Information Notice 2001-14, Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/03/2001
| issue date = 10/03/2001
| title = Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves
| title = Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves
| author name = Imbro E V
| author name = Imbro E
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/REXB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/REXB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
| revision = 0
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
 
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 3, 2001 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 2001-14: PROBLEMS WITH INCORRECTLY-INSTALLED
 
SWING-CHECK VALVES
 
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have ceased
 
operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
 
==Purpose==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
 
addressees to swing-check valve problems caused by incorrect installation. It is expected that
 
recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as
 
appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information
 
notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
 
==Description of Circumstances==
 
===Cooper Nuclear Station===
While trouble-shooting a leaking check valve between the reactor core isolation cooling
 
barometric condenser and the suppression pool, the licensee determined that a check valve
 
had been installed rotated 90 degrees away from the orientation recommended by the valve
 
vendor. According to the vendors technical manual, the valve should have been installed either
 
in a horizontal line with the hinge pin centerline vertical or in a vertical line with flow upward.
 
The staff documents this problem with certain Anderson-Greenwood check valves in Inspection
 
Report 50-298/98-05 (NUDOCS Accession Number 9809240061).1*
The check valves of concern are designed so that, when installed in a horizontal run of piping, the axis of the hinge is vertical and the check valve disc pivots in the horizontal plane, like a
 
door. The licensee incorrectly installed the valves with the hinge pin horizontal, so the disc did
 
not pivot in the horizontal plane as required. The disc face pivoted from a horizontal plane, on
 
forward flow, to a vertical plane on flow reversal. Therefore, the disc tended to hang open on
 
reversal and cessation of flow. This effect can be visualized from attached Figure 1, which
 
shows the relationship of the center of gravity of the disc to the axis of the hinge pin. The
 
spring shown wound around the hinge pin is intended to close the valve against only the design
 
frictional and drag forces expected to exist with the hinge pin vertical or with the valve in a
 
ML012710212
        1
                *NUDOCS documents can be accessed at the NRC Public Document Rooms vertical run of pipe; it was not designed to overcome the gravitational force that would tend to
 
hold the valve open when the hinge pin axis is horizontal and the valve is in a horizontal run of
 
pipe.
 
As part of its actions to correct this problem, the licensee identified several other check valves
 
of this type installed with this incorrect orientation.
 
===Palo Verde Nuclear Station===
The licensee experienced excessive leakage through some Borg-Warner swing-check valves in
 
the high-pressure safety injection (HPSI) system. The root cause of the problem was
 
determined to be an error in valve assembly during the original installation. As a result, the disc
 
assembly was suspended too low inside the body of the valve. With the disc assembly
 
suspended too low, the valve might have seated acceptably at first but remained partially open
 
after forward flow exercised the valve.
 
The improper assembly occurred during plant construction. The licensee removed the internals
 
of these valves so the valve bodies could be welded into the piping. During reassembly of the
 
internals, the bonnet retaining ring was threaded into the body until it bottomed. The original
 
factory assembly process included a step that involved backing out the bonnet retaining ring, after it bottomed in the valve body, until the correct disc height was obtained, as visually
 
observed through the open ends of the valve body. At Palo Verde, however, the valve had
 
been installed in the piping and the valve internals could not be observed. Therefore, the disc
 
height adjustment could not be made during valve reassembly, and the disc remained too low in
 
the body to engage the seat properly.
 
The NRC staff had addressed this problem in Information Notice IN 89-62, Malfunction of
 
Borg-Warner Pressure Seal Bonnet Check Valves Caused by Vertical Misalignment of Disk, dated August 31, 1989 (NUDOCS Accession Number 8908240375). After IN 89-62 was
 
issued, the valve vendor issued maintenance guidance to recommend that measurements of an
 
internal critical dimension be done to ensure that the disc is in the correct position following
 
maintenance.
 
Until November 1994, the licensees maintenance procedure for these check valves did not
 
include adequate instructions for ensuring correct vertical positioning of the disc. Once the
 
problem was diagnosed in 1998, the licensee implemented a plan to identify and correct the
 
error on all of the HPSI discharge check valves. The NRC staff described the licensees
 
actions on this problem in Inspection Report 50-528/529/530 98-14 (NUDOCS Accession
 
Number 9809090298).
 
Discussion
 
As a result of the installation and maintenance errors discussed in this information notice, some
 
check valves did not seat properly. Furthermore, the problems at Cooper and Palo Verde
 
reveal the importance of timely incorporation of vendor recommendations into work instructions
 
to ensure that check valves are installed and maintained properly. Specifically, the problems highlight the need to install Anderson Greenwood check valves in accordance with vendor
 
guidance and to ensure that the Borg-Warner check valve disc is in its correct vertical position.
 
