ML13280A151: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML13280A151 | | number = ML13280A151 | ||
| issue date = 10/03/2013 | | issue date = 10/03/2013 | ||
| title = | | title = Component Design Bases Inspection 05000250/2014007 and 05000251/2014007, Notification Letter Final | ||
| author name = Nease R | | author name = Nease R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 | ||
| addressee name = Nazar M | | addressee name = Nazar M | ||
| addressee affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co | | addressee affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co | ||
| docket = 05000250, 05000251 | | docket = 05000250, 05000251 | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 5 | | page count = 5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
See also: [[ | See also: [[see also::IR 05000250/2014007]] | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
REGION II | |||
245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 | |||
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 | |||
Mr. Mano Nazar Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Florida Power and Light Company | October 3, 2013 | ||
P.O. Box 14000 | Mr. Mano Nazar | ||
Juno Beach, FL | Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer | ||
Florida Power and Light Company | |||
P.O. Box 14000 | |||
Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 | |||
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4 | |||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT | |||
05000250/2014007 AND 05000251/2014007 | |||
Dear Mr. Nazar: | |||
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Turkey Point | |||
Nuclear Generating Units 3 and 4 during the weeks of January 27 - 31, February 10 - 14, and | |||
February 24 - 28, 2014. Mr. Shakur Walker, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRCs Region | |||
II Office, will lead the inspection team. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the | |||
baseline inspection procedure, Procedure 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, | |||
issued August 14, 2012. | |||
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant / low margin components to function | |||
as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review | |||
of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications. | |||
During a telephone conversation on October 2, 2013, Mr. Walker confirmed with Ms. Stavy | |||
Mihalakea of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the three-week | |||
onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows: | |||
* Information-gathering visit: Week of January 6 - 10, 2014 | |||
* Onsite weeks: January 27 - 31, February 10 - 14, and February 24 - 28, 2014 | |||
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify | |||
risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to | |||
support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. John Hanna, a Region II Senior Reactor | |||
Analyst, will support Mr. Walker during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic risk | |||
assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the | |||
inspection. | |||
The Enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the information-gathering visit. | |||
Please provide the referenced information to the Region II Office by December 2, 2013. | |||
M. Nazar 2 | |||
Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors | |||
will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents | |||
required for inspection preparation. The additional information will need to be available to the | |||
team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection teams preparation week of January 20, 2014. | |||
Mr. Walker will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details: (1) | |||
availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of | |||
contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection, | |||
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6) | |||
other applicable information. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its | |||
Enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document | |||
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide | |||
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC | |||
website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, regarding the | |||
information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Walker at 404-997-4639 or contact | |||
me at 404-997-4530. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
RA | |||
Rebecca L. Nease, Chief | |||
Engineering Branch 1 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket Nos.: 50-250, 50-251 | |||
License Nos.: DPR-31, DPR-41 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Information Request for Turkey Point | |||
Nuclear Generating Units 3 and 4 | |||
Component Design Bases Inspection | |||
cc: Distribution via Listserv | |||
__ML13280A151 x SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE x FORM 665 ATTACHED | |||
OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS | |||
SIGNATURE RA RA | |||
NAME WALKER NEASE | |||
DATE 10/ 2 /2013 10/3 /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013 | |||
E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO | |||
Letter to Mr. Mano Nazar from Rebecca L. Nease dated October 3, 2013. | |||
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4 | |||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT | |||
05000250/2014007 AND 05000251/2014007 | |||
Distribution | |||
RIDSNRRDIRS | |||
PUBLIC | |||
RidsNrrPMTurkeyPoint Resource | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4 | |||
The | COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | ||
Please provide the information electronically in .pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on | |||
CDROM (or FTP site, Sharepoint, etc.). The CDROM (or website) should be indexed and | |||
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. | |||
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and | |||
fires: | |||
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by Risk | |||
Achievement Worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | |||
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets | |||
2. From your most recent PSA including external events and fires: | |||
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW, | |||
and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance | |||
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets | |||
3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW. Provide | |||
human reliability worksheets for these items. | |||
4. List of time critical operator actions with a brief description of each action. | |||
5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since | |||
September 1, 2011, with a brief description of each revision. | |||
6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow | |||
or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to | |||
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and | |||
associated evaluations or calculations. | |||
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed, and documented in the | |||
stations corrective action program, for industry events and safety related equipment | |||
failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry | |||
Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications, etc) since September 1, 2011. | |||
8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) | |||
design modifications implemented since September 1, 2011. | |||
9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred since | |||
September 1, 2011. | |||
10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since September 1, 2011. | |||
Enclosure | |||
2 | |||
11. List of equipment on the sites Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a | |||
description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if | |||
available) of your plans to address the issue(s). | |||
12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as | |||
described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020. | |||
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from | |||
September 1, 2011, to present. | |||
14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems. | |||
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. | |||
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s). | |||
17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases. | |||
( | 18. Copy of Technical Requirements Manual(s). | ||
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since September 1, 2011. | |||
20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s). | |||
21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s). | |||
22. One line diagram of electrical plant. (Electronic and full size - hard copy week of | |||
January 6, 2014) | |||
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams. | |||
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses. | |||
25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses. | |||
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems. (Electronic and | |||
1/2 size - hard copy week of January 6, 2014) | |||
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs. | |||
28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s). | |||
30. Copies of condition reports associated with findings from previous CDBI (Inspection Report | |||
2011-008). | |||
31. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating | |||
Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures. | |||
32. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection. | |||
Enclosure | |||
3 | |||
33. List of any condition reports generated in preparation for this inspection. | |||
34. Copies of all condition reports generated from previous CDBI (Inspection Report 2011-008). | |||
35. Contact information for a person to discuss PSA information prior to the information- | |||
gathering trip. (Name, title, phone number, and e-mail address) | |||
Enclosure | |||
34. | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:51, 4 November 2019
ML13280A151 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Turkey Point |
Issue date: | 10/03/2013 |
From: | Nease R NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 |
To: | Nazar M Florida Power & Light Co |
References | |
IR-14-007 | |
Download: ML13280A151 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000250/2014007
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257
October 3, 2013
Mr. Mano Nazar
Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer
Florida Power and Light Company
P.O. Box 14000
Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT
05000250/2014007 AND 05000251/2014007
Dear Mr. Nazar:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Turkey Point
Nuclear Generating Units 3 and 4 during the weeks of January 27 - 31, February 10 - 14, and
February 24 - 28, 2014. Mr. Shakur Walker, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRCs Region
II Office, will lead the inspection team. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the
baseline inspection procedure, Procedure 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection,
issued August 14, 2012.
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant / low margin components to function
as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review
of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.
During a telephone conversation on October 2, 2013, Mr. Walker confirmed with Ms. Stavy
Mihalakea of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the three-week
onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:
- Information-gathering visit: Week of January 6 - 10, 2014
- Onsite weeks: January 27 - 31, February 10 - 14, and February 24 - 28, 2014
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify
risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to
support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. John Hanna, a Region II Senior Reactor
Analyst, will support Mr. Walker during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic risk
assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the
inspection.
The Enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the information-gathering visit.
Please provide the referenced information to the Region II Office by December 2, 2013.
M. Nazar 2
Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors
will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents
required for inspection preparation. The additional information will need to be available to the
team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection teams preparation week of January 20, 2014.
Mr. Walker will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details: (1)
availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of
contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)
other applicable information.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
Enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC
website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, regarding the
information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Walker at 404-997-4639 or contact
me at 404-997-4530.
Sincerely,
Rebecca L. Nease, Chief
Engineering Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos.: 50-250, 50-251
Enclosure:
Information Request for Turkey Point
Nuclear Generating Units 3 and 4
Component Design Bases Inspection
cc: Distribution via Listserv
__ML13280A151 x SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE x FORM 665 ATTACHED
OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS
NAME WALKER NEASE
DATE 10/ 2 /2013 10/3 /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013 10/ /2013
E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Letter to Mr. Mano Nazar from Rebecca L. Nease dated October 3, 2013.
SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT
05000250/2014007 AND 05000251/2014007
Distribution
RIDSNRRDIRS
PUBLIC
RidsNrrPMTurkeyPoint Resource
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Please provide the information electronically in .pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on
CDROM (or FTP site, Sharepoint, etc.). The CDROM (or website) should be indexed and
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and
fires:
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by Risk
Achievement Worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets
2. From your most recent PSA including external events and fires:
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW,
and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets
3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW. Provide
human reliability worksheets for these items.
4. List of time critical operator actions with a brief description of each action.
5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since
September 1, 2011, with a brief description of each revision.
6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow
or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and
associated evaluations or calculations.
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed, and documented in the
stations corrective action program, for industry events and safety related equipment
failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry
Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications, etc) since September 1, 2011.
8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs)
design modifications implemented since September 1, 2011.
9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred since
September 1, 2011.
10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since September 1, 2011.
Enclosure
2
11. List of equipment on the sites Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a
description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if
available) of your plans to address the issue(s).
12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as
described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020.
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from
September 1, 2011, to present.
14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems.
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s).
17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases.
18. Copy of Technical Requirements Manual(s).
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since September 1, 2011.
20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s).
21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s).
22. One line diagram of electrical plant. (Electronic and full size - hard copy week of
January 6, 2014)
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams.
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses.
25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses.
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems. (Electronic and
1/2 size - hard copy week of January 6, 2014)
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs.
28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s).
30. Copies of condition reports associated with findings from previous CDBI (Inspection Report
2011-008).
31. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating
Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures.
32. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection.
Enclosure
3
33. List of any condition reports generated in preparation for this inspection.
34. Copies of all condition reports generated from previous CDBI (Inspection Report 2011-008).
35. Contact information for a person to discuss PSA information prior to the information-
gathering trip. (Name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)
Enclosure