ML15328A083
| ML15328A083 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Northwest Medical Isotopes |
| Issue date: | 11/20/2015 |
| From: | Northwest Medical Isotopes |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15328A010 | List: |
| References | |
| NWMI-LTR-2015-005 NWMI-2015-RAI-001, Rev. 0 | |
| Download: ML15328A083 (58) | |
Text
APPENDIX F Credentials
ADAM J. WHITE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Bachelorof Science, Agricultural Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. System Management, Minor Soil office, is responsible for conducting environmental services. He is Science, 2005, University of responsible for the field services and development of reports for a wide Missouri-Columbia range of projects performed. His primary environmental duties involve performance and report development for Phase I environmental site assessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation projects, wetland delineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews. CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Wetland Delineation RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Red Cross First Aid
- Deer Valley Apartment, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.
WORK HISTORY
- Colt Railroad, Columbia, Missouri Terracon, Environmental Scientist, Performed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum and 2006-present; metals contaminated soils on the site. University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil CharacterizationLab, 2006
- Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, Iowa Performed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on the site using subsurface injection methods.
- Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO Conducted data review and assisted with report development for EPA Brownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by former petroleum bulk storage facilities.
- Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and Kansas Performed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to the development associated with co-located and raw land tower sites for Verizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.
- Agriculture Storage Facilities, Kansas Performed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10 agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.
- Missouri Theatre, Columbia, Missouri Performed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation of the historic Missouri Theatre building. The site is located in downtown Columbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
- Underground Storage Tank Removal, Moberly, Missouri Provided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soils during the excavation, removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.
- Hy-Vee, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling for proposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.
- Agricultural Storage Facility, Trenton, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources 06105
White, Adam J. 2 (MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.
- Hinton Little General Stores - Hinton, Missouri Conducted site characterization and risk based corrective action assessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leaking underground storage tank site.
- Autozone, Marshfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land, historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.
- Caterpillar Facility, Boonville, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility. The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple hazardous substances for operations at the site.
- Prairie Queen, Centralia, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
- AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power Plant Preformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing. Sample collection locations include the highly secure Protected Area.
- Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, Missouri Provided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
- City of Springfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valley downtown area of Springfield, MO.
- 401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent to the former location of a manufactured gas plant.
- Asbestos Air Sampling, Missouri Provided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.
06/05
MARK E. DIERKER FIELD GEOLOGIS T PROFES SIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology, Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. office, is 2000, University of Missouri-responsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services. He is Columbia responsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soil and groundwater sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).
CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Nuclear Soil Gauge Certification
- Bright Start Academy, Columbia, Missouri Red Cross FirstAid Provided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
- Proposed Firestone, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility. WORK HIS TORY Terracon Consultants, Inc.
- Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, Missouri Field Geologist, September 20 10-Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a high school. present Conn-Agg, LLC ,Boone Quarries
- Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, Missouri Quality Control Manager, Conducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network and January2004- August 2009 performs field services with monitoring well abandonment and well Engineering Surveys and Services, installations. Materials Tech, April 2003-December 2003
- Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, Missouri Quality control manager responsible for management of aggregate and concrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
- Engineering Surveys and Services, Columbia, Missouri Performed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.
06105
TRACIE A. RAGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors in Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience. Ms. EnvironmentalStudies, 1997, Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental Site University of Kansas Assessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, Bachelor of Science in Biology, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews. Ms. Ragland has CellularBiology, 1992, also prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments University of Kansas and some Limited Site Investigations (LSIs). Her duties include client interaction; scheduling andlor performing project field work; interviews with site contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soil CERTIFICATIONS 40-H-our Hazardous Waste Site identifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, and Operations Training, 1999 soil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetland AHERA Asbestos Inspector:
impacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection Kansas, Missouri, 1998 and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation and Category A Certificationin production of client deliverables. Radioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997 Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projects within the Due Diligence Group (DOG) at Terracon. Duties include oversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of client deliverables, supervision of DOG members, and training of Phase I ESA personnel. Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of the AFFILIATIONS society of Wetland Scientists DOG on several occasions.
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES WORK HISTORY
- Phase I ESAs Terracon, EnvironmentalScientist, Conducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout 1998-present the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers, University of Kansas, Research multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, Assistant, 1994-1998 gasoline refueling stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites, University of Minnesota, Graduate printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and US Research Assistant, 1993-1994 Postal Service Offices. Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993
- Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and report preparation for Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting. Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres. ADDITIONAL COURSES Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical Wetland Construction and criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, when Restoration, Wetland Training Institute, 2001 necessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the US). Wetland Plant Identification, Biotic Consuitants, Inc., 2000
- Asbestos Inspections and Sampling Basic Processesin Hydfic Soils, In conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections North CarolinaState University, 2O000 and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential 38-HourArmy Corps of Engineers structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KS Wetland Delineation &
and MO. Management Training Program, RichardChinn Environmental
- NEPA ReviewslEnvironmental Assessment (EA) Training, Inc., 1998 Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposed marina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal, state, and local government agencies, coordination of Cultural Resource Investigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client 2/07
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
deliverables.
Conducted and managed LSIs including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility. Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater samples, preparation of samples for shipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical results, and preparation of client deliverables.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs
- Falley's Food Stores - KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)
Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.
- Pizza Hut - Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastem US in 10 business days.
- Montezuma Wind Farm - Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, lnc.-Atlantic, IA)
Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposed windmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in westem KS.
- Industrial Warehouses - Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)
A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.
- Martin Tractor Company - Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS)
A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding facility, totaling 166,000sf, with numerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former underground storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams.
- Plastic Packaging Technologies - Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)
A 65,000sf facility associated with the production, printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plastic bags, with flexigraphic wide-web printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organic compound emissions burner.
- Mize Road - Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 79th Street in Lenexa, KS.
- Sovereign Business Forms - Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)
An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custom business forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.
- White Lakes Center - Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)
A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a 2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.
- Plant Property - St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)
A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility); pallet manufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.
- Farmers Coop Sites - KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS) 7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included: liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage AST facilities, a retail store, and filling station.
2 2/07
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
- Agricultural Chemical Facilities - KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO) 15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, and maintenance shops.
- Proposed County Buildings - Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS) 5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, and residential structures with extensive historical background.
Brownflelds Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs
- Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company - St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St. Joseph, MO) 40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
- Former Junction City Foundry Property - Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story office building, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
- EBA Building - Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.
- 312 South Second Street - Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS) 1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.
- Former Frisco Laboratory Building - Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO) 15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.
Limited Site InvestigatlonslpA/Sl
- Hardesty Federal Complex - Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)
Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soil and groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothing chemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PNSI reports reviewed and approved by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources.
- USA Detergents - Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)
Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.
- Commercial Retail Redevelopment - Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-
Leawood, KS)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.
- Night Club and Office Space - Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.
- Proposed Aldi - Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, Inc.-Olathe, KS)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.
2/07
htlp://www.¢pa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/ancl.html#MISSOURl l Currently Designated Nonattainment Areas for All Criteria Pollutants...htp/wweag/oraqsgenknlhm#MSO State, County, Pollutant,
- Part County NMA, NMA Area Name - Classification Standard MISSOURI Franklin Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment Jefferson Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate Lead
- Jefferson County (part); Herculaneum, MO -
PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment St Charles Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment St Louis 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment St Louis Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment 1 ofl 1 of I111312010 10:48 AM
WIND ROSE PLOT:
Columbia South Farms, MO Wind Speed Direction (blowing from)
MU E~xten~inn Cnmmerdial Aarlculture Weather Station
- '!NORTH --
t
". 15%~
\
// i
""., 12%"'
S_L__
9%N\\
N a
" ' \
/t //
/
a a -I a
N N
N --I SEAST I
/
/I
/I I
/
/
WIND SPEED (mph)
U>= 20.0 U15.0 -20.0 U10,0 -150
- - - -SOUTH --
LI5.0 -10.0 U1.0- 5.0 Calms: 0.00%
COMMENTS: DATA PERIOD:
Based on hourly average wind 2000-2006 speed and direction from the Jan 1 - Dec 31 _____________
MU Ag Weather Station 00:00 - 23:00 at Columbia South Farms (measured at 3 meters) UNIVESITY* OF MISSOURI CALM WINDS (less than 1 mph): TOTAL COUNT:
0.00% 61367 hrs.
AVG. WIND SPEED: DATE:
6.97 mph 319/2007 WRPLOT View - Lakes Enviromental Software
'iIr... .,,,
March 14, 2011 ll1mM I ~ImI=, l I Mr. John V. Huss Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Consulting Engineers 1901 Pennsylvania Drive Columbia, MO 65202 Re: Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 65201 Terracon Project No. 091 17701
Dear Mr. Huss:
Terracon is pleased to submit the Wetland Delineation Report for the above referenced project.
Based on the results of the delineation, 0.05 acre of suspect wetlands, 350 lineal feet of suspect drainageways and 0.01 acre of suspect upland depression was observed on the project site.
A cover letter addressed to the Kansas City District has been included with the enclosed report; however, a copy of this report has not been provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) by Terracon. A copy of the Wetland Delineation Report and attached letter should be submitted to the USACE for review and concurrence. The USACE can be reached at the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers - Kansas City District Missouri State Regulatory Office 221 Bolivar Street, Suite 103 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Terracon would be pleased to assist you in preparation of the Section 404 Permit Application and any wetland or WUS mitigation plans that may be required by the USACE if wetland or WUS impacts are proposed. Terracon appreciates the opportunity to have worked for you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the content of this report, please contact us at 314-692-8811.
Sincerely, TERRACON Consultants, Inc.
Lauren StrangeI Project Scientist Natural Resources Manager Terracon Consultants, Inc. 600 SW 7zh Street. Suite #, Des Moines, Iowa 50309 P [515] 244-3184 F [515] 244-5249 terracon corn S I
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge March 14, 2011 Terracon Project No. 09117701 Prepared for:
Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Columbia, Missouri Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
St. Louis, Missouri
[il*lli{r~ilnfr¢]l Irl, l l l lll lll* il~jl[~ iilr~iM[~m *li~J lrlilU]
Mrh12011 IFerracon Mr. Jim Ptacek US Army Corps of Engineers - Kansas City District Missouri State Regulatory Office 221 Bolivar Street, Suite 103 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Re: Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge Columbia, Boone County, Missouri Terracon Project No. 09117701 Dear Mr. Ptacek Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to submit the Wetland Delineation Report prepared for Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. Consulting Engineers (THH). This report describes the technical criteria, field indicators, and other sources of information used to identify and delineate wetlands and other waterbodies. Based on the results of the delineation, approximately 0.05 acre of suspect wetlands, 350 lineal feet of suspect drainageways and 0.01 acre of suspect upland depression was observed on the project site. At this time, we are requesting that you perform a Jurisdictional Determination for the project and advise our client if a permit will be required for any future impacts.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Lauren at (314) 692-8811 or by e-mail at lestrange2@terracon.com.
Sincerely, TERRACON Consultants, Inc.
Lauren Strange ( allero Project Scientist Natural Resources Manager Copies to: Mr. John V. Huss Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Consulting Engineers 1901 Pennsylvania Drive Columbia, MO 65202 rerrecon Consultants, Inc. 11600 Lilburn Park Road St. Louis, Missouri 63146 P [314] 692-8811 F [3141692-8810 terracon~corn I , I I
TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................................................... I 3.0 PRELIMINARY DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS.................................... 2 3.1 Topographic Map............................................................................. 2 3.2 National Wetland Inventory Map............................................................. 2 3.3 Soil Survey .................................................................................... 2 3.4 Aerial Imagery ................................................................................ 3 4.0 FIELD TECHNIQUES ........................................................................ 3 4.1 Plant Community Assessment............................................................... 3 4.2 Hydric Soils Assessment..................................................................... 4 4.3 Wetland Hydrology Assessment............................................................. 5 4.4 Classification of Wetlands ................................................................... 5 4.5 WUS Observations ........................................................................... 5 5.0 FIELD OBSERVATIONS RESULTS........................................................ 6 5.1I Wetlands ...................................................................................... 6 5.3 Suspect Drainageways....................................................................... 8 6.0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS ........................ 9 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 11 8.0
GENERAL COMMENT
S..................................................................... 12 APPENDIX A- EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Topographic Site Map Exhibit 2 - National Wetland Inventory Map Exhibit 3 - Soil Survey Map Exhibit 4 - Wetland Delineation Map APPENDIX B - HISTORIC AERIAL IMAGERY APPENDIX C - WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS APPENDIX D - GROUND PHOTOGRAPHS
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Discovery Ridge Columbia, Missouri Terracon Project No. 09117701 March 14, 2011
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) was retained by Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Consulting Engineers (THH) to perform a wetland delineation for the Discovery Ridge site, hereafter referred to as the project site. The project site is located north of Highway 63, south of Roosevelt Avenue and along portions of South Lenoir and East Gans Road in Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is located in portions of Sections 32 and 33, Township 48 North, Range 12 West, as depicted on Exhibit 1 in Appendix A.
The wetland delineation for the project site was completed for 15 lots (approximately 115 acres) scheduled for development activity. The project area consists primarily as agricultural fields, livestock pasture, manicured lawn and grassland areas. The site is located adjacent to a highway, residential property and agricultural land.
The purpose of performing the wetland delineation was to determine if wetlands or jurisdictional waters are present on the project site and, if so, to identify the boundaries. The wetland delineation was performed in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2008 Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. According to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) guidelines, wetlands generally have three essential characteristics: hydrophytic (wetland) vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology.
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Terracon performed the following scope of work:
- Reviewed topographical, National Wetland Inventory and aerial photograph resources to assist with identifying suspect Waters of the United States (WUS) and wetland areas at the subject site.
- Mobilized to the site to conduct the wetland delineation.
- Prepared a wetland delineation map showing WUS and wetland areas identified during the site visit, if any.
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1rra o March 14, 2011 ,, Terracon Project: 09107045
- Completed a Wetland Delineation Report that included delineation rationale, a discussion of applicable data, and recommendations for the site.
3.0 PRELIMINARY DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS Prior to performing the delineation, several map and aerial photograph resources were reviewed to assist with identifying WUS and wetland areas at the subject site. Each source of data is described in detail below.
3.1 Topographic Map The United States Department of the Interior Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5-Minute Topographic Map of the subject site was reviewed to identify drainages or WUS within the project area. A portion of the Columbia, Missouri Quadrangle can be seen as Exhibit I in Appendix A. USGS maps appear to show one blue-line tributary and three ponds on the project site.
3.2 National Wetland Inventory Map The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map of the subject site was reviewed to identify potential wetland areas. The map for the subject site was published by the U.S. Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service and depicts probable wetland areas based on stereoscopic analysis of high altitude aerial imagery. The review of the NWl map depicts two freshwater ponds (NWI code: PUBGh) on the project site, however no wetland areas are indicated. The NWl map data for the project site can be seen as Exhibit 2 in Exhibit A.
3.3 Soil Survey Data from the soil survey of Boone County, Missouri was reviewed to identify soil types, including hydric soils. As previously indicated, hydric soil is one of the three essential characteristics of a wetland according to the USACE. Data for the soil survey was compiled by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and correlated by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Data from the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database was digitized in 2008 and adapted for this report from the Center of Applied Research and Environmental Systems (CARES). Soil descriptions were adapted from the Soil Survey of Boone County. A soil survey map is included as Exhibit 3 in Appendix A.
The following soil types were identified within the project area on the soil survey map:
- Armstrong loam, 5-9% slopes, eroded (50001): Armstrong loam consists of somewhat poorly drained soil formed in loess over till located on Upland hills under grass/herbaceous cover and tame pastureland. Armstrong loam is listed on both the National and Boone County hydric soils list.
Reliable [] Responsive [] Convenient *] Innovative2 2
DiscoveryDelineation Wetland Ridge
- Columbia, Report Boone County, Missouri 1 rerrBEn a o March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045
- Mexico-urban land complex, 0-2% slopes (50005): Mexico-urban land complex consists of poorly drained soils located on hills. Mexico-urban land complex is listed on both the National and Boone County hydric soils list.
- Vanmeter clay loam, 5-14% slopes (50006): Vanmeter clay loam consists of moderately well drained soils formed in loess residuum weathered from clay shale located on upland hills under tree cover and hardwoods. Vanmeter clay loam is not classified as hydric.
- Leonard silt loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded (60022): Leonard silt loam consists of poorly drained soil formed in fine-silty loess over till located on ridges and uplands under grass/herbaceous cover and tame pastureland. Leonard silt loam is listed on both the National and Boone County hydric soils list.
3.4 Aerial Imagery Terracon reviewed aerial imagery to review suspect wetland areas that may be present on the project site. Aerial imagery was available for 1995, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2009. Review of the aerial imagery show the removal of one pond within the onsite area labeled "Lot 2".
Additionally, a blue-line tributary, as shown on topographical resources, appears to have previously been altered and is now located outside of the project site boundaries. Current aerial images show drainage occurring to the west and southwest of where the original blue-line tributary was located. For reference, historic aerial imagery is included as Appendix B.
4.0 FIELD TECHNIQUES Terracon personnel conducted a reconnaissance of lots 2, 5 and 9-15 on January 19, 2011 and of lots 6, 7 and 16-18 on February 18, 2011 to observe for the presence of potential wetland characteristics and jurisdictional waters. Characteristics of potential jurisdictional waters and wetland areas were assessed utilizing the criteria detailed in sections 4.1 through 4.5 of this report. The evaluation methods generally followed the routine on-site determination method referenced in the 1987 USACE Manual and 2008 Midwest Supplement.
Onsite wetland areas were not indicated in the NWl maps; however, several suspect areas were selected within the project area to explore for potential wetland properties. Vegetation, soils and hydrology were evaluated within each suspect area to determine if wetland characteristics were present.
4.1 Plant Community Assessment Suspect areas were visually observed to determine the species, when possible, and absolute percentage of ground cover for four stratum of plant community types. Herbs were generally observed within a five-foot radius, shrubs/saplings within a fifteen-foot radius, and trees and vines within a thirty-foot radius of the observation location.
Reliable u Responsive u Convenient
- Innovative3 3
Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri Wetland Delineation Report 1r*ra a March 14, 2011 mTerracon Project: 09107045 For each species of vegetation observed, their wetland indicator status was evaluated.
Indicator status was determined using the NRCS Plants Database. Indicator categories for vegetation are presented below:
- Obligate Wetland (OBL) - occur almost always (estimated probability greater than 99%) under natural conditions in wetlands.
- Facultative Wetland (FACW) - usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67% -
99%) but occasionally found in non-wetlands.
- Facultative (FAC) - equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability 34% - 66%).
- Facultative U pland (FACU) - usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probability 67% - 99%) but occasionally found in wetlands.
- Obligate Upland (UPL) - rarely occur in wetlands, but occur almost always (estimated probability greater than 99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands.
The percent cover of each stratum was determined and dominance was evaluated. Dominant species were the most abundant species that accounted for more than 20 percent of the absolute percent coverage of the stratum. The number of dominant species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC was compared to the total number of dominant species across all strata. Typically, when more than 50 percent of the dominant species had an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC, hydrophytic vegetation was present.
If the percentage of dominant species with an indicator Status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC was less than 50 percent, prevalence index and morphological adaptations may have been evaluated to confirm if hydrophytic vegetation was present or absent.
4.2 Hydric Soils Assessment After Terracon evaluated wetland vegetation, subsurface soil samples were collected using a soil probe. The samples were collected to a depth of approximately 15 inches below ground surface and were visually compared to Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell, 1994), which aided in the evaluation of hydric soil characteristics. The soil samples were further examined for hydric soil indicators including, but not limited to, histosol, thick dark surface, sandy gleyed matrix, sandy redox, loamy gleyed matrix, redox dark surface, and/or redox depressions. If these or other hydric soil indicators were observed in the subsurface soil sample, the observation location was considered to have hydric soil.
Reliable
- Responsive u Convenient
- Innovative4 4
Wetland DiscoveryDelineation Report Boone County, Missouri Ridge
- Columbia, 1 rerra-. omn March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 4.3 Wetland Hydrology Assessment Visual indicators of wetland hydrology were evaluated. Examples of primary wetland hydrology indicators include, but are not limited to, surface water, high water table, soil saturation, water marks, sediment deposits, drift deposits, iron deposits, inundation visible on aerial imagery, sparsely vegetated concave surface, and water-stained leaves. If at least one primary or two secondary indicators were observed, the observation location was considered to have wetland hydrology.
4.4 Classification of Wetlands Upon completion of the review of the three wetland criteria at each area, a wetland determination was made. Under normal circumstances, if one or more of the wetland criteria were not identified, the area was not considered to be a wetland. If all three wetland indicators were identified, the area was classified as wetland. Additional observations were made throughout the wetland area to define the wetland/non-wetland boundary, which was mapped with GPS technology or flagged and surveyed by traditional methods. Vegetation, soil and hydrology assessment data from at least one location within the wetland and one upland location outside of the wetland were recorded on a USACE Wetland Determination Form. The recorded data forms for the subject site can be found in Appendix C and data point locations can be seen on Exhibit 4 in Appendix A.
4.5 WUS Observations Terracon also made observations of site features that may be considered a jurisdictional waterbody. If a potential jurisdictional waterbody was identified, observations regarding its characteristics were recorded. Potential jurisdictional waterbodies were evaluated based on the observation of the following characteristics:
- Flow Characteristics:
o Perennial: contains water at all times except during extreme drought.
o Intermittent: carries water a considerable portion of the time, but ceases to flow occasionally or seasonally.
o Ephemeral: carries water only during and immediately after periods of rainfall or snowmelt.
- Ordinary High Water Mark: The limit line on the shore established by the fluctuation of the water surface. It is shown by such things as a clear line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in soil character, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris or other features influenced by the surrounding area.
- Bank Shape Descriptions:
o Undercut: banks that overhang the stream channel o Steep: bank slope of approximately greater than 30 degrees Reliable
- Responsive
- Convenient
- Innovative5 5
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge u Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1Ferraton March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 o Gradual: bank slope of approximately 30 degrees or less
- Aquatic Habitat Descriptions:
o Pool: deeper portion of a stream where water flows slower than in neighboring, shallower portions, smooth surface, and finer substrate o Riffle: shallow area in a stream where water flows swiftly over gravel and rock or other coarse substrate resulting in a rough flow and a turbulent surface o Run: section of a stream with a low or high velocity and with little or no turbulence on the surface of the water.
5.0 FIELD OBSERVATIONS RESULTS On January 19, 2011 and February 18, 2011, Terracon performed field observations and identified two suspect wetland areas and one suspect drainageway within the project site.
Locations of these onsite features are illustrated on Exhibit 4 in Appendix C. Ground photographs, included in Appendix D, provide an indication of the physical characteristics observed during the site visit. Descriptions of the evaluated areas are listed in the following sections.
5.1 Wetlands Wetland Area Description ID WL-A Size .01 acres Sampling Point(s) DP-1, DP-3 Association w/ WUS The suspect wetland area does not appear to be associated with a WUS.
Wetland Description Depression adjacent to existing road NWl Map Not indicated on NWI Map Cowardin Classification None Wetland Type Emergent Vegetative Cover Evenly mixed with non-vegetated, sparse Common Name Scientific Name WL Indicator Weln eeainCommon cattail Typha latifolia OBL Hydrogeomorphic Class Depression Soil Type (soil survey) Armstrong loam, 5-9% slopes, eroded Soil Type (field obs.) Silty clay Soil Characteristics Redox depressions Hydrology Characteristics Surface water, saturation visible on aerial photography Hydrology Source Surface water Other Information Non-Wetland (Upland) Description Data Point s) DP-2, DP-4 Reliable [] Responsive u] Convenient,[innovative6 6
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1Ferracan March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 Wetland Area Description ID WL- A Habitat Type I Grassland Was there a marked difference between the wetland Yes. Wetland area exhibits different vegetative and upland species and exhibits standing water.
Was there a gradual change in vegetation between Abrupt change from upland species to wetland the wetland and upland creating a "transition zone" species - wetland vegetation lines interior of wetland area Was there an abrupt topographic change between Slight topographic change; wetland area is located the wetland and upland in depressions at intersection of moderately sloping hillside and asphalt roadway.
Wetland Area Description ID WL- B Size .04 acres Sampling Point(s) DP-1, DP-3, DP-5, The wetland area appears to have a connection to an offsite lake. The offsite Association w/ WUS lake appears to have an outlet connection to a tributary of Gans Creek.
Therefore, this wetland area may be connected to as WUS.
Wetland Description Linear depression NWI Map Not indicated on NWI Map Cowardin Classification None Wetland Type Emergent, linear Vegetative Cover Vegetated throughout extent of wetland area.
Common Name Scientific Name WL Indicator WtadV tYellow nutsedge Cyperus esculentus FACW Weln egetation
- See Section 6.1 of this, report for further comments.
Hydrogeomorphic Class Linear depression Soil Type (soil survey) Leonard silt loam, 2-5% slopes, eroded Soil Type (field obs.) Silty clay Soil Characteristics Redox depressions CHarctristics Vegetated Concave Surface, with standing water Hydroogy SurceHillside runoff and possible overflow from offsite lake.
Non-Wetland (Upland) Description Data Point s) DP-2, DP-4, DP-6 Habitat Type IManicured grassland area, adjacent to agricultural field containing row crops.
Was there a marked difference between the wetland Yes. Wetland area exhibits different vegetative and ulandspecies and exhibits standing water.
Was there a gradual change in vegetation between Yes. Changes in vegetation appeared to be the wetland and upland creating a 'transition zone" gradual.
Was there an abrupt topographic change between Gradual change. Wetland area located at base of the wetland and upland gently sloping hill, within a concave linear area.
Reliable u Responsive
- Convenient.* Innovative7 7
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge a Columbia, Boone County, Missouri irerracon March 14, 2011 a Terracon Project: 09107045 5.3 Suspect Drainageways Suspect Drainage way Description ID SD-1 350 feet (estimated with topographic information, aerial Apprximte engt Oniteimagery and onsite observation)
Name of Water Body Unnamed LocationCentral portion of Lot 10, southwestern portion of project Locationsite WUS Type Natural Some ephemeral characteristics in portions of the Flow Characteristics dangwy Discontinuous OHWM observed throughout length of Ordiary ighWate Mak (OWM) drainageway. Observed height 6 inches to 2 feet.
Discontinuous bed and bank features observed Defied
& ankthroughout Bd length of drainageway.
Channel Width Across OHWM I to 3 feet Channel Width Across Bank Top 1 to 4 feet Channel Width Across Dry Bottom I to 4 feet Water Depth 0-12 inches Water Clarity Cloudy Stream Flow' Slow Bank eightLeft Bank: 6 inches to 3 feet Bank eightRight Bank: 6 inches to 3 feet
% Sloe anksLeft On Bank: Undercut, Steep, Gradual, Eroded Right Bank: Undercut, Steep, Gradual, Eroded Bank Substrate 30 % Gravel/Rock, 10% Sand, 60 % Soil Bed Substrate 90 % Gravel/Rip rap, 10% Soil/Organic Riparian Corridor: 05fe Vegetation: locust, American elm, pin oak, black walnut Wetland Fringe None observed Aquatic Organisms None observed Aquatic Habitat None observed 5.4 Suspect Depression Area Suspect Depression Area Description ID Suspect Depression Area ApproimateArea0.01 acre (estimate with field observations)
Name of Water Body Unnamed depression Location Southwestern portion of project site Reliable a Responsive u Convenient a Innovative8 8
Discovery Ridge u Columbia, Boone County, Missouri Wetland Delineation Report irerral* n n March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 Suspect Depression Area Description ID Suspect Depression Area WUS Type Artificial Observed Inlet or Outlet None observed Riparian Corridor 05fe
__________________________Vegetation: honey locust, pin oak, cedar Wetland Fringe None observed Aquatic Organisms None observed Water Depth Approximately 1-10 inches Bottom of depression lined with approximately 4 inches of Addiiona Remrkssoil/organic matter atop chat/rip rap material.
6.0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS A wetland delineation of approximately 115 acres located north of Highway 63, south of Roosevelt Avenue and along portions of South Lenoir and East Gans Road in Columbia, Boone County, Missouri was conducted on January 19, 2011 and February 18, 2011. A review of the site was conducted utilizing readily available information including, but not limited to, topographical, aerial and wetland data. In addition, site reconnaissance was performed to evaluate the site for potential jurisdictional waters and wetland areas. A summary of field observation and conclusions concerning jurisdictional status is outlined in the following sections.
6.1 Wetland Area Section 4.0 of this report details the procedures used to identify wetlands on the project site. In accordance with the field procedures described in this report, numerous onsite areas were observed for wetland characteristics. Although the NWI map does not indicate wetland features as existing onsite, aerial photos and topographical maps indicate areas that may display wetland characteristics. It was concluded during site reconnaissance that two of those areas contain wetland characteristics. The following table summarizes the size of the delineated suspect wetland within the project site.
Wetland Area (acre)
WL-A .01 WL-B .04 Total .05 Wetland Area A exists as an isolated depression located adjacent to an existing roadway. The area exhibits all requirements for wetland classification; however it does not appear to be associated with a WUS. Hydrology appears to occur from hillside runoff and the wetland area Reliable
- Responsive u Convenient
- Innovative9 9
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1rra u March 14, 2011 . Terracon Project: 09107045 may be a result from improper drainage at its intersection with the existing roadway. Due primarily to its isolated setting, it is Terracon's opinion that this wetland area would not be considered jurisdictional.
