ML20038B053

Forwards to State of Mi & NPDES Application in Response to NRC Requesting Addl Environ Info for Review of OL Applications

ML20038B053
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	11/20/1981
From:	Jackie Cook CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
14880, NUDOCS 8111240653
Download: ML20038B053 (75)

Text

C011Silm80S 5

)

POW 8r James W Cook C0mpany vic,e,,,is,,,- e,.i,,,,. e.,.

,i,,

and Con,truction General Offices: 1945 West Parnell Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (517) 788 0453 November 20, 1981 Harold R Denton, Director g

[{('Th}{) g Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

()

[

~ l j~

J Division of Licensing

'~

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 NOV 2 319815 32 n se:wm (

u.

MIDLAND PROJECT g',,

\\ ?

.[

MIDLAND DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

.g FILE:

0487.4/0505.5 SERIAL:

14880 Wm H Regan's letter of October 11, 1978 requested additional environmental information for the NRC review of our application for operating licenses for the Midland Plant Units 1 & 2.

Consumers Power Company has responded with all the necessary information. To update our submittals, attached are six copies of:

Michigan NPDES Permit Application, Revision 3, (Combined Discharge Permit Application), Consumers Power Company September 30, 1981 which was submitted to the Michigan Water Resources Commission on November 16, 1981.

hY

~

f,,

s'

/

,s JWC/RFG/fms

/

/

COO)

.5 b

8111240653 811120~

/

PDR ADOCK 05000329 Q,h g,d A

PDR oc1181-0457a131

m

/-== 4 CC0CU333 P003r

' i

\\, '~,'

Comp;ny 80EP10.1.3 General Offices: 212 West Michtgen Avenue, Jocheon, Machigen 40201 * (517) 795 4550 November 16, 1981 Mr Robert J Courchaine Executive Secretary Michigan Water Resources Co=ission P O Box 30028 Lansing, MI h8909 Dear Mr Courchaine On February 28, 1978 the Company submitted a State Discharge Permit application for the Midland Plant vaste water discharges; the application was amended on October 20, 1978 and June 1,1979 Amendment 3 which reflects the current plant design is enclosed.

Amendment 3 has been prepared using the revised state application for= per the direction of your staff.

The current schedule is for Unit 2 to begin co=mercial operation in December of 1983 and Unit 1 in July of 198h.

As indicated in our previous submittals, there are a number of construction and preoperational testing discharges that vill occur upon co=pletion of the various plant systems prior to the start of plant co=ercial operation.

Several of these types of discharges will require authorization in the near future. We plan to work with your staff te develop a schedule which assures timely authorization of these discharges.

We ask that you assist us by assuring that the processing of these authorizations is given an appropriate priority.

Additionally, we believe it vould be appropriate at this time to reaffirm the understanding between your agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Co=ission concerning the processing of the Draft Environmental Statement as it relates to the processing of the draft NPDES Pemit.

It may also be advisable at this time to develop a process schedule that acco=odates the needs of both agencies.

To assure that each of the actions outlined above is initiated, as well as to address any questions you may have on Amendment 3, we request an opportunity to meet with you and appropriate members of your staff within two weeks.

Thank you for your consideration.

Yours very truly l

P C Hittle Director of Environmental Department By ((p,e. l. l,.N.l b g

RLF/paf

MICHIGAN NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION REVISION 3 u

,.j.

I r 1:4 I

F

~

pn=w;uop 1s agan; anna; AL4u e

U,Q]

gl n

a T

9 t

c:

.a 3-

3. r rg g

eeaom_

rrt

, rT Midland Plant Units 1&2 L

s s

j

_i

a

=_ w m,w..

_a l

i t

~'

Consuillars 1

l POW 2r

/'C0ilip?!!i?

5 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY MIDLAND PLAh7 UNITS 1 & 2 STATE DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION (Superceded)

February 28, 1978 FEDERAL STANDARD FORM C APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER (Superceded)

May 16, 1978 MICHIGAN COMBINED DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION September 30, 1981 SUPPLEMENTS AMENDMENT NO 1 (STATE) OCTOBER 20, 1978 1

AMENDMENT NO 1 (FEDERAL) NOVEMBER 22, 1978 2

AMENDMENT NO 2 (STATE & FEDERAL) JUNE 1, 1979 3

AMENDMENT N0 3 (COMBINED DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION) SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 miO581-0354a102 l

l

s l

l TABII 0F CONTENTS l

PART NO TITLE 1

Discharge Permit Application 2

Support Dccument 3

Appendices i

4 Figures s

miO581-0354a102 Ip

PART ONE DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION miO581-0354a102

' Permit Nc.

Page of State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources water Resources Commission DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION (Please pnnt or type all information)

Section 1. Applicant and Facility Desenption - unless otherwise specified on this form, all items are to be completed. If an it:m is not applicable, indicate "NA."

I

1. Legal Name of Applicant:

Ccnsurers ?over Cc= rani

2. Mailing Address of Applicant:

number & street 212 V st Michican Avenue zip city Ja0hSO state MI code h9201 phone 517 785-0550 f

3. Applicant's Authorized Agent for further correspondence:

name & title

? C Hittle. Diraeter of Envin n= ental Activities number & street 10h5 West Pa"nall Road I

city Ja**cr state MI zip code h9201 telephone: area code

• 1~

number 95-10'O

4. Fac!!!ty/ Activity:give name, ownership and physical location of the plant or other operating facility where discharge (s) does or will occur.

I name EN**"-***

h***

Co-"* -" Mi dl *

• d Pl e *

• ownership:

sole owner; Y corporation; state in which incorporation filed; partnership; governmental unit; nonprofit organization.

location:

street & number ? t" rae*

Va*

um*d city

'"e' township Mid'**'

county '" e- '

, town

'hY O'

range pr section I c rtify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete and accurate. Submitted in accordance with Section 8 (b), Act 245, Public Acts of 1929, as amended.

I

' gnature o Applicant Si at

.ac r Date S' mature %of Site F

,L nwet Aaas(d i,

n Y. x W

4 p

Print o ype Applicant's Name & Title Print or Type Co-Owner's Name Janes W Cook Donald B Miller, Jr.

Vice President of Projects,

Site Manager n.a Engineering and Construction

l I

Permit No.

Page 2_ of.l.5 _

NOTE: If sanitsry sewage is to be discharged from housing developments, apartment buildings, shopping centers. or other commercial developments, into a system cther than an approved municipal sanitary waste collection system, the following should be completed and signed by an authorized municipal official or township officer, f

it is the policy of the Commission that applications involving the disposal of sewage of human ongin from any entity other than local government include the local govemment as a co-signer of the statement, and that all proceedings and heanngs against said entity willinclude the local unit of govemment as a party by appropnate notice. and all permits issued as a result of such heanngs and proceedings will be jointly against the said unit and entity.

Signature of Authorized Local Govemment Representative Mailing Address of Local Govemment Representative NA NA Pnnt or Type Name of Local Government Representative NA S. Nature of Business: describe the nature of the business or manufacturing process conducted at the plant or operating facility.

Gere-s'icr cf e7 ect-iaC e r a - m.-

a_-4 p-ecers st e =_.

(See 911 bit I).

6. Source of Water Supply: indicate average water intake volume per day by sources (See Fxhibit II and Figure 1).

municipal - name V ' a ' V" d a ' r e ' V a ' a -- "#e'at I2L 2'ii*

163 300 gallons per day surface water intake - name "d " a' ava " a a "#-==

fEi 9C 000 *^o gallons per day n gallons per day pnvate-well other (specify) Precipitatien (3,L,L6) o

• 7 o'n gallons per day

7. Facility Water Usage: average volume in gallons per day for the following types of water usage at the facility.

(See Exhibit III).

process water (including contact cooling water)

(23,27,23,39) 15L,800 gallons per oay plus 11,900,000 gallons per day recirculated (20).

noncontact cooling water 996,L35,000 gal per day recirculated (11,65)

- gations per day sanitary water (number of people served) ** LOO to 1300 (26) 1L.000 gallons per day other (specify) Evaporation and seepage (8,9) 18.32L 000 gallons per day total 18,L91,600 ;allons per dav

'Flev reference nodes. See Figure 1.

• • Tais value does not include sanitary and de=estic water obtained frc= private wells for the visiter / training center and outage building. Approxi=ately L,675 spd and 7,500 gpd, respectively, are utilized for de=estic purposes and discharged. to Dov for treat =ent and disposal. Outage building water use value applies only during i

plant outage for refueling.

Permit No.

Page of 1

8. Foc!Ilty Discharges: specify number of discharge points and the volume of water discharged or used from the facility according to the categories below.

(See Fipre 1).

10*

3 umber of discharge FefereL00 total volume used or points Modes discharged - gal / day surface water

~

60 d2 11 ~00 000 municipal sanitary sewer

^

municipal storm sewer

^

groundwater -

n a land application

^

b. percolation system F

0 0 S M*

well injection other (specify)

~

~

l e

~.

~

i"* " c#"

l total

9. Discharge Locations: provide a drawing or map of the f acility showing each point of discharge listed in item 8 Label each discharge with the appropriate three digit serial number assigned in Section !!,1 (a).

(Eee TirureE 2 ant ?'.

~

10. Pollution lncident Prevention Plan: has your facility submitted a Pollution incident Prevention Plan?

yes

" no date submitted IT 'S 'M date fully implemented 1*

i5 it ii-hie Lf Cerrercial C;.eratien.

11. Critical Matedals a.

usage: This appiscation contains a list of critical materials. Please indicate the amount of these materials used in.

produced in, or are incidental to your operation. (See Exhibit I7).

amount amount name Ibs/ yr.

name Ibs/ yr.

• Seepage and percolation fro: cooling pond.

~

..,,m o

b Permit No.

Discharge Serial No. '

Page of 15 Section 11 Basic Discharge Description (Please pnnt or type all information)

Complete this section fcr each discharge indicated in Section 1. Item 8. except those discharges which enter a municipal sanitary sewer. Separate desenptions of each discharge are required even if several discharges originate in the same facility.

All values for an existing discharge should be representative of the twelve previous months of operation. If this is a proposed

+scharge, values should reflect best engineenng estimates.

1. Discharge Serial No. and Name n

n Y

- (three digit code. 001. 002. etc.)

a.

discharge serial number b.

type of waste water being dischargeo (Process, noncontact coo!ing, etc.)

Certirei Flant Dischsrre -

rr00ess, ren?Ont act cSrline. =J. i rieriritstier ( 60 !*

--*c J

,- ~ --- average gals / day

'Ni ih, aximum ga s/ day

.,, C *,

c.

volume discharged

2. Discharge Location l

n, range er section z'

town city or town

'li f s" 3

'"d'a"'

county I

3. Discharge Point Description (if the discharge is to a county drain or storm sewer, indicate the receiving waters; e g.. Clear Lake via Mud Drain) lake river or stream

"' " cb e-en " e a a Di Ja-municipal storm sewer county drain grounowater well injection other (specify) 4 Activity Description give a narrative description of activity producing this discharge: (See Liitit !!!).

Tre prerered enterrrise is a twe u *t nuclear rever riant.

Esch unit censists of a praee"

• -ad vster resc cr. s tu-tire generater. and as sociated auxiliaries.

"he facilit hst s tet si cerbined creer cer aM 1' t-c f I P' 'G.'e rius L. " 5 7. IT n /kr of rrocar7 etes:

Tra elact -i af tv vi

te rup;11ed te the arplicert 's electrics 1 distributien syster sni t '- a p-ncent rt ae - vi

be rurp'dai t e rn a Ocv Cheriesi corpsrv

• Flev reference node.

See figure 1.

P2rmit No.

Discharge Serial No. 2._ l 1_

Page 5 of 1.5._._

5. Activity Causing Dischargt: For each S.I.C. Code which describes the activity causing this discharge. supply the type and average and maximum amount of either the raw materials consumed (item Sa) or the product produced (Item Sb) a.

raw materials:

average maximum unit discharge (s)

S.I.C. Code name amt/ day amt/ day (see Table 11) serial No. (s) b.

products:

average maximum unit discharge (s)

S.I.C. Code name amt/ day amt/ day (see Table 11) serial No.(s)

LC11 Electric Power Se'tices 1.26 E-1 001 Lofi st e s: Sur:1 C'.2 2-2 001

6. Weste Abatement Practices: Briefly describe the waste treatment practices applied to this discharge. (attach a waste flow diagram) 'See Exhiti '.' and Figure 1).

narrative: Miscellaneout 50;r drainsge and c llected I recipitation are trested ty til i

se nration and renevs1 equipment. Wastewater tscing extrene TE values is adjusted to a range of 6.C to 9.1 ty chemics 1 addition. Wastevater with high cuspended solide is r:uted to the :: ling pend for settling. laundr r facility vastevater is filtered to ren:re suspended solids.

Certsin prece r vasterster sni canitsre varte: are regregated and treated or diz; sed of Offrite. ::n-contset : cling vster is retircu-1sted to the ::: ling pond and rettined to a'1:v the dissipstien of heat sni :: a1 residusi chlorine.

Construction site rancff is centr:11ed ty holding ponds to allev

ttling, rip rap to reduce water velocity, and fertilizing, seeding and culching to a.

distance of treatment facility and/or disposal area from nearest well: (See belov.)

centrol scil erosien.

private well feet; municipal well feet.

The plant site (ie, the protected area) is located within the distributien systen of the Midland Municipal Water District which draws its supply fret Lake Euron.

The nearest known private wells in use are located near the plant site at the visitor / training center, the outage tuilding and i'arehouse no 2 (See Tirare 31

/

4 1

Permit No.

Discharge Serial No..f O 1 Page

1. of &

b.

If subsurface disposal, land application. or cxidation pond is proposed, nearest distance to a surface watercourse:

"'A feet.

c.

if discharge is to underground by injection well, include an application and'or approved permit in accordance with the provisions of Act 315. Public Acts cf 1969. N/A d.

names and addresses of property owners adjacent to the facility:

name address (See Exhith Y' i,

P. Wastewater Characteristics:If you presently have a discharge permit, list all paratneters reported on the current monthly operating report and compute monthly averages, maximum and minimum from the past twelve months. For the proposed discharge. describe the expected characteristics of the discharge after treatment.

Monthly Monthly Monthly Sample Sample Parameter Average Maximum Minimum Frequency Type fe.. Tyv4F4+ V Ti.

)

8.

Critical Materals Discharged: List those critical materials not reported in item 7 which may be present in the discharge.

Parameter Concer ' ration Units

'See tvM tit *M.

T

+-

.r

-m

g 1

Pcrmit No.

Disch:rg) Senil No. P f 2._

Page of ' '

9 Plant Controis: Check if the followmg plant controls are available for this discharge:

alternate power source V

alarm or emergency procedure for power or equipment failure.

10. Residuals and Residues: Are there any sludges. residues, or critical materials removed from or resulting from treatment or control of wastewaters produced by this discharge?

yes; no; if no is checked, continue to item 11.

(See I.Xhibit Y).

Y 8.

the physical state of the residue:

liquid; heavy sludge; wet solids; dry solids.

b.

the liquid portion of the residue is primarily; water; oil; chemical solvent.

c.

the residue results from; process wastewater; sanitary sewage; chemical production; food processing; machining; dust collection; paint booths;

' water treatment; other (specify).'

d.

estimate the total annual volume or weight of the material:

gallons; pounds; cubic yards (circle one) e.

if you dispose of the matenal yourself, indicate the type of disposal site:

public 'andfilt; private landfill; own land; shipped out of state; incinerated; other (specify).

f.

if a public or private landfill (s) is used, give name(s) and address (es):

g.

if you have the matenal removed by commercial waste or refuse hauler (s). give r.ame(s) and address (es):

P2rmit No Disch rge Serial No..fL. Q__ '

Page P of '"

h. indicate how the matenal is stored before disposal or removal:

metal drums; fiber drums; aboveground tank; underground tank; stockpiled on ground; holding pond / lagoon; other (specify)

11. Water Treatment Addnives: if the discharge is treated with any conditioner, inhibitor, algicide. answ.er the following:

a.

name of material (s)

II 'A b.

name and address of manufacturer (s)

IYA c.

quantity (pounds added per million gallons of water treated)

M /A d.

chemical composition of these ad(1itives:

,If NOTE: Complete items 12-14 if there is a thermal discharge; e g., asscciated with a steam and/cr power generation p' ant, steel mill, petroleum refinery or any other manufacturing process.

12. Thermal Discharge Source: Cbsck appropriate item (s) indicating the source of this discharge.

node 9anons/ day O

boiler blowdown O

boiler chemical cleaning O

ach pond overflow boiler water treatment - evaporation blowdown O

oil or coal fired plants - effluent from air pollution control devices l

l l

l l

l l

0 _ of 15 Permit No.

Descharge SerC) No. Q. _0_.1_

Page 1

i

12. (continued)

O condeneer cooling water i

O cooieng tower blowdown 0

mar.ufacturing process l

other (specify) Cooling pond blevdown 7

11."00.000 (a*cg) t f

13. Dischaege Temperature:

o, t

maximum summer a -'

'F maximum winter T

I 101 Y average winter f'O

'F l

average summer

14. Intake Temperature:

IE T

average winter M

V average summer 4

b

)

i 1

4

._,--,--#,,__.r_.

.,,__.,,,,,,,,,,,,_-.._,_.,_,.,.,_,.,_..,_,__,,_.,_.__,,,.._,_,,_.,____,_._..r.

Descharge Serid No. C 0 2 p g, E ct 1 Permit N3 Section il Basic Discherpe Descript6en (Phase print or type all mformation)

Complete this section for each discharge indicated in Section 1. Item 8. except those discharges which enter a municipa!

sanitary sewer. Separate desenptions of each discharge are required even if several discharges onginate in the same f acility.

All values for an existing discharge should be representative of the twelve previous months of operation. If this as a proposed Cischarge, values should reflect best engineering estimates.

1. 06scharge Serial No. and Name (three digit code, 001. 002, etc.)

^

0

^

a.

discharge serial number E^*3*""*******"'-*'"~'""

type of waste water being disenarged (Process. noncontact cooling. etc.)

b.

drainere - rr^ cess vster (6??

O average gafs/ day maximum gals / day

'S c.

volume discharged

2. Dischstge Location E

section

'D range town t" a A Vi E *"

• city or town county

3. Discharge Point Description (if the discharge is to a county drain or storm sewer. indicate the receiving v.aters: e g. Clear Lake via Mud Drain) lake river or stream municipal storm sewer

"aak

• • aak Y

county drain groundwater well injection Other (specify) 4 Activity Description give a narrative description of activity producing this drscharge: (See Exhibit III),

d

Gravity drainare free eMens e.t e return ru-rhe :s e to Efic-k creek.

"fe-a ge v aad P'a*"a*

4*c'**~a 00nsist ^f *.iner Dire an' ecuir-ert leskare. creim avnt a" seepara of the conmensate rires for r.sirtensnee.

na ~~ d a-e st a ' f _ae - w af-Me 4 -a-e ' d -s d

CualitV vc.ter.

"Flev reference node. See figure 1.

hrmet No.

Discharga Serici No.

O. CL.2._

Page l of

5. Activity Causing Discharge: For each S.I.C. Code which describes the activity causing this discharge, supply the type and average and maximum amount of either the raw materials consumed (ltem Sa) or the product produced (item 5b) a.

raw materials.

average maulmum unit discharge (s)

' S.I.C. Code name amt/ day amt/ day (see Table 11) serial No. (s) b.

products:

average maximum unit discharge (s)

S.I.C. Code name amt/ day amt/ day (see Table II) serial No.(s)

LO11 Electric Fever Services

'. ^4

^~-

Lo6-.

Stea.eurriv cv e

~_e n-e 6 Weste Abatement Practices: Briefly describe the waste treatrnent practices applied to this discharge. (attach a waste flow diagram) narrative-

'Ir r e a.

distance of treatment facility and/or disposal area from nearest well:

(See belev) private well _.

feet; municipal well feet.

The riant site (ie, the tretected area) is located within the distributien syster cf the Midland MunicipalJater Distriit whic'h' dFavs its supply frc= Lake Euran.

The nearest kncvn private vells in use are located near the ria.t site at the visiter / training center, the cutage building e.nd i.'erehouse :;o 2 (See Figure 3).

P;rmit No.

Discharge Serial No._.2.

Q.?

Page _12 of.11 b.

if subsurface disposal, land application, or oxidation pond is proposed, nearest distance to a surface watercourse:

"'I feet.

if discharge is to underground by injection well, include an applicat;on and/or approved permit in accordance with the c.

provisions of Act 315. Public Acts of 1069. p/A d.

names and addresses of property owr,ers adjacent to the facility:

name address (See D.hibit ?!).

7. Wastewater Characteristics:If you presently have a discharge permit, list all parameters reported on the current monthly operating report and compute monthly averages, maximum and minimum from the past twelve months. For the proposed discharge, describe the expected characteristics of the discharge after treatment Monthly Monthly Monthly Sample Sample Parameter Average Maulmum Minimum Frequency Type (See D.hitit 7:2 ).

8 Critical Materals Discharged: List these criticat materials not reported in item 7 which may be present in the oisch*.rge Parameter Concentration Units ISee Exhibit IV),

i Permit No, Discharge Serial No. 0 A 1 Page 13_. of.15 9 Plant Controls: Check if the follcwing plant controls are available for this discharge:

.I.n alternate power source alarm or emergency procedure for power or equipment failure, 1

10- Qesiduals and Pesidues: Are there any sludges, residues, or critical materials removed from or resulting from treatment or control of wastewaters produced by this discharge?

X yes; no; if no is checked, continue to item 11.

a.

the physical state of the residue:

liquid; heavy sludge; wet solids; dry solids.

b.

the liquid portion of the residue is primarily:

water; oil; chemical solvent.

c.

the residue results from:

process wastewater; sanitary sewage; chemical production; i

food processing; machining; dust collection; 1

paint booths; water treatment; other (scecify).

d.

estimate the total annual volume or weight of the material:

i gallons; pounds; cubic yards (circle one) e.

if you dispose of the matenal yourself. Indicate the type of disposal site:

public landfill; private landfill; own land; shipped out of state, incinerated;

_ other (specify).

f.

If a public or private landfill (s) is used. give name(s) and address (es):

g.

af you have the material removed by commercial waste or refuse hauler (s), give name(s) and addresstest:

)

A

-u-y-%

e g-,,e+-(-,,-p#,-9,,v

-^wew w t+w- = ry p vrww w tw r-v--g--p-w=e wow-ma--mT-'

ee-=+vv7'.e*

7 F-u+r--==y-w v-7--

.N'-7't8W

(

g

""W'-u-

P;rmit No.

D.sch rg2 S:riil No. 0 0 2 Paga Ik of 15

h. indicate how the material is stored before disposal or removal:

metal drums; fiber drums; aboveground tank; underg*ound tank; stockpiled on ground; holding pond / lagoon; _.,

other (spar;ify)

11. Water Treatment Additives: if the discharge is treated with any conditioner, inhibitor, algicide, answer the following:

a.

name of material (s) U /A b.

name and address of manufacturer (s)

'I ' i-

# 1 c.

quantity (pounds added per million ga!!ons of water treated) d.

chemical composition of these additives:

• ! / 2 NOTE: Complete items 1214 if there is a thermal discharge; e.g., associated with a steam and/or power generation plant.

steel mill, petroleum refinery or any other manufacturing process.

12. Thermal Discharge Source: Check appropriate item (s) indicating the source of this discharge.

i/A geHons/ day boiler blowdown boiler chemical cleaning ash pond overflow boiler water treatment - evaporation blowdown oil or coal fired plants - effluent from air pollution control devices

r Perbt No.

Discharge Serial No. 9_ Q 2._

Page _15_ of lf.__

f

12. (cSntmued) condenser cooling water cooling tower blowdown manufacturing process other (specify)

13. Oloct..rge Temperature:

!!/A maximum summer

'F maximum winter

'F average summer

'F ave. age winter _

'F

14. Intake Temperature:

i/A average summer

'F average winter

'F i

r l

l

,c-,

..e-.

n....-.,,

-..n.,,,.,,-,_. nan.,,,..,-,

m,.,,._..,,,,,,,.., _,.

~, ~ - - -

a i

l 3

PART TWO SUPPORT DOCLENT I

l l

5 I

i i

1

.I l

i i

miO581-0354a102

SUPPORT DOCUMENT TABLE OF CONTEhTS Exhibit Title I

Description of Proposed Enterprise Ti Source of Water III Water Usage IV Critical Materials, Toxic & Hazardous Substances V

Description of Waste Abatement Practices VI Property Owners Adjacent to Proposed Enterprise VII Description of Expected Wastewater Characterisitics miO581-0354a102

EXHIBIT I DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ENTERPRISE The Midland Plant Units 1 and 2, owned and to be operated the Consumers Power Company of Michigan, is sited partially within the se thern limits of the City of Midland, Michigan. Commercial operation of Unit 2 is planned for December,1983, and commercial operation of Unit 1 is planned for July 1984.

The 1235-acre plant site is on the south shore of the Tittabawassee River immediately across from the Dow Chemical Company's main industrial complex (see Figures 4 and 5).

The Midland Plant will generate approximately 1,300 megawatts of electricity for distribution to the applicant's system and that of the Michigan Power Pool of which the applicant and Detroit Edison Company are the principal partners.

In addition, up to 4,050,000 pounds per hour of process steam will be delivered to the Dow Chemical Plant across the river for use in chemical processes and heating.

The two reactors for the Midland Plant are pressurized-water type supplied by the Babcock and Wilcox Company. Each reactor will operate initially at a I

thermal power level of 2468 MWt and will be capable of an ultimate output of 2568 MWt.

Unit I will have a gross electrical capability of 505 MWe, and in addition will generate up to 3,650,000 pounds per hour of 175 psig steam and up to 400,000 pounds per hour of 600 psig steam for sale to Dow Chemical Company.

The gross electrical capability of Unit 2 will be 852 MWe.

In normal operation, Unit I will generate electricity and steam while Unit 2 will generate electricity. Unit 2 can provide steam when Unit 1 is shut down. The nominal operating pressure and temperature for both reactors is 2200 psig and 579 F.

The units are designed for a pressure of 2500 psig and a temperature of 650*F.

An exception is the pressurizer which is designed for a temperature of 670*F.

The steam and power conversion system is designed to accept steam from the nuclear steam system. One portion of this heat energy is converted to electrical energy by the turbine generators. A second portion of the heat energy is used in the process steam evaporators to generate process steam for Dow.

The circulating water system, utilizing cooling pond water, will dissipate the balance of the heat energy which is rejected by the turbine condenser.

Steam from the steam and power conversion systems is used in the process steam evaporators to generate process steam in a tertiary system for Dow.

The function of the process steam evapor-ters is to provide physical separation between the turbine plant cycle and the process steam delivered to Dow.

Steam from the Unit I steam generatore will pass through a two-flow, 1800 rpm, tandem-compound, high pressure turbine and then through moisture separator reheaters and combined intercept and stop valves to one double-flow low-pressure turbine which exhausts to the main condenser. Steam from Unit 2 will Amendment 3 miO681-0377a102-46 I-1 September 30, 1981

pass through a similar system, except that final flow will be to two double-flow, low pressure turbines which exhaust to a dual pressure condenser.

The Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 will generate electric power at 22 kV and 24 kV, respectively. This power will be fed through separate isolated phase buses to the unit main transformers where it will be stepped up to 345 kV transmission voltage and delivered to the switchyard on separate overhead lines.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377a102 I-2 September 30, 1981 l

l

EXHIBIT II SOURCE OF WATER PROCESS WATER All water for use as process water will be provided as follows:

1.

The Dow Chemical Company will provide feedwater to the evaporators (Node 20) in the process steam system. The steam thus produced is returned (Node 21) to the Dow Chemical Company for use in their process systems. This flow is expected to be continuous.

i 2.

The Midland Municipal Water District will supply the Midland Plant makeup l

demineralizer system (Node 23) which in turn will supply makeup water to the Midland Plant secondary steam cycle. The Plant will maintain a link I

to Dow demineralized water (Node 29) as an emergency backup.

i NONCONTACT COOLING WATER Water for use as cooling and condensing water will be withdrawn from the Tittabawassee River and pumped to the 880 acre recirculating cooling pond (Node 5).

The intake structure on the river will contain traveling screens, screen wash pumps, and trash racks.

The design of the intake structure has been found tentatively acceptable by the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources pending post operational studies of the intake's efficiency and on-site velocity measurement (letter from Mr Robert J Courchaine, DNR, to Mr Paul C Hittle, Consumers Power Company, dated January 17, 1977).

Preliminary design rating of the makeup pumps was 200 cfs. The makeup pumps as built will be capable of withdrawing water from the Tittabawasee River for cooling pond makeup at a maximum capacity of 270 cfs subject to the following:

River Flow. efs Maximum Pond Makeup Rate, cfs

<350 0

350-650 Excess over 350 up to a I

maximum of 40 650 and Excess over 650 plus 40 above but not more than 270 Expected makeup water approach velocities are presented in Table 1.

. Amendment 3 miO681-0377b102-46 II-1 September 30, 1981

TABLE 1 EXPECTED MAKEUP WATER APPROACH VELOCITIES FOR VARIOUS WITHDRAWAL RATES Water Sur-Estimated River Withdrawal Total (*}

No Of face elev Approach Flow for Makeup Recire Pumping Pumps atIn{gge Velocity (d) l (cfs)

(cfs)

(cfs)

(cfs)

Operating (ft)

(ft/s) 350 0

67(D) 67 1

588.8 0.42 390 40 40(c) 80 1

589.0 0.24 700 80 0

80 1

589.4 0.50 22 ')

156 2

589.5 0.73 I

?

744 134 1

1000 158 0

158 2

590.0 0.79 1565(*) 226 0

226 3

590.8 1.00 (a)

Pump output for makeup and recirculation to makeup pump inlet is a function of the river water surface elevation. Maximum pump ortput is 270 cfs at a water surface elevation of 608.0 ft.

(b)

Recirculation to the blowdown line is for radwaste dilution only. Pump output for radwaste dilution is 67 cfs and is not a function of the river water surface elevation. Radwaste dilution may also be provided by cooling pond blowdown where available.

(c)

-Recirculation to makeup pump inlet.

(d)

Caleclated one foot in front of screen face.

i For river flows exceeding 1565 cfs, the average approach velocity will be less than 1 ft/s.

l The circulating water intake structure on the cooling pond will contain

~

circulnting water pumps, trash racks and traveling screens. The cooling pond l

is designed to provide dissipation of heat removed by plant cooling and l

condensing systems and will be used to provide water for the plant fire protection system. Cooling pond operation is discussed in Exhibit III.

I Initial Pond Filling I

Water withdrawal from the Tittabawassee River for initial filling of the 12,600 acre-feet cooling pond began on April 7, 1978 and continued through May 4, 1978 (28 days).

Pond filling was resumed on November 8, 1978 with periodic pumping during 10 days in November, 19 days in December and 11 days in January 1979. Pond level has been maintained by filling activities during 4 days in March 1979, 1 day in November 1980, 4 days during December 1980 and 2 days in January 1981.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377b102-46 II-2 September 30, 1981 L

A Entrainment Monitoring of ichthyoplankton and macroinvertebrate_entrainment was conducted I

during the April and May 1978 pond fill activities and is reported in Survey and Evaluation of the Water Quality, Tittabawissee River, Near Midland,

)'

Michigan, 1978-1979 (CMU 1979). Due to the seasonal sparcity of entrainment organisms during successive pond fill or pond level maintenance activities a

(November and December 1978, January and March 1979), additional entrainment monitoring has not been conducted.

Impingement

. Impingement monitorine was conducted during each day of pond fill or level maintenance activities. A preliminary assessment of impingement during initial pond fill is reported in Assessment of Impingement During Initial Pumping to the Midland Plant Cooling Pond, (CP Co 1979).

Impingement associated with March 1979 pond level maintenance activities is reported in Aquatic Assessment of the Tittabawassee River in the Vicinity of Midland, Michigan, (LMS 1980). Additional impingement collections will be reported in an impingement and entrainment summary report anticipated by December 15, 1981. The summary report will include a review and evaluation of the complete l

Midland pond impingement and entrainment data base and discuss the importance and potential impact of entrainment and impingement associated with proposed operational intake activities.

SAhITARY WATER Domestic water for the power block and associated facilities will be supplied by the Midland Municipal Water District (Node 25). Domestic water for the visitor / training center and the outage building and sanitary water for Warehouse No 2 will be supplied from wells located adjacent to each structure.

Sanitary wastewater from all sources on the plant site will be transported to Dow for treatment and disposal, except wastewater from Warehouse No 2 which is i

discharged to an adjacent septic tank and drainfield.

PRECIPITATION Precipitation falling on the plant site will be transported via roof drains and site storm drains to Bullock Creek, the Tittabawassee River, and the cooling pond (Nodes 1, 2 and 3 and Figure 3).

Precipitation falling on areas I

where oil contamination may occur such as transformer areas, and oil storage areas (Node 48) is routed to the oily waste collection system. Precipitation falling on the cooling pond (Node 4) slightly decreases cooling pond makeup water requirements. The maximum precipitation rate is based on the 100 year, 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> rainfall since 1932 which was 4.6 inches. The average annual precipitation is about 30 inches.

1 i

Amendment 3 miO681-0377b102 II-3 September 30, 1981 i

REFERENCES H L Linn, et al, 1979. Survey and Evaluation of the Water Quality, Tittabawassee River, Near Midland, Michigan. 1978-1979 (Volume II), Central Michigan Universfty.

I H Zeitoun, et al, 1979. Assessment of Impingement During Initial Pumping to the Midland Plant Cooling Pond, Consumers Power Company.

Lawler, Matusky and Skelly Engineers, 1980. Aquatic Assessment of the Tittabawassee River in the Vicinity of Midland, Michigan.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377b102 II-4 September 30, 1981

EXHIBIT III WATER USAGE PROCESS *n'ATER Process water is derived from the Midlana Municipal Water District and from The Dow Chemical Company. Midland city water is used in the makeup demineralizer system, the laundry facility, sanitary, and laboratory fixtures.

l All of the process water used in the process steam system is supplied by Dow l

Chemical.

Dow Condensate Usage Condensate and demineralized water from the DOW Chemical Company are stored in separate tanks near the plant site and adjacent to the condensate return pumphous e.

Water from the demineralized water storage tank is used as makeup

(

for the condensate storage tank. Fumps in the condensate return pumphouse take suction from both the demineralized water and the condensate storage tanks.

Demineralized water is directed through miscellaneous sample panel and monitor coolers prior to discharge to the process steam evaporators.

Condensate (Node 20) is pumped to the evaporators for conversion to steam.

Floor drainage from the condensate return pumphouse is directed via gravity flow to Bullock Creek. Evaporator feedwater is conditioned by the addition of Na 50 '

• 2 4

3 4 (Chemical Node D).

The process steam produced in 0 and Na 0 2 3 the evaporators is then returned to Dow (Node 21) for use in their chemical processes and heating.

Condensate collected from the steam traps on the Dow process steam line will be routed to the site storm drainage system. Blowdown from the evaporators (Node 22) will be pumped to the Dow Chemical Company via the sanitary waste collection system for treatment and discharge or may alternately be routed to the liquid radwaste system for treatment and disposal in the event of unacceptable levels of radioactivity. This blowdown is expected to be continuous.

Midland City Water Usage Midland city water is transferred (Node 23) through the makeup demineralizer system to the plant water storage and transfer system (Node 34). The makeup demineralizers are periodically regenerated by the addition of H SO, and NaOH 2

(Chemical Node F) and the regeneration products are routed (Node 367 to the evaporator building neutralizing sump for treatment and discharge.

The plant water storage and transfer sy; tem consists of condensate storage tanks, a demineralizrJ water storage tank, a utility water storage tank, and a primary water storage tank. Water from the condensate storage tank and demineralized water storage tank is used for makeup in the Units 1 and 2 condensate and feedwater systems (Node 41) and the auxiliary, boilers (Nodes 32 and 33) with the addition of NH3

• "d

(

• • i#*1 Intermittent blowdown from the permanen'"t auxiliary boilers (Node 37) and the temporary aigh pressure auxiliary boilers (Node 72) is routed to the oily Amendment 3 miO681 0377d102 III-1 September 30, 1981 l

_____________J

waste collection system. Blowdown from the ermanent auxiliary boilers may begin as early as December 1981 and will c atinue for the life of the Midland Plant. The high pressure auxiliary boiletr will be used for testing and startup between June 1982 and June 1985.

Initial blowdown is scheduled dur2ng May 1982.

Water from the utility water storage tank and the primary water storage tank is used in the Units 1 and 2 reactor plant systems (Node 54) with the addition of H 0 and LiOH (Chemical Node K) and N,H and morpholine (Chemical Node P).

3 3 These tanks will also supply the initial fit,1 for the component cooling water system. Approximately 12.5 lb of N,H and 2 lb of morpholine will be used 4

annually to inhibit corrosion in this system (chemical Node P).

An anticorrosion water chemistry will be maintained in the containment spray system with Na 0 and N,H f 11 wing initial illing rom the Borated Water Storage Tank. 3No annual ~ consumption of these materials is anticipated after 4

4 initial charging of the containment spray system. Small amounts of these corrosion inhibitors may be discharged to nearby floor drains during routine maintenance or repair activities.

Overflow and drainage from the demineralized water storage tank are routed to the river via the site storm drainage system, while overflow and drainage from the condensate storage tanks are routed to the cooling pond via the site storm drainage system. Overflow and drainage from the utility water storage and primary water storage tanks are routed to the Boron Recovery System. The discharge of demineralized water via the makeup demineralizer storage tank overflow / drain line would be extremely infrequent, occu ring only when the water level in the storage tank exceeds normal or when the tank is required to be drained for maintenance. The tank is equipped with a high level alarm and a high level switch which automatically shuts down the makeup demineralizer system. This instrumentation is designed to preclude or prevent overflow occurrences. The storage tank will not be routinely drained for maintenance on any scheduled basis.

It is expected the tank may require maintenance less than once per year. The rated tank capacity is 50,000 gallons of demineralized water.

Midland city water will be distributed throughout the plant to the laundry facility (Node 27), laboratory fixtures (Nodes 28 and 30), and miscellaneous drinking fountains, safety showers, etc.

Domestic wastewater from sanitary fixtures is routed to Dow Chemical via the sanitary waste collection system (Node 24) for treatment and discharge.

Laundry facility wastewater is discharged (Node 52) to the laundry waste treatment system. Drainage from the secondary plant laboratory fixtures in the turbine building will be routed on a continuing basia (Node 35) to the Un.t 2 neutralizing sump for treatment and discharge.

Intermittent sink drainage from the evaporator building laboratory fixtures is routed to the evaporator building neutralizing sump.

Primary and Health Physics laboratory sink drainage is routed to the Liquid Radwaste Sys+em via the Boron Recovery System.

Midland City water will be used for initial fill and subsequent makeup to the plant heating, chilled water and diesel generator cooling water systems. A commercial borate-nitrite additive will be used to inhibit corrosion. The plant heating system will also contain ethylene glycol for freeze protection Amendment 3 miO681-0377d102 III-2 September 30, 1981

and improved heat transfer. Small quantities of these materials may be discharged to nearby floor drains during routine maintenance or repair activities.

NONCONTACT COOLING WATER The cooling pond receivts makeup water from the Tittabawassee River (Node 5) and from precipitation, both directly (Node 4) and indirectly via the site storm drainage system (Nodes 64 and 3).

Water from the river can also be diverted directly to the laundry /radwaste dilution line (Node 6).

The pond provides noncontact cooling water for the Units 1 and 2 condensers (Node 11) and for additional plant cooling requirements via the Units I and 2 service water systems (Node 13).

Plant circulating water is treated with H,SO, (Chemical Node B) and with Na0Cl (Chemicel Node A), is passed through the Units 1 and 2 condensers and is returned to the cooling pond.

In order for the service water system to perform its cooling functions, the service water entering the plant must not exceed its design temperature limit.

The service water cooling tower (Nodes 14-17) will be put into operation as needed to maintain the service water intake temperature below its design limit. Blowdown from the service water cooling tower will be returned to the cooling pond (Nede 18).

Both Na0C1 (Chemical Node C) and H SO4 (Chemical 2

Node N) are injected into the service water system.

Service water (Node 46) is used to generate sodium hypochlorite onsite for use in controlling biological growths on heat transfer surfaces exposed to cooling pond water. Nacl (Chemical Node L) is used in the manufacture of sodium hypochlori te.

Na0C1 will be injected twice daily for a period of one half hour each into the Units 1 and 2 condenser cooling water and service water systems (Chemical Nodes A and C).

Use of sodium hypochlorite will be limited as determined by operation requirements. A chlorine residual as a result of this operation is not expected to persist in the pond for a sufficient timc to circulate to the point from which pond blowdown is withdrawn.

Sulfuric acid will be injected int o the service water and condenser cooling water systems to reduce the formation cf carbonate scale on heat transfer surfaces (Chemical Nodes N and B).

This will slightly increase the sulfate concentration that would otherwise be present in the pond. Some sodium chloride will be present in the effluent produced by the onsite sodium hypochlorite generation system, but this will have negligible effect on the pond sodium and chloride concentrations.

Pond water loss mechanisms include ceepage (Nod' 8), and e'vaporation (Node 9) and intermittent flow to the fire rotection systam (Node 10). Fire c

protection water is ultimately routed via floor drains to the oily waste collection system. The site dewatering system removes groundwater and returns it to the cooling pond (Node 63).

SANITARY WATER USAGE Midland city water is used in sanitary facilities (Node 26) and is discharged to the sanitary waste collection system Well water is used in sanitary Amendment 3 miO681-0377d102 III-3 September 30, 1981

facilities at the Visitor / Training Center, Outage Building and Warehouse No 2.

Sanitary wastewater from the Visitor / Training Center and the Outage Building is discharged to the sanitary waste collection system while a septic tank and drainfield receives sanitary wastewater from Warehouse No 2.

i PLANT DISCHARGES PRIOR TO COMMERCIAL OPERATION Prior to commercial operation, the plant will use well water, City of Midland water and demineralized water for purposes of performing hydrostatic tests and water flushes on various plant systems during construction and testing phases as described below:

1.

Hydrostatic Tests - These tests are used to ensure integrity of welds and connections within a system. This test consists of holding pressurized test water within the system to be tested for given times and pressures.

The water does not become chemically contaminated in any way and present plans call for the discharge of such waters into either the cooling pond or the Tittabawassee River dependent upon the physical location of the hydrostatic testing activities.

(However, no discharge will be made to j

the Tittabawassee without appropriate approvals.)

2.

Flushes a.

Water Flushes - Water flushes differ from hydrostatic tests in that the purpose of the flush is to ensure proper functioning of a system and to remove any obstructions that may somehcw have gotten into a system. These flushes will also utilize well water, City of Midland water or demineralized water.

Large piping is delivered to the plant site with end caps installed.

The only contamination that the flush water could pick up would be minute amounts of rust, dust or oil in the form of thin residual film around pipe ends resulting from pipe beveling or preparation for welding. Minor flushes and hydrostatic tests, performed on components or small systems, will be drained to various building sumps which discharge to the cooling pond.

Two systems are scheduled for flushing as early as November 1981.

Approximately 100,000 gallons and 20,000 gallons of flush water will be routed to the cooling pond from the Condensate Storage and Transfer System and the Demineralized Water Storage and Transfer System Header, respectively.

In April 1982, the condensate system will also be flushed. Other major flushes or hydrostatic tests will be performed on all or parts of the following systems:

feedwater, part of main steam, bleed steam condenser and possibly part of piping to Dow. All major flushes will be drained to the cooling pond. Various stainless steel systems will be flushe' with demineralized water which will also be drained to the cooling pond.

b.

Chemical Flushes - The use of chemical flushes at the Midland site is planned for the condensate and feedwater systems. The chenical flush Amendment 3 miO681-0377d102 III-4 September 30, 1981 V

will be performed by a qualified subcontractor using a single system volume, two step process..The degreasing step will be done using Vertan 662, a corrosion' inhibitor and F082 surfactants at a pH of 4.5.

The iron and millscale removal stage will be completed by raising the system pH with NH 0H followed by an injection of H 0 I# ""#I*C' 4

22 passivation. This method will generate one system volume of chemical waste and one to two system volumes of rinse water waste. All waste will be neutralized prior to discharge to the cooling pond. Table 5 of Exhibit VII indicates the expected chemical characteristics of the wastewater that will be discharged to the pond. This data is based upon the best available information since subcontractor selection is still in progress at this time.

The permanent auxiliary boilers will receive an alkaline boil out as part of system startup. Each boiler will receive one system volume using Trisodium phosphate, Disodium phosphate and a vetting agent and two system volumes of rinse water as early as January 1982. Table 5 of Exhibit VII lists the expected chemical characteristics of the vastewater that will be discharged to the pond.

A subcontractor will also chemically clean eleven low pressure evaparators and two high pressure evaporators on the tube side (seconda ry). The chemicals will be shipped to the site in tank trucks by the subcontractor and removed in tank trucks following chemical cleaning. Eviporator cleaning materials would, therefore, not be discharged into either the pond or the river.

3.

Construction Chemistry Lab Trailer Wastes - Small amounts of waste chemicals resultant from wet chemistry analysis performed in the temporary lab trailer during construction will be discharged to Dow.

Use of the temporary lab trailer is expected to terminate with the completion of the permanent laboratory facilities currently scheduled for early 1982.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377d102 III-5 September 30, 1981

EXHIBIT IV CRITICAL MATERIALS, T0XIC & RAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES PART 1 A listing of materials to be reported in Item 11 of Section I of the Discharge Permit Application (ie, materials used in, produced in, or incidental to the plant's operation) was developed after careful review of selected documents:

Reference 1 Michigan Water Resources Commission Critical Materials Register published October 1, 1980 and a list of those US EPA Priority Pollutants not found in the current Critical Materials Register as presented in Tables IV and V, respectively of the State Discharge Application Supplement.

Reference 2 Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 122, US EPA Consolidated Permit Regulations published May 19, 1980:

Table II - Organic Toxic Pollutants in Each of Four Fractions in Analysis by GC/MS.

Table III - Other Toxic Pollutants; Metals, Cyanide, and Total Phenols Table IV - Conventional & Nonconventional Pollutants Table V

- Toxic Pollutants and Hazardous Substances Table ! of Exhibit IV provides a list of these materials for the Midland Plant. The materials listed in Table 1 under the "other use" category are expected or proposed to be used in plant operations as decribed below:

Ammonia: Ammonia will be utilized in the plant secondary steam cycle and auxiliary steam system for pH control.

Copper: The plant main condensers are tubed with admiralty metal. The value reported is an estimate of the circulating water copper pick-up.

Hydrazine: Hydrazine will be utilized in the plant steam cycle, auxiliary steam system, and reactor coolant system (temporary shutdown only) for oxygen scavenging. A solution of hydrazine-morpholine is added in the component cooling system to inhibit corrosion.

Hypochlorite: Sodium hypochlorite will be used to control biological growth on the main condensers and service water heat transfer surfaces.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377e102-46 IV-1 September 30, 1981

Lithium: Lithium hydroxide will be used for pH control in the reactor coolant systems.

Dimethyl Amine: This chemical will be used as a reagent in the on-line steam cycle sodium analyzers.

Triaryl Phosphate Esters: A triaryl phosphate ester will be used in the steam turbine electro-hydraulic control systems.

Estimated quantities are not available because a vendor has not been selected.

Other compounds listed on the Critical Materials Register may be included in commercially obtained formulations of various solvents, fluids, and solutions which are incidental to plant operation. However, these commercially obtained formulations will be used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and will not be produced or altered on-site.

Only appropriate herbicides approved by EPA and the Food and Drug Administration may be used on-site for grounds maintenance. They will be applied by licensed applicators in strict compliance with manufacturer's specified solution strengths and rates of application.

PART 2 Item 8 of Section II, Basic Discharge Description of the Discharge Permit Application requires a listing of critical materials discharged.

The listing of Critical Materials, Toxic and Hazardous Substances described by References 1 and 2 above has been thoroughly reviewed. Based on this review, only those parameters listed in Table 2 may be present in the plant discharge.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377e102-46 IV-2 September 30, 1981

TABLE 1 MATERIALS USAGE LISTING Use Category Chemical lbs/yr (est)

A.

Secondary laboratory use:

Total Organic Carbon 0.3 Formaldehyde 2

Vanadium 0.1 Copper 0.3 Lead 0.3 Nickel 0.3 Zinc 0.3 Hydrazine 0.3 Hydrogen Sulfide 1

B.

Primary laboratory use:

Strontium 0.3 Lithium 0.3 C.

Other use:

Ammonia 38,000 Copper 7,600 Hydrazine(,)(b) 25,000 Hypochlorite 693,000 Lithium 20 Dimethyl Amine 10,000 Tria g Phosphate Esters Not available Lead g

Mercug)

Nickel

.)

Silvg)"

Zinc

~

Uranium (d) 390,000 Zirconium (d) 280,000 (a)

Hydrazine will decompose prior to release.

'b)

Hypochlorite will decompose in the cooling pond prior to release.

(c) This material has been detected in the plant's proposed cooling water supply (Tittabawassee River) in the concentrations listed below. As such it is incidental to the plant's operation and discharge.

Pb 0.033 mg/l Hg 0.005 mg/l Ni 0.02 mg/l Ag 0.007 mg/l Zn 0.033 mg/l Amendment 3 miO681-0378a102 IV-3 September 30, 1981

(It is anticipateu that these materials will be concentrated in the cooling pond blowdown to the same extent as pond, cycles of concentration, see Exhibit VII, Table 2.)

(d)

Uranium and zirconium are the principal constituents of the nuclear fugl used in the plant. Each nuclear core contains approximately 1.95 x 10 D

pounds of uranium and 1.4 x 10 pounds of zirconium when it is initially loaded into the reactor. During each refueling, one-third of the fuel is removed to the spent fuel storage area and is replaced with one-third core of new fuel.

Amendment 3 miO681-0378a102-46 IV-4 September 30, 1981

TABLE 2 tiATERIALS DISCHARGED LISTING

?!ax Conc Source Chemical lbs/ year (est) mg/l (est)

Secondary laboratory (#

A.

Total Organic Carbon 0.3 Formaldehyde 2

Vanadium 0.1 Copper 0.3 Lead 0.3 Nickel 0.3 Zinc 0.3 Hydrazine 0.3 Hydrogen Sulfide 1

Primary laboratory (b)

B.

Strontium 0.3 Lithium 0.3 C.

Othar:

Copper 7,600 Lead (c) 0.17 Mercury (c) 0.02 Nickel (c)

(c)

Silver (c)

(c)

Zine (c) 0.22 Cyanide (d)

(d)

Aluminum (d)

(d)

Ammonia 38,000 2.0 Chlorinated Organic (e)

(e)

Compounds Phenols (c) 0.05 Beryllium (c)

(c)

Cadmium (c)

(c)

L.

(*)

These materials will discharge to the river via the turbine building neutralizer sump.

(b)

These materials will be routinely processed in the liquid radwaste system. There is a possibility of discharge vis the laundry waste system.

Amendment 3 miO681-0378b102-46 IV-5 September 30, 1981 z

. =

(c)

Unable to predict. Thic raterial has been detected in the plant's proposed cooling water supp1r (Tittabawassee River), and therefore is expected to be present in the combined plant discharge. Plant operation is not expected to contribute additional material.

(d)

Unable to determine. Material is expected to be present in main plant laboratory.

(e)

Chloramines may result from shock chlorination.

Amendment 3 miO681-0376b102-46 IV-6 September 30, 1981

EXHIBIT V DESCRIPTION OF WASTE ABATEMENT PRACTICES Selected waste abatement practices improve the quality of wastewater discharged from the Midland Plant. These practices, including separation, pH adjustment, sedimentation, filtration, recirculation, retention, segregation and offsite treatment or disposal, are applied to the waste water streams prior to their discharge to the Tittabawassee River.

PROCESS WATER Oil Separation The oily waste treatment system processes plant floor drainage and precipitation collected from areas which may be contaminated by oil.

Sources of wastewater include:

o Permanent auxiliary beiler blowdown (Node 37).

o Temporary high pressure auxiliary boiler blowdown (Node 72).

o The outdoor transformer area (Node 48).

o Floor drains in the areas of the Units 1 and 2 condensate feedwater and main steam systems, fire protection system and the evaporator building (Nodes 68 and 10).

Oily wastes are collected and transferred to a 300,000 gallon oily waste storage tank by individual pumps located throughout the plant site.

The storage tank combined with oil removal equipment and a waste oil tank treat the collected wastewater to remove oil contamination.

Inside the oily waste storage tanks, underflow and overflow weirs (analogous to an API separator) retain free oil and suspended colids until manually removed to avoid carryover into the tant effluent line. The active capacity (above the overflow weir) is sufficient to retain three inches of rainfall on outdoor collection areas plus the maximum firewater usage event.

If this capacity is exceeded due to an additional simultaneous event, an overflow from the effluent side of the underflow and overtlow weirs is routed to the cooling pond via the storm drainage system.

The oily waste treatment system removes any oil which may not have been retained in the oily waste storage tank (ie, emulsified or dispersed oils).

This remaining oil is separated by physical means in a " package plant" by oil removal equipment. The oil free effluent is discharged directly to the Tittabawassee River while the waste oil is transferred to the waste oil storage tank pending removal from the site by a licensed industrial waste hauler.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377f102-46 V-1 September 30, 1981

pH Adjustment The evaporator building neutralizing sump and the Units 1 and 2 neutralizing sumps receive process wastes and floor drainage from several wastewater sources that are expected to have extreme pH values. Some of these wastewater sources include:

o Evaporator building laboratory fixtures.

o The makeup demineralizer system.

o Chemical addition and storage area floor drains.

1 o Condensate demineralizer regenerative wastes.

o The secondary plant laboratory fixtures.

Air mixers, acid and caustic injection equipment and recirculating pumps located at these neutralizing sumps allow pH adjustment of the wastewater in a batch operation.

Following adjustment to the desired pH, the evaporator building neutralizing sump contents and the Units 1 and 2 neutralizing sump contents are discharged to the Tittabawassee River via the miscellaneous waste and cooling pond blowdown lines (Discharge No 001).

If the effluent from the Units 1 and 2 neutralization sump contains unacceptable levels of radioactivity, the wastewater is diverted to the liquid radwaste system for subsequent treatment.

Sedimentatic.n Wastewater from the Units 1 and 2 clean waste sump and the iron removal sump is discharged to the cooling pond for settling of suspended solids. The clean waste sumps receive condensate polisher backwash and rinse water from the condensate feedwater and main steam systems.

Since this wastewater is very low in total dissolved solids, the effluent from the clean waste sump is routed directly to the cooling pond for disposal. The suspended solids in the effluent (ie, ion exchange resin fines and corrosion products such as iron and copper oxides) are assimilated by the cooling pond sediment.

The magnetic filters remove suspended iron oxides frcm the evaporator condensate before it is returned to the condensate feedwater and main steam systems. These filters require periodic backwashing to remove collected iron oxides. This backwash water is routed through the iron removal sump and into the cooling pond (via the site storm drainage system) where suspended iron oxides are assimilated in tne cooling pond sediment.

If the effluent from the Units 1 and 2 clean waste sump contains unacceptable levels of radioactivity, the wastewater is routed to the liquid radwaste 4

system for subsequent treatment.

If the magnetic filter backwash water contains unacceptable levels of radiaactivity, the backwash will be sent to the liquid radwaste system or the filters will be taken out of service.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377f102-46 V-2 September 30, 1981

Filtration Various articles of protective clothing are cleaned in the laundry facility with non phosphate detergents. Wastewater from this facility is filtered to remove suspended solids in the laundry waste treatment system. Following treatment, the laundry wastewater is discharged to the Tittabawassee River via the miscellaneous waste and cooling pond blowdown lines (Discharge No 001).

If this waste stream contains unacceptable levels of radioactivity the flow is diverted to the liquid radwaste system for subsequent treatment.

Segregation and Treatment or Disposal Offsite Process steam system evaporator blowdown is normally transported offsite and treated by the Dow Chemical Company, Metal cleaning wastes from periodic steam system cleaning and debris removed from both makeup and circulating water intake structures are transported offsite for disposal. The only exception to this procedure involves the evaporator blowdown.

If this waste stream contains unacceptable levels of radioactivity, the flow is diverted to the liquid radwaste system for subsequent treatment.

Radioactive Waste Treatment Radioactive process wastewater and potentially contaminated drainage is collected and treated in the radwaste treatment systems. The major sources of these radioactive or potentially contaminated wastewaters may include:

(1) laundry waste treatment system, (2) reactor systems and solid radwaste system floor drains, (3) Units 1 and 2 neutralization sump, (4) Units 1 and 2 clean waste sump, (5) evaporator blowdown, (6) magnetic filter backwash, (7) effluent from the reactor systems and solid radwaste system and (8) the once through steam generatcrs. Radioactive wastewater treatment involves a combination of filters, ion exchangers, evaporators, and solid waste packaging equipment. Solids removed from the influent liquid radwastes are packaged and transported to a licenced burial site for disposal. The purified water is recycled to the reactor plant systems or discharged to the Tittabawassee River via the miscellaneous waste ar.1 cooling pond blowdown lines (Discharge No 001).

NONCONTACT COOLING WATER Recirculation The 880 acre recirculating cooling pond provides cooling water for the Units 1 and 2 condensers and for various plant cooling requirements via the Units 1 ano 2 service water systems. Condenser cooling water is recirculated to the cooling pond to minimize the discharge of heated effluent to the Tittabawassee River.

Blowdown from the cooling pond is taken from the coolest point in the pond and discharged through three 2-1/2 foot diameter valved pipes. These pipes are oriented perpendicular to the river flow and provide control of the blowdown rate and discharge velocity by valve throttling and. closure. This blowdown control mechanism combined with the recirculation of noncontact cooling water minimizes the release of thermal effluent to the Tittabawassee River (Discharge No 001).

Amendment 3 miO681-0377f102-46 V-3 September 30, 1981

Retention To control biological growth on heat transfer surfaces exposed to cooling pond water, sodium hypochlorite is injected into the Units 1 and 2 condenser cooling water and service water systems. Due to the extensive retention period, a chlorine residual is not expected to persist in the noncontact cooling water effluent for a sufficient time to circulate to the cooling pond blowdown discharge point.

SANITARY WATER Sanitary wastewater is collected from the plant site and transported to the Dow Chemical Company through a sanitary waste pipeline for subsequent treat-ment (Node 24). Approximately 100 to 300 gpd of sanitary wastewater from Warehouse No 2 is discharged to a septic tank and drainfield for treatment and disposal.

OTHER Construction Site Runoff Control In addition to the construction impact control measures specified in the Company's Supplemental Environmental Report and the AEC's Final Environmental Statement, several additional measures are also being implemented for the control of surface runoff. These additional construction impact control measures include:

o Construction of holding ponds in ditches near any source of runoff and near dewatering operations to control siltation.

o Rip-rap applied to Waite and Debolt Drain, Branch #1 Drain and Bullock Creek at changes of grade and at changes of direction to minimize erosion.

o Embankments seeded, fertilized and mulched to control soil erosion.

The construction impact control program follows standard practices presented in the following publications:

o Michigan Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Guidebook, prepared for Michigan Department of Natural Resources, et al by Beckett Jackson Raeder, Inc, Februa ry 1975.

o Soil Erosion and Sediment Control: Standards and Specifications for Bay 1 Midland and Saginaw Counties, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, December 1974.

o Engineering Field Manual for Conservation Practices, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1969.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377f102 V-4 September 30, 1981 i

---. - a

Residuals and Residues Sludges and residues resulting from the treatment or control of wastewaters are contained in the waste oil storage tank, evaporator building neutralizing sump and Unit I and 2 neutralizing sumps. Disposal of waste oil and associated sludges or residues is discussed in this Exhibit under the heading of "ROCESS WATER, OIL SEPARATION. Accumulated sediments incidental to the operation of the evaporator building neutralizing sump and the Unit I and 2 neutralizing sumps are removed on an annual or as needed basis and transported f om the site by a licensed industrial waste hauler.

In addition, accumulated sediments in miscellaneous plant sumps and Unit 1 and 2 clean waste sumps are removed on an annual or as needed basis. Although these residuals do not result from the treatment or control of wastewater, the removed sediments are disposed of in similar fashion as described above.

Residues or residuals generated by the radioactive waste treatment facilities (ie, liquid radwaste and solid radwaste systems) are packaged in accordance with 10 CFR 71 and shipped offsite for ultimate disposal.

If the sediments collected from any of the sumps listed above contain unacceptable levels of radioactivity, these wastes are considered radioactive and processed in a similar fashion as other radioactive wastes.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377f102 V-5 September 30, 1981

EXHIBIT VI PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED ENTERPRISE The owners of property adjacent to the Midland Plant are listed below. This information was compiled from the December 31, 1977, City Assessor and County Equalization platt maps.

The Dow Chemical Company Mr Clayton Badgero Michigan Division 3248 Miller Road Midland, Michigan 48640 Midland, Michigan 48640 Bullock Creek School Mr Arthur Fisher Poseyville Road 3239 E Bullock Creek Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 Midland, Michigan 48640 Consumers Power Company Fisher Contracting Company 212 West Michigan Avenue 921 Jefferson Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr Wm Linton Mr Wm Sasse Rt 10, 3156 E Gordonville Rd Rt 10 Midland, Michigan 48640 Midland, Michigan 48640 Francis Goulette Mr Daniel Hart 4439 N Eastman Road Rt 2 Midland, Michigan 48640 Freeland, Michigan 48623 Mr Jerry Bare Ellsie Spangler 702 West Ellsworth Rt 10 Midland, Michigan 48640 Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr Earl Roebuck Mr John Holmes Rt 10 Rt 10, 3422 E Gordonville Rd Midland, Michigan 48640 Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr Roy Robertson Mr Walter Bennett Rt 10, 3412 E Gordonville Rd 1555 Sassee Road Midland, Michigan 48640 Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr Wm Wineland Mr Wm Mergard 3632 E Gordonville Road 323 Potawaton Midland, Michigan 48640 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 Amendment 3 miO681-0377g102 VI-1 September 30, 1981 I

EXHIBIT VII DESCRIPTION OF EXPECTED WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS PROCESS WASTEWATERS The process wastewaters listed below are normally discharged directly to the Tittabawassee River at Discharge No 001, expect for condensate return pump house drainage which is routed to Bullock Creek at Discharge No 002. The expected characteristics of these process wastewaters are presented in Table 1:

o Evaporator Building Neutralizing Sump o Laundry Waste Treatment o Oily Waste Treatment o Auxiliary Boilers (via oily waste treatment) o Liquid Radwaste System I

o Condensate Return Pump House Drainage o Demineralized Water Storage Tank o Units 1 and 2 Neutralizing Sump COOLING POND BLOWDOWN Chemical Characteristics Certain process wastewaters are discharged to the cooling pond on a routine or intermittent basis. Evaporator Building Neutralizing Sump effluent may be discharged to the cooling pond on an optional basis (Sec Process Wastewater above). This wastewater combines in the cooling pond with the Units 1 and 2 condenser cooling water and service water systems discharge (recirculated) and form the cooling pond blowdown effluent. Expected wastewater characteristics of the pond blowdown are described in Table 2.

Routine o Iron Removal Sump o Units 1 and 2 Clean Waste Sump o Sodium Hypochlorite Generation System Amendment 3 miO681-0377h102 VII-1 September 30, 1981

1 Inte rmittent o Oily Waste Storage Tank Overflow o Miscellaneous Water Storage Tank Overflows and Drains o Service Water Cooling Tower Blowdown o Steam Trap Drainage o Steam Generator Drains (after wet layup)

Thermal Table 3 presents the surface area and length of the 5 F isotherm for various river flows. Physical Model Testing at Alden Research Laboratories was used in deriving Table 3.

River flows used in preparing these temperature distri-butions were based on long range average values. River water temperatures downstream of the mixing zone are not expected to exceed the values given in R323.1075 (2) and (3b) of the Michigan Administrative Code, Part 4, Michigan Water Quality Standards, as a result of the combined Plant discharge (Node 60, Figure 1).

Estimated distances for closure of the 1*F isotherms are given in Table 4.

Appendices A and B provide an overview of the simulation models used as well as the effects of the Plant's thermal plume on the Tittabawassee River.

Appendix A provides a detailed description of the field survey, physical model and mathematical model used in the Plant thermal plume simulation. Appendix B provides a general discussion of the plume in terms of its effects in the near field and far field based on preliminary modeling results.

COMBINED PLANT DISCHARGE WASTEWATER Table 2 of this exhibit presents the expected characteristics of the cooling pond blowdown after being combined with process wastewaters and discharged to the Tittabawassee River as combined Plant Discharge Wastewater. The total dissolved solids concentration in the Tittabawassee River at Freeland Road is not expected to exceed a monthly average of 500 mg/l nor an instantaneous maximum of 750 mg/l as a result of this discharge.

The combined Plant discharge (Node 60, Figure 1) will not exceed the phospho-rus limit of 1 mg/l as set forth in the Rule 323.1060 of the Michigan Administrative Code.

This limit is more stringent than the daily average phosphate limit of 35 lb (exclusive of pond reconcentration of existing levels in the river) that was set forth in the agreement reached between Consumers Power Company and the AEC Regulatory Staff Counsel, Thomas F Englehardt.

CONDENSATE RETURN PU'IPHOUSE DRAINAGE Table 1 of this exhibit presents the expected characteristics of condensate and demineralized water drainage from the condensate return pumphouse. The quality of this water is carefully maintained by DOW to prevent Amendment 3 miO681-0377h102 VII-2 September 30, 1981

cross-contamination from their processes. This high quality water may reach Bullock Creek as a result of incidental leakage or system drainage for maintenance purposes.

PI.AhT DISCHARGES PRIOR TO COMMERCIAL OPERATION Table 5 of this exhibit presents the expected characteristics of preopera-tional wa.=tewater discharges to the cooling pond prior to commercial opera-tion. Also included in this table is a summary of the chemical discharges from the construction chemistry lab trailer to the cooling pond for the period September 5, 1978 through April 20, 1979. As noted in Exhibit III, hydro-static test water will be discharged to either the Tittabawassee River or the cooling pond.

The characteristics of this waste water are also included in Table 5.

The frequency of flush water, hydrostatic test water, and layup discharges is listed in Table 5 as " varies".

This may be construed as several times a week for flush water, approximately once per week for hydrostatic test water, and perhaps a few times each month for system layup discharges. It should be noted that these frequencies are only approximations. Under field conditions, there may be weeks without discharges. As construction progresses towards completion, these discharges may become more frequent.

The cooling pond holds approximately four billion gallons of water when full.

The total estimated discharge of flush water and hydrostatic test water for 1981, 1982 and 1983 is approximately 15 million gallons. To illustrate the effect on pond chemistry, even if the total volume of both these wastewater streams for all three years were discharged all at once to the full pond, the dilution factor would be approximately 270 to 1.

There would be no effect on pond pH.

Pond TDS and TSS would be increased by less then 1 mg/1.

Similarly, the effect on pond chemistry of the other preoperational discharges would be very slight because the dilution becomes much larger as smaller volumes are discharged.

Hydrazine (N H ) rapidly disassociates into water, 34 ammonia and nitrogen gas when exposed to air and, so, can be disregarded.

In addition to the discharge listed in Table 5, there are two small volume discharges associated with the temporary fire protection system. Well leakoff from the temporary firewater pumphouse and seepage from the temporary firewater tank (capacity of 500,000 gallons) drain to Bullock Creek through construction site runoff ditches.

Both of these minor discharges will cease following commercial operation when the temporary fire protection system is eliminated.

Groundwater from the sanitary water well adjacent to Warehouse No 2 is pumped continuously and discharged to a nearby road drainage ditch to prevent pipe freezing during winter months. The road drainage discharges to Bullock Creek.

This discharge will be terminated following commercial operation.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377h102 VII-3 September 30, 1981

TABLE 1 EXPECTED CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PROCESS WASTEWATERS 4

1.

Evaporator Building Neutralizing Sump (Node 47)

Average / Maximum Pa ameter Value Average Daily Volume, gals 32,500 Maximum Daily Volume, gals 220,000 pH 6.0-9.0 TSS, mg/l

<30 TDS, mg/l 5,200 Ca, mg/l 190 Mg, mg/l 100 Na, mg/l 1,300 SO,, mg/l 3,100 C17mg/l 260 P, mg/l 1.04 NH, mg/l

<2 3

umps (* (Node 45) 2.

Units 1 & 2 Neutralizing c

Parameter Value Average Daily Volume, gals 16,000 Maximum Daily Volume, gals 104,000 pH 6.0-9.0 TSS, mg/l 30 TDS, mg/l 14,300 Ca, mg/l 200 NH,

g/l 1,200 3

Na, mg/l 3,000 50, mg/l 9,960 4

3.

Laundry Waste Treatment (Node 53)

Average / Maximum Parameter Value Daily Volume, gals 600/8,000 pH 6.0/9.0 TSS, mg/l

<30 Conductivity, umho/cm 1,400/2,000 TDS, mg/l 840/6,200 Amendment 3 miO681-0377i102 VII-4 September 30, 1981

TABLE 1 (CONTD) 4.

Oily Waste Treatment (Node 51)

Average / Maximum Pa rarieter Value Daily Volume, gals 64,000/288,000 pH 6.0-9.0 TSS, mg/l

<30/<100 Oil and Grease, mg/l

<15/<20 TDS, mg/l 980/2,290 5.

Magnetic Filter Backwash (Prior to Settling, Node 40)

Parameter Value( )

Average Daily Volume, gals 586 tiarimum Daily Volume, gals 1,758 pH 9.0-9.5 TDS, mg/l 0.3/5.0 TSS, as Fe3, mg 0

OilandGrease,mg71

<15 6.

Permanent Auxiliary Boiler Blowdown (Node 37)

Parameter Value( )

Frequency,daysperyegboiler 35 Average Daily Volume, gals 0

!!aximum Daily Volume, (d) gals 19,000 pH 9.0-9.5 TDS, mg/l

<200 TSS, mg/l

<30(c)

Fe, mg/l

<1(c)

Cu, mg/l

<1 Oil and Grease, mg/l

<15 h3, mg/l

<10 h

N'3 4 mg/l 12-25 Amendment 3 miO681-0377i102 VII-5 September 30, 1981

TABLE 1 (CONTD) 7.

Units 1 & 2 Clean Waste Sumps (Node 44)

Average / Maximum Parameter Value Average Daily Volume, gals 28,900 Maximum Daily Volume, gals 193,000 pH 6.0-9.0 TDS, mg/l

<50 TSS, mg/l 20/100 Oil and Grease, mg/l

<15 8.

Makeup Demin Storage Tank Overflow / Drain Parameter Value (Maximum Design)

Frequency of Discharge

<once/yr (est)

Maximum Daily Volume, gals 50,000 Conductivity pmho/cm @ 25 C

<0.50 Silica, mg/l Si0, (soluble)

<0.025 pH 6.5-3.0 C1 mg/l

<0.1 9.

Temporary High Pressure Auxiliary Boiler Blowdown (Node 72)

Parameter Value Frequency, days per year / boiler 46 Average Daily Volume, gals 1238 Maximum Daily Volume, gals 5524 pH 8.0-9.5 TDS, mg/l

<1250 TSS, mg/l

<30 Fe, mg/l

<0.05 Cu, mg/l

<0.03 Oil and Grease, mg/l

<15 Nd,,mg/l NH

<1.0 mg/l 12-25 4

10.

Liquid Radwaste System (Node 59)

Parameter Value Average Daily Volume, gals 200 Maximum Daily Volume, gals 40,000(*

pH 6.0-9.0(f)'

TDS, mg/l 5

TSS, mg/l

<30 Amendment 3 miO681-0377i102 VII-6 September 30, 1981

TABLE 1 (CONTD) 11.

Condensate Return Pump House Drainage (Node 62)

Parameter Value Average Daily Volume, gals O

Maximum Daily Volume, gals 12,000(8)

Average /Mggjmum Average /Mggjmum Value Value pH 8.5/9.0 8.0/10.0 Conductivity, pmho 2.5/5.0 6.0/22 Silica, mg/l Si0, 0.02/0.02 C1, mg/l 0/0 0.3/0.6 Na, mg/l 0.3/0.5 Fe, mg/l 0.03/0.04 0.04/0.05 Cu, mg/l 0/0 0.027/0.055 Oil and Grease, mg/l 0/0 0/0 Footnotes (a)

Trace amounts of certain reagents may be present in this waste stream.

See Table la.

(b)

Values for concentration parameters are estimated maximums.

(c)

During the startup of the auxiliary boiler, total iron and copper concentrations in the bailer blowdown may exceed 1 mg/l for a few hours.

(d)

Both auxiliary boilers in operation.

(e)

Maximum daily discharge rate is higher than the rate of accumulation.

This value based on operator experience.

(f)

~.usive of boric acid and chemicals added to adjust pH and remove oxygen.

(g)

Flow rate for maximum value is estimated at 100 gpm for up to four hours if entire suction header must be drained. Normal composition of drainage may 5 40% demineralized water and 2 60% polished condensate.

(h)

Demineralized water characteristics.

(i)

Polished condensate characteristics.

Amendment 3 l

miO681-0377i102 VII-7 September 30, 1981

TABLE la CHEMICAL REAGENTS USED IN THE SECONDARY PLANT IJLBORATORY

.The following reagents are e.pected to be used in the secondary plant laboratory. Occasionally trace amounts of these reagents may be present in the secondary plant laboratory drainage to the Unit I neutralizing sump.

REACENT ANALYSIS REACENT ANALYSIS REAGENT ANALYSIS Nitric Acid Phosphate Manganous Sulfate Orygen 1,2 ' Napthoquinone Morpholine Terrie Alum Chloride Potassium Iodide Oxygen Chromate 4 Sulfonic Acid Mercuric Thioryanate Chloride Sodium Thiosulfate Oxygen Mopholine Standard -

Morpholine Methanol Chloride Stabilized Starch Orygen Chromate Ammonium Molybdate Phosphate, Silica Hydrazine Sulfuric Acid Oxygen, Fluoride Oxalic Acid Silica Phosphate, Glycerol (Clycerin) Oxygen Alkalinity 1-Amino 2 Napthol Silica, Phosphate Sulfate Hydrochloric Acid Chromate. Fluoride 4-Sulfonic Acid Indigo Carmine Oxygen Silica, Hydrazine

. Sodium Sulfite Silican Phosphate Dextrose Oxygen Paradimethylamino-Hydrazine Manganese Standard Manganese benzaldehyde Pctassium Hydroxide Oxygen Mercuric Iodide Ammonia Boric Acid Ammonia Sodium Standard Sodium Mercuric Iodide Ammonia Sodium Metabisulfite Phosphate pH Buffers Various Sodium Hydroxide Ammonia Sodium Bisulfite Silica Fluoride Fluoride Zine sulfate Ammonia Barium Chloride Sulfate Lichium Standard Lithium Sodiua Potassium Ammonia Sodium Chloride Sulfate Tartrate Sodium Chloride Sulfate-Alizarin Eed S Fluoride Calcium Standard Calcium Phenolphtalein Alkalinity Indicator Zircenyl Chloride - Fluoride Magnesium Standard Magnesium Nethyl Orange Indicator Alkalinity Octahydrate Copper Standard Copper Methyl Purple Indicator Alkalinity Iron Standard Iron sic 581-0354bl02-46 VII-6 September 30, 1981

TABLE 2 EXPECTED CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COOLING POND BLOUDOWN AND COMBINED PLANT DISCHARGE Cooling Pond Blowdown Combined Plant Discharge (Node 7)

(Node 60)

Average / Maximum Average / Maximumg Parameter Concentration Concentration pH 7.0-9.0 6 0-9.0 TSS, mg/l

<100

<100 TDS, ppm 980/2,290 991/2,461 Ca, mg/l 150/360 149/322 Mg, mg/l 40/85 40/79 Na, mg/l 70/220 73/267 SO, mg/l 375/840 390/908 4

C1, mg/l 145/425 145/383 P, mg/l 0.06/0.3 0.06/0.3 NH'*8kbgsN 52.0

$2.0 3

Ag, mg/l 0.006/0.04 0.006/0.04 b)

Hg, mg/l 0.003/0.02 0.003/0.02 g)

Pb, mg/1 0.04/0.18 0.04/0.17 g)

Ni, mg/l(b) 0.03/0.11 0.03/0.11 Zn, mg/l 0.05/0.22 0.05/0.22 Oil and Grease

<15/<20

<15/<20 Total Residual Chlorine, mg/l

<0.2/<0.3

<0.2/<0.3

(*)

See Exhibit G.

Concentrations listed for these materials result from pond evaporative concentration of ambient levels of these materials, see Exhibit IV, Table 1, Note (c).

(#

l Maximum concentrations were computed using the minimum blowdown flow (5 cfs) and the maximum instantaneous waste discharge rates.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377jl02-46 VII-9 September 30, 1981

TABLE 3 AREA AND LENGTH 07 THE 5 F ISOTHERM FRO.'! ALDEN RESEARCH LABORATORY TEST DATA Q

Laboratory Q

AT Area Length (cfs)

Test No (c$s)

B (*F)

(acres)

X (ft) 835 292 25 15.0 0.18 540 288 13 19.5 0.32 860 290 9

25.1 0.17 600 1,305 329 73 12.2 0.40 1,210 336 23 22.6 0.39 1,090 331 130 10.0 0.17 210 333 11 35.3 0.37 1,100 2,065 355 137 12.3 0.21 200 354 73 13.9 0.29 820 343 73 13.3 0.29 830 342 73 24.2 0.71 1,350 345 35 23.8 0.51 1,230 298 20 29.5 0.27 800 301 15 39.5 0.27 810 3,015 307 73 19.5 0.32 830 21 25 42.3 0.50 1,260 350 100 18.1 0.30 720 305 73 29.7 0.51 1,200 3,515 322 143 17.8 0.63 1,010 320 73 28.5 0.58 740 278 45 40.0 0.37 740 317 73 35.9 0.37 550

Where, Q = River flow rate directly upstream of the blowdown (including plant makeup and Dow discharge).

Q B

AT = Temperature of the blowdown minus ambient river temperature.

B X = Distance from blowdown diccharge structure to point of isotherm closure.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377kl02 VII-10 September 30, 1981

TABLE 4 ESTIMATED DISTANCE FOR CLOSURE OF 1*F ISOTHERM FOR THE LABORATORY TESTS WITH THE LONGEST ISOTHERM IN EACH RIVER FLOW Q

Laborato ry Q

AT Length (cfs)

Test No (chs)

( Fh X (ft) 835 292 25 15.0 11,000 1,305 329 73 12.2 13,000 2,065 342 73 24.2 42,000 3,015 305 73 29.7 21,000 3,515 322 143 17.8 42,000

Vhere, Q = River flowrate directly upstream of the blowdown (including Plant makeup and Dow discharge).

Q = Blowdown flowrate.

B ATB = Temperature of the blowdown minus ambient river temperature.

X = Distance from blowdown discharge structure to point of isotherm closure.

Amendment 3 miO681-03771102 VII-11 September 30, 1981

l l

TABLE-5 EXPECTED CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANT DISCHARGES PRIOR TO COMMERCIAL OPERATION 1.

Flush Water (waste water from flushing systems after construction)

~

Parameter Expected Value Frequency of Discharge Varies Volume of Discharge 4,000,000 gal /yr for 1981, 1982 & 1983 pH 6-8 TDS, mg/l

<200 TSS, mg/l

<100 Effect of discharge to pond No. Measurable effect 2.

Hydrostatic Test Water (waste water from hydrostatic testing of systems)

Parameter Expected Value Frequency of Discharge Varies Volume of Discharga 1,000,000 gal /yr for 1981, 1982 & 1983 pH 6-8 TDS, mg/l

<200 TSS, mg/l

<100 Uranine Dye, mg/l (fuel pool leaks only)

Effect if discharged to pond No measurable effect Rhodamine WT Dye is recommended as a backup to Uranine Dye.

f 3.

System Lay-Up Discharges (as necessary to drain systems for rework after chemical lay-up)

Parameter Expected Value Frequency of Discharge Varies Volume of Discharge 1,000,000 gal /yr for 1981, 1982 & 1983 pH 9.3-9.5 TDS, ag/l

<50 TSS, mg/l

<10 NH, mg/l 2-20 Nd,,mg/l 200-500 2*

Effect of discharge to pond All chemicals would be diluted approximately 4,000 to 1 Amendment 3 miO681-0377m102 VII-12 September 30, 1981

TABLE 5 (CONTD) 4 Auxiliary Boiler Cleaning (wastes generated during initial boiler boil out)

Pa rameter Expected Value Frequency of Discharge Once Volume of Discharge 50,000 gal pH 9-11 TDS, mg/l

<10,000 TSS, mg/l

<1,000 Fe, mg/l

<1,000 PO, mg/l

<5,000 4

Effect of discharge to pond All chemicals would be diluted by at least 80,000 to 1 5.

Condensate and Feedwater Chemical Cleaning (Unit 1 and Unit 2)

Parameter Expected Value Frequency of Discharge Twice Volume of Discharge 100,000 gal /each pH 6.5-9.5 Temp F

<200 TDS, mg/l

<25,000 TSS, mg/l

<1,500 Oil / Grease, mg/l

<50 E d, g/l

<25 0

Fe, mg/l

<4,000 Effect of discharge to pond All chemicals would be diluted approximately 40,000 to 1 'per unit) 6.

Construction Chemistry Lab Trailer Wastes Summary of Chemical Discharge to cooling pond, September 5, 1978 through April 20, 1979.

Total Amount Chemical Discharged in,_Kg Amino Napthol Sulfonic Acid 0.004 Ammonium Molybdate 0.008 Ascorbic Acid 0.280 Boric Acid 0.099 CDTA 0.008 Disodium EDTA 0.536 Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate 0.110 Glacial Acetic Acid 0.069 Amendment 3 miO681-0377m102 VII-13 September 30, 1981

TABLE 5 (CONTD)

Hydrochloric Acid 0.298 Lead Perchlorate 0.001 Nitric Acid 0.432 Oxalic Acid 0.080 Phenolphatelein 0.008 Potassium Biphtalate 0.057 Potassium Chloride 0.165 Potassium Hydroxide 0.530 Silver Nitrate 0.040 Sodium Borate 0.010 Sodium Chloride 0.009 Sodium Fluoride 0.116 Sodium Hydrogen Sulfite 0.240 Sodium Hydroxide 0.924 Sodium Metasilicate 0.002 Sodium Phosphate 0.108 Sodium Sulfite 0.008 Sulfuric Acid 0.078 Zine Acetate 1.760 Total.

5.980 After April 20, 1979, wastes generated by wet chemistry performed in the temporary Lab are sent to DOW for treatment and disposal.

1 Amendment 3 miO681-0377m102 VII-14 Septeeber 30, 1981

[

t PART THREE APPENDICES Amendment 3 miO681-0377r102-46 September 30, 1961

APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix Title A

Thermal Plume Simulation Study B

Thermal Plume Effects C

Analysis of Midland Plant Cooling Pond Operation D

Blowdown and Makeup Control System E

Analysis of the Midland Plant Thermal Plume and The Dow Chemical Company Discharge Interaction F

Thermal Plume Effect on Dissolved Oxygen Levels G

Ammoniated Wastewater Processing H

Determination of Natural River Temperature I

Amendment 3 miO681-0377r102-46 September 30, 1981

8 APPENDIX A THERMAL PLUME SIMULATION STUDY DESCRIPTION OF FIELD SURVEY STUDY Field surveys of the plume resulting from Dow Chemical Company's tertiary pond effluent into Tittabawassee River were made in the months of July and October of 1977, for a river flow of about 400 and 1100 cfs respectively. The Dow discharge was located about 2000 feet upstream of the Plant river intake structure during the field tests and has subsequently been relocated approximately 200 feet downstream of the Plant river intake structure. The conductivity of the teritary pond effluent was used as a tracer. Data was collected at 5 to 11 cross sections during each survey. The cross sections were spaced approximately 1200 feet apart except in the vicinity of Dow's discharge where a few sections were spaced approximately 150 feet apart, and around bends where sections 600 feet apart were surveyed. The total length of the river reach surveyed was about 12,000 feet and the location of the cross sections is shown in Figure A2.

Measurements consisted of river depth, velocity, and conductivity readings taken in 20 to 30 vertical intervals of each cross section. A Price current meter obtained from the US Geological Survey (USGS) was used for velocity measurements. A top-setting wading rod was used to position the meter during the July surveys when the rivgr.was shallow and a boat, mounted with the necessary measuring equipment 1,

was used during the October surveys.

Standard USGS procedures (6) were followed for the velocity measurements and subsequent discharge calculations.

Conductivity was measured simultaneously with velocity measurements using a Yellow Springs conductivity meter (YSI Model 33).

Conductivities near the water surface and near the river bottom were measured to check the vertical variation of conductivity which was found to be substantially constant with depth, indicating that complete mixing occurred in the vertical direction.

Analysis of the survey data began by plotting the measured river depth, velocity, and conductivity versus transverse distance for each cross section.

Survey results for October 16, 1977 are shown in Figures A3 and A4.

Values of the dimensionless cumulative discharge from the right bank looking downstream were computed and conductivity versus dimensionless discharge profiles were constructed and are shown in Figure AS.

The concentration profiles were developed in this manner so that the stream-tube model described in the mathematical model section of this attachment can be applied.

The conductivity of ambient river was either actually measured or estimated from measured concentration profiles. The ambient value was subtracted from the measured conductivity level so that the " excess conductivity" could be defined and used in the stream-tube model.

The excess conductivity profiles established above were used in the mathematical model as upstream boundary conditions. This required dividing each profile into 10 to 15 segments and determining an equivalent line source for each segment. Additional data consisted of the total river discharge, and estimated value of the constant diffusion factor D for the river reach under consideration, and the distance to the downstream section where a conductivity profile was measured. The D value was then adjusted by making multiple runs Amendment 3 miO681-0377n102 A-1 September 30, 1981

i of the mathematical model until a best fit of computed excess conductivity profile to the measured downstream concentration profile was obtained. The measured downstream profile was then used as the upstream boundary condition for the adjacent downstream reach. By repeating this procedure, D values for each river reach were determined. The constant diffusion factors which yield the best fit to the survey data are given in Table A2.

The transverse

^

diffusion coefficient K,and the dimensionless constant B, both defined in the mathematical section, were computed from D and river flow characteristics and are also listed in Table A2.

The estimated B values vary from 0.2 to 2.7 for the vari.;us reaches for the Tittabawassee River that were studied.

In order to be conservative in modeling the physical effects of the Plant discharge (Reference Attachment B) and in modeling radionuclide transport B value of 0.23 was used.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICAL MODEL A reach of the Tittabawassee River extending 100 feet upstream to 2000 feet downstream of the river intake structure is simulated in the physical model (Figure A1) at a scale of 1:15. The model topography is constructed on a wood i

frame consisting of templates cut to reproduce the river bottom contours and is covered with plywood to conform tc the topography determined from field surveys. The plywood is sealed with a layer of polyester resin. The detailed features such as the river intake structure and the Dow Chemical Company and Midland Plant discharge outfalls, shown in Figure A1, are also constructed in plywood sealed with a resin coating. The flow field downstream from the Plant discharge structure can be divided into two regions; the near field, and the far field.

In the near field the dilution of effluent with the river is primarily due to jet mixing, dilution in the far field is achieved mainly be transverse convection and turbulent diffusion processes. To model the hydrodynamic mixing in the near field, it is essential to have undistorted geometry and to ensure the equivalence of the Froude numbers in both the prototype and the model. The Reynolds number is not modeled, but it must be i

kept high enough to ensure turbulent flow from the model discharge structure.

Equating the prototype and model Froude numbers yields U

U F =

p

=

F,

=

m (a) p gH gH, where the subscripts p and m denote prototype and model, U ahd H denote a characteristic velocity and depth, respectively and g is the gravitational acceleration. This equality ensures that phenomena influenced by the weight of fluid will be similar in both the model and the prototype.

It is also necessary to equate the densimetric Froude numbers in both the model and the prototype to ensure proper representation of buoyancy effects

=

m (b)

F =

p

= F P

a (AP/P)pgH (AP/P),gH, p

Amendment 3 miO681-0377n102 A-2 September 30, 1981

or (ao H)r /2

-1 F

=U (c) r P

where the subscript r density the ration between model and prototype, and ap/p is the initial density difference which depends on both temperature and Total Dissolvcd Solids (TDS) concentration. The selection of a length scale ratio of 1:15 resulted in the scale ratios of Table Al which were calculated from the continuity equation and equations (a) and (b).

Two methods of operation were employed for modeling conveniences; once-through operation and recirculation of the model river flow. For the once-through operation, a constant-head reservoir supplied the flow via a supply line.

Flowrates were measured by a Venturi meter in the line. The flow was then introduced into the model at the upstream trough. Baffles were used to distribute the flow across the entire width of the model river. At the downstream end of the water flowed over a tailgate and was discarded. Air teaperature inside the building housing the model was lowered to a level close to the model river water temperature so that undesirable heat transfer from the air to the model was minimized. For the recirculation operation, water flowed into a sump af ter leaving the model and was pumped back into the supply line. A small amount of water in the sump was replaced by cold fresh water from outside so the model river water temperature could be maintained at a constant level.

The Dow Chemical Company terticry treatment pond discharge was simulated using a hot water boiler connnected in parallel to a saturated brine storage tank.

The relative density of the discharge flow was maintained by controlling the temperature and brine (TDS) concentration in the flow. The discharge flow vas continually monitored with an in-line orifice plate metering section. The Plant discharge was similarly modeled, although its relative density was maintained by adjusting only the water temperature which was achieved with a boiler and a mixing network. The cooling pond makeup water was withdrawn through a geometrically similar structure via a small pump.

The withdrawal flow as well as the discharge flow were monitored by in-line orifice plate metering sections.

Surface and near bottom water velocity measurements were made with a calibrated miniature propeller meter.

Temperature measurements in the mode:

were accomplished using a matrix of about 230 copper /cor.stantan thermocouples.

These probes were used to measure surface and vertical temperature profiles throughout the model, in addition to critical temperatures for model operation such as air temperature, discharge temperatures, and river inflow temperatures.

The ambient river temperature was monitored by three proces located in the upstream flow distribution trough. The thermocouples could be scanned at desired time intervals and the excess temperature (water temperature less ambient river temperature) at various locations could be Amendment 3 miO681-0377n102 A-3 5eptember 30, 1981

l 5C

. displayed according to thermocouple positions. Further details of the model'

^

and its operation are contained in Reference 1.

DESCRIPTION OF THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR TRANSVERSE MIXING OF SOLUTES IN NATURAL STREAMS Themathematicalmodel(jgbasicallythestreamtubemodeloriginallypropo{gj by Yotsukura and Cobb adopted by the'US Nuclear Regulatory Commission The model was developed for the transverse diffusion of-solutes-from stea'dy sources placed in a natural stream with steady discharge. Density of water is assumed to be homogeneous-throughout the system. Vertical variations of solute concentration, velocity, and diffusion coefficient are neglected through the use of depth averaged values. As a result of these assumptions, the predicted solute plume is two-dimensional. 'The applicability of the stream tube model to the Tittabawassee River was verified by a number of field surveys of a conductivity plume resulted from Dow Chemical Company's tertiary pond effluent into the Tittabawassee River near the Plant. A description of 1

the field surveys has been previously described.

The theoretical development of the model involves the derivation of a diffusion equation by balancing inflow and outflow of solute mass in a control volume. The dependent variable is the solute concentration and the two independent variables are longitudinal distance along the river and transverse.

cumulative discharge, q, from the river bank:

y q = f ud dy (d) o j

where y = transverse distance from river bank u = local river velocity at y

-d = local river depth The use of the cumulative discharge instead of the transverse distance from i

the river bank enables a closed form solution to be found for natural rivers i

with irregular channel cross-sections. Boundary conditions are zero solute concentration gradient at both river banks and a known solute concentration

's profile at the upstream end of the river reach to be studied.

The stream-tube model (2) as originally formulated only applied to situations where the upstream solute concentration profile resembles a point source or a l

constant strength line source perpendicular to the river flow..

To treat variable solute concentration at the upstream boundary, a collection of short constant strength line sources was used to approximate the variable solute concentration profile. The stream-tube model was applied repeat'edly with each short line source as the upstream boundary condition and the iolutions were l

added. The solution obtained by this superposition is valid since the diffusion equation is linear.

The only parameter appearing in the diffusion equation is the' constant

• diffusion factor D.

The evaluation of D requi' es a reparate estimation of the r

~

,~

Amendment 3 4

miO681-0377n102 A-4 September 30, 1981

• • j 4

ee - - = - -

-.c

+.,e~-

-t

=w.n-w +

-,r.

+--,ew n

r c

.I n-

A, 8

~

1 4

i

)

diffusion coefficient K which, in turn, can F2 3etermined properties-andriverflowusingElder'sempiricalequation{rgmtheriver y

(e)

K = BU*d

,Y k'here d = average river 7 depth, ft U* = shear velocity, ft/sec E = a dimensionless constant i

s p

Valuesofdand'b*, cad'betalbulatedfromfieldmeasurementsofrivercross sectidnishape,dgptp,flowandfwatersurfaceslope. The value of B can be determined from 'tne 1 stream-tube.nodel,' field measured solute concentration-

[+

profiles /$ndtheriverdaty,m'e For straight rivers, B has a valueofapproximately0.23jjioned.above.

4 r

Forcurvedchannels,k3f*5}argerthan0.23 e

i due to increased transverse mixing by secondary currents 11 u

! 2d Tne constant diffusion factor D can be calculated utilizing the value of K l

obteined from Equation-(e):

F r r K

Q

/

/

Y C

D-

- f ud dq (f)

O o

where Q is the total river, flow 4

3.

3

[

The values of B and D for the stretch of the Tittabalassee River adjacent to f

"the Plant during July and October of 1977.were estimated from field data and are tabulated in Tat After finding D for a riveikreach and af ter defining the'ipstream solute i

%cZ concentration 'versus cum $11tive discharge, a, profile'of concentration versus the mathemh(t;ical lmodel'. cumulative ischarge at 'theedoynstream end o,f the rea For.t,ne next reach dbwnstream, this profile is used l

as the upstream-bodndary condition together with a new.value of D to compute the concentration profile at the downstream end of the reach. By repeating fnthis procedure the lateral transport of afsolute over a large distance-

//.. iownstream can be evaluated. by-knowing the solute concentration versus

', / " cumulative discharge profiles 'and the distribution of river flow within each riv' r cross section. the transport of a solute,in"the river can be adequately f3 e

i described.

j

,.s iREFERENCES

,/,

• p 3

e

/

4? ? A

.1. ' Alden Research Laboratories, '" Hydrothermal 'Nodel Studies, Cooling Pond N [%"

'V ~

Blowdown Discharge, Midlah'd' Nuclear Plant" Final Report 45-79/M124AF,-

'~

April, 19,79.

i

[ e*

' _i t

12. Yotsukura, N and E D Cobb,7 Transverse, Diffusion of S$10tes in Natural

,e f.

Streams," US Geological _ Survey Professional Paper 582-C,' 1972J E.

I.

l b f

,3.

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.113, " Estimating

. Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor

'r.

< Releases fo,r the Purpose of f1mplementing Appendix I," May,4z01976.

es

'Akendment 3-

,4

-x-

~-

I tiic681-0377n1029 '

.A-5 September 30, 1981 atu l Y.

'Y q A

m ;;x.,-..., _,.,, -, - -..,... -.. -.

4.

Elder, J W, "'he Dispersion of Marked Fluid in Turbulent Shear Flow,"

Journal of Fluid Mechanics, No 5, pp 544-560, 1959.

5.

Yotsukura, N and W W Sayre, " Transverse Mixing in Natural Channels," Water Resources Research, Vol 12, No 4, August, 1976.

6.

US Geological Survey, " Discharge Measurements at Gaging Stations," Chapter AS of Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the USGS, 1969.

t i

)

s 1

Amendment 3 s

'miO681-0377n102 A-6 September 30, 1981 au_

TABLE AI MODEL SCALE RATIOS Model to Protot>Te Characteristics Dimension Scale Ratio 1

Length L

L = 1:15 i

r 1

n l

Area L'

A = 1:225 r

(

Velocity L/t V = 1:3.87 1

r

'r = 1:3.67 l

1 3

1 Discharge L /t Q = 1:871.4 r

I i

Temperature F

T *II r

TDS ppm C

~1l r

1 i

l i

Amendment 3 miO681-0377o102 A-7 September 30, 1981

1 8

s 9

r 1

e t

e B 0

m 6465427608 221 88 6742 3

a r

1 00000001 0 1 01 00 1 200 r

a e

P b

)

m ns e

o/

t j

1 924620943 20877 471 8 p

st 301 9001 01 51 322 451 3 e

1 u

f S

f

(

0000000000 00000 0000 y

f K

i D

{)

c~s t/

5777 727777 43854 6 7 5.1 0

p 1

pt 2000000000 1

mf o(

CD

~

h tg n

S e) f L t 0000000000 00000 0000 i

f_

0000000000 00241 5079 ul h(

6666626622 53289 9895 S

c 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

44 E

a R

e R

Y D

)

U m

T c

S

/

o D.

rh em I

E vRJ I

i F

y 00000000000 000000 00000 R

t t 66666262222 555555 44444 2

E ni 66666666666 444444 44444 A

V ev I

ii E

R b t L

mc l

E A u l

A F

t l

T S

n S

o A

C W

A e

B gh A

at T

r p)

T eet 41 985635348 03010.

69952 1

vDf I

T A

(

1 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 242323 21 1 26 FO y

et Y

gi)

R acs r o/

1 61 90594928 240034 A

l t

440021 2391 7 2664 l

5cf 1

7 567 5, 4 56636 f

l l

U A\\ (

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 01 0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S

eg r) a s 00000000000 000000 00000 hi 1

968 986881 5 562847 85505 cc 43333333344 21 22 00009 1 1 s(

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i

D mmmmm mmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmm a pa pp a ppppppppaa pa pa pp y_

7777 7 f

77 77 7777777 77777 7 7 / 777 oe 77 7777 7777 7 7 77 777 v

55666 er 66666767 777 888999 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t n aS 000000 00000 D

777777 77777 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

1 1 1 1 1 0

n 1

o x

i 7

t 7

r c 3

er 0

evS e b

78901 234567 7 80246 37 060 i

1 R s m 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

8 s n 6

oN O

r C

i m

4I

I I

J K

L H

16 k 18 k I

I4 10 +O F

TITTA B AWASSEE E

s RIVER 8+10 20+C s

g 7+10 l

1 8

C jgo l

l

\\

\\

4+10 1

3+O t

A btO MICLAND BLCWDOWN COW CISCHARGE river INTAKE

\\,'

ETRUCTURE

i. cme R

FIGURE A1 PHYS 10AL MODEL LAYCUT MIDLAND PLANT UNITS la 2 CONSUMERS 70W2R COMPANY

A gi d

i 1

== y

'I' l Cs l

Es 2 a = * ~

~

Ng il

• 1(*

5A :h.

el!

)*I g0 con

. f & c,j IE g

=

s 2e a

{ $":4 5 5 us 5 E

I; ll ll I;

J,.

5..

f to t

Y N,

~"

/,.,.

/

y a......

~

f

~~

~,

'~ * %

n.

~.

W,

//

j Y

$fl

'ur,

. f ~'l1 I jf) i a >!t;#,

\\ 1,

~"

I

' ~.

p l

p hE 5 L.

F.', o a

Escr e

e'(L.~ %.

j,, j s

I t

.w.

~

~n &s I, :,s,

):-

+

\\N%

}~7 i

N

'u~.

tj I

P

, ~(-

ll I

N

n i

-l t

T

.$.1 4

7

~

s I

N

'o m

3

. ;s I

ll

(

i I

"K G

~

.- g

);-

}1

.t. - -

t 3

.I.

.Ji.

f.!

l i

i 1

t l

1

(

l l

l l

O 9

4 4

es La a 4

.e ce-

> 4 a.c.@

4 -p Ea M-*.

$M at g

a. Y.n tit: c W *% es a 4 M

> =

, '1.e.a *, !"!! a :-c.

Tal e Wa 5

4 -:U: a k>2' dk IkO>2k.W*$

1. ~ 4. at ' =

- -h g

!f. M I4 O b h

.N k

j* i f

g g

1Q >

f t.N i

CI ! ! M :a

/C*

\\'

/

4 n

g,

(.

- :e :

-g 3

- 4

-j t

' ' s /

'[

C 5

fl*

I

{

g g.

g C

\\

ji

/

J4 j.

t N

si 2

e

/

3

i i a

,3 C

'\\-

/'

,g 3

!(

C

\\

l1 I

If 1

l2 4

C.

./'i

!.i i

a r.

/

C r

6 s

I

(

l t e.

2 25 2-tg

-)

.g g

g I.

/

t*

s

.g d

/

c,' i 1

-)

c.

4

- -l 8

4 T

\\-

ss

]

, i r

3 c

jg il r1 3

i 3

s,s s

s.

s lt

(

N.

5

(

r 2 - i r:

3 ac e

2s

'/

g

(

't i/

t ',

f,.

I e

f.'

t i

r, i f i\\

(i r.

5

\\

i

- %_ s* y

% *j,

,.* 'y a.

..s

..s

. :.. wn..

......a=,.

.:w..=,.

I i

l 4

4 e a n

so M

a 45

-lt.

a.=.>s=3.a f.

m a s ta -

I

• • E "O

s.

2 ws>a at !

v. e > c

'm-

- C e

>e 42**="N 1 0 !" *. C,

g =a

.I..* _G E "

• I4 * * <! * !

r.

z

=>>C>%

s

. a 3

l t.

.s I

I a

i e*

E

=

2 g

r..

a' i-g g

s t

I e

1.

s i

4.

i o

g; g;

8 si 1

I i

!" 3 2 4

22

.32

!3 3*l I*g 3

g

!!E I5 8

e as 7 '

s3 gis

'. 3

g

-g 3

g.

1:

2 #.

3 3

3 r'

3 t

/

3 8

) g..

e i

A I.

.t t

4 I

a,.*** 4.aateamens j $ 3 3 {*

$ $ Ii

..., usm i a<****

p N I

e 4

4

,s 4 ?: a

: F. =

-.!n =

=,

e _.=s

>-ce

=-

. s e.T N,

_s-a..C d>l w-eo>=

.m--=%

_.r

..=. w.. a. = =.

-.z.

z.. n. "=. < 1

-..: m.s e I

1, 1,

j i

t i

I i

i 1

i l

.s

-7

-s

=

_g

=

=.

l 1

t g

l 3

3 3

l 3

3 i

i i

i i

i i

i

.I l

i

.I

?.

e:

+:

i

/.

I i

i l

I l

}

I

/i i

i t

i 99

• T 93

• E

• 5 7

l '

u t

t h

I i

t i

I t

i i

i i

.m.

....m, 1

I i

l t

i t

1

APPENDIX B

(

THERMAL PLUME EFFECTS Operation of the cooling pond blowdown system forms a thermal plume in the Tittabawassee River.

The thermal plume consists of two parts, the near field and the far field.

In the near field the blowdown discharge dilutes rapidly with river water through a jet mixing process. Further mixing in the far field is mainly due to transverse convection and turbulent ciffusion. The thermal plume is simulated by a physical river model for the near field and by a mathematical model for the far field as described in Attachment A.

Heat loss from the thermal plume into the atmosphere was not considered.

Dow Chemical Company discharges its tertiary pond effluent into the Tittabawassee River at about 300 feet upstream from the Plant blowdown structure. Both discharges are at the south bank of the river and are shown in Figure A1.

The excess temperature (temperature of the effluent less ambient natural river temperature) of Dow's effluent is incorporated into the Plant thermal plume simulation.

Physical model test results (Reference 1) in the near field resulted to the 1 F isotherms shown in Figures B1 to B5.

Io extend those isotherms in the far field, the transverse convection-diffusion mathematical model of Yotsukura and Cobb (Reference 2) was used.

Parameters needed in the mathematical model include river cross-sections and their velocity distribution as well as diffusion factors.

The Tittabawassee River geometry, river flow distribution, and excess i

temperature at the end of the near field (Section A shown in Figure B6) are used to initiate the far field thermal plume mathematical modeling. The l

linkage between near field and far field is based on an excess temperature versus dimensionless cumulative discharge profile at Section A which is used as the upstream boundary condition in the mathematical model.

Diffusion factors for the reach of the river extending from the near field to Section B (shown in Figure B6 at Gordonville Road) have been computed for a range of river discharges based on field data collected during July and October of 1977. Although no detailed field data is available for the reach of the river downstream of Section B, the Corps of Engineers has made a survey at the Smith's Crossing Road bridge which is shown as cross-section No 10 in Figure 2.4.19 of Reference 3.

This cross-section is quite similar to Section B.

The river was also observed on several occasions at the Smith's Crossing and Freeland Road bridges (Sections C and D shown in Figure B7),

approximately 0.5 and 4.5 mile downstream of Section B, respectively. The river cross-sections at those locations resemble that of Section B, having steep banks. slow moving current, and a deep channel. Based on these observations, it was assumed that the Tittabawassee River characteristics downstream of Section B are similar to those of Section B.

The diffusion factor for this part of the river was, therefore, determined from the hydraulic properties measured at Section B.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377p102 B-1 September 30, 1981

After determining the diffusion factor for a river reach and after defining the excess temperature versus cumulative discharge, a profile of excess temperature versus cumulative discharge at the do"ustream end of the reach was computed from the mathematical model. For the next reach downstream, this profile was used as an upstream boundary condition together with a new value of the diffusion factor to compute the excess temperature profile at the downstream end of the reach. By repeating this procedure, the lateral transport of the thermal discharge over a large distance downstrem was evaluated resulting to the lengths of the l'F isotherms listed in Table 4 for each river discharge. The distances should be conservative since the mathematical model does not account for surface heat transfer to the atmosphere. Due to the lack of information on river cross-sectional shapes and "elocity profiles downstream from Section B, isotherms could not be drawn for the far field.

REFERENCES 1.

Alden Research Laboratories, " Hydrothermal Model Studies; Cooling Pond Blowdown Discharge, Midland Nuclear Plant" Final Report 45-79/M124AF, April, 1979.

2.

N Yotsukura and E D Cobb, Transverse Diffusion of Solutes in Natural Streams, Professional Paper 582-C (1972), US Geological Survey.

3.

Consumers Power Company, Final Safety Analysis Report, Midland Plant-Units 1 and 2.

Amendment 3 B-2 September 30, 1981 miO681-0377p102 l

i 4

.U l l'

li: - l Y

.x, f, ::

0; :! ; j ;'

~

-wa i; i 3 ;j l.,s; a i

i !'ilij i a

,*- : C +i,s:.i t ud i i~

1: 5 Ii,,ri 3

i i=.

i g:

l i

.f. - t u t! I' ! !, :: :

r 5 l ' 'y..

t r T. I., w..

I!

.=

a llir s5 jt

~

, ! ii.'I d[l i

i EI e

s**.

t i jitg

..u m

il i

• g i

g

< <osc i.1 il c

t st

~

-t

• 1

/

2,.

t

.s A

~2=

!=

/

,/

%./

~

/

t l

i a

f l

f /

Ga

//'

f I

a

?!

l

!,/

g E

o e

o

[

..'/ -I I.

{

f n,!

l I

D

,/

///l

.i if i

i i

-/

s-tl.,:

f f

7 i

-1 1

i 11 : 3{

/

i l.

1 2

s a

• r i !r i

-t 1 :. ::.*

t-

' l.

i !. =. 5 -

.I la i.:g I

1-I 3

s g

.'I 3

le

,p

,4 a

g w

g g

e..._

li 1 }:

I l

l I

I!

1 l'

il 1

,I

'l 1

.., M j, - l l

~

i

=

[

'(

Y I

i 4

/

I l'

5 s

8

=

"" Nx '

/

6 I

\\

..."g 9,

\\ ~ \\

l "C-v t :f

=1

]

k.4

,1 1

a t

3g'i s.1 i

r-c, 2 ;\\, t a 1

.s,

~

z k k.f.3 2

I i

} $,; ' tU i.

o

$ I.

,.:n. t., W

• I -. cot

.i C

s e

2 e

f z

N

\\ *;. h 1 i

~

.u E!

s';

>r i s.a 1.;

a 2

';i ),

i

.s.

,1 ma.

f, <<*:4 ' I; g

3..

I sa i

i-

'l l

Il E

/

z l

..' M!

3 s

\\

l 1

s t:

1 1

t

- { j!

ljj

\\

1\\

\\\\

t.

i l i i

1 i 11.

t l

i 11 i i

il =

Si

/

I i i

1.

/ /

Ill i t(1;i

. It i

.e.,

<= 1

,/

lI t 2

i ts a i,i i I. :

1 i

.' 5

.I'i j.

s, s

u a

i 1

1 11 s

n M

' i i

!1 1

~Y il 1

i kl 1

f

*~{'t I

)

I

• 4 i

1 5

8 i

1 i

d'

+.

4

+

h.

• s.

.4 1

.mS

• i I

r.,

.W O It

O

ii t g.1,je

'i

$y.

. o a

',5 I

Cm

'. t neo y j!.!'

i5 g'

i fl ! i 0:-

w

,j:7-l-

t..j m

't, a.aun it a

e

..g

$C g

IIs-fl N

,.e a j i

.I 9*'3*3 e

r 2:

5 -[; l, f

{ I s-f N

., *l 3

E

?

j i s i.^.

~'

j ; :r 2l m 11 p t- *{,

T'E ' I

(,I lQ

%,*r v a

I p

n.

taf I

k' 3

s

?.

2 8

1

• e, f

c e

O \\

/

o l

I l

l j!

I. :n l

e

. ~v I

5! =

t i

eg s

e I

sg :a 1

i

.i eg 3 s

/

/

I is ;

i ir i

.. ;r f,

-}

}

/

t

/

,s i

/

G ss: :

i a

.f i

7.;

i a

i i

, i

/

3

.f f

/'/

g

=.

s 2

• =

(-

2

=

=

I I

,,,' N 4.

h I

7

/

WM j

,h lj

,l l

j Ii I

f,

=

i

/

i i

i

/

/

a i

a L'.. ~, t t

\\.

.t 4

~

t I

N I

j eJ

/

v 3

/-!

2 E

3

~t a

4 I

e

• =ew i

'g

..f

y,

M MO M M

4 i!!

3 il-

.* rc f

%e he

=m1 i *-

<r R

i -

i

?! g a+ sa. p" I I Il d dt t b

, s.I d

8

+ ': Il

(( m I

l,!;;*s.lw:

l i

3 i,-

i E"

o 3[=

1 l

s. i *. 7 43 i L

i

, i

/

{

I,, e. t :w

' i W*

O l55 g3,' C i

t.

en

=

4, g :$ ;

u 1 Ii -l J'l 4

1 N

a s

}4 Ill,[ t 1 i :1 -

4 2-

, f*1 O

=

1 t 3 1./ #. j,'.

.t I 3 g *'t

• i l

_t 6,

l

((,(kdIf I

J 8,.

A a.

l

/

T E l_

/

A m

• • • s t

/-/

g I

i.

e o

g S

l 5

[

t#

/

t*

==

l

/

Il w

/

s

• =

a-

=

r I I

11 :j r

8 t

s t

i

.. 1

=. a g

d

• ey

• a j

.{

z s a 8

o a

g 3

.l T*

x.

3 2

j, l

-2 ' =

tj

%. 3 j 3I e

g

• f.* ;

I 3

a 3

/

.e e s

=

s g

=

a

/

/

t i

i s

t'N

/

i

=.,X s

/

I i

l E

{

./

r r

I-I i

i t

l r

I i

s e

a 6

l

~

~

\\\\ \\ ~

IU 3

n$ e

< m.

z u.-

xn u

<a i

.I II a

s

'm... u I

b,I g

h k,I us i

W

\\

\\

e i

..i s ;s

+

i1-i S*

111

\\

4

• ' ei 9

ta1

.ti.

N 3I. },',

i j-W*

e

.'*t S

O l

5 -{ i l 'i

{

i k' "}, }'

2 N

I g e N

i. :* n'I M s

\\

s\\ l ",

c o

i e

1

\\

~*t

\\ x t '} k 1{'

\\#

'y/

11 'h' n**' s

\\\\

Ip

/

'/

,(GC4 # ;

kU

/

r, i

s g,

f

\\

\\

1 e

i R;

i O

4 l

/

,1 l*

~ r.

I 1

S.

l l

i I

e k

'1 t

5.

1.

t 11 11 l,*

Ik s:

/

i i

l 1

S it :

11 u

I i

1 I

1, 1

-5 i.s, a

. 5

?.

i 3

1: 1 3

n i

I i

$5 it i

't I

1

!*k i

s k\\\\ \\. )t e

3 i

8 d

5 9

5 6

i

~

1

-l

.i 1

e 1

,f 3

l s

{

='

1!

1 9

i g

t f.

a i

i il i

't 3

\\

\\

i i

I l

.t l'

g as..

j i.

..I j

..-v,-

,-.,a.-

.,,.,,, ~, -,,,

--,--..y

-,---~---p p-.,

i 4

s,.

4!lI I' :

6-,1

=

a

=

[i,rw s

u l "

/

J g, i s.

,l w

r a

=

o o

a sl

!/

$g c

$ls 2

.2 e

a<<

< it.~

~

s/N 8 mr' c

/ h I !5 3

t

/

3 I:

I 1:

.I:

11

-I' IL!

fl

_4.

//

s '.

/

?

. f' s

w.

1,;

t

,n. M J.

f

/

7

,f l

='

GT-/

/

7 vs I; c /

J# 1 is $/.'

qs 3,f~S$,4C.,- V f. I /

3 w.

• f c'y vj1 I,

i e

y l

=

m-

, n_. l, s

m (li",

w7c :4-0 A i

s

. iL 171, rin.2 x

gm b--

w.

i

_:j i-I-

))p-

"f 1

,J l

4 w.

3 s

. :l i

p "i

\\

-'T.

'r i

j-2 t

i..

i --

.1 1.i e

i. ;

,e l

1 l *=* i -'I l

'c x

p 4

• 9

!r 27

h....

E

i.

3=:

s 2

T e.

-

• P.

uJ g 6 w za 1

=.

>'g{.$.

} h.

==

, -o

-l-O 23

-- E gli'

", 5

Me c

3 *!g ~C

. c.I U s'

4: *2, w

1:. - -

a i

=

a e.

7 I2!.

M. **--

. N.

C'~

f

• /

9 g

s

.' "[

.\\/N

c. -

.v ef.

/

/ !

E.

/,

?

=

A.

• 1',,,,$

/

/

$. ! "['.

}I,:

4

.~ C '

/*9

..s, 12 3

l',:. %.

"s p

f=....

s.

/

n g

.t

,a e

,* y.

a.

,/, a 2

e '.-/

sr.;<

i:k i

.r g* 4 I

~

• ;i,.,, f,)', ='s--is.A Y

V :-L m ai.* =

~

+

p~o

-y,;c i

~

.s/

f

n..a y,'

,.,l.a g

e

,i t'

f.

/.

..C..--

,2.

4 *.

.v -

.... ;.i,.

s=..! :-. =.

l.

s.

/,

a e,

J

.t.--".,.

o/).7

}p.

.,F

. V ' dq,-- -

gt I n

?

I

.~.f*...a g*

I; y

-}'

Ws./- ) ( l,) 9

.)

/:

'f s.%

/.

..:]3 s

-*17-#'. '-]

.. f g

=

"*?'*F :

Q'

5r

...p

,3 r

.If' F

,,,,/

d/

. I *.

I-u,*

s-

.r-J4 ^,

e

./

'/

• r~p v.t;..,

v:

-s

.b p

/'

',.n if.*/. 9. 6 3,

..s..----.-

w 7

'.'*s. / ' -/ /-

. hi.p/

e :*

s.

t'

.d a

8 J'

't-g. l.....&,.....'. 6..... nw.f-* ***/V f". - 1[

-'j------

--f

\\.

t i

~.* - '

1 s.

J.,. E

.y %

s

~% _ e

'y

) n

/

~

a s

.y, i

4 1'G T.

i' r e;.

5

..,/y,J.:}/-

\\*

ag 4ees,p: -

C

/- /

r=-----g-

[.Yy *.t

'O c.

~ :s w... as. -- --.;

• //

a

,t,'. / {\\.

-- f *<.,'4 l..

s 1

g i

i h,' ;,'<,-,,.f

}

t em,y s., ae.g t r

y s

..__..,m.

w.

. -,-.__t.

,. s

. f./

• f %~,

.2.-3.m,a,._-

-:pa 2

.<.u..

\\ ~ '.z;,

/'

x.

b.

./*,

, j

..y s,;.;'

/

C.

/yI c,

e;/ '

i s -

.]-

s. A

.aI 5

.I /

I

• M'

// j /e-%

\\4

'2

. /

/

- ] ". "

k k A--- ' lb...7. ---- -

'$.? *'

.: 5 l1

)

f,i![

a

/g '. -.

' h.l y 8,

y 1,

,r

/

.,. is.;.f./ a /,

as2

/

5,

/

• /2 w. m,/.

s

?

w n., /... -- -.,

/

/

i

,3**(~..,,,,,.~-,

-i s

.~ :,i

/p

..aQ ).

>i'

/-

/

/

-.e s

-4.,,,

,/,

~.,r

,. / -

-- v 23 r_

f.,,

/.-

e

--.m.,,,._4

,e

)

'i l: ".,

s-t i

,1

' ~'

/*

j v

./ m M'

j.'. :

1 *

.,;,,~.

~,

p a,**=.

c.

&.,..s-

='

.l 5;. 4.,

i-9;l :.

r.- *,

. % y._.'*q',

y,.,.,s

, s,-

%~' la " ',

s

/

W n-

c..: :,ce:

,.ic.,. _r-a

.'a...._e.. -

y y%

, ::5 1

'/

N j.,,

5

~~

Y s,

..g----.

9 j

.,.,. ~;.

e..

g g-i Ir s

_s

~

y

.,1 9

t

..: %w

~'

,.' g h,s-

,,,,/

)-

. a sa M*~,

.m _.

j. */

I h.

....-.--a

t

~~'%

fa.,

i' g

( -=,s

=

hc g

y,,

i,N. -

< ~

,,,~' f i

J s,,,.

ms

.N 4

__.1 e

s g3 s.

1.

2 O.-

-5 n,,,

.---.i

.t.

• 5

.i:

~

N s

- N.,..

a 2.

o a

,g g

.+

2

=

c,

.. - - = = =

l I

APPENDIX C ANALYSIS OF MIDLAND PLANT COOLING POND OPERATION INTRODUCTION The cooling pond has been designed to adequately dissipate the vaste heat resulting from the generation of approximately 1300 MWe of electricity and four million pounds per hour of steam. The pond will effectively transfer waste heat to the atmosphere through evaporation, back radiation and conduction processes.

The cooling pond makeup and blowdown operation is designed to control the pond Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentrations which originate from use of l

Tittabawassee River water. TDS input from the plant operation, circulting water acid and hypochlorite addition and the possible discharge of condensate demineralizer regeneration waste are not significant. As evaporation losses of pond water resulting from the heat dissipation process will result in total dissolved solids accumulation, the cooling pond blowdown and makeup process will allow for TDS control within the pond operating requirements.

A description of the basic regulations, assumptions and data utilized in this analysis follows:

1.

Regulations Discharging cooling pond blowdown into the Tittabawassee River has two primary effects: Creating a thermal plume and adding TDS to the river.

To protect the water quality of the river, the following rules of the Michigan Water Resources Commission (MWRC) must be maintained.

i a.

Heat load to the river shall not warm the receiving water at the edge i

of the mixing zone to temperatures greater than the following monthly maximum temperatures:

Month:

J F

M A

M J

J A

S O

N D

F:

41 40 50 63 76 84 85 85 79 68 55 43 b.

Heat load to the river shall not warm the receiving water at the edge of the mixing zone more than 5 F.

c.

The size of the mixing zone is limited such that it does not contain more than 25% of the cross-sectional area and volume of flow of the river at any river transect.

d.

The controllable addition of TDS to the tiver shall not increase the river TDS concentration beyond 500 ppm as a monthly average nor more than 750 ppm at any time.

Atendment 3 miO681-0377r102 C-1 September 30, 1981

Dow Chemical Company discharges its tertiary pond effluent into the Tittabawassee River about 300 ft upstream from the location of the cooling poad blowdown discharge. Both discharges are at the south bank of the river. Dow's effluent also adds heat and TDS to the river.

2.

Physical Assumptions Simulation of the daily operation and the TDS concentration levels of the cooling pond are based on the following physical assumptions:

a.

Total dissolved solids in the cooling pond come from the Tittabawassee River only. TDS input from plant operation, circulating water acid and hypochlorite addition and the possible discharge of condensate demineralizer regeneration waste, is not significant and is not considered.

b.

Cooling pond volume gain by precipitation is assumed to be equal to the volume loss of seepage. This is a conservative assumption since an annual average precipitation of 30 inches over the pond surface of 880 acres is equivslent to 3 cfs which is larger than the estimated pond seepage loss of 0.5 cfs.

c.

No credit is taken for TDS loss from the cooling pond via seepage.

d.

Pond TDS is uniformly distributed throughout the pond volume.

e.

The effluent of Dow Chemical Company's tertiary pond is assumed to be a continuous discharge having a flowrate of 67 cfs with an excess temperature of 5'F and a TDS concentration of 2500 ppm.

f.

Average daily T;ttabawassee River flows for water years 1937 to 1977 are us=d in the operation study.

(This assumption was utilized for analytical purposes only. River flow may vary widely over a day due to operation of Sanford Dam.

Operating controls will assure continuous compliance with the withdrawal schedule set forth in Exhibit II.)

g.

The assumptions that the cooling pond is full and that pond TDS is at concentration of 500 ppm are used as initial conditions for the a

simulation of the pond operation.

3.

Operation Assumptions In this study, the operation of the cooling pond (timing and amount of makeup and blowdown), is governed by the following assumptions:

The annual refueling period for each unit is assumed to be one month.

a.

Refueling occurs in September for Unit I and in April for Unit 2.

The hegt load to the cooling pond is 3370 x 10" Btu /hr for April, 5680 x 6

10 Btu 'hr for September, and 9050 x 10 Btu /hr for the remaining months of the year.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377r102 C-2 September 30, 1981

b.

Maximum allow nle blowdown flowrates as determined f rom the Alden Research Laboratery (ARL) test program are a function of the river flow and blowdown excess temperature (blowdown temperatore less natural river temperature). Blowdown flowrates used in the pond o;7 ration study were kept below a set of maximum allowable values shown in Figure C-1 derived from the ARL test program and consideratica of thermal constraints in the Tittabavassee River.

Makeup flowrates are kept as high as possible without filling the pond c.

above elevation 627 ft.

The constraints on makeup flowrates are listed in Subsection 3.4 of the Environmental Report. The maximum makeup flow utilized in the pond operation simulation is 270 cfs corresponding to the makeup pumps runout conditions.

I d.

In order to simulate pond operation under the most stringent conditions, Dow effluent discharge into the Tittabawassee River is given priority over the Midland Plant cooling pond blowdown discharge.

The Midland Plant blowdown flow will be controlled so that it will not cause the river TDS to exceed 500 ppm.

l e.

The maximum blowdown flowrate is limited to 220 cfs because of hydraulic characteristics of the gravity fed blowdown scheme. The minimum flowrate is 5 cfs due to difficulty in throttling for flows below 5 cfs.

f.

The pond water surface elevation imposes the following limits on the makeup and blowdown flowrates:

1.

When pond level is above 627 ft, no makeup is permitted and blowdown may be discharged at its maximum allewable flowrate.

2.

When pond level is 626.5 ft, no blowdown it permitted and makeup withdrawal may be made at its maximum allavable flowrate.

3.

When pond level is between 627 ft and 626.75 ft, both makeup withdrawal and blowdown discharge may be made at their m:ximum allowable flowrates.

4.

When pond level is between 626.75 ft and 626.5 ft, makeup flowrate may be set at its maximum allowable value and the blowdown flowrate is limited so that the pond level is nct lowered because of the blowdown discharge.

g.

Fond blowdown discharge is terminated when daily average natural river temperatures are within 5 F of the monthly maximum temperatures.

4 Data a.

The US Geological Survey gaging station on the Tittabawassee River is located some 4700 ft upstream from the Midland Plant

• river intake structure. Daily average river flows published by tne USGS from water years 1937 to 1977 were used in the cooling pond operation simulation.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377r102 C-3 September 30, 1981

b.

Natural river temperatures on a daily average basis from October 1, 1975 to September 30, 1978 as recorded by the Dow Chemical Company at the Dow dam were extracted and used to develop a model relating long term daily natural river temperatures and daily dry bulb temperatures.

From dry bulb temperatures recorded at the Bishop Airport of Flint, Michigan, natural river temperatures were generated from March 3, 1049 to September 30, 1978 and were used in the pond operation simulation.

Daily natural river TDS concentrations were either directly obtained c.

or estimated from the natural river conductivities contained in the monthly Operating Report of Dow Chemical Company from October 1975 to September 1977. Conservatively, the higher 1976 TDS concentrations were used repeatedly in the study.

d.

A transient cooling pond mathematical model was used to estimate daily average blowdown temperatures and pond evaporative losses.

e.

A physical model was utilized to determine the quantity of blowdown that could be discharged into the Tittabawarsee without resulting in a mixing zone more than 1700 feet long and not exceeding the 25'4 cross-sectional limits for the thermal mixing zone.

Both the Dow tertiary pond discharge and the cooling pond blowdown were simulated in the physical model. A matrix of 275 thermocouples, positioned throughout the model, were used to determine the maximum allowable blowdown flowrate for a given blowdown excess temperature and river flow. For all data provided, the edge of the thermal plume is based on the location of the 5 F excess temperature isotherm as determined by the average temperatures obtained from 25 scans of each of the thermocouples.

5.

Simulation of Pond Operation A computer program was written for the daily simulation of the cooling pond operation. For each day, the makeup and blowdown flowrates (if any),

pond volume and pond TDS concentration are calculated from known blowdown excess temperatures (blowdown temperature less natural river temperature) and natural river TDS concentrations. The logic of the program incorporates all assumptions and operation rules previously outlined.

6.

Conclusions The following conclusions resulted from the simulation of the cooling pond operation based on the assumptions presented previously. Pond blowdown will be controlled by measuring the actual river flow, upstream river temperature, excess temperature of blowdown, upstream river TDS and Dow discharge ronditions.

a.

It is feasible to control the pond TDS level by a makeup-blowdown scheme. Based on the available data, the operational assumptions set forth result in pond TDS concentrations that are acceptable for the circulating water and service water system hardware.

Amendment 3 miO681-0377r102 C-4 September 30, 1981

b.

On an average temperature basis, the thermal plume shall not cover more than 25% of cross-sectional area or volume of river flow at any transect of the river, and its length shall not exceed 1700 feet.

c.

On a long term basis, cooling pond blowdown and the resulting thermal plumes will exist in the Tittabawassee River about 27% of the time.

Fifty percent of the time, blowdown is withheld because Dow effluent uses the whole TDS capacity of the river. Eight percent of the time, blowdown cannot be discharged because natural river temperatures are within 5 F of the monthly maximum temperatures set by MWRC. The pond water level was below 626.5 ft 2% of the time and no blowdown was discharged. The calculated blowdown flowrater are below the present minimum blewdown flowrate of 5 cfs 13% of the time, so that no blowdown takes place.

Variations between actual values of the parameters which will control pond blowdown and assumptions used in the study may result in increased frequency and blowdown rates. The combined effects of the cooling pond blowdown and the Dow Chemical Company discharge shall comply with Michigan Water Quality Standards regarding temperatures, TDS, mixing zone length and width.

I Amendment 3 miO681-u377r102 C-5 September 30, 1981

0 L

T Y

1 N

r 1

3 l

1 9

i A

A 1

1 1

X l

0 L

l 1

n 1

P A

1 il 1

1 1

A O

3 5

i I

4 t

T 5

0 R

i 0

0

?

A i

tp l

1 7

E l.I El c

s t

M 3

3 J

MN W

i A

t:

l-

=

A O

J O

~

t P

/

E O

3 D I,

F.

l R

1 t

I f

f A T 0 U

T O

D A

1 0

N M i G 1E t

G I

4 I

A iI.

f N7 0

A 1

W i F

y, I

O.

f d

l L

l i

X l

l sg

's F

D l

O M

I' O

I M

C A

\\

\\

, N,N 3

\\

f*

N 0I 3

F NN,,

l t

i t

T A

1f F

P 0

M F

S I

x\\

2 NN I

SS I

C X

J T

\\

W O

h D

02 W

- N I

O l

l

\\

aL, o QI I3o -

b Ifo-N l

~,e, e. -

~'so-

~

~

0 7no -

1 7ao -

~,: o -

~

~

S O

o n

0 0

0 9

0 0

0

[

0 O

n i

6 4

3 7

1 0

9 7

4 s

i s

1 i

1 3

1 1

g 3 s dn0 n

D.

u 1

lI l

I l

'l l

APPENDIX D ELOVDOWN MD MAKEEP CONTROL SYSTEM An automatic control system is trevided to minimize the TDS concentration in the cooling pond by maximizing bleadown and makeup flowrates. The frequent changes in the s - riables, particularly river flow, d:ctate the need for an automatic rather than a manual system.

The combined effects of the cooling pond blowdown and the Dow Chemical Company discharge shall comply with Michigan Water Quality Standards regarding temperatures, TDS, mixing zone length and width. The cooling pond is generally kept full when possible and therefore blowdown will usually be voluntarily restricted when makeup cannot keep up with pond losses.

ELCbBOWN CONTROL 1.

Elowdown flowrate is determined by calculating the flcwrate tbat sat' fies the TDS requirements an separately calculating the flowrate that satisfies the thermal requirements. The lower of the two flowrates is selected and is then checked to verify that it is within the physical range of the blowdown system.

Pond 1cvel and makeup rate are also checked to make certain that blowing down will not decrease the pond level.

The calculated blowdown rate is then set by an automatic adjustment of the l

three blowdown control valves.

Flow measurement is provided in each blowdown line.

Periodically the flowrate is recalculated and reset as required (every 15 minutes to I hour - to be determined based on o;> retir y experience).

2.

The blowdown flowrate to satisfy thermal requirements is calculated from the Alden Research Laboratory model testing program results. Calculations can be done by interpolation for all river flowrates up to the maximum rate tested.

For higher river flowrates, extapolation of the test data and proportioning are used to calculate blowdown flowrates.

The measured parameters required for this calculation of blowdovn are river flowrate, the cooling pond blowdown temperature and the natural river temperature.

If the natural river temperature approximates the monthly maximums stated in the water quality standards, the blowdown is reduced or terminated, as necessary, to preclude exceeding the monthly ma x i Fium.

3.

The blowdown flowrate to satisfy river TDS requirements is calculated by doing a fully mixed mass balance using measured values of river flow and TDS concent ration, the Dow discharge flow and TDS concentration and the blovdown TD5 concentration.

The allowable TDS river concentrations are 500 ppm as a daily average and 750 ppm as an ins tantaneous n.a:<imum.

A.mendment 3 miO681-0377s102 D-1 September 30, 1981

MAKEUP CONTROL 1.

The measured river flowrate is used to select a makeup flowrate that complies with both the makeup withdrawal schedule and the maximum 1 ft/see velocity in front of the intake structure traveling screens requirement.

2.

The calculated flowrate is established by starting the required number of pumps and adjusting the control valve in the recirculation line to bypass the excess flow Flow measurement is provided to determine both net makeup and bypass.

3.

Makeup is automatically terminated when the pond is full.

RADWASTE DISCHARGE DILUTION 1.

Pond blowdown is used for radwaste dilution when the blowdown flow is

adequate, i

2.

Radwaste dilution flow from the discharge of the makeup pumps will be used when pond blowdown flow is <45efs.

Pond blowdown will be temporarily suspended when radwaste dilution flow is in operation.

f Amendment 3 ruiO681-037 7s 102 0-2 September 30, 1981

APPEhTIX E ANALYSIS OF THE MIDLAND PLANT THERMAL PLL?!E AND THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANT DISCHARGE INTERACTION BAC}:GRol3D Or..T u ly 28, 1978, the Michigan DNR staff requested Consumers Power to analyze the possible interaction between critical Inaterials discharged f rom The Dow

'Se.mical Ccmpany and thermal effluent from the Midland Plant. A September 13, 1938 letter from Mr Robert Easch provided a list of critical materials that should be included in the secpe of the analysis. This list originated from Dow's annual wastewater report of critical materials discharged during 1977.

l The resulting analysis was provided in Amendment I to the State Discharge Fermit Application dated October 20, 1978.

l l

I Amendment 3 miO6El-0377t102 E-1 September 30, 19S1

w APPENDIX F THERMAL PLUME EFFECT ON DISS0IXED OXYGEN LEVELS Bacxeround Oa July 23, 1976, the MDNR Staff requer.ted Consumcrs Power to assest the effect of the Midland Plant's thermal discharge on dissolved oxygen levels in the Tittabawassee River.

Under certain conditions, the cooling pond discharge could reduce dissolved oxygen levels in the river as a result of the limited solubility ci exygen in heated ' eater and the potentially high biological oxygen demand of the *:idland effluent.

In response to the Staff's request, the company engaged Lawler, Matusky and Skelly Engineers (LMS) to evaluate the impact of Midland Plant discharges on dissolved oxygen levels in the Tittabavassee River. The results of this analysis are reported in LMS (1980) and summarized in the following discussion.

Analysis l

Tc assess the effect of cooling pond discharges on dissolved oxygenslevels in the littabawassee River, a water quality mathematical model was developed.

This neJel was calibrated with the results of an intensive water _ quality study (Gannon 1963), thus allowing the accurate reproduction of dissolved csygen, carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand and temperature.

The calibrated iodel was used to determine the separate and combined effects of the Midland P2 ant discharge and the "idland Wastewater Treatment Plant vaste loads on dirsolned

. y g e t.

levels in the river. The model included the various Dow Chemical Comva:q withdrawals and discharges. These ef fecte were sin.ulated under a variety of plant and river flow, temperature, and loading conditions.

An analysis of average monthly river and plant flovs and ten peratures determined that the month with the greatest potential dissolved oxygen decrease was April.

Study results for average April conditions are summarized in Table F-1.

The following conclusions arise from the (April) spring m? del results:

1.

The present (and operational) monthly average river DO levels for April are (and will be) significantly higher than the State Wat er Quality Standard requiring a 5.0 mg/l daily average with no single value less than 4.0 mg/l (Rule 323.1064 of the M2chigan Administrative Code).

2.

The influence of organic activities (CEOD) is not expected to cause a significant drop in river DO levelc.

3.

For the average monthly Apria condition, the effect of the M(dland blewdown on DO levels in the river appears to be minimal.

The largest

~

decrease is 0.3 mg/l (from 9.5 to v.0 mg/1).

Average seasonal conditions were also analyzed for impact on river DO levels.

These results are summarized in Table F-2.

Amendment 3 miO6SI-0377v102 F-1 September 30, 1981

e

.t

,L

'p'

>L.

3#

~

n p

The effects of the Midian3 Plant distharSe vi river DC' levels for the average 1-l seasonal condi'tions sisted in Table,F'2 are minimrl. and bslow their spring coun t e rpa rt s.

f The stdj results, for; the' cam $1ned effects of tbn Midland Plant and proposed wastewater treat.: nit plant kaste loads are sumt.ariged in Table F-3.

l

'gonclusions The following conclurions are drawn:

c-1.

!s study of average seasonal ronditions' indicates that the effect'of

'the Midland Plarit discharge or,.Tittabawassee River dissolved ox;vgen is mininal, and DO levels will. remain well above the State Water Quality Titanda rd for~ LO '(Eule 323.1064).

u.

i 4.

The Tittabawassee River is.cepable of handlir.g the preserit and proposed wasta 1(ads without contravention of this s'.andaid.

5;- Under critical low flow conditions, it appea2s d.at the Tittab.swassee

, River is marginally capable of handling t! e proposed loa 4hngs of the

~

i r5wer and wastewatdr. treatment plants.' ' Extreme climatic conditions cod 1d cause-the D0 io approach the 5 mg/i 'Jaily aGerage., but the level T

vill be well ab6fe the 4 mg'li; l

sjngle' set /p.le value.

e

-g I

t a

~

,4

' i

/

a

• /

~

_s

~.

j s _.

s

q x

1 4

s

,~

e

_~

(

..,tnend:nent J

'i ' miO681-0377v102

~'

' ' F-2 September 30, 1981 e

^4

___7____________________

l

)

S-3 k

TABLE F-1 DO DECREASE DO DECREASE COOLING POND AT MIDLAND AT FREELAND BLOWDOWN FLOW (mg/1)

(mg/1)

RUN DESCRIPTION (cfs)

FROM TO FROM TO High CEOD Level in 79 9.7 9.5 9.3 9.1 Discharge (5 mg/1)

Extreme CBSD Level in 79 9.7 9.5 9.3 9.1 Discharge (10 mg/1)

Most Likely Conditions

-79 9.7 9.5 9.3 9.1 CBOD = 2.5 mg/1)

Maximum Slowdown at 116 9.7 9.5 9.3 9.0 Average Discharge Temperature TABLE F-2 RANGE OF D0 RANGE OF DO LOWEST DO DECREASE AT DECREASE AT VALUE AT SEASON MIDLAND (mg/1)

FREELAND (mg/1)

FREELAND (eg/1)

Ave Winter Conditions 0.1-0.1 0.1-0.1 12.1 Ave Summer Conditions 0.0-0.1 0.0-0.1 6.5 Ave Fall Conditions 0.0-0.1 0.0-0.1 10.3 TABLE F-3 RANGE OF DO RANGE OF DO LOWEST DO DECREASE AT DECREASE AT VALUE BELOW FLOW CONDITIONS MIDLAND (mg/1)

FREELAND (mg/l)

MIDLAND (mg/1)

Extreme Drought Conditions no power plant 0.1-0.1" 5.7 discharge Summer Low Flow 0.1-0.1 0.0-0.1 5.6 Maximum WTP Discharge, 0.1-0.1 0.1-0.2 9.0 Ave October Conditions

• Due to WTP discharce Amendment 3 miO6SI-0377v102-46 F-3 September 30, 1981

References Gannon, John J.

1963. River BOD Abnormalities - A Case Study Approved.

University of Michigan School of Public Health, November 1963.

Lawler, Matusky and Skelly Engineers.

1980. Effect of Midland Power Plant on Tittabawassee River Dissolved Oxygen.

l Amendment 3 miO6SI-0377v102-46 F-4 September 30, 1981

APPENDIX G MP10NTATEi> WASTEWATER PROCESSING BACKGROUND During normal operation, the condensate polishers remove various chemical and particulate contaminants from the secondary system condensate.

In additica, the resins pick up ammonia used to control pH levels in the steam cycle. When regenerated, the resins release the accumulated ammonia in the backwash water resulting in up to 1200 mg/l of ammonia. Approximately 16,000 to 53,000 gal-lens of ammoniated wastewater is generated daily by the condensate pel.;shers.

Previous versions of the Midland Plant NPDES Permit Application indicated that the condensate polisher regenerates would be neutralized in the Units 1 and 2 Neutralizing Sump and discharged to the Tittabawassee River. However, the re-sulting wastewater could contain levels of ammonia which may lower the dissolved oxygen concentrations in the river. This, in combination with existing river conditions, may cause the water quality standard for dissolved oxygen to be exceeded.

ANALYSIS The Ccmpany is evaluating several methods aimed at reducing the effects of the ammoniated wastewater discharge. A primary criteria for evaluating these methods is a maximum concentration of 2 mg/l of ammonia in the wastewater discharged to the Tittabawassee River.

The Company is studying ammonia processing methods that would result in a wastewater discharge to either the Tittabawassee River or to the cooling pond.

An engineering evaluation of these systems is nearing completion. An assessment is also underway to determine if the long term routing of condensate polisher regenerates directly to the cooling pond would potentially result in ammonia concentrations in excess of 2 mg/l in the pond blowdown.

CONCLUSIONS The Company is continuing to review various options for the disposal of condensate polisher regeneration vastes. Following completion of these engineering studies, the Company will identify its specific plans for disposal cf the condensate polisher regeneration wastes.

mi1181-0419al31 G-1 September 30, 1981

APPENDIX H DETERMINATION OF NATURAL R WER TEMPERATURE In response to a December 13, 1978 Stafi's suggestion, the Company proposed a monitoring program for determining the natural water temperature in the Tittabawassee River, on February 20, 1979. Staff's concurrence on the pro-posal was received on February 28, 1979. The monitoring program was accom-plished es proposed during 1979. However, the dismantling and relocation of the Dow Chemical Company's temperature probe and the determination that the Dow H-flame discharge influenced water temperatures near the Midland Plant, required additional data collection and analyses during 1981 to complete the natural riv-r temperature assessment.

The 1981 program is designed to: provide data describing water temperatures at the relocated Dow monitoring probe, determine the relationship between water temperature at a sampling location above Dow Dam and the Dow probe, de-termine the water temperature relationship between the Midland Plant intake c

and the Dow probe, and determine the effect of the H-flume on water tempera-tures collected at the Dow probe and Plant intake locations. Data will be collected at the 13 locations sampled in the 1979 monitoring effort plus the H-flume outfall, a cooling pond location, and the Dow probe. Data evaluation will include correction factors to adjust current Dcw probe and intake.

temperatures to upriver water temperatures, if applicable. The assessment is tcheduled for completion by December 31, 1981.

i Amendment 3 miO681-0378fl02 H-1 September 30, 1981

i l-

- +

6 I

t PART FOUR I-FIGURES t

3 Amendment 3 miO681-0377wl02-46 June 1, 1981

FIGUPIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure Title 1

Water Use Diagram 2

Location Map - General 3

Location Map - Specific 4

Completed Plant -

Artist Rendering 5

Cooling Pond -

Artist Rendering Amendment 3 miO6SI-0377wl02-46 June 1, 1981

A FLOW DAILY FLOW (1000'S OF GALLONS PER DAYJ

(

NAME OF FLOW REFER-MAXIMUM POWER (NOTE 14)

ENCE AVERAGE MAXIMUM COMMEZ SITE STORM DRAINAGE TO BULLOCK CREEK 1

14.1 781

}

SITE STORM DRAINAGE TO THE TITTABAWASSEE RIVER 2

5.6 309 i

SITE STORM DRAINAGE TO THE COOLING POND 3

25.9 1419

{

PRECIPTATION TO THE COOLING POND 4

1961 108,957 SEENOTEJ COOLING POND MAKEUP 5

28,000 lb500 SEE NOTE $

LAUNDRY /RADWASTE DILUTION WATER 6

0 43,400 SEE NOTES }

COOLING POND BLOWDOWN 7

11,700 142,000 SEE NOTE $

~ SEEPAGE FROM COOLING POND 8

323 323 SEE NOT8 $

EVAPORATION FROM COOLING POND 9

18,000 54,700 SEENOTE$

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM INTAKE 10 0

303 SEENOTE.$

CIRCULATING WATER PUMPS INTAKE 11 942200_

942,700 SEE NOTE $

CONDENSER COOLING WATER RETURN 12 942,700 942,700 SEE NOTE $

SERVICE WATER PUMPS INTAKE 13 53,800 53,800 SEE NorE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM TO COOLING TOWER 14 0

53,735 SEE NOTES DRIFT FROM THE COOLING TOkTR 15 0

3 SEE NOTE A

' EVAPORATION FROM THE COOLING TOWER 16 0

949 SF.E NOTE f CGOLING TOWER RETURN TO SERVICE WATER PUMPS 17 0

48,273 SEE NOTES; COOLING TOWER BLOWD0%N 18 0

4510 SEE NOTES' SERVICE WATER RETURN TO COOLING POND 19 53,735 53,735 SEE NOTE &

CONDENSATE RETURN FROM DOW 20 11,900 11_,900

}

PROCESS STEAM 21 9.72x107 lb/ DAY 9.72x10 lb/ DAY SEE NOTE (

7 EVAPORATOR BLOWDOWN 22 60 120

-MAKEUP DEMIN SYSTEM WATER SUPPLY 23 153.2 912 SANITARY WASTE WATER 24 74 165.5 DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY 25 15.6 49.5 DOMESTIC WATER TO SANITARY FIXTURES 26 14 45.5

_ DOMESTIC WATER TO 'IHE LAUNDRY FACILITY 27 0.6 2

DOMv.STIC WATER TO MAIN PLANT IAB FIXTURES 28 05 1

MAKEUP DEMIN WATER SUPPLY FROM DOW 29 0

912 DOMESTIC WATER TO EVAPORATOR BLD LAB FIXTURES 30 0.5 1

j STEAM LOSSES FROM MAIN STEAM SYSTEM 31 5.9x10 lb/ DAY 1.tx10 G b/ DAY l

4 PERMANENT AUXILIARY BOILER FEEDWATER MAKEUP 32 0

19 I

TEMP HIGH PRESSURE AUX BOILiR FEEDWATER MAKEUP 33 1.238 5.524 1

MAKEUP DEMIN TO THE PLANT WATER STORAGE 34 120.7 720 SEE NOTE (

J 1

MAIN PLANT LAB FIXTURES WASTEWATER 35 0.5 1

_SEE NOTE (

MAKEUP DEMIN KEGEN WASTES 36 32.5 192 AUXILIARY BOILER BLOWDOWN 37 0

19 j

lb/ DAY 1.05x10s Ib/ DAY SEENOT]E' SECONDARY STEAM TO EVAPORATORS 38 1.05x108

_ SECONDARY CONDENSATE RETURN 39 12;960 12,960 SEE NOTE 4 MAGNETIC FILTER FLUSH 40 0.586 1.758 J

PLANT WATER STORAGE TO COND & FEEDWATER SYSTEMS 41 118 305 SEE NOTE {

CONDENSATE & FEEDWATER TO PLANT WATER STORAGE 42 0

160 SEE NOTE (

CONDENSATE DEMIN REGEN WASTES 43 44.4 148 SEE NOTE {

UNIT 1 & 2 CLEAN WASTE SUMP DISCHARGE 44 28.9 96.2 SEENOTESJ UNIT 1 & 2 NEUT SUMP DISCHARGE 45 m

52.8 SEE NOTESj SERVICE WATER TO SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE GEN SYSTEM 46 65 202 SEE NOTE &

EVAPORATOR BLDG NEUT SUMP DISCHARGE 47 32.5 192 SEE NOTE f PRECIPITATION TO THE TRANSFORMER AREA 48 1

48 SEE NOTE f DISCHARGE TO OILY WASTE STORAGE TANK 49 64 137

~ WASTE OIL TO STORAGE TANK 50

<0.01

<0.01 OILY WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM DISCHARGE 51 64 288

~

LAUNDRY FACILITY WASTEWATER 52 0.6 2

LAUNDRY WASTE TREATNENT SYSTEM DISCHARGE 53 0.6 2

SEE NOTESJ PLANT WATER STORAGE TO THE NUCLEAR SV5VEM 54 9.6 33.1 SEE NOTE {

TVAPORATION FROM FUEL POOL

$5 2.1 NOT KNOWN LIQUID RADWASTE TO SOLID RADWASTE 56 0.53 0.8 SOLID RADWASTE TO LIQUID RADWASTE 57 0.53 0.8 RADIOACTIVE LAUNDRY WASTEWATER 58 0

2 BLOWDOWN FROM L_IQUID RADWASTE 59 0.200 20 SEE NOTE &

COMBINED PLANT DISCHARGE 60 11,814 142,556 l

HYPOCHLORITE CATC_H_B,ASIN DISCHARGE 61 65 202 l

COND RETURN PUMPHOUSE DRAINAGE 62 0

12 i

SITE DEWATERING SYSTEM DISCHARGE 63 144 605 J

SEE NO

_P_RECIPITATION TO SITE STORM DRAINAGE 64 45.6 2509 SEE NOTE SERVICE WATER 65 53,735 53,800 REACTOR PLANT S_YSTEMS TO LIQUID RADWASTE 66 5.7 12.3 j

y QUID RADWASTE TO REACTOR PLANT SYSTEMS 67 0.20 0.26 COND, FEEDWATER & MAIN STEAM AREA FLOOR DRAINS 68 63.3 135.3

~5UCLEAR SYSTEMS FLOOR DRAIN 69 2

10 NUCLEAR SYSTEMS TO PLANT WATER STORAGE 70 7.26 11 SEE NOTE 1 SERVICE WATER PUMP MAKEUP 71 0

5462 SEE NOTES}

TEMP HICH PRESSURE AUX BOILER BLOWD0%N 72 1.238 5.524

b_

n M

$0TES i

I 1.

EVAPORATION FROM THE COULING POND WAS COMPUTED g

UW THE AVEMGE METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF 16.

(NOT USED) f JULY 1946 AhD AVERAGE WIND SPEED OF MARCH

(

1950. AMONG Tite METEOROLOGICAL DATA RECORDED IL DAILY FLOWS DO NOT TAKE REFUELING PERIODS INTO t

ACCOUNT FOR EITHER UNIT.

{

AT LAN%iNG, MICHIGAN FRON 1910-1976, JULY 1946 HAD THE MAXIMtM DEV POINT DEPRESSION AND NARCH i

3' 1950 HAD THE HIGHEST WIND SPEED.

19.

PLANT WATER STORAGE AND TRANSFER REPRESENTS Tite FOLLOWING TANKS: COhDENSATE STORAGE 2.

FOR THE MAKEUP WATER, COULING POND, SERVICE TANKS, DEMINERALIZED WATER STORACE TANK, M

WATER SYSTEM & C00LIhG TOWER, THE hnRMAL UTILITY WATER STORAGE TAhK, AND THE PRIMARY CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON AVERACE YEARLY VALUES WATER STORAGE TANK.

AS SHOWN IN TifE COOLING POND THERMAL P_E_RTORMANCE_StMMARY [REPOlif i6R' MIDIl%D Pl. ANT 19, (NOT USED)

~

UNITS 1 & 2 CONSUMERS PObT.R COMPANY, AUGUST 20.

(NOT USED) 1973, AND THE FINAL COOLING FOND OPERATION

. &5 STUp k MAR _CH 1979.

3.

THE RADhASTE DILUTION kATER IS l' SED TO SUPPLY HATER FOR DILUTION OF THE LALNDRY HASTES 22.

THE MAXINLM DAILY DISCHARGE RATE OF WASTEWATER g3 FOR Tite FOLlhWING NODE IS HIGHER THAh THE RATE DURING PEkl0DS WHEN THE PohD Blohl)OWN IS LESS

)&5 THAN 45 CFS.

OF ACCtMULATION. THESE NUMBERS ARE BASED ON OPERATOR EXPERIENCE AND MAY OCCUR:

h 4.

HIClf PRESSURE STEAM WILL P.E SENT TO DOW AT 0.4X104 LB/HR AND 600 PSIG. LOW PRESSUkE NODE 45. Unit 1 & 2 hELT SLMP DISCHARGE, S1EAM WILL BE SENT TO DOW AT 3.651104 LB/Hg MAX = 104,000 GPD AND 175 PSIG.

NODE 53, LAl% DRY WASTE, MAX c 8,600 GFD 5.

THE SERVICE W,IER COOLING T0bIR IS USED DURING THE SUMMER NONTHS ONLY, SO AS To MAINTAIN THE NODE 59, LIQUID RADWASTE,tiAX r.

SERVICE WATER INIIT TEMFERATtRE AT A MAXIMtm 40,000 GPD OF 92*F MAXEUP TO THE SERVICE WATER PUMP IS PROVIDED TO ACCOUNT ICR 7061.R LOSSES.

NODE 47, EVAP BLDG NEU SLMP, MAX =

220,000 GPD 6.

(NOT USED)

NODE 44 UNIT 1 & 2 CLEAN kASTE StMP, MAX = 193,000 CFD 7.

UNIJ l CONDENSATE DEMihERALITER IS OPERATED IN NH, CYCLE. IT IS REGENERATED ONCE EVT.RY 5

UNIT 2 DEMINERALIZER IS OPERATED IN H, DAYS.

CYCLE AND IS REGENERATED ONCE PER DAT. THE

)

MAXIMIM FREQUENCY IS ASSIMED Two RECENERATIONS l

PER DAY PER UNIT. TYPICALLY, THE WASTE IS g

DISTRIBUTED 65% TO THE CLEAN WASTE SUMP AND 35% TO THE hElfrRALIZING SUMP.

8.

NORMAL PRECIPITATION IS BASED ON AN AVERAGE CENERAL COMMF;NTS RAINFALL AS DETERMINED FRUM A TOTAL YEARLY RAlhTALL OF 30".

MAXIMt?! PRECIPITATION IS A.

DAILY FlokS ARE EXPRESSED IN 1000's OF GALLONS BASED ON THE 100 YEAR STORM /24 HOUR TIME PER DAY UNLESS OTIfERWISE SPECIFIED.

}

PERIOD bl{ICH RESULTS IN 4.6 INCHES OF RA:h PER

).

B.

EMERGENCY INIREQUENT, AND OPTIONAL FLOWS ARE DAT. ALL NORMAL TRANSFER RATES ARE BASED ON A k

RAINFALL INTENSITY OF 3.5 IN/HR (10 YR INDICATED BY DASHED LINES AND ARE NOT INCLUDED

&2 2,,_

STORM /15 MIN tc).

ALL MAXIMUM TRANSFER RATES IN TOTAL FLDW RATES

&22 ARE BASED DN A RAINFALL INTENSITY OF C.

THIS DIAGRAM 15 BALANCED FOR THE MAXIMt?1 POkIR 5.25 IN/HR (10 YR STORM /10 MIN tc).

AVERAGE DAILY FLOW CONDITION ONLY.

9.

(NOT USED) 10.

(h0T USED)

II.

(NOT U3ED) 12.

THE CHEMICAL UNIAADING AREA StMP FlhW WILL

$&22 CONSIST OF SPILLACE kHER L% LOADING AN ACID

)

(H SO ), CAUSTIC OR SALT TRUCK.

2 4 t

13.

CHEMICAL HASTE PRODUCTS FROM THE

[

HYP0 CHLORINATION GENERATION SYSTEM CONSIST OF SOD!th CHLORIDE, SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE AND

{

50DitM HYDROXIDE.

9 14.

MAXIMUM POWER IS DEFlhT.D AS UNIT 1 Tl;FBINE OPERATING AT BACK END LIMITED AND UNIT 2 WITH

~'

VALVES WIDE OPEN.

15.

(NOT USED) l l

i I

(

)

&5 t

- a

{j'l. l. l l l. l l.l.i.!.I l.l.!.I. l.l l.l l.l !.! !.I.l.l i.f l.l l.l l.l l.l l.l l.l l.l l.l.l.l l j'l'll. l..l.I.l.l.l.l.l.f.f.I..l.l.l.l.1.l.l.l.1.l.l

{ l,l l e

ar e ena g

I I

L

.. m..,

w m

.w

_.m T1f'.ames.a,idl v

pg w

f _ _.

(?)

..m.,._

m..

ss e

• • =

,t..

yTr > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Lo ___f_f ~~~

.....m.

u

n.

• 23 r________.,

>ta 7--_--

,I t!

• v y

CG $4_.uFeQ v,

am.a!.m..J O) o a.

c. =

g-

..:. m m

,=,,a =

} C7 W L_ q e4

(

6.

g

, c m

+sv O

-s v

~9 m,.,

nLf',.

p_m _

o au.

~a**

,,.s.

i i

m. c.

m

~~~]

g I

l n t-W l

l

• -

• L

• • m *____,

l 7_J. _ _ _ _

i L

i i

i i

i i

'. a

,'. g!l l

l u n L ]J ;,=

. ~,,..,

n; 7_.

v.

2..<. m.s g,

4 e i it _ _ g 1 m_*_ _,

t 4

r;.. ;...

U-L d 7,a f f

im,.n.

F S

mu

(-

6 1

,.--r---'

L l t

I D r-m.

~ m.

_ p, W-

= = =,. _. _.. _,

n n

<. + v.

n e,,a.

w--.

m

],;'d <

2.

+ n-M-,

l 1

g-

- 1m a. o 1

i i i

f. w-.

o

,....m.,,,

l l

u. >, n.

• • t"-

?' l '-* J r

,___7__

.._ ______________________ __l e

,i i

8 TC M N

&e as nsa l 8

s r 41 s

=a.

q e

f

[8 4 ry M

l i

.,c.,_....

%m _

i l

7.__l____ _T CT___.__________,

-_________._____ I l l c_____________________________.,.I j

l m,R,.al

,,,.. [

d,O I*C i

+='m o,

l e

m i

4 ces i

.m.

i e

I L.__ l' i

_l

• C

_________'_______.____p(

l gg,..u:

4 42 g;7MS e

i 3

yy ;

M. I w"1.. "m*

' -O "R-m 8l an*.s'1B 4

l (9

~--- -

r 4

. mas # '.u.. c w.7 l

gj s

4--

__5..-_

J r w'f 9 'e u (

l s s i

4'tLWW h

~0^',, ~

' 0 *orw 9fl'l*f?

~-

~

j m;

PA. (

4 4_

wl l

i L ___.__ __..________ -..

._q t

l r

t j

p-

[

m r--- -,

t rm

~t It l

H,

1. ]

g I, &

%.[. -[. f_Ce 1--**

a sty H-O-- 9

,f',",[

l.

r-L t D J' g,.. J

.l w.

o.

.r.z q3 g?___

' g

n... -., p"F L

+i g t O

..,... w (-

tg l

m i

i g,y... -.2 9

4<=

.mta s,vre 6

i 5

~~ 8 7

r

!!!!!.9.!!!!

fI"~l ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! l !

fI"I ! !

l mea i

f

.'210, T.

H 4...

5 e n-

_ _ __d ***13'*11 !N '3..

u i*T?_th.' -c Tsm i

l y m=.

t i

G O

)L.,y

wu c,n, O

=a**c : d?.m l

e, m.

_q._ _ _ _1+.,e.=

?

i, a,

D mar. e 2

CHE*flCAL USAGE E

~ ~

-. 4,s. sc:m[

O CHEMICAL Lb/YR 4

l

., _ _e_'.er_,

n yrs "l

i i

l l

~A Ne0C1 6.4slos l'"

l l

8 Hjo 2.1s10 {

l g

C heOCl 5.3x10T i

a l

j I

Na SO 1.4x10T 2 -, m,.

~ ~., ~~

b__

i.,

.?-

a 3

/* I

-4h D

I I

4 n-I O l__

H50,

l. Sal 03 E

NaOH 6.1x104

, '* ",',7 ll l

Haso, 4.6x10F l

J-J-*b m.

ll F

hoM 3.4x105 4

4 ll NH 1.2x10 3 3

L L

G N H.

2.5x104 i i l

________$_'iti'*"'*____________________$

l NM OT 2

g M

N,H 130 g

M 50 I 7E0Y d

2 4 Y.8 lu OH 6.9slos a

a C

Haso, 1.5x10 J

WaOH 6.0x10'

_ _ A _ _ _ _ _ _- W Ca(OH),

5.3x10-~~

4 M,Q" l l

i u3so3 4400 r-- g-

}

x tion 20 o

l 1

Wf L

Nacl 1.4x10' I

g

]

l M

ASPHALT 1.0x10{

"*#.]

' e {']

l si H SO, 1.Oa10

{

"T.f* O*'

=

2 4.s j

i NH3 5.4a10 g

O NW 200 2 a._

l N H, 12.5 i

r

_ _ ])_ _ _.j P

MORPH 0LINE 2

=

i l

I.y C

• '!_*___ _____ g _____j r,

LEEW

-_-f ;..n p.

"a =~

(.j_

g

,,4.y,,,

_o_ sto. acnatia su

~~

---

7-~1.,'M.,,,;*,~',f_j_________.___._____-.___-______,__rir',

[>*

C4** JSAE y,w..-,..n..,

- e t r a c w o.

_ _ O '

5' ' 4 f

v l

l

.N'ENT T E NT FLOW COPO %

A

',..,..c,

ui I

l w wa

'l B

_ _sa_'_e.'.'.d_ [s r_ _F%"---.SD E'-

~~l I

F-9--

p-' 9.i-'i s

i l

l

. m]..nmu-a _ _ _ _._,;.- l U "L_ M l

L 1".__J l, sa :-

L _ _ _ _f g f.CD g

FIGURE I SCHEMATiG OF WATER FLO-N

_ m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ !.

p,,

NO CHEJ/ CAL USE

-1 i

i l

C_"'_ jl GCf4StfERS PONER COWANY

<L'*

-"'S V,0L AND PLANT UNITS I B 2 A

~*"

V:DLAND, M-CH!GAN l

AVEND*CNT 3 SEPT 30,1981

~"

M 4

i 3

2 1

c

(

_ N-f _Jf,'

_Nu w>~.

s.

~

~

~

,n

.~, :.

-=r- -

J-L._ _

_. L.

t.

.(

(4',1 V

1...,

s

,. g., %.!h f"l.

__s 4

4 i

i 2

N.

g I

h.i

._f c.

,L 1

U *g

~

y-,

.h"h

$Yn" b - kh'

\\

l w-7

~-is r

u p

. 1 s,' _. e_ ao l

s o

e n.

c v

4 9

x t

s lg.... (l9 M-w.,u. N 1

d

.i i

i m

. r-i

!.-/

'x i

NL_i_. I. j..

le

_~ " "

m i --

L-.&

_ _ _ _.. _I, 1_-

'Aiaj m

i i

.i l

I j j h nj

/

j,_l

. l.%;..

~

fc__'

i d*,o

'l p

. '4

,,,,,d.

l j

,, y' I y..... ~

1 QW

ese I.. l '..

p

~ h' i ' $' W

.l I

.,1

=

1LIJ l.

~

I

~

,,]

[,,

i E L

-_, O[ W,N,,0 LN_v $ Q C' """~ f~ " 'C.] f4. -_._

o.R E

L

\\

7

.M r..._

l W

li i

N-Lx!!

.1-p,N..,,#___Mg g

.d:

"W' g _--

w..

"Ql *f.q':'/ v :. d._a'I i

m, -r s

.J

.H I

"r_l I -

'i,

-.l a

.s y~

'8 J

- a_....

t L_.

.__= g--.:

. - _. _ g. j

. b - %[l. l 4 g,m }. y l.

l ( k']. V. v s..

/.... gi-A i

i I =-f y l 4 f

%s

=-L g

l l

.j-p_..'I[rpl[I

..If

'f'Y~'f' Z,I I D.. !,o.ri. [

/[f..

o-j p

__p___.?_ 'y ig_}l4-_

f55U y= p i,4__4____ 4,__"= p, 5 *... u ;M. i r___.j___

I

-! a-i> -

It,,

4 cy._9 -_p=_'_8q,___

s!ehc ra

.. $ __P_.,aO /+l R

.=t

n,. f7 IaI..

n, a,

8 l.. J R s s g_ __ _3 9 __ 4 = _ 4 p; I i.

,,J,p, T r M __ +...

,T p

..$._f_a_

.__+__.+---+_Q==_+.=

s s

r-er

... ( n 3

a.

a a

. )p...,... -,..Q!

1..,

I h

.i a

m-l

's 80*T" 4',1 a

I SAGIN AW

_. _. p_./ l_ _ 7___p=____+.g/ gj_4;d d

8 s

__,.g.__.pe g__q

..1 CO j

=.

GR ATIOT

.r.

I

c.

-.'""d p.--_q...._.u..m m.

.l i

=

_-_g,-

_p

~ ~ Q, s,

, ru,.,. g g

al 4 N

A.;:

i "}--f=f

*l N

. _ ]..

.. g - i

/

j g

t-

%1

- i

.1 -

i

!s K i-:N i

L aL N R

i m" _j *{uw--a{

b n,7. r..

p -

.i

,m

{M' 0J.A,4I.

N w_zL.

A1.li.'.y M

l

sT

[$

..,,oco c

--- g g,,,"T" i

r g ----.

\\ileI t-ca h_L _ L. _

t-2 b,6 JiA._'1LU.y -

g ~d }

) j%"ii"?"'o LOCATION MAP - GENERAL

.... e.

.N.a d O'#_~~'I~ a MICHIGAN STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION i

7- ~^T+T :-'i-L- Ti];,,..

N'--v --. - r --

DEPARTMENT OF STATE HIGHWAYS PLANT SITE l'

's D

.o u

1

j., au a

,__s.__=.__3,_e,il__,g.. 3,;.,y' p

...w bml i.

7; ao. ic t_s __-t CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY 7.

_-j l ' 'i ij MIDLAND PLANT

' _4L___J J L".:'n'T-' _

_p..

MIDLAND, MICHIGAN

• !,I Vl1 l"

"i"s SEPTEMBER 30,1981

-- w =+i

~

r "_y, i

L_

p

. 4.w.r 1,G ).p N

sE Rs S O L

L, 2-

,. e'

,. s i

~~?--4yM-h;..,..,,*-h's

-d "-

~~~-~;7oa t p3 p-p gl.7

---

R.l~ 3 FIGURE 2

n m,;

a

_p w

1 0

1 2

3 4

SCALE IN MILES

9 i

" t l'!!!!!!!.',','I'1'm'I'I'i'i'1'I'i'I'1'1'1'i'i'i'i'i' rl;!!je ejjj;;;;;;;,,;;;;

e, g ;,j, e

(

O 8

8 0

o 3

o 9

N[

s5000 B

w M

~ _ +[, e

~Q

.n. c --

=m

/ p.- Q-l

=N N-S 4000 g

,,ga r

m e-g m

a UU c,.a b

O.,_\\.\\s '

o s 3oco m

(

/

jL cr e4 a

Pg

+

o s

,~

's.

"e

's t s

y

'g

'0 PDetoq l <

\\

l l

j + sc I"

muv m.v ener auss

=i

=:= _q-

\\

g.-- -

, S.[~

N i

na, w J

..r S 7000, $l I

f p/

g j,a.

To e e.w. o

/ n 1,

El 612 d

1

,g

+

S 8000,

{p t

i il sa Ql s==ws asse g

a m==x r;

l S9000,

i Y% n e.

aa' c

C00'..NO PCND g

s exo, : ;

if l I

h

$~

@ N b%.

(

S

/ o6 p-, _--.y,32.2...g m e {,3.. - _..._-

.<.__..-._.._3

_ wm m -

2-rr.--

p_ - -

y -

gy g

i g

r,

.u. -

S12.000 4

O O

o O

J =

m 3

i

]

I 6

6 5

8 7

a 1

A 8 d m -4 =s=

• t i

t k

1. i 1 a i..

.i a

b H

~

W W

W w

w SSOOO y

.- e,w..ww II!

G

.,- e

.t..,

""" IZ2.Tu.o oo.

I R

\\

gS4000 N

I s

\\

~~

s,

\\

N 1

,S5000

.am e,

%s r,,

,/

.=ame e,,s se0TE

)/

s,,/;*

/y sm% amm

. av ewme== vevo.s w

S6000

, i, % erw% am, w vae m 4 es av i

. m. _

4 s= n =un m t<

en = w eu e o r.

t.

1%

N w

g

% rs e,em

.4 = ' ',

=-

a..,_ m w ;-

y.,. g[-

.e s

3); - ]., ' -p '. ".. -

' ~

N'

. Md

.y g

.g g

1

,g

,1,..

• gh #;

e

~

vs~.

m..

sy w

r

- mn

..' J.' t. _

~

4

... ; m

,c -.

y...~ *

}

A y,_,

(

,s i,c

_p +:.

,l,..

~..

y 9,.'N

.g y'

+.,,

l_

h )* b '.p 6 *

• I

'~

a w.

'~

..J-- l4

}

m z.

_.,1 9

_n-

+

4

= ~ ~

~ - x s

p _.

'f,

~~

. %m.igm

~' '

,v

. nW g.

p m,,;.

.~

r

>,. 4-., p,A Npf.' [,_3. w, ; y 3 '-

y;l :

"S:

fws..,

u.

a

. c,]w.. - -

\\(

+

'M, Egp*?

~ '

gY..

{.N.

.g..y%

• q 7,.

g.,s

, +,.

J-% 4 { Y,,l%..1,

.u c,V

'4,,

, a.;_d,y#:.

• j, rg 9

~

Q ^ce g

,1 y ' i '

.,e%'. '. g y,.

6:

'N

.~L

, F

. - e 'y,F -,

I P

, p,. < -g g 3.; y -

36'-

% g,,/e;4;w...,.s e.

.s c.c.1.\\. 3 q...

.g

+,

' ' n7

'T t !

..g

- +. -...%

6i,g3 :_ v$.Xh.. ='[j.[-

[:}, :l -

- L s qQ ;g

'4

+

^Y~ m yy

?p v::Q& 3

,J..

. ~~

er

~

%y3 -Q. ig.. '

y y

.,,p*.. ; m+,;,.

.. n. 2. n.

n..e

_) 4 te_ l% ' '

_, gW 'd.

'l

-,. +.

n a

4

[

)

i COMPLETED PL ANTI 1

FIGURE 4

-a y'f4 a::' y.;;.,y' g ;

.y,,.

,1}N' f$i -'

L.9p'f

? g..

y.

Y,..

. p;

& pg y. ;

Qr+[psy g( Ap_u,5

_. %f.,

J. n.";~.-T99. %,k. g&w L. yf.,-[ g. Q ;y ;g.'~ W~ -

J l- % G.+

Ci

..4,

..w

s. c.

~

e.. w.

.. p-

.:.7 w

..J. <;f

[ : T.y.

4

.s.,_-

. j,,

'y

.s.

,a

.- W; :,

& i

-w~

. p.: =?

. h. ;s-

" %&,;.?-. *: - L '

y... ' (:l

1. q,' a v

n vi,

3

. g t,'

iT v.,:

- 7 x _g p., ' ;. },. :

7 -j..

7,

,. '. '.. ~..

'.L.

%i-w - ",c.

w....

t m..

.n

,_y

.... ~ - _

. +..

_x...

.s 4

l_

'~;.: h K f 5.

= - ;

4. :.

. v.

!}Vf a p

]',

. Emma ma} ; '

' 5 i%g.b '

~'} f '.T g..

w- + d. fl*,

..T..R,

/.L %..;

...- W ? :1 w.

..W

n __

s

.,.g..,...

.s

.. +

.a

.g

.r.-

- \\

A-

-..x a

{ [QK~

44

~,.

,. # y

_ud-n..

,g.. -

n.

,. age &. +,~.nyr x

..7.

.ci

).-

=~ op

~

m#

h............. u~ ~ R% ' N... Y(

1c'

,,,,,,.#T a

j5$

Y p

.,f.m.#

d?e.

• • =m f -

e

,g,% r og '

, ;w+ = = w y u,.,

.,e :

,w a

'w e

n,

.. w.

v.

n

.tl abM f'I -.

{.

'[: :. :x;-

.0

~

u"y~~~~

?.f.h[A n-

~~~&m' f.h?p4.g g $ ?.

~

e:s l..

' ^

y;.Q h

Q;

~

' s.

.- ~

.a :g. w. 3 n,...

m :x,4: m, g >.:.,.

y n

~.

• "']

g :9_

l-

' ^

_e

~-

w

'.1 g T: 7, E ' ;.,,J_.,.:r/..... - E. -- E, h,

+%

.v.

. }.x._.-

y g

"4

^ 7@r['

.h.

's.,p.--

• - - :q c... y. y,.y

.y.

c,.

4 z

r, ;.

~~. s 7,., _ _.. _..

.= _

MN M. &,.,M M A 2 3. E M, f.k ; g.@g l ?.,?.f 3,;

l

. g _ g,..

e 1

ARTIST RENDERING

w.~,,.

n....

6., s n :..,

..,.e.,,...w...,

, m.

....:..~

.-a...,.

a s

I t

.I c.

.J.,, s) - -

f &a (

?

$q M y y>dtir# y,x y ; f. ^

m

,... y n.

-3

~

y s

3 o

~

a g

2

?.

z '

=,

g

-f.. ' -

w

$-3

%. % y.

^

-l N

5,-

i

. g,...

.s

/*','.

_:-***4+

r& Q >.. _.

' ~

,~.4,*-

-* t-

- l,,,, f -

~

, W..

j

' ~~-

" ; V_ ' * ',.. -

+

2 3

~.

m.g-T

.'.., J '^s - i.',.J..

_"w a.

f

. A. ~ g3 9 -

w

x..

. g&

W' 5 i,.

Y?O.hm.

=, 7;,.sy, a

N.

x

'f[ -

s$;

.m

. m-

.] ; %E-p

)

3

+

f :. ?

?

[: 3 & h' W : % % 2 f Y^2^. k N,k9 g e.

,dhj$b " Q

[

3

'~

~

',../ L

+

h.~

7' m

', y J

W:

-%i

_. wn ;n <, -

c; w e~,~ %'r.,,.., y '4fp,.[;.; 2,L'q:.,

c _ o q,;.

4 Ect.>,y::~- %,.

mL s,

- y,e,%.

.;..u

~

g C

s"

~..._ Q44g,,7 C. ' ',

a ~v

.. c.

.y ~-

. ~

< x.- 4..

.r.

r

p. g,,.',

3

%. N *-

J,,

g.4..:

~

p :.,-

-,,77,-

4_

,~y 9

=.

5

. s,.

'L,

r 9 .

4 e

s p

a m

s w,. v A'

< +

A 1

n.

y W.y

' h..

./

y

1. r; 4

. 1 s

1 y

,e s

y t

e s

a..

m J

l COOLING POND-AR

/

e g.

I l

FIGURE 5 l

4 l

1

.... y x.

.s 4 _ ',

'- Y mRL '

~

-. '- j,p.p+g0 l

p,.., <_+g'

'. g_ 7 4

. 3;.3,;4.. g l

g._,

g

___s - - ;

_ +,.,

,.s-

~-

\\

eq.gy[ q '

?,'

^

9.

.y - sp::

3_

w.

9

.,. *^ A 1p

~,_

4' w' -

..;.e

s. m,.

kgh l

m4qy._ },I,..M. f' J _ f.1,**llOf[m.m,;[e.*._&.-[.3

, w [_

i

+ g,4

.~

wv-..-

i 4

s, k

-g -

l

~, ?_)

h:.

t 1 4 f'

~

^

'n

,* Nh _

, " ' g, _ "% : -

Y T g:k.a..~ _

j..'-f

.*;[l* '.

.,'. y ;. ;. g. _,

'L ;.. * /

...,; g

~.

n.....,

f 9_

Mh V {

%,"q. 2. M l -

) - [ $ 1 ]

E [ ' . [ [ p+..,

t

n,%:.

' ^

~

, "~

s-a rh' l '~;.f,?','

., ?l\\r

!h.; ;-l. ??.' gl._

y_,l

_k

~ ~

f _f T,. m =~' * = ~ - * ' -Y Y.o

N

._khu h

s, + [.

~,5

~

I

\\

~syg n.

w

<a n

= -.

=

m,+.

~.

I hN M

d 3a mumm %ew

- wCm jdf!ks EEN54D$$$.6ht Ih

/

mayynn y

-h.I -

y.

\\,

l l

.t c a.

• \\'

M

nw -

'Y.MW

'g n[nw f%

,9

?

v..

~D%a.-

%dj

- WA

.)

I' '

^

= g lQ E,

~%" '

y '4 f.@h4 l

n..

+

'yT g.g

<-s -

, y

,.yf 4.4 x_

u

~

Y r

l l

IST RENDERING