ML051780288: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/15/2002
| issue date = 04/15/2002
| title = E-mail from R. Landsman to J. Caldwell, Dpv Concerning Dresden Cask Storage Issues
| title = E-mail from R. Landsman to J. Caldwell, Dpv Concerning Dresden Cask Storage Issues
| author name = Landsman R B
| author name = Landsman R
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| addressee name = Caldwell J L
| addressee name = Caldwell J
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| docket = 05000237, 05000249
| docket = 05000237, 05000249
| license number = DPR-019, DPR-025
| license number = DPR-019, DPR-025
| contact person = Pedersen R M, OE
| contact person = Pedersen R, OE
| case reference number = DPO-2003-100
| case reference number = DPO-2003-100
| document type = Differing Professional Opinion Case File, E-Mail
| document type = Differing Professional Opinion Case File, E-Mail
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:7IsabelfeiSchfenfld  
{{#Wiki_filter:7IsabelfeiSchfenfld - Re: DPV concerningDrens-dCdsk stor age ssus                                                         Page 11 From:             Ross Landsman %fl1 To:               James Caldwell Rap Date:             4/15102 5:25PM
-Re: DPV concerningD rens-dCdsk stor age ssus Page 11 From: Ross Landsman %fl 1 To: James Caldwell Rap Date: 4/15102 5:25PM  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Re: DPV concerning Dresden Cask storage issues Sorry I bothered you in the stairway, I had not read my E-mails yet as I was out of town all last week and did not know you were working on it. I still think the DPV issues should be resolved along with the backfit issues and RAI questions before we let them load a cask next week as I just found out they intend to do.The reactor building and crane are still not within design basis and the cask transfer facility still does not have weld records or QC inspections on the questionable welds. Also as I told you the other day it came to my attention that during the last outage for the hold down beam inspections on Unit 3 the licensee lifted two 50 ton blocks 150 feet above the other operating units torus, and placed 110 ton shield blocks over the other operating units reactor. Both of these the licensee said they would not do with the reactor at power, its in an unanalyzed condition with the conditions they have in the building.>>> James Caldwell 04/12/02 11:02AM >>>Ross the RAs office received the DPV panel's recommendations.
Re: DPV concerning Dresden Cask storage issues Sorry I bothered you in the stairway, I had not read my E-mails yet as I was out of town all last week and did not know you were working on it. I still think the DPV issues should be resolved along with the backfit issues and RAI questions before we let them load a cask next week as I just found out they intend to do.
Because of the Davis Besse issues and the AARM both Jim Dyer and Jack Grobe have been out of the office since receiving the panel's recommendations.
The reactor building and crane are still not within design basis and the cask transfer facility still does not have weld records or QC inspections on the questionable welds. Also as I told you the other day it came to my attention that during the last outage for the hold down beam inspections on Unit 3 the licensee lifted two 50 ton blocks 150 feet above the other operating units torus, and placed 110 ton shield blocks over the other operating units reactor. Both of these the licensee said they would not do with the reactor at power, its in an unanalyzed condition with the conditions they have in the building.
I have a few questions to ask Jack when he returns and would also like Jim to see the recommendations.
          >>> James Caldwell 04/12/02 11:02AM >>>
Since both Jack and Jim will be back in the office on Monday, I will be extending my allowed review time by a couple of days. I also called your office and left a voice mail to the same effect.We should be sending you a memo describing the next steps shortly.CC: Jim Dyer; John Craig; William Travers ry}}
Ross the RAs office received the DPV panel's recommendations. Because of the Davis Besse issues and the AARM both Jim Dyer and Jack Grobe have been out of the office since receiving the panel's recommendations. I have a few questions to ask Jack when he returns and would also like Jim to see the recommendations. Since both Jack and Jim will be back in the office on Monday, I will be extending my allowed review time by a couple of days. I also called your office and left a voice mail to the same effect.
We should be sending you a memo describing the next steps shortly.
CC:               Jim Dyer; John Craig; William Travers ry}}

Latest revision as of 00:15, 24 November 2019

E-mail from R. Landsman to J. Caldwell, Dpv Concerning Dresden Cask Storage Issues
ML051780288
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/2002
From: Landsman R
NRC/RGN-III
To: Caldwell J
NRC/RGN-III
Pedersen R, OE
References
DPO-2003-100
Download: ML051780288 (1)
v • d • e


Text

7IsabelfeiSchfenfld - Re: DPV concerningDrens-dCdsk stor age ssus Page 11 From: Ross Landsman %fl1 To: James Caldwell Rap Date: 4/15102 5:25PM

Subject:

Re: DPV concerning Dresden Cask storage issues Sorry I bothered you in the stairway, I had not read my E-mails yet as I was out of town all last week and did not know you were working on it. I still think the DPV issues should be resolved along with the backfit issues and RAI questions before we let them load a cask next week as I just found out they intend to do.

The reactor building and crane are still not within design basis and the cask transfer facility still does not have weld records or QC inspections on the questionable welds. Also as I told you the other day it came to my attention that during the last outage for the hold down beam inspections on Unit 3 the licensee lifted two 50 ton blocks 150 feet above the other operating units torus, and placed 110 ton shield blocks over the other operating units reactor. Both of these the licensee said they would not do with the reactor at power, its in an unanalyzed condition with the conditions they have in the building.

>>> James Caldwell 04/12/02 11:02AM >>>

Ross the RAs office received the DPV panel's recommendations. Because of the Davis Besse issues and the AARM both Jim Dyer and Jack Grobe have been out of the office since receiving the panel's recommendations. I have a few questions to ask Jack when he returns and would also like Jim to see the recommendations. Since both Jack and Jim will be back in the office on Monday, I will be extending my allowed review time by a couple of days. I also called your office and left a voice mail to the same effect.

We should be sending you a memo describing the next steps shortly.

CC: Jim Dyer; John Craig; William Travers ry

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML051780288&oldid=2198367"