ML12325A691: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/20/2012 | | issue date = 11/20/2012 | ||
| title = Ltr. 11/20/12 Braidwood Ti 2515-182 Request for Information | | title = Ltr. 11/20/12 Braidwood Ti 2515-182 Request for Information | ||
| author name = Hills D | | author name = Hills D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1 | ||
| addressee name = Pacilio J | | addressee name = Pacilio J | ||
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear | | addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear | ||
| docket = 05000456, 05000457 | | docket = 05000456, 05000457 | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| page count = 12 | | page count = 12 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 November 20, 2012 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NOTIFICATION OF NRC INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION | |||
==Dear Mr. Mr. Pacilio:== | |||
On January 7, 2013, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (NRC) will begin the Temporary Instruction (TI) inspection, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks, (TI 2515-182) at your Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2. This on-site inspection is scheduled to be performed January 7-11, 2013. | |||
In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources, and to ensure a productive inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a list of documents pertinent to our inspection. The documents that are requested for this inspection include all relevant documents that will allow the inspector(s) to adequately complete Phase II of this inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date, and complete, in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection. | |||
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. A. Murtaza, of your organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. M. Holmberg at (630) 829-9748. | |||
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. | |||
M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77 | |||
==Enclosure:== | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ' | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Inspection Dates: January 7 - 11, 2013 Inspection Procedures: Temporary Instruction 2515-182, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks Inspector: Mel Holmberg (630) 829-9748 mel.holmberg@nrc.gov A. Information Requested for the in-Office Preparation Week The following documents listed below are requested (electronic copy CD ROM if possible) by December 27, 2012, to facilitate the preparation for the on-site inspection week. | |||
: 1. Organization list of site individuals responsible for the sites Underground Piping and Tanks Program. | |||
: 2. Copy of Site Underground Piping and Tanks Program. | |||
: 3. Please review the attached Questions list and provide the response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Prep (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided in advance of the inspection to support preparation for on-site week. | |||
: 4. Schedule for completion of the following NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes: | |||
Buried Piping | |||
* Procedures and Oversight; | |||
* Risk-Ranking; | |||
* Inspection Plan; | |||
* Plan Implementation; and | |||
* Asset Management Plan. | |||
Underground Piping and Tanks | |||
* Procedures and Oversight; | |||
* Prioritization; | |||
* Condition Assessment Plan; 1 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | |||
* Plan Implementation; and | |||
* Asset Management Plan. | |||
The inspector may select specific items from the information requested for the preparation week and request follow-up documents during the on-site inspection week. | |||
B. Information to be Provided On-Site to the Inspector Following the Entrance Meeting | |||
: 1. Location maps of buried and underground piping and tanks identified by the inspector from the information requested for the preparation week. | |||
: 2. Copy of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) document Recommendations for an Effective Program to Control the Degradation of Buried Pipe. | |||
: 5. Self or third party assessments of the Underground Piping and Tanks Program (if any have been performed). | |||
: 6. Please review the attached Questions list and provide response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Onsite (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided to the inspector on-site at the entrance meeting. | |||
: 7. For any of the NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes identified below which have been completed prior to the NRCs on-site inspection, provide written records that demonstrate that the program attribute is complete. | |||
Buried Piping | |||
* Procedures and Oversight; | |||
* Risk Ranking; | |||
* Inspection Plan; | |||
* Plan Implementation; and | |||
* Asset Management Plan. | |||
Underground Piping and Tanks | |||
* Procedures and Oversight; | |||
* Prioritization; | |||
* Condition Assessment Plan; | |||
* Plan Implementation; and | |||
* Asset Management Plan. | |||
2 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Questions Response Prep week/ Initiative Consistency Onsite week Prep Has the licensee taken any deviations to Yes/No either of the initiatives? If applicable, identify the specific NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 requirements subject to the deviations. | |||
Prep If so, what deviations have been taken If applicable, provide the basis for each deviation and what is (are) the basis for these from NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 and any associated deviations? corrective action reports. | |||
Prep Does the licensee have an onsite buried Yes/No piping program manager (owner) and, If yes identify owner(s). | |||
potentially, a staff? If no explain. | |||
Onsite How many buried piping program owners Provide list of individuals responsible for the site have there been since January 1, 2010? buried piping program since January 1, 2010. | |||
Onsite How many other site programs are List all site programs that are under the direct assigned to the buried piping program responsibility of the sites current buried piping owner? program owner. | |||
Onsite Does the licensee have requirements to Yes/No capture program performance, such as system health reports and performance Provide copies of most recent systems health indicators? reports and a copy of the procedure that requires these reports (if applicable). | |||
Onsite Are these requirements (for program Periodic/Event Driven/None health reports or performance indicators) periodic or event driven? Provide copies of the procedure that directs the frequency of reports (if applicable) | |||
Onsite Are there examples where these Yes/No requirements have been successfully used to upgrade piping systems or to Provide results of any effectiveness reviews avert piping or tank leaks? related to use of system health reports or performance indicators (if applicable) | |||
Prep Does the licensee have a program or Yes/No procedure to confirm the as-built location of buried and underground piping and tanks at the plant? Provide a copy of the procedure (if applicable). | |||
3 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Prep Has the licensee used this program? Yes/No Identify if the procedure above has been implemented and if so to what extent (if applicable). | |||
Prep Was the program effective in identifying Yes/No the location of buried pipe? | |||
Explain how as-built location of buried pipe and underground piping and tanks was confirmed. | |||
Prep/Onsite For a sample of buried pipe and Yes/No Sample size examined _____ | |||
underground piping and tanks (sample size at least 1 high and 1 low risk/priority pipe or tank), did the risk ranking and/or Prep: Provide copy of sites risk ranking prioritization process utilized by the procedures that identify how buried and licensee produce results in accordance underground pipe and tanks were risk ranked with the initiative guidelines, i.e., which including methodology followed. | |||
emphasize the importance of components which have a high likelihood and Prep: Provide list of buried and underground pipe consequence of failure and deemphasize and tanks in the high and low risk category. | |||
the importance of components which have a low likelihood and consequence of Onsite: Provide copies of drawings and/or failure? database printouts that identify the risk ranking for each buried pipe segment or tank in each system selected by the inspector from the list of high and low risk categories of buried pipe/tank segments. | |||
Onsite: Explain how risk methodology was applied to determine the risk of pipe segments or tanks selected by the inspector above. | |||
Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of buried/ underground piping If yes, identify the total length of 4 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST included in the initiatives? buried/underground piping. | |||
Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of high risk buried/underground If yes, identify the total length of high risk piping included in the initiatives? buried/underground piping Preventive Actions/System Maintenance Onsite For buried steel, copper, or aluminum Yes/No/Not Applicable (no buried steel, copper, or piping or tanks which are not cathodically aluminum piping which is not cathodically protected, has the licensee developed a protected) technical basis for concluding that structural (e.g. ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained? | |||
Onsite Is the technical basis provided as Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g. evaluations of steel, copper or aluminum piping or NACE SP0169) tanks without cathodic protection and include the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable). | |||
Onsite For uncoated steel piping, has the Yes/No/Not Applicable (no uncoated buried steel licensee developed a technical basis for pipe) concluding that structural (e.g., ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained? | |||
5 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Is the technical basis provided as Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g., evaluations of uncoated steel piping and include NACE SP0169)? the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable). | |||
Onsite For licensees with cathodic protection Yes/No/Not Applicable (no cathodic protection systems, does the licensee have systems) procedures for the maintenance, monitoring, and surveys of this Provide copies of these procedures (if applicable). | |||
equipment? | |||
Onsite Are the licensee procedures consistent Yes/No with the initiative (including its reference documents) or industry standards (e.g., Provide copies of the industry standards applicable NACE SP0169)? to the cathodic protection system procedures and identify any deviations taken from these standards. | |||
Onsite Is the cathodic protection system, Yes/No including the evaluation of test data, being operated and maintained by personnel Provide completed records of training or knowledgeable of, or trained in, such qualification applicable to personnel evaluating test activities? data, operating or maintaining cathodic protection systems. | |||
Onsite Is there a program to ensure chase and Yes/No/N/A (No piping in chases or vaults) vault areas which contain piping or tanks subject to the underground piping and Provide copy of procedures (if applicable). | |||
tanks initiative are monitored for, or protected against, accumulation of leakage from these pipes or tanks? | |||
Inspection Activities / Corrective Actions Prep Has the licensee prepared an inspection Yes/No plan for its buried piping and underground piping and tanks? | |||
6 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Does the plan specify dates and locations Yes/No where inspections are planned? | |||
Provide copy of inspection plan and associated implementation procedures. | |||
Prep Have inspections, for which the planned Identify inspections of buried and underground dates have passed, occurred as piping or tanks that did not occur as originally scheduled or have a substantial number scheduled (e.g., date originally scheduled and date of inspections been deferred? actually accomplished). | |||
Identify planned inspections of buried and underground piping or tanks that have been deferred from their originally planned schedule (e.g., date originally scheduled and date currently scheduled). | |||
Prep Has the licensee experienced leaks Leaks Yes/No Degradation Yes/No and/or significant degradation in safety related piping or piping carrying licensed If yes, identify the pipe segments that have leaked material since January 1, 2009? and identify site buried pipe program definition of licensed material. | |||
Prep If leakage or significant degradation did Yes/No occur, did the licensee determine the If yes, identify the cause for leakage from each cause of the leakage or degradation? pipe segment. | |||
Onsite Based on a review of a sample of root Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) cause analyses for leaks from buried piping or underground piping and tanks Provide root or apparent cause report for identified which are safety related or contain leaks (if applicable) and corrective action records. | |||
licensed material, did the licensee's corrective action taken as a result of the incident include addressing the cause of the degradation? | |||
7 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Did the corrective action include an Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) evaluation of extent of condition of the piping or tanks and possible expansion of Provide corrective action documents that define scope of inspections? (Preference should the extent of condition for cause of significant be given to high risk piping and leaks (if applicable). | |||
significant leaks where more information is likely to be available). | |||
Onsite Based on a review of a sample of NDE Yes/No activities which were either directly observed or for which records were Provide a copy of the direct and indirect NDE reviewed, were the inspections conducted procedures used to examine buried pipe and using a predetermined set of tanks. | |||
licensee/contractor procedures? | |||
Onsite Were these procedures sufficiently Yes/No described and recorded such that the inspection could be reproduced at a later Provide a copy of completed direct NDE records date? for the last three direct examinations of buried pipe and tanks. | |||
Provide a copy of completed indirect NDE records for the last three indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks. | |||
Onsite Were the procedures appropriate to Yes/No detect the targeted degradation mechanism? Identify the degradation mechanisms that the last three direct and indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks are intended to detect. | |||
Onsite For quantitative inspections, were the Yes/No procedures used adequate to collect quantitative information? Identify the active degradation mechanisms that each type of NDE procedure is credited for detecting and/or monitoring within your buried pipe and tanks program. | |||
8 Enclosure | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Did the licensee disposition direct or Yes/No indirect NDE results in accordance with their procedural requirements? Provide a copy of the procedure used to evaluate the results of the last three direct and three indirect NDE results from buried pipe and tank components. | |||
9 Enclosure | |||
M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77 | |||
==Enclosure:== | |||
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ' DISTRIBUTION: | |||
Cayetano Santos RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Christine Lipa Carole Ariano Linda Linn Tammy Tomczak DOCUMENT NAME: Braidwood TI-182 Phase 2 RFI-msh Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII NAME MHolmberg:ls DHills DATE 11/20/12 11/20/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} |
Latest revision as of 19:52, 11 November 2019
ML12325A691 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Braidwood |
Issue date: | 11/20/2012 |
From: | Dave Hills NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1 |
To: | Pacilio J Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
Melvin Holmberg | |
References | |
Download: ML12325A691 (12) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 November 20, 2012 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NOTIFICATION OF NRC INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Mr. Pacilio:
On January 7, 2013, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (NRC) will begin the Temporary Instruction (TI) inspection, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks, (TI 2515-182) at your Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2. This on-site inspection is scheduled to be performed January 7-11, 2013.
In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources, and to ensure a productive inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a list of documents pertinent to our inspection. The documents that are requested for this inspection include all relevant documents that will allow the inspector(s) to adequately complete Phase II of this inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date, and complete, in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. A. Murtaza, of your organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. M. Holmberg at (630) 829-9748.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77
Enclosure:
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Inspection Dates: January 7 - 11, 2013 Inspection Procedures: Temporary Instruction 2515-182, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks Inspector: Mel Holmberg (630) 829-9748 mel.holmberg@nrc.gov A. Information Requested for the in-Office Preparation Week The following documents listed below are requested (electronic copy CD ROM if possible) by December 27, 2012, to facilitate the preparation for the on-site inspection week.
- 1. Organization list of site individuals responsible for the sites Underground Piping and Tanks Program.
- 2. Copy of Site Underground Piping and Tanks Program.
- 3. Please review the attached Questions list and provide the response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Prep (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided in advance of the inspection to support preparation for on-site week.
- 4. Schedule for completion of the following NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes:
Buried Piping
- Procedures and Oversight;
- Risk-Ranking;
- Inspection Plan;
- Plan Implementation; and
- Asset Management Plan.
Underground Piping and Tanks
- Procedures and Oversight;
- Prioritization;
- Condition Assessment Plan; 1 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
- Plan Implementation; and
- Asset Management Plan.
The inspector may select specific items from the information requested for the preparation week and request follow-up documents during the on-site inspection week.
B. Information to be Provided On-Site to the Inspector Following the Entrance Meeting
- 1. Location maps of buried and underground piping and tanks identified by the inspector from the information requested for the preparation week.
- 2. Copy of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) document Recommendations for an Effective Program to Control the Degradation of Buried Pipe.
- 5. Self or third party assessments of the Underground Piping and Tanks Program (if any have been performed).
- 6. Please review the attached Questions list and provide response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Onsite (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided to the inspector on-site at the entrance meeting.
- 7. For any of the NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes identified below which have been completed prior to the NRCs on-site inspection, provide written records that demonstrate that the program attribute is complete.
Buried Piping
- Procedures and Oversight;
- Risk Ranking;
- Inspection Plan;
- Plan Implementation; and
- Asset Management Plan.
Underground Piping and Tanks
- Procedures and Oversight;
- Prioritization;
- Condition Assessment Plan;
- Plan Implementation; and
- Asset Management Plan.
2 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Questions Response Prep week/ Initiative Consistency Onsite week Prep Has the licensee taken any deviations to Yes/No either of the initiatives? If applicable, identify the specific NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 requirements subject to the deviations.
Prep If so, what deviations have been taken If applicable, provide the basis for each deviation and what is (are) the basis for these from NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 and any associated deviations? corrective action reports.
Prep Does the licensee have an onsite buried Yes/No piping program manager (owner) and, If yes identify owner(s).
potentially, a staff? If no explain.
Onsite How many buried piping program owners Provide list of individuals responsible for the site have there been since January 1, 2010? buried piping program since January 1, 2010.
Onsite How many other site programs are List all site programs that are under the direct assigned to the buried piping program responsibility of the sites current buried piping owner? program owner.
Onsite Does the licensee have requirements to Yes/No capture program performance, such as system health reports and performance Provide copies of most recent systems health indicators? reports and a copy of the procedure that requires these reports (if applicable).
Onsite Are these requirements (for program Periodic/Event Driven/None health reports or performance indicators) periodic or event driven? Provide copies of the procedure that directs the frequency of reports (if applicable)
Onsite Are there examples where these Yes/No requirements have been successfully used to upgrade piping systems or to Provide results of any effectiveness reviews avert piping or tank leaks? related to use of system health reports or performance indicators (if applicable)
Prep Does the licensee have a program or Yes/No procedure to confirm the as-built location of buried and underground piping and tanks at the plant? Provide a copy of the procedure (if applicable).
3 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Prep Has the licensee used this program? Yes/No Identify if the procedure above has been implemented and if so to what extent (if applicable).
Prep Was the program effective in identifying Yes/No the location of buried pipe?
Explain how as-built location of buried pipe and underground piping and tanks was confirmed.
Prep/Onsite For a sample of buried pipe and Yes/No Sample size examined _____
underground piping and tanks (sample size at least 1 high and 1 low risk/priority pipe or tank), did the risk ranking and/or Prep: Provide copy of sites risk ranking prioritization process utilized by the procedures that identify how buried and licensee produce results in accordance underground pipe and tanks were risk ranked with the initiative guidelines, i.e., which including methodology followed.
emphasize the importance of components which have a high likelihood and Prep: Provide list of buried and underground pipe consequence of failure and deemphasize and tanks in the high and low risk category.
the importance of components which have a low likelihood and consequence of Onsite: Provide copies of drawings and/or failure? database printouts that identify the risk ranking for each buried pipe segment or tank in each system selected by the inspector from the list of high and low risk categories of buried pipe/tank segments.
Onsite: Explain how risk methodology was applied to determine the risk of pipe segments or tanks selected by the inspector above.
Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of buried/ underground piping If yes, identify the total length of 4 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST included in the initiatives? buried/underground piping.
Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of high risk buried/underground If yes, identify the total length of high risk piping included in the initiatives? buried/underground piping Preventive Actions/System Maintenance Onsite For buried steel, copper, or aluminum Yes/No/Not Applicable (no buried steel, copper, or piping or tanks which are not cathodically aluminum piping which is not cathodically protected, has the licensee developed a protected) technical basis for concluding that structural (e.g. ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?
Onsite Is the technical basis provided as Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g. evaluations of steel, copper or aluminum piping or NACE SP0169) tanks without cathodic protection and include the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable).
Onsite For uncoated steel piping, has the Yes/No/Not Applicable (no uncoated buried steel licensee developed a technical basis for pipe) concluding that structural (e.g., ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?
5 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Is the technical basis provided as Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g., evaluations of uncoated steel piping and include NACE SP0169)? the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable).
Onsite For licensees with cathodic protection Yes/No/Not Applicable (no cathodic protection systems, does the licensee have systems) procedures for the maintenance, monitoring, and surveys of this Provide copies of these procedures (if applicable).
equipment?
Onsite Are the licensee procedures consistent Yes/No with the initiative (including its reference documents) or industry standards (e.g., Provide copies of the industry standards applicable NACE SP0169)? to the cathodic protection system procedures and identify any deviations taken from these standards.
Onsite Is the cathodic protection system, Yes/No including the evaluation of test data, being operated and maintained by personnel Provide completed records of training or knowledgeable of, or trained in, such qualification applicable to personnel evaluating test activities? data, operating or maintaining cathodic protection systems.
Onsite Is there a program to ensure chase and Yes/No/N/A (No piping in chases or vaults) vault areas which contain piping or tanks subject to the underground piping and Provide copy of procedures (if applicable).
tanks initiative are monitored for, or protected against, accumulation of leakage from these pipes or tanks?
Inspection Activities / Corrective Actions Prep Has the licensee prepared an inspection Yes/No plan for its buried piping and underground piping and tanks?
6 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Does the plan specify dates and locations Yes/No where inspections are planned?
Provide copy of inspection plan and associated implementation procedures.
Prep Have inspections, for which the planned Identify inspections of buried and underground dates have passed, occurred as piping or tanks that did not occur as originally scheduled or have a substantial number scheduled (e.g., date originally scheduled and date of inspections been deferred? actually accomplished).
Identify planned inspections of buried and underground piping or tanks that have been deferred from their originally planned schedule (e.g., date originally scheduled and date currently scheduled).
Prep Has the licensee experienced leaks Leaks Yes/No Degradation Yes/No and/or significant degradation in safety related piping or piping carrying licensed If yes, identify the pipe segments that have leaked material since January 1, 2009? and identify site buried pipe program definition of licensed material.
Prep If leakage or significant degradation did Yes/No occur, did the licensee determine the If yes, identify the cause for leakage from each cause of the leakage or degradation? pipe segment.
Onsite Based on a review of a sample of root Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) cause analyses for leaks from buried piping or underground piping and tanks Provide root or apparent cause report for identified which are safety related or contain leaks (if applicable) and corrective action records.
licensed material, did the licensee's corrective action taken as a result of the incident include addressing the cause of the degradation?
7 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Did the corrective action include an Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) evaluation of extent of condition of the piping or tanks and possible expansion of Provide corrective action documents that define scope of inspections? (Preference should the extent of condition for cause of significant be given to high risk piping and leaks (if applicable).
significant leaks where more information is likely to be available).
Onsite Based on a review of a sample of NDE Yes/No activities which were either directly observed or for which records were Provide a copy of the direct and indirect NDE reviewed, were the inspections conducted procedures used to examine buried pipe and using a predetermined set of tanks.
licensee/contractor procedures?
Onsite Were these procedures sufficiently Yes/No described and recorded such that the inspection could be reproduced at a later Provide a copy of completed direct NDE records date? for the last three direct examinations of buried pipe and tanks.
Provide a copy of completed indirect NDE records for the last three indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks.
Onsite Were the procedures appropriate to Yes/No detect the targeted degradation mechanism? Identify the degradation mechanisms that the last three direct and indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks are intended to detect.
Onsite For quantitative inspections, were the Yes/No procedures used adequate to collect quantitative information? Identify the active degradation mechanisms that each type of NDE procedure is credited for detecting and/or monitoring within your buried pipe and tanks program.
8 Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Did the licensee disposition direct or Yes/No indirect NDE results in accordance with their procedural requirements? Provide a copy of the procedure used to evaluate the results of the last three direct and three indirect NDE results from buried pipe and tank components.
9 Enclosure
M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely, David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77
Enclosure:
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ' DISTRIBUTION:
Cayetano Santos RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Christine Lipa Carole Ariano Linda Linn Tammy Tomczak DOCUMENT NAME: Braidwood TI-182 Phase 2 RFI-msh Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII NAME MHolmberg:ls DHills DATE 11/20/12 11/20/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY