ML12257A385: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing From: Sent: To:  
{{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing From:                     Celeste Lilore [celeste@restoreclothing.com]
Sent:                     Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:18 PM To:                       Docket, Hearing; Siarnacki, Anne


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Celeste Lilore [celeste@restoreclothing.com]
CLOSE Indian Point Top 5 Reasons to Close Indian Point
Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:18 PM Docket, Hearing; Siarnacki, Anne CLOSE Indian Point Top 5 Reasons to Close Indian Point 5. More than 1,500 tons of radioactive waste stored in unfortified containers on the banks of the Hudson River at Indian Point. If the two nuclear reactors operate for another 20 years, Entergy would add another 1,000 tons of nuclear waste to containers New York State has described as "vulnerable to attack." What's more, carcinogenic radioisotopes from the plants have been leaking into the Hudson River since at least the early 1990s.4. More than 1 billion dead fish and other organisms, killed by Indian Point's cooling water intakes every year. Indian Point uses more than 2.5 billion gallons of water per day, sucking river life in with the water. Clean water laws require the use of the best available technology to reduce the environmental damage, but Indian Point's owners have refused -for decades -to upgrade to modern technology.
: 5. More than 1,500 tons of radioactive waste stored in unfortified containers on the banks of the Hudson River at Indian Point. If the two nuclear reactors operate for another 20 years, Entergy would add another 1,000 tons of nuclear waste to containers New York State has described as "vulnerable to attack." What's more, carcinogenic radioisotopes from the plants have been leaking into the Hudson River since at least the early 1990s.
The slaughter helps explain why 10 of 13 signature Hudson River species are in decline.3. An "unworkable" evacuation plan. After extensive study, James Lee Witt, the former head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, flatly declared Indian Point's evacuation plans "unworkable." What's more, the evacuation plans cover just a 10-mile radius around the plant, when fallout could easily spread 50 miles or more.2. More than 20 million Americans at risk. A disaster here on the scale of the meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi plant would endanger millions in and around New York City and the Hudson Valley. The economy of the country, and indeed the world, could be shaken by such a catastrophe.
: 4. More than 1 billion dead fish and other organisms, killed by Indian Point's cooling water intakes every year. Indian Point uses more than 2.5 billion gallons of water per day, sucking river life in with the water. Clean water laws require the use of the best available technology to reduce the environmental damage, but Indian Point's owners have refused - for decades - to upgrade to modern technology. The slaughter helps explain why 10 of 13 signature Hudson River species are in decline.
: 1. We don't need Indian Point's power. A 2011 study commissioned by Riverkeeper and NRDC found that without Indian Point, the region would have a surplus of power through .2020, and could replace Indian Point many times over with investments in renewable energy, efficiency and transmission.
: 3. An "unworkable" evacuation plan. After extensive study, James Lee Witt, the former head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, flatly declared Indian Point's evacuation plans "unworkable." What's more, the evacuation plans cover just a 10-mile radius around the plant, when fallout could easily spread 50 miles or more.
The cost would be as little as $1-$5 per month for the typical homeowner.
: 2. More than 20 million Americans at risk. A disaster here on the scale of the meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi plant would endanger millions in and around New York City and the Hudson Valley. The economy of the country, and indeed the world, could be shaken by such a catastrophe.
Healthy regards, CUleste Lilore Co-Founder and Eco-Preneur RESTORE Clothing Mindful Active Style W 212-564-4080 C 347-843-3927 DOCKETED USNRC September 6, 2012 (3:18 p.m.)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Follow us: Twitter Like us: Facebook 1 Proud to be a RIVERKEEPER Ambassador Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 2}}
: 1. We don't need Indian Point's power. A 2011 study commissioned by Riverkeeper and NRDC found that without Indian Point, the region would have a surplus of power through .2020, and could replace Indian Point many times over with investments in renewable energy, efficiency and transmission. The cost would be as little as $1-$5 per month for the typical homeowner.
Healthy regards, CUleste Lilore                                                                             DOCKETED USNRC Co-Founder and Eco-Preneur RESTORE Clothing                                                                   September 6, 2012 (3:18 p.m.)
Mindful Active      Style OFFICE OF SECRETARY W 212-564-4080                                                                          RULEMAKINGS AND C 347-843-3927                                                                        ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Follow us: Twitter Like us: Facebook 1
 
Proud to be a RIVERKEEPER Ambassador Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 2}}

Latest revision as of 23:46, 11 November 2019

Limited Appearance Statement of Celeste Lilore Opposing Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
ML12257A385
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/2012
From: Lilore C
Restore Clothing
To: Siarnacki A
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-286-LR, RAS E-679
Download: ML12257A385 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Docket, Hearing From: Celeste Lilore [celeste@restoreclothing.com]

Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:18 PM To: Docket, Hearing; Siarnacki, Anne

Subject:

CLOSE Indian Point Top 5 Reasons to Close Indian Point

5. More than 1,500 tons of radioactive waste stored in unfortified containers on the banks of the Hudson River at Indian Point. If the two nuclear reactors operate for another 20 years, Entergy would add another 1,000 tons of nuclear waste to containers New York State has described as "vulnerable to attack." What's more, carcinogenic radioisotopes from the plants have been leaking into the Hudson River since at least the early 1990s.
4. More than 1 billion dead fish and other organisms, killed by Indian Point's cooling water intakes every year. Indian Point uses more than 2.5 billion gallons of water per day, sucking river life in with the water. Clean water laws require the use of the best available technology to reduce the environmental damage, but Indian Point's owners have refused - for decades - to upgrade to modern technology. The slaughter helps explain why 10 of 13 signature Hudson River species are in decline.
3. An "unworkable" evacuation plan. After extensive study, James Lee Witt, the former head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, flatly declared Indian Point's evacuation plans "unworkable." What's more, the evacuation plans cover just a 10-mile radius around the plant, when fallout could easily spread 50 miles or more.
2. More than 20 million Americans at risk. A disaster here on the scale of the meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi plant would endanger millions in and around New York City and the Hudson Valley. The economy of the country, and indeed the world, could be shaken by such a catastrophe.
1. We don't need Indian Point's power. A 2011 study commissioned by Riverkeeper and NRDC found that without Indian Point, the region would have a surplus of power through .2020, and could replace Indian Point many times over with investments in renewable energy, efficiency and transmission. The cost would be as little as $1-$5 per month for the typical homeowner.

Healthy regards, CUleste Lilore DOCKETED USNRC Co-Founder and Eco-Preneur RESTORE Clothing September 6, 2012 (3:18 p.m.)

Mindful Active Style OFFICE OF SECRETARY W 212-564-4080 RULEMAKINGS AND C 347-843-3927 ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Follow us: Twitter Like us: Facebook 1

Proud to be a RIVERKEEPER Ambassador Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12257A385&oldid=2095078"