ML16211A112: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16211A112
| number = ML16211A112
| issue date = 07/28/2016
| issue date = 07/28/2016
| title = Email to D. Grinnell From J. Lamb Regarding Counterproposal from Seabrook on ASR Meeting
| title = Email to D. Grinnell from J. Lamb Regarding Counterproposal from Seabrook on ASR Meeting
| author name = Lamb J G
| author name = Lamb J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name = Bower F L, Grinnell D, Poole J
| addressee name = Bower F, Grinnell D, Poole J
| addressee affiliation = - No Known Affiliation, NRC/NRR, NRC/RGN-I
| addressee affiliation = - No Known Affiliation, NRC/NRR, NRC/RGN-I
| docket = 05000443
| docket = 05000443
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ML16211A112 From:          Lamb, John To:            Poole, Justin; Bower, Fred; Deborah Grinnell (            )
==Subject:==
Fw: Seabrook Cores Date:          Thursday, July 28, 2016 11:01:01 AM Attachments:    Re Counterproposal From Seabrook on ASR Meeting (003).pdf Ms. Grinnell, I am no longer the PM for Seabrook. I forwarded your email to Justin and Fred. They will handle the response with some of your other emails.
Thanks.
John From: Debbie - Gmail <                                          >
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:54:04 AM To: Lamb, John
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Seabrook Cores Hello John, I owe you the email from Conte to promised that was sent to NRC staff in a FOIA.
Where are the five cores I requested in an NRC response. I asked you  when the NRCs negotiation with NextEra to test cores with petrography and material properties and failed to have the cores tested, where are the cores? Did the NRC request that they be tested as agreed on tensile properties.
With no regulation, you have no power to protect us and fail the public. NRC NRR staff stated it needed to be done over and over again to Region 1 staff.
Thank you, Debbie}}

Latest revision as of 15:58, 30 October 2019

Email to D. Grinnell from J. Lamb Regarding Counterproposal from Seabrook on ASR Meeting
ML16211A112
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/2016
From: John Lamb
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Fred Bower, Grinnell D, Justin Poole
- No Known Affiliation, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC Region 1
References
Download: ML16211A112 (3)
v • d • e


Text

ML16211A112 From: Lamb, John To: Poole, Justin; Bower, Fred; Deborah Grinnell ( )

Subject:

Fw: Seabrook Cores Date: Thursday, July 28, 2016 11:01:01 AM Attachments: Re Counterproposal From Seabrook on ASR Meeting (003).pdf Ms. Grinnell, I am no longer the PM for Seabrook. I forwarded your email to Justin and Fred. They will handle the response with some of your other emails.

Thanks.

John From: Debbie - Gmail < >

Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 10:54:04 AM To: Lamb, John

Subject:

[External_Sender] Seabrook Cores Hello John, I owe you the email from Conte to promised that was sent to NRC staff in a FOIA.

Where are the five cores I requested in an NRC response. I asked you when the NRCs negotiation with NextEra to test cores with petrography and material properties and failed to have the cores tested, where are the cores? Did the NRC request that they be tested as agreed on tensile properties.

With no regulation, you have no power to protect us and fail the public. NRC NRR staff stated it needed to be done over and over again to Region 1 staff.

Thank you, Debbie

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16211A112&oldid=2018250"