ML16230A358: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1From:Buford, Angela Sent:Monday, August 15, 2016 4:29 PM To:'Deborah Grinnell' Cc:Bower, Fred; Poole, Justin
{{#Wiki_filter:ML16230A358 From:                               Buford, Angela Sent:                               Monday, August 15, 2016 4:29 PM To:                                 'Deborah Grinnell' Cc:                                 Bower, Fred; Poole, Justin


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Re: C-10 request to the NRC on the J une 15, 2016 Cat 1 meeting to send me the NRC questions to NextEra Attachments:
RE: Re: C-10 request to the NRC on the June 15, 2016 Cat 1 meeting to send me the NRC questions to NextEra Attachments:                         RE: NextEra/NRC public meeting ?? [2016-SST-0548]
RE: NextEra/NRC public meeting ?? [2016-SST-0548]GoodafternoonDebbie!Thankyouforyouremail,andweappreciateyourquestions.Ibelievetheattachedemailisresponsivetoyourquery.AsIstatedbelowinmyAugust11,2016emailandisechoedbyFredBowerintheattachedemailtoyou,theNRCdidnotgeneratea"listofquestions"toaskNextEraduringtheJune15,2016publicmeeting.TheNRCstaffspontaneouslyandinformallyaskedquestionsasNextEragaveitspresentation;assuchthereisnolistavailabletosendtoyouinsuchregard.Fred'sattachedemailalsoprovidesinformationontheassociatedADAMSML#sassociatedwiththisandyourotherconcerns.Ialsowouldliketoremindyouthattechnicalcorrespondence(e.g.,auditreports,requestsforadditionalinformation,safetyevaluationandnonproprietaryinformationsubmittedbyNextEra)betweentheNRC/NRRstaffandNextEraduringthestaff'sreviewoftheNextEralicenseamendmentrequestwillbeavailabletothepublic,andverbalcommunicationofatechnicalnatureistransparentlyconductedthroughapublicmeeting.Thankyou,AngieAngelaBuford,PEStructuralEngineerU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionNRR/DLR/RASB3014153166From:DeborahGrinnell[mailto:grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com]Sent:Monday,August15,20161:19PMTo:Buford,Angela;Bower,Fred
Good afternoon Debbie!
Thank you for your email, and we appreciate your questions. I believe the attached email is responsive to your query. As I stated below in my August 11, 2016 email and is echoed by Fred Bower in the attached email to you, the NRC did not generate a list of questions to ask NextEra during the June 15, 2016 public meeting. The NRC staff spontaneously and informally asked questions as NextEra gave its presentation; as such there is no list available to send to you in such regard. Freds attached email also provides information on the associated ADAMS ML #s associated with this and your other concerns.
I also would like to remind you that technical correspondence (e.g., audit reports, requests for additional information, safety evaluation and nonproprietary information submitted by NextEra) between the NRC/NRR staff and NextEra during the staffs review of the NextEra license amendment request will be available to the public, and verbal communication of a technical nature is transparently conducted through a public meeting.
Thank you, Angie Angela Buford, PE Structural Engineer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DLR/RASB 3014153166 From: Deborah Grinnell [mailto:grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:19 PM To: Buford, Angela ; Bower, Fred


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender]Re:C10requesttotheNRContheJune15,2016Cat1meetingtosendmetheNRCquestionstoNextErasorry SEND me the list of questi ons requested to NextEra.
[External_Sender] Re: C10 request to the NRC on the June 15, 2016 Cat 1 meeting to send me the NRC questions to NextEra sorry SEND me the list of questions requested to NextEra.
Debbie On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Deborah Grinnell <
Debbie On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com> wrote:
grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com
Hello Angie and Fred, To be clear. Below is the purpose of the June 15 2016 NextEra and NRC Cat 1 meeting in the NRC notice.
> wrote: Hello Angie and Fred, To be clear. Below is the purpose of the June 15 2016 NextEra and NRC Cat 1 meeting in the NRC notice.
1
2"The purpose of this meeting is for NextEra Energy to present to the NRC staff its plan for a license amendment request regarding revising the licensing basis for Alkali-Silica Reaction at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1. "
Below is the copy of the NRC letter on page 2. It states what the NRC requested questions to NextEra to answer to the NRC. . I asked you to see me the list of NRC questions your NRC staff asked NextEra staff to answer. I have requested that you send C-10 the list of NRC questions. We also want the NextEra answers to your questions when you receive them


Thank you, Debbie  
"The purpose of this meeting is for NextEra Energy to present to the NRC staff its plan for a license amendment request regarding revising the licensing basis for Alkali-Silica Reaction at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1. "
Below is the copy of the NRC letter on page 2. It states what the NRC requested questions to NextEra to answer to the NRC. . I asked you to see me the list of NRC questions your NRC staff asked NextEra staff to answer. I have requested that you send C-10 the list of NRC questions. We also want the NextEra answers to your questions when you receive them Thank you, Debbie Docket No. 50-443


Docket No. 50-443
==Enclosure:==


==Enclosure:==
List of Attendees cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
List of Attendees cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource RidsNrrPMSeabrook Resource RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsRgn 1MailCenter Resource LPL1-2 R/F TWertz, NRR RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource KManoly, NRR FFarzam, NRR BLehman, NRR RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource GThomas, NRR TTran, NRR FBower, RI BCook, RI JBowen, OEDO The NRC staff had a number of questions on the modeling techniques NextEra would be using to ref On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Buford, Angela <
PUBLIC RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource RidsNrrPMSeabrook Resource RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsRgn 1MailCenter Resource LPL1-2 R/F TWertz, NRR RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource KManoly, NRR FFarzam, NRR BLehman, NRR RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource GThomas, NRR TTran, NRR FBower, RI BCook, RI JBowen, OEDO The NRC staff had a number of questions on the modeling techniques NextEra would be using to ref On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Buford, Angela <Angela.Buford@nrc.gov>
Angela.Buford@nrc.gov
wrote:
> wrote:
2
3I forwarded your previous email to Fred Bower so that he can consider whether to include a formal response to this question in the letter he is planning to send you responding to all of your other questions, but the short answer is: I don't have knowledge that the NRC had a "list" of questions. NextEra was presenting, and the NRC participants peppered the applican t with clarifying questions during and after they presented their slides (see the "public meetings" section on the
 
Seabrook ASR Public Webpage http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/concrete-degradation.html#mtgs.) If you want to be ensured to have the specifics of any public meeting, we encourage you to call in to public meetings - we always give notice and a way to observe - and that ensures that you are privy to the specifics of public meetings that are not transcribed.I will forward the email below, as you corrected it, to Fred Bower since he has NRC Oversight of Seabrook. Also, I plan to continue to allow your questions to be responded to by the NRC through the proper channel of the Region I Office since they oversee Seabrook, and I provide them engineering support from


Headquarters.Thank you!Angie}}
I forwarded your previous email to Fred Bower so that he can consider whether to include a formal response to this question in the letter he is planning to send you responding to all of your other questions, but the short answer is: I dont have knowledge that the NRC had a list of questions. NextEra was presenting, and the NRC participants peppered the applicant with clarifying questions during and after they presented their slides (see the public meetings section on the Seabrook ASR Public Webpage http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/concrete-degradation.html#mtgs.) If you want to be ensured to have the specifics of any public meeting, we encourage you to call in to public meetings - we always give notice and a way to observe - and that ensures that you are privy to the specifics of public meetings that are not transcribed.
I will forward the email below, as you corrected it, to Fred Bower since he has NRC Oversight of Seabrook. Also, I plan to continue to allow your questions to be responded to by the NRC through the proper channel of the Region I Office since they oversee Seabrook, and I provide them engineering support from Headquarters.
Thank you!
Angie 3}}

Latest revision as of 14:59, 30 October 2019

A. Buford/D. Grinnell E-mail Thread Subj: C-10 Request
ML16230A358
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/15/2016
From: Angela Buford
NRC/NRR/DLR/RASB
To: Grinnell D
- No Known Affiliation
References
2016-SST-0548
Download: ML16230A358 (3)
v • d • e


Text

ML16230A358 From: Buford, Angela Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 4:29 PM To: 'Deborah Grinnell' Cc: Bower, Fred; Poole, Justin

Subject:

RE: Re: C-10 request to the NRC on the June 15, 2016 Cat 1 meeting to send me the NRC questions to NextEra Attachments: RE: NextEra/NRC public meeting ?? [2016-SST-0548]

Good afternoon Debbie!

Thank you for your email, and we appreciate your questions. I believe the attached email is responsive to your query. As I stated below in my August 11, 2016 email and is echoed by Fred Bower in the attached email to you, the NRC did not generate a list of questions to ask NextEra during the June 15, 2016 public meeting. The NRC staff spontaneously and informally asked questions as NextEra gave its presentation; as such there is no list available to send to you in such regard. Freds attached email also provides information on the associated ADAMS ML #s associated with this and your other concerns.

I also would like to remind you that technical correspondence (e.g., audit reports, requests for additional information, safety evaluation and nonproprietary information submitted by NextEra) between the NRC/NRR staff and NextEra during the staffs review of the NextEra license amendment request will be available to the public, and verbal communication of a technical nature is transparently conducted through a public meeting.

Thank you, Angie Angela Buford, PE Structural Engineer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DLR/RASB 3014153166 From: Deborah Grinnell [1]

Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:19 PM To: Buford, Angela ; Bower, Fred

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: C10 request to the NRC on the June 15, 2016 Cat 1 meeting to send me the NRC questions to NextEra sorry SEND me the list of questions requested to NextEra.

Debbie On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Angie and Fred, To be clear. Below is the purpose of the June 15 2016 NextEra and NRC Cat 1 meeting in the NRC notice.

1

"The purpose of this meeting is for NextEra Energy to present to the NRC staff its plan for a license amendment request regarding revising the licensing basis for Alkali-Silica Reaction at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1. "

Below is the copy of the NRC letter on page 2. It states what the NRC requested questions to NextEra to answer to the NRC. . I asked you to see me the list of NRC questions your NRC staff asked NextEra staff to answer. I have requested that you send C-10 the list of NRC questions. We also want the NextEra answers to your questions when you receive them Thank you, Debbie Docket No. 50-443

Enclosure:

List of Attendees cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource RidsNrrPMSeabrook Resource RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsRgn 1MailCenter Resource LPL1-2 R/F TWertz, NRR RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource KManoly, NRR FFarzam, NRR BLehman, NRR RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource GThomas, NRR TTran, NRR FBower, RI BCook, RI JBowen, OEDO The NRC staff had a number of questions on the modeling techniques NextEra would be using to ref On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Buford, Angela <Angela.Buford@nrc.gov>

wrote:

2

I forwarded your previous email to Fred Bower so that he can consider whether to include a formal response to this question in the letter he is planning to send you responding to all of your other questions, but the short answer is: I dont have knowledge that the NRC had a list of questions. NextEra was presenting, and the NRC participants peppered the applicant with clarifying questions during and after they presented their slides (see the public meetings section on the Seabrook ASR Public Webpage http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/concrete-degradation.html#mtgs.) If you want to be ensured to have the specifics of any public meeting, we encourage you to call in to public meetings - we always give notice and a way to observe - and that ensures that you are privy to the specifics of public meetings that are not transcribed.

I will forward the email below, as you corrected it, to Fred Bower since he has NRC Oversight of Seabrook. Also, I plan to continue to allow your questions to be responded to by the NRC through the proper channel of the Region I Office since they oversee Seabrook, and I provide them engineering support from Headquarters.

Thank you!

Angie 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16230A358&oldid=2017746"