ML12275A543: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/01/2012
| issue date = 10/01/2012
| title = Limited Appearance Statement of Durossert D. Clerval Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
| title = Limited Appearance Statement of Durossert D. Clerval Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
| author name = Clerval D D
| author name = Clerval D
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Legal-Limited Appearance Statement
| document type = Legal-Limited Appearance Statement
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing tzrvs From:                          Clerval, Durossert D. [CLERVALD@coned.com]
Sent:                          Monday, October 01, 2012 3:15 AM To:            -              Docket, Hearing                                          DOCKETED
==Subject:==
Relicensing of Indian Point Units 2 & 3                    USNRC October 1, 2012 (8:30 a.m.)
Office of the Secretary OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff                                              ADJUDICATIONS STAFF U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Fax to: (301) 415-1101 (verification (301) 415-1966)
Email to: hearing.docket(Dnrc.pov Re: Indian Point Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application NRC Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BDO1
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
I, Durossert D. Clerval, am writing to express my support for the relicensing of Indian Point Units 2 and 3 in Buchanan, NY. It is my understanding that the NRC is considering numerous issues in connection with the license renewal application, including the potential for alternative energy sources Indian Point is an important source of base load energy, and it emits virtually no greenhouse gasses. It supplies between 25% and 30% of the electricity for New York City and the lower Westchester County area, at a reasonable cost, while supporting the reliability of the electric grid. The facility employs about 1,100 full-time workers and it contributes hundreds of millions of dollars in economic impact to the region.
Various alternative energy sources have been proposed over the years, but none of them would be an acceptable substitute for Indian Point. Last year, the City of New I
York's Department of Environmental Protection released the results of a study performed by Charles River Associates. That independent study demonstrated that any alternative to Indian Point would be higher-priced, would reduce air quality, and would reduce the reliability of the electric grid.
I strongly encourage you to issue a renewed license for Indian Point once you have completed your technical reviews of the facility. Thank you.
Sincerely yours, Durossert D. Clerval 2}}

Latest revision as of 22:52, 11 November 2019

Limited Appearance Statement of Durossert D. Clerval Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
ML12275A543
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/2012
From: Clerval D
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS E-1331
Download: ML12275A543 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Docket, Hearing tzrvs From: Clerval, Durossert D. [CLERVALD@coned.com]

Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 3:15 AM To: - Docket, Hearing DOCKETED

Subject:

Relicensing of Indian Point Units 2 & 3 USNRC October 1, 2012 (8:30 a.m.)

Office of the Secretary OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff ADJUDICATIONS STAFF U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Fax to: (301) 415-1101 (verification (301) 415-1966)

Email to: hearing.docket(Dnrc.pov Re: Indian Point Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application NRC Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BDO1

Dear Sir or Madam:

I, Durossert D. Clerval, am writing to express my support for the relicensing of Indian Point Units 2 and 3 in Buchanan, NY. It is my understanding that the NRC is considering numerous issues in connection with the license renewal application, including the potential for alternative energy sources Indian Point is an important source of base load energy, and it emits virtually no greenhouse gasses. It supplies between 25% and 30% of the electricity for New York City and the lower Westchester County area, at a reasonable cost, while supporting the reliability of the electric grid. The facility employs about 1,100 full-time workers and it contributes hundreds of millions of dollars in economic impact to the region.

Various alternative energy sources have been proposed over the years, but none of them would be an acceptable substitute for Indian Point. Last year, the City of New I

York's Department of Environmental Protection released the results of a study performed by Charles River Associates. That independent study demonstrated that any alternative to Indian Point would be higher-priced, would reduce air quality, and would reduce the reliability of the electric grid.

I strongly encourage you to issue a renewed license for Indian Point once you have completed your technical reviews of the facility. Thank you.

Sincerely yours, Durossert D. Clerval 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12275A543&oldid=2093788"