ML11290A102: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Leaming N
| author name = Leaming N
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| addressee name = Regner L M
| addressee name = Regner L
| addressee affiliation = NRC/ADM/DAS/RDEB, NRC/NRR
| addressee affiliation = NRC/ADM/DAS/RDEB, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000352, 05000353
| docket = 05000352, 05000353

Revision as of 09:09, 29 June 2019

Comment (12) of Nancy Leaming Opposing the Renewal of Limerick Plant License
ML11290A102
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/12/2011
From: Leaming N
- No Known Affiliation
To: Lisa Regner
Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
76FR53498 00012
Download: ML11290A102 (1)


Text

7].Mendiola, Doris From: Sent: To:

Subject:

naturalcat@comcast.

net Wednesday, October 12, 2011 5:26 PM Regner, Lisa NRC ID DOCKET 2011-0166 K Ti U w Cf)Dear Ms Regner As a business owner in Pottstown and a long time resident of the area I am deeply concerned about the Limerick plant. I do not know if this plant is internally "safe" and it may very well be.I am more concerned about the effects of our surrounding air and water supply and the future of my children and grandchildren, some of whom are already inflicted with cancer and other diseases.

I also am concerned about terrorist attacks, natural diseasters and the more common"human error." I plead with you to not renew this license. I am very fearful.Respectfully, Nancy Leaming p.s. I did attend the meeting and listen with open mind and ears but my fears were not eased.//6,f-),V o L/ V -3 Z7)93~z ~1