ML21225A686: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Official Transcript of Proceedings NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
 
==Title:==
33rd Regulatory Information Conference Daily Staff Talks - Risks - Deconstructed Docket Number:    (n/a)
Location:          teleconference Date:              Monday, March 8, 2021 Work Order No.:    NRC-1420                          Pages 1-25 NEAL R. GROSS AND CO., INC.
Court Reporters and Transcribers 1323 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 234-4433
 
1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                              + + + + +
33RD REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE (RIC)
                              + + + + +
DAILY STAFF TALKS RISK - DECONSTRUCTED
                              + + + + +
MONDAY, MARCH 8, 2021
                              + + + + +
The RIC session convened via Video Teleconference, at 2:45 p.m. EST, Alysia Bone, NMSS, presiding.
PRESENT:
ALYSIA BONE, Futures Communications Lead, OEDO JOSEPH DONOGHUE, Director, Division of Safety Systems, NRR/NRC MEENA KHANNA, Director, Division of Resource Management and Administration, NRR/NRC BRIAN KEMKER, Senior Resident Inspector, Vogtle Resident Office, Division of Construction Oversight, RII/NRC P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701  (202) 234-4433
 
2 2:46 p.m.
MS. BONE:        Hello, and welcome to the first ever staff talk of the first ever virtual Regulatory Information Conference at the NRC.                  I'm Alysia Bone and I'll be your host for these chats which are really just an opportunity to sit down with some of our NRC employees, talk a little bit about the day, their impressions of the RIC, and just some topics of interest. You can see the question answer queue on the right-hand side of your screen.            That's actually not going to be monitored during this little chat.
Thanks for joining for today's session which is about "Risk - Deconstructed."            I've got a very esteemed group of speakers today with us.                    I have Joe Donoghue, Director of the Division of Safety Systems in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, or NRR; Meena Khanna, who is the Director of the Division of Resource Management and Administration in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation; and Brian Kemker, who is the Senior Resident Inspector at the Vogtle Units 3 and 4 which are under construction in Waynesboro, Georgia.
Joe, Meena, Brian, thank you for joining NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433      WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701      (202) 234-4433
 
3 today.        It's great to have you here.
Joe, I want to start with you, but before we dive into today's topic, I want to know what do you think about the first virtual RIC?                      How did today go for you?
MR. DONOGHUE:            Wow,      it  was    pretty exciting.          You know, as you can tell, along the way some risks came true maybe.                  One virtual session had a hard time getting started.                          Maybe during this session        there    might      be    some      hesitation    in      the internet connection.              We're working our way through it.      It's great.
A couple of things that I noticed while watching        the  proceedings        earlier,      this  topic      is central        to  a  lot    of    what    the      agency  does.        No surprise.          The chairman's remarks brought that center stage.
Also, the exhibits are great.                  If you have time, anybody who is listening, take the time to go to those virtual exhibits.                      "The Future is Now" took me a good part of my morning to work through.
It's a lot of good material.                  So I'm really excited.
This is great.
MS. BONE:      Awesome, Joe.          Thank you for NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
4 that.          Yes, absolutely.          That is something I was thinking today as I was watching the session, the plenary session with Margie, and the discussion there of how risk was used, the risk insights were thought about at NIH throughout the development of COVID 19 vaccinations.
It was an incredibly exciting first day of the RIC.          I'm glad you sort of helped us intro into our first topic of the staff talks, which is "Risk - Deconstructed."                  Set the stage for us a little bit, Joe.
You know, risk, obviously, is not new to the NRC.          We have been a risk-informed agency for many, many years.              We have a Safety Goal Policy Statement, which was, you know, developed more than 30 years ago, that talks about risk considerations.
Risk-informed regulations are at the heart of our regulatory framework.
Why  is    being    a    modern  risk-informed regulator a vision for transformation?                    As folks might know, we're on this journey to be a modern risk-informed regulator.              What is it about risk that's different today than the way we've talked about or thought about risk in years past?
NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701        (202) 234-4433
 
5 MR. DONOGHUE:          So I've had plenty of chance and opportunity to think about this because I've been at the agency for 30 years now.                    I began as a technical reviewer, you know, reactor engineer.
At that point, you know, PRA was its own kind of, I think you've heard the word, siloed, its own kind of discipline, and the rest of us were doing our own deterministic kind of approach.
Definitely over the years that's changed.
Now we are getting more and more used to across the agency looking at aspects of risk in what we do.
Just as you can see with the panels we have here, and also from some of the other presentations you have seen earlier today, it's not just in the reactor or the materials, the technical aspects of where the risk is.                      There's enterprise risk.                In our work in being a regulator legal risks, and risks on how we communicate with the public.                    One thing that really got my attention earlier today was how much      trust in  what    we    do  is    important  to    being effective.      I mean, it came up in chairman's remarks.
It came up with Dr. Mascola, I think is his name, with NIH mentioned that as well where, you know, our ability to do our job is not just how NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
6 accurate        we  are,    how    many      decimal  places      for something we're calculating.                  It's also how we can communicate safety conclusions in our business in order to elicit trust and be effective.                  That's a big part of our job.                    So all those things -- I've been in this particular position, this job, for a little over a year now and it's kind of where I started, as I mentioned, as a technical review.                          As kind      of  a  technical    organization,        being  able        to understand and communicate all the technical, but also nontechnical, aspects of risk in an issue is important.
I think the NRC as a whole, the staff all the way up to the EDO and the chairman, we're much more integrated.            I'll say we're much more -- we understand each other a lot more maybe than we did 30 years ago when I was first here where somebody talked about risk and I really didn't understand what that meant when I first looked at it.
One last thing I'll say is it's still a goal.        I think the chairman also said this.              I think that being risk informed in everything we do is still a goal.        We've gone a long way but I'll say that Be riskSMART is an initiative that has gained a lot of NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
7 ground but I think it has a lot of potential to get us even better at this.
MS. BONE:      Thank you so much for that, Joe.      Absolutely.      So much of what you said resonated with me personally.            I started at the agency 13 years ago now as a risk and reliability analyst.                    I learned so much at that point what risk meant to the agency and now I have seen it continue to bloom and expand in terms of how we communicate with risk, as you mentioned,        risk  communications            being  so  critical across disciplines.
Which brings me to Meena.              I want to talk to you a little bit about what it means.                      What does risk consideration mean in your world?                    Joe mentioned enterprise risk, sort of the corporate side of the house.        Again, you are the Division Director for the Division of Resource Management and Administration in NRR.        Talk to me about how risk considerations show up in your world?
MS. KHANNA:          Thanks for that question, Alysia.        As you've heard from Joe, and I'm just going to be totally honest, when I took on the role here in DRMA, and I come from the technical side, when we're talking        about  risk      being    a  modern      risk-informed NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
8 regulator, I'm going to be totally honest and say, eh, I don't have to worry about this because it doesn't apply to us on the corporate side.
We are fortunate enough, and I think many of you had the opportunity to listen to Mirela and Candace        in    a    previous        discussion      where      they demonstrated, applied, and showed us how to apply the Be riskSMART initiative.                What we were fortunate in having was to have both of them join our division, basically have a division meeting, and they basically introduced        us  to    a  concept      of      the Be  riskSMART initiative.
They conveyed to us, hey, this is not just a technical thing.              As we all know, we can apply risk in every aspect of our jobs here whether you're here      at  the  agency,      whether      you're    in  industry.
We've heard that everyone is doing it and it's working very, very well.
Joe just mentioned that we are nowhere near where we want to be but, I've got to tell you, we are definitely making some great strides and I think you guys are going to hear more and more.                          In response to your question, Alysia, I'm so proud of my division, DRMA, Division of Resource Management and NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
9 Administration. We've really, really done an amazing job.
My  branch      team,      management    team,        my staff, what we're looking for is we are basically looking for ways to improve our processes.                    How can we implement efficiencies in our processes?                    How can we also leverage data analytics and be able to make more timely decision making?                And what tools can we develop on our own to be able to help us to do our job      and  to  support      the    executive      team  and      the leadership team with decision making?
Very briefly, I'll just mention one item that        we  did  do    is    we    streamlined      our    office instruction process.            What we did there was basically shed a whole layer of management review and what we determined is why not have those managers focus on the more risk-significant initiatives and allow the others to be able to review those. Small, small little thing there but, I tell you, it's a huge savings in time and resources.
Secondly,        we      also      developed        two dashboards.        We developed a human capital dashboard as well as a budget financial dashboard.                      Both of those we've leveraged to be able to provide our LT NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
10 updates on where we are on hiring, you know, the budgeted resources.            Basically, it's been wonderful.
It basically gives a one-stop shop to all the LT and ET as to where we are on hiring.
Secondly,      the    dashboard      that  we    also developed was financials and that's been wonderful to be able to communicate to the office, as well as the divisions, what they are doing with budget execution.
Those two have been really, really helpful.
Lastly, I wanted to also mention that one of our branch chiefs, Kirk Foggie, who you guys are going to hear from on Wednesday, developed an awards tool which, again, this has been like so amazing.                        It has saved us so many resources.                  It's helping out the leadership team when they are identifying resource -
- I'm sorry, awards.
They are able to actually see first-hand in      one    place  what      their    budget      is,  what    their remaining        budget    is,    what      they've    submitted      for awards.        In a nutshell I just wanted to say these are just a few examples.              We've got plenty more that we've done and we're looking forward to doing more.
The other thing that I wanted to also mention is the communication piece.                    What we've been NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
11 doing is we've been trying to also communicate to our other          Division      of      Resource          Management        and Administration organizations across the agency of what tools we're using so they can also implement them and gain the benefits and efficiencies that we are here in NRR.
MS. BONE:        Wow, Meena.          You guys have clearly been very busy.              Lots of great work.          What I love about everything you just sort of laid out for us      is    that,  you      know,      again      our  vision      for transformation is to be this modern risk-informed regulator.
As Joe mentioned, that doesn't just apply to the "technical" side of the house.                      That applies to our corporate, legal, all disciplines across the board.        Hearing how you're helping us get there in sort      of  the  corporate        world    is    really  exciting.
Thank you for connecting those dots for us.
So shifting gears a little bit.                  Again, Brian, you are the senior resident inspector at the Vogtle 3 and 4 sites under construction in Georgia.
I think we have a picture actually of Brian on the job.        Can we pull that up?            I think it's slide 4.
Do we have that teed up?              It's not that one but we've NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
12 got another -- there we go.                There's Brian.
Tell us, Brian, where are you?              What are you doing in this picture?
MR. KEMKER:          I am inside the unit 4 reactor        containment      building      and    that's  actually fairly early in the construction.                    That dates back a couple of years ago.            Probably near grade elevation.
You can see the wall of the containment, the steel containment there.          I'm standing on some scaffolding.
Posing for a picture at the time but typically we'll take cameras out with us to take pictures of different things that we happen to be inspecting at any given time.
MS. BONE:      Incredible.          I'm glad we got to see a little bit of -- a little slice of what you experience as a senior resident inspector there.                        How have risk considerations played out in some of the work that you've done at Vogtle?
MR. KEMKER:          Well, I guess, to answer your question, Alysia, I have to look -- I take it from the focus of what we do with the inspection program.        I have to mention 10 CFR Part 52 and ITAAC.
For those who don't know, Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are Westinghouse AP1000 units and they are the first two NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
13 plants to be built and licensed under Part 52.
Combined operating license under Part 52 enables the licensee to construct a plant and operate it      once    construction        is    complete        if    certain identified        standards      in    the  combined        license      are satisfied.            These    standards          are    what  we      call inspections,          tests,      analyses,            and    acceptance criteria,        or  ITAAC.      Now,      the      ITAAC    identifies reasonable          assurance      that      the        plant    has      been constructed and will operate in accordance with the combined license conditions and the NRC's rules and regulations.
Throughout the construction process, NRC inspectors perform elected inspections to confirm that      the  licensee    has    successfully          completed      the ITAAC.            There's      principally            three    types        of inspections performed while under construction.                              We are actively engaged in all three of those right now.
We    perform        direct          inspections          of construction activities that are in progress like welding        system    piping      and    components,        electrical installations, and building structures, and other methods like design and fabrication inspections to confirm the licensee in the end satisfies the ITAAC.
NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701              (202) 234-4433
 
14 In    addition,          we      inspect    licensee construction          programs      that      would      include  quality assurance          activities,          pre-operational          testing activities, and readiness of programs that will be required during plant operations later on.                            These inspections verify the reactor units are constructed correctly and the licensee will have the appropriate programs in place to operate them safely.
The inspection program for Vogtle 3 and 4 from the very beginning incorporated risk insights into our selection of what we inspect.                        We targeted or select an ITAAC for direct inspection based on the safety        or    risk    significance            of  the  systems, structures, and components.
As time went by and we gained experience from      our  inspections,        we    adjusted      our  inspection program to take advantage of what we had learned.
For example, in 2019 and early 2020 the Region II Division of Construction Oversight conducted risk-informed          assessments        of      the      remaining      ITAAC inspections needed to support the 10 CFR 52-103(g) finding.        That's basically what we call the all ITAAC complete finding that allows the licensee then to go on and move the fuel in to operate the units.
NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
15 We considered multiple perspectives in construction history when we reviewed the remaining inspection        plans    to    determine          if  the  NRC      had performed enough inspections in a given skill set in an area or system, and the type of NRC inspections that were being performed.
Based upon all the previous work that was accomplished, the confidence that we had gained on the licensee's program up to this point, and the safety and risk of upcoming construction activities, we bundled some, deleted some, and made additions to our inspection plans.
As  a  result,      the      construction        ITAAC Inspection        Program    was    significantly          re-baselined while remaining our strong focus reasonable assurance and adequate protection.                All along in our process we    have    incorporated      risk    insights      into  what        we inspect at the construction sites.
MS. BONE:        Thanks for those insights, Brian.        I'm really glad that you sort of emphasized, again, that in all of this, in the transformation journey and everything that we're doing.                      Our mission is    still    central,      our    mission      to    protect    public health        and  safety,      promote        common      defense      and NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
16 security        remains      unchanged.            You  know,    we're enhancing the way that we carry out this mission via these things as risk considerations and other parts of our transformation.
Joe, I want to go back to you.                Hearing these two examples from Meena from the corporate side,        Brian  from      very      specifically,      you    know, thinking how he is working on inspections at Vogtle using risk insights, can you tell me what are some commonalities that you see in the way that we use risk-informed          decision          making        across      these disciplines?        What are sort of the things that sort of bubble up to the top that apply no matter what to the kind of decision that you're making?
MR. DONOGHUE:          Well, I think that one thing that we all deal with, and Meena and Brian alluded        to,  was    you    make    adjustments      with      the information that you pick up, that you learn.                            You might be faced with an issue and at first blush you think you know where the risks are but, as time goes on, as you learn more, you may have to make some adjustments.        You may learn that things -- maybe you reduce some uncertainties in some ways.                        You can either add or back off on level of attention on NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
17 certain aspects.
I guess, for example, Brian, I was an inspector as you are.              As you're going through your inspection program, for example, I would imagine that you have the inspection that's before you but, just as a simple example, you see something else that you didn't expect.          It just doesn't look right, and you have to start asking questions.
I know in Meena's work, more often than she      would    like  to    have    to  deal      with, there      are surprises.          You    think      you    understand      how,      for example, our budget is being expanded but then you're hit with a surprise because there's new work that arrived or some surprise, a reduction in the number of resources in an area.
You have to deal with that, and you have to go explain that all the way up the chain and make sure the enterprise risks are still going to get the amount of attention they desire.                    I guess that's one thing is that -- again, to sum it up, the work that we      do    in  all  these      different          areas  relies      on understanding the situation.
You want to get as much information as you can.        At some point, though, you have to kind of NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
18 take the information you have, make a decision, and go.      That's always a challenge knowing when you have enough information.
The other thing I'll say is we're all keeping -- no matter what we do in this agency, any of the 2,700-plus people in the agency, safety is where it's at.        That's our purpose for being here, protecting the health and safety of the country.
Those are the things that are common to everything that we talked about so far.
MS. BONE:      Absolutely.          Absolutely, Joe.
Since this is a little bit more of an informal chat of the RIC and this is sort of still based on the conversation of risk - deconstructed, you mentioned understanding the situation, how to apply this risk-informed decision-making kind of anywhere, even in personal life.        I think we actually have a picture of Joe after he made a risk-informed decision.                          I think it's slide 2.            Do we have the picture of Joe that you can pull up?          Thank you.
MR. DONOGHUE:        Oh, my gosh.      Okay.
MS. BONE:      Surprise!
MS. KHANNA:        Mr. Risk taker.
MS. BONE:      Tell me, Joe, what is risky NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
19 about this situation and how did you ultimately end up taking the decision to go down the hill?
MR. DONOGHUE:        So, first of all, the risk is don't send things to Alysia.                Here was -- so this is pretty recent.          We got for the first time in a couple years a little bit of snow in Maryland.                          I took advantage of it.          Those are, if you squint and see real close, on my feet are cross-country skis.
I'm barely moving but I made it look good.
The point of this was, you know, there are some obvious risks and not so obvious.                  This goes back to the point we were just talking about where you are gathering information and maybe your first look -- here your first look at this situation is here is a guy in his 50s trying to do a tuck and go downhill and maybe is going to hurt himself.
If you look closer, you start doing some investigation and then you find out he really is taking a risk because those skis on his feet are like more than 30 years old and they are glued together and, wow, you don't want to go down too steep a hill with those.
There    are    some      obvious      risks  in    any situation      we  deal      with    from        Brian  doing      his NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
20 inspections, for Meena and her staff, making sure that the lights are on and we're doing our work in this office and all over the agency.                        People get faced with a situation, they have to make a quick assessment, what are the risks?
You think you know but you have to keep your eyes open and your antenna tuned to additional information.        Some of that information you can decide is not significant to the situation.                    In other ways, skiing downhill with really old skies you want to be careful and take it easy and be ready to bail out.
MS. BONE:        Perfect.          Thank you, Joe.
Thank you for sharing that little slice of your personal life.
MR. DONOGHUE:        Sure.
MS. BONE:      I have to spread the wealth a little bit.
Brian. Can we pull up the picture of the Brian?        I think we had a little teaser shot of that earlier.        There we go.      Brian, what are you doing in this picture?          This is quite different than Vogtle.
Where are you here?
MR. KEMKER:        Well, we were asked to send NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
21 you a couple of pictures of, I guess, something risky in our personal lives.                The photo to the right I'm actually cavern diving.
A past time that I enjoy is scuba diving.
When it comes to risk taking, I don't really consider that all that risky because I have good training and I practice my skills and I don't exceed my training or my qualifications.
I  have      good    equipment        and  it's      well maintained, and I routinely check it out.                        I would say that the first picture you showed of me inside the      Unit    4  containment        during      construction        is probably more risky than the cavern diving.
If you recall that picture, it showed all sorts of electrical power cables, temporary power cables        strewn    about      in    there,        plus  all      the scaffolding up in the overhead.                      What's not shown, of course, is all the overhead crane activity that's going on all the time.
I think we have to manage our risk both industrial        safety    perspective          on  the  job    site, particularly on a construction job site, as well as in our day-to-day lives with some of the activities we enjoy doing whether it's downhill skiing or scuba NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
22 diving.
MS. BONE:      Thank you so much for sharing that, Brian.      I love the picture.            I'm very impressed with your skill set here, both at Vogtle and also with scuba cave diving.            You both have really touched on key components of the smart framework that we've heard about a number of times today; spotting what the risk is, different kinds of risk, understanding the situation, managing those risks.
Meena, I want to go back to you a little bit more kind of on -- more specifically on the NRC topic and the way that we are looking at the Be riskSMART      framework.            Can    you    tell  me    what, especially      in  your    world,      but    maybe  just    across disciplines what do you find sort of most complicated or      challenging    about      talking        about  risk,    about communicating risk?          What are some of the things that you're doing within your team to help people be more comfortable using the Be riskSMART framework, for instance?
MS. KHANNA:          A great question, Alysia.
One, the communications aspect is so significant.                        I think you've heard from each one of us and from the session that we heard earlier on the risk informed NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
23 decision making, the Be riskSMART model.
I think we are effectively communicating, and we are letting folks know what are needs are and what are projects are that we're doing so that people can leverage those as well.              If you think about it, we do a lot of similar work across the agency.                  Maybe different aspects but a lot of it is similar whether it's licensing, technical.
I'll give you an example.            In NRR we have routine meetings.          We meet with the executive team on a weekly basis and then we meet with a leadership team as well.        My folks and myself are in both of those meetings.          So now if Joe and his team are working on something, for example, like ATF, right?
That's a huge initiative.              Communication may indicate, for example, I don't have enough budget needs, or I don't have enough resource needs.                  I need to do my hiring.        What we've done like in that case in order to be able to help move the process along and get Joe the resources, or any other divisions the resources      that  they    need,      we      actually  in    DRMA developed a streamlined hiring strategy.
What that's been able to do is help us to be able to bring staff on board in a more timely or NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
24 efficient and effective manner.                    If Joe or another division director indicates that they need contact funds, we've also looked at that as well and we've tried to delegate funds really quickly.
I guess in a nutshell it's really good to be able to communicate.            I think the challenges occur when we're not communicating, we're not understanding what folks need to help them be successful.                      I also mentioned the fact that it's so important that the organizations learn from each other.                      We are all learning from each other.                We want to benefit from it.      I've mentioned the dashboards.
I    can't      tell      you      how  amazing      the dashboards have helped us all across the agency with data      analytics  to    be  able    to    make  timely    risk-informed decision making.
An example that we have that OCFO just recently put together.              I can't tell you how great it was for my team and I to be able to leverage that information        to    give      insights        into  the    budget formulation for fiscal year '23.
It's just all -- I mean, in a nutshell, I would say the best that we can do is effectively communicate.        Let people know what we're doing.                  Let NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701          (202) 234-4433
 
25 people know what our needs are and then look for ways to      be    more  efficient      and    effective    while    still meeting our mission.
MS. BONE:      Absolutely.        Meena, thank you so much.          These are perfect words to kind of close out here.          I want to thank all three of you; Joe, Brian, Meena, thank you so much for being here today and      talking      to  me    about    "Risk      -  Deconstructed."
Thank you all out there for being part of this very first staff talk.
Really hope you enjoyed this little chat.
Please join tomorrow not only for another full fun day of the RIC, but also for our other staff talk, our      Tuesday      staff    talk,      Overcoming      the  Fear      of Failure.        We have three exceptional panelists to talk about this topic as well.
We have Dave Nelson who is our chief information          officer;      Stephanie        Coffin  who  is    our deputy office director for the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research; and Shaun Anderson who is the division director of EMBARK Venture Studio in NRR.
Please do come back for that.              Thank you all so much for joining today.                        Thank you, again, panelists, speakers for coming and having this chat NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701            (202) 234-4433
 
26 with me.      Hope you all have a wonderful evening or rest of the day.
MS. KHANNA:        Thank you, Alysia.
(Whereupon,        the    above-entitled    matter went off the record at 3:17 p.m.)
NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701        (202) 234-4433
 
27 NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W.
(202) 234-4433    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701  (202) 234-4433}}

Revision as of 01:26, 17 January 2022

Transcript for Daily Staff Talks - Day 1
ML21225A686
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/08/2021
From:
NRC/EDO
To:
References
NRC-1420
Download: ML21225A686 (28)
v • d • e


Text

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML21225A686&oldid=3392507"