Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Issue date | Title | Topic | |
---|---|---|---|
ML14022A282 | 21 December 2013 | Comment (00930) of Michael Keegan on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel | Time to boil Operating Basis Earthquake License Renewal Earthquake Chernobyl Fuel cladding Affidavit |
ML14001A018 | 19 December 2013 | Comment (00748) of Connie Kline on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel | |
ML14014A110 | 19 December 2013 | Comment (00915) of Corinne Carey on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel | |
ML13336B471 | 1 December 2013 | Comment (00306) of Charles Bagwell on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel | |
ML112521106 | 9 September 2011 | Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment | Aging Management Fukushima Dai-Ichi Severe Accident Management Guideline License Renewal Earthquake Chernobyl |
ML112521039 | 9 September 2011 | Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment | Aging Management Fukushima Dai-Ichi Severe Accident Management Guideline License Renewal Earthquake Chernobyl |
NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment | 9 September 2011 | Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment | Aging Management Fukushima Dai-Ichi Severe Accident Management Guideline License Renewal Earthquake Chernobyl |
ML092930988 | 19 October 2009 | Comment (30) from T.A. Henderson on Behalf of Firstenergy Corp, on Proposed Rules Pr 50 & 52, Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations. | |
ML092800079 | 5 October 2009 | Comment (14) of George R. Sabo on Proposed Rules Pr 50 and 52 Regarding Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations | |
NRC-2008-0404, Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update | 4 February 2009 | Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update | |
NRC-2008-0482, 2009/02/04-Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update | 4 February 2009 | 2009/02/04-Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update | |
ML081340284 | 8 May 2008 | Comment (22) of Ronald W Gaston on Behalf of Detroit Edison on Proposed Rules PR-20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 Regarding Decommissioning Planning | Backfit |
ML073100248 | 1 November 2007 | Comment (2) of Todd a Henderson on Behalf of Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) on Energy Solutions PRM-50-88 Re to Amend 10 CFR 50.82., Termination of License | |
ML070810020 | 20 March 2007 | Comment (2) Submitted by Matt Kirkland on Proposed Rules Pr 40, 72, 74 and 150 Regarding Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System | |
NRC-06-0081, Comment (7) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W. Gaston, on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 73, 76, and 150, Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information | 29 December 2006 | Comment (7) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W. Gaston, on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 73, 76, and 150, Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information | |
ML053620309 | 27 December 2005 | Comment (60) Submitted by Andrew V. Antrassian, on Behalf of the Utility Workers Union of America, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs | Fitness for Duty |
NRC-05-0087, Comment (68) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W Gaston on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs | 27 December 2005 | Comment (68) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W Gaston on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs | Fitness for Duty |
L-HU-05-029, Comment (51) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs | 22 December 2005 | Comment (51) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs | Fitness for Duty |
L-05-194, Comments (69) Submitted by First Energy Nuclear Operating Company, Gregory H. Halnon on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Rule Programs | 22 December 2005 | Comments (69) Submitted by First Energy Nuclear Operating Company, Gregory H. Halnon on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Rule Programs | Fitness for Duty |
NRC-05-0028, Comment (2) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman K Peterson Supporting Proposed Rule 170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2005 | 22 March 2005 | Comment (2) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman K Peterson Supporting Proposed Rule 170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2005 | |
ML041060212 | 8 April 2004 | Comment (6) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman Peterson, on Proposed Rules Pr 19, 20 & 50 Regarding Collection, Reporting, or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language | |
ML032470849 | 28 August 2003 | Comment (22) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors | |
ML032320135 | 1 August 2003 | Comment (9) Submitted by Morgan Lewis & Brockus, Llp, Steven P. Frantz, P.M. Bessette, on Behalf of Exelon Gen., S. Texas, on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization & Treatment of Structures, Systems & Components for Nuclear Po | Safe Shutdown Probabilistic Risk Assessment Large early release frequency Severe Accident Management Guideline Exemption Request Earthquake Maintenance Rule Program |
NRC-03-0058, Comment (10) Submitted by Detroit Edison ,Norman K. Peterson, Supporting Sander C. Perle Petition for Rulemaking PRM 20-25, Re Requirements That Dosimetry Used as Primary Dosimeter Shall Be Accredited | 15 July 2003 | Comment (10) Submitted by Detroit Edison ,Norman K. Peterson, Supporting Sander C. Perle Petition for Rulemaking PRM 20-25, Re Requirements That Dosimetry Used as Primary Dosimeter Shall Be Accredited | Deep Dose Equivalent |
ML031290102 | 5 May 2003 | Comment (22) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, Edward J. Weinkam, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171, Revision of Fee Schedules: Recovery for Fy 2003 | |
ML022890165 | 14 October 2002 | Comment (7) Submitted by Firstenergy, Perry Nuclear Power, Kristi Mcconnell on PR-Chapter 1 (Dfr) Regarding Electronic Maintenance & Submission of Information | |
NRC-02-0068, Comment of Norman K. Peterson Re Response to Requests for Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process | 4 September 2002 | Comment of Norman K. Peterson Re Response to Requests for Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process | |
ML022380017 | 16 August 2002 | Comment of Terry Lodge on Proposed Use of ADR in NRC Enforcement Proceedings |