ML062020402: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I-.RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
{{#Wiki_filter:I-.
TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY ITechnical Specification
RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)
* NRC issued the CLIIP 0 NRC issued.the TSTF-422 Notice of Availability TSTF-422-A RO (CEOG)Required Actions Notice of Availability for on July 5, 2005.Preferred End States TSTF-422 on July 5, 2005. 0 NCisethTSF2NocefAvlalty TSTF-423-A RO (BWROG)* NRC issued the CLIIP on March 23, 2006. TSTF-43 1 RO (BWOG)Notice of Availability for TSTF-423 on March 10, 0 TSTF-43 1 was distributed to the BWOG and the TSTF-432 RO (WOG)2006. RITSTF for review on 7/11/04. (Not created)* BWOG Topical Report (BAW-244 1) was submitted to NRC on 1/19/04. The NRC provided RAIs on 6/29/04. The BWOG responded to the RAls in 2/05.* The NRC provided the draft SE for the BWOG Topical Report for review in May 2006. Areva preparing comments.
RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE                 TITLE               INITIATIVE STATUS                             NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                           TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY ITechnical Specification
TSTF-43 1 will be revised and submitted to the NRC following approval of.the Topical Report. Implementation guidance to be developed.
* NRC issued the CLIIP             0   NRC issued.the TSTF-422 Notice of Availability     TSTF-422-A RO (CEOG)
* WOG submitted their Topical Report on 9/9/05.* NRC will review the WOG Topical Report in FY 06.2 Missed Surveillances
Required Actions               Notice of Availability for           on July 5, 2005.
* TSTF-358, R6 has been 0 Initiative Complete.
Preferred End States           TSTF-422 on July 5, 2005.       0   NCisethTSF2NocefAvlalty                             TSTF-423-A RO (BWROG)
TSTF-358-A R6 SR 3.0.3 approved and published for CLIIP adoption.
* NRC issued the CLIIP                   on March 23, 2006.                                 TSTF-43 1 RO (BWOG)
0 The TSTF issued implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-0 1, for TSTF-358 on 5/05/06.NEI Biff Bradley Tony Pietrangelo TSTF Donald Hoffman, EXCEL Brian Mann, EXCEL EPRI Frank Rahn John Gaertner 202 739-8083 202 739-8081 301 984-4400 301 9844400 650 855-2037 704 547-6169 NEI RITSTF PWR/ Jack Stringfcllow, Southern Nuclear W Jim Andrachck, Westinghouse Jerry Andre, Westinghouse PWR' David Rothrock, PGN B&W Stanley Levinson, Framatome Mike Kitlan, Duke 205 992-7037 412 374-5018 412 374-4723 352 563-4771 434 832-2768 980 373-8348 PWRI Alan Hackerott, OPPD CE Gary Chung, SCE Ray Schneider, CE BWR Fred Emerson, GE Tom Carrier, Eri 402 533-7276 949 368-9431 860 731-6461 910 675-5615 856-339-2120 Page I of 76/920 6/29/2006 0, RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/
Notice of Availability for TSTF-423 on March 10,           0   TSTF-43 1 was distributed to the BWOG and the       TSTF-432 RO (WOG) 2006.                                 RITSTF for review on 7/11/04.                       (Not created)
TSTF NUMBER_____________
* BWOG Topical Report (BAW-244 1) was submitted to NRC on 1/19/04. The NRC provided RAIs on 6/29/04. The BWOG responded to the RAls in 2/05.
_________________RESPONSIBILITY 3 Increase Flexibility in *TSTF-3 59, R9, has been 0 Initiative Complete.
* The NRC provided the draft SE for the BWOG Topical Report for review in May 2006. Areva preparing comments. TSTF-43 1 will be revised and submitted to the NRC following approval of.
TSTF-359-A R9 Mode Restraints LCO approved and published for 3.0.4 CLIIP adoption.
the Topical Report. Implementation guidance to be developed.
0 The TSTF issued updated implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-02, for TSTF-359 on 5/08/06 4a Individual Risk Informed Completion Times Owners Groups (OGs) are pursuing generic Risk Informed Completion Time extensions through OG-specific Topicals and license amendments." TSTF-373R2, "Increase CIV Completion Time in Accordance With CE-NPSD-1 168," approved on 2/27/04.* The Notice for Comment for TSTF-409R2,"Containment Spray System Completion Time Extension (CE NPSD- 1045-A)," was published on 4/11/06. The RITSTF provided comments; on 5/10/06. On 6/13/06, NRC provided responses and requested a meeting." TSTF-41 7R0, "AC Electrical Power System Completion Times (WCAP-15622)," has been withdrawn.
* WOG submitted their Topical Report on 9/9/05.
* TSTF-430R0, "AQT Extension to 7 Days for LPI and Containment Spray (PAW-2295-A, Rev. 1)," approved on 8/5/04.* NRC accepted TSTF-439R2, "Eliminate Second Completion Times Limiting Time From Discovery of Failure To Meet an LCO," as an administrative change in Rev. 3.1 of the ISTS NUREGs." The NRC completed -their review of the Topical Report that supports TSTF-446R0, "Risk Informed Evaluation of Extensions to Containment Isolation Valve Completion Times (WCAP- 1579 1)," on 3/.10/06.
* NRC will review the WOG Topical Report in FY 06.
Additional issues being pursued by the lead plant (Wolf Creek). RAI response scheduled to be submitted in July. Revision to the Topical Report or Traveler may be required." TSTF-454RI, "Extend PCIV Completion Times (NEDC-33046)," approved on 12/13/05.TSTF-373-A R2 (CEOG)TSTF-409 R2 (CEOG)TSTF-417 RO (WOG)TSTF-43 0-A RO (BWOG)TSTF-439-A R2 (ALL OG)TSTF-446 RO (WOG)TSTF-454-A RI (BWROG).1. 1 _________________________________
2           Missed Surveillances
+/-Page 2 of 7 6/29/2006 Page 2 of 7 6/29/2006 p.RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE 1 TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
* TSTF-358, R6 has been             0   Initiative Complete.                               TSTF-358-A R6 SR 3.0.3                     approved and published for CLIIP adoption.                   0   The TSTF issued implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-0 1, for TSTF-358 on 5/05/06.
]~TST-F NUMBER_____ _______________I RESPONSIBILITY I 4b Risk Informed Completion Times With Configuration Risk Management Program or Maintenance Rule Backstop 0 Fort Calhoun, South Texas Project, and Prairie Island have volunteered to develop pilot submittals.
NEI RITSTF NEI   Biff Bradley             202 739-8083    PWR/    Jack Stringfcllow, Southern Nuclear    205 992-7037    PWRI    Alan Hackerott, OPPD          402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo          202 739-8081   W       Jim Andrachck, Westinghouse           412 374-5018    CE      Gary Chung, SCE              949 368-9431 TSTF  Donald Hoffman, EXCEL    301 984-4400            Jerry Andre, Westinghouse              412 374-4723             Ray Schneider, CE              860 731-6461 Brian Mann, EXCEL        301 9844400    PWR'    David Rothrock, PGN                    352 563-4771    BWR      Fred Emerson, GE              910 675-5615 EPRI  Frank Rahn                650 855-2037    B&W      Stanley Levinson, Framatome            434 832-2768            Tom Carrier, Eri              856-339-2120 John Gaertner            704 547-6169            Mike Kitlan, Duke                      980 373-8348 Page I of 76/920                                                             6/29/2006
* Fort Calhoun and South Texas Project have submitted their pilots." The RITSTF is working to resolve the NRC's comments on the Risk Management Guidelines, the STP submittal, and the Traveler.* RITSTF will develop aWhite Paper to address the interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and transition for ITS and non ITS plants and will provide to NRC be 12/05." The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.* The RITSTF provided responses to the NRC and met to discuss these responses on 12/15/04.* NRC visited STP week of 1/ 18/05 to evaluate applications of Initiative 4b.* NRC and RITSTF met 3/17-18/05 and 5/3-5/4, 2005 to discuss policy issues.* The RITSTF has revised the draft Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines document incorporating the results of the discussions with the NRC. The revised draft RMTS document was provided to the NRC at the August 2005 RITSTF/NRC meeting." NRC provided comments; on the draft RMTS to RITSTF on 9/21/05. RITSTF developing a response.* NRC and RITSTF met in 12/2005 to discuss the RAI responses on the STP pilot." RITSTF provided the revised RMTS guidelines document to the NRC on 2/3/06.* NRC and RITSTF met to review the RMTS guidelines document on 2/28/06 and 4/27/06.* RITSTF provided a revised RMTS guideline document to the NRC on 4/3/06 and 5/10/06.* NRC visited STP 6/19-22/06 to audit process.* The TSTF will submit a revision to TSTF-424 to address the NRC comments in the Fall of 2006.TSTF-424 RO Pagec3 of 76/926 6/29/2006 R1TSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE
 
'TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/
0, RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE                       INITIATIVE STATUS                                 NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/                       TSTF NUMBER
TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 5a Relocate Surveillance
______________________________RESPONSIBILITY 3     Increase Flexibility in         *TSTF-3         59, R9, has been     0       Initiative Complete.                               TSTF-359-A R9 Mode Restraints LCO                   approved and published for 3.0.4                                 CLIIP adoption.                 0     The TSTF issued updated implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-02, for TSTF-359 on 5/08/06 4a   Individual Risk                       Owners Groups (OGs) are         "      TSTF-373R2, "Increase CIV Completion Time in       TSTF-373-A R2 (CEOG)
* Deterministic portion of 0 TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated.
Informed Completion                    pursuing generic Risk                  Accordance With CE-NPSD-1 168," approved on Times                                  Informed Completion Time                2/27/04.
None assigned Requirements Not Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety TSTF responsibility.
extensions through OG-specific Topicals and
0 PWROG and BWROG to determine if funding will be requested for this initiative by 12/06.5b Relocate Surveillance
* The Notice for Comment for TSTF-409R2,             TSTF-409 R2 (CEOG) license amendments.                    "Containment Spray System Completion Time Extension (CE NPSD- 1045-A)," was published on 4/11/06. The RITSTF provided comments; on 5/10/06. On 6/13/06, NRC provided responses and requested a meeting.
* RLTSTF/BWROG/Pilot 0 The Limerick lead plant license amendment was TSTF-425 RO Test Intervals to Plant are applying the submitted on 6/11/04.Licensee Control methodology and interfacing with the NRC on
                                                                                      "     TSTF-41 7R0, "AC Electrical Power System           TSTF-417 RO (WOG)
* TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.the issues.* NEI provided the formal methodology document to the NRC on 2/3/05.0 NRC reviewed the Limerick LAR, TSTF-425, and the methodology document and issued RAIs 4/12/05 to the RITSTF.* The NRC provided additional comments and the first set of RAIs on 10/20/05.* The RITSTF has submitted responses to the first set of NRC RAIs in 12/05 and has significantly revised the methodology document.
Completion Times (WCAP-15622)," has been withdrawn.
Limerick submitted responses to plant-specific RAIs in 12/05, 2/28/06, and 4/4/06.* At the 2/22/0 6 TSTF/NRC meeting, the NRC stated that before approving TSTF-425 for general adoption, they would like a second lead plant in order to verify that the methodology is transferable.
* TSTF-430R0, "AQT Extension to 7 Days for LPI       TSTF-43 0-A RO (BWOG) and Containment Spray (PAW-2295-A, Rev. 1),"
0 The NRC held an internal meeting on 5/30/06 to discuss the Electrical Engineering Branch's comments on TSTF-425.* On 6/6/2006, NRC provided additional RAIs to Limerick.0 Limerick preparing response to NRC's RAIs.Draft to be provided to NRC in early 7/200 6.L _________________
approved on 8/5/04.
Page 4 of 7 6/29/2006 Page 4 of 7 6/29/2006 t ýRITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULEI TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a Modify LCO 3.0.3
* NRC accepted TSTF-439R2, "Eliminate Second         TSTF-439-A R2 (ALL OG)
Completion Times Limiting Time From Discovery of Failure To Meet an LCO," as an administrative change in Rev. 3.1 of the ISTS NUREGs.
                                                                                      " The NRC completed -their review of the Topical         TSTF-446 RO (WOG)
Report that supports TSTF-446R0, "Risk Informed Evaluation of Extensions to Containment Isolation Valve Completion Times (WCAP- 1579 1)," on 3/.10/06. Additional issues being pursued by the lead plant (Wolf Creek). RAI response scheduled to be submitted in July. Revision to the Topical Report or Traveler may be required.
                                                                                      " TSTF-454RI, "Extend PCIV Completion Times               TSTF-454-A RI (BWROG)
(NEDC-33046)," approved on 12/13/05.
                                          .1.                                    1 _________________________________                        +/-               6/29/2006 of 77 Page 22 of                                                                    6/29/2006
 
p.
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE 1        TITLE        INITIATIVE STATUS                            NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                        ]~TST-F NUMBER
_____      _______________I                                      RESPONSIBILITY                          I 4b      Risk Informed      0 Fort Calhoun, South Texas
* RITSTF will develop aWhite Paper to address the        TSTF-424 RO Completion Times    Project, and Prairie Island          interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and With Configuration  have volunteered to develop          Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and Risk Management      pilot submittals.                     transition for ITS and non ITS plants and will Program or                                                provide to NRC be 12/05.
Maintenance Rule
* Fort Calhoun and South Backstop            Texas Project have              " The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup submitted their pilots.              to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.
* The RITSTF provided responses to the NRC and
                                  " The RITSTF is working to             met to discuss these responses on 12/15/04.
resolve the NRC's comments on the Risk
* NRC visited STP week of 1/18/05 to evaluate Management Guidelines,               applications of Initiative 4b.
the STP submittal, and the
* NRC and RITSTF met 3/17-18/05 and 5/3-5/4, Traveler.                             2005 to discuss policy issues.
* The RITSTF has revised the draft Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines document incorporating the results of the discussions with the NRC. The revised draft RMTS document was provided to the NRC at the August 2005 RITSTF/NRC meeting.
                                                                    " NRC provided comments; on the draft RMTS to RITSTF on 9/21/05. RITSTF developing a response.
* NRC and RITSTF met in 12/2005 to discuss the RAI responses on the STP pilot.
                                                                    " RITSTF provided the revised RMTS guidelines document to the NRC on 2/3/06.
* NRC and RITSTF met to review the RMTS guidelines document on 2/28/06 and 4/27/06.
* RITSTF provided a revised RMTS guideline document to the NRC on 4/3/06 and 5/10/06.
* NRC visited STP 6/19-22/06 to audit process.
* The TSTF will submit a revision to TSTF-424 to address the NRC comments in the Fall of 2006.
Pagec3 of 76/926                                                              6/29/2006
 
