ML19305D015: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_
{{#Wiki_filter:_
* 1                              UiJITED STATES CF A:l:ICA
1                              UiJITED STATES CF A:l:ICA UUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICU      March 12,1480 3EFOR2 EC iTC::IC SAFETY & LICEUSIUG 3CA2D          _.    . . . . . . .
        .
                                          ,_
UUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICU      March 12,1480
_
          ,.
                -. _ . . . _ _ _ .
3EFOR2 EC iTC::IC SAFETY & LICEUSIUG 3CA2D          _.    . . . . . . .
In the Matter of HOU3TCH LIG:ITI:!G MiD PO'.fER CCM?r!Y          )  Docket No. 50 a66
In the Matter of HOU3TCH LIG:ITI:!G MiD PO'.fER CCM?r!Y          )  Docket No. 50 a66
( Allens Creek :!uclear Generating Station, Unit 1)                            )
( Allens Creek :!uclear Generating Station, Unit 1)                            )
Line 34: Line 27:
                                                                                                   $'cM            D Intervenor contends Applicant's main generator turbine is not designed sufficiently to prevent turbine missiles O    %
                                                                                                   $'cM            D Intervenor contends Applicant's main generator turbine is not designed sufficiently to prevent turbine missiles O    %
(bl l 125 from damaging critical components of the system.              Further,
(bl l 125 from damaging critical components of the system.              Further,
        '
(                that stoppage or vibration of the turbine following missile thrust will create. dangerous halting and" damage to the tur-bine5and main steam power train of the plant.
(                that stoppage or vibration of the turbine following missile thrust will create. dangerous halting and" damage to the tur-bine5and main steam power train of the plant.
That one turbine has indeed e:cpelled a portion oft alttirbine disic is shown by Board Motification SN 80-8, which sites a ore-liminary report of a portion of a disc hurled during;turbi'ne synch-ronization at (800 rpm on Feb. 14, 1980, at the Yankee Ryge, nuclear plant in Massachusetsa.            Crac'cing of turbine disks is the subject of Board IIotification BU 80-4, which indicates "the cracking may be core widesfWdad than previously reported" and that one manufacturer, Westinghouse,is, " (ij n the process of elevating some of their previously estimated turbine missile onergies". ( BU 80-4; Janury '6,1980). The largest cracks d.e-tected to date were found at Zion Station. Unit 1 , and re7arted                                  _
That one turbine has indeed e:cpelled a portion oft alttirbine disic is shown by Board Motification SN 80-8, which sites a ore-liminary report of a portion of a disc hurled during;turbi'ne synch-ronization at (800 rpm on Feb. 14, 1980, at the Yankee Ryge, nuclear plant in Massachusetsa.            Crac'cing of turbine disks is the subject of Board IIotification BU 80-4, which indicates "the cracking may be core widesfWdad than previously reported" and that one manufacturer, Westinghouse,is, " (ij n the process of elevating some of their previously estimated turbine missile onergies". ( BU 80-4; Janury '6,1980). The largest cracks d.e-tected to date were found at Zion Station. Unit 1 , and re7arted                                  _
b7 the Inspection & Enforcement Division of the URC on :Mvember 20, 1979          Further, on March 1', 1980, special insoections were ordett'or "O nuclear reactors of their turbines. Because
b7 the Inspection & Enforcement Division of the URC on :Mvember 20, 1979          Further, on March 1', 1980, special insoections were ordett'or "O nuclear reactors of their turbines. Because of uncertainty of these calcuations of sissile energy and the dangers of missiles, to the functioning of the ACUGS and conse-i                    guent risk to t'cas Intervenor's health and environmental inter-l                    ests, he urges            ;n4;ss on    tys  .
            .
of uncertainty of these calcuations of sissile energy and the dangers of missiles, to the functioning of the ACUGS and conse-i                    guent risk to t'cas Intervenor's health and environmental inter-l                    ests, he urges            ;n4;ss on    tys  .
                                                                     .tention to the proce dg gg. y 9 % [
                                                                     .tention to the proce dg gg. y 9 % [
Jm          %  A      ,              over
Jm          %  A      ,              over


                                                                          .
Suo'orting Statenent for Contention #47 This Intervanor believes, the above Contention should be admitted to the proceedings because
                                                                                ,
                                                                                  .
                                                                                    .
Suo'orting Statenent for Contention #47
        .
This Intervanor believes, the above Contention should be admitted to the proceedings because
: a. There was far less basis to argue the Contrations admissibility at the original deadline, because the Yankee Rowe incident had not occured. In~short the Contention is currently based on new evidence.
: a. There was far less basis to argue the Contrations admissibility at the original deadline, because the Yankee Rowe incident had not occured. In~short the Contention is currently based on new evidence.
: b. No other party has raised the issue. There are no current plans to consider the issue at this moment within the NRC.
: b. No other party has raised the issue. There are no current plans to consider the issue at this moment within the NRC.
Line 55: Line 39:
: d. No e::isting '2rty has indicated an interest in this issue to date.
: d. No e::isting '2rty has indicated an interest in this issue to date.
g
g
    -
: e. It does not appear the issue will unreasonably delay thes e oroceedings. The issue is a well focused one    which is unlikel7 to broaden the proceedings greatly.
: e. It does not appear the issue will unreasonably delay thes e oroceedings. The issue is a well focused one    which is
Respectfully Submitted, val hw0            -
  '
unlikel7 to broaden the proceedings greatly.
Respectfully Submitted,
    -
val hw0            -
uohn F. Dohert Copies of "JOIEi F. DORERTf' ', COHTE'ITION #47" were served on the partias_'below via first class U. S. Postal Service, this 42.
uohn F. Dohert Copies of "JOIEi F. DORERTf' ', COHTE'ITION #47" were served on the partias_'below via first class U. S. Postal Service, this 42.
of March, 4930.
of March, 4930.
                                                                  '
                                                                     $bJh ohn F. Doherty
                                                                     $bJh ohn F. Doherty
* l l          Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq. (ERC) l          Gustave A. Linenberger (NRC)
* l l          Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq. (ERC) l          Gustave A. Linenberger (NRC)
Dr. E. Leonard Cheatum (:iRC)
Dr. E. Leonard Cheatum (:iRC)
Richard A. Lowerre, Esc. (Texas) l R. Gordon Gooch, Esq. (A'olicant)
Richard A. Lowerre, Esc. (Texas) l R. Gordon Gooch, Esq. (A'olicant)
'
J. Gre7ory Copeland, Esc. (.'.p"licant)
J. Gre7ory Copeland, Esc. (.'.p"licant)
James M. Scott, Jr. Esc. (TexFI2G)
James M. Scott, Jr. Esc. (TexFI2G)
Line 76: Line 53:
       ,    Dr. David Marrack
       ,    Dr. David Marrack
         - Carro Hinderstein, Esq.
         - Carro Hinderstein, Esq.
T  D    D'
T  D    D' D
* D w      a A[ nf b l}}
w      a A[ nf b l}}

Latest revision as of 13:42, 1 February 2020

Intervenor Contention 47.Applicant Main Generator Turbine Is Not Designed Sufficiently to Prevent Turbine Missiles from Damaging Critical Components of Sys.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19305D015
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/1980
From: Doherty J
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8004110551
Download: ML19305D015 (2)
v • d • e


Text

_

1 UiJITED STATES CF A:l:ICA UUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICU March 12,1480 3EFOR2 EC iTC::IC SAFETY & LICEUSIUG 3CA2D _. . . . . . . .

In the Matter of HOU3TCH LIG:ITI:!G MiD PO'.fER CCM?r!Y ) Docket No. 50 a66

( Allens Creek :!uclear Generating Station, Unit 1) )

JOIIII F. DCIIERTI'S COIITENTION '#47 -

John F. Doherty, Intervenor in the chove Constructica LfcenseProceedingsfilesthisContention#47,oursuantto  %

10 CFR 2.714 of the Commissions Rules of Practice, and sup- d porting statement to support the filing after the deadline jf

  • for contentions for this proceed 2.ng, ,

7 gR 21 @ g Contention 547

$'cM D Intervenor contends Applicant's main generator turbine is not designed sufficiently to prevent turbine missiles O  %

(bl l 125 from damaging critical components of the system. Further,

( that stoppage or vibration of the turbine following missile thrust will create. dangerous halting and" damage to the tur-bine5and main steam power train of the plant.

That one turbine has indeed e:cpelled a portion oft alttirbine disic is shown by Board Motification SN 80-8, which sites a ore-liminary report of a portion of a disc hurled during;turbi'ne synch-ronization at (800 rpm on Feb. 14, 1980, at the Yankee Ryge, nuclear plant in Massachusetsa. Crac'cing of turbine disks is the subject of Board IIotification BU 80-4, which indicates "the cracking may be core widesfWdad than previously reported" and that one manufacturer, Westinghouse,is, " (ij n the process of elevating some of their previously estimated turbine missile onergies". ( BU 80-4; Janury '6,1980). The largest cracks d.e-tected to date were found at Zion Station. Unit 1 , and re7arted _

b7 the Inspection & Enforcement Division of the URC on :Mvember 20, 1979 Further, on March 1', 1980, special insoections were ordett'or "O nuclear reactors of their turbines. Because of uncertainty of these calcuations of sissile energy and the dangers of missiles, to the functioning of the ACUGS and conse-i guent risk to t'cas Intervenor's health and environmental inter-l ests, he urges ;n4;ss on tys .

.tention to the proce dg gg. y 9 % [

Jm  % A , over

Suo'orting Statenent for Contention #47 This Intervanor believes, the above Contention should be admitted to the proceedings because

a. There was far less basis to argue the Contrations admissibility at the original deadline, because the Yankee Rowe incident had not occured. In~short the Contention is currently based on new evidence.
b. No other party has raised the issue. There are no current plans to consider the issue at this moment within the NRC.
c. Consideration of the issue in regard to the large turbine to be used at ACNGS will develope an important part of the record. At this moment, it appears most of the turbines involved in the ordered inspections and incidents such as Shioningoort, 1974, are much smaller than AC:!GS.
d. No e::isting '2rty has indicated an interest in this issue to date.

g

e. It does not appear the issue will unreasonably delay thes e oroceedings. The issue is a well focused one which is unlikel7 to broaden the proceedings greatly.

Respectfully Submitted, val hw0 -

uohn F. Dohert Copies of "JOIEi F. DORERTf' ', COHTE'ITION #47" were served on the partias_'below via first class U. S. Postal Service, this 42.

of March, 4930.

$bJh ohn F. Doherty

  • l l Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq. (ERC) l Gustave A. Linenberger (NRC)

Dr. E. Leonard Cheatum (:iRC)

Richard A. Lowerre, Esc. (Texas) l R. Gordon Gooch, Esq. (A'olicant)

J. Gre7ory Copeland, Esc. (.'.p"licant)

James M. Scott, Jr. Esc. (TexFI2G)

Brenda McCortcle, Esq.

Wa7ne Rentfro ,

, Dr. David Marrack

- Carro Hinderstein, Esq.

T D D' D

w a A[ nf b l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19305D015&oldid=2373958"