Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Start dateReporting criterionTitleEvent descriptionSystemLER
ENS 5195925 May 2016 19:15:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
Discovery of Non-Conforming Conditions During Tornado Hazards Analysis05000456/LER-2016-002
ENS 517717 March 2016 02:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition Involving Diesel Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Air IntakesThe Auxiliary Feedwater (AF) system at Braidwood automatically supplies feedwater to the Steam Generators (SG) to remove decay heat from the Reactor Coolant System following a loss of normal feedwater supply. The AF System consists of a motor driven pump (A) and a diesel driven pump (B) configured into two trains for each unit. Each pump provides 100% of the required AF capacity to the SGs as assumed in the accident analysis. One pump at full flow is sufficient to remove decay heat and cool the unit to Residual Heat Removal (RHR) entry conditions. The diesel driven AF pump is powered from an independent diesel whose combustion air intake is located in the Seismic Category II (non-seismically qualified) Turbine Building but the diesel and pump are located in the Seismic Category I (seismically qualified) Auxiliary Building. During the ongoing NRC Component Design Basis Inspection at Braidwood Station, Inspectors asked about the acceptability of the diesel combustion air intake being located in the non-seismic Turbine Building. During the review of available documentation related to the AF diesel engine combustion air intake, it was identified that the documentation did not support operation of the diesel with High Energy Line Break (HELB) environmental conditions in the Turbine Building. This has been reviewed and determined to be applicable to Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2. Specifically, prior evaluations did not account for air displacement by steam release during the event. After running different models for the Turbine Building HELB, diesel driven AF pump operability was supported for all but the Main Feedwater (FW) HELB. For the FW HELB, the best air density obtained failed to remain above the required levels deemed acceptable for engine operation and remained suppressed for extended periods of time. Additional efforts to qualify the FW piping in the Turbine Building for an Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) to eliminate this piping from HELB considerations were not successful. This condition applies to both Units 1 and 2 but does not affect the motor driven AF pumps. This event does not constitute a loss of safety function at the point of discovery because the Braidwood opposite train motor driven AF pumps were operable on both Units 1 and 2. This event is reportable per 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) for 'any event or condition that results in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety.' The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. The licensee entered a 72-hour Action Statement and is preparing to address the issue with a configuration change.Steam Generator
Reactor Coolant System
Feedwater
Auxiliary Feedwater
Residual Heat Removal
05000456/LER-2016-001
ENS 5133420 August 2015 22:10:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionCondition That Could Prevent Pressurizer Porv Block Valves from Operating

On 8/20/2015 at 1710 CDT, a design flaw was discovered with the pressurizer power operated relief valve (PZR PORV) block valve control circuitry. Specifically, the circuit deficiency for which a design basis fire in the Main Control Room (MCR) or cable spreading room could prevent the PZR PORV block valves from being closed from the local control switch at their associated motor control center (MCC). Engineering has reviewed this issue and determined that a potential fire induced ground in the MCR or cable spreading room could clear the associated control power fuses which would prevent the block valves from operating at the local control switch. These valves are considered to form a High/Low pressure interface which requires postulating a proper polarity DC cable to cable fault. Engineering has reviewed the circuit design and cable routing associated with PORVs 1(2)RY455A and 1(2)RY456 and determined that their associated cables are routed with other DC circuit cables in the MCR control board and cable spreading room raceways, such that this postulated fault could potentially cause spurious opening of one of the PORVs even after the control power fuses have been removed as directed by the station abnormal operating procedures for control room inaccessibility. This identified block valve circuit deficiency prevents the credited safe shutdown action of locally closing the block valves to mitigate the spurious operation of a PORV. Hourly fire watches of the affected MCR and cable spreading room fire zones have been implemented. In addition, the MCR is continuously staffed and the affected cable spreading room fire zones are equipped with detection and automatic suppression. This event is being reported under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) for 'Any event or condition that results in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety.' The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * UPDATE PROVIDED BY ROB SHERMAN TO JEFF ROTTON AT 1845 EDT ON 09/02/2015 * * *

During the extent of condition review, an additional design deficiency was identified with respect to the PZR PORV and PZR PORV Block valves. Specifically, the current mitigating strategy for removing PZR PORV control power fuses does not adequately prevent a PZR PORV from spuriously opening due to fire induced hot short. Furthermore, local actions to close the associated PZR PORV block valve at the motor control center (MCC) may not be effective because the MCC may not have electrical power during the design basis fire. Therefore, the credited safe shutdown action to remove the PZR PORV control power fuses does not prevent the PZR PORV from spuriously opening during design basis fires in some of the upper and lower cable spreading room fire zones. The affected Fire Zones are the same upper and lower spreading rooms previously identified and fire watches of the affected areas remain in place. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified. Notified the R3DO (Skokowski)

05000456/LER-2015-003
ENS 5028215 July 2014 14:42:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition - Low Containment Spray Flow Rate

At 0942 (CDT) on 7/15/2014, the 2A Containment Spray chemical additive flow was found out of tolerance low during surveillance testing. This resulted in an unanalyzed condition in that insufficient chemical additive flow might have resulted in lower than assumed containment spray pH values during past periods. Based on the above, this is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B). Actions are in progress to restore the 2A Containment Spray chemical additive flow to within tolerance. The 2B Containment Spray system is operable per Technical Specification 3.6.6 and is capable of providing required chemical additive flow. The required flow is 18 to 67 gallons per minute (gpm), however, the measured flow was 17.96 gpm. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM JAMES PETTY TO JOHN SHOEMAKER AT 1729 EDT ON 8/1/14 * * *

The purpose of this report is to retract ENS report #50282 (July 15, 2014). This ENS report was made for the 2A Containment Spray chemical additive flow which was found out of tolerance low during surveillance testing. At the time of reporting, it was concluded that this was an unanalyzed condition in that insufficient chemical additive flow may have resulted in lower than assumed containment spray pH values during past periods. This was reported in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(11)(B) as an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety. On Wednesday, July 29, 2014, Braidwood Generating Station concluded that the prior ENS notification could be retracted based on the completion of Engineering Change 398884, 'Evaluation Of 2A CS NaOH Spray Additive Test Results And Discussion of IRs 1682209 and 1683413.' The Engineering Change concluded that the approval of the alternate source term (AST) license amendment resulted in the elimination of a minimum containment spray (CS) spray pH value. The current containment release analysis does not credit the addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to CS spray for fission product removal from the containment atmosphere. The long-term retention of captured fission products in the sump water assumes the sump water pH is greater than 7. This is established by the transfer of the containment spray additive tank (CSAT) contents to the sump during CS system operation. To transfer the maximum CSAT inventory to the sump within 8 hours, a minimum NaOH eductor flow of approximately 10 gpm is required. The minimum NaOH injection flow for the 2A CS eductor system exceeded 10 gpm so the eductor injection flows meet the criteria to transfer CSAT inventory to the containment recirculation sump within the expected minimum CS system operating time. The out of tolerance flow values recorded at the time of the initial ENS notification are acceptable. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified the R3DO (Lara).

Containment Spray
ENS 5022725 June 2014 20:55:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionPotential Loss of Ultimate Heat Sink Capacity Due to Low LevelAt approximately 1555 CDT on Wednesday, June 25, 2014, during a review of several station abnormal operating procedures for actions related to low ultimate heat sink (UHS) level, it was discovered that the procedures do not incorporate design assumptions for shutting down the non-essential service water (WS) pumps following a loss of cooling lake dike. The pumps that take suction from the UHS include the WS, circulating water (CW) and fire protection (FP) pumps. Based on current procedural guidance, the only pumps that are secured due to a low ultimate heat sink level are the circulating water (CW) pumps based on low net positive suction (NPSH) Failing to secure the non-essential pumps on a loss of cooling lake dike failure significantly reduces the 30 day design basis UHS volume to approximately 4 days. This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) for 'any event or condition that results in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety.' Immediate actions taken included issuance of an operations standing order providing direction to secure non-essential pumps on the failure of the cooling lake dike. Proposed corrective actions include procedure revisions. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Service water
ENS 5018911 June 2014 19:34:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionOne Containment Spray Train Chemical Additive Flow Out of Specifications

At 1434 (CDT) on 06/11/14, the 1A Containment Spray chemical additive flow was found out of tolerance low during surveillance testing. This resulted in an unanalyzed condition in that insufficient chemical additive flow might have resulted in lower than assumed containment spray Ph values during past periods. The impact of the unanalyzed condition has not been fully evaluated. Based on the above, this is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B). Engineering analyses are in progress to evaluate the past condition. Actions are in progress to restore the 1A Containment Spray chemical additive flow to within tolerance. The 1B Containment Spray system is operable per Tech Spec 3.6.6 and is capable of providing required chemical additive flow. The required flow is 30 to 63 gpm. Measured flow was 27 gpm. The last measurement was six years ago. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION PROVIDED BY JOHN LOGAN TO JEFF ROTTON AT 1803 EDT ON 06/13/2014 * * *

The purpose of this report is to retract EN report #50189 (June 11, 2014). This EN report was made for the 1A Containment Spray chemical additive flow which was found out of tolerance low during surveillance testing. At the time of reporting, it was concluded that this was an unanalyzed condition in that insufficient chemical additive flow may have resulted in lower than assumed containment spray pH values during past periods. This was reported in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) as an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety. At approximately 1700 CDT on Thursday, June 12, 2014, Braidwood Generating Station concluded that the prior EN notification could be retracted based on the completion of Engineering Change 398472, 'Evaluation of As-Found Results for 1A Containment Spray NaOH Additive Flow.' The Engineering Change concluded that the approval of the alternate source term (AST) license amendment resulted in the elimination of a minimum containment spray (CS) spray pH value. The current containment release analysis does not credit the addition of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to CS spray for fission product removal from the containment atmosphere. The long-term retention of captured fission products in the sump water assumes the sump water pH is greater than 7. This is established by the transfer of the containment spray additive tank (CSAT) contents to the sump during CS system operation. To transfer the maximum CSAT inventory to the sump within 8 hours, a minimum NaOH eductor flow of approximately 10 gpm is required. The minimum NaOH injection flow for the 1A CS eductor system (27.0 ' as-found' and 27.7 'as-left' gpm) exceeded 10 gpm so the eductor injection flows meet the criteria to transfer CSAT inventory to the containment recirculation sump within the expected minimum CS system operating time. The out of tolerance flow values recorded at the time of the initial notification are acceptable. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R3DO (Daley).

Containment Spray
ENS 493719 September 2013 22:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Leakage of Containment System Isolation Valve Controlled Leakage Devices

On September 9, 2013, during the A1R17 Braidwood Station Unit 1 refueling outage, the as-found leakage of the controlled leakage devices (1RH01SA and 1RH01SB) for the safety injection (SI) system ECCS sump containment isolation valves (1SI8811A and 1SI8811B) were determined to not be 'leak tight' as described in the UFSAR. Since there was only minor leakage from the isolation valves or the associated residual heat (RH) system piping (1-2 drops/month from 1SI8811A and no leakage from 1SI8811B), there was no actual impact on offsite dose or long-term ECCS operation. However, further evaluation has concluded that there was a potential to exceed the assumed leakage limits of the Alternate Source Term (AST) calculation. The RH system is classified as a closed system outside containment meaning the system is designed to accommodate a single active failure (i.e., the failure of the 1SI8811B valve to close) and still maintain an adequate isolation barrier to release recirculation water outside containment. The encapsulation device is intended to capture and limit leakage from a potential leak in the 1SI8811A/B or piping. The controlled leakage device is built to the same standards as the remainder of the RH system recirculation water outside containment. The design function is to limit potential offsite dose due to leakage of recirculation water outside containment. This is not a specified safety function and there are no Technical Specification requirements for these devices. The encapsulation devices do not perform a containment function and are not a principle safety barrier. As there was only minor ECCS system leakage at the time of discovery, there was no impact on past offsite dose or long-term ECCS operation. This is reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) since the as-found leakage of the controlled leakage devices could have allowed RH leakage to exceed the calculated limits for ECCS systems outside containment. The NRC Resident Inspector has been informed.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM RANDY RAHRIG TO HOWIE CROUCH AT 1556 EDT ON 10/31/13 * * *

Retraction of ENS 49371 dated 9/09/2013: The purpose of this report is to retract ENS report #49371 (September 9, 2013). This report was made during Braidwood's refueling outage (A1R17) for the as-found leakage on the controlled leakage devices (1RH01SA and 1RH01SB) for the safety injection (SI) system ECCS sump containment isolation valves (1SI8811A and 1SI8811B) that were determined not to be 'leak tight' as described in the UFSAR. When the ENS notification was made on 9/9/2013, the station determined that there was a potential to exceed the assumed leakage limits of the alternate source term (AST) calculation. The ENS notification was made under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) as an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety. At 1500 CDT on Thursday, October 17, 2013, the Braidwood Generating Station concluded that the prior ENS notification could be retracted based on the completion of Revision 2 of calculation BRW-13-0135-M, '1/2RH01SA/B Leak Rate Conversion and Test Pressure Determination'. The as-found pressure test results for the 1RH01SA and 1RH01SB valve containment assemblies would not have resulted in a total ECCS leakage outside containment in excess of that assumed in the AST dose calculation BRW-04-0038-M, 'Re-Analysis of Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) Using Alternate Source Terms (AST)'. The as-found valve containment assembly (VCA) pressure test results did not result in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R3DO (Daley).

ENS 4686820 May 2011 23:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition Marine Life Inside Afw PipingThe past operability of the 2A train of Auxiliary Feedwater has been called into question based on finding clam shells in the safety related water source piping. During performance of valve strokes on 5/9/2011 per an Operations Department surveillance, clam shells were found while draining a section of the safety related water source piping. System Engineering collected the shells as part of troubleshooting. Based on analysis performed by System Engineering, the 2A Train of Auxiliary Feedwater was not operable with clam shells in the pipe. The amount of shells present would have caused an unacceptable differential pressure across the 2A train Auxiliary Feedwater System flow control valves. The extent of condition has been evaluated for the other Auxiliary Feedwater trains for both units and it has been determined that the only affected train is 2A. The 2B Auxiliary Feedwater train has also been inoperable at various times over the past 3 years for maintenance. The clams were flushed out of the 2A Train Auxiliary Feedwater suction piping during a recent refueling outage and both trains of Auxiliary Feedwater on Unit 2 are operable. The licensee has not implemented any compensatory measures nor are they in any LCO's as a result this event. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.Auxiliary Feedwater
ENS 4670730 March 2011 01:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
Potential Voiding in Auxiliary Feedwater Alternate Suction LineThe design of the Auxiliary Feedwater (AF) system is for the AF pumps to normally take suction from the condensate storage tank. If the condensate storage tank is not available, the essential service water system provides the alternate supply. Due to the AF system suction piping and valve configuration, a voided section of pipe could exist in the portion that isolates the condensate storage tank supply from the essential service water supply. A preliminary vendor analysis has determined that the void fraction to reach the pump in a dynamic scenario exceeds the acceptance criteria for AF pump operability. Based on past operation in this configuration, the event is being reported as a unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety and a condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of a safety function (i.e., remove residual heat) under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii) and 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v). Further review of the void model and pump performance characteristics are planned. In 2011, prior to the completion of this analysis, the void was refilled and verified full for the 'B' trains at Braidwood U1 and U2. Filling the voided piping of both 'A' trains at Braidwood U1 and U2 is in progress. Once filled, the AF systems are operable. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Service water
Auxiliary Feedwater
ENS 4641512 November 2010 19:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionInaccurate Information Provided in License Amendment RequestAt 1300, on November 12, 2010, Exelon Generation Company LLC concluded that inaccurate information contained in the PRA technical bases for a 1987 License Amendment Request (LAR) for Byron and Braidwood Stations would have potentially impacted the acceptability of the LAR by the NRC. The LAR was to extend Allowed Outage Times (AOT) from 72 hours to 7 days for several systems, to include the Component Cooling (CC) and Residual Heat Removal (RH) Systems. The original design intent of the CC system was that each unit has two independent CC pumps and a fifth pump (U0) CC pump could be used as an operable spare for any of the unit specific pumps. This is how CC was modeled in the PRA technical justification for the 1987 LAR. However, a piping configuration design flaw that was recently evaluated in that the U0 CC pump could not be considered an operable spare for either unit's B pumps was not correctly modeled in the PRA. During the evaluation to assess the potential significance of this CC design flaw on the PRA justification for the 1987 LAR, another potentially significant discrepancy was discovered in that it appears the operational practice to always split CC trains after a design basis LOCA was not modeled correctly in the RH analysis. Administrative controls have been put in place to restrict the AOT for the CC pumps and RH trains to the pre-LAR timeframe of 72 hours pending the permanent corrective actions. In addition, administrative controls have been put in place to prohibit the U0 CC pump from being an operable spare for either unit's B trains. This event is being reported as an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii). The NRC Resident Inspectors have been notifiedResidual Heat Removal
ENS 4620324 August 2010 16:40:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
Essential Service Water Placed in a Line-Up That May Have Prevented Its Safety Function

At 1140 (CDT) on August 24th, Unit 2 received Essential Service Water (SX) discharge header pressure low and SX strainer delta pressure high alarms indicative of high flow. At the time, a 2B SX ASME surveillance was in progress which involved field operations by Equipment Operators (EO's). At the time of the event, SX discharge header pressure dropped to 65 psig, less than the 89 psig necessary for operability. The Control Room responded by directing the EO's to restore SX discharge header pressure, which was promptly restored. The 2B SX ASME surveillance sets initial conditions prior to data collection. The surveillance has the total SX flow be adjusted to 24000 gpm via the U2 Component Cooling Water (CC) heat exchanger outlet throttle valve, 2SX007. The subject flow was intended to be measured via an installed ultrasonic flow gauge 2FE-SX147. The EO's, instead used the U2 CC heat exchanger flow gauge 2FE-SX031. As a result, in an attempt to achieve 24000 gpm through the U2 CC heat exchanger, total SX flow exceeded the 24000 gpm since the U2 CC heat exchanger is but one of many loads the 2B SX pump is serving. For the 5 minutes described above, the SX system was in a lineup that may have prevented it to fulfill its safety function and placed Unit 2 in a potentially unanalyzed condition. This condition is still being evaluated. Site Engineering has determined no runout conditions existed. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM JOE KLEVORN TO VINCE KLCO ON 10/19/2011 AT 1626 EDT* * *

The evaluation of the condition has been completed. Based on Essential Service Water (SX) system flow model runs performed, the conditions that existed at the time of the low SX header pressure would have resulted in low flow supplied to multiple safety related components. However, the safety function to provide necessary cooling to required safety-related safe shutdown equipment would have been met under design basis conditions with the auto-start of the 2A SX pump. Therefore, this did not result in a condition that could have prevented fulfillment of a safety function or in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degraded plant safety. Therefore, ENS notification 46203 is being retracted. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified the R3DO (Daley).

Service water
ENS 4602117 June 2010 10:19:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition Due to Containment Spray Recirc Sump Isolation Valve Failure to Stroke Closed

At 0519 CDT on June 17th, Unit 2 was closing the 2CS009B, Containment Spray Recirc Sump Isolation Valve, as part of post maintenance testing when the valve stopped stroking (i.e. mid position). The 2CS009B valve was being stroked closed for restoration from a successful timed stroke in the open direction. The 2CS009B valve was manually closed and verified closed via limit switch indication. With the 2CS009B valve unable to be closed from the Main Control Room, an unanalyzed condition may have existed where, during a large break LOCA requiring cold leg recirc, the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) had an additional flow path to the containment recirc sump. This potentially challenges the operators to complete the switchover prior to the RWST reaching 9%, the point at which pumps taking a suction from the RWST only are shutdown. This condition is still being evaluated. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

* * * RETRACTION FROM P. MOODY TO P. SNYDER AT 0404 ON 2/1/11 * * *

At 0509 on June 17, 2010, Unit 2 was closing the 2CS009B, Containment Spray (CS) Recirculation Sump Isolation Valve, as part of post maintenance testing when the valve stopped stroking (i.e., mid-position). The 2CS009B was being stroked closed for restoration from a successful timed stroke in the open direction. The 2CS009B was manually closed and verified closed via limit switch indication. With the 2CS009B unable to close from the Main Control Room, an unanalyzed condition may have existed where, during a large break LOCA requiring cold leg recirculation, the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) had an additional flow path to the recirculation sump. This potentially challenged the operators to complete the switchover prior to the RWST reaching 9%, the point at which pumps taking a suction from the RWST only are shutdown. While this condition was being evaluated, an ENS notification was made per ENS 46021 under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B). As the evaluation approached the 60-day reporting period, LER 2010-002 was issued in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), assuming the results would yield an unanalyzed condition. Since then, an evaluation was completed. The results concluded the operators would have performed the switchover steps within the allowed time, before reaching the RWST empty alarm set point. Therefore, the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) and CS system would have performed their design functions. The evaluation also determined the RWST outflows with 2CS009B in the open position during the ECCS switchover sequence did not affect the RWST vortex analysis. Based on no loss of design function, the plant was not in an unanalyzed condition and this event is not reportable per 10CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) or 10CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B). This event was screened for additional reportability criteria contained in the Exelon Reportability Manual. Again, since there was no loss of design function there is no reportability requirement. Therefore ENS notification 46021 is being retracted. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

Emergency Core Cooling System
Containment Spray