Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Issue date | From | Title | Project stage | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ML20205Q488 | 7 May 1986 | Dean R GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES INC./GENER | Forwards Info Re Chernobyl Incident & Lack of Similarities Between Chernobyl & High Temp Gas Reactor Concepts Being Developed in Us.Discussion Requested | Other |
ML20197B921 | 9 May 1986 | Xcel Energy | Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Accident & Implications Upon Fort St Vrain | Other |
ML20197B893 | 9 May 1986 | Xcel Energy Brey H | Forwards Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Accident & Implications Upon Fort St Vrain, Per NRC Request to Assess Possibility of Graphite Fire.Accident Involving Graphite Oxidation Not Credible | Other |
ML20205Q483 | 9 May 1986 | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Harold Denton | Discusses Continued Operation of Facility in View of Accident at Chernobyl.Encl Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Scenario Concludes That Graphite Oxidation Could Be Terminated within 24 H | Other |
ML20205Q477 | 14 May 1986 | NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) Stello V | Forwards Memo & Supporting Info Re Reexam of Basis for Licensing Facility in View of Accident at Chernobyl. Continued Operation Justified Until Scheduled Shutdown on 860531.Issue Will Be Reexamined Prior to Restart | Other |
ML20207J766 | 2 July 1986 | Hogan R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) Yandell L Baird J Hackney C | Emergency Preparedness Insp Rept 50-267/86-15 on 860519-22. Violation Noted:Inadequate Emergency Response Training Program Evidenced by Lack of Records | Request |
ML20237G425 | 18 July 1986 | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Harold Denton | Responds to to Lw Zech Re Safety of Plant in Light of Recent Accident at Chernobyl Facility in Soviet Union.Evaluation Indicated That Radiation Doses Would Be So Low as Not to Require Evacuation of Local Residents | Other |
ML20210C968 | 16 September 1986 | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Heitner K | Forwards Translation of Soviet Rept on Chernobyl Accident. Rept Should Be Reviewed & Matl Used to Update Previous Rept, Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Accident & Implications. Requests Revised Rept by 861010.W/o Encl | Other |
ML20215F206 | 6 October 1986 | Xcel Energy Brey H | Requests Extension of Time Frame to Review Soviet Rept on Chernobyl Accident & Assess Impact on Facility Safety.Util Will Define Areas to Be Further Investigated & Complete Schedule by 861022 | Other |
ML20211D330 | 16 October 1986 | Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | Comments on Program Plan for Utilizing Facility Experiences & Technical Support Activities to Best Advantage in Advanced HTGR Safety Studies.Focus of Program Plan Should Be Limited to Few Critical Areas | Other |
ML20214X368 | 26 November 1986 | Xcel Energy GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES INC./GENER | Revised Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Accident & Implications Upon Fort St Vrain | Other |
ML20214X358 | 4 December 1986 | Xcel Energy Brey H | Forwards Revised Analysis of Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Accident & Implications Upon Fort St Vrain. Chernobyl-type Accident Cannot Occur at Plant Due to Fundamental Design Differences | Other |
ML20209B691 | 29 January 1987 | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Heitner K | Forwards Official Repts Made Public by DOE Re Review of N-reactor for Info & Review.Util Should Review Repts for Matl Potentially Relevant to Facility.W/O Encl | Approval |
ML20206B603 | 1 April 1987 | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Heitner K | Forwards Comments Re Implication of Chernobyl Reactor Accident.Design Differences Between Fort St Vrain & Chernobyl Preclude Accident Similar to Chernobyl from Occurring at Fort St Vrain | Approval |