ML16053A211

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC - NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Revision 0, Engineering Design File, Appendix F, EDF-3124-0014, Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using Aerscreen
ML16053A211
Person / Time
Site: Northwest Medical Isotopes
Issue date: 07/30/2015
From: Mcmanus G
Northwest Medical Isotopes, Portage
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16053A221 List:
References
NWMI-LTR-2016-002 EDF-3124-0014, NWMI-2016-RAI-001, Rev. 0
Download: ML16053A211 (25)
v • d • e


Text

NWMI NWMI-201 6-RAI-00!

Rev. 0 EDF-3124-0014, Emission Appendix F-Modelingfor Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN F-i

Document ID: EDF-3124-0014 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: July 30, 2015 Engineering Design File Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN Portage Project

Title:

NWMI Project No.: 3124 Environmental Report Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 23

1. Portage Project No.: 3124 2. Project/Task: NWIVI Environmental Report
3. DCN#

4.

Title:

Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN

5. NPH PC or SDC: N/A
6. SSC Safety Category: N/A 7 Summary: This EDF documents the expected off-site emission concentration from the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI) Radioisotope Production Facility project for PM-10, PM-2.5, NOR, CO, and SOx~. The assumptions used and the results are presented in this document.

8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)

9. Review (Identify(R) and Approval,(A) minimum reviews andSignatures:

approvals. :; ... reviews/approvals Additional

  • may '.. be added.)
  • : ="; * ' :r* W*'

R/ I. Printed Name! :"".

Organizationi ... .*':Signature ' Date Author/Design Agent A Gary McManus I 7/30/15, Independent Review R Dave Thorne

  • _f .,7/30/15 Independent Review R Project Manager R/A John Belier !fS.- .. 7/30/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) E]N/A

TEM-9002 'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 23 Introduction As described in EDF-3 124-0004, Calculationfor the Determination of Fugitive Dust During ConstructionActivities, EDiF-3 124-0006, Determinationof Wind-Blown Dust During ConstructionActivities, and EDF-3 124-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, there will be numerous emissions sources during the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWML) Radioisotope Production Facility. The three sources considered for this calculation include fugitive dust, windblown dust, and emissions for off-road construction equipment. The totals from all three of these activities are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Anticipated Gaseous Effluents and Their Associated Air Quality Parameters for Construction PM-2.5 iW, C, OR - 304 ' 674 CO OR i ... 91.5 .... i .. .. 202 .. .

,i. .*SO

. *. * . .  ;-,-, ' , . . O R, " "*:',- i '* " 107 * - , 7,;

,23.6 , ,.,

a W - Wind-blown dust (EDF-3 124-0006), C - Construction activities (EDF-3124-0004), OR - Off-road construction equipment emissions (EDF-3 124-0009).

CO = carbon monoxide. PM-10 =particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.

NOx = nitrogen oxides. SOx = sulfur dioxide.

PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jtm or less diameter.

Assumptions (AERSCREEN)

The input assumptions used for the AERSCREEN model are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.

Table 2. AERSCREEN Input STable 3. MAKEMET Meteorology Stack Parameters i Parameters ISource emi*ssion rate  :"!*

Area emission rate 18.8 5E-06 g/s-m 2 ' 7.02E-05 lb/hr-rn 2 iMinimum wind speed 005 in/s An*emometer height :.' *,v ' :::10,m , ..:

Area source long side 189.89 623.00 !Surface characteristics - User defined iArea source short side .:i*  ;:

Initial vertical dimension 0.00m OO000ft !Bowen ratio 1.50

!Rural or urbain. :,:",*  :.**

Flagpole receptor height 2m 6.56 ft iInitial probe distance !: ii 5,0 m1,44f The closest residential receptor was assumed to be a single family home located approximately 430 meters (in) south-southeast from the facility location. Using these assumptions, the AERSCREEN model was run and the results were obtained. A complete listing of the model is included in Attachment 1.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 3 of 23 Results (AERSCREEN)

The final run results for the maximum concentration downwind of the facility are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. AERSCREEN Results 112 ma 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 N/A

....... 30mb".... , :;* ,<391.....

, ,- 9: " ..... *::. .. 391 3 1. '..... , ,! ; 3 1 .:,'.... . .

391'

"...... "7 9I...

391 ..... . .; ,"--

,...... : N/Am6

/ .

a Distance from the source to the location of the maximum concentration is 112 m.

b Distance from the source to the nearest receptor.

N/A = not applicable.

Using the AERSCREEN results from Table 4, the concentrations at 112 and 430 m for each of the effluents in Table 1 were calculated as follows.

The calculations were conducted using the attached Excel spreadsheet (Attachment 2). The following example for PM-10 shows the approach.

Total release is 1,463 kilograms (kg) (3,226 pounds [lb]) over 17 months (Table 1).

Average 1-hr PM- 10 release is:

3,226 lb/17 months x 1 monthl30 days x 1 day/24 hr 2.64E-01 lb/hours (hr) average over 17 months From AERSCREEN, the maximum concentration is at 112 m and is 1,103 micrograms (pgg)/cubic meter (m3)/(1 .00 lb/hr release).

  • PM-10 = 2.64E-01 lb/hr average over 3 years x 1,103 igg/m 3/(1.00 lb/hr release)
  • PM-10 =291pgg/m 3 Similarly, from AERSCREEN, the concentration at 430 m (closest receptor) is 391 pgg/m 3/

(1.00 lb/hr release) (Attachment 2).

PM-10 103 jgg/m 3 Similar calculations were completed for each of the other constituents in Table 1. The results are shown in Table 5.

TEM-9002 EDF-3124--0014 09/29109 FIesut Rev. 1 Rev. 0 MdeSiGng Page 4 of 23 TbeNGINEERIsinG Table 5. Emission Modeling Results S -~ 0 .~ 0 - 'S

  • 0 - .0 - ~ I 0 0 0 PM-10 2.64E-01 291 103 i~221!

NOx 1. 16E-0 1 128 45 16.4!1 SO*

1.93E-02 21 7.5 CO = carbon monoxide. PM-10 particulate matter 10 p.m or less diameter.

NOx = mitrogen oxides. SOX = sulfur dioxide.

PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 ptm or less diameter.

The values in Table 5 were then compared to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in Table 6.

Table 6. Release Concentration Comparison to National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM-10 291 103 0.15 194% 69%

0.04 NO. 128 45 0.10 1.88E+o2 68% 24%

35.0 SOx 21 7.5 0.075 1.97E+02 10.7% 3.8 1%

a Maximutm concentration from AERSCREEN was at 112 m.

b Shaded cells represent actual NAAQS units without conversion.

CO =carbon monoxide. PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.

NAAQS =National Ambient Air Quality Standards. PM-10 = particulate matter 10 pxm or less diameter.

NOx nitrogen oxides. SCIx = sulfur dioxide.

Based on Table 6, the modeled release concentrations are below the applicable NAAQS standards except for PM-10 and PM-2.5. The PM-10 and PM-2.5 releases are assumed to not be mitigated for this analysis. However, the PM-10 and PM-2.5 would be mitigated to ensure that the air concentrations are less than the NAAQ standards by use of water application during excavation operations and limiting excavation during periods of high winds. Therefore, no additional modeling is required at this time.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEE -RII*N1G DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 23 A similar evaluation of the model emission Table 7. Ambient Air of Rural/Urban Missouri concentrations was performed to determine if the emissions exceed the regional ambient concentrations of the listed pollutants. Regional values of the five regulated pollutants for Missouri were

- PM-10 ' 6~

  • S -

17.2 20.8 S. S obtained from the Missouri Division of Environmental Quality website for SO2 different monitoring stations in the state 6.97 the closest to the RPF site (MDNR, 2015). CO =carbon monoxide.

NOx = nitrogen oxides.

Table 7 summarizes the data in PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jIm or less diameter. used to determine the PM-10 =particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.

average values. SO,' = sulfur dioxide, Table 8 presents the results of the comparison of the air concentrations at the closest receptor (430 m) to the ambient air concentrations.

Table 8. Comparison of Modeled Concentrations to Average Ambient Levels Around the State of Missouri PM-10 103 17.2 Yes8 Yes6 NOx' 45 20.8 No SOx 7.5 7.0 o PM values do not include control measures CO =carbon monoxide. PM-10 particulate matter 101im or less diameter.

NO,' = nitrogen oxides. SOx' = sulfur dioxide.

PM-2. 5 =particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.

From Table 8, control measures for particulate matter should be considered during construction.

In addition, engine emission controls for the construction equipment should be evaluated for the individual units. The emissions factors used were based on average equipment and associated horsepower. Emissions information based on the specific manufacturer's data should result in actual emissions being lower.

References EDF-3 124-0004, Calculationfor the Determinationof Fugitive Dust During ConstructionActivities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 3, 2015.

EDF-3 124-0006, Determinationof Wind-Blown Dust During Construction Activities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 21, 2015.

EDF-3224-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 31, 2015.

MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqm/index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 6 of 23 Attachment 1 AERSCREEN Fliles AERSCREEN 11126 /AERMOD 1234 06/18/14 13 :04:48 TIThE: AREA RELEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

                        • AREA****- PARAMETERS *************

SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0. 1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.885E-O: 5 gI(s-m2) 0. 702E-04 lbI(hr-m2)

AREA HiEIGHT: 0.30 meters 0. 98 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SID)E: 189.189 meters 623.00 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 74.598 meters 246.00 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: C).00 meters 0.00 feet RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: 2.00 meters 6.56 feet INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet

                        • BUILDIING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS **********

BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POJINIT SOURCES

                        • FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters MAX[MUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1 -HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg)(in) PERIOD

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 7of 23 1" 0.500 1079. 0 125.0 ANN

  • = worst case diagonal
                                  • MVAKE]V[ET METEOROLOGY *ARAETER*****************

MIN/MAX TEMIPERATURE: 249.8 /310.9 (K)

MINIMUM WiINID SPEED: 0.5 m/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS JINPUT: USER ENTERED ALBEDO: 0.60 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 0.500 (meters)

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAX[MUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 01 01 1 01 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS

-0.78 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14. 3.6 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HIT REF TA HIT 10.0 249.8 2.0 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR

TEM-9002 09/29/,09 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 8 of 23 10 0104 1 01 HO U*~ W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS

-0.72 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14. 4.0 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 249.8 2.0

                          • AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES *********

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM51v MAXIMUJM DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC (in) (ug/m3) (in) (ug/m3) 0.99 557.3 2525.00 42.82 25.00 698.4 2550.00 42.25 50.00 833.0 2575.00 41.69 75.00 954.4 2600.00 41.14 100.00 1064. 2625.00 40.61 125.00 1079. 2650.00 40.09 150.00 983.7 2675.00 39.58 175.00 888.5 2700.00 39.08 200.00 805.4 2725.00 38.59 225.00 733.5 2750.00 38.11 250.00 670.7 2775.00 37.65 275.00 615.7 2800.00 37.19 300.00 567.5 2825.00 36.74 325.00 524.7 2850.00 36.30 350.00 487.0 2875.00 35.87 375.00 453.2 2900.00 35.45 400.00 423.2 2925.00 35.04 425.00 396.1 2950.00 34.63 450.00 371.9 2975.00 34.24 475.00 350.0 3000.00 33.85 500.00 330.2 3025.00 33.47 525.00 312.1 3050.00 33.09 550.00 295.7 3075.00 32.73 575.00 280.7 3100.00 32.37

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 9 of 23 600.00 266.8 3125.00 32.01 625.00 254.1 3150.00 31.67 650.00 242.5 3174.99 31.33 675.00 231.7 3199.99 31.00 700.00 221.5 3225.00 30.67 725.00 212.2 3250.00 30.35 750.00 203.6 3275.00 30.03 775.00 195.6 3300.00 29.72 800.00 188.0 3325.00 29.42 825.00 180.9 3350.00 29.12 850.00 174.2 3375.00 28.82 875.00 168.0 3400.00 28.54 900.00 162.2 3425.00 28.25 925.00 156.7 3450.00 27.97 950.00 151.5 3475.00 27.70 975.00 146.5 3500.00 27.43 1000.00 141.9 3525.00 27.16 1025.00 137.5 3550.00 26.90 1050.00 133.4 3575.00 26.65 1075.00 129.4 3600.00 26.39 1100.00 125.6 3625.00 26.15 1125.00 122.1 3650.00 25.90 1150.00 118.7 3675.00 25.66 1175.00 115.4 3700.00 25.43 1200.00 112.3 3725.00 25.19 1225.00 109.3 3750.00 24.96 1250.00 106.5 3775.00 24.74 1275.00 103.8 3800.00 24.52 1300.00 101.2 3825.O00 24.30 1325.00 98.73 3849.99 24.08 1350.00 96.38 3875.00 23.87 1375.00 94.09 3900.00 23.66 1400.00 91.90 3925.00 23.46 1425.00 89.80 3950.00 23.26 1450.00 87.79 3975.00 23.06 1475.00 85.84 4000.00 22.86 1500.00 83.96 4025.00 22.67 1525.00 82.14 4050.00 22.48 1550.00 80.40 4075.00 22.29 1575.00 78.72 4100.00 22.10 1600.00 77.10 4125.00 21.92 1625.00 75.54 4150.00 21.74 1650.00 74.03 4175.00 21.56 1675.00 72.58 4200.00 21.39 1700.00 71.18 4225.00 21.22 1725.00 69.82 4250.00 21.05

TEM-9002 ,ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 10 of 23 1750.00 68.51 4275.00 20.88 1775.00 67.25 4300.00 20.71 1800.00 66.02 4325.00 20.55 1825.00 64.83 4350.00 20.39 1850.00 63.68 4375.00 20.23 1875.00 62.57 4400.00 20.07 1900.00 61.48 4425.00 19.92 1925.00 60.43 4450.00 19.76 1950.00 59.40 4475.00 19.61 1975.00 58.41 4500.00 19.47 2000.00 57.44 4525.00 19.32 2025.00 56.49 4550.00 19.17 2050.00 55.56 4575.00 19.03 2075.00 54.67 4600.00 18.89 2100.00 53.80 4625.00 18.75 2125.00 52.95 4650.00 18.61 2150.00 52.13 4675.00 18.48 2175.00 51.33 4700.00 18.34 2200.00 51.66 4725.00 18.21 2225.00 50.87 4750.00 18.08 2250.00 50.10 4775.00 17.95 2275.00 49.36 4800.00 17.82 2300.00 48.63 4825.00 17.70 2325.00 47.92 4850.00 17.57 2350.00 47.22 4875.00 17.45 2375.00 46.55 4900.00 17*33 2400.00 45.89 4924.99 17.21 2425.00 45.24 4950.00 17.09 2450.00 44.61 4975.00 16.97 2475.00 44.00 5000.00 16.86 2500.00 43.40

TEM-9002 EDF-3124-0014 09/29109 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 11 of 23

                      • AERSCREEN MAIXIMUMV IMPACT SUMvIMARY ********

3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in SCREEN]NG PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THlE AIR QUALITY IMP~ACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)

Report number EPA-454/R-92-019 http://www.epa.gov/scram00 1/guidance~permit.htm under Screening Guidance MAXIMUrM SC!ALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOI J-R 8-HOUR 24-HOUR AINJNUAL CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CALCULATION PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)

FLAT TERRAIN 1103. 1103. 1103. 1103. N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 112.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 557.3 557.3 557.3 557.3 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 0.99 0.9mtr meters

TEM-9002 EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 12 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 start date and time 06/13/14 10:00:24 AERSCREEN 11126 NWMI Process boiler run#1 NWMI Process boiler run#1 DATA ENTRY VALIDATION METRIC ENGLISH

    • STACKDATA ** - - - -- - - -

Emission Rate: 0.1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr stack Height: 18.59 meters 61.00 feet stack Diameter: 0.305 meters 12.00 inches stack Temperature: 310.9 K 100.0 Deg F Exit Velocity: 17.929 m/s 58.82 ft/s Stack Flow Rate: 2772 ACFM Model Mode: RURAL Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet

    • BUILDING DATA **

No Building Downwash Parameters

    • TERRAIN DATA **

NO Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet Flagpole Receptor Height: 1.8 meters 6. feet No discrete receptors used

    • METEOROLOGY DATA **

Min/Max Temperature: 255.4 / 302.6 K 0.0 / 85.0 Deg F Minimum wind speed: 0.5 in/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant surface Profile: Grassland Dominant climate Type: Average Moisture AERSCREEN output file:

NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13.out

    • AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin.

No terrain used, AERMAP will, not be run changing units flag from English to metric Page 1

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09129109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 13 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 SURFACE obtainingCHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET surface characteri sti Cs...

using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Grassland with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.60 1.50 0.001 spring 0.18 0.40 0.050 summer 0.18 0.80 0.100 Autumn 0.20 1.00 0.010 Creating met files aerscreenOLl0.sfc & aerscreen0LO1_O.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO2_.01.sfc & aerscreen_02_0.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO3_l.sfc & aerscreen_03_Ol.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_&04_O.pfl PROBE started 06/13/14 10:05:11 Running probe for winter sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Winter sector 1

        • r**** WARNING MESSAGES *****
      • NONE **

Running probe for spring sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Spring sector1

  • e******* WARNING MESSAGES *****
    • NONE **

Running probe for summer sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Summer sector1

          • ~** WARNING MESSAGES *****
      • NONE **

Running probe for Autumn sector 1 AERMOO Finishes successfullyfor PROBE stage 1 Autumn sector 1

                  • WARNING MESSAGES *****
    • NONE **

PROBE ended 06/13/14 10:05:17 REFINE started 06/13/14 10:05:17 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 spring sector1 Page 2

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-001 Rev. I 4 Rev. 0 Page 14 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13

          • WARNING MESSAGES *****
    • NONE **

REFINE ended 06/13/14 10:05:17

  • e**** * *** *** **Y*Ye*
  • ** * *** *** * ** **Y*

e* ***e* *******

AERSCREEN Finished successfully with no errors or warnings units switched from EngVIsh to metric check log file for details Ending date and time 06/13/14 10:05:19

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 15 of 23 OUTPUT FILE:

NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 AERSCREEN 11126 / AERMOD 1234 06/13/14 10:05:17 TITLE: NWMI Process boiler run#1

                    • ~***,*******1i******* STACK PARAMETERS *******(*1*Y~*********f*(*******

SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr

  • STACK HEIGHT: 18.59 meters 61.00 feet STACK INNER DIAMETER: 0.305 meters 12.00 inches PLUME EXIT TEMPERATURE: 310.9 K 100.0 Deg F PLUME EXIT VELOCITY: 17.929 mn/s 58.82 ft/s STACK AIR FLOW RATE: 2772 ACFM RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: 1.83 meters 6.00 feet INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
                            • ~ ~BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS *************

NO BUILDING DOWNWASH HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR THIS ANALYSIS

                                            • e**** PROBE ANALYSIS **************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters Zo ROUGHNESS 1-HR CONC DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR LENGTH (ug/m3) Cm) PERIOD 1"0.050 19.15- 125.0 SPR

  • = worst case flow sector
                        • MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ***********

MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 255.4 / 302.6 (K)

MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 mn/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Grassland DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Spring ALB EDO: 0.18 0.40 BOWEN RATIO:

ROUGHNESS' LENGTH: 0.050 (meters)

Page 1

TEM-9002 EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 16 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0105 5 12 HO W*' DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS 21.62 0.066 0.300 0.020 46. 39. -1.2 0.050 0.40 0.18 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 302.6 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT Cnon-downwash): 33.3 meters METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0101 5 12 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN zo BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS

-1.63 0.0o39- 0.100 0.0o20- -19.- -18.- _.9 0.010- 1.00 0.20 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 255.4 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT (non-downwash): 53.7 meters

                                    • 1******* AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) Cm) (ug/m3) 1.00 0.4366E-03 2525.00 5.097 25.00 7.119 2550.00 5.061 50.00 9.924 2575.00 5.024 75.00 14.25 2600.00 4.989 100.00 18.40 2625.00 4.953 125.00 19.15 2650.00 4.919 150.00 18.65 2675.00 4.884 175.00 17.82 2700.00 4.850 200.00 16.90 2725.00 4.817 225.00 15.99 2750.00 4.784 250.00 15.14 2775.00 4.752 275.00 14.36 2800.00 4.720 300.00 13.65 2825.00 4.688 325.00 13.00 2850.00 4.657 Page 2

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 09129/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 17 of 23 NWMiI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13

  • 350.00 12.41 2875.00 4,627 375.00 11.87 2900.00 4.597 400.00 11.38 2925.00 4.567 425.00 10.93 2950.00 4.537 450.00 10. 52 2975.00 4.508 475.00 10.39 3000.00 4.480 500.00 10.29 3025.00 4.451 525.00 10.15 3050.00 4.423 550.00 9.975 3075.00 4.396 575.00 9.782 3100.00 4.369 600.00 9.575 3125.00 4.342 625.00 9.357 3150.00 43315 650.00 9.13 5 3175.00 4.289 675.00 8.910 3200.00 4.263 700 .00 8.685 3225 .00 4.238 725.00 8.461 3250.00 4.212 750.00 8.241 3275.00 4.187 775.00 8.029 3300.00 4.163 800.00 7.938 3325.00 4.139 825.00 7.842 3350.00 4.115 850.00 7.742 3375.00 4.091 875.00 7.887 3400.00 4.067 900.00 8.023 3425.00 4.044 925.00 8.132 3450.00 4.021 950.00 8.2 18 3475.00 3.999 975.00 8.282 3500.00 3.976 1000.00 8.327 3525.00 3.954 1025.00 8.300 3550.00 3.933 1050.00 8.258 3575.00 3.911 1075.00 8.212 3600.00 3.890 1100.O00 8.162 3625.00 3.869 1125.O00 8.110 3650.00 3.848 1150.O00 8.055 3675.00 3.827 1175.00 7.998 3700.00 3.807 1200.O00 7.938 3725.00 3.787 1225.O00 7.878 3750.00 3.767 1250.00 7.816 3775.00 .3.747 1275.00 7.753 3800.00 3.727 1300.00 7.689 3825.00 .3.708 1325.00 7.625 3850.00 3.689 1350.00 7.560 3875.00 3.670 1375.00 7.495 3900.00 3.651 1400.O00 7.430 3925.00 3.633 1425.O00 7.365 3950.00 3,615 1450.00 7.300 3975.00 3,597 1475.00 7.23 5 4000.00 3.579 1500.00 7.171 4025.00 3,561 1525.00 7.107 4050.00 .3.543 1550.00 7.043 4075.00 3.526 1575.00 6.980 4100.00 3.509 1600.00 6.918 4125.00 3.492 1625.00 6.856 4150.00 3,475 1650.00 6.794 4175.00 3.458 1675.00 6.734 4200.00 3.442 1700.00 6.674 4225.00 3 .425 1725.00 6.614 4250.00 3.409 1750.00 6.556 4275.00 3,393 1775.00 6.498 4300.00 3.377 1800.00 6.441 4325.00 3.362 1825.00 6.385 4350.00 3.346 1850.00 6.329 4375.00 3.331 1875.00 6.274 4400.00 3.315 1900.00 6.220 4425.00 3.300 Page 3

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 18 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 1925.00 6.167 4450.00 3.285 1950.00 6.114 4475.00 3.270 1975.00 6.062 4500.00 3.256 2000.00 6.011 4525.00 3.241 2025.00 5.961 4550.00 3.227 2050.00 5.911 4575.00 3.212 2075.00 5.863 4600.00 3.198 2100.00 5.815 4625.00 3.184 2125.00 5.767 4650.00 3.170 2150.00 5.720 4675.00 3.157 2175.00 5.674 4700.00 3.143 2200.00 5.629 4725.00 3.129 2225.00 5.584 4750.00 3.116 22 50.00 5.540 4775.00 3.103 2275.00 5.497 4800.00 3.089 2300.00 5.454 4825.00 3.076 2325.00 5.412 4850.00 3.063 2350.00 5.371 4875.00 3.051 2375.00 5.330 4900.00 3.038 2400.00 5.290 4925.00 3.025 2425.00 5.250 4950.00 3.013 2450.00 5.211 4975.00 3.000 2475.00 5.173 5000.00 2.988 2500.00 5.135

                        • (*** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT

SUMMARY

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/mi3) (ug/m3)

FLAT TERRAIN 19.15 19.15 17.24 11.49 1.915 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 123.00 meters IMPACT ATBOUNDARY AMBIENT THE 0.4366E-03 0.4366E-03 0.3929E-03 0.2619E-03 0.4366E-04 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE1.0mtr 1. O0 meters

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 Rev. 1 24-0014 Rev. 0 Page 19 of 23 Attachment 2 Excel Spreadsheet of Emission Rate Calculations Total PM Emissions Source (Hbs) Total Amount Effluent ________

_____________Equlpment Winda [ onstuctin b Off-Road Construction (is PM-10 160 [ 3000 66 3226 PM-2.5 24 [ 600 50 674

a. FromEDF-3 124-0006
b. From EDF-3124-0004
c. From EDF-3 124-0009 ________

[PM-10 Calculation !Total relase is 3226 lbs over 17 months

!lAveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> release is f ]3322-17bs.....mo---s x ont3 days

  • 1lday/24 hours i 2.64E-01 ___ lb/hr average over 17 months ___ ____

i [1.4lb1 /hraverage over 3-years....

From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release

... . ... ... The;aveag cnnetration at 112 meters is

,- 2.64E-02 [2.64E-02 lb/hr

  • 1103 ug/m3 ____

, 17 months , 2.91E+02 !ug/m3 __

~PM-2.5 Calculation }Total relase is 674 lbs over 17 months

_* Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> release is I 64ls1 months x 1 month/S0 days_* Iday/24 hours __

S...... ...... .. ... .. .. ... .551 -0 . J l/hr average over 17 months _ _ _

.  !...2.60E-02 Ilb/hr average over 3-years From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release

-- The average concnetration at 112_meters is_____

SPM2.5 6.07E+i01 *ug/m 3

-- From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 430 meters and is 391 ug/m3 / lb/hr release

'At 430 meters  ; . ___

+ PM- 10 = 1.0305E+02 iug/m3 IPM-2.5_____ 2,1531E+Oljug/m3 - __ _

i .. .

._. . .... .... . U.. . . . .. . .. ....

. i. ....

lTM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 20 of 23 Tablc 20Off-Road Vehiele Emissions (During 17 Months of Construction)

_________________Pollutant(s)

Equipment Number Hours NOx CO ____CO 2 SOx (kg (Ibs)

  • kg) (Ibs) (kg) (Ibs) *kg (Ibs)

Bulldozer 1.00E+00O 1.00E÷02 1.39E+f02 3.07E+i02 1.90E+-01 4.10E+-01 1.30E+04 2.87E+04 2.30E+01 5.l0E+01 Compactor 1.00E+00 1.20E+02 1.55E+-I02 3.42E+I02 2.10E+I01 4.60E+01l 1.45E+'04 3.20E+04 2.60E+~01 5.70E+I01 Excavators 1.00E+00 6.00E+01 4.90E-i01 1.08E+02 8.00E+00 1.70E+f01 4.53E1+03 9.99E1+03 8.00E1+00 1.80E+01 Front Loaders 1.00E+400 1.20E1+02 6.80E+f01 1.50E1+02 1.00E-t01 2.30E+01 6.25E+03 1.38E+04 1.10E1+01 2.50E-I01 Grfaders 1.0OE+t00 8.00E+01 6.60E+01 1.45E-+02 1.00E+01 2.20E1+01 6.04E+03 1.33E1+04 1.10E1+01 2.40E+01 Paver 1.OOE-l-00 8.00E1+01 6.40E+01 1.4211+02 1.00E+01 2.20E+i01 5.921-+03 1.30E+04 1.10E+01 2.30E1+01 Asphalt Roller 1.00E+i00 8.00E1+01 1.04E+-102 2.28E+02 1.40E+01 3.10E1+01 9.6711+03 2.13E+04 1.70E+01 3.80E+01 Total 6.46E+02 1.42E+03 9.10E+01 2.01E+02 6.01E+04 1.32E+05 1.07E+02 2.36E+02

[N~x CalculaUon I Totalirehase is 1,4221lbs over 17 months T-i

________Aveage 1hour releas is _______2_--2 -_-

5

'iee l ]14221b s/17 m onth saxl1m onth/30 days

  • 1 d a y /24hou s_._! _ ... .....

1-hr,98thpercntile avoa__o____e____ .1_ -0______ _______-______________________

aged ver aerhreeover1'7 monthsa .. .

years. t _____

-F !__5.4911-02 Ylb/hr average over 3-years _________

-U-_ _ _

FmAESCREEN Maxmsnnconcentrallon is at 112 meters and is 1103 uglm3 /lblhr release I ____

[From AESCREEN concentratlon Is at 430 meters, and is 391 sng/n3/ lb/hr release J____[

eaverage oonenetration at 121 meters is ] _ The average conenetration at 430 meters is r i 6.2 10 pb _ _ __ _ _ .4 +0__gm__..

__ , Aveag......releasci I --.----

S ___x193C-02 Tbhrlvergeove17 montha ___ I

______ 91.91E-03 lb/hr average over 3-yar months______

__.0E-3 l__raveage__e 3-ea__-

it ~From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at112 meters andlis 1103 uglm3!/lb/hr release ____ .

[The average eonenetr-ation at 112 meters IThe average oonenelration at 430 metersT

[ I ]~2.31-1i-01--- gm3..... F......i........ 7.54E+00 lu/m3 j~.~___

K_____ 1.121o-3 ---- iF-- _ -i L_-- e_____

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 Rev. 1 24--0014 Rev. 0 Page 21 of 23 ICO Calculation Total relase is 201 lbs over 17 months __________

______ Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> release is - I ______

____ 201 lbs/17 months x 1 month/30_days

  • day/24 hours _____Il

. 1 7.75E-03 7ijlbhr average over 3-ye ars

f. r average 1........s.... . .ver f .... - --.- - -- i iFrom AESCREEN Maxmmnmconcentratlon is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/nm3 /Ilblhrrelease_ _ i "

L!FromAE*SCR EE.N_ once ntraten.Isa 4430 un.e ters_.and is 391 .g/m3/lb/h

-.......... rleas ...... I..............

S The average conenetration at 112 meters is The average oonenetration at 430 meters is

...J64E-02 1 lb/h-r*l113 ugm3-t 1.8E+01*ug/3

{ [ 16.42E-+00 iug/m3

  • S1.58E-02 !ppm i 56E0 pm . ....-- ..

i -i I I I- ____

_________________ I I]

_____ 1 For Concentrations at 430 meters multiply 112 concentration times 391/1103 NOx 2.42E+01 ppb CO 5.61E-03 ppm SOx '2. 88E=03 ppm Aegeconcentration at 112 meters Nx6.82E+01 ppb CO1.58E-02 ppm Sx8.12E-03 ppm r O1p=18~gm

TEM-9002  :'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 22 of 23 Attachment 3 Average Ambient Pollutant Concentrations for Missouri Table A3-1. Levels of Carbon Monoxide in Springfield Missouri 1993 i 5.4 14 59 1995 9 1997 1999 ~4.1 5

>).]: );f 27*"2Q007!*6.6:/**:*::,i:

2001

, 2.84 7

- '-', 6 2003 4

2005 5

4 2007 i 2.6 4 1.9 2009 ' 1.5 2.3 2.3 Second Quarter 2013 .

  • 1.1 2.3

-- Average {((g/m )- 3 5.73E+00 6.56E+03 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dur.mo.govfenv/esp/aqm-index.htm1, accessed July 2015.

Table A3-2. Nitrogen Dioxide - Hillcrest Hligh School Springfield 1993 0.011 2002 0.0107

'-7L,*:0!*11*

0.013 1995 2004 0.012 0.012 1996 2006 0.0104

, " - i'.998:,',. 0.011 2). 'A 1999 ~20087! 0.0089 0.013 2001 Through Third Quarter 0.0079 1.1OE-02!

"? ,* ):*

index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 23 of 23 Table A3-3. Inhalable PM10 - Missouri State University Springfield 1993 S 18 2003 17 S 40 i 38 1995 17 , 44 S 2005 19.3 45 ,

1997 S 15 51 2007 17.9 1999 45 2009 14

7 18 38 2001  : 20 57 2011 16.5
  • 5+

+::" 1 d+ :

£{l'*::*> * *8 Average (utg/m 3 ") 17.16 43.2 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http:lldnr.mo.gov/env/esplaqmn/

mndex html, accessed July 2015.

Table A3-4. Inhalable PM-2.5 - Missouri State University Springfield 1999 , 12.24 2006 10.82

<12*2 2001 ' 12.2 2008 ~10.7 2003 , 11.7 2010 ~9.89 2005  : 13.01 2012 i 10.09 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/ envlesplaqm/

mndcxhtml, accessed July 2015.

Table A3-$. Sulfur Dioxide - Missouri State University Springfield

0.0053 2002 0.003 I19942 -
  • ! :" :,:'¢ ::::*0.002 -:t* .>:

1995

  • 0.002 2004 0.0014
{:

"59.96:

1"! ,{  :,'>*=,*:-, .,0.0017, 7 ,:;,

1997

~

2 2 0.002 2006 0.0019 1998>)i~ ~0.002 1999 =v>';a,**,--,:* *°0.003, a...

2008 0.0022 0.004 2001 ,Average (ppm) , 2.66E-03 Source: MvDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqml index.html, accessed July 2015.

NWMI NWMI-201 6-RAI-00!

Rev. 0 EDF-3124-0014, Emission Appendix F-Modelingfor Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN F-i

Document ID: EDF-3124-0014 Revision ID: 1 Effective Date: July 30, 2015 Engineering Design File Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN Portage Project

Title:

NWMI Project No.: 3124 Environmental Report Portage TEM-9002 09/29/09 Rev. 0

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 23

1. Portage Project No.: 3124 2. Project/Task: NWIVI Environmental Report
3. DCN#

4.

Title:

Emission Modeling for Construction Activities Using AERSCREEN

5. NPH PC or SDC: N/A
6. SSC Safety Category: N/A 7 Summary: This EDF documents the expected off-site emission concentration from the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI) Radioisotope Production Facility project for PM-10, PM-2.5, NOR, CO, and SOx~. The assumptions used and the results are presented in this document.

8 Distribution: (Portage, Inc.)

9. Review (Identify(R) and Approval,(A) minimum reviews andSignatures:

approvals. :; ... reviews/approvals Additional

  • may '.. be added.)
  • : ="; * ' :r* W*'

R/ I. Printed Name! :"".

Organizationi ... .*':Signature ' Date Author/Design Agent A Gary McManus I 7/30/15, Independent Review R Dave Thorne

  • _f .,7/30/15 Independent Review R Project Manager R/A John Belier !fS.- .. 7/30/15 Registered Professional Engineer's Stamp (if required) E]N/A

TEM-9002 'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 23 Introduction As described in EDF-3 124-0004, Calculationfor the Determination of Fugitive Dust During ConstructionActivities, EDiF-3 124-0006, Determinationof Wind-Blown Dust During ConstructionActivities, and EDF-3 124-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, there will be numerous emissions sources during the construction phase of the Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWML) Radioisotope Production Facility. The three sources considered for this calculation include fugitive dust, windblown dust, and emissions for off-road construction equipment. The totals from all three of these activities are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Anticipated Gaseous Effluents and Their Associated Air Quality Parameters for Construction PM-2.5 iW, C, OR - 304 ' 674 CO OR i ... 91.5 .... i .. .. 202 .. .

,i. .*SO

. *. * . .  ;-,-, ' , . . O R, " "*:',- i '* " 107 * - , 7,;

,23.6 , ,.,

a W - Wind-blown dust (EDF-3 124-0006), C - Construction activities (EDF-3124-0004), OR - Off-road construction equipment emissions (EDF-3 124-0009).

CO = carbon monoxide. PM-10 =particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.

NOx = nitrogen oxides. SOx = sulfur dioxide.

PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jtm or less diameter.

Assumptions (AERSCREEN)

The input assumptions used for the AERSCREEN model are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.

Table 2. AERSCREEN Input STable 3. MAKEMET Meteorology Stack Parameters i Parameters ISource emi*ssion rate  :"!*

Area emission rate 18.8 5E-06 g/s-m 2 ' 7.02E-05 lb/hr-rn 2 iMinimum wind speed 005 in/s An*emometer height :.' *,v ' :::10,m , ..:

Area source long side 189.89 623.00 !Surface characteristics - User defined iArea source short side .:i*  ;:

Initial vertical dimension 0.00m OO000ft !Bowen ratio 1.50

!Rural or urbain. :,:",*  :.**

Flagpole receptor height 2m 6.56 ft iInitial probe distance !: ii 5,0 m1,44f The closest residential receptor was assumed to be a single family home located approximately 430 meters (in) south-southeast from the facility location. Using these assumptions, the AERSCREEN model was run and the results were obtained. A complete listing of the model is included in Attachment 1.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 3 of 23 Results (AERSCREEN)

The final run results for the maximum concentration downwind of the facility are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. AERSCREEN Results 112 ma 1,103 1,103 1,103 1,103 N/A

....... 30mb".... , :;* ,<391.....

, ,- 9: " ..... *::. .. 391 3 1. '..... , ,! ; 3 1 .:,'.... . .

391'

"...... "7 9I...

391 ..... . .; ,"--

,...... : N/Am6

/ .

a Distance from the source to the location of the maximum concentration is 112 m.

b Distance from the source to the nearest receptor.

N/A = not applicable.

Using the AERSCREEN results from Table 4, the concentrations at 112 and 430 m for each of the effluents in Table 1 were calculated as follows.

The calculations were conducted using the attached Excel spreadsheet (Attachment 2). The following example for PM-10 shows the approach.

Total release is 1,463 kilograms (kg) (3,226 pounds [lb]) over 17 months (Table 1).

Average 1-hr PM- 10 release is:

3,226 lb/17 months x 1 monthl30 days x 1 day/24 hr 2.64E-01 lb/hours (hr) average over 17 months From AERSCREEN, the maximum concentration is at 112 m and is 1,103 micrograms (pgg)/cubic meter (m3)/(1 .00 lb/hr release).

  • PM-10 = 2.64E-01 lb/hr average over 3 years x 1,103 igg/m 3/(1.00 lb/hr release)
  • PM-10 =291pgg/m 3 Similarly, from AERSCREEN, the concentration at 430 m (closest receptor) is 391 pgg/m 3/

(1.00 lb/hr release) (Attachment 2).

PM-10 103 jgg/m 3 Similar calculations were completed for each of the other constituents in Table 1. The results are shown in Table 5.

TEM-9002 EDF-3124--0014 09/29109 FIesut Rev. 1 Rev. 0 MdeSiGng Page 4 of 23 TbeNGINEERIsinG Table 5. Emission Modeling Results S -~ 0 .~ 0 - 'S

  • 0 - .0 - ~ I 0 0 0 PM-10 2.64E-01 291 103 i~221!

NOx 1. 16E-0 1 128 45 16.4!1 SO*

1.93E-02 21 7.5 CO = carbon monoxide. PM-10 particulate matter 10 p.m or less diameter.

NOx = mitrogen oxides. SOX = sulfur dioxide.

PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 ptm or less diameter.

The values in Table 5 were then compared to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in Table 6.

Table 6. Release Concentration Comparison to National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM-10 291 103 0.15 194% 69%

0.04 NO. 128 45 0.10 1.88E+o2 68% 24%

35.0 SOx 21 7.5 0.075 1.97E+02 10.7% 3.8 1%

a Maximutm concentration from AERSCREEN was at 112 m.

b Shaded cells represent actual NAAQS units without conversion.

CO =carbon monoxide. PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.

NAAQS =National Ambient Air Quality Standards. PM-10 = particulate matter 10 pxm or less diameter.

NOx nitrogen oxides. SCIx = sulfur dioxide.

Based on Table 6, the modeled release concentrations are below the applicable NAAQS standards except for PM-10 and PM-2.5. The PM-10 and PM-2.5 releases are assumed to not be mitigated for this analysis. However, the PM-10 and PM-2.5 would be mitigated to ensure that the air concentrations are less than the NAAQ standards by use of water application during excavation operations and limiting excavation during periods of high winds. Therefore, no additional modeling is required at this time.

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEE -RII*N1G DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 5 of 23 A similar evaluation of the model emission Table 7. Ambient Air of Rural/Urban Missouri concentrations was performed to determine if the emissions exceed the regional ambient concentrations of the listed pollutants. Regional values of the five regulated pollutants for Missouri were

- PM-10 ' 6~

  • S -

17.2 20.8 S. S obtained from the Missouri Division of Environmental Quality website for SO2 different monitoring stations in the state 6.97 the closest to the RPF site (MDNR, 2015). CO =carbon monoxide.

NOx = nitrogen oxides.

Table 7 summarizes the data in PM-2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 jIm or less diameter. used to determine the PM-10 =particulate matter 10 jim or less diameter.

average values. SO,' = sulfur dioxide, Table 8 presents the results of the comparison of the air concentrations at the closest receptor (430 m) to the ambient air concentrations.

Table 8. Comparison of Modeled Concentrations to Average Ambient Levels Around the State of Missouri PM-10 103 17.2 Yes8 Yes6 NOx' 45 20.8 No SOx 7.5 7.0 o PM values do not include control measures CO =carbon monoxide. PM-10 particulate matter 101im or less diameter.

NO,' = nitrogen oxides. SOx' = sulfur dioxide.

PM-2. 5 =particulate matter 2.5 jim or less diameter.

From Table 8, control measures for particulate matter should be considered during construction.

In addition, engine emission controls for the construction equipment should be evaluated for the individual units. The emissions factors used were based on average equipment and associated horsepower. Emissions information based on the specific manufacturer's data should result in actual emissions being lower.

References EDF-3 124-0004, Calculationfor the Determinationof Fugitive Dust During ConstructionActivities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 3, 2015.

EDF-3 124-0006, Determinationof Wind-Blown Dust During Construction Activities, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 21, 2015.

EDF-3224-0009, Off-Road Emissions During Construction, Rev. 1, Portage, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, July 31, 2015.

MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqm/index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 6 of 23 Attachment 1 AERSCREEN Fliles AERSCREEN 11126 /AERMOD 1234 06/18/14 13 :04:48 TIThE: AREA RELEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

                        • AREA****- PARAMETERS *************

SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0. 1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.885E-O: 5 gI(s-m2) 0. 702E-04 lbI(hr-m2)

AREA HiEIGHT: 0.30 meters 0. 98 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SID)E: 189.189 meters 623.00 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 74.598 meters 246.00 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: C).00 meters 0.00 feet RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: 2.00 meters 6.56 feet INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet

                        • BUILDIING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS **********

BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POJINIT SOURCES

                        • FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters MAX[MUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1 -HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg)(in) PERIOD

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 7of 23 1" 0.500 1079. 0 125.0 ANN

  • = worst case diagonal
                                  • MVAKE]V[ET METEOROLOGY *ARAETER*****************

MIN/MAX TEMIPERATURE: 249.8 /310.9 (K)

MINIMUM WiINID SPEED: 0.5 m/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS JINPUT: USER ENTERED ALBEDO: 0.60 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 0.500 (meters)

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAX[MUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 01 01 1 01 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS

-0.78 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14. 3.6 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HIT REF TA HIT 10.0 249.8 2.0 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR

TEM-9002 09/29/,09 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 8 of 23 10 0104 1 01 HO U*~ W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS

-0.72 0.033 -9.000 0.020 -999. 14. 4.0 0.500 1.50 0.60 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 249.8 2.0

                          • AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES *********

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM51v MAXIMUJM DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC (in) (ug/m3) (in) (ug/m3) 0.99 557.3 2525.00 42.82 25.00 698.4 2550.00 42.25 50.00 833.0 2575.00 41.69 75.00 954.4 2600.00 41.14 100.00 1064. 2625.00 40.61 125.00 1079. 2650.00 40.09 150.00 983.7 2675.00 39.58 175.00 888.5 2700.00 39.08 200.00 805.4 2725.00 38.59 225.00 733.5 2750.00 38.11 250.00 670.7 2775.00 37.65 275.00 615.7 2800.00 37.19 300.00 567.5 2825.00 36.74 325.00 524.7 2850.00 36.30 350.00 487.0 2875.00 35.87 375.00 453.2 2900.00 35.45 400.00 423.2 2925.00 35.04 425.00 396.1 2950.00 34.63 450.00 371.9 2975.00 34.24 475.00 350.0 3000.00 33.85 500.00 330.2 3025.00 33.47 525.00 312.1 3050.00 33.09 550.00 295.7 3075.00 32.73 575.00 280.7 3100.00 32.37

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. I Rev. 0 Page 9 of 23 600.00 266.8 3125.00 32.01 625.00 254.1 3150.00 31.67 650.00 242.5 3174.99 31.33 675.00 231.7 3199.99 31.00 700.00 221.5 3225.00 30.67 725.00 212.2 3250.00 30.35 750.00 203.6 3275.00 30.03 775.00 195.6 3300.00 29.72 800.00 188.0 3325.00 29.42 825.00 180.9 3350.00 29.12 850.00 174.2 3375.00 28.82 875.00 168.0 3400.00 28.54 900.00 162.2 3425.00 28.25 925.00 156.7 3450.00 27.97 950.00 151.5 3475.00 27.70 975.00 146.5 3500.00 27.43 1000.00 141.9 3525.00 27.16 1025.00 137.5 3550.00 26.90 1050.00 133.4 3575.00 26.65 1075.00 129.4 3600.00 26.39 1100.00 125.6 3625.00 26.15 1125.00 122.1 3650.00 25.90 1150.00 118.7 3675.00 25.66 1175.00 115.4 3700.00 25.43 1200.00 112.3 3725.00 25.19 1225.00 109.3 3750.00 24.96 1250.00 106.5 3775.00 24.74 1275.00 103.8 3800.00 24.52 1300.00 101.2 3825.O00 24.30 1325.00 98.73 3849.99 24.08 1350.00 96.38 3875.00 23.87 1375.00 94.09 3900.00 23.66 1400.00 91.90 3925.00 23.46 1425.00 89.80 3950.00 23.26 1450.00 87.79 3975.00 23.06 1475.00 85.84 4000.00 22.86 1500.00 83.96 4025.00 22.67 1525.00 82.14 4050.00 22.48 1550.00 80.40 4075.00 22.29 1575.00 78.72 4100.00 22.10 1600.00 77.10 4125.00 21.92 1625.00 75.54 4150.00 21.74 1650.00 74.03 4175.00 21.56 1675.00 72.58 4200.00 21.39 1700.00 71.18 4225.00 21.22 1725.00 69.82 4250.00 21.05

TEM-9002 ,ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 10 of 23 1750.00 68.51 4275.00 20.88 1775.00 67.25 4300.00 20.71 1800.00 66.02 4325.00 20.55 1825.00 64.83 4350.00 20.39 1850.00 63.68 4375.00 20.23 1875.00 62.57 4400.00 20.07 1900.00 61.48 4425.00 19.92 1925.00 60.43 4450.00 19.76 1950.00 59.40 4475.00 19.61 1975.00 58.41 4500.00 19.47 2000.00 57.44 4525.00 19.32 2025.00 56.49 4550.00 19.17 2050.00 55.56 4575.00 19.03 2075.00 54.67 4600.00 18.89 2100.00 53.80 4625.00 18.75 2125.00 52.95 4650.00 18.61 2150.00 52.13 4675.00 18.48 2175.00 51.33 4700.00 18.34 2200.00 51.66 4725.00 18.21 2225.00 50.87 4750.00 18.08 2250.00 50.10 4775.00 17.95 2275.00 49.36 4800.00 17.82 2300.00 48.63 4825.00 17.70 2325.00 47.92 4850.00 17.57 2350.00 47.22 4875.00 17.45 2375.00 46.55 4900.00 17*33 2400.00 45.89 4924.99 17.21 2425.00 45.24 4950.00 17.09 2450.00 44.61 4975.00 16.97 2475.00 44.00 5000.00 16.86 2500.00 43.40

TEM-9002 EDF-3124-0014 09/29109 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 11 of 23

                      • AERSCREEN MAIXIMUMV IMPACT SUMvIMARY ********

3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in SCREEN]NG PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THlE AIR QUALITY IMP~ACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)

Report number EPA-454/R-92-019 http://www.epa.gov/scram00 1/guidance~permit.htm under Screening Guidance MAXIMUrM SC!ALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOI J-R 8-HOUR 24-HOUR AINJNUAL CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CALCULATION PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3)

FLAT TERRAIN 1103. 1103. 1103. 1103. N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 112.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 557.3 557.3 557.3 557.3 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 0.99 0.9mtr meters

TEM-9002 EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 SENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 12 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 start date and time 06/13/14 10:00:24 AERSCREEN 11126 NWMI Process boiler run#1 NWMI Process boiler run#1 DATA ENTRY VALIDATION METRIC ENGLISH

    • STACKDATA ** - - - -- - - -

Emission Rate: 0.1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr stack Height: 18.59 meters 61.00 feet stack Diameter: 0.305 meters 12.00 inches stack Temperature: 310.9 K 100.0 Deg F Exit Velocity: 17.929 m/s 58.82 ft/s Stack Flow Rate: 2772 ACFM Model Mode: RURAL Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet

    • BUILDING DATA **

No Building Downwash Parameters

    • TERRAIN DATA **

NO Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet Flagpole Receptor Height: 1.8 meters 6. feet No discrete receptors used

    • METEOROLOGY DATA **

Min/Max Temperature: 255.4 / 302.6 K 0.0 / 85.0 Deg F Minimum wind speed: 0.5 in/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant surface Profile: Grassland Dominant climate Type: Average Moisture AERSCREEN output file:

NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13.out

    • AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin.

No terrain used, AERMAP will, not be run changing units flag from English to metric Page 1

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09129109 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 13 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 SURFACE obtainingCHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET surface characteri sti Cs...

using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Grassland with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.60 1.50 0.001 spring 0.18 0.40 0.050 summer 0.18 0.80 0.100 Autumn 0.20 1.00 0.010 Creating met files aerscreenOLl0.sfc & aerscreen0LO1_O.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO2_.01.sfc & aerscreen_02_0.pfl Creating met files aerscreenO3_l.sfc & aerscreen_03_Ol.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_&04_O.pfl PROBE started 06/13/14 10:05:11 Running probe for winter sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Winter sector 1

        • r**** WARNING MESSAGES *****
      • NONE **

Running probe for spring sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Spring sector1

  • e******* WARNING MESSAGES *****
    • NONE **

Running probe for summer sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for PROBE stage 1 Summer sector1

          • ~** WARNING MESSAGES *****
      • NONE **

Running probe for Autumn sector 1 AERMOO Finishes successfullyfor PROBE stage 1 Autumn sector 1

                  • WARNING MESSAGES *****
    • NONE **

PROBE ended 06/13/14 10:05:17 REFINE started 06/13/14 10:05:17 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 spring sector1 Page 2

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-001 Rev. I 4 Rev. 0 Page 14 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13

          • WARNING MESSAGES *****
    • NONE **

REFINE ended 06/13/14 10:05:17

  • e**** * *** *** **Y*Ye*
  • ** * *** *** * ** **Y*

e* ***e* *******

AERSCREEN Finished successfully with no errors or warnings units switched from EngVIsh to metric check log file for details Ending date and time 06/13/14 10:05:19

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 15 of 23 OUTPUT FILE:

NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 AERSCREEN 11126 / AERMOD 1234 06/13/14 10:05:17 TITLE: NWMI Process boiler run#1

                    • ~***,*******1i******* STACK PARAMETERS *******(*1*Y~*********f*(*******

SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.1260 g/s 1.000 lb/hr

  • STACK HEIGHT: 18.59 meters 61.00 feet STACK INNER DIAMETER: 0.305 meters 12.00 inches PLUME EXIT TEMPERATURE: 310.9 K 100.0 Deg F PLUME EXIT VELOCITY: 17.929 mn/s 58.82 ft/s STACK AIR FLOW RATE: 2772 ACFM RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL FLAGPOLE RECEPTOR HEIGHT: 1.83 meters 6.00 feet INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
                            • ~ ~BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS *************

NO BUILDING DOWNWASH HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR THIS ANALYSIS

                                            • e**** PROBE ANALYSIS **************

25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters Zo ROUGHNESS 1-HR CONC DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR LENGTH (ug/m3) Cm) PERIOD 1"0.050 19.15- 125.0 SPR

  • = worst case flow sector
                        • MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ***********

MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 255.4 / 302.6 (K)

MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 mn/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Grassland DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Spring ALB EDO: 0.18 0.40 BOWEN RATIO:

ROUGHNESS' LENGTH: 0.050 (meters)

Page 1

TEM-9002 EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 16 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0105 5 12 HO W*' DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS 21.62 0.066 0.300 0.020 46. 39. -1.2 0.050 0.40 0.18 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 302.6 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT Cnon-downwash): 33.3 meters METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT YR MO DY JDY HR 10 0101 5 12 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN zo BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS

-1.63 0.0o39- 0.100 0.0o20- -19.- -18.- _.9 0.010- 1.00 0.20 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 255.4 2.0 ESTIMATED FINAL PLUME HEIGHT (non-downwash): 53.7 meters

                                    • 1******* AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) Cm) (ug/m3) 1.00 0.4366E-03 2525.00 5.097 25.00 7.119 2550.00 5.061 50.00 9.924 2575.00 5.024 75.00 14.25 2600.00 4.989 100.00 18.40 2625.00 4.953 125.00 19.15 2650.00 4.919 150.00 18.65 2675.00 4.884 175.00 17.82 2700.00 4.850 200.00 16.90 2725.00 4.817 225.00 15.99 2750.00 4.784 250.00 15.14 2775.00 4.752 275.00 14.36 2800.00 4.720 300.00 13.65 2825.00 4.688 325.00 13.00 2850.00 4.657 Page 2

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124--0014 09129/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 17 of 23 NWMiI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13

  • 350.00 12.41 2875.00 4,627 375.00 11.87 2900.00 4.597 400.00 11.38 2925.00 4.567 425.00 10.93 2950.00 4.537 450.00 10. 52 2975.00 4.508 475.00 10.39 3000.00 4.480 500.00 10.29 3025.00 4.451 525.00 10.15 3050.00 4.423 550.00 9.975 3075.00 4.396 575.00 9.782 3100.00 4.369 600.00 9.575 3125.00 4.342 625.00 9.357 3150.00 43315 650.00 9.13 5 3175.00 4.289 675.00 8.910 3200.00 4.263 700 .00 8.685 3225 .00 4.238 725.00 8.461 3250.00 4.212 750.00 8.241 3275.00 4.187 775.00 8.029 3300.00 4.163 800.00 7.938 3325.00 4.139 825.00 7.842 3350.00 4.115 850.00 7.742 3375.00 4.091 875.00 7.887 3400.00 4.067 900.00 8.023 3425.00 4.044 925.00 8.132 3450.00 4.021 950.00 8.2 18 3475.00 3.999 975.00 8.282 3500.00 3.976 1000.00 8.327 3525.00 3.954 1025.00 8.300 3550.00 3.933 1050.00 8.258 3575.00 3.911 1075.00 8.212 3600.00 3.890 1100.O00 8.162 3625.00 3.869 1125.O00 8.110 3650.00 3.848 1150.O00 8.055 3675.00 3.827 1175.00 7.998 3700.00 3.807 1200.O00 7.938 3725.00 3.787 1225.O00 7.878 3750.00 3.767 1250.00 7.816 3775.00 .3.747 1275.00 7.753 3800.00 3.727 1300.00 7.689 3825.00 .3.708 1325.00 7.625 3850.00 3.689 1350.00 7.560 3875.00 3.670 1375.00 7.495 3900.00 3.651 1400.O00 7.430 3925.00 3.633 1425.O00 7.365 3950.00 3,615 1450.00 7.300 3975.00 3,597 1475.00 7.23 5 4000.00 3.579 1500.00 7.171 4025.00 3,561 1525.00 7.107 4050.00 .3.543 1550.00 7.043 4075.00 3.526 1575.00 6.980 4100.00 3.509 1600.00 6.918 4125.00 3.492 1625.00 6.856 4150.00 3,475 1650.00 6.794 4175.00 3.458 1675.00 6.734 4200.00 3.442 1700.00 6.674 4225.00 3 .425 1725.00 6.614 4250.00 3.409 1750.00 6.556 4275.00 3,393 1775.00 6.498 4300.00 3.377 1800.00 6.441 4325.00 3.362 1825.00 6.385 4350.00 3.346 1850.00 6.329 4375.00 3.331 1875.00 6.274 4400.00 3.315 1900.00 6.220 4425.00 3.300 Page 3

TEM-9002 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 18 of 23 NWMI Process Boilers ARESCREEN Run 6-13 1925.00 6.167 4450.00 3.285 1950.00 6.114 4475.00 3.270 1975.00 6.062 4500.00 3.256 2000.00 6.011 4525.00 3.241 2025.00 5.961 4550.00 3.227 2050.00 5.911 4575.00 3.212 2075.00 5.863 4600.00 3.198 2100.00 5.815 4625.00 3.184 2125.00 5.767 4650.00 3.170 2150.00 5.720 4675.00 3.157 2175.00 5.674 4700.00 3.143 2200.00 5.629 4725.00 3.129 2225.00 5.584 4750.00 3.116 22 50.00 5.540 4775.00 3.103 2275.00 5.497 4800.00 3.089 2300.00 5.454 4825.00 3.076 2325.00 5.412 4850.00 3.063 2350.00 5.371 4875.00 3.051 2375.00 5.330 4900.00 3.038 2400.00 5.290 4925.00 3.025 2425.00 5.250 4950.00 3.013 2450.00 5.211 4975.00 3.000 2475.00 5.173 5000.00 2.988 2500.00 5.135

                        • (*** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT

SUMMARY

MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/mi3) (ug/m3)

FLAT TERRAIN 19.15 19.15 17.24 11.49 1.915 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 123.00 meters IMPACT ATBOUNDARY AMBIENT THE 0.4366E-03 0.4366E-03 0.3929E-03 0.2619E-03 0.4366E-04 DISTANCE FROM SOURCE1.0mtr 1. O0 meters

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 Rev. 1 24-0014 Rev. 0 Page 19 of 23 Attachment 2 Excel Spreadsheet of Emission Rate Calculations Total PM Emissions Source (Hbs) Total Amount Effluent ________

_____________Equlpment Winda [ onstuctin b Off-Road Construction (is PM-10 160 [ 3000 66 3226 PM-2.5 24 [ 600 50 674

a. FromEDF-3 124-0006
b. From EDF-3124-0004
c. From EDF-3 124-0009 ________

[PM-10 Calculation !Total relase is 3226 lbs over 17 months

!lAveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> release is f ]3322-17bs.....mo---s x ont3 days

  • 1lday/24 hours i 2.64E-01 ___ lb/hr average over 17 months ___ ____

i [1.4lb1 /hraverage over 3-years....

From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release

... . ... ... The;aveag cnnetration at 112 meters is

,- 2.64E-02 [2.64E-02 lb/hr

  • 1103 ug/m3 ____

, 17 months , 2.91E+02 !ug/m3 __

~PM-2.5 Calculation }Total relase is 674 lbs over 17 months

_* Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> release is I 64ls1 months x 1 month/S0 days_* Iday/24 hours __

S...... ...... .. ... .. .. ... .551 -0 . J l/hr average over 17 months _ _ _

.  !...2.60E-02 Ilb/hr average over 3-years From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/m3 / lb/hr release

-- The average concnetration at 112_meters is_____

SPM2.5 6.07E+i01 *ug/m 3

-- From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at 430 meters and is 391 ug/m3 / lb/hr release

'At 430 meters  ; . ___

+ PM- 10 = 1.0305E+02 iug/m3 IPM-2.5_____ 2,1531E+Oljug/m3 - __ _

i .. .

._. . .... .... . U.. . . . .. . .. ....

. i. ....

lTM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-3124-0014 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 20 of 23 Tablc 20Off-Road Vehiele Emissions (During 17 Months of Construction)

_________________Pollutant(s)

Equipment Number Hours NOx CO ____CO 2 SOx (kg (Ibs)

  • kg) (Ibs) (kg) (Ibs) *kg (Ibs)

Bulldozer 1.00E+00O 1.00E÷02 1.39E+f02 3.07E+i02 1.90E+-01 4.10E+-01 1.30E+04 2.87E+04 2.30E+01 5.l0E+01 Compactor 1.00E+00 1.20E+02 1.55E+-I02 3.42E+I02 2.10E+I01 4.60E+01l 1.45E+'04 3.20E+04 2.60E+~01 5.70E+I01 Excavators 1.00E+00 6.00E+01 4.90E-i01 1.08E+02 8.00E+00 1.70E+f01 4.53E1+03 9.99E1+03 8.00E1+00 1.80E+01 Front Loaders 1.00E+400 1.20E1+02 6.80E+f01 1.50E1+02 1.00E-t01 2.30E+01 6.25E+03 1.38E+04 1.10E1+01 2.50E-I01 Grfaders 1.0OE+t00 8.00E+01 6.60E+01 1.45E-+02 1.00E+01 2.20E1+01 6.04E+03 1.33E1+04 1.10E1+01 2.40E+01 Paver 1.OOE-l-00 8.00E1+01 6.40E+01 1.4211+02 1.00E+01 2.20E+i01 5.921-+03 1.30E+04 1.10E+01 2.30E1+01 Asphalt Roller 1.00E+i00 8.00E1+01 1.04E+-102 2.28E+02 1.40E+01 3.10E1+01 9.6711+03 2.13E+04 1.70E+01 3.80E+01 Total 6.46E+02 1.42E+03 9.10E+01 2.01E+02 6.01E+04 1.32E+05 1.07E+02 2.36E+02

[N~x CalculaUon I Totalirehase is 1,4221lbs over 17 months T-i

________Aveage 1hour releas is _______2_--2 -_-

5

'iee l ]14221b s/17 m onth saxl1m onth/30 days

  • 1 d a y /24hou s_._! _ ... .....

1-hr,98thpercntile avoa__o____e____ .1_ -0______ _______-______________________

aged ver aerhreeover1'7 monthsa .. .

years. t _____

-F !__5.4911-02 Ylb/hr average over 3-years _________

-U-_ _ _

FmAESCREEN Maxmsnnconcentrallon is at 112 meters and is 1103 uglm3 /lblhr release I ____

[From AESCREEN concentratlon Is at 430 meters, and is 391 sng/n3/ lb/hr release J____[

eaverage oonenetration at 121 meters is ] _ The average conenetration at 430 meters is r i 6.2 10 pb _ _ __ _ _ .4 +0__gm__..

__ , Aveag......releasci I --.----

S ___x193C-02 Tbhrlvergeove17 montha ___ I

______ 91.91E-03 lb/hr average over 3-yar months______

__.0E-3 l__raveage__e 3-ea__-

it ~From AESCREEN Maxmum concentration is at112 meters andlis 1103 uglm3!/lb/hr release ____ .

[The average eonenetr-ation at 112 meters IThe average oonenelration at 430 metersT

[ I ]~2.31-1i-01--- gm3..... F......i........ 7.54E+00 lu/m3 j~.~___

K_____ 1.121o-3 ---- iF-- _ -i L_-- e_____

TEM-9002 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 Rev. 1 24--0014 Rev. 0 Page 21 of 23 ICO Calculation Total relase is 201 lbs over 17 months __________

______ Aveage 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> release is - I ______

____ 201 lbs/17 months x 1 month/30_days

  • day/24 hours _____Il

. 1 7.75E-03 7ijlbhr average over 3-ye ars

f. r average 1........s.... . .ver f .... - --.- - -- i iFrom AESCREEN Maxmmnmconcentratlon is at 112 meters and is 1103 ug/nm3 /Ilblhrrelease_ _ i "

L!FromAE*SCR EE.N_ once ntraten.Isa 4430 un.e ters_.and is 391 .g/m3/lb/h

-.......... rleas ...... I..............

S The average conenetration at 112 meters is The average oonenetration at 430 meters is

...J64E-02 1 lb/h-r*l113 ugm3-t 1.8E+01*ug/3

{ [ 16.42E-+00 iug/m3

  • S1.58E-02 !ppm i 56E0 pm . ....-- ..

i -i I I I- ____

_________________ I I]

_____ 1 For Concentrations at 430 meters multiply 112 concentration times 391/1103 NOx 2.42E+01 ppb CO 5.61E-03 ppm SOx '2. 88E=03 ppm Aegeconcentration at 112 meters Nx6.82E+01 ppb CO1.58E-02 ppm Sx8.12E-03 ppm r O1p=18~gm

TEM-9002  :'ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 22 of 23 Attachment 3 Average Ambient Pollutant Concentrations for Missouri Table A3-1. Levels of Carbon Monoxide in Springfield Missouri 1993 i 5.4 14 59 1995 9 1997 1999 ~4.1 5

>).]: );f 27*"2Q007!*6.6:/**:*::,i:

2001

, 2.84 7

- '-', 6 2003 4

2005 5

4 2007 i 2.6 4 1.9 2009 ' 1.5 2.3 2.3 Second Quarter 2013 .

  • 1.1 2.3

-- Average {((g/m )- 3 5.73E+00 6.56E+03 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dur.mo.govfenv/esp/aqm-index.htm1, accessed July 2015.

Table A3-2. Nitrogen Dioxide - Hillcrest Hligh School Springfield 1993 0.011 2002 0.0107

'-7L,*:0!*11*

0.013 1995 2004 0.012 0.012 1996 2006 0.0104

, " - i'.998:,',. 0.011 2). 'A 1999 ~20087! 0.0089 0.013 2001 Through Third Quarter 0.0079 1.1OE-02!

"? ,* ):*

index.html, accessed July 2015.

TEM-9002 EDF-31 24-0014 09/29/09 ENGINEERING DESIGN FILE Rev. 1 Rev. 0 Page 23 of 23 Table A3-3. Inhalable PM10 - Missouri State University Springfield 1993 S 18 2003 17 S 40 i 38 1995 17 , 44 S 2005 19.3 45 ,

1997 S 15 51 2007 17.9 1999 45 2009 14

7 18 38 2001  : 20 57 2011 16.5
  • 5+

+::" 1 d+ :

£{l'*::*> * *8 Average (utg/m 3 ") 17.16 43.2 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http:lldnr.mo.gov/env/esplaqmn/

mndex html, accessed July 2015.

Table A3-4. Inhalable PM-2.5 - Missouri State University Springfield 1999 , 12.24 2006 10.82

<12*2 2001 ' 12.2 2008 ~10.7 2003 , 11.7 2010 ~9.89 2005  : 13.01 2012 i 10.09 Source: MDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/ envlesplaqm/

mndcxhtml, accessed July 2015.

Table A3-$. Sulfur Dioxide - Missouri State University Springfield

0.0053 2002 0.003 I19942 -
  • ! :" :,:'¢ ::::*0.002 -:t* .>:

1995

  • 0.002 2004 0.0014
{:

"59.96:

1"! ,{  :,'>*=,*:-, .,0.0017, 7 ,:;,

1997

~

2 2 0.002 2006 0.0019 1998>)i~ ~0.002 1999 =v>';a,**,--,:* *°0.003, a...

2008 0.0022 0.004 2001 ,Average (ppm) , 2.66E-03 Source: MvDNR 2014, "Air Quality Monitoring," Missouri Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.mo.gov/env/esp/aqml index.html, accessed July 2015.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16053A211&oldid=2510793"