ML14157A240: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | ||
Sent: | Brown, Timothy D [Timothy.Brown@duke-energy.com] | ||
Sent: | |||
Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:27 PM To: | |||
Hall, Randy; Guzman, Richard Cc: | |||
Baxter, David A | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
The Keowee identified potential failure was associated with the unintentional, simultaneous closing of the KPF-9 and KPF-10 breakers at Keowee, resulting in paralleling of the output from the Keowee Units 1 and 2. To prevent this, design changes were made. The breakers KPF-9 and KPF-10 are electrically interlocked so that only one breaker feeds power to PSW switchgear B6T or B7T. The breaker control circuitry was modified such that the breaker close charging springs are maintained discharged until the breaker is commanded to close. Since the closing coil springs are not charged the breaker will not close due to mechanical failure. This completes the commitment. | The Keowee identified potential failure was associated with the unintentional, simultaneous closing of the KPF-9 and KPF-10 breakers at Keowee, resulting in paralleling of the output from the Keowee Units 1 and 2. To prevent this, design changes were made. The breakers KPF-9 and KPF-10 are electrically interlocked so that only one breaker feeds power to PSW switchgear B6T or B7T. The breaker control circuitry was modified such that the breaker close charging springs are maintained discharged until the breaker is commanded to close. Since the closing coil springs are not charged the breaker will not close due to mechanical failure. This completes the commitment. | ||
Should there be any additional questions on these commitments, please let me know. | Should there be any additional questions on these commitments, please let me know. | ||
Timothy D. Brown, PE Duke Energy | Timothy D. Brown, PE Duke Energy | ||
Oconee Nuclear Station Manager PSW Licensing Office: 864-873-3952 Cell: 864-784-0197 | 2 Oconee Nuclear Station Manager PSW Licensing Office: 864-873-3952 Cell: 864-784-0197 | ||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: | ||
NRR_PMDA Email Number: | |||
1342 Mail Envelope Properties (34294FB8312F6A48A0AC1838387F7301B08FE8E4) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
PSW Commitments Sent Date: | PSW Commitments Sent Date: | ||
4/29/2014 4:27:21 PM Received Date: | |||
4/29/2014 6:04:45 PM From: | |||
Brown, Timothy D Created By: | |||
Timothy.Brown@duke-energy.com Recipients: | |||
"Baxter, David A" <David.Baxter@duke-energy.com> | "Baxter, David A" <David.Baxter@duke-energy.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Hall, Randy" <Randy.Hall@nrc.gov> | Tracking Status: None "Hall, Randy" <Randy.Hall@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Guzman, Richard" <Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov> | Tracking Status: None "Guzman, Richard" <Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
IMCLTEXCP67.nam.ent.duke-energy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2899 4/29/2014 6:04:45 PM Options Priority: | |||
Standard Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | Recipients Received:}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:28, 10 January 2025
| ML14157A240 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee |
| Issue date: | 04/29/2014 |
| From: | Tony Brown Duke Energy Corp |
| To: | Randy Hall Plant Licensing Branch II |
| References | |
| ME7737, ME7738, ME7739 | |
| Download: ML14157A240 (3) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Brown, Timothy D [Timothy.Brown@duke-energy.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:27 PM To:
Hall, Randy; Guzman, Richard Cc:
Baxter, David A
Subject:
PSW Commitments To all:
Some of your electrical technical reviewers questioned whether the commitments listed in our 7/11/2012 RAI response had been completed. Below is our response to that question:
- 1. Establish program to implement periodic condition inspection of the cable trenches, duct banks, manholes, and drainage systems associated with the Keowee to PSW building underground paths.
Response: Model Work order 2103098 was created for the periodic inspections per Maintenance Procedure MP/0/B/2002/002, Protected Service Water (PSW) Underground Cable Duct Bank - Drainage System Inspection. Due date for the first inspection is 10/01/14. Note that the Keowee Underground Trench is currently inspected by MP/0/B/2002/001, Inspection of the Keowee Underground Cable Trench Drainage System. This completes the commitment.
- 2. Include the Keowee to PSW underground path cables in the Oconee Cable Aging Management Program.
Response: The Oconee Nuclear Station Insulated Cables and Aging Management Program has been revised to include the PSW cables in the scope of cables to be inspected every ten years, similar to other existing inaccessible medium voltage cables present in the plant (per License Renewal). This completes the commitment.
- 3. Resolve the two (2) FMEA-related deficiencies associated with the designs of the 4kV SSF and 13.8 kV Keowee distribution feeder circuits.
Response: The SSF identified potential failure was associated with the unintentional, simultaneous powering of the OTS1 switchgear from both the PSW and SSF 4kV power sources following a spurious closure of breaker OTS1-0 with OTS1 aligned to the SSF or spurious closure of breaker OTS1-1 or OTS1-4 with OTS1 aligned to the PSW source. To prevent this, design changes were made.
Interlocked auxiliary contacts from breaker OTS1-0 were installed to prevent breakers OTS1-1 and OTS1-4 from closing while OTS1-0 is closed and vice versa. This completes the commitment.
The Keowee identified potential failure was associated with the unintentional, simultaneous closing of the KPF-9 and KPF-10 breakers at Keowee, resulting in paralleling of the output from the Keowee Units 1 and 2. To prevent this, design changes were made. The breakers KPF-9 and KPF-10 are electrically interlocked so that only one breaker feeds power to PSW switchgear B6T or B7T. The breaker control circuitry was modified such that the breaker close charging springs are maintained discharged until the breaker is commanded to close. Since the closing coil springs are not charged the breaker will not close due to mechanical failure. This completes the commitment.
Should there be any additional questions on these commitments, please let me know.
Timothy D. Brown, PE Duke Energy
2 Oconee Nuclear Station Manager PSW Licensing Office: 864-873-3952 Cell: 864-784-0197
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
1342 Mail Envelope Properties (34294FB8312F6A48A0AC1838387F7301B08FE8E4)
Subject:
PSW Commitments Sent Date:
4/29/2014 4:27:21 PM Received Date:
4/29/2014 6:04:45 PM From:
Brown, Timothy D Created By:
Timothy.Brown@duke-energy.com Recipients:
"Baxter, David A" <David.Baxter@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Hall, Randy" <Randy.Hall@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Guzman, Richard" <Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
IMCLTEXCP67.nam.ent.duke-energy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2899 4/29/2014 6:04:45 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: