ML18142A335: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18142A335
| number = ML18142A335
| issue date = 01/31/1984
| issue date = 01/31/1984
| title = Operational Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Rept,1983.
| title = Operational Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Rept,1983
| author name = Grover J, Robison M
| author name = Grover J, Robison M
| author affiliation = NUS CORP.
| author affiliation = NUS CORP.
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:*
NUS - 4503 SURRY POWER STATION OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Annua 1 Re port 1983 Prepared for Virginia Electric Power Company by Mary S. Robison January 1984 Environmental Services Division NUS Corpora ti on 5350 Campbells Run Raad Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15~05 Approved: On:M.   /1, ~&+:,,1,,/'
SURRY POWER STATION OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Annua 1 Re port 1983 Prepared for Virginia Electric Power Company by Mary S. Robison January 1984 Environmental Services Division NUS Corpora ti on 5350 Campbells Run Raad Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15~05 Approved: On:M. /1, ~&+:,,1,,/'
7                         .
7 Joan M. Grover, Manager Radiological Laboratory 8504100625 ~iggg~80  
Joan M. Grover, Manager Radiological Laboratory 8504100625 ~iggg~80
~DR ADOCK PDR NUS - 4503
  ~DR ADOCK     PDR


OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Annua 1 Re !=)Ort 1983 Prepared for Virginia Electric Power Company
OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Annua 1 Re !=)Ort 1983 Prepared for Virginia Electric Power Company  


1--*-* -=*       **----**>>*--*--*--* -----~*-*--**~.~-**,-*' .,._,,./-.. :.,i,* -- **---**. *0c-,--*-~* ... *. -*** ,*' ,,..'*.,.*s .........."'***-*, ........ ****-* *.' - - - - - * * - * - - - - * - - * * * **-*-**-**
1--*-* -=* **----**>>*--*--*--* -----~*-*--**~.~-**,-*'.,._,,./-.. :.,i,* --
          *        ~ --   Ii<*
**---**. *0c-,--*-~*... *. -***,*',,..'*.,.*s.......... "'***-*,........ ****-* *.' -----**-*----*--** * **-*-**-**  
~ --
Ii<*
f'.'
f'.'
rl .:!
r l.:!
TABLE OF CONTENTS i
i i
i l .:                               Section                              Title r*--
l.:
1     '
r*--
I I.*
1 I I.*
I.                   INTRODUCTION                                                                                  1 f]                                    I I.               SAMP~ING PROGRAM                                                                               3 I I I.              ANALYTICAL PROGRAM                                                                             11 IV.               
f ]
I :
I.-*
1~-.
I '
U*..
[
[--~
(
\\
I*,_,
l, j
i l~
I '
Section I.
I I.
I I I.
IV.
V.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Title INTRODUCTION SAMP~ING PROGRAM ANALYTICAL PROGRAM  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND DISCUSSION OF 1983 ANALYTICAL RESULTS                                                                             15 A.       Air Iodine/Air Particulates                                                         15 I:
AND DISCUSSION OF 1983 ANALYTICAL RESULTS A.
I.-*
Air Iodine/Air Particulates B.
B.        Milk                                                                                 25 1~-.
Milk C.
I '                                                        C.        Pree i pita ti on                                                                   35 U* .
Pree i pita ti on D.
D.        Water                                                                               35
Water E.
[                                                            E.       Aquatic Biota                                                                     39 F.       Sediment                                                                           45
Aquatic Biota F.
[--~
Sediment G.  
G.       \-Ja ter Fowl                                                                     45
\\-Ja ter Fowl H.
(
Food Products I. Soi 1 J.
        \
Direct Radiation CONCLUSIONS A~PENDIX A REPORTING OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS APPENDIX B ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES APPENDIX C LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE i
H.       Food Products                                                                     50 I*
1 3
I.       Soi 1                                                                               50 J.       Direct Radiation                                                                   54 V.                  CONCLUSIONS                                                                                 64
11 15 15 25 35 35 39 45 45 50 50 54 64
      ,*-*,j l,                                      A~PENDIX A           REPORTING OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS i
.:-;**----~-
l~
--~-.--
APPENDIX B           ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES APPENDIX C           LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE I'                                                                                i
                                                                                                                                                                        .:-;**----~-           --~-.--


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            <* *: *; "* *.:,*. ~h':, :.:.~:,'* '
- -- --*-*---*-*~.. --.-**-... 4*0 -*-.. ',...,,,_ * ~0,....s::z**.. :_*-M-~ "*.*.. *_* -~* *; C*-" __.  
      -~.
.:,,-.,24_.. ~.... ~-~-* 0"*4*---"~-.: *.*'--*.. --***-*--. ___ * *""  
                                                                                                                    .:,,-.,24_ .. ~ .... ~-~-* 0"*4*---"~-.: *.*'--*.. --***-*-- . _ _ _ * *""                                                                                     * * .* "", * ***
"--~-* * *-* ', *
- -- --*-*---*-*~ .. --.-**-... 4*0 -*-.. ',...,,,_ * ~0,....s::z** ..: _ * - M - ~ "* .*.. *_* -~* *; C*-" __ .                                                                               *   " - - ~ - * * *-* ',
:.:*..* <* *: *; "* *.:,*. ~h':, :.:.~:,'* ' * *.* "", * * **  
* __ ,_;.  : .:*..*
-~
lJ
lJ
(         :
( :
l ..J                                                                                                           LIST OF TABLES Table                                                                    Ti _tl e 1                                  Sampling Program                                                                                                                        4 2                                  Analytical Program                                                                                                                  12 3                                  Iodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges                                                                                                  16 n
l.. J n
i_.__i 4                                  Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters                                                                                              18 5                                  Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters                                                                                              21 l;
i_. _ _i l ;  
      '        !                                              6                                  Gamma Spectrometry of Composited
~ *..J  
      ~ *..J Air Particulate Filters                                                                                                            24
\\ __ \\
      \ __\                                                   7                                  Iodine-131 in Milk                                                                                                                26
i i l
      ,---,                                                    8                                  ~amma Spectrometry of Milk                                                                                                          28 l
'i I
i         i
11  
              'i I         '
\\
9                                  Calcium in Milk                                                                                                                    30 10                                Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk                                                                                              33 11                                 Gross Beta and Tritium in Precipitation Monthly and Quarterly Composites                                                                                                    36 11        \
l  
12                                Determination of Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, and Tritium in I-later, Semi-Annual Samples                                                                                        37 l         '
\\.
    \ .:.......                                                13                                Gamma Spectrometry of River Water                                                                                                  38 14                                Determination of Tritium in Water I :                                                                                           Semi-Annual Composites                                                                                                              40 r*,                                                       15                                Gamma Spectrometry of River Water I
I :
I
r*,
              *,                                                                                  Monthly Composites                                                                                                                  41
I I  
    \ . ...I 16                                Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Water                                                                                              42
\\....I
[*1 i :
[*1 i :
I
I -~
      -~                                                       17                                Gamma Spectrometry of Clams and Oysters                                                                                             43 i i 18                                Gamma Spectrometry of Crabs                                                                                                         46 u                                                          19                                Gamma Spectrometry of Fish                                                                                                         47 ii
i i u
        . ~I
. ~I Table 1
                  .                                            . .              . ..    -      .. .    . -  .. :*... *                .  ---. .... ., .. ,.. -      *. *:  . . . . . -*  ..... --~~_:__.:~:~   .'~*   :_.*   - , .. - .      *. .**  ..  **- . . .  *.-.                  .
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 LIST OF TABLES Ti _tl e Sampling Program Analytical Program Iodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters Gamma Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters Iodine-131 in Milk
~amma Spectrometry of Milk Calcium in Milk Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk Gross Beta and Tritium in Precipitation Monthly and Quarterly Composites Determination of Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, and Tritium in I-later, Semi-Annual Samples Gamma Spectrometry of River Water Determination of Tritium in Water Semi-Annual Composites Gamma Spectrometry of River Water Monthly Composites Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Water Gamma Spectrometry of Clams and Oysters Gamma Spectrometry of Crabs Gamma Spectrometry of Fish ii 4
12 16 18 21 24 26 28 30 33 36 37 38 40 41 42 43 46 47
..... --~~_:__.:~:~.'~* :_.*  


r1
r1
* L:<
* L:<  
    -*~   1 I       :
-*~
LIST OF TABLES (continued)
1 I :  
  \*     .
\\*
Table                                                              Title i*
i*  
20                                   Gamma Spectrometry of Sediment                                                                       48 21                                  Gamma Spectrometry of Fowl                                                                           49 22                                  Gamma Spe_ctrometry of Vegetation                                                                     51 23                                  Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Vegetation                                                          52 24                                  Gamma Spectrometry of Soil                                                                           53
'. ! i L..;
  ',.--.                                        25                                  Direct Radiation-Thermoluminescent Dosimetry 55
r**1 I '
  !L..;i 26                                  Summary of Data for the Surry NPS r**1                                                                              Radiological Environmental Monitoring I -:i'                                                                          Program.- 1983                                                                                       57 l ,.J u
l
r*,                                                                                                          (
-:i  
  'j.. ;'
,.J u
u
r*,
    'L...J.
j.. ; u L...J Table 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Gamma Gamma LIST OF TABLES (continued)
iii
Title Spectrometry of Sediment Spectrometry of Fowl Gamma Spe_ctrometry of Vegetation Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Gamma Spectrometry of Soil 48 49 51 Vegetation 52 53 Direct Radiation-Thermoluminescent Dosimetry 55 Summary of Data for the Surry NPS Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.- 1983 57
~       _,...T ... : ~~ ...... ,... __ --
(
                                        . *- _ ".'*-'"' o**'.""" * .":* ::~--------~.""?*'...... * , ~ 0 ~=--~--:-""?.* ~-.-,"'l"'....-. -. *::---_-~-._;*.;.- -~---_--.:-_.-. * .*.*., * ,* *' : - * . : : . :*:.* ... ~ ............
iii  
~
_,...T  
~~
o**'."""  
.":* ::~--------~.""?*'...... *,~
0 ~=--~--:-""?.*  
~-.-,"'l"'... -.. -. *::---_-~-._;*.;.-
-~---_--.:-_.-. *.*.*.,  
-*.::.. :*:.*... ~  


r-:                                                                                         LIST OF FIGURES i '
r-:
i .'
i '
Figure                                                          Title 1                              Land Based Sampling Locations 2                              River Based Sampling Locations                                                                                  9 3                              Site Boundary TLD Locations                                                                                10 C
i.'
C
[
[
t -*
t -*
I .
I.  
) ;
) ;  
~-'
~-'
r*-:
r*-:
i ;
i ;
l_)
l_)
r ..
r..
i :
i :
I     :
I  
.....l iv
.....l  
\.*...
\\.*...
_.:_J
_.:_J Figure 1
        . .*. . . . .  . .: - . '-. '; *'.... ..*.: . :- . *. -*** . : ' . '.* -* *: ...... *,. ,. *_-.;--**:. ,* .. :~-:. .- *- .. -.-.,* ... - . .* ' . . . - . . ,. . *. :- ' *.* :-:1,-_ -,.< .: . :* . . . . .. . .**.*. *..
2 3
LIST OF FIGURES Title Land Based Sampling Locations River Based Sampling Locations Site Boundary TLD Locations iv 9
10
*. -***. : '. '.* -* *:...... *,.,.
* _-.;--**:.,*.. :~-:..- *-.. -.-.,*... -.  
. *. :- ' *.* :-:1,-_ -,.<.:  


1.*;1 l:\
1.*;1 l:\\
fi~ .,,,,
f i
I. INTRODUCTION This document reports on the operational radiological environmental monitoring program conducted during 1983 for the Surry Power Station.
~.,,,,
r*-                      The analytical portion of this program was conducted by NUS Corporation
r*-'.
  '.                    (NUS) under contract to the Virginia Electric Power Company. This
i ;
; __ ,'.                  annual report of the radiological environmental monitoring program s*ummari zes
i ;
l r**-*
I i
I. ;
I..,
\\
I.
INTRODUCTION This document reports on the operational radiological environmental monitoring program conducted during 1983 for the Surry Power Station.
The analytical portion of this program was conducted by NUS Corporation (NUS) under contract to the Virginia Electric Power Company.
This annual report of the radiological environmental monitoring program s*ummari zes
* the results of measurements and analyses of data obtained from samples collected during the reporting period.
* the results of measurements and analyses of data obtained from samples collected during the reporting period.
A.         Site and Station Description
A.
,i.........;            The Surry Power Station of Virginia Electric Power Company consists of two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors, each with a generating capacity of 788 MHe. Unit 1 has been in operation since July 1, 1972*,
Site and Station Description The Surry Power Station of Virginia Electric Power Company consists of two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors, each with a generating capacity of 788 MHe.
Unit 2 since March 7,1973. The station is located on a peninsula in the James River, approximately 25 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay. Cooling water is taken in downstream of the site and discharged 5.7 miles i ;                    upstream of the intake.
Unit 1 has been in operation since July 1, 1972*,
l        *'
Unit 2 since March 7,1973.
B.         Objectives and Overview of the Surry Power Station Monitoring Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations (10 CFR r**-*
The station is located on a peninsula in the James River, approximately 25 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay.
50.34) require thai nuclear power plants be de~igned, constructed, and I
Cooling water is taken in downstream of the site and discharged 5.7 miles upstream of the intake.
i operated to keep levels of radioactive material in effluents to unrestricted areas as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). To ensure that these criteria are met, the operating license for Surry Power Station includes Technical* Specifications ~hich govern the release of I.          '
B.
radi cacti ve effluents
Objectives and Overview of the Surry Power Station Monitoring Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations (10 CFR 50.34) require thai nuclear power plants be de~igned, constructed, and operated to keep levels of radioactive material in effluents to unrestricted areas as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
* I ..,                  In-plant monitoring is used to ensure that these predetermined release limits are not exceeded. However, as a precaution against unexpected and undefined processes which might allow undue accumulation                                                       of radioactivity in any sector of the human environment, a program for monitoring the plant environs is also included.
To ensure that these criteria are met, the operating license for Surry Power Station includes Technical* Specifications ~hich govern the release of radi cacti ve effluents
Various environmenta.l samples are collected at indicator and *control or background 1oca tions and analyzed                                             to determine if changes *in radioactivity levels may be attributable to the operation of the station.               Measured values are compared with background l~vels. The background levels at ~ny one location are not const~nt, but vary with.
* In-plant monitoring is used to ensure that these predetermined release limits are not exceeded.
time due to external events such as cosmic ray bombardment, weapons test fallout, an~ seasonal variations.                                   These levels also vary spatially within relatively short distances as a reflection of geological
However, as a precaution against unexpected and undefined processes which might allow undue accumulation of radioactivity in any sector of the human environment, a program for monitoring the plant environs is also included.
; .-:*                  composition. Data collected prior to plant operation are used to
Various environmenta.l samples are collected at indicator and *control or background 1 oca tions and analyzed to determine if changes *in radioactivity levels may be attributable to the operation of the station.
  \
Measured values are compared with background l~vels.
indicate the degree of natural variation to be expected.                                                         These preoperational data are compared with data collected during                                                       the
The background levels at ~ny one location are not const~nt, but vary with.
,,,.                      operational phase to assist in evaluating the radiological impact of plant operation.
time due to external events such as cosmic ray bombardment, weapons test fallout, an~ seasonal variations.
1
These levels also vary spatially within relatively short distances as a reflection of geological composition.
      .        . .'.,  .  . ..., .. -. *- .. ,- .'      ...... ,. . . . . . *.    .      .. : ;  "'*.* - . ~-. ~ . .* ~ .-, . . . _,.,__    . . ..
Data collected prior to plant operation are used to indicate the degree of natural variation to be expected.
                                                    .* *,: __:~
These preoperational data are compared with data collected during the operational phase to assist in evaluating the radiological impact of plant operation.
1  
. ~-. ~.  
~  
. * *,: __ :~  


d The objectives of an operational radiological                                                   environmental       monitoring program are:
d l
l .*
/
o To fulfill the obligations of the Surry Power Station Technical Specifications;
t l
  /    .
l I __ l r
t  *-*
The objectives of an operational radiological environmental monitoring program are:
o To determine whether any* statistically significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in any critical pa th; o To detect any                       buildup               of     long-lived radionuclides               in the en vi ronmen t; o To verify that radioactive releases are within allowable limits and that plant operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment;
o To fulfill the obligations of the Surry Power Station Technical Specifications; o To determine whether any* statistically significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in any critical pa th; o To detect any buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the en vi ronmen t; o To verify that radioactive releases are within allowable limits and that plant operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment; o And, to establish measurement and assessment methods capable of rapid mobilization during unplanned releases and emergencies.
, ....                                            o And, to establish measurement and assessment methods capable of l
In 1983 the radiological monitoring program included the mea~urement of ambient gamma radiation by thermoluminescent dosimetry; the determination of gross alpha, gross beta, and gamma emitters in air particulates; the measurement of airborne I-131 in charcoal cartridges; the determination of gamma emitters in river bottom sediment,
l
: fish, crabs, clams, and oysters; the measurement of gamma emitters, tritium, and strontium-89 and -90 in river water; the determination of gross a 1 pha and beta. and tritium in we 11
* rapid mobilization during unplanned releases and emergencies.
: water, surface water; the determination of gross beta and tritium in precipitation; the determination of gamma emitters, iodine-131, calcium and strontium-89 and -90 in milk; the measurement of gamma emitters and strontium-89 and  
I __ l In 1983 the radiological monitoring program included the mea~urement of ambient gamma               radiation                         by thermoluminescent dosimetry;                           the determination of gross alpha, gross beta, and gamma emitters in air particulates; the measurement of airborne I-131 in charcoal cartridges; the determination of gamma emitters in river bottom sediment, fish, crabs, clams, and oysters; the measurement of gamma emitters, tritium, and strontium-89 and -90 in river water;                                                 the determination of gross a 1pha and beta . and tritium in we 11 water, surface water;                                                               the determination of gross beta and tritium in                                                             precipitation;   the determination of gamma emitters, iodine-131, calcium and strontium-89 and -90 in milk; the measurement of gamma emitters and strontium-89 and
-90 in food crops; and the determination of gamma emitters in soil and waterfowl.
                                        -90 in food crops; and the determination of gamma emitters in soil and waterfowl.
2  
2 r *.,
--:.~.. :.-.: **.. :-; __.-
  --:.~ . :.-.: * .. :-; _ .....--.. ;-:..  . - .- . .      :. : ... * .::: ..* .. - .,._._ . . ,:---, .,.*.-,'. ..*. *-**...... ----_---*- .. ~*-. ----------* --~--------cc--
.,.*.-,'... *. *-**...... ----_---*-.. ~*-. ----------* --~--------cc--


~
I~  
  *--:-*--~,- ____:c.a*::,..c~,...,,,...L,,c_..:.,,,,:-_,;,c"''*'.:.,.a'.:,,c::,:,:;*;,~.:i,:;<;,:;;:.\,>;c f-,,
*--:-*--~,- ____ :c.a*::,..c~,...,,,...L,,c_..:.,,,,:-_,;,c"''*'.:.,.a'.:,,c::,:,:;*;,~.:i,:;<;,:;;:.\\,>;c f-,,
I( __j;
I ;
* II. SAMPLING PROGRAM L:'.                                      Table 1 summarizes the sampling program for Surry Power Station during 1983.                           The symbols on this table refer to the sample locations shown on Figures 1 to 3. Figure 1 shows the locations of land based sampling in the environs of the station, while Figure 2 shows the locations of river based sampling stations. The small triangles in Figure 3 indicate the positions of environmental thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) at the site boundary.
( _ _j L:'.
Samples are collected by VEPCO personnel except for those 1i sted as state splits, which are collected by the Commonwealth_of Virginia. All samples are shipped to the NUS Radiological Laboratory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
r~-
A.                   Program Exceptions No air*samples were collected from station FE for the week of 09/06/83-09/14/83 due to pump failure. No air particulate filter was collected from station SS for the week of 07/26/83-08/02/83.
L.. ;
T~e I-131 analysis on the milk sample from station LEE HALL for the
r-**~
                                            . month of December was lost due to a broken container. The milk sample from station WMS for the month of June was lost during ashing in r~-                                        preparation for gamma spectrometry, due to a furnace malfunction. The stronti.um-89, -90 analysis on this sample was also lost, as well as the L..;                                      strontium-89, -90 analysis on the sample from this station for the month r-**~
i :
of May. The milk sample from station JDKs for the month of September i :                                      was depleted in other analyses and no gamma spectrometry could be I ,
I I I _c
                                              -performed.
* II.
Values for five quarterly TLD measurements are not reported. Three were missing at the time of pickup. These were the second quarter TLDs for location 04 and the fourth quarter TLDs for locations 07 and 08.                             Two additional fourth quarter TLD locations, 14 and 15, were not recorded as I
SAMPLING PROGRAM Table 1 summarizes the sampling program for Surry Power Station during 1983.
missin~ at the time of pickup, but were not received for analysis by the I _c                                      laboratory.
The symbols on this table refer to the sample locations shown on Figures 1 to 3.
3
Figure 1 shows the locations of land based sampling in the environs of the station, while Figure 2 shows the locations of river based sampling stations.
The small triangles in Figure 3 indicate the positions of environmental thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) at the site boundary.
Samples are collected by VEPCO personnel except for those 1 i sted as state splits, which are collected by the Commonwealth_of Virginia. All samples are shipped to the NUS Radiological Laboratory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
A.
Program Exceptions No air*samples were collected from station FE for the week of 09/06/83-09/14/83 due to pump failure.
No air particulate filter was collected from station SS for the week of 07/26/83-08/02/83.
T~e I-131 analysis on the milk sample from station LEE HALL for the  
. month of December was lost due to a broken container.
The milk sample from station WMS for the month of June was lost during ashing in preparation for gamma spectrometry, due to a furnace malfunction.
The stronti.um-89, -90 analysis on this sample was also lost, as well as the strontium-89, -90 analysis on the sample from this station for the month of May.
The milk sample from station JDKs for the month of September was depleted in other analyses and no gamma spectrometry could be  
-performed.
Values for five quarterly TLD measurements are not reported. Three were missing at the time of pickup. These were the second quarter TLDs for location 04 and the fourth quarter TLDs for locations 07 and 08.
Two additional fourth quarter TLD locations, 14 and 15, were not recorded as missin~ at the time of pickup, but were not received for analysis by the laboratory.
3  


TABLE 1 (Page 1 of 4)
TABLE 1 (Page 1 of 4)
SAMPLING PROGRAM l ;                             Media                   Sampling Location                 Collection Frequency L ,.
SAMPLING PROGRAM l ;
Air Particulates     Surry Station (SS)                                 weekly and              Hog Island Reserve (HIR)
L,.
Charcoal Cartridges  Bacon's Castle (BC)
Media Collection Frequency Sampling Location
A11 i ance (ALL)
('"
D                    Colonial Parkway (CP)
i L__j L
r*1
...__J Air Particulates and Charcoal Cartridges D
Milk Precipitation CV Well Water Surface Water River Water Surry Station (SS)
Hog Island Reserve (HIR)
Bacon's Castle (BC)
A 11 i ance (ALL)
Colonial Parkway (CP)
Dow Chemi ca 1 (DOW)
Dow Chemi ca 1 (DOW)
Fort Eustis (FE)
Fort Eustis (FE)
Newport News (NN)
Newport News (NN)
Milk                  Lee Hall (Ross) Dairy (LEE HALL)(l)               ~onthly Epps Dairy (EPPS ) (1 )
Lee Hall (Ross) Dairy (LEE HALL)(l)
Epps Dairy (EPPS ) ( 1 )
Colonial. Parkway (Smith) Dairy (CP)
Colonial. Parkway (Smith) Dairy (CP)
Judkins Dairy (JDKs)
Judkins Dairy (JDKs)
William's Dairy (WMS)
William's Dairy (WMS)
Precipitation        Surry Station (SS)                             monthly and
Surry Station (SS)
('"                                                                                              quarterly composites i                                                  Newport News (NN)
Newport News (NN)
L__j                        CV Well Water            Surry Sta ti on (SS)                             semi-annually Hog Island Reserve (HIR)
Surry Sta ti on (SS)
Hog Island Reserve (HIR)
Bacon's Castle (BC)
Bacon's Castle (BC)
Jamestown (JMTN)
Jamestown (JMTN)
L                            Surface Water        Chippokes Creek (CC)                             semi-annually Williamsburg, Waller Mill Reservoir (WMR) r*1                                                Newport News Reservoir (NNR)
Chippokes Creek (CC)
Williamsburg, Waller Mill Reservoir Newport News Reservoir (NNR)
Smithfield Reservoir (SR)
Smithfield Reservoir (SR)
River Water          Surry Station Intake (SI)                         bi-monthly Hog Island Point (HIP)
Surry Station Intake (SI)
Hog Island Point (HIP)
Newport News (NN)
Newport News (NN)
Chicahominy River (CHIC)
Chicahominy River (CHIC)
Surry Station Discharge (SD)
Surry Station Discharge (SD)
Surry Station Discharge (SD)(l)                 monthly composites Scotland Wharf (S. WHARF)(l)
Surry Station Discharge (SD)(l)
Scotland Wharf (S. WHARF)(l)
Note: See footnote at end of table.
Note: See footnote at end of table.
4
4  
...__J
.* ~~----~~-.... ~.  
  .....              * .. *  .*.    . -    .                ._...  ,'  .* ~~----~~- .... ~ .
~. '_ : *::__*..
  . ~ . '_ : *::__* ..
weekly
~onthly monthly and quarterly composites semi-annually semi-annually (WMR) bi-monthly monthly composites


{,*   -.L i *]
{,*  
l.i TABLE 1 (Page 2 of 4)
-.L i *]
SAMPLING PROGRAM Media                      Sampling Location                                Collection Frequency Sediment (Si.l t)        Chicahominy River (CHIC)                                  semi-annually Surry Sta ti on Intake (SI) r**,             @                      Surry Station Discharge (SD)
l.i r**,
I :
I :
I*-,
I*-,  
\\.._...:
r-~
I.' u I ;
I i '
I '
*~*-*,;
Media Sediment (Si.l t)
Clams
&#xa9; Oysters Crabs Fish (catfish, eel) 0 Fowl Crops (corn, peanuts, soybeans, cabbage)
Soil TABLE 1 (Page 2 of 4)
SAMPLING PROGRAM Sampling Location Chicahominy River (CHIC)
Surry Sta ti on Intake (SI)
Surry Station Discharge (SD)
Hog Island Point (HIP)
Hog Island Point (HIP)
    \.._...:
Point of Shoals (POS)
Point of Shoals (POS)
Newport News (NN)
Newport News (NN)
'- r-~
Chicahominy River (CHIC)
I .'
Surry Station Discharge (SD)
u                Clams                  Chicahominy River (CHIC)                                     bi-monthly Surry Station Discharge (SD)
Hog Island Point (HIP)
                    &#xa9;                      Hog Island Point (HIP)
Jamestown (JMTN)
Jamestown (JMTN)
Lawnes Creek (LC).
Lawnes Creek (LC).
I;              Oysters                Deep Water Shoals (DWS)                                     bi-monthly Point of S-hoa 1s (POS)
Deep Water Shoals (DWS)
* Newport News (NN)
Point of S-hoa 1 s (POS)
Crabs                  Surry Station Discharge (SD)                           July-August-September Fish (catfish, eel)    Surry Sta ti on Discharge (SD)                             semi--annua l ly I
Newport News (NN)
i '
Surry Station Discharge (SD)
0Fowl                    Hog Island Reserve (HIR)                                   semi-annually I '
Surry Sta ti on Discharge (SD)
    *~*-*,;
Hog Island Reserve (HIR)
Crops                  Slade's Farm (Slade's)                                       annually (corn, peanuts,        Brock's Farm (Brock's) soybeans, cabbage)      Carter's Grove Garden (Carter's)
Slade's Farm (Slade's)
Brock's Farm (Brock's)
Carter's Grove Garden (Carter's)
Poole Home Garden (Poole)
Poole Home Garden (Poole)
Soil                    Surry Station (SS)                                           annually
Surry Station (SS)
* Bacon's Castle (BC)
* Bacon's Castle (BC)
A11 i ance (ALL)
A 11 i ance (ALL)
* Colonial Parkway (CP)
* Colonial Parkway (CP)
Dow Chemi ca 1 (DOH)
Dow Chemi ca 1 (DOH)
Fort Eustis (FE)
Fort Eustis (FE)
Note: See footnote at end of tab.le.
Note: See footnote at end of tab.le.
5
5  
  *  *            .                      *      . . '  . *-.. .** .... ~- '< .* *-,.-~. - .. - .* *                .*  . --.:. :, .*.*:,,**' .*
.**.... ~-
'<.* *-,.-~.
Collection Frequency semi-annually bi-monthly bi-monthly July-August-September semi--annua l ly semi-annually annually annually


.~
.~
u I   *.
I *. u n*
n*
I :
I:
l_
l_
* TABLE 1 (Page 3 of 4) r.
: r.
I .                                                   SAMPLING PROGRAM Media                                      Sampling Location                Collection Frequency Thermoluminescent                      Control (CONTROL)            (00)                      quarterly Dosimetry                          Surry Station (SS)          (01)
I.
West North West (WNW)      (02) 6                                      Station Discharge (SD)      (03)
North North West (NNW)      (04)
Nor th (N)                  (0 5 )
r**~
r**~
I
I I.
* I .                                             North North East (NNE)      (06)
LJ I
LJ                                               North Ea st (NE)            (07)
East North East (ENE)        (08)
I
* East (exclusion) (EE)      (09)
I I. -
I I. -
West (W)                   (10)
r, I
West South West (WSW)       (11) r,                                            South West (SW)             (12)
I L_;
I'  .I South South West (SSW)       (13)
[J r -.
Sou th (S )                 (14)
I.
South South East             (15)
i Media Thermoluminescent Dosimetry 6
South East                   (16)
TABLE 1 (Page 3 of 4)
East (E)                   (17)
SAMPLING PROGRAM Sampling Location Control (CONTROL)
Sta ti on Intake (SI)       (18)
(00)
Hog Island Reserve (HIR)   (19)
Surry Station (SS)
Bacon's Castle (BC)         (20)
(01)
Route 633 (RT 633)         (21)
West North West (WNW)
Alliance (ALL)             (22)
(02)
L_;                                            Surry (SURRY)               (23)
Station Discharge (SD)
Route 636 & 637 (636/637)   (24)
(03)
Scotland Wharf (S.~HARF)   (25)
North North West (NNW)
[J                                                Jamestown (JMTN)
(04)
* Colonial Parkway (CP)
Nor th ( N )
( 0 5 )
North North East (NNE)
(06)
North Ea st (NE)
(07)
East North East (ENE)
(08)
East (exclusion) (EE)
(09)
West (W)
(10)
West South West (WSW)
(11)
South West (SW)
(12)
South South West (SSW)
(13)
Sou th ( S )
( 14)
South South East (15)
South East (16)
East (E)
(17)
Sta ti on Intake (SI)
(18)
Hog Island Reserve (HIR)
(19)
Bacon's Castle (BC)
(20)
Route 633 (RT 633)
(21)
Alliance (ALL)
(22)
Surry (SURRY)
(23)
Route 636 & 637 (636/637)
(24)
Scotland Wharf (S.~HARF)
(25)
Jamestown (JMTN)
(26)
(26)
Colonial Parkway (CP)
(27)
(27)
Route 617 & 618 (617/618)   (28)
Route 617 & 618 (617/618)
Kingsmill (KM)               (29)
(28)
Williamsburg (WMBG)         (30)
Kingsmill (KM)
Kingsmill North (KMN)       (31)
(29)
Budweiser (BUD)             (32)
Williamsburg (WMBG)
Water Plant (WP)           (33) r-.
(30)
I.
Kingsmill North (KMN)
i Note: See footnote at end of table.
(31)
6
Budweiser (BUD)
          .  ; ,, - **. :* *.* :* .. :- . - - - .. ..  .    .      .      .    . -*' :_*_.:: :_:* ___._:...:~_ . >:-". ':,~-~- ~ ~-* .. -:..,.;*::_.... *-* ..**--.*
(32)
Water Plant (WP)
(33)
Note: See footnote at end of table.
6 Collection Frequency quarterly
:_*_.:: :_:* ___._:...:~_.. >:-". ':,~-~- ~ ~-*.. -:..,.;*::_.... *-*.. **--.*  
* a:,
* i ;
I l L __ J
[
_ _J
[
,.~
i ;
\\_;
j Media Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (continued)
( 1 ) S ta te s p l i t
. TABLE 1 (Page 4 of 4)
SAMPLING PROGRAM Sampling Location Dow (DOW)
Lee Ha 11 (LEE HALL)
Goose Island (GI)
Fort Eustis (FE)
Newport News (NN)
James River Bridge (JRB)
Benn's Church (BENN'S)
Smithfield (SMFD)
Rushmere (RUSHMERE)
Route 628 (RT 628) 7 Collection Frequency (34) quarterly
( 35 )&deg; (36)
(37)
(38)
(39) Control (40) Control (41)
(42)
(43)


  *a:,
* j i;
I      ,
                                            . TABLE 1 (Page 4 of 4) l                                      SAMPLING PROGRAM L__  J Media                    Sampling Location            Collection Frequency
[__J        Thermoluminescent      Dow (DOW)                (34)          quarterly Dosimetry            Lee Ha 11 (LEE HALL)    ( 35 )&deg; (continued)          Goose Island (GI)        (36)
Fort Eustis (FE)        (37)
Newport News (NN)        (38)
James River Bridge (JRB) (39) Control Benn's Church (BENN'S)  (40) Control Smithfield (SMFD)        (41)
Rushmere (RUSHMERE)      (42)
Route 628 (RT 628)      (43)
[    ;
,.~
i\_;;
(1 ) Sta te s pl i t 7
              ' ' .*'. ~ .<.:_~. . -
r-:-:
r-:-:
f :
f :
l_. __ :
l_. __ :
r-;
r-;  
    'I I.*
' I.*
I ___ ;
I I ___ ;
r:":"i I '
r:":"i I
I II  ** :
I I
  *.:in..,
I ** :
l r::
n l*.:i r::
I -1:
I :
L    ..)
L
-1.,
..)
[J f:
[J f:
L.:
L.:
I ,
I,
L:~
L:~
I' LAND BASED SAMPLES 8
I  
' '.*'. ~.<.:_~.. -
LAND BASED SAMPLES 8  
**- *-*--------~-----*--*----*---
,.------~----,.------.,--....-........---~---"-**,---~-----.~-"--*- *-----------.-*---~-------- ~----------------------- -*-** ---


  --..'\
--..'\\  
    . ,I
.,I  
\     J L.
\\
J L.
r**
r**
l.1 r**
l.1 r**
l~
l ~
r ---~
r ---~
1; L__.
1 ;
l __ ...,
L l __...,
1*
1*
SAMPLES
SAMPLES  
-----~-     . *-* --;-**....., . . *_,-::-;-----:-*~.-=.: .. -* - .. _.--, .* *.:-:~:-~,-~.;-*_--:::-......----:----,----~-----:--*- ----=~*--,,-;~;-~-:::---r---:-:*-:---::---:*:..__~_-;-:--::-.....-.--.--,..--:---- - . -. ----*-***
-----~-
*-* --;-**.....,.. *_,-::-;-----:-*~.-=.:.. -* -.. _.--,.* *.:-:~:-~,-~.;-*_--:::-......----:----,----~-----:--*- ----=~*--,,-;~;-~-:::---r---:-:*-:---::---:*:..__~_-;-:--::-.....-.--.--,..--:----


[' :*      + +    . *!*
[' :*
r~
r~
i*:+
i*:+
1.... ,
1....,
r-*-
r-*-
i L__ ;
i !' *,
L __ ;
[
[
                                              +
[J i
[J
i i t.  
                                                +
,_j r*,
i    i i
I :
t .
i L  
,_j r*,
+
I:
+
i L
10
Figure 3
+
        *-                SITE BOTJNDRY TLD
+
                    /   +.
Figure 3 SITE BOTJNDRY TLD  
10
-/  
                                *.**------ -~---~.
+.  
*.** -------~---~.  


  - ** ---.-**- :' *--~--- -~* ------ *-----*----~-"'--%
- ** ---.-**- :' *--~--- -~* ------ *-----*----~-"'--% -~.  
                        ~                      .        -~. **'*&deg;'*-***-->-*-- * . __ .* *' * -* ~-~-*-~~-- *** *....,.* * * ,.- ....... *~:s:d:*=~-~~- ~~;, ,*~*-,.-'< ,* .....~ ... 4*<**" *. ' * ~ . *'-' : -~' *-* * * . *"_:,,~.-.:,__:_,A_...,_.:___.__..~----*-~~-*
**'*&deg;'*-***-->-*--
III.            ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Table 2 summarizes the analytical program for Surry Power Station during 1983.          Sample c*lass, frequency, an<;! type of analysis performed are
*' * -* ~-~-*-~~-- ***  
~-                             1i sted. The analytical methods used are described in detafl in Appendix I' ,                             C.
*....,.* * *,.-....... *~:s:d:*=~-~~- ~~;,,*~*-,.-'<,*..... ~... 4*<**" *. ' * ~ *'-' : -~' *-* * *  
. *"_:,,~.-.:,__:_,A_...,_.:___.__..~----*-~~-*  
~-
' I,
L *"
L *"
Air iodine and air *~articulate samples were collected from seven indicator and one control location on a weekly basis. Air iodine was lJ                               collected by drawing air through TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridges.
lJ 1;
Air particulates were collected by drawing air though a 47-millimeter 1;                             diameter glass-fiber filter. In the laboratory, air par~iculate filters were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta activity, and were L:                             composited quarterly for analysis by gamma spectrometry.                                                                                                                            Charcoal cartridges were analyzed for iodine-131.
L:
[                               Milk was collected from one control and four indicator locations on a monthly basis.                            Samples from the LEE HALL and EPPS locations were collected by and split with the Commonwealth of Virginia.                                                                                                                          All milk samples were analyzed for iodine-131, gamma emitters, stable calcium, and strontium-89 and -90.
[
r*:
r*:
I   '
I L..:
Precipitation samples were collected as monthly and quarterly composites L..:                            from one control and one indicator location. Gross beta and tritium analyses were performed on both types of composites.
~
III.
ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Table 2 1983.
1 i sted.
C.
summarizes the analytical program for Surry Power Station during Sample c*lass, frequency, an<;!
type of analysis performed are The analytical methods used are described in detafl in Appendix Air iodine and air *~articulate samples were collected from seven indicator and one control location on a weekly basis.
Air iodine was collected by drawing air through TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridges.
Air particulates were collected by drawing air though a 47-millimeter diameter glass-fiber filter.
In the laboratory, air par~iculate filters were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta activity, and were composited quarterly for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
Charcoal cartridges were analyzed for iodine-131.
Milk was collected from one control and four indicator locations on a
monthly basis.
Samples from the LEE HALL and EPPS locations were collected by and split with the Commonwealth of Virginia.
All milk samples were analyzed for iodine-131, gamma emitters, stable calcium, and strontium-89 and -90.
Precipitation samples were collected as monthly and quarterly composites from one control and one indicator location.
Gross beta and tritium analyses were performed on both types of composites.
water samples in.eluded well water, surface water and river water.
water samples in.eluded well water, surface water and river water.
Well water was sampled from four locations on a semi-annual basis ..
Well water was sampled from four locations on a semi-annual basis..
Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses were performed on these samples.
Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses were performed on these samples.
Surface water was sampled from four locations on a semi-annual basis.
Surface water was sampled from four locations on a semi-annual basis.
Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses were performed on these samples.
Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses were performed on these samples.
Two types of river water samples were collected.                                                                                                     Monthly composites were taken from one control location upstream of the plant and an indicator station at the plant discharge location.                                                                                                               These composite samples were collected by and split with the Commonwealth of Virginia; they were analyzed for gamma emitters and strontium-89 and -90.
Two types of river water samples were collected.
Bi-monthly river water samples were also collected from one control and four indicator locations. These were analyzed by gamma spectrometry on a bi-monthly basis and composited for semi-annual analysis of tritium.
Monthly composites were taken from one control location upstream of the plant and an indicator station at the plant discharge location.
The James River is an estuary near Surry Power Station, and tidal exchange of water with Chesapeake Bay occurs. River based samples include silt, crabs, fish, clams and oysters.
These composite samples were collected by and split with the Commonwealth of Virginia; they were analyzed for gamma emitters and strontium-89 and -90.
Crabs were taken from the plant discharge location during July, August and September only.* These samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
Bi-monthly river water samples were also collected from one control and four indicator locations.
11
These were analyzed by gamma spectrometry on a bi-monthly basis and composited for semi-annual analysis of tritium.
The James River is an estuary near Surry Power exchange of water with Chesapeake Bay occurs.
include silt, crabs, fish, clams and oysters.
Station, and tidal River based samples Crabs were taken from the plant discharge location during July, August and September only.* These samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
11  


    *- -* -- . --- ' *--. *-* *-~                   ' *. '' -* ..,,~ *.. *,* ..__ ._ ..._;; *. *--* ; **:.._: :, . *">*~:.;.':,._,:: :> ,* ~.:. ;--~-.~~.".: .'.- ****.!,... *** **:*.,*.,- ..**,,:* .-. : ..... * ... *-- :. ~ *.:. --v*. __ .,:..*;;,~*: __ ,.'* **..____ ,. ***-*---'"*-* -~-* *-~--:. - _*. ;* __ ' *. ,* -~- - ' . _,..___ ' .' :__
*- -* --. --- ' *--. *-* *-~  
I..                   ii,_
' *. '' -*..,,~ *..  
n u
*,*.. __._... _;; *. *--* ; * *:.._: :,. *">*~:.;.':,._,:: :>,* ~.:..;--~-.~~.".:.'.- ****.!,... *** **:*., *.,-.. **,,:*.-. :..... *... *-- :. ~  
        ,~
*.:. --v*. __.,:.. *;;,~*: __,.'* **.. ____,.. * **-*---'"*-* -~-* *-~--:. -
I*'                                                                                                                                         TABLE 2 I~
_*. ;* __ ' *.,* -~- - '. _,..___ '.' : __
(Page 1 of 2) r I__                                                                                                                      ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
I..
[                                       Sample Class                                                                                    Frequency                                                                                        Type of Analysis
n u  
[-: _j                           Air Particulate                                                                                      weekly                                                                                        Gross alpha and beta quarterly composite                                                                                                Gamma spectrometry
,~
[J                               Air.borne Iodine                                                                                      weekly                                                                                        Iodine-131
I*'
[J                               Thermoluminescent                                                                                quarterly                                                                                        Radiation dose Dosimetry* (TLD) 1*:
I ~
Milk                                                                                                  monthly                                                                                      Iodine-131 Gamma spectrometry
r I __
[J                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Strontium-89, -90 Stable calcium r-:
[
l__  J Precipitation                                                                                        monthly                                                                                      Gross beta Tritium
[-:
                                                                                                                            *quarterly composite                                                                                            Gross beta C                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Tritium r**
_j
i L..J Well water                                                                                semi-annually                                                                                            Gross alpha and beta Tritium
[J
[J                               Surface water                                                                              semi-annually                                                                                          Gross alpha and beta r*--:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Tritium I     '
[J 1*:
I
[J r-: l
        !   i I :
__ J C
River water                                                                                  bi-monthly                                                                                            Gamma spectrometry semi-annual composite                                                                                              Tritium D                                                                                                                         monthly composite                                                                                          Gamma spectrometry Strontium-89, -90 r*-1 L-1 r**:
r**
I
i L..J
          ~
[J r*--:
i L-iLJ; 12
I I ! i I :
* - - * - - - - - . * - - . , * - : - ~ - - - - -..     -      .._-------.-----..* ... *-..-...--*-'"<*--,--.--,.., __ .-_ . * ~. --                         -~- ...... _ - - - . * - . - -..---..-                           .--:c*****-- .* .;--... ~-                 *~:c---r-......- ~ - . - - - - * -.*       -    .----;--......,-~*7'"".
D r*-1 L-1 r**:
I  
~
i L-i ;
LJ ii,_
Sample Class Air Particulate Air.borne Iodine Thermoluminescent Dosimetry* (TLD)
Milk Precipitation Well water Surface water River water TABLE 2 (Page 1 of 2)
ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Frequency weekly quarterly composite weekly quarterly monthly monthly
*quarterly composite semi-annually semi-annually bi-monthly semi-annual composite monthly composite 12 Type of Analysis Gross alpha and beta Gamma spectrometry Iodine-131 Radiation dose Iodine-131 Gamma spectrometry Strontium-89, -90 Stable calcium Gross beta Tritium Gross beta Tritium Gross alpha and beta Tritium Gross alpha and beta Tritium Gamma spectrometry Tritium Gamma spectrometry Strontium-89, -90
*--*-----.*--.,*-:-~-----..  
.._-------.-----.. *... *-..-...--*-'"<*--,--.--,.., __.-_.* ~. --
-~-...... _ ---.*-.--.. ---..-.--:c*****--.*.;--... ~-
*~:c---r-...... -~-.----*-.*  
.----;--......,-~*7'"".  


r~.,
r~
[J f'
[J f'
I i I',__ _;i TABLE 2 r~                               (Page 2 of 2)
I i I' i r~
II .'
I I.
i._ __
i._ __ *
* ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Sample Class        Frequency      Type of Analysis
[J I)
[J Silt                semi-annually    Gamma spectrometry Clams and Oysters    bi-monthly      Gamma spectrometry I)
LJ D
LJ
r-1 LJ i.;
                                                                    ~-
I L..J r --~
Crabs            three summer months Gamma spectrometry Fish                semi-annually    Gamma spectrometry D          Fowl                  annually        Gamma spectrometry r-1     Crops                annually        Gamma spectrometry LJ                                           Strontium-89, -90 Soil                  annually        Gamma spectrometry i .;
r.
I '
r *l r'
L..J r --~
' ' I
r .
__J Sample Class Silt Clams and Oysters Crabs Fish Fowl Crops Soil TABLE 2 (Page 2 of 2)
r *l
ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Frequency semi-annually bi-monthly three summer months semi-annually annually annually annually 13 Type of Analysis Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Strontium-89, -90 Gamma spectrometry
__J
~-
      'r''
I 13


Two kinds of fish, eel and catfish, were collected semi-annually                                                                                                                                                          from the*plant discharge location for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
t.)
t.)
Clams were collected bi-monthly from one control and four indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.                                                                                                                              Oysters were also collected bi-monthly from three indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
r-;.  
r-;.
.1 l.;
  !-.; .1 River bottom silt (sediment) was collected semi-annually from one l _:J                                   control and four indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
_:J r,
One waterfowl sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
1*,;
Seven samples of food crops were collected during 1983 for analysis of gamma emitters and strontium-89 and -90. These included cabbage, kale, corn, peanuts, and soybeans from four indicator locations.
(.. ~.;  
Annual samples of soil were taken from six indicator locations near                                                                                                                                                        air samplers and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
~'*.*.
Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to determine the direct r,
1*,;                                     (ambient) radiation levels at monitoring points.                                                                                                                                          For routine TLD
( .. ~.;                               measurements, a dosimeter of CaS04:oy*in a Teflon card wai deployed at each selected location. Dosimeters were exchanged on a quarterly basis.
Additional sets of dosimeters were shipped with each exchange cycle to serve as in-transit controls. For routine exchanges, TLDs were shipped by Federal Express. Individual dosimeters were calibrated by exposure to an accurately known radiation field from a calibrated Cs-137 source.
    ~'*.*.
l '
l '
LJ ll U*
LJ ll U*
[1 lJ 14
[1 lJ Two kinds of fish, eel and catfish, were collected semi-annually from the*plant discharge location for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
- ..  -, *-**,-. ----- - ... - * - - - .. --*--- -.*-*-....,---* *.. ' *. *._::-;--.... .,"" .... *.*.. -~. * . . :. c-.-. -. .*.. -** ,-. .-*-*--:-- ** . --..:--...... _.*--. .. , ... *.- . . ~-.- - .* '72 ...... -- .* -_ .......... ~ . - - : : - . . _ , _ .
Clams were collected bi-monthly from one control and four indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
Oysters were also collected bi-monthly from three indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
River bottom silt (sediment) was collected semi-annually from one control and four indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
One waterfowl sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
Seven samples of food crops were collected during 1983 for analysis of gamma emitters and strontium-89 and -90.
These included cabbage, kale, corn, peanuts, and soybeans from four indicator locations.
Annual samples of soil were taken from six indicator locations near air samplers and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to determine the direct (ambient) radiation levels at monitoring points.
For routine TLD measurements, a dosimeter of CaS04:oy*in a Teflon card wai deployed at each selected location. Dosimeters were exchanged on a quarterly basis.
Additional sets of dosimeters were shipped with each exchange cycle to serve as in-transit controls.
For routine exchanges, TLDs were shipped by Federal Express.
Individual dosimeters were calibrated by exposure to an accurately known radiation field from a calibrated Cs-137 source.
14
*. *._::-;--.....,"".... *.*.. -~. *.. :. c-.-.  
. --..:--...... _.*--...,... *.-.. ~-.- -.* '72...... --.* -_.......... ~.--::-.._,_.  


...**. * -        .* - * .* , '
.* - *.*, '*Sc~... **  
* S c ~ ... ** '* . *-~- * *.*.*.* , __ ,.:.__ __ ,._:._ ___ ,.o.i"'---**~---~*..:,.-=.C.O.o,c:-'--'*"**.,_;__,,,"",*'*"-'-*~COC"'-"'--"-''-'-"':*,*~--''*':
'*. *-~- * *.*.*.*, __,.:.__ __,._:._ ___,.o.i"'---**~---~ *.. :,.-=.C.O.o,c:-'--'*"**.,_;__,,,"",*'*"-'-*~COC"'-"'--"-''-'-"':*,*~--''*':
nI i r1*:J   :
n I i r :
IV.        
1*:J
[-l
'&deg;'
I.
I I
n I i i
L.~
r*~,
I i
I i
L 1*:
[J r*-,
i r*r-,
I i.
LJ IV.  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND DISCUSSION OF 1983 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Data from the radiological analyses of environmental media collected during the report period are tabulated a~d discussed below. The procedures and specifications followed in the laboratory for these analyses are as required in Section 5.0 of the NUS Environmental Services Division Quality Assurance Manual, and are detailed in the NUS
AND DISCUSSION OF 1983 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Data from the radiological analyses of environmental media collected during the report period are tabulated a~d discussed below.
        ,-,                                        Radiological Laboratory Work Instructions.
The procedures and specifications followed in the laboratory for these analyses are as required in Section 5.0 of the NUS Environmental Services Division Quality Assurance Manual, and are detailed in the NUS Radiological Laboratory Work Instructions.
[-l                                          Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approach and frequently fall below the detection limits of state-of-the-art measurement methods. (1) The use of 11 LT 11 in the data tab-les is the equivalent of the less than symbol (<) and is consistent with the NUS Radiological Laboratory practice of data reporting.                                                                                                     The   number following the 11 LT 11 is a result of the lower limit of detection (LLD) 11 calculation as defined in Appendix B.                                                                                             ND 11 (Not Detected) is used periodically in the tables presenting gamma analysis results for various media. It primarily appears under the "Others" column, where it I'&deg;'.                                      indicates                                   that no other detectable gamma emitting nuclides were I
Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approach and frequently fall below the detection limits of state-of-the-art measurement methods.
I                                        identified. NUS analytical methods meet the LLD requirements addressed ,
(1) The use of 11LT 11 in the data tab-les is the equivalent of the less than symbol (<) and is consistent with the NUS Radiological Laboratory practice of data reporting.
in Table 2 of the USNRC. Branch Technical Position of Radiological Monitoring (November 1979, Revision 1). (2)
The number following the 11 LT 11 is a result of the lower limit of detection (LLD) calculation as defined in Appendix B.
Tables 3 through 25 give the radioanalytical results for individual samples. A statistical summary of the results appears in Table 26. The reported averages are based only on concentrations above the limit of detection.                                     In Table 26, the fraction (f) of the total number of analyses which were detectable follows in parentheses.                                                                                               Also given in n                                          parentheses are the minimum and maximum values of detectable activity Ii                                            during the report period.
11 ND 11 (Not Detected) is used periodically in the tables presenting gamma analysis results for various media.
A.           Air Iodine/Air Particulates i
It primarily appears under the "Others" column, where it indicates that no other detectable gamma emitting nuclides were identified.
L.~                                        Results of airborne iodine-131 analyses on charcoal* cartridges are presented in Table 3. I-131 was not detected in any of the samples.
NUS analytical methods meet the LLD requirements addressed,
Results of gross alpha and gross beta analyses on air particulate filters are given in Tables 4 and 5. The mean gross alpha activity for all stations was 3.8 + 2.6 E-03 pCi/~3 and the range of gross alpha activity was 1.2 to 20 E-03 pCi/m                                                                                         T~e mean gross beta activity for a 11 stations was 16 + 19 E-03 p~i /m3 and the* range of gross beta r*~,
in Table 2 of the USNRC. Branch Technical Position of Radiological Monitoring (November 1979, Revision 1).
I    i activity was 3.2 to 78 E-03 pCi/m.
(2)
I    i L                                          Air filters were composited quarterly and then analyzed by gamma spectrometry.                                       The gamma spectrometry data is presented in Table 6.
Tables 3 through 25 give the radioanalytical results for individual samples. A statistical summary of the results appears in Table 26.
1*:                                        Cosmogenic beryllium-7 was detected in 2~ of 32 samples. The range of
The reported averages are based only on concentrations above the limit of detection.
[J                                          Be-7 activity *was 32 to 110 E-03 pCi/m. Three samples for v1hich LLDs were measured also fell within this range.                                                                                               Cesium-134 and cesium-137
In Table 26, the fraction (f) of the total number of analyses which were detectable follows in parentheses.
          'r*-,.                                    were found in the first and second quarterly composites from Surry i                                          Station (SS). Both isotopes may be the result of plant effluents.* This station is located within the plant boundary and is not an environmental location. Cesium-137 was also detected at one environmental location in th~               third                         quarter.                     This isotope is occasionally found in air particulate composites and is considered to be a result of atmospheric r*r-,
Also given in parentheses are the minimum and maximum values of detectable activity during the report period.
weapons testing and global fallout.
A.
          'I    .*
Air Iodine/Air Particulates Results of airborne iodine-131 analyses on charcoal* cartridges are presented in Table 3.
i .                                                                                                                                          15 LJ
I-131 was not detected in any of the samples.
    ---- ----.-- -~------------.------~- ,,-- -- *,7-- --~-,--- --- - ----.----,""----~ ..-----" ...-.*,--------...-,--
Results of gross alpha and gross beta analyses on air particulate filters are given in Tables 4 and 5. 3 The mean gross alpha activity for all stations was 3.8 + 2.6 E-03 pCi/~ and the range of gross alpha activity was 1.2 to 20 E-03 pCi/m 3 T~e mean gross beta activity for a 11 stations was 16 + 19 E-03 p~i /m and the* range of gross beta activity was 3.2 to 78 E-03 pCi/m.
 
Air filters were composited quarterly and then analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
r                                        r--*
The gamma spectrometry data is presented in Table 6.
L.                      ,.L....    '
Cosmogenic beryllium-7 was detected in 2~ of 32 samples.
                                                                                            - ._J r.. ------,
The range of Be-7 activity *was 32 to 110 E-03 pCi/m.
L - ..
Three samples for v1hich LLDs were measured also fell within this range.
I
Cesium-134 and cesium-137 were found in the first and second quarterly composites from Surry Station (SS).
                                                                                                                          ._j
Both isotopes may be the result of plant effluents.* This station is located within the plant boundary and is not an environmental location.
                                                                                                                              .~.--1 L~.a.J                          -1
Cesium-137 was also detected at one environmental location in th~
  *I
third quarter.
      .j I
This isotope is occasionally found in air particulate composites and is considered to be a result of atmospheric weapons testing and global fallout.
  ,]
15  
,*1
---- ----.-- -~------------.------~-,,-- -- *,7-- --~-,--- --- - ----.----,""----~..-----"... -.*,--------... -,--
      ..                                                                                                                                                                      ,.. i-L*
* I  
    .1*
.j I  
i                                                                                    TABLE 3                                                                                !*'
,]  
  *:1
,*1 i  
    .*I j                                                                                (Page 1 of 2)
.1*
  .l                                                                   Iodine-131 in VEPCO Charcoal Cartridges REMP - 1983                                                                      ,.
j
l                                                                                                                                                                           1.*
*:1  
i                                                                                                      3 I      j                                                                   (Results          in  pCi/m    +/-_ *2s)
.*I. l l Ii j  
'-j 1-.*
'-j i'!)  
i'!)       Honth          Collection Period        ss          IIIR                BC                      ALL                  CP        DOW          FE            NN
.I I  
      .I I
,:1  
January      12/28/82  to 01/04/83  LT 0.02(1) LT    0.03        LT    0.03            LT    0.04            LT  0.019 LT  0.018  LT  0.02      LT    0,02
*1  
  ,:1                 01/04/83    to 01/12/83  LT 0.03    LT    0.04        LT    0.03            LT    0.05            LT  0.03  LT  0.03  'LT  0.03    LT    0,04
)
    *1               01/12/83    to 01/18/83  LT 0.04    LT    0.04        LT    0.04            LT    0.07            LT  0.02  LT  0.02  LT  0.02    LT    0.02
  )
:/
:/
01/18/83 01/25/83 to to 01/25/83 02/02/63 LT LT 0.02 0.02 LT LT 0.015 0.02 LT
i
* LT 0.015 0.02 LT LT 0.02 0.03 LT LT 0.017 0.02 LT LT 0.017 0.02 LT LT 0.018 0,02 LT LT 0.019 0.03 i
'.*,)
.*!      February   02/02/83   to 02/08/83   LT 0.016  LT    0.018        LT    0.018            LT    0.03            LT  0.02 LT  0.02   LT  0,02     LT    0.02
I "i
'.*,)                02/08/63   to 02/15/83  LT 0.06   LT    0.05        LT    0.04             LT    0.07            LT  0.019 LT  0.018  LT  0.018    LT    0.02 I              02/15/63   to 02/22/83   LT 0.04    LT    0.05        LT    0.05            LT    0.06             LT  0.02  LT  0.019  LT  0.02    LT    0.02 "i                02/22/63    to 03/02/63   LT 0.03    LT    0.04         LT    0.04            LT    0.05            LT  0.04  LT  0,03  LT  0.03    LT    0,04
)
      )  March      03/02/83   to 03/10/83   LT 0.03    LT    0.03        LT    0.03             LT    0.05            LT  0.03 LT  0.03  .LT  0.03    LT    0,03
I j
  . I,              03/10/63 03/16/llJ to to 03/16/83 03/23/83 LT LT 0.04 0.03 LT LT 0.04 0.03 LT LT 0.05 0.03 LT    0.07            LT  0.05 LT  0.04  LT  0.05     LT    0.04 LT    0.05             LT  0.03  LT  0,03  LT  0.03    LT    0.03 j              03/2 3/03  to 03/30/63   LT 0.018  LT    0.02        LT    0.02            LT    0.03            LT  0.02 LT   0.019  LT   0.02
*I
    *I                                                                                                                                                            LT     0.02
*i
  *i
.'i I ' *;
.'i      April      03/30/83    to 04/06/83  LT 0.03    LT     0.03        LT     0.03                                    LT 0.03 LT
i
* 0.05                        LT   0.03   LT   0.03     LT     0,03 I              01, /06 /83 to 04/12/83  LT 0.03   LT     0.03        LT     0.03             LT 0.05                LT 0.03 LT   0.03   LT   0.03    LT     0.03
*1.  
  *;                  04/12/83    to 04/19/83  LT 0.03   LT     0.03         LT     0.03             LT 0.05               LT 0.018 LT   0.017  LT   0,018    LT     0.02 i              04/19/83    to 04/26/83
~
* LT 0.03    LT     0.03         LT     0.03            LT 0.05
':i
.*!                                                                                                                          LT 0.04 LT   0.03   LT   0.03     LT     0,04 04 /26/83
,.I l
.*1 to 05/03/83  LT 0.02    LT     0.02        LT     0.02            LT 0.04                LT 0.03 LT   0.02   I.T 0,02    LT     0.02
'.i
    ~
:J i
  ':i
,'j
  ,.I    May        05/0.1/IJ)  to 05/10/83  LT 0.03   LT     0.03        LT     0.03            LT    0.05.           LT  0.04  LT  0.03  LT  0.03    LT    0.03 l                05/10/63 05/17/63 to 05/17/83  LT LT 0.04    LT    0.04        LT    0.04            LT 0.06                LT 0.04  LT   0.04   LT   0.04    LT     0.04
*l I
'.i                              to 05/24/83      0.018  LT     0.02        LT     0.02            LT 0.04                LT 0.02  LT   0.02  LT   0.02     LT     0.02
*.i
:J                  05/24/83    to 06/01/83  LT 0.04    LT     0.04        LT     0.04            LT 0.07                LT 0.03 LT   0.03  LT   0.03    LT     0.03 i
*i
    ,'j June        06/01/63    to 06/08/83  LT 0.03   LT     0.03         LT     0.03             LT   0.04             LT 0.03  LT   0.03   LT   0.03     LT   0.03
*' j
  *l                06/06/63    to 06/14/63  LT 0.03    LT     0.03        LT     0.03            LT   0.06            LT 0.03 LT   0.03   LT   0.03    LT   0.03 I
.J J I 1
  *.i                06/14/83    to 06/22/83  LT 0.03    LT     0.03        LT     0.03            LT   0.04            LT 0.03 LT   0.03  LT   0.03    J,T  0.03
J 1
  *i                06/22/13)  to 06/28/83  LT 0.05   I.T    0.05         LT     0.05            LT   0.07             LT 0.07 LT   0.07   LT   0.06     LT   0.07 j  July        06/26/83    to 07 /06/83  LT 0.03    LT     0.05         LT     0.04            LT   0.07            LT 0.06  LT   0.05  LT   0.05    LT     0.05
I I
  .J                07/06/83    to 07 /13/83  LT 0.04    LT     0.05        LT*    0.04             LT   0.06            LT 0.03  LT   0.05  LT   0.03    LT     0.03 J                07 /1 )/63  to 07/19/83  LT 0.03   LT     0.03        LT     0.03            LT   0.03             LT 0.03  LT   0.03  LT   0.02     LT   0,03 I                .07/19/83 07 /26/83 to to 07 /26/83 08/02/83 LT LT 0.03 0.06 LT LT 0.04 0.07 LT LT 0.03 0.07 LT LT p.07 0.05 LT LT 0.04 0.05 LT LT 0.05 0.07 LT LT 0.06 0.05 LT LT 0,06 0,05 1
1 l r
J Note: See footnote at end of ta~le.
Honth January February March April May June July Collection Period 12/28/82 01/04/83 01/12/83 01/18/83 01/25/83 02/02/83 02/08/63 02/15/63 02/22/63 03/02/83 03/10/63 03/16/llJ 03/2 3/03 03/30/83 01, /06 /83 04/12/83 04/19/83 04 /26/83 05/0.1/IJ) 05/10/63 05/17/63 05/24/83 06/01/63 06/06/63 06/14/83 06/22/13) 06/26/83 07/06/83 07 /1 )/63  
1 I
.07/19/83 07 /26/83 to 01/04/83 to 01/12/83 to 01/18/83 to 01/25/83 to 02/02/63 to 02/08/83 to 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 to 03/02/63 to 03/10/83 to 03/16/83 to 03/23/83 to 03/30/63 to 04/06/83 to 04/12/83 to 04/19/83 to 04/26/83
I 1
* to 05/03/83 to 05/10/83 to 05/17/83 to 05/24/83 to 06/01/83 to 06/08/83 to 06/14/63 to 06/22/83 to 06/28/83 to 07 /06/83 to 07 /13/83 to 07/19/83 to 07 /26/83 to 08/02/83 Note: See footnote at end of ta~le.
l
ss LT 0.02(1)
LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.016 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.018 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.018 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.06 r--*
L.
IIIR LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.015 LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 I.T 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.07 L.... -._J TABLE 3
(Page 1 of 2) r.. ------,
I L -..._j
.~.--1 L~.a.J Iodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/m3
+/-_ *2s)
BC ALL LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.015
* LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT* 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.07 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.07 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT
* 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05.
LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.07 LT 0.04 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.07 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.03 LT p.07 LT 0.05 CP LT 0.019 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.017 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.019 LT 0.02 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.018 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 DOW LT 0.018 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.017 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0.019 LT 0,03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0,03 LT 0.019 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.017 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.07 FE LT 0.02
'LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0,02 LT 0,02 LT 0.018 LT 0.02 LT 0.03
.LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0,018 LT 0.03 I.T 0,02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.06 LT 0.05
-1 NN LT 0,02 LT 0,04 LT 0.02 LT 0.019 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0,04 LT 0,03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0,03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0,04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 J,T 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0,03 LT 0,06 LT 0,05
,.. i-L*
1.*
1-.*


1 *.,..,   r-*.1                                                       r-:--.
*,.:.]
: t. ....... I 1-*-.~
.J
: 1. __ * .,:.. .*.* J r..,.--,J 1..- ~--..... _* **
**.I., j.
1::--1
j
                                                                                                                                                                                .... ~.~-. -
.*l.,
i
*I i l
:l i
* I i i l l j
*I I*
*1
*:j:
1 *.,.., r-*. 1 Month Collect Lon PP.rlod ss August Ofl/02/111 to 06/09/63 LT 0.04 06/09/83 to 08/17 /fl1 LT 0.017 08/17 /83 to 08/23/83 LT 0.03 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 LT 0.03 September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83 LT 0.03 09/06/83 to 09/14/83 LT 0.04 09/14/83 to 09/20/83 LT 0.06 09/20/83 to 09/27 /83 LT 0.05 09/2 7 /83 to 09/27 /83(3)
I.T 0.04 October 09 /2 7 /8 3 to 10/04/83 LT 0.05 1 0/01, /8 3 to 10/11/83 LT 0.04 10/11/83 to 10/18/ll.1 LT 0.03 10/18/83 to 10/26/83 LT 0.04 November 10/26/83 to 11/01/83 LT 0.06 11/01/83 to 11/08/83 LT 0.03 ll/08/83 to 11/15/83 LT 0.03 l l/15/83 to 11 /22/83 LT 0.03 11/22/83 to 11/29/83 LT 0.02 December 11/29/83 to 12/07 /83 LT 0.03 12/07 /83 to l 2/L 3/83 LT 0.05 12/l3/83 to 12/20/83 LT 0.05 12/20/83 to 12/28/83 LT 0.06 l2/28/83 to Ol/03/84 LT 0.04 (1)
LT
~ Lese Than (2)
Sample missing due to failed sample pump *
(3)
One-day sample collected as part of effluent r-:--.
: t........ I 1-*-.~
: 1. __ *.,:...*.* J TAHU:
.'3 (Page 2 of 2) lod!ne-131 in Charcoal VEPCO REMP -
(Results in pCl/ra)
Cartridges 1983
+ 2e)
IIIR nc ALL LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 l,T LT 0.03 LT 0.03
'LT 0.03 LT LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 1,T 0.04 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT LT O.OJ LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT LT 0.02 LT O.OJ l,T 0.03 LT l,T 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT LT o.os LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT I.T 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT release monltorlng program.
r..,.--,
1..- ~--..... _* ** J 1::--1  
.... ~.~-. -
* I t
* I t
TAHU: .'3 (Page 2 of 2) lod!ne-131 in          Charcoal                  Cartridges VEPCO          REMP              -  1983 pCl/ra)
CP DOW FE NN 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.03 LT 0,03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 0.04 LT 0.05 (2)
(Results        in
LT 0.05 0.06 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.07 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 1,T 0.05 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.06 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT o.04 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.07.
                                                                                                                                -+ 2e)
LT 0.03 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.06 1.T 0.07 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.06  
Month            Collect Lon PP.rlod          ss            IIIR              nc                                ALL                CP                           DOW                   FE           NN August        Ofl/02/111  to 06/09/63    LT  0.04    LT    0.05      LT      0.05                      LT    0.04        LT  0.04                     LT   0.05             LT   0.04 LT     0.04 06/09/83    to 08/17 /fl1  LT  0.017    LT    0.02      LT      0.02                      LT    0.02        LT  0.03                     LT   0.03             LT   0.03 LT     0.04 08/17 /83    to 08/23/83    LT  0.03    LT    0.03      LT      0.03                      LT    0.03        l,T  0.05                     LT   0.04             LT   0.04 LT   0.05 08/23/83    to 08/30/83    LT  0.03    LT    0.03      LT      0.03                'LT          0.03        LT    0.03                     LT   0,03             LT    0.03  LT    0.03 September    08/30/83    to 09/06/83    LT  0.03    LT   0.03       LT     0.03                       LT    0.04        LT  0.06                     LT   0.04             LT   0.06 LT     0.06 09/06/83    to 09/14/83    LT  0.04    LT    0.04      LT      0.04                       LT     0.04        LT    0.04                    LT    0.05               (2)     LT    0.05 09/14/83    to 09/20/83    LT  0.06    LT    0.05      LT     0.05                       1,T    0.04        LT    0.06                     LT   0.07             LT 0.06     LT   0.07 09/20/83    to 09/27 /83    LT  0.05    LT    0.05      LT      0.05                      LT    0.04        LT    0.05                     LT   0.05             LT 0.04     1,T   0.05 09/2 7 /83  to 09/27 /83(3) I.T  0.04 October      09 /2 7 /8 3 to 10/04/83    LT  0.05     LT    0.05       LT     0.05                      LT    0.04        LT  0.05                    LT    0.06             LT   0.05 LT     0.06 10/01, /8 3  to 10/11/83    LT  0.04    LT    0.04      LT      0.04                      LT    0.04         LT   0.04                     LT   0.04            LT    0.03 LT     o.04 10/11/83    to 10/18/ll.1  LT  0.03    LT    0.04       LT     0.03                      LT    0.04       LT   0.04                     LT   0.04             LT    0.04 LT     0.04 10/18/83    to 10/26/83    LT   0.04    LT    0.04      LT      0.04                      LT    0.04        LT    0.04                    LT    0.04            LT    0.03 LT   0.04
*,.:.]
*.:        November      10/26/83    to 11/01/83    LT  0.06    LT    0.06      LT      0.06                      LT    0.06        LT  0.05                     LT   0.05             LT   0.04 LT     0.05 11/01/83    to 11/08/83    LT  0.03    LT    O.OJ      LT      0.03                      LT    0.03        LT  0.04                     LT   0.05             LT   0.04 LT     0.05 ll/08/83    to 11/15/83    LT  0.03          0.02      LT      O.OJ                        l,T  0.03        LT  0.04                     LT   0.04             LT   0.07. LT    0.03
.J.,
  **.I l l/15/83 11/22/83 to to 11 /22/83 11/29/83 LT  0.03 0.02 LT l,T LT 0.03 0.03 LT LT 0.03 0.03 LT     0.03 0.03 LT LT 0.03 0.04 LT LT 0.03 0.04 LT LT 0.03 0.03 LT    0.04 0.04 LT                                                                LT                                                                                  LT j.
j  December      11/29/83    to 12/07 /83    LT   0.03     LT   0.04       LT      0.04                      LT    0.03        LT  0.05                     LT   0.06             LT   0.04 LT    0.05
    .,.*l                12/07 /83    to l 2/L 3/83  LT  0.05    LT    o.os      LT     0.05                       LT    0.05        LT    0.03                     LT   0.04             LT   0.03 LT   0.04 12/l3/83    to 12/20/83    LT  0.05    LT    0.05      LT      0.06                      LT    0.06        LT    0.06                     1.T   0.07             LT   0.04 LT   0.05 i                12/20/83
    *I                                to 12/28/83    LT  0.06    I.T  0.06      LT      0.06                      LT    0.06        LT  0.05                    LT    0.05             LT    0.04  LT     0.05 i                l2/28/83    to Ol/03/84    LT   0.04     LT   0.05       LT      0.05                       LT     0.05        LT  0.05                    LT    0.06             LT   0.05 LT   0.06 l.,      --------
:l (1)      LT  ~
Lese Than
  *I i    (2)
(3)
Sample missing due to failed sample pump
* One-day sample collected as part of effluent release monltorlng program.
i i
l l    j
    *I
    *1 I*
  *:j:


I l*i         le ...:;  [". -*.
I l*i I I I
( .  '                            ~1            c----,                                    ,-*-:--*1 I       II                                                                                                      L~* ...,_:I   I **- ~- .J                                \.. ....*... I I
I I
I 1
1 I j
j I
Ii  
                                                                                                  '-..._ Table 4 Ii .1 (Pagel of 3)
.1 J
J*1                                                                               Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO REHP - 1983 i                                                                                                                   3
*1 i  
  *1                                                                                       '(Results in E-03 pCi/m + 2s)
*1  
  .,**/
**/.,
    'i'                                                                                                                                                                    AVERAGE
'i  
  'J                 Month    Collection Period            ss        IIIR            BC                ALL                CP                DOW      FE      NN            + 2s
'J
:i*;           -----
:i *;  
  ;.1 January  12/28/82 to 01/04/83      LT 1.50)  LT 1.8          LT 1.8            LT 3              LT 1.9              LT 1.7    LT 2      LT 2    2.0 + 0.9.
;.1 j  
j
'.j  
  *.,                        01/04/83 to Ol/12/83      LT 1.8    LT 2            LT 2              LT 3              LT 2                l,T 2    J.T 2    LT 2    2,1 + 0.7
.I ii 1i 1!  
  '.j 01/12/83 to 01/18/83      LT 3      LT 3            LT 3              LT 4              LT 3              3.1 + 2.6  LT 3      LT 3    3.1 + 0.7
' t  
    *!                        01/18/83 to 01/25/83    3.1 + 2.1  2.3 + 2.1        LT 2              LT 4              LT 3                J.T 3    J.T 2  3.0 + 2.5 2.8 + 1.3
,i l'.l  
  .I ii                             01/25/83 to 02/02/83    2,4 + 1.6    LT 1.5          LT 1.5            LT 2          2.1 + 1.8              LT 1.7    LT 1,7  2.0 + 1,9 1,9 + 0.6 1i February  02/02/8) to 02/08/83      LT 1.3  2,1 + 1.8        q  1.4    3.5 + 2.6                LT 1.6              LT 1.6    LT 1,6    LT 1. 7 1.9 + 1,4 1!                             02/08/83 to 02/15/83    1.4 + 1.3  2.9 + 2.0      1.5 + 1.5            LT 2              LT 1.4              LT 1.3  1.7+1.6    LT 1.4. 1.7 + 1.1 2.2 + 0.7 t,i' 02/15/83 to 02/22/83      LT 1.9    LT 2            LT 2              LT 3              LT 2                LT 2      LT 2    2,3 + 2.2
'I j  
            ~
.J;  
OJ                02/22/83 to 03/02/83    1.5 + 1.5  2.3 + 2.0        I.T 2            LT 2              LT 3                LT 2      LT 2      LT 3    2.2 + 1.1 l'.l
.i I I l i
'I j               March    0)/02/83 to 03/10/83    3.0 +*1.0  2.1 + 1.7        I.T 1.5            LT 2          2.7 + 2.0              LT 1.6  3.9 + 2.3 3.1 + 2.2 2.5 + 1.7
I I j
    .J;
J  
    .i
*,1 1
      !                        03/10/8) to 03/16/83    15 + 5    9.5 + 4.1      19 + 5            l2 + 6            1.8 + 1.4            17 + 5    12 + 5    11 + 5      12 + 11 0)/16/63 to 03/23/63      LT 1.5    LT l. 7        1.T l. 7          LT 3              LT 2                LT 1.8    LT 2      LT 2    2.0 + 0.9 I                         03/2)/83 to 03/30/83    1.9 + 1.6    LT l.7          LT 1.7            LT 3              LT 2                LT 1.9    LT 2      LT 2    2.0 + 0.8
* I li              April    03/30/83 to 04/06/63    5.6 + 2.5  3.2 + 2.1      4.1 + 2.3            l.T 3            l.T 2            4.3+2.5-  3.1 + 2.3  LT 2    3.4 + 2.4 I                        04/06/83 to 04/12/83      l.T 2      l.T 3          LT 3        3.0 + 2.2              LT 3                LT 3      r.T 3  4.9 + 3.1 3.1 + 1.6 I
j                          04/12/63 to 04/19/83    4.1 + 2.2    J.T 1. 7    2.7..+ 1..8          l.T 3              LT 1.4              LT 1.9    LT 2      LT 2    2.3 + 1.7 J
04 /19/83 to 04/26/83      LT 2      LT 3            LT 3        2.0 + 2.0              LT 1.9              LT 3      LT 3      LT 3    2.6 + 1.1
*,1 04/26/83 to 05/0)/83    2.4 + 1.7  3.7 + 2.1      1.8 + 1;6      2,6 + 2.0            2.1 + 1.5            2.8 + 2.1 3.4 + 2.2  LT 1,5  2.5 + 1.5 1;
l j
l j
l                 Note: See footnote at end of table.
l J
J I
I I  
I l
-! l l t
t I.
I.  
"i'.
"i'.
le... :;
~
OJ
[". -*.
Month Collection Period ss IIIR January 12/28/82 to 01/04/83 LT 1.50)
LT 1.8 01/04/83 to Ol/12/83 LT 1.8 LT 2 01/12/83 to 01/18/83 LT 3 LT 3 01/18/83 to 01/25/83 3.1 + 2.1 2.3 + 2.1 01/25/83 to 02/02/83 2,4 + 1.6 LT 1.5 February 02/02/8) to 02/08/83 LT 1.3 2,1 + 1.8 02/08/83 to 02/15/83 1.4 + 1.3 2.9 + 2.0 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 LT 1.9 LT 2 02/22/83 to 03/02/83 1.5 + 1.5 2.3 + 2.0 March 0)/02/83 to 03/10/83 3.0 +*1.0 2.1 + 1.7 03/10/8) to 03/16/83 15 + 5 9.5 + 4.1 0)/16/63 to 03/23/63 LT 1.5 LT l. 7 03/2)/83 to 03/30/83 1.9 + 1.6 LT l.7 April 03/30/83 to 04/06/63 5.6 + 2.5 3.2 + 2.1 04/06/83 to 04/12/83 l.T 2 l.T 3 04/12/63 to 04/19/83 4.1 + 2.2 J.T 1. 7 04 /19/83 to 04/26/83 LT 2 LT 3 04/26/83 to 05/0)/83 2.4 + 1.7 3.7 + 2.1 Note: See footnote at end of table.
(.
'-..._ Table 4 (Pagel of
~1 L~*...,_:I
: 3) c----,
I **- ~-
.J Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO REHP - 1983
'(Results in E-03 pCi/m3 + 2s)
BC ALL CP DOW LT 1.8 LT 3 LT 1.9 LT 1.7 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 l,T 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 3.1 + 2.6 LT 2 LT 4 LT 3 J.T 3 LT 1.5 LT 2 2.1 + 1.8 LT 1.7 q 1.4 3.5 + 2.6 LT 1.6 LT 1.6 1.5 + 1.5 LT 2 LT 1.4 LT 1.3 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 I.T 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 I.T 1.5 LT 2 2.7 + 2.0 LT 1.6 19 + 5 l2 + 6 1.8 + 1.4 17 + 5 1.T l. 7 LT 3 LT 2 LT 1.8 LT 1.7 LT 3 LT 2 LT 1.9 4.1 + 2.3 l.T 3 l.T 2 4.3+2.5-LT 3 3.0 + 2.2 LT 3 LT 3 2.7..+ 1..8 l.T 3 LT 1.4 LT 1.9 LT 3 2.0 + 2.0 LT 1.9 LT 3 1.8 + 1;6 2,6 + 2.0 2.1 + 1.5 2.8 + 2.1
,-*-:--*1
\\......*... I AVERAGE FE NN
+ 2s LT 2 LT 2 2.0 + 0.9.
J.T 2 LT 2 2,1 + 0.7 LT 3 LT 3 3.1 + 0.7 J.T 2 3.0 + 2.5 2.8 + 1.3 LT 1,7 2.0 + 1,9 1,9 + 0.6 LT 1,6 LT 1. 7 1.9 + 1,4 1.7+1.6 LT 1.4.
1.7 + 1.1 LT 2 2,3 + 2.2 2.2 + 0.7 LT 2 LT 3 2.2 + 1.1 3.9 + 2.3 3.1 + 2.2 2.5 + 1.7 12 + 5 11 + 5 12 + 11 LT 2 LT 2 2.0 + 0.9 LT 2 LT 2 2.0 + 0.8
* 3.1 + 2.3 LT 2 3.4 + 2.4 r.T 3 4.9 + 3.1 3.1 + 1.6 LT 2 LT 2 2.3 + 1.7 LT 3 LT 3 2.6 + 1.1 3.4 + 2.2 LT 1,5 2.5 + 1.5


j I :..,
r-*-*-**
r-*-*-**
j  I :..,                            1,: .. l Table 4 (Page 2 of 3)
1,:.. l Table 4 (Page 2 of 3)
Grose Alpha on Air Pert!culate Filters VEPCO REMP - 1983 3   .
Grose Alpha on Air Pert!culate Filters VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results 3
(Results In E-03 pCi/m :!:. 2e)
In E-03 pCi/m :!:. 2e)
AVERAGE Month     Collection Period           ss     l!IR               BC         ALL           CP         DOW.       FE         NN         + 2e May       05/03/83 to 05/10/83       I.T 3   LT 3               LT 3         LT 2         I.T 1.8     LT 3     ,LT. 3 "*   LT 3   2.7 + 1.0 05/10/83 to 05/17/83   3.7 + 2.2   J.T l .3           LT l.3       LT 3         LT l.~   3.8 + 2.3   LT 1.4     LT 1.5 2.2 + 2.2 05/17/81 to 05/24/83   1.8 + 1.6 2.2 + 1.9           LT 1.8       LT 4         LT 2       LT 2       LT 2       LT 2   2.2 :!:_ 1.* 5 05/24 /83 to 06/01/83   2.3 + 1.6   LT 1.6             t.T 1.6       LT 2         LT 1.9     LT 1.9 2.2 + 1.9     LT 1.8 1.9 + 0.5 June     06/01/83 to 06/08/83   2.4 + 2.2   LT 3               LT 3         LT 4         LT 3       LT 3   4.0 + 2.9     LT 3   3.2 + 1.1 06/08/83 to 06/14/83   2.4 + 1.9   LT 2           3.1 + 2.2     4.1 + 3.2       LT 2       LT 2       LT 2       LT 2   2.5 + 1.5 06/14/83 to 06/22/83   5.4 + 2.3 2.8 + 1.8         3.7 + 2.0     5.4 + 3.1     4.9 + 2.5   6.3 + 2.7 4.3 + 2.3   4.4 + 2.3 4.7 + 2.2 I-'           06/22/83 to 06/28/83   1.7 + 1.6 2.6 + 2.1         2.0 + 1.8       LT 3         LT 3       20 + 4   3.3 + 2.4   3.0 + 2.3     5 + 12 I.O 06/28/83 to 07/06/83       LT 2     LT 2*             LT 2         LT 3         LT 3       LT 2       LT 3       LT 3   2.5 + 1.1 July     07 /06/83 to 07/13/83   2.2 + 1.6 2.0 + 1.7         2.2 + 1.8     5.2 + 3.4       LT 2     2.8 + 2.0   LT 2     3.5 + 2.3 2.7 + 2.3 07/13/83 to 07/19/83   2.6 + 2.4 3.0 + 2.6         3.1 + 2.5     4.8 + 3.9       LT 3     4.8 + 3.2 3.5 + 3.0   4.2 + 3.1 3.6 + 1.7 07 /19/83 to 07 /26/83 2.2 + 1.7 2.7 + 2.1         4.6 + 2.5     5.9 + 3.4     3.0 + 2.4   5.3 + 2.8 4.5 + 2.7   6.5 + 3.2 4.3 + 3.1 07 /26/83 to 08/02/83     NS(4) 5.5 + 3.0         6.8 + 3.1       LT 3       3.3 + 2.6     LT 2       LT 3     3.6 + 2.7 3.9 + 3.3 August   08/02/83 to 08/09/83   2.6 + 1.9 7.3 + 3.3         2.7 + 2.2     3.2 + 2.6     3.6 + 2.7   2.2 + 2.2 5.2 + 3.1   4.1, + 3.0 3.9 + 3.4 08/09/83 to 08/17 /83   3.3 + 1.9 3.3 + 2.3         3.2 + 2.2     2.8 + 2.2     6.2 + 3.0   3.7 + 2.3 3.3 + 2.3   7.2 + 3.3 4.1 + 3.3 08/17/83 to 08/23/83   7.1 + 3.4 7.8 + 3.7           10 + 4       5.8 + 3.4     9.4 + 4.4     LT 3   6.0 + 3.5   9.9+4.5   7.* 4 + 4.8 08/23/83 to 08/30/83   6.1 + 3.0 2.9 + 2.3         5.7 + 2.9     3.9 + 2.6     3.6 + 2.7   2.7 + 2.7 4.1 + 2.8   3.3 + 2.6 4.0 + 2.5 Note: See footnote at end of table.
AVERAGE Month Collection Period ss l!IR BC ALL CP DOW.
FE NN  
+ 2e May 05/03/83 to 05/10/83 I.T 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 I.T 1.8 LT 3  
,LT. 3 "*
LT 3 2.7 + 1.0 05/10/83 to 05/17/83 3.7 + 2.2 J.T l.3 LT l.3 LT 3 LT l.~
3.8 + 2.3 LT 1.4 LT 1.5 2.2 + 2.2 05/17/81 to 05/24/83 1.8 + 1.6 2.2 + 1.9 LT 1.8 LT 4 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 2.2 :!:_ 1.* 5 05/24 /83 to 06/01/83 2.3 + 1.6 LT 1.6 t.T 1.6 LT 2 LT 1.9 LT 1.9 2.2 + 1.9 LT 1.8 1.9 + 0.5 June 06/01/83 to 06/08/83 2.4 + 2.2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 4.0 + 2.9 LT 3 3.2 + 1.1 06/08/83 to 06/14/83 2.4 + 1.9 LT 2 3.1 + 2.2 4.1 + 3.2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 2.5 + 1.5 06/14/83 to 06/22/83 5.4 + 2.3 2.8 + 1.8 3.7 + 2.0 5.4 + 3.1 4.9 + 2.5 6.3 + 2.7 4.3 + 2.3 4.4 + 2.3 4.7 + 2.2 I-'
06/22/83 to 06/28/83 1.7 + 1.6 2.6 + 2.1 2.0 + 1.8 LT 3 LT 3 20 + 4 3.3 + 2.4 3.0 + 2.3 5 + 12 I.O 06/28/83 to 07/06/83 LT 2 LT 2*
LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 2.5 + 1.1 July 07 /06/83 to 07/13/83 2.2 + 1.6 2.0 + 1.7 2.2 + 1.8 5.2 + 3.4 LT 2 2.8 + 2.0 LT 2 3.5 + 2.3 2.7 + 2.3 07/13/83 to 07/19/83 2.6 + 2.4 3.0 + 2.6 3.1 + 2.5 4.8 + 3.9 LT 3 4.8 + 3.2 3.5 + 3.0 4.2 + 3.1 3.6 + 1.7 07 /19/83 to 07 /26/83 2.2 + 1.7 2.7 + 2.1 4.6 + 2.5 5.9 + 3.4 3.0 + 2.4 5.3 + 2.8 4.5 + 2.7 6.5 + 3.2 4.3 + 3.1 07 /26/83 to 08/02/83 NS(4) 5.5 + 3.0 6.8 + 3.1 LT 3 3.3 + 2.6 LT 2 LT 3 3.6 + 2.7 3.9 + 3.3 August 08/02/83 to 08/09/83 2.6 + 1.9 7.3 + 3.3 2.7 + 2.2 3.2 + 2.6 3.6 + 2.7 2.2 + 2.2 5.2 + 3.1 4.1, + 3.0 3.9 + 3.4 08/09/83 to 08/17 /83 3.3 + 1.9 3.3 + 2.3 3.2 + 2.2 2.8 + 2.2 6.2 + 3.0 3.7 + 2.3 3.3 + 2.3 7.2 + 3.3 4.1 + 3.3 08/17/83 to 08/23/83 7.1 + 3.4 7.8 + 3.7 10 + 4 5.8 + 3.4 9.4 + 4.4 LT 3 6.0 + 3.5 9.9+4.5 7.* 4 + 4.8 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 6.1 + 3.0 2.9 + 2.3 5.7 + 2.9 3.9 + 2.6 3.6 + 2.7 2.7 + 2.7 4.1 + 2.8 3.3 + 2.6 4.0 + 2.5 Note: See footnote at end of table.  


I . -*.*-           i. *. -*---                    r-,-.--.            r.----...                    .---~
i 1 i i l r l I
I.,      .                                          I. ...*.*          I L,. * * * * *
I.
                                                                                            ,)              '
I I.
: l. . ....J'            ~:.J Table 4 (Page 3 of 3)
I r j;
Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO kEHr - 1933 3
I. -*.*-
(ilesulte in E-03 pCi/m :!:_ 2s)
I.,
AVERAGE Month          Collection Period            ss      IIIR                    IIC                  ALI,         CP            DOW        FE        NN          + 2e September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83         3.3 + 2.3  3.2 + 2.4                5.4 + 2.8        2.7 + 2.3      5.1 + 3.1    5.2 + 2.9    LT 3    4.2  + 2.8  4.0 + 2;2 09/06/83 to 09/14/83   3.4 + 2.1  5.2  + 2.6              4.2 + 2.3            LT 2        1.9 + 1.8        LT 2        (2}    4.7 + 2.7    3.3 + 2.8 09/14/83 to 09/20/i3    2.1 + 2.1    LT 3                   5.0 + 3.0        2.9 + 2.3       2.9 + 2.5    3.7 + 2.9    LT 3       LT 3     3.2 + 1.7 09/20/63 to 09/27/83        LT 3      LT 2                   4.1 + 2.5        2.8 + 2.1       6.1 + 2.9     1.6  + 1.5  2.5 + 1.4  1.11 + 1.5  3.0 + 3.0 09/27/83 to 09/27/83(3) 1.7 + 1.2
l'v 0
* October        09/27/83 to 10/04/83        LT 3   2.6 + 2.5               J.l + 2.6         2.8 + 2.3      3.1 + 2.6    2.8 + 2.8    LT 3        LT 3      2.9 + 0.4 10/01,/83 to 10/11/83  1.5 + 1.4     LT 2                  1.7+1.5          1.7+1.4           LT 2          LT 3       LT 2       LT  2     2.0 + 0.9 10/11/83 to 10/18/83    2.3+1.7    1.7+1.6                  1.5 + 1.4        1.9 + 1.6        LT 1.2      1.5  + 1.5  1.9 + 1.7  2.8 + 2.1    1.9 + 1.0 l'v                      10/18/83 to 10/26/83        LT 1.3    LT 1.5                   LT 1.4              LT 1.4       LT 1.4         LT 1.5    LT l,3     LT 1.6    1.4 + 0.2 0
: i. *. -*---
10/26/83 to 11/04/63    2.4 + 1.4    LT 1.2                2.2 + 1.3        2.4    +   1.4 1.6 + 1.3     2.1 + 1.5     LT 1,2.8 + 1.6    2.0 + 1.2 November      11/01/83 to 11/08/83    1.7 + 1.2.1 + 1..3               2.3 + 1.3        1.9 + 1.2      2.4 :!:_ 1.4. 2.4 + 1.2.0 + 1.2 3.+   1.7 2.3 + 0.9 11/08/83 to 11/15/83    2.8 + 1.1.7 + 1.4                 LT 2            2.5    + 1.5     LT 2        1.8  + 1.6  4.3 +. 1.7 3.8  +  1.9 2.6 + 1.9 11/15/83 to 11/22/83  2.0 + 1.2. LT 1.2                 1.9 + l.2        1.2 + 1.1      1.6 + 1.2     1.4 + 1.1  1.2 + 1.2.8 +   1.6 1.7 + 1.1 11/22/83 to 11/29/83  3.3 + 1.4   3.3  +  1.6            4.2 +   1.7      ,,.6     + 1.4.2 + 1.7     3.5.+ 1.7   2.+ 1.3 4.3 +   1.9 3.7 + 1.5 i                December      11/29/83 to 12/07/83 12/07/83 to 12/13/83 3.1 + 1.5 5.6 + 2.4 2.8 + l.6 4.3 + 2.1
Month Collection Period September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83 09/06/83 to 09/14/83 r-, -.--.
                                                                                              ].l + 1.6 1.9 + 1.8 5.3 + 1.8 4.5 + 2.1 4.0 + 1.8
I.... *.*
                                                                                                                                ~.o +   2.5 3.-9 + 2.0 5.4 + 2.2 2.3 + 1.4 4.8 + 2.5 LT 1.9 4.1 + 2.2 3.3 + 2,.2 4.5 + 2.3 1                               12/13/83 to 12/20/83    3.1 + 1.3  4.2 + 1.5                2.7 + 1.3        3.2 + 1.4       4.1 + 1.6    4.7 + 1.8  2.5 + 1.2  4.5 + 1.7    3.6 + 1.7 i                                12/20/83 to 12/28/83  2.7  + 1.3 2.8 + 1.3               1.5 + 1.2        2.6 + 1.3      3.6  + 1.2.+ 1.3.3 + 1.3.+ 1.2.9 + 1.4 i
ss 3.3 + 2.3 3.4 + 2.1 09/14/83 to 09/20/i3 2.1 + 2.1 09/20/63 to 09/27/83 LT 3 09/27/83 to 09/27/83(3) 1.7 + 1.2
l                                                      4.9 + 2.3.0 + 1.9                2.7 + 1.8        5.1 + 2.2       4.2 + 2.2                4.3 + 2.0 3.6 + 2.2    4.1 + 1.9 r                                12/28/fll to 01/03/84                                                                                        5.1 :I- 2.5 lI                                      AVERAGE  + 2s  3.0 + 4.3   2.9 + 3.2                3.1 + 5.5         3.3 + 3.3      2.9 + 3.0    3.4 + 6.5  3.0 + 3.4 3.3 + 3.7 I.                (1) J.T - Less Thnn. The nctual I.LO values are included in the averages and standard deviations shown on this tahle.
* October 09/27/83 to 10/04/83 10/01,/83 to 10/11/83 10/11/83 to 10/18/83 10/18/83 to 10/26/83 10/26/83 to 11/04/63 November 11/01/83 to 11/08/83 11/08/83 to 11/15/83 11/15/83 to 11/22/83 11/22/83 to 11/29/83 December 11/29/83 to 12/07/83 12/07/83 to 12/13/83 12/13/83 to 12/20/83 12/20/83 to 12/28/83 12/28/fll to 01/03/84 AVERAGE
I                (2)
+ 2s LT 3 1.5 + 1.4 2.3+1.7 LT 1.3 2.4 + 1.4 1.7 + 1.2 2.8 + 1.6 2.0 + 1.2.
(3)
3.3 + 1.4 3.1 + 1.5 5.6 + 2.4 3.1 + 1.3 2.7 + 1.3 4.9 + 2.1 3.0 + 4.3 r.----...
Sample missing due to failed sample pump.
I L,. *****
One-day sample collecte~ oe part of effluent release monitoring program.
,)
I.                (4) NS - No sample received.
IIIR 3.2 + 2.4 5.2 + 2.6 LT 3 LT 2 2.6 + 2.5 LT 2 1.7+1.6 LT 1.5 LT 1.2 2.1 + 1..3 1.7 + 1.4 LT 1.2 3.3 + 1.6 2.8 + l.6 4.3 + 2.1 4.2 + 1.5 2.8 + 1.3 3.0 + 1.9 2.9 + 3.2
I rj;
.---~
: l.  
..... J Table 4 (Page 3 of 3)
~:.J Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO kEHr - 1933 3
(ilesulte in E-03 pCi/m
:!:_ 2s)
IIC 5.4 + 2.8 4.2 + 2.3 5.0 + 3.0 4.1 + 2.5 J.l + 2.6 1.7+1.5 1.5 + 1.4 LT 1.4 2.2 + 1.3 2.3 + 1.3 LT 2 1.9 + l.2 4.2 + 1.7
].l + 1.6 1.9 + 1.8 2.7 + 1.3 1.5 + 1.2 2.7 + 1.8 3.1 + 5.5
: ALI, 2.7 + 2.3 LT 2 2.9 + 2.3 2.8 + 2.1 2.8 + 2.3 1.7+1.4 1.9 + 1.6 LT 1.4 2.4 + 1.4 1.9 + 1.2 2.5 + 1.5 1.2 + 1.1
,,.6 + 1.8 5.3 + 1.8 4.5 + 2.1 3.2 + 1.4 2.6 + 1.3 5.1 + 2.2 3.3 + 3.3 CP 5.1 + 3.1 1.9 + 1.8 2.9 + 2.5 6.1 + 2.9 3.1 + 2.6 LT 2 LT 1.2 LT 1.4 1.6 + 1.3 DOW 5.2 + 2.9 LT 2 3.7 + 2.9 1.6 + 1.5 2.8 + 2.8 LT 3 1.5 + 1.5 LT 1.5 2.1 + 1.5 2.4 :!:_ 1.4.
2.4 + 1.5 LT 2 1.8 + 1.6 1.6 + 1.2 1.4 + 1.1 4.2 + 1.7 3.5.+ 1.7 4.0 + 1.8
~.o + 2.5 4.1 + 1.6 3.6 + 1.5 4.2 + 2.2 2.9 + 3.0 3.-9 + 2.0 5.4 + 2.2 4.7 + 1.8 2.9 + 1.5 5.1 :I-2.5 3.4 + 6.5 FE LT 3 (2}
LT 3 2.5 + 1.4 LT 3 LT 2 1.9 + 1.7 LT l,3 LT 1,1 2.0 + 1.2 4.3 +. 1.7 1.2 + 1.0 2.3 + 1.3 2.3 + 1.4 4.8 + 2.5 2.5 + 1.2 3.3 + 1.4 4.3 + 2.0 3.0 + 3.4 (1) J.T - Less Thnn. The nctual I.LO values are included in the averages and standard deviations shown on this tahle.
(2) Sample missing due to failed sample pump.
(3) One-day sample collecte~ oe part of effluent release monitoring program.
(4) NS -
No sample received.
NN 4.2 + 2.8 4.7 + 2.7 LT 3 1.11 + 1.5 LT 3 LT 2 2.8 + 2.1 LT 1.6 2.8 + 1.6 3.2 + 1.7 3.8 + 1.9 2.8 + 1.6 4.3 + 1.9 LT 1.9 4.1 + 2.2 4.5 + 1.7 3.8 + 1.6 3.6 + 2.2 3.3 + 3.7 AVERAGE
+ 2e 4.0 + 2;2 3.3 + 2.8 3.2 + 1.7 3.0 + 3.0 2.9 + 0.4 2.0 + 0.9 1.9 + 1.0 1.4 + 0.2 2.0 + 1.2 2.3 + 0.9 2.6 + 1.9 1.7 + 1.1 3.7 + 1.5 3.3 + 2,.2 4.5 + 2.3 3.6 + 1.7 2.9 + 1.4 4.1 + 1.9


[ ~- *--:                                                                                                   r--1                             :-----i
[ ~- *--:
                                                                                                                '*., ___ j                       ' _____ .....JI i.
r--1  
Table 5 (Page 1 of 3)
'*., ___ j Table 5 (Page 1 of 3)
Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters VEl'CO REHP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pC1/m3   .:!: Zs)
Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters VEl'CO REHP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pC1/m3.:!: Zs)
AVERAGE Month       Collection Period           ss       llIR             BC           Al.I,         CP               DOW      FE                        NN      + 2s January     12/28/62 to Ol/04/83       16 + 5   14 + 5       17 + 5       9.8 + 6.9       10 +5           LT 7(1)  13 + 6                    17 + 6  13 + 7 01/04/83 to 01/12/83       21 + 4   11 + 4       14 + 5       7.4 + 5.8       12 + 5           15 + 5    12 + 5                    13 + 5  13 + 8 01/12/83 to oi/18/8'3     7.6 + 4.7 6.5 + 5,1       l,T fl       l,T 7         l,T 9         9.1 + 5.4  LT 9                  9.1 + 5.9  8.2 + 2.1 01/18/ll.l to fl l /2 5/83 19 + 5   4.8 + 4.1     ll + 5         LT 10         LT 7          8.3 + 4.7 5.2 :!:. 4 .8                LT 7   9.0 + 9.1 Ol /2 5/8) to 02/02/fl J   19 + 5   14 + 5       13 + 5       7.5 + 6.2       13 + 5           12  +  5  13 + 5                    13 + 6  13 + 6 February   02/02/83 to 02/08/83         LT 7   6.9 + 5.2     . LT 8         LT 10         LT 9             LT 9      LT 9                      LT 9  8.5 + 2.2
Month Collection Period ss llIR BC Al.I, CP January 12/28/62 to Ol/04/83 16 + 5 14 + 5 17 + 5 9.8 + 6.9 10 + 5 01/04/83 to 01/12/83 21 + 4 11 + 4 14 + 5 7.4 + 5.8 12 + 5 01/12/83 to oi/18/8'3 7.6 + 4.7 6.5 + 5,1 l,T fl l,T 7 l,T 9 01/18/ll.l to fl l /2 5/83 19 + 5 4.8 + 4.1 ll + 5 LT 10 LT 7 Ol /2 5/8) to 02/02/fl J 19 + 5 14 + 5 13 + 5 7.5 + 6.2 13 + 5 February 02/02/83 to 02/08/83 LT 7 6.9 + 5.2  
\,)
. LT 8 LT 10 LT 9  
02/08/83 to 02/15/83       25 + 4   28 + 5       19 + 4         26 + 6         21 + 4           24 + 5    25 + 5                    21 + 5  24 + 6 02/15/83 to 02/22/83       19 + 5   16 + 5       14 + 5         LT 8         11 + 5          11 + 5   16 + 6                    10 + 6  13 + 7 02/22/83 to 03/02/83       15 + 4   5.0 + 4.2     8.1 + 4.2     5.6 + 4.6     7.3 + 6.4       8.6 + 4.8  LT 7                  8.0 + 5.4  8.1 + 6.1 Harch       03/02/83 to 03/10/83       11 + 4   6.9 + 4.3     7.5 + 4.2       LT 9           LT 7            LT 7   8.3 + 4.9                7.8 + 5.2  8.1 + 2.8 03/10/83 to 03/16/83       28 + 7   15 + 6       22 + 7         23 + 10         LT 8           29 + 8    16 + 7                    19 + 7  20 + 14 03/16/83 to 0)/23/83       26 + 6     LT 8           LT 7         LT 8           LT 9             LT 8      LT 9                      LT 9    11 + 13 03/2 3/63 to 03/30/83       11 + 5     LT 8       8.1 + 5*.2       LT 8         Iii + 7           LT 8      LT 9                  6.7 + 5.7  9.4 + 5.9 April       03/30/83 to 04/06/83       78 + 8   9.7 + 5.1     7.7 + 4.8       LT 8           LT 8             LT 8    7.0 + 5.6                  12 + 6  17 + 1,9 Olo/06/83 to 04/12/83       LT 7     LT 8           LT 8         LT 10         LT 10            LT 9      LT 9                      23 + 7  11 + 10 04/12/8) to 04/19/83       29 + 6   4.8 + 4.5     4.6 + 4.4       J.T 10         l,T 6           LT 8      LT 8                      LT 9  *9.9 + 16 04/19/83 to 04/26/83       11 + 5   8.3 + 5.1     9.9 + 5.0     7.8 + 5.2       LT 6           14 + 6    LT 8                      11 + 6  9.5 + 5.0 04/26/83 to 05/03/83       22 + 5   23 + 6       16 + 5         13 + 5       18 + 5           13 + 6   19 + 6                     20 + 6   18 + 8 NOTE:  See footnotes on last page of table
\\,)
02/08/83 to 02/15/83 25 + 4 28 + 5 19 + 4 26 + 6 21 + 4 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 19 + 5 16 + 5 14 + 5 LT 8 11 + 5 02/22/83 to 03/02/83 15 + 4 5.0 + 4.2 8.1 + 4.2 5.6 + 4.6 7.3 + 6.4 Harch 03/02/83 to 03/10/83 11 + 4 6.9 + 4.3 7.5 + 4.2 LT 9 LT 7 03/10/83 to 03/16/83 28 + 7 15 + 6 22 + 7 23 + 10 LT 8 03/16/83 to 0)/23/83 26 + 6 LT 8 LT 7 LT 8 LT 9 03/2 3/63 to 03/30/83 11 + 5 LT 8 8.1 + 5*.2 LT 8 Iii + 7 April 03/30/83 to 04/06/83 78 + 8 9.7 + 5.1 7.7 + 4.8 LT 8 LT 8 Olo/06/83 to 04/12/83 LT 7 LT 8 LT 8 LT 10 LT 10 04/12/8) to 04/19/83 29 + 6 4.8 + 4.5 4.6 + 4.4 J.T 10 l,T 6 04/19/83 to 04/26/83 11 + 5 8.3 + 5.1 9.9 + 5.0 7.8 + 5.2 LT 6 04/26/83 to 05/03/83 22 + 5 23 + 6 16 + 5 13 + 5 18 + 5 NOTE:
See footnotes on last page of table DOW LT 7(1) 15 + 5 9.1 + 5.4 8.3 + 4.7 12 + 5 LT 9 24 + 5 11 + 5 8.6 + 4.8 LT 7 29 + 8 LT 8 LT 8 LT 8 LT 9 LT 8 14 + 6 13 + 6
:-----i I
: i. _____..... J FE NN 13 + 6 17 + 6 12 + 5 13 + 5 LT 9 9.1 + 5.9 5.2 :!:. 4.8 LT 7 13 + 5 13 + 6 LT 9 LT 9 25 + 5 21 + 5 16 + 6 10 + 6 LT 7 8.0 + 5.4 8.3 + 4.9 7.8 + 5.2 16 + 7 19 + 7 LT 9 LT 9 LT 9 6.7 + 5.7 7.0 + 5.6 12 + 6 LT 9 23 + 7 LT 8 LT 9 LT 8 11 + 6 19 + 6 20 + 6 AVERAGE
+ 2s 13 + 7 13 + 8 8.2 + 2.1 9.0 + 9.1 13 + 6 8.5 + 2.2 24 + 6 13 + 7 8.1 + 6.1 8.1 + 2.8 20 + 14 11 + 13 9.4 + 5.9 17 + 1,9 11 + 10
*9.9 + 16 9.5 + 5.0 18 + 8  


c* -       r--
j j
1         r:-=:i                         r*-_.1
l
                                                            ***--~-**'"-*'
:1 I j i
: r. . --~-.. . . . r
:j
                                                                                                    ...r-~
,,\\
                                                                                                      - .....~_)                             l Table 5 j                                                                                                        (Page 2 of 3) j                                                                              Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filtera l
I I j
1 VEPCO KliMP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pCi/m3               :!: 2s)
.i
I j                                                                                                                                                                                AVERAGE i        Month        Collection Period          ss                        urn                             BC           ALL         CP        1)0\,/    l'g        NN          + 2s j
'i I
,\
.I j
,!        May          05/03/83 to 05/10/83    34 + 6                    10 + 5                     13 + 5             LT 9         LT 7    8.1 + 5.6 5.8 + 5.5 9.3 + 5.7    12 + 18.
r
I                      05/10/83 to 05/17 /83    25  :!: 5              8.4 + 5.1                   7.4 + 4.9           LT 10         LT 8    33 + 7   11 + 6    LT 8       14 + 19 Ij 05/17/83 to 05/24/83      53 + 6                  9.2 + 5.0                   11     + 5     5.3 + 5.2     6.8 + 5.7 14 + 6  7.4 + 5.3 9.3  :!: 5.5  15 + 32 i
~
i                      05/24/83 to 06/01/83      42 + 6                    LT 7                     6.5 + 4.6           LT 8         LT 9      LT 9     LT 8    7.1 + 5.4    12 + 24 I
i l* I I
I June          06/01/83 to 06/08/83   9.4 + 4.8                 8.9 + 5.6                   6.9 + 5.2           I.T 8         LT 9      LT 9      LT 9   8.5 + 6.0    8.6 + 1.6 j
I I
'*                    06/08/83 to 06/14/83     45 + 7                   16 + 6                     15 + 6           7.6 + 6.5       18 + 7     LT 10    14 + 7    17 + 7      18 + 23 06/14/83 to 06/22/83     39 + 6                   16 + 5                     22 + 5           12 + 7         18 + 6   23 + 6    25 + 6    17 + 5      22 + 16 06/22/83 to 06/28/83     14 + 6                     LT 10                   9.9 + 6.3           LT 9       9.9 + 5.1 63 + 7    72 + 10  12 + 5      25 + 53 9.5 + 5.3    9.3 + 3.9 r i
I i ! }
    ~
l
06/28/83 to 07/06/83     12 + 4                   11 + 5                   11 + 5             LT 8       6.2 + 5.4 8.4 + 4.9  LT 8 l*
~
I      July          07 /06/83 to 0?/13/83     18 + 5                   10 + 5                     12 + 5           14 + 7         13 + 6   18 +*6    14 + 6    17 + 6      15 + 5.9 07/13/83 to 07/19/83     '43 + 8                   27 + 7                     23 + 7           14 + 9         27 + 9   21 + 8    37 + 9    30 + 8      28 + 18 I                      07/19/83 to 07 /26/83     35 + 6                   24 + 6                     18 + 6           12 + 7         17 + 7   16 + 6    20 + 7    13 + 6      19 + 15 II                    07 /26/83 to 08/02/83     NS(4)                     LT 8                       11     + 5     9.1 + 6.0       11 + 6    LT 8      LT 9    11 + 6     9.6 + 2.8 I
ll*
i        August      08/02/83 to 08/09/83     11 + 5                   19 + 6                   9.3 + 5.1           LT 9         14 + 6   9.8 + 5.8  13 + 6  6.3 + 6.1    l1 + 8
J
}                      08/09/83 to 08/17/83     30 + 5                 9.3 + 5.2                   21 + 5           14 + 6         15 + 6   15 + 5    15 + 5    12 + 6      16 + 13 .
-1 i
l ~
'l l '
08/17 /83 to 08/23/83 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 39 + 8 22 + 6 40 + 8 16 + 6 33 + 7 19 + 6 22 + 7 7 .6 + 5."5 42 + 9 15 + 6 LT 9 13 + 6 39 + 9 18 + 6 40 + 9 17 + 6 33 + 23 16 + 9 ll*J 1
1 I
i        NOTE:    See footnotes on last page of table l
l l
l 1I l
1 l l I I,
l 1
j
l lI I,
/1 c* -
j
Month May June July August NOTE:
  /1
r--
1 r:-=:i Collection Period 05/03/83 to 05/10/83 05/10/83 to 05/17 /83 05/17/83 to 05/24/83 05/24/83 to 06/01/83 ss 34 + 6 25 :!: 5 53 + 6 42 + 6 r*-_.1  
***--~-**'"-*'
r  
.... --~-............. r r-~  
-..... ~_)
Table 5 (Page 2 of 3)
Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filtera VEPCO KliMP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pCi/m3 :!: 2s) urn BC ALL 10 + 5 13 + 5 LT 9 8.4 + 5.1 7.4 + 4.9 LT 10 l
CP LT 7 LT 8 9.2 + 5.0 11 + 5 5.3 + 5.2 6.8 + 5.7 LT 7 6.5 + 4.6 LT 8 LT 9 06/01/83 to 06/08/83 9.4 + 4.8 8.9 + 5.6 6.9 + 5.2 I.T 8 LT 9 06/08/83 to 06/14/83 45 + 7 16 + 6 15 + 6 7.6 + 6.5 18 + 7 06/14/83 to 06/22/83 39 + 6 16 + 5 22 + 5 12 + 7 18 + 6 06/22/83 to 06/28/83 14 + 6 LT 10 9.9 + 6.3 LT 9 9.9 + 5.1 06/28/83 to 07/06/83 12 + 4 11 + 5 11 + 5 LT 8 6.2 + 5.4 07 /06/83 to 0?/13/83 18 + 5 10 + 5 12 + 5 14 + 7 13 + 6 07/13/83 to 07/19/83  
'43 + 8 27 + 7 23 + 7 14 + 9 27 + 9 07/19/83 to 07 /26/83 35 + 6 24 + 6 18 + 6 12 + 7 17 + 7 07 /26/83 to 08/02/83 NS(4)
LT 8 11 + 5 9.1 + 6.0 11 + 6 08/02/83 to 08/09/83 11 + 5 19 + 6 9.3 + 5.1 LT 9 14 + 6 08/09/83 to 08/17/83 30 + 5 9.3 + 5.2 21 + 5 14 + 6 15 + 6 08/17 /83 to 08/23/83 39 + 8 40 + 8 33 + 7 22 + 7 42 + 9 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 22 + 6 16 + 6 19 + 6 7.6 + 5."5 15 + 6 See footnotes on last page of table AVERAGE 1)0\\,/
l'g NN
+ 2s 8.1 + 5.6 5.8 + 5.5 9.3 + 5.7 12 + 18.
33 + 7 11 + 6 LT 8 14 + 19 14 + 6 7.4 + 5.3 9.3 :!: 5.5 15 + 32 LT 9 LT 8 7.1 + 5.4 12 + 24 LT 9 LT 9 8.5 + 6.0 8.6 + 1.6 LT 10 14 + 7 17 + 7 18 + 23 23 + 6 25 + 6 17 + 5 22 + 16 63 + 7 72 + 10 12 + 5 25 + 53 8.4 + 4.9 LT 8 9.5 + 5.3 9.3 + 3.9 18 +*6 14 + 6 17 + 6 15 + 5.9 21 + 8 37 + 9 30 + 8 28 + 18 16 + 6 20 + 7 13 + 6 19 + 15 LT 8 LT 9 11 + 6 9.6 + 2.8 9.8 + 5.8 13 + 6 6.3 + 6.1 l1 + 8 15 + 5 15 + 5 12 + 6 16 + 13.
LT 9 39 + 9 40 + 9 33 + 23 13 + 6 18 + 6 17 + 6 16 + 9  


i r---        [.. -*--..                                r----:-1                                                          ,.... .......,.
ii
I                       **-'                                ... __ .. ~-* .. ,                                                t..
,I i
i i
i r
r j
'j t
t                                                                                                     Table 5 (Page J of. 3)
I  
I
*1 J l  
*1                                                                                   Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters J                                                                                               VEPCO REMP - 1983 l/
/
(Results in E-03 pCi/mJ  :!:. 2s)
I j.
I
I  
: j.       --- ... --------------------------------------------------------------------
*,{ r l j
I
:.J'  
,{                                                                                                                                                                               AVERAGE.
'11:
r           Month            Collection Period        SS                        lllR            IIC          ALL            CP              DOW      FE        NN          + 2s l j         September        08/30/83 to 09/06/83    22 + 6                    19 + 6          17 + 6        11  +  6      15 + 7            14 + 6    19 + 6    10 + 6    16 + 8
11
.J'                         09/06/83 to 09/14/83    17  + 5                    23 + 5          30 + 6          LT 6        17 + 5            LT 7        (2)    38 + 7    20 + 23 09/14/83 to 09/20/83    22 + 6                    19 + 7          18 + 7        15 + 6        16 + 6            15 + 7    19 + 6    23 + 8    18 + 6 11:
:.1.
1                          09/20/83 to 09/27 /83    LT 8                      15 + 6          14 +  5      14 + 5        20 + 6            12 + 4    13  +4    15 + 4    14 + 7
l 1,.
.1.                         09/27/83 to 09/27/03(3)  12 + 3 l
If  
1,.
,1 !j.
If 1
A j.
October          09/27/83 to 10/04/83 10/04/83 to 10/11/83 19 + 6 19  + 5 21 + 6 9,7    + 4.1 19 + 6 12 +  4 18 + 5 11  + 4 19 + 6 15 + 4 19 + 7 12 + 5 17 + 5 13  +4 20 + 6 16 + 5 19 + 2 13 +      6
:J j
!j.                         10/11/83 to 10/18/83    27 + 5                    12 + 4          8.6 + 3.4      16 + 4        16 + 4            15 + 4    23 + 5    21 + 5    1.7  :!:. 12
I
!                          10/18/83 to 10/26/83    11 + 3                  3.2 + 3.0        3.8 + 2.8        LT 4          LT 5              LT 5      LT 4      LT 5    5.1  + 4.9 A                           10/26/83 to 11/04/83    7.5 + 3.8                5.1 + 3.8          LT 6        6.4 + 3.9        J.T 6            J.T 7    J.T 6      r.T 6    6.3 + 1.5 j.
.j  
J j           November        11/01/83 to 11/08/83    10 + 3                  7.6 + 3.4        3.7 + 3.1      9.9 + 3.4      5.9 + 3.4        7.5 + 3.8 9.3 + 3.2  11  +4    8.l + 4.9
! i J.
.j I                          11/08/83 to 11/15/83    15 + 4                    11 + 4            LT 5        8.8 + 3.3        LT 6            10 + 4  9.0 +-3.3  9.5  + 4.1 9.3 + 6.1
j '
!J .i                      11/15/83 to 11/22/83    14 + ,,                  3.5 + 3.1          LT 5        5.2 + 3.3      5.4 + 3.5        7.8 + 3.4 3.8  + 3.1  12 + 4    7.1 + 7.8 j '                         11/22/83 to 11/29/83    24 + 4                    19 + 4          11 + 4        19 + 4        20 + 4            19 + 4    16 + 3    19 + 4    18  +    7 JI '
J '
1 Jj          December        11/29/8*3 to 12/07 /83  14 + 3                  8.6 + 2.9          LT 4        11 + 3        8.7 + 3.0          12  +  4 7.2 + 2,6    LT 4    8.7 + 7.2 q
I 1 J j
I 12/07/83 to 12/i1/IIJ    15 + 4                  8.1 + 3.7        4.0 + 3.6      8.5 + 3.7      9.1  + 4.4        13  +  4  16  +5    7.4 + 4.0  10 + 8
I q
  !;                        12/13/83 to 12/20/83    22 +  3                    19 + 3          11 + 3        19 + 3        20 + 4            43 + 5    16 + J    22 + 4    *22  + 19
\\'  
  \'                       12/20/83 to 12/28/1!3    17 + 3                    14 + 3        3.4 + 2.7      12 + 3        14  +    3      15 + 4    16 + 3    14  +4    13 + 8
).
  ).                       12/23/83 to 01/03/84    19 + 4                    17 + 4        4.7 + J.7      13  +  4      19 + 5            13 + 5    18 + 4    16 + 5    15 + 10 I .
I.  
.I.
.I.
I.
I.
i                                 AVERAGE + Zs   22 + 27                   13 +   1/,     12 + 13       11 +   9     13   + 13         14 + 20   14 + 22   14 + 15 I
i I j
j                                                                                                                                                                                            f
' l I
  '          (l)   LT - Lees Than. The nc1.w1l I.Lil vulues are included in the averages and standard deviations shown on this table, l
I, ij :*
l            (2) Sample mfsslng due to failed sample pump.
):
l' r---
[. -*--..
r----:-1
... __.. ~-*..,
Table 5 (Page J of. 3)
Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pCi/mJ :!:. 2s) t..
Month Collection Period SS September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83 22 + 6 09/06/83 to 09/14/83 17 + 5 09/14/83 to 09/20/83 22 + 6 09/20/83 to 09/27 /83 LT 8 09/27/83 to 09/27/03(3) 12 + 3 October 09/27/83 to 10/04/83 10/04/83 to 10/11/83 10/11/83 to 10/18/83 10/18/83 to 10/26/83 10/26/83 to 11/04/83 November 11/01/83 to 11/08/83 11/08/83 to 11/15/83 11/15/83 to 11/22/83 11/22/83 to 11/29/83 December 11/29/8*3 to 12/07 /83 12/07/83 to 12/i1/IIJ 12/13/83 to 12/20/83 12/20/83 to 12/28/1!3 12/23/83 to 01/03/84 AVERAGE  
+ Zs 19 + 6 19 + 5 27 + 5 11 + 3 7.5 + 3.8 10 + 3 15 + 4 14 +,,
24 + 4 14 + 3 15 + 4 22 + 3 17 + 3 19 + 4 22 + 27 lllR 19 + 6 23 + 5 19 + 7 15 + 6 21 + 6 9,7 + 4.1 12 + 4 3.2 + 3.0 5.1 + 3.8 7.6 + 3.4 11 + 4 3.5 + 3.1 19 + 4 8.6 + 2.9 8.1 + 3.7 19 + 3 14 + 3 17 + 4 13 + 1/,
IIC 17 + 6 30 + 6 18 + 7 14 + 5 19 + 6 12 + 4 8.6 + 3.4 3.8 + 2.8 LT 6 3.7 + 3.1 LT 5 LT 5 11 + 4 LT 4 4.0 + 3.6 11 + 3 3.4 + 2.7 4.7 + J.7 12 + 13 ALL 11 + 6 LT 6 15 + 6 14 + 5 18 + 5 11 + 4 16 + 4 LT 4 6.4 + 3.9 9.9 + 3.4 8.8 + 3.3 5.2 + 3.3 19 + 4 11 + 3 8.5 + 3.7 19 + 3 12 + 3 13 + 4 11 + 9 CP 15 + 7 17 + 5 16 + 6 20 + 6 19 + 6 15 + 4 16 + 4 LT 5 J.T 6 5.9 + 3.4 LT 6 5.4 + 3.5 20 + 4 8.7 + 3.0 9.1 + 4.4 20 + 4 14 + 3 19 + 5 13 + 13 DOW 14 + 6 LT 7 15 + 7 12 + 4 19 + 7 12 + 5 15 + 4 LT 5 J.T 7 7.5 + 3.8 10 + 4 7.8 + 3.4 19 + 4 12 + 4 13 + 4 43 + 5 15 + 4 13 + 5 14 + 20 FE 19 + 6 (2) 19 + 6 13 + 4 17 + 5 13 + 4 23 + 5 LT 4 J.T 6 9.3 + 3.2 9.0 +-3.3 3.8 + 3.1 16 + 3 7.2 + 2,6 16 + 5 16 + J 16 + 3 18 + 4 14 + 22 (l) LT - Lees Than.
The nc1.w1l I.Lil vulues are included in the averages and standard deviations shown on this table, (2) Sample mfsslng due to failed sample pump.
(3) One-day sample collected as part of effluent release monitoring program.
(3) One-day sample collected as part of effluent release monitoring program.
(I,) No sample received i
(I,) No sample received NN 10 + 6 38 + 7 23 + 8 15 + 4 20 + 6 16 + 5 21 + 5 LT 5 r.T 6 11 + 4 9.5 + 4.1 12 + 4 19 + 4 LT 4 7.4 + 4.0 22 + 4 14 + 4 16 + 5 14 + 15 AVERAGE.
                                                                                                                                                                                              *I II,                                                                                                                                                                                          I ij :*
+ 2s 16 + 8 20 + 23 18 + 6 14 + 7 19 + 2 13 + 6 1.7 :!:. 12 5.1 + 4.9 6.3 + 1.5 8.l + 4.9 9.3 + 6.1 7.1 + 7.8 18 + 7 8.7 + 7.2 10 + 8
tr, . .*
*22 + 19 13 + 8 15 + 10 f l i  
  ):l'                                                                                                                                                                                          f,'.
*I I t r,...
* f,'.  


                                                                                                                ----------------'          -~-::S-~. .    -~ :* -~~-~-
n I
n I     {
{
r                                                                           Table    6 I
r I
I     .
I.
L:_;                                     Gamma Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters VEPCO RE.MP - 1983 (Results    in Units        of    E-03    pCi/m( 3 ) + 2s) rl*.-
L:_;
Composite Location      Quarter      Period            Be-7                Ce-144            Cs-134        Cs-137    Nb-95      Zr-95 ss          1        12/28/82        48 :t_ 13              LT  4Cl)    2.2    + 1.1  6.6    + l.6  LT  l. 7  LT  3 HIR                      to          58    + 13              LT  4            LT  1.2        LT    l.O  LT l.2    LT  2 BC                    03/30/83        50 :t_ 13              LT  3            LT  l.6        LT 1.7    LT* 1,7    LT  4 ALL                                    78    +      23        LT  8            LT  1.9        LT    2    LT  2    LT  3 CP                                    32    :t_ 13            LT  7            LT  2        LT    1,4  LT  1.7  LT  3 DOW                                    53 ::t_ 13              LT    4          LT  l.5      LT    l.3  LT  l. 7  LT  2 FE                                    48 :t_ 14              LT  4            LT  1.7        LT    l.7  LT  1.,9  LT  3 NN                                    38    + 16              LT    7          LT  2        LT    l.6  LT  l.5  LT  3 ss          2        03/30/83        79    :t_ 28            LT    ll      5.4 +      2.2  14    + 3    LT  4    LI  6 liIR                      to          58 :t_      24        LT  11          LT  3          LT    3    LT  3      LT .5 BC                    07 /06/83        55    :t_ 19            LT    6          LT  1.9        LT    2    LT  2    LT  5 ALL                                    66    :t_ 20            LT    10          LT 3          LT    3    LT  3    LT  6 CP                                      LT      70            LT  17          LT 4          LT    6    LT  6      LT  10 DOW                                  100 + 40                  LT  15          LT  3          LT    3    LT  5    LT  14 FE                                    56    + 29              LT    13          LT  5          LT    7    LT  6    LT  7 NN                                      LT      70            LT  13          LT  4        LT    5    LT  4    LT  11 11 I i ss          3        07 /06/83      88      :t_    -23      LT    9          LT  3      4.3    :t_ l.9 LT  3    LT  5 L.'j               HlR                      to          94    :t_      26      LT  8            LT 2          LT    3    LT  4    LT  8 BC                    10/04/83      88      +        24      LT    9          LT 2      2.0    + LO    LT  3      LT  5 r *.                 ALL                                  97    +        28      LT    10          LT  3        LT    3    LT  4    LT  7
rl*.-
        !'                  CP                                    82    :t_      25      LT    9          LT  2        LT    2    LT  2    LT  4
11 I i L.'j r *.  
        ~
~
DOW                                  73    :t_      22      LT    9          LT  2          LT    3    LT  4      LT  6 FE                                  75      ::t_    23      LT    10          LT  2          LT    2    LT  3    LT  4 110      :t_      30      LT    9          LT  2          LT    3    LT  4    LT  7 ss          4        10/04/83        60 + 20                LT  8            LT  3          LT    3    LT  3      LT  5 r,                   HlR                      to          43    :t_ 13            LT    5          LT  l.3      LT    l.3  LT  l.9  LT  3 L.;                                                                                 LT    l.8        LT            LT        LT  4    LT  6 BC                  Ot/03/P,4          LT      50                                  3                3 ALL                                    46 :t_ 16              LT  8            LI  l. 7      LT    l.9  LT  3      LT  4 CP                                    33 :t_ 20              LT  12          LT  4        LT    4    LT  4    LT. 8 DOW                                    62    :t_ . 25.        LT    11          LI  3          LT    3    LT  4    LT  8 FE                                    33 :t_ 26              LT    l. 7        LT  3          LT    4    LT  5    LT  9 r**-~                 NN                                    71    :t_ 20            LT  8            LT  2        T,T  2    LT  2    LT  5 i .
r,
L.;
r**-~
i.
i '
i '
Cl)     LT* Less Than 24
Location ss HIR BC ALL CP DOW FE NN ss liIR BC ALL CP DOW FE NN ss HlR BC ALL CP DOW FE ss HlR BC ALL CP DOW FE NN Quarter 1
2 3
4 Cl) LT* Less Than  
----------------' -~-::S-~..
-~ :* -~~-~-
Table 6 Gamma Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters VEPCO RE.MP 1983 Composite Period 12/28/82 to 03/30/83 03/30/83 to 07 /06/83 07 /06/83 to 10/04/83 10/04/83 to Ot/03/P,4 (Results in Units of E-03 pCi/m(3 ) + 2s)
Be-7 48 :t_ 13 58 + 13 50 :t_
13 78 + 23 32 :t_
13 53
::t_
13 48 :t_ 14 38 + 16 79
:t_ 28 58 :t_
24 55
:t_
19 66
:t_
20 LT 70 100 + 40 56 + 29 LT 70 88
:t_
-23 94
:t_
26 88
+
24 97
+
28 82
:t_
25 73
:t_
22 75
::t_
23 110
:t_
30 60 + 20 43
:t_
13 LT 50 46
:t_ 16 33
:t_ 20 62
:t_. 25.
33
:t_ 26 71
:t_
20 Ce-144 Cs-134 LT 4Cl) 2.2 + 1.1 LT 4
LT 1.2 LT 3
LT l.6 LT 8
LT 1.9 LT 7
LT 4
LT 4
LT 7
LT ll LT 11 LT 6
LT 10 LT 17 LT 15 LT 13 LT 13 LT 9
LT 8
LT 9
LT 10 LT 9
LT 9
LT 10 LT 9
LT 8
LT 5
LT l.8 LT 8
LT 12 LT 11 LT l. 7 LT 8
24 LT 2
LT l.5 LT 1.7 LT 2
5.4 + 2.2 LT 3
LT 1.9 LT 3
LT 4
LT 3
LT 5
LT 4
LT 3
LT 2
LT 2
LT 3
LT 2
LT 2
LT 2
LT 2
LT 3
LT l.3 LT 3
LI l. 7 LT 4
LI 3
LT 3
LT 2
Cs-137 6.6 + l.6 LT l.O LT 1.7 LT 2
LT 1,4 LT l.3 LT l.7 LT l.6 14 + 3 LT 3
LT 2
LT 3
LT 6
LT 3
LT 7
LT 5
4.3
:t_ l.9 LT 3
2.0 + LO LT 3
LT 2
LT 3
LT 2
LT 3
LT 3
LT l.3 LT 3
LT l.9 LT 4
LT 3
LT 4
T,T 2
Nb-95 LT l. 7 LT l.2 LT* 1,7 LT 2
LT 1.7 LT l. 7 LT 1.,9 LT l.5 LT 4
LT 3
LT 2
LT 3
LT 6
LT 5
LT 6
LT 4
LT 3
LT 4
LT 3
LT 4
LT 2
LT 4
LT 3
LT 4
LT 3
LT l.9 LT 4
LT 3
LT 4
LT 4
LT 5
LT 2
Zr-95 LT 3
LT 2
LT 4
LT 3
LT 3
LT 2
LT 3
LT 3
LI 6
LT
.5 LT 5
LT 6
LT 10 LT 14 LT 7
LT 11 LT 5
LT 8
LT 5
LT 7
LT 4
LT 6
LT 4
LT 7
LT 5
LT 3
LT 6
LT 4
LT. 8 LT 8
LT 9
LT 5
-=---***** -- ----.-*-*---*---.-----------.-- ---.-------- -
-=---***** -- ----.-*-*---*---.-----------.-- ---.-------- -
 
-...--------------*-~- --*--**- -
.,.                     :r
:r  
~
~
: i. j
: i. j
: .. }
:.. }
B.-              Mi 1k The results of iodine-131 analyses of milk samples are presented in Table 7.                            No I-131 was detected in any of the samples. A total of 59 analyses were performed, 47 from indicator locations and 12 from the Williams (WMS) control location. The required sensitivity limit of 1 pCi/1 for I-131 in milk could not be met for the December milk sample from station EPPS due to delay between sample collection and arrival at f -~                                     the 1abora tory.
f -~
L.J                                     Milk samples were also analyzed by gamma spectrometry and the results are shown in _Table 8.                                                A total of.58 samples were analyzed, 47 from indicator locations and 11 from the WMS control location. The required sensitivity limits of 60 pCi/1 for Ba-140 and 15 pCi/1 for La-140 were not met in 10 of the analyses, due to delay in analysis.                                                                                  The La-140 sensitivity limit was also exceeded in two additional analyses due to delay between sample collection and arrival at the laboratory.
L.J i :
As expected, naturally occurring*K-40 was the major detectable activity
1**,
! :                                      in the milk samples. Detectable levels of cesium-137 were found in 15 i :
LJ r*****  
of 58 samples, ranging from 1.4 to 43 pCi/1. Since Cs-137 is present in global
\\
* fallout,                              the              occasional                            detection            of this isotope in environmental media is not unusual. With two exceptions,* the results fell well within the expected range of activities due to long term fallout. On~ value, 43 pCi/1, was higher than expected, although 1**,                                   occasional results in this range have been reported for other programs.
r.
LJ                                     In a second sample, Cs-137 was accompanied by Cs-134 at a level of 10 pCi/1.                    The presence of Cs-134 is indicative of the release of radioactivity from the plant.                                                  This possibility has been previously noted in the discussion of air particulate analytical results. NRC non-routine reporting levels for these isotopes are 60 pCi/1 for Cs-134 and 70 pCi/1 for Cs-137, and the levels found are well below these action levels.
Stable. (non-radioactive) calcium in milk was also determined in 60 r*****
  \     .                                samples at an average level of 1400 + 340.                                                                                    These analyses were performed by the NUS Laboratory Services Division rather than by the NUS Radiological Laboratory.
* r .
I.
I.
I l \                                   Strontium-89 and strontium-90 were determined in 58 samples, 48 from indicator locat~ons .and 10 from the WMS control location. Results for these analyses are listed in Table 10. Stro~tium-89 was not detected in any of the samples analyzed.
I l \\
Strontium-90 was found in 5 of 58 samples, ranging from 1.6 to 3.5 I                                      pCi/1.                     Two of the four samples were from indicator locations; the i
I i l.
: l.                                    remaining two were from the WMS control location.                                                                                 Strontium-90 is likely to be due to global fallout.                                                                         During the preoperational radiological monitoring program for Surry Power Station, stronti~m-90 was detected in milk samples at a range of 5.2 to 13 pCi/1.
B.-
25
Mi 1 k The results of iodine-131 analyses of milk samples are presented in Table 7.
-- *----- ----..........-c-..,_____ ,__,.. -.-7'"-* _... .,~ -,,.- - ** ...  - ,..... * -_. *-. *- - - - . - - ---*--' - **,.._ ......,_ --.-,-  - *  ........-.. .--.    --- - ----------*------..... - - - - - - - - * - - - - ~ - - - - -
No I-131 was detected in any of the samples.
A total of 59 analyses were performed, 47 from indicator locations and 12 from the Williams (WMS) control location. The required sensitivity limit of 1 pCi/1 for I-131 in milk could not be met for the December milk sample from station EPPS due to delay between sample collection and arrival at the 1 abora tory.
Milk samples were also analyzed by gamma spectrometry and the results are shown in _Table 8.
A total of.58 samples were analyzed, 47 from indicator locations and 11 from the WMS control location. The required sensitivity limits of 60 pCi/1 for Ba-140 and 15 pCi/1 for La-140 were not met in 10 of the analyses, due to delay in analysis.
The La-140 sensitivity limit was also exceeded in two additional analyses due to delay between sample collection and arrival at the laboratory.
As expected, naturally occurring*K-40 was the major detectable activity in the milk samples.
Detectable levels of cesium-137 were found in 15 of 58 samples, ranging from 1.4 to 43 pCi/1.
Since Cs-137 is present in global
* fallout, the occasional detection of this isotope in environmental media is not unusual.
With two exceptions,* the results fell well within the expected range of activities due to long term fallout.
On~ value, 43 pCi/1, was higher than expected, although occasional results in this range have been reported for other programs.
In a second sample, Cs-137 was accompanied by Cs-134 at a level of 10 pCi/1.
The presence of Cs-134 is indicative of the release of radioactivity from the plant.
This possibility has been previously noted in the discussion of air particulate analytical results.
NRC non-routine reporting levels for these isotopes are 60 pCi/1 for Cs-134 and 70 pCi/1 for Cs-137, and the levels found are well below these action levels.
Stable. (non-radioactive) calcium in milk was also determined in 60 samples at an average level of 1400
+ 340.
These analyses were performed by the NUS Laboratory Services Division rather than by the NUS Radiological Laboratory.
* Strontium-89 and strontium-90 were determined in 58
: samples, 48 from indicator locat~ons.and 10 from the WMS control location. Results for these analyses are listed in Table 10.
Stro~tium-89 was not detected in any of the samples analyzed.
Strontium-90 was found in 5 of 58
: samples, ranging from 1.6 to 3.5 pCi/1.
Two of the four samples were from indicator locations; the remaining two were from the WMS control location.
Strontium-90 is likely to be due to global fallout.
During the preoperational radiological monitoring program for Surry Power Station, stronti~m-90 was detected in milk samples at a range of 5.2 to 13 pCi/1.
25  
-- *----- ----..........-c-.., _____,__,..  
-.-7'"-* _...  
.,~ -,,.- -
----------*------..... --------*----~-----


                        ---*f **-***-- .
*-~--;,*:*-* *** ~._.... :_,._...  
                                                                *        *-~--;,*:*-* *** ~._ ....:_,._ ... * **** * ** * ** * * ** ** __ .*. -, ___ ** ~-~: *** -* .*', ** * --~*.: * .. ~z' - ::=::** -.:. ---~--~...-:-- -0_~ .,-~-- -~-..;: .: ..,.* :_;,._
* * ** ** __.*. -, ___ ** ~-~: *** -*.*', ** * --~*.: *
n u
.. ~z' - ::=::** -.:. ---~--~...-:-- -0_~.,-~-- -~-..;:.:..,.* :_;,._  
Table 7 (Page 1 of 2) i"
---*f **-***--.
      ! .-~
. n u
r       -.                                                                 Iodine-131 *in Milk VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s) l n-L_J                                                Month      Location                                                 Sampling Date                                                                   Iodine-131 n!        l l'.....:.J January        LEE HALL                                                             01/05/83                                                           LT      0.4(l)
i"  
EPPS                                                                 01/06/83                                                           LT      0.3
!.-~
      ,-i CP                                                                   01/18/83                                                           LT      0.6 ll      .\
r l
            .c..l WMS JDKs 01/18/83 01/18/83 LT LT 0.5 0.5 r-,                                            February      LEE HALL                                                             02/02/83                                                             LT *0.5 1..~                                                          EPPS                                                                 02/03/83                                                           LT 0.4 CP                                                                   02/08/83                                                           LT 0.3 WMS.                                                                 02/15/83                                                           LT 0.5 1"..                                                          JDKs                                                                 02/08/83                                                           LT 0.4 L.-~!
n-L_J n
March          LEE HALL                                                             03/29/83( 2 )                                                       LT      0.3 f':
! l l'.....:.J
      ._J EPPS                                                                 03/03/83                                                           LT      0.3 CP                                                                   03/16/83.                                                           LT      0.2 WMS                                                                 03/23/83                                                           LT      0.2 n                                                            JDKs                                                                 03/16/83                                                           LT      0.3 f .'.
,-i ll
* April          LEE HALL                                                             04/13/83                                                           LT      0.3 I -
.\\
I                                                            EPPS                                                                 04/14/83                                                           LT      0.3 l .
.c..l r-,
L.J                                                          CP                                                                   04/12/83                                                           LT      0.3 WMS                                                                 04/19/83                                                           LT      0.4 r*-1                                                          JDKs                                                                 04/12/83                                                           LT      0.4 l.J                                            May            LEE HALL                                                             05/11/83                                                           LT 0.7 EPPS                                                                 05/12/83                                                           LT . 0 .3
1..~
[.                                                            CP WMS
1" L.-~!
* 05/10/83 05/24/83 LT 0.3 LT 0.2
f ':
                                                                    *JDKs                                                                 05/10/83                                                           LT 0.2 1*,.,
._J n
u                                              June          LEE HALL                                                             06/01/83                                                           LT      0.2 EPPS                                                                 06/01/83                                                           LT      0.3 n                                                            CP                                                                   06/14/83                                                           LT      0.3 LJ                                                            WMS JDKs 06/23/83 06/14/83 LT LT 0.6 0.,2.
f.'.
      ~: **;
I -
      'L__
I l.
Note: See footnotes at end of table.
L.J r*-1 l.J
26
[.
1 *,
u n
LJ
~: **;
' L __
Month January February March
* April May June Table 7 (Page 1 of 2)
Iodine-131 *in Milk VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s)
Location Sampling Date LEE HALL 01/05/83 EPPS 01/06/83 CP 01/18/83 WMS 01/18/83 JDKs 01/18/83 LEE HALL 02/02/83 EPPS 02/03/83 CP 02/08/83 WMS.
02/15/83 JDKs 02/08/83 LEE HALL 03/29/83(2 )
EPPS 03/03/83 CP 03/16/83.
WMS 03/23/83 JDKs 03/16/83 LEE HALL 04/13/83 EPPS 04/14/83 CP 04/12/83 WMS 04/19/83 JDKs 04/12/83 LEE HALL 05/11/83 EPPS 05/12/83 CP
* 05/10/83 WMS 05/24/83  
*JDKs 05/10/83 LEE HALL 06/01/83 EPPS 06/01/83 CP 06/14/83 WMS 06/23/83 JDKs 06/14/83 Note: See footnotes at end of table.
26 Iodine-131 LT 0.4(l)
LT 0.3 LT 0.6 LT 0.5 LT 0.5 LT *0.5 LT 0.4 LT 0.3 LT 0.5 LT 0.4 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.4 LT 0.4 LT 0.7 LT. 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.6 LT 0.,2.


*..... -:;:-***----~-.. -- t    -----------*--*-- .-                      .:.. *-----"-~~--- ... * .. --~- .. * ,.* .. *-*c:-*.<:c*0*>.'*.:<.:*,.'',2c******h,-.-*.*.c,.*..                 -<***--=-',.- .-.*:...;.,., ,,. . :. :_.-~ .: * * "* . ___*. * *-----* *-~-
--"-~~---... *.. --~-.. *,.*.. *-*c:-*.<:c*0*>.'*.:<.:*,.'',2c******h,-.-*.*.c,.*.. -<***--=-',.-.-.*:...;.,.,,,... :. :_.-~.: * * "*.. ___ *. * *-----* *-~-
      ~ .,*
-:;:-***----~- --t -----------*--*-- -
      \
\\~., u n r, u
u rn ,
[J n
u                                                                                                                                           Table 7 (Pa:ge 2 of 2)
Lj u  
Iodine-131 in Milk VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s)
) '  
[J                                                             Month                          Location                                                              Sampling Date                                          Iodine-131 n
/_;
Lj                                                           July                              LEE.HALL                                                                      07 /13/83                                      LT          0.13 EPPS                                                                          07 /14/83                                      LT          0.3 u
r; u r-:
CP                                                                          07 /19/83                                      LT          0.14 WMS                                                                          07/27/83                                        LT          0.2 JDKs                                                                          07/19/83                                        LT          0 .11
LJ n
      ,-                                                          August                            LEE HALL                                                                      08/10/83                                        LT          0.4
      ) '
      /_;                                                                                             EPPS                                                                          08/10/83                                        LT          0.9 CP                                                                          08/10/83                                        LT          0.4 r;                                                                                             WMS                                                                          08/17/83                                        LT          0.2 u                                                                                               JDKs                                                                          08/10/83                                        LT          0.4 September                        LEE HALL                                                                      09/01/83                                        LT          o.s r-:LJ                                                                                           EPPS                                                                          09/01/83                                        LT          0.3 CP                                                                          09/14/83                                        LT          1.0 WMS                                                                          09/27 /83                                      LT          0.3 n
i :!
i :!
JDKs                                                                        09/14/83                                        LT          1.0 L.:J October                            LEE HALL                                                                      10/06/83                                        LT          0.2 r= -*
L.:J r= -*  
      ! ;                                                                                               EPPS                                                                        10/06/83                                        LT          0.2 u                                                                                                 CP WMS 10/11/83 10/18/83 LT          0.2 0.2 LT f Tl
! ; u f Tl *
        *** 1
*** 1 LJ
* JDKs                                                                        10/11/83                                        LT          0.2 LJ November                          LEE HALL                                                                      11/10/83                                        LT          0.2
:--~  
:--~                                                                                             EPPS                                                                        11/10/83                                        LT          0.2
/_j r*~
      /_j                                                                                               CP                                                                          11/08/83                                        LT          0.14 WMS                                                                          11/29/83                                        LT          0.17 JDKs                                                                          11/08/83                                        LT          0.15 r*~ ..
(~~!
(~~!
t~                                                           December                          LEE HALL                                                                      12/08/83 <3 )
t~
EPPS                                                                        12/08/83                                        LT          1.2(4) r--:*:i r :                                                                                               CF                                                                          12/13/83"                                      LT          0.3 i*-,,
r--:*:i r :
I,:
i*-,,
      ~   ...                                                                                         WMS                                                                          12/20/83                                        LT          o. 7 JDKs                                                                          12/16/83                                        LT          0.3 c: ~
I,:  
      ; 4 LT = Less Than L,
~...
(1)
c: ~  
(2)                Original sample, dated 03/03/83, was received spoiled and could not be analyzed for I-131. The station was re sampled on 03/29/83.
; 4 L,
      !_:_:                                      (3)                Sample lost during *analysis due to broken container.
(4)                Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping.
r - -*
r - -*
I 27
I (1)
. - .           . .** _ .. - *y~_....... _, *_* ""'. - . . . . . ..- .,--~_ ~~~       ~- * * -    ,...,.._.,. __ -._ ,,--,.,,~-, :- .....,~-----~-----*-- - ~ _.,..,. _______ * - - - - - - - - -... -~-~~ *.   ,.-.            -**-------.~ ...---.--. - - - * - - - __________ _, ___ _
(2)
(3)
(4)
Month July August September October November December LT = Less Than Table 7 (Pa:ge 2 of 2)
Iodine-131 in Milk VEPCO REMP -
1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s)
Location Sampling Date LEE.HALL 07 /13/83 EPPS 07 /14/83 CP 07 /19/83 WMS 07/27/83 JDKs 07/19/83 LEE HALL 08/10/83 EPPS 08/10/83 CP 08/10/83 WMS 08/17/83 JDKs 08/10/83 LEE HALL 09/01/83 EPPS 09/01/83 CP 09/14/83 WMS 09/27 /83 JDKs 09/14/83 LEE HALL 10/06/83 EPPS 10/06/83 CP 10/11/83 WMS 10/18/83 JDKs 10/11/83 LEE HALL 11/10/83 EPPS 11/10/83 CP 11/08/83 WMS 11/29/83 JDKs 11/08/83 LEE HALL 12/08/83 <3 )
EPPS 12/08/83 CF 12/13/83" WMS 12/20/83 JDKs 12/16/83 Original sample, dated 03/03/83, was received spoiled not be analyzed for I-131.
The station was re sampled Sample lost during *analysis due to broken container.
Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping.
27 Iodine-131 LT 0.13 LT 0.3 LT 0.14 LT 0.2 LT 0.11 LT 0.4 LT 0.9 LT 0.4 LT 0.2 LT 0.4 LT o.s LT 0.3 LT 1.0 LT 0.3 LT 1.0 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.14 LT 0.17 LT 0.15 LT 1.2(4)
LT 0.3 LT o. 7 LT 0.3 and could on 03/29/83.  
*y~_....... _, *_*  
.,--~_ ~~~  
~-
-._,,--,.,,~-, :-.....,~-----~-----*--
-~ _.,..,. _______ * ---------... -~-~~ *.  
-**-------.~... ---.--. ---*--


. **--;----- .*... _,. *i*** *. . . . . . . . . *.. **-*.**** .*:. .~. :*** .._*_:.~ ::.** .:.,-*.J,.\ ,*".):<:<:*.:~:.-"-~:.-* .,,: :*             -'_-_.**:;- ".,.: .._.. *.~--->-~:- -~-: .*. . *:*.-;;*. -. ~-~----. --~:.:L..-.:<< .* --~:-. -... **>* __ :* .- __ .. __ *... 0.,.* *.... : .:- ~:-* :_. -~* *._* ::<_.<:.::-~---:*=..
,. *i*** *.................. *.. **-*.****. *:...~.. :***.. _*_:.~ ::.**.:.,-*.J,.\\,*".):<:<:*.:~:.-"-~:.-*.,,: :* -'_-_.**:;- ".,.:.. _.. *.~--->-~:- -~-:. *... *:*.-;;*.. -. ~-~----. --~:.:L.. -.:<<.* --~:-. -... **>* __ :*.-__.. __ *... 0.,.* *.... :.:- ~:-* :_. -~* *._* ::<_.<:.::-~---:*=..
r,   .
r, i i L._~
iL._~i r1 i                                                                                                                                                                  Table 8 1 .. i                                                                                                                                                   (Page 1 of 2)
r1 Table 8 i
Gamma Spectrometry of Milk r--c.
1.. i (Page 1 of 2) r--c Gamma Spectrometry of Milk I
I                                                                                                                                                  VEPCO REMP - 1983
VEPCO REMP - 1983 I [ ____ :
[____:                                                                                                                                       (Results in pCi/1 !_ 2s)
(Results in pCi/1 !_ 2s)
Month                             Location                                 Sampling Date                                     Ba-140                           Cs-134                                 Cs-137                               K-40                         La-140 I
I Month Location Sampling Date Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140  
      \   ..
\\..
January                             LEE RALL                                         01/05/83                                 LT 30(l)                            LT 9                                     LT 10                 1400                   200             LT 10 01/06/83                                 LT 30                               LT 11                                                         1100 + 200
LT 30(l)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-                        LT 13 EPPS                                                                                                                                                                    LT 9
January LEE RALL 01/05/83 LT 9 LT 10 1400  
[l                                                    CP                                               01/18./83                                 LI' 30                               LT 10                                   LT 12                 1400 + 200                               LT 13 IIMS                                             01/18/83                                 LT 30                               LT 9                                     LT 8                   1300           + 200                   LI' 15 JDKs                                           *01/18/83                                   LT 30                               LT 9                                   LT 8                   1300                   200             LT 12
=-
['__j                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                =-
200 LT 10
February                           LEE RALL                                         02/02/83                                 LT 13                             *LT 4                                     LT 4                   1300                   200             LT 8 EPPS                                             02/03/83                                 LI' 20                               LT 7                                   LT 6                   1500 + 200
[l EPPS 01/06/83 LT 30 LT 11 LT 9 1100 + 200 LT 13 CP 01/18./83 LI' 30 LT 10 LT 12 1400 + 200 LT 13 IIMS 01/18/83 LT 30 LT 9 LT 8 1300 + 200 LI' 15
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-                        LT 8
['
[1                                                    CP                                               02/08/83                                 LT 30                               LT 10                                   LT 10                 1300
JDKs  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
*01/18/83 LT 30 LT 9 LT 8 1300  
200             LT 15
=-
        --'                                                IIMS                                              02/15/83                                 LT 20                               LT 7                                   LT 8                   1400 + 200                               LT 9 r~                                                   JDKs                                             02/08/83                                 LT 15                               LT 6                                   LT 7                   1100                     200             LT 7
200 LT 12
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
_j February LEE RALL 02/02/83 LT 13  
i __;
*LT 4 LT 4 1300  
March                               LEE HALL(2)                                       03/29/83                                 LT 30                               LT 7                                   LT 7                   1400 +                 200             LT 13 EPPS                                             03/03/83                                 LT 19                           10               4                 21               5             1300                     200             LT 13 Tl                                                                                                        03/16/83                                 LT 20                               LT 9
=-
                                                                                                                                                                                                =-                                    =-
200 LT 8
LT 8                 1300 + 200
[ 1 EPPS 02/03/83 LI' 20 LT 7 LT 6 1500 + 200 LT 8 CP 02/08/83 LT 30 LT 10 LT 10 1300 =-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-                        LT 11 CP l..J                                                  IIMS                                             03/23/83                                 LT 13                               LT 4                                     LT 5                 1500*                   200             LT 6 03/16/83                                 LT 30                               LT 11                                   LT 10                 1200
200 LT 15 02/15/83 IIMS LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1400 + 200 LT 9 r~
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-       200             LT 14 JDKs
JDKs 02/08/83 LT 15 LT 6 LT 7 1100  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
=-
[                  April                               LEE HALL                                         04/13/83                                 LT 16                               LT 5                         3.1               2.8           1300 + 200                               LT 9
200 LT 7  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      =-
! i _ _;
n EPPS                                             04/14/83                                 LT 20                               LT 5                                   LT 6                   1400                     200             LT 9 LT 9                                                        . 1400
March LEE HALL(2) 03/29/83 LT 30 LT 7 LT 7 1400 + 200 LT 13 Tl EPPS 03/03/83 LT 19 10  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-        200 CP                                               04/12/83                                 LT 20                                                                       LT 11                                                           LT 12
=-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
4 21 =-
WMS                                               04/19/83                                 LT 17                               LT 5                                     LT 6                 1400           +
5 1300  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          -        200             LT 9
=-
        --                                                JDKs                                             04/12/83                                 LT 20                               LT 8                                   LT 8                   1200                     200             LT 12
200 LT 13 l..J CP 03/16/83 LT 20 LT 9 LT 8 1300 + 200 LT 11 IIMS 03/23/83 LT 13 LT 4 LT 5 1500*  
(
=-
I ,
200 LT 6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
[
u                   May                                 LEE HALL                                         05/11/83                                 LT 20                               LT 6                                   LT 8                   1400
JDKs 03/16/83 LT 30 LT 11 LT 10 1200 =-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
200 LT 14 April LEE HALL 04/13/83 LT 16 LT 5 3.1 2.8 1300 + 200 9  
200             LT 10 EPP"S                                             05/12/83                                 LT 20                               LT 7                                     LT 8                 1400                     200            LT 9
=-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
LT EPPS 04/14/83 LT 20 LT 5 LT 6 1400  
r-i     I                                              CP                                               05/10/83                                 LT 19                               LT 6                                   LT 7                   1200
=-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =--
200 LT 9 n
200             LT 10 L_J                                                     IIMS                                              05/24/83                                 LT 20                               LT 6                                   LT 7                   1500                     200             LT 13 43                            1100
CP 04/12/83 LT 20 LT 9 LT 11  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-+*      200 JDKs                                             05/10/83                                 LT 20                               LT 8                                           8                                                      LT 9 r*-:c                                                                                                                                                                                                                             =-
. 1400
L                   June                               LEE HALL                                         06/01/83                                 LT 17                               LT 4                         8.6         + 3.0               1800
=-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          -+       200             LT 7 EPPS                                             06/01/83                                 LT 20                               LT 7                                   LT 8                   1400           +- 200                   LT 11 r*1i                                                    CP                                               06/14/83                                 LT 30                               LT 9                                   LT 12                 1000
200 LT 12 WMS 04/19/83 LT 17 LT 5 LT 6 1400 + 200 LT 9 JDKs 04/12/83 LT 20 LT 8 LT 8 1200  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          =-
=-
100             LT 17
200 LT 12
    '        I L                                                       IIMS (3)                                         06/23/83 JDKs                                             06/14/83                                 LT 15                               LT 5                         5.6               3.4           1300                     200             LT 6 r-*1                                                                                                                                                                                                                               =-                                  =-
( --
I I           -----
I, u May LEE HALL 05/11/83 LT 20 LT 6 LT 8 1400  
LJ Note: See: footnote at end of table.
=-
r-:
200 LT 10 EPP"S 05/12/83 LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1400  
    \
=-
I l
200 LT 9 r-i CP 05/10/83 LT 19 LT 6 LT 7 1200 =-
  '-J 28
200 LT 10 I
  \...--1
L_J 05/24/83 IIMS LT 20 LT 6 LT 7 1500 =-
                                                                            /
200 LT 13 JDKs 05/10/83 LT 20 LT 8 43 r*-:c  
- -    -*.    ' * '    -**.                  .    * "I:   ~             **      **              *    * -:----.-.-::,-......- . - ~ - - - - ..- - - * - - ~ .   --------*           * * * ~*-*     . - - - - - - ~ **       *--* .-.,-,--,.-------------~----........--~. - ~ - - . . - - - *
=-
8 1100
+* 200 LT 9 L
June LEE HALL 06/01/83 LT 17 LT 4 8.6 + 3.0 1800 + 200 LT 7 EPPS 06/01/83 LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1400 +-
200 LT 11 r*1 LT i
CP 06/14/83 LT 30 LT 9 LT 12 1000  
=-
100 17 I
L IIMS (3) 06/23/83 JDKs 06/14/83 LT 15 LT 5 5.6 =-
3.4 1300 =-
200 LT 6 r-*1 I I LJ Note: See: footnote at end of table.
r-:  
\\
I l  
'-J 28  
\\...--1  
/  
"I:  
~  
-:----.-.-::,-......-.-~----.. ---*--~. --------* *** ~*-*  
.------~  
** *--*.-.,-,--,.-------------~----........--~. -~--..---*  


                                                .                                                                    ~-,' ~-. _: ... ;
~-,' ~-. _:... ;  
      ""'"_ . . . .___ :..-:__:...~--..;::.:.._:.~~~~;.-~~-~-~*-:-.-- *-- .. : .. :-_.>* .   ---.~::<> . . *::_***>::~.:!:.-** .:'-.; *., ... .,. *!* * -*** .. ,_ _ _ *- ** -:<..- .. *... ,* ..,.. a.:....::-'-* .*.       :_** .....,...~:**- .... *.. *,.-;-:.-:-.<:.-.:*::;-*..: .'*-,_~-~::* .. *. - .. _..: >, *.:.....
""'"_....... ___ :..-:__:...~--..;::.:.._:.~~~~;.-~~-~-~*-:-.-- *--.. :.. :-_.>*. ---.~::<>.. *::_***>::~.:!:.-**.:'-.; *.,....,. *!*  
    ..                        f L.J                                                                                                                   Table 8 (Page 2 of 2) c~                                                                                                   Gamma Spectrometry-of Milk l   ..
* -***..,_ __ *- ** -:<..-.. *...,*..,.. a.:....::-'-*.*.
I '                                                                                                       VEPCO REMP ~ 1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/-. 2p)
:_**.....,... ~:**-.... *.. *,.-;-:.-:-.<:.-.:*::;-*..:.'*-,_~-~::*.. *. -.. _.. : >, *.:.....
Month                Location                  Sampling Date              Ba-140                          Cs-134                                Cs-137                                          K-40                                            La-140 l
f L.J c~
July                  LEE HALL                        07 /13/83              LT 30                              LT 10                                  LT 12                            1300              +/-_ 200                                    LT 14 f:                                                 EPPS                            07 /14/83              LT.30                              LT 11                                  LT 13                            1400' +/-_ 200                                                LT 11 1._J                                                                                                     LT 400( 4 )                                                                                                                                                            LT 180( 4 )
l I '
CP                              07/19/8':.                                                LT 1.9                      2.5          +/-_ 1.2                        1200              + 200 WMS                            07 /27 /83            LT 30                              LT 7                                  LT 8                              1500 + 200                                                  LT 14 n
l f:
I i                                               JDKs                            07 /19/83              LT 200( 4 )                        LT 1.3                      2.9          +/-_ 0.8                        1300              +/-_ 200                                    LT 130( 4 )
1._J n
L3 August                  LEE HALL                        08/10/83              LT 30                              LT 10                                  LT 11                            1500              +/-_ 200                                    LT 15 EPPS                            08/10/83              LT 30                              LT 7                                  LT 9                              1500              +/-_ 200                                    LT 15 CP                              08/09 /83              LT 40                              LT 11                                  LT 13                            1300              +/-_ 200                                    LT 14 WMS                            08/17 /83              LT 40                              LT 12                                  LT 14                            1700              + 200                                    LT 14 f-C-'
I i L3 f-C-'
' .                                              JDKs                            08/09/83              LT 30                              LT 9                                  LT 12                            1300              +/-_ 200                                    LT 13 i i l....'
i i
September              LEE HALL                        09/01/83              LT 150( 4 )                        LT 2                          2.0          +/-_ 1.3                      1400              +/-_ 200                                    LT 70( 4 )
l.... '
r, I i                                               EPPS                            09/01/83              LT 120( 4 )                        LT l.9.                        3.6          +/-_ l.l                      1200              +/-_ 200                                    LT 50( 4 )
r, I i u n
u                                                 CP                              09/14/83              LT 50                              LT l.3                        l.4          +/-_ 0.8                      1300              +/-_ 200                                    LT 20 WMS                            09/27 /83              LT 4000( 4 )                      LT 3                                  LT 4                              1300              + 200                                    LT 1300( 4 )
l i.:
JDKs(6)                        09/14/83 October                LEE HALL                        10/06/83              LT 800( 4 )                        LT l.4                        ~.3          +/-,        0.8              1300              +/-_ 200                                    LT 300( 4 )
__ J n
n                                                 EPPS CP WMS 10/06/83 10/11/83 10/18/83 LT 1000 ( 4 )
LT 1300( 4 )
LT 800( 4 )
LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 2.5 LT 4 LT 3
                                                                                                                                                                                          +          Ll              1300 1500 rsoo +
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        +/-_ 200
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        +      200 200 LT 400( 4 )
LT 600( 4 )
LT 400( 4 )
JDKs                            10/11/83              LT 600( 4 )                        LT 1.8                        2.1          +/-_ l.0                      1400              +      200                              LT 300( 4 )
l i .:
__ J November                LEE HALL                        11/10/83            . LT 20                              LT 4                                  LT 5                              1400              +/-_ 200                                    LT 9 EPPS                            11/10/83              LT 18                              LT 4                        4.0          +          2.3                1600              +/-_ 200                                    LT 9 CP                              11/08/83              LT 30                              LT 5                                  LT 6                              1400              + 200                                    LT 15 WMS                            11/29/83              LT 30                              LT 5                                  LT*        s                      1500              +/-_ 200                                    LT 20 JDKs                            11/08/83              LT 18                              LT 3                                  LT 4                              1300              +      200                              LT 9 December                Lee Hall                        12/08/83              LT 30                              LT 2                                  LT 3                              1200            .!.      200                              LT 18( 5 )
EPPS                            12/08/83              LT 60                              LT 4                                  LT 4                              1400              +/-_ 200                                    LT 30 (S)
CP                              12/13/83              LT 50                              LT 6                                  LT 6                              1300              +/-_ 200                                  LT 20 WMS                            12/20/83              LT 20                              LT 3                                  LT 4                              1300              .!. 200                              LT 13 n
L____;
L____;
JDKs                           12/16/83               LT 18                             LT 2                       2.5         +         1/2                 1300              +       200                              LT 10 (l)      LT= Less Than (2)       This was the record sample collected. An earlier sample arrived spoiled and was resampled.
Month July August September October November December Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs(6)
(3)       Sample destroyed during ashing, due to furna*ce malfunction.
LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Lee Hall EPPS CP WMS JDKs (l) LT= Less Than Sampling Date 07 /13/83 07 /14/83 07/19/8':.
(4)       Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting, (5)       Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping, (6)       Sample depleted in other analysei.
07 /27 /83 07 /19/83 08/10/83 08/10/83 08/09 /83 08/17 /83 08/09/83 09/01/83 09/01/83 09/14/83 09/27 /83 09/14/83 10/06/83 10/06/83 10/11/83 10/18/83 10/11/83 11/10/83 11/10/83 11/08/83 11/29/83 11/08/83 12/08/83 12/08/83 12/13/83 12/20/83 12/16/83 Table 8 (Page 2 of 2)
29
Gamma Spectrometry-of Milk VEPCO REMP
. - *- -**---* *------* -------~----~---~,--------:-- ------.*-*-:-*:----::: . -,.. .* .. -  ',.- .        -. *... - :.-
~ 1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/-. 2p)
                                                                                                                    -~      ,...,;::,.,. .* ~-' .... .* .---- .. *.*         .         .~:--~-             _. , , ~ ..... \.{..-....... _... -~--- .             -,--.-~- .         ~--~.         ~,---_.....:::_ __ _
Ba-140 LT 30 LT.30 LT 400(4 )
LT 30 LT 200(4 )
LT 30 LT 30 LT 40 LT 40 LT 30 LT 150(4 )
LT 120(4 )
LT 50 LT 4000(4 )
LT 800(4 )
LT 1000 (4 )
LT 1300(4 )
LT 800(4 )
LT 600(4 )
. LT 20 LT 18 LT 30 LT 30 LT 18 LT 30 LT 60 LT 50 LT 20 LT 18 Cs-134 LT 10 LT 11 LT 1.9 LT 7 LT 1.3 LT 10 LT 7 LT 11 LT 12 LT 9 LT 2 LT l.9.
LT l.3 LT 3 LT l.4 LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 1.8 LT 4 LT 4 LT 5 LT 5 LT 3 LT 2 LT 4 LT 6 LT 3 LT 2 Cs-137 LT 12 LT 13 2.5  
+/-_ 1.2 LT 8 2.9
+/-_ 0.8 LT 11 LT 9 LT 13 LT 14 LT 12 2.0 +/-_ 1.3 3.6
+/-_ l.l l.4
+/-_ 0.8 LT 4
~.3 +/-, 0.8 2.5 + Ll LT 4 LT 3 2.1
+/-_ l.0 LT 5 4.0 + 2.3 LT 6 LT* s LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 6 LT 4 2.5 + 1/2 K-40 1300
+/-_ 200 1400' +/-_ 200 1200 + 200 1500 + 200 1300
+/-_ 200 1500
+/-_ 200 1500
+/-_
200 1300
+/-_
200 1700 + 200 1300
+/-_
200 1400
+/-_
200 1200
+/-_
200 1300
+/-_ 200 1300 + 200 1300
+/-_
200 1300
+/-_
200 1500 +
200 rsoo +
200 1400 +
200 1400
+/-_
200 1600
+/-_
200 1400 + 200 1500
+/-_
200 1300 +
200 1200.!. 200 1400
+/-_
200 1300
+/-_
200 1300.!.
200 1300 +
200 (2)
This was the record sample collected.
An earlier sample arrived spoiled and was resampled.
(3)
Sample destroyed during ashing, due to furna*ce malfunction.
(4)
Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting, (5)
Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping, (6)
Sample depleted in other analysei.
29 La-140 LT 14 LT 11 LT 180(4 )
LT 14 LT 130(4 )
LT 15 LT 15 LT 14 LT 14 LT 13 LT 70(4 )
LT 50(4 )
LT 20 LT 1300(4 )
LT 300(4 )
LT 400(4 )
LT 600(4 )
LT 400(4 )
LT 300(4 )
LT 9 LT 9 LT 15 LT 20 LT 9 LT 18(5 )
LT 30 (S)
LT 20 LT 13 LT 10
. - *- -**---* *------* -------~----~---~,--------:--------.*-*-:-*:----:::  
-. *... -~ -:  
.-,...,;::,.,..* ~-'.....*.----.. *.*.  
.~:--~- _..,,~..... \\.{.. -....... _... -~---. -,--.-~-. ~--~. ~,---_  


(1 i* i t.:.*.J Table 9 (Page 1 of 3) f':
(1 i* i t.:.*.J f':
I      '
I i ;
Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP - 1983 i ;                                                                                                        (Results in mg/1) l..
l..
Sampling                                 Calcium Month                          Location                                            Date                             Concentration January                        LEE HALL                                          01/05/83                                   1380(1)
n u
EPPS                                              01/06/83                                   1380 n
I,
u CP WMS 01/18/83 01/18/83 1540 1570 JDKs                                            . 01/18/83                                   1550 Average.+/- 2s                                                                              1480 + 190 February                      LEE RALL                                          02/02/83                                   1200 EPPS                                              02/03/83                                   1160 CP                                                02/08/83                                   1430 WMS                                                02/15/83                                   1570 JDKs                                              02/08/83                                   1550 Average + 2s                                                                              1380 + 380 March                          LEE HALL                                          03/29/83                                   1450 EPPS                                              03/03/83                                   1250 CP                                                03/16/83                                   1320 I ,
u r**,.
u                                                                                    WMS                                                03/23/83                                   1610 JDKs                                              03/16/83                                   1360 Average.+/- 2s                                                                              1400 + 280 April                          LEE HALL                                          04/13/83                                   1390 EPPS                                              04./14/83                                 1400
I i u l_.'
                                                                                      .CP                                                04/12/83                                   1560 WMS                                                04/.19/83                                 1890 JDKs                                              04/12/83                                   1590 Average.+/- 2s                                                                              1570 + 410 r**,.
Month January February March April May Table 9 (Page 1 of 3)
I i 1060 u                                                    May                            LEE HALL EPPS 05/11/83 05/12/83                                   1110 CP                                                05/10/83                                   1360 WMS                                                05/24/83                                   1400 JDKs                                              05/10/83                                   1340 Average+ 2s                                                                                1250 + 310 Note: See footnote at end of table .
Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP -
l_.'
1983 (Results in mg/1)
30
Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average + 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS
***.*   .----~---****-~---. **.*-.-. r * - ..*. *z.~" -,-_.,-. ** - -*.*~--~--"',""7.* * ~ .* *... ~-:*... *.* ,._.-.*--* --~-*,-.-**.~ ..~ * ! . - *...- .. ~-_, ____ .,.,_ .,* *~ .. * ~--~-- --**---.---.~----.-.--.,--.---.-,.
.CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average+ 2s Sampling Date 01/05/83 01/06/83 01/18/83 01/18/83  
. 01/18/83 02/02/83 02/03/83 02/08/83 02/15/83 02/08/83 03/29/83 03/03/83 03/16/83 03/23/83 03/16/83 04/13/83 04./14/83 04/12/83 04/.19/83 04/12/83 05/11/83 05/12/83 05/10/83 05/24/83 05/10/83 Note: See footnote at end of table.
30 Calcium Concentration 1380(1) 1380 1540 1570 1550 1480 + 190 1200 1160 1430 1570 1550 1380 + 380 1450 1250 1320 1610 1360 1400 + 280 1390 1400 1560 1890 1590 1570 + 410 1060 1110 1360 1400 1340 1250 + 310
***.*.----~---****-~---.  
**.*-.-. r*-..*. *z.~" -,-_.,-. ** - -*.*~--~--"',""7.* *~.* *... ~-:*... *.*,._.-.*--* --~-*,-.-**.~.. ~*!.- *... -.. ~-_, ____.,.,_  
.,* *~.. *  
~--~--
--**---.---.~----.-.--.,--.---.-,.  


  *---*-- -...._~- ~- <.~., *,_ '* ..-.* __ ._.___,__ ___.__ -_* -*~-~-**-*-* . *. **-..-__ ' _.* - . '*~-- .. *- -*-*-** *. *~:.":,. -~;".*:;''. . . :.*.:.-:~.,:*., :_~;~.-..;:: :_. **_ :.~*-.. *.. *:_. *.
*---*-- -...._~- ~- <.~., *,_ '*.. -.* __._.___,__ ___.
('
__ -_* -*~-~-**-*-*.. *. **-.. -__ ' _.* -. '*~--.. *- -*-*-** *. *~:.":,. -~;".*:;''..... :.*.:.-:~.,:*., :_~;~.-..;:: :_. **_ :.~*-.. *.. *:_. *.
      ~-
('  
1... J 1*,   !                                                                                               /                              Table 9
~-
      \ ..
1... J 1*, !  
L_.*.a (Page 2 of 3)
\\..
* u                                                                                                                       Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in mg/1)
L_.*.a u
Sampling                                  Calcium Month                                Location                                                                  Date                        Concentration June                              LEE HALL                                                              06/01/83                                    1200 r---
r---
1 *.]                                                                                       EPPS                                                                  06/01/83                                    1300 I       j L.J                                                                                         CP                                                                  .06/14/83                                      1500 WMS                                                                    06/23/83                                    1400 JDKs                                                                  06/14/83                                    1400 Average+/- 2s                                                                                                    1360 + 230 July                              LEE HALL                                                              07/13/83                                    1300 EPPS                                                                  07/14/83                                    1200 CP                                                                    07/19/83                                    1400
1 *.]
* WMS                                                                      07/27/83                                    1400 fJ                                                                                        JDKs Average+/- 2s 07/19/83                                    1600 1380 + 300
I j
L.J fJ
[
[
[
August                           LEE HALL                                                               08/10/83                                   1400 EPPS                                                                  08/10/83                                   1300
L.:..i c-*,
[                                                                                          CP WMS 08/09/83 08/17/83 1300 1300 JDKs                                                                  08/09/83                                   1400 Average+ 2s                                                                                                    1340 + 110 September                        LEE HALL                                                              09/01/83                                   1300
. r *: u 0
        ;*:                                                                                        EPPS                                                                  09/01/83                                   1400 L.:..i CP                                                                    09/14/83                                     890 c-*,
Month June July August September
      . r *:                                                                                        WMS                                                                    09/27/83                                   1500 u                                                                                          JDKs Average + 2s 09/14/83                                   1000 1220 + 260 Note: See footnote at end of table.
/
0 31
Table 9 (Page 2 of 3)
. _____     ~- -~. *. --~"'.".---..-... _. .... * ~- ~--* .... .._
* Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP -
                                                                                                      *****-* *-**~**.**-.-*   **. '* --.-* .. :-.-.~ ....
1983 (Results in mg/1)
Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP
* WMS JDKs Average+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average+ 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average + 2s Sampling Date 06/01/83 06/01/83
.06/14/83 06/23/83 06/14/83 07/13/83 07/14/83 07/19/83 07/27/83 07/19/83 08/10/83 08/10/83 08/09/83 08/17/83 08/09/83 09/01/83 09/01/83 09/14/83 09/27/83 09/14/83 Note: See footnote at end of table.
31 Calcium Concentration 1200 1300 1500 1400 1400 1360 + 230 1300 1200 1400 1400 1600 1380 + 300 1400 1300 1300 1300 1400 1340 + 110 1300 1400 890 1500 1000 1220 + 260
. _____ ~- -~. *. --~"'.".---..-... _..... * ~- ~--*....  
*: *****-* *-**~**.**-.-*  
'* --.-*.. :-.-.~.... _:.*.*,.. '*.*-;


l(
C i"': l i r-I l_,.
Table 9 (Page 3 of 3)
1":
Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in mg/1)
Sampling                          Calcium Month                    Location                                Date                  Concentration C __ ;
October                LEE HALL                              10/06/83                              1400 i"':i                                                                   EPPS                                  10/06/83                              1400 l  :.-.:;                                                              CP                                    10/11/83                              1500 WMS                                    10/18/83                              1400 r,-       .                                                              JDKs                                  10/11/83                              1500
        !I l_,.
* Average.+/- 2s                                                          1440 + 110 November              LEE HALL                              11/10/83                              1100 EPPS                                  11/10/83                              1000 CP                                    11/08/83                              1500
        ''      ..                                                              WMS                                    11/29/83                              1500 JDKs                                  11/08/83                              1200 Average.+/- 2s                                                          1260 + 460 1":
i :
i :
[_~
[_~
December               LEE HALL                               12/08/83                               2000 r*'*                                                                    EPPS                                  12/08/83                               1200 I        '                                                              CP                                    12/13/83                               1420 L                                                                        WMS                                    12/20/83                               1500 JDKs                                  12/16/83                               1350 Average.+/- 2s                                                          1490 + 610
r*'*
                                                        *Annual                LEE HALL                                                              1350       +   500 Average              EPPS                                                                  1260       +   210 CP                                                                    1390       +   360 p                                                                        WMS                                                                  1500       +   300
I L
: l. i..2 JDKs                                                                  1400       + 350 (1) Estimated error is less than 5%.
p
I i'--'-
: l. i
32
..2 I
.,. ...-47.         ., * *-. - ~   * "* ."'J"-- * .-. *, ~~.~ <., ,-.s;;:v~ ** ~ , .-~,*. * * ,-.* .. -  - * - ~ _ _ _ _ _ -* _ _,_ ., ~ _ *--=---- '---=---*- -="' _ _,_. _ *-*
i '--'-
l(
Month October November December  
*Annual Average Table 9 (Page 3 of 3)
Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP -
1983 (Results in mg/1)
Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Sampling Date 10/06/83 10/06/83 10/11/83 10/18/83 10/11/83 11/10/83 11/10/83 11/08/83 11/29/83 11/08/83 12/08/83 12/08/83 12/13/83 12/20/83 12/16/83 (1) Estimated error is less than 5%.
32 Calcium Concentration 1400 1400 1500 1400 1500 1440 + 110 1100 1000 1500 1500 1200 1260 + 460 2000 1200 1420 1500 1350 1490 + 610 1350 + 500 1260 + 210 1390 + 360 1500 + 300 1400 + 350  
.,....-47.  
* *-. -~  
* "*."'J"--
~~.~ <.,,-.s;;:v~ **  
~  
,.-~,*. *  
~  
~ *--=----
'---=---*- -="'  


I D
I D
I .,
I.,  
  ~   ..
~..
: n. __ j .
n  
Table 10 (Page 1 of 2)
. __ j.
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1   + 2s)
r I
Month      Location      Sampling Date       Strontium-89  Strontium-90 January*    LEE HALL        01/05/83             LT 0.7(l)    LT 0.8 r
* I L..
II *.                  EPPS            01/06/83             LT 1.5    2.2  + 1.3 L ..
r*--
CP              01/18/83             LT 0.6      LT 0.6 WMS              01/18/83             LT 1.0      LT 1.0 JDKs            01/18/83             LT 0.7      LT O. 7 February    LEE HALL        02/02/83             LT 0.6      LT  0. 6 EPPS            02/03/83             LT 0.6      LT  0.6 CP              02/08/83             LT 1.2      LT  O. 6 WMS              02/15/83             LT 0.7      LT  0. 7 JDKs
i L.:
* 02/08/83             LT 0.6      LT  0~6 March      LEE HALL        03/29/83             LT 1        LT 1 EPPS            03/03/83             LT 1        LT 1 CP              '03/16/83             LT 2        LT 2 WMS              03/23/83             LT 1        LT 2 JDKs            03/16/83             LT 2        LT 2 April      LEE HALL        04/14/83             LT 1.3      LT 2 EPPS            04/14/83             LT 0.8      LT 1.1 r*--                    CP              04/12/83             LT 1.0      LT 1.2 i
[
L.:                    WMS              04/19 /83           LT 1        LT 1 JDKs            04/12/83             LT 1.1      LT 1.5
~'.
  ~'.
i
[      i May        LEE HALL        05/11/83             LT 1        LT 1
-s r.
  -s EPPS            05/12/83             LT 1        LT 2 CP              05/10/83             LT 1        LT 1 WMS (2)          05/24/83 JDKs            05/10_/83           LT 1        LT 2 June        LEE HALL        06/01/83             LT 1 EPPS            06/01/83             LT 1 CP              06/14/83             LT 1.8 WMS (2)          06/23/83 JDKs            06/14/83             LT 5       3.5  + 2.7 r .
i.
Note: See footnote at end of table.
i.
i .
Month January*
,_                                                33 i .
February March April May June Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs
* LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS (2)
JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS (2)
JDKs Table 10 (Page 1 of 2)
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s)
Sampling Date 01/05/83 01/06/83 01/18/83 01/18/83 01/18/83 02/02/83 02/03/83 02/08/83 02/15/83 02/08/83 03/29/83 03/03/83  
'03/16/83 03/23/83 03/16/83 04/14/83 04/14/83 04/12/83 04/19 /83 04/12/83 05/11/83 05/12/83 05/10/83 05/24/83 05/10_/83 06/01/83 06/01/83 06/14/83 06/23/83 06/14/83 Strontium-89 LT 0.7(l)
LT 1.5 LT 0.6 LT 1.0 LT 0.7 LT 0.6 LT 0.6 LT 1.2 LT 0.7 LT 0.6 LT 1 LT 1 LT 2 LT 1 LT 2 LT 1.3 LT 0.8 LT 1.0 LT 1 LT 1.1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1.8 LT 5 Note: See footnote at end of table.
33 Strontium-90 LT 0.8 2.2 + 1.3 LT 0.6 LT 1.0 LT O. 7 LT 0. 6 LT 0.6 LT O. 6 LT 0. 7 LT 0~6 LT 1 LT 1 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.1 LT 1.2 LT 1 LT 1.5 LT 1 LT 2 LT 1 LT 2 3.5 + 2.7


                                                                                                                                                              **-**---. __ ,**.*:/*,~*~---------  - ~--*-
-r:-:a r.
    -r:-:a r .
f..
f ..
i
Table 10 (Page 2 *of 2)
~ r-i
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90.in Milk VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1   +/- 2s     )
[ __ ;
Month                          Lo.cation                    Sampling Date     Strontium-89                   Strontium-.90 i ~  r-i                July                            LEE RALL                      07/13/83             LT   0.6                         LT          0.5 EPPS                          07/14/83             LT   0.7                         LT          0.6
i l.
      !__ ;                                                CP                                                      0.9                          LT          1.0
L r-~
[      ;
i L......:
07/19/83             LT WMS                            07/27/83             LT   1.1                         LT          1.5 JDKs                          07/19/83             LT   1.2                         LT          1.5 August                          LEE RALL.                      08/10/83             LT   0.8                         LT 0.7
L.
      ,---.                                              EPPS                          08/10/83             LT   1.3                         LT 2 il        .                                          CP                            08/09/83             LT   0.9                         LT 1.8 WMS                            08/17/83             LT   1.0                     1.6 + 1.1 JDKs                          08/09/83             LT   0.8                         LT 0.8 September                        LEE HALL                      09/01/83             LT 0.8                           LT 1. 2 EPPS                          09/01/83             LT 0.8                           LT 1.3 CP                            09/14/83             LT 0.7                           LT 2 WMS                            09/27/83 JDKs                          09/14/83             LT 0.8                           LT 2 October                          LEE RALL                      10/06/83 EPPS                          10/06/83
r,
    ,:    --                                              CP                            10/11/83 WMS                            10/18/83             LT 0.5 L                                                    J.DKs                          10/11/83 November                        LEE RALL                      11/10/83 EPPS                          11/10/83 CP                            11/08/83 WMS                            11/29/83 JDKs                          11/08/83 December                        LEE RALL                      12/08/83 EPPS                          12/08/83 CP                            12/13/83 WMS                            12/20/83 r-~                                                  JDKs                          12/16/83 i
I Month Lo.cation July LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs August LEE RALL.
L......:
EPPS CP WMS JDKs September LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs October LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS J.DKs November LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs December LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs (1)
(1)        LT= Less Than (2)        Sample destroyed in analysis L.
LT= Less Than (2)
r ,
Sample destroyed Table 10 (Page 2 *of 2)
34 I
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90.in Milk VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/- 2s )
          **-~-*,--a*-...._~** ... * - . ~ * ~ * * . * * . , - : ' * . * " ' ...  *.    *        **.~   .*,  .~.- -,*  '* .*.. ~ .. *'r,.-"./,, ...... ~ , .*.--*.;.-, ..,~,, .......-     ._*-f N'S:.-...~--
Sampling Date Strontium-89 07/13/83 LT 0.6 07/14/83 LT 0.7 07/19/83 LT 0.9 07/27/83 LT 1.1 07/19/83 LT 1.2 08/10/83 LT 0.8 08/10/83 LT 1.3 08/09/83 LT 0.9 08/17/83 LT 1.0 08/09/83 LT 0.8 09/01/83 LT 0.8 09/01/83 LT 0.8 09/14/83 LT 0.7 09/27/83 09/14/83 LT 0.8 10/06/83 10/06/83 10/11/83 10/18/83 LT 0.5 10/11/83 11/10/83 11/10/83 11/08/83 11/29/83 11/08/83 12/08/83 12/08/83 12/13/83 12/20/83 12/16/83 in analysis 34
**-**---. __,**.*:/*,~*~--------- - ~--*-
Strontium-.90 LT 0.5 LT 0.6 LT 1.0 LT 1.5 LT 1.5 LT 0.7 LT 2 LT 1.8 1.6 + 1.1 LT 0.8 LT 1. 2 LT 1.3 LT 2 LT 2
**-~-*,--a*-...._~**... *-.~*~**.**.,-:'*.*"'  
**.~  
.~.-
~  
.. *'r,.-"./,,...... ~,.*.--*.;.-,..,~,,.......-
._*-f N'S:.-...~--


C. Precipitation I
I I '
I '     Precipitation samples were collected as monthly composites and analyzed 1*--,
' 1*--,
for gross beta and tritium. Quarterly samples from the same locations (one indicator and one control) were composited from monthly aliquots retained at the site.       This compositing was performed by station personnel and the composites were submitted for the san~ analyses as monthly samples. The results of these analyses are shown in Table 11.
n l--:.J r,
In some cases, the. gross beta results on the quarterly samples appear to be at variance with the results from monthly samples. In all these cases the reported value was confirmed by reanalysis. Sampling, storage n l--:.J and compostting methods were reviewed with VEPCO and the reason for the discrepancies remain unresolved. Tritium was detected in 6 of 32 analyses. The values were typical for environmental samples.
ll)
r, l)      D*   Water l  **..J
**..J 1 ;
,--      Well water was collected from four indicator locations during May and 1 ;      October. The results of gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses
: n.
!....!  on these 8 samples are sho\'m on Table 12. No alpha activity was found in any of the samples (stations SS, HIR, BC, and JMTN). Gross beta activities ranged from 1.8 to 11 pCi/1, well within the preoperational range of O to 25 pCi/1. Tritium was.detected in 2 of 8 analyses at typical environmental levels.
lJ I :
' L....'
C.
Precipitation Precipitation samples were collected as monthly composites and analyzed for gross beta and tritium. Quarterly samples from the same locations (one indicator and one control) were composited from monthly aliquots retained at the site.
This compositing was performed by station personnel and the composites were submitted for the san~ analyses as monthly samples.
The results of these analyses are shown in Table 11.
In some cases, the. gross beta results on the quarterly samples appear to be at variance with the results from monthly samples.
In all these cases the reported value was confirmed by reanalysis.
Sampling, storage and compostting methods were reviewed with VEPCO and the reason for the discrepancies remain unresolved.
Tritium was detected in 6 of 32 analyses. The values were typical for environmental samples.
D
* Water Well water was collected from four indicator locations during May and October.
The results of gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses on these 8 samples are sho\\'m on Table 12.
No alpha activity was found in any of the samples (stations SS, HIR, BC, and JMTN).
Gross beta activities ranged from 1.8 to 11 pCi/1, well within the preoperational range of O to 25 pCi/1. Tritium was.detected in 2 of 8 analyses at typical environmental levels.
Table 12 also includes gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium results on 8 surface water samples which were also collected during May and October.
Table 12 also includes gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium results on 8 surface water samples which were also collected during May and October.
Surface water stations are Chippokes Creek '(CC) and three reservoirs
Surface water stations are Chippokes Creek '(CC) and three reservoirs (WMR,
: n.      (WMR,   NNR, and SR). All are indicator locations.
: NNR, and SR).
activities of 4 and 9.6 pCi/1 were found in 2 of the 8 samples.
All are indicator locations.
range of gross beta activity was 1.4 to 23 pCi/1. The maximum value in Gross alpha The this range was confirmed by reanalysis;                         this sample contained high suspended solids. No tritium was detected in any of these samples.
Gross alpha activities of 4 and 9.6 pCi/1 were found in 2 of the 8 samples.
In addition to the water samples discussed above, samples of James River lJ      water are collected as both. monthly composites and bi-monthly grab samples. The James River is an estuary near Surry Power Station and undergoes tidal exchange with Chesapeake Bay. River water samples thus represent saline bay water in contrast to the fresh water samples discussed above.
The range of gross beta activity was 1.4 to 23 pCi/1.
The maximum value in this range was confirmed by reanalysis; this sample contained high suspended solids.
No tritium was detected in any of these samples.
In addition to the water samples discussed above, samples of James River water are collected as both. monthly composites and bi-monthly grab samples.
The James River is an estuary near Surry Power Station and undergoes tidal exchange with Chesapeake Bay.
River water samples thus represent saline bay water in contrast to the fresh water samples discussed above.
Ga~ma spectrometr~ was performed on bi-monthly grab samples of James River water and the results are presented on Table 13.
Ga~ma spectrometr~ was performed on bi-monthly grab samples of James River water and the results are presented on Table 13.
* With four exceptions, all nuclides were below the detectiorr limit. The May sample from Surry Discharge (SD) contained 5.5 pCi/1 Co-58, 9.8 pCi/1 Cs-134, I:      and 11 pCi/1 Cs-i37. These nuclides may be due to plant operations. In addition, the November sample from Hog Island Point (HIP) contained 3.7 pCi/1 Cs-137. When unaccompanied by Cs-134, Cs-137 is likely to be due to atmospheric fallout.
* With four exceptions, all nuclides were below the detectiorr limit. The May sample from Surry Discharge (SD) contained 5.5 pCi/1 Co-58, 9.8 pCi/1 Cs-134, and 11 pCi/1 Cs-i37.
'L....'                                  35
These nuclides may be due to plant operations.
                                              ...____-._.,.~-----..................... --- ....... _ ... *. *--. ---~---*****-* . .-,-*--*-*-- ------ --. ----- *- " - ------
In
: addition, the November sample from Hog Island Point (HIP) contained 3.7 pCi/1 Cs-137.
When unaccompanied by Cs-134, Cs-137 is likely to be due to atmospheric fallout.
35
-~-- *
--*--------**----~-
*--- ~.*. --**----
... ____ -..,.~-----..................... ---....... _  
... *. *--. ---~---*****-*..-,-*--*-*-- ------ --. ----- *-


                                              ,__.- --:* *---~-~-~-**---------~*----------...-*-* ..- . - . .   ---" -*-. :- ~~- ---- *---- _. - .. ,. ---**
I L~*
Table 11 Gross Beta and Tritium in Precipitation (Monthly and Quarterly Composites)
).
\\_
r:*,
i r.,
I.
\\ L~
, __.- --:* *---~-~-~-**---------~*----------...-*-*.. -. -..  
---" -*-. :- ~~- ---- *---- _. -..,. ---**
Location ss NN ss NN ss NN ss NN ss NN Month January February March Quarter 1 January February March Quarter 1 April May June Quarter 2 April May June Quarter 2 July August September Quarter 3 July August September Quarter 3 October November December Quarter 4 October November December Quarter 4 Table 11 Gross Beta and Tritium in Precipitation (Monthly and Quarterly Composites)
VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/- 2s)
VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/- 2s)
Collection Location    Month              Period                         Gross Beta                            Tritium ss        January      01/01/83 to 02/01/83                 2.7        +    1.4                    LT  300(1)
Collection Period 01/01/83 to 02/01/83 02/01/83 to 02/28/83 03/01/83 to 03/30/83 01/01/83 to 03/30/83 01/01/83 to 02/01/83 02/01/83 to 02/28/83 03/01/83 to 03/30/83 01/01/83 to 03/30/83 04/01/83 to 04/26/83 04/27/83 to 05/31/83 06/01/83 to 06/30/83 04/01/83 to 06/30/83 04/01/83 to 04/26/83 04/27/83 to 05/31/83 06/01/83 to 06/30/83 04/01/83 to 06/30/83 07/01/83 to 07/31/83 08/01/83 to 08/30/83 09/14/83 to 09/27/83 07/01/83 to 09/27/83 07/01/83 to 07/31/83 08/01/83 to 08/30/83 09/14/83 to 09/27/83 07/01/83 to 09/27/83 09/28/83 to 10/26/83-10/27/83 to 11/29/83 12/01/83 to 12/28/83 10/01/83 to 12/28/83 09/28/83 to 10/26/83 10/27/83 to 11/29/83 12/01/83 to 12/28/83 10/01/83 to 12/28/83 Gross Beta 2.7
February    02/01/83 to 02/28/83                 1.9      + 1.3                        LT  400 March        03/01/83 to 03/30/83                 1.6      + 1.2                        LT  300 Quarter 1    01/01/83 to 03/30/83                   75      + 8                          LT  300 NN        January      01/01/83 to 02/01/83                 1.4      + 1.3                        LT 300 February    02/01/83 to 02/28/83               4.6        + 1.4                        LT 400 March        03/01/83 to 03/30/83                       LT 1.8                    190 + 180 Quarter 1    01/01/83 to 03/30/83                   49 + 5                                LT 300 ss        April        04/01/83 to 04/26/83                 1.5      +      1.3                    LT 300 May          04/27/83 to 05/31/83                 5.0      +      4.9            750      + 200 June        06/01/83 to 06/30/83                   37      +      4              570      + 200 Quarter 2    04/01/83 to 06/30/83                   45      +    5              380      + 200 I
+ 1.4 1.9 + 1.3 1.6 + 1.2 75
NN        April        04/01/83 to 04/26/83                 1.8      + 1.3                        LT 300 L~*              May          04/27/83 to 05/31/83                       LT    2                  630 + 200 June        06/01/83 to 06/30/83                 6.6        + 1.5                410*      +    200 Quarter 2    04/01/83 to 06/30/83                   46      + 5                          LT 300 ss        July        07/01/83 to 07/31/83                 2.9        + 1.3                        LT  500
+
).
8 1.4 + 1.3 4.6 + 1.4 LT 1.8 49 + 5 1.5 + 1.3 5.0 + 4.9 37 + 4 45 + 5 1.8 + 1.3 LT 2 6.6 + 1.5 46 +
August      08/01/83 to 08/30/83                   14      +
5 2.9 + 1.3 14 +
                                                                              - 1.4 2                      LT  300
2 4.4 + 1.4 12 +
\_              September    09/14/83 to 09/27/83               4.4        +
2 LT 1. 8 14 +
                                                                              -+ 2                          LT  300 Quarter 3    07/01/83 to 09/27/83                   12                                    LT  300 r:*,
2 1.3 + 1.0 10 +
i      NN        July        07/01/83 to 07/31/83                       LT 1. 8                          LT  500 August      08/01/83 to 08/30/83                   14      + 2                          LT  300 r .,
2 3.7 + 1.2 4.3 + 1.2 2.7 + 1.3 1.4 + 1.1 1.4 + 1.2 1.6 + 1.1 LT 1. 9 LT 1. 8 Annual Average+/- 2s Annual Average+/- 2s 6.8 + 20 3.4 + 7.4 (1)
September    09/14/83 to 09/27/83                 1.3        + 1.0                        LT  300 I .              Quarter 3    07/01/83 to 09/27/83                   10      +      2                      LT  300
L.T = Less Than (2)
\
No average computed due to large number of LLDs.
L~
36 Tritium LT 300(1)
ss        October      09/28/83 to 10/26/83-               3.7        +    1.2                    LT  300 November    10/27/83 to 11/29/83               4.3        +    1.2                    LT  300 December    12/01/83 to 12/28/83                 2.7        +    1.3                    LT  300 Quarter 4    10/01/83 to 12/28/83                 1.4        +    1.1                    LT  300 NN        October      09/28/83 to 10/26/83                 1.4        + 1.2
LT 400 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 400 190 +
* LT  300 November    10/27/83 to 11/29/83                 1.6      + 1.1                        LT  300 December    12/01/83 to 12/28/83                       LT 1. 9                          LT  300*
180 LT 300 LT 300 750 + 200 570 +
Quarter 4    10/01/83 to 12/28/83                       LT 1. 8                         LT .300 ss        Annual Average+/- 2s                               6.8        + 20                          (2)
200 380 + 200 LT 300 630 +
NN        Annual Average+/- 2s                               3.4       + 7.4                         (2)
200 410* + 200 LT 300 LT 500 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 500 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300
(1)  L.T = Less Than (2) No average computed due to large number of LLDs.
* LT 300 LT 300 LT 300*
36
LT.300 (2)
(2)


1--. L....                             [. _* ..                                      (**-*-**1             .*       . r-~                              /*----,
w
l ..                                                 l. .                              *( C*    *:          : .*. : i l. ..... --.... ~.:i             i,C: .. ./
-..J 1--.
Table 12 Determination of Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, and Tritium in Surface and He 11 ,Water, Semi-Annual Samples VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/1 .:!:. 2s) 1.
l..
L....
[.
(**-*-**1  
*( C*
: l...
Table 12
:.*. : i r-~
: l...... --.... ~.:i  
/*----,
i,C:.../
Determination of Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, and Tritium in Surface and He 11,Water, Semi-Annual Samples VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/1.:!:. 2s)
Sampling Analysis Surface Water
~Jell Water Date Type cc
~/MR NNR SR ss HIR BC 04/12/83 Gross Alpha LT 1.5(1)
LT 1. 5 LT 3 9.6 + 2.9 LT 1. 9 LT 2 LT 3 Gross Beta 2.0.! 1.2 1.4.! 1.2 2.9.! 2.3 6.4 + 2.5 2.8.! 1.3 4.1.! 1.4 6.4 + 1.!i
* Tritium LT 300 LT 300 LT.300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 230 + 180 10/11/83 Gross Alpha 4.0.! 2.7 LT 4 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 Gross Beta 23 + 6 7.5 + 4.6 4.0 + 2.7 4.5.! 2.8 4.8 + 1.4 1.8.:!:. 1.5 9.3 + 3.0 Tritium LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 560 + 170 LT 300 LT 300 Gross Beta Average.:!:. 2s 13 + 30 4.5 + 8.6 3.8 + 3.8 5.5 + 2.6 3.8 + 2.8 3.0 + 3.0 7.9 + 4.2 (1)
LT
= Less than (2)
No average computed due to large number of LLDs.
Gross. Be ta JMTN Average
+ 2s LT 3 (2) 11 + 2 4.6 + 6 LT 300*
(2)
LT 3 (2) 6.1 + 1.6 7.6 + 13 LT 300 (2) 8.6.:!:. 7.0 (2)
: 1.
I I
I I
Sampling          Analysis                                Surface Water                                                                    ~Jell Water                          Gross. Be ta    1:
1:  
                                                                                                                                                                                                          /.'. *\.
/.'.  
[.-* ' ..
*\\.
Date              Type            cc                ~/MR            NNR                    SR          ss                        HIR            BC          JMTN        Average + 2s f
[.-* '..
04/12/83        Gross Alpha      LT 1.5(1)          LT 1. 5        LT 3              9.6 + 2.9      LT 1. 9                    LT 2            LT 3          LT 3            (2)        rl Gross Beta      2.0 .! 1.2          1.4 .! 1.2    2.9 .! 2.3          6.4 + 2.5    2.8 .! 1.3            4.1 .! 1.4          6.4 + 1.!i      11 + 2        4.6 + 6        1*
f r
* Tritium          LT 300              LT 300        LT .300              LT 300      LT 300                      LT 300        230 + 180        LT 300*          (2) w
l 1* !
-..J 10/11/83        Gross Alpha    4.0 .! 2.7            LT 4          LT 2                LT 3        LT 2                        LT 2            LT 3          LT 3            (2)        i I
i I
Gross Beta      23 + 6            7.5 + 4.6    4.0 + 2.7            4.5 .! 2.8    4.8 + 1.4              1.8 .:!:. 1.5        9.3 + 3.0      6.1 + 1.6      7.6 + 13
[>
[>
Tritium          LT 300              LT 300        LT 300              LT 300    560 + 170                    LT 300          LT 300        LT 300          (2) 1.
: 1.
Gross Beta      Average.:!:. 2s  13 + 30            4.5 + 8.6    3.8 + 3.8            5.5 + 2.6    3.8  +  2.8          3.0 + 3.0            7.9 + 4.2      8.6 .:!:. 7.0      (2)      !*
1*
1*
i-*
i-*
1:.-
1:.-
I:
I:
                                                                                                                                                                                                      ,.i" I
i",.
I
[-..
[-..
(1)    LT = Less than                                                                                                                                                                      I.
I.
I (2)    No average computed due to large number of LLDs.                                                                                                                                    1*
I 1*
t.
: t.
1*.*
1*.*  


I*.**--~-- 7 --,
l ... *__-.;
I l.
I r*-:--*-~
                                                                          \,.-- ..... ;,    L
                                                                                                        ;              r-:
                                                                                                                        .. ~- *****. ,J r--
                                                                                                                                                                ~ ...... -
I
                                                                                                                                                                          .... I r---*1
                                                                                                                                                                                            '***-'- -*-J i    i.....
* j Table 13 Comma Spectrometry of River Water VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in pCi/1 ~ 2s)
Month      Location        Date      Ba-140        Co-58              Co-60            Cs-134      Cs-137          Fe-59      La-140                  Mn-54  Nb-')5          Zn-65        Zr-95            K-40 (3)                                                    LT  5            ND( 2 )
January          SI      01/19/83    LT 50(1)      l.T 3              LT    3          LT  2        LT 2        LT 8        LT 40(3)                LT  2  LT 3            LT 5 1983            IIIP    01/20/83    LT 50          LT 3                LT    3          LT  2          l,T 2      LT 10      LT 40( 3 )              LT  2  LT 3            LT 7          LT  6            ND NN      01/21/83    LT 60( 3 )    LT 3                LT    2          LT  2        LT 2        LT 8        LT 30( 3 )              LT  3  LT]              LT 6          LT  6            ND CIIIC  01/211/83  LT 70          l.T 5              LT    5          LT  3        LT 3        LT 16      LT 50                    LT  4  LT 6            LT 11        LT  9            ND Sll    01/26/8)    LT 90(3)      LT 5                LT    3          LT  4        LT 4        LT 11      LT 30                    LT  4  LT 6            LT 8          LT 11            ND March            SI      03/29/83    LT 16          LT 3                LT 6              LT 5          LT 4        LT 11      LT 14                    LT  5  LT 4            LT 9          LT 7              ND HIP    03/2 3/83  LT 30          LT 6                LT 4              LT 5          LT 8        LT 10      T:r 14                  l,T 5  LT 5            LT 11        LT 9              ND NN      03/23/83    LT 14          l.'f 6              LT 4              LT 4          LT 4        Lt  12      LT 8                    LT 3  LT 4            LT 9          LT 7              ND CHIC    03/~8/8)    LT 11          LT 3                LT    3          LT 3          LT 3        LT 6        l,T 6                    LT]    LT]              LT 6          l,T 5            ND SD      03/28/83    LT )0          LT 7                LT    6          LT*6          LT 5        LT 12      LT 14                    LT 5  LT 5            LT 14        LT 12            ND May              SI      05/25/8)    LT 13          LT 2                LT 2              I.T 2        LT 2        LT 6        LT 10                    LT  2  LT 2            LT 4          LT 4              ND HIP    05/19/8)    LT 30          LT 7                LT 6              LT 5          LT 5        LT 13      LT 15                    LT  5  LT 6            LT 10        J.T 10            ND w                                NN      05/2 5/8)  LT 15
* LT 3                LT 3              l,T 2        LT 2        I.T 5      LT 9                    LT  2  LT 2            LT 5          LT 4        100    + 20 ro CHIC    05/25/8)    LT 20          LT 4                LT 4              l.T 3        LT 4        LT 9        LT 12                    LT  3  LT 4            LT 8          LT 7              ND Sll    05/2 7 /BJ  LT 30      5.5 + 4.6              LT 6            9.8  +  3.5  11 + 4          LT 10      LT 14                    LT  5  LT 6            LT 11        LT 10            ND (4)
July            SI      07/19/8)    LT 8          LT 13              LT 8              LT 7          LT 7        LT  40( 4 ) l,T 8                    LT 9  LT 13            LT 18        LT 20            ND lllP    07 /13/83  LT 12          LT 15              LT 9              LT 8          LT 8        LT  40( 4 ) LT 12                    LT 9  LT 15            LT 20        LT 30            ND NN      07 /13/83  LT 10          LT 14              l.T 8            LT 7          LT 7        LT  40      LT 10                    LT 9  LT 14            LT 18        LT 20            Nll CIIIC  07/25/83    LT 8          LT 6                LT 4              LT 4          LT 4        LT  18      LT 8                    l,T 4  LT 6            LT 9          LT 11            ND SD      07/19/83    LT 9          LT 6                LT 4              LT 4          LT 4        LT  20      LT 9                    LT 4  LT 6            LT 9          LT 12            ND LT 200( 4 )                                                                                        (4)
September        SI    09/27 /83                  LT 5                LT    3          LT 3          LT 3        LT 14      LT 110( 4 )              LT]    LT 5            LT 6          LT  9            ND IIIP  09/27/83    LT 200( 4 )    LT 5                LT 3              LT J          f,T 3      LT  14      LT 110( 4 )              LT J  LT 5            LT 6          LT  9            ND NN    09/27/83    LT 400( 4 )    LT 5
* LT 3              LT 3          r:r 2        I.T 16      LT 200( 4 )              LT J  LT 5            LT 7          LT  9            ND CIIIC 09/27 /83  LT 200( 4 )    LT 5                LT 3              l.T 3        LT 3        LT  14      LT 110( 4 )              LT]    LT 5            LT 6          LT  9            ND SD    09/27/83    LT 400( 4 )    LT 6                LT]              LT 3          LT 3        LT  18      LT 200                  LT J  LT 6            LT 8          LT  11          ND (4)                                                                                  LT 180( 4 )
Noven1ber          SI    11/14/83    LT 300( 4 )    LT 4                LT 3              LT 2          LT 2        LT  15                              LT 3  LT 4            LT 7          LT 8              ND lllP  11/14/83    LT 170        LT 3                LT l. 7          LT 1.4    3.7 + 0.8        LT  8      LT  100( 4 )            LT 1.5 LT J-            LT 4          LT 5              ND NN    11 /ll, /83 LT 300( 4 )    LT 4                LT 3              LT 2          LT-2        LT  13      LT  130( 4 )            LT 3  LT 4            LT 6          LT 7              ND CIIIC l l/llo/83  LT 170( 4 )    LT 5                LT 4              LT 3          LT 3        LT  16      LT  100( 4 )            LT 3  LT 5            LT 9          LT 9              ND Sll  11/14/83    LT 400( 4 )    LT 6                LT 4              LT 3          LT 3        LT  19      LT  200( 4 )            LT 4  LT 7            LT 9          LT 12            ND
                    --(ff--I.T-= Less Than I
I I
I I
(2) ND = Not Detected. I.I.Os fo K-40 not normally calculated for individual water sample.
I I i 1:
(3) Lower sensitivity due to delay ln shipping.
J l l I*.**--~-- 7 --,
(4) Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting.
l...
I i
* _ _-.;
1:
w ro I
J l
: l.
l
I r*-:--*-~
\\,.--..... ;,
L Month Location Date Ba-140 Co-58 Co-60 r-:
.. ~- *****.,J Table 13 Comma Spectrometry of River Water VEPCO REMP -
1983 (Results in pCi/1 ~ 2s)
Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 La-140 r--
I
~...... -
.... I r---*1
'***-'- -*-J
**------***, i i.....
* j Mn-54 Nb-')5 Zn-65 Zr-95 K-40 January 1983 March May July September Noven1ber SI IIIP NN CIIIC Sll SI HIP NN CHIC SD SI HIP NN CHIC Sll SI lllP NN CIIIC SD SI IIIP NN CIIIC SD SI lllP NN CIIIC Sll 01/19/83 01/20/83 01/21/83 01/211/83 01/26/8) 03/29/83 03/2 3/83 03/23/83 03/~8/8) 03/28/83 05/25/8) 05/19/8) 05/2 5/8) 05/25/8) 05/2 7 /BJ 07/19/8) 07 /13/83 07 /13/83 07/25/83 07/19/83 09/27 /83 09/27/83 09/27/83 09/27 /83 09/27/83 11/14/83 11/14/83 11 /ll, /83 l l/llo/83 11/14/83
--(ff--I.T-= Less Than LT 50(1)
LT 50 LT 60( 3 )
LT 70 LT 90(3)
LT 16 LT 30 LT 14 LT 11 LT )0 LT 13 LT 30 LT 15 LT 20 LT 30 LT 8 LT 12 LT 10 LT 8 LT 9 LT 200(4 )
LT 200(4 )
LT 400(4 )
LT 200(4 )
LT 400(4 )
(4)
LT 300(4 )
LT 170 LT 300(4 )
LT 170(4 )
LT 400(4 )
l.T 3 LT 3 LT 3 l.T 5 LT 5 LT 3 LT 6 l.'f 6 LT 3 LT 7 LT 2 LT 7
* LT 3 LT 4 5.5 + 4.6 LT 13 LT 15 LT 14 LT 6 LT 6 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 6 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 LT 6 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 5 LT 3 LT 6 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT 6 LT 2 LT 6 LT 3 LT 4 LT 6 LT 8 LT 9 l.T 8 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3
* LT 3 LT 3 LT]
LT 3 LT l. 7 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 LT 5 LT 4 LT 3 LT*6 I.T 2 LT 5 l,T 2 l.T 3 9.8 + 3.5 LT 7 LT 8 LT 7 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT J LT 3 l.T 3 LT 3 LT 2 l,T 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 8 LT 4 LT 3 LT 5 LT 2 LT 5 LT 2 LT 4 11 + 4 LT 7 LT 8 LT 7 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 f,T 3 r:r 2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.4 3.7 + 0.8 LT 2 LT-2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 8 LT 10 LT 8 LT 16 LT 11 LT 11 LT 10 Lt 12 LT 6 LT 12 LT 6 LT 13 I.T 5 LT 9 LT 10 (4)
LT 40(4 )
LT 40(4 )
LT 40 LT 18 LT 20 LT 14 LT 14 I.T 16 LT 14 LT 18 LT 15 LT 8 LT 13 LT 16 LT 19 (3)
LT 40(3)
LT 40( 3 )
LT 30(3 )
LT 50 LT 30 LT 14 T:r 14 LT 8 l,T 6 LT 14 LT 10 LT 15 LT 9 LT 12 LT 14 l,T 8 LT 12 LT 10 LT 8 LT 9 (4)
LT 110(4 )
LT 110(4)
LT 200(4 )
LT 110(4 )
LT 200 LT 180(4 )
LT 100(4 )
LT 130(4 )
LT 100(4 )
LT 200(4 )
(2)
ND = Not Detected.
I.I.Os fo K-40 not normally calculated for individual water sample.
(3)
Lower sensitivity due to delay ln shipping.
(4)
Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting.
LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 5 l,T 5 LT 3 LT]
LT 5 LT 2 LT 5 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 9 LT 9 LT 9 l,T 4 LT 4 LT]
LT J LT J LT]
LT J LT 3 LT 1.5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT]
LT 6 LT 6 LT 4 LT 5 LT 4 LT]
LT 5 LT 2 LT 6 LT 2 LT 4 LT 6 LT 13 LT 15 LT 14 LT 6 LT 6 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 6 LT 4 LT J-LT 4 LT 5 LT 7 LT 5 LT 7 LT 6 LT 11 LT 8 LT 9 LT 11 LT 9 LT 6 LT 14 LT 4 LT 10 LT 5 LT 8 LT 11 LT 18 LT 20 LT 18 LT 9 LT 9 LT 6 LT 6 LT 7 LT 6 LT 8 LT 7 LT 4 LT 6 LT 9 LT 9 LT 5 ND(2 )
LT 6 ND LT 6 ND LT 9 ND LT 11 ND LT 7 ND LT 9 ND LT 7 ND l,T 5 ND LT 12 ND LT 4 ND J.T 10 ND LT 4 100 + 20 LT 7 ND LT 10 ND LT 20 ND LT 30 ND LT 20 Nll LT 11 ND LT 12 ND LT 9 ND LT 9 ND LT 9 ND LT 9 ND LT 11 ND LT 8 ND LT 5 ND LT 7 ND LT 9 ND LT 12 ND


              - - - ------~-----------~-----:___.*  _._ - ----~~-._,_:_*_,_, __ **:*____ -_.,,._- - ........_,~,,.--~- --.~,. - "'--.. -~~-- __._ ._ '..J.'--~'-*,..*-
I'-.
* l. ., __ , __ __,i_~..,-~._........, __ _:_..,_:.~.i..~----"'--'--*-
I' i
I' I'-        J..,
i  
i        i
/ __ :
/ __   :
i i
i       ';
J 1.*  
The bi~month1y samples of river water were composited on a semi-annual basis and analyzed for tritium.                                                      Low positive values of 200 and 290 pCi/1 were found in samples from the Chicahominy River (CKIC) control location.          Values for .the indicator lotations ranged from 220 to 1500 pCi/1. These results are given on Table 14. During the preoperational i
\\i I
J radiological environmental monitoring program, higher values of 4500 to 1' .*'                  15000 pCi/1 were reported.
Monthly composites of river water are col"lected by the Commonwealth of Virginia.          Results of gamma spectrometry on these samples are shown in Table 15. With four exceptions, all nuclides were below the detection limit.          The        February sample from the indicator location~ Surry
  \i I
1._:
1._:
Discharge, contained 12 pCi/1 of Co-58 and 27 pCi/1 of Co-60. Co-60 was again detected in th~ November sample from the same location, at a level r-~.
r-~.
                        *of 3.8 pCi/1, and was accompanied by 2.6 pCi/1 of Cs-137.                                                                                                                                         These I        ;            nuclides may be due to plant operations.
I
u                      The monthly composites of river water are also analyzed for strontium-89 r~
; u r~
l        !
l
and -90.           Results are shown on Table 16. (Ten of these analyses were
( :
(        :            incomplete at the time of submission of the draft annual report.                                                                                                                                           Low levels of Sr-90 (0.68 to 0.98 pCi/1) were found in samples from both the
I
    ;        I indicator and control (Scotland Wharf)                                                                       locations.                                           During                                   the
\\
    \ ~
~
preoperational. radiological environmental mbnitoring program for Surry Power Station, Sr-90 was occasionally found in James River water in the range 0.1 to 3.1 pCi/1.
r-**
In addition, strontium-89 was detected in the two samples collected in April.         The levels observed were 1.0 + 0.6 and 1.6 + 1.1 pCi/1. These va 1ues for stronti um-89 may be art'ifacts of the calculation method.
I L*
Because this analysis is a function of the difference between two counts, normal statistical variations will occasionally lead to the r-**                reporting of a false positive result for this isotope at values near its I                  detection limit. The analysis could not be confirmed because sufficient L*                  volume of sample no longer remained to match the original sensitivity 1imH.
r1
r1 E.     Aquatic Biota Marine biota can be sensitive indicators of radionuclide accumulation in the environment because of their ability to concentrate certain chemical elements wh.ich have radioactive isotopes.                                                                         Gamma spectrometry was performed on bi-monthly samples of clams and oysters from the James River. The results are shown on Table 17.                                                                           As expected, naturally occurring K-40 was the nuclide most frequently detected. In one sample from station LC, Co-60 was found at a low level of 18 pCi/kg (wet weight). All other nuclides were below the detection limit.
- - ------~-----------~-----:___.* _._ - ----~~-._,_:_*_,_, __ **:* ____ -_.,,._- -........ _,~,,.--~- --.~,. -
39
"'--.. -~~-- __._._ '..J.'--~'-*,..*- *l
                                                                                --------             ____._c  - -          **- *-     ** --*..--**- ....._.-,.,.. --**, .... _.,--,.--..-..-...,.,.-*,*, . , . . . - . - ~ . . , , - - - ~ - - - .......* - * - - - - - - - - -
.., __, __ __,i_~..,-~._........, __ _:_..,_:.~.i..~----"'--'--*-
J..,
The bi~month1y samples of river water were composited on a semi-annual basis and analyzed for tritium.
Low positive values of 200 and 290 pCi/1 were found in samples from the Chicahominy River (CKIC) control location.
Values for.the indicator lotations ranged from 220 to 1500 pCi/1.
These results are given on Table 14.
During the preoperational radiological environmental monitoring program, higher values of 4500 to 15000 pCi/1 were reported.
Monthly composites of river water are col"lected by the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Results of gamma spectrometry on these samples are shown in Table 15.
With four exceptions, all nuclides were below the detection limit.
The February sample from the indicator location~ Surry Discharge, contained 12 pCi/1 of Co-58 and 27 pCi/1 of Co-60.
Co-60 was again detected in th~ November sample from the same location, at a level  
*of 3.8 pCi/1, and was accompanied by 2.6 pCi/1 of Cs-137.
These nuclides may be due to plant operations.
The monthly composites of river water are also analyzed for strontium-89 and -90.
Results are shown on Table 16.
(Ten of these analyses were incomplete at the time of submission of the draft annual report.
Low levels of Sr-90 (0.68 to 0.98 pCi/1) were found in samples from both the indicator and control (Scotland Wharf) locations.
During the preoperational. radiological environmental mbnitoring program for Surry Power Station, Sr-90 was occasionally found in James River water in the range 0.1 to 3.1 pCi/1.
In addition, strontium-89 was detected in the two samples collected in April.
The levels observed were 1.0 + 0.6 and 1.6 + 1.1 pCi/1. These va 1 ues for stronti um-89 may be art'ifacts of the calculation method.
Because this analysis is a function of the difference between two counts, normal statistical variations will occasionally lead to the reporting of a false positive result for this isotope at values near its detection limit.
The analysis could not be confirmed because sufficient volume of sample no longer remained to match the original sensitivity 1 imH.
E.
Aquatic Biota Marine biota can be sensitive indicators of radionuclide accumulation in the environment because of their ability to concentrate certain chemical elements wh.ich have radioactive isotopes.
Gamma spectrometry was performed on bi-monthly samples of clams and oysters from the James River.
The results are shown on Table 17.
As
: expected, naturally occurring K-40 was the nuclide most frequently detected.
In one sample from station LC, Co-60 was found at a low level of 18 pCi/kg (wet weight). All other nuclides were below the detection limit.
39  
----~. -*-** ----..,-*---.-....---~- *---*-
____._c
....._.-,.,.. --**,.... _.,--,.--..-..-...,.,.-*,*,.,...-.-~..,,---~---....... *-*--------


TABLE 14 Determination of Tritium in River Water - Semi-Annua 1 Composite VEPCO REMP 1983 r*-                                     (Results om pCi /1  ~ 2s) j I
r*-
rr I:
j I
(j l
rr I :
Location                Collection Period              Tritium CHIC                1/24/83    to 5/28/83        290 +    200 HIP                  1/20/83    to 5/19/83        240 +    200 NN                  1/21/83    to 5/25/83        220 +    200 r*--*           SD                  1/26/83    to .5/27/83        380 +    20?
l (j
r*--*
l !
l !
it ____.
i t ____.
SI                  1/19/83    to 5/25/83            LT-  300 l) r **-         CHIC                7/25/83    to  11/14/83      200    +  190 HIP                  7/13/83    to  11/14/83      380      190 iL  ...       NN                  7/13/83    to  11/14/83      570  -++  190 SD                  7/19/83    t*o 11/14/83      1300    +  200
r **-
* SI                  7/19/83    to  11/14/83      1500    +  200 I     '
i L...
I I
I l._.:
I l._.:
I      '
r.;
r.;
l.J (1) LT= Less Than I \
l.J I \\
i___:
i ___ :
40
TABLE 14 Determination of Tritium in River Water - Semi-Annua 1 Composite VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results om pCi /1
~ 2s)
Location Collection Period Tritium CHIC 1/24/83 to 5/28/83 290
+ 200 HIP 1/20/83 to 5/19/83 240
+ 200 NN 1/21/83 to 5/25/83 220
+ 200 SD 1/26/83 to.5/27/83 380 + 20?
SI 1/19/83 to 5/25/83 LT-300 l)
CHIC 7/25/83 to 11/14/83 200
+ 190 HIP 7/13/83 to 11/14/83 380
+ 190 NN 7/13/83 to 11/14/83 570
+ 190 SD 7/19/83 t*o 11/14/83 1300
+ 200
* SI 7/19/83 to 11/14/83 1500
+ 200 (1) LT= Less Than 40
--* -*-**---- -- -*-*-""'-- --~ ~ - ~---- ----------~--- ----- *-


i*
i*
('
c.,..~:i
l..
[~:J
:  r:*                c.,..~:i   [~:J
::~--:---*,
::~--:---*,
L~-,-~c!      [__ . . ~:.J     c*;:_J     :--,-}
[ __... ~:.J c*;:_J
                                                                                                        ***---*.......)
:--,-}
r-1     L.:_,j       c=:-J r-1                   ;-*** .. ****-,,
r-1 L.:_,j c=:-J r-1 r~,...--.-**.1
lc.":*.:.... :J r~,...--.-**.1 t             I
: ;,;.i
                                                                                                                                                                                                      ***-*-*-* *.. 1
~.;::.:J r:':~.-... :,1
: ;,; .i ~.;:: .:J r:':~.-..:,1
[)..'}] ~ Ti
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ~.: * **** ..! * .:.J     [) ..'}] ~ Ti
(' - -*.. -
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                - I.
r:*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ,.l I.
lc.":*.:.... :J t
l
I l..
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ,.1**
L~-,-~c!
Table 15                                                                                                                                             t.*
***---*.......)
rI"*...
***-*-*-* *.. 1  
Gamma Spectrometry of River Water {monthly composl tee) .                                                                                                                               f:*
~.: * ****..! *.:.J  
VEPCO. REMP - 1983 t-r**
- I.
l I.
l  
',.1**
Table 15 t.*
I"*
r...
Gamma Spectrometry of River Water {monthly composl tee).
f:*
t-VEPCO. REMP - 1983 r**
i*
i*
(Results in pCl/1     :!: 2s)
(Results in pCl/1 :!: 2s)
I 1.-..
I 1.-..
I-.
I-.
Month         Location           Date           Ba-140             Co-58       Co-60               Cs-134     Cs-137       Fe-59         La-140             Mn-54                 Nb-95       Zn-65     Zr-95   K-40                                   r'.
Month Location Date Ba-140 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95 Zn-65 Zr-95 K-40 r'.
                    ---*---                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ('
('
December     Scotland Wh. 12/31 /83           LT 30(1)           LT 1.9     LT 2                 LT 1.5     LT 1.5       LT 6           LT 20< >
December Scotland Wh.
2 LT 1.8               LT 2         LT S     LT 4         ND( 4 )'                           L 1982         Surry Dis.     12/31/83           LT 80( 2 )         LT 5       LT 4                 LT 3       LT 4         LT 11         LT 40< 2>
12/31 /83 LT 30(1)
LT 3                 LT 5         LT 10     LT 9         ND                                 1.'t/*. .
LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 1.5 LT 1.5 LT 6 LT 20<2>
January 1983 Scotland Wh.
LT 1.8 LT 2 LT S LT 4 ND(4)'
L 1
* 1982 Surry Dis.
12/31/83 LT 80(2 )
LT 5 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 11 LT 40<2>
LT 3 LT 5 LT 10 LT 9 ND  
.'t/..
January Scotland Wh.
Ol/3 l /83 LT l 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 8 LT 12 (2)
LT 3 LT 3 LT 7 LT S ND ir 1983 Surry Dis.
01/31/.83 LT 40 LT 7 LT 7 LT 7 LT 7 LT 16 LT 16 LT 6 LT 7 LT 15 LT 13 ND February Scotland Wh.
02/28/83 LT 30 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1. 7 LT 1.* 6 LT 7 LT 19 <2 )
LT 1.8 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 ND r:
Surry Dis.
Surry Dis.
Ol/3 l /83 01/31/.83 LT l 4 LT 40 LT 3 LT 7 LT 4 LT 7 LT 3 LT 7 LT 3 LT 7 LT 8 LT 16 LT 12 (2)
02/28/83 LT 30 12 + 3 27 + 3 LT 1. 9 LT 2.
LT 16 LT 3 LT 6 LT 3 LT 7 LT 7 LT 15 LT S LT 13 ND ND ir February    Scotland Wh.
I.T 9 LT 20<2 )
LT 3 LT 3 LT 6 LT S 53 + 15 i
March Scotland Wh.
03/31/83 30 4
l.T 5 4
LT 4 9
20<2 )
LT 4 LT 5 LT 10 LT 7 ND LT LT LT LT LT i
Surry Dis.
Surry Dis.
02/28/83 02/28/83 LT 30 LT 30 LT 2 12 + 3 LT 2 27 + 3 LT 1. 7 LT 1. 9 LT 1.* 6 LT 2.
03/31/83 LT 30 LT 5 LT 4 LT 4 LT 4 LT 10 LT 20<2 )
LT 7 I.T 9 LT 19 < )
LT 4 LT 4 LT 9 LT 8 ND h I April Scotland Wh.
LT 20< )
04/30/83 LT 30 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 7 LT 14 LT 3 LT 3 LT 6 LT 6 ND  
2 2
/*
LT 1.8 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 6 LT 4 LT S  53 + 15 ND                                  r:
Surry Dis.
March        Scotland Wh. 03/31/83            LT 30              LT 4        l.T 5                LT 4      LT 4          LT 9          LT 20< )
04/30/83 I.T 19 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 I.T 7 LT 10 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 5 ND 1:. !:**
2 2
30<3 )
LT 4                LT 5        LT 10      LT 7        ND i
f.:..
i Surry Dis.      03/31/83           LT 30             LT 5       LT 4                 LT 4       LT 4         LT 10         LT 20< )           LT 4                 LT 4         LT 9     LT 8         ND                                 h I
* May Scotland Wh.
April       Scotland Wh. 04/30/83           LT 30             LT 3       LT 3                 LT 3       LT 3         LT 7           LT 14             LT 3                   LT 3         LT 6     LT 6         ND                                   /*
06/21 /83 LT 20 LT 1.3 LT 2 LT 3 I.T 0.8 LT 5 LT LT 1.0 LT 1.3 LT 3 LT 2 ND
1:.
: f.
Surry Dis.     04/30/83           I.T 19             LT 3       LT 3                 LT 2       LT 2         I.T 7         LT 10             LT 2                 LT 3         LT 5       LT 5         ND                                 !:**
Surry Dis.
f.: ..
06/21/83 LT 30 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 8 LT 15 LT 3 LT 3 l.T 7 LT 6 ND i
* 3                                                                                                            f.
I-'
May         Scotland Wh. 06/21 /83           LT 20             LT 1.3     LT 2                 LT 3       I.T 0.8       LT 5           LT 30< )          LT 1.0               LT 1.3       LT 3     LT 2         ND I-'
I*
Surry Dis.     06/21/83           LT 30             LT 4       LT 3                 LT 3       LT 3         LT 8           LT 15               LT 3                 LT 3       l.T 7     LT 6         ND                                 i June         Scotland Wh. 07 /08/83           LT 11             LT 6       LT 4                 LT 3       LT 4         LT 19         LT 11               LT 4                 LT 6         LT 9       LT 11       ND I*
June Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis.     07 /08/83           LT 30             LT 7       LT 4                 LT 4       LT .4         LT 20         LT 30             LT 4                 LT 7         LT 10     LT 14   LT 60 lI
07 /08/83 LT 11 LT 6 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 19 LT 11 LT 4 LT 6 LT 9 LT 11 ND l
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      /.
Surry Dis.
t July         Scotland Wh. 07/31/83           LT 150 < )
07 /08/83 LT 30 LT 7 LT 4 LT 4 LT.4 LT 20 LT 30 LT 4 LT 7 LT 10 LT 14 LT 60 I /.
3 LT 3       LT 1.6               i,T 1.4   LT 1.5       LT 8         LT 10< 3 )          LT 1.5               LT 3         LT 3       LT 5   LT 20                                     r.:
150 <3)
Surry Dis.     07/31/83           LT 150 (3)         LT 3       LT 1.6               LT 1.4     LT 1.5       LT 8           LT 70( 3 )         LT 1.5               LT 3         LT 3     LT 5   LT 20                                     [.
LT 10<3 )
3                                                                                                                                                                                                  I'>
t July Scotland Wh.
August       Scotland Wh. 09/27 /83           LT 4 00 < )       LT 5       LT 3                 I.T 2     LT 2         LT 13         LT 180(3)           LT 3                 LT 5         LT 6       LT 7         ND                                   I .
07/31/83 LT LT 3 LT 1.6 i,T 1.4 LT 1.5 LT 8 LT 1.5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 5 LT 20 r.:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      !I:.
Surry Dis.
Surry Dis.     09/27/8)           LT 190 (3)         LT 5       LT 3                 LT 3       LT 3         LT 15         LT llO())
07/31/83 LT 150 (3)
3 LT 3                 LT 5         LT 7       LT 8         ND c.
LT 3 LT 1.6 LT 1.4 LT 1.5 LT 8 LT 70(3 )
September   Seo t land Wh. 10/18/83           LT 2'00 (3 ) LT 8             LT 4                 LT 4       LT 3         LT 30         LT 120< > LT 4                           LT 9         LT 11     LT 17       ND                                   j?i Surry Dis.     10/18/83           LT 1200(3) 'LT 11                                                                               100<  3>
LT 1.5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 5 LT 20
LT 6                 LT 5       LT 5         LT 40         LT                 LT 6                 LT 12       LT 14     LT 20       ND October     Scotland Wh. 11/22/83 3
[.
LT 100< > LT 4                 LT 3                 LT 3       LT 3         LT ll         LT 60< )
I'>
3                                                                                                          f,-
August Scotland Wh.
LT 3                 LT 4         LT 7     LT 7         ND Surry Dis.     ll /2 2/83                       3 LT 100< > LT 4                 LT 3                 LT 3       LT 3         LT 11         LT 60< )
09/27 /83 LT 4 00 <3 )
3 I.T 3                 LT 4         LT 7     LT 7         ND                                   k:'
LT 5 LT 3 I.T 2 LT 2 LT 13 LT 180(3)
LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 7 ND I.
Surry Dis.
09/27/8)
LT 190 (3)
LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 15 LT llO())
LT 3 LT 5 LT 7 LT 8 ND  
!I:. c.
LT 2'00 (3 )
LT 120<3>
September Seo t land Wh.
10/18/83 8
LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT 30 LT LT 4 LT 9 LT 11 LT 17 ND j?i Surry Dis.
10/18/83 LT 1200(3) 'LT 11 LT 6 LT 5 LT 5 LT 40 LT 100<3> LT 6 LT 12 LT 14 LT 20 ND f,-
October Scotland Wh.
11/22/83 LT 100<3> LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT ll LT 60<3 )
LT 3 LT 4 LT 7 LT 7 ND Surry Dis.
ll /2 2/83 LT 100<3> LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 11 LT 60<3 )
I.T 3 LT 4 LT 7 LT 7 ND k:'
1***
1***
1*,:*   ..
1*,:*...
60(3)
LT 30(3 )
[..i'*:
[..i'*:
November     Scotland Wh. 11 /30/83           LT 60(3)          LT 3       LT 2                 LT *2     LT 2         LT 8         LT 30( 3 )          LT 2                 LT 3         LT 6       I.T 6       ND                                     i Surry Dis.       l l /30/83         LT 10< 3 )         LT 3     3.8 + 1.3             LT 1. 9 2.6 + 0.9       LT 7         LT 40(3)           1:r 1. 7             LT 3         LT 4       LT 5         ND                                   v*
November Scotland Wh.
11 /30/83 LT LT 3 LT 2 LT *2 LT 2 LT 8 LT 2 LT 3 LT 6 I.T 6 ND i
Surry Dis.
l l /30/83 LT 10<3 )
LT 3 3.8 + 1.3 LT 1. 9 2.6 + 0.9 LT 7 LT 40(3) 1:r 1. 7 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 ND v*
t*.
t*.
December     Scotland Wh. 12/31 /83           LT 30             LT 3       LT 2                 J.T 2     LT 2         I.T 7.       LT 15               LT 2                 LT 3         LT 5     LT S         ND                                     f'*.*:1*;
December Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis.     12/31/83           LT 30             LT 3       LT 2                 LT 2       LT 2         J.T 7         LT 15               LT 2                 LT 3         J.T 5     LT S         ND r.:i.:
12/31 /83 LT 30 LT 3 LT 2 J.T 2 LT 2 I.T 7.
(I ) I.T
LT 15 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT S ND f'*.*:1*;
* Lens Thon (2)
Surry Dis.
(3)
12/31/83 LT 30 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 J.T 7 LT 15 LT 2 LT 3 J.T 5 LT S ND r.:
Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping.                                                                                                                                                                                                             lv*,-
(I )
Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting (I,) NO ~ Not Detected. LLDs for K-~0 not nor11111l l.y calculated for indiv!duol                             water   sample.
I.T
liJ, i.,* ,:..:,
* Lens Thon i.:
l i:'
(2)
i**   ,:t ,
Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping.
l (3)
Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting v*,-
(I,)
NO  
~ Not Detected. LLDs for K-~0 not nor11111l l.y calculated for indiv!duol water sample.
: liJ, i.,*,:..:,
l,:t i:'
i**  


n i*__ i i
' n i '
Table 16 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in River Water VEPCO REMP -1983 (Results in pti/l                            +      2s Ij '**;
i* __ i I'
j **;
i
i
( __ .i r**
( __.i r**  
  ! **I Month                                        Location                        Sampling Date                                  St ront i um-89                  St ront i um-90 I {
! **I I { u Fl I
u December                                      Surry Dis                                12/31/82                                        LT 0.8(l)                          LT 0.8 1~82                                    Scotland Wh.                            12/31/82                                        LT 0.9                            LT 0.7 Fl I
L--'
L--'
r
January                                      Surry Dis                                01/31/83                                        LT 0.7                            LT 0.7
--"j  
        --"j 1983                                    Scotland Wh.                             01/31/83                                        LT 0.7                            LT 0.7
...J I
: r. .J                                              February                                     Surry Dis                             . 02/28/83                                        LT 1.0                            LT 1.0 Scotland Wh.                             02/28/83                                        LT 2.0                      0.86 + 0.86 March                                        Surry Dis                               03/31/83                                        LT 3                              LT 3 Scotland Wh.                             03/31/83                                        LT 1.5                      0.98 + 0.94 April                                        Surry Dis                               04/30/83                                  1.0 + 0.6                        0.68 + 0.56 Scotland vJh.                           04/30/83                                  1.6+1.l                                LT-1. 7 May                                          Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
L.J r*;
June                                          Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
I :  
I
;,l l-"
* July                                          Surry Dis                               07/31/83                                        LT 1.4                            LT 1.2 L.J                                                                                              Scotland Wh.                             07/31/83                                        LT 1.2                            LT 0.8 August                                        Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
(
September                                    Surry Dis                               10/18/83                                        LT 1.0                            LT 1.5 r*;:                                                                                            Scotland Hh.                             10/18/83                                        LT O. 7                            LT 0.5 I,._......,
~
October                                      Surry Dis
f i
    ,-.                                                                                            Sc ot l an d Wh*
r  
    ; ,l l-"
*~
November                                      Surry Dis.
~-
(1)
Month December 1~82 January 1983 February March April May June July August September October November December Table 16 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in River Water VEPCO REMP -1983 (Results in pti/l + 2s Location Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis Scotland vJh.
Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis Scotland W h.
Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis Scotland Wh.
Surry Dis Scotland Hh.
Surry Dis Sc ot l an d W h
* Surry Dis.
Scotland Hh.
Scotland Hh.
December                                      Surry Dis.
Surry Dis.
(    ~
Sc ot l an d W h.
Sc ot l an d Wh .
Sampling Date 12/31/82 12/31/82 01/31/83 01/31/83
(1) LT               =             Less than f      i r    *~
. 02/28/83 02/28/83 03/31/83 03/31/83 04/30/83 04/30/83 07/31/83 07/31/83 10/18/83 10/18/83 St ront i um-89 LT 0.8(l)
      ~-                                                                                                                                            42
LT 0.9 LT 0.7 LT 0.7 LT 1.0 LT 2.0 LT 3 LT 1.5 1.0 + 0.6 1.6+1.l LT 1.4 LT 1.2 LT 1.0 LT O. 7 St ront i um-90 LT 0.8 LT 0.7 LT 0.7 LT 0.7 LT 1.0 0.86 + 0.86 LT 3 0.98 + 0.94 0.68 + 0.56 LT-1. 7 LT 1.2 LT 0.8 LT 1.5 LT 0.5 LT = Less than 42  
* -~--,...-._.,.._ --.---- .. _...,.......-~-,.~~--,..---*, * * ,........,.........,._ ______ ---..---*---*****-.....,.--..------...---.-..-....----...-.-. ......- - - *
* -~--,...-._.,.._ --.----.. _...,.......-~-,.~~--,..---*, **,........,.........,._ ______ ---..---*---*****-.....,.--..------...---.-..-....----...-.-....... --- *,--.. --~--*---~-- -.-. --..----.-----**-------------~.  
                                                                                                                                                                            ,-- .. - - ~ - - * - - - ~ - - -.-. - - . . - - - - . - - - - - * * - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ .


      **-*-:*1 [ ...
**-*-:*1
                        'i  '    L ,     L. . . c_-...*,      :*--*,
[
l :: . -* __ .j
L,
                                                                                    '-*******;    ~
L....
                                                                                                              ,-':J L ..*..
c_-...*,  
                                                                                                                                ... *- ~*-'    '    ... J r-*--.--,
~,-': ;.:
L:. * .... ;  [::_-:-:J     c=--=-J   ::]   *... **1     ...  ....*1
... J r-*--.--,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ) :-.** :J . ,,t L
[::_-:-:J c=--=-J
I.,.
::]  
I (Page l Table      t7 of         2)
*... **1  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ~-
*1
Gamma   Spectrometry       of     Clams and            Oysters                                                                                 ~*
:-.** :J,,t i
VEPCO         RllMP 1983 r-l (Results     in      pCl/kg         (wet)     :!:. 2e)                                                                                       f*
l ::. -* __.j L..*.. J
... *- ~*-'
L:. *.... ;
....... )
L I.,.
I Table t7
~-
(Page l
of 2)
Clams and Gamma Spectrometry of Oysters  
~*
VEPCO RllMP 1983 r-(Results pCl/kg (wet) 2e) l in f*
1:_
1:_
I*
I*
I..'
I..' r*
Sampling           Sample                                                                                                                                                                             r*  ::.:''
Sampling Sample c-**..
c-** .
Month Location Date Type Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 L:..
Month       Location       Date           Type                 Co-58             Co-60             Cs-134               Cs-137           Fe-59                   K-40         Mn-54           Zn-65                           L:..
L;>:*.
L;>:* .
January SD 01/20/83 Clam LT 50 (l)
January         SD       01/20/83           Clam                 LT     50 (l)     LT   30           LT   30             LT   30         LT       140           LT 200       LT   30         LT 70                         if::*:-
LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 140 LT 200 LT 30 LT 70 if::*:-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ))}' . *>
))}'.. *>
HIP     01/20/83           Clam                 LT     50         LT   30           LT   30             LT   30         LT       140     1200 + 200         LT   40         LT *00 LC       01/20/83           Clam                 LT     30         LT   20           LT   20             LT   18         LT       100     4600 + 1500       LT   20         LT 50                         (i'>"*
HIP 01/20/83 Clam LT 50 LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 140 1200 + 200 LT 40 LT *00 (i'>"*
CIIIC JMTN 01 /20/83 01/20/83 Clam Clam LT LT 20 30 LT LT 19 18 LT LT 15 20 LT LT 14 19 L'l' LT 90 90 4200 2300
LC 01/20/83 Clam LT 30 LT 20 LT 20 LT 18 LT 100 4600 + 1500 LT 20 LT 50 CIIIC 01 /20/83 Clam LT 20 LT 19 LT 15 LT 14 L'l' 90 4200 + 1200 LT 15 LT 40 p:**
                                                                                                                                                                                        +
JMTN 01/20/83 Clam LT 30 LT 18 LT 20 LT 19 LT 90 2300 + 1100 LT 20 LT 40 r
                                                                                                                                                                                        +
POS 01/21/8)
1200 1100 LT LT 15 20 LT 40 LT 40 p:**
Oyster LT 70 LT 50 LT 50 LT 50 LT 200 1300 + 300 LT 50 LT 130
POS DWS 01/21/8) 01/21/83 Oyster Oyster LT LT 70 60 LT LT 50 40 LT LT 50 40 LT LT 50 40 LT LT 200 200 1300 + 300 850   +     270 LT LT 50 40 LT 130 LT 100                       r1-*r.*
~\\-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ~\-
DWS 01/21/83 Oyster LT 60 LT 40 LT 40 LT 40 LT 200 850 + 270 LT 40 LT 100 1-*r.*
NN       01/23/83           Oyster               LT     40         LT   40           LT   30             LT   30         LT       190       630   +     280 LT   30         LT 90 t'* .
NN 01/23/83 Oyster LT 40 LT 40 LT 30 LT 30 LT 190 630 + 280 LT 30 LT 90 t'*.
r Harch           SD       03/08/83           Cl.am               LT     30         LT   20           LT   40             LT   40         LT     60         250 + 200       LT   40         LT   70                       f 1111'   03/2 )/8)         Clam                 LT     20         LT   JO           LT   20             LT   )0         LT     60         440 + 180       LT   20         LT 50                       f:~
r Harch SD 03/08/83 Cl.am LT 30 LT 20 LT 40 LT 40 LT 60 250 + 200 LT 40 LT 70 f
1111' 03/2 )/8)
Clam LT 20 LT JO LT 20 LT  
)0 LT 60 440 + 180 LT 20 LT 50 f:~
LC 0)/2)/8)
Clam LT 1.\\
18 +
11 LT l)
LT 13 LT 40 250. + 80 LT 13 LT
)0 bi<
of::>
of::>
LC CIIIC 0)/2)/8) 03/23/83 Clam Clam LT LT 1.\
CIIIC 03/23/83 Clam LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 80 LT 300 LT 30 LT 60
30 18 LT
[&sect;J:;i w
                                                                                                        +  11 30 LT LT l) 30 LT LT 13 30 LT LT 40 80 250. + 80 LT 300 LT LT 13 30 LT LT
JMTN 03/23/83 Clam LT 19 LT 20 LT 20 LT 19 LT 60 390 + 160 LT 20 LT 40 POS 03/23/83 Oyster LT 20 LT JO LT 20 LT 20 LT 60 670 + 220 LT 20 LT 50 DWS 03/23/83 Oyster LT 40 LT 30 LT 40 LT qQ LT 100 480 + 230 LT 30 LT 80 NN 03/07 /83 Oyster LT 30 LT 20 LT 19 LT 19 LT 80 570 + 190 LT 20 LT 5_0 May SD 05/03/83 Clam LT 20 LT 30 LT 20 LT 30 LT 60 li30 + 170 LT 20 LT 50 HIP 05/19/83 Clam LT 50 LT 60 LT 50 LT 50 LT 130 4200 + 500 LT 50 LT 90 LC 05/19/83 Clam LT 50 LT 50 LT 50 LT 50 LT 120 1200 + 300 LT 40 LT 100 CIIIC 05/2 5/8)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        )0 60 bi<
Clam LT 50 LT 50 LT 40 LT 50 LT 130 LT 200 LT 40 LT 100 JMTN 05/25/83 Clam LT 50 LT 40 LT 40 LT 40 LT 120 LT 300 LT 40 LT 100 POS 05/25/83 Oyster LT 30 LT 40 LT 30 LT 40 LT 100 730 + 300 LT 30 LT 70 D\\IS 05/25/83 Oyster LT 70 LT 70 LT 60 LT 70 LT 160 1700 + 600 LT 60 LT 130 NN 05/02/83 Oyster LT 18 LT 20 LT 19 LT 20 LT 50 570 + 150 LT 20 LT 40 July so 07/12/83 Clam LT 70 LT 90 LT 60 LT BO LT 180 LT 900 LT 60 LT 150 l!lP 07 /13/83 Cl.am LT 70 LT BO LT 60 LT 70 LT 200 LT 1200 LT 50 LT 150 LC 07 /13/83 Clam LT 80 LT 90 LT 60 LT 60 LT 200 LT llOO LT 50 LT 150 V'/':
w                               JMTN     03/23/83           Clam                 LT     19         LT   20           LT   20             LT   19         LT     60         390 + 160       LT   20         LT   40 POS     03/23/83           Oyster               LT     20         LT   JO           LT   20             LT   20         LT     60         670   +     220 LT   20         LT   50
CHIC 07/25/83 Clam LT 90 l.T 110 I.T 70 LT 80 LT 250 LT 1400 LT 80 LT 160 JMTN 07/13/8)
[&sect;J:;i DWS     03/23/83           Oyster               LT     40         LT   30           LT   40             LT   qQ         LT     100         480   +     230 LT   30         LT   80 NN       03/07 /83         Oyster               LT     30         LT   20           LT   19             LT   19         LT     80         570   +     190 LT   20         LT   5_0 May             SD       05/03/83           Clam                 LT     20         LT   30           LT   20             LT   30         LT     60         li30 + 170       LT   20         LT   50 HIP     05/19/83           Clam                 LT     50         LT   60           LT   50             LT   50         LT     130       4200 + 500         LT   50         LT   90 LC       05/19/83 05/2 5/8)
Clam LT 70 LT 60 LT 70 LT 70 LT 200 LT 1000 LT 50 I.T 140 POS 07/13/8)
Clam                 LT     50         LT   50           LT   50             LT   50         LT       120     1200   +     300 LT   40         LT   100 CIIIC                       Clam                 LT     50         LT   50           LT   40             LT   50         LT     130             LT 200       LT   40         LT   100 JMTN     05/25/83           Clam                 LT     50         LT   40           LT   40             LT   40         LT     120             LT 300       LT   40         LT   100 POS     05/25/83           Oyster               LT     30         LT   40           LT   30             LT   40         LT     100         730 + 300       LT   30         LT   70 D\IS     05/25/83           Oyster               LT     70         LT   70           LT   60             LT   70         LT     160       1700   +     600 LT   60         LT   130 NN       05/02/83           Oyster               LT     18         LT   20           LT   19             LT   20         LT     50         570   +     150 LT   20         LT   40 July             so       07/12/83           Clam                 LT     70         LT   90           LT   60             LT   BO         LT     180             LT   900     LT   60         LT   150 l!lP     07 /13/83         Cl.am               LT     70         LT   BO           LT   60             LT   70         LT     200             LT   1200   LT   50         LT   150 LC       07 /13/83         Clam                 LT     80         LT   90           LT   60             LT   60         LT     200             LT   llOO   LT   50         LT   150 CHIC     07/25/83           Clam                 LT     90         l.T 110         I.T 70             LT   80         LT     250             LT   1400   LT   80         LT   160                     V'/':
Oyster LT 110 LT 100 LT 80 LT 100 LT 250 LT 1300 LT 90 LT 200 ll\\lS 07/13/8)
JMTN     07/13/8)           Clam                 LT     70         LT   60           LT   70             LT   70         LT       200             LT   1000   LT   50         I.T 140 POS     07/13/8)           Oyster               LT     110       LT   100         LT   80             LT   100         LT     250             LT   1300   LT   90         LT   200 ll\lS   07/13/8)           Oyster               LT     BO         LT   BO           LT   70             LT   70         LT     260       1400 +       400 LT   70         LT   170 NN       07/11/83           Oyster               J.T     llO       1.T 100         LT   70             LT   70         LT     200             LT   1600   LT   90         LT   170 Note: See footnotes at end of table.
Oyster LT BO LT BO LT 70 LT 70 LT 260 1400 + 400 LT 70 LT 170 NN 07/11/83 Oyster J.T llO 1.T 100 LT 70 LT 70 LT 200 LT 1600 LT 90 LT 170 Note: See footnotes at end of table.  


1----- -                                                                                                                                                                   ,~~,                                i c;;.7:l                                                                                                                                                         F~~~.~J
i
.j l l
.I
.l J 1 I i
J
-I i I
j I
I
.j.
I 1----- -
\\*.
I l....
Month Septembe'r November Location SD HIP LC CIIIC JMTN POS D\\./S NN SD IIIP LC CIIIC JMTN POS Df!S NN (1)
LT Less Than c;;.7:l  
\\,--*****-'*'
(--*""7'-...
(--*""7'-...
i
t*-::.~ __ J Sampling Date 09/01/83 09/27/83 09/27/fl) 09/2 7 /83 09/27/83 09/27 /83 09/27/83 09/06/83 ll /02/83 l l/14/fl3 11/14/83 11/14/83
.j
* 11/14/83 11/14/83*
    \*.
ll/14/83 11/02/83 Sample Type Clam Clam Clnm Clnm Clam Oyster Oyster
I
*oyster clam Clam Clam Clam Clam Oyster Oyster Oyster (2)
: l. ...              \,--*****-'*' t*-::.~__J                                                      :_._,__ j   ~]
Lower sensltlvity due to delay in analysis.
1.........,_._....:..:.J                         . .. *i                    . r- /*
Table 17 (Page 2
                                                                                                                                                                                                              ~- [:'-
of 2)
l
:_._, __ j Gamma Spectrometry of Clams and VEPCO REHP 1983
.I
~]
.l l                                                                                                                                                                                                          ~)-u l'
1.........,_._....:..:.J Oysters (Results in pct/kg (wet)  
t; '
~ 2s)
f: ..
Co-58 LT 70 LT 70 LT 80 LT 60 LT 60 LT 50 LT 80 LT 70 LT 150(2 )
J1                                                                                                                                                                                                                Jt: _-
LT 60 LT 70 LT 50 LT 80 LT 70 LT 90 LT 90 Co-60 LT 70 LT 80 LT 60 LT 60 LT 50 LT 40 LT 80 LT 90 LT 80 LT 60 LT 60 LT 40 LT 70 LT 60 LT 70 LT* 90 Cs-134 LT 50 LT 50 LT 70 LT 60 LT 40 LT 40 LT 80 LT 70 LT 70 LT 50 LT 50 LT JO LT 60 LT 40 LT 70 LT 70 Cs-137 LT 60 LT 60 LT 90 LT 60 LT 50 LT 40 LT 80 LT 70 LT 80 LT 50 I.T 50 LT 40 LT 70 LT 50 LT 70 LT 70 Fe-59 LT 260 LT 200 LT 200 I.T 260 LT 180 LT 140 LT 260 LT 200 LT 400(2 )
Table    17                                                                                                      (.;:.
LT 150 LT 150 LT 120 LT 200 LT 140 LT 200 LT 200 K-40 LT 700 LT 1000 1100 + 500 LT-900 1100 + 300 LT-700 LT 1200 LT 1200 2400 + 500 790 + 240 1100 + 400 LT 600 1100 + 500 760 + 350 LT 1000 970 + 520
I                                                                                            (Page 2    of  2) i J                                                                            Gamma    Spectrometry  of Clams and          Oysters
,~~,
-I                                                                                            VEPCO    REHP 1983 i
... *i Hn-54 LT 40 LT 60 LT 60 LT 60 LT 40 LT 40 LT 80 LT 70 LT 80 LT 50 LT 50 LT JO LT 60 LT 40 LT 70 LT 70 Zn-65 LT no LT 120 LT 180 LT 120 LT 110 LT 90 LT 150 LT 140 LT 170 LT 100 LT 110 LT 80 LT 160 LT 100 LT 170 LT 170 i
(Results   in   pct/kg   (wet)     ~   2s)
F~~~.~J. r- /*  
Sampling                Sample Month        Location            Date              Type  Co-58         Co-60        Cs-134      Cs-137                Fe-59                            K-40      Hn-54      Zn-65 Septembe'r          SD          09/01/83                Clam  LT 70       LT   70     LT   50      LT     60           LT                 260          LT 700    LT     40 LT no HIP        09/27/83                Clam  LT 70       LT   80       LT 50      LT   60             LT                 200          LT 1000  LT     60 LT 120 LC          09/27/fl)              Clnm  LT 80        LT   60      LT   70      LT     90           LT                 200      1100 + 500      LT     60 LT 180 CIIIC      09/2 7 /83              Clnm  LT 60        LT   60      LT 60     LT     60            I.T                260          LT- 900    LT     60 LT 120 JMTN        09/27/83                Clam  LT 60       LT   50      LT 40     LT     50            LT                 180      1100 + 300      LT     40 LT 110 POS        09/27 /83              Oyster LT 50       LT   40      LT 40      LT   40             LT                 140          LT- 700    LT     40 LT 90 D\./S      09/27/83                Oyster LT 80        LT   80      LT   80      LT   80             LT                 260          LT 1200    LT     80 LT 150 NN          09/06/83              *oyster LT 70       LT   90      LT 70     LT     70           LT                 200           LT 1200    LT     70 LT 140 November            SD          ll /02/83              clam  LT 150( 2 )  LT   80      LT   70      LT    80              LT                400( 2 ) 2400  + 500    LT     80 LT 170 IIIP        l l/14/fl3              Clam  LT 60        LT   60      LT   50      LT   50              LT                 150      790  +  240  LT     50 LT 100 LC          11/14/83                Clam  LT 70        LT   60      LT 50      I.T  50              LT                 150      1100   + 400   LT     50 LT 110 CIIIC      11/14/83                Clam  LT  50        LT   40     LT   JO      LT   40              LT                 120          LT 600    LT     JO LT 80 JMTN
~- [:'-
* 11/14/83                Clam  LT 80       LT   70      LT   60      LT   70            LT                  200      1100  +  500  LT     60 LT 160 POS        11/14/83*              Oyster LT 70       LT   60      LT 40      LT   50            LT                 140      760  +  350  LT     40 LT 100 Df!S        ll/14/83                Oyster LT 90       LT   70      LT   70      LT    70            LT                  200          LT  1000  LT      70 LT 170 NN          11/02/83                Oyster LT 90        LT*  90      LT 70      LT     70            LT                 200      970  +  520  LT     70 LT 170 (1)      LT
l' t; '
* Less Than (2)       Lower sensltlvity due to delay in analysis.
~)-u f:..
I j
Jt: _-
I I
(.;:.  
.j.
I


  't-     ;  ...
't-
      ,_    {
{
f{
f{
LJ n
LJ n  
~   ___ ;
~ ___ ;
Crabs were also collected during July, August, and September from the i--;              Surry Discharge (SD) location and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
i--;
I:
I :
\._.'
\\._.'
Naturally occurring K-40 was found in all three samples, as shown on Table 18. The August sample contained 13 pCi/kg Cs-134 and 18 pCi/kg Cs-137 on a wet weight basis. These nuclides could be due to plant operations.
r, L.J f
Eel and catfish were collected during February and August from the same SD location. The results of gamma spectrometry on these samples are shown on Table 19. K-40 was found in all four samples. The eel sample from February contained 100 pCi/kg Co-58 and 50 pCi/kg Co-~0. The r,                catfish sample from February contained 6.7 pCi/kg Cs-134 and 12 pCi/kg L.J              Cs-137.   (All results are given on a wet weight basis.) Only the eel sample from August showed positive activity for any nuclide other than K-40;   it contained 37 pCi/kg Cs-137. These nuclides could be due to
:.J
:.J plant operations, although the Cs-137 may also be attributable to global f' .__ .l fallout.
__.l
F. Sediment Sediment samples were collected twice during this program year.                           All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry:                             five locations were submitted in March and six 1oca ti ons in September. A number of man-made and naturally occurring radioisotopes were detected in these samples.
/.
The isotope cesium-137 was detected in all samples, ranging from 56 to 2900 pCi/kg (dry). Cesium-134 was detected in 8 of 10 indicator samples ranging from 180 to 1300 pCi/kg (dry). Cobalt-60 was detected in 7 of 10 indicator samples.       Its range was from 310 to 2400 pCi/kg (dry).
/
  / .              Cobalt-58 was detected in one indicator sample at 1900 pCi/kg (dry).
l __..
  /
i L-..J r",
l __..          The only man-made isotope in the single control sample collected was Cs-137. In addition to the man-made isotopes discussed above, a number of naturally     occurring   isotopes were observed in all samples.
I I i Crabs were also collected during July, August, and September from the Surry Discharge (SD) location and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
iL-..J          Potassium-40 was detected in all samples, ranging from 3000 to 17000 pCi/kg (dry)~     An assortment of daughters from the uranium and thorium chains were also detected in all of the samples. These generally ranged from 97 to 1100 pCi/kg (dry) between the different samples. The observed results were internally consistent for any .given sample.
Naturally occurring K-40 was found in all three samples, as shown on Table 18.
r",'
The August sample contained 13 pCi/kg Cs-134 and 18 pCi/kg Cs-137 on a wet weight basis. These nuclides could be due to plant operations.
I I            G. Waterfowl i
Eel and catfish were collected during February and August from the same SD location.
A single waterfowl sample was collected for 198j from Hag Island Reserve (HIR) . . This sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry, the results or which are shown in Table 21.       The man-made isotope cesium-137 was detected at a value of 4.7 pci/kg (wet). The naturally occurring isotopes K-40 and Be-7 were also detected at 420 and 42 pci/kg (wet),
The results of gamma spectrometry on these samples are shown on Table 19.
respectively. The values for the K-40 was not unexpected nor unusual.
K-40 was found in all four samples.
The eel sample from February contained 100 pCi/kg Co-58 and 50 pCi/kg Co-~0.
The catfish sample from February contained 6.7 pCi/kg Cs-134 and 12 pCi/kg Cs-137.
(All results are given on a wet weight basis.) Only the eel sample from August showed positive activity for any nuclide other than K-40; it contained 37 pCi/kg Cs-137.
These nuclides could be due to plant operations, although the Cs-137 may also be attributable to global fallout.
F.
Sediment Sediment samples were collected twice during this program year.
All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry:
five locations were submitted in March and six 1 oca ti ons in September.
A number of man-made and naturally occurring radioisotopes were detected in these samples.
The isotope cesium-137 was detected in all samples, ranging from 56 to 2900 pCi/kg (dry).
Cesium-134 was detected in 8 of 10 indicator samples ranging from 180 to 1300 pCi/kg (dry). Cobalt-60 was detected in 7 of 10 indicator samples.
Its range was from 310 to 2400 pCi/kg (dry).
Cobalt-58 was detected in one indicator sample at 1900 pCi/kg (dry).
The only man-made isotope in the single control sample collected was Cs-137.
In addition to the man-made isotopes discussed above, a number of naturally occurring isotopes were observed in all samples.
Potassium-40 was detected in all samples, ranging from 3000 to 17000 pCi/kg (dry)~
An assortment of daughters from the uranium and thorium chains were also detected in all of the samples.
These generally ranged from 97 to 1100 pCi/kg (dry) between the different samples.
The observed results were internally consistent for any.given sample.
G.
Waterfowl A single waterfowl sample was collected for 198j from Hag Island Reserve (HIR).. This sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry, the results or which are shown in Table 21.
The man-made isotope cesium-137 was detected at a value of 4.7 pci/kg (wet).
The naturally occurring isotopes K-40 and Be-7 were also detected at 420 and 42 pci/kg (wet),
respectively.
The values for the K-40 was not unexpected nor unusual.
The Be-7 value is attributable to the probable ingestion of leafy vegetation or sediment which may contain this particular isotope due *to-its production in the upper atmosphere and subsequent deposition_ on vegetation and soi 1.
The Be-7 value is attributable to the probable ingestion of leafy vegetation or sediment which may contain this particular isotope due *to-its production in the upper atmosphere and subsequent deposition_ on vegetation and soi 1.
45
45  
                                                        ----------------------**----*-------------*~---- -- "  .. ~
***--------~-~*--** -,----~:-~:---~-:-:r-;:--:--:-;.~. *:
-.-- ----------------------**----*-------------*~---- --
~  


1i
[ --- *'
[ --- *'
                      , ...                1*-0*~.--,  :* --:-*-~-1                                    ~
l l
I.                  L.*.<*---j  L ...,*.. :!                                    l..:_:., ..... J i
ll I l
ll Table 18 Gamma-Spectrometry of Crabs VEPCO REMP 1983 I
I  
(Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)    + 2s) l I
,I i
I i                                Sampling I
I I!
Month    Location    *nate            Co-58              Co-60    Cs-134      Cs-137          Fe-59        K-40      Mn-54  Zn-65 I!
I!
II I
I I I i
!            July          SD    07 /19/83          LT                          LT  40      LT. 30  LT              120 3100  + 400  LT  40 LT  80 i
I
I
:-         August       SD     08/25/83           LT 19             LT 11   13 + 5( 2 ) 18 + 5   LT               60 1700  + 200. LT 11  LT   30 I
:-I I
I            September    SD    09/24/83          LT          70    LT  60   LT 60      LT 60 LT               200 25(?0 + 600 LT 60 LT   110 i
i
    ,i,.
,i,.
en (1)  LT= Less Than (2)  Positive activity confirmed by recount.
en I.
Month Location July August SD SD September SD 1*-0*~.--,
L.*.<*---j Sampling
*nate 07 /19/83 08/25/83 09/24/83 (1) LT= Less Than
:* --:-*-~-1 L...,*.. :!
Table 18 Gamma-Spectrometry of Crabs VEPCO REMP 1983
~
l..:_:.,..... J (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) + 2s)
Co-58 LT LT 19 LT 70 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 LT 40 LT. 30 LT 11 13 + 5(2 )
18 + 5 LT 60 LT 60 LT 60 Fe-59 LT 120 LT 60 LT 200 (2)
Positive activity confirmed by recount.
K-40 3100 + 400 1700 + 200.
25(?0 + 600 Mn-54 LT 40 LT 11 LT 60 Zn-65 LT 80 LT 30 LT 110  


                                                                                                                                                            \~~--.:*. . :. ~ ~:.~-~-.l ."'-~~J  L~~ ~, ~ t<-
Sampling
                                    ~-*. _,' .. I        _l  L::              : ....... J                l. ...: ... J      i:.. _** ... J (._"~--J Table 19 Gamma Spectrometry of Fish VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/kg (wet)+/-. 2s)
: Month, Location Date February SD 02/02/83 SD 02/02/83 I
Sampling          Sample Month,   Location   Date                 Type          Co-58                  co~6o      Cs-134                Cs-137              Fe-59      K-40                Mn-54        Zn-65 February     SD   02/02/83       Eel                100 + 30                50 + 17      LT 30(l)                LT 30            LT 130  690 + 150                LT 30      LT 60 SD   02/02/83       Catfish                LT 3                    LT 2    6.7 + 1.0                12 + 2              LT 15  1300 + 200                LT 2        LT 7 I
I I
I I
I J       August       SD   08/26/83       Catfish                LT 60                  LT 50      LT 40.                  LT 40            LT 200  1300 -+ 300              LT 40        LT 90 l
I J
  .t>                SD   08/17/83       Eel                    LT 40                  LT 20      LT 20                  37 + 13            LT 150  940 + 270                LT 20        LT 60
August SD 08/26/83 l
-...J j
SD 08/17/83  
l I
.t>
l l
-...J j
I 1*
l I l l
I (1) LT - Less Than
I I 1*
I (1)
LT - Less Than  
~-*. _,'.. I
_l Sample Type Eel Catfish Catfish Eel L::
:....... J
: l.... :... J Table 19 Gamma Spectrometry of Fish VEPCO REMP-1983 i:.. _**... J (Results in pCi/kg (wet)+/-. 2s)
Co-58 co~6o Cs-134 Cs-137 100 + 30 50 + 17 LT 30(l)
LT 30 LT 3 LT 2 6.7 + 1.0 12 + 2 LT 60 LT 50 LT 40.
LT 40 LT 40 LT 20 LT 20 37 + 13
(._"~--J
\\~~--.:*... :.. ~
~:.~-~-.l
."'-~~J L~~ ~, ~ t<-
Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 LT 130 690 + 150 LT 30 LT 60 LT 15 1300 + 200 LT 2 LT 7 LT 200 1300 + 300 LT 40 LT 90 LT 150 940 + 270 LT 20 LT 60


r*--1     c-_ -                                   ---.
i I J
                                                                                                                        ,,I*        -~
* l l
L .. _ - ....'J L** _.,* *. *.,.'
j
i J                                                                                                                                                                                              *   ~ L ..
:J i I
l r/
.)
TABLE 20                                                                                              * .Jr.
'-I
l                                                                              Gamma Spectrometry of Sediment                                                                                        f.:-,
''.j
:1 j
j
'j
;l
.I..,
'l -.,
I
*l i
*I
*1 i
j J
I 1 I 1
I i
1 I
I.
i
,J
;J i
i
*1
.I J
'.j
.I j
'l ! 1  
''.J i
,i's OJ Loca-tion SI SD Ill p.
POS NN CIIIC SI SD IIIP POS NN
( I )
(2)
Sampling Date Bi-214 03/2 3/83 1200 + 400 03/23/83 1100 + 40'0 03/23/83 1000 + 200 03/23/83 850 + 200 03/23/83 ND 09/27 /83 1200 + 200 09/27/83 940 + 220 09/27 /83 1100 + 200 09/27/83 1200 + 300 09/27/83 1000 + 300 09/27/83 HlO + 130 N>> d Not-detected LT= Less than Cs-134 470 + 150 1300 + 300 510 + 90 180 + so LT 50( 2)
LT 140 420 +.100 1200 + 200 190 + 70 200 + 80 LT 140 r*--1 c-TABLE 20
-~
L.. _ -....'J L ** _.,* *. *.,.'
I*,,
Gamma Spectrometry of Sediment VEl'CO REHP -
1983 (Results in pCi/kg (dry)+/- 2s)
Cs-137 K:-40 1500 + 300 16000 + 3000 2300 + 300 15000 + 3000 1100 + 200 17000 + 2000 720 + 140 17000 + 2000 56 + 34 3000 + 700 860 + 110 17000 + 2000 1300 + 200 16000 + 2000 2900 + 300 17000 + 2000 690 + 150 11000 + 2000 980 + 160 17000 + 3000 260 + 80 14000 + 2000 Pb-212 Pb-214 Ra-226 990 + 310 990 + 390 1100 + 400 820 + 280 630 + 360 860 + 400 850 + 190 970 + 220 1000 + 200 1000 + 200 890 + 190 870 + 200 ND ND ND 1200 + 200 1300 + 200 1300 + 200 950 + 240 1100 + 200 1000 + 200 970 + 240 1000 + 200 1100 + 200 810 + 200 1400 + 300 1300 + 300 940 + 220 1000 + 200 1000 + 300 500 + 120 690 + 150 750 + 170 Tl-208 ND(l) 880 + 480 1200 + 300 990 + 2'10 97 + 83 1300 + 200 1000 + 300 llOO + 400 1300 + 300 1200 + 300 720 + 200 Co-60 ND 930 + 260 420 + 120 370 + llO ND ND 450 + 160 2400 + 300 450 + 120 310 + 130 ND Others ND ND Ac-228@
llOO + 300 Ac-228@
780 + 310 ND n1-212 @
1100 + 800 Ac-228@
1400 + 300 Ac-228@
750 + 400 co~58@
1900 + 200 Ac-228@
790 + 480 ND Ac-228@
610 + 400 Ac-228 @
690 + 260
~ L..  
*.Jr. r/
f.:-,
I*'.
I*'.
VEl'CO REHP - 1983                                                                                              i' j                                                                              (Results in pCi/kg (dry)+/- 2s) f,*.
i' f,*.
r ..
r..
:J
[' ':
[' ':
i      Loca-    Sampling                                                                                                                                                                          L I
L f.:/*..
  .)        tion        Date      Bi-214      Cs-134        Cs-137        K:-40        Pb-212        Pb-214            Ra-226                  Tl-208                Co-60        Others          f .:/*.
-I
.j
:1          SI      03/2 3/83  1200 + 400  470 + 150    1500 + 300  16000 + 3000    990 + 310      990 + 390    1100 + 400                    ND(l)                  ND            ND
[:}?
[:}?
j            SD      03/23/83  1100 + 40'0 1300 + 300    2300 + 300  15000 + 3000    820 + 280      630 + 360        860 + 400          880 + 480                  930 + 260        ND fjg r :~ ,: --
fjg r :~,: --
j
[*; ~(
  'j        Ill p . 03/23/83  1000 + 200  510 + 90      1100 + 200  17000 + 2000    850 + 190      970 + 220    1000 + 200          1200 + 300                    420 + 120    Ac-228@            [*; ~(
[:*,::
llOO + 300
;l
  ..I,      POS      03/23/83    850 + 200  180 + so      720 + 140  17000 + 2000    1000 + 200      890 + 190        870 + 200            990 + 2'10                370 + llO    Ac-228@
780 + 310
-.,'l        NN      03/23/83      ND        LT 50( 2 )    56 + 34    3000 + 700          ND            ND                ND                  97 + 83                  ND          ND I
  *l i        CIIIC    09/27 /83  1200 + 200    LT 140      860 + 110  17000 + 2000    1200 + 200    1300 + 200    1300 + 200            1300 + 200                        ND      n1-212 @
  *I    ,i's                                                                                                                                                                        1100 + 800
*1    OJ i                                                                                                                                                                                Ac-228@
j                                                                                                                                                                              1400 + 300 J                                                                                                                                                                                                      [:*,::
1 I      SI      09/27/83    940 + 220  420 +.100    1300 + 200  16000 + 2000    950 + 240    1100 + 200    1000 + 200            1000 + 300                    450 + 160    Ac-228@
750 + 400            r:..
I **
I **
I        SD      09/27 /83  1100 + 200  1200 + 200    2900 + 300  17000 + 2000    970 + 240    1000 + 200    1100 + 200            llOO      + 400 2400 + 300                co~58@
r:..
i,-*
i,-* r*.
r*.
i*'\\
1I                                                                                                                                                                              1900 + 200            i*'\
[/  
i                                                                                                                                                                                Ac-228@
*l}\\\\
    !                                                                                                                                                                              790 + 480 1
_ ___!]
I IIIP    09/27/83  1200 + 300  190 + 70      690 + 150  11000 + 2000    810 + 200    1400 + 300    1300 + 300            1300 + 300                    450 + 120    ND I.
i      POS      09/27/83  1000 + 300  200 + 80      980 + 160  17000 + 3000    940 + 220    1000 + 200    1000 + 300            1200 + 300                    310 + 130    Ac-228@
[/
                                                                                                                                                                                                      *l}\\
,J                                                                                                                                                                                  610 + 400
;J          NN      09/27/83    HlO + 130    LT 140      260 + 80    14000 + 2000    500 + 120      690 + 150    750 + 170            720      + 200                  ND      Ac-228 @
690 + 260 ii
  *1 (I )  N>> d Not-detected
    .I        (2)  LT= Less than J
'.j
    .I j
'l 1''.J i                                                                                                                                                                                              ____!]


                                                                                          .                                                                  L-
Sampling Month Location Date j
                                                                                                      '1.. ........ *** ~--J,  c,----i  --*-**.. .-. '1*
I j
                                                                                                                                                                . -,..-.-.! -.- .. I]
l I February HIR 02/15/83 I
l
i j
* i._ __ ....                                        * . .,I                                  _
J
Table 21 Gamma Spectrometry of Fowl VEPCO  REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/kg (wet)            +      2s)
,i,.
Sampling Month     Location   Date   Be-7  Co-58    Co-60  Cs-134    Cs-137                  Fe-59            K-40        Mn-54 I
I  
j l       February   HIR     02/15/83 42 + 21  LT 4(l)  LT 4    LT 3  4.7  + i.9              LT 18  420          + 50      LT 3        LT 8 I
\\!)
I i
I I I l I*
1 I
1 l
\\
j J
j J
  ,i,.
j 1
I  \!)
(1) LT= Less Than I
I l
1 I i 1*
I*
:, I.
I 1
i r,.
l
\
J j
1 (1) LT= Less Than I
1 I
i 1*
I.
i r
I i
I i
i._ __....
Table 21 Gamma Spectrometry of Fowl VEPCO REMP-1983 l
~--J,
,----i
--*-**.. -.. '1*
* L-
....... -,.. -.. -.! -.-.. I]
1.......... **
c *.
.,I (Results in pCi/kg (wet) + 2s)
Be-7 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 42 + 21 LT 4(l)
LT 4 LT 3 4.7 + i.9 LT 18 420 + 50 LT 3 LT 8


H. Food Products n
n n
!          A total of seven food products were collected for analysis during this program year.       Two samples each of corn and peanuts were submitted for analysis as ,,.,ell as individual samples of cabbage, kale .and soybeans.
LJ
: r.
f ',,
t Li L
1, u
,-~
\\, :
\\-,*,
f.'
H.
Food Products A total of seven food products were collected for analysis during this program year.
Two samples each of corn and peanuts were submitted for analysis as,,.,ell as individual samples of cabbage, kale.and soybeans.
All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry as well as for strontium-89 and -90.
All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry as well as for strontium-89 and -90.
No man-made .radioisotopes were detected in any of the sample$.         The naturally occurring isotope potassium-40 was observed in all the samples. The observed values (2300 to 5600 pCi/Kg (wet)) were within nLJ the expected range of normal distribution.
No man-made.radioisotopes were detected in any of the sample$.
I. Soil Soil samples were collected from six locations during this program year.
The naturally occurring isotope potassium-40 was observed in all the samples.
All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry *. The only man-made radioisotope detected was cesium-137. This isotope was detected in all r.
The observed values (2300 to 5600 pCi/Kg (wet)) were within the expected range of normal distribution.
but one sample, ranging from 270 to 830 pCi/Kg(dry). In addition, a number of naturally occurring isotopes were observed in all samples
I.
* Potassium-40 was detected in all samples, ranging from 2100 to 15000 pCi/Kg(dry). An assortment of daughters from the uranium and thorium chains were also detected in all of the samples. These generally ranged from 100 to 1700 pCi/Kg(dry) between the different samples.* The f ',,    observed results were internally consistent for any given sample.
Soil Soil samples were collected from six locations during this program year.
t      . Finally, one sample contained detectable activity of beryllium-? at a Li        level of 520 pCi/Kg(dry). This is a naturally occurring radioisotope which is produced in the upper atmosphere. It is often detected in air particulate samples, and quite commonly seen on leafy vegetation and in soil samples.
All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry *. The only man-made radioisotope detected was cesium-137.
L.
This isotope was detected in all but one
1, u
: sample, ranging from 270 to 830 pCi/Kg(dry).
  ,-~
In addition, a number of naturally occurring isotopes were observed in all samples
  \,    :
* Potassium-40 was detected in all samples, ranging from 2100 to 15000 pCi/Kg(dry).
    \-,*,
An assortment of daughters from the uranium and thorium chains were also detected in all of the samples.
50 f.'.,
These generally ranged from 100 to 1700 pCi/Kg(dry) between the different samples.*
 
The observed results were internally consistent for any given sample.
n.
Finally, one sample contained detectable activity of beryllium-? at a level of 520 pCi/Kg(dry). This is a naturally occurring radioisotope which is produced in the upper atmosphere. It is often detected in air particulate samples, and quite commonly seen on leafy vegetation and in soil samples.
I         ,
50
r ir __ *'
: n.
Table 22 r---,
I r
Gamma Spectrometry of Vegetation
i '
    ''                                                                                                                        VEPCO REMP 1983
r __
    \___     :
* r---,  
(Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)*+/- 2s)
\\ ___ :  
  .. (71 j.- i
.. (71 j.- i  
    ~.J Sample                                    Sampling nj      -;
~.J n
Location                                    Type                                          Date                                Cs-134                  Cs-137          I-131                                K-40 t .
j t.
r-**
r-**
I!
I !
I -
I -
* Carter's                                Cabbage                                    07/12/83                                    LT 30(1) LT 30                          LT 40
*1**...,
* 3100 + 400 Grove
    *1**...,
I I.
I I.
( ___ .,       Poole                                  Kale                                        10/18/83                                    LT 11                  LT 13          LT 30                        3000 + 300 Gardens r*~..
( ___.,
      \ 1           Brock            Farm                    Peanuts                                    11/23/83                                    LT        11          LT. 15        LT          30              4400          + 500
r*~..  
      '-"          Brock            Farm                    Corn                                      11/23/83                                    LT        13          LT    15        LT        40                2300          + 300 r*-.,         Slade            Farm                    Peanuts                                    11/23/83                                    LT        14          LT    16        LT        40                4900          + 500
\\ 1 r*-.,  
    !1         i   Slade            Farm                    Corn                                      11/23/83                                    LT        7            LT    8          LT        19              2100          + 300 L)
!1 i L)
Brock Farm                              Soybeans                                  11/29/83                                    LT 12                  LT 14            LT 20                      5600 + 600 Ct
Ct
(_.,t iI      ,
( t i I,  
        ~.)
~.)  
        '1 I
'1 I L_
L_
r*;
r*;
r' __'.
r __.
(1)            LT = Less Than r-:
r-:
I Lt
I Lt
( ~ .,.
( ~.,.  
        \
\\ ' !, __
(
(
i
i  
        '*--~
'*--~
51 I-,
I-,
. - - ~ - - - - . - - - . . - - * . * - - - ~ ~ - .... '* .-- : ~ ,* ,_*,.:**** *....,. .:r, ~ , . .- .... -:*.~'.*, *;,*.,-... *::. ~ .. ,~~::0.. -**:;:, *.,, -,-., . - -.- - -*   **. : # --::----:::--=-~-.-;'- . -..---::--* .~
Location
* F; Table 23 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Vegetation VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+ 2s) u r:'"!
* Carter's Grove Poole Gardens Brock Farm Brock Farm Slade Farm Slade Farm Brock Farm (1)
Sample        Sampling Location        Type          Date        Strontium-89          Strontium-90 Carter's      Cabbage      07/12/83            (1)                    (1) r
LT = Less Sample Type Cabbage Kale Peanuts Corn Peanuts Corn Soybeans Than Table 22 Gamma Spectrometry of Vegetation VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)*+/- 2s)
  ,,i __:
Sampling Date 07/12/83 10/18/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/29/83 51 Cs-134 LT 30(1)
Grove Poole          Kale          10/18/83 Gardens Brook Farm    Peanuts      11/23/83 Brock Farm    Corn          11/23/83 r~
LT 11 LT 11 LT 13 LT 14 LT 7 LT 12 Cs-137 I-131 LT 30 LT 40
I .         Slade Farm    Peanuts      11/23/83 I ;
* LT 13 LT 30 LT. 15 LT 30 LT 15 LT 40 LT 16 LT 40 LT 8 LT 19 LT 14 LT 20 K-40 3100 + 400 3000 + 300 4400 + 500 2300 + 300 4900 + 500 2100 + 300 5600 + 600
t__;         Slade Farm    Corn          11/23/83 I~'
. --~----.---..--*.*---~~-.... '*.-- : ~,*,_*,.:**** *....,..:r, ~  
I l... J
,..-.... -:*.~'.*, *;,*.,-... *::. ~..,~~::0.. -**:;:, *.,, -,-.,.. - -.- - -*  
              *Brock Farm    Soybeans      11/28/83 I ,
# --::----:::--=-~-.-;'-
. -..---::--*.~
* F; r:'"! u r
i :
r~
I.
I ;
t__;
I~
I
: l... J I,
L.:
L.:
(1)  Sample destroyed in analysis.
r-;
r-;
LJ p
LJ p
:   .)
:.)
52
Location Carter's Grove Poole Gardens Brook Farm Brock Farm Slade Farm Slade Farm
*Brock Farm Table 23 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Vegetation VEPCO REMP 1983 Sample Type Cabbage Kale Peanuts Corn Peanuts Corn Soybeans (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+ 2s)
Sampling Date 07/12/83 10/18/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/28/83 Strontium-89 (1)
(1)
Sample destroyed in analysis.
52 Strontium-90 (1)
*--,-.------.--:-*~---7~~-~-..~
.. ;n-~ --
-~o: v ::
-~--~
-~~---
--~--- -


                                        ~ --*--~ ~i I._ .. - _;
tn w
l..
Location(3}
c*-~7 l.. -~---,.*J
Ac-228 ss 1100 + ioo BC ND(2}
:--:-- '\
ALL ND CP 470 + 210 DOW 1',00 + 300 FE 820 + 250 (1)
                                                                                                                  ...... . , )
LT= Less Than (2)
t ' . -....,___ !
ND= Not Detected
                                                                                                                                                            .r..,...._..._..
~ --*--~ ~i 81-214 1300 + 200 580 + 110 270 + 190 540 + 140 llOO + 200 910 + 160 I._.. -
                                                                                                                                                            '\..~.c.:...1
Cs-134 LT 140(l}
                                                                                                                                                                                ---~~
LT 80 LT 150 LT 110 LT 140 LT 120
L. ... .,.. ,
(]) All samples collected on 17 August 1983 l..
TABLE 24 Gamma Spectrometry of Soil VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/kg (dry}:!:_ 2s}
c*-~7
Location( 3 }    Ac-228        81-214          Cs-134          Cs-137        J<-40              Pb-212                  Pb-214                Ra-226                  Tl-208             Others ss          1100  + ioo    1300 + 200         LT 140(l}      470 + 70    15000 + 2000      1100 + 200                  1700 + 200          1500 + 200              1600 + 200          Be-7@
:--:-- '\\
l.. -~---,.* J TABLE 24 Gamma Spectrometry of Soil VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/kg (dry}:!:_ 2s}
Cs-137 J<-40 Pb-212
.......,)
470 + 70 15000 + 2000 1100 + 200 720 + 80 5200 + 900 310 + 50 270 + 90 2100 + 800 100 + 90 830 + 100 7500 + 1500 550 + 70 320 + 80 9000 + 1600 720 + 90 LT 120 11000 + 2000 670 + 80 t '.. -...., ___ !  
.r..,...._..._..  
'\\..~.c.:...1 Pb-214 Ra-226 1700 + 200 1500 + 200 560 + 100 570 + 100 620 + 190 450 + 190 790 + 140 670 + 140 1100 + 200 llOO + 200 890 + 150 900 + 160
---~~
L.....,..,
Tl-208 1600 + 200 450 + 120 410 + 210 550 + 180 910 + 230 680 + 190 Others Be-7@
540 + 120 Di-212 @
540 + 120 Di-212 @
1700 + 700 BC              ND( 2 }    580 + 110        LT 80          720 + 80      5200 + 900          310 + 50                  560 + 100            570 + 100                450 + 120            ND ALL              ND         270 + 190        LT 150        270 + 90      2100 + 800          100 + 90                  620 + 190            450 + 190                410 + 210            ND CP          470 + 210      540 + 140        LT 110        830 + 100    7500 + 1500        550    + 70              790 + 140            670 + 140                550 + 180            ND DOW        1',00 + 300    llOO + 200          LT 140        320 + 80      9000 + 1600        720 + 90                  1100 + 200          llOO  + 200              910 + 230            ND FE          820 + 250      910 + 160        LT 120          LT 120    11000 + 2000        670 + 80                  890 + 150            900 + 160                680 + 190            ND tn w
1700 + 700 ND ND ND ND ND  
(1)  LT= Less Than (2)  ND= Not Detected
(])  All samples collected on 17 August 1983


I .i u
I.i u n  
n
\\.J  
\.J J. Direct Radiation
;. \\
;. \
I,
I ,
l...J r::
l . ..J         Environmental radiation dose rates determined by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are given in Table 25. TLD badges of four readout r::            areas each were deployed quarterly at each location. The mean values of I      '        four readings (corrected individually for response to a known dose and i* j for in-transit exposure) are reported in this table, unless indicated otherwise. A description of the TLD system used is contained in r--,'
I i* j r--,
Appendix C.
I :
I:
*~.-1 r1 L--'
  *~.-1                                                                            ..
( \\ u r..
\\
i, J.
Direct Radiation Environmental radiation dose rates determined by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are given in Table 25.
TLD badges of four readout areas each were deployed quarterly at each location.
The mean values of four readings (corrected individually for response to a known dose and for in-transit exposure) are reported in this table, unless indicated otherwise.
A description of the TLD system used is contained in Appendix C.
A statistical summary of the 1983 data is included in Table 26.
A statistical summary of the 1983 data is included in Table 26.
Individual measurements of external radiation levels in the environs of the Surry site ranged from 0.11 to 0.82 mR/day. Annual: levels ranged from 47 to 130 mR/year. The values obtained for location 00 (an onsite lead pig controll and location 01 (an onsite station near a waste holding area) are not included in the statistical summaries. Exposures at the onsite location 01 were elevated throughout the year.
Individual measurements of external radiation levels in the environs of the Surry site ranged from 0.11 to 0.82 mR/day.
TLD results from the first and second quarter indicated an anomalous exposure to a low energy radiation source. Each TLD placed in the field has four separate readout areas, each of which has a different degree of r1' L--'
Annual: levels ranged from 47 to 130 mR/year.
shielding. This permits a *rudimentary assessment of the energy of exposure *within certain limits. On initial review, the data exhibited wider variations among the four readout areas-of individual badges than
The values obtained for location 00 (an onsite lead pig controll and location 01 (an onsite station near a waste holding area) are not included in the statistical summaries.
  ,"            was usual. Closer inspection revealed a trend wherein the least
Exposures at the onsite location 01 were elevated throughout the year.
( \
TLD results from the first and second quarter indicated an anomalous exposure to a low energy radiation source.
shielded areas showed the highest exposures, although this was by no u            means universal. Using a method supplied by the TLD and badge manufacturer, the readings were corrected for the overresponse to low energy radiation. Not all the values could be corrected in this way.
Each TLD placed in the field has four separate readout areas, each of which has a different degree of shielding.
There were many instances of inversions (higher response from the more heavily shielded area), tight initial variations, and outliers. Each of these conditions can result in sets of readings which diverge on application of the correction curves. Fpr Table 25, the corrected readings were reported if the application *of the correction curves to any individual station resulted in a new data set which uniformly converged with respect to the internal variation of the four readings.
This permits a *rudimentary assessment of the energy of exposure *within certain limits.
Sets for which no low energy corrections were applied are indicated in the data table.     Despite the corrections which were applied, the data for the first and second quarters still shows a high variability. The results seem to indicate an non-uniform exposure to a source of low energy radiation. This anomalous pattern of results has been observed previously in other programs and has been attributed to accidental shipping or storage in proximity to a source or intentional x-raying enroute for shipping inspection. In any case, plant releases are not implicated because of the absence of any rational           pattern,   in particular, the high exposure exhibited by the control locations.
On initial review, the data exhibited wider variations among the four readout areas-of individual badges than was usual.
r ...
Closer inspection revealed a trend wherein the least shielded areas showed the highest exposures, although this was by no means universal.
54
Using a method supplied by the TLD and badge manufacturer, the readings were corrected for the overresponse to low energy radiation.
      \
Not all the values could be corrected in this way.
          ....i,
There were many instances of inversions (higher response from the more heavily shielded area), tight initial variations, and outliers. Each of these conditions can result in sets of readings which diverge on application of the correction curves.
Fpr Table 25, the corrected readings were reported if the application *of the correction curves to any individual station resulted in a new data set which uniformly converged with respect to the internal variation of the four readings.
Sets for which no low energy corrections were applied are indicated in the data table.
Despite the corrections which were applied, the data for the first and second quarters still shows a high variability.
The results seem to indicate an non-uniform exposure to a source of low energy radiation. This anomalous pattern of results has been observed previously in other programs and has been attributed to accidental shipping or storage in proximity to a source or intentional x-raying enroute for shipping inspection.
In any case, plant releases are not implicated because of the absence of any rational
: pattern, in particular, the high exposure exhibited by the control locations.
54  
----- --- ~~--~


n                                                             Table 25 (Page l of 2)
n r*~
Direct Radiation--Thermoluminescent Dosimetry VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in mR/day      :!:_ 2s)
I j I, l  
STATION NO.      FIRST QUARTER          SECOND QUARTER        THIRD QUARTER            FOU,RTH QUARTER      AVERAGE    + 2s r*~
*...J 1/
I j I, l
I L,
  *.. .J Start: 011383          Start: 040783        'Start: 071383            Start: 101183 Stop: 040783          Stop: 071383          Stop: 101183            Stop: 010684 1/
L,
  ' I     00(12)        .09  :!:_ .01 (l)      .07  +    .01          .09      +    .01< 8 )  .as  .:_  ,01 (ll)  0.08  +    0.01 L,
: l...
01(12)        2,4  +    .3(l)(*)    6.3  +/-.  .7(S)(*)    4.1    +    ,3        2.9  +    ,1        3.9  +    1.7 02            .24  +    .03          ,23  +/-_ .03            .29    .:_  .02 <3 )  .26  +    .a/11)    0.26  +    0.03 03            .19  +    .03(l)      .11  + .02(S)          .12      +
( '
* 01 (S)  .11  +    .01 (11)  0.13  +    0.04 04            .23  +    .08< 1 )        (6)                .17 +        .02-< 8 )  .20  +    .01< 11 ) 0.20  +/-_ 0.03 05            .29  +    .03          .17  +    .02          ,19 +        .02 ( 3 )  .19  .:_  .01< 11 ) 0.21  + a.as
                                                            .04< 5 )                  .o/8)                .01< 11 >
L,       06 07
                          .28
                          .26
                                +
                                    .02(1)
                                    .03(l)
                                                  ,25
                                                  .21
                                                      +/-_
                                                      +/-.  .04 (S)
                                                                        .23 +
                                                                        .22 +
* 01 (S)
                                                                                                  .22  .:_
(6) 0,25 0.23
                                                                                                                            .:_  0.03
                                                                                                                            +/-_ 0.03 08            .36  :!:_ .04 (l)      .22  +    ,03< 5 )    .20      +    .01< 3 )        (6)            Q.26 + 0.09 09            .36  :t  .as <1 )    .23  +/-.  .03 (S)      .22      .:_  .01 (S)    .19  +/-.  .01< 11 ) 0.2s  .:. a.as 10            .27  +/-_ .* 04< 2 >    .77 +    .09< 5 )(*)  .21    .:_  .02 <3 )  .20  +/-.   .01 (ll)  0.36  +    0.27
          *11            ,32  +/-_ .04< 2 )      .31 +/-_ .04 (S)        .21      +    .02< 8 )  .22  .:_  .01 (ll)  0,27  +    0.06 12            .26  +/-_ ,04< 3 )      .14  +/-_ ,02            .20      +/-_  .01< 8 )  .21  :t_  .02< 11 ) 0.20 +    a.as 13            .26  +  ,04< 3 )    .14 + .02              .23    .:_  , 02 ( 9 ) .27  +/-.  .04(ll)  0.23 +    0.06 14            .38  .:_  ,04< 3 )    ,16  .:!: ,02 *        .28    .:. .o/9)            (10)            0.27  .:_  0.11 15 *          .30  .:_  .03< 2 >    .11  +    .02< 5 )    .26      .:_  .02 <9 )        (10)            0.24  .:_  0.07 16            .21  :!:_ ,03< 2 >    .26  .:!: ,03< 5 )    .26      .:_  ,02 <9 )  ,21  :t_  .01< 11 ) 0.24  .:_  Q,03 17            ,16  :!:  ,05< 4 )    .62  +    ,32< 7 )    .2*4    :!:_ .01 ( 9 )  .25  +    .02(1l)  0.32  +    0.21 18            .19  :!:_ .02< 4 )    .27  .:!: .03< 5 )    .18      +    .01< 9 )  .15  +/-.  .01 (ll)  0.20  +/-. a.as l..        19            .17  .:_  .02          .13  +  .02          .18      :!:_ .02        .19  .:!:
                                                                                                        +
                                                                                                            .01      0.17  .:_
                                                                                                                            +
0.03 20            .20  .:_  .03          .12 +    ,02          .17      :!:_ .01        .15        .01      0,16      0.03 21            .19  .:_  .02          .15  .:!: .02          .19      +    .03        .17  .:!: .01      0.18 +    0.02 22            .47  +    .as          .13  +    .02          .18      :!:_ .02        .16  .:!: .01      0.23 +    0.16 23            .26  .:_  ,03<*)      .16  +    .02          .19      :!:_ .03        , 15  :t_  .01      0.19 +    a.as
(
( ;
( ;
    '      24            .17  :!:  .02          .23  +    ,04<*)      .20      +  .03        .18  .:!: .01      0.20  +/-. 0.03
Li
:__:      25            .17  +/-_  .02          .13  +    ,02          .20      :!:_ .02        .17  +    .01      0.17  +    C.03 26            .16  +    .03          .29  +    ,03<*)      .20      +  .02        .16  +    .01      0.20  +/-. 0.06 27            .47  +/-.  .2s<*)      ,14  +    .02          .18      +/-_  .02        .16  +/-.  .01      0.24  +/-. 0.16 Li         28            .22  +/-.  .03          .14  +/-_  .02          .20      +/-.  .02        ,17  .:!: .01      0.18  +/-. 0.03 29            .22  +    .03 (*)      .12  .:!: .02          .18      +/-_ .02          .15- +/-_    .01      0.17  +    0.04
["")
["")       30            .15  +/-.  .02          .12  .:!: .02          .20 + .01                .17  !.  .01      0.16  .:!: Q,03 I ;
I ;
I '
I '
Note: See footnotes at end of table, 55
STATION NO.
00(12) 01(12) 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
*11 12 13 14 15
* 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Table 25 (Page l of 2)
Direct Radiation--Thermoluminescent Dosimetry VEPCO REMP 1983 FIRST QUARTER Start: 011383 Stop:
040783
.09
.01 (l) 2,4 +.3(l)(*)
.24 +
.03
.19 +.03(l)
.23 +
.08<1 )
.29 +
.03
.28
.02(1)
.26 +.03(l)
.36
.04 (l)
.36 :t.as <1 )
.27
+/-_.* 04<2>
,32
+/-_
.04<2)
.26
+/-_
,04<3 )
.26 +
,04<3 )
.38
,04<3 )
.30
.03<2 >
.21
,03< 2 >
,16 :!:
,05<4 )
.19
.02<4 )
.17
.02
.20
.03
.19
.02
.47 +
.as
.26
,03<*)
.17 :!:
.02
.17
+/-_
.02
.16 +
.03
.47 +/-.
.2s<*)
.22 +/-.
.03
.22 +
.03 (*)
.15 +/-.
.02 (Results in mR/day
:!:_ 2s)
SECOND QUARTER Start: 040783 Stop:
071383
.07
+
.01 6.3 +/-.
.7(S)(*)
,23
+/-_
.03
.11 +.02(S)
(6)
.17 +.02
,25
.21
+/-_
.04<5 )
+/-.
.04 (S)
,03<5 )
+/-.
.03 (S)
.22 +
.23
.77
.31
+
.09<5)(*)
+/-_
.04 (S)
.14
+/-_
,02
.14 +.02
,16.:!:
,02 *
.11 +
.02<5 )
.26.:!:
,03< 5 )
.62 +
,32<7 )
.27.:!:
.03<5 )
.13 +
.02
.12 +
,02
.15
.02
.13 +
.02
.16 +
.02
.23 +
,04<*)
.13 +
,02
.29 +
,03<*)
,14 +
.02
.14
+/-_
.02
.12.:!:
.02
.12.:!:
.02 THIRD QUARTER
'Start: 071383 Stop:
101183
.09 +
.01<8 )
4.1 +
,3
.29
.12 +
.17 +
.02 <3 )
* 01 (S)
.02-<8 )
.02 ( 3 )
.o/8)
* 01 (S)
.01< 3 )
,19 +
.23 +
.22 +
.20 +
.22
.21
.01 (S)
.02 <3 )
.21 +
.02< 8 )
+/-_
.01<8 )
, 02 ( 9 )
.:..o/9)
.02 <9 )
,02 <9 )
.01 ( 9 )
.20
.23
.28
.26
.26
.2*4
.18 +
.01< 9 )
.18
.02
.17
.01
.19 +
.03
.18
.02
.19
.03
.20 +
.03
.20
.02
.20 +
.02
.18
+/-_
.02
.20 +/-.
.02
.18 +/-_
.02
.20 +
.01 FOU,RTH QUARTER Start: 101183 Stop:
010684
,01 (ll)
.as 2.9 +
,1
.26 +
.a/11)
+
.01 (11)
.01<11 )
.01<11 )
.01<11 >
.11
.20 +
.19
.22 (6)
(6)
.19 +/-.
.01<11 )
.20 +/-.
.01 (ll)
.22
.01 (ll)
.21
:t_
.02< 11 )
.27 +/-.
.04(ll)
(10)
(10)
,21
:t_
.01<11 )
.25 +
.02(1l)
.15 +/-.
.01 (ll)
.19.:!:
.01
.15 +
.01
.17.:!:
.01
.16.:!:
.01
, 15
:t_
.01
.18.:!:
.01
.17 +
.01
.16 +
.01
.16 +/-.
.01
,17.:!:
.01
.15-
+/-_
.01
.17 !.
.01 Note: See footnotes at end of table, 55 AVERAGE + 2s 0.08 +
0.01 3.9 + 1.7 0.26 + 0.03 0.13 +
0.04 0.20
+/-_
0.03 0.21 + a.as 0,25 0.03 0.23
+/-_
0.03 Q.26 +
0.09 0.2s
.:. a.as 0.36 +
0.27 0,27 + 0.06 0.20 + a.as 0.23 +
0.06 0.27 0.11 0.24 0.07 0.24 Q,03 0.32 +
0.21 0.20 +/-. a.as 0.17 0.03 0,16 +
0.03 0.18 + 0.02 0.23 +
0.16 0.19 + a.as 0.20 +/-. 0.03 0.17 +
C.03 0.20 +/-.
0.06 0.24 +/-.
0.16 0.18 +/-.
0.03 0.17 +
0.04 0.16 Q,03


r
r n
                . .:,t'""
ji(
n ji(
l.'.C:!
l.'.C:!
      'r:I.
r:
I r.
I I
Table 25 (Page 2 of 2) r
: r.
      /       ;                                               Direct Radiation-Thermoluminescent Dosimetry 1, **** :
r  
VEPCO REMP 1983 1*.                                                                 (Results in mR/day  .!. 2s)
/ ;
1, **** :
1*.
L.
L.
STATION NO.         FIRST QUARTER           SECOND QUARTER       THIRD QUARTER   FOURTH QUARTER AVERAGE  + 2s Start: 011383           Start: 040783         Start: 071383 . Start: 101183 Stop: 040783            Stop: 071300          Stop: 101183    Stop: 010684 f:1 31                       +  .02          .15      .02              +                                + 0.01 II_ __;i                            .15                          .!.             .18      .02    .17
f:1 I i I_ __ ;
                                                                                                              -+  .01  0.16 32                .28  .!. .03          .16  .!. .02         .18
r'
                                                                                            -+ .02      .19    + .01  0.20  +  o.os 33                .21  .!.
' i :
* 03 <3 )     .17 .!.   .02         .21 .!. .02    .24    + .02  0.21  + 0.03 34                .22    +
I..!
* 03 <3 )     .17 .!.   .02         .21 +   .02    .21            0.20 + 0.02
r--"
                                                                                                              .!. .01
f '
* 02 <3 )                                 + .01 35                .21
i I
                                                -+                .19 .!.   .02         .24             .46    + .17  0.28 + 0.13
.... -1
* 05 <3 )
[',
r' 36                .46 +                   .20
,__j r **~-.
                                                                        -+  .02         .24 +   .01    .26
I;.,
                                                                                                                -+ .01  0.29  +  o."t2 37                .82 +    .22< 3 )(*)   .18      .02        .20      .03    .20 +     .01  0.35      0.31
*~---
    'i :                                        -                      .!.                  .!.                              .!.
..:,t'""
I . .!
Table 25 (Page 2 of 2)
38                .26  .!.
Direct Radiation-Thermoluminescent Dosimetry VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in mR/day.!. 2s)
* 09 <3 )     .26 .!. .08         .27 .!. .03    .28      .01  0.27  + 0.01
STATION NO.
                                                      . (3)(*)
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER Start: 011383 Start: 040783 Start:
39                .43  .!. .05           .19 .!. .03         .20 .!. .02      .20 .!.  .01  0.25  +  0.12 40                .74  .!. .23< 3 )     .12 .!. .02         .16 +   .02    .15 .!.  .01  0.29  +  0.30 41                .31      .04 <3 )     .16       .02        .22                                  + 0.06
Stop:
                                                .!.                    .!.                  .!. .03    .24 .!.  .02 0.23 42                .52  .!. . 06 <3 )     .18   + .02         .19 +   .01    .24    + .02  0.28  +  0.16 43                .55      .44( 3 )(*)   .14       .02        .16      .02   .22 + .02      0.27      0.19
31  
                                              .!.                    .!.                  .!.                             -+
.15 32
INDICATOR
.28 33
                                                +
.21 34
AVERAGE
.22 35
                              -+  2s  0.29        0.14         0.21 .!. 0.13       0.21 + 0.03    0.20
.21 36
                                                                                                              -+  0.06 CONTROL r--"
.46 37
                                + 2s f '
.82 38
i        I AVERAGE            0.58
.26 39
                                              -+   0.22         0.15
.43 40
                                                                      -+  .OS       0.18 .!. 0.03  0.18
.74 41
                                                                                                              -+  0.04
.31 42
  ....-1
.52 43
[,__j',
.55 INDICATOR AVERAGE
* COMMENTS:    (l)        Exposure period was 1-14-83 to 4-11-83.
+ 2s 0.29 CONTROL AVERAGE
(2)        ~xposure period was 1-13-83 to 4-11-83.
+ 2s 0.58
(3)        Exposure period was 1-14-83 to 4-07-83.
* COMMENTS:
(4)        Exposure period was 1-13-83 to 4-12-83.
(l)
(5)        Exposure perioa was 4-11-83 to 7-13-83.
(2)
(6)        Missing at time of pickup in field.
(3)
(7)        Exposure period was 4-12-83 to 7-14-83.
(4)
(8)        Exposure period was 07-13-83 to 10-10-83.
(5)
(9)        Exposure period was 07-13-82 to 09-28-83.
(6)
(10)      Lost in transit.
(7)
(11)      Exposure period was 10-10-83 to 01-06-84 (12)      Not included in vertical averages.
(8)
(*)        No low energy correction applied.
(9)
r **~-.
(10)
I;.,
(11)
  *~---
(12)
56
(*)
040783 Stop:
071300 Stop:
+
.02
.15.!.  
.02  
.18 +
.03
.16.!.  
.02
.18 + -
* 03 <3)  
.17.!..02  
.21.!.  
+
* 03 <3 )  
.17.!.  
.02  
.21 +  
+
* 02 <3)  
.19.!..02  
.24 +  
+
* 05 <3 )  
.20 +  
.02  
.24 +  
.22<3)(*)  
+  
.18.!.  
.02
.20.!.
* 09 <3 )  
.26.!.  
.08  
.27.!.  
. (3)(*)  
.05  
.19.!.  
.03  
.20.!.  
.23<3)  
.12.!.  
.02  
.16 +  
.04 <3)  
.16.!.  
.02  
.22.!.  
. 06 <3 )  
.18 +.02  
.19 +  
.44(3 )(*)  
.14.!.  
.02  
.16.!.  
+ 0.14 0.21.!. 0.13 0.21 +  
+ 0.22 0.15 +
.OS 0.18.!.
Exposure period was 1-14-83 to 4-11-83.  
~xposure period was 1-13-83 to 4-11-83.
Exposure period was 1-14-83 to 4-07-83.
Exposure period was 1-13-83 to 4-12-83.
Exposure perioa was 4-11-83 to 7-13-83.
Missing at time of pickup in field.
Exposure period was 4-12-83 to 7-14-83.
Exposure period was 07-13-83 to 10-10-83.
Exposure period was 07-13-82 to 09-28-83.
Lost in transit.
Exposure period was 10-10-83 to 01-06-84 Not included in vertical averages.
No low energy correction applied.
56 071383.
101183
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01
.03
.03
.02
.02
.03
.01
.02 0.03 0.03 FOURTH QUARTER Start: 101183 Stop:
010684
.17 +
.01
.19 +
.01
.24 +
.02
.21.!..01
.46 +
.17
.26 +
.01
.20 +
.01
.28.!.
.01
.20.!.
.01
.15.!.
.01
.24.!.
.02
.24 +.02
.22 +.02 0.20 + 0.06 0.18 + 0.04 AVERAGE
+ 2s 0.16 + 0.01 0.20 + o.os 0.21 + 0.03 0.20 + 0.02 0.28 + 0.13 0.29 +
o."t2 0.35.!. 0.31 0.27 + 0.01 0.25 + 0.12 0.29 + 0.30 0.23 + 0.06 0.28 +
0.16 0.27 + 0.19


r-**--i l, ..*,*-** _J Pl               t'_:__~,_J                               c:-J TABLE 26
Medium or Pathway Sampled (Uni ts of Measurement)
Air 1o9ine -
(pCi/m)
Ai rl.Jorne Pa rti cul ates (lE-03 pCi/rn3J Milk (pCi /l) r-**--i l,.. *,*-** _J Pl t'_:__~,_J TABLE 26  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADJOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 1 OF 7)
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADJOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 1 OF 7)
N11r.ie of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-200; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Reporting Period: 10 January - 31 December 1983 Medium or Pathway              Type and                                                      Location with Highest Annua 1 Mean Sampled            Total Number            Lo~ier             A11 Indicator                                                  Control LocaH~ns (Uni ts of            of Analyses          Limit of             Locations              Name, Di stance        Mean ( f) ( 2 l  Mean (fl Measurement)            Performed          Detection (1)     Mean (f) (Range)            and Direction            (Range)          (Range)
N11r.ie of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-200; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed 1-131 - 423 Gross Beta -
Air 1o9ine -        1-131 - 423                0.07              LLD                                                                  L,LD (pCi/m)
422 Gross Alpha - 422 Gamma Spec -
Ai rl.Jorne          Gross Beta - 422            10          15.0 (285/369)                   FE            17 (38/52)           19 (45/53)
32 Be-7 Ce-141 Cs-134 Cs-137 IJb-95 Zr-95 Gamma Spec - 58 K-40 Cs-137 Cs-134
Pa rti cul ates                                              {3.2-78)                                         (3.8-72)             (6.3-40)
* Ba-140 La-140 I-131 -
(lE-03 pCi/rn3J      Gross Alpha - 422                        3.7 (212/369)                   DOH            4.5 (28/53)         4.2 (29/53) 1.2-20                                          (l.4-20)             (2.0-11)
59 Sr 58 Sr-90 -58 Ca-60 Reporting Period:
Gamma Spec - 32 Be-7                                    64 (26/28)                       DOH/FE         72 (4/4)/72 (4/4)   73 (3/4)
10 January -
(32-100) .                                      (53-100/46-97)       (38-110)
31 December 1983 Lo~ier Limit of Detection (1) 0.07 10 0.05 0.06 18 15 60 15 l
Ce-141                                      LLD                                                                  LLD Cs-134                    0.05          3.8 (2/28)                      ss            3.8 (2/4)                 LLD (2.2-5.4)                                       (2.2-5.4)
*5 l
Cs-137                    0.06          6. 7 (4/28)                      BC            2.0 (1/4) (3)             LLD (2.0-14)                                        (2.0-2.0)
A 11 Indicator Locations Mean (f)
IJb-95                                      LLD                                                                  LLD Zr-95                                        LLD                                                                  LLD Milk                Gamma Spec - 58 (pCi /l)            K-40
(Range)
* 1300 (47/47)                  LEE HALL          1400 (12/12)        1400 (11/11)
LLD 15.0 (285/369)
(l 000-1800)                                    (1200-1800)         (1300-1700)
{3.2-78) 3.7 (212/369) 1.2-20 64 (26/28)
Cs-137                      18          8.4 (12/58)                      JDKS          14 (4/11)                 LLD (l.4-43)                                        (2.5-43)
(32-100).
Cs-134                      15          10 (l/50)                        EPPS          10 (1/12)                 LLD (10-10)                                          (10-10)
LLD 3.8 (2/28)
* Ba-140                      60              LLD                                                                  LLD La-140                      15              LLD                                                                  LLD I-131 - 59                    l              LLD                                                                  LLU Sr 58                  *5          2.9 (1/58)                      CP            2.9 (1/12)               LLD (2.9-2.9)                                       (2.9-2.9)
(2.2-5.4)
Sr-90 -58                    l          2.9 (3/48)                       JDKS          3.5 (l/12)           2.3 (2/10)
: 6. 7 (4/28)
(2.2-3.5)                                        (3.5-3.5)           (l. 6-2. 9)
(2.0-14)
Ca-60                                    1350 (48/48)                    JDKS          1400 (12/12)        1500 (12/12)
LLD LLD
(890-2000)                                      (l 000-1600)        (1300-1890)
* 1300 (47/47)
NOTE:     See footnote at end of table.
(l 000-1800) 8.4 (12/58)
(l.4-43) 10 (l/50)
(10-10)
LLD LLD LLD 2.9 (1/58)
(2.9-2.9) 2.9 (3/48)
(2.2-3.5) 1350 (48/48)
(890-2000)
Location with Highest Annua 1 Mean Name, Di stance Mean ( f) (2 l and Direction (Range)
FE DOH DOH/FE ss BC LEE HALL JDKS EPPS CP JDKS JDKS 17 (38/52)
(3.8-72) 4.5 (28/53)
(l.4-20) 72 (4/4)/72 (4/4)
(53-100/46-97) 3.8 (2/4)
(2.2-5.4) 2.0 (1/4) (3)
(2.0-2.0) 1400 (12/12)
(1200-1800) 14 (4/11)
(2.5-43) 10 (1/12)
(10-10) 2.9 (1/12)
(2.9-2.9) 3.5 (l/12)
(3.5-3.5) 1400 (12/12)
(l 000-1600)
NOTE:
See footnote at end of table.
Control LocaH~ns Mean (fl (Range)
L,LD 19 (45/53)
(6.3-40) 4.2 (29/53)
(2.0-11) 73 (3/4)
(38-110)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1400 (11/11)
(1300-1700)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLU LLD 2.3 (2/10)
(l. 6-2. 9) 1500 (12/12)
(1300-1890) c:-J


r---*- ..                                                                                                       r--,                               l ......J l..._....* ..J I *. -...* ;
J..**
TABLE 26
: j. i.
J lJ1 co r---*-..
I *. -...* ;
Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units of Measurement)
Precipitation (pCi/l)
River Water Monthly (pCi /l)
TABLE 26 r--,
l..._....*..J  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 2 OF 7)
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -
Name of Facility; SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Reporting Period: 10 January - 31 December 1983 Medium 'or Pathway              Type and                                              Location with Highest Annual Mean Sampled          Total Number          Lo~1er           A11 I ndi ca tor                                          Control LocarHns (Units of          of Analyses        Limit of           Locations        Name, Di stance        Mean (fl ( 2 )  Mean { f)
1983 (Sheet 2 OF 7)
Measurement)        Performed          Detection (l)   Hean (fl   (Range)    and Direction            (Range)           (Range)
Name of Facility; SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Gross Beta Gamma Spec Cs-134 Cs-137 Tritium-30 Gamma Spec -
Precipitation      Gross Beta                4          6.8 {12/12/)                ss          6.8 {12/12)          3.8 (9/12)
26 Co-58 Co-60 Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 Sr 13
(pCi/l)                                                  {l. 5-37)                                {l. 5-37)            (1.3-14)
* Sr 13 Fe-59 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95 Zn-65 Zr-95 Reporting Period:
Gamma Spec Cs-134                  15              LLD                                                            LLD Cs-137                  18              LLD                                                           LLD lJ1 co                                  Tritium-30            2000          660 (2/12)                  ss          660 {2/12)          410 {3/12)
10 January -
{570-750)                               (570-750)            (190-630)
31 December 1983 Lo~1er Limit of Detection (l) 4 15 18 2000 15 15 60 15 18 5
River Water        Gamma Spec - 26 Monthly            Co-58                    15          12 {l/13)             SURRY DISCIIARGE  12 (1/13)                LLD (pCi /l)                                                {12-12)                                 (12-12)
30 15 15 15 30 30 A 11 I ndi ca tor Locations Hean (fl (Range) 6.8 {12/12/)
Co-60                    15          15 {2/13)             SURRY DISCHARGE  15 {2/13)                LLD
{l. 5-37)
{3. 8-27)                                (3.8-27)
LLD LLD 660 (2/12)
Ba-140                  60              LLD                                                            LLD Cs-134                  15              LLD                                                           LLD Cs-137                  18          2.6 {1/13)             SURRY DISCHARGE  2.6 (1/13)               LLD
{570-750) 12 {l/13)
{2.6-2.6)                               (2.6-2.6)
{12-12) 15 {2/13)
K-40                                  53 (1/13)             SURRY DISCHARGE   53 (1/13)                 LLD (53-53)                                 (53-53)
{3. 8-27)
Sr 13
LLD LLD 2.6 {1/13)
* 5          1.0 (1/13)             SURRY DI SCIIARGE 1.0 (1/13)           1.6 (1/13)
{2.6-2.6) 53 (1/13)
(1.0-1.0)                               (1.0-1.0)             (1.6-1.6)
(53-53) 1.0 (1/13)
Sr 13                            .68 (1/13)             SURRY DISCHARGE
(1.0-1.0)  
.68 (1/13)
{.68-.68)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance Mean (fl (2) and Direction (Range) ss ss SURRY DISCIIARGE SURRY DISCHARGE SURRY DISCHARGE SURRY DISCHARGE SURRY DI SCIIARGE SURRY DISCHARGE 6.8 {12/12)
{l. 5-37) 660 {2/12)
(570-750) 12 (1/13)
(12-12) 15 {2/13)
(3.8-27) 2.6 (1/13)
(2.6-2.6) 53 (1/13)
(53-53) 1.0 (1/13)
(1.0-1.0)
* 68 ( 1 /13)
* 68 ( 1 /13)
(.68-.68)
NOTE:
See footnote at ehd of table.
Control LocarHns Mean { f)
(Range) 3.8 (9/12)
(1.3-14)
LLD LLD 410 {3/12)
(190-630)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1.6 (1/13)
(1.6-1.6)
* 92 ( 2 /13)
* 92 ( 2 /13)
{.68-.68)                                (.68-.68)            (. 86-. 98)
(. 86-. 98)
Fe-59                    30              LLD                                                           LLD La-140                  15              LLD                                                           LLD Mn-54                    15              LLD                                                           LLD Nb-95                    15              LLD                                                            LLD Zn-65                    30              LLD                                                            LLD Zr-95                    30              LLD                                                            LLD NOTE:  See footnote at ehd of table.
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD l......J  
J..**
j.
i.
J


1-----,                         r-:--~                      '. .. -.... 1         1 L*c     .                     :._. --~--* i - .J'              h ....... ,~.:.J                           L. .*. *
\\
      \
i j
TABLE 26
J j
l J
j l r i
J J.
j ;,  
\\
:i
'l l
.! l 1
1
.)
.l
'i j
i i
\\ i J.  
'J
)
l I
I j
I I I l 1 l l 1
* I I
11 11
'i I
: i.  
\\ **-
Ul
\\.D Medi um or Pathway Sampled (Units of Measure men tl Bi-Monthly River Hater (pCi /1)
Surface Hater (pCi /1)
I/ell Hater (pCi/1)
'* L*c __.:
TABLE 26 1-----,
:._. --~--* i r-:--~
h.......,~.:.J  
-.J


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 3 OF 7)                             .
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 3 OF 7)
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Reporting Period: 10 January - 31 December 1983 Medi um or Pathway            Type and                                                  Location with Highest Annual Mean Sampled          To'ta l Number        Lo~1er               All Indicator                                                        Control Locaf~~ns (Units of          of Analyses          Limit of                 Locations      Name, Di stance          Mean ( f) ( 2 l              Mean ( fl Measure men tl      Performed          Detection (l)         Mean (fl (Range)   and Direction            (Range)                        (Range)
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and To'ta l Number of Analyses Performed Gamma Spec - 30 Co-58 Cs-134 Cs-137 Tritium - 10 Ba-140 Fe-59 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95 Zn-65 Zr-95 Gross Beta - 8 Gross*Alpha - 8 Tritium - B Gross Beta - 8 Gross Alpha - !l Tritium - 30 Reporting Period:
Bi-Monthly        Gamma Spec - 30 River Hater        Co-58                    15                5.5 (1/30)                   SD          5.5 (1/6)                          LLD (pCi /1)                                                      (5. 5-5. 5)                               (5.5-5.5)
10 January - 31 December 1983 Lo~1er Limit of Detection (l) 15 18 2000 60 30 15 15 15 30 30 4
Cs-134                                      9.8 (1/30)                   SD          9.8 (1/6)                          LLD (9.8~9.B)                                 (9.B-9.B)
2000 4
Cs-137                    18                7.4 (2/30)                   SD          11 (1/6)                            LLD Ul                                                                  (3. 7-11)                                 (11-11)
2000 All Indicator Locations Mean (fl (Range) 5.5 (1/30)
            \.D                    Tritium - 10            2000                660 (7/8)                    SI          1500 (1/2)                    250 (2/2)
(5. 5-5. 5) 9.8 (1/30)
(220-1500)                               (1500-1500)                    (200-290)
(9.8~9.B) 7.4 (2/30)
Ba-140                    60                    LLD                                                                    .HD
(3. 7-11) 660 (7/8)
    .                                Fe-59                    30                    LLD                                                                      LLD La-140                    15                    LLD                                                                      LLD Mn-54                    15                    LLD                                                                       LLD Nb-95 I                                    Zn-65 Zr-95 15 30 30 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD Surface Hater      Gross Beta - 8              4              6.5 (8/8)                     cc        13 (2/2)                        no control (pCi /1)                                                      (1.4-23)                                 (2.0-23)
(220-1500)
Gross*Alpha - 8                            6.8 (2/8)                    SR          9.6 (1/2)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6.5 (8/8)
(4. 0-9. 6)                              (9.6-9.6)
(1.4-23) 6.8 (2/8)
Tritium - B            2000                  LLD
(4. 0-9. 6)
* I  ~    **    .
LLD 5.8 (8/8)
                                                                                                                                                                                            *1.- ..:**    :,
1** .*;
l l
1*
I/ell Hater (pCi/1)
Gross Beta - 8 Gross Alpha - !l Tritium - 30          2000 4              5.8 (8/8)
(1.8-Jl)
(1.8-Jl)
LLD 400 (2/8)
LLD 400 (2/8)
(230-560)
(230-560)
JMTN ss 8.6 (2/2)
Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance Mean ( f) (2 l and Direction (Range)
SD SD SD SI cc SR JMTN ss 5.5 (1/6)
(5.5-5.5) 9.8 (1/6)
(9.B-9.B) 11 (1/6)
(11-11) 1500 (1/2)
(1500-1500) 13 (2/2)
(2.0-23) 9.6 (1/2)
(9.6-9.6) 8.6 (2/2)
(6.1-11) 560 (1/2)
(6.1-11) 560 (1/2)
(560-560) no control f)i
(560-560)
: .;..,/'*1 I
NOTE:
I1 NOTE:  See footnote at ~nd of table.
See footnote at ~nd of table.
1 iI i.
'... -.... 1 Control Locaf~~ns Mean ( fl (Range)
LLD LLD LLD 250 (2/2)
(200-290)
.HD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD no control no control L..*.
* 1
* I  
~  
*1.-..:**
1**.*;
f)i
:.;..,/'*


j     [~---.                                                     L ...
j  
j l
'j
*l
..j
**i J j I l
,j I
l j
\\
j
~1
! I
' ! I i i
[~---.
Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units of Measurement)
Clan,s (pCi/kg (wet))
Oysters (pCi/kg (wet))
.Crabs (pCi/kg (wet))
L...
TABLE 26 SUHHARY OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 4 OF 7)
TABLE 26 SUHHARY OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 4 OF 7)
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Reporting Period: 10 January - 31 December 1983 Medium or Pathway            Type and                                             Location with Highest Annual Mean Sampled          Total Number         Lo~1er            Al 1 Indicator                                      Control LocaH?ns (Units of        'of Analyses       Limit of (l)          Locations      Name, Dis ta nee
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number  
* Mean (fl (2 )  Mean (fl Measurement)        Performed         De tee ti on      Mean (f) (Range)    and Direction        (Range)          (Range)
'of Analyses Performed Gamma Spec - 30 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gamma Spec - 18 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gamma Spec - 3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co'-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Reporting Period:
Clan,s            Gamma Spec - 30 (pCi/kg (wet))    K-40                                   1400 (16/24)              HIP          1700 (4/6)        4200 (2/6)
10 January - 31 December 1983 Lo~1er Limit of (l)
(2 50-4600) .                          (440-4200)          (4200-4200)
De tee ti on 130 260 130 260 130 150 130 260 130 260 130 150 130 260 130 260 130 150 Al 1 Indicator Locations Mean (f)
Mn-54                   130                LLD                                                      LLD Fe-59                   260                LLD                                                      LLD Co-58,60               130                LLD                                                      LLD Zn-65                   260                LLD                                                      LLD Cs-134                 130                LLD                                                      LLD Cs-137                 150                LLD                                                      LLD
(Range) 1400 (16/24)
.j
(2 50-4600).
*i Oysters            Gamma Spec - 18 J              (pCi/kg (wet))    K-40                                   890 (12/18)              DWS          1200 (4/6)            None j                                Mn-54 Fe-59 130 260 (480-1700)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 890 (12/18)
LLD LLD (480-1700)
(480-1700)
LLD LLD I                              Co-58,60 l                                                      130                LLD                                                      LLD Zn-65                   260                LLD                                                      LLD
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2400 (3/3)
,j                              Cs-134                 130                LLD                                                      LLD Cs-137                 150                LLD                                                      LLD I
(1700-3100)
l           .Crabs            Gamma Spec - 3 (pCi/kg (wet))   K-40                                  2400 (3/3)               SD          2400 (3/3)             None j                                                                    (1700-3100)                           (1700-3100)
LLD LLD LLD LLD 13 (1/3)
  \                            Mn-54                  130                LLD                                                      LLD
(13-13) 18 (1/3)
    !                            Fe-59                  260                LLD                                                      LLD Co'-58,60              130                LLD                                                       LLD Zn-65                  260                LLD                                                       LLD Cs-134                  130            13 (1/3)                 SD          13 (1-/3)             None (13-13)                               (13-13)
(18-18)
  .!                            Cs-137                  150            18 (1/3)                 SD          18 (1/3)               None j                                                                  (18-18)                               (HHS)
Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Dis ta nee and Direction HIP DWS SD SD SD
~1
* Mean (fl (2)
  !        NOTE:   See footnote at end* of table.
(Range) 1700 (4/6)
I' I
(440-4200) 1200 (4/6)
i i
(480-1700) 2400 (3/3)
(1700-3100) 13 (1-/3)
( 13-13) 18 (1/3)
(HHS)
NOTE:
See footnote at end* of table.
Control LocaH?ns Mean (fl (Range) 4200 (2/6)
(4200-4200)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD None LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD None LLD LLD LLD LLD None None


I   r--*
I
I r-- -,             l. .. _.... '
:/
                                                                      ~-~----,
I
L.... i
.*l }
                                                                                                                                                ...-1        :---1
"j
                                                                                                                                                            *.... .. _: __ )
*i !
                                                                                  , TABLE 26
i
.1 j
1
.:j
.]
i I l
.j i
j J
-'j
.J J i.*;
11
.,:i
. J r--*
I Medium or Pa tllway Sampled (Units of r-- -,
* Measurement)
Fish (pCi/kg (wet))
River Bottom Sediments (pCi/kg (dry))
~-~----,
: l... _.... '
L....
i
, TABLE 26  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0t.M&#xa3;NTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 5 OF 7)
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0t.M&#xa3;NTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 5 OF 7)
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Reporting Period: 10 January - 31 December 1983 Medium or
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed
  /            Pa tllway            Type and                                                    Location with Highest Annual Mean I            Sampled            Total Number              Lower               All Indicator                                              Control LocaH?ns Mean (f) ( 2 )
*Gamma Spec - 4 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gamma Spec - 11 Bi-214 Pb-214 Ra-226 Pb-212 Tl-208 Ac-228 K-40 Reporting Period:
*l            (Units of            of Analyses              Limit of (1 l         Locations     Name, Di stance                                Mean (fl
10 January - 31 December 1983 Lower Limit of (1 l Detection 130 260 130 130 260 130 150 All Indicator Locations Mean (fl (Range) 1100 (4/4)
  }
(690-1300)
* Measurement)          Performed              Detection          Mean (fl (Range)   and Di rec ti on        (Range)                  (Range) j
LLD LLD 100 (1/4)
  *i
(100-100) 50 (1/4)
  !          Fish (pCi/kg (wet))
(50-50)
                                  *Gamma Spec - 4 K-40                                          1100 (4/4)               SD              1100 (4/4)                    None (690-1300)                              (690-1300)
LLD 6.7 (1/4)
Mn-54                        130                  LLD                                                               LLD Fe-59                        260                  LLD                                                                LLD Co-58                        130              100 (1/4)               SD              100 (1 /4)                    None (100-100)                                (100-100)
(6. 7-6. 7) 12 (1/4)
Co-60                        130              50 (1/4)                 SD              50 (1/4)                      None (50-50)                                  (50-50)
(12-12) 1000 (9/10)
Zn-65                        260                  LLD                                                               LLD Cs-134                      130              6.7 (1/4)               SD              6. 7 (1/4)                    None (6. 7-6. 7)                              (6.7-6.7)
(810-1200) 960 (9/10)
Cs-137                      150              12 (1/4)                 SD              12 (1/4)                     None (12-12)                                 (12-12) i          River Bottom
(690-1400) 1000 (9/10)
  .1                              Gamma Spec - 11 Sediments j          (pCi/kg (dry))       Bi-214                                        1000 (9/10)             SD;IIIP        1100 (2/2); (2/2)         1200 (1/1) 1                                                                            (810-1200)                           (1100-1100); (1000-1200)     (1200-1200)
(750-1300) 870 (9/10)
Pb-214                                        960 (9/10)               HIP            1200 (2/2)               1300 (1/1)
(500-1000) 940 (9/10)
.:j                                                                              (690-1400)                               (970-1400)               (1300-1300)
(970-1300) 790 (6/10)
Ra-226                                        1000 (9/10)             HIP            1200 (2/2)               1300 (1/1)
(610-1100) 14000 (10/10)
.]                                                                              (750-1300)                               (1000-1300)               (1300-1300) i                              Pb-212                                        870 (9/10)               SI;POS          970 (2 /2; (2/2)          1200 (1/1)
(3000-17000)
I l                                                                            (500-1000)                              (950-990;940-1000)       (1200-1200)
Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance and Di rec ti on SD SD SD SD SD SD;IIIP HIP HIP SI;POS IHP ll IP POS Mean (f) (2 )
  .j                              Tl-208                                        940 (9/10)                               1300 (2/2)               1300 (1 /1}
(Range) 1100 (4/4)
IHP i                              Ac-228 (970-1300)                               (1200-1300)               (1300-1300) j                                                                            790 (6/10)               ll IP          860 (2/2)                 1400 (1/1)
(690-1300) 100 (1 /4)
(610-1100)                               (610-1100)               (1400-1400)
(100-100) 50 (1/4)
J                                K-40                                          14000 (10/10)           POS            17000 ( 2 /2)             17000 (1/1)
(50-50)
-'j                                                                            (3000-17000)                            (17000-17000)            (,17000-17000)
: 6. 7 (1/4)
.J J  i 11
(6.7-6.7) 12 (1/4)
.,:i        NOTE:    See footnote at end of table *
(12-12) 1100 (2/2); (2/2)
.J
(1100-1100); (1000-1200) 1200 (2/2)
(970-1400) 1200 (2/2)
(1000-1300) 970 (2 /2; (2/2)
(950-990;940-1000) 1300 (2/2)
(1200-1300) 860 (2/2)
(610-1100) 17000 ( 2 /2)
(17000-17000)
NOTE:
See footnote at end of table *
,,-... -1
:---1  
*.... _.. _: __ )
Control LocaH?ns Mean (fl (Range)
None LLD LLD None None LLD None None 1200 (1/1)
(1200-1200) 1300 (1/1)
(1300-1300) 1300 (1/1)
(1300-1300) 1200 (1/1)
(1200-1200) 1300 (1 /1}
(1300-1300) 1400 (1/1)
(1400-1400) 17000 (1/1)
(,17000-17000)  


                                                                                        . ~ :: .,... : ., ..* ~ .:... . . . *~ .. ~* ; .-,.: :..... * ..* '*** ' . *-" ** ~ .*. *-* -*-' - ... :, .. t .* ,.. ~ .-.<~.- ..... ~- -~-- ,*. -. -' .. :. .***-' .. ~* ., .... w :,* : -~-*~ * *:~ *
\\
\
. ~ ::.,... :.,..* ~.:.....  
TABLE 26
. *~.. ~* ;.-,.: :..... *..* '*** '. *-" ** ~.*. *-* -*-' -...
:,.. t.*,.. ~.-.<~.-..... ~-
-~--,*. -. -'.. :.. ***-'.. ~*.,.... w :,* : -~-*~ ** :~ *  
~iedium or Pathway Sampled (Un its of
. Measurement)
River Bottom Sediments (cont'd)
Water Fowl (pCi/kg (wet))
Vegetation (pCi /kg (wet))
TABLE 26  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 6 OF 7)
OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Reporting Period: 10 January - 31 December 1983
1983 (Sheet 6 OF 7)
        ~iedium or Pathway            Type and                                                Location with Highest Annual Mean Sampled          Total Number        Lower             All Indicator                                                                                                                    Control Locaf~?ns (Un its of          of Analyses        Limit of (l)        Locations            Name, Di stance                                          Mean (f) <2 >                                                Mean ( f)
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Bi-212 Co-5!\\
    . Measurement)        Performed        De tee ti on     Mean (f)     (Range)     and Direction                                              (Range)                                                         (Range)
Gamma Spec -
River Bottom      Cs-134                  150          560 (8/10)                                 SD                            1300 (2/2)                                                                   LLD Sediments                                                (190-1300)                                                                 (1200-1300)
1 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Be-7 Gamnra Spec -
(cont'd)         Cs-137                  180          1200 (10/10)                               SD                             2600 (2/2)                                                           860 ( 1 /1)
7 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 Sr 6 Sr 6 Reporting Period:
(56-2900)                                                                 (2 300-2900)                                                         (860-060)
10 January -
Co-60                                670 (7/10)                                 SD                            1700 (2/2)                                                                   LLD (310-240)                                                                 (930-2400)
31 December 1983 Lower Limit of (l)
Bi-212                                    LLD                                                                                                                                       1100 (1/1)
De tee ti on 150 180 130 260 130 260 130 150 80 60 All Indicator Locations Mean (f)
(Range) 560 (8/10)
(190-1300) 1200 (10/10)
(56-2900) 670 (7/10)
(310-240)
LLD 1900 (1/10) 1900-1900) 420 (1/1)
(420-420)
LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4.7 (1/1)
(4.'7-4.7) 42 (1/1)
(42-42)
LLD LLD 3600 *( 7 /7)
(2100-4900)
Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance and Direction SD SD SD SD HIR HIR BROCK Mean (f) <2 >
(Range) 1300 (2/2)
(1200-1300) 2600 (2/2)
(2 300-2900) 1700 (2/2)
(930-2400) 1900 (1/2)
(1900-1900) 420 (1/1)
(420-420) 4.7 (1/1)
(4. 7-4. 7) 42-(1/1)
(42-42) 4100 (3/3)
(2300-5600)
NOTE:
See footnote at *end of table.
Control Locaf~?ns Mean ( f)
(Range)
LLD 860 ( 1 /1)
(860-060)
LLD 1100 (1/1)
(1100-1100)
(1100-1100)
Co-5!\                                1900 (1/10)                                SD                            1900 (1/2)                                                                    LLD 1900-1900)                                                                (1900-1900)
LLD None LLD LLD LLD LLD
Water Fowl        Gamma Spec - 1 (pCi/kg (wet))    K-40                                  420 (1/1)                                  HIR                            420 (1/1)                                                                    None (420-420)                                                                  (420-420)
: LLD, None None LLD LLD None  
Mn-54                  130              LLD                                                                                                                                                 LLD Fe-59                  260              LLD                                                                                                                                                 LLD Co-58,60                130              LLD                                                                                                                                                LLD Zn-65                  260              LLD                                                                                                                                                LLD Cs-134                  130              LLD                                                                                                                                                  LLD, Cs-137                  150          4.7 (1/1)                                  HIR                            4.7 (1/1)                                                                    None (4.'7-4.7)                                                                (4. 7-4. 7)
Be-7                                  42 (1/1)                                                                  42-(1/1)                                                                      None (42-42)                                                                    (42-42)
Vegetation        Gamnra Spec - 7 (pCi /kg (wet))    Cs-134                  80              LLD                                                                                                                                                LLD Cs-137                  60              LLD                                                                                                                                                 LLD K-40                                  3600 *( 7 /7)                              BROCK                          4100 (3/3)                                                                    None (2100-4900)                                                                (2300-5600)
Sr 6 Sr 6 NOTE:  See footnote at *end of table.


                                                                                                      .. _.J I
,I I  
                                                                                                                                        .-.,    ~,..:::-~:] j l.: *:*
\\ l j
eC TABLE 26 SUMMAkY OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 7 of 7)
\\ r
-*1-J
)J
&deg;'
w Medium or Pathway Sampled (Un its of Measurement)
Soil (pCi/kg (dry))
TLDs (mR/day)
TABLE 26 I
.. _.J SUMMAkY OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 7 of 7)
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket_ Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia
Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket_ Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia
* Reporting Period: 10 January - 31 December 1983 Medium or Pathway            Type and                                             Location with Highest Annual Mean Sampled            To ta l Number         Lower           All Indicator                                             Control LocaH?ns (2)
* Reporting Period:
(Un its of            of Analyses         Limit of           Locations       Name, Di stance           Mean ( fl       -Mean (fl (1)
10 January - 31 December 1983 Type and Location with Highest Annual Mean To ta l Number Lower All Indicator (2) of Analyses Limit of (1)
Measurement)          Performed         Detection       Mean (f) (Range)     and Direction             (Range)          (Range)
Locations Name, Di stance Mean ( fl Performed Detection Mean (f)
Soil                Gamma Spec - 6                                                       (3)
(Range) and Direction (Range)
(pCi/kg (dry))      Bi-214                                 780 (6/6)                 ss             1300 (1/1)             None (270-1300)                                 ( 1300-1300)
Gamma Spec - 6 (3)
Pb-214                                 940 (6/6)                 ss             1700 (1/1)             None (560-1700)                                 ( 1700-1700)
Bi-214 780 (6/6) ss 1300 (1/1)
    &deg;'
(270-1300)
w                        Ra-226                                 870 (6/6)                 ss             1500 (1/1)             None (560-1500)                                 (1500-1500)
( 1300-1300)
Pb-212                                 580 (6/6)                 ss             1100 (1/1)             None (100-1100)                                 (1100-llOO)
Pb-214 940 (6/6) ss 1700 (1/1)
Tl-208                                 770 (6/6)                 ss             1600 (1/1)             None (410-1600)                                 (1600-1600)
(560-1700)
Ac-228                                 1100 (4/6)                 ss             1700 (1/1)             None (470-1700)                                 (1700-1700)
( 1700-1700)
K-40                                   8300 (6/6)                 ss             15000 (1/1)           None (2100-15000)                               (15000-15000)
Ra-226 870 (6/6) ss 1500 (1/1)
Cs-134                                   LLD                                                            LLD Cs-137                                 520 (5/6)                 CP             830 (1/1)             None (270-830)                                 (830-830)
(560-1500)
Bi-212                                 1700 (1 /6)               ss             1700 (1/1)             None (1700-1700)                               (1700-1700)
(1500-1500)
  ,I                          Cs-137                                 540 (1/6)                 ss             *540 (l/6)             None I                                                                (540-540)                                 (540-540)
Pb-212 580 (6/6) ss 1100 (1/1)
  \
(100-1100)
lj      TLDs Gamma Dose - 172                       0.23 (155/155)             10             0.36 (4/4)         0.27 (8/8)
(1100-llOO)
  \    (mR/day)            per RG 4.13                           (0.11-.82)                                 (0.20-0.97)         (0.12-0.74) r
Tl-208 770 (6/6) ss 1600 (1/1)
-*1-    (ll   LLD is lower limit of detection as defined and required in USNRC Branch Technical Position on J          An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.
(410-1600)
)J      (2)'   (f) is the ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest (3)   Station SS not s~lected as the location with the highest average when a true, off site alternative was available.
(1600-1600)
Ac-228 1100 (4/6) ss 1700 (1/1)
(470-1700)
(1700-1700)
K-40 8300 (6/6) ss 15000 (1/1)
(2100-15000)
(15000-15000)
Cs-134 LLD Cs-137 520 (5/6)
CP 830 (1/1)
(270-830)
(830-830)
Bi-212 1700 (1 /6) ss 1700 (1/1)
(1700-1700)
(1700-1700)
Cs-137 540 (1/6) ss  
*540 (l/6)
(540-540)
(540-540)
Gamma Dose - 172 0.23 (155/155) 10 0.36 (4/4) per RG 4.13 (0.11-.82)
(0.20-0.97)
(ll LLD is lower limit of detection as defined and required in USNRC Branch Technical Position on An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.
(2)'
(f) is the ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest Control LocaH?ns
-Mean (fl (Range)
None None None None None None None LLD None None None 0.27 (8/8)
(0.12-0.74)
(3)
Station SS not s~lected as the location with the highest average when a true, off site alternative was available.  
~,.. :::-~:] j l.: *:*
eC


I V. CONCLUSIONS Results of the 1983 R~diological Environmental Monitoring. Program for the Surry Nuclear Station have been presented. Generally the fesults were as expected for normal environmental samples. Naturally occurring activity was observed in the expected sample media in the activity ranges.
tl l
--~
Ll
[--:,..
[ __
' L fl. u L...
V.
CONCLUSIONS Results of the 1983 R~diological Environmental Monitoring. Program for the Surry Nuclear Station have been presented.
Generally the fesults were as expected for normal environmental samples.
Naturally occurring activity was observed in the expected sample media in the activity ranges.
One onsite station contained activity of probable plant origin in air particulate samples*and also showed a higher than normal exposure rate.
One onsite station contained activity of probable plant origin in air particulate samples*and also showed a higher than normal exposure rate.
This station is not a true indicator of environmental contamin*ation.
This station is not a true indicator of environmental contamin*ation.
l.,
Occasional samples of nearly all media showed the presence of man-made isotopes. These have been discussed individually in the text. Observed activities were at very lqw concentrations and of no significant dose consequence.
tl
Anomalous TLD readings were observed but there was no basis for concluding that these resulted from any station operations.
--~    Occasional samples of nearly all media showed the presence of man-made isotopes. These have been discussed individually in the text. Observed Ll      activities were at very lqw concentrations and of no significant dose consequence.
Based on the evidence of the environmental monitoring pro~ram the station appears to be operating within regulatory limits.
[--:,.. Anomalous TLD readings were observed but there was no         basis   for
64
[ __    concluding that these resulted from any station operations.
~*
Based on the evidence of the environmental monitoring       pro~ram   the station appears to be operating within regulatory limits.
~
L fl.
l I
u L...
64


                                                                                                                                                                                            )
Z 4BWP.5".,.,, _  
Z 4BWP.5".,.,, _
)
                                                                                      -*:***_ *:**"'*_-": --,.**:~;;'-::*--~-:-~--'.-~.-~r,'"'~-':""'~:A~'"'"""~; ~~
~~
                                                                              .* . :. .                                                          '                                  .              *LI.
*-c.* -* -~--::,.~::* -*:***_ *:**"'*_-": --,.**:~;;'-::*--~-:-~--'.-~.-~r,'"'~-':""'~:A~'"'"""~; ~~  
                                      "'-- ~~
*LI l
                                                            *-c . *  -* -~--::,.~::*
l
[
[
NUS Corporation                                       Domestic Offices
NUS Corporation Domestic Offices International Offices  
* International Offices                                                   .-
-=.:.......,_- *--~=-=-=----'" -===--====...:.-~cc.,====-;==--.---------*--o--=-:. =-*---~-c=~=-==-=~~"C""----i.
                      -=.:.......,_- *--~=-=-=----'" -===--====...:.-~cc.,====-;==--.---------*--o--=-:. =-*---~-c=~=-==-=~~"C""----i                                                                       .
910 Clopper Road Aiken, SC Brazil Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
910 Clopper Road                                       Aiken, SC                                   Brazil                                                                   .......
* Arlington, VA Germany 301/258-6000 Aurora, CO Japan
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
... TWX: 710-828-0540 Chicago, IL Saudi Arabia
* Arlington, VA                               Germany 301/258-6000
* NUSWASH  
                  ... TWX: 710-828-0540 Aurora, CO Chicago, IL                     . , ;-
. Clearwater, FL  
Japan Saudi Arabia                                                           .
* -r, a -
* NUSWASH
*Columbia, SC Gaithersburg, MD Tucker, GA Houston, TX Menlo Park, CA Bedford, MA Edison, NJ
                                                                            . Clearwater, FL
-. '. Wayne, PA.
                                                                              *Columbia, SC t.......l Gaithersburg, MD Tucker, GA Houston, TX Menlo Park, CA
rl:rt 't iP Pittsburgh, PA Portland, OR San Diego, CA Sherman Oaks, CA
.;_.* r *** +* &#xa5; b'
*'**"t ort"&deg;es
*..,* 1*i I
*' -,*.. ; -*flidtct d
t
' l
(!
(!
Bedford, MA Edison, NJ
(i r
                                                                        -. '. Wayne, PA .
Pittsburgh, PA (i
r Portland, OR San Diego, CA Sherman Oaks, CA
[:
[:
L
L  
                                                                                                                                                                                                  ;r*
;r*
                *  -r,  a -                                rl:rt 't '  iP                            .;_.* r ***  +*  &#xa5; b'  *'**"t ort"&deg;es    *.. ,* 1*i I * ' -,*.. ; -*flidtct  d      t  ~ ..,.. '}}
t  
~..,.. '}}

Latest revision as of 20:49, 5 January 2025

Operational Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Annual Rept,1983
ML18142A335
Person / Time
Site: Surry  
Issue date: 01/31/1984
From: Grover J, Robison M
NUS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML18142A334 List:
References
NUS-4503, NUDOCS 8504100625
Download: ML18142A335 (71)


Text

SURRY POWER STATION OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Annua 1 Re port 1983 Prepared for Virginia Electric Power Company by Mary S. Robison January 1984 Environmental Services Division NUS Corpora ti on 5350 Campbells Run Raad Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15~05 Approved: On:M. /1, ~&+:,,1,,/'

7 Joan M. Grover, Manager Radiological Laboratory 8504100625 ~iggg~80

~DR ADOCK PDR NUS - 4503

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Annua 1 Re !=)Ort 1983 Prepared for Virginia Electric Power Company

1--*-* -=* **----**>>*--*--*--* -----~*-*--**~.~-**,-*'.,._,,./-.. :.,i,* --

    • ---**. *0c-,--*-~*... *. -***,*',,..'*.,.*s.......... "'***-*,........ ****-* *.' -----**-*----*--** * **-*-**-**

~ --

Ii<*

f'.'

r l.:!

i i

l.:

r*--

1 I I.*

f ]

I :

I.-*

1~-.

I '

U*..

[

[--~

(

\\

I*,_,

l, j

i l~

I '

Section I.

I I.

I I I.

IV.

V.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Title INTRODUCTION SAMP~ING PROGRAM ANALYTICAL PROGRAM

SUMMARY

AND DISCUSSION OF 1983 ANALYTICAL RESULTS A.

Air Iodine/Air Particulates B.

Milk C.

Pree i pita ti on D.

Water E.

Aquatic Biota F.

Sediment G.

\\-Ja ter Fowl H.

Food Products I. Soi 1 J.

Direct Radiation CONCLUSIONS A~PENDIX A REPORTING OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS APPENDIX B ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES APPENDIX C LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE i

1 3

11 15 15 25 35 35 39 45 45 50 50 54 64

.:-;**----~-

--~-.--

- -- --*-*---*-*~.. --.-**-... 4*0 -*-.. ',...,,,_ * ~0,....s::z**.. :_*-M-~ "*.*.. *_* -~* *; C*-" __.

.:,,-.,24_.. ~.... ~-~-* 0"*4*---"~-.: *.*'--*.. --***-*--. ___ * *""

"--~-* * *-* ', *

.:*..* <* *: *; "* *.:,*. ~h':, :.:.~:,'* ' * *.* "", * * **

-~

lJ

( :

l.. J n

i_. _ _i l ;

~ *..J

\\ __ \\

i i l

'i I

11

\\

l

\\.

I :

r*,

I I

\\....I

[*1 i :

I -~

i i u

. ~I Table 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 LIST OF TABLES Ti _tl e Sampling Program Analytical Program Iodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters Gamma Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters Iodine-131 in Milk

~amma Spectrometry of Milk Calcium in Milk Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk Gross Beta and Tritium in Precipitation Monthly and Quarterly Composites Determination of Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, and Tritium in I-later, Semi-Annual Samples Gamma Spectrometry of River Water Determination of Tritium in Water Semi-Annual Composites Gamma Spectrometry of River Water Monthly Composites Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Water Gamma Spectrometry of Clams and Oysters Gamma Spectrometry of Crabs Gamma Spectrometry of Fish ii 4

12 16 18 21 24 26 28 30 33 36 37 38 40 41 42 43 46 47

..... --~~_:__.:~:~.'~* :_.*

r1

  • L:<

-*~

1 I :

\\*

i*

'. ! i L..;

r**1 I '

l

-:i

,.J u

r*,

j.. ; u L...J Table 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Gamma Gamma LIST OF TABLES (continued)

Title Spectrometry of Sediment Spectrometry of Fowl Gamma Spe_ctrometry of Vegetation Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Gamma Spectrometry of Soil 48 49 51 Vegetation 52 53 Direct Radiation-Thermoluminescent Dosimetry 55 Summary of Data for the Surry NPS Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.- 1983 57

(

iii

~

_,...T

~~

o**'."""

.":* ::~--------~.""?*'...... *,~

0 ~=--~--:-""?.*

~-.-,"'l"'... -.. -. *::---_-~-._;*.;.-

-~---_--.:-_.-. *.*.*.,

-*.::.. :*:.*... ~

r-:

i '

i.'

C

[

t -*

I.

) ;

~-'

r*-:

i ;

l_)

r..

i :

I

.....l

\\.*...

_.:_J Figure 1

2 3

LIST OF FIGURES Title Land Based Sampling Locations River Based Sampling Locations Site Boundary TLD Locations iv 9

10

  • . -***. : '. '.* -* *:...... *,.,.
  • _-.;--**:.,*.. :~-:..- *-.. -.-.,*... -.

. *. :- ' *.* :-:1,-_ -,.<.:

1.*;1 l:\\

f i

~.,,,,

r*-'.

i ;

i ;

l r**-*

I i

I. ;

I..,

\\

I.

INTRODUCTION This document reports on the operational radiological environmental monitoring program conducted during 1983 for the Surry Power Station.

The analytical portion of this program was conducted by NUS Corporation (NUS) under contract to the Virginia Electric Power Company.

This annual report of the radiological environmental monitoring program s*ummari zes

  • the results of measurements and analyses of data obtained from samples collected during the reporting period.

A.

Site and Station Description The Surry Power Station of Virginia Electric Power Company consists of two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors, each with a generating capacity of 788 MHe.

Unit 1 has been in operation since July 1, 1972*,

Unit 2 since March 7,1973.

The station is located on a peninsula in the James River, approximately 25 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay.

Cooling water is taken in downstream of the site and discharged 5.7 miles upstream of the intake.

B.

Objectives and Overview of the Surry Power Station Monitoring Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations (10 CFR 50.34) require thai nuclear power plants be de~igned, constructed, and operated to keep levels of radioactive material in effluents to unrestricted areas as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).

To ensure that these criteria are met, the operating license for Surry Power Station includes Technical* Specifications ~hich govern the release of radi cacti ve effluents

  • In-plant monitoring is used to ensure that these predetermined release limits are not exceeded.

However, as a precaution against unexpected and undefined processes which might allow undue accumulation of radioactivity in any sector of the human environment, a program for monitoring the plant environs is also included.

Various environmenta.l samples are collected at indicator and *control or background 1 oca tions and analyzed to determine if changes *in radioactivity levels may be attributable to the operation of the station.

Measured values are compared with background l~vels.

The background levels at ~ny one location are not const~nt, but vary with.

time due to external events such as cosmic ray bombardment, weapons test fallout, an~ seasonal variations.

These levels also vary spatially within relatively short distances as a reflection of geological composition.

Data collected prior to plant operation are used to indicate the degree of natural variation to be expected.

These preoperational data are compared with data collected during the operational phase to assist in evaluating the radiological impact of plant operation.

1

. ~-. ~.

~

. * *,: __ :~

d l

/

t l

l I __ l r

The objectives of an operational radiological environmental monitoring program are:

o To fulfill the obligations of the Surry Power Station Technical Specifications; o To determine whether any* statistically significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in any critical pa th; o To detect any buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the en vi ronmen t; o To verify that radioactive releases are within allowable limits and that plant operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment; o And, to establish measurement and assessment methods capable of rapid mobilization during unplanned releases and emergencies.

In 1983 the radiological monitoring program included the mea~urement of ambient gamma radiation by thermoluminescent dosimetry; the determination of gross alpha, gross beta, and gamma emitters in air particulates; the measurement of airborne I-131 in charcoal cartridges; the determination of gamma emitters in river bottom sediment,

fish, crabs, clams, and oysters; the measurement of gamma emitters, tritium, and strontium-89 and -90 in river water; the determination of gross a 1 pha and beta. and tritium in we 11
water, surface water; the determination of gross beta and tritium in precipitation; the determination of gamma emitters, iodine-131, calcium and strontium-89 and -90 in milk; the measurement of gamma emitters and strontium-89 and

-90 in food crops; and the determination of gamma emitters in soil and waterfowl.

2

--:.~.. :.-.: **.. :-; __.-

.,.*.-,'... *. *-**...... ----_---*-.. ~*-. ----------* --~--------cc--

I~

  • --:-*--~,- ____ :c.a*::,..c~,...,,,...L,,c_..:.,,,,:-_,;,c"*'.:.,.a'.:,,c::,:,:;*;,~.:i,:;<;,:;;:.\\,>;c f-,,

I ;

( _ _j L:'.

r~-

L.. ;

r-**~

i :

I I I _c

  • II.

SAMPLING PROGRAM Table 1 summarizes the sampling program for Surry Power Station during 1983.

The symbols on this table refer to the sample locations shown on Figures 1 to 3.

Figure 1 shows the locations of land based sampling in the environs of the station, while Figure 2 shows the locations of river based sampling stations.

The small triangles in Figure 3 indicate the positions of environmental thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) at the site boundary.

Samples are collected by VEPCO personnel except for those 1 i sted as state splits, which are collected by the Commonwealth_of Virginia. All samples are shipped to the NUS Radiological Laboratory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

A.

Program Exceptions No air*samples were collected from station FE for the week of 09/06/83-09/14/83 due to pump failure.

No air particulate filter was collected from station SS for the week of 07/26/83-08/02/83.

T~e I-131 analysis on the milk sample from station LEE HALL for the

. month of December was lost due to a broken container.

The milk sample from station WMS for the month of June was lost during ashing in preparation for gamma spectrometry, due to a furnace malfunction.

The stronti.um-89, -90 analysis on this sample was also lost, as well as the strontium-89, -90 analysis on the sample from this station for the month of May.

The milk sample from station JDKs for the month of September was depleted in other analyses and no gamma spectrometry could be

-performed.

Values for five quarterly TLD measurements are not reported. Three were missing at the time of pickup. These were the second quarter TLDs for location 04 and the fourth quarter TLDs for locations 07 and 08.

Two additional fourth quarter TLD locations, 14 and 15, were not recorded as missin~ at the time of pickup, but were not received for analysis by the laboratory.

3

TABLE 1 (Page 1 of 4)

SAMPLING PROGRAM l ;

L,.

Media Collection Frequency Sampling Location

('"

i L__j L

r*1

...__J Air Particulates and Charcoal Cartridges D

Milk Precipitation CV Well Water Surface Water River Water Surry Station (SS)

Hog Island Reserve (HIR)

Bacon's Castle (BC)

A 11 i ance (ALL)

Colonial Parkway (CP)

Dow Chemi ca 1 (DOW)

Fort Eustis (FE)

Newport News (NN)

Lee Hall (Ross) Dairy (LEE HALL)(l)

Epps Dairy (EPPS ) ( 1 )

Colonial. Parkway (Smith) Dairy (CP)

Judkins Dairy (JDKs)

William's Dairy (WMS)

Surry Station (SS)

Newport News (NN)

Surry Sta ti on (SS)

Hog Island Reserve (HIR)

Bacon's Castle (BC)

Jamestown (JMTN)

Chippokes Creek (CC)

Williamsburg, Waller Mill Reservoir Newport News Reservoir (NNR)

Smithfield Reservoir (SR)

Surry Station Intake (SI)

Hog Island Point (HIP)

Newport News (NN)

Chicahominy River (CHIC)

Surry Station Discharge (SD)

Surry Station Discharge (SD)(l)

Scotland Wharf (S. WHARF)(l)

Note: See footnote at end of table.

4

.* ~~----~~-.... ~.

~. '_ : *::__*..

weekly

~onthly monthly and quarterly composites semi-annually semi-annually (WMR) bi-monthly monthly composites

{,*

-.L i *]

l.i r**,

I :

I*-,

\\.._...:

r-~

I.' u I ;

I i '

I '

  • ~*-*,;

Media Sediment (Si.l t)

Clams

© Oysters Crabs Fish (catfish, eel) 0 Fowl Crops (corn, peanuts, soybeans, cabbage)

Soil TABLE 1 (Page 2 of 4)

SAMPLING PROGRAM Sampling Location Chicahominy River (CHIC)

Surry Sta ti on Intake (SI)

Surry Station Discharge (SD)

Hog Island Point (HIP)

Point of Shoals (POS)

Newport News (NN)

Chicahominy River (CHIC)

Surry Station Discharge (SD)

Hog Island Point (HIP)

Jamestown (JMTN)

Lawnes Creek (LC).

Deep Water Shoals (DWS)

Point of S-hoa 1 s (POS)

Newport News (NN)

Surry Station Discharge (SD)

Surry Sta ti on Discharge (SD)

Hog Island Reserve (HIR)

Slade's Farm (Slade's)

Brock's Farm (Brock's)

Carter's Grove Garden (Carter's)

Poole Home Garden (Poole)

Surry Station (SS)

  • Bacon's Castle (BC)

A 11 i ance (ALL)

  • Colonial Parkway (CP)

Dow Chemi ca 1 (DOH)

Fort Eustis (FE)

Note: See footnote at end of tab.le.

5

.**.... ~-

'<.* *-,.-~.

Collection Frequency semi-annually bi-monthly bi-monthly July-August-September semi--annua l ly semi-annually annually annually

.~

I *. u n*

I :

l_

r.

I.

r**~

I I.

LJ I

I I. -

r, I

I L_;

[J r -.

I.

i Media Thermoluminescent Dosimetry 6

TABLE 1 (Page 3 of 4)

SAMPLING PROGRAM Sampling Location Control (CONTROL)

(00)

Surry Station (SS)

(01)

West North West (WNW)

(02)

Station Discharge (SD)

(03)

North North West (NNW)

(04)

Nor th ( N )

( 0 5 )

North North East (NNE)

(06)

North Ea st (NE)

(07)

East North East (ENE)

(08)

East (exclusion) (EE)

(09)

West (W)

(10)

West South West (WSW)

(11)

South West (SW)

(12)

South South West (SSW)

(13)

Sou th ( S )

( 14)

South South East (15)

South East (16)

East (E)

(17)

Sta ti on Intake (SI)

(18)

Hog Island Reserve (HIR)

(19)

Bacon's Castle (BC)

(20)

Route 633 (RT 633)

(21)

Alliance (ALL)

(22)

Surry (SURRY)

(23)

Route 636 & 637 (636/637)

(24)

Scotland Wharf (S.~HARF)

(25)

Jamestown (JMTN)

(26)

Colonial Parkway (CP)

(27)

Route 617 & 618 (617/618)

(28)

Kingsmill (KM)

(29)

Williamsburg (WMBG)

(30)

Kingsmill North (KMN)

(31)

Budweiser (BUD)

(32)

Water Plant (WP)

(33)

Note: See footnote at end of table.

6 Collection Frequency quarterly

_*_.:: :_:* ___._:...:~_.. >:-". ':,~-~- ~ ~-*.. -:..,.;*::_.... *-*.. **--.*
  • a:,
  • i ;

I l L __ J

[

_ _J

[

,.~

i ;

\\_;

j Media Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (continued)

( 1 ) S ta te s p l i t

. TABLE 1 (Page 4 of 4)

SAMPLING PROGRAM Sampling Location Dow (DOW)

Lee Ha 11 (LEE HALL)

Goose Island (GI)

Fort Eustis (FE)

Newport News (NN)

James River Bridge (JRB)

Benn's Church (BENN'S)

Smithfield (SMFD)

Rushmere (RUSHMERE)

Route 628 (RT 628) 7 Collection Frequency (34) quarterly

( 35 )° (36)

(37)

(38)

(39) Control (40) Control (41)

(42)

(43)

r-:-:

f :

l_. __ :

r-;

' I.*

I I ___ ;

r:":"i I

I I

I ** :

n l*.:i r::

I :

L

-1.,

..)

[J f:

L.:

I,

L:~

I

' '.*'. ~.<.:_~.. -

LAND BASED SAMPLES 8

    • - *-*--------~-----*--*----*---

,.------~----,.------.,--....-........---~---"-**,---~-----.~-"--*- *-----------.-*---~-------- ~----------------------- -*-** ---

--..'\\

.,I

\\

J L.

r**

l.1 r**

l ~

r ---~

1 ;

L l __...,

1*

SAMPLES


~-

  • -* --;-**.....,.. *_,-::-;-----:-*~.-=.:.. -* -.. _.--,.* *.:-:~:-~,-~.;-*_--:::-......----:----,----~-----:--*- ----=~*--,,-;~;-~-:::---r---:-:*-:---::---:*:..__~_-;-:--::-.....-.--.--,..--:----

[' :*

r~

i*:+

1....,

r-*-

i !' *,

L __ ;

[

[J i

i i t.

,_j r*,

I :

i L

+

+

10

+

+

Figure 3 SITE BOTJNDRY TLD

-/

+.

  • .** -------~---~.

- ** ---.-**- :' *--~--- -~* ------ *-----*----~-"'--% -~.

    • '*°'*-***-->-*--
  • ' * -* ~-~-*-~~-- ***
  • ....,.* * *,.-....... *~:s:d:*=~-~~- ~~;,,*~*-,.-'<,*..... ~... 4*<**" *. ' * ~ *'-' : -~' *-* * *

. *"_:,,~.-.:,__:_,A_...,_.:___.__..~----*-~~-*

~-

' I,

L *"

lJ 1;

L:

[

r*:

I L..:

~

III.

ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Table 2 1983.

1 i sted.

C.

summarizes the analytical program for Surry Power Station during Sample c*lass, frequency, an<;!

type of analysis performed are The analytical methods used are described in detafl in Appendix Air iodine and air *~articulate samples were collected from seven indicator and one control location on a weekly basis.

Air iodine was collected by drawing air through TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridges.

Air particulates were collected by drawing air though a 47-millimeter diameter glass-fiber filter.

In the laboratory, air par~iculate filters were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta activity, and were composited quarterly for analysis by gamma spectrometry.

Charcoal cartridges were analyzed for iodine-131.

Milk was collected from one control and four indicator locations on a

monthly basis.

Samples from the LEE HALL and EPPS locations were collected by and split with the Commonwealth of Virginia.

All milk samples were analyzed for iodine-131, gamma emitters, stable calcium, and strontium-89 and -90.

Precipitation samples were collected as monthly and quarterly composites from one control and one indicator location.

Gross beta and tritium analyses were performed on both types of composites.

water samples in.eluded well water, surface water and river water.

Well water was sampled from four locations on a semi-annual basis..

Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses were performed on these samples.

Surface water was sampled from four locations on a semi-annual basis.

Gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses were performed on these samples.

Two types of river water samples were collected.

Monthly composites were taken from one control location upstream of the plant and an indicator station at the plant discharge location.

These composite samples were collected by and split with the Commonwealth of Virginia; they were analyzed for gamma emitters and strontium-89 and -90.

Bi-monthly river water samples were also collected from one control and four indicator locations.

These were analyzed by gamma spectrometry on a bi-monthly basis and composited for semi-annual analysis of tritium.

The James River is an estuary near Surry Power exchange of water with Chesapeake Bay occurs.

include silt, crabs, fish, clams and oysters.

Station, and tidal River based samples Crabs were taken from the plant discharge location during July, August and September only.* These samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry.

11

  • - -* --. --- ' *--. *-* *-~

' *. -*..,,~ *..

  • ,*.. __._... _;; *. *--* ; * *:.._: :,. *">*~:.;.':,._,:: :>,* ~.:..;--~-.~~.".:.'.- ****.!,... *** **:*., *.,-.. **,,:*.-. :..... *... *-- :. ~
  • .:. --v*. __.,:.. *;;,~*: __,.'* **.. ____,.. * **-*---'"*-* -~-* *-~--:. -

_*. ;* __ ' *.,* -~- - '. _,..___ '.' : __

I..

n u

,~

I*'

I ~

r I __

[

[-:

_j

[J

[J 1*:

[J r-: l

__ J C

r**

i L..J

[J r*--:

I I ! i I :

D r*-1 L-1 r**:

I

~

i L-i ;

LJ ii,_

Sample Class Air Particulate Air.borne Iodine Thermoluminescent Dosimetry* (TLD)

Milk Precipitation Well water Surface water River water TABLE 2 (Page 1 of 2)

ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Frequency weekly quarterly composite weekly quarterly monthly monthly

  • quarterly composite semi-annually semi-annually bi-monthly semi-annual composite monthly composite 12 Type of Analysis Gross alpha and beta Gamma spectrometry Iodine-131 Radiation dose Iodine-131 Gamma spectrometry Strontium-89, -90 Stable calcium Gross beta Tritium Gross beta Tritium Gross alpha and beta Tritium Gross alpha and beta Tritium Gamma spectrometry Tritium Gamma spectrometry Strontium-89, -90
  • --*-----.*--.,*-:-~-----..

.._-------.-----.. *... *-..-...--*-'"<*--,--.--,.., __.-_.* ~. --

-~-...... _ ---.*-.--.. ---..-.--:c*****--.*.;--... ~-

  • ~:c---r-...... -~-.----*-.*

.----;--......,-~*7'"".

r~

[J f'

I i I' i r~

I I.

i._ __ *

[J I)

LJ D

r-1 LJ i.;

I L..J r --~

r.

r *l r'

' ' I

__J Sample Class Silt Clams and Oysters Crabs Fish Fowl Crops Soil TABLE 2 (Page 2 of 2)

ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Frequency semi-annually bi-monthly three summer months semi-annually annually annually annually 13 Type of Analysis Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Strontium-89, -90 Gamma spectrometry

~-

t.)

r-;.

.1 l.;

_:J r,

1*,;

(.. ~.;

~'*.*.

l '

LJ ll U*

[1 lJ Two kinds of fish, eel and catfish, were collected semi-annually from the*plant discharge location for analysis by gamma spectrometry.

Clams were collected bi-monthly from one control and four indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.

Oysters were also collected bi-monthly from three indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.

River bottom silt (sediment) was collected semi-annually from one control and four indicator locations for analysis by gamma spectrometry.

One waterfowl sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry.

Seven samples of food crops were collected during 1983 for analysis of gamma emitters and strontium-89 and -90.

These included cabbage, kale, corn, peanuts, and soybeans from four indicator locations.

Annual samples of soil were taken from six indicator locations near air samplers and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to determine the direct (ambient) radiation levels at monitoring points.

For routine TLD measurements, a dosimeter of CaS04:oy*in a Teflon card wai deployed at each selected location. Dosimeters were exchanged on a quarterly basis.

Additional sets of dosimeters were shipped with each exchange cycle to serve as in-transit controls.

For routine exchanges, TLDs were shipped by Federal Express.

Individual dosimeters were calibrated by exposure to an accurately known radiation field from a calibrated Cs-137 source.

14

  • . *._::-;--.....,"".... *.*.. -~. *.. :. c-.-.

. --..:--...... _.*--...,... *.-.. ~-.- -.* '72...... --.* -_.......... ~.--::-.._,_.

.* - *.*, '*Sc~... **

'*. *-~- * *.*.*.*, __,.:.__ __,._:._ ___,.o.i"'---**~---~ *.. :,.-=.C.O.o,c:-'--'*"**.,_;__,,,"",*'*"-'-*~COC"'-"'--"--'-"':*,*~--*':

n I i r :

1*:J

[-l

'°'

I.

I I

n I i i

L.~

r*~,

I i

I i

L 1*:

[J r*-,

i r*r-,

I i.

LJ IV.

SUMMARY

AND DISCUSSION OF 1983 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Data from the radiological analyses of environmental media collected during the report period are tabulated a~d discussed below.

The procedures and specifications followed in the laboratory for these analyses are as required in Section 5.0 of the NUS Environmental Services Division Quality Assurance Manual, and are detailed in the NUS Radiological Laboratory Work Instructions.

Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approach and frequently fall below the detection limits of state-of-the-art measurement methods.

(1) The use of 11LT 11 in the data tab-les is the equivalent of the less than symbol (<) and is consistent with the NUS Radiological Laboratory practice of data reporting.

The number following the 11 LT 11 is a result of the lower limit of detection (LLD) calculation as defined in Appendix B.

11 ND 11 (Not Detected) is used periodically in the tables presenting gamma analysis results for various media.

It primarily appears under the "Others" column, where it indicates that no other detectable gamma emitting nuclides were identified.

NUS analytical methods meet the LLD requirements addressed,

in Table 2 of the USNRC. Branch Technical Position of Radiological Monitoring (November 1979, Revision 1).

(2)

Tables 3 through 25 give the radioanalytical results for individual samples. A statistical summary of the results appears in Table 26.

The reported averages are based only on concentrations above the limit of detection.

In Table 26, the fraction (f) of the total number of analyses which were detectable follows in parentheses.

Also given in parentheses are the minimum and maximum values of detectable activity during the report period.

A.

Air Iodine/Air Particulates Results of airborne iodine-131 analyses on charcoal* cartridges are presented in Table 3.

I-131 was not detected in any of the samples.

Results of gross alpha and gross beta analyses on air particulate filters are given in Tables 4 and 5. 3 The mean gross alpha activity for all stations was 3.8 + 2.6 E-03 pCi/~ and the range of gross alpha activity was 1.2 to 20 E-03 pCi/m 3 T~e mean gross beta activity for a 11 stations was 16 + 19 E-03 p~i /m and the* range of gross beta activity was 3.2 to 78 E-03 pCi/m.

Air filters were composited quarterly and then analyzed by gamma spectrometry.

The gamma spectrometry data is presented in Table 6.

Cosmogenic beryllium-7 was detected in 2~ of 32 samples.

The range of Be-7 activity *was 32 to 110 E-03 pCi/m.

Three samples for v1hich LLDs were measured also fell within this range.

Cesium-134 and cesium-137 were found in the first and second quarterly composites from Surry Station (SS).

Both isotopes may be the result of plant effluents.* This station is located within the plant boundary and is not an environmental location.

Cesium-137 was also detected at one environmental location in th~

third quarter.

This isotope is occasionally found in air particulate composites and is considered to be a result of atmospheric weapons testing and global fallout.

15


----.-- -~------------.------~-,,-- -- *,7-- --~-,--- --- - ----.----,""----~..-----"... -.*,--------... -,--

  • I

.j I

,]

,*1 i

.1*

j

  • 1

.*I. l l Ii j

'-j i'!)

.I I

,:1

  • 1

)

/

i

'.*,)

I "i

)

I j

  • I
  • i

.'i I ' *;

i

  • 1.

~

':i

,.I l

'.i

J i

,'j

  • l I
  • .i
  • i
  • ' j

.J J I 1

J 1

I I

1 l r

Honth January February March April May June July Collection Period 12/28/82 01/04/83 01/12/83 01/18/83 01/25/83 02/02/83 02/08/63 02/15/63 02/22/63 03/02/83 03/10/63 03/16/llJ 03/2 3/03 03/30/83 01, /06 /83 04/12/83 04/19/83 04 /26/83 05/0.1/IJ) 05/10/63 05/17/63 05/24/83 06/01/63 06/06/63 06/14/83 06/22/13) 06/26/83 07/06/83 07 /1 )/63

.07/19/83 07 /26/83 to 01/04/83 to 01/12/83 to 01/18/83 to 01/25/83 to 02/02/63 to 02/08/83 to 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 to 03/02/63 to 03/10/83 to 03/16/83 to 03/23/83 to 03/30/63 to 04/06/83 to 04/12/83 to 04/19/83 to 04/26/83

  • to 05/03/83 to 05/10/83 to 05/17/83 to 05/24/83 to 06/01/83 to 06/08/83 to 06/14/63 to 06/22/83 to 06/28/83 to 07 /06/83 to 07 /13/83 to 07/19/83 to 07 /26/83 to 08/02/83 Note: See footnote at end of ta~le.

ss LT 0.02(1)

LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.016 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.018 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.018 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.06 r--*

L.

IIIR LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.015 LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 I.T 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.07 L.... -._J TABLE 3

(Page 1 of 2) r.. ------,

I L -..._j

.~.--1 L~.a.J Iodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/m3

+/-_ *2s)

BC ALL LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.015

  • LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT* 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.07 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.07 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT
  • 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05.

LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.07 LT 0.04 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.07 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.03 LT p.07 LT 0.05 CP LT 0.019 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.017 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.019 LT 0.02 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.018 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 DOW LT 0.018 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.017 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0.019 LT 0,03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0,03 LT 0.019 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.017 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.07 FE LT 0.02

'LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.018 LT 0,02 LT 0,02 LT 0.018 LT 0.02 LT 0.03

.LT 0.03 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0,018 LT 0.03 I.T 0,02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.06 LT 0.05

-1 NN LT 0,02 LT 0,04 LT 0.02 LT 0.019 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0,04 LT 0,03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0,03 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 LT 0,04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 J,T 0.03 LT 0.07 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0,03 LT 0,06 LT 0,05

,.. i-L*

1.*

1-.*

  • ,.:.]

.J

    • .I., j.

j

.*l.,

i

  • I i l
l i
  • I i i l l j
  • I I*
  • 1
  • j:

1 *.,.., r-*. 1 Month Collect Lon PP.rlod ss August Ofl/02/111 to 06/09/63 LT 0.04 06/09/83 to 08/17 /fl1 LT 0.017 08/17 /83 to 08/23/83 LT 0.03 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 LT 0.03 September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83 LT 0.03 09/06/83 to 09/14/83 LT 0.04 09/14/83 to 09/20/83 LT 0.06 09/20/83 to 09/27 /83 LT 0.05 09/2 7 /83 to 09/27 /83(3)

I.T 0.04 October 09 /2 7 /8 3 to 10/04/83 LT 0.05 1 0/01, /8 3 to 10/11/83 LT 0.04 10/11/83 to 10/18/ll.1 LT 0.03 10/18/83 to 10/26/83 LT 0.04 November 10/26/83 to 11/01/83 LT 0.06 11/01/83 to 11/08/83 LT 0.03 ll/08/83 to 11/15/83 LT 0.03 l l/15/83 to 11 /22/83 LT 0.03 11/22/83 to 11/29/83 LT 0.02 December 11/29/83 to 12/07 /83 LT 0.03 12/07 /83 to l 2/L 3/83 LT 0.05 12/l3/83 to 12/20/83 LT 0.05 12/20/83 to 12/28/83 LT 0.06 l2/28/83 to Ol/03/84 LT 0.04 (1)

LT

~ Lese Than (2)

Sample missing due to failed sample pump *

(3)

One-day sample collected as part of effluent r-:--.

t........ I 1-*-.~
1. __ *.,:...*.* J TAHU:

.'3 (Page 2 of 2) lod!ne-131 in Charcoal VEPCO REMP -

(Results in pCl/ra)

Cartridges 1983

+ 2e)

IIIR nc ALL LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 l,T LT 0.03 LT 0.03

'LT 0.03 LT LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 1,T 0.04 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT LT O.OJ LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT LT 0.02 LT O.OJ l,T 0.03 LT l,T 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT LT o.os LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT I.T 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT release monltorlng program.

r..,.--,

1..- ~--..... _* ** J 1::--1

.... ~.~-. -

  • I t

CP DOW FE NN 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.03 LT 0,03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 0.04 LT 0.05 (2)

LT 0.05 0.06 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.07 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 1,T 0.05 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.06 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT o.04 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.07.

LT 0.03 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 0.06 1.T 0.07 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 0.05 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 LT 0.06

I l*i I I I

I I

1 I j

Ii

.1 J

  • 1 i
  • 1
    • /.,

'i

'J

i *;
.1 j

'.j

.I ii 1i 1!

' t

,i l'.l

'I j

.J;

.i I I l i

I I j

J

  • ,1 1

l j

l J

I I

-! l l t

I.

"i'.

le... :;

~

OJ

[". -*.

Month Collection Period ss IIIR January 12/28/82 to 01/04/83 LT 1.50)

LT 1.8 01/04/83 to Ol/12/83 LT 1.8 LT 2 01/12/83 to 01/18/83 LT 3 LT 3 01/18/83 to 01/25/83 3.1 + 2.1 2.3 + 2.1 01/25/83 to 02/02/83 2,4 + 1.6 LT 1.5 February 02/02/8) to 02/08/83 LT 1.3 2,1 + 1.8 02/08/83 to 02/15/83 1.4 + 1.3 2.9 + 2.0 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 LT 1.9 LT 2 02/22/83 to 03/02/83 1.5 + 1.5 2.3 + 2.0 March 0)/02/83 to 03/10/83 3.0 +*1.0 2.1 + 1.7 03/10/8) to 03/16/83 15 + 5 9.5 + 4.1 0)/16/63 to 03/23/63 LT 1.5 LT l. 7 03/2)/83 to 03/30/83 1.9 + 1.6 LT l.7 April 03/30/83 to 04/06/63 5.6 + 2.5 3.2 + 2.1 04/06/83 to 04/12/83 l.T 2 l.T 3 04/12/63 to 04/19/83 4.1 + 2.2 J.T 1. 7 04 /19/83 to 04/26/83 LT 2 LT 3 04/26/83 to 05/0)/83 2.4 + 1.7 3.7 + 2.1 Note: See footnote at end of table.

(.

'-..._ Table 4 (Pagel of

~1 L~*...,_:I

3) c----,

I **- ~-

.J Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO REHP - 1983

'(Results in E-03 pCi/m3 + 2s)

BC ALL CP DOW LT 1.8 LT 3 LT 1.9 LT 1.7 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 l,T 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 3.1 + 2.6 LT 2 LT 4 LT 3 J.T 3 LT 1.5 LT 2 2.1 + 1.8 LT 1.7 q 1.4 3.5 + 2.6 LT 1.6 LT 1.6 1.5 + 1.5 LT 2 LT 1.4 LT 1.3 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 I.T 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 I.T 1.5 LT 2 2.7 + 2.0 LT 1.6 19 + 5 l2 + 6 1.8 + 1.4 17 + 5 1.T l. 7 LT 3 LT 2 LT 1.8 LT 1.7 LT 3 LT 2 LT 1.9 4.1 + 2.3 l.T 3 l.T 2 4.3+2.5-LT 3 3.0 + 2.2 LT 3 LT 3 2.7..+ 1..8 l.T 3 LT 1.4 LT 1.9 LT 3 2.0 + 2.0 LT 1.9 LT 3 1.8 + 1;6 2,6 + 2.0 2.1 + 1.5 2.8 + 2.1

,-*-:--*1

\\......*... I AVERAGE FE NN

+ 2s LT 2 LT 2 2.0 + 0.9.

J.T 2 LT 2 2,1 + 0.7 LT 3 LT 3 3.1 + 0.7 J.T 2 3.0 + 2.5 2.8 + 1.3 LT 1,7 2.0 + 1,9 1,9 + 0.6 LT 1,6 LT 1. 7 1.9 + 1,4 1.7+1.6 LT 1.4.

1.7 + 1.1 LT 2 2,3 + 2.2 2.2 + 0.7 LT 2 LT 3 2.2 + 1.1 3.9 + 2.3 3.1 + 2.2 2.5 + 1.7 12 + 5 11 + 5 12 + 11 LT 2 LT 2 2.0 + 0.9 LT 2 LT 2 2.0 + 0.8

  • 3.1 + 2.3 LT 2 3.4 + 2.4 r.T 3 4.9 + 3.1 3.1 + 1.6 LT 2 LT 2 2.3 + 1.7 LT 3 LT 3 2.6 + 1.1 3.4 + 2.2 LT 1,5 2.5 + 1.5

j I :..,

r-*-*-**

1,:.. l Table 4 (Page 2 of 3)

Grose Alpha on Air Pert!culate Filters VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results 3

In E-03 pCi/m :!:. 2e)

AVERAGE Month Collection Period ss l!IR BC ALL CP DOW.

FE NN

+ 2e May 05/03/83 to 05/10/83 I.T 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 I.T 1.8 LT 3

,LT. 3 "*

LT 3 2.7 + 1.0 05/10/83 to 05/17/83 3.7 + 2.2 J.T l.3 LT l.3 LT 3 LT l.~

3.8 + 2.3 LT 1.4 LT 1.5 2.2 + 2.2 05/17/81 to 05/24/83 1.8 + 1.6 2.2 + 1.9 LT 1.8 LT 4 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 2.2 :!:_ 1.* 5 05/24 /83 to 06/01/83 2.3 + 1.6 LT 1.6 t.T 1.6 LT 2 LT 1.9 LT 1.9 2.2 + 1.9 LT 1.8 1.9 + 0.5 June 06/01/83 to 06/08/83 2.4 + 2.2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 4.0 + 2.9 LT 3 3.2 + 1.1 06/08/83 to 06/14/83 2.4 + 1.9 LT 2 3.1 + 2.2 4.1 + 3.2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 2.5 + 1.5 06/14/83 to 06/22/83 5.4 + 2.3 2.8 + 1.8 3.7 + 2.0 5.4 + 3.1 4.9 + 2.5 6.3 + 2.7 4.3 + 2.3 4.4 + 2.3 4.7 + 2.2 I-'

06/22/83 to 06/28/83 1.7 + 1.6 2.6 + 2.1 2.0 + 1.8 LT 3 LT 3 20 + 4 3.3 + 2.4 3.0 + 2.3 5 + 12 I.O 06/28/83 to 07/06/83 LT 2 LT 2*

LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 2.5 + 1.1 July 07 /06/83 to 07/13/83 2.2 + 1.6 2.0 + 1.7 2.2 + 1.8 5.2 + 3.4 LT 2 2.8 + 2.0 LT 2 3.5 + 2.3 2.7 + 2.3 07/13/83 to 07/19/83 2.6 + 2.4 3.0 + 2.6 3.1 + 2.5 4.8 + 3.9 LT 3 4.8 + 3.2 3.5 + 3.0 4.2 + 3.1 3.6 + 1.7 07 /19/83 to 07 /26/83 2.2 + 1.7 2.7 + 2.1 4.6 + 2.5 5.9 + 3.4 3.0 + 2.4 5.3 + 2.8 4.5 + 2.7 6.5 + 3.2 4.3 + 3.1 07 /26/83 to 08/02/83 NS(4) 5.5 + 3.0 6.8 + 3.1 LT 3 3.3 + 2.6 LT 2 LT 3 3.6 + 2.7 3.9 + 3.3 August 08/02/83 to 08/09/83 2.6 + 1.9 7.3 + 3.3 2.7 + 2.2 3.2 + 2.6 3.6 + 2.7 2.2 + 2.2 5.2 + 3.1 4.1, + 3.0 3.9 + 3.4 08/09/83 to 08/17 /83 3.3 + 1.9 3.3 + 2.3 3.2 + 2.2 2.8 + 2.2 6.2 + 3.0 3.7 + 2.3 3.3 + 2.3 7.2 + 3.3 4.1 + 3.3 08/17/83 to 08/23/83 7.1 + 3.4 7.8 + 3.7 10 + 4 5.8 + 3.4 9.4 + 4.4 LT 3 6.0 + 3.5 9.9+4.5 7.* 4 + 4.8 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 6.1 + 3.0 2.9 + 2.3 5.7 + 2.9 3.9 + 2.6 3.6 + 2.7 2.7 + 2.7 4.1 + 2.8 3.3 + 2.6 4.0 + 2.5 Note: See footnote at end of table.

i 1 i i l r l I

I.

I I.

I r j;

I. -*.*-

I.,

l'v 0

i. *. -*---

Month Collection Period September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83 09/06/83 to 09/14/83 r-, -.--.

I.... *.*

ss 3.3 + 2.3 3.4 + 2.1 09/14/83 to 09/20/i3 2.1 + 2.1 09/20/63 to 09/27/83 LT 3 09/27/83 to 09/27/83(3) 1.7 + 1.2

  • October 09/27/83 to 10/04/83 10/01,/83 to 10/11/83 10/11/83 to 10/18/83 10/18/83 to 10/26/83 10/26/83 to 11/04/63 November 11/01/83 to 11/08/83 11/08/83 to 11/15/83 11/15/83 to 11/22/83 11/22/83 to 11/29/83 December 11/29/83 to 12/07/83 12/07/83 to 12/13/83 12/13/83 to 12/20/83 12/20/83 to 12/28/83 12/28/fll to 01/03/84 AVERAGE

+ 2s LT 3 1.5 + 1.4 2.3+1.7 LT 1.3 2.4 + 1.4 1.7 + 1.2 2.8 + 1.6 2.0 + 1.2.

3.3 + 1.4 3.1 + 1.5 5.6 + 2.4 3.1 + 1.3 2.7 + 1.3 4.9 + 2.1 3.0 + 4.3 r.----...

I L,. *****

,)

IIIR 3.2 + 2.4 5.2 + 2.6 LT 3 LT 2 2.6 + 2.5 LT 2 1.7+1.6 LT 1.5 LT 1.2 2.1 + 1..3 1.7 + 1.4 LT 1.2 3.3 + 1.6 2.8 + l.6 4.3 + 2.1 4.2 + 1.5 2.8 + 1.3 3.0 + 1.9 2.9 + 3.2

.---~

l.

..... J Table 4 (Page 3 of 3)

~:.J Gross Alpha on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO kEHr - 1933 3

(ilesulte in E-03 pCi/m

!:_ 2s)

IIC 5.4 + 2.8 4.2 + 2.3 5.0 + 3.0 4.1 + 2.5 J.l + 2.6 1.7+1.5 1.5 + 1.4 LT 1.4 2.2 + 1.3 2.3 + 1.3 LT 2 1.9 + l.2 4.2 + 1.7

].l + 1.6 1.9 + 1.8 2.7 + 1.3 1.5 + 1.2 2.7 + 1.8 3.1 + 5.5

ALI, 2.7 + 2.3 LT 2 2.9 + 2.3 2.8 + 2.1 2.8 + 2.3 1.7+1.4 1.9 + 1.6 LT 1.4 2.4 + 1.4 1.9 + 1.2 2.5 + 1.5 1.2 + 1.1

,,.6 + 1.8 5.3 + 1.8 4.5 + 2.1 3.2 + 1.4 2.6 + 1.3 5.1 + 2.2 3.3 + 3.3 CP 5.1 + 3.1 1.9 + 1.8 2.9 + 2.5 6.1 + 2.9 3.1 + 2.6 LT 2 LT 1.2 LT 1.4 1.6 + 1.3 DOW 5.2 + 2.9 LT 2 3.7 + 2.9 1.6 + 1.5 2.8 + 2.8 LT 3 1.5 + 1.5 LT 1.5 2.1 + 1.5 2.4 :!:_ 1.4.

2.4 + 1.5 LT 2 1.8 + 1.6 1.6 + 1.2 1.4 + 1.1 4.2 + 1.7 3.5.+ 1.7 4.0 + 1.8

~.o + 2.5 4.1 + 1.6 3.6 + 1.5 4.2 + 2.2 2.9 + 3.0 3.-9 + 2.0 5.4 + 2.2 4.7 + 1.8 2.9 + 1.5 5.1 :I-2.5 3.4 + 6.5 FE LT 3 (2}

LT 3 2.5 + 1.4 LT 3 LT 2 1.9 + 1.7 LT l,3 LT 1,1 2.0 + 1.2 4.3 +. 1.7 1.2 + 1.0 2.3 + 1.3 2.3 + 1.4 4.8 + 2.5 2.5 + 1.2 3.3 + 1.4 4.3 + 2.0 3.0 + 3.4 (1) J.T - Less Thnn. The nctual I.LO values are included in the averages and standard deviations shown on this tahle.

(2) Sample missing due to failed sample pump.

(3) One-day sample collecte~ oe part of effluent release monitoring program.

(4) NS -

No sample received.

NN 4.2 + 2.8 4.7 + 2.7 LT 3 1.11 + 1.5 LT 3 LT 2 2.8 + 2.1 LT 1.6 2.8 + 1.6 3.2 + 1.7 3.8 + 1.9 2.8 + 1.6 4.3 + 1.9 LT 1.9 4.1 + 2.2 4.5 + 1.7 3.8 + 1.6 3.6 + 2.2 3.3 + 3.7 AVERAGE

+ 2e 4.0 + 2;2 3.3 + 2.8 3.2 + 1.7 3.0 + 3.0 2.9 + 0.4 2.0 + 0.9 1.9 + 1.0 1.4 + 0.2 2.0 + 1.2 2.3 + 0.9 2.6 + 1.9 1.7 + 1.1 3.7 + 1.5 3.3 + 2,.2 4.5 + 2.3 3.6 + 1.7 2.9 + 1.4 4.1 + 1.9

[ ~- *--:

r--1

'*., ___ j Table 5 (Page 1 of 3)

Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters VEl'CO REHP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pC1/m3.:!: Zs)

Month Collection Period ss llIR BC Al.I, CP January 12/28/62 to Ol/04/83 16 + 5 14 + 5 17 + 5 9.8 + 6.9 10 + 5 01/04/83 to 01/12/83 21 + 4 11 + 4 14 + 5 7.4 + 5.8 12 + 5 01/12/83 to oi/18/8'3 7.6 + 4.7 6.5 + 5,1 l,T fl l,T 7 l,T 9 01/18/ll.l to fl l /2 5/83 19 + 5 4.8 + 4.1 ll + 5 LT 10 LT 7 Ol /2 5/8) to 02/02/fl J 19 + 5 14 + 5 13 + 5 7.5 + 6.2 13 + 5 February 02/02/83 to 02/08/83 LT 7 6.9 + 5.2

. LT 8 LT 10 LT 9

\\,)

02/08/83 to 02/15/83 25 + 4 28 + 5 19 + 4 26 + 6 21 + 4 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 19 + 5 16 + 5 14 + 5 LT 8 11 + 5 02/22/83 to 03/02/83 15 + 4 5.0 + 4.2 8.1 + 4.2 5.6 + 4.6 7.3 + 6.4 Harch 03/02/83 to 03/10/83 11 + 4 6.9 + 4.3 7.5 + 4.2 LT 9 LT 7 03/10/83 to 03/16/83 28 + 7 15 + 6 22 + 7 23 + 10 LT 8 03/16/83 to 0)/23/83 26 + 6 LT 8 LT 7 LT 8 LT 9 03/2 3/63 to 03/30/83 11 + 5 LT 8 8.1 + 5*.2 LT 8 Iii + 7 April 03/30/83 to 04/06/83 78 + 8 9.7 + 5.1 7.7 + 4.8 LT 8 LT 8 Olo/06/83 to 04/12/83 LT 7 LT 8 LT 8 LT 10 LT 10 04/12/8) to 04/19/83 29 + 6 4.8 + 4.5 4.6 + 4.4 J.T 10 l,T 6 04/19/83 to 04/26/83 11 + 5 8.3 + 5.1 9.9 + 5.0 7.8 + 5.2 LT 6 04/26/83 to 05/03/83 22 + 5 23 + 6 16 + 5 13 + 5 18 + 5 NOTE:

See footnotes on last page of table DOW LT 7(1) 15 + 5 9.1 + 5.4 8.3 + 4.7 12 + 5 LT 9 24 + 5 11 + 5 8.6 + 4.8 LT 7 29 + 8 LT 8 LT 8 LT 8 LT 9 LT 8 14 + 6 13 + 6

-----i I
i. _____..... J FE NN 13 + 6 17 + 6 12 + 5 13 + 5 LT 9 9.1 + 5.9 5.2 :!:. 4.8 LT 7 13 + 5 13 + 6 LT 9 LT 9 25 + 5 21 + 5 16 + 6 10 + 6 LT 7 8.0 + 5.4 8.3 + 4.9 7.8 + 5.2 16 + 7 19 + 7 LT 9 LT 9 LT 9 6.7 + 5.7 7.0 + 5.6 12 + 6 LT 9 23 + 7 LT 8 LT 9 LT 8 11 + 6 19 + 6 20 + 6 AVERAGE

+ 2s 13 + 7 13 + 8 8.2 + 2.1 9.0 + 9.1 13 + 6 8.5 + 2.2 24 + 6 13 + 7 8.1 + 6.1 8.1 + 2.8 20 + 14 11 + 13 9.4 + 5.9 17 + 1,9 11 + 10

  • 9.9 + 16 9.5 + 5.0 18 + 8

j j

l

1 I j i
j

,,\\

I I j

.i

'i I

.I j

r

~

i l* I I

I I

I i ! }

l

~

ll*

J

-1 i

'l l '

1 I

l l

1 l l I I,

j

/1 c* -

Month May June July August NOTE:

r--

1 r:-=:i Collection Period 05/03/83 to 05/10/83 05/10/83 to 05/17 /83 05/17/83 to 05/24/83 05/24/83 to 06/01/83 ss 34 + 6 25 :!: 5 53 + 6 42 + 6 r*-_.1

      • --~-**'"-*'

r

.... --~-............. r r-~

-..... ~_)

Table 5 (Page 2 of 3)

Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filtera VEPCO KliMP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pCi/m3 :!: 2s) urn BC ALL 10 + 5 13 + 5 LT 9 8.4 + 5.1 7.4 + 4.9 LT 10 l

CP LT 7 LT 8 9.2 + 5.0 11 + 5 5.3 + 5.2 6.8 + 5.7 LT 7 6.5 + 4.6 LT 8 LT 9 06/01/83 to 06/08/83 9.4 + 4.8 8.9 + 5.6 6.9 + 5.2 I.T 8 LT 9 06/08/83 to 06/14/83 45 + 7 16 + 6 15 + 6 7.6 + 6.5 18 + 7 06/14/83 to 06/22/83 39 + 6 16 + 5 22 + 5 12 + 7 18 + 6 06/22/83 to 06/28/83 14 + 6 LT 10 9.9 + 6.3 LT 9 9.9 + 5.1 06/28/83 to 07/06/83 12 + 4 11 + 5 11 + 5 LT 8 6.2 + 5.4 07 /06/83 to 0?/13/83 18 + 5 10 + 5 12 + 5 14 + 7 13 + 6 07/13/83 to 07/19/83

'43 + 8 27 + 7 23 + 7 14 + 9 27 + 9 07/19/83 to 07 /26/83 35 + 6 24 + 6 18 + 6 12 + 7 17 + 7 07 /26/83 to 08/02/83 NS(4)

LT 8 11 + 5 9.1 + 6.0 11 + 6 08/02/83 to 08/09/83 11 + 5 19 + 6 9.3 + 5.1 LT 9 14 + 6 08/09/83 to 08/17/83 30 + 5 9.3 + 5.2 21 + 5 14 + 6 15 + 6 08/17 /83 to 08/23/83 39 + 8 40 + 8 33 + 7 22 + 7 42 + 9 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 22 + 6 16 + 6 19 + 6 7.6 + 5."5 15 + 6 See footnotes on last page of table AVERAGE 1)0\\,/

l'g NN

+ 2s 8.1 + 5.6 5.8 + 5.5 9.3 + 5.7 12 + 18.

33 + 7 11 + 6 LT 8 14 + 19 14 + 6 7.4 + 5.3 9.3 :!: 5.5 15 + 32 LT 9 LT 8 7.1 + 5.4 12 + 24 LT 9 LT 9 8.5 + 6.0 8.6 + 1.6 LT 10 14 + 7 17 + 7 18 + 23 23 + 6 25 + 6 17 + 5 22 + 16 63 + 7 72 + 10 12 + 5 25 + 53 8.4 + 4.9 LT 8 9.5 + 5.3 9.3 + 3.9 18 +*6 14 + 6 17 + 6 15 + 5.9 21 + 8 37 + 9 30 + 8 28 + 18 16 + 6 20 + 7 13 + 6 19 + 15 LT 8 LT 9 11 + 6 9.6 + 2.8 9.8 + 5.8 13 + 6 6.3 + 6.1 l1 + 8 15 + 5 15 + 5 12 + 6 16 + 13.

LT 9 39 + 9 40 + 9 33 + 23 13 + 6 18 + 6 17 + 6 16 + 9

ii

,I i

i r

'j t

I

  • 1 J l

/

I j.

I

  • ,{ r l j
.J'

'11:

11

.1.

l 1,.

If

,1 !j.

A j.

J j

I

.j

! i J.

j '

J '

I 1 J j

I q

\\'

).

I.

.I.

I.

i I j

' l I

I, ij :*

):

l' r---

[. -*--..

r----:-1

... __.. ~-*..,

Table 5 (Page J of. 3)

Gross Beta on Air Particulate Filters VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in E-03 pCi/mJ :!:. 2s) t..

Month Collection Period SS September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83 22 + 6 09/06/83 to 09/14/83 17 + 5 09/14/83 to 09/20/83 22 + 6 09/20/83 to 09/27 /83 LT 8 09/27/83 to 09/27/03(3) 12 + 3 October 09/27/83 to 10/04/83 10/04/83 to 10/11/83 10/11/83 to 10/18/83 10/18/83 to 10/26/83 10/26/83 to 11/04/83 November 11/01/83 to 11/08/83 11/08/83 to 11/15/83 11/15/83 to 11/22/83 11/22/83 to 11/29/83 December 11/29/8*3 to 12/07 /83 12/07/83 to 12/i1/IIJ 12/13/83 to 12/20/83 12/20/83 to 12/28/1!3 12/23/83 to 01/03/84 AVERAGE

+ Zs 19 + 6 19 + 5 27 + 5 11 + 3 7.5 + 3.8 10 + 3 15 + 4 14 +,,

24 + 4 14 + 3 15 + 4 22 + 3 17 + 3 19 + 4 22 + 27 lllR 19 + 6 23 + 5 19 + 7 15 + 6 21 + 6 9,7 + 4.1 12 + 4 3.2 + 3.0 5.1 + 3.8 7.6 + 3.4 11 + 4 3.5 + 3.1 19 + 4 8.6 + 2.9 8.1 + 3.7 19 + 3 14 + 3 17 + 4 13 + 1/,

IIC 17 + 6 30 + 6 18 + 7 14 + 5 19 + 6 12 + 4 8.6 + 3.4 3.8 + 2.8 LT 6 3.7 + 3.1 LT 5 LT 5 11 + 4 LT 4 4.0 + 3.6 11 + 3 3.4 + 2.7 4.7 + J.7 12 + 13 ALL 11 + 6 LT 6 15 + 6 14 + 5 18 + 5 11 + 4 16 + 4 LT 4 6.4 + 3.9 9.9 + 3.4 8.8 + 3.3 5.2 + 3.3 19 + 4 11 + 3 8.5 + 3.7 19 + 3 12 + 3 13 + 4 11 + 9 CP 15 + 7 17 + 5 16 + 6 20 + 6 19 + 6 15 + 4 16 + 4 LT 5 J.T 6 5.9 + 3.4 LT 6 5.4 + 3.5 20 + 4 8.7 + 3.0 9.1 + 4.4 20 + 4 14 + 3 19 + 5 13 + 13 DOW 14 + 6 LT 7 15 + 7 12 + 4 19 + 7 12 + 5 15 + 4 LT 5 J.T 7 7.5 + 3.8 10 + 4 7.8 + 3.4 19 + 4 12 + 4 13 + 4 43 + 5 15 + 4 13 + 5 14 + 20 FE 19 + 6 (2) 19 + 6 13 + 4 17 + 5 13 + 4 23 + 5 LT 4 J.T 6 9.3 + 3.2 9.0 +-3.3 3.8 + 3.1 16 + 3 7.2 + 2,6 16 + 5 16 + J 16 + 3 18 + 4 14 + 22 (l) LT - Lees Than.

The nc1.w1l I.Lil vulues are included in the averages and standard deviations shown on this table, (2) Sample mfsslng due to failed sample pump.

(3) One-day sample collected as part of effluent release monitoring program.

(I,) No sample received NN 10 + 6 38 + 7 23 + 8 15 + 4 20 + 6 16 + 5 21 + 5 LT 5 r.T 6 11 + 4 9.5 + 4.1 12 + 4 19 + 4 LT 4 7.4 + 4.0 22 + 4 14 + 4 16 + 5 14 + 15 AVERAGE.

+ 2s 16 + 8 20 + 23 18 + 6 14 + 7 19 + 2 13 + 6 1.7 :!:. 12 5.1 + 4.9 6.3 + 1.5 8.l + 4.9 9.3 + 6.1 7.1 + 7.8 18 + 7 8.7 + 7.2 10 + 8

  • 22 + 19 13 + 8 15 + 10 f l i
  • I I t r,...
  • f,'.

n I

{

r I

I.

L:_;

rl*.-

11 I i L.'j r *.

~

r,

L.;

r**-~

i.

i '

Location ss HIR BC ALL CP DOW FE NN ss liIR BC ALL CP DOW FE NN ss HlR BC ALL CP DOW FE ss HlR BC ALL CP DOW FE NN Quarter 1

2 3

4 Cl) LT* Less Than


' -~-::S-~..

-~ :* -~~-~-

Table 6 Gamma Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters VEPCO RE.MP 1983 Composite Period 12/28/82 to 03/30/83 03/30/83 to 07 /06/83 07 /06/83 to 10/04/83 10/04/83 to Ot/03/P,4 (Results in Units of E-03 pCi/m(3 ) + 2s)

Be-7 48 :t_ 13 58 + 13 50 :t_

13 78 + 23 32 :t_

13 53

t_

13 48 :t_ 14 38 + 16 79

t_ 28 58 :t_

24 55

t_

19 66

t_

20 LT 70 100 + 40 56 + 29 LT 70 88

t_

-23 94

t_

26 88

+

24 97

+

28 82

t_

25 73

t_

22 75

t_

23 110

t_

30 60 + 20 43

t_

13 LT 50 46

t_ 16 33
t_ 20 62
t_. 25.

33

t_ 26 71
t_

20 Ce-144 Cs-134 LT 4Cl) 2.2 + 1.1 LT 4

LT 1.2 LT 3

LT l.6 LT 8

LT 1.9 LT 7

LT 4

LT 4

LT 7

LT ll LT 11 LT 6

LT 10 LT 17 LT 15 LT 13 LT 13 LT 9

LT 8

LT 9

LT 10 LT 9

LT 9

LT 10 LT 9

LT 8

LT 5

LT l.8 LT 8

LT 12 LT 11 LT l. 7 LT 8

24 LT 2

LT l.5 LT 1.7 LT 2

5.4 + 2.2 LT 3

LT 1.9 LT 3

LT 4

LT 3

LT 5

LT 4

LT 3

LT 2

LT 2

LT 3

LT 2

LT 2

LT 2

LT 2

LT 3

LT l.3 LT 3

LI l. 7 LT 4

LI 3

LT 3

LT 2

Cs-137 6.6 + l.6 LT l.O LT 1.7 LT 2

LT 1,4 LT l.3 LT l.7 LT l.6 14 + 3 LT 3

LT 2

LT 3

LT 6

LT 3

LT 7

LT 5

4.3

t_ l.9 LT 3

2.0 + LO LT 3

LT 2

LT 3

LT 2

LT 3

LT 3

LT l.3 LT 3

LT l.9 LT 4

LT 3

LT 4

T,T 2

Nb-95 LT l. 7 LT l.2 LT* 1,7 LT 2

LT 1.7 LT l. 7 LT 1.,9 LT l.5 LT 4

LT 3

LT 2

LT 3

LT 6

LT 5

LT 6

LT 4

LT 3

LT 4

LT 3

LT 4

LT 2

LT 4

LT 3

LT 4

LT 3

LT l.9 LT 4

LT 3

LT 4

LT 4

LT 5

LT 2

Zr-95 LT 3

LT 2

LT 4

LT 3

LT 3

LT 2

LT 3

LT 3

LI 6

LT

.5 LT 5

LT 6

LT 10 LT 14 LT 7

LT 11 LT 5

LT 8

LT 5

LT 7

LT 4

LT 6

LT 4

LT 7

LT 5

LT 3

LT 6

LT 4

LT. 8 LT 8

LT 9

LT 5

-=---***** -- ----.-*-*---*---.-----------.-- ---.-------- -

-...--------------*-~- --*--**- -

r

~

i. j
.. }

f -~

L.J i :

1**,

LJ r*****

\\

r.

I.

I l \\

I i l.

B.-

Mi 1 k The results of iodine-131 analyses of milk samples are presented in Table 7.

No I-131 was detected in any of the samples.

A total of 59 analyses were performed, 47 from indicator locations and 12 from the Williams (WMS) control location. The required sensitivity limit of 1 pCi/1 for I-131 in milk could not be met for the December milk sample from station EPPS due to delay between sample collection and arrival at the 1 abora tory.

Milk samples were also analyzed by gamma spectrometry and the results are shown in _Table 8.

A total of.58 samples were analyzed, 47 from indicator locations and 11 from the WMS control location. The required sensitivity limits of 60 pCi/1 for Ba-140 and 15 pCi/1 for La-140 were not met in 10 of the analyses, due to delay in analysis.

The La-140 sensitivity limit was also exceeded in two additional analyses due to delay between sample collection and arrival at the laboratory.

As expected, naturally occurring*K-40 was the major detectable activity in the milk samples.

Detectable levels of cesium-137 were found in 15 of 58 samples, ranging from 1.4 to 43 pCi/1.

Since Cs-137 is present in global

  • fallout, the occasional detection of this isotope in environmental media is not unusual.

With two exceptions,* the results fell well within the expected range of activities due to long term fallout.

On~ value, 43 pCi/1, was higher than expected, although occasional results in this range have been reported for other programs.

In a second sample, Cs-137 was accompanied by Cs-134 at a level of 10 pCi/1.

The presence of Cs-134 is indicative of the release of radioactivity from the plant.

This possibility has been previously noted in the discussion of air particulate analytical results.

NRC non-routine reporting levels for these isotopes are 60 pCi/1 for Cs-134 and 70 pCi/1 for Cs-137, and the levels found are well below these action levels.

Stable. (non-radioactive) calcium in milk was also determined in 60 samples at an average level of 1400

+ 340.

These analyses were performed by the NUS Laboratory Services Division rather than by the NUS Radiological Laboratory.

samples, 48 from indicator locat~ons.and 10 from the WMS control location. Results for these analyses are listed in Table 10.

Stro~tium-89 was not detected in any of the samples analyzed.

Strontium-90 was found in 5 of 58

samples, ranging from 1.6 to 3.5 pCi/1.

Two of the four samples were from indicator locations; the remaining two were from the WMS control location.

Strontium-90 is likely to be due to global fallout.

During the preoperational radiological monitoring program for Surry Power Station, stronti~m-90 was detected in milk samples at a range of 5.2 to 13 pCi/1.

25

-- *----- ----..........-c-.., _____,__,..

-.-7'"-* _...

.,~ -,,.- -


*------..... --------*----~-----

  • -~--;,*:*-* *** ~._.... :_,._...
  • * ** ** __.*. -, ___ ** ~-~: *** -*.*', ** * --~*.: *

.. ~z' - ::=::** -.:. ---~--~...-:-- -0_~.,-~-- -~-..;:.:..,.* :_;,._

---*f **-***--.

. n u

i"

!.-~

r l

n-L_J n

! l l'.....:.J

,-i ll

.\\

.c..l r-,

1..~

1" L.-~!

f ':

._J n

f.'.

I -

I l.

L.J r*-1 l.J

[.

1 *,

u n

LJ

~: **;

' L __

Month January February March

  • April May June Table 7 (Page 1 of 2)

Iodine-131 *in Milk VEPCO REMP - 1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s)

Location Sampling Date LEE HALL 01/05/83 EPPS 01/06/83 CP 01/18/83 WMS 01/18/83 JDKs 01/18/83 LEE HALL 02/02/83 EPPS 02/03/83 CP 02/08/83 WMS.

02/15/83 JDKs 02/08/83 LEE HALL 03/29/83(2 )

EPPS 03/03/83 CP 03/16/83.

WMS 03/23/83 JDKs 03/16/83 LEE HALL 04/13/83 EPPS 04/14/83 CP 04/12/83 WMS 04/19/83 JDKs 04/12/83 LEE HALL 05/11/83 EPPS 05/12/83 CP

  • 05/10/83 WMS 05/24/83
  • JDKs 05/10/83 LEE HALL 06/01/83 EPPS 06/01/83 CP 06/14/83 WMS 06/23/83 JDKs 06/14/83 Note: See footnotes at end of table.

26 Iodine-131 LT 0.4(l)

LT 0.3 LT 0.6 LT 0.5 LT 0.5 LT *0.5 LT 0.4 LT 0.3 LT 0.5 LT 0.4 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.4 LT 0.4 LT 0.7 LT. 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 LT 0.6 LT 0.,2.

--"-~~---... *.. --~-.. *,.*.. *-*c:-*.<:c*0*>.'*.:<.:*,.,2c******h,-.-*.*.c,.*.. -<***--=-',.-.-.*:...;.,.,,,... :. :_.-~.: * * "*.. ___ *. * *-----* *-~-

-:;:-***----~- --t -----------*--*-- -

\\~., u n r, u

[J n

Lj u

) '

/_;

r; u r-:

LJ n

i :!

L.:J r= -*

! ; u f Tl *

      • 1 LJ
--~

/_j r*~

(~~!

t~

r--:*:i r :

i*-,,

I,:

~...

c: ~

4 L,

r - -*

I (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Month July August September October November December LT = Less Than Table 7 (Pa:ge 2 of 2)

Iodine-131 in Milk VEPCO REMP -

1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s)

Location Sampling Date LEE.HALL 07 /13/83 EPPS 07 /14/83 CP 07 /19/83 WMS 07/27/83 JDKs 07/19/83 LEE HALL 08/10/83 EPPS 08/10/83 CP 08/10/83 WMS 08/17/83 JDKs 08/10/83 LEE HALL 09/01/83 EPPS 09/01/83 CP 09/14/83 WMS 09/27 /83 JDKs 09/14/83 LEE HALL 10/06/83 EPPS 10/06/83 CP 10/11/83 WMS 10/18/83 JDKs 10/11/83 LEE HALL 11/10/83 EPPS 11/10/83 CP 11/08/83 WMS 11/29/83 JDKs 11/08/83 LEE HALL 12/08/83 <3 )

EPPS 12/08/83 CF 12/13/83" WMS 12/20/83 JDKs 12/16/83 Original sample, dated 03/03/83, was received spoiled not be analyzed for I-131.

The station was re sampled Sample lost during *analysis due to broken container.

Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping.

27 Iodine-131 LT 0.13 LT 0.3 LT 0.14 LT 0.2 LT 0.11 LT 0.4 LT 0.9 LT 0.4 LT 0.2 LT 0.4 LT o.s LT 0.3 LT 1.0 LT 0.3 LT 1.0 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 LT 0.14 LT 0.17 LT 0.15 LT 1.2(4)

LT 0.3 LT o. 7 LT 0.3 and could on 03/29/83.

  • y~_....... _, *_*

.,--~_ ~~~

~-

-._,,--,.,,~-, :-.....,~-----~-----*--

-~ _.,..,. _______ * ---------... -~-~~ *.

-**-------.~... ---.--. ---*--

,. *i*** *.................. *.. **-*.****. *:...~.. :***.. _*_:.~ ::.**.:.,-*.J,.\\,*".):<:<:*.:~:.-"-~:.-*.,,: :* -'_-_.**:;- ".,.:.. _.. *.~--->-~:- -~-:. *... *:*.-;;*.. -. ~-~----. --~:.:L.. -.:<<.* --~:-. -... **>* __ :*.-__.. __ *... 0.,.* *.... :.:- ~:-* :_. -~* *._* ::<_.<:.::-~---:*=..

r, i i L._~

r1 Table 8 i

1.. i (Page 1 of 2) r--c Gamma Spectrometry of Milk I

VEPCO REMP - 1983 I [ ____ :

(Results in pCi/1 !_ 2s)

I Month Location Sampling Date Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140

\\..

LT 30(l)

January LEE RALL 01/05/83 LT 9 LT 10 1400

=-

200 LT 10

[l EPPS 01/06/83 LT 30 LT 11 LT 9 1100 + 200 LT 13 CP 01/18./83 LI' 30 LT 10 LT 12 1400 + 200 LT 13 IIMS 01/18/83 LT 30 LT 9 LT 8 1300 + 200 LI' 15

['

JDKs

  • 01/18/83 LT 30 LT 9 LT 8 1300

=-

200 LT 12

_j February LEE RALL 02/02/83 LT 13

  • LT 4 LT 4 1300

=-

200 LT 8

[ 1 EPPS 02/03/83 LI' 20 LT 7 LT 6 1500 + 200 LT 8 CP 02/08/83 LT 30 LT 10 LT 10 1300 =-

200 LT 15 02/15/83 IIMS LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1400 + 200 LT 9 r~

JDKs 02/08/83 LT 15 LT 6 LT 7 1100

=-

200 LT 7

! i _ _;

March LEE HALL(2) 03/29/83 LT 30 LT 7 LT 7 1400 + 200 LT 13 Tl EPPS 03/03/83 LT 19 10

=-

4 21 =-

5 1300

=-

200 LT 13 l..J CP 03/16/83 LT 20 LT 9 LT 8 1300 + 200 LT 11 IIMS 03/23/83 LT 13 LT 4 LT 5 1500*

=-

200 LT 6

[

JDKs 03/16/83 LT 30 LT 11 LT 10 1200 =-

200 LT 14 April LEE HALL 04/13/83 LT 16 LT 5 3.1 2.8 1300 + 200 9

=-

LT EPPS 04/14/83 LT 20 LT 5 LT 6 1400

=-

200 LT 9 n

CP 04/12/83 LT 20 LT 9 LT 11

. 1400

=-

200 LT 12 WMS 04/19/83 LT 17 LT 5 LT 6 1400 + 200 LT 9 JDKs 04/12/83 LT 20 LT 8 LT 8 1200

=-

200 LT 12

( --

I, u May LEE HALL 05/11/83 LT 20 LT 6 LT 8 1400

=-

200 LT 10 EPP"S 05/12/83 LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1400

=-

200 LT 9 r-i CP 05/10/83 LT 19 LT 6 LT 7 1200 =-

200 LT 10 I

L_J 05/24/83 IIMS LT 20 LT 6 LT 7 1500 =-

200 LT 13 JDKs 05/10/83 LT 20 LT 8 43 r*-:c

=-

8 1100

+* 200 LT 9 L

June LEE HALL 06/01/83 LT 17 LT 4 8.6 + 3.0 1800 + 200 LT 7 EPPS 06/01/83 LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1400 +-

200 LT 11 r*1 LT i

CP 06/14/83 LT 30 LT 9 LT 12 1000

=-

100 17 I

L IIMS (3) 06/23/83 JDKs 06/14/83 LT 15 LT 5 5.6 =-

3.4 1300 =-

200 LT 6 r-*1 I I LJ Note: See: footnote at end of table.

r-:

\\

I l

'-J 28

\\...--1

/

"I:

~

-:----.-.-::,-......-.-~----.. ---*--~. --------* *** ~*-*

.------~

    • *--*.-.,-,--,.-------------~----........--~. -~--..---*

~-,' ~-. _:... ;

""'"_....... ___ :..-:__:...~--..;::.:.._:.~~~~;.-~~-~-~*-:-.-- *--.. :.. :-_.>*. ---.~::<>.. *::_***>::~.:!:.-**.:'-.; *.,....,. *!*

  • -***..,_ __ *- ** -:<..-.. *...,*..,.. a.:....::-'-*.*.
_**.....,... ~:**-.... *.. *,.-;-:.-:-.<:.-.:*::;-*..:.'*-,_~-~::*.. *. -.. _.. : >, *.:.....

f L.J c~

l I '

l f:

1._J n

I i L3 f-C-'

i i

l.... '

r, I i u n

l i.:

__ J n

L____;

Month July August September October November December Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs(6)

LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Lee Hall EPPS CP WMS JDKs (l) LT= Less Than Sampling Date 07 /13/83 07 /14/83 07/19/8':.

07 /27 /83 07 /19/83 08/10/83 08/10/83 08/09 /83 08/17 /83 08/09/83 09/01/83 09/01/83 09/14/83 09/27 /83 09/14/83 10/06/83 10/06/83 10/11/83 10/18/83 10/11/83 11/10/83 11/10/83 11/08/83 11/29/83 11/08/83 12/08/83 12/08/83 12/13/83 12/20/83 12/16/83 Table 8 (Page 2 of 2)

Gamma Spectrometry-of Milk VEPCO REMP

~ 1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/-. 2p)

Ba-140 LT 30 LT.30 LT 400(4 )

LT 30 LT 200(4 )

LT 30 LT 30 LT 40 LT 40 LT 30 LT 150(4 )

LT 120(4 )

LT 50 LT 4000(4 )

LT 800(4 )

LT 1000 (4 )

LT 1300(4 )

LT 800(4 )

LT 600(4 )

. LT 20 LT 18 LT 30 LT 30 LT 18 LT 30 LT 60 LT 50 LT 20 LT 18 Cs-134 LT 10 LT 11 LT 1.9 LT 7 LT 1.3 LT 10 LT 7 LT 11 LT 12 LT 9 LT 2 LT l.9.

LT l.3 LT 3 LT l.4 LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 1.8 LT 4 LT 4 LT 5 LT 5 LT 3 LT 2 LT 4 LT 6 LT 3 LT 2 Cs-137 LT 12 LT 13 2.5

+/-_ 1.2 LT 8 2.9

+/-_ 0.8 LT 11 LT 9 LT 13 LT 14 LT 12 2.0 +/-_ 1.3 3.6

+/-_ l.l l.4

+/-_ 0.8 LT 4

~.3 +/-, 0.8 2.5 + Ll LT 4 LT 3 2.1

+/-_ l.0 LT 5 4.0 + 2.3 LT 6 LT* s LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 6 LT 4 2.5 + 1/2 K-40 1300

+/-_ 200 1400' +/-_ 200 1200 + 200 1500 + 200 1300

+/-_ 200 1500

+/-_ 200 1500

+/-_

200 1300

+/-_

200 1700 + 200 1300

+/-_

200 1400

+/-_

200 1200

+/-_

200 1300

+/-_ 200 1300 + 200 1300

+/-_

200 1300

+/-_

200 1500 +

200 rsoo +

200 1400 +

200 1400

+/-_

200 1600

+/-_

200 1400 + 200 1500

+/-_

200 1300 +

200 1200.!. 200 1400

+/-_

200 1300

+/-_

200 1300.!.

200 1300 +

200 (2)

This was the record sample collected.

An earlier sample arrived spoiled and was resampled.

(3)

Sample destroyed during ashing, due to furna*ce malfunction.

(4)

Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting, (5)

Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping, (6)

Sample depleted in other analysei.

29 La-140 LT 14 LT 11 LT 180(4 )

LT 14 LT 130(4 )

LT 15 LT 15 LT 14 LT 14 LT 13 LT 70(4 )

LT 50(4 )

LT 20 LT 1300(4 )

LT 300(4 )

LT 400(4 )

LT 600(4 )

LT 400(4 )

LT 300(4 )

LT 9 LT 9 LT 15 LT 20 LT 9 LT 18(5 )

LT 30 (S)

LT 20 LT 13 LT 10

. - *- -**---* *------* -------~----~---~,--------:--------.*-*-:-*:----:::

-. *... -~ -:

.-,...,;::,.,..* ~-'.....*.----.. *.*.

.~:--~- _..,,~..... \\.{.. -....... _... -~---. -,--.-~-. ~--~. ~,---_

(1 i* i t.:.*.J f':

I i ;

l..

n u

I,

u r**,.

I i u l_.'

Month January February March April May Table 9 (Page 1 of 3)

Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP -

1983 (Results in mg/1)

Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average + 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS

.CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average+ 2s Sampling Date 01/05/83 01/06/83 01/18/83 01/18/83

. 01/18/83 02/02/83 02/03/83 02/08/83 02/15/83 02/08/83 03/29/83 03/03/83 03/16/83 03/23/83 03/16/83 04/13/83 04./14/83 04/12/83 04/.19/83 04/12/83 05/11/83 05/12/83 05/10/83 05/24/83 05/10/83 Note: See footnote at end of table.

30 Calcium Concentration 1380(1) 1380 1540 1570 1550 1480 + 190 1200 1160 1430 1570 1550 1380 + 380 1450 1250 1320 1610 1360 1400 + 280 1390 1400 1560 1890 1590 1570 + 410 1060 1110 1360 1400 1340 1250 + 310

      • .*.----~---****-~---.
    • .*-.-. r*-..*. *z.~" -,-_.,-. ** - -*.*~--~--"',""7.* *~.* *... ~-:*... *.*,._.-.*--* --~-*,-.-**.~.. ~*!.- *... -.. ~-_, ____.,.,_

.,* *~.. *

~--~--

--**---.---.~----.-.--.,--.---.-,.

  • ---*-- -...._~- ~- <.~., *,_ '*.. -.* __._.___,__ ___.

__ -_* -*~-~-**-*-*.. *. **-.. -__ ' _.* -. '*~--.. *- -*-*-** *. *~:.":,. -~;".*:;..... :.*.:.-:~.,:*., :_~;~.-..;:: :_. **_ :.~*-.. *.. *:_. *.

('

~-

1... J 1*, !

\\..

L_.*.a u

r---

1 *.]

I j

L.J fJ

[

[

L.:..i c-*,

. r *: u 0

Month June July August September

/

Table 9 (Page 2 of 3)

1983 (Results in mg/1)

Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP

  • WMS JDKs Average+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average+ 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average + 2s Sampling Date 06/01/83 06/01/83

.06/14/83 06/23/83 06/14/83 07/13/83 07/14/83 07/19/83 07/27/83 07/19/83 08/10/83 08/10/83 08/09/83 08/17/83 08/09/83 09/01/83 09/01/83 09/14/83 09/27/83 09/14/83 Note: See footnote at end of table.

31 Calcium Concentration 1200 1300 1500 1400 1400 1360 + 230 1300 1200 1400 1400 1600 1380 + 300 1400 1300 1300 1300 1400 1340 + 110 1300 1400 890 1500 1000 1220 + 260

. _____ ~- -~. *. --~"'.".---..-... _..... * ~- ~--*....

  • *****-* *-**~**.**-.-*

'* --.-*.. :-.-.~.... _:.*.*,.. '*.*-;

C i"': l i r-I l_,.

1":

i :

[_~

r*'*

I L

p

l. i

..2 I

i '--'-

l(

Month October November December

  • Annual Average Table 9 (Page 3 of 3)

Calcium in Milk VEPCO REMP -

1983 (Results in mg/1)

Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Average.+/- 2s LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs Sampling Date 10/06/83 10/06/83 10/11/83 10/18/83 10/11/83 11/10/83 11/10/83 11/08/83 11/29/83 11/08/83 12/08/83 12/08/83 12/13/83 12/20/83 12/16/83 (1) Estimated error is less than 5%.

32 Calcium Concentration 1400 1400 1500 1400 1500 1440 + 110 1100 1000 1500 1500 1200 1260 + 460 2000 1200 1420 1500 1350 1490 + 610 1350 + 500 1260 + 210 1390 + 360 1500 + 300 1400 + 350

.,....-47.

  • *-. -~
  • "*."'J"--

~~.~ <.,,-.s;;:v~ **

~

,.-~,*. *

~

~ *--=----

'---=---*- -="'

I D

I.,

~..

n

. __ j.

r I

  • I L..

r*--

i L.:

[

~'.

i

-s r.

i.

i.

Month January*

February March April May June Location LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs

  • LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS (2)

JDKs LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS (2)

JDKs Table 10 (Page 1 of 2)

Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1 + 2s)

Sampling Date 01/05/83 01/06/83 01/18/83 01/18/83 01/18/83 02/02/83 02/03/83 02/08/83 02/15/83 02/08/83 03/29/83 03/03/83

'03/16/83 03/23/83 03/16/83 04/14/83 04/14/83 04/12/83 04/19 /83 04/12/83 05/11/83 05/12/83 05/10/83 05/24/83 05/10_/83 06/01/83 06/01/83 06/14/83 06/23/83 06/14/83 Strontium-89 LT 0.7(l)

LT 1.5 LT 0.6 LT 1.0 LT 0.7 LT 0.6 LT 0.6 LT 1.2 LT 0.7 LT 0.6 LT 1 LT 1 LT 2 LT 1 LT 2 LT 1.3 LT 0.8 LT 1.0 LT 1 LT 1.1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1 LT 1.8 LT 5 Note: See footnote at end of table.

33 Strontium-90 LT 0.8 2.2 + 1.3 LT 0.6 LT 1.0 LT O. 7 LT 0. 6 LT 0.6 LT O. 6 LT 0. 7 LT 0~6 LT 1 LT 1 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.1 LT 1.2 LT 1 LT 1.5 LT 1 LT 2 LT 1 LT 2 3.5 + 2.7

-r:-:a r.

f..

i

~ r-i

[ __ ;

i l.

L r-~

i L......:

L.

r,

I Month Lo.cation July LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs August LEE RALL.

EPPS CP WMS JDKs September LEE HALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs October LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS J.DKs November LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs December LEE RALL EPPS CP WMS JDKs (1)

LT= Less Than (2)

Sample destroyed Table 10 (Page 2 *of 2)

Strontium-89 and Strontium-90.in Milk VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/- 2s )

Sampling Date Strontium-89 07/13/83 LT 0.6 07/14/83 LT 0.7 07/19/83 LT 0.9 07/27/83 LT 1.1 07/19/83 LT 1.2 08/10/83 LT 0.8 08/10/83 LT 1.3 08/09/83 LT 0.9 08/17/83 LT 1.0 08/09/83 LT 0.8 09/01/83 LT 0.8 09/01/83 LT 0.8 09/14/83 LT 0.7 09/27/83 09/14/83 LT 0.8 10/06/83 10/06/83 10/11/83 10/18/83 LT 0.5 10/11/83 11/10/83 11/10/83 11/08/83 11/29/83 11/08/83 12/08/83 12/08/83 12/13/83 12/20/83 12/16/83 in analysis 34

    • -**---. __,**.*:/*,~*~--------- - ~--*-

Strontium-.90 LT 0.5 LT 0.6 LT 1.0 LT 1.5 LT 1.5 LT 0.7 LT 2 LT 1.8 1.6 + 1.1 LT 0.8 LT 1. 2 LT 1.3 LT 2 LT 2

    • -~-*,--a*-...._~**... *-.~*~**.**.,-:'*.*"'
    • .~

.~.-

~

.. *'r,.-"./,,...... ~,.*.--*.;.-,..,~,,.......-

._*-f N'S:.-...~--

I I '

' 1*--,

n l--:.J r,

ll)

    • ..J 1 ;
n.

lJ I :

' L....'

C.

Precipitation Precipitation samples were collected as monthly composites and analyzed for gross beta and tritium. Quarterly samples from the same locations (one indicator and one control) were composited from monthly aliquots retained at the site.

This compositing was performed by station personnel and the composites were submitted for the san~ analyses as monthly samples.

The results of these analyses are shown in Table 11.

In some cases, the. gross beta results on the quarterly samples appear to be at variance with the results from monthly samples.

In all these cases the reported value was confirmed by reanalysis.

Sampling, storage and compostting methods were reviewed with VEPCO and the reason for the discrepancies remain unresolved.

Tritium was detected in 6 of 32 analyses. The values were typical for environmental samples.

D

  • Water Well water was collected from four indicator locations during May and October.

The results of gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium analyses on these 8 samples are sho\\'m on Table 12.

No alpha activity was found in any of the samples (stations SS, HIR, BC, and JMTN).

Gross beta activities ranged from 1.8 to 11 pCi/1, well within the preoperational range of O to 25 pCi/1. Tritium was.detected in 2 of 8 analyses at typical environmental levels.

Table 12 also includes gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium results on 8 surface water samples which were also collected during May and October.

Surface water stations are Chippokes Creek '(CC) and three reservoirs (WMR,

NNR, and SR).

All are indicator locations.

Gross alpha activities of 4 and 9.6 pCi/1 were found in 2 of the 8 samples.

The range of gross beta activity was 1.4 to 23 pCi/1.

The maximum value in this range was confirmed by reanalysis; this sample contained high suspended solids.

No tritium was detected in any of these samples.

In addition to the water samples discussed above, samples of James River water are collected as both. monthly composites and bi-monthly grab samples.

The James River is an estuary near Surry Power Station and undergoes tidal exchange with Chesapeake Bay.

River water samples thus represent saline bay water in contrast to the fresh water samples discussed above.

Ga~ma spectrometr~ was performed on bi-monthly grab samples of James River water and the results are presented on Table 13.

  • With four exceptions, all nuclides were below the detectiorr limit. The May sample from Surry Discharge (SD) contained 5.5 pCi/1 Co-58, 9.8 pCi/1 Cs-134, and 11 pCi/1 Cs-i37.

These nuclides may be due to plant operations.

In

addition, the November sample from Hog Island Point (HIP) contained 3.7 pCi/1 Cs-137.

When unaccompanied by Cs-134, Cs-137 is likely to be due to atmospheric fallout.

35

-~-- *

--*--------**----~-

  • --- ~.*. --**----

... ____ -..,.~-----..................... ---....... _

... *. *--. ---~---*****-*..-,-*--*-*-- ------ --. ----- *-

I L~*

).

\\_

r:*,

i r.,

I.

\\ L~

, __.- --:* *---~-~-~-**---------~*----------...-*-*.. -. -..

---" -*-. :- ~~- ---- *---- _. -..,. ---**

Location ss NN ss NN ss NN ss NN ss NN Month January February March Quarter 1 January February March Quarter 1 April May June Quarter 2 April May June Quarter 2 July August September Quarter 3 July August September Quarter 3 October November December Quarter 4 October November December Quarter 4 Table 11 Gross Beta and Tritium in Precipitation (Monthly and Quarterly Composites)

VEPCO REMP-1983 (Results in pCi/1 +/- 2s)

Collection Period 01/01/83 to 02/01/83 02/01/83 to 02/28/83 03/01/83 to 03/30/83 01/01/83 to 03/30/83 01/01/83 to 02/01/83 02/01/83 to 02/28/83 03/01/83 to 03/30/83 01/01/83 to 03/30/83 04/01/83 to 04/26/83 04/27/83 to 05/31/83 06/01/83 to 06/30/83 04/01/83 to 06/30/83 04/01/83 to 04/26/83 04/27/83 to 05/31/83 06/01/83 to 06/30/83 04/01/83 to 06/30/83 07/01/83 to 07/31/83 08/01/83 to 08/30/83 09/14/83 to 09/27/83 07/01/83 to 09/27/83 07/01/83 to 07/31/83 08/01/83 to 08/30/83 09/14/83 to 09/27/83 07/01/83 to 09/27/83 09/28/83 to 10/26/83-10/27/83 to 11/29/83 12/01/83 to 12/28/83 10/01/83 to 12/28/83 09/28/83 to 10/26/83 10/27/83 to 11/29/83 12/01/83 to 12/28/83 10/01/83 to 12/28/83 Gross Beta 2.7

+ 1.4 1.9 + 1.3 1.6 + 1.2 75

+

8 1.4 + 1.3 4.6 + 1.4 LT 1.8 49 + 5 1.5 + 1.3 5.0 + 4.9 37 + 4 45 + 5 1.8 + 1.3 LT 2 6.6 + 1.5 46 +

5 2.9 + 1.3 14 +

2 4.4 + 1.4 12 +

2 LT 1. 8 14 +

2 1.3 + 1.0 10 +

2 3.7 + 1.2 4.3 + 1.2 2.7 + 1.3 1.4 + 1.1 1.4 + 1.2 1.6 + 1.1 LT 1. 9 LT 1. 8 Annual Average+/- 2s Annual Average+/- 2s 6.8 + 20 3.4 + 7.4 (1)

L.T = Less Than (2)

No average computed due to large number of LLDs.

36 Tritium LT 300(1)

LT 400 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 400 190 +

180 LT 300 LT 300 750 + 200 570 +

200 380 + 200 LT 300 630 +

200 410* + 200 LT 300 LT 500 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 500 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300

  • LT 300 LT 300 LT 300*

LT.300 (2)

(2)

w

-..J 1--.

l..

L....

[.

(**-*-**1

  • ( C*
l...

Table 12

.*. : i r-~
l...... --.... ~.:i

/*----,

i,C:.../

Determination of Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, and Tritium in Surface and He 11,Water, Semi-Annual Samples VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/1.:!:. 2s)

Sampling Analysis Surface Water

~Jell Water Date Type cc

~/MR NNR SR ss HIR BC 04/12/83 Gross Alpha LT 1.5(1)

LT 1. 5 LT 3 9.6 + 2.9 LT 1. 9 LT 2 LT 3 Gross Beta 2.0.! 1.2 1.4.! 1.2 2.9.! 2.3 6.4 + 2.5 2.8.! 1.3 4.1.! 1.4 6.4 + 1.!i

  • Tritium LT 300 LT 300 LT.300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 230 + 180 10/11/83 Gross Alpha 4.0.! 2.7 LT 4 LT 2 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 Gross Beta 23 + 6 7.5 + 4.6 4.0 + 2.7 4.5.! 2.8 4.8 + 1.4 1.8.:!:. 1.5 9.3 + 3.0 Tritium LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 LT 300 560 + 170 LT 300 LT 300 Gross Beta Average.:!:. 2s 13 + 30 4.5 + 8.6 3.8 + 3.8 5.5 + 2.6 3.8 + 2.8 3.0 + 3.0 7.9 + 4.2 (1)

LT

= Less than (2)

No average computed due to large number of LLDs.

Gross. Be ta JMTN Average

+ 2s LT 3 (2) 11 + 2 4.6 + 6 LT 300*

(2)

LT 3 (2) 6.1 + 1.6 7.6 + 13 LT 300 (2) 8.6.:!:. 7.0 (2)

1.

I I

1:

/.'.

  • \\.

[.-* '..

f r

l 1* !

i I

[>

1.

1*

i-*

1:.-

I:

i",.

I

[-..

I.

I 1*

t.

1*.*

I I

I I i 1:

J l l I*.**--~-- 7 --,

l...

  • _ _-.;

w ro I

l.

I r*-:--*-~

\\,.--..... ;,

L Month Location Date Ba-140 Co-58 Co-60 r-:

.. ~- *****.,J Table 13 Comma Spectrometry of River Water VEPCO REMP -

1983 (Results in pCi/1 ~ 2s)

Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 La-140 r--

I

~...... -

.... I r---*1

'***-'- -*-J

    • ------***, i i.....
  • j Mn-54 Nb-')5 Zn-65 Zr-95 K-40 January 1983 March May July September Noven1ber SI IIIP NN CIIIC Sll SI HIP NN CHIC SD SI HIP NN CHIC Sll SI lllP NN CIIIC SD SI IIIP NN CIIIC SD SI lllP NN CIIIC Sll 01/19/83 01/20/83 01/21/83 01/211/83 01/26/8) 03/29/83 03/2 3/83 03/23/83 03/~8/8) 03/28/83 05/25/8) 05/19/8) 05/2 5/8) 05/25/8) 05/2 7 /BJ 07/19/8) 07 /13/83 07 /13/83 07/25/83 07/19/83 09/27 /83 09/27/83 09/27/83 09/27 /83 09/27/83 11/14/83 11/14/83 11 /ll, /83 l l/llo/83 11/14/83

--(ff--I.T-= Less Than LT 50(1)

LT 50 LT 60( 3 )

LT 70 LT 90(3)

LT 16 LT 30 LT 14 LT 11 LT )0 LT 13 LT 30 LT 15 LT 20 LT 30 LT 8 LT 12 LT 10 LT 8 LT 9 LT 200(4 )

LT 200(4 )

LT 400(4 )

LT 200(4 )

LT 400(4 )

(4)

LT 300(4 )

LT 170 LT 300(4 )

LT 170(4 )

LT 400(4 )

l.T 3 LT 3 LT 3 l.T 5 LT 5 LT 3 LT 6 l.'f 6 LT 3 LT 7 LT 2 LT 7

  • LT 3 LT 4 5.5 + 4.6 LT 13 LT 15 LT 14 LT 6 LT 6 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 6 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 LT 6 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 5 LT 3 LT 6 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT 6 LT 2 LT 6 LT 3 LT 4 LT 6 LT 8 LT 9 l.T 8 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3
  • LT 3 LT 3 LT]

LT 3 LT l. 7 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 LT 5 LT 4 LT 3 LT*6 I.T 2 LT 5 l,T 2 l.T 3 9.8 + 3.5 LT 7 LT 8 LT 7 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT J LT 3 l.T 3 LT 3 LT 2 l,T 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 8 LT 4 LT 3 LT 5 LT 2 LT 5 LT 2 LT 4 11 + 4 LT 7 LT 8 LT 7 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 f,T 3 r:r 2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.4 3.7 + 0.8 LT 2 LT-2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 8 LT 10 LT 8 LT 16 LT 11 LT 11 LT 10 Lt 12 LT 6 LT 12 LT 6 LT 13 I.T 5 LT 9 LT 10 (4)

LT 40(4 )

LT 40(4 )

LT 40 LT 18 LT 20 LT 14 LT 14 I.T 16 LT 14 LT 18 LT 15 LT 8 LT 13 LT 16 LT 19 (3)

LT 40(3)

LT 40( 3 )

LT 30(3 )

LT 50 LT 30 LT 14 T:r 14 LT 8 l,T 6 LT 14 LT 10 LT 15 LT 9 LT 12 LT 14 l,T 8 LT 12 LT 10 LT 8 LT 9 (4)

LT 110(4 )

LT 110(4)

LT 200(4 )

LT 110(4 )

LT 200 LT 180(4 )

LT 100(4 )

LT 130(4 )

LT 100(4 )

LT 200(4 )

(2)

ND = Not Detected.

I.I.Os fo K-40 not normally calculated for individual water sample.

(3)

Lower sensitivity due to delay ln shipping.

(4)

Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting.

LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 5 l,T 5 LT 3 LT]

LT 5 LT 2 LT 5 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 9 LT 9 LT 9 l,T 4 LT 4 LT]

LT J LT J LT]

LT J LT 3 LT 1.5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT]

LT 6 LT 6 LT 4 LT 5 LT 4 LT]

LT 5 LT 2 LT 6 LT 2 LT 4 LT 6 LT 13 LT 15 LT 14 LT 6 LT 6 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 5 LT 6 LT 4 LT J-LT 4 LT 5 LT 7 LT 5 LT 7 LT 6 LT 11 LT 8 LT 9 LT 11 LT 9 LT 6 LT 14 LT 4 LT 10 LT 5 LT 8 LT 11 LT 18 LT 20 LT 18 LT 9 LT 9 LT 6 LT 6 LT 7 LT 6 LT 8 LT 7 LT 4 LT 6 LT 9 LT 9 LT 5 ND(2 )

LT 6 ND LT 6 ND LT 9 ND LT 11 ND LT 7 ND LT 9 ND LT 7 ND l,T 5 ND LT 12 ND LT 4 ND J.T 10 ND LT 4 100 + 20 LT 7 ND LT 10 ND LT 20 ND LT 30 ND LT 20 Nll LT 11 ND LT 12 ND LT 9 ND LT 9 ND LT 9 ND LT 9 ND LT 11 ND LT 8 ND LT 5 ND LT 7 ND LT 9 ND LT 12 ND

I'-.

I' i

i

/ __ :

i i

J 1.*

\\i I

1._:

r-~.

I

u r~

l

( :

I

\\

~

r-**

I L*

r1

- - ------~-----------~-----:___.* _._ - ----~~-._,_:_*_,_, __ **:* ____ -_.,,._- -........ _,~,,.--~- --.~,. -

"'--.. -~~-- __._._ '..J.'--~'-*,..*- *l

.., __, __ __,i_~..,-~._........, __ _:_..,_:.~.i..~----"'--'--*-

J..,

The bi~month1y samples of river water were composited on a semi-annual basis and analyzed for tritium.

Low positive values of 200 and 290 pCi/1 were found in samples from the Chicahominy River (CKIC) control location.

Values for.the indicator lotations ranged from 220 to 1500 pCi/1.

These results are given on Table 14.

During the preoperational radiological environmental monitoring program, higher values of 4500 to 15000 pCi/1 were reported.

Monthly composites of river water are col"lected by the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Results of gamma spectrometry on these samples are shown in Table 15.

With four exceptions, all nuclides were below the detection limit.

The February sample from the indicator location~ Surry Discharge, contained 12 pCi/1 of Co-58 and 27 pCi/1 of Co-60.

Co-60 was again detected in th~ November sample from the same location, at a level

  • of 3.8 pCi/1, and was accompanied by 2.6 pCi/1 of Cs-137.

These nuclides may be due to plant operations.

The monthly composites of river water are also analyzed for strontium-89 and -90.

Results are shown on Table 16.

(Ten of these analyses were incomplete at the time of submission of the draft annual report.

Low levels of Sr-90 (0.68 to 0.98 pCi/1) were found in samples from both the indicator and control (Scotland Wharf) locations.

During the preoperational. radiological environmental mbnitoring program for Surry Power Station, Sr-90 was occasionally found in James River water in the range 0.1 to 3.1 pCi/1.

In addition, strontium-89 was detected in the two samples collected in April.

The levels observed were 1.0 + 0.6 and 1.6 + 1.1 pCi/1. These va 1 ues for stronti um-89 may be art'ifacts of the calculation method.

Because this analysis is a function of the difference between two counts, normal statistical variations will occasionally lead to the reporting of a false positive result for this isotope at values near its detection limit.

The analysis could not be confirmed because sufficient volume of sample no longer remained to match the original sensitivity 1 imH.

E.

Aquatic Biota Marine biota can be sensitive indicators of radionuclide accumulation in the environment because of their ability to concentrate certain chemical elements wh.ich have radioactive isotopes.

Gamma spectrometry was performed on bi-monthly samples of clams and oysters from the James River.

The results are shown on Table 17.

As

expected, naturally occurring K-40 was the nuclide most frequently detected.

In one sample from station LC, Co-60 was found at a low level of 18 pCi/kg (wet weight). All other nuclides were below the detection limit.

39


~. -*-** ----..,-*---.-....---~- *---*-

____._c

....._.-,.,.. --**,.... _.,--,.--..-..-...,.,.-*,*,.,...-.-~..,,---~---....... *-*--------

r*-

j I

rr I :

l (j

r*--*

l !

i t ____.

r **-

i L...

I I

I l._.:

r.;

l.J I \\

i ___ :

TABLE 14 Determination of Tritium in River Water - Semi-Annua 1 Composite VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results om pCi /1

~ 2s)

Location Collection Period Tritium CHIC 1/24/83 to 5/28/83 290

+ 200 HIP 1/20/83 to 5/19/83 240

+ 200 NN 1/21/83 to 5/25/83 220

+ 200 SD 1/26/83 to.5/27/83 380 + 20?

SI 1/19/83 to 5/25/83 LT-300 l)

CHIC 7/25/83 to 11/14/83 200

+ 190 HIP 7/13/83 to 11/14/83 380

+ 190 NN 7/13/83 to 11/14/83 570

+ 190 SD 7/19/83 t*o 11/14/83 1300

+ 200

  • SI 7/19/83 to 11/14/83 1500

+ 200 (1) LT= Less Than 40

--* -*-**---- -- -*-*-""'-- --~ ~ - ~---- ----------~--- ----- *-

i*

c.,..~:i

[~:J

~--:---*,

[ __... ~:.J c*;:_J

--,-}

r-1 L.:_,j c=:-J r-1 r~,...--.-**.1

;,;.i

~.;::.:J r:':~.-... :,1

[)..'}] ~ Ti

(' - -*.. -

r:*

lc.":*.:.... :J t

I l..

L~-,-~c!

      • ---*.......)
      • -*-*-* *.. 1

~.: * ****..! *.:.J

- I.

l I.

l

',.1**

Table 15 t.*

I"*

r...

Gamma Spectrometry of River Water {monthly composl tee).

f:*

t-VEPCO. REMP - 1983 r**

i*

(Results in pCl/1 :!: 2s)

I 1.-..

I-.

Month Location Date Ba-140 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95 Zn-65 Zr-95 K-40 r'.

('

December Scotland Wh.

12/31 /83 LT 30(1)

LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 1.5 LT 1.5 LT 6 LT 20<2>

LT 1.8 LT 2 LT S LT 4 ND(4)'

L 1

  • 1982 Surry Dis.

12/31/83 LT 80(2 )

LT 5 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 11 LT 40<2>

LT 3 LT 5 LT 10 LT 9 ND

.'t/..

January Scotland Wh.

Ol/3 l /83 LT l 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 8 LT 12 (2)

LT 3 LT 3 LT 7 LT S ND ir 1983 Surry Dis.

01/31/.83 LT 40 LT 7 LT 7 LT 7 LT 7 LT 16 LT 16 LT 6 LT 7 LT 15 LT 13 ND February Scotland Wh.

02/28/83 LT 30 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1. 7 LT 1.* 6 LT 7 LT 19 <2 )

LT 1.8 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 ND r:

Surry Dis.

02/28/83 LT 30 12 + 3 27 + 3 LT 1. 9 LT 2.

I.T 9 LT 20<2 )

LT 3 LT 3 LT 6 LT S 53 + 15 i

March Scotland Wh.

03/31/83 30 4

l.T 5 4

LT 4 9

20<2 )

LT 4 LT 5 LT 10 LT 7 ND LT LT LT LT LT i

Surry Dis.

03/31/83 LT 30 LT 5 LT 4 LT 4 LT 4 LT 10 LT 20<2 )

LT 4 LT 4 LT 9 LT 8 ND h I April Scotland Wh.

04/30/83 LT 30 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 7 LT 14 LT 3 LT 3 LT 6 LT 6 ND

/*

Surry Dis.

04/30/83 I.T 19 LT 3 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 I.T 7 LT 10 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 5 ND 1:. !:**

30<3 )

f.:..

  • May Scotland Wh.

06/21 /83 LT 20 LT 1.3 LT 2 LT 3 I.T 0.8 LT 5 LT LT 1.0 LT 1.3 LT 3 LT 2 ND

f.

Surry Dis.

06/21/83 LT 30 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 8 LT 15 LT 3 LT 3 l.T 7 LT 6 ND i

I-'

I*

June Scotland Wh.

07 /08/83 LT 11 LT 6 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 19 LT 11 LT 4 LT 6 LT 9 LT 11 ND l

Surry Dis.

07 /08/83 LT 30 LT 7 LT 4 LT 4 LT.4 LT 20 LT 30 LT 4 LT 7 LT 10 LT 14 LT 60 I /.

150 <3)

LT 10<3 )

t July Scotland Wh.

07/31/83 LT LT 3 LT 1.6 i,T 1.4 LT 1.5 LT 8 LT 1.5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 5 LT 20 r.:

Surry Dis.

07/31/83 LT 150 (3)

LT 3 LT 1.6 LT 1.4 LT 1.5 LT 8 LT 70(3 )

LT 1.5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 5 LT 20

[.

I'>

August Scotland Wh.

09/27 /83 LT 4 00 <3 )

LT 5 LT 3 I.T 2 LT 2 LT 13 LT 180(3)

LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 7 ND I.

Surry Dis.

09/27/8)

LT 190 (3)

LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 15 LT llO())

LT 3 LT 5 LT 7 LT 8 ND

!I:. c.

LT 2'00 (3 )

LT 120<3>

September Seo t land Wh.

10/18/83 8

LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 LT 30 LT LT 4 LT 9 LT 11 LT 17 ND j?i Surry Dis.

10/18/83 LT 1200(3) 'LT 11 LT 6 LT 5 LT 5 LT 40 LT 100<3> LT 6 LT 12 LT 14 LT 20 ND f,-

October Scotland Wh.

11/22/83 LT 100<3> LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT ll LT 60<3 )

LT 3 LT 4 LT 7 LT 7 ND Surry Dis.

ll /2 2/83 LT 100<3> LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 11 LT 60<3 )

I.T 3 LT 4 LT 7 LT 7 ND k:'

1***

1*,:*...

60(3)

LT 30(3 )

[..i'*:

November Scotland Wh.

11 /30/83 LT LT 3 LT 2 LT *2 LT 2 LT 8 LT 2 LT 3 LT 6 I.T 6 ND i

Surry Dis.

l l /30/83 LT 10<3 )

LT 3 3.8 + 1.3 LT 1. 9 2.6 + 0.9 LT 7 LT 40(3) 1:r 1. 7 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 ND v*

t*.

December Scotland Wh.

12/31 /83 LT 30 LT 3 LT 2 J.T 2 LT 2 I.T 7.

LT 15 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT S ND f'*.*:1*;

Surry Dis.

12/31/83 LT 30 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 J.T 7 LT 15 LT 2 LT 3 J.T 5 LT S ND r.:

(I )

I.T

  • Lens Thon i.:

(2)

Lower sensitivity due to delay in shipping.

l (3)

Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting v*,-

(I,)

NO

~ Not Detected. LLDs for K-~0 not nor11111l l.y calculated for indiv!duol water sample.

liJ, i.,*,:..:,

l,:t i:'

i**

' n i '

i* __ i I'

j **;

i

( __.i r**

! **I I { u Fl I

L--'

r

--"j

...J I

L.J r*;

I :

,l l-"

(

~

f i

r

  • ~

~-

(1)

Month December 1~82 January 1983 February March April May June July August September October November December Table 16 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in River Water VEPCO REMP -1983 (Results in pti/l + 2s Location Surry Dis Scotland Wh.

Surry Dis Scotland Wh.

Surry Dis Scotland Wh.

Surry Dis Scotland Wh.

Surry Dis Scotland vJh.

Surry Dis Scotland Wh.

Surry Dis Scotland W h.

Surry Dis Scotland Wh.

Surry Dis Scotland Wh.

Surry Dis Scotland Hh.

Surry Dis Sc ot l an d W h

  • Surry Dis.

Scotland Hh.

Surry Dis.

Sc ot l an d W h.

Sampling Date 12/31/82 12/31/82 01/31/83 01/31/83

. 02/28/83 02/28/83 03/31/83 03/31/83 04/30/83 04/30/83 07/31/83 07/31/83 10/18/83 10/18/83 St ront i um-89 LT 0.8(l)

LT 0.9 LT 0.7 LT 0.7 LT 1.0 LT 2.0 LT 3 LT 1.5 1.0 + 0.6 1.6+1.l LT 1.4 LT 1.2 LT 1.0 LT O. 7 St ront i um-90 LT 0.8 LT 0.7 LT 0.7 LT 0.7 LT 1.0 0.86 + 0.86 LT 3 0.98 + 0.94 0.68 + 0.56 LT-1. 7 LT 1.2 LT 0.8 LT 1.5 LT 0.5 LT = Less than 42

  • -~--,...-._.,.._ --.----.. _...,.......-~-,.~~--,..---*, **,........,.........,._ ______ ---..---*---*****-.....,.--..------...---.-..-....----...-.-....... --- *,--.. --~--*---~-- -.-. --..----.-----**-------------~.
    • -*-:*1

[

L,

L....

c_-...*,

~,-': ;.:

... J r-*--.--,

[::_-:-:J c=--=-J

]
  • ... **1
  • 1
-.** :J,,t i

l ::. -* __.j L..*.. J

... *- ~*-'

L:. *.... ;

....... )

L I.,.

I Table t7

~-

(Page l

of 2)

Clams and Gamma Spectrometry of Oysters

~*

VEPCO RllMP 1983 r-(Results pCl/kg (wet) 2e) l in f*

1:_

I*

I..' r*

Sampling Sample c-**..

Month Location Date Type Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 L:..

L;>:*.

January SD 01/20/83 Clam LT 50 (l)

LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 140 LT 200 LT 30 LT 70 if::*:-

))}'.. *>

HIP 01/20/83 Clam LT 50 LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 140 1200 + 200 LT 40 LT *00 (i'>"*

LC 01/20/83 Clam LT 30 LT 20 LT 20 LT 18 LT 100 4600 + 1500 LT 20 LT 50 CIIIC 01 /20/83 Clam LT 20 LT 19 LT 15 LT 14 L'l' 90 4200 + 1200 LT 15 LT 40 p:**

JMTN 01/20/83 Clam LT 30 LT 18 LT 20 LT 19 LT 90 2300 + 1100 LT 20 LT 40 r

POS 01/21/8)

Oyster LT 70 LT 50 LT 50 LT 50 LT 200 1300 + 300 LT 50 LT 130

~\\-

DWS 01/21/83 Oyster LT 60 LT 40 LT 40 LT 40 LT 200 850 + 270 LT 40 LT 100 1-*r.*

NN 01/23/83 Oyster LT 40 LT 40 LT 30 LT 30 LT 190 630 + 280 LT 30 LT 90 t'*.

r Harch SD 03/08/83 Cl.am LT 30 LT 20 LT 40 LT 40 LT 60 250 + 200 LT 40 LT 70 f

1111' 03/2 )/8)

Clam LT 20 LT JO LT 20 LT

)0 LT 60 440 + 180 LT 20 LT 50 f:~

LC 0)/2)/8)

Clam LT 1.\\

18 +

11 LT l)

LT 13 LT 40 250. + 80 LT 13 LT

)0 bi<

of::>

CIIIC 03/23/83 Clam LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 80 LT 300 LT 30 LT 60

[§J:;i w

JMTN 03/23/83 Clam LT 19 LT 20 LT 20 LT 19 LT 60 390 + 160 LT 20 LT 40 POS 03/23/83 Oyster LT 20 LT JO LT 20 LT 20 LT 60 670 + 220 LT 20 LT 50 DWS 03/23/83 Oyster LT 40 LT 30 LT 40 LT qQ LT 100 480 + 230 LT 30 LT 80 NN 03/07 /83 Oyster LT 30 LT 20 LT 19 LT 19 LT 80 570 + 190 LT 20 LT 5_0 May SD 05/03/83 Clam LT 20 LT 30 LT 20 LT 30 LT 60 li30 + 170 LT 20 LT 50 HIP 05/19/83 Clam LT 50 LT 60 LT 50 LT 50 LT 130 4200 + 500 LT 50 LT 90 LC 05/19/83 Clam LT 50 LT 50 LT 50 LT 50 LT 120 1200 + 300 LT 40 LT 100 CIIIC 05/2 5/8)

Clam LT 50 LT 50 LT 40 LT 50 LT 130 LT 200 LT 40 LT 100 JMTN 05/25/83 Clam LT 50 LT 40 LT 40 LT 40 LT 120 LT 300 LT 40 LT 100 POS 05/25/83 Oyster LT 30 LT 40 LT 30 LT 40 LT 100 730 + 300 LT 30 LT 70 D\\IS 05/25/83 Oyster LT 70 LT 70 LT 60 LT 70 LT 160 1700 + 600 LT 60 LT 130 NN 05/02/83 Oyster LT 18 LT 20 LT 19 LT 20 LT 50 570 + 150 LT 20 LT 40 July so 07/12/83 Clam LT 70 LT 90 LT 60 LT BO LT 180 LT 900 LT 60 LT 150 l!lP 07 /13/83 Cl.am LT 70 LT BO LT 60 LT 70 LT 200 LT 1200 LT 50 LT 150 LC 07 /13/83 Clam LT 80 LT 90 LT 60 LT 60 LT 200 LT llOO LT 50 LT 150 V'/':

CHIC 07/25/83 Clam LT 90 l.T 110 I.T 70 LT 80 LT 250 LT 1400 LT 80 LT 160 JMTN 07/13/8)

Clam LT 70 LT 60 LT 70 LT 70 LT 200 LT 1000 LT 50 I.T 140 POS 07/13/8)

Oyster LT 110 LT 100 LT 80 LT 100 LT 250 LT 1300 LT 90 LT 200 ll\\lS 07/13/8)

Oyster LT BO LT BO LT 70 LT 70 LT 260 1400 + 400 LT 70 LT 170 NN 07/11/83 Oyster J.T llO 1.T 100 LT 70 LT 70 LT 200 LT 1600 LT 90 LT 170 Note: See footnotes at end of table.

i

.j l l

.I

.l J 1 I i

J

-I i I

j I

I

.j.

I 1----- -

\\*.

I l....

Month Septembe'r November Location SD HIP LC CIIIC JMTN POS D\\./S NN SD IIIP LC CIIIC JMTN POS Df!S NN (1)

LT Less Than c;;.7:l

\\,--*****-'*'

(--*""7'-...

t*-::.~ __ J Sampling Date 09/01/83 09/27/83 09/27/fl) 09/2 7 /83 09/27/83 09/27 /83 09/27/83 09/06/83 ll /02/83 l l/14/fl3 11/14/83 11/14/83

  • 11/14/83 11/14/83*

ll/14/83 11/02/83 Sample Type Clam Clam Clnm Clnm Clam Oyster Oyster

  • oyster clam Clam Clam Clam Clam Oyster Oyster Oyster (2)

Lower sensltlvity due to delay in analysis.

Table 17 (Page 2

of 2)

_._, __ j Gamma Spectrometry of Clams and VEPCO REHP 1983

~]

1.........,_._....:..:.J Oysters (Results in pct/kg (wet)

~ 2s)

Co-58 LT 70 LT 70 LT 80 LT 60 LT 60 LT 50 LT 80 LT 70 LT 150(2 )

LT 60 LT 70 LT 50 LT 80 LT 70 LT 90 LT 90 Co-60 LT 70 LT 80 LT 60 LT 60 LT 50 LT 40 LT 80 LT 90 LT 80 LT 60 LT 60 LT 40 LT 70 LT 60 LT 70 LT* 90 Cs-134 LT 50 LT 50 LT 70 LT 60 LT 40 LT 40 LT 80 LT 70 LT 70 LT 50 LT 50 LT JO LT 60 LT 40 LT 70 LT 70 Cs-137 LT 60 LT 60 LT 90 LT 60 LT 50 LT 40 LT 80 LT 70 LT 80 LT 50 I.T 50 LT 40 LT 70 LT 50 LT 70 LT 70 Fe-59 LT 260 LT 200 LT 200 I.T 260 LT 180 LT 140 LT 260 LT 200 LT 400(2 )

LT 150 LT 150 LT 120 LT 200 LT 140 LT 200 LT 200 K-40 LT 700 LT 1000 1100 + 500 LT-900 1100 + 300 LT-700 LT 1200 LT 1200 2400 + 500 790 + 240 1100 + 400 LT 600 1100 + 500 760 + 350 LT 1000 970 + 520

,~~,

... *i Hn-54 LT 40 LT 60 LT 60 LT 60 LT 40 LT 40 LT 80 LT 70 LT 80 LT 50 LT 50 LT JO LT 60 LT 40 LT 70 LT 70 Zn-65 LT no LT 120 LT 180 LT 120 LT 110 LT 90 LT 150 LT 140 LT 170 LT 100 LT 110 LT 80 LT 160 LT 100 LT 170 LT 170 i

F~~~.~J. r- /*

~- [:'-

l' t; '

~)-u f:..

Jt: _-

(.;:.

't-

{

f{

LJ n

~ ___ ;

i--;

I :

\\._.'

r, L.J f

.J

__.l

/.

/

l __..

i L-..J r",

I I i Crabs were also collected during July, August, and September from the Surry Discharge (SD) location and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.

Naturally occurring K-40 was found in all three samples, as shown on Table 18.

The August sample contained 13 pCi/kg Cs-134 and 18 pCi/kg Cs-137 on a wet weight basis. These nuclides could be due to plant operations.

Eel and catfish were collected during February and August from the same SD location.

The results of gamma spectrometry on these samples are shown on Table 19.

K-40 was found in all four samples.

The eel sample from February contained 100 pCi/kg Co-58 and 50 pCi/kg Co-~0.

The catfish sample from February contained 6.7 pCi/kg Cs-134 and 12 pCi/kg Cs-137.

(All results are given on a wet weight basis.) Only the eel sample from August showed positive activity for any nuclide other than K-40; it contained 37 pCi/kg Cs-137.

These nuclides could be due to plant operations, although the Cs-137 may also be attributable to global fallout.

F.

Sediment Sediment samples were collected twice during this program year.

All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry:

five locations were submitted in March and six 1 oca ti ons in September.

A number of man-made and naturally occurring radioisotopes were detected in these samples.

The isotope cesium-137 was detected in all samples, ranging from 56 to 2900 pCi/kg (dry).

Cesium-134 was detected in 8 of 10 indicator samples ranging from 180 to 1300 pCi/kg (dry). Cobalt-60 was detected in 7 of 10 indicator samples.

Its range was from 310 to 2400 pCi/kg (dry).

Cobalt-58 was detected in one indicator sample at 1900 pCi/kg (dry).

The only man-made isotope in the single control sample collected was Cs-137.

In addition to the man-made isotopes discussed above, a number of naturally occurring isotopes were observed in all samples.

Potassium-40 was detected in all samples, ranging from 3000 to 17000 pCi/kg (dry)~

An assortment of daughters from the uranium and thorium chains were also detected in all of the samples.

These generally ranged from 97 to 1100 pCi/kg (dry) between the different samples.

The observed results were internally consistent for any.given sample.

G.

Waterfowl A single waterfowl sample was collected for 198j from Hag Island Reserve (HIR).. This sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry, the results or which are shown in Table 21.

The man-made isotope cesium-137 was detected at a value of 4.7 pci/kg (wet).

The naturally occurring isotopes K-40 and Be-7 were also detected at 420 and 42 pci/kg (wet),

respectively.

The values for the K-40 was not unexpected nor unusual.

The Be-7 value is attributable to the probable ingestion of leafy vegetation or sediment which may contain this particular isotope due *to-its production in the upper atmosphere and subsequent deposition_ on vegetation and soi 1.

45

      • --------~-~*--** -,----~:-~:---~-:-:r-;:--:--:-;.~. *:

-.-- ----------------------**----*-------------*~---- --

~

1i

[ --- *'

l l

ll I l

I

,I i

I I!

I!

I I I i

I

-I I

i

,i,.

en I.

Month Location July August SD SD September SD 1*-0*~.--,

L.*.<*---j Sampling

  • nate 07 /19/83 08/25/83 09/24/83 (1) LT= Less Than
  • --:-*-~-1 L...,*.. :!

Table 18 Gamma-Spectrometry of Crabs VEPCO REMP 1983

~

l..:_:.,..... J (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) + 2s)

Co-58 LT LT 19 LT 70 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 LT 40 LT. 30 LT 11 13 + 5(2 )

18 + 5 LT 60 LT 60 LT 60 Fe-59 LT 120 LT 60 LT 200 (2)

Positive activity confirmed by recount.

K-40 3100 + 400 1700 + 200.

25(?0 + 600 Mn-54 LT 40 LT 11 LT 60 Zn-65 LT 80 LT 30 LT 110

Sampling

Month, Location Date February SD 02/02/83 SD 02/02/83 I

I I

I J

August SD 08/26/83 l

SD 08/17/83

.t>

-...J j

l I l l

I I 1*

I (1)

LT - Less Than

~-*. _,'.. I

_l Sample Type Eel Catfish Catfish Eel L::

....... J
l.... :... J Table 19 Gamma Spectrometry of Fish VEPCO REMP-1983 i:.. _**... J (Results in pCi/kg (wet)+/-. 2s)

Co-58 co~6o Cs-134 Cs-137 100 + 30 50 + 17 LT 30(l)

LT 30 LT 3 LT 2 6.7 + 1.0 12 + 2 LT 60 LT 50 LT 40.

LT 40 LT 40 LT 20 LT 20 37 + 13

(._"~--J

\\~~--.:*... :.. ~

~:.~-~-.l

."'-~~J L~~ ~, ~ t<-

Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 LT 130 690 + 150 LT 30 LT 60 LT 15 1300 + 200 LT 2 LT 7 LT 200 1300 + 300 LT 40 LT 90 LT 150 940 + 270 LT 20 LT 60

i I J

  • l l

j

J i I

.)

'-I

.j

1 j

j

'j

l

.I..,

'l -.,

I

  • l i
  • I
  • 1 i

j J

I 1 I 1

I i

1 I

I.

i

,J

J i

i

  • 1

.I J

'.j

.I j

'l ! 1

.J i

,i's OJ Loca-tion SI SD Ill p.

POS NN CIIIC SI SD IIIP POS NN

( I )

(2)

Sampling Date Bi-214 03/2 3/83 1200 + 400 03/23/83 1100 + 40'0 03/23/83 1000 + 200 03/23/83 850 + 200 03/23/83 ND 09/27 /83 1200 + 200 09/27/83 940 + 220 09/27 /83 1100 + 200 09/27/83 1200 + 300 09/27/83 1000 + 300 09/27/83 HlO + 130 N>> d Not-detected LT= Less than Cs-134 470 + 150 1300 + 300 510 + 90 180 + so LT 50( 2)

LT 140 420 +.100 1200 + 200 190 + 70 200 + 80 LT 140 r*--1 c-TABLE 20

-~

L.. _ -....'J L ** _.,* *. *.,.'

I*,,

Gamma Spectrometry of Sediment VEl'CO REHP -

1983 (Results in pCi/kg (dry)+/- 2s)

Cs-137 K:-40 1500 + 300 16000 + 3000 2300 + 300 15000 + 3000 1100 + 200 17000 + 2000 720 + 140 17000 + 2000 56 + 34 3000 + 700 860 + 110 17000 + 2000 1300 + 200 16000 + 2000 2900 + 300 17000 + 2000 690 + 150 11000 + 2000 980 + 160 17000 + 3000 260 + 80 14000 + 2000 Pb-212 Pb-214 Ra-226 990 + 310 990 + 390 1100 + 400 820 + 280 630 + 360 860 + 400 850 + 190 970 + 220 1000 + 200 1000 + 200 890 + 190 870 + 200 ND ND ND 1200 + 200 1300 + 200 1300 + 200 950 + 240 1100 + 200 1000 + 200 970 + 240 1000 + 200 1100 + 200 810 + 200 1400 + 300 1300 + 300 940 + 220 1000 + 200 1000 + 300 500 + 120 690 + 150 750 + 170 Tl-208 ND(l) 880 + 480 1200 + 300 990 + 2'10 97 + 83 1300 + 200 1000 + 300 llOO + 400 1300 + 300 1200 + 300 720 + 200 Co-60 ND 930 + 260 420 + 120 370 + llO ND ND 450 + 160 2400 + 300 450 + 120 310 + 130 ND Others ND ND Ac-228@

llOO + 300 Ac-228@

780 + 310 ND n1-212 @

1100 + 800 Ac-228@

1400 + 300 Ac-228@

750 + 400 co~58@

1900 + 200 Ac-228@

790 + 480 ND Ac-228@

610 + 400 Ac-228 @

690 + 260

~ L..

  • .Jr. r/

f.:-,

I*'.

i' f,*.

r..

[' ':

L f.:/*..

[:}?

fjg r :~,: --

[*; ~(

[:*,::

I **

r:..

i,-* r*.

i*'\\

[/

  • l}\\\\

_ ___!]

Sampling Month Location Date j

I j

l I February HIR 02/15/83 I

i j

J

,i,.

I

\\!)

I I I l I*

1 I

1 l

\\

j J

j 1

(1) LT= Less Than I

1 I i 1*

, I.

i r,.

I i

i._ __....

Table 21 Gamma Spectrometry of Fowl VEPCO REMP-1983 l

~--J,

,----i

--*-**.. -.. '1*

  • L-

....... -,.. -.. -.! -.-.. I]

1.......... **

c *.

.,I (Results in pCi/kg (wet) + 2s)

Be-7 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 42 + 21 LT 4(l)

LT 4 LT 3 4.7 + i.9 LT 18 420 + 50 LT 3 LT 8

n n

LJ

r.

f ',,

t Li L

1, u

,-~

\\, :

\\-,*,

f.'

H.

Food Products A total of seven food products were collected for analysis during this program year.

Two samples each of corn and peanuts were submitted for analysis as,,.,ell as individual samples of cabbage, kale.and soybeans.

All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry as well as for strontium-89 and -90.

No man-made.radioisotopes were detected in any of the sample$.

The naturally occurring isotope potassium-40 was observed in all the samples.

The observed values (2300 to 5600 pCi/Kg (wet)) were within the expected range of normal distribution.

I.

Soil Soil samples were collected from six locations during this program year.

All samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry *. The only man-made radioisotope detected was cesium-137.

This isotope was detected in all but one

sample, ranging from 270 to 830 pCi/Kg(dry).

In addition, a number of naturally occurring isotopes were observed in all samples

  • Potassium-40 was detected in all samples, ranging from 2100 to 15000 pCi/Kg(dry).

An assortment of daughters from the uranium and thorium chains were also detected in all of the samples.

These generally ranged from 100 to 1700 pCi/Kg(dry) between the different samples.*

The observed results were internally consistent for any given sample.

Finally, one sample contained detectable activity of beryllium-? at a level of 520 pCi/Kg(dry). This is a naturally occurring radioisotope which is produced in the upper atmosphere. It is often detected in air particulate samples, and quite commonly seen on leafy vegetation and in soil samples.

50

n.

I r

i '

r __

  • r---,

\\ ___ :

.. (71 j.- i

~.J n

j t.

r-**

I !

I -

  • 1**...,

I I.

( ___.,

r*~..

\\ 1 r*-.,

!1 i L)

Ct

( t i I,

~.)

'1 I L_

r*;

r __.

r-:

I Lt

( ~.,.

\\ ' !, __

(

i

'*--~

I-,

Location

  • Carter's Grove Poole Gardens Brock Farm Brock Farm Slade Farm Slade Farm Brock Farm (1)

LT = Less Sample Type Cabbage Kale Peanuts Corn Peanuts Corn Soybeans Than Table 22 Gamma Spectrometry of Vegetation VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)*+/- 2s)

Sampling Date 07/12/83 10/18/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/29/83 51 Cs-134 LT 30(1)

LT 11 LT 11 LT 13 LT 14 LT 7 LT 12 Cs-137 I-131 LT 30 LT 40

  • LT 13 LT 30 LT. 15 LT 30 LT 15 LT 40 LT 16 LT 40 LT 8 LT 19 LT 14 LT 20 K-40 3100 + 400 3000 + 300 4400 + 500 2300 + 300 4900 + 500 2100 + 300 5600 + 600

. --~----.---..--*.*---~~-.... '*.-- : ~,*,_*,.:**** *....,..:r, ~

,..-.... -:*.~'.*, *;,*.,-... *::. ~..,~~::0.. -**:;:, *.,, -,-.,.. - -.- - -*

  1. --::----:::--=-~-.-;'-

. -..---::--*.~

  • F; r:'"! u r

i :

r~

I.

I ;

t__;

I~

I

l... J I,

L.:

r-;

LJ p

.)

Location Carter's Grove Poole Gardens Brook Farm Brock Farm Slade Farm Slade Farm

  • Brock Farm Table 23 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Vegetation VEPCO REMP 1983 Sample Type Cabbage Kale Peanuts Corn Peanuts Corn Soybeans (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet)+ 2s)

Sampling Date 07/12/83 10/18/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/23/83 11/28/83 Strontium-89 (1)

(1)

Sample destroyed in analysis.

52 Strontium-90 (1)

  • --,-.------.--:-*~---7~~-~-..~

.. ;n-~ --

-~o: v ::

-~--~

-~~---

--~--- -

tn w

Location(3}

Ac-228 ss 1100 + ioo BC ND(2}

ALL ND CP 470 + 210 DOW 1',00 + 300 FE 820 + 250 (1)

LT= Less Than (2)

ND= Not Detected

~ --*--~ ~i 81-214 1300 + 200 580 + 110 270 + 190 540 + 140 llOO + 200 910 + 160 I._.. -

Cs-134 LT 140(l}

LT 80 LT 150 LT 110 LT 140 LT 120

(]) All samples collected on 17 August 1983 l..

c*-~7

--:-- '\\

l.. -~---,.* J TABLE 24 Gamma Spectrometry of Soil VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/kg (dry}:!:_ 2s}

Cs-137 J<-40 Pb-212

.......,)

470 + 70 15000 + 2000 1100 + 200 720 + 80 5200 + 900 310 + 50 270 + 90 2100 + 800 100 + 90 830 + 100 7500 + 1500 550 + 70 320 + 80 9000 + 1600 720 + 90 LT 120 11000 + 2000 670 + 80 t '.. -...., ___ !

.r..,...._..._..

'\\..~.c.:...1 Pb-214 Ra-226 1700 + 200 1500 + 200 560 + 100 570 + 100 620 + 190 450 + 190 790 + 140 670 + 140 1100 + 200 llOO + 200 890 + 150 900 + 160

---~~

L.....,..,

Tl-208 1600 + 200 450 + 120 410 + 210 550 + 180 910 + 230 680 + 190 Others Be-7@

540 + 120 Di-212 @

1700 + 700 ND ND ND ND ND

I.i u n

\\.J

. \\

I,

l...J r::

I i* j r--,

I :

  • ~.-1 r1 L--'

( \\ u r..

\\

i, J.

Direct Radiation Environmental radiation dose rates determined by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are given in Table 25.

TLD badges of four readout areas each were deployed quarterly at each location.

The mean values of four readings (corrected individually for response to a known dose and for in-transit exposure) are reported in this table, unless indicated otherwise.

A description of the TLD system used is contained in Appendix C.

A statistical summary of the 1983 data is included in Table 26.

Individual measurements of external radiation levels in the environs of the Surry site ranged from 0.11 to 0.82 mR/day.

Annual: levels ranged from 47 to 130 mR/year.

The values obtained for location 00 (an onsite lead pig controll and location 01 (an onsite station near a waste holding area) are not included in the statistical summaries.

Exposures at the onsite location 01 were elevated throughout the year.

TLD results from the first and second quarter indicated an anomalous exposure to a low energy radiation source.

Each TLD placed in the field has four separate readout areas, each of which has a different degree of shielding.

This permits a *rudimentary assessment of the energy of exposure *within certain limits.

On initial review, the data exhibited wider variations among the four readout areas-of individual badges than was usual.

Closer inspection revealed a trend wherein the least shielded areas showed the highest exposures, although this was by no means universal.

Using a method supplied by the TLD and badge manufacturer, the readings were corrected for the overresponse to low energy radiation.

Not all the values could be corrected in this way.

There were many instances of inversions (higher response from the more heavily shielded area), tight initial variations, and outliers. Each of these conditions can result in sets of readings which diverge on application of the correction curves.

Fpr Table 25, the corrected readings were reported if the application *of the correction curves to any individual station resulted in a new data set which uniformly converged with respect to the internal variation of the four readings.

Sets for which no low energy corrections were applied are indicated in the data table.

Despite the corrections which were applied, the data for the first and second quarters still shows a high variability.

The results seem to indicate an non-uniform exposure to a source of low energy radiation. This anomalous pattern of results has been observed previously in other programs and has been attributed to accidental shipping or storage in proximity to a source or intentional x-raying enroute for shipping inspection.

In any case, plant releases are not implicated because of the absence of any rational

pattern, in particular, the high exposure exhibited by the control locations.

54


--- ~~--~

n r*~

I j I, l

  • ...J 1/

I L,

L,

l...

( '

( ;

Li

["")

I ;

I '

STATION NO.

00(12) 01(12) 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

  • 11 12 13 14 15
  • 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Table 25 (Page l of 2)

Direct Radiation--Thermoluminescent Dosimetry VEPCO REMP 1983 FIRST QUARTER Start: 011383 Stop:

040783

.09

.01 (l) 2,4 +.3(l)(*)

.24 +

.03

.19 +.03(l)

.23 +

.08<1 )

.29 +

.03

.28

.02(1)

.26 +.03(l)

.36

.04 (l)

.36 :t.as <1 )

.27

+/-_.* 04<2>

,32

+/-_

.04<2)

.26

+/-_

,04<3 )

.26 +

,04<3 )

.38

,04<3 )

.30

.03<2 >

.21

,03< 2 >

,16 :!:

,05<4 )

.19

.02<4 )

.17

.02

.20

.03

.19

.02

.47 +

.as

.26

,03<*)

.17 :!:

.02

.17

+/-_

.02

.16 +

.03

.47 +/-.

.2s<*)

.22 +/-.

.03

.22 +

.03 (*)

.15 +/-.

.02 (Results in mR/day

!:_ 2s)

SECOND QUARTER Start: 040783 Stop:

071383

.07

+

.01 6.3 +/-.

.7(S)(*)

,23

+/-_

.03

.11 +.02(S)

(6)

.17 +.02

,25

.21

+/-_

.04<5 )

+/-.

.04 (S)

,03<5 )

+/-.

.03 (S)

.22 +

.23

.77

.31

+

.09<5)(*)

+/-_

.04 (S)

.14

+/-_

,02

.14 +.02

,16.:!:

,02 *

.11 +

.02<5 )

.26.:!:

,03< 5 )

.62 +

,32<7 )

.27.:!:

.03<5 )

.13 +

.02

.12 +

,02

.15

.02

.13 +

.02

.16 +

.02

.23 +

,04<*)

.13 +

,02

.29 +

,03<*)

,14 +

.02

.14

+/-_

.02

.12.:!:

.02

.12.:!:

.02 THIRD QUARTER

'Start: 071383 Stop:

101183

.09 +

.01<8 )

4.1 +

,3

.29

.12 +

.17 +

.02 <3 )

  • 01 (S)

.02-<8 )

.02 ( 3 )

.o/8)

  • 01 (S)

.01< 3 )

,19 +

.23 +

.22 +

.20 +

.22

.21

.01 (S)

.02 <3 )

.21 +

.02< 8 )

+/-_

.01<8 )

, 02 ( 9 )

.:..o/9)

.02 <9 )

,02 <9 )

.01 ( 9 )

.20

.23

.28

.26

.26

.2*4

.18 +

.01< 9 )

.18

.02

.17

.01

.19 +

.03

.18

.02

.19

.03

.20 +

.03

.20

.02

.20 +

.02

.18

+/-_

.02

.20 +/-.

.02

.18 +/-_

.02

.20 +

.01 FOU,RTH QUARTER Start: 101183 Stop:

010684

,01 (ll)

.as 2.9 +

,1

.26 +

.a/11)

+

.01 (11)

.01<11 )

.01<11 )

.01<11 >

.11

.20 +

.19

.22 (6)

(6)

.19 +/-.

.01<11 )

.20 +/-.

.01 (ll)

.22

.01 (ll)

.21

t_

.02< 11 )

.27 +/-.

.04(ll)

(10)

(10)

,21

t_

.01<11 )

.25 +

.02(1l)

.15 +/-.

.01 (ll)

.19.:!:

.01

.15 +

.01

.17.:!:

.01

.16.:!:

.01

, 15

t_

.01

.18.:!:

.01

.17 +

.01

.16 +

.01

.16 +/-.

.01

,17.:!:

.01

.15-

+/-_

.01

.17 !.

.01 Note: See footnotes at end of table, 55 AVERAGE + 2s 0.08 +

0.01 3.9 + 1.7 0.26 + 0.03 0.13 +

0.04 0.20

+/-_

0.03 0.21 + a.as 0,25 0.03 0.23

+/-_

0.03 Q.26 +

0.09 0.2s

.:. a.as 0.36 +

0.27 0,27 + 0.06 0.20 + a.as 0.23 +

0.06 0.27 0.11 0.24 0.07 0.24 Q,03 0.32 +

0.21 0.20 +/-. a.as 0.17 0.03 0,16 +

0.03 0.18 + 0.02 0.23 +

0.16 0.19 + a.as 0.20 +/-. 0.03 0.17 +

C.03 0.20 +/-.

0.06 0.24 +/-.

0.16 0.18 +/-.

0.03 0.17 +

0.04 0.16 Q,03

r n

ji(

l.'.C:!

r:

I I

r.

r

/ ;

1, **** :

1*.

L.

f:1 I i I_ __ ;

r'

' i :

I..!

r--"

f '

i I

.... -1

[',

,__j r **~-.

I;.,

  • ~---

..:,t'""

Table 25 (Page 2 of 2)

Direct Radiation-Thermoluminescent Dosimetry VEPCO REMP 1983 (Results in mR/day.!. 2s)

STATION NO.

FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER Start: 011383 Start: 040783 Start:

Stop:

31

.15 32

.28 33

.21 34

.22 35

.21 36

.46 37

.82 38

.26 39

.43 40

.74 41

.31 42

.52 43

.55 INDICATOR AVERAGE

+ 2s 0.29 CONTROL AVERAGE

+ 2s 0.58

  • COMMENTS:

(l)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(*)

040783 Stop:

071300 Stop:

+

.02

.15.!.

.02

.18 +

.03

.16.!.

.02

.18 + -

  • 03 <3)

.17.!..02

.21.!.

+

  • 03 <3 )

.17.!.

.02

.21 +

+

  • 02 <3)

.19.!..02

.24 +

+

  • 05 <3 )

.20 +

.02

.24 +

.22<3)(*)

+

.18.!.

.02

.20.!.

  • 09 <3 )

.26.!.

.08

.27.!.

. (3)(*)

.05

.19.!.

.03

.20.!.

.23<3)

.12.!.

.02

.16 +

.04 <3)

.16.!.

.02

.22.!.

. 06 <3 )

.18 +.02

.19 +

.44(3 )(*)

.14.!.

.02

.16.!.

+ 0.14 0.21.!. 0.13 0.21 +

+ 0.22 0.15 +

.OS 0.18.!.

Exposure period was 1-14-83 to 4-11-83.

~xposure period was 1-13-83 to 4-11-83.

Exposure period was 1-14-83 to 4-07-83.

Exposure period was 1-13-83 to 4-12-83.

Exposure perioa was 4-11-83 to 7-13-83.

Missing at time of pickup in field.

Exposure period was 4-12-83 to 7-14-83.

Exposure period was 07-13-83 to 10-10-83.

Exposure period was 07-13-82 to 09-28-83.

Lost in transit.

Exposure period was 10-10-83 to 01-06-84 Not included in vertical averages.

No low energy correction applied.

56 071383.

101183

.02

.02

.02

.02

.01

.01

.03

.03

.02

.02

.03

.01

.02 0.03 0.03 FOURTH QUARTER Start: 101183 Stop:

010684

.17 +

.01

.19 +

.01

.24 +

.02

.21.!..01

.46 +

.17

.26 +

.01

.20 +

.01

.28.!.

.01

.20.!.

.01

.15.!.

.01

.24.!.

.02

.24 +.02

.22 +.02 0.20 + 0.06 0.18 + 0.04 AVERAGE

+ 2s 0.16 + 0.01 0.20 + o.os 0.21 + 0.03 0.20 + 0.02 0.28 + 0.13 0.29 +

o."t2 0.35.!. 0.31 0.27 + 0.01 0.25 + 0.12 0.29 + 0.30 0.23 + 0.06 0.28 +

0.16 0.27 + 0.19

Medium or Pathway Sampled (Uni ts of Measurement)

Air 1o9ine -

(pCi/m)

Ai rl.Jorne Pa rti cul ates (lE-03 pCi/rn3J Milk (pCi /l) r-**--i l,.. *,*-** _J Pl t'_:__~,_J TABLE 26

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADJOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 1 OF 7)

N11r.ie of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-200; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed 1-131 - 423 Gross Beta -

422 Gross Alpha - 422 Gamma Spec -

32 Be-7 Ce-141 Cs-134 Cs-137 IJb-95 Zr-95 Gamma Spec - 58 K-40 Cs-137 Cs-134

59 Sr 58 Sr-90 -58 Ca-60 Reporting Period:

10 January -

31 December 1983 Lo~ier Limit of Detection (1) 0.07 10 0.05 0.06 18 15 60 15 l

  • 5 l

A 11 Indicator Locations Mean (f)

(Range)

LLD 15.0 (285/369)

{3.2-78) 3.7 (212/369) 1.2-20 64 (26/28)

(32-100).

LLD 3.8 (2/28)

(2.2-5.4)

6. 7 (4/28)

(2.0-14)

LLD LLD

  • 1300 (47/47)

(l 000-1800) 8.4 (12/58)

(l.4-43) 10 (l/50)

(10-10)

LLD LLD LLD 2.9 (1/58)

(2.9-2.9) 2.9 (3/48)

(2.2-3.5) 1350 (48/48)

(890-2000)

Location with Highest Annua 1 Mean Name, Di stance Mean ( f) (2 l and Direction (Range)

FE DOH DOH/FE ss BC LEE HALL JDKS EPPS CP JDKS JDKS 17 (38/52)

(3.8-72) 4.5 (28/53)

(l.4-20) 72 (4/4)/72 (4/4)

(53-100/46-97) 3.8 (2/4)

(2.2-5.4) 2.0 (1/4) (3)

(2.0-2.0) 1400 (12/12)

(1200-1800) 14 (4/11)

(2.5-43) 10 (1/12)

(10-10) 2.9 (1/12)

(2.9-2.9) 3.5 (l/12)

(3.5-3.5) 1400 (12/12)

(l 000-1600)

NOTE:

See footnote at end of table.

Control LocaH~ns Mean (fl (Range)

L,LD 19 (45/53)

(6.3-40) 4.2 (29/53)

(2.0-11) 73 (3/4)

(38-110)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1400 (11/11)

(1300-1700)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLU LLD 2.3 (2/10)

(l. 6-2. 9) 1500 (12/12)

(1300-1890) c:-J

J..**

j. i.

J lJ1 co r---*-..

I *. -...* ;

Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units of Measurement)

Precipitation (pCi/l)

River Water Monthly (pCi /l)

TABLE 26 r--,

l..._....*..J

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -

1983 (Sheet 2 OF 7)

Name of Facility; SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Gross Beta Gamma Spec Cs-134 Cs-137 Tritium-30 Gamma Spec -

26 Co-58 Co-60 Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 Sr 13

  • Sr 13 Fe-59 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95 Zn-65 Zr-95 Reporting Period:

10 January -

31 December 1983 Lo~1er Limit of Detection (l) 4 15 18 2000 15 15 60 15 18 5

30 15 15 15 30 30 A 11 I ndi ca tor Locations Hean (fl (Range) 6.8 {12/12/)

{l. 5-37)

LLD LLD 660 (2/12)

{570-750) 12 {l/13)

{12-12) 15 {2/13)

{3. 8-27)

LLD LLD 2.6 {1/13)

{2.6-2.6) 53 (1/13)

(53-53) 1.0 (1/13)

(1.0-1.0)

.68 (1/13)

{.68-.68)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance Mean (fl (2) and Direction (Range) ss ss SURRY DISCIIARGE SURRY DISCHARGE SURRY DISCHARGE SURRY DISCHARGE SURRY DI SCIIARGE SURRY DISCHARGE 6.8 {12/12)

{l. 5-37) 660 {2/12)

(570-750) 12 (1/13)

(12-12) 15 {2/13)

(3.8-27) 2.6 (1/13)

(2.6-2.6) 53 (1/13)

(53-53) 1.0 (1/13)

(1.0-1.0)

  • 68 ( 1 /13)

(.68-.68)

NOTE:

See footnote at ehd of table.

Control LocarHns Mean { f)

(Range) 3.8 (9/12)

(1.3-14)

LLD LLD 410 {3/12)

(190-630)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1.6 (1/13)

(1.6-1.6)

  • 92 ( 2 /13)

(. 86-. 98)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD l......J

\\

i j

J j

l J

j l r i

J J.

j ;,

\\

i

'l l

.! l 1

1

.)

.l

'i j

i i

\\ i J.

'J

)

l I

I j

I I I l 1 l l 1

  • I I

11 11

'i I

i.

\\ **-

Ul

\\.D Medi um or Pathway Sampled (Units of Measure men tl Bi-Monthly River Hater (pCi /1)

Surface Hater (pCi /1)

I/ell Hater (pCi/1)

'* L*c __.:

TABLE 26 1-----,

._. --~--* i r-:--~

h.......,~.:.J

-.J

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 3 OF 7)

Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and To'ta l Number of Analyses Performed Gamma Spec - 30 Co-58 Cs-134 Cs-137 Tritium - 10 Ba-140 Fe-59 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95 Zn-65 Zr-95 Gross Beta - 8 Gross*Alpha - 8 Tritium - B Gross Beta - 8 Gross Alpha - !l Tritium - 30 Reporting Period:

10 January - 31 December 1983 Lo~1er Limit of Detection (l) 15 18 2000 60 30 15 15 15 30 30 4

2000 4

2000 All Indicator Locations Mean (fl (Range) 5.5 (1/30)

(5. 5-5. 5) 9.8 (1/30)

(9.8~9.B) 7.4 (2/30)

(3. 7-11) 660 (7/8)

(220-1500)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6.5 (8/8)

(1.4-23) 6.8 (2/8)

(4. 0-9. 6)

LLD 5.8 (8/8)

(1.8-Jl)

LLD 400 (2/8)

(230-560)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance Mean ( f) (2 l and Direction (Range)

SD SD SD SI cc SR JMTN ss 5.5 (1/6)

(5.5-5.5) 9.8 (1/6)

(9.B-9.B) 11 (1/6)

(11-11) 1500 (1/2)

(1500-1500) 13 (2/2)

(2.0-23) 9.6 (1/2)

(9.6-9.6) 8.6 (2/2)

(6.1-11) 560 (1/2)

(560-560)

NOTE:

See footnote at ~nd of table.

'... -.... 1 Control Locaf~~ns Mean ( fl (Range)

LLD LLD LLD 250 (2/2)

(200-290)

.HD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD no control no control L..*.

  • 1
  • I

~

  • 1.-..:**

1**.*;

f)i

.;..,/'*

j

'j

  • l

..j

    • i J j I l

,j I

l j

\\

j

~1

! I

' ! I i i

[~---.

Medium or Pathway Sampled (Units of Measurement)

Clan,s (pCi/kg (wet))

Oysters (pCi/kg (wet))

.Crabs (pCi/kg (wet))

L...

TABLE 26 SUHHARY OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 4 OF 7)

Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number

'of Analyses Performed Gamma Spec - 30 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gamma Spec - 18 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gamma Spec - 3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co'-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Reporting Period:

10 January - 31 December 1983 Lo~1er Limit of (l)

De tee ti on 130 260 130 260 130 150 130 260 130 260 130 150 130 260 130 260 130 150 Al 1 Indicator Locations Mean (f)

(Range) 1400 (16/24)

(2 50-4600).

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 890 (12/18)

(480-1700)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2400 (3/3)

(1700-3100)

LLD LLD LLD LLD 13 (1/3)

(13-13) 18 (1/3)

(18-18)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Dis ta nee and Direction HIP DWS SD SD SD

  • Mean (fl (2)

(Range) 1700 (4/6)

(440-4200) 1200 (4/6)

(480-1700) 2400 (3/3)

(1700-3100) 13 (1-/3)

( 13-13) 18 (1/3)

(HHS)

NOTE:

See footnote at end* of table.

Control LocaH?ns Mean (fl (Range) 4200 (2/6)

(4200-4200)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD None LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD None LLD LLD LLD LLD None None

I

/

I

.*l }

"j

  • i !

i

.1 j

1

.:j

.]

i I l

.j i

j J

-'j

.J J i.*;

11

.,:i

. J r--*

I Medium or Pa tllway Sampled (Units of r-- -,

  • Measurement)

Fish (pCi/kg (wet))

River Bottom Sediments (pCi/kg (dry))

~-~----,

l... _.... '

L....

i

, TABLE 26

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0t.M£NTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 5 OF 7)

Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed

10 January - 31 December 1983 Lower Limit of (1 l Detection 130 260 130 130 260 130 150 All Indicator Locations Mean (fl (Range) 1100 (4/4)

(690-1300)

LLD LLD 100 (1/4)

(100-100) 50 (1/4)

(50-50)

LLD 6.7 (1/4)

(6. 7-6. 7) 12 (1/4)

(12-12) 1000 (9/10)

(810-1200) 960 (9/10)

(690-1400) 1000 (9/10)

(750-1300) 870 (9/10)

(500-1000) 940 (9/10)

(970-1300) 790 (6/10)

(610-1100) 14000 (10/10)

(3000-17000)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance and Di rec ti on SD SD SD SD SD SD;IIIP HIP HIP SI;POS IHP ll IP POS Mean (f) (2 )

(Range) 1100 (4/4)

(690-1300) 100 (1 /4)

(100-100) 50 (1/4)

(50-50)

6. 7 (1/4)

(6.7-6.7) 12 (1/4)

(12-12) 1100 (2/2); (2/2)

(1100-1100); (1000-1200) 1200 (2/2)

(970-1400) 1200 (2/2)

(1000-1300) 970 (2 /2; (2/2)

(950-990;940-1000) 1300 (2/2)

(1200-1300) 860 (2/2)

(610-1100) 17000 ( 2 /2)

(17000-17000)

NOTE:

See footnote at end of table *

,,-... -1

---1
  • .... _.. _: __ )

Control LocaH?ns Mean (fl (Range)

None LLD LLD None None LLD None None 1200 (1/1)

(1200-1200) 1300 (1/1)

(1300-1300) 1300 (1/1)

(1300-1300) 1200 (1/1)

(1200-1200) 1300 (1 /1}

(1300-1300) 1400 (1/1)

(1400-1400) 17000 (1/1)

(,17000-17000)

\\

. ~ ::.,... :.,..* ~.:.....

. *~.. ~* ;.-,.: :..... *..* '*** '. *-" ** ~.*. *-* -*-' -...

,.. t.*,.. ~.-.<~.-..... ~-

-~--,*. -. -'.. :.. ***-'.. ~*.,.... w :,* : -~-*~ ** :~ *

~iedium or Pathway Sampled (Un its of

. Measurement)

River Bottom Sediments (cont'd)

Water Fowl (pCi/kg (wet))

Vegetation (pCi /kg (wet))

TABLE 26

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -

1983 (Sheet 6 OF 7)

Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Bi-212 Co-5!\\

Gamma Spec -

1 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58,60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Be-7 Gamnra Spec -

7 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 Sr 6 Sr 6 Reporting Period:

10 January -

31 December 1983 Lower Limit of (l)

De tee ti on 150 180 130 260 130 260 130 150 80 60 All Indicator Locations Mean (f)

(Range) 560 (8/10)

(190-1300) 1200 (10/10)

(56-2900) 670 (7/10)

(310-240)

LLD 1900 (1/10) 1900-1900) 420 (1/1)

(420-420)

LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4.7 (1/1)

(4.'7-4.7) 42 (1/1)

(42-42)

LLD LLD 3600 *( 7 /7)

(2100-4900)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Di stance and Direction SD SD SD SD HIR HIR BROCK Mean (f) <2 >

(Range) 1300 (2/2)

(1200-1300) 2600 (2/2)

(2 300-2900) 1700 (2/2)

(930-2400) 1900 (1/2)

(1900-1900) 420 (1/1)

(420-420) 4.7 (1/1)

(4. 7-4. 7) 42-(1/1)

(42-42) 4100 (3/3)

(2300-5600)

NOTE:

See footnote at *end of table.

Control Locaf~?ns Mean ( f)

(Range)

LLD 860 ( 1 /1)

(860-060)

LLD 1100 (1/1)

(1100-1100)

LLD None LLD LLD LLD LLD

LLD, None None LLD LLD None

,I I

\\ l j

\\ r

-*1-J

)J

°'

w Medium or Pathway Sampled (Un its of Measurement)

Soil (pCi/kg (dry))

TLDs (mR/day)

TABLE 26 I

.. _.J SUMMAkY OF DATA FOR THE SURRY NPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Sheet 7 of 7)

Name of Facility: SURRY Nuclear Power Station Docket_ Nos. 5-280; 50-281 Location of Facility: SURRY County, Virginia

  • Reporting Period:

10 January - 31 December 1983 Type and Location with Highest Annual Mean To ta l Number Lower All Indicator (2) of Analyses Limit of (1)

Locations Name, Di stance Mean ( fl Performed Detection Mean (f)

(Range) and Direction (Range)

Gamma Spec - 6 (3)

Bi-214 780 (6/6) ss 1300 (1/1)

(270-1300)

( 1300-1300)

Pb-214 940 (6/6) ss 1700 (1/1)

(560-1700)

( 1700-1700)

Ra-226 870 (6/6) ss 1500 (1/1)

(560-1500)

(1500-1500)

Pb-212 580 (6/6) ss 1100 (1/1)

(100-1100)

(1100-llOO)

Tl-208 770 (6/6) ss 1600 (1/1)

(410-1600)

(1600-1600)

Ac-228 1100 (4/6) ss 1700 (1/1)

(470-1700)

(1700-1700)

K-40 8300 (6/6) ss 15000 (1/1)

(2100-15000)

(15000-15000)

Cs-134 LLD Cs-137 520 (5/6)

CP 830 (1/1)

(270-830)

(830-830)

Bi-212 1700 (1 /6) ss 1700 (1/1)

(1700-1700)

(1700-1700)

Cs-137 540 (1/6) ss

  • 540 (l/6)

(540-540)

(540-540)

Gamma Dose - 172 0.23 (155/155) 10 0.36 (4/4) per RG 4.13 (0.11-.82)

(0.20-0.97)

(ll LLD is lower limit of detection as defined and required in USNRC Branch Technical Position on An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.

(2)'

(f) is the ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest Control LocaH?ns

-Mean (fl (Range)

None None None None None None None LLD None None None 0.27 (8/8)

(0.12-0.74)

(3)

Station SS not s~lected as the location with the highest average when a true, off site alternative was available.

~,.. :::-~:] j l.: *:*

eC

tl l

--~

Ll

[--:,..

[ __

' L fl. u L...

V.

CONCLUSIONS Results of the 1983 R~diological Environmental Monitoring. Program for the Surry Nuclear Station have been presented.

Generally the fesults were as expected for normal environmental samples.

Naturally occurring activity was observed in the expected sample media in the activity ranges.

One onsite station contained activity of probable plant origin in air particulate samples*and also showed a higher than normal exposure rate.

This station is not a true indicator of environmental contamin*ation.

Occasional samples of nearly all media showed the presence of man-made isotopes. These have been discussed individually in the text. Observed activities were at very lqw concentrations and of no significant dose consequence.

Anomalous TLD readings were observed but there was no basis for concluding that these resulted from any station operations.

Based on the evidence of the environmental monitoring pro~ram the station appears to be operating within regulatory limits.

64

~*

~

l I

Z 4BWP.5".,.,, _

)

~~

  • -c.* -* -~--::,.~::* -*:***_ *:**"'*_-": --,.**:~;;'-::*--~-:-~--'.-~.-~r,'"'~-':""'~:A~'"'"""~; ~~
  • LI l

[

NUS Corporation Domestic Offices International Offices

-=.:.......,_- *--~=-=-=----'" -===--====...:.-~cc.,====-;==--.---------*--o--=-:. =-*---~-c=~=-==-=~~"C""----i.

910 Clopper Road Aiken, SC Brazil Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878

  • Arlington, VA Germany 301/258-6000 Aurora, CO Japan

... TWX: 710-828-0540 Chicago, IL Saudi Arabia

  • NUSWASH

. Clearwater, FL

  • -r, a -
  • Columbia, SC Gaithersburg, MD Tucker, GA Houston, TX Menlo Park, CA Bedford, MA Edison, NJ

-. '. Wayne, PA.

rl:rt 't iP Pittsburgh, PA Portland, OR San Diego, CA Sherman Oaks, CA

.;_.* r *** +* ¥ b'

  • '**"t ort"°es
  • ..,* 1*i I
  • ' -,*.. ; -*flidtct d

t

' l

(!

(i r

[:

L

r*

t

~..,.. '