R1TSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE        'TITLE          INITIATIVE STATUS                              NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                             TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 5a    Relocate Surveillance
* Deterministic portion of          0    TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated.        None assigned Requirements Not        Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety      TSTF responsibility.             0    PWROG and BWROG to determine if funding will be requested for this initiative by 12/06.
5b    Relocate Surveillance
* RLTSTF/BWROG/Pilot                0    The Limerick lead plant license amendment was      TSTF-425 RO Test Intervals to       Plant are applying the                 submitted on 6/11/04.
Licensee Control        methodology and interfacing with the NRC on
* TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.
the issues.
* NEI provided the formal methodology document to the NRC on 2/3/05.
0    NRC reviewed the Limerick LAR, TSTF-425, and the methodology document and issued RAIs 4/12/05 to the RITSTF.
* The NRC provided additional comments and the first set of RAIs on 10/20/05.
* The RITSTF has submitted responses to the first set of NRC RAIs in 12/05 and has significantly revised the methodology document. Limerick submitted responses to plant-specific RAIs in 12/05, 2/28/06, and 4/4/06.
* At the 2/22/0 6 TSTF/NRC meeting, the NRC stated that before approving TSTF-425 for general adoption, they would like a second lead plant in order to verify that the methodology is transferable.
0    The NRC held an internal meeting on 5/30/06 to discuss the Electrical Engineering Branch's comments on TSTF-425.
* On 6/6/2006, NRC provided additional RAIs to Limerick.
0    Limerick preparing response to NRC's RAIs.
Draft to be provided to NRC in early 7/200 6.
L _________________ 6/29/2006 Page    of 77 Page 44 of                                                                      6/29/2006
 
t ý RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE           INITIATIVE STATUS                         NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULEI                         TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a   Modify LCO 3.0.3
* On hold.
* On hold.
* On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1 determine if Initiative 6a is required.hour -24 hours 6b Provide Conditions in
* On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1                                         determine if Initiative 6a is required.
* NRC issued Safety 0 NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO the LCOs for Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.Levels of Degradation Report on 7/9/04.Where No Condition
hour - 24 hours 6b   Provide Conditions in
* NRC issued Safety             0   NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report   TSTF-426 RO the LCOs for Those       Evaluation for Topical             on 7/9/04.
Levels of Degradation     Report on 7/9/04.
Where No Condition
* TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on Currently Exists to
* TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on Currently Exists to
* TSTF-426 RO was 8/30/04.Preclude Entry Into submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.* The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.* NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.6c Provide Specific Times o NRC issued Safety
* TSTF-426 RO was                     8/30/04.
* NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO in the LCO For Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.Conditions That Report on 7/9/04.Require Entry Into & TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 Immediately
Preclude Entry Into       submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3                 8/30/04.                       0   NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.
* TSTF-426 RO was 8/30/04.submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.-The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.* The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.* NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.PageS5 of 76/900 6/29/2006 RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONSISCIIEDULE/
The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.
I TSTF NUMBER I J ~~~~RESPONSIBILITY I__________
* The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.
7a Impact of Non Technical Specification Design Features on Operability Requirements
* NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.
-Barriers* The NRC issued the FRN Notice of Availability for TSTF-372, Rev. 4 on 5/4/05.* The TSTF issued implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-05-03, for TSTF-372 on 11/1/105." The NRC issued the FRN Notice for Comment for TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/06.* The NRC published the FRN Notice of Availability for TSTF-372 on 5/4/05.TSTF-372-A R4 TSTF-427 RO* The TSTF issued implementation guidance for TSTF-372 on 11/1/105.* TSTF-427 Implementation Guidance was provided to the NRC on 09/21/04.
6c   Provide Specific Times o NRC issued Safety
NRC provided comments on the draft guidance on 10/ 13/04.*NRC provided RAIs on TSTF-427 and the implementation guidance on' 11/13/04 and 6/2/2005.
* NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report   TSTF-426 RO in the LCO For Those     Evaluation for Topical             on 7/9/04.
RITSTF provided responses to the NRC's RAIs on 3/23/05.* Members of the TSTF & RITSTF met with the NRC on 7/28/05 to discuss the NRC comments.* The revised Implementation Guidance and a draft of TSTF-427 were provided to the NRC on 1/ 10/05. The NRC provided comments in 12/05.The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 2/3/06. The RITSTF submitted the Implementation Guidance on 2/6/06.* The RITSTF submitted the revised Implementation Guidance to address NRC comments on 4/4/06.* The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 5/3/06.* The NRC issued the FRN Notice for Comment for TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/06. The TSTF and RITSTF to submit comments.Page 6 of 762906 6/29/2006 RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/
Conditions That           Report on 7/9/04.
TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b Impact of Non TS
Require Entry Into                                       &   TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 Immediately
* A White Paper on the 0 RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the None assigned Design Features on process to address this scope process and to address the scope of SSCs in 12/06.Operability of SSCs is being developed.
* TSTF-426 RO was                     8/30/04.
Requirements  
submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.                       0   NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.
-All 0 The TSTF will develop a Traveler following NRC other SSCs not in acceptance of the White Paper process.Technical Specifications
                                                                -           The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.
________________
* The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.
__________________________
* NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.
8a Remove or Relocate
PageS5 of 76/900                                                         6/29/2006
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE         TITLE             INITIATIVE STATUS                         NEXT ACTIONSISCIIEDULE/                 I       TSTF NUMBER I                                   J                 ~~~~RESPONSIBILITY                   I__________
7a   Impact of Non
* The NRC issued the FRN
* The NRC published the FRN Notice of                TSTF-372-A R4 Technical Specification  Notice of Availability for          Availability for TSTF-372 on 5/4/05.
Design Features on        TSTF-372, Rev. 4 on                                                                   TSTF-427 RO Operability              5/4/05.
* The TSTF issued implementation guidance for Requirements - Barriers                                      TSTF-372 on 11/1/105.
* The TSTF issued implementation guidance,
* TSTF-427 Implementation Guidance was TSTF-IG-05-03, for TSTF-            provided to the NRC on 09/21/04. NRC provided 372 on 11/1/105.                    comments on the draft guidance on 10/ 13/04.
                                  " The NRC issued the FRN            *NRC provided RAIs on TSTF-427 and the Notice for Comment for              implementation guidance on' 11/13/04 and TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on                  6/2/2005. RITSTF provided responses to the 6/2/06.                              NRC's RAIs on 3/23/05.
* Members of the TSTF & RITSTF met with the NRC on 7/28/05 to discuss the NRC comments.
* The revised Implementation Guidance and a draft of TSTF-427 were provided to the NRC on 1/10/05. The NRC provided comments in 12/05.
The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 2/3/06. The RITSTF submitted the Implementation Guidance on 2/6/06.
* The RITSTF submitted the revised Implementation Guidance to address NRC comments on 4/4/06.
* The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 5/3/06.
* The NRC issued the FRN Notice for Comment for TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/06. The TSTF and RITSTF to submit comments.
Page 6 of 762906                                                       6/29/2006
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE               TITLE                     INITIATIVE STATUS                           NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/                           TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b         Impact of Non TS
* A White Paper on the           0   RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the     None assigned Design Features on                 process to address this scope       process and to address the scope of SSCs in 12/06.
Operability                       of SSCs is being developed.
Requirements - All                                                 0     The TSTF will develop a Traveler following NRC other SSCs not in                                                       acceptance of the White Paper process.
Technical Specifications             ________________                       __________________________
8a         Remove or Relocate
* A White Paper on the
* A White Paper on the
* The TSTF has developed a White Paper to outline None assigned Systems LCOs That Do application of the 10 CFR the guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-Not Meet the 4 50.36 criteria has been 04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 Criterion of 10 CFR developed.
* The TSTF has developed a White Paper to outline     None assigned Systems LCOs That Do               application of the 10 CFR           the guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-Not Meet the 4                     50.36 criteria has been             04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 Criterion of 10 CFR                 developed.                           CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for 50.36 From Technical                                                     relocation.
CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for 50.36 From Technical relocation.
Specifications
Specifications
* The White Paper was provided to the Owners Groups in 12/05. The TSTF and RITSTF will develop a draft Traveler for Owners Group consideration by the third quarter of 2006.8b Modify 50.36 Rule to
* The White Paper was provided to the Owners Groups in 12/05. The TSTF and RITSTF will develop a draft Traveler for Owners Group consideration by the third quarter of 2006.
8b         Modify 50.36 Rule to
* Requires Rulemaking
* Requires Rulemaking
* RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with Not applicable Permit Removal or longer-term.
* RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with   Not applicable Permit Removal or                                                       longer-term. initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk                                                   rulemak-ing.
initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk rulemak-ing.
Significant Systems out of Technical
Significant Systems out of Technical
* Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications Criterion 4 a "two way door" (e.g., if it doesn't meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).PWROG -Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 BWROG -Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 Page 7 of 762/06 6/29/2006}}
* Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications                                                         Criterion 4 a "two way door" (e.g., if it doesn't meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).
PWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 Page 7 of 762/06                                                             6/29/2006}}

Revision as of 16:04, 23 November 2019

RITSTF Meeting of June 29, 2006 - Risk Management Technical Specification Initiative Status Enclosure 4
ML062020402
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/21/2006
From: Tjader T
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DIRS/ITSB
To: Bradley B
Nuclear Energy Institute
Tjader T., NRC/ITSB, 415-1187
Shared Package
ML062060031 List:
References
Download: ML062020402 (10)
v • d • e


Text

I-.

RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)

RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY ITechnical Specification

Required Actions Notice of Availability for on July 5, 2005.

Preferred End States TSTF-422 on July 5, 2005. 0 NCisethTSF2NocefAvlalty TSTF-423-A RO (BWROG)

Notice of Availability for TSTF-423 on March 10, 0 TSTF-43 1 was distributed to the BWOG and the TSTF-432 RO (WOG) 2006. RITSTF for review on 7/11/04. (Not created)

  • BWOG Topical Report (BAW-244 1) was submitted to NRC on 1/19/04. The NRC provided RAIs on 6/29/04. The BWOG responded to the RAls in 2/05.
  • The NRC provided the draft SE for the BWOG Topical Report for review in May 2006. Areva preparing comments. TSTF-43 1 will be revised and submitted to the NRC following approval of.

the Topical Report. Implementation guidance to be developed.

  • WOG submitted their Topical Report on 9/9/05.
  • NRC will review the WOG Topical Report in FY 06.

2 Missed Surveillances

NEI RITSTF NEI Biff Bradley 202 739-8083 PWR/ Jack Stringfcllow, Southern Nuclear 205 992-7037 PWRI Alan Hackerott, OPPD 402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo 202 739-8081 W Jim Andrachck, Westinghouse 412 374-5018 CE Gary Chung, SCE 949 368-9431 TSTF Donald Hoffman, EXCEL 301 984-4400 Jerry Andre, Westinghouse 412 374-4723 Ray Schneider, CE 860 731-6461 Brian Mann, EXCEL 301 9844400 PWR' David Rothrock, PGN 352 563-4771 BWR Fred Emerson, GE 910 675-5615 EPRI Frank Rahn 650 855-2037 B&W Stanley Levinson, Framatome 434 832-2768 Tom Carrier, Eri 856-339-2120 John Gaertner 704 547-6169 Mike Kitlan, Duke 980 373-8348 Page I of 76/920 6/29/2006

0, RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER

______________________________RESPONSIBILITY 3 Increase Flexibility in *TSTF-3 59, R9, has been 0 Initiative Complete. TSTF-359-A R9 Mode Restraints LCO approved and published for 3.0.4 CLIIP adoption. 0 The TSTF issued updated implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-02, for TSTF-359 on 5/08/06 4a Individual Risk Owners Groups (OGs) are " TSTF-373R2, "Increase CIV Completion Time in TSTF-373-A R2 (CEOG)

Informed Completion pursuing generic Risk Accordance With CE-NPSD-1 168," approved on Times Informed Completion Time 2/27/04.

extensions through OG-specific Topicals and

  • The Notice for Comment for TSTF-409R2, TSTF-409 R2 (CEOG) license amendments. "Containment Spray System Completion Time Extension (CE NPSD- 1045-A)," was published on 4/11/06. The RITSTF provided comments; on 5/10/06. On 6/13/06, NRC provided responses and requested a meeting.

" TSTF-41 7R0, "AC Electrical Power System TSTF-417 RO (WOG)

Completion Times (WCAP-15622)," has been withdrawn.

approved on 8/5/04.

  • NRC accepted TSTF-439R2, "Eliminate Second TSTF-439-A R2 (ALL OG)

Completion Times Limiting Time From Discovery of Failure To Meet an LCO," as an administrative change in Rev. 3.1 of the ISTS NUREGs.

" The NRC completed -their review of the Topical TSTF-446 RO (WOG)

Report that supports TSTF-446R0, "Risk Informed Evaluation of Extensions to Containment Isolation Valve Completion Times (WCAP- 1579 1)," on 3/.10/06. Additional issues being pursued by the lead plant (Wolf Creek). RAI response scheduled to be submitted in July. Revision to the Topical Report or Traveler may be required.

" TSTF-454RI, "Extend PCIV Completion Times TSTF-454-A RI (BWROG)

(NEDC-33046)," approved on 12/13/05.

.1. 1 _________________________________ +/- 6/29/2006 of 77 Page 22 of 6/29/2006

p.

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE 1 TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ ]~TST-F NUMBER

_____ _______________I RESPONSIBILITY I 4b Risk Informed 0 Fort Calhoun, South Texas

  • RITSTF will develop aWhite Paper to address the TSTF-424 RO Completion Times Project, and Prairie Island interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and With Configuration have volunteered to develop Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and Risk Management pilot submittals. transition for ITS and non ITS plants and will Program or provide to NRC be 12/05.

Maintenance Rule

  • Fort Calhoun and South Backstop Texas Project have " The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup submitted their pilots. to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.
  • The RITSTF provided responses to the NRC and

" The RITSTF is working to met to discuss these responses on 12/15/04.

resolve the NRC's comments on the Risk

  • NRC visited STP week of 1/18/05 to evaluate Management Guidelines, applications of Initiative 4b.

the STP submittal, and the

  • NRC and RITSTF met 3/17-18/05 and 5/3-5/4, Traveler. 2005 to discuss policy issues.
  • The RITSTF has revised the draft Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines document incorporating the results of the discussions with the NRC. The revised draft RMTS document was provided to the NRC at the August 2005 RITSTF/NRC meeting.

" NRC provided comments; on the draft RMTS to RITSTF on 9/21/05. RITSTF developing a response.

  • NRC and RITSTF met in 12/2005 to discuss the RAI responses on the STP pilot.

" RITSTF provided the revised RMTS guidelines document to the NRC on 2/3/06.

  • NRC and RITSTF met to review the RMTS guidelines document on 2/28/06 and 4/27/06.
  • RITSTF provided a revised RMTS guideline document to the NRC on 4/3/06 and 5/10/06.
  • NRC visited STP 6/19-22/06 to audit process.
  • The TSTF will submit a revision to TSTF-424 to address the NRC comments in the Fall of 2006.

Pagec3 of 76/926 6/29/2006

R1TSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE 'TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 5a Relocate Surveillance

  • Deterministic portion of 0 TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated. None assigned Requirements Not Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety TSTF responsibility. 0 PWROG and BWROG to determine if funding will be requested for this initiative by 12/06.

5b Relocate Surveillance

  • RLTSTF/BWROG/Pilot 0 The Limerick lead plant license amendment was TSTF-425 RO Test Intervals to Plant are applying the submitted on 6/11/04.

Licensee Control methodology and interfacing with the NRC on

  • TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.

the issues.

  • NEI provided the formal methodology document to the NRC on 2/3/05.

0 NRC reviewed the Limerick LAR, TSTF-425, and the methodology document and issued RAIs 4/12/05 to the RITSTF.

  • The NRC provided additional comments and the first set of RAIs on 10/20/05.
  • The RITSTF has submitted responses to the first set of NRC RAIs in 12/05 and has significantly revised the methodology document. Limerick submitted responses to plant-specific RAIs in 12/05, 2/28/06, and 4/4/06.
  • At the 2/22/0 6 TSTF/NRC meeting, the NRC stated that before approving TSTF-425 for general adoption, they would like a second lead plant in order to verify that the methodology is transferable.

0 The NRC held an internal meeting on 5/30/06 to discuss the Electrical Engineering Branch's comments on TSTF-425.

  • On 6/6/2006, NRC provided additional RAIs to Limerick.

0 Limerick preparing response to NRC's RAIs.

Draft to be provided to NRC in early 7/200 6.

L _________________ 6/29/2006 Page of 77 Page 44 of 6/29/2006

t ý RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULEI TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a Modify LCO 3.0.3

  • On hold.
  • On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1 determine if Initiative 6a is required.

hour - 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 6b Provide Conditions in

  • NRC issued Safety 0 NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO the LCOs for Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.

Levels of Degradation Report on 7/9/04.

Where No Condition

  • TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on Currently Exists to

Preclude Entry Into submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.

The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.

  • The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.
  • NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.

6c Provide Specific Times o NRC issued Safety

  • NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO in the LCO For Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.

Conditions That Report on 7/9/04.

Require Entry Into & TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 Immediately

submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.

- The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.

  • The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.
  • NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.

PageS5 of 76/900 6/29/2006

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONSISCIIEDULE/ I TSTF NUMBER I J ~~~~RESPONSIBILITY I__________

7a Impact of Non

  • The NRC issued the FRN
  • The NRC published the FRN Notice of TSTF-372-A R4 Technical Specification Notice of Availability for Availability for TSTF-372 on 5/4/05.

Design Features on TSTF-372, Rev. 4 on TSTF-427 RO Operability 5/4/05.

  • The TSTF issued implementation guidance for Requirements - Barriers TSTF-372 on 11/1/105.
  • The TSTF issued implementation guidance,
  • TSTF-427 Implementation Guidance was TSTF-IG-05-03, for TSTF- provided to the NRC on 09/21/04. NRC provided 372 on 11/1/105. comments on the draft guidance on 10/ 13/04.

" The NRC issued the FRN *NRC provided RAIs on TSTF-427 and the Notice for Comment for implementation guidance on' 11/13/04 and TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/2005. RITSTF provided responses to the 6/2/06. NRC's RAIs on 3/23/05.

  • Members of the TSTF & RITSTF met with the NRC on 7/28/05 to discuss the NRC comments.
  • The revised Implementation Guidance and a draft of TSTF-427 were provided to the NRC on 1/10/05. The NRC provided comments in 12/05.

The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 2/3/06. The RITSTF submitted the Implementation Guidance on 2/6/06.

  • The RITSTF submitted the revised Implementation Guidance to address NRC comments on 4/4/06.
  • The NRC issued the FRN Notice for Comment for TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/06. The TSTF and RITSTF to submit comments.

Page 6 of 762906 6/29/2006

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b Impact of Non TS

  • A White Paper on the 0 RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the None assigned Design Features on process to address this scope process and to address the scope of SSCs in 12/06.

Operability of SSCs is being developed.

Requirements - All 0 The TSTF will develop a Traveler following NRC other SSCs not in acceptance of the White Paper process.

Technical Specifications ________________ __________________________

8a Remove or Relocate

  • A White Paper on the
  • The TSTF has developed a White Paper to outline None assigned Systems LCOs That Do application of the 10 CFR the guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-Not Meet the 4 50.36 criteria has been 04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 Criterion of 10 CFR developed. CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for 50.36 From Technical relocation.

Specifications

  • The White Paper was provided to the Owners Groups in 12/05. The TSTF and RITSTF will develop a draft Traveler for Owners Group consideration by the third quarter of 2006.

8b Modify 50.36 Rule to

  • Requires Rulemaking
  • RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with Not applicable Permit Removal or longer-term. initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk rulemak-ing.

Significant Systems out of Technical

  • Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications Criterion 4 a "two way door" (e.g., if it doesn't meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).

PWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 Page 7 of 762/06 6/29/2006

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML062020402&oldid=2188799"