ML14112A172: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:07 AM To: cadner@entergy.com Cc: Carneal, Jason; Wolfgang, Robert; Lupol d, Timothy; Beasley, Benjamin
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                         Pickett, Douglas Sent:                         Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:07 AM To:                           cadner@entergy.com Cc:                           Carneal, Jason; Wolfgang, Robert; Lupold, Timothy; Beasley, Benjamin


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick Relief Request PRR-05Mr. Adner:  
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick Relief Request PRR-05 Mr. Adner:
 
By letter dated February 21, 2014, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted relief request PRR-05 for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (TAC No. MF3680). The relief request proposes an alternative vibration alert limit for the residual heat removal pumps.
By letter dated February 21, 2014, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted relief request PRR-05 for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (TAC No. MF3680). The relief request proposes an alternative vibration alert limit for the residual heat removal pumps.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to a llow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.  
Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov 1
 
Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov


Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1237   Mail Envelope Properties   (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20140422080700)
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         1237 Mail Envelope Properties   (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20140422080700)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick Relief Request PRR-05 Sent Date:   4/22/2014 8:07:07 AM Received Date: 4/22/2014 8:07:00 AM From:   Pickett, Douglas Created By:   Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Carneal, Jason" <Jason.Carneal@nrc.gov>
Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick Relief Request PRR-05 Sent Date:             4/22/2014 8:07:07 AM Received Date:         4/22/2014 8:07:00 AM From:                 Pickett, Douglas Created By:           Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None "Wolfgang, Robert" <Robert.Wolfgang@nrc.gov>
"Carneal, Jason" <Jason.Carneal@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Lupold, Timothy" <Timothy.Lupold@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Beasley, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Beasley@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "cadner@entergy.com" <cadner@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Wolfgang, Robert" <Robert.Wolfgang@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1959     4/22/2014 8:07:00 AM
Tracking Status: None "Lupold, Timothy" <Timothy.Lupold@nrc.gov>
 
Tracking Status: None "Beasley, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Beasley@nrc.gov>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "cadner@entergy.com" <cadner@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                         1959                   4/22/2014 8:07:00 AM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 05:35, 4 November 2019

Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick Relief Request PRR-05
ML14112A172
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/22/2014
From: Pickett D
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Adner C
Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
MF3680
Download: ML14112A172 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:07 AM To: cadner@entergy.com Cc: Carneal, Jason; Wolfgang, Robert; Lupold, Timothy; Beasley, Benjamin

Subject:

Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick Relief Request PRR-05 Mr. Adner:

By letter dated February 21, 2014, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted relief request PRR-05 for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (TAC No. MF3680). The relief request proposes an alternative vibration alert limit for the residual heat removal pumps.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1237 Mail Envelope Properties (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20140422080700)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for FitzPatrick Relief Request PRR-05 Sent Date: 4/22/2014 8:07:07 AM Received Date: 4/22/2014 8:07:00 AM From: Pickett, Douglas Created By: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Carneal, Jason" <Jason.Carneal@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Wolfgang, Robert" <Robert.Wolfgang@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Lupold, Timothy" <Timothy.Lupold@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Beasley, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Beasley@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "cadner@entergy.com" <cadner@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1959 4/22/2014 8:07:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14112A172&oldid=2050009"