ML12325A691: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 November 20, 2012 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
-4352   November 20, 2012 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2  
BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NOTIFICATION OF NRC INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
- NOTIFICATION OF NRC INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION


==Dear Mr. Mr. Pacilio:==
==Dear Mr. Mr. Pacilio:==


On January 7, 20 13, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (NRC) will begin the Temporary Instruction (TI) inspection, "Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks,"
On January 7, 2013, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (NRC) will begin the Temporary Instruction (TI) inspection, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks, (TI 2515-182) at your Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2. This on-site inspection is scheduled to be performed January 7-11, 2013.
(TI 2515-182) at your Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2. This on
In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources, and to ensure a productive inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a list of documents pertinent to our inspection. The documents that are requested for this inspection include all relevant documents that will allow the inspector(s) to adequately complete Phase II of this inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date, and complete, in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.
-site inspection is scheduled to be performed January 7-1 1, 2013. In order to minimize the impact to your on
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. A. Murtaza, of your organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. M. Holmberg at (630) 829-9748.
-site resources, and to ensure a productive inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a list of documents pertinent to our inspection
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
. The documents that are requested for this inspection include all relevant documents that will allow the inspector(s) to adequately complete Phase II of this inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up
-to-date, and complete, in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on
-site portions of the inspection.
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. A. Murtaza, of your organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr.
M. Holmberg at (630) 829
-9748. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).      Sincerely, 
/RA/        David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457


License No. NPF-72; NPF-77  
M. Pacilio                                              In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl:      Distribution via ListServ'


TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Inspection Dates:              January 7 - 11, 2013 Inspection Procedures:        Temporary Instruction 2515-182, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks Inspector:                    Mel Holmberg (630) 829-9748 mel.holmberg@nrc.gov A. Information Requested for the in-Office Preparation Week The following documents listed below are requested (electronic copy CD ROM if possible) by December 27, 2012, to facilitate the preparation for the on-site inspection week.
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl:
: 1. Organization list of site individuals responsible for the sites Underground Piping and Tanks Program.
Distribution via ListServŽ
: 2. Copy of Site Underground Piping and Tanks Program.
: 3. Please review the attached Questions list and provide the response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Prep (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided in advance of the inspection to support preparation for on-site week.
: 4. Schedule for completion of the following NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes:
Buried Piping
* Procedures and Oversight;
* Risk-Ranking;
* Inspection Plan;
* Plan Implementation; and
* Asset Management Plan.
Underground Piping and Tanks
* Procedures and Oversight;
* Prioritization;
* Condition Assessment Plan; 1                                    Enclosure


TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 1 Enclosure Inspection Dates:
* Plan Implementation; and
January 7 - 1 1, 201 3 Inspection Procedures
* Asset Management Plan.
: Temporary Instruction 2515-182 , "Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks" Inspecto r:  Mel Holmberg (630) 829-9748 mel.holmberg@nrc.gov A. Information Requested for the i n-Office Preparation Week The following documents listed below are requested (electronic copy CD ROM if possible) by December 27, 2012, to facilitate the preparation for the on
The inspector may select specific items from the information requested for the preparation week and request follow-up documents during the on-site inspection week.
-site inspection week. 1. Organization list of site individuals responsible for the site's Underground Piping a nd Tanks Program.
B. Information to be Provided On-Site to the Inspector Following the Entrance Meeting
: 2. Copy of Site Underground Piping and Tanks Program. 3. Please review the attached "Questions" list and provide the response and/or document requests.
: 1. Location maps of buried and underground piping and tanks identified by the inspector from the information requested for the preparation week.
The questions identified with the word "Prep" (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided in advance of the inspection to support preparation for on-site week.
: 2. Copy of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) document Recommendations for an Effective Program to Control the Degradation of Buried Pipe.
: 4. Schedule for completion of the following NEI 09
: 5. Self or third party assessments of the Underground Piping and Tanks Program (if any have been performed).
-14 Revision 1 attributes:
: 6. Please review the attached Questions list and provide response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Onsite (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided to the inspector on-site at the entrance meeting.
Procedures and Oversight
: 7. For any of the NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes identified below which have been completed prior to the NRCs on-site inspection, provide written records that demonstrate that the program attribute is complete.
; Buried Piping Risk-Ranking;  Inspection Plan
Buried Piping
Plan Implementation
* Procedures and Oversight;
; and Asset Management Plan
* Risk Ranking;
. Procedures and Oversight
* Inspection Plan;
; Underground Piping and Tanks Prioritization
* Plan Implementation; and
;  Condition Assessment Plan
* Asset Management Plan.
;
Underground Piping and Tanks
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
* Procedures and Oversight;
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 2 Enclosure  Plan Implementation; and  Asset Management Plan
* Prioritization;
. The inspector may select specific items from the information requested for the preparation week and request follow
* Condition Assessment Plan;
-up documents during the on
* Plan Implementation; and
-site inspection week. B. Information t o be Provided On
* Asset Management Plan.
-Site t o the Inspector Following the Entrance Meeting 1. Location maps of buried and underground piping and tanks identified by the inspector from the information requested for the preparation week
2                                      Enclosure
. 2. Copy of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) document "Recommendations for an Effective Program to Control the Degradation of Buried Pipe
." 5. Self or third party assessments of the Underground Piping and Tanks Program (if any have been performed).
: 6. Please review the attached "Questions" list and provide response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word "Onsite" (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided to the inspector on
-site at the entrance meeting.
: 7. For any of the NEI 09
-14 Revision 1 attributes identified below which have been completed prior to the NRC's on
-site inspection, provide written records that demonstrate that the program attribute is complete.
Procedures and Oversight
; Buried Piping  Risk Ranking
Inspection Plan
Plan Implementation
; and Asset Management Plan
. Procedures and Oversight
; Underground Piping and Tanks Prioritization
Condition Assessment Plan
Plan Implementation; and Asset Management Plan
.
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 3  Enclosure  Questions Response  Prep week/
Onsite week Initiative Consistency Prep Has the licensee taken any deviations to either of the initiatives?
Yes/No If applicable, identify the specific NEI 09
-14 Rev. 1 requirements subject to the deviations.
Prep If so, what deviations have been taken and what is (are) the basis for these deviations?
If applicable, provide the basis for each deviation from NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 and any associated corrective action reports.
Prep Does the licensee have an onsite buried piping program manager (owner) and, potentially, a staff?
Yes/No If yes identify owner(s).
If no explain.
Onsite How many buried piping program owners have there been since January 1, 2010?
Provide list of individuals responsible for the site buried piping program since January 1, 2010.
Onsite How many other site programs are assigned to the buried piping program owner?  List all site programs that are under the direct responsibility of the site's current buried piping program owner.
Onsite Does the licensee have requirements to capture program performance, such as system health reports and performance indicators?  Yes/No  Provide copies of most recent systems health reports and a copy of the procedure that requires these reports (if applicable
). Onsite Are these requirements (for program health reports or performance indicators) periodic or event driven?
Periodic/Event Driven/None Provide copies of the procedure that directs the frequency of reports (if applicable)
Onsite Are there examples where these requirements have been successfully used to upgrade piping systems or to avert piping or tank leaks?
Yes/No  Provide results of any effectiveness reviews related to use of system health reports or performance indicators (if applicable
) Prep Does the licensee have a program or procedure to confirm the as
-built location of buried and underground piping and tanks at the plant?
Yes/No Provide a copy of the procedure (if appl icable).
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 4  Enclosure Prep Has the licensee used this program?
Yes/No  Identify if the procedure above has been implemented and if so to what extent (if applicable).
Prep  Was the program effective in identifying the location of buried pipe?
Yes/No Explain how as
-built location of buried pipe and underground piping and tanks was confirmed.
Prep/Onsite For a sample of buried pipe and underground piping and tanks (sample size at least 1 high and 1 low risk/priority pipe or tank), did the risk ranking and/or prioritization process utilized by the licensee produce results in accordance with the initiative guidelines, i.e., which emphasize the importance of components which have a high likelihood and consequence of failure and deemphasize the importance of components which have a low likelihood and consequence of failure? Yes/No    Sample size examined _____


Prep:  Provide copy of site's risk ranking procedures that identify how buried and underground pipe and tanks were risk ranked including methodology followed.
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Questions                                      Response Prep week/                Initiative Consistency Onsite week Prep          Has the licensee taken any deviations to  Yes/No either of the initiatives?                If applicable, identify the specific NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 requirements subject to the deviations.
Prep:  Provide list of buried and underground pipe and tanks in the high and low risk category
Prep          If so, what deviations have been taken    If applicable, provide the basis for each deviation and what is (are) the basis for these      from NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 and any associated deviations?                                corrective action reports.
. OnsiteProvide copies of drawings and/or database printouts that identif y the risk ranking for each buried pipe segment or tank in each system selected by the inspector from the list of high and low risk categories of buried pipe/tank segments.
Prep           Does the licensee have an onsite buried   Yes/No piping program manager (owner) and,        If yes identify owner(s).
Onsite:  Explain how  risk methodology was applied to determine the risk of pipe segments or tanks selected by the inspector above. Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the licensee estimate/determine the total length of buried/ underground piping Yes/No If yes, identify the total length of TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
potentially, a staff?                      If no explain.
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 5  Enclosure included in the initiatives?
Onsite         How many buried piping program owners      Provide list of individuals responsible for the site have there been since January 1, 2010?    buried piping program since January 1, 2010.
buried/underground piping.
Onsite         How many other site programs are          List all site programs that are under the direct assigned to the buried piping program      responsibility of the sites current buried piping owner?                                    program owner.
Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the licensee estimate/determine the total length of high risk buried/underground piping included in the initiatives?
Onsite        Does the licensee have requirements to    Yes/No capture program performance, such as system health reports and performance      Provide copies of most recent systems health indicators?                                reports and a copy of the procedure that requires these reports (if applicable).
Yes/No  If yes, identify the total length of high risk buried/underground piping
Onsite        Are these requirements (for program        Periodic/Event Driven/None health reports or performance indicators) periodic or event driven?                  Provide copies of the procedure that directs the frequency of reports (if applicable)
Onsite        Are there examples where these            Yes/No requirements have been successfully used to upgrade piping systems or to      Provide results of any effectiveness reviews avert piping or tank leaks?                related to use of system health reports or performance indicators (if applicable)
Prep           Does the licensee have a program or        Yes/No procedure to confirm the as-built location of buried and underground piping and tanks at the plant?                       Provide a copy of the procedure (if applicable).
3                                                          Enclosure


Preventive Actions/System Maintenance Onsite For buried steel, copper, or aluminum piping or tanks which are not cathodically protected, has the licensee developed a technical basis for concluding that structural (e.g. ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Prep          Has the licensee used this program?         Yes/No Identify if the procedure above has been implemented and if so to what extent (if applicable).
Yes/No/Not Applicable (no buried steel, copper, or aluminum piping which is not cathodically protected)
Prep          Was the program effective in identifying    Yes/No the location of buried pipe?
Onsite Is the technical basis provided as justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference documents) or industry standards (e.g. NACE SP0169)
Explain how as-built location of buried pipe and underground piping and tanks was confirmed.
Yes/No Provide two specific examples that document evaluations of steel, copper or aluminum piping or tanks without cathodic protection and include  the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable). Onsite For uncoated steel piping, has the licensee developed a technical basis for concluding that structural (e.g.
Prep/Onsite   For a sample of buried pipe and              Yes/No       Sample size examined _____
, ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?
underground piping and tanks (sample size at least 1 high and 1 low risk/priority pipe or tank), did the risk ranking and/or  Prep: Provide copy of sites risk ranking prioritization process utilized by the       procedures that identify how buried and licensee produce results in accordance      underground pipe and tanks were risk ranked with the initiative guidelines, i.e., which  including methodology followed.
Yes/No/Not Applicable (no uncoated buried steel pipe)
emphasize the importance of components which have a high likelihood and            Prep: Provide list of buried and underground pipe consequence of failure and deemphasize      and tanks in the high and low risk category.
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
the importance of components which have a low likelihood and consequence of     Onsite: Provide copies of drawings and/or failure?                                     database printouts that identify the risk ranking for each buried pipe segment or tank in each system selected by the inspector from the list of high and low risk categories of buried pipe/tank segments.
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 6  Enclosure Onsite Is the technical basis provided as justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference documents) or industry standards (e.g.
Onsite: Explain how risk methodology was applied to determine the risk of pipe segments or tanks selected by the inspector above.
, NACE SP0169)?
Prep           As part of its risk ranking process did the Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of buried/ underground piping         If yes, identify the total length of 4                                                        Enclosure
Yes/No  Provide two specific examples that document evaluations of uncoated steel piping and include  the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable).
Onsite For licensees with cathodic protection systems, does the licensee have procedures for the maintenance, monitoring, and surveys of this equipment?
Yes/No/Not Applicable (no cathodic protection systems)
Provide copies of these procedures (if applicable).
Onsite Are the licensee procedures consistent with the initiative (including its reference documents) or industry standards (e.g.
, NACE SP0169)?
Yes/No  Provide copies of the industry standards applicable to the cathodic protection system procedures and identify any deviations taken from these standards.
Onsite Is the cathodic protection system, including the evaluation of test data, being operated and maintained by personnel knowledgeable of, or trained in, such activities?
Yes/No  Provide completed records of training or qualification applicable to personnel evaluating test data, operating or maintaining cathodic protection systems. Onsite Is there a program to ensure chase and vault areas which contain piping or tanks subject to the underground piping and tanks initiative are monitored for, or protected against, accumulation of leakage from these pipes or tanks?
Yes/No/N/A (No piping in chases or vaults)
Provide copy of procedures (if applicable).
Inspection Activities / Corrective Actions  Prep Has the licensee prepared an inspection plan for its buried piping and underground piping and tanks?
Yes/No TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 7  Enclosure Onsite Does the plan specify dates and locations where inspections are planned?
Yes/No  Provide copy of inspection plan and associated implementation procedures.
Prep Have inspections, for which the planned dates have passed, occurred as scheduled or have a substantial number of inspections been deferred?
Identify inspections of buried and underground piping or tanks that did not occur as originally scheduled (e.g.
, date originally scheduled and date actually accomplished).


TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST included in the initiatives?                buried/underground piping.
Prep      As part of its risk ranking process did the  Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of high risk buried/underground      If yes, identify the total length of high risk piping included in the initiatives?          buried/underground piping Preventive Actions/System Maintenance Onsite    For buried steel, copper, or aluminum        Yes/No/Not Applicable (no buried steel, copper, or piping or tanks which are not cathodically  aluminum piping which is not cathodically protected, has the licensee developed a      protected) technical basis for concluding that structural (e.g. ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?
Onsite    Is the technical basis provided as          Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g.      evaluations of steel, copper or aluminum piping or NACE SP0169)                                tanks without cathodic protection and include the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable).
Onsite    For uncoated steel piping, has the          Yes/No/Not Applicable (no uncoated buried steel licensee developed a technical basis for    pipe) concluding that structural (e.g., ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?
5                                                    Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite    Is the technical basis provided as          Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g.,      evaluations of uncoated steel piping and include NACE SP0169)?                                the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable).
Onsite    For licensees with cathodic protection      Yes/No/Not Applicable (no cathodic protection systems, does the licensee have              systems) procedures for the maintenance, monitoring, and surveys of this              Provide copies of these procedures (if applicable).
equipment?
Onsite    Are the licensee procedures consistent      Yes/No with the initiative (including its reference documents) or industry standards (e.g.,      Provide copies of the industry standards applicable NACE SP0169)?                                to the cathodic protection system procedures and identify any deviations taken from these standards.
Onsite    Is the cathodic protection system,          Yes/No including the evaluation of test data, being operated and maintained by personnel        Provide completed records of training or knowledgeable of, or trained in, such        qualification applicable to personnel evaluating test activities?                                  data, operating or maintaining cathodic protection systems.
Onsite    Is there a program to ensure chase and      Yes/No/N/A (No piping in chases or vaults) vault areas which contain piping or tanks subject to the underground piping and        Provide copy of procedures (if applicable).
tanks initiative are monitored for, or protected against, accumulation of leakage from these pipes or tanks?
Inspection Activities / Corrective Actions Prep      Has the licensee prepared an inspection      Yes/No plan for its buried piping and underground piping and tanks?
6                                                      Enclosure
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite    Does the plan specify dates and locations  Yes/No where inspections are planned?
Provide copy of inspection plan and associated implementation procedures.
Prep      Have inspections, for which the planned    Identify inspections of buried and underground dates have passed, occurred as            piping or tanks that did not occur as originally scheduled or have a substantial number    scheduled (e.g., date originally scheduled and date of inspections been deferred?              actually accomplished).
Identify planned inspections of buried and underground piping or tanks that have been deferred from their originally planned schedule (e.g., date originally scheduled and date currently scheduled).
Identify planned inspections of buried and underground piping or tanks that have been deferred from their originally planned schedule (e.g., date originally scheduled and date currently scheduled).
Prep Has the licensee experienced leaks and/or significant degradation in safety related piping or piping carrying licensed material since January 1, 2009?
Prep     Has the licensee experienced leaks         Leaks Yes/No        Degradation Yes/No and/or significant degradation in safety related piping or piping carrying licensed If yes, identify the pipe segments that have leaked material since January 1, 2009?            and identify site buried pipe program definition of licensed material.
Leaks Yes/No    Degradation Yes/No If yes, identify the pipe segments that have leaked and identify site buried pipe program definition of "licensed material."
Prep     If leakage or significant degradation did Yes/No occur, did the licensee determine the     If yes, identify the cause for leakage from each cause of the leakage or degradation?      pipe segment.
Prep If leakage or significant degradation did occur, did the licensee determine the cause of the leakage or degradation?
Onsite   Based on a review of a sample of root     Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) cause analyses for leaks from buried piping or underground piping and tanks     Provide root or apparent cause report for identified which are safety related or contain       leaks (if applicable) and corrective action records.
Yes/No If yes, identify the cause for leakage from each pipe segment. Onsite Based on a review of a sample of root cause analyses for leaks from buried piping or underground piping and tanks which are safety related or contain licensed material, did the licensee's corrective action taken as a result of the incident include addressing the cause of the degradation?
licensed material, did the licensee's corrective action taken as a result of the incident include addressing the cause of the degradation?
Yes/No/N/A (no leaks)
7                                                        Enclosure
Provide root or apparent cause report for identified leaks (if applicable) and corrective action records.
 
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite   Did the corrective action include an       Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) evaluation of extent of condition of the piping or tanks and possible expansion of Provide corrective action documents that define scope of inspections? (Preference should   the extent of condition for cause of significant be given to high risk piping and           leaks (if applicable).
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 8  Enclosure Onsite Did the corrective action include an evaluation of extent of condition of the piping or tanks and possible expansion of scope of inspections? (Preference should be given to high risk piping and "significant" leaks where more information is likely to be available).
significant leaks where more information is likely to be available).
Yes/No/N/A (no leaks)  Provide corrective action documents that define the extent of condition for cause of significant leaks (if applicable
Onsite   Based on a review of a sample of NDE       Yes/No activities which were either directly observed or for which records were         Provide a copy of the direct and indirect NDE reviewed, were the inspections conducted  procedures used to examine buried pipe and using a predetermined set of              tanks.
). Onsite Based on a review of a sample of NDE activities which were either directly observed or for which records were reviewed, were the inspections conducted using a predetermined set of licensee/contractor procedures?
licensee/contractor procedures?
Yes/No  Provide a copy of the direct and indirect NDE procedures used to examine buried pipe and tanks. Onsite Were these procedures sufficiently described and recorded such that the inspection could be reproduced at a later date?  Yes/No Provide a copy of completed direct NDE records for the last three direct examinations of buried pipe and tanks.
Onsite   Were these procedures sufficiently         Yes/No described and recorded such that the inspection could be reproduced at a later  Provide a copy of completed direct NDE records date?                                      for the last three direct examinations of buried pipe and tanks.
Provide a copy of completed indirect NDE records for the last three indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks.
Provide a copy of completed indirect NDE records for the last three indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks.
Onsite Were the procedures appropriate to detect the targeted degradation mechanism?
Onsite   Were the procedures appropriate to         Yes/No detect the targeted degradation mechanism?                                 Identify the degradation mechanisms that the last three direct and indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks are intended to detect.
Yes/No  Identify the degradation mechanisms that the last three direct and indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks are intended to detect.
Onsite   For quantitative inspections, were the     Yes/No procedures used adequate to collect quantitative information?                 Identify the active degradation mechanisms that each type of NDE procedure is credited for detecting and/or monitoring within your buried pipe and tanks program.
Onsite For quantitative inspections, were the procedures used adequate to collect quantitative information?
8                                                        Enclosure
Yes/No  Identify the active degradation mechanisms that each type of NDE procedure is credited for detecting and/or monitoring within your buried pipe and tanks program.


TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite   Did the licensee disposition direct or Yes/No indirect NDE results in accordance with their procedural requirements?         Provide a copy of the procedure used to evaluate the results of the last three direct and three indirect NDE results from buried pipe and tank components.
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST 9  Enclosure      Onsite Did the licensee disposition direct or indirect NDE results in accordance with their procedural requirements?
9                                                      Enclosure
Yes/No  Provide a copy of the procedure used to evaluate the results of the last three direct and three indirect NDE results from buried pipe and tank components.


M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system  
M. Pacilio                                                                                   In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
Sincerely, David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77
(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,  
 
David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77  


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
 
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl:                 Distribution via ListServ' DISTRIBUTION:
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515
Cayetano Santos RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Christine Lipa Carole Ariano Linda Linn Tammy Tomczak DOCUMENT NAME: Braidwood TI-182 Phase 2 RFI-msh Publicly Available                      Non-Publicly Available               Sensitive                  Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII                                               RIII NAME               MHolmberg:ls                           DHills DATE               11/20/12                               11/20/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl:
Distribution via ListServŽ DISTRIBUTIONCayetano Santos
: RidsNrrDorlLpl3
-2 Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Christine Lipa Carole Ariano Linda Linn Tammy Tomczak    
 
DOCUMENT NAME: Braidwood TI
-182 Phase 2 RFI
-msh -Publicly Available
  -Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII     NAME MHolmberg:ls DHills   DATE 11/20/12 11/20/12   OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}

Latest revision as of 19:52, 11 November 2019

Ltr. 11/20/12 Braidwood Ti 2515-182 Request for Information
ML12325A691
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/20/2012
From: Dave Hills
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB1
To: Pacilio J
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
Melvin Holmberg
References
Download: ML12325A691 (12)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 November 20, 2012 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NOTIFICATION OF NRC INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Mr. Pacilio:

On January 7, 2013, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (NRC) will begin the Temporary Instruction (TI) inspection, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks, (TI 2515-182) at your Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2. This on-site inspection is scheduled to be performed January 7-11, 2013.

In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources, and to ensure a productive inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a list of documents pertinent to our inspection. The documents that are requested for this inspection include all relevant documents that will allow the inspector(s) to adequately complete Phase II of this inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date, and complete, in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. A. Murtaza, of your organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. M. Holmberg at (630) 829-9748.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77

Enclosure:

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Inspection Dates: January 7 - 11, 2013 Inspection Procedures: Temporary Instruction 2515-182, Review of Implementation of the Industry Initiative to Control Degradation of Underground Piping and Tanks Inspector: Mel Holmberg (630) 829-9748 mel.holmberg@nrc.gov A. Information Requested for the in-Office Preparation Week The following documents listed below are requested (electronic copy CD ROM if possible) by December 27, 2012, to facilitate the preparation for the on-site inspection week.

1. Organization list of site individuals responsible for the sites Underground Piping and Tanks Program.
2. Copy of Site Underground Piping and Tanks Program.
3. Please review the attached Questions list and provide the response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Prep (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided in advance of the inspection to support preparation for on-site week.
4. Schedule for completion of the following NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes:

Buried Piping

  • Procedures and Oversight;
  • Risk-Ranking;
  • Inspection Plan;
  • Plan Implementation; and
  • Asset Management Plan.

Underground Piping and Tanks

  • Procedures and Oversight;
  • Prioritization;
  • Condition Assessment Plan; 1 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

  • Plan Implementation; and
  • Asset Management Plan.

The inspector may select specific items from the information requested for the preparation week and request follow-up documents during the on-site inspection week.

B. Information to be Provided On-Site to the Inspector Following the Entrance Meeting

1. Location maps of buried and underground piping and tanks identified by the inspector from the information requested for the preparation week.
2. Copy of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) document Recommendations for an Effective Program to Control the Degradation of Buried Pipe.
5. Self or third party assessments of the Underground Piping and Tanks Program (if any have been performed).
6. Please review the attached Questions list and provide response and/or document requests. The questions identified with the word Onsite (highlighted in bold) are the items to be provided to the inspector on-site at the entrance meeting.
7. For any of the NEI 09-14 Revision 1 attributes identified below which have been completed prior to the NRCs on-site inspection, provide written records that demonstrate that the program attribute is complete.

Buried Piping

  • Procedures and Oversight;
  • Risk Ranking;
  • Inspection Plan;
  • Plan Implementation; and
  • Asset Management Plan.

Underground Piping and Tanks

  • Procedures and Oversight;
  • Prioritization;
  • Condition Assessment Plan;
  • Plan Implementation; and
  • Asset Management Plan.

2 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Questions Response Prep week/ Initiative Consistency Onsite week Prep Has the licensee taken any deviations to Yes/No either of the initiatives? If applicable, identify the specific NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 requirements subject to the deviations.

Prep If so, what deviations have been taken If applicable, provide the basis for each deviation and what is (are) the basis for these from NEI 09-14 Rev. 1 and any associated deviations? corrective action reports.

Prep Does the licensee have an onsite buried Yes/No piping program manager (owner) and, If yes identify owner(s).

potentially, a staff? If no explain.

Onsite How many buried piping program owners Provide list of individuals responsible for the site have there been since January 1, 2010? buried piping program since January 1, 2010.

Onsite How many other site programs are List all site programs that are under the direct assigned to the buried piping program responsibility of the sites current buried piping owner? program owner.

Onsite Does the licensee have requirements to Yes/No capture program performance, such as system health reports and performance Provide copies of most recent systems health indicators? reports and a copy of the procedure that requires these reports (if applicable).

Onsite Are these requirements (for program Periodic/Event Driven/None health reports or performance indicators) periodic or event driven? Provide copies of the procedure that directs the frequency of reports (if applicable)

Onsite Are there examples where these Yes/No requirements have been successfully used to upgrade piping systems or to Provide results of any effectiveness reviews avert piping or tank leaks? related to use of system health reports or performance indicators (if applicable)

Prep Does the licensee have a program or Yes/No procedure to confirm the as-built location of buried and underground piping and tanks at the plant? Provide a copy of the procedure (if applicable).

3 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Prep Has the licensee used this program? Yes/No Identify if the procedure above has been implemented and if so to what extent (if applicable).

Prep Was the program effective in identifying Yes/No the location of buried pipe?

Explain how as-built location of buried pipe and underground piping and tanks was confirmed.

Prep/Onsite For a sample of buried pipe and Yes/No Sample size examined _____

underground piping and tanks (sample size at least 1 high and 1 low risk/priority pipe or tank), did the risk ranking and/or Prep: Provide copy of sites risk ranking prioritization process utilized by the procedures that identify how buried and licensee produce results in accordance underground pipe and tanks were risk ranked with the initiative guidelines, i.e., which including methodology followed.

emphasize the importance of components which have a high likelihood and Prep: Provide list of buried and underground pipe consequence of failure and deemphasize and tanks in the high and low risk category.

the importance of components which have a low likelihood and consequence of Onsite: Provide copies of drawings and/or failure? database printouts that identify the risk ranking for each buried pipe segment or tank in each system selected by the inspector from the list of high and low risk categories of buried pipe/tank segments.

Onsite: Explain how risk methodology was applied to determine the risk of pipe segments or tanks selected by the inspector above.

Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of buried/ underground piping If yes, identify the total length of 4 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST included in the initiatives? buried/underground piping.

Prep As part of its risk ranking process did the Yes/No licensee estimate/determine the total length of high risk buried/underground If yes, identify the total length of high risk piping included in the initiatives? buried/underground piping Preventive Actions/System Maintenance Onsite For buried steel, copper, or aluminum Yes/No/Not Applicable (no buried steel, copper, or piping or tanks which are not cathodically aluminum piping which is not cathodically protected, has the licensee developed a protected) technical basis for concluding that structural (e.g. ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?

Onsite Is the technical basis provided as Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g. evaluations of steel, copper or aluminum piping or NACE SP0169) tanks without cathodic protection and include the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable).

Onsite For uncoated steel piping, has the Yes/No/Not Applicable (no uncoated buried steel licensee developed a technical basis for pipe) concluding that structural (e.g., ASME Code minimum wall, if applicable) and leaktight integrity of buried piping can be maintained?

5 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Is the technical basis provided as Yes/No justification by the licensee consistent with the initiative (including its reference Provide two specific examples that document documents) or industry standards (e.g., evaluations of uncoated steel piping and include NACE SP0169)? the technical basis and referenced source documents supporting this evaluation (if applicable).

Onsite For licensees with cathodic protection Yes/No/Not Applicable (no cathodic protection systems, does the licensee have systems) procedures for the maintenance, monitoring, and surveys of this Provide copies of these procedures (if applicable).

equipment?

Onsite Are the licensee procedures consistent Yes/No with the initiative (including its reference documents) or industry standards (e.g., Provide copies of the industry standards applicable NACE SP0169)? to the cathodic protection system procedures and identify any deviations taken from these standards.

Onsite Is the cathodic protection system, Yes/No including the evaluation of test data, being operated and maintained by personnel Provide completed records of training or knowledgeable of, or trained in, such qualification applicable to personnel evaluating test activities? data, operating or maintaining cathodic protection systems.

Onsite Is there a program to ensure chase and Yes/No/N/A (No piping in chases or vaults) vault areas which contain piping or tanks subject to the underground piping and Provide copy of procedures (if applicable).

tanks initiative are monitored for, or protected against, accumulation of leakage from these pipes or tanks?

Inspection Activities / Corrective Actions Prep Has the licensee prepared an inspection Yes/No plan for its buried piping and underground piping and tanks?

6 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Does the plan specify dates and locations Yes/No where inspections are planned?

Provide copy of inspection plan and associated implementation procedures.

Prep Have inspections, for which the planned Identify inspections of buried and underground dates have passed, occurred as piping or tanks that did not occur as originally scheduled or have a substantial number scheduled (e.g., date originally scheduled and date of inspections been deferred? actually accomplished).

Identify planned inspections of buried and underground piping or tanks that have been deferred from their originally planned schedule (e.g., date originally scheduled and date currently scheduled).

Prep Has the licensee experienced leaks Leaks Yes/No Degradation Yes/No and/or significant degradation in safety related piping or piping carrying licensed If yes, identify the pipe segments that have leaked material since January 1, 2009? and identify site buried pipe program definition of licensed material.

Prep If leakage or significant degradation did Yes/No occur, did the licensee determine the If yes, identify the cause for leakage from each cause of the leakage or degradation? pipe segment.

Onsite Based on a review of a sample of root Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) cause analyses for leaks from buried piping or underground piping and tanks Provide root or apparent cause report for identified which are safety related or contain leaks (if applicable) and corrective action records.

licensed material, did the licensee's corrective action taken as a result of the incident include addressing the cause of the degradation?

7 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Did the corrective action include an Yes/No/N/A (no leaks) evaluation of extent of condition of the piping or tanks and possible expansion of Provide corrective action documents that define scope of inspections? (Preference should the extent of condition for cause of significant be given to high risk piping and leaks (if applicable).

significant leaks where more information is likely to be available).

Onsite Based on a review of a sample of NDE Yes/No activities which were either directly observed or for which records were Provide a copy of the direct and indirect NDE reviewed, were the inspections conducted procedures used to examine buried pipe and using a predetermined set of tanks.

licensee/contractor procedures?

Onsite Were these procedures sufficiently Yes/No described and recorded such that the inspection could be reproduced at a later Provide a copy of completed direct NDE records date? for the last three direct examinations of buried pipe and tanks.

Provide a copy of completed indirect NDE records for the last three indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks.

Onsite Were the procedures appropriate to Yes/No detect the targeted degradation mechanism? Identify the degradation mechanisms that the last three direct and indirect examinations of buried pipe and tanks are intended to detect.

Onsite For quantitative inspections, were the Yes/No procedures used adequate to collect quantitative information? Identify the active degradation mechanisms that each type of NDE procedure is credited for detecting and/or monitoring within your buried pipe and tanks program.

8 Enclosure

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Onsite Did the licensee disposition direct or Yes/No indirect NDE results in accordance with their procedural requirements? Provide a copy of the procedure used to evaluate the results of the last three direct and three indirect NDE results from buried pipe and tank components.

9 Enclosure

M. Pacilio In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely, David E. Hills, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50 456; 50 457 License No. NPF-72; NPF-77

Enclosure:

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION (TI 2515-182) INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ' DISTRIBUTION:

Cayetano Santos RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker DRPIII DRSIII Christine Lipa Carole Ariano Linda Linn Tammy Tomczak DOCUMENT NAME: Braidwood TI-182 Phase 2 RFI-msh Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII NAME MHolmberg:ls DHills DATE 11/20/12 11/20/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY