ML22277A751: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:TN International ANALYSIS OF THE FATIGUE STRENGTH OF A THE FCC3/FCC4 CONTAINERS AREVA Names Signatures Date
{{#Wiki_filter:TN International ANALYSIS OF THE FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC3/FCC4 CONTAINERS BLA-IG Names Signatures Date Preparation Check Ref.
NTC 00135891E-NPV Rev 01 E
Form : PM04-3-MO-3 rev. 2 Page 1/17 Non-proprietary version CONTENTS


BLA-IG Preparation
==SUMMARY==
 
............................................................................................................................... 3
Check
 
Ref. NTC-08-I I I 00135891E-NPV Rev 01E
 
Form : PM04-3-MO-3 rev. 2 Page 1/17
 
CONTENTS
 
SUMMAR Y............................................................................................................................... 3
: 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3
: 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3
: 2. HYPOTHESES.................................................................................................................. 3
: 2. HYPOTHESES.................................................................................................................. 3
Line 38: Line 31:
: 5. BOUNDING NATURE OF ROAD TRANSPORT...................................................... 15
: 5. BOUNDING NATURE OF ROAD TRANSPORT...................................................... 15
: 6. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................ 15
: 6. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................ 15
: 7. REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 15
: 7. REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 15 LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................... 17 A
 
AREVA I
LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................... 17
I I


Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 2 / 17
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 2 / 17 Non-proprietary version REVISION STATUS Revision Date Modifications Prepared by /
Checked by 0
12/08 First issue 1
01/09
- Details added
- Modification in the number of handling operations per loading


REVISION STATUS
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 3 / 17 Non-proprietary version
 
Revision Date Modifications Prepared by /
Checked by
 
0 12/08 First issue
 
- Details added 1 01/09 - Modification in the number of handling operations per loading
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 3 / 17


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
This document concerns the fatigue analysis of the FCC 3 and FCC 4 containers. The study is based on the hypotheses of road transports per year for the FCC 3 container and road transports per year for the FCC 4 container. These hypotheses are justified by the bounding nature of road transport with respect to maritime and railway transport.
This document concerns the fatigue analysis of the FCC 3 and FCC 4 containers. The study is based on the hypotheses of road transports per year for the FCC 3 container and road transports per year for the FCC 4 container. These hypotheses are justified by the bounding nature of road transport with respect to maritime and railway transport.
Account is taken of the fatigue cycles caused by handling and stacking. The cumulative alternating stress is calculated on the basis of the MINER law. The maximum lifetimes of the containers are calculated for 3 lashing ca ses and are recapped in the following table:
Account is taken of the fatigue cycles caused by handling and stacking. The cumulative alternating stress is calculated on the basis of the MINER law. The maximum lifetimes of the containers are calculated for 3 lashing cases and are recapped in the following table:
 
Lashing case 1 Lashing case 2 Lashing case 4 Lifetime (FCC 3)  
Lashing case 1 Lashing case 2 Lashing case 4 Lifetime (FCC 3) > 40years 37 ans > 40 years Lifetime (FCC 4) > 40 years 10 years 37 years
> 40years 37 ans  
: 1. INTRODUCTION
> 40 years Lifetime (FCC 4)  
 
> 40 years 10 years 37 years
This document presents the fatigue analysis of the FCC 3 and FCC 4 containers in road, maritime and railway transport configuration, taking into account the cycles due to stacking and handling.
: 1. INTRODUCTION This document presents the fatigue analysis of the FCC 3 and FCC 4 containers in road, maritime and railway transport configuration, taking into account the cycles due to stacking and handling.
: 2. HYPOTHESES
: 2. HYPOTHESES The transport hypotheses are as follows:
 
FCC3 container: transports / year  
The transport hypotheses are as follows:
- road: 1 outward and return road transport = 1200 km  
 
- railway: 1 outward and return railway transport = 1200 km:  
FCC3 container: transports / year
- maritime : 1 outward transport: 30.5 d FCC4 container: transports / year  
- road: 1 outward and return road transport = 1200 km
- road: 1 outward and return road transport = 1200 km  
- railway: 1 outward and return railway transport = 1200 km:
- railway: 1 outward and return railway transport = 1200 km:  
- maritime : 1 outward transport: 30.5 d
- maritime : 1 outward transport: 15 d Based on note <1>, it appears that the vertical and horizontal acceleration spectra undergone by a container during railway transport are less penalizing than those obtained during a road transport. As a result, railway transport will be considered as a road transport.  
 
FCC4 container: transports / year
- road: 1 outward and return road transport = 1200 km
- railway: 1 outward and return railway transport = 1200 km:
- maritime : 1 outward transport: 15 d
 
Based on note <1>, it appears that the vertical and horizontal acceleration spectra undergone by a container during railway transport are less penalizing than those obtained during a road transport. As a result, railway transport will be considered as a road transport.
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 4 / 17
 
Likewise for the FCC3 container, maritime transport will be considered as a road transport and neglected for the FCC4 container. The justification of these hypotheses will be given in chapter 4. road transports per year are th erefore considered for the FCC 3 container and road transports per year for the FCC 4 container.
 
The stresses considered are the maximum stre sses encountered during transport, (based on note <2> and <3>). On the MINER cumulative damage law, the cumulative alternating stresses are calculated and compar ed with the fatigue limits taken from the curve in figure 1 <6>.
 
The following table recaps the numbers of cycles to be considered for each direction for an outward and return transport of 1200 km. The number of cycles corresponding to an acceleration level is calculated from <1> proportionally to the number of kilometers travelled
 
Number of cycles ni Level of the accelerations (+/- Vertical Transverse Longitudinal g) transport transport transport (Z) (Y) (X) 0,4 382212 26575 9303 0,6 29351 2675 3750 0,8 2924 912 1590 1 440 268 631
,2 121 83 203
,4 38 27 52
,6 20 9 15 1,8 11 2 5 2 7 0 0 2,2 5 0 0
 
The maximum authorized number of cycles N i is derived from the curve shown in figure
: 1. Ni is obtained according to the value of the maximum variation of stress S a. The various values Ni are interpolated from two known points on the curve.


TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 4 / 17 Non-proprietary version Likewise for the FCC3 container, maritime transport will be considered as a road transport and neglected for the FCC4 container. The justification of these hypotheses will be given in chapter 4. road transports per year are therefore considered for the FCC 3 container and road transports per year for the FCC 4 container.
The stresses considered are the maximum stresses encountered during transport, (based on note <2> and <3>). On the MINER cumulative damage law, the cumulative alternating stresses are calculated and compared with the fatigue limits taken from the curve in figure 1 <6>.
The following table recaps the numbers of cycles to be considered for each direction for an outward and return transport of 1200 km. The number of cycles corresponding to an acceleration level is calculated from <1> proportionally to the number of kilometers travelled Number of cycles ni Level of the accelerations (+/-
g)
Vertical transport (Z)
Transverse transport (Y)
Longitudinal transport (X) 0,4 382212 26575 9303 0,6 29351 2675 3750 0,8 2924 912 1590 1
440 268 631
,2 121 83 203
,4 38 27 52
,6 20 9
15 1,8 11 2
5 2
7 0
0 2,2 5
0 0
The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni is derived from the curve shown in figure
: 1. Ni is obtained according to the value of the maximum variation of stress Sa. The various values Ni are interpolated from two known points on the curve.
For each container, various lashing cases are considered, corresponding to maximum stresses in the three directions.
For each container, various lashing cases are considered, corresponding to maximum stresses in the three directions.
Stacking and handling are taken into account at a rate of handling operations and stacking operations per transport.
Stacking and handling are taken into account at a rate of handling operations and stacking operations per transport.
The number of stress cycles per transport due to handling Nm is calculated by the following equation:
The number of stress cycles per transport due to handling Nm is calculated by the following equation:
Nm = M. Zm. km


Nm = M. Zm. km
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 5 / 17 Non-proprietary version where:
 
km Max number of stress cycles resulting from a handling operation Zm Number of handling operations per loading M
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 5 / 17
Max number of handling operations per transport This gives:
 
Nm = cycles per transport The number of stress cycles per transport due to stacking is calculated by the following equation:
where:
Ng = G. Zg. kg where:
 
kg Number of stress cycles resulting from a stacking operation 1 (static stress)
km Max number of stress cycles resulting from a handling operation Zm Number of handling operations per loading I I Max number of handling operations per transport  
Zg Number of stacking operations per loading G
: N m = cycles per transport
Max number of stacking operations per transport This gives:
 
Ng = cycles per transport
The number of stress cycles per transport due to stacking is calculated by the following equation:
: 3. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 3 CONTAINER 3.1 Sustained stresses During transport, the stresses in the 3 axes differ for each lashing case. The following table groups together the maximum stresses considered in the 3 directions:
 
Lashing case type 1 Lashing case type 2 Lashing case type 4 Vertical transport (MPa)
Ng = G. Zg. kg
 
where:
 
kg Number of stress cycles resulting from a stacking 1 (static I l,_______I ____ operation stress) ______,
Zg Number of stacking operations per loading Max nu t
: N g = cycles per transport
: 3. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 3 CONTAINER
 
3.1 Sustained stresses
 
During transport, the stresses in the 3 axes differ for each lashing case. The following table groups together the maximum stresses considered in the 3 directions:
 
Lashing case Lashing case Lashing case type 1 type 2 type 4 Vertical transport (MPa)
Transversal transport (MPa)
Transversal transport (MPa)
Longitudinal transport (MPa)
Longitudinal transport (MPa)
These transport loadings must be combined with the handling and stacking loadings.
These transport loadings must be combined with the handling and stacking loadings.
During a handling operation, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (at an acceleration of 1.15 g). Although it is not located at the same place as the stress I
I I
l,_______I ____


During a handling operation, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (at an acceleration of 1.15 g). Although it is not located at the same place as the stress
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 6 / 17 Non-proprietary version generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 6 / 17
 
generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
 
A handling cycle breaks down as follows (as per <4>, by adjusting the peak measured at 1.15 g):
A handling cycle breaks down as follows (as per <4>, by adjusting the peak measured at 1.15 g):
 
A distinction is made between:  
1,15 g
- The main loading cycle described between the values 0 / 1,15 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,575 g about the average value of the range,  
 
- Intermediate cycles about the average value of 1 g due to the oscillations before stabilisation. These variations are sufficiently small not to cause fatigue damage.
1 g
 
0. g
 
A distinction is made between:
- The main loading cycle described between the values 0 / 1,15 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,575 g about the average value of the range,
- Intermediate cycles about the average value of 1 g due to the oscillations before stabilisation. These variations are sufficiently small not to cause fatigue damage.
 
This means that the fatigue analysis is conducted on the basis of the stress cycle +/-
This means that the fatigue analysis is conducted on the basis of the stress cycle +/-
MPa.
MPa.
During stacking, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (envelope value for all the directions and stacking modes) for an acceleration of 1 g. Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
During stacking, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (envelope value for all the directions and stacking modes) for an acceleration of 1 g. Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
Stacking is considered as a static operation. The loading cycle varies between the values 0 / 1 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,5 g about the average value of the range which is /2= MPa. Thus, the equivalent stress for fatigue dimensioning will beMpa.
Stacking is considered as a static operation. The loading cycle varies between the values 0 / 1 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,5 g about the average value of the range which is /2= MPa. Thus, the equivalent stress for fatigue dimensioning will beMpa.
3.2 Total fatigue damage Knowing:
- The total number of cycles ni corresponding to an acceleration level,
- The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni, depending on the stress value Sa, it is possible to calculate the fatigue damage for an acceleration level by means of the following equation:
i i
i N
n d
1 g 0. g 1,15 g


3.2 Total fatigue damage
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 7 / 17 Non-proprietary version The following tables recap the results obtained for the various lashing cases:
 
Lashing case 1 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7
Knowing:
5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.108 5.106 3.106 1,5.106 Vertical damage di =
 
i N
- The total number of cycles ni corresponding to an acceleration level,
n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-9 1,2.10-9 3,8.10-10 2.10-7 2,1.10-6 2,3.10-6 3,5.10-6 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9
- The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni, depending on the stress value Sa,
2 0
 
0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
it is possible to calculate the fatigue damage for an acceleration level by means of the following equation:
0 Transverse damage di =
 
i N
d ni i N i
n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0
 
0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 7 / 17
0 0
 
Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
The following tables recap the results obtained for the various lashing cases:
0 Longitudinal damage di =
i N
n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0
0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 1,29.10-5 Nb of possible transports 77788 Lifetime 7779 years Lashing case 1 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.


Lashing case 1 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7 5 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.108 5.106 3.106 1,5.106 Ni Vertical damage n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-9 1,2.10-9 3,8.10-10 2.10-7 2,1.10-6 2,3.10-6 3,5.10-6 di =
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 8 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 2 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7
Ni Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9 2 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Transverse damage n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0 0 di = N
5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 3.106 1.106 4.105 1,5.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 3.104 Vertical damage di =
i N
n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 9,7.10-4 4,4.10-4 3.10-4 2,5.10-4 2.10-4 1,5.10-4 1,7.10-4 1,8.10-4 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9
2 0
0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
0 Transverse damage di =
i N
n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0
0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5
0 0
Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
0 Longitudinal damage di =
i N
n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0
0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 2,67.10-3 Nb of possible transports 373 Lifetime 37 years Lashing case 2 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 37 years.


i Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Longitudinal damage n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0 0 di =
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 9 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 4 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7
Ni Handling Stacking damage 2.10-10 damage 4,8.10-9 Total Nb of possible Lifetime 7779 damage 1,29.10-5 transports 77788 years
5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.107 3.106 1.106 4.105 3.105 2.105 1,5.105 Vertical damage di =
i N
n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-5 4.10-5 3,8.10-5 5,1.10-5 3,5.10-5 3,4.10-5 3,5.10-5 Transverse comparison stress Sa
&#xb2; Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9
2 0
0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.109 0
0 Transverse damage di =
i N
n i 2,7.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,7.10-10 9,1.10-11 1,1.10-7 0
0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5
0 0
Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
0 Longitudinal damage di =
i N
n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0
0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 2,83.10-4 Nb of possible transports 3535 Lifetime 353 years Lashing case 4 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.  


Lashing case 1 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 10 / 17 Non-proprietary version
 
: 4. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 4 CONTAINER 4.1 Sustained stresses During transport, the stresses in the 3 axes differ for each lashing case. The following table groups together the maximum stresses considered in the 3 directions:
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 8 / 17
Lashing case type 1 Lashing case type 2 Lashing case type 4 Vertical transport (MPa)
 
Lashing case 2 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7 5 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 3.106 1.106 4.105 1,5.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 3.104 Ni Vertical damage n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 9,7.10-4 4,4.10-4 3.10-4 2,5.10-4 2.10-4 1,5.10-4 1,7.10-4 1,8.10-4 di =
Ni Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9 2 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Transverse damage n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0 0 di = N
 
i Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Longitudinal damage n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0 0 di =
Ni Handling Stacking damage 2.10-10 damage 4,8.10-9 Total Nb of possible Lifetime 37 damage 2,67.10-3 transports 373 years
 
Lashing case 2 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 37 years.
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 9 / 17
 
Lashing case 4 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7 5 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.107 3.106 1.106 4.105 3.105 2.105 1,5.105 Ni Vertical damage n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-5 4.10-5 3,8.10-5 5,1.10-5 3,5.10-5 3,4.10-5 3,5.10-5 di = N
 
i Transverse comparison &#xb2; stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9 2 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.109 0 0 Ni Transverse damage n i 2,7.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,7.10-10 9,1.10-11 1,1.10-7 0 0 di =
Ni Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Longitudinal damage n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0 0 di =
Ni Handling Stacking damage 2.10-10 damage 4,8.10-9 Total Nb of possible Lifetime 353 damage 2,83.10-4 transports 3535 years
 
Lashing case 4 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 10 / 17
: 4. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 4 CONTAINER
 
4.1 Sustained stresses
 
During transport, the stresses in the 3 axes differ for each lashing case. The following table groups together the maximum stresses considered in the 3 directions:
 
Lashing case Lashing case Lashing case type 1 type 2 type 4 Vertical transport (MPa)
Transversal transport (MPa)
Transversal transport (MPa)
Longitudinal transport (MPa)
Longitudinal transport (MPa)
These transport loadings must be combined with the handling and stacking loadings.
These transport loadings must be combined with the handling and stacking loadings.
During a handling operation, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (at an acceleration of 1.15 g). Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
During a handling operation, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (at an acceleration of 1.15 g). Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
A handling cycle breaks down as follows (as per <4>, by adjusting the peak measured at 1.15 g):
A handling cycle breaks down as follows (as per <4>, by adjusting the peak measured at 1.15 g):
 
A distinction is made between:  
1,15 g 1. g
- The main loading cycle described between the values 0 / 1,15 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,575 g about the average value of the range,  
 
- Intermediate cycles about the average value of 1 g due to the oscillations before stabilisation. These variations are sufficiently small not to cause fatigue damage.
0. g
 
A distinction is made between:
- The main loading cycle described between the values 0 / 1,15 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,575 g about the average value of the range,
- Intermediate cycles about the average value of 1 g due to the oscillations before stabilisation. These variations are sufficiently small not to cause fatigue damage.
 
This means that the fatigue analysis is conducted on the basis of the stress cycle +/-
This means that the fatigue analysis is conducted on the basis of the stress cycle +/-
MPa.
MPa.
1. g 0. g 1,15 g


Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 11 / 17
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 11 / 17 Non-proprietary version During stacking, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (envelope value for all the directions and stacking modes) for an acceleration of 1 g. Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
 
During stacking, the maximu m equivalent stress is MPa (envelope value for all the directions and stacking modes) for an acceleration of 1 g. Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.
 
Stacking is considered as a static operation. The loading cycle varies between the values 0 / 1 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,5 g about the average value of the range which is /2=MPa. Thus, the equivalent stress for fatigue dimensioning will beMpa.
Stacking is considered as a static operation. The loading cycle varies between the values 0 / 1 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,5 g about the average value of the range which is /2=MPa. Thus, the equivalent stress for fatigue dimensioning will beMpa.
4.2 Total fatigue damage Knowing:
- The total number of cycles ni corresponding to an acceleration level,
- The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni, depending on the stress value Sa, it is possible to calculate the fatigue damage for an acceleration level by means of the following equation:
i i
i N
n d
The following tables recap the results obtained for the various lashing cases:


4.2 Total fatigue damage
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 12 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 1 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7
 
5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 5.107 5.106 3.106 Vertical damage di =
Knowing:
i N
- The total number of cycles ni corresponding to an acceleration level,
n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-9 1,2.10-9 3,8.10-10 2.10-10 2,1.10-7 1,4.10-6 1,8.10-6 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9
 
2 0
- The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni, depending on the stress value Sa,
0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
 
0 Transverse damage di =
it is possible to calculate the fatigue damage for an acceleration level by means of the following equation:
i N
 
n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0
d ni i N i
0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5
 
0 0
The following tables recap the results obtained for the various lashing cases:
Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
 
0 Longitudinal damage di =
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 12 / 17
i N
 
n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0
Lashing case 1 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7 5 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 5.107 5.106 3.106 Ni Vertical damage n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-9 1,2.10-9 3,8.10-10 2.10-10 2,1.10-7 1,4.10-6 1,8.10-6 di =
0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 7,95.10-6 Nb of possible transports 125658 Lifetime 8321 years Lashing case 1 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.  
Ni Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9 2 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Transverse damage n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0 0 di =
Ni Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Longitudinal damage n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0 0 di = N
 
i Handling Stacking damage 2.10-10 damage 4,8.10-9 Total Nb of possible Lifetime 8321 damage 7,95.10-6 transports 125658 years
 
Lashing case 1 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.


Non-proprietary version
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 13 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 2 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7
5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 3.107 1,5.106 4.105 2.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 3.104 2.104 Vertical damage di =
i N
n i 3,8.10-6 9,8.10-4 1,9.10-3 1,1.10-3 6,1.10-4 3,8.10-4 2,9.10-4 2,7.10-4 2,3.10-4 2,7.10-4 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9
2 0
0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
0 Transverse damage di =
i N
n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0
0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5
0 0
Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
0 Longitudinal damage di =
i N
n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0
0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 6,1.10-3 Nb of possible transports 164 Lifetime 10 years Lashing case 2 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 10 years.


TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 13 / 17
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 14 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 4 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7
 
5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 5.106 1,5.106 4.105 3.105 1,5.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 Vertical damage di =
Lashing case 2 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7 5 Number of cycles 1.1011 3.107 1,5.106 4.105 2.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 3.104 2.104 Ni Vertical damage n i 3,8.10-6 9,8.10-4 1,9.10-3 1,1.10-3 6,1.10-4 3,8.10-4 2,9.10-4 2,7.10-4 2,3.10-4 2,7.10-4 di =
i N
Ni Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9 2 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Transverse damage n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0 0 di =
n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 5,8.10-4 2,9.10-4 3.10-4 1,3.10-4 1,4.10-4 1,1.10-4 9,7.10-5 1,3.10-4 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9
Ni Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Longitudinal damage n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0 0 di = N
2 0
 
0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
i Handling Stacking damage 2.10-10 damage 4,8.10-9 Total Nb of possible Lifetime 10 damage 6,1.10-3 transports 164 years
0 Transverse damage di =
 
i N
Lashing case 2 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 10 years.
n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0
 
0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5
Non-proprietary version
0 0
 
Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 14 / 17
0 Longitudinal damage di =
 
i N
Lashing case 4 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7 5 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 5.106 1,5.106 4.105 3.105 1,5.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 Ni Vertical damage n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 5,8.10-4 2,9.10-4 3.10-4 1,3.10-4 1,4.10-4 1,1.10-4 9,7.10-5 1,3.10-4 di =
n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0
Ni Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9 2 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Transverse damage n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0 0 di =
0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 1,78.10-3 Nb of possible transports 560 Lifetime 37 years Lashing case 4 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 37 years.  
Ni Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5 0 0 Number of cycles 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0 0 Ni Longitudinal damage n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0 0 di = N
 
i Handling Stacking damage 2.10-10 damage 4,8.10-9 Total Nb of possible Lifetime 37 damage 1,78.10-3 transports 560 years
 
Lashing case 4 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 37 years.
 
Non-proprietary version
 
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 15 / 17
: 5. BOUNDING NATURE OF ROAD TRANSPORT
 
The appendix of letter <5> defines the maximum accelerations undergone by the container depending on the sea conditions, together with the associated number of cycles.
They are calculated by taking into account the following accelerations and frequencies
- +/- 0,4 g with a period of 6 seconds throughout the transport, which corresponds to the everyday conditions (sea conditions force 6 on average)
- +/- 0,6 g with a period of 9.2 seconds during 6 % of the transport time, which corresponds to severe conditions (sea conditions up to force 11)


TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 15 / 17 Non-proprietary version
: 5. BOUNDING NATURE OF ROAD TRANSPORT The appendix of letter <5> defines the maximum accelerations undergone by the container depending on the sea conditions, together with the associated number of cycles.
They are calculated by taking into account the following accelerations and frequencies
- +/- 0,4 g with a period of 6 seconds throughout the transport, which corresponds to the everyday conditions (sea conditions force 6 on average)
- +/- 0,6 g with a period of 9.2 seconds during 6 % of the transport time, which corresponds to severe conditions (sea conditions up to force 11)
The following table groups together the numbers of associated cycles for each container (1 transport of 30.5 days for the FCC 3 container and 1 transport of 15 days for the FCC 4 container).
The following table groups together the numbers of associated cycles for each container (1 transport of 30.5 days for the FCC 3 container and 1 transport of 15 days for the FCC 4 container).
Everyday conditions
(+/- 0,4 g)
Severe conditions
(+/- 0,6 g)
Number of cycles ni (FCC 3) 439200 17264 Number of cycles ni (FCC 4) 216000 8490 The number of cycles corresponding to an acceleration of +/- 0.6 g is less than for road transport. For an acceleration of +/- 0.4 g, the number of cycles is of the same order of magnitude as for road transport and the total damage is covered by the inclusion of higher acceleration levels in the case of road transport. The replacement of maritime transport by road transport in the total fatigue damage calculation is therefore fully justified.
: 6. CONCLUSION The following table recaps the maximum lifetimes for lashing cases 1, 2 and 4 on the basis of 10 road transports per year for the FCC 3 container and 15.1 road transports per year for the FCC 4 container.
Lashing case 1 Lashing case 2 Lashing case 4 Lifetime (FCC 3)
> 40 years 37 years
> 40 years Lifetime (FCC 4)
> 40 years 10 years 37 years
: 7. REFERENCES
<1>
D. PUJET, Nuclear Transport Limited Paris et P. MALESYS, Transnucl&#xe9;aire Paris << Measurement of the acceleration undergone by the trunnions of irradiated fuel transport flasks during normal use >> - PATRAM 89, 11-16 juin 1989, WASHINGTON DC, USA.


Everyday conditions Severe conditions
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 16 / 17 Non-proprietary version
(+/- 0,4 g) (+/- 0,6 g)
<2>
Number of cycles ni (FCC 3) 439200 17264 Number of cycles ni (FCC 4) 216000 8490
Containers pour assemblages de combustible neufs FCC3, Donn&#xe9;es pour l'analyse de la tenue en fatigue des botes de levage et de la coquille sup&#xe9;rieure (FCC3 containers for fresh fuel assemblies, data for analysis of the fatigue strength of the lifting boxes and upper shell), ref. NEEL-F 2008 DC 117/B  
 
<3>
The number of cycles corresponding to an acceleration of +/- 0.6 g is less than for road transport. For an acceleration of +/- 0.4 g, the number of cycles is of the same order of magnitude as for road transport and the total damage is covered by the inclusion of higher acceleration levels in the case of road transport. The replacement of maritime transport by road transport in the total fatigue damage calculation is therefore fully justified.
Containers pour assemblages de combustible neufs FCC4, Donn&#xe9;es pour l'analyse de la tenue en fatigue des botes de levage et de la coquille sup&#xe9;rieure (FCC4 containers for fresh fuel assemblies, data for analysis of the fatigue strength of the lifting boxes and upper shell), ref. NEEL-F 2008 DC 118/A  
: 6. CONCLUSION
<4>
 
KTA standard 3201.2 - << Safety Standards of the Nuclear Safety Standards Commission - Components of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of Light Water Reactors / Part 2 : Design and Analysis >> - Edition 06/96  
The following table recaps the maximum lifetimes for lashing cases 1, 2 and 4 on the basis of 10 road transports per year for the FCC 3 container and 15.1 road transports per year for the FCC 4 container.
<5>
 
Courrier COGEMA LOGISTICS S/03-045 du 28 mai 2003 - << Transport de matires radioactives - Sujets g&#xe9;n&#xe9;riques - Tenue des arrimages en transport maritime >> (Letter from COGEMA LOGISTICS S/03-045 dated May 28th 2003 - << Transport of radioactive materials - Generic issues - Strength of lashing in maritime transport)  
Lashing case 1 Lashing case 2 Lashing case 4 Lifetime (FCC 3) > 40 years 37 years > 40 years Lifetime (FCC 4) > 40 years 10 years 37 years
<6>
: 7. REFERENCES
Courbe de fatigue grand nombre de cycles sp&#xe9;cifique pour les aciers au carbone, r&#xe9;f. NEEL-F 09.0011 (Fatigue curve with large number of specific cycles for carbon steels, ref NEEL-F 09.0011)  
 
<1> D. PUJET, Nuclear Transport Limited Paris et P. MALESYS, Transnucl&#xe9;aire Paris << Measurement of the acceleration undergone by the trunnions of irradiated fuel transport flasks durin g normal use >> - PATRAM 89, 11-16 juin 1989, WASHINGTON DC, USA.
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 16 / 17
 
<2> Containers pour assemblages de combustible neufs FCC3, Donn&#xe9;es pour l'analyse de la tenue en fatigue des botes de levage et de la coquille sup&#xe9;rieure (FCC3 containers for fresh fuel assemblies, data for analysis of the fatigue strength of the lifting boxes and upper shell), ref. NEEL-F 2008 DC 117/B
 
<3> Containers pour assemblages de combustible neufs FCC4, Donn&#xe9;es pour l'analyse de la tenue en fatigue des botes de levage et de la coquille sup&#xe9;rieure (FCC4 containers for fresh fuel assemblies, data for analysis of the fatigue strength of the lifting boxes and upper shell), ref. NEEL-F 2008 DC 118/A
 
<4> KTA standard 3201.2 - << Safety Standards of the Nuclear Safety Standards Commission - Components of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of Light Water Reactors / Part 2 : Design and Analysis >> - Edition 06/96
 
<5> Courrier COGEMA LOGISTICS S/03-045 du 28 mai 2003 - << Transport de matires radioactives - Sujets g&#xe9;n&#xe9;ri ques - Tenue des arrimages en transport maritime >> (Letter from COGEMA LOGISTICS S/03-045 dated May 28th 2003 - << Transport of radioactive materials - Generic issues - Strength of lashing in maritime transport)
 
<6> Courbe de fatigue grand nombre de cycles sp&#xe9;cifique pour les aciers au carbone, r&#xe9;f. NEEL-F 09.0011 (Fatigue curve with large number of specific cycles for carbon steels, ref NEEL-F 09.0011)
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 17 / 17
 
LIST OF FIGURES
 
Number Rev Title Number of pages
 
1 A Stress fatigue curve - Carbon steel for large cycle 1 numbers
 
Total 1
 
Non-proprietary version TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Index A
 
FIGURE 1
 
STRESS FATIGUE CURVE - CARBON STEEL FOR LARGE CYCLE NUMBERS (DERIVED FROM <6>)
 
