ML080640201: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:H-'a'-r'r-i-s--N--u'-c'l-'e"-a'-r--P-la'nt
~~Shearon~~~arrisEIS~~
eea arsNcerPatPgI~
From: To: Date:
 
==Subject:==
'connections" <ford8nl @juno.com>
<ShearonHarrisEIS@nrc.gov>
Mon, Jan 28, 2008 6:47 AM Renewal Harris Nuclear Plant Memories of the former Torry Canyon and Exxon Valdez oil supertankers cannot fade from my mind. And they should not. They were some of the greatest ecological and economic diasters of mankind. Millions of fish, birds, and mammals died in the black ooz spilled from these vessels. More recent oil spills have happened off the coast of South Korea. If mankind depends upon oil for energy this tragically will not stop.Oil must be replaced by alternative energy sources. Yes so far our automobiles and other ground transport still depend upon this source but our power generating stations do not!From internet information I understand that the USA has about 104 nuclear power plants with the Shearon Harris plant being one. Our future depends upon reliable energy without being held hostage by those nations such as in the far east for this essential oil.How many of our young generation will die and spill their blood on a foreign land in this relentless quest for oil? Wars are being fought for this resource and America is going into debt that will never be paid off to do this? Are our future generations (assuming there may be a future) going to be doomed due to our reluctance to use nuclear techonology?
Who knows? The jury is still out.For one electricity consumerserved by the Harris nuke plant I would without reservation say to renew the license for the additional 20 years.Our life as a people and a nation depend upon energy that is cheap, plentiful, and obtainable, The risks compared to wars being fought for oil and past oil spill disasters are just plain not worth it. Yes in my opinion not worth it .....GEORGE J. WILBERG 5021 SIMPSON DRIVE SANFORD, NC 27330-7021 TEL: 919 718 6135 d7/7, 2-3 4/.-T0-i-N)'-Il N)4-3 c~,o.C -,' T<< ..-''- U-- ".S a VS. &#xfd;-,& C- ee~-~j7:-- -e)3 tem.p\GW)00001.TMP
: c. ". ....... ...,O, ,ITM, Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (479DCOCE.ACB:
3 :2763)
 
==Subject:==
Creation Date From: Created By: Renewal Harris Nuclear Plant Mon, Jan 28, 2008 6:45 AM"connections" <ford8n 1 (@i) uno.com>ford8nl @iuno.corn Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 ShearonHarrisElS Post Office TWGWPO03.HQGWDOOI Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE Mime.822 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
 
==Subject:==
Security: Size 1710 3399 Date & Time Monday, January 28, 2008 6:45 AM None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results.Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}

Revision as of 17:45, 20 September 2018

Comment (4) of George J. Wilberg Supporting Renewal Harris Nuclear Plant
ML080640201
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/2008
From: Wilberg G J
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch
References
72FR71973 00004
Download: ML080640201 (2)


Text

H-'a'-r'r-i-s--N--u'-c'l-'e"-a'-r--P-la'nt

~~Shearon~~~arrisEIS~~

eea arsNcerPatPgI~

From: To: Date:

Subject:

'connections" <ford8nl @juno.com>

<ShearonHarrisEIS@nrc.gov>

Mon, Jan 28, 2008 6:47 AM Renewal Harris Nuclear Plant Memories of the former Torry Canyon and Exxon Valdez oil supertankers cannot fade from my mind. And they should not. They were some of the greatest ecological and economic diasters of mankind. Millions of fish, birds, and mammals died in the black ooz spilled from these vessels. More recent oil spills have happened off the coast of South Korea. If mankind depends upon oil for energy this tragically will not stop.Oil must be replaced by alternative energy sources. Yes so far our automobiles and other ground transport still depend upon this source but our power generating stations do not!From internet information I understand that the USA has about 104 nuclear power plants with the Shearon Harris plant being one. Our future depends upon reliable energy without being held hostage by those nations such as in the far east for this essential oil.How many of our young generation will die and spill their blood on a foreign land in this relentless quest for oil? Wars are being fought for this resource and America is going into debt that will never be paid off to do this? Are our future generations (assuming there may be a future) going to be doomed due to our reluctance to use nuclear techonology?

Who knows? The jury is still out.For one electricity consumerserved by the Harris nuke plant I would without reservation say to renew the license for the additional 20 years.Our life as a people and a nation depend upon energy that is cheap, plentiful, and obtainable, The risks compared to wars being fought for oil and past oil spill disasters are just plain not worth it. Yes in my opinion not worth it .....GEORGE J. WILBERG 5021 SIMPSON DRIVE SANFORD, NC 27330-7021 TEL: 919 718 6135 d7/7, 2-3 4/.-T0-i-N)'-Il N)4-3 c~,o.C -,' T<< ..-- U-- ".S a VS. ý-,& C- ee~-~j7:-- -e)3 tem.p\GW)00001.TMP

c. ". ....... ...,O, ,ITM, Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (479DCOCE.ACB:

3 :2763)

Subject:

Creation Date From: Created By: Renewal Harris Nuclear Plant Mon, Jan 28, 2008 6:45 AM"connections" <ford8n 1 (@i) uno.com>ford8nl @iuno.corn Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDOO1 ShearonHarrisElS Post Office TWGWPO03.HQGWDOOI Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE Mime.822 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security: Size 1710 3399 Date & Time Monday, January 28, 2008 6:45 AM None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results.Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled