ML16195A325: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/15/2016
| issue date = 07/15/2016
| title = La Salle, Units 1 and 2, MF8063 & MF8064, Meeting Feedback Form for July 15, 2016, Pre-Application Public Meeting Regarding Suppression Pool Swell, (NRC Form 659)
| title = La Salle, Units 1 and 2, MF8063 & MF8064, Meeting Feedback Form for July 15, 2016, Pre-Application Public Meeting Regarding Suppression Pool Swell, (NRC Form 659)
| author name = Vaidya B K
| author name = Vaidya B
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-2
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000373, 05000374
| docket = 05000373, 05000374
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Vaidya B K, NRR/DORL/LPL3-2, 415-3308
| contact person = Vaidya B, NRR/DORL/LPL3-2, 415-3308
| case reference number = CAC MF8063, CAC MF8064
| case reference number = CAC MF8063, CAC MF8064
| document type = - No Document Type Applies
| document type = - No Document Type Applies
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = CAC:MF8063, CAC:MF8064
| project = CAC:MF8063, CAC:MF8064
| stage =  
| stage = Meeting
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:2. This meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed.NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACKNRC FORM 659(03-2014)U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOMB NO. 3150-0217Expires: (03/31/2017)Public Protection Notification:  If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection. Thank you for attending this public meeting hosted by the NRC. In order to help us understand your views about this meeting and improve future meetings, please take a couple minutes to answer the questions below.Meeting Date:Meeting Title:3. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient.5. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions      or express their views.8. I am satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting.4. The meeting facility, room set up, microphones, and visuals used contributed to the success of the meeting.Category1. The meeting achieved its stated purpose.Please address the following statements in terms of your experience at the meeting. 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree."6. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff.7. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable, fair and balanced.1234554321543215432154321543215432154321"STRONGLY DISAGREE""STRONGLY AGREE""DISAGREE""AGREE""NEITHER  AGREE OR  DISAGREE"NameTelephone No.E-MailOPTIONALOrganizationCheck here if you would like a member of NRC staff to contact you.There are several ways you can provide your feedback:1) Scanning the Quick Response (QR) Code on the back of this form with your smartphone to link directly to our feedback page. If you do not have a QR reader on your mobile device, you can use your App store to access available QR scanning applications suitable for your device.2) Through any computer by going to the Public Meeting Schedule and pressing the "Meeting Feedback" link for the       specific meeting, or pressing the "[-more]" link for a specific meeting and then pressing the "Meeting Feedback"      link on the "Meeting Details" page.3) By filling out this hard copy of our "Public Meeting Feedback Form" and providing it to an NRC staff member or mailing it in.Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.Note: You have up to 30 days after the meeting has ended to submit feedback on the public meeting that you've attended. Thank you again for your participation.
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 659                                                                                                                           U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2014)
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001BUSINESS REPLY MAILFIRST CLASS MAILPERMIT NO. 12904WASHINGTON DCPOSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONNO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE  UNITED STATESMAIL STOP: (HQ Staff Only) OR CHOOSE REGIONPlease provide any suggestions you have on ways the NRC could improve their public meetings:QR CODEUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001ATTN: NAME AND OFFICE 
Category NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK 1
}}
Meeting                                              Meeting LaSalle Units 1 and 2, Pre-Application Meeting - License Amendment Request -
JULY 15, 2016 Date:
 
==Title:==
Suppression Pool Swell Thank you for attending this public meeting hosted by the NRC. In order to help us understand your views about this meeting and improve future meetings, please take a couple minutes to answer the questions below.
There are several ways you can provide your feedback:
: 1) Scanning the Quick Response (QR) Code on the back of this form with your smartphone to link directly to our feedback page. If you do not have a QR reader on your mobile device, you can use your App store to access available QR scanning applications suitable for your device.
: 2) Through any computer by going to the Public Meeting Schedule and pressing the Meeting Feedback link for the specific meeting, or pressing the [more] link for a specific meeting and then pressing the Meeting Feedback link on the Meeting Details page.
: 3) By filling out this hard copy of our Public Meeting Feedback Form and providing it to an NRC staff member or mailing it in.
Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.
Note: You have up to 30 days after the meeting has ended to submit feedback on the public meeting that you've attended. Thank you again for your participation.
Please address the following statements in terms of your experience at the meeting. 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree."
                                                                                                                                                      "NEITHER "STRONGLY                                              "STRONGLY "DISAGREE"    AGREE OR      "AGREE" DISAGREE"                                              AGREE" DISAGREE"
: 1. The meeting achieved its stated purpose.                                                                            1            2            3            4            5
: 2. This meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed.                                                          1            2            3            4            5
: 3. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were 1            2            3            4            5 reasonably convenient.
: 4. The meeting facility, room set up, microphones, and visuals 1            2            3            4            5 used contributed to the success of the meeting.
: 5. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions 1            2            3            4            5 or express their views.
: 6. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff.                                                            1            2            3            4            5
: 7. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff 1            2            3            4            5 were understandable, fair and balanced.
: 8. I am satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated 1            2            3            4            5 in the meeting.
OPTIONAL Name                                                                              Organization Check here if you would like a Telephone No.                                              E-Mail                                                                                    member of NRC staff to contact you.
OMB NO. 3150-0217                                                                                                                                                            Expires: (03/31/2017)
Public Protection Notification: If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
 
Please provide any suggestions you have on ways the NRC could improve their public meetings:
QR CODE UNITED STATES                                                                         NO POSTAGE NUCLEAR REGULATORY                                                                         NECESSARY COMMISSION                                                                             IF MAILED WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001                                                                        IN THE UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS MAIL            PERMIT NO. 12904                WASHINGTON DC POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MAIL STOP:         O-08G9A ATTN:    BHALCHANDRA K. VAIDYA (HQ Staff Only)
NAME AND OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR                      OR CHOOSE OFFICE    REGULATION                                    REGION        Select Region...
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001}}

Latest revision as of 15:19, 4 December 2019

La Salle, Units 1 and 2, MF8063 & MF8064, Meeting Feedback Form for July 15, 2016, Pre-Application Public Meeting Regarding Suppression Pool Swell, (NRC Form 659)
ML16195A325
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/2016
From: Bhalchandra Vaidya
Plant Licensing Branch III
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Vaidya B, NRR/DORL/LPL3-2, 415-3308
References
CAC MF8063, CAC MF8064
Download: ML16195A325 (2)


Text

NRC FORM 659 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2014)

Category NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK 1

Meeting Meeting LaSalle Units 1 and 2, Pre-Application Meeting - License Amendment Request -

JULY 15, 2016 Date:

Title:

Suppression Pool Swell Thank you for attending this public meeting hosted by the NRC. In order to help us understand your views about this meeting and improve future meetings, please take a couple minutes to answer the questions below.

There are several ways you can provide your feedback:

1) Scanning the Quick Response (QR) Code on the back of this form with your smartphone to link directly to our feedback page. If you do not have a QR reader on your mobile device, you can use your App store to access available QR scanning applications suitable for your device.
2) Through any computer by going to the Public Meeting Schedule and pressing the Meeting Feedback link for the specific meeting, or pressing the [more] link for a specific meeting and then pressing the Meeting Feedback link on the Meeting Details page.
3) By filling out this hard copy of our Public Meeting Feedback Form and providing it to an NRC staff member or mailing it in.

Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.

Note: You have up to 30 days after the meeting has ended to submit feedback on the public meeting that you've attended. Thank you again for your participation.

Please address the following statements in terms of your experience at the meeting. 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree."

"NEITHER "STRONGLY "STRONGLY "DISAGREE" AGREE OR "AGREE" DISAGREE" AGREE" DISAGREE"

1. The meeting achieved its stated purpose. 1 2 3 4 5
2. This meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed. 1 2 3 4 5
3. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were 1 2 3 4 5 reasonably convenient.
4. The meeting facility, room set up, microphones, and visuals 1 2 3 4 5 used contributed to the success of the meeting.
5. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions 1 2 3 4 5 or express their views.
6. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff. 1 2 3 4 5
7. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff 1 2 3 4 5 were understandable, fair and balanced.
8. I am satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated 1 2 3 4 5 in the meeting.

OPTIONAL Name Organization Check here if you would like a Telephone No. E-Mail member of NRC staff to contact you.

OMB NO. 3150-0217 Expires: (03/31/2017)

Public Protection Notification: If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

Please provide any suggestions you have on ways the NRC could improve their public meetings:

QR CODE UNITED STATES NO POSTAGE NUCLEAR REGULATORY NECESSARY COMMISSION IF MAILED WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 IN THE UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS MAIL PERMIT NO. 12904 WASHINGTON DC POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MAIL STOP: O-08G9A ATTN: BHALCHANDRA K. VAIDYA (HQ Staff Only)

NAME AND OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR OR CHOOSE OFFICE REGULATION REGION Select Region...

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001