Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
ML14022A28221 December 2013Comment (00930) of Michael Keegan on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear FuelTime to boil
Operating Basis Earthquake
License Renewal
Earthquake
Chernobyl
Fuel cladding
Affidavit
ML14001A01819 December 2013Comment (00748) of Connie Kline on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14014A11019 December 2013Comment (00915) of Corinne Carey on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336B4711 December 2013Comment (00306) of Charles Bagwell on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML1125211069 September 2011Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification AmendmentAging Management
Fukushima Dai-Ichi
Severe Accident Management Guideline
License Renewal
Earthquake
Chernobyl
ML1125210399 September 2011Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification AmendmentAging Management
Fukushima Dai-Ichi
Severe Accident Management Guideline
License Renewal
Earthquake
Chernobyl
NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment9 September 2011Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification AmendmentAging Management
Fukushima Dai-Ichi
Severe Accident Management Guideline
License Renewal
Earthquake
Chernobyl
ML09293098819 October 2009Comment (30) from T.A. Henderson on Behalf of Firstenergy Corp, on Proposed Rules Pr 50 & 52, Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations.
ML0928000795 October 2009Comment (14) of George R. Sabo on Proposed Rules Pr 50 and 52 Regarding Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
NRC-2008-0404, Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update4 February 2009Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update
NRC-2008-0482, 2009/02/04-Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update4 February 20092009/02/04-Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update
ML0813402848 May 2008Comment (22) of Ronald W Gaston on Behalf of Detroit Edison on Proposed Rules PR-20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 Regarding Decommissioning PlanningBackfit
ML0731002481 November 2007Comment (2) of Todd a Henderson on Behalf of Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) on Energy Solutions PRM-50-88 Re to Amend 10 CFR 50.82., Termination of License
ML07081002020 March 2007Comment (2) Submitted by Matt Kirkland on Proposed Rules Pr 40, 72, 74 and 150 Regarding Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System
NRC-06-0081, Comment (7) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W. Gaston, on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 73, 76, and 150, Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information29 December 2006Comment (7) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W. Gaston, on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 73, 76, and 150, Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information
ML05362030927 December 2005Comment (60) Submitted by Andrew V. Antrassian, on Behalf of the Utility Workers Union of America, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty ProgramsFitness for Duty
NRC-05-0087, Comment (68) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W Gaston on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs27 December 2005Comment (68) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W Gaston on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty ProgramsFitness for Duty
L-HU-05-029, Comment (51) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs22 December 2005Comment (51) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty ProgramsFitness for Duty
L-05-194, Comments (69) Submitted by First Energy Nuclear Operating Company, Gregory H. Halnon on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Rule Programs22 December 2005Comments (69) Submitted by First Energy Nuclear Operating Company, Gregory H. Halnon on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Rule ProgramsFitness for Duty
NRC-05-0028, Comment (2) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman K Peterson Supporting Proposed Rule 170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 200522 March 2005Comment (2) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman K Peterson Supporting Proposed Rule 170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2005
ML0410602128 April 2004Comment (6) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman Peterson, on Proposed Rules Pr 19, 20 & 50 Regarding Collection, Reporting, or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language
ML03247084928 August 2003Comment (22) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML0323201351 August 2003Comment (9) Submitted by Morgan Lewis & Brockus, Llp, Steven P. Frantz, P.M. Bessette, on Behalf of Exelon Gen., S. Texas, on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization & Treatment of Structures, Systems & Components for Nuclear PoSafe Shutdown
Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Large early release frequency
Severe Accident Management Guideline
Exemption Request
Earthquake
Maintenance Rule Program
NRC-03-0058, Comment (10) Submitted by Detroit Edison ,Norman K. Peterson, Supporting Sander C. Perle Petition for Rulemaking PRM 20-25, Re Requirements That Dosimetry Used as Primary Dosimeter Shall Be Accredited15 July 2003Comment (10) Submitted by Detroit Edison ,Norman K. Peterson, Supporting Sander C. Perle Petition for Rulemaking PRM 20-25, Re Requirements That Dosimetry Used as Primary Dosimeter Shall Be AccreditedDeep Dose Equivalent
ML0312901025 May 2003Comment (22) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, Edward J. Weinkam, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171, Revision of Fee Schedules: Recovery for Fy 2003
ML02289016514 October 2002Comment (7) Submitted by Firstenergy, Perry Nuclear Power, Kristi Mcconnell on PR-Chapter 1 (Dfr) Regarding Electronic Maintenance & Submission of Information
NRC-02-0068, Comment of Norman K. Peterson Re Response to Requests for Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process4 September 2002Comment of Norman K. Peterson Re Response to Requests for Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
ML02238001716 August 2002Comment of Terry Lodge on Proposed Use of ADR in NRC Enforcement Proceedings