ML20151Y667: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = TAC:60597, TAC:8910 | |||
| stage = Approval | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:, | {{#Wiki_filter:, | ||
b February 3, 1986 | b OIb February 3, 1986 Docket No. 50-285 DISTRIBUTION: | ||
Docket File JPartlow NRC & L PDRs TBarnhart +4 WJones WRegan PD#8 Rh ACRS+10 Mr. R. L. Andrews FJMiraglia OPA Division Manager, Nuclear Production PMKreutzer LFMB Omaha Public Power District EGTourigny Gray File 1623 Harney Street OELD Omaha, Nebraska 68102 LHarmon EJordan | |||
==Dear Mr. Andrews:== | ==Dear Mr. Andrews:== | ||
BGrimes The Comission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 95 | BGrimes The Comission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 95 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-40 for the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1. | ||
This amendment consists of chances to the Technical Specifications in partial response to your application dated March 30, 1977, as supplemented by letters dated May 15, 1980, September 3, 1982, November 5, 1982, January 26, 1983 and November 27, 1985. | |||
The amendment revises the surveillance technical specifications to ensure that the reactor containment building leak rate testing (Types A, B, and C) is performed in accordance with and as specified by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J. | The amendment revises the surveillance technical specifications to ensure that the reactor containment building leak rate testing (Types A, B, and C) is performed in accordance with and as specified by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J. | ||
" Primary Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors." | |||
It should be noted that we made one change to your proposed technical specifications. | It should be noted that we made one change to your proposed technical specifications. | ||
The change was discussed with and agreed to by your staff. The change keeps in-place the surveillance requirements for the Containment air purge isolation valves. It is our understanding that your omitting the current requirements was an oversight. | The change was discussed with and agreed to by your staff. The change keeps in-place the surveillance requirements for the Containment air purge isolation valves. | ||
As you know, we acted on your two exemption requests by letter dated January 10, 1986. The enclosed technical specifications reflect our disposition of that matter. | It is our understanding that your omitting the current requirements was an oversight. | ||
Our review of your proposed technical specification changes dealing with (1) moving the recirculation heat removal system surveillance requirements to a separate part of the technical specifications, and (2) deletion of surveillance requirements in effect during early plant life, is continuing. | As you know, we acted on your two exemption requests by {{letter dated|date=January 10, 1986|text=letter dated January 10, 1986}}. The enclosed technical specifications reflect our disposition of that matter. | ||
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The notice of issuance will be included in the Cormission's next regular bi-weekly Federal Register notice. | Our review of your proposed technical specification changes dealing with (1) moving the recirculation heat removal system surveillance requirements to a separate part of the technical specifications, and (2) deletion of surveillance requirements in effect during early plant life, is continuing. | ||
Sincerely, g 82 G gg y $$ fd y | These changes will be the subject of a separate evaluation. | ||
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. | |||
The notice of issuance will be included in the Cormission's next regular bi-weekly Federal Register notice. | |||
Sincerely, g 82 G gg y $$ fd y f37 P' | |||
E. G. Tourigny, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #8 Division of PWR Licensing-B | |||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
1. | |||
Amendment No. 95 to DPR-40 2. | |||
See next page PD#8 y | Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure: | ||
fl{ | |||
j See next page PD#8 y PDd8gf PBd8 ELD M | |||
#~b P.Kreurter EGTouridny:dd AThadani h1 s eW, | |||
>/ff/86 | |||
/ /pj/86 l/2.j/86 86%Q/ / | |||
Mr. R. L. Andrews | Mr. R. L. Andrews Fort Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Unit No. I cc: | ||
Harry H. Voigt 'Esq. | Harry H. Voigt 'Esq. | ||
LeBoeuf Lamb. Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Mr. Jack Jensen, Chairman Washington County Board of Supervisors | LeBoeuf Lamb. Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. | ||
Blair, Nebraska 68023 MetropolitanblanningAgency ATTN: Dagnia Prieditis 7000 West Center Road | 20036 Mr. Jack Jensen, Chairman Washington County Board of Supervisors Blair, Nebraska 68023 MetropolitanblanningAgency ATTN: Dagnia Prieditis 7000 West Center Road | ||
' Omaha, Nebraska 68107 Mr. Phillip Harrell, Resident Inspector | |||
~ | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 309 Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 309 Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operatins C-E Power Systems 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas. 76011 i | ||
Washington Nuclear Operatins C-E Power Systems 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas. 76011 i | *}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:38, 11 December 2024
| ML20151Y667 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1986 |
| From: | Tourigny E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Andrews R OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151Y672 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-60597, TAC-8910, NUDOCS 8602130090 | |
| Download: ML20151Y667 (2) | |
Text
,
b OIb February 3, 1986 Docket No. 50-285 DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File JPartlow NRC & L PDRs TBarnhart +4 WJones WRegan PD#8 Rh ACRS+10 Mr. R. L. Andrews FJMiraglia OPA Division Manager, Nuclear Production PMKreutzer LFMB Omaha Public Power District EGTourigny Gray File 1623 Harney Street OELD Omaha, Nebraska 68102 LHarmon EJordan
Dear Mr. Andrews:
BGrimes The Comission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 95 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-40 for the Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No. 1.
This amendment consists of chances to the Technical Specifications in partial response to your application dated March 30, 1977, as supplemented by letters dated May 15, 1980, September 3, 1982, November 5, 1982, January 26, 1983 and November 27, 1985.
The amendment revises the surveillance technical specifications to ensure that the reactor containment building leak rate testing (Types A, B, and C) is performed in accordance with and as specified by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J.
" Primary Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors."
It should be noted that we made one change to your proposed technical specifications.
The change was discussed with and agreed to by your staff. The change keeps in-place the surveillance requirements for the Containment air purge isolation valves.
It is our understanding that your omitting the current requirements was an oversight.
As you know, we acted on your two exemption requests by letter dated January 10, 1986. The enclosed technical specifications reflect our disposition of that matter.
Our review of your proposed technical specification changes dealing with (1) moving the recirculation heat removal system surveillance requirements to a separate part of the technical specifications, and (2) deletion of surveillance requirements in effect during early plant life, is continuing.
These changes will be the subject of a separate evaluation.
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed.
The notice of issuance will be included in the Cormission's next regular bi-weekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely, g 82 G gg y $$ fd y f37 P'
E. G. Tourigny, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #8 Division of PWR Licensing-B
Enclosures:
1.
Amendment No. 95 to DPR-40 2.
Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure:
fl{
j See next page PD#8 y PDd8gf PBd8 ELD M
- ~b P.Kreurter EGTouridny:dd AThadani h1 s eW,
>/ff/86
/ /pj/86 l/2.j/86 86%Q/ /
Mr. R. L. Andrews Fort Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District Unit No. I cc:
Harry H. Voigt 'Esq.
LeBoeuf Lamb. Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, D.C.
20036 Mr. Jack Jensen, Chairman Washington County Board of Supervisors Blair, Nebraska 68023 MetropolitanblanningAgency ATTN: Dagnia Prieditis 7000 West Center Road
' Omaha, Nebraska 68107 Mr. Phillip Harrell, Resident Inspector
~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 309 Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operatins C-E Power Systems 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas. 76011 i