Information Notice 2001-14, Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/03/2001
| issue date = 10/03/2001
| title = Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves
| title = Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves
| author name = Imbro E V
| author name = Imbro E
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/REXB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/REXB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:1*NUDOCS documents can be accessed at the NRC Public Document RoomsUNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001October 3, 2001NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 2001-14:PROBLEMS WITH INCORRECTLY-INSTALLEDSWING-CHECK VALVES
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
 
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 3, 2001 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 2001-14: PROBLEMS WITH INCORRECTLY-INSTALLED
 
SWING-CHECK VALVES


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have ceasedoperations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have ceased
 
operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alertaddressees to swing-check valve problems caused by incorrect installation. It is expected that
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
 
addressees to swing-check valve problems caused by incorrect installation. It is expected that


recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as
recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as


appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information
appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information


notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.


==Description of Circumstances==
==Description of Circumstances==
Cooper Nuclear StationWhile trouble-shooting a leaking check valve between the reactor core isolation coolingbarometric condenser and the suppression pool, the licensee determined that a check valve
 
===Cooper Nuclear Station===
While trouble-shooting a leaking check valve between the reactor core isolation cooling
 
barometric condenser and the suppression pool, the licensee determined that a check valve


had been installed rotated 90 degrees away from the orientation recommended by the valve
had been installed rotated 90 degrees away from the orientation recommended by the valve


vendor. According to the vendor's technical manual, the valve should have been installed either
vendor. According to the vendors technical manual, the valve should have been installed either


in a horizontal line with the hinge pin centerline vertical or in a vertical line with flow upward.
in a horizontal line with the hinge pin centerline vertical or in a vertical line with flow upward.
Line 40: Line 56:
The staff documents this problem with certain Anderson-Greenwood check valves in Inspection
The staff documents this problem with certain Anderson-Greenwood check valves in Inspection


Report 50-298/98-05 (NUDOCS Accession Number 9809240061).
Report 50-298/98-05 (NUDOCS Accession Number 9809240061).1*
The check valves of concern are designed so that, when installed in a horizontal run of piping, the axis of the hinge is vertical and the check valve disc pivots in the horizontal plane, like a
 
door. The licensee incorrectly installed the valves with the hinge pin horizontal, so the disc did
 
not pivot in the horizontal plane as required. The disc face pivoted from a horizontal plane, on
 
forward flow, to a vertical plane on flow reversal. Therefore, the disc tended to hang open on
 
reversal and cessation of flow. This effect can be visualized from attached Figure 1, which
 
shows the relationship of the center of gravity of the disc to the axis of the hinge pin. The


1*The check valves of concern are designed so that, when installed in a horizontal run of piping,the axis of the hinge is vertical and the check valve disc pivots in the horizontal plane, like a
spring shown wound around the hinge pin is intended to close the valve against only the design


door.  The licensee incorrectly installed the valves with the hinge pin horizontal, so the disc did
frictional and drag forces expected to exist with the hinge pin vertical or with the valve in a


not pivot in the horizontal plane as required.  The disc face pivoted from a horizontal plane, on
ML012710212
        1
                *NUDOCS documents can be accessed at the NRC Public Document Rooms vertical run of pipe; it was not designed to overcome the gravitational force that would tend to


forward flow, to a vertical plane on flow reversal.  Therefore, the disc tended to hang open on
hold the valve open when the hinge pin axis is horizontal and the valve is in a horizontal run of


reversal and cessation of flow. This effect can be visualized from attached Figure 1, which
pipe.


shows the relationship of the center of gravity of the disc to the axis of the hinge pin.  The
As part of its actions to correct this problem, the licensee identified several other check valves


spring shown wound around the hinge pin is intended to close the valve against only the design
of this type installed with this incorrect orientation.


frictional and drag forces expected to exist with the hinge pin vertical or with the valve in a  vertical run of pipe; it was not designed to overcome the gravitational force that would tend tohold the valve open when the hinge pin axis is horizontal and the valve is in a horizontal run of
===Palo Verde Nuclear Station===
The licensee experienced excessive leakage through some Borg-Warner swing-check valves in


pipe.As part of its actions to correct this problem, the licensee identified several other check valvesof this type installed with this incorrect orientation.Palo Verde Nuclear StationThe licensee experienced excessive leakage through some Borg-Warner swing-check valves inthe high-pressure safety injection (HPSI) system. The root cause of the problem was
the high-pressure safety injection (HPSI) system. The root cause of the problem was


determined to be an error in valve assembly during the original installation. As a result, the disc
determined to be an error in valve assembly during the original installation. As a result, the disc


assembly was suspended too low inside the body of the valve. With the disc assembly
assembly was suspended too low inside the body of the valve. With the disc assembly


suspended too low, the valve might have seated acceptably at first but remained partially open
suspended too low, the valve might have seated acceptably at first but remained partially open


after forward flow exercised the valve.The improper assembly occurred during plant construction. The licensee removed the internalsof these valves so the valve bodies could be welded into the piping.  During reassembly of the
after forward flow exercised the valve.
 
The improper assembly occurred during plant construction. The licensee removed the internals


internals, the bonnet retaining ring was threaded into the body until it bottomed. The original
of these valves so the valve bodies could be welded into the piping. During reassembly of the
 
internals, the bonnet retaining ring was threaded into the body until it bottomed. The original


factory assembly process included a step that involved backing out the bonnet retaining ring, after it bottomed in the valve body, until the correct disc height was obtained, as visually
factory assembly process included a step that involved backing out the bonnet retaining ring, after it bottomed in the valve body, until the correct disc height was obtained, as visually


observed through the open ends of the valve body. At Palo Verde, however, the valve had
observed through the open ends of the valve body. At Palo Verde, however, the valve had


been installed in the piping and the valve internals could not be observed. Therefore, the disc
been installed in the piping and the valve internals could not be observed. Therefore, the disc


height adjustment could not be made during valve reassembly, and the disc remained too low in
height adjustment could not be made during valve reassembly, and the disc remained too low in


the body to engage the seat properly. The NRC staff had addressed this problem in Information Notice IN 89-62, "Malfunction ofBorg-Warner Pressure Seal Bonnet Check Valves Caused by Vertical Misalignment of Disk,"
the body to engage the seat properly.
dated August 31, 1989 (NUDOCS Accession Number 8908240375). After IN 89-62 was
 
The NRC staff had addressed this problem in Information Notice IN 89-62, Malfunction of
 
Borg-Warner Pressure Seal Bonnet Check Valves Caused by Vertical Misalignment of Disk, dated August 31, 1989 (NUDOCS Accession Number 8908240375). After IN 89-62 was


issued, the valve vendor issued maintenance guidance to recommend that measurements of an
issued, the valve vendor issued maintenance guidance to recommend that measurements of an
Line 85: Line 122:
internal critical dimension be done to ensure that the disc is in the correct position following
internal critical dimension be done to ensure that the disc is in the correct position following


maintenance.Until November 1994, the licensee's maintenance procedure for these check valves did notinclude adequate instructions for ensuring correct vertical positioning of the disc. Once the
maintenance.
 
Until November 1994, the licensees maintenance procedure for these check valves did not
 
include adequate instructions for ensuring correct vertical positioning of the disc. Once the


problem was diagnosed in 1998, the licensee implemented a plan to identify and correct the
problem was diagnosed in 1998, the licensee implemented a plan to identify and correct the


error on all of the HPSI discharge check valves. The NRC staff described the licensee's
error on all of the HPSI discharge check valves. The NRC staff described the licensees


actions on this problem in Inspection Report 50-528/529/530 98-14 (NUDOCS Accession
actions on this problem in Inspection Report 50-528/529/530 98-14 (NUDOCS Accession
Line 95: Line 136:
Number 9809090298).
Number 9809090298).


DiscussionAs a result of the installation and maintenance errors discussed in this information notice, somecheck valves did not seat properly. Furthermore, the problems at Cooper and Palo Verde
Discussion
 
As a result of the installation and maintenance errors discussed in this information notice, some
 
check valves did not seat properly. Furthermore, the problems at Cooper and Palo Verde


reveal the importance of timely incorporation of vendor recommendations into work instructions
reveal the importance of timely incorporation of vendor recommendations into work instructions


to ensure that check valves are installed and maintained properly. Specifically, the problems highlight the need to install Anderson Greenwood check valves in accordance with vendorguidance and to ensure that the Borg-Warner check valve disc is in its correct vertical position. This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  However, recipients arereminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC
to ensure that check valves are installed and maintained properly. Specifically, the problems highlight the need to install Anderson Greenwood check valves in accordance with vendor


information notices),  where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations
guidance and to ensure that the Borg-Warner check valve disc is in its correct vertical position.


under 10 CFR 50.65, "Requirement for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. However, recipients are


Power Plants.If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact
reminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC
 
information notices), where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations
 
under 10 CFR 50.65, Requirement for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear
 
Power Plants. If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact


one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor
one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor


Regulation (NRR) project manager./RA Patrick M. Madden Acting for/Eugene V. Imbro, Acting Chief
Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
/RA Patrick M. Madden Acting for/
                                                Eugene V. Imbro, Acting Chief
 
Operational Experience
 
and Non-Power Reactors Branch
 
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts:    Charles Marschall, Region IV                Robert Benedict, NRR
 
(817) 860-8185                              (301) 415-1157 E-mail: csm@nrc.gov                          E-mail: rab1@nrc.gov
 
Attachments:
1. Figure 1. Anderson Greenwood Check Valve


===Operational Experience===
2. Figure 2. Borg-Warner Check Valve With Disk Jammed in Open Position
  and Non-Power Reactors Branch


===Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs===
3. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Charles Marschall, Region IVRobert Benedict, NRR(817) 860-8185(301) 415-1157 E-mail: csm@nrc.govE-mail: rab1@nrc.gov


Attachments:1. Figure 1. Anderson Greenwood Check Valve
ML012710212                                  TEMPLATE NO.=NRR-052
      *See previous concurrence


2.  Figure 2. Borg-Warner Check Valve With Disk Jammed in Open Position
OFFICE    REXB            Tech Editor      RIV            C:EMEB        REXB              AC:REXB


3.  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
NAME      RBenedict*      PKleene*        CMarschall PKuo*              JTappert          EVImbro


ML012710212TEMPLATE NO.=NRR-052*See previous concurrenceOFFICEREXBTech EditorRIVC:EMEBREXBAC:REXBNAMERBenedict*PKleene*CMarschallPKuo*JTappertEVImbroDATE09/06/200109/ 04 /2001   /     /200109/26/2001   /     /2001   /     /2001 Attachment 1 Attachment 2
DATE      09/06/2001      09/ 04 /2001       /   /2001 09/26/2001         / /2001           / /2001
______________________________________________________________________________________OL = Operating License


CP = Construction PermitAttachment 3 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES
===Attachment 1===
Attachment 2 Attachment 3 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED


_____________________________________________________________________________________InformationDate of
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES


===Notice No.        SubjectIssuanceIssued to===
_____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________2001-13Inadequate Standby LiquidControl System Relief Valve
Information                                        Date of


Margin10/03/01All holders of operating licensesfor boiling water reactors2001-12(ERRATA)Hydrogen Fire at NuclearPower Stations8/08/01All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for
Notice No.              Subject                    Issuance  Issued to
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
2001-13          Inadequate Standby Liquid        10/03/01    All holders of operating licenses
 
Control System Relief Valve                  for boiling water reactors
 
Margin
 
2001-12           Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear        8/08/01    All holders of operating licenses
 
(ERRATA)          Power Stations                              or construction permits for


nuclear power reactors except
nuclear power reactors except
Line 143: Line 222:
fuel has been permanently
fuel has been permanently


removed from the reactor vessel2001-12Hydrogen Fire at NuclearPower Stations7/13/01All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for
removed from the reactor vessel
 
2001-12          Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear        7/13/01    All holders of operating licenses
 
Power Stations                              or construction permits for


nuclear power reactors except
nuclear power reactors except
Line 153: Line 236:
fuel has been permanently
fuel has been permanently


removed from the reactor vessel2001-11Thefts of Portable Gauges07/13/01All portable gauge licensees
removed from the reactor vessel


