NRC Generic Letter 1987-06: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:I UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY | {{#Wiki_filter:I | ||
COMMISSION | UNITED STATES | ||
WASHINGTON. | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20555 | |||
.MAR 13 3987 TO: All Holders of Operating Licenses Gentlemen:. | |||
SUBJECT: PERIODIC VERIFICATION OF LEAK TIGHTAINTEGRITY OF PRESSURE ISOLATION | |||
VALVES (GENERIC LETTER 87-06' | |||
Pursuant to 10 CPR 50.54(f), NRC is seeking to verify the methods,integrity if any, by which each opetatng reactor licensee is assuring.the leak-tigh.t of' | |||
all pressure isolation valves as independent barriers against abnormal leakage, rapidly propagating.,failure, and gross rupture~of the reactor coolant pressure boundary. | |||
Pressure isolation valves (PIVs) are defined for each interface as any two valves in series within the reactor coolant pressure boundary which separate the high pressure reactor coolant system (RCS) from an attached low pressure system. These valves are normally closed during power operation. The reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) is.defined in 10 CFR 50.2 and generally includes all PIVs. | |||
Periodic-tests or verifications'Of the leak tight integrity of all pressure _- | |||
..." GDC 32 states that Components which are part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary shall be designed to permit (1)periodic inspection and testing of important areas and features to assess their structural and leak tight integrity | isolation valves are necessary in'order to assure the integrity of the RCPB in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendices A and B. General Design Criterion - (GDC) | ||
..." Further, as outlined in Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, each licensee's quality assurance program must include planned and systematic actions which will provide adequate confidence that these components will perform satisfactorily in service | 14 of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A requires that 'The reactor coolant pressure boundary shall be designed, fabricated, erected and tested so.as to have an extremely low probability of abnormal leakage, of rapidly propagating failure and of gross rupture." GDC 30 requires that "The reactor coolant pressure boundary shall be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested to the highest quality standards practical . . ." GDC 32 states that Components which are part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary shall be designed to permit (1) | ||
periodic inspection and testing of important areas and features to assess their structural and leak tight integrity . . ." Further, as outlined in Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, each licensee's quality assurance program must include planned and systematic actions which will provide adequate confidence that these components will perform satisfactorily in service. | |||
Certain older plants were required to periodically leak test, on an individual basis, only those PIVs which were listed in an order dated April 20, 1981 (Event V Order). That order was sent to 32 operating PWR's and 2 operating BWR's. Other older plants have had no specific requirements imposed to individually leak test any of their PIVs | All plants licensed since 1979 have all PIVs listed in the Technical Specifications along with testing intervals, acceptance criteria and limiting conditions for operation. Certain older plants were required to periodically leak test, on an individual basis, only those PIVs which were listed in an order dated April 20, 1981 (Event V Order). That order was sent to 32 operating PWR's and 2 operating BWR's. Other older plants have had no specific requirements imposed to individually leak test any of their PIVs. | ||
A number of events have occurred in LWRs involving leakage past pressure isolation valves, failures of the valves, inadvertent actuation of the valves, or mispositioning of the valves. NRC is therefore seeking assurances that the RCPB is being protected. | |||
1> ~0150 0O00?11 | |||
This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget Clearance Number 3150-0111 which expires September | -2- Accordingly, you are requested to submit a list of all pressure isolation valves in your plant. For each valve, describe the periodic tests or other measures performed to assure the integrity of the valve as an independent barrier at the RCPB along with the acceptance criteria for leakage, if any, operational limits, if any, and frequency of test performance. This information is required to be submitted within 90 days of this letter. If current plant Technical Specifications require leak rate testing of all of the PIYs in the plant, your reply to that effect will be sufficient. | ||
30, 1989. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.Our review of your submittal of information in response to this letter is not subject to fees under the provision of 10CFR170.Sincerely, | |||
INFORMATION-ASSESSMENT | This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget Clearance Number | ||
3150-0111 which expires September 30, 1989. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. | |||
Our review of your submittal of information in response to this letter is not subject to fees under the provision of 10CFR170. | |||
GL 87-04 | Sincerely, R4 2mFRflid p k | ||
_ _ | |||
Harold enton, irector | |||
OF THE FBI CRIMINAL HISTORY RULE FOR TEMPORARY WORKERS VERIFICATION | __ _ _Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
OF SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL | |||
F"' | |||
EQUIPTMENT | LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERI& -ETTERS | ||
IN OPERATING | Generic I Date of Letter No. Subject Issuance Issued To GL 87-05 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 03/12/87 LICENSEES OF | ||
REACTORS, USI A-46 VERIFICATION | INFORMATION-ASSESSMENT OF OR S, | ||
OF SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL | LICENSEE MEASURES TO MITIGATE APPLICANTS FOR | ||
AND/OR IDENTIFY POTENTIAL DL'S, AND | |||
EQUIPMENT | DEGRADATION MK1 HOLDERS OF | ||
CP'S FOR BWR | |||
REACTORS (USI A-46) | MARK I | ||
CONTAINMENTS | |||
--CRITERIA ON SEISMIC QUALIFICATION | GL 87-04 TEMPORARY EXEMPTION FROM 03/06/87 ALL POWER | ||
OF EQUIPMENT GL 87-01 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY | PROVISIONS OF THE FBI CRIMINAL REACTOR | ||
OF THE NRC 01/08/87 OPERATOR LICENSING | HISTORY RULE FOR TEMPORARY LICENCES | ||
EXAMINATION | WORKERS | ||
QUESTION BANK | GL 87-03 VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC 02/26/87 ALL LICENSEES | ||
ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND NOT SUBJECT TO | |||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPTMENT IN USI A-46 OPERATING REACTORS, USI A-46 REQUIREMENTS | |||
OF NUREG-1169,"TECHNICAL | GL 87-02 VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC 02/19/67 ALL HOLDERS OF | ||
FINDINGS RELATED TO GENERIC ISSUE C-8 BWR MSIC LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE CONTROL SYSTEM | ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND OPERATING | ||
ECCS EVALUATION | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN LICENSES NOT | ||
OPERATING REACTORS (USI A-46) REVIEWED TO | |||
WATER REACTOR APPLICANTS | CURRENT | ||
LICENSING -- | |||
RELATING TO COMPLIANCE | CRITERIA ON | ||
WITH 10 CFR 50.49,`EQ OF ELECTRICAL | SEISMIC | ||
QUALIFICATION | |||
TO SAFETY" | OF EQUIPMENT | ||
GL 87-01 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF THE NRC 01/08/87 ALL POWER | |||
OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REACTOR | |||
QUESTION BANK LICENSEES AND | |||
APPLICANTS FOR | |||
AN OPERATING | |||
LICENSE | |||
GL 86-17 AVAILABILITY OF NUREG-1169, 10/17/86 ALL LICENSEES | |||
"TECHNICAL FINDINGS RELATED TO OF BOILING | |||
GENERIC ISSUE C-8 WATER REACTORS | |||
BWR MSIC LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE | |||
CONTROL SYSTEM | |||
GL 86-16 WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION 10/22/86 ALL | |||
MODELS PRESSURIZED | |||
WATER REACTOR | |||
APPLICANTS AND | |||
LICENSEES | |||
GL 86-15 INFORMATION RELATING TO 09/22/86 ALL LICENSEES | |||
COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.49, AND HOLDERS OF | |||
`EQ OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AN APPLICATION | |||
IMPORTANT TO SAFETY" FOR AN | |||
OPERATING | |||
LICENSE}} | |||
{{GL-Nav}} | {{GL-Nav}} |
Latest revision as of 02:47, 24 November 2019
I
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20555
.MAR 13 3987 TO: All Holders of Operating Licenses Gentlemen:.
SUBJECT: PERIODIC VERIFICATION OF LEAK TIGHTAINTEGRITY OF PRESSURE ISOLATION
VALVES (GENERIC LETTER 87-06'
Pursuant to 10 CPR 50.54(f), NRC is seeking to verify the methods,integrity if any, by which each opetatng reactor licensee is assuring.the leak-tigh.t of'
all pressure isolation valves as independent barriers against abnormal leakage, rapidly propagating.,failure, and gross rupture~of the reactor coolant pressure boundary.
Pressure isolation valves (PIVs) are defined for each interface as any two valves in series within the reactor coolant pressure boundary which separate the high pressure reactor coolant system (RCS) from an attached low pressure system. These valves are normally closed during power operation. The reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) is.defined in 10 CFR 50.2 and generally includes all PIVs.
Periodic-tests or verifications'Of the leak tight integrity of all pressure _-
isolation valves are necessary in'order to assure the integrity of the RCPB in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendices A and B. General Design Criterion - (GDC) 14 of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A requires that 'The reactor coolant pressure boundary shall be designed, fabricated, erected and tested so.as to have an extremely low probability of abnormal leakage, of rapidly propagating failure and of gross rupture." GDC 30 requires that "The reactor coolant pressure boundary shall be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested to the highest quality standards practical . . ." GDC 32 states that Components which are part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary shall be designed to permit (1)
periodic inspection and testing of important areas and features to assess their structural and leak tight integrity . . ." Further, as outlined in Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, each licensee's quality assurance program must include planned and systematic actions which will provide adequate confidence that these components will perform satisfactorily in service.
All plants licensed since 1979 have all PIVs listed in the Technical Specifications along with testing intervals, acceptance criteria and limiting conditions for operation. Certain older plants were required to periodically leak test, on an individual basis, only those PIVs which were listed in an order dated April 20, 1981 (Event V Order). That order was sent to 32 operating PWR's and 2 operating BWR's. Other older plants have had no specific requirements imposed to individually leak test any of their PIVs.
A number of events have occurred in LWRs involving leakage past pressure isolation valves, failures of the valves, inadvertent actuation of the valves, or mispositioning of the valves. NRC is therefore seeking assurances that the RCPB is being protected.
1> ~0150 0O00?11
-2- Accordingly, you are requested to submit a list of all pressure isolation valves in your plant. For each valve, describe the periodic tests or other measures performed to assure the integrity of the valve as an independent barrier at the RCPB along with the acceptance criteria for leakage, if any, operational limits, if any, and frequency of test performance. This information is required to be submitted within 90 days of this letter. If current plant Technical Specifications require leak rate testing of all of the PIYs in the plant, your reply to that effect will be sufficient.
This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget Clearance Number
3150-0111 which expires September 30, 1989. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Our review of your submittal of information in response to this letter is not subject to fees under the provision of 10CFR170.
Sincerely, R4 2mFRflid p k
_ _
Harold enton, irector
__ _ _Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
F"'
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERI& -ETTERS
Generic I Date of Letter No. Subject Issuance Issued To GL 87-05 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 03/12/87 LICENSEES OF
INFORMATION-ASSESSMENT OF OR S,
LICENSEE MEASURES TO MITIGATE APPLICANTS FOR
AND/OR IDENTIFY POTENTIAL DL'S, AND
DEGRADATION MK1 HOLDERS OF
MARK I
CONTAINMENTS
GL 87-04 TEMPORARY EXEMPTION FROM 03/06/87 ALL POWER
PROVISIONS OF THE FBI CRIMINAL REACTOR
HISTORY RULE FOR TEMPORARY LICENCES
WORKERS
GL 87-03 VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC 02/26/87 ALL LICENSEES
ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND NOT SUBJECT TO
ELECTRICAL EQUIPTMENT IN USI A-46 OPERATING REACTORS, USI A-46 REQUIREMENTS
GL 87-02 VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC 02/19/67 ALL HOLDERS OF
ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND OPERATING
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN LICENSES NOT
OPERATING REACTORS (USI A-46) REVIEWED TO
CURRENT
LICENSING --
CRITERIA ON
SEISMIC
QUALIFICATION
OF EQUIPMENT
GL 87-01 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF THE NRC 01/08/87 ALL POWER
OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REACTOR
QUESTION BANK LICENSEES AND
APPLICANTS FOR
AN OPERATING
LICENSE
GL 86-17 AVAILABILITY OF NUREG-1169, 10/17/86 ALL LICENSEES
"TECHNICAL FINDINGS RELATED TO OF BOILING
GENERIC ISSUE C-8 WATER REACTORS
BWR MSIC LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE
CONTROL SYSTEM
GL 86-16 WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION 10/22/86 ALL
MODELS PRESSURIZED
WATER REACTOR
APPLICANTS AND
LICENSEES
GL 86-15 INFORMATION RELATING TO 09/22/86 ALL LICENSEES
COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.49, AND HOLDERS OF
`EQ OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AN APPLICATION
IMPORTANT TO SAFETY" FOR AN
OPERATING
LICENSE