Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
CY-99-076, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR1,2,4,7,9,15,16,76 & 110 Re Initiative to Implement New Document Mgt Sys That Would Permit Electronic Storage,Retrieval & on-line Ordering of Publicly Available NRC Official Records20 May 1999Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR1,2,4,7,9,15,16,76 & 110 Re Initiative to Implement New Document Mgt Sys That Would Permit Electronic Storage,Retrieval & on-line Ordering of Publicly Available NRC Official Records
ML20204B66322 February 1999Comment on Recommended Improvements to Oversight Process for Nuclear Power Reactors.Forwards 5th Edition of Nuclear Lemons Assessment of America Worst Commerical Nuclear Power PlantsEnforcement Discretion
CY-98-139, Comment on Draft NUREG-1625, Proposed Standard TSs for Permanently Defueled Westinghouse Plants1 September 1998Comment on Draft NUREG-1625, Proposed Standard TSs for Permanently Defueled Westinghouse PlantsFuel cladding
ML20216B56631 March 1998Comment Supporting NRC Draft RG DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept
ML20199A16328 October 1997Forwards Final Page of Exhibit 2,P Gunter Ltr to Commission on Behalf of Nirs Re Prs 10CFR2,50 & 51 Involving Immediate Recission of Current Decommissioning Rules,Conducting Site Specific Health Study & EA &/Or EIS
ML20199A13524 October 1997Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Immediate Rescission of Current Decommissioning Rules & Provision for Hearing on Decommissioning Plan for Plant.W/Nirs & Affidavits of M Resnikoff,S Mangiagli & R BassilakisIncorporated by reference
Deep Dose Equivalent
Chernobyl
Scaffolding
Affidavit
ML20134P06814 November 1996Comment on Draft RG DG-1051, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npp
ML20059F7763 January 1994Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Proposal to Amend Its Physical Protection Regulations for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors by Modifying Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage
B14644, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70 & 72 Re Whistleblower Protection for Nuclear Power Plant Employees.Supports Rules14 October 1993Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70 & 72 Re Whistleblower Protection for Nuclear Power Plant Employees.Supports Rules
B14346, Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1020, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants15 January 1993Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1020, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power PlantsMaintenance Rule Program
ML20059P06315 October 1990Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARCLicense Renewal
B13567, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Endorses NUMARC Position That Rule Challenges Licensed Operators Trustworthiness W/O Justification & Would Affect Morale of Licensed Operators2 July 1990Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Endorses NUMARC Position That Rule Challenges Licensed Operators Trustworthiness W/O Justification & Would Affect Morale of Licensed Operators
B13572, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Periodicity of Submissions of FSAR Revs2 July 1990Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Periodicity of Submissions of FSAR Revs
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements20 September 1989Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements
ML20245G0723 August 1989Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants
ML20246K4805 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel8 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of DieselProbabilistic Risk Assessment
Overspeed trip
ML20236B4648 March 1989Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide FlexibilityProbabilistic Risk Assessment
Overspeed trip
ML20246N9478 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power PlantsProbabilistic Risk Assessment
Overspeed trip
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague27 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too VagueBackfit
ML20235N5479 February 1989Undated Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Education & Experience for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Neither Alternative Acceptable or Needed
ML20206M53221 November 1988Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty ProgramFitness for Duty
Backfit
ML20196E59322 June 1988Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
B12891, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcement of Inspector on Site18 April 1988Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcement of Inspector on Site
B12870, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Leakage Testing of Containments to Permit Use of Mass Point Method as Alternative Method for Calculating Containment Leakage Rates31 March 1988Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Leakage Testing of Containments to Permit Use of Mass Point Method as Alternative Method for Calculating Containment Leakage Rates
ML20151A88831 March 1988Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Leakage Testing of Containment to Permit Use of Mass Point Method as Alternative Method for Calculating Containment Leakage Rates.Mass Point Method More Accurate for Calculating Rates
ML20147C3196 January 1988Comment Opposing SRP Section 3.6.3 of NUREG-0800.Utils Endorse Comments by Nuclear Util Group on Equipment QualificationWeld Overlay
B12706, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev of Backfitting Process for Power Reactors13 October 1987Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev of Backfitting Process for Power ReactorsBackfit