ML17308A008: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17308A008
| number = ML17308A008
| issue date = 05/26/2016
| issue date = 05/26/2016
| title = 2016/05/26 Seabrook La - Status of Seabrook Rod - Your Question
| title = La - Status of Seabrook Rod - Your Question
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC
| author affiliation = NRC
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1SeabrookLANPEm ResourceFrom:Tran, TamSent:Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:50 PMTo:'Ossing, Michael'; Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.comCc:James, Lois; Mitchell, Jeffrey; Poole, Justin
{{#Wiki_filter:SeabrookLANPEm Resource From:                           Tran, Tam Sent:                           Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:50 PM To:                             'Ossing, Michael'; Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com Cc:                             James, Lois; Mitchell, Jeffrey; Poole, Justin


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Status of Seabrook ROD - your questionAttachments:ASR April 28 public meeting summary.docxMike and Ed, FYI You have a question in wanting to know more about the status of the Seabrook ROD and the implication of the Commission order on Indian Point. Lois will be on the Wednesday call, next week, and will have information regarding your questions. I will be on travel and will not be on the call.  
Status of Seabrook ROD - your question Attachments:                     ASR April 28 public meeting summary.docx Mike and Ed, FYI You have a question in wanting to know more about the status of the Seabrook ROD and the implication of the Commission order on Indian Point. Lois will be on the Wednesday call, next week, and will have information regarding your questions. I will be on travel and will not be on the call.
Also, attached is the meeting summary for the April 28 meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks/Tam.
1


Also, attached is the meeting summary for the April 28 meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks/Tam.
Hearing Identifier:     Seabrook_LA_NonPublic Email Number:           222 Mail Envelope Properties     (0c0f276308ad44d9b1bfec518e585e2b)
Hearing Identifier: Seabrook_LA_NonPublic Email Number: 222   Mail Envelope Properties   (0c0f276308ad44d9b1bfec518e585e2b)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Status of Seabrook ROD - your question Sent Date:   5/26/2016 1:49:32 PM Received Date: 5/26/2016 1:49:33 PM From:   Tran, Tam Created By:   Tam.Tran@nrc.gov Recipients:     "James, Lois" <Lois.James@nrc.gov>
Status of Seabrook ROD - your question Sent Date:               5/26/2016 1:49:32 PM Received Date:           5/26/2016 1:49:33 PM From:                   Tran, Tam Created By:             Tam.Tran@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None "Mitchell, Jeffrey" <>
"James, Lois" <Lois.James@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None
Tracking Status: None "Mitchell, Jeffrey" <>
"'Ossing, Michael'" <Michael.Ossing@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None "Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com" <Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:   HQPWMSMRS04.nrc.gov Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   448     5/26/2016 1:49:33 PM ASR April 28 public meeting summary.docx   36551   Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:
Tracking Status: None "Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>
April 28, 2016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting Summary Title: Public Meeting with NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Regarding the Issuance of Alkali-Silica Reaction Related Requests (Needs) for Additional Information for the License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1. Meeting Identifier: 20160552 Date of Meeting:   Thursday, April 28, 2016 Location:   NRC One White Flint North, Room T-8E8 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD Type of Meeting:   Category 1 Purpose of the Meeting(s): The purpose of this public meeting is for NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) to discuss with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff about (a) the staff's request (need) for information (RAI) and (b) NextEra's plan for response to the staff's need for information and the completion of the licensing action for Seabrook Station (Seabrook) license renewal. General Details: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) held a meeting on January 19, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 a.m. EST. The meetings began with an introduction, a review of meeting ground rules for category 1 meeting, and introductions of all in attendance.
Tracking Status: None
Jane Marshall, Deputy Director of Division of License Renewal, provided the opening remarks emphasizing the importance of the meeting outcome for clear technical understanding between the applicant and the staff regarding the ASR issues and path forward. NextEra and the staff engaged in technical discussion regarding the staff concerns and the SER open item regarding ASR monitoring AMP path forward as presented by NextEra. Following the discussion, the meeting was opened for the public to interact with NRC staff. Approximately 27 people participated in the meeting. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line (i.e., self-identified in the call-in line). Meeting participants included representatives from NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, NextEra corporate, MPR Associates, and NRC staff. Summary of Presentation (Meeting): The NRC Project Manager for the license renewal review of the Seabrook license renewal application provided a brief overview of the generic license renewal review process, the current status of the review for Seabrook, and the open item related to Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR). NextEra then presented their prepared slides (relative to   the staff safety concerns and issues), as provided in the attachment. Significant technical points of discussion are listed below:
"'Ossing, Michael'" <Michael.Ossing@nexteraenergy.com>
* NextEra stated that all MPR/University of Texas (UT) test programs are completed, and Owner's Acceptance Review of the test reports is in progress.
Tracking Status: None "Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com" <Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com>
* NextEra stated that while Seabrook-specific research performed by UT was complete, the AMP would be updated include provisions to evaluate and incorporate impact of applicable future research data on adequacy of the AMP as operating experience as it becomes available. NextEra also stated that the ASR Aging Management Program (AMP) will be submitted as complete once UT research results are integrated, and it is not dependent upon ongoing industry research. NextEra agreed to provide a thorough description as a commitment in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) supplement and the AMP operating experience section, of how applicable future research would be incorporated into the program.
Tracking Status: None Post Office:             HQPWMSMRS04.nrc.gov Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         448                     5/26/2016 1:49:33 PM ASR April 28 public meeting summary.docx                       36551 Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
 
April 28, 2016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting Summary
 
==Title:==
Public Meeting with NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Regarding the Issuance of Alkali-Silica Reaction Related Requests (Needs) for Additional Information for the License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1.
Meeting Identifier:   20160552 Date of Meeting:       Thursday, April 28, 2016 Location:             NRC One White Flint North, Room T-8E8 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD Type of Meeting:       Category 1 Purpose of the Meeting(s):
The purpose of this public meeting is for NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) to discuss with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff about (a) the staffs request (need) for information (RAI) and (b) NextEras plan for response to the staffs need for information and the completion of the licensing action for Seabrook Station (Seabrook) license renewal.
General Details:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) held a meeting on January 19, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 a.m. EST. The meetings began with an introduction, a review of meeting ground rules for category 1 meeting, and introductions of all in attendance.
Jane Marshall, Deputy Director of Division of License Renewal, provided the opening remarks emphasizing the importance of the meeting outcome for clear technical understanding between the applicant and the staff regarding the ASR issues and path forward.
NextEra and the staff engaged in technical discussion regarding the staff concerns and the SER open item regarding ASR monitoring AMP path forward as presented by NextEra. Following the discussion, the meeting was opened for the public to interact with NRC staff.
Approximately 27 people participated in the meeting. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line (i.e., self-identified in the call-in line). Meeting participants included representatives from NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, NextEra corporate, MPR Associates, and NRC staff.
Summary of Presentation (Meeting):
The NRC Project Manager for the license renewal review of the Seabrook license renewal application provided a brief overview of the generic license renewal review process, the current status of the review for Seabrook, and the open item related to Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR). NextEra then presented their prepared slides (relative to
 
the staff safety concerns and issues), as provided in the attachment. Significant technical points of discussion are listed below:
* NextEra stated that all MPR/University of Texas (UT) test programs are completed, and Owners Acceptance Review of the test reports is in progress.
* NextEra stated that while Seabrook-specific research performed by UT was complete, the AMP would be updated include provisions to evaluate and incorporate impact of applicable future research data on adequacy of the AMP as operating experience as it becomes available. NextEra also stated that the ASR Aging Management Program (AMP) will be submitted as complete once UT research results are integrated, and it is not dependent upon ongoing industry research.
NextEra agreed to provide a thorough description as a commitment in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) supplement and the AMP operating experience section, of how applicable future research would be incorporated into the program.
* NextEra agreed to include within the AMP a plan to provide in-plant corroboration of the methodology in MPR-4153 to correlate large-scale test results with performance of ASR-affected Seabrook structures, with a description of the methodology used.
* NextEra agreed to include within the AMP a plan to provide in-plant corroboration of the methodology in MPR-4153 to correlate large-scale test results with performance of ASR-affected Seabrook structures, with a description of the methodology used.
* The staff requested clarification whether misaligned or distorted equipment is the parameter monitored to provide indications that cracking is occurring that leads to building deformation. NextEra stated that misaligned or distorted equipment is only used as indicator, and that that actual parameters monitored in accordance with the AMP are on the structures themselves, via measurements from combined cracking indexing, extensometers, etc. NextEra agreed to clearly indicate in the AMP what parameters will be monitored and make a clear distinction between structural and non-structural components
* The staff requested clarification whether misaligned or distorted equipment is the parameter monitored to provide indications that cracking is occurring that leads to building deformation. NextEra stated that misaligned or distorted equipment is only used as indicator, and that that actual parameters monitored in accordance with the AMP are on the structures themselves, via measurements from combined cracking indexing, extensometers, etc. NextEra agreed to clearly indicate in the AMP what parameters will be monitored and make a clear distinction between structural and non-structural components
* The staff stated that it expects the methodology derived from the Texas testing for use in the ASR AMP will be validated (corroborated) with data and observations obtained from Seabrook structures.
* The staff stated that it expects the methodology derived from the Texas testing for use in the ASR AMP will be validated (corroborated) with data and observations obtained from Seabrook structures.
* The staff expects that in the revised ASR AMP, the data will be presented with descriptions that are self-explanatory relative to either (a) micro-cracking or (b) global manifestations (macro-cracking, building deformation), to avoid seemingly inconsistency in technical descriptions.
* The staff expects that in the revised ASR AMP, the data will be presented with descriptions that are self-explanatory relative to either (a) micro-cracking or (b) global manifestations (macro-cracking, building deformation), to avoid seemingly inconsistency in technical descriptions.
* The applicant stated that it understands the staff's needs for further information to make a reasonable assurance determination on the ASR open item in the license renewal application review (i.e., compelling explanation). Public Participation Themes: There was no comment or question during the public interaction period. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line. Next Step:   The NextEra plans to have a license amendment request pre-application meeting on ASR during the month of June 2016. NextEra plans to submit the revised ASR Monitoring Aging Management Program in July 2016. Attachments:
* The applicant stated that it understands the staffs needs for further information to make a reasonable assurance determination on the ASR open item in the license renewal application review (i.e., compelling explanation).
Public Participation Themes:
There was no comment or question during the public interaction period. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line.
Next Step:
 
The NextEra plans to have a license amendment request pre-application meeting on ASR during the month of June 2016. NextEra plans to submit the revised ASR Monitoring Aging Management Program in July 2016.
Attachments:
* Meeting description and agenda - ML16109A004
* Meeting description and agenda - ML16109A004
* Attendance List - MLxxxxxx
* Attendance List - MLxxxxxx
* Seabrook presentation - MLxxxxx   Public Participation Themes: There was no comment or question during the public interaction period. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line. Next Step: The NextEra plans to have a license amendment request pre-application meeting on ASR during the month of June 2016. NextEra plans to submit the revised ASR Aging Management Program in July 2016. Attachments: o Meeting description and agenda - ML16109A004 o Attendance List - MLxxxxxx o Seabrook presentation - MLxxxxx ADAMS Accession No.: MLXXXXXX                                  *concurred via email OFFICE LA:RPB:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR RASB:DLR OGC BC:RPB1:DLR NAME IBetts TTran/JMitchellB.Wittick M.Ring YDiaz-Sanabria DATE     /   /2016       /   /2016       /   /2016 OFFICE RECORD COPY DISTRIBUTION:   Listserv Lois James   U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Yoira Diaz-Sanabria   NRC Brian Wittick   NRC George Thomas NRC Angela Buford   NRC Justin Poole   NRC Fred Bower   NRC Matt Ring   NRC Jenny Weil   NRC Larry Nicholson NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (Seabrook)
* Seabrook presentation - MLxxxxx
Michael Ossing Seabrook Edward Carley Seabrook Ken Brown   Seabrook Brian Brown   Seabrook}}
 
Public Participation Themes:
There was no comment or question during the public interaction period. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line.
Next Step:
The NextEra plans to have a license amendment request pre-application meeting on ASR during the month of June 2016. NextEra plans to submit the revised ASR Aging Management Program in July 2016.
Attachments:
o   Meeting description and agenda - ML16109A004 o   Attendance List - MLxxxxxx o   Seabrook presentation - MLxxxxx ADAMS Accession No.: MLXXXXXX                                  *concurred via email OFFICE LA:RPB:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR RASB:DLR                         OGC         BC:RPB1:DLR NAME       IBetts         TTran/JMitchell B.Wittick           M.Ring     YDiaz-Sanabria DATE         / /2016         / /2016                                         / /2016 OFFICE RECORD COPY
 
DISTRIBUTION:
Listserv Lois James         U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Yoira Diaz-Sanabria NRC Brian Wittick       NRC George Thomas       NRC Angela Buford       NRC Justin Poole       NRC Fred Bower         NRC Matt Ring           NRC Jenny Weil         NRC Larry Nicholson     NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (Seabrook)
Michael Ossing     Seabrook Edward Carley       Seabrook Ken Brown           Seabrook Brian Brown         Seabrook}}

Latest revision as of 21:15, 2 December 2019

La - Status of Seabrook Rod - Your Question
ML17308A008
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/26/2016
From:
NRC
To:
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
17-953-02-LA-BD01
Download: ML17308A008 (7)


Text

SeabrookLANPEm Resource From: Tran, Tam Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 1:50 PM To: 'Ossing, Michael'; Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com Cc: James, Lois; Mitchell, Jeffrey; Poole, Justin

Subject:

Status of Seabrook ROD - your question Attachments: ASR April 28 public meeting summary.docx Mike and Ed, FYI You have a question in wanting to know more about the status of the Seabrook ROD and the implication of the Commission order on Indian Point. Lois will be on the Wednesday call, next week, and will have information regarding your questions. I will be on travel and will not be on the call.

Also, attached is the meeting summary for the April 28 meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks/Tam.

1

Hearing Identifier: Seabrook_LA_NonPublic Email Number: 222 Mail Envelope Properties (0c0f276308ad44d9b1bfec518e585e2b)

Subject:

Status of Seabrook ROD - your question Sent Date: 5/26/2016 1:49:32 PM Received Date: 5/26/2016 1:49:33 PM From: Tran, Tam Created By: Tam.Tran@nrc.gov Recipients:

"James, Lois" <Lois.James@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Mitchell, Jeffrey" <>

Tracking Status: None "Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

"'Ossing, Michael'" <Michael.Ossing@nexteraenergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com" <Edward.Carley@nexteraenergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS04.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 448 5/26/2016 1:49:33 PM ASR April 28 public meeting summary.docx 36551 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

April 28, 2016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting Summary

Title:

Public Meeting with NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Regarding the Issuance of Alkali-Silica Reaction Related Requests (Needs) for Additional Information for the License Renewal of Seabrook Station, Unit 1.

Meeting Identifier: 20160552 Date of Meeting: Thursday, April 28, 2016 Location: NRC One White Flint North, Room T-8E8 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD Type of Meeting: Category 1 Purpose of the Meeting(s):

The purpose of this public meeting is for NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) to discuss with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff about (a) the staffs request (need) for information (RAI) and (b) NextEras plan for response to the staffs need for information and the completion of the licensing action for Seabrook Station (Seabrook) license renewal.

General Details:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) held a meeting on January 19, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 a.m. EST. The meetings began with an introduction, a review of meeting ground rules for category 1 meeting, and introductions of all in attendance.

Jane Marshall, Deputy Director of Division of License Renewal, provided the opening remarks emphasizing the importance of the meeting outcome for clear technical understanding between the applicant and the staff regarding the ASR issues and path forward.

NextEra and the staff engaged in technical discussion regarding the staff concerns and the SER open item regarding ASR monitoring AMP path forward as presented by NextEra. Following the discussion, the meeting was opened for the public to interact with NRC staff.

Approximately 27 people participated in the meeting. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line (i.e., self-identified in the call-in line). Meeting participants included representatives from NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, NextEra corporate, MPR Associates, and NRC staff.

Summary of Presentation (Meeting):

The NRC Project Manager for the license renewal review of the Seabrook license renewal application provided a brief overview of the generic license renewal review process, the current status of the review for Seabrook, and the open item related to Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR). NextEra then presented their prepared slides (relative to

the staff safety concerns and issues), as provided in the attachment. Significant technical points of discussion are listed below:

  • NextEra stated that all MPR/University of Texas (UT) test programs are completed, and Owners Acceptance Review of the test reports is in progress.
  • NextEra stated that while Seabrook-specific research performed by UT was complete, the AMP would be updated include provisions to evaluate and incorporate impact of applicable future research data on adequacy of the AMP as operating experience as it becomes available. NextEra also stated that the ASR Aging Management Program (AMP) will be submitted as complete once UT research results are integrated, and it is not dependent upon ongoing industry research.

NextEra agreed to provide a thorough description as a commitment in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) supplement and the AMP operating experience section, of how applicable future research would be incorporated into the program.

  • NextEra agreed to include within the AMP a plan to provide in-plant corroboration of the methodology in MPR-4153 to correlate large-scale test results with performance of ASR-affected Seabrook structures, with a description of the methodology used.
  • The staff requested clarification whether misaligned or distorted equipment is the parameter monitored to provide indications that cracking is occurring that leads to building deformation. NextEra stated that misaligned or distorted equipment is only used as indicator, and that that actual parameters monitored in accordance with the AMP are on the structures themselves, via measurements from combined cracking indexing, extensometers, etc. NextEra agreed to clearly indicate in the AMP what parameters will be monitored and make a clear distinction between structural and non-structural components
  • The staff stated that it expects the methodology derived from the Texas testing for use in the ASR AMP will be validated (corroborated) with data and observations obtained from Seabrook structures.
  • The staff expects that in the revised ASR AMP, the data will be presented with descriptions that are self-explanatory relative to either (a) micro-cracking or (b) global manifestations (macro-cracking, building deformation), to avoid seemingly inconsistency in technical descriptions.
  • The applicant stated that it understands the staffs needs for further information to make a reasonable assurance determination on the ASR open item in the license renewal application review (i.e., compelling explanation).

Public Participation Themes:

There was no comment or question during the public interaction period. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line.

Next Step:

The NextEra plans to have a license amendment request pre-application meeting on ASR during the month of June 2016. NextEra plans to submit the revised ASR Monitoring Aging Management Program in July 2016.

Attachments:

  • Attendance List - MLxxxxxx
  • Seabrook presentation - MLxxxxx

Public Participation Themes:

There was no comment or question during the public interaction period. No members of the public attended the meeting or participated in the call-in line.

Next Step:

The NextEra plans to have a license amendment request pre-application meeting on ASR during the month of June 2016. NextEra plans to submit the revised ASR Aging Management Program in July 2016.

Attachments:

o Meeting description and agenda - ML16109A004 o Attendance List - MLxxxxxx o Seabrook presentation - MLxxxxx ADAMS Accession No.: MLXXXXXX *concurred via email OFFICE LA:RPB:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR RASB:DLR OGC BC:RPB1:DLR NAME IBetts TTran/JMitchell B.Wittick M.Ring YDiaz-Sanabria DATE / /2016 / /2016 / /2016 OFFICE RECORD COPY

DISTRIBUTION:

Listserv Lois James U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Yoira Diaz-Sanabria NRC Brian Wittick NRC George Thomas NRC Angela Buford NRC Justin Poole NRC Fred Bower NRC Matt Ring NRC Jenny Weil NRC Larry Nicholson NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (Seabrook)

Michael Ossing Seabrook Edward Carley Seabrook Ken Brown Seabrook Brian Brown Seabrook