1,E+11
 
1,E+10
 
1,E+09
 
1,E+08
 
1,E+07 Nu m
J. be 1,E+06 r
., of
- cy
~
, cle 1,E+05 s
 
,J 1,E+04
 
1,E+03
 
/ 1,E+02


,I
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 17 / 17 Non-proprietary version LIST OF FIGURES Number Rev Title Number of pages 1
,.r 1,E+01
A Stress fatigue curve - Carbon steel for large cycle numbers 1
Total 1  


'I
TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Index A FIGURE 1 STRESS FATIGUE CURVE - CARBON STEEL FOR LARGE CYCLE NUMBERS (DERIVED FROM <6>)
~" 1,E+00 1,E+05 1,E+04 1,E+03 1,E+02 1,E+01 S a (M Pa)}}
1,E+00 1,E+01 1,E+02 1,E+03 1,E+04 1,E+05 1,E+06 1,E+07 1,E+08 1,E+09 1,E+10 1,E+11 1,E+01 1,E+02 1,E+03 1,E+04 1,E+05 S a (MPa)
Nu m
be r
of cy cle s
J.
~,
,J
/
,I
,.r
'I
~"}}

Latest revision as of 15:34, 27 November 2024

E-61285, Enclosure 4, 009c1 Ap 2.1-3 Document No. NTC-08-00135891E-NPV, Revision 01E, Analysis of the Fatigue Strength of the FCC3/FCC4 Containers (Public)
ML22277A751
Person / Time
Site: 07103097
Issue date: 01/01/2009
From: Boyle R, Shaw D
AREVA, TN Americas LLC
To:
Division of Fuel Management
Garcia-Santos N
Shared Package
ML22277A716 List: ... further results
References
A33010, E-61285, EPID L-2022-DOT-0008
Download: ML22277A751 (18)


Text

TN International ANALYSIS OF THE FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC3/FCC4 CONTAINERS BLA-IG Names Signatures Date Preparation Check Ref.

NTC 00135891E-NPV Rev 01 E

Form : PM04-3-MO-3 rev. 2 Page 1/17 Non-proprietary version CONTENTS

SUMMARY

............................................................................................................................... 3

1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3
2. HYPOTHESES.................................................................................................................. 3
3. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 3 CONTAINER.............................................. 5
4. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 4 CONTAINER............................................ 10
5. BOUNDING NATURE OF ROAD TRANSPORT...................................................... 15
6. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................ 15
7. REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 15 LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................... 17 A

AREVA I

I I

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 2 / 17 Non-proprietary version REVISION STATUS Revision Date Modifications Prepared by /

Checked by 0

12/08 First issue 1

01/09

- Details added

- Modification in the number of handling operations per loading

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 3 / 17 Non-proprietary version

SUMMARY

This document concerns the fatigue analysis of the FCC 3 and FCC 4 containers. The study is based on the hypotheses of road transports per year for the FCC 3 container and road transports per year for the FCC 4 container. These hypotheses are justified by the bounding nature of road transport with respect to maritime and railway transport.

Account is taken of the fatigue cycles caused by handling and stacking. The cumulative alternating stress is calculated on the basis of the MINER law. The maximum lifetimes of the containers are calculated for 3 lashing cases and are recapped in the following table:

Lashing case 1 Lashing case 2 Lashing case 4 Lifetime (FCC 3)

> 40years 37 ans

> 40 years Lifetime (FCC 4)

> 40 years 10 years 37 years

1. INTRODUCTION This document presents the fatigue analysis of the FCC 3 and FCC 4 containers in road, maritime and railway transport configuration, taking into account the cycles due to stacking and handling.
2. HYPOTHESES The transport hypotheses are as follows:

FCC3 container: transports / year

- road: 1 outward and return road transport = 1200 km

- railway: 1 outward and return railway transport = 1200 km:

- maritime : 1 outward transport: 30.5 d FCC4 container: transports / year

- road: 1 outward and return road transport = 1200 km

- railway: 1 outward and return railway transport = 1200 km:

- maritime : 1 outward transport: 15 d Based on note <1>, it appears that the vertical and horizontal acceleration spectra undergone by a container during railway transport are less penalizing than those obtained during a road transport. As a result, railway transport will be considered as a road transport.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 4 / 17 Non-proprietary version Likewise for the FCC3 container, maritime transport will be considered as a road transport and neglected for the FCC4 container. The justification of these hypotheses will be given in chapter 4. road transports per year are therefore considered for the FCC 3 container and road transports per year for the FCC 4 container.

The stresses considered are the maximum stresses encountered during transport, (based on note <2> and <3>). On the MINER cumulative damage law, the cumulative alternating stresses are calculated and compared with the fatigue limits taken from the curve in figure 1 <6>.

The following table recaps the numbers of cycles to be considered for each direction for an outward and return transport of 1200 km. The number of cycles corresponding to an acceleration level is calculated from <1> proportionally to the number of kilometers travelled Number of cycles ni Level of the accelerations (+/-

g)

Vertical transport (Z)

Transverse transport (Y)

Longitudinal transport (X) 0,4 382212 26575 9303 0,6 29351 2675 3750 0,8 2924 912 1590 1

440 268 631

,2 121 83 203

,4 38 27 52

,6 20 9

15 1,8 11 2

5 2

7 0

0 2,2 5

0 0

The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni is derived from the curve shown in figure

1. Ni is obtained according to the value of the maximum variation of stress Sa. The various values Ni are interpolated from two known points on the curve.

For each container, various lashing cases are considered, corresponding to maximum stresses in the three directions.

Stacking and handling are taken into account at a rate of handling operations and stacking operations per transport.

The number of stress cycles per transport due to handling Nm is calculated by the following equation:

Nm = M. Zm. km

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 5 / 17 Non-proprietary version where:

km Max number of stress cycles resulting from a handling operation Zm Number of handling operations per loading M

Max number of handling operations per transport This gives:

Nm = cycles per transport The number of stress cycles per transport due to stacking is calculated by the following equation:

Ng = G. Zg. kg where:

kg Number of stress cycles resulting from a stacking operation 1 (static stress)

Zg Number of stacking operations per loading G

Max number of stacking operations per transport This gives:

Ng = cycles per transport

3. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 3 CONTAINER 3.1 Sustained stresses During transport, the stresses in the 3 axes differ for each lashing case. The following table groups together the maximum stresses considered in the 3 directions:

Lashing case type 1 Lashing case type 2 Lashing case type 4 Vertical transport (MPa)

Transversal transport (MPa)

Longitudinal transport (MPa)

These transport loadings must be combined with the handling and stacking loadings.

During a handling operation, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (at an acceleration of 1.15 g). Although it is not located at the same place as the stress I

I I

l,_______I ____

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 6 / 17 Non-proprietary version generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.

A handling cycle breaks down as follows (as per <4>, by adjusting the peak measured at 1.15 g):

A distinction is made between:

- The main loading cycle described between the values 0 / 1,15 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,575 g about the average value of the range,

- Intermediate cycles about the average value of 1 g due to the oscillations before stabilisation. These variations are sufficiently small not to cause fatigue damage.

This means that the fatigue analysis is conducted on the basis of the stress cycle +/-

MPa.

During stacking, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (envelope value for all the directions and stacking modes) for an acceleration of 1 g. Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.

Stacking is considered as a static operation. The loading cycle varies between the values 0 / 1 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,5 g about the average value of the range which is /2= MPa. Thus, the equivalent stress for fatigue dimensioning will beMpa.

3.2 Total fatigue damage Knowing:

- The total number of cycles ni corresponding to an acceleration level,

- The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni, depending on the stress value Sa, it is possible to calculate the fatigue damage for an acceleration level by means of the following equation:

i i

i N

n d

1 g 0. g 1,15 g

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 7 / 17 Non-proprietary version The following tables recap the results obtained for the various lashing cases:

Lashing case 1 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7

5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.108 5.106 3.106 1,5.106 Vertical damage di =

i N

n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-9 1,2.10-9 3,8.10-10 2.10-7 2,1.10-6 2,3.10-6 3,5.10-6 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9

2 0

0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Transverse damage di =

i N

n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0

0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5

0 0

Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Longitudinal damage di =

i N

n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0

0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 1,29.10-5 Nb of possible transports 77788 Lifetime 7779 years Lashing case 1 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 8 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 2 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7

5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 3.106 1.106 4.105 1,5.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 3.104 Vertical damage di =

i N

n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 9,7.10-4 4,4.10-4 3.10-4 2,5.10-4 2.10-4 1,5.10-4 1,7.10-4 1,8.10-4 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9

2 0

0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Transverse damage di =

i N

n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0

0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5

0 0

Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Longitudinal damage di =

i N

n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0

0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 2,67.10-3 Nb of possible transports 373 Lifetime 37 years Lashing case 2 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 37 years.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 9 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 4 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7

5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.107 3.106 1.106 4.105 3.105 2.105 1,5.105 Vertical damage di =

i N

n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-5 4.10-5 3,8.10-5 5,1.10-5 3,5.10-5 3,4.10-5 3,5.10-5 Transverse comparison stress Sa

² Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9

2 0

0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.109 0

0 Transverse damage di =

i N

n i 2,7.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,7.10-10 9,1.10-11 1,1.10-7 0

0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5

0 0

Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Longitudinal damage di =

i N

n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0

0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 2,83.10-4 Nb of possible transports 3535 Lifetime 353 years Lashing case 4 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 10 / 17 Non-proprietary version

4. FATIGUE STRENGTH OF THE FCC 4 CONTAINER 4.1 Sustained stresses During transport, the stresses in the 3 axes differ for each lashing case. The following table groups together the maximum stresses considered in the 3 directions:

Lashing case type 1 Lashing case type 2 Lashing case type 4 Vertical transport (MPa)

Transversal transport (MPa)

Longitudinal transport (MPa)

These transport loadings must be combined with the handling and stacking loadings.

During a handling operation, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (at an acceleration of 1.15 g). Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.

A handling cycle breaks down as follows (as per <4>, by adjusting the peak measured at 1.15 g):

A distinction is made between:

- The main loading cycle described between the values 0 / 1,15 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,575 g about the average value of the range,

- Intermediate cycles about the average value of 1 g due to the oscillations before stabilisation. These variations are sufficiently small not to cause fatigue damage.

This means that the fatigue analysis is conducted on the basis of the stress cycle +/-

MPa.

1. g 0. g 1,15 g

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 11 / 17 Non-proprietary version During stacking, the maximum equivalent stress is MPa (envelope value for all the directions and stacking modes) for an acceleration of 1 g. Although it is not located at the same place as the stress generated during the transport, it is conservatively directly combined with that of the transport.

Stacking is considered as a static operation. The loading cycle varies between the values 0 / 1 g / 0, or a variation of +/- 0,5 g about the average value of the range which is /2=MPa. Thus, the equivalent stress for fatigue dimensioning will beMpa.

4.2 Total fatigue damage Knowing:

- The total number of cycles ni corresponding to an acceleration level,

- The maximum authorized number of cycles Ni, depending on the stress value Sa, it is possible to calculate the fatigue damage for an acceleration level by means of the following equation:

i i

i N

n d

The following tables recap the results obtained for the various lashing cases:

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 12 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 1 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7

5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 5.107 5.106 3.106 Vertical damage di =

i N

n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 2,9.10-8 4,4.10-9 1,2.10-9 3,8.10-10 2.10-10 2,1.10-7 1,4.10-6 1,8.10-6 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9

2 0

0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Transverse damage di =

i N

n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0

0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5

0 0

Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Longitudinal damage di =

i N

n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0

0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 7,95.10-6 Nb of possible transports 125658 Lifetime 8321 years Lashing case 1 is validated for a lifetime well above 40 years.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 13 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 2 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7

5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 3.107 1,5.106 4.105 2.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 3.104 2.104 Vertical damage di =

i N

n i 3,8.10-6 9,8.10-4 1,9.10-3 1,1.10-3 6,1.10-4 3,8.10-4 2,9.10-4 2,7.10-4 2,3.10-4 2,7.10-4 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9

