|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML15124A0232015-04-20020 April 2015
Comment (1) of Lewis Cuthbert on Behalf of Alliance for Clean Environment on Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternative Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule - Docket Id NRC-2014-0137
ML13190A3072013-07-0303 July 2013
Comment (11) of Charlie and Betty Shank Opposing Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Limerick Units 1 and 2
ML13190A3082013-06-27027 June 2013
Comment (12) of Tina Daly Opposing Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Limerick Units 1 and 2
ML13190A0052013-06-27027 June 2013
Comment (9) of Lindy Nelson on Behalf of Us Department of the Interior, on License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, NUREG-1437, Supplement 49
ML13182A0112013-06-26026 June 2013
Comment (8) of Charlie and Betty Shank Requesting That NRC to Reconsider Environmental Impacts of Its Decision to Re-License Limerick Units 1 & 2
ML13182A0102013-06-25025 June 2013
Comment (7) of E. Christopher Abruzzo on Behalf of State of PA, Dept of Environmental Protection on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Limerick Units 1 and 2
ML13182A0402013-06-24024 June 2013
Comment (6) by Lewis Cuthbert, on Behalf of ACE, on Limerick Nuclear Plant'S Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML13172A0482013-06-20020 June 2013
Comment (5) of Janice Monger Opposed to Renewing Limerick Nuclear Plant'S License
ML13170A3132013-06-14014 June 2013
Comment (4) of Kelly Jameson Opposing Limerick Nuclear Plant Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML13157A2612013-05-23023 May 2013
Comment (3) of Les Rinehart of Potty Queen Supporting the Relicensing of the Limerick Generating Station
ML13141A1522013-05-16016 May 2013
Comment (2) of Marvin Lewis Opposing Application for Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License
ML13141A1512013-05-16016 May 2013
Comment (1) of Marvin Lewis Opposing Exelon Generation Company, LLC, License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11307A4542011-11-0202 November 2011
Comment (39) of Michael Smokowicz, on Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11307A3882011-11-0101 November 2011
Comment (33) of Charlotte Derr, Opposing Limerick License Renewal - NRC 2011-0166
ML11307A4552011-10-31031 October 2011
Comment (38) of Sharon Yohn Opposing License Renewal of Limerick Power Plant
ML11307A4562011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (36) of Jordan Weaver, Et. Al., on Behalf of Natural Resources Defense Council, on Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2
ML11305A0102011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (32) of Anita Baly, on Behalf of Herself, Opposed to Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11308B3522011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (37) of Lorraine Ruppe Opposing the Reissuing of a License to Run the Limerick Nuclear Plant
ML11305A0092011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (31) of John and Joyce B. Webber, on Behalf of Selfs, Opposed to Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11305A0082011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (30) of Charlie Koenig Opposing the Limerick Licensing
ML11305A0072011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (29) of Debby Penrod, Supporting Limerick License Renewal
ML11305A0152011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (25) of Ken Sekellick Opposing an Extension of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Operating License
ML11305A0142011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (24) of Doris Meyers, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Limerick Relicensing
ML11306A2442011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (27) of Lewis Cuthbert on Behalf of the Alliance for a Clean Environment, Opposing Limerick License Renewal. Part 1 of 2
ML11306A2452011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (27) of Lewis Cuthbert on Behalf of the Alliance for a Clean Environment, Opposing Limerick License Renewal. Part 2 of 2
ML11307A3872011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (34) of Michael M. Stokes, on Behalf of Montgomery County, PA Planning Commission, on Limerick Nuclear Generating Station License Renewal, NRC-2011-0166
ML11307A3862011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (35) of Thomas M. Sullivan, on Behalf of Montgomery County Dept of Public Safety, on Environmental Scoping, Limerick Nuclear Generating Station, Division of License Renewal, NRC-2011-0166
ML11300A0112011-10-23023 October 2011
Comment (21) of Lisa Smoyer, Opposing Limerick License Renewal - NRC Id Docket 2011-0166
ML11301A0722011-10-21021 October 2011
Comment (23) of Lori Molinari, Opposing Limerick Relicensure
ML11294A2082011-10-19019 October 2011
Comment (20) of Mary Lou & Herald Smith Opposing License Renewal at Limerick
ML11305A0062011-10-15015 October 2011
Comment (28) of Anthony Gonyea, on Behalf of the Onondaga Nation, on Limerick Generating Station License Renewal
ML11291A1552011-10-14014 October 2011
Comment (17) of Melissa Antrim on Behalf of Self Opposing Limerick License Renewal
ML11291A1562011-10-14014 October 2011
Comment (18) of Michael Antrim on Behalf of Self Opposing the Renewal of Limerick Operating License
ML11290A1052011-10-13013 October 2011
Comment (15) of Michael Gale Opposing Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Plant
ML11290A1042011-10-13013 October 2011
Comment (14) of Jude Schwegel Opposing Limerick License Renewal
ML11290A1032011-10-12012 October 2011
Comment (13) of Cynthia Gale Opposing Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11290A1022011-10-12012 October 2011
Comment (12) of Nancy Leaming Opposing the Renewal of Limerick Plant License
ML11286A2982011-10-11011 October 2011
Comment (9) of Unknown Individual Re Limerick Generating Station License Renewal
ML11300A0122011-10-0808 October 2011
Comment (22) of Unknown Individual Opposing Limerick Nuclear Plant'S License Renewal
ML11279A1142011-09-28028 September 2011
Comment (8) of Stockbridge-Munsee Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Review on Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2, License Application Renewal
ML11279A1112011-09-28028 September 2011
Comment (5) of Sylvia Pollick Opposing Exelon Energy'S License Renewal
ML11290A1062011-09-26026 September 2011
Comment (16) of Joe Roberto, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Relicensing of Limerick
ML11279A1072011-09-26026 September 2011
Comment (1) of Camilla Lange Serious Reservations and Concerns on Limerick Generating Station License Renewal
ML11286A3002011-09-24024 September 2011
Comment (11) by Charles & Elizabeth Shank Opposing License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station
ML11279A1132011-09-23023 September 2011
Comment (7) of Brice Obermeyer on Behalf of Delaware Tribe Historic Preservation Office Concerning the Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2, License Renewal Application Review
ML11279A1102011-09-22022 September 2011
Comment (4) of Charlene Padworny Opposing an Extension of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 Operating License
ML11286A2992011-09-22022 September 2011
Comment (10) by Richard Kolsch on Limerick Power Plant License Renewal
2015-04-20
[Table view] |
Text
Mendiola, Doris From: Melissa Antrim [mantrim@boscovs.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:18 PM To: Regner, Lisa Cc: Antrim, Melissa home)
Subject:
Docket 2011-0166 - Limerick License Renewal
Via email: Lisa. Regqner(U@NRC.qov
.. /7Lc i /K 7L U.S. NRC .-
Ms. Lisa Regner Mailstop TWB-05-BO1 M -/
Washington, D.C. 20555 /.
Reference:
Request for Denial of Limerick License Renewal - NRC I.D. Docket 2011-0166
Dear Ms. Regner:
I attended the recent meeting on the possible renewal of Limerick Nuclear Plant's license for 20 years past its current 2024 and 2029 expiration dates. I strongly believe, as do many of my local friends and family, that the Limerick Nuclear Plant must be closed, not relicensed. Approving Limerick Nuclear Plant to be relicensed until 2049 would be jeopardizing the health of thousands and thousands of people in neighboring communities. There is substantial evidence readily available which justifies closing Limerick. Renewing this license could lead to a catastrophic meltdown.
Limerick was built to last 40 years. The older any facility gets, the more likely breakdowns and equipment failure will occur. When it's a nuclear power plant, meltdown could result from corroding, deteriorating, and aging pipes, cables, and equipment - honestly, a number of things. Miles of deteriorating underground buried pipes and cables are a major concern - how and how often are these inspected? Signs of mechanical damage and breakdown already exist -
three unplanned shutdowns June 2011, preceded by many others since 2007, one with loss of cooling water. While some parts can be replaced, by the nuclear industry's own admission, some equipment is too big and expensive to replace. Limerick is showing signs of stress and no one knows just how bad this will be by the time the current license is up. To add 20 more years to that, without having a clue as to what the condition will be, would be beyond careless.
Over eight million people live within 50 miles of Limerick Nuclear Plant. Safe evacuation is not possible, even within the seriously flawed and inadequate current 10-mile evacuation plan. Until Limerick closes, NRC should expand the evacuation plan (to 50 miles) and be sure there are enough shelters and supplies available to accommodate the over 8 million people within that radius. Exelon should pay for the supplies.
It doesn't take an accident or disaster for Limerick to poison the region's residents with radiation. Radiation from Limerick's routine and accidental emissions alone for the past 26 years is reason enough to deny Exelon's request. It's not credible for NRC to claim continuous radiationlevels are safe for me and my family when there is no safe level of exposure according to the National Academy of Sciences and Physicians for Social Responsibility.
NRC never did any radiation monitoring or testing at Limerick. Evidence shows testing done by Exelon and DEP cannot be trusted. Exposure to radiation is known to cause cancer. It should be obvious to NRC that Limerick played a major role in our tragic, well documented cancer crisis after Limerick started operating in the mid 198.0s to the late 1990s.
Four cancer studies based on PA Cancer Registry and CDC data showed skyrocketing rates for several cancers far higher than national and state averages, especially in children. Our children had the highest levels of Strontium-90 radiation in their baby teeth of any group near any nuclear plant studied. Limerick Nuclear Plant released SR-90 into our air and water that got into the milk, vegetation, and food since Limerick started operating.
Thyroid cancer increased by 128% from 1985 to 1997 - was a side note, with no family history or other obvious risk factors in my life, I was recently treated for thyroid cancer. Since my diagnosis, I have learned of many other locals like me. It's scary to think the choice of where we live could kill us.
It would be careless, unethical and immoral for NRC to approve Exelon's requested license extensions for Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. Limerick Nuclear Plant must be closed by 2029.
Sincerely, Melissa Antrim 1008 Reading Ave Boyertown, PA 19512 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
2