2001-10Failure of Central SprinklerCompany Model GB Series
2001-11          Thefts of Portable Gauges        07/13/01    All portable gauge licensees


Fire Sprinkler Heads06/28/01All holders of licenses for nuclearpower, research, and test
2001-10          Failure of Central Sprinkler     06/28/01    All holders of licenses for nuclear


reactors and fuel cycle facilities2001-09Main Feedwater SystemDegradation in Safety-Related
Company Model GB Series                      power, research, and test


===ASME Code Class 2 Piping===
Fire Sprinkler Heads                        reactors and fuel cycle facilities
Inside the Containment of a


Pressurized Water Reactor06/12/01All holders of operating licensesfor pressurized water nuclear
2001-09          Main Feedwater System            06/12/01    All holders of operating licenses


power reactors, except those who
Degradation in Safety-Related                for pressurized water nuclear


have permanently ceased
ASME Code Class 2 Piping                    power reactors, except those who


operations and have certified that
Inside the Containment of a                  have permanently ceased
 
Pressurized Water Reactor                    operations and have certified that


fuel has been permanently
fuel has been permanently


removed from the reactor vessel2001-08Supplement 1Update on the Investigation ofPatient Deaths in Panama,
removed from the reactor vessel
 
2001-08          Update on the Investigation of  06/06/01    All Medical Licensees
 
Supplement 1      Patient Deaths in Panama, Following Radiation Therapy
 
Overexposures
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License


===Following Radiation Therapy===
CP = Construction Permit}}
Overexposures06/06/01All Medical Licensees}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 05:41, 24 November 2019

Problems with Incorrectly-Installed Swing-Check Valves
ML012710212
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/03/2001
From: Imbro E
Operational Experience and Non-Power Reactors Branch
To:
vsb
References
TAC MA2314 IN-01-014
Download: ML012710212 (6)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 3, 2001 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 2001-14: PROBLEMS WITH INCORRECTLY-INSTALLED

SWING-CHECK VALVES

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have ceased

operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to swing-check valve problems caused by incorrect installation. It is expected that

recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as

appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information

notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

Cooper Nuclear Station

While trouble-shooting a leaking check valve between the reactor core isolation cooling

barometric condenser and the suppression pool, the licensee determined that a check valve

had been installed rotated 90 degrees away from the orientation recommended by the valve

vendor. According to the vendors technical manual, the valve should have been installed either

in a horizontal line with the hinge pin centerline vertical or in a vertical line with flow upward.

The staff documents this problem with certain Anderson-Greenwood check valves in Inspection

Report 50-298/98-05 (NUDOCS Accession Number 9809240061).1*

The check valves of concern are designed so that, when installed in a horizontal run of piping, the axis of the hinge is vertical and the check valve disc pivots in the horizontal plane, like a

door. The licensee incorrectly installed the valves with the hinge pin horizontal, so the disc did

not pivot in the horizontal plane as required. The disc face pivoted from a horizontal plane, on

forward flow, to a vertical plane on flow reversal. Therefore, the disc tended to hang open on

reversal and cessation of flow. This effect can be visualized from attached Figure 1, which

shows the relationship of the center of gravity of the disc to the axis of the hinge pin. The

spring shown wound around the hinge pin is intended to close the valve against only the design

frictional and drag forces expected to exist with the hinge pin vertical or with the valve in a

ML012710212

1

  • NUDOCS documents can be accessed at the NRC Public Document Rooms vertical run of pipe; it was not designed to overcome the gravitational force that would tend to

hold the valve open when the hinge pin axis is horizontal and the valve is in a horizontal run of

pipe.

As part of its actions to correct this problem, the licensee identified several other check valves

of this type installed with this incorrect orientation.

Palo Verde Nuclear Station

The licensee experienced excessive leakage through some Borg-Warner swing-check valves in

the high-pressure safety injection (HPSI) system. The root cause of the problem was

determined to be an error in valve assembly during the original installation. As a result, the disc

assembly was suspended too low inside the body of the valve. With the disc assembly

suspended too low, the valve might have seated acceptably at first but remained partially open

after forward flow exercised the valve.

The improper assembly occurred during plant construction. The licensee removed the internals

of these valves so the valve bodies could be welded into the piping. During reassembly of the

internals, the bonnet retaining ring was threaded into the body until it bottomed. The original

factory assembly process included a step that involved backing out the bonnet retaining ring, after it bottomed in the valve body, until the correct disc height was obtained, as visually

observed through the open ends of the valve body. At Palo Verde, however, the valve had

been installed in the piping and the valve internals could not be observed. Therefore, the disc

height adjustment could not be made during valve reassembly, and the disc remained too low in

the body to engage the seat properly.

The NRC staff had addressed this problem in Information Notice IN 89-62, Malfunction of

Borg-Warner Pressure Seal Bonnet Check Valves Caused by Vertical Misalignment of Disk, dated August 31, 1989 (NUDOCS Accession Number 8908240375). After IN 89-62 was

issued, the valve vendor issued maintenance guidance to recommend that measurements of an

internal critical dimension be done to ensure that the disc is in the correct position following

maintenance.

Until November 1994, the licensees maintenance procedure for these check valves did not

include adequate instructions for ensuring correct vertical positioning of the disc. Once the

problem was diagnosed in 1998, the licensee implemented a plan to identify and correct the

error on all of the HPSI discharge check valves. The NRC staff described the licensees

actions on this problem in Inspection Report 50-528/529/530 98-14 (NUDOCS Accession

Number 9809090298).

Discussion

As a result of the installation and maintenance errors discussed in this information notice, some

check valves did not seat properly. Furthermore, the problems at Cooper and Palo Verde

reveal the importance of timely incorporation of vendor recommendations into work instructions

to ensure that check valves are installed and maintained properly. Specifically, the problems highlight the need to install Anderson Greenwood check valves in accordance with vendor

guidance and to ensure that the Borg-Warner check valve disc is in its correct vertical position.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. However, recipients are

reminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC

information notices), where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations

under 10 CFR 50.65, Requirement for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear

Power Plants. If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact

one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA Patrick M. Madden Acting for/

Eugene V. Imbro, Acting Chief

Operational Experience

and Non-Power Reactors Branch

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Charles Marschall, Region IV Robert Benedict, NRR

(817) 860-8185 (301) 415-1157 E-mail: csm@nrc.gov E-mail: rab1@nrc.gov

Attachments:

1. Figure 1. Anderson Greenwood Check Valve

2. Figure 2. Borg-Warner Check Valve With Disk Jammed in Open Position

3. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

ML012710212 TEMPLATE NO.=NRR-052

  • See previous concurrence

OFFICE REXB Tech Editor RIV C:EMEB REXB AC:REXB

NAME RBenedict* PKleene* CMarschall PKuo* JTappert EVImbro

DATE 09/06/2001 09/ 04 /2001 / /2001 09/26/2001 / /2001 / /2001

Attachment 1

Attachment 2 Attachment 3 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

______________________________________________________________________________________

2001-13 Inadequate Standby Liquid 10/03/01 All holders of operating licenses

Control System Relief Valve for boiling water reactors

Margin

2001-12 Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear 8/08/01 All holders of operating licenses

(ERRATA) Power Stations or construction permits for

nuclear power reactors except

those who have ceased

operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

2001-12 Hydrogen Fire at Nuclear 7/13/01 All holders of operating licenses

Power Stations or construction permits for

nuclear power reactors except

those who have ceased

operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

2001-11 Thefts of Portable Gauges 07/13/01 All portable gauge licensees

2001-10 Failure of Central Sprinkler 06/28/01 All holders of licenses for nuclear

Company Model GB Series power, research, and test

Fire Sprinkler Heads reactors and fuel cycle facilities

2001-09 Main Feedwater System 06/12/01 All holders of operating licenses

Degradation in Safety-Related for pressurized water nuclear

ASME Code Class 2 Piping power reactors, except those who

Inside the Containment of a have permanently ceased

Pressurized Water Reactor operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

2001-08 Update on the Investigation of 06/06/01 All Medical Licensees

Supplement 1 Patient Deaths in Panama, Following Radiation Therapy

Overexposures

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit