RNP-RA/12-0014, Transmittal of Core Operating Limits Report
| ML12087A236 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/2012 |
| From: | Hightower W Progress Energy Carolinas |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RNP-RA/12-0014 | |
| Download: ML12087A236 (27) | |
Text
~j Progress Energy h4?
Serial: RNP-RA/12-0014 MAR 0 1 2012 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-23 TRANSMITTAL OF CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Ladies and Gentlemen:
In accordance with Technical Specifications 5.6.5.d, Carolina Power and Light Company, now doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., is transmitting Revision 0 to the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2, Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Cycle 28. A summary of the changes is provided on Page 2 of the attached revision to FMP-001, "Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)." The COLR is Attachment 10.1 to FMP-001.
There are no commitments associated with this letter.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (843) 857-1329.
Sincerely, W. R. Hightower Supervisor - Licensing/Regulatory Programs MSC/msc Attachment c: V. McCree, NRC, Region II NRC Resident Inspector, HBRSEP A. Billoch, NRR Robinson Progress Nuclear Carolinas, Inc.
Energy Plant A 0o /
3581 West Entrance Road Hartsville, SC 29550
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attachment to Serial: RNP-RA/12-0014 26 pages including cover page H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (HBRSEP), UNIT NO. 2 CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT, REVISION 0 Note: This report is Attachment 10.1 to HBRSEP, Unit No. 2, Fuel Management Procedure (FMP) - 001
- , ProgressEnergy Information Use H. B. ROBINSON NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 PLANT OPERATING MANUAL VOLUME 6 PART 5 FUEL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE FMP-O01 CORE OPERA TING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)
REVISION 29 I FMP-001 Rev. 29 7 Page I of 25 1
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES PRR 320284 and 505293 REVISION # REVISION COMMENTS PRR 320284 (Editorial Correction)
- 1) Deleted NFP-NGGC-0003 from Attachment 10.2 as no longer applicable to RNP PRR 505293 Per EC 77261
- 1) Procedure revision changed to 29.
- 2) Reference 2.5 changed to Cycle 28 Reload Design and Safety Analysis EC
- 3) Deleted References 2.13 and 2.14.
- 4) Added 5.2.2 to Precautions and Limitations
- 6) Attachment 10.1: Section 1: Delete all entries for Methodologies 1,4, 6, 7, 10, and 12-15.
- 7) Attachment 10.1: Section 1: Add methodologies 26 and 27 to appropriate sections of table.
- 8) Attachment 10.1: Section 2.1.2: 300ppm Surveillance Limit changed from -39.50 pcm/0 F to -39.70 pcm/ 0 F.
- 9) Attachment 10.1: Section 2.1.3: 60ppm Surveillance Limit changed from -43.88 pcm/°F to -43.90 pcm/0 F 10)Attachment 10.1: Section 2.4.1: Reference to batch ROB-19 removed and reference to batch ROB2-28 added.
11 )Attachment 10.1: Section 2.5.2: Reference to batch ROB-19 removed and reference to batch ROB2-28 added.
12)Attachment 10.1: Section 3: Methodology references altered to match Improved Tech Specs. Methods: 1,4, 6, 7, 10, and 12-15 were removed while 26 and 27 were added. Additional corrections made to ensure report entries match Tech Specs.
- 13) Attachment 10.1: Figure 1.0: The note was updated to reflect the new cycle breakpoint of 286 EFPD (10,000 MWD/MTU)
- 14) Attachment 10.1: Figure 2.0: Chart and note were updated to reflect the new K(z).
- 15) Attachment 10.1: Table 3.0: Note was updated to reflect the new End of Licensed Life of 20,614 MWD/MTU.
I FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 2 of 25 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 PURPOSE ..................................................................................................... 4
2.0 REFERENCES
.................................................................................................. 4 3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................................................................... 5 4.0 PREREQUISITES ............................................................................................. 5 5.0 PRECAUTIONS and LIMITATIONS ................................................................. 5 6.0 SPECIAL TOOLS and EQUIPMENT ................................................................ 6 7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA .............................................................................. 6 8.0 PROCEDURE ................................................................................................... 7 9 .0 R E C O R D S .......................................................................................................... 11 10.0 ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................ 11 10.1 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT .... 12 10.2 PROCEDURES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY COLR REVISIONS ..... 25 I FMP-001 Rev. 29 1 Page 3 o°f25
1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To present the cycle-specific Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for HBRSEP Unit No. 2 1.2 To provide a means of incorporating the COLR into the Plant Operating Manual (POM). The COLR is placed in the POM to ensure that it resides in a controlled location, and that references are provided that ensure that the requirements specified in NRC Generic Letter 88-16 and Improved Technical Specification 5.6.5 are met.
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 Improved Technical Specifications 1.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.3, 3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.4.5, 3.4.6, 3.9.1, and 5.6.5 2.2 PLP-100, Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) 2.3 NRC Generic Letter 88-16, "Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits from Technical Specifications," October 4, 1988.
2.4 License Amendment No. 141 - Regarding Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits to Core Operating Limits Report 2.5 EC 77261, R2C28 Reload Core Design and Safety Analysis 2.6 PRO-NGGC-0204, Procedure Review and Approval 2.7 PLP-001, Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) 2.8 REG-NGGC-0010, 10 CFR 50.59 and Selected Regulatory Reviews 2.9 Self Assessment # 108207, Technical Specifications 5.0, "Administrative Controls 2.10 UFSAR Section 17.3, RNP Quality Assurance Program Description 2.11 Calculation RNP-F/NFSA-0199, "RNP Cycle 28 COLR Update" 2.12 NFP-NGGC-0018, Core Operating Limits Report Generation for HNP, RNP, and CR3 I FMP-001 Rev. 29 1 Page 4 of 25 1
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 RES Reactor Systems and/or the Nuclear Fuels Management and Safety Analysis Section (NFM&SA) is responsible for revising this procedure as changes to the COLR are required. At a minimum, revisions are required once per cycle, at Beginning of Cycle, to make the COLR cycle-specific.
3.2 The Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) is responsible for reviewing revisions to the COLR and providing concurrence prior to implementation of COLR revisions (UFSAR Section 17.3, RNP Quality Assurance Program Description, Appendix A Item A.1.6.6.j).
3.3 RES Reactor Systems and Operations are responsible for monitoring plant conditions to ensure the Core Operating Limits specified in this procedure are met.
3.4 Licensing/Regulatory Programs is responsible for providing prompt notification of COLR revisions to the NRC in accordance with ITS 5.6.5.d within 30 days upon procedure approval.
4.0 PREREQUISITES 4.1 None.
5.0 PRECAUTIONS and LIMITATIONS 5.1 Requirements for Revision of the COLR 5.1.1 The COLR is cycle-specific, this procedure will be revised at least once per cycle, that is, at the beginning of the cycle.
5.1.2 The methods and requirements established by this procedure for revision of the COLR supplement those of PRO-NGGC-0204.
5.1.3 Changes to the COLR will require a 10CFR 50.59 Evaluation as well as PNSC concurrence and notification of the NRC per TS 5.6.5.d as part of the revision process.
5.2 Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) 5.2.1 The current cycle-specific Core Operating Limits Report is provided in ATTACHMENT 10.1.
5.2.2 The titles for the Methodology references in attachments 10.1.3 have been altered to match what is currently listed in the RNP Technical Specifications. These report titles may differ slightly from current report titles.
FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page5 of 25
6.0 SPECIAL TOOLS and EQUIPMENT 6.1 None.
7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 7.1 None.
FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 6 of 25 1
8.0 PROCEDURE 8.1 Definitions 8.1.1 FQV(Z) - the Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor is the maximum local heat flux on the surface of a fuel rod divided by the average fuel rod heat flux and including the V (z) penalty and measurement uncertainties.
8.1.2 CFQ = FQRTP - the cycle-specific FQ limit at Rated Thermal Power (RTP).
8.1.3 K(Z) - the normalized axial dependence factor for FQ versus core elevation.
8.1.4 FAHN - the Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor is the integral of linear power along the rod with the highest integrated power divided by the average rod power.
8.1.5 FAH RTP - the cycle-specific FAH limit at Rated Thermal Power (RTP).
8.1.6 PFAH - the Power Factor Multiplier for FAH.
8.1.7 AFD - the Axial Flux Difference is the difference in normalized flux signals between the top and bottom halves of a two-section excore neutron detector.
8.1.8 V(Z) - the ratio of the maximum FQ(Z) produced during and following transient maneuvers to the equilibrium FQ(Z) value at target axial offset conditions.
8.1.9 P - the fraction of rated power (2339 MWt) at which the core is operating.
8.1.10 RTP - Rated Thermal Power is a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 2339 MWt.
8.2 Abbreviations 8.2.1 POM - Plant Operating Manual 8.2.2 PNSC - Plant Nuclear Safety Committee 8.2.3 COLR - Core Operating Limits Report 8.2.4 MTC - Moderator Temperature Coefficient IFMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 7 of 25
8.2.5 ITS - Improved Technical Specifications 8.2.6 RIL - Rod Insertion Limits 8.2.7 EFPD - Effective Full Power Day 8.2.8 HBRSEP - H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant 8.2.9 NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission 8.2.10 RES - Robinson Engineering Section 8.2.11 ARO - All Rods Out 8.2.12 SDM - Shutdown Margin 8.3 Background Information 8.3.1 HBRSEP Unit No. 2, like all other commercial nuclear power plants, is required to operate within the specific core operating limits and restrictions as specified in the Technical Specifications. Examples of these limits/restrictions include power dependent rod insertion limits, and limits of FQ(Z) and FAH, among others. Technical Specification changes and NRC approval were required as specific numerical values for these limits/restrictions were revised. If these changes were frequent, e.g. on a cycle-specific basis, or if they were needed on accelerated schedules, considerable administrative burdens were placed on both the NRC and on utility personnel.
8.3.2 To reduce this burden, the COLR concept was developed in which specific numerical values for certain core operating limits and/or restrictions would be removed from the Technical Specifications and relocated to a COLR document. Using NRC approved methodologies, numerical values for these operating limits and/or restrictions can be updated on an as-needed basis (e.g. each cycle) by simply revising the COLR with appropriate review and notification to the NRC. Hence, revisions to the Technical Specifications are not required.
8.3.3 The NRC endorsed the COLR concept by encouraging licensees to develop such a document in Generic Letter 88-16 which provided guidance for relocation of specific numerical values for various core operating limits and/or restrictions to a COLR and indicated that these values could be changed without prior NRC approval so long as an NRC-approved methodology is followed. Future changes and updates would be allowable provided an Evaluation is performed in accordance
[FMP-001 7 Rev. 29 1 Page 8 of 25
with the provisions of 10CFR 50.59, the COLR is suitably revised, and the NRC is promptly informed of the revision.
8.3.4 The use of a COLR at H. B. Robinson was accepted by the NRC per License Amendment 141. The amendment established requirements for a cycle-specific COLR and for notification of the NRC (ITS 5.6.5.d) when any revisions or supplements (beginning of cycle or midcycle) are made.
Since the COLR is cycle-specific, the COLR will be revised at least once per cycle, that is, at the beginning of the cycle.
8.4 Contents of the H.B. Robinson Unit 2 COLR 8.4.1 Technical Specification ITS 5.6.5.a requires the following cycle-specific core operating limits be established and documented in the Core Operating Limits Reports
- 1. Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) Limits
- 2. Shutdown Bank Insertion Limits
- 3. Control Bank Insertion Limits
- 4. Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor (FQ(Z)) Limit, CFQ
- 5. K(Z) Curve
- 6. Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor (FAH N) Limit, FAH RTP
- 7. FAH Power Factor Multiplier (PFAH)
- 8. Axial Flux Difference (AFD) Limits
- 9. V(Z) Curve(s)
- 10. Shutdown Margin
- 11. Refueling Boron Concentration 8.4.2 The COLR will also contain a listing of the specific methodologies used to support the core operating limits per TS 5.6.5.b.
8.4.3 The core operating limits shall be determined such that all applicable limits (e.g., fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) limits, nuclear limits such as SDM, transient analysis limits, and accident analysis limits) of the safety analysis are met (TS 5.6.5.c).
FMP-001 I Rev. 29 Page 9 of 25
8.5 Revisions to The COLR 8.5.1 Nuclear Fuels Management & Safety Analysis Section (NFM&SA) shall review and recommend for implementation any changes to the COLR.
The review is normally documented in an EC including any required Owner's Reviews, calculations and other reviews. The use of NRC approved methodologies is also confirmed in the EC. Changes recommended by NFM&SA are normally transmitted to the plant via a memo recommending the revision of the COLR.
8.5.2 Once NFM&SA recommends a revision to the COLR, a Reactor Engineer shall prepare a revision to FMP-001 in accordance with the requirements of PRO-NGGC-0204.
8.5.3 Other plant procedures shall be reviewed to determine if they require revision in order to implement the revised COLR. At a minimum, the procedures listed in ATTACHMENT 10.2 shall be reviewed.
8.5.4 Any required procedure revisions or new procedures necessary to incorporate the change to the COLR shall be completed by the effective date of the COLR change.
8.5.5 The proposed revision of the COLR shall be submitted to the PNSC for review.
8.5.6 The PNSC shall review the proposed revision to the COLR and concur with the changes prior to their implementation in accordance with UFSAR Section 17.3 Appendix A Item A.1.6.6.j.
8.5.7 Upon approval of the COLR revision, Licensing/Regulatory Programs shall notify the NRC per ITS 5.6.5.d within 30 days.
FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 10 of 25
9.0 RECORDS 9.1 This procedure does not generate any records.
10.0 ATTACHMENTS 10.1 HBRSEP Unit No. 2 Cycle 28 Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 0 10.2 Procedures Potentially Affected By COLR Revisions I FMP-001 I Rev. 29 1 Page 11 of 251
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 1 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 1.0 OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for HBRSEP Unit No. 2, Cycle 28 has been prepared per EC 77261 in accordance with the requirements of ITS 5.6.5 and is applicable to 590 EFPD (20,614 MWD/MTU).
The Improved Technical Specifications affected by this report and the methodologies used for the various parameters are listed below.
ITS Applicable Methodology Parameter Reference (Section 3.0 Number)
MTC 3.1.3 2,18,19,22,23,25 Shutdown Bank RILs 3.1.5 2, 8, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25 Control Bank RILs 3.1.6 2,8,18,19,22,23,25 FQv(Z) 3.2.1, 3.2.3 2, 5, 8,11, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 FAH 3.2.2, 3.2.3 2, 3, 5, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 AFD 3.2.1, 3.2.3 2,16,18,19,21,22,23,24, 25, 27 Shutdown Margin Requirements 3.1.1, 3.4.5, 3.4.6 2, 8,18,19,22,23,25 Refueling Boron Requirements 3.9.1 2, 8,18,19, 22, 23 COLR 5.6.5 None I FMP-001 Rev. 29 1 Page 12 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 2 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented in the following subsections. These limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in ITS 5.6.5 and the COLR Section 3.0.
2.1 Moderator Temperature Coefficient (ITS 3.1.3) 2.1.1 The Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) limits are:
a) The Positive MTC (ARO) shall be less than or equal to +5.0 pcm/OF for power levels less than 50% RTP, and b) The Positive MTC (ARO) shall be less than or equal to 0.0 pcm/°F at 50%
RTP and above.
c) The Negative MTC (ARO/RTP) shall be less negative than -45.0 pcm/°F.
2.1.2 The 300 ppm Surveillance limit is:
At an equilibrium RTP-ARO boron concentration of 300 ppm the MTC shall be less negative than or equal to -39.70 pcm/°F.
2.1.3 The 60 ppm Surveillance limit is:
At an equilibrium RTP-ARO boron concentration of 60 ppm the MTC shall be less negative than or equal to -43.90 pcm/°F.
2.2 Shutdown Banks Insertion Limits (ITS 3.1.5) 2.2.1 The shutdown banks shall be withdrawn to at least 225 steps.
2.3 Control Bank Insertion Limits (ITS 3.1.6) 2.3.1 The control banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown in Figure 1.0 I FMP-001 Rev. 29 1 Page 13of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 3 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 2.4 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQv (Z) (ITS 3.2.1, 3.2.3)
FQV(Z) _ (CFQ/P) x K(Z) for P > 0.5 FQV(Z) < (CFQ/0.5) x K(Z) for P < 0.5 Where: P = (Thermal Power/ Rated Thermal Power) 2.4.1 CFQ = 2.46 for ROB2-25, ROB2-26, ROB2-27, and ROB2-28 reload batches 2.4.2 K(Z) is specified in Figure 2.0 2.5 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FAH (ITS 3.2.2, 3.2.3)
FAH < FAHRTP (1 + PFAH (1-P))
Where: P = (Thermal Power / Rated Thermal Power) 2.5.1 FAH is the measured FAHN multiplied by the measurement uncertainty (1.04) 2.5.2 FAHRTP = 1.80 for ROB2-25, ROB2-26, ROB2-27, and ROB2-28 reload batches 2.5.3 PFAH = 0.2 2.6 Axial Flux Difference (ITS 3.2.1, 3.2.3) 2.6.1 The axial flux difference target bands are +/-3% and +/-5% about the target AFD.
2.6.2 V(Z) values for the +/-3% and +/-5% target bands are specified in Figures 3.1 and 3.2 2.6.3 The AFD Acceptable Operation Limits are specified in Figure 4.0 LFMP-001 Rev. 29 1 Page 14 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 4 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 2.7 Shutdown Margin Requirements (SDM) (ITS 3.1.1, 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.1.8, 3.4.5, 3.4.6, 3.9.1) 2.7.1 The Mode 1 and Mode 2 required SDM versus RCS boron concentration is presented in Figure 5.0.
2.7.2 The Mode 3 SDM requirements are as follows:
a) With at least 2 reactor coolant pumps in operation, the SDM shall be greater than or equal to that specified in Figure 5.0.
b) With less than 2 reactor coolant pumps in operation and the rod control system capable of rod withdrawal, the SDM shall be greater than or equal to 6% Ak/k. This shutdown margin requirement shall be met with a minimum boron concentration of 1950 ppm.
c) With less than 2 reactor coolant pumps in operation and with the rod control system not capable of rod withdrawal, the SDM shall be greater than or equal to that specified in Figure 5.0.
2.7.3 The Mode 4 SDM requirements are as follows:
a) With at least 2 reactor coolant pumps in operation, the SDM shall be greater than or equal to 2.6% Ak/k.
b) With less than 2 reactor coolant pumps in operation and the rod control system capable of rod withdrawal, the SDM shall be greater than or equal to 6% Ak/k. This shutdown margin requirement shall be met with a minimum boron concentration of 1950 ppm.
c) With less than 2 reactor coolant pumps in operation and with the rod control system not capable of rod withdrawal, the SDM shall be greater than or equal to 2.6% Ak/k.
2.7.4 The minimum required SDM for Mode 5 is 2.6% Ak/k.
2.7.5 The minimum required SDM for Mode 6 is 6% Ak/k.
2.8 Refueling Boron Concentration (ITS 3.9.1) 2.8.1 In Mode 6 the minimum boron concentration shall be 1950 ppm.
FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 15 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 5 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 3.0 METHODOLOGY REFERENCES
- 1) Deleted
- 2) XN-NF-84-73(P), Revision 5, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology For Pressurized Water Reactors: Analysis of Chapter 15 Events," Siemens Power Corporation, October 1990.
- 3) XN-NF-82-21 (A), Revision 1, "Application of Exxon Nuclear Company PWR Thermal Margin Methodology to Mixed Core Configurations," Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1983.
- 4) Deleted
- 5) XN-75-32(A) Supplements 1, 2, 3, and 4, "Computational Procedure for Evaluating Rod Bow," Exxon Nuclear Company, October 1983.
- 6) Deleted
- 7) Deleted
- 8) XN-NF-78-44(A)," Generic Control Rod Ejection Analysis," Exxon Nuclear Company, October 1983
- 9) Not Used For Cycle 28
- 10) Deleted
- 11) XN-NF-82-06(A), Revision 1 and Supplements 2, 4, and 5, "Qualification of Exxon Nuclear Fuel for Extended Burnup," Exxon Nuclear Company, October 1986.
- 12) Deleted FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 16 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 6 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0
- 13) Deleted
- 14) Deleted
- 15) Deleted
- 16) ANF-88-054(P), "PDC-3: Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Power Distribution Control for Pressurized Water Reactors and Application of PDC-3 to H.B. Robinson Unit 2," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, October 1990.
- 17) ANF-88-133(P) (A), and Supplement 1, "Qualification of Advanced Nuclear Fuels PWR Design Methodology for Rod Burnups of 62 GWd/MTU,"
Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, December 1991.
- 18) AN F-89-151(A), and correspondence "ANF-RELAP Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors: Analysis of Non-LOCA Chapter 15 Events,"
Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, May 1992.
- 19) EMF-92-081 (A), Revision 1, "Statistical Setpoint/Transient Methodology for Westinghouse Type Reactors," Siemens Power Corporation, February 2000.
- 20) EMF-92-153(P) (A), Revision 1, "HTP: Departure from Nucleate Boiling Correlation for High Thermal Performance Fuel," Siemens Power Corporation, January 2005.
- 21) XN-NF-85-92(P) (A), "Exxon Nuclear Uranium Dioxide/Gadolinia Irradiation Examination and Thermal Conductivity Results," Exxon Nuclear Company, November 1986.
- 22) EMF-96-029(P) (A), Volume 1, Volume 2 and Attachment, "Reactor Analysis System for PWRs," Siemens Power Corporation, January 1997.
- 23) EMF-92-116, "Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for PWR Fuel Designs,"
Siemens Power Corporation, February 1999.
- 24) EMF-2103(P) (A), Revision 0, Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors, Framatome ANP, April 2003.
I FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 17of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 7 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0
- 25) EMF-2310(P) (A) Revision 1, SRP Chapter 15 Non-LOCA Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors, May 2004.
- 26) BAW-10240(P) (A), "Incorporation of M5 Properties in Framatome ANP Approved Methods," Framatome ANP, May 2004.
IFIMP-001 I Rev. 29 Page 18 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 8 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 Figure 1.0, Control Group Insertion Limits for Three Loop Operation 225 (4.07,225) .. . . ' " (67;.03,22S)
- i. " ( 0.15 5,1225)
(0,215) BankýB 200 175 B a ~k C(100,185) 150 (-,-)
I-t 125 Cfl z B n D 100,129) 100 a.
0 75
- - -- - - - - - .. . . . -- - -- - - - -- --.-- .- .- - . - .- -- . -_ -- - E O L *- -- - -- -
5o
I-----I-----I---------- ----
25 .. ....-----------L 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 CORE POWER (%)
NOTE: The breakpoint between BOL and EOL RIL occurs at 50% of the cycle as defined by burnup. For Cycle 28, this burnup occurs at 286 EFPDs (10,000 MWD/MTU).
Control rod banks shall always be withdrawn and inserted in the prescribed sequence. For withdrawal, the sequence is Control "A", Control "B", Control "C",
and Control "D". The insertion sequence is the reverse of the withdrawal sequence.
Overlap of consecutive control banks shall not exceed the prescribed setpoint for automatic overlap. The setpoint is 97 steps.
Control bank A must be withdrawn from the core prior to power operation.
At BOL and 0% core Dower, Control bank B will be at or above step 224.
IFMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 19of2
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 9 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 Figure 2.0, Normalized Axial Dependence Factor K(z) for Fq Versus Elevation 1.2 - r - - -I- I I I I 4 4 4 1.1 .. . . . . .4 . . q . . . . . . I .4' . . .4 . . T . . . i . . ." . .
I tI I 4 I I 4i 4 II 4 1.0 0.9 I---- I J - ----- ----- U-------
4 4 I 4 I 4 I 4 4
, --- ,-- - J-- - J- - - - - - -
0.8 >4 4 4 I I I 4 4 t~ i - - - -i i4 0.7 I i I 4 - - - - i 4
- £ I. . .L .. .L. .. L . .. L.....i.. .J -. .
0 ,6 I 4 I t 4 4 i i 4 i 4 4I 4 I 4 0.5 -I- - - - - - - - I 4 --4 0.4 ... - 4 - . A4 . . . -4I - - - 4 4 4 . . . . . . I I 4 I I I 4 0.3 i t t 4 I 4 I t I 4 I 0,2 I 4i I 4 t 4 4 I 4 4 4 4 I I 4 0.1 .~...;.. .. I.. .... ............ ;.... t........ t....
0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 Core Height (ft)
NOTE: For all power levels the K(z) at all axial levels is 1.0.
I FMP-001 Rev. 29 1 Page 20 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 10 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 Figure 3.1 V(z) as a Function of Core Height Height +1-5% +?-3%
(reel) '142) '/421
'0.0 1-0C0 1.0)0 S.2 1.02CCO 1A3Cll
'04 1.0CC) 1.0)03
'0,6 1,0CC) 1.30)0
'.6 1.0CC3 O 1 M03 1.12
.___ _ __ __ _ - +1-3% AFD Band J _ -L, J _ _ '1.0 1.0ECC 1M03O 1 .1i 1 ....
1" g j
_l i _
~ I a....
I I
I I
I J. . I
. L-------------------.---
I I I . I443I I I I A.I Band.
I I I I,---.-------.----i----
I t
I i
I I I I 4I i I
I I 1.4 11f 1.13-35 1-1-12 1.0M3!
U1.716 1,- 1.0-S-76 1-269D2 1.-l I I - - I- r - I- -r - I I I I -- - I I 21.3 1.0105 1,3661 7 I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I 2-2 1.06C4 410630 1.9--r*
1.- - --. -- --.
lI I r ---- T-------------*-...
z------
I
-- I- I I
_-r- -- r-- -rI-- 4----F--- ------
I I I I I I I I--
I r.... I I
I I I Ir- --)I- -- ,I- -
I I
- 24 1.0652 14-0500 2m 1.015 1.0564 I I I
- I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ I I I I I 2.5 1.077.3 1.0524 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I* I I I 3.0 1.0742 1U3500!
32 1-0718 1.04M3 I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I i I I 3-4 1.0693 U2463 3.M 1E0665 1.0441 32 1.0652 1.0422 I B I A I I I I I I I III I I I I I 4,0 1.0E66 1.4431 IS I IA I I I I I I 4:2 I.cE95 1.04.6 1.05------------------;~i- 4.4 1.0723 1.0432 I I i I I ml l m I i i I i m l I I 4.- 1.0747 1.049W
-- IT---.-- --.- -- r- - -I-. ---- ,-T- ----- --- -- 4.6 1.0765 1.051E 5.0 1.08 I.0r5'30 1O,*3 I I I I I I I iI I
I I i i i I I iI I ,
I C Iw ' I I I E
I II I I I *I I
I H I
i I
I I
I I
I I I I 5.4 107S3 1,0735 1.05,4)
II I I I I
- I I* I I I I I. I I I *l I I I I I I 56 10760 1.0642 5.. i".071 1,0532
- lE TI I
0.05 1-. I I
- 2.0'I L- I L -iI I
- 4.0--- I 5.0 -I i IL 6.
I I iI I
- III
- 70J--90J--0110 I. J I - I I I-I . 5.0 10752 1.0514 5.2 1.0725 1.0504 I = . 3I i iI I = I = I i I I i I i I I I I I I .4 "10E6,9 1.0437 6.6 1.065a 104651 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.O 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 t0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 563 1.0e611 1,0435 Core Height (ft) 7.0 1.0655 1.0412 7.2 1.0619 02369E 7A 1.0521 1.0!5 7.1 1.0570 1.0378 7.5 1.0611 14'0392 5.0 1.0652 1.0417 52 1.0E69 1.0443 6A 1.0716 1.047E 6.5 1.0747 1.0503 6.5 1.0780 1.0534 9.0 1.0621 1,0560 9.2 1.0E6-1 1.0610 9.4 1-0;33 1.0657 C.A 1.0S43 I.T070 9.8 1.015,1 1JE734 104. 1.1019 1.07f7 NOTE: V(z) data applicable for 0 < burnup <20,614 MWD/MTU. 10,2 103 1.1052 1.1D79 1.0606 1.0836 M0.6 110a8 13652
.10.3 0100 1.A003 For power levels below 50% RTP, the V(z) data at all axial '11.0 1.000 1U030
'11,2 1.0CC) 1.20032 levels is 1.0. It is conservative to apply the above figure to ,11.4 1.0C00 1;0300' power levels below 50% RTP. 1 t.6 13.
1.0C00 1.0CC) 1.0303' 1.3033
'12.0 1.0C3 100300 I FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 21 of 25 1
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 11 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 Figure 3.2 V(z) as a Function of Core Height Figure 3.2 is not required for Cycle 28 I FMP-001 I Rev. 29 Page 22 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 12 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 Figure 4.0, Allowable Deviation from Target Flux Difference 100
(-q,90) (+10,90) 90 UNACCOPTABL ,: (-6,90 (+8,9) UNACCEP~tABLE OPERATION! -T*-
7- OPERATION 80 70 U-
, ACCEPTA 3LE OPERATIONU x
-- I 60 (.24,50) ."
Z 2
i--
Iz 50 ... (-22501 -----------
iC
(+1 ---
(+30,50) 0)------
LL 40
- 0
- ---- ---I --- --
30 S-5%Target.Bands 20
....... +-3% Target Bands 10 0 I I + I
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 DEVIATION FROM TARGET FLUX DIFFERENCE(%)
NOTE: For power levels above 90%, power operation is allowed within the target bands (+3% and +5%).
I FMP-001 Rev. 29 Page 23 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.1 Page 13 of 13 HBRSEP UNIT NO. 2, CYCLE 28 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT REVISION 0 Figure 5.0, Shutdown Margin Versus Boron Concentration 2 I .--I -r--..[-*T-I I FI I I / I I I I I ! I I I I I III I riii7*C FI F I
F IT I I I I FI I F I
-I[I I /
-t -F--- F--I- H-t-- - F----H - -- F- -i- - - +- - _F_ H F----H - 4 -4 - H- H-I-F + -F- -F-H - k-I- - F- --
S II I II IL .- l - I L I I I_ I ' I I I I I F 1.8-F I I F FI- toe 1,F .F3a) uII T- 3 rcI F F F I II F I IIF 1I I I-I F F F I F 7I -r I F 1.6- - T -
F 1 -- '1 F- -- - - -T T r 1,-
-- F-H-F- I T1I--H-F--F-1- I-- F -- F-F---_ FFF_4--F-H-H-+-F--F----I--F--I---4j---F-- _
I TI _LF - - . - I -... -F._
] J_. - T FF I F T f F F- .F - TI I rI T T I -I r I I _I.. L_ _ J _.L _FL.._L.J..._[ L -L..I IJJ . F... F. J _i.. .. II -.. L_ -. _J -J.I ........
1.4- -v--r-1 5 -F -r ,r- fl a n---F- i 2 F I
' r -.II-F F F F F F
_1FII I
I F F I
F F F F- I F I I I I FT FI F F F F F F F I F I I
I I C
1.2 -
I-F 1-U F.. . . . . . -'-F LU..F, .F. . ..L1 .L .J. .-. . L U. .... LFF L
,LW w 0.8- I T I n-re-- I I -r-F-H-I I I-T- I I -rn,-i F - I r It- -tTF-- F -1F -7 7F F F F F 1-r I F F l7r--
F F I F --F --F '--I -F F- FI-_jiF L-* F F -'L-:-
F F I F F F F F dLF "L F L* F F } IF IF I.__L F F 95ol-L F
L--
F I F F I F I F I F F F F I F I I IF F F F F F F F F F F I F F I F
._1_ , T_r-- L __-I _ _, V--I-F- - r--L -I---r .- _FL i. _t - Lr-r I - _ iL__ .- F - - --. L --L -- J -. _L--- - -I_ r. F t-0.6- J..I Fj.1LFj1W F
S-- I-- --F3-T FT--H*- I-H T - -F-H-I- H - F- -F-F - ---- -- F' F-"* H--
F"*-- F-* -Fr--H- 4l-
"--FT- r H - + -Fr--F-H - TI--Fr--F-H-I-- F-r
-F-r-0.4 F-F- - £LL - J-- -- _I_ J - L _L_! J1. L _LJil - L-L1J Li- -L 2J- - I k_ F---JIL -L lJ1 L -L-0.2 - F I I F F F F F F F F F I F F F F I F F F F F F I F F F F F F I F I I 'I l 1 I - r-r--F I ; I ~i - FFI ' - V 1 t F ;i I F iT F -
0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 BORON CONCENTRATION, ARO, HFP (ppm)
IFMP-001 I Rev. 29 Page 24 of 25
ATTACHMENT 10.2 Page 1 of 1 PROCEDURES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY COLR REVISIONS Revisions to the COLR may require that revisions be made to other plant procedures. At a minimum the following procedures should be reviewed to determine if they must be revised:
APP-005 GP-002 CP-010 GP-003 EST-002 GP-006-1 EST-003 GP-006-2 EST-028 GP-009-1 EST-048 GP-009-2 EST-049 GP-009-3 EST-050 GP-009-4 EST-105 GP-009-5 EST-146 GP-010 FMP-009 LP-551 FMP-012 LP-552 FMP-014 OP-003 FMP-019 OP-910 FHP-003 OMP-003 Station Curve Book PLP-100 ERFIS CAOC Software NFP-NGGC-0018 The procedures listed above are those that are typically affected by COLR revisions; however, other procedures may also be affected.
I FMP-001 Rev. 29 1 Page 25 of25