2 0

0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Transverse damage di =

i N

n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0

0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5

0 0

Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Longitudinal damage di =

i N

n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0

0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 6,1.10-3 Nb of possible transports 164 Lifetime 10 years Lashing case 2 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 10 years.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 14 / 17 Non-proprietary version Lashing case 4 Acceleration 0,4 g 0,6 g 0,8 g 1,0 g 1,2 g 1,4 g 1,6 g 1,8 g 2,0 g 2,2 g Vertical comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 382212 29351 2924 440 121 38 20 11 7

5 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 5.106 1,5.106 4.105 3.105 1,5.105 1.105 7.104 4.104 Vertical damage di =

i N

n i 3,8.10-6 2,9.10-7 5,8.10-4 2,9.10-4 3.10-4 1,3.10-4 1,4.10-4 1,1.10-4 9,7.10-5 1,3.10-4 Transverse comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 26575 2675 912 268 83 27 9

2 0

0 Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Transverse damage di =

i N

n i 2,6.10-7 2,7.10-8 9,1.10-9 2,7.10-9 8,3.10-10 2,6.10-10 9.10-11 2,3.10-11 0

0 Longitudinal comparison stress Sa Number of cycles ni 9303 3750 1590 631 203 52 15 5

0 0

Number of cycles Ni 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 1.1011 0

0 Longitudinal damage di =

i N

n i 9,3.10-8 3,7.10-8 1,6.10-8 6,3.10-9 2.10-9 5,2.10-10 1,5.10-10 4,5.10-11 0

0 Handling damage 4,8.10-9 Stacking damage 2.10-10 Total damage 1,78.10-3 Nb of possible transports 560 Lifetime 37 years Lashing case 4 is validated for a maximum lifetime of 37 years.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 15 / 17 Non-proprietary version

5. BOUNDING NATURE OF ROAD TRANSPORT The appendix of letter <5> defines the maximum accelerations undergone by the container depending on the sea conditions, together with the associated number of cycles.

They are calculated by taking into account the following accelerations and frequencies

- +/- 0,4 g with a period of 6 seconds throughout the transport, which corresponds to the everyday conditions (sea conditions force 6 on average)

- +/- 0,6 g with a period of 9.2 seconds during 6 % of the transport time, which corresponds to severe conditions (sea conditions up to force 11)

The following table groups together the numbers of associated cycles for each container (1 transport of 30.5 days for the FCC 3 container and 1 transport of 15 days for the FCC 4 container).

Everyday conditions

(+/- 0,4 g)

Severe conditions

(+/- 0,6 g)

Number of cycles ni (FCC 3) 439200 17264 Number of cycles ni (FCC 4) 216000 8490 The number of cycles corresponding to an acceleration of +/- 0.6 g is less than for road transport. For an acceleration of +/- 0.4 g, the number of cycles is of the same order of magnitude as for road transport and the total damage is covered by the inclusion of higher acceleration levels in the case of road transport. The replacement of maritime transport by road transport in the total fatigue damage calculation is therefore fully justified.

6. CONCLUSION The following table recaps the maximum lifetimes for lashing cases 1, 2 and 4 on the basis of 10 road transports per year for the FCC 3 container and 15.1 road transports per year for the FCC 4 container.

Lashing case 1 Lashing case 2 Lashing case 4 Lifetime (FCC 3)

> 40 years 37 years

> 40 years Lifetime (FCC 4)

> 40 years 10 years 37 years

7. REFERENCES

<1>

D. PUJET, Nuclear Transport Limited Paris et P. MALESYS, Transnucléaire Paris << Measurement of the acceleration undergone by the trunnions of irradiated fuel transport flasks during normal use >> - PATRAM 89, 11-16 juin 1989, WASHINGTON DC, USA.

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 16 / 17 Non-proprietary version

<2>

Containers pour assemblages de combustible neufs FCC3, Données pour l'analyse de la tenue en fatigue des botes de levage et de la coquille supérieure (FCC3 containers for fresh fuel assemblies, data for analysis of the fatigue strength of the lifting boxes and upper shell), ref. NEEL-F 2008 DC 117/B

<3>

Containers pour assemblages de combustible neufs FCC4, Données pour l'analyse de la tenue en fatigue des botes de levage et de la coquille supérieure (FCC4 containers for fresh fuel assemblies, data for analysis of the fatigue strength of the lifting boxes and upper shell), ref. NEEL-F 2008 DC 118/A

<4>

KTA standard 3201.2 - << Safety Standards of the Nuclear Safety Standards Commission - Components of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of Light Water Reactors / Part 2 : Design and Analysis >> - Edition 06/96

<5>

Courrier COGEMA LOGISTICS S/03-045 du 28 mai 2003 - << Transport de matires radioactives - Sujets génériques - Tenue des arrimages en transport maritime >> (Letter from COGEMA LOGISTICS S/03-045 dated May 28th 2003 - << Transport of radioactive materials - Generic issues - Strength of lashing in maritime transport)

<6>

Courbe de fatigue grand nombre de cycles spécifique pour les aciers au carbone, réf. NEEL-F 09.0011 (Fatigue curve with large number of specific cycles for carbon steels, ref NEEL-F 09.0011)

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Page 17 / 17 Non-proprietary version LIST OF FIGURES Number Rev Title Number of pages 1

A Stress fatigue curve - Carbon steel for large cycle numbers 1

Total 1

TN International Ref. NTC-08-00135891 E-NPV Rev. 01E Index A FIGURE 1 STRESS FATIGUE CURVE - CARBON STEEL FOR LARGE CYCLE NUMBERS (DERIVED FROM <6>)

1,E+00 1,E+01 1,E+02 1,E+03 1,E+04 1,E+05 1,E+06 1,E+07 1,E+08 1,E+09 1,E+10 1,E+11 1,E+01 1,E+02 1,E+03 1,E+04 1,E+05 S a (MPa)

Nu m

be r

of cy cle s

J.

~,

,J

/

,I

,.r

'I

~"