Information Notice 2006-02, Use of Galvanized Supports and Cable Trays with Meggitt Si 2400 Stainless Steel Jacketed Electrical Cables: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 01/19/2006
| issue date = 01/19/2006
| title = Use of Galvanized Supports and Cable Trays with Meggitt Si 2400 Stainless Steel Jacketed Electrical Cables
| title = Use of Galvanized Supports and Cable Trays with Meggitt Si 2400 Stainless Steel Jacketed Electrical Cables
| author name = Grimes C I, Pierson R C
| author name = Grimes C, Pierson R
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/FCSS, NRC/NRR/ADRA/DPR
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/FCSS, NRC/NRR/ADRA/DPR
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| revision = 0
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
[[Issue date::January 19, 2006]]


NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2006-02: USE OF GALVANIZED SUPPORTS AND CABLETRAYS WITH MEGGITT Si 2400 STAINLESS-
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
STEEL-JACKETED ELECTRICAL CABLES
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 19, 2006 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2006-02:               USE OF GALVANIZED SUPPORTS AND CABLE
 
TRAYS WITH MEGGITT Si 2400 STAINLESS-
                                              STEEL-JACKETED ELECTRICAL CABLES


==ADDRESSEES==
==ADDRESSEES==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear reactors except those who have permanentlyceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel; and fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders.
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear reactors except those who have permanently
 
ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor
 
vessel; and fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders.


==PURPOSE==
==PURPOSE==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to informaddressees of the potential generic issue of using galvanized supports or galvanized cable trays with Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical cable Recipients are expected to review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions to avoid similarproblem However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, nospecific action or written response is required.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform
 
addressees of the potential generic issue of using galvanized supports or galvanized cable
 
trays with Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical cables. Recipients are expected to
 
review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions to avoid similar
 
problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, no
 
specific action or written response is required.


==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
In March 2004, Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. did a fire test of Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc.'sSi 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical cables on behalf of Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.,
In March 2004, Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. did a fire test of Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc.s
as described in its license amendment request for the Harris Nuclear Plant dated August 18, 2005 (Accession No. ML052640144). The test did not successfully demonstrate continued electrical functionality of the cables for the complete duration of the fire tes The cable samples were installed on galvanized supports for the fire tes Wherever the cables came in contact with a galvanized support, the cable jacket was degrade The degradation was attributed to liquid metal embrittlement of the stainless steel cable jacket directly contacting the galvanized support material at high temperature The cable jacket failure was not discovered until a hose stream test at the end of the fire test.A second fire test was done later using stainless steel supports so that no cable samples werein direct contact with galvanized materia No cable jacket degradation was observed during the second test.
 
Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical cables on behalf of Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.,
as described in its license amendment request for the Harris Nuclear Plant dated
 
August 18, 2005 (Accession No. ML052640144). The test did not successfully demonstrate
 
continued electrical functionality of the cables for the complete duration of the fire test. The
 
cable samples were installed on galvanized supports for the fire test. Wherever the cables
 
came in contact with a galvanized support, the cable jacket was degraded. The degradation
 
was attributed to liquid metal embrittlement of the stainless steel cable jacket directly contacting
 
the galvanized support material at high temperatures. The cable jacket failure was not
 
discovered until a hose stream test at the end of the fire test.
 
A second fire test was done later using stainless steel supports so that no cable samples were
 
in direct contact with galvanized material. No cable jacket degradation was observed during the
 
second test.


==DISCUSSION==
==DISCUSSION==
Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed cable is designed to function during a fir Thestainless steel jacket acts as a fire barrie This cable is used in some nuclear facilities to provide power to equipment required for safe shutdown of the facility. If galvanized supports are in contact with the stainless steel jacket of the cable, the stainlesssteel jacket could degrade during a fire even Degradation of the cable jacket would expose the cable to the fire and possibly result in damage to the cabl Consequently, the equipment being powered by the cable might malfunction during shutdown of the plan According to Section 4.0 j of Meggitt document ER 05-179 (Revision A, dated October 7, 2005), "Unpacking, Inspection, Installation and Standard Practices of Si 2400 Fire Rated Cable,"
Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed cable is designed to function during a fire. The
"Si 2400 Fire Cable may be routed in cable trays; Stainless steel trays are recommende Cable should not be installed in galvanized trays and should NOT be in direct contact with galvanized or aluminum trays or structures." This statement was added to the document as a result of the unsuccessful March 2004 fire test.
 
stainless steel jacket acts as a fire barrier. This cable is used in some nuclear facilities to
 
provide power to equipment required for safe shutdown of the facility.
 
If galvanized supports are in contact with the stainless steel jacket of the cable, the stainless
 
steel jacket could degrade during a fire event. Degradation of the cable jacket would expose
 
the cable to the fire and possibly result in damage to the cable. Consequently, the equipment
 
being powered by the cable might malfunction during shutdown of the plant. According to
 
Section 4.0 j of Meggitt document ER 05-179 (Revision A, dated October 7, 2005), Unpacking, Inspection, Installation and Standard Practices of Si 2400 Fire Rated Cable, Si 2400 Fire Cable may be routed in cable trays; Stainless steel trays are recommended.
 
Cable should not be installed in galvanized trays and should NOT be in direct contact with
 
galvanized or aluminum trays or structures. This statement was added to the document as a
 
result of the unsuccessful March 2004 fire test.


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
should be aware that fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders are not held to thesame fire protection requirements specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, with regard to electrical circuits, but there are a limited number of safety events that could be triggered by damage to electrical cables during a fire at a fuel cycle facility (e.g., lossof power for maintaining a vacuum in gloveboxes). Fuel cycle licensees and certificate holdersalso may be interested in knowing about this generic issue because there may be potential for loss of some safeguards capabilities during a fire, if power to safeguards equipment were lost.GENERIC IMPLICATIONSGalvanized supports and cable trays with Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electricalcables can impact the safe shutdown functions of the equipment powered by the cables.
should be aware that fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders are not held to the
 
same fire protection requirements specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, with regard to electrical circuits, but there are a limited number of safety events that
 
could be triggered by damage to electrical cables during a fire at a fuel cycle facility (e.g., loss
 
of power for maintaining a vacuum in gloveboxes). Fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders
 
also may be interested in knowing about this generic issue because there may be potential for
 
loss of some safeguards capabilities during a fire, if power to safeguards equipment were lost.
 
===GENERIC IMPLICATIONS===
Galvanized supports and cable trays with Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical
 
cables can impact the safe shutdown functions of the equipment powered by the cables.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This IN requires no specific action or written respons Please direct any questions about thismatter to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Robert C. Pierson, Director/RA/ Christopher I. Grimes, Director /RA/Division of Fuel Cycle Safety & SafeguardsDivision of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts: Robert Wolfgang, NRR Rex Wescott, NMSS301-415-1624 301-415-6727 E-mail: rjw1@nrc.govE-mail: rgw@nrc.govNote: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collection If galvanized supports are in contact with the stainless steel jacket of the cable, the stainlesssteel jacket could degrade during a fire even Degradation of the cable jacket would expose the cable to the fire and possibly result in damage to the cabl Consequently, the equipment being powered by the cable might malfunction during shutdown of the plan According to Section 4.0 j of Meggitt document ER 05-179 (Revision A, dated October 7, 2005), "Unpacking, Inspection, Installation and Standard Practices of Si 2400 Fire Rated Cable,"
This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this
"Si 2400 Fire Cable may be routed in cable trays; Stainless steel trays are recommende Cable should not be installed in galvanized trays and should NOT be in direct contact with galvanized or aluminum trays or structures." This statement was added to the document as a result of the unsuccessful March 2004 fire test.


==Addressees==
matter to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor
should be aware that fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders are not held to thesame fire protection requirements specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, with regard to electrical circuits, but there are a limited number of safety events that could be triggered by damage to electrical cables during a fire at a fuel cycle facility (e.g., lossof power for maintaining a vacuum in gloveboxes). Fuel cycle licensees and certificate holdersalso may be interested in knowing about this generic issue because there may be potential for loss of some safeguards capabilities during a fire, if power to safeguards equipment were lost.GENERIC IMPLICATIONSGalvanized supports and cable trays with Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electricalcables can impact the safe shutdown functions of the equipment powered by the cables.
 
Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
Robert C. Pierson, Director /RA/                        Christopher I. Grimes, Director /RA/
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety & Safeguards              Division of Policy and Rulemaking
 
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts: Robert Wolfgang, NRR                        Rex Wescott, NMSS
 
301-415-1624                            301-415-6727 E-mail: rjw1@nrc.gov                    E-mail: rgw@nrc.gov
 
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
 
ML053200005 OFFICE  IOEB:DIRS      TECH EDITOR      NRR              BC:AFPB          D:DRA
 
NAME    CRoquecruz      PKleene          RWolfgang        SWeerakkody      JELyons
 
DATE    11/29/2005      11/15/2005        11/18/2005        11/18/2005        11/28/2005 OFFICE  BC:IOEB:DIRS  BC:PGCB            D:DPR            NMSS              D:FCSS
 
NAME    MJRoss-Lee    CJackson          CIGrimes          RWescott          RPierson


==CONTACT==
DATE    11/30/2005    12/16/2005         01/19/2006      01/11/2006        01/12/2006}}
This IN requires no specific action or written respons Please direct any questions about thismatter to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Robert C. Pierson, Director /RA/ Christopher I. Grimes, Director /RA/Division of Fuel Cycle Safety & SafeguardsDivision of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Material Safety & SafeguardsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts: Robert Wolfgang, NRR Rex Wescott, NMSS301-415-1624 301-415-6727 E-mail: rjw1@nrc.govE-mail: rgw@nrc.govNote: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.DISTRIBUTION:IN FileADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML053200005OFFICEIOEB:DIRSTECH EDITORNRRBC:AFPBD:DRANAMECRoquecruzPKleeneRWolfgangSWeerakkodyJELyonsDATE11/29/200511/15/200511/18/200511/18/200511/28/2005OFFICEBC:IOEB:DIRSBC:PGCBD:DPRNMSSD:FCSSNAMEMJRoss-LeeCJacksonCIGrimesRWescottRPiersonDATE11/30/200512/16/2005 01/19/200601/11/200601/12/2006OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 00:49, 24 November 2019

Use of Galvanized Supports and Cable Trays with Meggitt Si 2400 Stainless Steel Jacketed Electrical Cables
ML053200005
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/19/2006
From: Charemagne Grimes, Pierson R
NRC/NMSS/FCSS, NRC/NRR/ADRA/DPR
To:
References
+sunsimjr=200611 IN-06-002
Download: ML053200005 (3)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 19, 2006 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2006-02: USE OF GALVANIZED SUPPORTS AND CABLE

TRAYS WITH MEGGITT Si 2400 STAINLESS-

STEEL-JACKETED ELECTRICAL CABLES

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear reactors except those who have permanently

ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor

vessel; and fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders.

PURPOSE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform

addressees of the potential generic issue of using galvanized supports or galvanized cable

trays with Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical cables. Recipients are expected to

review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions to avoid similar

problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, no

specific action or written response is required.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

In March 2004, Omega Point Laboratories, Inc. did a fire test of Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc.s

Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical cables on behalf of Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.,

as described in its license amendment request for the Harris Nuclear Plant dated

August 18, 2005 (Accession No. ML052640144). The test did not successfully demonstrate

continued electrical functionality of the cables for the complete duration of the fire test. The

cable samples were installed on galvanized supports for the fire test. Wherever the cables

came in contact with a galvanized support, the cable jacket was degraded. The degradation

was attributed to liquid metal embrittlement of the stainless steel cable jacket directly contacting

the galvanized support material at high temperatures. The cable jacket failure was not

discovered until a hose stream test at the end of the fire test.

A second fire test was done later using stainless steel supports so that no cable samples were

in direct contact with galvanized material. No cable jacket degradation was observed during the

second test.

DISCUSSION

Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed cable is designed to function during a fire. The

stainless steel jacket acts as a fire barrier. This cable is used in some nuclear facilities to

provide power to equipment required for safe shutdown of the facility.

If galvanized supports are in contact with the stainless steel jacket of the cable, the stainless

steel jacket could degrade during a fire event. Degradation of the cable jacket would expose

the cable to the fire and possibly result in damage to the cable. Consequently, the equipment

being powered by the cable might malfunction during shutdown of the plant. According to

Section 4.0 j of Meggitt document ER 05-179 (Revision A, dated October 7, 2005), Unpacking, Inspection, Installation and Standard Practices of Si 2400 Fire Rated Cable, Si 2400 Fire Cable may be routed in cable trays; Stainless steel trays are recommended.

Cable should not be installed in galvanized trays and should NOT be in direct contact with

galvanized or aluminum trays or structures. This statement was added to the document as a

result of the unsuccessful March 2004 fire test.

Addressees

should be aware that fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders are not held to the

same fire protection requirements specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, with regard to electrical circuits, but there are a limited number of safety events that

could be triggered by damage to electrical cables during a fire at a fuel cycle facility (e.g., loss

of power for maintaining a vacuum in gloveboxes). Fuel cycle licensees and certificate holders

also may be interested in knowing about this generic issue because there may be potential for

loss of some safeguards capabilities during a fire, if power to safeguards equipment were lost.

GENERIC IMPLICATIONS

Galvanized supports and cable trays with Meggitt Si 2400 stainless-steel-jacketed electrical

cables can impact the safe shutdown functions of the equipment powered by the cables.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this

matter to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation (NRR) project manager.

Robert C. Pierson, Director /RA/ Christopher I. Grimes, Director /RA/

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety & Safeguards Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Robert Wolfgang, NRR Rex Wescott, NMSS

301-415-1624 301-415-6727 E-mail: rjw1@nrc.gov E-mail: rgw@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.

ML053200005 OFFICE IOEB:DIRS TECH EDITOR NRR BC:AFPB D:DRA

NAME CRoquecruz PKleene RWolfgang SWeerakkody JELyons

DATE 11/29/2005 11/15/2005 11/18/2005 11/18/2005 11/28/2005 OFFICE BC:IOEB:DIRS BC:PGCB D:DPR NMSS D:FCSS

NAME MJRoss-Lee CJackson CIGrimes RWescott RPierson

DATE 11/30/2005 12/16/2005 01/19/2006 01/11/2006 01/12/2006