ML12067A220: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12067A220
| number = ML12067A220
| issue date = 03/08/2012
| issue date = 03/08/2012
| title = Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information
| title = Request for Additional Information
| author name = Martin R E
| author name = Martin R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Ajluni M J
| addressee name = Ajluni M
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| docket = 05000348, 05000364
| docket = 05000348, 05000364
| license number = NPF-002, NPF-008
| license number = NPF-002, NPF-008
| contact person = Martin R E
| contact person = Martin R
| case reference number = TAC ME7094, TAC ME7095
| case reference number = TAC ME7094, TAC ME7095
| document type = Letter
| document type = Letter
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:ME7094, TAC:ME7095
| stage = RAI
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 8, 2012 Mr. M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
40 Inverness Center Parkway Post Office Box 1295, Bin - 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295
==SUBJECT:==
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. ME7094 AND ME7095 )
==Dear Mr. Ajluni:==
By letter dated September 9, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML112521438), Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC or the licensee), submitted a license amendment request regarding FNP to add Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.14 to Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation," Function 3, "Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate."
By letter dated February 3, 2012, SNC responded to a request for additional information (RAI).
With respect to the response to RAI No.2, please provide the allocation time for processing the Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate Trip (PFRT) function. WCAP-13632-P-A, Revision 2, "Elimination of Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements," identifies a bounding generic rack response time allocation applicable to the protection functions in accordance with the protection function hardware. Accordingly, the staff is requesting information about the bounding allocation time for the PFRT function for Farley, Units 1 and 2.
Note that the WCAP allows users to estimate response time allocation times, using the specific channel card string for the protective function. Please indicate whether that is SNC's practice in this regard. If a different practice or approach is used to derive the allocation time, please include a specific explanation in your response.
Please provide your response to the RAI within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
                                              !Z~~Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
March 8, 2012 Mr. M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
40 Inverness Center Parkway Post Office Box 1295, Bin - 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295 SUB.JECT:        JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. ME7094 AND ME7095 )
==Dear Mr. Ajluni:==
By letter dated September 9,2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML112521438), Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC or the licensee), submitted a license amendment request regarding FNP to add Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.14 to Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation," Function 3, "Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate."
By letter dated February 3, 2012, SNC responded to a request for additional information (RAI).
With respect to the response to RAI No.2, please provide the allocation time for processing the Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate Trip (PFRT) function. WCAP-13632-P-A, Revision 2, "Elimination of Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements," identifies a bounding generic rack response time allocation applicable to the protection functions in accordance with the protection function hardware. Accordingly, the staff is requesting information about the bounding allocation time for the PFRT function for Farley, Units 1 and 2.
Note that the WCAP allows users to estimate response time allocation times, using the specific channel card string for the protective function. Please indicate whether that is SNC's practice in this regard. If a different practice or approach is used to derive the allocation time, please include a specific explanation in your response.
Please provide your response to the RAI within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely, IRA!
Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC          LPL2-1 RlF    RidsNrrDorlLpl2-1 Resource      RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource        RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource      RidsNrrLASFigueroa Resource RidsOgcRp Resource              MSingletary, NRR                RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrPMFarley Resource        RidsNrrDeEicb Resource          RAlvarado, NRR ADAMS A ccesslon N0.: ML12067A220                                                    *BjY memo dated OFFICE    DORULPL2-1/PM DORULPL2-1/LA            NRR/DE/EICB/BC    DORULPL2-1/BC      DORULPL2-1/PM NAME      RMartin            SFigueroa          JThorp*          NSalgado          RMartin DATE      03/0/712          03/08/12            03/07/12          03/08/12          03/08/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy}}

Latest revision as of 07:07, 12 November 2019

Request for Additional Information
ML12067A220
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/2012
From: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Ajluni M
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Martin R
References
TAC ME7094, TAC ME7095
Download: ML12067A220 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 8, 2012 Mr. M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

40 Inverness Center Parkway Post Office Box 1295, Bin - 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295

SUBJECT:

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. ME7094 AND ME7095 )

Dear Mr. Ajluni:

By letter dated September 9, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML112521438), Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC or the licensee), submitted a license amendment request regarding FNP to add Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.14 to Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation," Function 3, "Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate."

By letter dated February 3, 2012, SNC responded to a request for additional information (RAI).

With respect to the response to RAI No.2, please provide the allocation time for processing the Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate Trip (PFRT) function. WCAP-13632-P-A, Revision 2, "Elimination of Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements," identifies a bounding generic rack response time allocation applicable to the protection functions in accordance with the protection function hardware. Accordingly, the staff is requesting information about the bounding allocation time for the PFRT function for Farley, Units 1 and 2.

Note that the WCAP allows users to estimate response time allocation times, using the specific channel card string for the protective function. Please indicate whether that is SNC's practice in this regard. If a different practice or approach is used to derive the allocation time, please include a specific explanation in your response.

Please provide your response to the RAI within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter.

Sincerely,

!Z~~Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv

March 8, 2012 Mr. M. J. Ajluni Nuclear Licensing Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

40 Inverness Center Parkway Post Office Box 1295, Bin - 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295 SUB.JECT: JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. ME7094 AND ME7095 )

Dear Mr. Ajluni:

By letter dated September 9,2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML112521438), Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC or the licensee), submitted a license amendment request regarding FNP to add Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.14 to Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation," Function 3, "Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate."

By letter dated February 3, 2012, SNC responded to a request for additional information (RAI).

With respect to the response to RAI No.2, please provide the allocation time for processing the Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate Trip (PFRT) function. WCAP-13632-P-A, Revision 2, "Elimination of Pressure Sensor Response Time Testing Requirements," identifies a bounding generic rack response time allocation applicable to the protection functions in accordance with the protection function hardware. Accordingly, the staff is requesting information about the bounding allocation time for the PFRT function for Farley, Units 1 and 2.

Note that the WCAP allows users to estimate response time allocation times, using the specific channel card string for the protective function. Please indicate whether that is SNC's practice in this regard. If a different practice or approach is used to derive the allocation time, please include a specific explanation in your response.

Please provide your response to the RAI within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter.

Sincerely, IRA!

Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC LPL2-1 RlF RidsNrrDorlLpl2-1 Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RidsNrrLASFigueroa Resource RidsOgcRp Resource MSingletary, NRR RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrPMFarley Resource RidsNrrDeEicb Resource RAlvarado, NRR ADAMS A ccesslon N0.: ML12067A220 *BjY memo dated OFFICE DORULPL2-1/PM DORULPL2-1/LA NRR/DE/EICB/BC DORULPL2-1/BC DORULPL2-1/PM NAME RMartin SFigueroa JThorp* NSalgado RMartin DATE 03/0/712 03/08/12 03/07/12 03/08/12 03/08/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy