Revision as of 04:15, 7 May 2019

Text

Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Revision 0, Engineering Design File, Appendix F, EDF-3124-0014, Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using Aerscreen
	ML16053A211
Person / Time
Site:	Northwest Medical Isotopes
Issue date:	07/30/2015
From:	McManus G; Northwest Medical Isotopes, Portage
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16053A221	List: ML16053A204; ML16053A205; ML16053A206; ML16053A207; ML16053A208; ML16053A209; ML16053A210; ML16053A211; ML16053A212;
References
	NWMI-LTR-2016-002 EDF-3124-0014, NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Rev. 0
	Download: ML16053A211 (25)
	v • d • e

NWMI NWMI-201 6-RAI-00!Rev. 0 Appendix F-EDF-3124-0014, Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN F-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0014 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: July 30, 2015 Engineering Design File Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN Portage Project No.: 3124 Project Title: NWMI Environmental Report Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 23 1. Portage Project No.: 3124 2. Project/Task:

NWIVI Environmental Report 3. DCN#4. Title: Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN 5. NPH PC or SDC: N/A 6. SSC Safety Category:

N/A 7 Summary: This EDF documents the expected off-site emission concentration from the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI) Radioisotope Production Facility project for PM-10, PM-2.5, NOR, CO, and SOx~. The assumptions used and the results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval,(A)

Signatures:

... '.. '(Identify minimum reviews and approvals.

Additional reviews/approvals may be added.): = "; ' I. Printed Name! ...* R/ Organizationi

"". .*':Signature

' Date Author/Design Agent A Gary McManus I 7/30/15, Independent Review R Dave Thorne _f .,7/30/15 Independent Review R Project Manager R/A John Belier !fS.- ..7/30/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

E]N/A TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 2 of 23 Introduction As described in EDF-3 124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities, EDiF-3 124-0006, Determination of Wind-Blown Dust During Construction Activities, and EDF-3 124-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, there will be numerous emissions sources during the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWML) Radioisotope Production Facility.

The three sources considered for this calculation include fugitive dust, windblown dust, and emissions for off-road construction equipment.

The totals from all three of these activities are summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Anticipated Gaseous Effluents and Their Associated Air Quality Parameters for Construction PM-2.5 iW, C, OR -304 ' 674 CO OR i ...91.5 .... i .. ..202 .. .,i ..* ..;-,-, ' , ..O R, " ,- i " 107 7,; -, ,23.6 , ,., a W -Wind-blown dust (EDF-3 124-0006), C -Construction activities (EDF-3124-0004), OR -Off-road construction equipment emissions (EDF-3 124-0009).

CO = carbon monoxide.

PM-10 =particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.NOx = nitrogen oxides. SOx = sulfur dioxide.PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jtm or less diameter.Assumptions (AERSCREEN)

The input assumptions used for the AERSCREEN model are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.Table 2. AERSCREEN Input Stack Parameters ISource rate Area emission rate 18.8 Area source long side iArea source short side ;: Initial vertical dimension!Rural or urbain. Flagpole receptor height iInitial probe distance !: ii 5E-06 g/s-m 2' 7.02E-05 lb/hr-rn 2 189.89 623.00 0.00m OO000ft 2 m 6.56 ft 5,0 m1,44f STable 3. MAKEMET Meteorology i Parameters iMinimum wind speed 0 05 in/s height :.' ' :::10,m , ..:!Surface characteristics

-User defined!Bowen ratio 1.50 The closest residential receptor was assumed to be a single family home located approximately 430 meters (in) south-southeast from the facility location.

Using these assumptions, the AERSCREEN model was run and the results were obtained.

A complete listing of the model is included in Attachment

1.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 3 of 23 Results (AERSCREEN)

The final run results for the maximum concentration downwind of the facility are summarized in Table 4.Table 4. AERSCREEN Results 112 ma 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 N/A.......30 .... mb" ... ,- : " ....., 391..... .... 391 '.. "...... ,'.... 391' "7 ..... ..; ,"-- 391 ,...... .N/Am6 , ,< 9 .. 3 1 , ,! ; 3 1 .: ..9I... : /a Distance from the source to the location of the maximum concentration is 112 m.b Distance from the source to the nearest receptor.N/A = not applicable.

Using the AERSCREEN results from Table 4, the concentrations at 112 and 430 m for each of the effluents in Table 1 were calculated as follows.The calculations were conducted using the attached Excel spreadsheet (Attachment 2). The following example for PM-10 shows the approach.Total release is 1,463 kilograms (kg) (3,226 pounds [lb]) over 17 months (Table 1).Average 1 -hr PM- 10 release is: 3,226 lb/17 months x 1 monthl30 days x 1 day/24 hr 2.64E-01 lb/hours (hr) average over 17 months From AERSCREEN, the maximum concentration is at 112 m and is 1,103 micrograms (pgg)/cubic meter (m 3)/(1 .00 lb/hr release).* PM-10 = 2.64E-01 lb/hr average over 3 years x 1,103 igg/m 3/(1.00 lb/hr release)* PM-10 =291pgg/m 3 Similarly, from AERSCREEN, the concentration at 430 m (closest receptor) is 391 pgg/m 3/(1.00 lb/hr release) (Attachment 2).PM-10 103 jgg/m 3 Similar calculations were completed for each of the other constituents in Table 1. The results are shown in Table 5.

TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 TbeNGINEERIsinG MdeSiGng FIesut EDF-3124--0014 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 23 Table 5. Emission Modeling Results S -~ 0 .~ 0 -'S

0 -.0 -~ I 0 0 0 PM-10 NOx2.64E-01 1. 16E-0 1 1 .93E-02 291 128 21 103 i~221!45 16.4!1 7.5 CO NOx PM-2.5= carbon monoxide.= mitrogen oxides.= particulate matter 2.5 ptm or less diameter.PM-10 particulate matter 10 p.m or less diameter.SOX = sulfur dioxide.The values in Table 5 were then compared to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in Table 6.Table 6. Release Concentration Comparison to National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM-10 NO.SOx 291 128 21 103 45 7.5 0.15 0.04 0.10 35.0 0.075 1.88E+o2 1.97E+02 194%68%10.7%69%24%3.8 1%a Maximutm concentration from AERSCREEN was at 112 m.b Shaded cells represent actual NAAQS units without conversion.

CO =carbon monoxide.

PM-2.5 NAAQS =National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

PM-10 NOx nitrogen oxides. SCIx= particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.= particulate matter 10 pxm or less diameter.= sulfur dioxide.Based on Table 6, the modeled release concentrations are below the applicable NAAQS standards except for PM-10 and PM-2.5. The PM-10 and PM-2.5 releases are assumed to not be mitigated for this analysis.

However, the PM-10 and PM-2.5 would be mitigated to ensure that the air concentrations are less than the NAAQ standards by use of water application during excavation operations and limiting excavation during periods of high winds. Therefore, no additional modeling is required at this time.

TEM-9002 ENGINEE 09/29/09 Rev. 0 A similar evaluation of the model emission concentrations was performed to determine if the emissions exceed the regional ambient concentrations of the listed pollutants.

Regional values of the five regulated pollutants for Missouri were obtained from the Missouri Division of Environmental Quality website for different monitoring stations in the state the closest to the RPF site (MDNR, 2015).Table 7 summarizes the data in Attachment 3 used to determine the average values.N1G DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 5 of 23 Table 7. Ambient Air of Rural/Urban Missouri-' 6~

S -S. S PM-10 SO2 17.2 20.8 6.97 CO NOx PM-2.5 PM-10 SO,'=carbon monoxide.= nitrogen oxides.= particulate matter 2.5 jIm or less diameter.=particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.= sulfur dioxide, Table 8 presents the results of the comparison of the air concentrations at the closest receptor (430 m) to the ambient air concentrations.

Table 8. Comparison of Modeled Concentrations to Average Ambient Levels Around the State of Missouri PM-10 NOx'SOx 103 45 7.5 17.2 20.8 7.0 Yes 8 Yes 6 No o PM values do not include control measures CO NO,'PM-2. 5=carbon monoxide.= nitrogen oxides.=particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.PM-10 particulate matter 101im or less diameter.SOx' = sulfur dioxide.From Table 8, control measures for particulate matter should be considered during construction.

In addition, engine emission controls for the construction equipment should be evaluated for the individual units. The emissions factors used were based on average equipment and associated horsepower.

Emissions information based on the specific manufacturer's data should result in actual emissions being lower.References EDF-3 124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 3, 2015.EDF-3 124-0006, Determination of Wind-Blown Dust During Construction Activities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 21, 2015.EDF-3224-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 31, 2015.MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqm/index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. I Page 6 of 23 Attachment 1 AERSCREEN Fliles AERSCREEN 11126 /AERMOD 1234 06/18/14 13 :04:48 TIThE: AREA RELEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

- - - - AREA****-

PARAMETERS

SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0. 1260 g/s AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.885E-O: AREA HiEIGHT: 0.30 meters AREA SOURCE LONG SID)E: 189.1 AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 74.5 INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION:

C RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL 5 gI(s-m2)0.89 meters 98 meters).00 meters 1.000 lb/hr 0. 702E-04 lbI(hr-m2) 98 feet 623.00 feet 246.00 feet 0.00 feet FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE =2.00 meters 5000. meters 6.56 feet 16404. feet************BUILDIING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS

BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POJINIT SOURCES************

FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters -5000. meters MAX[MUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1 -HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg)(in)

PERIOD TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 Rev. 1 Page 7of 23 1" 0.500 1079.*= worst case diagonal 0 125.0 ANN*****************MVAKE]V[ET METEOROLOGY

ARAETER*****************

MIN/MAX TEMIPERATURE:

249.8 /310.9 (K)MINIMUM WiINID SPEED: 0.5 m/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS JINPUT: USER ENTERED ALBEDO: 0.60 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 0.500 (meters)METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAX[MUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 01 01 1 01 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS-0.78 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14. 3.6 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HIT REF TA HIT 10.0 249.8 2.0 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR TEM-9002 09/29/,09 Rev. 0 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. I Page 8 of 23 10 0104 1 01 HO U*~ W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS-0.72 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14.4.0 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 249.8 2.0*************AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES

- - - - OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM51v DIST 1-HR CONC (in) (ug/m3)0.99 557.3 25.00 698.4 50.00 833.0 75.00 954.4 100.00 1064.125.00 1079.150.00 983.7 175.00 888.5 200.00 805.4 225.00 733.5 250.00 670.7 275.00 615.7 300.00 567.5 325.00 524.7 350.00 487.0 375.00 453.2 400.00 423.2 425.00 396.1 450.00 371.9 475.00 350.0 500.00 330.2 525.00 312.1 550.00 295.7 575.00 280.7 MAXIMUJM DIST 1-HR CONC (in) (ug/m3)2525.00 42.82 2550.00 42.25 2575.00 41.69 2600.00 41.14 2625.00 40.61 2650.00 40.09 2675.00 39.58 2700.00 39.08 2725.00 38.59 2750.00 38.11 2775.00 37.65 2800.00 37.19 2825.00 36.74 2850.00 36.30 2875.00 35.87 2900.00 35.45 2925.00 35.04 2950.00 34.63 2975.00 34.24 3000.00 33.85 3025.00 33.47 3050.00 33.09 3075.00 32.73 3100.00 32.37 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. I Page 9 of 23 600.00 625.00 650.00 675.00 700.00 725.00 750.00 775.00 800.00 825.00 850.00 875.00 900.00 925.00 950.00 975.00 1000.00 1025.00 1050.00 1075.00 1100.00 1125.00 1150.00 1175.00 1200.00 1225.00 1250.00 1275.00 1300.00 1325.00 1350.00 1375.00 1400.00 1425.00 1450.00 1475.00 1500.00 1525.00 1550.00 1575.00 1600.00 1625.00 1650.00 1675.00 1700.00 1725.00 266.8 254.1 242.5 231.7 221.5 212.2 203.6 195.6 188.0 180.9 174.2 168.0 162.2 156.7 151.5 146.5 141.9 137.5 133.4 129.4 125.6 122.1 118.7 115.4 112.3 109.3 106.5 103.8 101.2 98.73 96.38 94.09 91.90 89.80 87.79 85.84 83.96 82.14 80.40 78.72 77.10 75.54 74.03 72.58 71.18 69.82 3125.00 3150.00 3174.99 3199.99 3225.00 3250.00 3275.00 3300.00 3325.00 3350.00 3375.00 3400.00 3425.00 3450.00 3475.00 3500.00 3525.00 3550.00 3575.00 3600.00 3625.00 3650.00 3675.00 3700.00 3725.00 3750.00 3775.00 3800.00 3825.O00 3849.99 3875.00 3900.00 3925.00 3950.00 3975.00 4000.00 4025.00 4050.00 4075.00 4100.00 4125.00 4150.00 4175.00 4200.00 4225.00 4250.00 32.01 31.67 31.33 31.00 30.67 30.35 30.03 29.72 29.42 29.12 28.82 28.54 28.25 27.97 27.70 27.43 27.16 26.90 26.65 26.39 26.15 25.90 25.66 25.43 25.19 24.96 24.74 24.52 24.30 24.08 23.87 23.66 23.46 23.26 23.06 22.86 22.67 22.48 22.29 22.10 21.92 21.74 21.56 21.39 21.22 21.05 TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 ,ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 10 of 23 1750.00 1775.00 1800.00 1825.00 1850.00 1875.00 1900.00 1925.00 1950.00 1975.00 2000.00 2025.00 2050.00 2075.00 2100.00 2125.00 2150.00 2175.00 2200.00 2225.00 2250.00 2275.00 2300.00 2325.00 2350.00 2375.00 2400.00 2425.00 2450.00 2475.00 2500.00 68.51 67.25 66.02 64.83 63.68 62.57 61.48 60.43 59.40 58.41 57.44 56.49 55.56 54.67 53.80 52.95 52.13 51.33 51.66 50.87 50.10 49.36 48.63 47.92 47.22 46.55 45.89 45.24 44.61 44.00 43.40 4275.00 4300.00 4325.00 4350.00 4375.00 4400.00 4425.00 4450.00 4475.00 4500.00 4525.00 4550.00 4575.00 4600.00 4625.00 4650.00 4675.00 4700.00 4725.00 4750.00 4775.00 4800.00 4825.00 4850.00 4875.00 4900.00 4924.99 4950.00 4975.00 5000.00 20.88 20.71 20.55 20.39 20.23 20.07 19.92 19.76 19.61 19.47 19.32 19.17 19.03 18.89 18.75 18.61 18.48 18.34 18.21 18.08 17.95 17.82 17.70 17.57 17.45 17.21 17.09 16.97 16.86 TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 11 of 23***********AERSCREEN MAIXIMUMV IMPACT SUMvIMARY

- - - - 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in SCREEN]NG PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THlE AIR QUALITY IMP~ACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)Report number EPA-454/R-92-019 http://www.epa.gov/scram00 1/guidance~permit.htm under Screening Guidance MAXIMUrM 1 -HOUR SC!3-HOI ALED SCALED SCALED J-R 8-HOUR 24-HOUR AINJNUAL CONC CONC CONC CONC (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)CALCULATION PROCEDURE CONC (ug/m3)FLAT TERRAIN 1103. 1103. 1103. 1103. N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 112.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 557.3 557.3 557.3 557.3 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 0.9mtr 0.99 meters TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 12 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 start date and time 06/13/14 10:00:24 AERSCREEN 11126 NWMI Process boiler run#1 NWMI Process boiler run#1 DATA ENTRY VALIDATION METRIC ENGLISH** STACKDATA

- ----- ---Emission Rate: 0.1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr stack Height: 18.59 meters 61.00 feet stack Diameter:

0.305 meters 12.00 inches stack Temperature:

310.9 K 100.0 Deg F Exit Velocity:

17.929 m/s 58.82 ft/s Stack Flow Rate: 2772 ACFM Model Mode: RURAL Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet** BUILDING DATA **No Building Downwash Parameters

- TERRAIN DATA NO Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation:

0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance:

5000. meters 16404. feet Flagpole Receptor Height: 1.8 meters No discrete receptors used 6. feet** METEOROLOGY DATA **Min/Max Temperature:

255.4 / 302.6 K 0.0 / 85.0 Deg F Minimum wind speed: 0.5 in/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant surface Profile: Grassland Dominant climate Type: Average Moisture AERSCREEN output file: NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13.out** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin.No terrain used, AERMAP will, not be run changing units flag from English to metric Page 1 TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 13 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS

& MAKEMET obtaining surface characteri sti Cs...using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Grassland with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.60 1.50 0.001 spring 0.18 0.40 0.050 summer 0.18 0.80 0.100 Autumn 0.20 1.00 0.010 Creating met files aerscreenOLl0.sfc

& aerscreen0LO1_O.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO2_.01.sfc

& aerscreen_02_0.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO3_l.sfc

& aerscreen_03_Ol.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc

& aerscreen_&04_O.pfl PROBE started 06/13/14 10:05:11 Running probe for winter sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Winter sector 1****r****

WARNING MESSAGES ******** NONE **Running probe for spring sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage*e*******

WARNING MESSAGES ******* NONE **Running probe for summer sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage*****~** WARNING MESSAGES ******** NONE **Running probe for Autumn sector 1 AERMOO Finishes successfullyfor PROBE stage*********

WARNING MESSAGES ******* NONE **1 Spring sector1 1 Summer sector1 1 Autumn sector 1 PROBE REFINE AERMOD ended 06/13/14 10:05:17 started 06/13/14 10:05:17 Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 spring sector1 Page 2 TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-001 4 09/29/09 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 14 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13WARNING MESSAGES ** NONE **REFINE ended 06/13/14 10:05:17* e* *** * *** *** **Y*Ye* * ** * *** *** * ** e* **Y* ***e* *******AERSCREEN Finished successfully with no errors or warnings units switched from EngVIsh to metric check log file for details Ending date and time 06/13/14 10:05:19 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 15 of 23 OUTPUT FILE: NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 AERSCREEN 11126 / AERMOD 1234 06/13/14 10:05:17 TITLE: NWMI Process boiler run#1**********~***,*******1i*******

STACK PARAMETERS

- - - - (*1*Y~*********f*(*******

SOURCE EMISSION RATE:*STACK HEIGHT: STACK INNER DIAMETER: PLUME EXIT TEMPERATURE:

PLUME EXIT VELOCITY: STACK AIR FLOW RATE: RURAL OR URBAN: FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE =0.1260 18.59 0.305 310.9 17.929 2772 RURAL g/s meters meters K mn/s ACFM 1.000 61.00 12.00 100.0 58.82 lb/hr feet inches Deg F ft/s 1.83 meters 5000. meters 6.00 feet 16404. feet**************~

~ BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS

NO BUILDING DOWNWASH HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR THIS ANALYSIS**********************e****

PROBE ANALYSIS **************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters -5000. meters Zo ROUGHNESS 1-HR CONC DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR LENGTH (ug/m3) Cm) PERIOD 1"0.050 19.15- 125.0 SPR* = worst case flow sector************

MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS

MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:

MINIMUM WIND SPEED: ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 255.4 / 302.6 (K)0.5 mn/s 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Grassland DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Spring ALB EDO: BOWEN RATIO: ROUGHNESS' LENGTH: 0.18 0.40 0.050 (meters)Page 1 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 16 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0105 5 12 HO 21.62 HT 10.0 0.066 W*' DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN 0.300 0.020 46. 39. -1.2 Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS 0.050 0.40 0.18 0.50 REF TA HT 302.6 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT Cnon-downwash):

33.3 meters METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0101 5 12 HO-1.63 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH 0.0o39- 0.100 0.0o20- -19.- -18.-M-O LEN-2-_.9 zo BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS 0.010- 1.00 0.20 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 255.4 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT (non-downwash):

53.7 meters******************1*******

AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC (m) (ug/m3)1.00 0.4366E-03 25.00 7.119 50.00 9.924 75.00 14.25 100.00 18.40 125.00 19.15 150.00 18.65 175.00 17.82 200.00 16.90 225.00 15.99 250.00 15.14 275.00 14.36 300.00 13.65 325.00 13.00 MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC Cm) (ug/m3)2525.00 5.097 2550.00 5.061 2575.00 5.024 2600.00 4.989 2625.00 4.953 2650.00 4.919 2675.00 4.884 2700.00 4.850 2725.00 4.817 2750.00 4.784 2775.00 4.752 2800.00 4.720 2825.00 4.688 2850.00 4.657 Page 2 TEM-9002 09129/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 Rev. 1 Page 17 of 23*350.00 375.00 400.00 425.00 450.00 475.00 500.00 525.00 550.00 575.00 600.00 625.00 650.00 675.00 700 .00 725.00 750.00 775.00 800.00 825.00 850.00 875.00 900.00 925.00 950.00 975.00 1000.00 1025.00 1050.00 1075.00 1100.O00 1125.O00 1150.O00 1175.00 1200.O00 1225.O00 1250.00 1275.00 1300.00 1325.00 1350.00 1375.00 1400.O00 1425.O00 1450.00 1475.00 1500.00 1525.00 1550.00 1575.00 1600.00 1625.00 1650.00 1675.00 1700.00 1725.00 1750.00 1775.00 1800.00 1825.00 1850.00 1875.00 1900.00 NWMiI Process Boilers 12.41 11.87 11.38 10.93 10. 52 10.39 10.29 10.15 9.975 9.782 9.575 9.357 9.13 5 8.910 8.685 8.461 8.241 8.029 7.938 7.842 7.742 7.887 8.023 8.132 8.2 18 8.282 8.327 8.300 8.258 8.212 8.162 8.110 8.055 7.998 7.938 7.878 7.816 7.753 7.689 7.625 7.560 7.495 7.430 7.365 7.300 7.23 5 7.171 7.107 7.043 6.980 6.918 6.856 6.794 6.734 6.674 6.614 6.556 6.498 6.441 6.385 6.329 6.274 6.220 ARESCREEN Run 2875.00 2900.00 2925.00 2950.00 2975.00 3000.00 3025.00 3050.00 3075.00 3100.00 3125.00 3150.00 3175.00 3200.00 3225 .00 3250.00 3275.00 3300.00 3325.00 3350.00 3375.00 3400.00 3425.00 3450.00 3475.00 3500.00 3525.00 3550.00 3575.00 3600.00 3625.00 3650.00 3675.00 3700.00 3725.00 3750.00 3775.00 3800.00 3825.00 3850.00 3875.00 3900.00 3925.00 3950.00 3975.00 4000.00 4025.00 4050.00 4075.00 4100.00 4125.00 4150.00 4175.00 4200.00 4225.00 4250.00 4275.00 4300.00 4325.00 4350.00 4375.00 4400.00 4425.00 6-13 4,627 4.597 4.567 4.537 4.508 4.480 4.451 4.423 4.396 4.369 4.342 43 315 4.289 4.263 4.238 4.212 4.187 4.163 4.139 4.115 4.091 4.067 4.044 4.021 3.999 3.976 3.954 3.933 3.911 3.890 3.869 3.848 3.827 3.807 3.787 3.767.3.747 3.727.3.708 3.689 3.670 3.651 3.633 3,615 3,597 3.579 3,561.3.543 3.526 3.509 3.492 3,475 3.458 3.442 3 .425 3.409 3,393 3.377 3.362 3.346 3.331 3.315 3.300 Page 3 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 18 of 23 1925.00 1950.00 1975.00 2000.00 2025.00 2050.00 2075.00 2100.00 2125.00 2150.00 2175.00 2200.00 2225.00 22 50.00 2275.00 2300.00 2325.00 2350.00 2375.00 2400.00 2425.00 2450.00 2475.00 2500.00 NWMI Process Boilers 6.167 6.114 6.062 6.011 5.961 5.911 5.863 5.815 5.767 5.720 5.674 5.629 5.584 5.540 5.497 5.454 5.412 5.371 5.330 5.290 5.250 5.211 5.173 5.135 ARESCREEN Run 4450.00 4475.00 4500.00 4525.00 4550.00 4575.00 4600.00 4625.00 4650.00 4675.00 4700.00 4725.00 4750.00 4775.00 4800.00 4825.00 4850.00 4875.00 4900.00 4925.00 4950.00 4975.00 5000.00 6-13 3.285 3.270 3.256 3.241 3.227 3.212 3.198 3.184 3.170 3.157 3.143 3.129 3.116 3.103 3.089 3.076 3.063 3.051 3.038 3.025 3.013 3.000 2.988************(***

AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT

SUMMARY

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/mi3) (ug/m3)FLAT TERRAIN 19.15 19.15 17.24 11.49 1.915 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 123.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.4366E-03 0.4366E-03 0.3929E-03 0.2619E-03 0.4366E-04 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE1.0mtr

1. O0 meters TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 19 of 23 Attachment 2 Excel Spreadsheet of Emission Rate Calculations Total PM Emissions Source (Hbs) Total Amount Effluent ________Winda [ onstuctin b Off-Road Construction

_____________Equlpment (is PM-10 160 [ 3000 66 3226 PM-2.5 24 [ 600 50 674 a. FromEDF-3 124-0006 b. From EDF-3124-0004

c. From EDF-3 124-0009 ________[PM-10 Calculation

!Total relase is 3226 lbs over 17 months!lAveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months release is f ]3322-17bs.....mo---s x ont3 days

1lday/24 hours i 2.64E-01 ___ lb/hr average over 17 months ___ ____i [1.4lb1 /hraverage over 3-years....

From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release...The; .... ...aveag cnnetration at 112 meters is ,- 2.64E-02 [2.64E-02 lb/hr

1103 ug/m3 ____, 17 months , 2.91E+02 !ug/m3 __~PM-2.5 Calculation

}Total relase is 674 lbs over 17 months.... ................ Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months release is I 64ls1 months x 1 month/S0 days_* Iday/24 hours __S...... ...... .. ... .. .. ... .551 -0 .J l/hr average over 17 months _ _ _.!...2.60E-02 Ilb/hr average over 3-years From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release-- The average concnetration at 112_meters is_____SPM2.5 6.07E+i01 3-- From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 430 meters and is 391 ug/m3 / lb/hr release'At 430 meters ; .___+ PM- 10 = 1.0305E+02 iug/m3 IPM-2.5_____

2,1531E+Oljug/m3

-__ _i .....-- -.. .... ....---.... .. .... ....................... U .............."_ _ _._. ...... .. ... ... _ ....... ..... ........ ....... ..... ... ........ ... ...i .... .......... .... ... .

lTM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 20 of 23 Tablc 20Off-Road Vehiele Emissions (During 17 Months of Construction)

_________________Pollutant(s)

Equipment Number Hours NOx CO ____CO 2 SOx (kg (Ibs)

kg) (Ibs) (kg) (Ibs) (Ibs)Bulldozer 1.00E+00O 1.00E÷02 1.39E+f02 3.07E+i02 1.90E+-01 4.10E+-01 1.30E+04 2.87E+04 2.30E+01 5.l0E+01 Compactor 1.00E+00 1.20E+02 1.55E+-I02 3.42E+I02 2.10E+I01 4.60E+01l 1.45E+'04 3.20E+04 2.60E+~01 5.70E+I01 Excavators 1.00E+00 6.00E+01 4.90E-i01 1.08E+02 8.00E+00 1.70E+f01 4.53E1+03 9.99E1+03 8.00E1+00 1.80E+01 Front Loaders 1.00E+400 1.20E1+02 6.80E+f01 1.50E1+02 1.00E-t01 2.30E+01 6.25E+03 1.38E+04 1.10E1+01 2.50E-I01 Grfaders 1.0OE+t00 8.00E+01 6.60E+01 1.45E-+02 1.00E+01 2.20E1+01 6.04E+03 1.33E1+04 1.10E1+01 2.40E+01 Paver 1.OOE-l-00 8.00E1+01 6.40E+01 1.4211+02 1.00E+01 2.20E+i01 5.921-+03 1.30E+04 1.10E+01 2.30E1+01 Asphalt Roller 1.00E+i00 8.00E1+01 1.04E+-102 2.28E+02 1.40E+01 3.10E1+01 9.6711+03 2.13E+04 1.70E+01 3.80E+01 Total 6.46E+02 1.42E+03 9.10E+01 2.01E+02 6.01E+04 1.32E+05 1.07E+02 2.36E+02[N~x CalculaUon I Totalirehase is 1,4221lbs over 17 months T-i________Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months releas is _______2_--2

-_-5'iee l ]14221b s/17 m onth saxl1m onth/30 days

1 d a y /24 hou s_._! ... ....._1-hr,98thpercntile avoa__o____e____

.1_ -0 ______ _______-______________________

aged ver aerhreeover1'7 monthsa .. .years. t _____-F !__5.4911-02 Ylb/hr average over 3-years _________-U-_ _ _FmAESCREEN Maxmsnnconcentrallon is at 112 meters and is 1103 uglm3 /lblhr release I ____[From AESCREEN concentratlon Is at 430 meters, and is 391 sng/n3 / lb/hr release J____[eaverage oonenetration at 121 meters is ] _ The average conenetration at 430 meters is r i---------------

6.2 1 0 p b _ _ __ _ _ .4 +0__gm__..

.. ... ...... ... ..__...... .__ , Aveag......releasci I --.----S ___x193C-02 Tbhrlvergeove 17 montha I _________ 91.91E-03 lb/hr average over 3-yar months______

__.0E-3 l__raveage__e 3-ea__-it ~From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at112 meters andlis 1103 uglm3!/lb/hr release ____ .[The average eonenetr-ation at 112 meters IThe average oonenelration at 430 metersT[ I ]~2.31-1i

--gm3 .....F......i........

7.54E+00 lu/m3 j~.~___K_____ 1.121o-3 ----iF-- _ L_ -i -- e_____

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24--0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 21 of 23 ICO Calculation Total relase is 201 lbs over 17 months __________

______ Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months release is -I __________ 201 lbs/17 months x 1 month/30_days

day/24 hours _____Il.1 7.75E-03 7ijlbhr average over 3-ye ars _________;- -..f. ... .....r average ..ver 1........s....

f .. .. ---.- ---i iFrom AESCREEN Maxmmnmconcentratlon is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/nm3 /Ilblhr release_ _ i "-..........

EE.N_ *once ntraten. Isa 4430 un.e ters_.and is 391 .g/m3/lb/h rleas ......I..............

S The average conenetration at 112 meters is The average oonenetration at 430 meters is 1 ..... ...J64E-02 lb/h-r*l113 ugm3-t

{ [ 16.42E-+00 iug/m3 S1.58E-02

!ppm i 56E0 pm .-- .... ..i -i I I ' -_____ -___ _____________ _______ _________________

I _____ 1 I- I]For Concentrations at 430 meters multiply 112 concentration times 391/1103 NOx 2.42E+01 ppb CO 5.61E-03 ppm SOx '2. 88E=03 ppm Aegeconcentration at 112 meters Nx6.82E+01 ppb CO1.58E-02 ppm Sx8.12E-03 ppm r O1p=18~gm TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0:'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 22 of 23 Attachment 3 Average Ambient Pollutant Concentrations for Missouri Table A3-1. Levels of Carbon Monoxide in Springfield Missouri 1993 1995 1997 1999>).]: );f 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Second Quarter 2013--Average {((g/m 3)-i 5.4 59~4.1 , 2.84 i 2.6' 1.5.1.1 14 9 5 7-'-', 6 4 5 4 4 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.3 5.73E+00 6.56E+03 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dur.mo.govfenv/esp/aqm-index.htm1, accessed July 2015.Table A3-2. Nitrogen Dioxide -Hillcrest Hligh School Springfield 1993 1995 1996 , " -i'. 998:,',.1999 2001 0.011 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.013 2002 2004 2006~20087!Through Third Quarter Averaze (u2/m 3)0.0107 0.012 0.0104 0.0089 0.0079 1.1OE-02!2.08E+01 2). 'A"? 5"::' !, 'Y Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Departmnent of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqrm/

index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 23 of 23 Table A3-3. Inhalable PM10 -Missouri State University Springfield 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 S 18 17 S 15:7 18: 20£{l +::" 1 d + : i 38 , 44 51 45 57 2003 S 2005 2007 2009 2011 Average (utg/m 3")17 19.3 17.9 14 16.5 17.16 S 40 45 , 38 43.2 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http:lldnr.mo.gov/env/esplaqmn/

mndex html, accessed July 2015.Table A3-4. Inhalable PM-2.5 -Missouri State University Springfield 1999 2001 2003 2005 , 12.24<12*2' 12.2 , 11.7: 13.01 2006 2008 2010 2012 10.82~10.7~9.89 i 10.09 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/

envlesplaqm/

mndcxhtml, accessed July 2015.Table A3-$. Sulfur Dioxide -Missouri State University Springfield I19942 1995 1"! :{: "59.96: ,{1997 1998>)i~1999 2001; 0.0053 -* 0.002 2 ~ 2 0.002~0.002, a...0.004 2002 2004 2006 2008 ,Average (ppm)0.003" ! : :,:'¢ 0.002 .>: 0.0014

-, .,0.0017, 7 ,:; , 0.0019 0.0022 , 2.66E-03 Source: MvDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqml index.html, accessed July 2015.

NWMI NWMI-201 6-RAI-00!Rev. 0 Appendix F-EDF-3124-0014, Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN F-i Document ID: EDF-3124-0014 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: July 30, 2015 Engineering Design File Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN Portage Project No.: 3124 Project Title: NWMI Environmental Report Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 23 1. Portage Project No.: 3124 2. Project/Task:

NWIVI Environmental Report 3. DCN#4. Title: Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN 5. NPH PC or SDC: N/A 6. SSC Safety Category:

N/A 7 Summary: This EDF documents the expected off-site emission concentration from the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI) Radioisotope Production Facility project for PM-10, PM-2.5, NOR, CO, and SOx~. The assumptions used and the results are presented in this document.8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)9. Review (R) and Approval,(A)

Signatures:

... '.. '(Identify minimum reviews and approvals.

Additional reviews/approvals may be added.): = "; ' I. Printed Name! ...* R/ Organizationi

"". .*':Signature

' Date Author/Design Agent A Gary McManus I 7/30/15, Independent Review R Dave Thorne _f .,7/30/15 Independent Review R Project Manager R/A John Belier !fS.- ..7/30/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required)

E]N/A TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 2 of 23 Introduction As described in EDF-3 124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities, EDiF-3 124-0006, Determination of Wind-Blown Dust During Construction Activities, and EDF-3 124-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, there will be numerous emissions sources during the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWML) Radioisotope Production Facility.

The three sources considered for this calculation include fugitive dust, windblown dust, and emissions for off-road construction equipment.

The totals from all three of these activities are summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Anticipated Gaseous Effluents and Their Associated Air Quality Parameters for Construction PM-2.5 iW, C, OR -304 ' 674 CO OR i ...91.5 .... i .. ..202 .. .,i ..* ..;-,-, ' , ..O R, " ,- i " 107 7,; -, ,23.6 , ,., a W -Wind-blown dust (EDF-3 124-0006), C -Construction activities (EDF-3124-0004), OR -Off-road construction equipment emissions (EDF-3 124-0009).

CO = carbon monoxide.

PM-10 =particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.NOx = nitrogen oxides. SOx = sulfur dioxide.PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jtm or less diameter.Assumptions (AERSCREEN)

The input assumptions used for the AERSCREEN model are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.Table 2. AERSCREEN Input Stack Parameters ISource rate Area emission rate 18.8 Area source long side iArea source short side ;: Initial vertical dimension!Rural or urbain. Flagpole receptor height iInitial probe distance !: ii 5E-06 g/s-m 2' 7.02E-05 lb/hr-rn 2 189.89 623.00 0.00m OO000ft 2 m 6.56 ft 5,0 m1,44f STable 3. MAKEMET Meteorology i Parameters iMinimum wind speed 0 05 in/s height :.' ' :::10,m , ..:!Surface characteristics

-User defined!Bowen ratio 1.50 The closest residential receptor was assumed to be a single family home located approximately 430 meters (in) south-southeast from the facility location.

Using these assumptions, the AERSCREEN model was run and the results were obtained.

A complete listing of the model is included in Attachment

1.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 3 of 23 Results (AERSCREEN)

The final run results for the maximum concentration downwind of the facility are summarized in Table 4.Table 4. AERSCREEN Results 112 ma 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 N/A.......30 .... mb" ... ,- : " ....., 391..... .... 391 '.. "...... ,'.... 391' "7 ..... ..; ,"-- 391 ,...... .N/Am6 , ,< 9 .. 3 1 , ,! ; 3 1 .: ..9I... : /a Distance from the source to the location of the maximum concentration is 112 m.b Distance from the source to the nearest receptor.N/A = not applicable.

Using the AERSCREEN results from Table 4, the concentrations at 112 and 430 m for each of the effluents in Table 1 were calculated as follows.The calculations were conducted using the attached Excel spreadsheet (Attachment 2). The following example for PM-10 shows the approach.Total release is 1,463 kilograms (kg) (3,226 pounds [lb]) over 17 months (Table 1).Average 1 -hr PM- 10 release is: 3,226 lb/17 months x 1 monthl30 days x 1 day/24 hr 2.64E-01 lb/hours (hr) average over 17 months From AERSCREEN, the maximum concentration is at 112 m and is 1,103 micrograms (pgg)/cubic meter (m 3)/(1 .00 lb/hr release).* PM-10 = 2.64E-01 lb/hr average over 3 years x 1,103 igg/m 3/(1.00 lb/hr release)* PM-10 =291pgg/m 3 Similarly, from AERSCREEN, the concentration at 430 m (closest receptor) is 391 pgg/m 3/(1.00 lb/hr release) (Attachment 2).PM-10 103 jgg/m 3 Similar calculations were completed for each of the other constituents in Table 1. The results are shown in Table 5.

TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 TbeNGINEERIsinG MdeSiGng FIesut EDF-3124--0014 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 23 Table 5. Emission Modeling Results S -~ 0 .~ 0 -'S

0 -.0 -~ I 0 0 0 PM-10 NOx2.64E-01 1. 16E-0 1 1 .93E-02 291 128 21 103 i~221!45 16.4!1 7.5 CO NOx PM-2.5= carbon monoxide.= mitrogen oxides.= particulate matter 2.5 ptm or less diameter.PM-10 particulate matter 10 p.m or less diameter.SOX = sulfur dioxide.The values in Table 5 were then compared to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in Table 6.Table 6. Release Concentration Comparison to National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM-10 NO.SOx 291 128 21 103 45 7.5 0.15 0.04 0.10 35.0 0.075 1.88E+o2 1.97E+02 194%68%10.7%69%24%3.8 1%a Maximutm concentration from AERSCREEN was at 112 m.b Shaded cells represent actual NAAQS units without conversion.

CO =carbon monoxide.

PM-2.5 NAAQS =National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

PM-10 NOx nitrogen oxides. SCIx= particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.= particulate matter 10 pxm or less diameter.= sulfur dioxide.Based on Table 6, the modeled release concentrations are below the applicable NAAQS standards except for PM-10 and PM-2.5. The PM-10 and PM-2.5 releases are assumed to not be mitigated for this analysis.

However, the PM-10 and PM-2.5 would be mitigated to ensure that the air concentrations are less than the NAAQ standards by use of water application during excavation operations and limiting excavation during periods of high winds. Therefore, no additional modeling is required at this time.

TEM-9002 ENGINEE 09/29/09 Rev. 0 A similar evaluation of the model emission concentrations was performed to determine if the emissions exceed the regional ambient concentrations of the listed pollutants.

Regional values of the five regulated pollutants for Missouri were obtained from the Missouri Division of Environmental Quality website for different monitoring stations in the state the closest to the RPF site (MDNR, 2015).Table 7 summarizes the data in Attachment 3 used to determine the average values.N1G DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 5 of 23 Table 7. Ambient Air of Rural/Urban Missouri-' 6~

S -S. S PM-10 SO2 17.2 20.8 6.97 CO NOx PM-2.5 PM-10 SO,'=carbon monoxide.= nitrogen oxides.= particulate matter 2.5 jIm or less diameter.=particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.= sulfur dioxide, Table 8 presents the results of the comparison of the air concentrations at the closest receptor (430 m) to the ambient air concentrations.

Table 8. Comparison of Modeled Concentrations to Average Ambient Levels Around the State of Missouri PM-10 NOx'SOx 103 45 7.5 17.2 20.8 7.0 Yes 8 Yes 6 No o PM values do not include control measures CO NO,'PM-2. 5=carbon monoxide.= nitrogen oxides.=particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.PM-10 particulate matter 101im or less diameter.SOx' = sulfur dioxide.From Table 8, control measures for particulate matter should be considered during construction.

In addition, engine emission controls for the construction equipment should be evaluated for the individual units. The emissions factors used were based on average equipment and associated horsepower.

Emissions information based on the specific manufacturer's data should result in actual emissions being lower.References EDF-3 124-0004, Calculation for the Determination of Fugitive Dust During Construction Activities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 3, 2015.EDF-3 124-0006, Determination of Wind-Blown Dust During Construction Activities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 21, 2015.EDF-3224-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 31, 2015.MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqm/index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. I Page 6 of 23 Attachment 1 AERSCREEN Fliles AERSCREEN 11126 /AERMOD 1234 06/18/14 13 :04:48 TIThE: AREA RELEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

- - - - AREA****-

PARAMETERS

SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0. 1260 g/s AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.885E-O: AREA HiEIGHT: 0.30 meters AREA SOURCE LONG SID)E: 189.1 AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 74.5 INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION:

C RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL 5 gI(s-m2)0.89 meters 98 meters).00 meters 1.000 lb/hr 0. 702E-04 lbI(hr-m2) 98 feet 623.00 feet 246.00 feet 0.00 feet FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE =2.00 meters 5000. meters 6.56 feet 16404. feet************BUILDIING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS

BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POJINIT SOURCES************

FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters -5000. meters MAX[MUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1 -HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg)(in)

PERIOD TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 Rev. 1 Page 7of 23 1" 0.500 1079.*= worst case diagonal 0 125.0 ANN*****************MVAKE]V[ET METEOROLOGY

ARAETER*****************

MIN/MAX TEMIPERATURE:

249.8 /310.9 (K)MINIMUM WiINID SPEED: 0.5 m/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS JINPUT: USER ENTERED ALBEDO: 0.60 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 0.500 (meters)METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAX[MUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 01 01 1 01 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS-0.78 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14. 3.6 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HIT REF TA HIT 10.0 249.8 2.0 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR TEM-9002 09/29/,09 Rev. 0 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. I Page 8 of 23 10 0104 1 01 HO U*~ W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS-0.72 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14.4.0 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 249.8 2.0*************AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES

- - - - OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM51v DIST 1-HR CONC (in) (ug/m3)0.99 557.3 25.00 698.4 50.00 833.0 75.00 954.4 100.00 1064.125.00 1079.150.00 983.7 175.00 888.5 200.00 805.4 225.00 733.5 250.00 670.7 275.00 615.7 300.00 567.5 325.00 524.7 350.00 487.0 375.00 453.2 400.00 423.2 425.00 396.1 450.00 371.9 475.00 350.0 500.00 330.2 525.00 312.1 550.00 295.7 575.00 280.7 MAXIMUJM DIST 1-HR CONC (in) (ug/m3)2525.00 42.82 2550.00 42.25 2575.00 41.69 2600.00 41.14 2625.00 40.61 2650.00 40.09 2675.00 39.58 2700.00 39.08 2725.00 38.59 2750.00 38.11 2775.00 37.65 2800.00 37.19 2825.00 36.74 2850.00 36.30 2875.00 35.87 2900.00 35.45 2925.00 35.04 2950.00 34.63 2975.00 34.24 3000.00 33.85 3025.00 33.47 3050.00 33.09 3075.00 32.73 3100.00 32.37 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. I Page 9 of 23 600.00 625.00 650.00 675.00 700.00 725.00 750.00 775.00 800.00 825.00 850.00 875.00 900.00 925.00 950.00 975.00 1000.00 1025.00 1050.00 1075.00 1100.00 1125.00 1150.00 1175.00 1200.00 1225.00 1250.00 1275.00 1300.00 1325.00 1350.00 1375.00 1400.00 1425.00 1450.00 1475.00 1500.00 1525.00 1550.00 1575.00 1600.00 1625.00 1650.00 1675.00 1700.00 1725.00 266.8 254.1 242.5 231.7 221.5 212.2 203.6 195.6 188.0 180.9 174.2 168.0 162.2 156.7 151.5 146.5 141.9 137.5 133.4 129.4 125.6 122.1 118.7 115.4 112.3 109.3 106.5 103.8 101.2 98.73 96.38 94.09 91.90 89.80 87.79 85.84 83.96 82.14 80.40 78.72 77.10 75.54 74.03 72.58 71.18 69.82 3125.00 3150.00 3174.99 3199.99 3225.00 3250.00 3275.00 3300.00 3325.00 3350.00 3375.00 3400.00 3425.00 3450.00 3475.00 3500.00 3525.00 3550.00 3575.00 3600.00 3625.00 3650.00 3675.00 3700.00 3725.00 3750.00 3775.00 3800.00 3825.O00 3849.99 3875.00 3900.00 3925.00 3950.00 3975.00 4000.00 4025.00 4050.00 4075.00 4100.00 4125.00 4150.00 4175.00 4200.00 4225.00 4250.00 32.01 31.67 31.33 31.00 30.67 30.35 30.03 29.72 29.42 29.12 28.82 28.54 28.25 27.97 27.70 27.43 27.16 26.90 26.65 26.39 26.15 25.90 25.66 25.43 25.19 24.96 24.74 24.52 24.30 24.08 23.87 23.66 23.46 23.26 23.06 22.86 22.67 22.48 22.29 22.10 21.92 21.74 21.56 21.39 21.22 21.05 TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 ,ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 10 of 23 1750.00 1775.00 1800.00 1825.00 1850.00 1875.00 1900.00 1925.00 1950.00 1975.00 2000.00 2025.00 2050.00 2075.00 2100.00 2125.00 2150.00 2175.00 2200.00 2225.00 2250.00 2275.00 2300.00 2325.00 2350.00 2375.00 2400.00 2425.00 2450.00 2475.00 2500.00 68.51 67.25 66.02 64.83 63.68 62.57 61.48 60.43 59.40 58.41 57.44 56.49 55.56 54.67 53.80 52.95 52.13 51.33 51.66 50.87 50.10 49.36 48.63 47.92 47.22 46.55 45.89 45.24 44.61 44.00 43.40 4275.00 4300.00 4325.00 4350.00 4375.00 4400.00 4425.00 4450.00 4475.00 4500.00 4525.00 4550.00 4575.00 4600.00 4625.00 4650.00 4675.00 4700.00 4725.00 4750.00 4775.00 4800.00 4825.00 4850.00 4875.00 4900.00 4924.99 4950.00 4975.00 5000.00 20.88 20.71 20.55 20.39 20.23 20.07 19.92 19.76 19.61 19.47 19.32 19.17 19.03 18.89 18.75 18.61 18.48 18.34 18.21 18.08 17.95 17.82 17.70 17.57 17.45 17.21 17.09 16.97 16.86 TEM-9002 09/29109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 11 of 23***********AERSCREEN MAIXIMUMV IMPACT SUMvIMARY

- - - - 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in SCREEN]NG PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THlE AIR QUALITY IMP~ACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)Report number EPA-454/R-92-019 http://www.epa.gov/scram00 1/guidance~permit.htm under Screening Guidance MAXIMUrM 1 -HOUR SC!3-HOI ALED SCALED SCALED J-R 8-HOUR 24-HOUR AINJNUAL CONC CONC CONC CONC (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)CALCULATION PROCEDURE CONC (ug/m3)FLAT TERRAIN 1103. 1103. 1103. 1103. N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 112.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 557.3 557.3 557.3 557.3 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 0.9mtr 0.99 meters TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 12 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 start date and time 06/13/14 10:00:24 AERSCREEN 11126 NWMI Process boiler run#1 NWMI Process boiler run#1 DATA ENTRY VALIDATION METRIC ENGLISH** STACKDATA

- ----- ---Emission Rate: 0.1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr stack Height: 18.59 meters 61.00 feet stack Diameter:

0.305 meters 12.00 inches stack Temperature:

310.9 K 100.0 Deg F Exit Velocity:

17.929 m/s 58.82 ft/s Stack Flow Rate: 2772 ACFM Model Mode: RURAL Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet** BUILDING DATA **No Building Downwash Parameters

- TERRAIN DATA NO Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation:

0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance:

5000. meters 16404. feet Flagpole Receptor Height: 1.8 meters No discrete receptors used 6. feet** METEOROLOGY DATA **Min/Max Temperature:

255.4 / 302.6 K 0.0 / 85.0 Deg F Minimum wind speed: 0.5 in/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant surface Profile: Grassland Dominant climate Type: Average Moisture AERSCREEN output file: NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13.out** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin.No terrain used, AERMAP will, not be run changing units flag from English to metric Page 1 TEM-9002 09129109 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 13 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS

& MAKEMET obtaining surface characteri sti Cs...using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Grassland with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.60 1.50 0.001 spring 0.18 0.40 0.050 summer 0.18 0.80 0.100 Autumn 0.20 1.00 0.010 Creating met files aerscreenOLl0.sfc

& aerscreen0LO1_O.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO2_.01.sfc

& aerscreen_02_0.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO3_l.sfc

& aerscreen_03_Ol.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc

& aerscreen_&04_O.pfl PROBE started 06/13/14 10:05:11 Running probe for winter sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Winter sector 1****r****

WARNING MESSAGES ******** NONE **Running probe for spring sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage*e*******

WARNING MESSAGES ******* NONE **Running probe for summer sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage*****~** WARNING MESSAGES ******** NONE **Running probe for Autumn sector 1 AERMOO Finishes successfullyfor PROBE stage*********

WARNING MESSAGES ******* NONE **1 Spring sector1 1 Summer sector1 1 Autumn sector 1 PROBE REFINE AERMOD ended 06/13/14 10:05:17 started 06/13/14 10:05:17 Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 spring sector1 Page 2 TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-001 4 09/29/09 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 14 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13WARNING MESSAGES ** NONE **REFINE ended 06/13/14 10:05:17* e* *** * *** *** **Y*Ye* * ** * *** *** * ** e* **Y* ***e* *******AERSCREEN Finished successfully with no errors or warnings units switched from EngVIsh to metric check log file for details Ending date and time 06/13/14 10:05:19 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 15 of 23 OUTPUT FILE: NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 AERSCREEN 11126 / AERMOD 1234 06/13/14 10:05:17 TITLE: NWMI Process boiler run#1**********~***,*******1i*******

STACK PARAMETERS

- - - - (*1*Y~*********f*(*******

SOURCE EMISSION RATE:*STACK HEIGHT: STACK INNER DIAMETER: PLUME EXIT TEMPERATURE:

PLUME EXIT VELOCITY: STACK AIR FLOW RATE: RURAL OR URBAN: FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE =0.1260 18.59 0.305 310.9 17.929 2772 RURAL g/s meters meters K mn/s ACFM 1.000 61.00 12.00 100.0 58.82 lb/hr feet inches Deg F ft/s 1.83 meters 5000. meters 6.00 feet 16404. feet**************~

~ BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS

NO BUILDING DOWNWASH HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR THIS ANALYSIS**********************e****

PROBE ANALYSIS **************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters -5000. meters Zo ROUGHNESS 1-HR CONC DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR LENGTH (ug/m3) Cm) PERIOD 1"0.050 19.15- 125.0 SPR* = worst case flow sector************

MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS

MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:

MINIMUM WIND SPEED: ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 255.4 / 302.6 (K)0.5 mn/s 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Grassland DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Spring ALB EDO: BOWEN RATIO: ROUGHNESS' LENGTH: 0.18 0.40 0.050 (meters)Page 1 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 16 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0105 5 12 HO 21.62 HT 10.0 0.066 W*' DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN 0.300 0.020 46. 39. -1.2 Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS 0.050 0.40 0.18 0.50 REF TA HT 302.6 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT Cnon-downwash):

33.3 meters METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0101 5 12 HO-1.63 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH 0.0o39- 0.100 0.0o20- -19.- -18.-M-O LEN-2-_.9 zo BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS 0.010- 1.00 0.20 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 255.4 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT (non-downwash):

53.7 meters******************1*******

AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC (m) (ug/m3)1.00 0.4366E-03 25.00 7.119 50.00 9.924 75.00 14.25 100.00 18.40 125.00 19.15 150.00 18.65 175.00 17.82 200.00 16.90 225.00 15.99 250.00 15.14 275.00 14.36 300.00 13.65 325.00 13.00 MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC Cm) (ug/m3)2525.00 5.097 2550.00 5.061 2575.00 5.024 2600.00 4.989 2625.00 4.953 2650.00 4.919 2675.00 4.884 2700.00 4.850 2725.00 4.817 2750.00 4.784 2775.00 4.752 2800.00 4.720 2825.00 4.688 2850.00 4.657 Page 2 TEM-9002 09129/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 Rev. 1 Page 17 of 23*350.00 375.00 400.00 425.00 450.00 475.00 500.00 525.00 550.00 575.00 600.00 625.00 650.00 675.00 700 .00 725.00 750.00 775.00 800.00 825.00 850.00 875.00 900.00 925.00 950.00 975.00 1000.00 1025.00 1050.00 1075.00 1100.O00 1125.O00 1150.O00 1175.00 1200.O00 1225.O00 1250.00 1275.00 1300.00 1325.00 1350.00 1375.00 1400.O00 1425.O00 1450.00 1475.00 1500.00 1525.00 1550.00 1575.00 1600.00 1625.00 1650.00 1675.00 1700.00 1725.00 1750.00 1775.00 1800.00 1825.00 1850.00 1875.00 1900.00 NWMiI Process Boilers 12.41 11.87 11.38 10.93 10. 52 10.39 10.29 10.15 9.975 9.782 9.575 9.357 9.13 5 8.910 8.685 8.461 8.241 8.029 7.938 7.842 7.742 7.887 8.023 8.132 8.2 18 8.282 8.327 8.300 8.258 8.212 8.162 8.110 8.055 7.998 7.938 7.878 7.816 7.753 7.689 7.625 7.560 7.495 7.430 7.365 7.300 7.23 5 7.171 7.107 7.043 6.980 6.918 6.856 6.794 6.734 6.674 6.614 6.556 6.498 6.441 6.385 6.329 6.274 6.220 ARESCREEN Run 2875.00 2900.00 2925.00 2950.00 2975.00 3000.00 3025.00 3050.00 3075.00 3100.00 3125.00 3150.00 3175.00 3200.00 3225 .00 3250.00 3275.00 3300.00 3325.00 3350.00 3375.00 3400.00 3425.00 3450.00 3475.00 3500.00 3525.00 3550.00 3575.00 3600.00 3625.00 3650.00 3675.00 3700.00 3725.00 3750.00 3775.00 3800.00 3825.00 3850.00 3875.00 3900.00 3925.00 3950.00 3975.00 4000.00 4025.00 4050.00 4075.00 4100.00 4125.00 4150.00 4175.00 4200.00 4225.00 4250.00 4275.00 4300.00 4325.00 4350.00 4375.00 4400.00 4425.00 6-13 4,627 4.597 4.567 4.537 4.508 4.480 4.451 4.423 4.396 4.369 4.342 43 315 4.289 4.263 4.238 4.212 4.187 4.163 4.139 4.115 4.091 4.067 4.044 4.021 3.999 3.976 3.954 3.933 3.911 3.890 3.869 3.848 3.827 3.807 3.787 3.767.3.747 3.727.3.708 3.689 3.670 3.651 3.633 3,615 3,597 3.579 3,561.3.543 3.526 3.509 3.492 3,475 3.458 3.442 3 .425 3.409 3,393 3.377 3.362 3.346 3.331 3.315 3.300 Page 3 TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Page 18 of 23 1925.00 1950.00 1975.00 2000.00 2025.00 2050.00 2075.00 2100.00 2125.00 2150.00 2175.00 2200.00 2225.00 22 50.00 2275.00 2300.00 2325.00 2350.00 2375.00 2400.00 2425.00 2450.00 2475.00 2500.00 NWMI Process Boilers 6.167 6.114 6.062 6.011 5.961 5.911 5.863 5.815 5.767 5.720 5.674 5.629 5.584 5.540 5.497 5.454 5.412 5.371 5.330 5.290 5.250 5.211 5.173 5.135 ARESCREEN Run 4450.00 4475.00 4500.00 4525.00 4550.00 4575.00 4600.00 4625.00 4650.00 4675.00 4700.00 4725.00 4750.00 4775.00 4800.00 4825.00 4850.00 4875.00 4900.00 4925.00 4950.00 4975.00 5000.00 6-13 3.285 3.270 3.256 3.241 3.227 3.212 3.198 3.184 3.170 3.157 3.143 3.129 3.116 3.103 3.089 3.076 3.063 3.051 3.038 3.025 3.013 3.000 2.988************(***

AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT

SUMMARY

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/mi3) (ug/m3)FLAT TERRAIN 19.15 19.15 17.24 11.49 1.915 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 123.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.4366E-03 0.4366E-03 0.3929E-03 0.2619E-03 0.4366E-04 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE1.0mtr

1. O0 meters TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 19 of 23 Attachment 2 Excel Spreadsheet of Emission Rate Calculations Total PM Emissions Source (Hbs) Total Amount Effluent ________Winda [ onstuctin b Off-Road Construction

_____________Equlpment (is PM-10 160 [ 3000 66 3226 PM-2.5 24 [ 600 50 674 a. FromEDF-3 124-0006 b. From EDF-3124-0004

c. From EDF-3 124-0009 ________[PM-10 Calculation

!Total relase is 3226 lbs over 17 months!lAveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months release is f ]3322-17bs.....mo---s x ont3 days

1lday/24 hours i 2.64E-01 ___ lb/hr average over 17 months ___ ____i [1.4lb1 /hraverage over 3-years....

From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release...The; .... ...aveag cnnetration at 112 meters is ,- 2.64E-02 [2.64E-02 lb/hr

1103 ug/m3 ____, 17 months , 2.91E+02 !ug/m3 __~PM-2.5 Calculation

}Total relase is 674 lbs over 17 months.... ................ Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months release is I 64ls1 months x 1 month/S0 days_* Iday/24 hours __S...... ...... .. ... .. .. ... .551 -0 .J l/hr average over 17 months _ _ _.!...2.60E-02 Ilb/hr average over 3-years From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release-- The average concnetration at 112_meters is_____SPM2.5 6.07E+i01 3-- From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 430 meters and is 391 ug/m3 / lb/hr release'At 430 meters ; .___+ PM- 10 = 1.0305E+02 iug/m3 IPM-2.5_____

2,1531E+Oljug/m3

-__ _i .....-- -.. .... ....---.... .. .... ....................... U .............."_ _ _._. ...... .. ... ... _ ....... ..... ........ ....... ..... ... ........ ... ...i .... .......... .... ... .

lTM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 20 of 23 Tablc 20Off-Road Vehiele Emissions (During 17 Months of Construction)

_________________Pollutant(s)

Equipment Number Hours NOx CO ____CO 2 SOx (kg (Ibs)

kg) (Ibs) (kg) (Ibs) (Ibs)Bulldozer 1.00E+00O 1.00E÷02 1.39E+f02 3.07E+i02 1.90E+-01 4.10E+-01 1.30E+04 2.87E+04 2.30E+01 5.l0E+01 Compactor 1.00E+00 1.20E+02 1.55E+-I02 3.42E+I02 2.10E+I01 4.60E+01l 1.45E+'04 3.20E+04 2.60E+~01 5.70E+I01 Excavators 1.00E+00 6.00E+01 4.90E-i01 1.08E+02 8.00E+00 1.70E+f01 4.53E1+03 9.99E1+03 8.00E1+00 1.80E+01 Front Loaders 1.00E+400 1.20E1+02 6.80E+f01 1.50E1+02 1.00E-t01 2.30E+01 6.25E+03 1.38E+04 1.10E1+01 2.50E-I01 Grfaders 1.0OE+t00 8.00E+01 6.60E+01 1.45E-+02 1.00E+01 2.20E1+01 6.04E+03 1.33E1+04 1.10E1+01 2.40E+01 Paver 1.OOE-l-00 8.00E1+01 6.40E+01 1.4211+02 1.00E+01 2.20E+i01 5.921-+03 1.30E+04 1.10E+01 2.30E1+01 Asphalt Roller 1.00E+i00 8.00E1+01 1.04E+-102 2.28E+02 1.40E+01 3.10E1+01 9.6711+03 2.13E+04 1.70E+01 3.80E+01 Total 6.46E+02 1.42E+03 9.10E+01 2.01E+02 6.01E+04 1.32E+05 1.07E+02 2.36E+02[N~x CalculaUon I Totalirehase is 1,4221lbs over 17 months T-i________Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months releas is _______2_--2

-_-5'iee l ]14221b s/17 m onth saxl1m onth/30 days

1 d a y /24 hou s_._! ... ....._1-hr,98thpercntile avoa__o____e____

.1_ -0 ______ _______-______________________

aged ver aerhreeover1'7 monthsa .. .years. t _____-F !__5.4911-02 Ylb/hr average over 3-years _________-U-_ _ _FmAESCREEN Maxmsnnconcentrallon is at 112 meters and is 1103 uglm3 /lblhr release I ____[From AESCREEN concentratlon Is at 430 meters, and is 391 sng/n3 / lb/hr release J____[eaverage oonenetration at 121 meters is ] _ The average conenetration at 430 meters is r i---------------

6.2 1 0 p b _ _ __ _ _ .4 +0__gm__..

.. ... ...... ... ..__...... .__ , Aveag......releasci I --.----S ___x193C-02 Tbhrlvergeove 17 montha I _________ 91.91E-03 lb/hr average over 3-yar months______

__.0E-3 l__raveage__e 3-ea__-it ~From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at112 meters andlis 1103 uglm3!/lb/hr release ____ .[The average eonenetr-ation at 112 meters IThe average oonenelration at 430 metersT[ I ]~2.31-1i

--gm3 .....F......i........

7.54E+00 lu/m3 j~.~___K_____ 1.121o-3 ----iF-- _ L_ -i -- e_____

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24--0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 21 of 23 ICO Calculation Total relase is 201 lbs over 17 months __________

______ Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months release is -I __________ 201 lbs/17 months x 1 month/30_days

day/24 hours _____Il.1 7.75E-03 7ijlbhr average over 3-ye ars _________;- -..f. ... .....r average ..ver 1........s....

f .. .. ---.- ---i iFrom AESCREEN Maxmmnmconcentratlon is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/nm3 /Ilblhr release_ _ i "-..........

EE.N_ *once ntraten. Isa 4430 un.e ters_.and is 391 .g/m3/lb/h rleas ......I..............

S The average conenetration at 112 meters is The average oonenetration at 430 meters is 1 ..... ...J64E-02 lb/h-r*l113 ugm3-t

{ [ 16.42E-+00 iug/m3 S1.58E-02

!ppm i 56E0 pm .-- .... ..i -i I I ' -_____ -___ _____________ _______ _________________

I _____ 1 I- I]For Concentrations at 430 meters multiply 112 concentration times 391/1103 NOx 2.42E+01 ppb CO 5.61E-03 ppm SOx '2. 88E=03 ppm Aegeconcentration at 112 meters Nx6.82E+01 ppb CO1.58E-02 ppm Sx8.12E-03 ppm r O1p=18~gm TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0:'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 22 of 23 Attachment 3 Average Ambient Pollutant Concentrations for Missouri Table A3-1. Levels of Carbon Monoxide in Springfield Missouri 1993 1995 1997 1999>).]: );f 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Second Quarter 2013--Average {((g/m 3)-i 5.4 59~4.1 , 2.84 i 2.6' 1.5.1.1 14 9 5 7-'-', 6 4 5 4 4 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.3 5.73E+00 6.56E+03 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dur.mo.govfenv/esp/aqm-index.htm1, accessed July 2015.Table A3-2. Nitrogen Dioxide -Hillcrest Hligh School Springfield 1993 1995 1996 , " -i'. 998:,',.1999 2001 0.011 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.013 2002 2004 2006~20087!Through Third Quarter Averaze (u2/m 3)0.0107 0.012 0.0104 0.0089 0.0079 1.1OE-02!2.08E+01 2). 'A"? 5"::' !, 'Y Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Departmnent of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqrm/

index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 Rev. 1 Page 23 of 23 Table A3-3. Inhalable PM10 -Missouri State University Springfield 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 S 18 17 S 15:7 18: 20£{l +::" 1 d + : i 38 , 44 51 45 57 2003 S 2005 2007 2009 2011 Average (utg/m 3")17 19.3 17.9 14 16.5 17.16 S 40 45 , 38 43.2 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http:lldnr.mo.gov/env/esplaqmn/

mndex html, accessed July 2015.Table A3-4. Inhalable PM-2.5 -Missouri State University Springfield 1999 2001 2003 2005 , 12.24<12*2' 12.2 , 11.7: 13.01 2006 2008 2010 2012 10.82~10.7~9.89 i 10.09 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/

envlesplaqm/

mndcxhtml, accessed July 2015.Table A3-$. Sulfur Dioxide -Missouri State University Springfield I19942 1995 1"! :{: "59.96: ,{1997 1998>)i~1999 2001; 0.0053 -* 0.002 2 ~ 2 0.002~0.002, a...0.004 2002 2004 2006 2008 ,Average (ppm)0.003" ! : :,:'¢ 0.002 .>: 0.0014

-, .,0.0017, 7 ,:; , 0.0019 0.0022 , 2.66E-03 Source: MvDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqml index.html, accessed July 2015.

ML16053A211: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:15, 7 May 2019

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML16053A211: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:15, 7 May 2019

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search