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. However, recipients are
 
reminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC
 
information notices), where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations
 
under 10 CFR 50.65, Requirement for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear
 
Power Plants. If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact
 
one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor
 
Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
/RA Patrick M. Madden Acting for/
                                                Eugene V. Imbro, Acting Chief
 
Operational Experience
 
and Non-Power Reactors Branch
 
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts:    Charles Marschall, Region IV                Robert Benedict, NRR
 
(817) 860-8185                              (301) 415-1157 E-mail: csm@nrc.gov                          E-mail: rab1@nrc.gov
 
Attachments:
1. Figure 1. Anderson Greenwood Check Valve
 
2. Figure 2. Borg-Warner Check Valve With Disk Jammed in Open Position
 
3. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
 
ML012710212                                  TEMPLATE NO.=NRR-052
      *See previous concurrence
 
OFFICE    REXB            Tech Editor      RIV            C:EMEB        REXB              AC:REXB
 
NAME      RBenedict*      PKleene*        CMarschall PKuo*              JTappert          EVImbro
 
DATE      09/06/2001      09/ 04 /2001        /  /2001 09/26/2001          / /2001          / /2001
 
===Attachment 1===
Attachment 2 Attachment 3 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
 
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
 
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information                                        Date of
 
Notice No.              Subject                    Issuance  Issued to
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
2001-13          Inadequate Standby Liquid        10/03/01    All holders of operating licenses
 
Control System Relief Valve                  for boiling water reactors
 
Margin
 
2001-12          Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear        8/08/01    All holders of operating licenses
 
(ERRATA)          Power Stations                              or construction permits for
 
nuclear power reactors except
 
those who have ceased
 
operations and have certified that
 
fuel has been permanently
 
removed from the reactor vessel
 
2001-12          Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear        7/13/01    All holders of operating licenses
 
Power Stations                              or construction permits for
 
nuclear power reactors except
 
those who have ceased
 
operations and have certified that
 
fuel has been permanently
 
removed from the reactor vessel
 
2001-11          Thefts of Portable Gauges        07/13/01    All portable gauge licensees
 
2001-10          Failure of Central Sprinkler    06/28/01    All holders of licenses for nuclear
 
Company Model GB Series                      power, research, and test
 
Fire Sprinkler Heads                        reactors and fuel cycle facilities
 
2001-09          Main Feedwater System            06/12/01    All holders of operating licenses
 
Degradation in Safety-Related                for pressurized water nuclear
 
ASME Code Class 2 Piping                    power reactors, except those who
 
Inside the Containment of a                  have permanently ceased
 
Pressurized Water Reactor                    operations and have certified that
 
fuel has been permanently
 
removed from the reactor vessel
 
2001-08          Update on the Investigation of  06/06/01    All Medical Licensees
 
Supplement 1      Patient Deaths in Panama, Following Radiation Therapy
 
Overexposures
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License
 
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 05:41, 24 November 2019

Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves
ML012710212
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/03/2001
From: Imbro E
Operational Experience and Non-Power Reactors Branch
To:
vsb
References
TAC MA2314 IN-01-014
Download: ML012710212 (6)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 3, 2001 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 2001-14: PROBLEMS WITH INCORRECTLY-INSTALLED

SWING-CHECK VALVES

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have ceased

operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to swing-check valve problems caused by incorrect installation. It is expected that

recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as

appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information

notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

Cooper Nuclear Station

While trouble-shooting a leaking check valve between the reactor core isolation cooling

barometric condenser and the suppression pool, the licensee determined that a check valve

had been installed rotated 90 degrees away from the orientation recommended by the valve

vendor. According to the vendors technical manual, the valve should have been installed either

in a horizontal line with the hinge pin centerline vertical or in a vertical line with flow upward.

The staff documents this problem with certain Anderson-Greenwood check valves in Inspection

Report 50-298/98-05 (NUDOCS Accession Number 9809240061).1*

The check valves of concern are designed so that, when installed in a horizontal run of piping, the axis of the hinge is vertical and the check valve disc pivots in the horizontal plane, like a

door. The licensee incorrectly installed the valves with the hinge pin horizontal, so the disc did

not pivot in the horizontal plane as required. The disc face pivoted from a horizontal plane, on

forward flow, to a vertical plane on flow reversal. Therefore, the disc tended to hang open on

reversal and cessation of flow. This effect can be visualized from attached Figure 1, which

shows the relationship of the center of gravity of the disc to the axis of the hinge pin. The

spring shown wound around the hinge pin is intended to close the valve against only the design

frictional and drag forces expected to exist with the hinge pin vertical or with the valve in a

ML012710212

1

  • NUDOCS documents can be accessed at the NRC Public Document Rooms vertical run of pipe; it was not designed to overcome the gravitational force that would tend to

hold the valve open when the hinge pin axis is horizontal and the valve is in a horizontal run of

pipe.

As part of its actions to correct this problem, the licensee identified several other check valves

of this type installed with this incorrect orientation.

Palo Verde Nuclear Station

The licensee experienced excessive leakage through some Borg-Warner swing-check valves in

the high-pressure safety injection (HPSI) system. The root cause of the problem was

determined to be an error in valve assembly during the original installation. As a result, the disc

assembly was suspended too low inside the body of the valve. With the disc assembly

suspended too low, the valve might have seated acceptably at first but remained partially open

after forward flow exercised the valve.

The improper assembly occurred during plant construction. The licensee removed the internals

of these valves so the valve bodies could be welded into the piping. During reassembly of the

internals, the bonnet retaining ring was threaded into the body until it bottomed. The original

factory assembly process included a step that involved backing out the bonnet retaining ring, after it bottomed in the valve body, until the correct disc height was obtained, as visually

observed through the open ends of the valve body. At Palo Verde, however, the valve had

been installed in the piping and the valve internals could not be observed. Therefore, the disc

height adjustment could not be made during valve reassembly, and the disc remained too low in

the body to engage the seat properly.

The NRC staff had addressed this problem in Information Notice IN 89-62, Malfunction of

Borg-Warner Pressure Seal Bonnet Check Valves Caused by Vertical Misalignment of Disk, dated August 31, 1989 (NUDOCS Accession Number 8908240375). After IN 89-62 was

issued, the valve vendor issued maintenance guidance to recommend that measurements of an

internal critical dimension be done to ensure that the disc is in the correct position following

maintenance.

Until November 1994, the licensees maintenance procedure for these check valves did not

include adequate instructions for ensuring correct vertical positioning of the disc. Once the

problem was diagnosed in 1998, the licensee implemented a plan to identify and correct the

error on all of the HPSI discharge check valves. The NRC staff described the licensees

actions on this problem in Inspection Report 50-528/529/530 98-14 (NUDOCS Accession

Number 9809090298).

Discussion

As a result of the installation and maintenance errors discussed in this information notice, some

check valves did not seat properly. Furthermore, the problems at Cooper and Palo Verde

reveal the importance of timely incorporation of vendor recommendations into work instructions

to ensure that check valves are installed and maintained properly. Specifically, the problems highlight the need to install Anderson Greenwood check valves in accordance with vendor

guidance and to ensure that the Borg-Warner check valve disc is in its correct vertical position.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. However, recipients are

reminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC

information notices), where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations

under 10 CFR 50.65, Requirement for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear

Power Plants. If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA Patrick M. Madden Acting for/

Eugene V. Imbro, Acting Chief

Operational Experience

and Non-Power Reactors Branch

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Charles Marschall, Region IV Robert Benedict, NRR

(817) 860-8185 (301) 415-1157 E-mail: csm@nrc.gov E-mail: rab1@nrc.gov

Attachments:

1. Figure 1. Anderson Greenwood Check Valve

2. Figure 2. Borg-Warner Check Valve With Disk Jammed in Open Position

3. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

ML012710212 TEMPLATE NO.=NRR-052

  • See previous concurrence

OFFICE REXB Tech Editor RIV C:EMEB REXB AC:REXB

NAME RBenedict* PKleene* CMarschall PKuo* JTappert EVImbro

DATE 09/06/2001 09/ 04 /2001 / /2001 09/26/2001 / /2001 / /2001

Attachment 1

Attachment 2 Attachment 3 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

______________________________________________________________________________________

2001-13 Inadequate Standby Liquid 10/03/01 All holders of operating licenses

Control System Relief Valve for boiling water reactors

Margin

2001-12 Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear 8/08/01 All holders of operating licenses

(ERRATA) Power Stations or construction permits for

nuclear power reactors except

those who have ceased

operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

2001-12 Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear 7/13/01 All holders of operating licenses

Power Stations or construction permits for

nuclear power reactors except

those who have ceased

operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

2001-11 Thefts of Portable Gauges 07/13/01 All portable gauge licensees

2001-10 Failure of Central Sprinkler 06/28/01 All holders of licenses for nuclear

Company Model GB Series power, research, and test

Fire Sprinkler Heads reactors and fuel cycle facilities

2001-09 Main Feedwater System 06/12/01 All holders of operating licenses

Degradation in Safety-Related for pressurized water nuclear

ASME Code Class 2 Piping power reactors, except those who

Inside the Containment of a have permanently ceased

Pressurized Water Reactor operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

2001-08 Update on the Investigation of 06/06/01 All Medical Licensees

Supplement 1 Patient Deaths in Panama, Following Radiation Therapy

Overexposures

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit