|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML15124A0232015-04-20020 April 2015
Comment (1) of Lewis Cuthbert on Behalf of Alliance for Clean Environment on Draft Guidance Regarding the Alternative Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule - Docket Id NRC-2014-0137
ML13190A3072013-07-0303 July 2013
Comment (11) of Charlie and Betty Shank Opposing Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Limerick Units 1 and 2
ML13190A3082013-06-27027 June 2013
Comment (12) of Tina Daly Opposing Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Limerick Units 1 and 2
ML13190A0052013-06-27027 June 2013
Comment (9) of Lindy Nelson on Behalf of Us Department of the Interior, on License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, NUREG-1437, Supplement 49
ML13182A0112013-06-26026 June 2013
Comment (8) of Charlie and Betty Shank Requesting That NRC to Reconsider Environmental Impacts of Its Decision to Re-License Limerick Units 1 & 2
ML13182A0102013-06-25025 June 2013
Comment (7) of E. Christopher Abruzzo on Behalf of State of PA, Dept of Environmental Protection on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Limerick Units 1 and 2
ML13182A0402013-06-24024 June 2013
Comment (6) by Lewis Cuthbert, on Behalf of ACE, on Limerick Nuclear Plant'S Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML13172A0482013-06-20020 June 2013
Comment (5) of Janice Monger Opposed to Renewing Limerick Nuclear Plant'S License
ML13170A3132013-06-14014 June 2013
Comment (4) of Kelly Jameson Opposing Limerick Nuclear Plant Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML13157A2612013-05-23023 May 2013
Comment (3) of Les Rinehart of Potty Queen Supporting the Relicensing of the Limerick Generating Station
ML13141A1522013-05-16016 May 2013
Comment (2) of Marvin Lewis Opposing Application for Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License
ML13141A1512013-05-16016 May 2013
Comment (1) of Marvin Lewis Opposing Exelon Generation Company, LLC, License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012
Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012
Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML11307A4542011-11-0202 November 2011
Comment (39) of Michael Smokowicz, on Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11307A3882011-11-0101 November 2011
Comment (33) of Charlotte Derr, Opposing Limerick License Renewal - NRC 2011-0166
ML11307A4552011-10-31031 October 2011
Comment (38) of Sharon Yohn Opposing License Renewal of Limerick Power Plant
ML11307A4562011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (36) of Jordan Weaver, Et. Al., on Behalf of Natural Resources Defense Council, on Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2
ML11305A0102011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (32) of Anita Baly, on Behalf of Herself, Opposed to Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11308B3522011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (37) of Lorraine Ruppe Opposing the Reissuing of a License to Run the Limerick Nuclear Plant
ML11305A0092011-10-28028 October 2011
Comment (31) of John and Joyce B. Webber, on Behalf of Selfs, Opposed to Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11305A0082011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (30) of Charlie Koenig Opposing the Limerick Licensing
ML11305A0072011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (29) of Debby Penrod, Supporting Limerick License Renewal
ML11305A0152011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (25) of Ken Sekellick Opposing an Extension of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Operating License
ML11305A0142011-10-27027 October 2011
Comment (24) of Doris Meyers, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Limerick Relicensing
ML11306A2442011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (27) of Lewis Cuthbert on Behalf of the Alliance for a Clean Environment, Opposing Limerick License Renewal. Part 1 of 2
ML11306A2452011-10-26026 October 2011
Comment (27) of Lewis Cuthbert on Behalf of the Alliance for a Clean Environment, Opposing Limerick License Renewal. Part 2 of 2
ML11307A3872011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (34) of Michael M. Stokes, on Behalf of Montgomery County, PA Planning Commission, on Limerick Nuclear Generating Station License Renewal, NRC-2011-0166
ML11307A3862011-10-25025 October 2011
Comment (35) of Thomas M. Sullivan, on Behalf of Montgomery County Dept of Public Safety, on Environmental Scoping, Limerick Nuclear Generating Station, Division of License Renewal, NRC-2011-0166
ML11300A0112011-10-23023 October 2011
Comment (21) of Lisa Smoyer, Opposing Limerick License Renewal - NRC Id Docket 2011-0166
ML11301A0722011-10-21021 October 2011
Comment (23) of Lori Molinari, Opposing Limerick Relicensure
ML11294A2082011-10-19019 October 2011
Comment (20) of Mary Lou & Herald Smith Opposing License Renewal at Limerick
ML11305A0062011-10-15015 October 2011
Comment (28) of Anthony Gonyea, on Behalf of the Onondaga Nation, on Limerick Generating Station License Renewal
ML11291A1552011-10-14014 October 2011
Comment (17) of Melissa Antrim on Behalf of Self Opposing Limerick License Renewal
ML11291A1562011-10-14014 October 2011
Comment (18) of Michael Antrim on Behalf of Self Opposing the Renewal of Limerick Operating License
ML11290A1052011-10-13013 October 2011
Comment (15) of Michael Gale Opposing Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Plant
ML11290A1042011-10-13013 October 2011
Comment (14) of Jude Schwegel Opposing Limerick License Renewal
ML11290A1032011-10-12012 October 2011
Comment (13) of Cynthia Gale Opposing Relicensing of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant
ML11290A1022011-10-12012 October 2011
Comment (12) of Nancy Leaming Opposing the Renewal of Limerick Plant License
ML11286A2982011-10-11011 October 2011
Comment (9) of Unknown Individual Re Limerick Generating Station License Renewal
ML11300A0122011-10-0808 October 2011
Comment (22) of Unknown Individual Opposing Limerick Nuclear Plant'S License Renewal
ML11279A1142011-09-28028 September 2011
Comment (8) of Stockbridge-Munsee Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Review on Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2, License Application Renewal
ML11279A1112011-09-28028 September 2011
Comment (5) of Sylvia Pollick Opposing Exelon Energy'S License Renewal
ML11290A1062011-09-26026 September 2011
Comment (16) of Joe Roberto, on Behalf of Self, Opposing Relicensing of Limerick
ML11279A1072011-09-26026 September 2011
Comment (1) of Camilla Lange Serious Reservations and Concerns on Limerick Generating Station License Renewal
ML11286A3002011-09-24024 September 2011
Comment (11) by Charles & Elizabeth Shank Opposing License Renewal of Limerick Generating Station
ML11279A1132011-09-23023 September 2011
Comment (7) of Brice Obermeyer on Behalf of Delaware Tribe Historic Preservation Office Concerning the Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2, License Renewal Application Review
ML11279A1102011-09-22022 September 2011
Comment (4) of Charlene Padworny Opposing an Extension of Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 Operating License
ML11286A2992011-09-22022 September 2011
Comment (10) by Richard Kolsch on Limerick Power Plant License Renewal
2015-04-20
[Table view] |
Text
Mendiola, Doris 30 r'--
From: Michael Antrim [antrim89@gmail.com] -7: CD Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:35 PM
Subject:
Limerick - NRC I.D. Docket 2011-0166
Reference:
Request for Denial of Limerick License Renewal - NRC I.D. Docket 2011-01.66 C
Dear Ms. Regner:
The possible renewal of Limerick Nuclear Plant's license for 20 years past its current 2024 and 2029 expiration dates more than 12 years ahead of time, worries me a great deal. It's hard to understand why something this major would be done so far in advance. It's IMPOSSIBLE to know the condition of Limerick 12-19 years ahead of time. Why on earth would this be renewed so early? It's a lengthy process that could begin earlier, but in no way should something this important be rushed through now. Why not wait until closer to the expiration dates, and then seek approval? I understand this is how the original guidelines were set up - but those are long outdated. Approving Limerick Nuclear Plant to be relicensed until 2049 would be jeopardizing the health of millions. Renewing this license could be catastrophic to millions. Someone has to speak up; someone has to step up.
Earthquakes and other natural disasters are more frequent and stronger than ever before. Limerick is 3rd on the earthquake risk list. Underground pipes and cables can shake and break, which would lead to loss of power, loss of cooling water, and meltdown. Limerick's substandard containment flaw means more radiation would be released. It is simply too dangerous to keep Limerick operating. Would you want to live within miles of this potential catastrophic disaster? Add the enormous population growth that this area has seen over the past 10 years - with little to no road improvements - and attempting to evacuate the area during a disaster would be futile. It would be virtually impossible to get out of harms way.
The older any facility gets, the more likely breakdowns and equipment failure will occur. Limerick was built to last 40 years. Limerick is showing signs of stress and no one knows just how bad this will be by the time the current license is up. To add 20 more years to that, without possibly knowing what the condition will be, would be careless. No one can predict what the condition of Limerick will be in 2024 or 2029.
Over eight million people live within 50 miles of Limerick Nuclear Plant. Safe evacuation is not an option. Plain and simple. That's a scary thought for those of us who live here!!
Exposure to radiation is known to cause cancer. NRC has not done any radiation monitoring or testing at Limerick. Evidence shows testing done by Exelon and DEP cannot be trusted - it's ridiculous to think they could monitor themselves. It should be obvious to NRC that Limerick played a major role in our cancer crisis after Limerick started operating in the mid 1980s to 2000. Four cancer studies based on Pennsylvania Cancer Registry and the CDC showed skyrocketing rates for several cancers much higher than national and state averages, especially in children - innocent children. Thyroid cancer increased by 128% from 1985 to 1997. I have local friends and family with thyroid cancer and brain cancer - not one, but several. Sadly, it's no longer uncommon in this area to have a personal link to cancer. However, it IS uncommon in other areas of the country. It used to be uncommon here too -
prior to Limerick. Would YOU want to live here? Would YOU approve a license renewal so close to home? Your job is to safely review the facts. Don't like the money of these corporations blur the facts.
Thank you for your time today. Just remember, itwould be careless, unethical and immoral for NRC to approve Exelon's requested license extensions for Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. Limerick Nuclear Plant must be closed by 2029.
Sincerely,
- 66) ~&KS?7
Melissa Antrim 1008 Reading Ave Boyertown, PA 19512 2
