ML17108A478: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/09/2017
| issue date = 02/09/2017
| title = 2017 Clinton Power Station Initial Licensed Operator Examination Form ES-301-4
| title = 2017 Clinton Power Station Initial Licensed Operator Examination Form ES-301-4
| author name = Zoia C D
| author name = Zoia C
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301                                         Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist                                 Form ES-301-4 Facility: Clinton                   Date of Exam: 1l3O/17                 Scenario Numbers: 1 l2 /SOperaling Test Number: 2017-301 lnitials OUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a       b. c#
Clinton Date of Exam: 1l3O/17 Scenario Numbers: 1 l2 /SOperaling Test Number: 2017-301 OUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnitials a b.c#The initial conditions are realistic, n that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operalors into expected events.fl 4t, 2.The scenarios consist mostly of related events t, 1 A.*a4 3.Each event description conssts of o lhe point in the scenaro when it is to be initiated. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event r the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew o the expected operator actions (by shft position)o the event termination point (if applicable)
The initial conditions are realistic, n that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operalors into expected events.                                         fl   4      t,
//I ,[ry 4.The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamcs.
: 2.           The scenarios consist mostly of related events                                                       t, 1   A.     *a4
il/y.ta-5.Sequencing and timing of events s reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
: 3.             Each event description conssts of
6 I il 6.lf tme compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
                                                                                                                        /          I o   lhe point in the scenaro when it is to be initiated
                    . the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event r   the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew                                                     ,[
o   the expected operator actions (by shft position) o   the event termination point (if applicable)                                                   /               ry
: 4.           The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamcs.                                           il     /y   .ta-I
: 5.           Sequencing and timing of events s reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
I 6       ilI
: 6.             lf tme compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constrainls.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constrainls.
Cues are given.I fl9 I^k rt/*7 The simulator modeling is not altered.(t]*4, 8.The scenarios have been validated.
Cues are given.                                                                                         fl9             rt/*
Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is mantained while running the planned scenarios.
(        ^k 7             The simulator modeling is not altered.                                                                   t]
,øq ry 9.Every operator wll be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.&q w)10.All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submt the form along with the simulator scenarios).
* 4,
q ry 11 The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3)øq og 12.Each applicant wll be signífcantly nvolved in the minmum number of transents and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
: 8.             The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator                     ,ø performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is mantained while running the planned scenarios.
/+u7 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to supporl licensing decisions for each crew position.,1¿tu4 Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)Actual Attributes I'l Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)I /l/ \lL O.t 2.Abnormal events (2-4)q /, / q I¿A¿, 3.Major transients
q ry
('l -2)I /l t I (I dta 4.EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 -2)A t2 t 2 I hl-5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)t/l/o 0/d4 6. Critical tasks (2-3)2. t7 tq I e,- The faclity signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.NOTE I t, ES-301, Page 25 ot 27}}
: 9.             Every operator wll be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.                       &       q w)
: 10.           All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submt the form along with the simulator scenarios).
q ry 11             The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3)                                                                                                 ø       q       og
: 12.           Each applicant wll be signífcantly nvolved in the minmum number of transents and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
                                                                                                                      ,1
                                                                                                                          /     + u7
: 13.           The level of difficulty is appropriate to supporl licensing decisions for each crew position.                     ¿     tu4 I
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)                       Actual Attributes
'l           Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)                                                     I /l/         \         lL       O.t
: 2.           Abnormal events (2-4)                                                                 q /, / q           I       ¿       A¿,
: 3.           Major transients ('l -2)                                                               I /l t I           (     I       dta
: 4.           EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions         (1 -2)                           A t2 t 2                   I       hl-
: 5.           EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)                                 t/l/o                 0   /       d4
: 6.           Critical tasks (2-3)                                                                 2. t7 tq                   I       e, NOTE          - The faclity signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.                                   I        t,
              # lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 25 ot 27}}

Latest revision as of 05:34, 30 October 2019

2017 Clinton Power Station Initial Licensed Operator Examination Form ES-301-4
ML17108A478
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/09/2017
From: Chuck Zoia
Operations Branch III
To:
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
Shared Package
ML16308A466 List:
References
50-461/17-301
Download: ML17108A478 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 1l3O/17 Scenario Numbers: 1 l2 /SOperaling Test Number: 2017-301 lnitials OUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b. c#

The initial conditions are realistic, n that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operalors into expected events. fl 4 t,

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events t, 1 A. *a4
3. Each event description conssts of

/ I o lhe point in the scenaro when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event r the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ,[

o the expected operator actions (by shft position) o the event termination point (if applicable) / ry

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamcs. il /y .ta-I
5. Sequencing and timing of events s reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

I 6 ilI

6. lf tme compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constrainls.

Cues are given. fl9 rt/*

( ^k 7 The simulator modeling is not altered. t]

  • 4,
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator ,ø performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is mantained while running the planned scenarios.

q ry

9. Every operator wll be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. & q w)

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submt the form along with the simulator scenarios).

q ry 11 The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3) ø q og

12. Each applicant wll be signífcantly nvolved in the minmum number of transents and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

,1

/ + u7

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to supporl licensing decisions for each crew position. ¿ tu4 I

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

'l Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) I /l/ \ lL O.t

2. Abnormal events (2-4) q /, / q I ¿ A¿,
3. Major transients ('l -2) I /l t I ( I dta
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 -2) A t2 t 2 I hl-
5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) t/l/o 0 / d4
6. Critical tasks (2-3) 2. t7 tq I e, NOTE - The faclity signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. I t,
  1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 25 ot 27

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17108A478&oldid=2009031"