Wetland Area B exists as a linear depression located adjacent to an offsite lake. No inlet was observed for the offsite lake; however, the lake appears to have an outlet through underground piping, eventually draining into an offsite, channelized tributary to Gans Creek. Wetland Area B exhibits soil and hydrological requirements for wetland classification. Due to the time of year this delineation was conducted, accurate identification of several of the plants within, and surrounding, the wetland area was not possible. Additionally, the area surrounding Wetland Area B appears to have been mowed prior to field reconnaissance, further reducing accurate plant identification. One sedge species (FACW) was observed and identified within Wetland Area B. It is Terracon's opinion that Wetland Area B may be jurisdictional, primarily due to the presence of wetland characteristics and its association with an offsite lake that appears to have an outlet connection to a tributary of Gans Creek.
6.2 Suspect Drainageway Though not indicated as blue lines on USGS topographical maps, one suspect drainageway was observed for jurisdictional characteristics during site reconnaissance activities. The following table summarizes the approximate length of the suspect drainageway, based on topographic information, onsite GPS data and aerial imagery estimations.
Suspect Drainageway (Linear Feet)
ISD-I 350 Total 350 The suspect drainageway displays discontinuous bed and bank features and/or ordinary high water marks for approximately 350 linear feet. After approximately 350 linear feet of discontinuous features, the drainage loses definition and appears to turn into an unchanneled area with overland flow. Up to 12 inches of water was observed within the banks of this drainageway; however, site reconnaissance was performed following a significant amount of rain and snow melt and observed water depths may have primarily been due to runoff. A majority of the drainageway appears to have been previously lined with riprap. Based on observations of the physical characteristics of the drainageway, it was concluded and is Terracon's opinion that this suspect drainageway would not be classified as jurisdictional.
6.3 Ponds and Suspect Depressed Area The NWI map indicates two ponds within the project site. Field observations led to the conclusion that neither of these ponds are still in existence. Based on a review of aerial Reliable u Responsive u Convenient u Innovative 10
Wetland DiscoveryDelineation Report Boone County, Missouri Ridge
- Columbia, 1rrr cu March 14, 2011 . Terracon Project: 09107045 imagery, it appears that the larger of the two ponds, formerly located in Lot 2, was filled sometime between August 2007 and August 2009. A smaller pond, formerly located in Lot 5, is present in the most recent aerial image reviewed (2009); however, a pond was not observed in that location during field reconnaissance.
A suspect depressed area (approximately 0.01 acres) was located within the project site. This area does not exhibit the general characteristics of an upland pond, nor did it fulfill wetland requirements. Soil samples taken around the depressed area did not prove to be hydric, while soil samples taken within the area were impeded by a layer of rip rap/chat approximately four to six inches below the surface. Soil samples observed from the top four to six inches were not found to be hydric. The area was observed as holding approximately 4 to 6 inches of water; however, no inlet or outlet was observed. The area did not appear to be associated with a WUS. Due to its isolated location and lack of association with a WUS, it is Terracon's opinion that the suspect depressed area would not be classified as jurisdictional.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS According to survey results, approximately 0.05 acre of suspect wetlands, 350 lineal feet of a suspect drainageway, and 0.01 acres of an upland depression were identified on the project site.
If future development of the project site does not avoid impacts to Wetland Area A, the suspect drainageway, and upland depressed area, it is Terracon's opinion that these features would be considered upland/isolated and/or not under the jurisdiction of the USACE. However, for all onsite areas, only the USACE can make the final determination on the jurisdictional status of wetlands or waterbodies, and on the need for permit processing and compensatory mitigation.
If future development of the project site does not avoid impacts to Wetland Area B, it is Terracon's opinion that this feature may be under the jurisdiction of the USACE. This opinion is primarily based on Wetland Area B's association with an offsite lake which appears to have an outlet connection to a tributary of Gans Creek. Furthermore the area exhibits wetland characteristics including hydrological indicators, hydric soils, and at least one hydrophytic plant species. If further verification for the wetland area is needed, Terracon recommends returning to the site during the growing season for an accurate evaluation of the plant community within Wetland Area B. Only the USACE can make the final determination on the jurisdictional status of wetlands or waterbodies, and on the need for permit processing and compensatory mitigation.
If impacts are proposed to any of the aforementioned wetlands or waterbodies, the USACE should be consulted to determine if a Section 404 Permit will be required for the project.
Terracon recommends a copy of this report be submitted to the USACE for their final Reliable
- Responsive
- Convenient u Innovative 1 11
Wetland Ridge
- Columbia, DiscoveryDelineation Report Boone County, Missouri March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 1! rerracon determination of potential jurisdictional waters on the site and required USACE permitting and mitigation (if any) for potential impacts to these waters. The USACE can be reached at the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers - Kansas City District Missouri State Regulatory Office 221 Bolivar Street, Suite 103 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 8.0
GENERAL COMMENT
S The wetland delineation was performed using the USACE Manual and Midwest Supplement.
The manual provides assistance for delineating wetlands based on the three criteria discussed.
However, the manual alone may not have provided enough information to document whether or not the three criteria were met. Various physical properties or other visual signs used to evaluate whether the three wetland identification criteria areas were satisfied may not be straightforward, especially in disturbed or problem areas. The manual also allows the user to visually estimate certain indicators such as the percentage of area covered by dominant species for the entire community. Terracon did not attempt to identify every possible plant species and did not classify soil type by laboratory methods. Due to seasonal changes, Terracon cannot guarantee the area to exhibit or not to exhibit wetland characteristics at all times of the year. The limitations of this wetland delineation should be recognized.
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted scientific and engineering evaluation practices. This report is for the exclusive use of the client for the project being discussed. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are intended or made.
Reliable
- Responsive
- Convenient
- Innovative 12
APPENDIX A Exhibits
.- -- _k* ,---- - , * * \
"-, /7 !i ,t *
- i H 9 t.i j:i /( " . "r !* '- (K *'- "
0 i" j
- y6~t
~po1~
- ~-t ~':;K
- K/'J1* ~
-~--_-__-<a-hY
~
- \~1 //r P> -- < \4/ .--
~ h ,.-?" ":',m -. ... " . '_, , -
N. </ I.N.. ),:-
~ 'I' I
- K e / "*~*~N~
,- ~-
i.
U
- ~---,,
-1 9 LEGEND
-Approximate Site Boundary Adapted from USGS Quadrangle Columbia, 1981 WETLAND DELINEATION Consulting Er~nne andSie st DISCOVERY RIDGE TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
I11403IJER PARK ROf T LOUIS, ST. WM 34 MO *31*
Approximate Site Boundary Freshwater Pond Lake 0 800 Feet Freshwater Forested / Shrub Wi etland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Adapted from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands Mapper.
ihd~ - dw ulEngineers ting Consul*Whn and Scienbtits DISCOVMERY RIDGE2 l'@L tiA~iOD ST.LOWS,MO 1TRAUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, IC
.JCV Jl' 03J07/2011 PtalU4tFAX.(3lMO45t51 COLUMBIA MISSOR ___
LEGEND - Approximate Site Boundary
- ] 50001 Armstrong loam, 5-9%, eroded [] 50059 Mexico silt loam, 1-4% slopes, eroded
[] 50005 Mexico-urban land complex,0-2% slopes El 60022 Leonard silt loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded El 50006 Vanmeter clay loam, 5-14% slopes *] Water
[;n Adapted from the Center for Applied Research and Environmental Systems (CARES) mapping application, Soils 2008 layer.
7701 e o ... SOIL SURVEY MAP EXHIBIT 20O1 nsuligEngineeus n Sientist Coo EIETO DISOERYLIDGE~l MISOR 3ELN Coslin ninesan cenitwDSOERgIG flOLL4R pceoRKR) sT.wLUIa,uMO i*, TRABUE. HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
/2011 P*l3424*.1t ,FAX.3*l2145I COLUMBIA MSOR
Approximately 0.01 acres I ~
Approximately 0.04 acres *o Suspec Depression Are o
- 4) m oIo00ace
APPENDIX B Historical Aerial Imagery
LEGEND Approximate Site Boundary
- 80Feet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial imagery.
U' IF 11~~**~*~
Pjey LES I HISTORIC AERIAL: 1995 LES RkN.
I-=800cConsulting Engineers o1 s=P*091177°I and Scientists WETLAND DELINEATIONI DISCOVERY RIDGE JCV Dlec 1IU5LL5IRPNS(ROADI .TO0I1110 13146 TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, 1NC.
03/07I2011 At 1341513111 FAX0141 52-315 COLUMBIA
- t " " ,,
SApproximate Site Boundary
'*F LEGEND 80 eet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial images.
[J*] .EIWETLAND DELNEATIONj Ou B CV R [I i Conisu ringEnigineers and Scientists DISCOVERY RIDGE
- *u*PR* sru. *TRABUE, HANSEN & HINSHAW, INC.
__ CV__ , 03107/2011 P (=l4)
U2.'U FAX(14) *Ut0 COLUMIA MISSOURIJ_ __
-U LEGEND Approximate Site Boundary O fr 800 Feet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial images.
- IE 'V El El -
0g117?01 HISTORIC AERIAL: 2005 LES WETLAND DELINEATION Consulting Engineers and Scientists DISCOVERY RIDGE Jcv 11tj*a*wpAI6(ftOA ST.tLOUgg, MO63146 TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
JLV 03107/2011 MI p34) 46.3t 13t41463610 Cl .......
FAYZ I.
LEGEND Approx mate S te Boundary 1
Adapted from the Google Earth hlstonc aerial Images.
HISTORIC AERIAL: 2006 ] EXHIBIl Terracon WETLAND DEUNEATION I Uue4 ting Consu PMIXEng ROAD LouisMO neem and ST Scents s63 DISCOVERY TRASUE, RIDGE INC.
HANSEN & HINSHAW, I __
EXH'B'7 LEGEND
/m*PNtK Approximate Consulting 111i00 rr*I*11--
Engineers ROAD LILBUI* andSite
- -m Boundary ST.LOUIS, Scientists MOU14 DISCOVERY TRABUE, H'STOR'CwETLAND HANSEN RIDGE Adapted AER'ALDEUNEAT*2006
& HINSHAW, INC. ,'.,
LEGEND SApproximate Site Boundary 0 i* 800 Feet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial images.
- LES P~~r o~irnoi170 ak l HISTORIC AERIAL: 2007 EXHIBIT oU*=== EFr-ICUI WETLAND DEUNEATION Cmd l Consultng Engineers and Scientists DISCOVERY RIDGE ,
- ,d 10ULJU
- O m m.*OU TRABUE, HAN*SEN
&HINSHAW, INC.
JCV 03R7/2011 PH() I*X(4 m.al OLUMBIA MISSOURI ___
LEGEND
- =Approximate
.. Site Boundary
- 80Feet Adapted from thle Google Earth historic aeiial images.
OwMS Fis e Consultng EngineerX and Scienbtast DISCOVERY RIDGE
= t m oUUN wO aTt.OS LoE O 83t46 TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
JCV 03/07/2011 m.{14ulel FAX(3t4) 2,lO COLUMBIA MISSOURI
APPENDIX C Wetland Determination Data Forms
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Boone County Columbia! Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: DP-1 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): _____Lat: 38.896433 Long: -92.275639 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (ifneeded, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStraum DB >"(Plt sie: 3 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrset Tre DH Statu >"(lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiacTetWrse:
1 _____ _____Number of Dominant Species that 2 ________are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 ___________ _____Across All Strata (B):
5 _____Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (AIB):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______________ Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
2 ____________OBL species 90 Xl1 90 3 _______ ___FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _________ ____FAC species 10 X3 30 5 _________ ____FACU species 0 X4 0 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species 0 X5 0 Totals (A) 100 (B) 120 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index --B/A = 1.2 1 Typha latifolia 90 Y OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Festuca spp 10 N FAC ___Dominance Test is > 50%
3 _____ X Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 _____ __Morphological Adaptations 6 _____(Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 _____ __Problematic Hydrophytic 9 ____Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 _____ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 ______hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum Ž 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________I_____Hydrophytic 2 __________I_____ Vegetation Yes X No 1 __________JPresent?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover =Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Describtion: (Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % TypeI Loc2 Texture 0-6 10YR 5/2 80 7.5YR 6/8 20 C M SiCI 8-15 10YR 5/2 95 7.5YR 6/8 5 D M SiCI 1
T~yp:C=Concentration, D--Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) ___ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
- Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___Black Histic (A3) ___ Stripped Matrix (S6) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ___ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___2 cm Muck (Al10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) __Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (83) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators ('minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B1 4) __Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) __Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) __Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Sufface(B8) ___ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No X Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
in~cludes caplillar fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 State: MO Sampling Point: D-Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. _________ _______(OUT)
Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ___________ Local Relief (concave, convex, none):_____________
Slope (%): _____Lat: 38.90341 Long: -92.27977 Datum: NAD83/WIGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of ye.ar?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significan ntly disturbed? Are"'Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___signiflcar ntly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DH Statu >"(lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW kse" 1 _____Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 ______Across All Strata (B):
5 ______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover --Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplingq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______ ___ Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 ____OBL species 0 X1 0 3 ____________FACW species 0 X2 0 4 ________FAC species 50 X 3 150 5 ____ ____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species 0 X5 0 Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lo/ium perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 _____Prevalence Index is <3.0' 4 ____ __ Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 _____ _____Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9 __ _ __ _ __ _Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 _______________hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 38 20% Total Cover 15 75 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________Hydrophytic 2 _ _1Vegetation Yes __ No X 1 __ _ _ _ _ _ Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox FeaturesReak (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % T~ype* Loc2 Texture 0-15 10YR 4/3 100 SiCI
]Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matnix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
__ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) __Depleted Matrix (F3)
__Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ___ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) __ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___ Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) __ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) __Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
__Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) ___ Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: ____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Projct/ite Disovey Rdge ityCouty: Columbia!
Project/Site:_Discovey__idgeCty/County: Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: DP-3 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hilisiope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.896461 Long: -92.275583 Datum: NAD83iWGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil ___or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStraum
'3' BH Plotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant -Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DH Statu *" (lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW khe:
1 __________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ____________Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplin~q/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1____ _____Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
2 ____OBL species 90 Xl1 90 3 _________ ____FACW species 0 X2 0 4 ____ ___ ____FAC species 10 X3 30 5 ___ ____I____ FACU species 0 X4 0 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover =Total Cover UPL species 0 X 5 0 Totals (A) 100 (B) 120 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Peaec ne I .
I Tyha atiolia90 OB HyropyecVa egetaione =ndicAtors.2 2 Festuca spp 10 N FAC Dominance Test is > 50%
3 X Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 __Problematic Hydrophytic 9 1
_ _ __ _Vegetation *(Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 _____hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tail (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 ____ ____I_____Hydrophytic 2 ________Vegetation Yes X No
__ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _I_ _ Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = oa over Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Descrilotion: (Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.1 Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye Loc Texture ___________________
0-6 10YR 5/2 80 7.5YR 5/1 10 C M SiCI 7.5YR 6/8 10 C M SiCI 6-10 7.5YR 6/1 70 7.5YR 5/1 30 C M SiCI 10-15 10YR 3/1 60 715YR 4/6 40 C M SiCI 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
__ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All1) -_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
__5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) __Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (Bl0)
X_ Saturation (A3) ___ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (B1) ___ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) ___ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ____ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) __Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery(B7) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge Boone County Samplin! gDate: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
State: MO Sampin! g Point: D-(OUT)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, Ri12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): hilislope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.896494 Long: -92.2755972 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are"'Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DHStatu >"(lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstWrhe:
1___________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 ______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______ ___ Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 ____OBL species 0 XI1 0 3 _______ ___FACW species 0 X2 0 4 ____ ____FAC species 50 X 3 150 5 _________ ____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover . UPL species 0 X 5 0 Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lolium perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9___Vegetation ' (Explain) 10 _____ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 ______hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 38 20% Total Cover 15 75 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 ____ ____ Hydrophytic 2 __________J_____ Vegetation Yes ____No X 1 __________JPresent?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Descriotion: (Describe to the death needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.i Depth Matrix Redox Features ______Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type1 LocI Texture___________________
0-15 10YR 4/3 100 ______ ___ ___ ___[ SiCI 4 4 ~ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix ($4) __Coast Prairie Redox (Al16)
___Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
__Strati fled Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) __Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All1) ___ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) __Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___ Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) __True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (Bl) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) __Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lmnagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)______________________________
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 State: MO SamlinPont: WL-B Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. SamlinPont: DP-1 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.896433 Long: -92.275639 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation N soil N or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStraum DB >"(Plt sie: 3 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
TreeStrtum>3"DBH (Plt sze:30'radus) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW khe:
1______Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 ______Across All Strata (B):
5 _______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (ANB):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1____Total % Cover of: Multpyb 2 ______OBL species _____X I 3 __________FACW species _____X 2 4 ___ ____FAC species _ __X 3 5 _____FACU species _____X 4 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species _____X 5 Totals (A) _____(B)
Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 Cyperus esculentus FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 ____ __ Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 _____Remarks) 8 ____________Problematic Hydrophytic 9 _____ _____Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11_______________________ ____ _____ _____hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1______________________________________Hydrephytic 2_____________________ _________Vegetation Yes
- No 1__ oa Present?
50% Total Cover 20% Total Cover = oa over *See Remarks Remarks: Delineation conducted during dormant season, numerous plants unidentifiable. Dominance Test/Prevalence Index could not be completed.
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.I Depth Matrix Redox Features ______Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type Loc Texture 0-5 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 6/6 15 C M SiCI 5-10 10YR 5II 90 10YR 6/6 10 C M SiCI 10-15 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 6/6 10 C M SiCI
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ___ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
__Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) ___ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
__5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: _________________
Depth (inches): _________________Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No____
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) X Water-Stained Leaves (89) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B36)
X High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B313) X Drainage Patterns (B310)
X Saturation (A3) __True Aquatic Plants (814) __Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (81) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (82) __Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B34) -_ Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (835) ___ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ___FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lrnagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes caplillar fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: WLB(OUT)P2 Section 21, T49, R12W Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township R* ange:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave .,convex, none Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.903372 Long: -92.279806 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are "IN lormal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (ifrieeded, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DH Statu >" (lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW khet 1 Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ____________Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 __________Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______ ___ Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 _____OBL species 0 X1 0 3 _____FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _____FAC species 50 X3 150 5 _____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover 0UPL species 0 X5 0
____________-Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lo/lium perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __._ Morphological Adaptations 6 __________(Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 __Problematic Hydrophytic 1
9 __ _ _ _ _ _Vegetation (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 __________hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius)
I2 1
__ 1
.1.
__ F ___
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes No X 50% Total Cover 20% Total Cover _ = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Sampling Point:
Point:
SOIL Profile Descriotion: (Describe to the denth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye Loc Texture 0-10 10YR 4/3 10-15 10YR 4/3 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M SiCI 1Tpe CConcentration, D='Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils':
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (Al16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
__ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
__2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
___Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) -_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
__High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___Sediment Deposits (B2) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery(B7) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: ____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe) ____________________________
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Projct/ite Disovey Rdge ityCouty: Columbia/
Project/_te:_DisoveryRdgeCtyCounty: Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: W-
_______________________________ ______DP-3 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ___________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): _____Lat: 38.9034194444444 Long: -92.2800611111111 Datum: NAD83IWGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum >3"l DBH (Plot size: 30' radius) Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:
__________________________________ % Cover Species? Status
_______Number_______________of_______Dominant____________ ______Species__________ ume o omnntSece tta 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _____Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover _ __20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1____________________________Total % Cover of: Multi ply by:
2 __________OBL species _____X I 3 ___ ___FACW species ____X 2 4____________________________FAC species _____X 3 5__________FACU species _ ___X 4 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species _____X 5 Totals (A) _____ (B)
Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < I m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index --B/A =
1 Cyeru esuletusFACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 __Problematic Hydrophytic 9 Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1__________1 Hydrophytic 2 _ _ _ _IVegetation Yes
- No
__1_ _Present?
50% Total Cover ____ 20% Total Cover __= Total Cover *See Remarks Remarks: Delineation conducted during dormant season, numerous plants unidentifiable. Dominance Test/Prevalence Index could not be completed.
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye LocT Texture 0-5 10YR 5/2 80 I0YR 6/8 20 C M SiCl 5-10 10YR 512 85 10YR 5/8 15 C M SiCl 10-15 10YR 5/2 75 10YR 5/8 25 C M SiCI
- Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox ($5).__ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
__Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ___ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
__2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) -_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) ___ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) ___ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) ___ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) __Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) ___ Thin Muck Surface(C7) __FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lrnagery(B7) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Discovery Ridge Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO .SamlinPont:
Saplig Pont: WL-B DP-4 (OUT)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): _____________
Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.90346 Long: -92.27986 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3"
Tre BH 3" Sratm BH (lotsize (Plt ize 30 radus) 3' rdis) Absolute
% Cover Dominant Species? -IndicatorDoiacTetWrse:
Status DonacTetW kset 1 Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplin~q/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 ___ ____Total % Cover of: Mutipl~yb:
2 ____OBL species 0 Xl1 0 3 _ ___FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _____FAC species 50 X3 150 5 _____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover 0UPL species 0 X5 0
_____________________________________________ -Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index --BIA = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lolium perenne 25 Y FACU ___Dominance Test is > 50%
3 -- Prevalence index is <3.01 4 ______Morphological Adaptations 6 _____(Provide supporting data in 7 ______ Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 1
9 __ _Vegetation I(Explain) 10 _____ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 ______hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tail (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________I_____Hydrophytic 2 _ _ _ _I_ _ Vegetation Yes __No X 1 _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _I_ _ Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover =Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye Loc Texture 0-10 10YR 4/3 10-15 10YR 413 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M SiCI
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
__ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (36) Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (A10) __Depleted Matrix (F3)
___Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) __Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___Drainage Patterns (BI0)
___Saturation (A3) ___True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___Sediment Deposits (B2) __Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) ___Thin Muck Surface (C7) ___ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: ____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Boone County Columbia/Sa SapigDt:0-921 pig at: 0-921 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: WL-BIN Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.9034028 Long: -92.280172 Datum: NAD83/VVGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum >3" DBH (Plot size: 30' radius) Absoluer Domcinant StIdiator Dominance Test Worksheet:
1 ____________________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ____________Total Number of Dominant Species 4 _____Across All Strata (B):
5 ______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (N/B):
Saplincj/Shrub Stratum <3' DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Werksheet:
1_______________ ___ ___Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 ___________jOBL species _____X 1 3 _ ___1FACW species ____X 2 4 ___________jFAC species _____X 3 5 _____ ____1FACU species _ ___X 4 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species _____X 5 Totals (A) _____ (B)
Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 Cyperus esculentus FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
2 _____Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9 Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 ______ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________[Hydrophytic 2 __________IVegetation Yes
- No 1i_____ ____ Present?
50% Total Cover 20% Total Cover = Total Cover *See Remarks Remarks: Delineation conducted during dormant season, numerous plants unidentifiable. Dominance Test/Prevalence Index could not be completed.
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.'I Depth Matrix Redox Features ______Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture 0-10 10YR 5/2 70 7.5YR 5/8 30 C M SiC!
10-15 10YR 5/2 .70 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M SiC!
I0YR 6/8 10 C M SiCI 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ___ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
__Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) ___ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)"
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) __ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) . _Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present; unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)I Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required'!
X Surface Water (Al) . Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X High Water Table (A2) ___ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) ___ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (BI) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___Drift Deposits (B3) ___ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) ___ Thin Muck Surface.(C7) __ FAC-N eutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos; previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 State: MO Sampling Point: WLBD-Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. __________ _______(OUT)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): _____________
Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.903383 Long: -92.2722 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant -Indicator DoiacTetWrset Tre 3" Sratm BH (Plt ize 3' rdis) % Cover Species? Status DoiacTetWrset 1 _____ __________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _ _ __ _Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5________________________Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplingq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1______________ ______ITotal % Cover of: Mulipjlyby:
2 ____ ____jOBL species 0 Xl1 0 3 ________1FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _________ ____FAC species 50 X3 150 5 ____ ____1____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover 0UPL species 0 X5 0 Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 mtall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lolum perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 -- Prevalence Index is -<3.01 4 ___ Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 - Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9 -- Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________[Hydrophytic 2 __ _ _LVegetation Yes __ No X
__ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Coo Moist) % Tye Loc Texture 0-10 10YR 4/3 10-15 10OYR 4/3 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M SiCI 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix H-ydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils':
___Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
__Strati fied Layers (AS) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All1) __Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) __True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
____ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ____ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) __Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
APPENDIX F Credentials
ADAM J. WHITE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Bachelorof Science, Agricultural Mr. White, a staff Environmental Scientist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. System Management, Minor Soil office, is responsible for conducting environmental services. He is Science, 2005, University of responsible for the field services and development of reports for a wide Missouri-Columbia range of projects performed. His primary environmental duties involve performance and report development for Phase I environmental site assessments, Phase II site assessments and remediation projects, wetland delineations, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews. CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Wetland Delineation RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Red Cross First Aid
- Deer Valley Apartment, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) on a multi-family residential apartment complex for Prudential Mortgage Capital Company.
WORK HISTORY
- Colt Railroad, Columbia, Missouri Terracon, Environmental Scientist, Performed on-site soil sampling related to identifying petroleum and 2006-present; metals contaminated soils on the site. University of Missouri-Columbia, Soil CharacterizationLab, 2006
- Beatrice Cheese, New Hampton, Iowa Performed on-site remediatory supervision and site conditions monitoring associated with the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils on the site using subsurface injection methods.
- Flat Branch Park Phase II, Columbia, MO Conducted data review and assisted with report development for EPA Brownfield project associated with remediation of site impacted by former petroleum bulk storage facilities.
- Cell Tower Sites, Missouri and Kansas Performed Phase I ESAs and NEPA assessments as they applied to the development associated with co-located and raw land tower sites for Verizon Wireless throughout Missouri and Kansas.
- Agriculture Storage Facilities, Kansas Performed on-site soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling, at 10 agricultural fertilizer/pesticide facilities in Kansas.
- Missouri Theatre, Columbia, Missouri Performed a Phase I ESA and report development for the renovation of the historic Missouri Theatre building. The site is located in downtown Columbia and was the former location of a drycleaner and printing facility.
- Underground Storage Tank Removal, Moberly, Missouri Provided oversight, documentation, and sampling of contaminated soils during the excavation, removal, and closure of an underground petroleum storage tank.
- Hy-Vee, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and on-site soil and groundwater sampling for proposed Hy-Vee grocery stores and gas station.
- Agricultural Storage Facility, Trenton, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA and Missouri Department of Natural Resources 06105
White, Adam J. 2 (MDNR) file review for the historic agricultural chemical facility.
- Hinton Little General Stores - Hinton, Missouri Conducted site characterization and risk based corrective action assessment consisting of soil and groundwater sampling of leaking underground storage tank site.
- Autozone, Marshfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA and MDNR file review on a vacant tract of land, historically the location of a gasoline station with leaking underground storage tanks.
- Caterpillar Facility, Boonville, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA for a Caterpillar equipment manufacturing facility. The facility was a large quantity generator that uses multiple hazardous substances for operations at the site.
- Prairie Queen, Centralia, Missouri Conducted Phase I ESA on a gasoline station facility located in proximity to off-site gasoline stations.
- AmerenUE, Callaway Nuclear Power Plant Preformed soil and groundwater sample collection for radiological parameters laboratory testing. Sample collection locations include the highly secure Protected Area.
- Hudson Hallow, Osage Beach, Missouri Provided consultation regarding on-site wetlands including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting.
- City of Springfield, Missouri Provided Phase I ESAs on six sites located in the historic Jordan Valley downtown area of Springfield, MO.
- 401 S. Maple Avenue and 1057 Colfax Avenue, Hannibal, Missouri Provided Phase I ESA on a screen printing business located adjacent to the former location of a manufactured gas plant.
- Asbestos Air Sampling, Missouri Provided asbestos air sampling at sites which include churches, university dormitories, factories, and Bagnell Dam.
06/05
MARK E. DIERKER FIELD GEOLOGIS T PROFES SIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Geology, Mr. Dierker, a Field Geologist in Terracon's Columbia, Mo. office, is 2000, University of Missouri-responsible for conducting environmental and geotechnical services. He is Columbia responsible for working with drilling crews performing field services, soil and groundwater sampling, and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs).
CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Nuclear Soil Gauge Certification
- Bright Start Academy, Columbia, Missouri Red Cross FirstAid Provided Phase I ESA for site to be developed as a child care facility.
- Proposed Firestone, Columbia, Missouri Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as an autocare facility. WORK HIS TORY Terracon Consultants, Inc.
- Father Tolton Catholic High School, Columbia, Missouri Field Geologist, September 20 10-Provided Phase 1 ESA for site to be developed as a high school. present Conn-Agg, LLC ,Boone Quarries
- Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Reform, Missouri Quality Control Manager, Conducts groundwater sampling from monitoring well network and January2004- August 2009 performs field services with monitoring well abandonment and well Engineering Surveys and Services, installations. Materials Tech, April 2003-December 2003
- Con-Agg, LLC, Columbia, Missouri Quality control manager responsible for management of aggregate and concrete materials testing lab and quarry inventories.
- Engineering Surveys and Services, Columbia, Missouri Performed field and laboratory testing of concrete, soils, and aggregate.
06105
TRACIE A. RAGLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, Honors in Ms. Ragland has 9 years of general environmental experience. Ms. EnvironmentalStudies, 1997, Ragland performs various duties including Phase I Environmental Site University of Kansas Assessments (Phase I ESAs), wetland delineations, asbestos inspections, Bachelor of Science in Biology, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reviews. Ms. Ragland has CellularBiology, 1992, also prepared Phase I ESAs in association with Brownfields Assessments University of Kansas and some Limited Site Investigations (LSIs). Her duties include client interaction; scheduling andlor performing project field work; interviews with site contacts, state, and local government officials; analytical interpretation of research databases and historical records; wetland plant and hydric soil CERTIFICATIONS 40-H-our Hazardous Waste Site identifications; interpretation and analysis of maps, aerial photographs, and Operations Training, 1999 soil surveys; wetland site survey coordination; calculation of wetland AHERA Asbestos Inspector:
impacts; asbestos inspection and sampling; groundwater and soil collection Kansas, Missouri, 1998 and interpretation of laboratory analytical results; and preparation and Category A Certificationin production of client deliverables. Radioisotopes and Radiation Safety in Research, 1997 Ms. Ragland also has management responsibility of Phase I ESA projects within the Due Diligence Group (DOG) at Terracon. Duties include oversight of projects, assignment of projects, technical review of client deliverables, supervision of DOG members, and training of Phase I ESA personnel. Ms. Ragland has also served as Acting Group Manager of the AFFILIATIONS society of Wetland Scientists DOG on several occasions.
PROFESSIONAL DUTIES WORK HISTORY
- Phase I ESAs Terracon, EnvironmentalScientist, Conducted and managed over 300 Phase I ESAs for 9 years throughout 1998-present the continental US, including undeveloped land, communications towers, University of Kansas, Research multi-family residential structures, large-scale commercial developments, Assistant, 1994-1998 gasoline refueling stations, automobile repair facilities, industrial sites, University of Minnesota, Graduate printing facilities, dry cleaners, agricultural cooperative facilities, and US Research Assistant, 1993-1994 Postal Service Offices. Oklahoma State University, Laboratory Technician, 1992-1993
- Wetland Delineations Conducts and manages wetland delineations and wetland permitting projects in KS and MO, including: coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and report preparation for Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory permitting. Delineated sites from 1 to 8,000 acres. ADDITIONAL COURSES Responsible for onsite wetland delineations utilizing mandatory technical Wetland Construction and criteria and field indicators established by the USACE and, when Restoration, Wetland Training Institute, 2001 necessary, by the USDA (National Food Security Act Manual and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the US). Wetland Plant Identification, Biotic Consuitants, Inc., 2000
- Asbestos Inspections and Sampling Basic Processesin Hydfic Soils, In conjunction with Phase I ESAs, conducts limited asbestos inspections North CarolinaState University, 2O000 and sampling of properties ranging from multi-family residential 38-HourArmy Corps of Engineers structures and commercial developments to heavy industrial sites in KS Wetland Delineation &
and MO. Management Training Program, RichardChinn Environmental
- NEPA ReviewslEnvironmental Assessment (EA) Training, Inc., 1998 Conducted NEPA Reviews for existing and proposed communications towers and a fiber optic cable corridor, including an EA for a proposed marina at a USACE lake. Responsible for field work, contact with federal, state, and local government agencies, coordination of Cultural Resource Investigation for historical preservation clearance, and production of client 2/07
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
deliverables.
Conducted and managed LSIs including a PA/SI on a former government WWII facility. Responsibilities included preparation of work scopes, collection of soil and groundwater samples, preparation of samples for shipment to a laboratory for analysis, interpretation of analytical results, and preparation of client deliverables.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Phase I ESAs
- Falley's Food Stores - KS and MO (Associated Wholesale Grocers-Kansas City, KS)
Coordinated research database and historical records procurement, technical report editing, scheduling and/or performing field work, and assisting with report preparation for 25 Falley's Food stores.
- Pizza Hut - Southeastern US (National Pizza Company International, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
Coordinated and managed field work, technical report review and editing, and client deliverable production for 47 Pizza Hut facilities located across the southeastem US in 10 business days.
- Montezuma Wind Farm - Montezuma, KS (Snyder and Associates, lnc.-Atlantic, IA)
Conducted field work, including a low-altitude aerial reconnaissance, and report preparation for a proposed windmill energy generating facility located on 8,000 acres of farmland in westem KS.
- Industrial Warehouses - Kansas City, MO and KS (Block Income Fund I, L.P.-Kansas City, MO)
A portfolio of 5 industrial warehouses containing multiple tenants totaling 390,000sf.
- Martin Tractor Company - Topeka, KS (Martin Tractor Company-Topeka, KS)
A large-scale truck maintenance/service and parts testing and rebuilding facility, totaling 166,000sf, with numerous aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), an oil burner, mud trap, paint room, former underground storage tanks (USTs), and multiple waste streams.
- Plastic Packaging Technologies - Kansas City, KS (Stonehenge Partners, Inc.-Columbus, OH)
A 65,000sf facility associated with the production, printing, and distribution of roll stack packaging and plastic bags, with flexigraphic wide-web printing, solvent-less lamination operations, and a volatile organic compound emissions burner.
- Mize Road - Lenexa, KS (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.-Lenexa, KS)
Proposed expansion and improvement of 1.5 to 2 miles of Mize Road and West 79th Street in Lenexa, KS.
- Sovereign Business Forms - Girard, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)
An 80,000sf facility associated with the printing, packaging, warehousing, and distribution of custom business forms, including the production of metal photo plates from film and negatives.
- White Lakes Center - Topeka, KS (LaSalle Bank National Association-Chicago, IL)
A retail facility consisting of a 414,582sf mall, an 8,141sf former Penny's Automotive Service Center, a 2,750sf Burger King restaurant, and associated parking and drives.
- Plant Property - St. Joseph, MO (Premium Pork, LLC-Lenexa, KS)
A 60-acre tract consisting of a chemical storage warehouse (former meat packing facility); pallet manufacturing company; truck maintenance facility and empty dumpster storage; vacant grass-covered land; farmland; and dilapidated hog pens.
- Farmers Coop Sites - KS (Farmers Cooperative Association-Lawrence, KS) 7 Farmers Coop facilities in northeast KS which included: liquid/dry fertilizer plants, grain storage elevators, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, tire shops, feed mills, storage yards, bulk fuel storage AST facilities, a retail store, and filling station.
2 2/07
RAGLAND, TRACIE A.
- Agricultural Chemical Facilities - KS and MO (United Agri Products-Greeley, CO) 15 agricultural chemical blending facilities in north central KS and northwest MO which included liquid/dry fertilizer plants, anhydrous ammonia distribution facilities, offices, and maintenance shops.
- Proposed County Buildings - Olathe, KS (Johnson County, KS-Olathe, KS) 5 city blocks in downtown Olathe, KS including parking areas and multiple commercial, government, and residential structures with extensive historical background.
Brownflelds Revitalization Act Phase I ESAs
- Former St. Joseph Power & Light Company - St. Joseph, MO (Heartland Foundation-St. Joseph, MO) 40,000sf general commodities warehouse facility.
- Former Junction City Foundry Property - Junction City, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 41 acres consisting of a 106,000sf former electric heavy iron foundry structure, a vacant 1-story office building, an abandoned 2-story farmhouse, and outbuildings.
- EBA Building - Topeka, KS (Kansas Department of Health and Environment-Topeka, KS) 2 acres consisting of a 60,000sf three-story medical office building and parking area.
- 312 South Second Street - Atchison, KS (City of Atchison-Atchison, KS) 1.2-acre metals and plastics salvage yard.
- Former Frisco Laboratory Building - Springfield, MO (City of Springfield-Springfield, MO) 15,000sf former railroad laboratory testing facility.
Limited Site InvestigatlonslpA/Sl
- Hardesty Federal Complex - Kansas City, MO (US General Services Administration-Kansas City, MO)
Conducted PA and SI under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), including soil and groundwater analyses and lead sampling, at 7 structures on 18 acres, including a former clothing chemical pretreatment facility and indoor firing range. PNSI reports reviewed and approved by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources.
- USA Detergents - Harrisonville, MO (Pinnacle Capital Group-Philadelphia, PA)
Conducted groundwater and soil sampling near an abandoned UST. Conducted outfall sampling to establish baseline analytical data for use in the application of a wastewater/storm water discharge permit.
- Commercial Retail Redevelopment - Overland Park, KS (Continental Consulting Engineers, Inc.-
Leawood, KS)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from surrounding former dry-cleaning and printing/photography facilities.
- Night Club and Office Space - Kansas City, MO (MC Real Estate Services, Inc.-Kansas City, MO)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite gasoline tanks and surrounding former dry-cleaning, spray painting/auto repair, and filling station facilities.
- Proposed Aldi - Lee's Summit, MO (Aldi, Inc.-Olathe, KS)
Conducted an LSI regarding potential impact from former onsite towing/maintenance activities.
2/07
htlp://www.¢pa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/ancl.html#MISSOURl l Currently Designated Nonattainment Areas for All Criteria Pollutants...htp/wweag/oraqsgenknlhm#MSO State, County, Pollutant,
- Part County NMA, NMA Area Name - Classification Standard MISSOURI Franklin Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment Jefferson Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate Lead
- Jefferson County (part); Herculaneum, MO -
PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment St Charles Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment St Louis 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment St Louis Co 8-Hr Ozone St Louis, MO-IL - Moderate PM-2.5 1997 St. Louis, MO-IL - Nonattainment 1 ofl 1 of I111312010 10:48 AM
WIND ROSE PLOT:
Columbia South Farms, MO Wind Speed Direction (blowing from)
MU E~xten~inn Cnmmerdial Aarlculture Weather Station
- '!NORTH --
t
". 15%~
\
// i
""., 12%"'
S_L__
9%N\\
N a
" ' \
/t //
/
a a -I a
N N
N --I SEAST I
/
/I
/I I
/
/
WIND SPEED (mph)
U>= 20.0 U15.0 -20.0 U10,0 -150
- - - -SOUTH --
LI5.0 -10.0 U1.0- 5.0 Calms: 0.00%
COMMENTS: DATA PERIOD:
Based on hourly average wind 2000-2006 speed and direction from the Jan 1 - Dec 31 _____________
MU Ag Weather Station 00:00 - 23:00 at Columbia South Farms (measured at 3 meters) UNIVESITY* OF MISSOURI CALM WINDS (less than 1 mph): TOTAL COUNT:
0.00% 61367 hrs.
AVG. WIND SPEED: DATE:
6.97 mph 319/2007 WRPLOT View - Lakes Enviromental Software
'iIr... .,,,
March 14, 2011 ll1mM I ~ImI=, l I Mr. John V. Huss Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Consulting Engineers 1901 Pennsylvania Drive Columbia, MO 65202 Re: Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 65201 Terracon Project No. 091 17701
Dear Mr. Huss:
Terracon is pleased to submit the Wetland Delineation Report for the above referenced project.
Based on the results of the delineation, 0.05 acre of suspect wetlands, 350 lineal feet of suspect drainageways and 0.01 acre of suspect upland depression was observed on the project site.
A cover letter addressed to the Kansas City District has been included with the enclosed report; however, a copy of this report has not been provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) by Terracon. A copy of the Wetland Delineation Report and attached letter should be submitted to the USACE for review and concurrence. The USACE can be reached at the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers - Kansas City District Missouri State Regulatory Office 221 Bolivar Street, Suite 103 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Terracon would be pleased to assist you in preparation of the Section 404 Permit Application and any wetland or WUS mitigation plans that may be required by the USACE if wetland or WUS impacts are proposed. Terracon appreciates the opportunity to have worked for you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the content of this report, please contact us at 314-692-8811.
Sincerely, TERRACON Consultants, Inc.
Lauren StrangeI Project Scientist Natural Resources Manager Terracon Consultants, Inc. 600 SW 7zh Street. Suite #, Des Moines, Iowa 50309 P [515] 244-3184 F [515] 244-5249 terracon corn S I
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge March 14, 2011 Terracon Project No. 09117701 Prepared for:
Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Columbia, Missouri Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
St. Louis, Missouri
[il*lli{r~ilnfr¢]l Irl, l l l lll lll* il~jl[~ iilr~iM[~m *li~J lrlilU]
Mrh12011 IFerracon Mr. Jim Ptacek US Army Corps of Engineers - Kansas City District Missouri State Regulatory Office 221 Bolivar Street, Suite 103 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Re: Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge Columbia, Boone County, Missouri Terracon Project No. 09117701 Dear Mr. Ptacek Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to submit the Wetland Delineation Report prepared for Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. Consulting Engineers (THH). This report describes the technical criteria, field indicators, and other sources of information used to identify and delineate wetlands and other waterbodies. Based on the results of the delineation, approximately 0.05 acre of suspect wetlands, 350 lineal feet of suspect drainageways and 0.01 acre of suspect upland depression was observed on the project site. At this time, we are requesting that you perform a Jurisdictional Determination for the project and advise our client if a permit will be required for any future impacts.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Lauren at (314) 692-8811 or by e-mail at lestrange2@terracon.com.
Sincerely, TERRACON Consultants, Inc.
Lauren Strange ( allero Project Scientist Natural Resources Manager Copies to: Mr. John V. Huss Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Consulting Engineers 1901 Pennsylvania Drive Columbia, MO 65202 rerrecon Consultants, Inc. 11600 Lilburn Park Road St. Louis, Missouri 63146 P [314] 692-8811 F [3141692-8810 terracon~corn I , I I
TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................................................... I 3.0 PRELIMINARY DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS.................................... 2 3.1 Topographic Map............................................................................. 2 3.2 National Wetland Inventory Map............................................................. 2 3.3 Soil Survey .................................................................................... 2 3.4 Aerial Imagery ................................................................................ 3 4.0 FIELD TECHNIQUES ........................................................................ 3 4.1 Plant Community Assessment............................................................... 3 4.2 Hydric Soils Assessment..................................................................... 4 4.3 Wetland Hydrology Assessment............................................................. 5 4.4 Classification of Wetlands ................................................................... 5 4.5 WUS Observations ........................................................................... 5 5.0 FIELD OBSERVATIONS RESULTS........................................................ 6 5.1I Wetlands ...................................................................................... 6 5.3 Suspect Drainageways....................................................................... 8 6.0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS ........................ 9 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 11 8.0
GENERAL COMMENT
S..................................................................... 12 APPENDIX A- EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Topographic Site Map Exhibit 2 - National Wetland Inventory Map Exhibit 3 - Soil Survey Map Exhibit 4 - Wetland Delineation Map APPENDIX B - HISTORIC AERIAL IMAGERY APPENDIX C - WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS APPENDIX D - GROUND PHOTOGRAPHS
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Discovery Ridge Columbia, Missouri Terracon Project No. 09117701 March 14, 2011
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) was retained by Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
Consulting Engineers (THH) to perform a wetland delineation for the Discovery Ridge site, hereafter referred to as the project site. The project site is located north of Highway 63, south of Roosevelt Avenue and along portions of South Lenoir and East Gans Road in Columbia, Boone County, Missouri. The site is located in portions of Sections 32 and 33, Township 48 North, Range 12 West, as depicted on Exhibit 1 in Appendix A.
The wetland delineation for the project site was completed for 15 lots (approximately 115 acres) scheduled for development activity. The project area consists primarily as agricultural fields, livestock pasture, manicured lawn and grassland areas. The site is located adjacent to a highway, residential property and agricultural land.
The purpose of performing the wetland delineation was to determine if wetlands or jurisdictional waters are present on the project site and, if so, to identify the boundaries. The wetland delineation was performed in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2008 Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. According to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) guidelines, wetlands generally have three essential characteristics: hydrophytic (wetland) vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology.
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Terracon performed the following scope of work:
- Reviewed topographical, National Wetland Inventory and aerial photograph resources to assist with identifying suspect Waters of the United States (WUS) and wetland areas at the subject site.
- Mobilized to the site to conduct the wetland delineation.
- Prepared a wetland delineation map showing WUS and wetland areas identified during the site visit, if any.
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1rra o March 14, 2011 ,, Terracon Project: 09107045
- Completed a Wetland Delineation Report that included delineation rationale, a discussion of applicable data, and recommendations for the site.
3.0 PRELIMINARY DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS Prior to performing the delineation, several map and aerial photograph resources were reviewed to assist with identifying WUS and wetland areas at the subject site. Each source of data is described in detail below.
3.1 Topographic Map The United States Department of the Interior Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5-Minute Topographic Map of the subject site was reviewed to identify drainages or WUS within the project area. A portion of the Columbia, Missouri Quadrangle can be seen as Exhibit I in Appendix A. USGS maps appear to show one blue-line tributary and three ponds on the project site.
3.2 National Wetland Inventory Map The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map of the subject site was reviewed to identify potential wetland areas. The map for the subject site was published by the U.S. Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service and depicts probable wetland areas based on stereoscopic analysis of high altitude aerial imagery. The review of the NWl map depicts two freshwater ponds (NWI code: PUBGh) on the project site, however no wetland areas are indicated. The NWl map data for the project site can be seen as Exhibit 2 in Exhibit A.
3.3 Soil Survey Data from the soil survey of Boone County, Missouri was reviewed to identify soil types, including hydric soils. As previously indicated, hydric soil is one of the three essential characteristics of a wetland according to the USACE. Data for the soil survey was compiled by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and correlated by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Data from the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database was digitized in 2008 and adapted for this report from the Center of Applied Research and Environmental Systems (CARES). Soil descriptions were adapted from the Soil Survey of Boone County. A soil survey map is included as Exhibit 3 in Appendix A.
The following soil types were identified within the project area on the soil survey map:
- Armstrong loam, 5-9% slopes, eroded (50001): Armstrong loam consists of somewhat poorly drained soil formed in loess over till located on Upland hills under grass/herbaceous cover and tame pastureland. Armstrong loam is listed on both the National and Boone County hydric soils list.
Reliable [] Responsive [] Convenient *] Innovative2 2
DiscoveryDelineation Wetland Ridge
- Columbia, Report Boone County, Missouri 1 rerrBEn a o March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045
- Mexico-urban land complex, 0-2% slopes (50005): Mexico-urban land complex consists of poorly drained soils located on hills. Mexico-urban land complex is listed on both the National and Boone County hydric soils list.
- Vanmeter clay loam, 5-14% slopes (50006): Vanmeter clay loam consists of moderately well drained soils formed in loess residuum weathered from clay shale located on upland hills under tree cover and hardwoods. Vanmeter clay loam is not classified as hydric.
- Leonard silt loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded (60022): Leonard silt loam consists of poorly drained soil formed in fine-silty loess over till located on ridges and uplands under grass/herbaceous cover and tame pastureland. Leonard silt loam is listed on both the National and Boone County hydric soils list.
3.4 Aerial Imagery Terracon reviewed aerial imagery to review suspect wetland areas that may be present on the project site. Aerial imagery was available for 1995, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2009. Review of the aerial imagery show the removal of one pond within the onsite area labeled "Lot 2".
Additionally, a blue-line tributary, as shown on topographical resources, appears to have previously been altered and is now located outside of the project site boundaries. Current aerial images show drainage occurring to the west and southwest of where the original blue-line tributary was located. For reference, historic aerial imagery is included as Appendix B.
4.0 FIELD TECHNIQUES Terracon personnel conducted a reconnaissance of lots 2, 5 and 9-15 on January 19, 2011 and of lots 6, 7 and 16-18 on February 18, 2011 to observe for the presence of potential wetland characteristics and jurisdictional waters. Characteristics of potential jurisdictional waters and wetland areas were assessed utilizing the criteria detailed in sections 4.1 through 4.5 of this report. The evaluation methods generally followed the routine on-site determination method referenced in the 1987 USACE Manual and 2008 Midwest Supplement.
Onsite wetland areas were not indicated in the NWl maps; however, several suspect areas were selected within the project area to explore for potential wetland properties. Vegetation, soils and hydrology were evaluated within each suspect area to determine if wetland characteristics were present.
4.1 Plant Community Assessment Suspect areas were visually observed to determine the species, when possible, and absolute percentage of ground cover for four stratum of plant community types. Herbs were generally observed within a five-foot radius, shrubs/saplings within a fifteen-foot radius, and trees and vines within a thirty-foot radius of the observation location.
Reliable u Responsive u Convenient
- Innovative3 3
Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri Wetland Delineation Report 1r*ra a March 14, 2011 mTerracon Project: 09107045 For each species of vegetation observed, their wetland indicator status was evaluated.
Indicator status was determined using the NRCS Plants Database. Indicator categories for vegetation are presented below:
- Obligate Wetland (OBL) - occur almost always (estimated probability greater than 99%) under natural conditions in wetlands.
- Facultative Wetland (FACW) - usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67% -
99%) but occasionally found in non-wetlands.
- Facultative (FAC) - equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability 34% - 66%).
- Facultative U pland (FACU) - usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probability 67% - 99%) but occasionally found in wetlands.
- Obligate Upland (UPL) - rarely occur in wetlands, but occur almost always (estimated probability greater than 99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands.
The percent cover of each stratum was determined and dominance was evaluated. Dominant species were the most abundant species that accounted for more than 20 percent of the absolute percent coverage of the stratum. The number of dominant species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC was compared to the total number of dominant species across all strata. Typically, when more than 50 percent of the dominant species had an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC, hydrophytic vegetation was present.
If the percentage of dominant species with an indicator Status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC was less than 50 percent, prevalence index and morphological adaptations may have been evaluated to confirm if hydrophytic vegetation was present or absent.
4.2 Hydric Soils Assessment After Terracon evaluated wetland vegetation, subsurface soil samples were collected using a soil probe. The samples were collected to a depth of approximately 15 inches below ground surface and were visually compared to Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell, 1994), which aided in the evaluation of hydric soil characteristics. The soil samples were further examined for hydric soil indicators including, but not limited to, histosol, thick dark surface, sandy gleyed matrix, sandy redox, loamy gleyed matrix, redox dark surface, and/or redox depressions. If these or other hydric soil indicators were observed in the subsurface soil sample, the observation location was considered to have hydric soil.
Reliable
- Responsive u Convenient
- Innovative4 4
Wetland DiscoveryDelineation Report Boone County, Missouri Ridge
- Columbia, 1 rerra-. omn March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 4.3 Wetland Hydrology Assessment Visual indicators of wetland hydrology were evaluated. Examples of primary wetland hydrology indicators include, but are not limited to, surface water, high water table, soil saturation, water marks, sediment deposits, drift deposits, iron deposits, inundation visible on aerial imagery, sparsely vegetated concave surface, and water-stained leaves. If at least one primary or two secondary indicators were observed, the observation location was considered to have wetland hydrology.
4.4 Classification of Wetlands Upon completion of the review of the three wetland criteria at each area, a wetland determination was made. Under normal circumstances, if one or more of the wetland criteria were not identified, the area was not considered to be a wetland. If all three wetland indicators were identified, the area was classified as wetland. Additional observations were made throughout the wetland area to define the wetland/non-wetland boundary, which was mapped with GPS technology or flagged and surveyed by traditional methods. Vegetation, soil and hydrology assessment data from at least one location within the wetland and one upland location outside of the wetland were recorded on a USACE Wetland Determination Form. The recorded data forms for the subject site can be found in Appendix C and data point locations can be seen on Exhibit 4 in Appendix A.
4.5 WUS Observations Terracon also made observations of site features that may be considered a jurisdictional waterbody. If a potential jurisdictional waterbody was identified, observations regarding its characteristics were recorded. Potential jurisdictional waterbodies were evaluated based on the observation of the following characteristics:
- Flow Characteristics:
o Perennial: contains water at all times except during extreme drought.
o Intermittent: carries water a considerable portion of the time, but ceases to flow occasionally or seasonally.
o Ephemeral: carries water only during and immediately after periods of rainfall or snowmelt.
- Ordinary High Water Mark: The limit line on the shore established by the fluctuation of the water surface. It is shown by such things as a clear line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in soil character, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris or other features influenced by the surrounding area.
- Bank Shape Descriptions:
o Undercut: banks that overhang the stream channel o Steep: bank slope of approximately greater than 30 degrees Reliable
- Responsive
- Convenient
- Innovative5 5
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge u Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1Ferraton March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 o Gradual: bank slope of approximately 30 degrees or less
- Aquatic Habitat Descriptions:
o Pool: deeper portion of a stream where water flows slower than in neighboring, shallower portions, smooth surface, and finer substrate o Riffle: shallow area in a stream where water flows swiftly over gravel and rock or other coarse substrate resulting in a rough flow and a turbulent surface o Run: section of a stream with a low or high velocity and with little or no turbulence on the surface of the water.
5.0 FIELD OBSERVATIONS RESULTS On January 19, 2011 and February 18, 2011, Terracon performed field observations and identified two suspect wetland areas and one suspect drainageway within the project site.
Locations of these onsite features are illustrated on Exhibit 4 in Appendix C. Ground photographs, included in Appendix D, provide an indication of the physical characteristics observed during the site visit. Descriptions of the evaluated areas are listed in the following sections.
5.1 Wetlands Wetland Area Description ID WL-A Size .01 acres Sampling Point(s) DP-1, DP-3 Association w/ WUS The suspect wetland area does not appear to be associated with a WUS.
Wetland Description Depression adjacent to existing road NWl Map Not indicated on NWI Map Cowardin Classification None Wetland Type Emergent Vegetative Cover Evenly mixed with non-vegetated, sparse Common Name Scientific Name WL Indicator Weln eeainCommon cattail Typha latifolia OBL Hydrogeomorphic Class Depression Soil Type (soil survey) Armstrong loam, 5-9% slopes, eroded Soil Type (field obs.) Silty clay Soil Characteristics Redox depressions Hydrology Characteristics Surface water, saturation visible on aerial photography Hydrology Source Surface water Other Information Non-Wetland (Upland) Description Data Point s) DP-2, DP-4 Reliable [] Responsive u] Convenient,[innovative6 6
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1Ferracan March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 Wetland Area Description ID WL- A Habitat Type I Grassland Was there a marked difference between the wetland Yes. Wetland area exhibits different vegetative and upland species and exhibits standing water.
Was there a gradual change in vegetation between Abrupt change from upland species to wetland the wetland and upland creating a "transition zone" species - wetland vegetation lines interior of wetland area Was there an abrupt topographic change between Slight topographic change; wetland area is located the wetland and upland in depressions at intersection of moderately sloping hillside and asphalt roadway.
Wetland Area Description ID WL- B Size .04 acres Sampling Point(s) DP-1, DP-3, DP-5, The wetland area appears to have a connection to an offsite lake. The offsite Association w/ WUS lake appears to have an outlet connection to a tributary of Gans Creek.
Therefore, this wetland area may be connected to as WUS.
Wetland Description Linear depression NWI Map Not indicated on NWI Map Cowardin Classification None Wetland Type Emergent, linear Vegetative Cover Vegetated throughout extent of wetland area.
Common Name Scientific Name WL Indicator WtadV tYellow nutsedge Cyperus esculentus FACW Weln egetation
- See Section 6.1 of this, report for further comments.
Hydrogeomorphic Class Linear depression Soil Type (soil survey) Leonard silt loam, 2-5% slopes, eroded Soil Type (field obs.) Silty clay Soil Characteristics Redox depressions CHarctristics Vegetated Concave Surface, with standing water Hydroogy SurceHillside runoff and possible overflow from offsite lake.
Non-Wetland (Upland) Description Data Point s) DP-2, DP-4, DP-6 Habitat Type IManicured grassland area, adjacent to agricultural field containing row crops.
Was there a marked difference between the wetland Yes. Wetland area exhibits different vegetative and ulandspecies and exhibits standing water.
Was there a gradual change in vegetation between Yes. Changes in vegetation appeared to be the wetland and upland creating a 'transition zone" gradual.
Was there an abrupt topographic change between Gradual change. Wetland area located at base of the wetland and upland gently sloping hill, within a concave linear area.
Reliable u Responsive
- Convenient.* Innovative7 7
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge a Columbia, Boone County, Missouri irerracon March 14, 2011 a Terracon Project: 09107045 5.3 Suspect Drainageways Suspect Drainage way Description ID SD-1 350 feet (estimated with topographic information, aerial Apprximte engt Oniteimagery and onsite observation)
Name of Water Body Unnamed LocationCentral portion of Lot 10, southwestern portion of project Locationsite WUS Type Natural Some ephemeral characteristics in portions of the Flow Characteristics dangwy Discontinuous OHWM observed throughout length of Ordiary ighWate Mak (OWM) drainageway. Observed height 6 inches to 2 feet.
Discontinuous bed and bank features observed Defied
& ankthroughout Bd length of drainageway.
Channel Width Across OHWM I to 3 feet Channel Width Across Bank Top 1 to 4 feet Channel Width Across Dry Bottom I to 4 feet Water Depth 0-12 inches Water Clarity Cloudy Stream Flow' Slow Bank eightLeft Bank: 6 inches to 3 feet Bank eightRight Bank: 6 inches to 3 feet
% Sloe anksLeft On Bank: Undercut, Steep, Gradual, Eroded Right Bank: Undercut, Steep, Gradual, Eroded Bank Substrate 30 % Gravel/Rock, 10% Sand, 60 % Soil Bed Substrate 90 % Gravel/Rip rap, 10% Soil/Organic Riparian Corridor: 05fe Vegetation: locust, American elm, pin oak, black walnut Wetland Fringe None observed Aquatic Organisms None observed Aquatic Habitat None observed 5.4 Suspect Depression Area Suspect Depression Area Description ID Suspect Depression Area ApproimateArea0.01 acre (estimate with field observations)
Name of Water Body Unnamed depression Location Southwestern portion of project site Reliable a Responsive u Convenient a Innovative8 8
Discovery Ridge u Columbia, Boone County, Missouri Wetland Delineation Report irerral* n n March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 Suspect Depression Area Description ID Suspect Depression Area WUS Type Artificial Observed Inlet or Outlet None observed Riparian Corridor 05fe
__________________________Vegetation: honey locust, pin oak, cedar Wetland Fringe None observed Aquatic Organisms None observed Water Depth Approximately 1-10 inches Bottom of depression lined with approximately 4 inches of Addiiona Remrkssoil/organic matter atop chat/rip rap material.
6.0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS A wetland delineation of approximately 115 acres located north of Highway 63, south of Roosevelt Avenue and along portions of South Lenoir and East Gans Road in Columbia, Boone County, Missouri was conducted on January 19, 2011 and February 18, 2011. A review of the site was conducted utilizing readily available information including, but not limited to, topographical, aerial and wetland data. In addition, site reconnaissance was performed to evaluate the site for potential jurisdictional waters and wetland areas. A summary of field observation and conclusions concerning jurisdictional status is outlined in the following sections.
6.1 Wetland Area Section 4.0 of this report details the procedures used to identify wetlands on the project site. In accordance with the field procedures described in this report, numerous onsite areas were observed for wetland characteristics. Although the NWI map does not indicate wetland features as existing onsite, aerial photos and topographical maps indicate areas that may display wetland characteristics. It was concluded during site reconnaissance that two of those areas contain wetland characteristics. The following table summarizes the size of the delineated suspect wetland within the project site.
Wetland Area (acre)
WL-A .01 WL-B .04 Total .05 Wetland Area A exists as an isolated depression located adjacent to an existing roadway. The area exhibits all requirements for wetland classification; however it does not appear to be associated with a WUS. Hydrology appears to occur from hillside runoff and the wetland area Reliable
- Responsive u Convenient
- Innovative9 9
Wetland Delineation Report Discovery Ridge
- Columbia, Boone County, Missouri 1rra u March 14, 2011 . Terracon Project: 09107045 may be a result from improper drainage at its intersection with the existing roadway. Due primarily to its isolated setting, it is Terracon's opinion that this wetland area would not be considered jurisdictional.
Wetland Area B exists as a linear depression located adjacent to an offsite lake. No inlet was observed for the offsite lake; however, the lake appears to have an outlet through underground piping, eventually draining into an offsite, channelized tributary to Gans Creek. Wetland Area B exhibits soil and hydrological requirements for wetland classification. Due to the time of year this delineation was conducted, accurate identification of several of the plants within, and surrounding, the wetland area was not possible. Additionally, the area surrounding Wetland Area B appears to have been mowed prior to field reconnaissance, further reducing accurate plant identification. One sedge species (FACW) was observed and identified within Wetland Area B. It is Terracon's opinion that Wetland Area B may be jurisdictional, primarily due to the presence of wetland characteristics and its association with an offsite lake that appears to have an outlet connection to a tributary of Gans Creek.
6.2 Suspect Drainageway Though not indicated as blue lines on USGS topographical maps, one suspect drainageway was observed for jurisdictional characteristics during site reconnaissance activities. The following table summarizes the approximate length of the suspect drainageway, based on topographic information, onsite GPS data and aerial imagery estimations.
Suspect Drainageway (Linear Feet)
ISD-I 350 Total 350 The suspect drainageway displays discontinuous bed and bank features and/or ordinary high water marks for approximately 350 linear feet. After approximately 350 linear feet of discontinuous features, the drainage loses definition and appears to turn into an unchanneled area with overland flow. Up to 12 inches of water was observed within the banks of this drainageway; however, site reconnaissance was performed following a significant amount of rain and snow melt and observed water depths may have primarily been due to runoff. A majority of the drainageway appears to have been previously lined with riprap. Based on observations of the physical characteristics of the drainageway, it was concluded and is Terracon's opinion that this suspect drainageway would not be classified as jurisdictional.
6.3 Ponds and Suspect Depressed Area The NWI map indicates two ponds within the project site. Field observations led to the conclusion that neither of these ponds are still in existence. Based on a review of aerial Reliable u Responsive u Convenient u Innovative 10
Wetland DiscoveryDelineation Report Boone County, Missouri Ridge
- Columbia, 1rrr cu March 14, 2011 . Terracon Project: 09107045 imagery, it appears that the larger of the two ponds, formerly located in Lot 2, was filled sometime between August 2007 and August 2009. A smaller pond, formerly located in Lot 5, is present in the most recent aerial image reviewed (2009); however, a pond was not observed in that location during field reconnaissance.
A suspect depressed area (approximately 0.01 acres) was located within the project site. This area does not exhibit the general characteristics of an upland pond, nor did it fulfill wetland requirements. Soil samples taken around the depressed area did not prove to be hydric, while soil samples taken within the area were impeded by a layer of rip rap/chat approximately four to six inches below the surface. Soil samples observed from the top four to six inches were not found to be hydric. The area was observed as holding approximately 4 to 6 inches of water; however, no inlet or outlet was observed. The area did not appear to be associated with a WUS. Due to its isolated location and lack of association with a WUS, it is Terracon's opinion that the suspect depressed area would not be classified as jurisdictional.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS According to survey results, approximately 0.05 acre of suspect wetlands, 350 lineal feet of a suspect drainageway, and 0.01 acres of an upland depression were identified on the project site.
If future development of the project site does not avoid impacts to Wetland Area A, the suspect drainageway, and upland depressed area, it is Terracon's opinion that these features would be considered upland/isolated and/or not under the jurisdiction of the USACE. However, for all onsite areas, only the USACE can make the final determination on the jurisdictional status of wetlands or waterbodies, and on the need for permit processing and compensatory mitigation.
If future development of the project site does not avoid impacts to Wetland Area B, it is Terracon's opinion that this feature may be under the jurisdiction of the USACE. This opinion is primarily based on Wetland Area B's association with an offsite lake which appears to have an outlet connection to a tributary of Gans Creek. Furthermore the area exhibits wetland characteristics including hydrological indicators, hydric soils, and at least one hydrophytic plant species. If further verification for the wetland area is needed, Terracon recommends returning to the site during the growing season for an accurate evaluation of the plant community within Wetland Area B. Only the USACE can make the final determination on the jurisdictional status of wetlands or waterbodies, and on the need for permit processing and compensatory mitigation.
If impacts are proposed to any of the aforementioned wetlands or waterbodies, the USACE should be consulted to determine if a Section 404 Permit will be required for the project.
Terracon recommends a copy of this report be submitted to the USACE for their final Reliable
- Responsive
- Convenient u Innovative 1 11
Wetland Ridge
- Columbia, DiscoveryDelineation Report Boone County, Missouri March 14, 2011
- Terracon Project: 09107045 1! rerracon determination of potential jurisdictional waters on the site and required USACE permitting and mitigation (if any) for potential impacts to these waters. The USACE can be reached at the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers - Kansas City District Missouri State Regulatory Office 221 Bolivar Street, Suite 103 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 8.0
GENERAL COMMENT
S The wetland delineation was performed using the USACE Manual and Midwest Supplement.
The manual provides assistance for delineating wetlands based on the three criteria discussed.
However, the manual alone may not have provided enough information to document whether or not the three criteria were met. Various physical properties or other visual signs used to evaluate whether the three wetland identification criteria areas were satisfied may not be straightforward, especially in disturbed or problem areas. The manual also allows the user to visually estimate certain indicators such as the percentage of area covered by dominant species for the entire community. Terracon did not attempt to identify every possible plant species and did not classify soil type by laboratory methods. Due to seasonal changes, Terracon cannot guarantee the area to exhibit or not to exhibit wetland characteristics at all times of the year. The limitations of this wetland delineation should be recognized.
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted scientific and engineering evaluation practices. This report is for the exclusive use of the client for the project being discussed. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are intended or made.
Reliable
- Responsive
- Convenient
- Innovative 12
APPENDIX A Exhibits
.- -- _k* ,---- - , * * \
"-, /7 !i ,t *
- i H 9 t.i j:i /( " . "r !* '- (K *'- "
0 i" j
- y6~t
~po1~
- ~-t ~':;K
- K/'J1* ~
-~--_-__-<a-hY
~
- \~1 //r P> -- < \4/ .--
~ h ,.-?" ":',m -. ... " . '_, , -
N. </ I.N.. ),:-
~ 'I' I
- K e / "*~*~N~
,- ~-
i.
U
- ~---,,
-1 9 LEGEND
-Approximate Site Boundary Adapted from USGS Quadrangle Columbia, 1981 WETLAND DELINEATION Consulting Er~nne andSie st DISCOVERY RIDGE TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
I11403IJER PARK ROf T LOUIS, ST. WM 34 MO *31*
Approximate Site Boundary Freshwater Pond Lake 0 800 Feet Freshwater Forested / Shrub Wi etland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Adapted from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands Mapper.
ihd~ - dw ulEngineers ting Consul*Whn and Scienbtits DISCOVMERY RIDGE2 l'@L tiA~iOD ST.LOWS,MO 1TRAUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, IC
.JCV Jl' 03J07/2011 PtalU4tFAX.(3lMO45t51 COLUMBIA MISSOR ___
LEGEND - Approximate Site Boundary
- ] 50001 Armstrong loam, 5-9%, eroded [] 50059 Mexico silt loam, 1-4% slopes, eroded
[] 50005 Mexico-urban land complex,0-2% slopes El 60022 Leonard silt loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded El 50006 Vanmeter clay loam, 5-14% slopes *] Water
[;n Adapted from the Center for Applied Research and Environmental Systems (CARES) mapping application, Soils 2008 layer.
7701 e o ... SOIL SURVEY MAP EXHIBIT 20O1 nsuligEngineeus n Sientist Coo EIETO DISOERYLIDGE~l MISOR 3ELN Coslin ninesan cenitwDSOERgIG flOLL4R pceoRKR) sT.wLUIa,uMO i*, TRABUE. HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
/2011 P*l3424*.1t ,FAX.3*l2145I COLUMBIA MSOR
Approximately 0.01 acres I ~
Approximately 0.04 acres *o Suspec Depression Are o
- 4) m oIo00ace
APPENDIX B Historical Aerial Imagery
LEGEND Approximate Site Boundary
- 80Feet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial imagery.
U' IF 11~~**~*~
Pjey LES I HISTORIC AERIAL: 1995 LES RkN.
I-=800cConsulting Engineers o1 s=P*091177°I and Scientists WETLAND DELINEATIONI DISCOVERY RIDGE JCV Dlec 1IU5LL5IRPNS(ROADI .TO0I1110 13146 TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, 1NC.
03/07I2011 At 1341513111 FAX0141 52-315 COLUMBIA
- t " " ,,
SApproximate Site Boundary
'*F LEGEND 80 eet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial images.
[J*] .EIWETLAND DELNEATIONj Ou B CV R [I i Conisu ringEnigineers and Scientists DISCOVERY RIDGE
- *u*PR* sru. *TRABUE, HANSEN & HINSHAW, INC.
__ CV__ , 03107/2011 P (=l4)
U2.'U FAX(14) *Ut0 COLUMIA MISSOURIJ_ __
-U LEGEND Approximate Site Boundary O fr 800 Feet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial images.
- IE 'V El El -
0g117?01 HISTORIC AERIAL: 2005 LES WETLAND DELINEATION Consulting Engineers and Scientists DISCOVERY RIDGE Jcv 11tj*a*wpAI6(ftOA ST.tLOUgg, MO63146 TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
JLV 03107/2011 MI p34) 46.3t 13t41463610 Cl .......
FAYZ I.
LEGEND Approx mate S te Boundary 1
Adapted from the Google Earth hlstonc aerial Images.
HISTORIC AERIAL: 2006 ] EXHIBIl Terracon WETLAND DEUNEATION I Uue4 ting Consu PMIXEng ROAD LouisMO neem and ST Scents s63 DISCOVERY TRASUE, RIDGE INC.
HANSEN & HINSHAW, I __
EXH'B'7 LEGEND
/m*PNtK Approximate Consulting 111i00 rr*I*11--
Engineers ROAD LILBUI* andSite
- -m Boundary ST.LOUIS, Scientists MOU14 DISCOVERY TRABUE, H'STOR'CwETLAND HANSEN RIDGE Adapted AER'ALDEUNEAT*2006
& HINSHAW, INC. ,'.,
LEGEND SApproximate Site Boundary 0 i* 800 Feet Adapted from the Google Earth historic aerial images.
- LES P~~r o~irnoi170 ak l HISTORIC AERIAL: 2007 EXHIBIT oU*=== EFr-ICUI WETLAND DEUNEATION Cmd l Consultng Engineers and Scientists DISCOVERY RIDGE ,
- ,d 10ULJU
- O m m.*OU TRABUE, HAN*SEN
&HINSHAW, INC.
JCV 03R7/2011 PH() I*X(4 m.al OLUMBIA MISSOURI ___
LEGEND
- =Approximate
.. Site Boundary
- 80Feet Adapted from thle Google Earth historic aeiial images.
OwMS Fis e Consultng EngineerX and Scienbtast DISCOVERY RIDGE
= t m oUUN wO aTt.OS LoE O 83t46 TRABUE, HANSEN &HINSHAW, INC.
JCV 03/07/2011 m.{14ulel FAX(3t4) 2,lO COLUMBIA MISSOURI
APPENDIX C Wetland Determination Data Forms
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Boone County Columbia! Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: DP-1 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): _____Lat: 38.896433 Long: -92.275639 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (ifneeded, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStraum DB >"(Plt sie: 3 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrset Tre DH Statu >"(lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiacTetWrse:
1 _____ _____Number of Dominant Species that 2 ________are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 ___________ _____Across All Strata (B):
5 _____Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (AIB):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______________ Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
2 ____________OBL species 90 Xl1 90 3 _______ ___FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _________ ____FAC species 10 X3 30 5 _________ ____FACU species 0 X4 0 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species 0 X5 0 Totals (A) 100 (B) 120 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index --B/A = 1.2 1 Typha latifolia 90 Y OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Festuca spp 10 N FAC ___Dominance Test is > 50%
3 _____ X Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 _____ __Morphological Adaptations 6 _____(Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 _____ __Problematic Hydrophytic 9 ____Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 _____ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 ______hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum Ž 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________I_____Hydrophytic 2 __________I_____ Vegetation Yes X No 1 __________JPresent?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover =Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Describtion: (Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % TypeI Loc2 Texture 0-6 10YR 5/2 80 7.5YR 6/8 20 C M SiCI 8-15 10YR 5/2 95 7.5YR 6/8 5 D M SiCI 1
T~yp:C=Concentration, D--Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) ___ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
- Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___Black Histic (A3) ___ Stripped Matrix (S6) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ___ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___2 cm Muck (Al10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) __Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (83) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators ('minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B1 4) __Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) __Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) __Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Sufface(B8) ___ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No X Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
in~cludes caplillar fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 State: MO Sampling Point: D-Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. _________ _______(OUT)
Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ___________ Local Relief (concave, convex, none):_____________
Slope (%): _____Lat: 38.90341 Long: -92.27977 Datum: NAD83/WIGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of ye.ar?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significan ntly disturbed? Are"'Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___signiflcar ntly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DH Statu >"(lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW kse" 1 _____Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 ______Across All Strata (B):
5 ______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover --Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplingq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______ ___ Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 ____OBL species 0 X1 0 3 ____________FACW species 0 X2 0 4 ________FAC species 50 X 3 150 5 ____ ____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species 0 X5 0 Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lo/ium perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 _____Prevalence Index is <3.0' 4 ____ __ Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 _____ _____Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9 __ _ __ _ __ _Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 _______________hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 38 20% Total Cover 15 75 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________Hydrophytic 2 _ _1Vegetation Yes __ No X 1 __ _ _ _ _ _ Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox FeaturesReak (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % T~ype* Loc2 Texture 0-15 10YR 4/3 100 SiCI
]Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matnix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
__ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) __Depleted Matrix (F3)
__Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ___ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) __ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___ Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) __ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) __Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
__Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) ___ Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: ____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Projct/ite Disovey Rdge ityCouty: Columbia!
Project/Site:_Discovey__idgeCty/County: Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: DP-3 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hilisiope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.896461 Long: -92.275583 Datum: NAD83iWGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil ___or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStraum
'3' BH Plotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant -Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DH Statu *" (lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW khe:
1 __________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ____________Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplin~q/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1____ _____Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
2 ____OBL species 90 Xl1 90 3 _________ ____FACW species 0 X2 0 4 ____ ___ ____FAC species 10 X3 30 5 ___ ____I____ FACU species 0 X4 0 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover =Total Cover UPL species 0 X 5 0 Totals (A) 100 (B) 120 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Peaec ne I .
I Tyha atiolia90 OB HyropyecVa egetaione =ndicAtors.2 2 Festuca spp 10 N FAC Dominance Test is > 50%
3 X Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 __Problematic Hydrophytic 9 1
_ _ __ _Vegetation *(Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 _____hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tail (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 ____ ____I_____Hydrophytic 2 ________Vegetation Yes X No
__ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _I_ _ Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = oa over Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Descrilotion: (Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.1 Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye Loc Texture ___________________
0-6 10YR 5/2 80 7.5YR 5/1 10 C M SiCI 7.5YR 6/8 10 C M SiCI 6-10 7.5YR 6/1 70 7.5YR 5/1 30 C M SiCI 10-15 10YR 3/1 60 715YR 4/6 40 C M SiCI 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
__ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All1) -_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
__5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) __Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (Bl0)
X_ Saturation (A3) ___ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (B1) ___ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) ___ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ____ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) __Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery(B7) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge Boone County Samplin! gDate: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc.
State: MO Sampin! g Point: D-(OUT)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, Ri12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): hilislope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.896494 Long: -92.2755972 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are"'Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DHStatu >"(lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstWrhe:
1___________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 ______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______ ___ Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 ____OBL species 0 XI1 0 3 _______ ___FACW species 0 X2 0 4 ____ ____FAC species 50 X 3 150 5 _________ ____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover . UPL species 0 X 5 0 Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lolium perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9___Vegetation ' (Explain) 10 _____ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 ______hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 38 20% Total Cover 15 75 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 ____ ____ Hydrophytic 2 __________J_____ Vegetation Yes ____No X 1 __________JPresent?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Descriotion: (Describe to the death needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.i Depth Matrix Redox Features ______Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type1 LocI Texture___________________
0-15 10YR 4/3 100 ______ ___ ___ ___[ SiCI 4 4 ~ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix ($4) __Coast Prairie Redox (Al16)
___Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
__Strati fled Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) __Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All1) ___ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) __Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___ Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) __True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (Bl) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) __Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lmnagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)______________________________
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 State: MO SamlinPont: WL-B Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. SamlinPont: DP-1 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.896433 Long: -92.275639 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation N soil N or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStraum DB >"(Plt sie: 3 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
TreeStrtum>3"DBH (Plt sze:30'radus) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW khe:
1______Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _______Total Number of Dominant Species 4 ______Across All Strata (B):
5 _______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (ANB):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1____Total % Cover of: Multpyb 2 ______OBL species _____X I 3 __________FACW species _____X 2 4 ___ ____FAC species _ __X 3 5 _____FACU species _____X 4 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species _____X 5 Totals (A) _____(B)
Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 Cyperus esculentus FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 ____ __ Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 _____Remarks) 8 ____________Problematic Hydrophytic 9 _____ _____Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11_______________________ ____ _____ _____hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1______________________________________Hydrephytic 2_____________________ _________Vegetation Yes
- No 1__ oa Present?
50% Total Cover 20% Total Cover = oa over *See Remarks Remarks: Delineation conducted during dormant season, numerous plants unidentifiable. Dominance Test/Prevalence Index could not be completed.
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.I Depth Matrix Redox Features ______Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type Loc Texture 0-5 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 6/6 15 C M SiCI 5-10 10YR 5II 90 10YR 6/6 10 C M SiCI 10-15 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 6/6 10 C M SiCI
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ___ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
__Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) ___ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
__5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: _________________
Depth (inches): _________________Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No____
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) X Water-Stained Leaves (89) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B36)
X High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B313) X Drainage Patterns (B310)
X Saturation (A3) __True Aquatic Plants (814) __Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (81) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (82) __Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B34) -_ Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (835) ___ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ___FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lrnagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes caplillar fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: WLB(OUT)P2 Section 21, T49, R12W Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township R* ange:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave .,convex, none Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.903372 Long: -92.279806 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are "IN lormal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (ifrieeded, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant Indicator DoiacTetWrse:
Tre DH Statu >" (lotsie: 0' adis) % Cover Species? Status DoiaeTstW khet 1 Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ____________Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 __________Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 _______ ___ Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 _____OBL species 0 X1 0 3 _____FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _____FAC species 50 X3 150 5 _____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover 0UPL species 0 X5 0
____________-Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lo/lium perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __._ Morphological Adaptations 6 __________(Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 __Problematic Hydrophytic 1
9 __ _ _ _ _ _Vegetation (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 __________hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius)
I2 1
__ 1
.1.
__ F ___
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes No X 50% Total Cover 20% Total Cover _ = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Sampling Point:
Point:
SOIL Profile Descriotion: (Describe to the denth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye Loc Texture 0-10 10YR 4/3 10-15 10YR 4/3 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M SiCI 1Tpe CConcentration, D='Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils':
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (Al16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
__ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
__2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
___Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) -_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
__High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___Sediment Deposits (B2) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery(B7) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) __Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: ____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe) ____________________________
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Projct/ite Disovey Rdge ityCouty: Columbia/
Project/_te:_DisoveryRdgeCtyCounty: Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: W-
_______________________________ ______DP-3 (IN)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ___________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): _____Lat: 38.9034194444444 Long: -92.2800611111111 Datum: NAD83IWGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum >3"l DBH (Plot size: 30' radius) Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:
__________________________________ % Cover Species? Status
_______Number_______________of_______Dominant____________ ______Species__________ ume o omnntSece tta 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _____Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover _ __20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplincq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1____________________________Total % Cover of: Multi ply by:
2 __________OBL species _____X I 3 ___ ___FACW species ____X 2 4____________________________FAC species _____X 3 5__________FACU species _ ___X 4 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species _____X 5 Totals (A) _____ (B)
Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < I m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index --B/A =
1 Cyeru esuletusFACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 __Problematic Hydrophytic 9 Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1__________1 Hydrophytic 2 _ _ _ _IVegetation Yes
- No
__1_ _Present?
50% Total Cover ____ 20% Total Cover __= Total Cover *See Remarks Remarks: Delineation conducted during dormant season, numerous plants unidentifiable. Dominance Test/Prevalence Index could not be completed.
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye LocT Texture 0-5 10YR 5/2 80 I0YR 6/8 20 C M SiCl 5-10 10YR 512 85 10YR 5/8 15 C M SiCl 10-15 10YR 5/2 75 10YR 5/8 25 C M SiCI
- Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox ($5).__ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
__Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ___ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
___Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
__2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) -_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
X Surface Water (Al) X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) ___ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) ___ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) ___ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) __Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) ___ Thin Muck Surface(C7) __FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial lrnagery(B7) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 Discovery Ridge Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO .SamlinPont:
Saplig Pont: WL-B DP-4 (OUT)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): _____________
Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.90346 Long: -92.27986 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation ___soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3"
Tre BH 3" Sratm BH (lotsize (Plt ize 30 radus) 3' rdis) Absolute
% Cover Dominant Species? -IndicatorDoiacTetWrse:
Status DonacTetW kset 1 Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5 Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplin~q/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1 ___ ____Total % Cover of: Mutipl~yb:
2 ____OBL species 0 Xl1 0 3 _ ___FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _____FAC species 50 X3 150 5 _____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover 0UPL species 0 X5 0
_____________________________________________ -Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index --BIA = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lolium perenne 25 Y FACU ___Dominance Test is > 50%
3 -- Prevalence index is <3.01 4 ______Morphological Adaptations 6 _____(Provide supporting data in 7 ______ Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 1
9 __ _Vegetation I(Explain) 10 _____ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 ______hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tail (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________I_____Hydrophytic 2 _ _ _ _I_ _ Vegetation Yes __No X 1 _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _I_ _ Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover =Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Tye Loc Texture 0-10 10YR 4/3 10-15 10YR 413 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M SiCI
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
__ Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (36) Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (A10) __Depleted Matrix (F3)
___Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) __Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___Drainage Patterns (BI0)
___Saturation (A3) ___True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___Sediment Deposits (B2) __Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___Geomorphic Position (D2)
___Iron Deposits (B5) ___Thin Muck Surface (C7) ___ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: ____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Boone County Columbia/Sa SapigDt:0-921 pig at: 0-921 Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. State: MO Sampling Point: WL-BIN Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.9034028 Long: -92.280172 Datum: NAD83/VVGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum >3" DBH (Plot size: 30' radius) Absoluer Domcinant StIdiator Dominance Test Worksheet:
1 ____________________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 ____________Total Number of Dominant Species 4 _____Across All Strata (B):
5 ______Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (N/B):
Saplincj/Shrub Stratum <3' DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Werksheet:
1_______________ ___ ___Total % Cover of: Mlil y 2 ___________jOBL species _____X 1 3 _ ___1FACW species ____X 2 4 ___________jFAC species _____X 3 5 _____ ____1FACU species _ ___X 4 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover UPL species _____X 5 Totals (A) _____ (B)
Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 m tall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 Cyperus esculentus FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
2 _____Dominance Test is > 50%
3 Prevalence Index is <3.01 4 __Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9 Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 ______ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________[Hydrophytic 2 __________IVegetation Yes
- No 1i_____ ____ Present?
50% Total Cover 20% Total Cover = Total Cover *See Remarks Remarks: Delineation conducted during dormant season, numerous plants unidentifiable. Dominance Test/Prevalence Index could not be completed.
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the deoth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.'I Depth Matrix Redox Features ______Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type 1 Loc2 Texture 0-10 10YR 5/2 70 7.5YR 5/8 30 C M SiC!
10-15 10YR 5/2 .70 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M SiC!
I0YR 6/8 10 C M SiCI 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils*:
___ Histosol (Al) __Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ___ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
__Histic Epipedon (A2) __Sandy Redox (S5) ___ Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) __Stripped Matrix (S6) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)"
___ Stratified Layers (A5) __Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (Al10) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
___Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) __ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) . _Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present; unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)I Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required'!
X Surface Water (Al) . Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X High Water Table (A2) ___ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) ___ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___Water Marks (BI) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
___ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___Drift Deposits (B3) ___ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ___ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) ___ Thin Muck Surface.(C7) __ FAC-N eutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) ___ Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: 2-4 in Water Table Present? Yes X No ___Depth: surface in Saturation Present? Yes X No ___ Depth: surface in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes X No ___
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos; previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers USAmyorpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site: Discovery Ridge City/County: Columbia/
Boone County Sampling Date: 01-19-2011 State: MO Sampling Point: WLBD-Applicant/Owner: Trabue, Hansen & Hinshaw, Inc. __________ _______(OUT)
Investigator(s): Lauren Strange Section, Township Range: Section 21, T49, R12W Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ____________Local Relief (concave, convex, none): _____________
Slope (%): ____Lat: 38.903383 Long: -92.2722 Datum: NAD83/WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Columbia, Missouri NWI Classification: No classification Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?. Yes X No _____(If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Y X N Are vegetation soil or hydrology ___significantly problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Remarks:
VEGETATION - use scientific names of plants.
TreeStrtum 3" BH (lotsize 30 radus) Absolute Dominant -Indicator DoiacTetWrset Tre 3" Sratm BH (Plt ize 3' rdis) % Cover Species? Status DoiacTetWrset 1 _____ __________Number of Dominant Species that 2 are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A):
3 _ _ __ _Total Number of Dominant Species 4 Across All Strata (B):
5________________________Percent of Dominant Species That 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B):
Saplingq/Shrub Stratum <3" DBH or > 1 m tall (Plot size: 15' radius) Prevalence Index Worksheet:
1______________ ______ITotal % Cover of: Mulipjlyby:
2 ____ ____jOBL species 0 Xl1 0 3 ________1FACW species 0 X2 0 4 _________ ____FAC species 50 X3 150 5 ____ ____1____FACU species 25 X4 100 50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover 0UPL species 0 X5 0 Totals (A) 75 (B) 250 Herb Stratum non-woody or woody < 1 mtall (Plot size: 5' radius) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3 1 Festuca spp. 50 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
2 Lolum perenne 25 Y FACU __Dominance Test is > 50%
3 -- Prevalence Index is -<3.01 4 ___ Morphological Adaptations 6 (Provide supporting data in 7 - Remarks) 8 Problematic Hydrophytic 9 -- Vegetation 1 (Explain) 10 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland 11 hydrology must be present, unless 50% Total Cover 50 20% Total Cover 20 100 = Total Cover disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine Stratum > 1 m tall (Plot size: 30' radius) 1 __________[Hydrophytic 2 __ _ _LVegetation Yes __ No X
__ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Present?
50% Total Cover ____20% Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile
Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator to confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Coo Moist) % Tye Loc Texture 0-10 10YR 4/3 10-15 10OYR 4/3 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M SiCI 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix H-ydric Soil Indicators: Indicator for Problematic Hydric Soils':
___Histosol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) __Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
___ Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) __Iron-Manganese Masses ( F12)
___ Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks)
___ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) __Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
__Strati fied Layers (AS) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
___ 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
___ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All1) __Redox Dark Surface (F6)
___ Thick Dark Surface (A12) __Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3 indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
___ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) __Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
___ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
___ Surface Water (Al) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ___Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
___ High Water Table (A2) __Aquatic Fauna (B13) ___Drainage Patterns (B10)
___ Saturation (A3) __True Aquatic Plants (B14) ___ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
___ Water Marks (B1) __Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ___Crayfish Burrows (C8)
____ Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ___Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
___ Drift Deposits (B3) __Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ___ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
___ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ___Recent Iron Reduction on Tilled Soil (C6) ____ Geomorphic Position (D2)
___ Iron Deposits (B5) __Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
___Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ___Gauge or Well Data (D9)
___Sparse Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ___Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Water Table Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Saturation Present? Yes ___No X Depth: _____in Wetland Hydrology Present Yes ____No X (includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers US Amy orpsof nginersMidwest Region - Interim Version