PY-CEI-NRR-1341, 1990 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept

1990 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept

ML20072S420
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	12/31/1990
From:	Lyster M CENTERIOR ENERGY
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
PY-CEI-NRR-1341, NUDOCS 9104150248
Download: ML20072S420 (190)

Text

- - - - - - - - - - - -

y

,h camamo7 l

ENERGY

.. g

. PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT il Moress:

Michael D. Lyster

~ i0 PERRY. OHIO 44001 VICE PRESIDENT NUCLE *D pE k HIO 4 081 (216) 259-3737 Aptil 9, 1991 PY-CEl/NRR-1341 L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.

20555 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-440 Annual Environmental Operating Report Centlemen We are.hereby submitting the Annual Environmental Operating Report for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, for the period of January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990.

Included is the radiological environmental operating report required by PNPP Technical Specification, Section 6.9.1.6, and the non-radiological environmental operating report required by Section 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B of PNPP Operating License NPF-58.

Please call if you have any questions.

Since.

f 1&

Michael D. Lyster MDL:AHL:njc Attachment cc:

NRC Project Manager NRC Resident Inspector Office NRC, Region III S. Focht - ANI oce e ng c e c e es aesaN Ew wume g

' Tclenn Fr1 w C OO/

't',

9104150248 901231 dD PDR ADOCK 05000440 R

PDR

/[/

l I

Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit No.1 Annual Environmental Operating Report January 1,1990 - December 31,1990

$-MM3NIsU$i=

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC l

E

- lNN ILLUMIN ATING COMP ANY

?3M*&

. BMhl; s.iving es, s.,1 tocar,on,n is, nation Wr

i O

O O

....... - ~. - -

-. -. _. ~..

~. - - ~.. -. ~. - -.. -

1 =

i t,

f a

t

_I THE PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

'\\

.1.

'1990 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT I

f-4 i

I t

I d

3 J

k l,.

t i.

4 6

4 j.

i

~

~__.

1 J

l J

4 i

i TABLE OF CONTENTS s

DESCRIPTION PAGE Executive Summary........................................

1 I.

Introduction..........................................

1!

II.

Program States...............-.........................

2 III.

Program Changes.......................................

3 i

IV.

Sampling Methods and Procedures.......................

4 1.

Direct. Radiation..................................

4 2.

Air..............................................

5 3.-

Vater............................................

6 4.

Milk.............................................

6 5.

Fish.............................................

7 6.

Sediment.........................................

8 7.-

Soil.............................................

8 8.

Precipitation -....................................

8' 9.

Food Products.....................................

9 10.

Feed / Silage......................................

9 11.1 Vegetation.......................................-

9-V.

-Discussion and Results................................

10 1.

Direct Radiation.................................

10 h.

'2.

Air..............................................

12 3.

Vater.............................................

14 4.

Milk.............................................

17 5.

Fish.............................................

20 i.

6.

Sediment.........................................

21 7.

Soil.............................................

23

(-

l, - -

l l-i e+

,c.

.,a

,mc.a

-e r

.m

• c-gg v7 g

-.r-.

,v+m

-m-

-rw--+

'--m--

w 9^

--+m e--

TABLE OF CONTERTS (Cont.)

DESCRIPTION PAGE 8.

Precipitation....................................

27 9.

Food Products....................................

29 10.

Feed / Silage......................................

29 11.

Vegetation.......................................

30 VI.

Effluent Releases.....................................

32 VII.

Lover Limit of Detection..............................

3?

VIII.

Land Use Census.......................................

35 i

II.

Quality Assurance.....................................

34 e

X.

Conclusion............................................

35

\\.

Table 1:

List of Sample Locations....................

37

/

Figure la Sample Locations Vithin Tvo Hiles.....

43 l

Figure 2:

Sample Locations Vithin Two-Eight Miles.................................

44 Figure 3: Control Sample Locations..............

45 Table 2:

Missing Sample Collections......

46 Table 3:

Summary of Results..........................

47 Table 4:

Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Results of Quartotly and Annual Field Cycles 1990...........................

70 Table 5:

Comparison of TLD Direct Radiation Results Comparing Quarterly Sums and Annual Results..........................

71 Table 6:

Plant Caseous Effluents taken from the 1990 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report..............................

72 Table 7:

Plant Liquid Effluents taken from the 1990 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report..............................

73 i

l l

1 11

l N

TABLE OF COPTTENTS (Cont.)

Qf- -

DESCRIPTION PAGE Table 8:

Summary of. Radionuclides Associated with I

Light-Water Reactors and the Activity Reported, from the PNPP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program............

74 Table.9:

Nearest Garden by Sector and Deposition (D/0) Value......................

75 Table 10: Nearest Resident by Sector and Dispersion (X/0) Value......................

76 Table 11: Milk Animals by Sector and Deposition (D/0) Value......................

77 Table 12: Produce Grovers Within Vicinity of PNPP.....

78 Table 13: Recreational Areas and Pub'.ic Drinking Vater Facilities............................

80 l-Figure 4:

Land Use Census Map...................

81

{g Table 14: EPA Intercomparison Program 1990............

82 Table 15: Environmental TLD Results - Quality Control Spiking Program 1990................

85 i

Appendix A 1990 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data................

A I

l'.

111 l-L

l l

V EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

mis report is a sumary of the PNPP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for 1990. We report includes a review of the resultr of sampling performed in 1990, as well as a comparison with preoperational results and 1989 results. We report also includes results from the 1990 Land Use Survey, the EPA Crosscheck Intercomparison Program, and the TLD Irradiation Program.

A total of 1261 environmental samples were collected and analyzed in 1990, in accordance with the PNPP Technical Specifications for Radiological Environmental Monitoring. We collection of water samples in April and food products in September were inadvertently lost in transit to the vendor laboratory.

Water samples collected from the control station at the Ohio-American Water Plant in Ashtabula for November and December were declared invalid due to the disconrection of the tubing from the main raw water line. To correct the problem and increase control, a permanent water station was established at the CEI Ashtabula Generating Station in January of 1991. his location n

will be used to collect controi samples in the future. PNPP will V

for a period of time continue to collect grab samples from the Ohio-American Water plant.

We radionuclides Cs-137 and Sr-90 continue to be detected in sample medias. Although these radionuclides were detected separately or together in such samples as soil, sediment, water, milk, fish, hay and grass, further investigations showed no evidence that these radionuclides were the result of plant effluents. Technical literature and texts indicates that these radionuclides are the result of weapon testing several decades ago.

It was concluded from this report thyt the Perry Nuclear Power Plant operations continued to have no measurable adverse impact on the environment in 1990.

O l

(

PERRY POWER PLANT U

RADIOUXHCAL ENVIRONKENTAL MmI70RIN3 PROGRAM 1990 ANNUAL REPORT I. INTRODUCTION We Perry Power Plant is a Bolling Water Reactor (BWR) plant with a capacity to generate 1205 MWe h e main condenser is cooled by a closed-loop circulating water system with a natural draft cooling tcmer system. We plant is located on Lake Erie, on approximately 1100 acres about thirty-five (35) miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio.

During 1990, Unit 1 produced 20,045,470 megawatt-hours of gross thermal energy and was operational (critical) for 5880.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />.

In 1990, the second refueling outage for the Perry Power Plant occurred. he generator came off line for the outage at 00:20 on September 7 and was back on line at 12:12 January 4,1991. he outage duration was approximately 119 days.

We primary objective of the PNPP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to measure ambient direct radiation and radioactivity levels within a twenty-five mile radius around the O

Perry Power Plant. % e objectives of this program are conducted in

(

accordance with the PNPP Technical Specification section 3.12, on Radiological Environmental Monitoring.

Radiological Monitoring Program.

Prior to initial criticality on June 6, 1986, the program compiled several years of preoperational data to establish a baseline database. We operational data are compared to preoperational data to determine if any direct radiation or radioactivity has been contributed to the environment frca the plant.

II. PRCGRAM STA3US During 1990, the Perry Operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program consisted of seven air sampling stations, five water sampling stations, seven milk sampling stations, thirty-five TLD ( hermoluminescent Dosimeters) stations, six precipitation sampling stations, two fish sampling stations, seven sediment sampling stations (three stations are located along the shoreline), and eight soil sampling stations h e food product locations were divided into three sections with the following number of stations; produce-four, feed / silage-seven, vegetation (which includes grass and leaves)-five, c

TLD stations one through twenty-four, four sediment (stations 25, 26, 27, and 32) and two fish sampling stations were placed into

. 2-

LO operation in 1981. In 1982, sanple collection was started for air, water, milk,-and food products / silage. We program was augmented in 1985 to include snow and soil. In 1988, the method for collecting precipitation was modified to include both snow and rain.. Prior to 1988, only snow'was collected when available, t

Although precipitation and soil samples are not required by the NRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Environmental Monitoring (Revision 1) or the PNPP Technical Specifications for Radiclogical Environmental Monitoring, the two media have been added to the program to expand the scope of environmental monitcring.

he location of each sampling station within the tweaty-five mile radius of the Perry Plant is shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3. Figure 1 shows all sampling stations within a two mile radiv.s of the plant. Figure 2 s'iows all sample stations approximately two to eight miles from :he plant, and Figure 3 shows all control stations greater ". hen eight miles from the plant.

Table 1 identifies each sample station by number, and the distance and direction from the plant site. A description of each sample station and the med)a pathway found in tnat particular sample station are also found in Table 1.

In 1990, several samples from different environmental media were e

not collected due malfunction of equipment, animal husbandry practices, lost shipments and vandalism. Table 2 lists the samples, their location, the collection date, and a orief reason why each sample was not collected and/or analyzed.

III. PROGRAM CHANGES h ere were several changes to the program in 1990. Wese changes include the addition and deletion of sample stations as follows:

January o A new water sampling station-(Location 68, Ohio-American Water Co. Ashtabula 19.5 miles ENE control) was added to the program. his location reflects a public drinking water intake, o he old control water sampling station (Location 28, CEI Generating Station, Ashtabula 22.0 miles DIE) was deleted from the program. mis location was an industrial water intake.

NorE: In January 1991, sampling locations were switched back. See Section 5, Discussion and Results for Water.

o he Rhoades Farm, which is a control location for milk and feed / silage sampling was added to the program..

[

j August o A new food product sampling station (Location 70, b'

H&H Farms Chardon, 16.2 miles SSN Control) was added to the program to replace Iocation 50 (Radcliffe Rd 10.9 miles S. Control). We owners of location 50 elected not to grew food products in 1990.

December o Milk sampling stations 30 (N. Ridge Rd 2.3 miles SSW) and 52 (Wood Rd. 4.5 miles SE) were deleted from the program. We owners had sold their milk producing animals.

IV. SAMPLING METHODS AND PROCEDURES h derive meaningful and useful data from the program, sampling methods and procedures have been developed which provide samples representative of potential pathways to man for the area. The methods described herein were used for sample collection in 1990.

Samples were collected at indicator and control locations. An indicator location is a location near the plant that has a high probability of detecting plant effluents; whereas, a control location is a location that is away from the plant and the probability of influence by the plant effluents is low.

!O

(/

1. DIRECT RADIATICH Environmental thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to measure the direct and ambient radiation levels at thirty-five locations as described in Table 1. Environmental TLDs were located in two rings around the station as well as along the site boundary. We inner ring measured direct radiation within a one-mile radius around the plant, whereas, the outer ring measured direct radiation at an approximate distance of four to five miles from the station. W e site boundary ranges from 0.42 miles in the NE sector to 0.82 miles in the SSE sector.

control TLDs were placed in two locations approximately ten miles in the two least prevalent wind directions from the plant.

We area around the plant is divided into 16 radial sectors, each of which is 22 1/2 degrees. Environmental TLDs were placed in each sector except those sectors which radiate from the site directly out over the lake without intersecting any unrestricted areas over land.

Each environmental TLD consists of a calcium sulfate wafer with dysprosium impurities. Each location had one field p)

(_ -

h')

environmental TLD, one emergency environmental TLD, and one annual environmental TLD. The field environmental TLD and the v

emergency environmental TLD were collected quarterly, whereas, the annual environmental TLD is collected once a year.

he field environmental TLD was the primary TLD used for measuring direct radiation exposure and the results are included in this report. Results from the annual environmental TLDs are also included in this report.

Emergency environmental TLDs are intended to be used only under emergency conditions, and because he results are not included in this report. In certain situations in which the field environmental TLD is lost and the emergency environmental TLD data for that location exists, the emergency environmental TLD data is substituted for the lost TLD data.

Transient TLDs were used during transportation to correct for any direct radiation not received during the field cycle.

Special control TLDs were kept in a lead-thielded container.

These special control TLDs can be used in conjunction with the other control field e7vironmental TLDs to determine if any abnormal exposure recorded on a TLD or a group of TLDs was attributed by the plant.

Od All environmental TLDs were packaged at the site and were shipped by comercial freight to the vendor laboratory for analysis.

2.

AIR Air samples were collected weekly at seven locations. These air samples consist of glass fiber filters and charcoal cartridges. We glass fiber filters were used to collect particulates and the charcoal cartridges were used to collect iodine.

tere were six air sample locations operating within a four mile radius of the plant. The seventh location was a control location that was located in the least predominant wind direction at a distance greater than ten miles from the plant.

We air samples were collected on a lw volume air sampler (Research Appliance Company Model No. 209088-2). he air samplers run continuously and sample approximately 10,000 cubic feet of air a week. We total air volume was measured by a dry gas meter and the time was registered by a time totalizer h e samples were packaged and shipped to the vendor laboratory for analysis. -.

n Calibration for total air flow and maintenance checks were performed every six months or after repair.

3. WATER Water samples were collected monthly at three locations and weekly at two locations. h e three monthly locations are: the control location at the Ohio-American Water Company (68) in Ashtabula, the Lake County Drinking Water racility (36) in Painesville, and the Perry Plant Service Water Pumphouse forebay (34) in Perry. The two weekly locations are taken from the shoreline at the north end of Green Rd. (59) and at the shoreline at the boat launch in Perry Park (60). Wese two locations are on opposite sides of the plant, j

Samples are collected monthly at the three locations using composite samplers. The Perry Plant Intake sample location and the Ashtabula drinking water facility sample location obtain water samples via a Horizon Interval Sampler, which collects a small volume of water at short intervals, 1

nominally a one-and-one-half minute sample every fifteen minutes. The other water location at Lake County Water Plant in Painesville uses an interval timer to control a solenoid valve on a pressurized sampling line his sampling unit p/

collects a one minute sample of water from the raw water t

sample line every hour and composites it in a five-gallon container.

l At the remaining two locations, grab samples are collected weekly and composited for a monthly sample, nese grab samples are taken from the shoreline.

Each sample was composited in a five-gallon container. Each month, two one-gallon samples and one 125-milliliter sample were renoved from each of the five-gallon containers. %e remaining sample volume in the five-gallon container was disposed of. %e two one-gallon samples were treated with ten-milliliters of nitric acid to prevent plate-out on the sample container. We 125-milliliter sample was not treated with nitric acid, since it is analyzed only for tritium, which does not plate-out on the container.

All samples were then packaged and shipped to the vendor laboratory for analysis.

4. MILK During 1990, the number of milk locations had varied from two locations to as many as eight locations. One location had only participated in the program for two sample collections f-)

(o

\\

O at the beginning of the year and sold its herd he program

'd introduced another milk (dairy) sampling location, Rhoades Farm (Location #69), in late 1989, his sampling location can be found 18.7 miles SSR of the plant his location, in conjunction with Rettger's Farm (Location #51), will serve as control locations jointly.

We PNPP Technical Specifications requires a control sample at a distance between 15-30 km in the least prevalent wind direction. Rettger's Farm is located 9.6 miles (15.4 km South) and Rhoades' Parm is located 18.7 miles (30.1 km SSW).

Since Rettger's larm still falls within the limits of the technical specification, it was decided to keep this location as an additional control.

We locations that contain goats generally produced milk from early spring to late fall. We goats were generally dried-out in the winter as part of a normal husbandry practice.

However, dairy cows traduce milk on a year-round basis.

Milk samples were collected monthly during the non-grazing season (October 16 through April 14) and twice a month during the grazing season. Milk samples were normally collected from j

a batch tank at the dairy farms. The owners who supply milk i

samples were given two one-gallon containers and the filled O

containers were collected two to three days later.

LJ All milk samples were treated with forty grams of sodium bi-sulfite to preserve the milk. We samples were then packaged and shipped to the vendor laboratory for analysis.

5. FISH Fish samples were collected semiannually from two locations.

h e indicator location is in the immediate vicinity of the plant discharge and an offshore location near the area of Mentor-on-We-Lake is the control location.

A passive collection technique was used for fish collection.

An experimental gill net, with a mesh ranging from approximately 1.0 to 2.5 inches was used to maximize catches in the useful size range. We net was set in the evening and removed the following morning. A scientific collecting permit was obtained from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources to permit sampling.

Available edible portions were packed in ice and shipped to the vendor laboratory for analysis by gama spectrometry.

O v

_?_

(]

6. SEDIMENT C/

Sediment sanples were collected semiannually frem seven locations. 'No sanples were collected at the same locations where fish samples were collected. he other sediment sample locations were offshore in the vicinities of Fairport Harbor and Redbird (Madison). Wree on-site shoreline sampling locations were added in 1989. These were the minor and major stream outlets to Lake Erie and the storm drain impoundment outfall to the lake, i

At the four offshore sediment sample locations, samples were collected with a Ponar Grab Sampler. W e depth of sample collection was approximately 20-40 feet. nese samples were then transferred to plastic containers. At the three new shoreline sediment sampling points, samples were collected by a scoop just offshore in 1 to 1-1/2 feet of water. A minimum of 1000 grams of sediment from each sample location was collected, and shipped tu the vendor laboratory for analysis.

7. SOIL Soil samples were taken quarterly at eight locations, of which one sample (Location 66) was a control sample located l

eleven miles SSW at the Concord Service Center. The other l

r"~N soil samples were located in two rings around the plant.

l V There were three soil samples in the inner ring within a mile l

of the plant. Another four soil samples were collected in an outer ring approximately five miles from the plant. %e eighth soil sample was located near a cormuunity in the DE sector. his sector is one of the three highest DM (Deposition rate) sectors. he highest DM sector covers a s:sall sparsely populated area and then eventually continues out over the lake.

A garden trowel was used to remove the soil from a twelve inch by twelve inch area approximately one inch deep. he soil was placed in a one-liter plastic container at each location. he samples were then packaged and shipped to the vendor laboratory for sample analysis.

8. PRECIPITATICN Precipitation samples are collected from six sampling stctions. Five sample stations are located near the site boundary in the highest DM sectors. %e sixth sampling station, (location 6) was the control station located 11 miles SSW at the Concord Service Center. Samples are collected monthly as a composite using 3 gallon passive collection containers. Containers are removed when the sample container is full or nearly full. A new container is then l

placed in the same location for the remainder of the sample b

period. All collected water is composited, strained to remove

\\

L debris, and shipped to the laboratory for analysis.

Nitric acid, normally added to prevent plate-out, is not

. added to precipitation samples. Since the amount of sample volume may vary from collection period to collection period, it is not known until the end of the collection period whether or not a sufficient volume exists to perform all the analyses required, one of which is tritium. We addition of nitric acid to the composite sample prior to the removal of

)

125 ml'of. tritium would adversely affect the tritium analysis. %erefore, nitric acid is not added to the sample.

9. FOOD PRODUCTS te food product samples were collected once a year during the harvest season (late August or early September). W e food products were collected from four locally grown gardens and roadside vendors near the plant. One location (Location 70, Auburn Rd.16.2 miles SSW) was a control location. In 1988 and 1989,-no food products were collected from the old control location (Location 50, 13271 Radcliffe Rd. 10.9 miles S.). Werefore, in 1990, a new control location was found.

Every effort was made to collect broad-leaf. vegetation (i.e.,

p\\

cabbage, lettuce, etc.) if possible. However, if broad-leaf l

vegetation was not available, other food products were collected for samples.

10. TEED / SILAGE The feed / silage and/or hay products were collected once a year. during the harvest ' season (late August or early September). Feed / silage and/or hay were collected from each milk sanple location. Samples were packaged and shipped to the vendor laboratory for analysis.

11. VEGETATION Samples of grass and leaves, when available, were ecliected monthly during the growing season to supplement milk sampling.' Wese samples were collected at'five locations. %e control location (Location 6, concord Service Center 11.0 miles SSW) was in the least prevalent wind direction.

At each grass sample location, grass was clipped from an area ranging frcm1 approximately.10 to 200 square feet in area.

Large sample areas were often used to obtain the required sample size. Grass samples weighed approximately 1000 grams depending on the moisture content. Samples were taken at the highest D M sector, the highest DM sector "ith

. O-milk-producing animals, or both.

9-i 1

b U

Leaves were sampled at or very near the same locations as grass samples. Leaves wers taken from one particular species (the Staghorn Sumac or_ Rhus Typhina L.) that is abundant in the-area. A minimum of 1000 grams was collected each month when available.

V. DISCUSSION AND RESULTS A sumary of the results for each sample medium is provided in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sumary Table 3. We average values recorded in Table 3 reflect the results for each sample medium in Appendix A.~ The 1990 results recorded in Table 3 are discussed below for each sample medium and the results are compared with the historical values to reflect any possible trends.

1. DIRECT RADIATION A total of 136 TLDs were collected and analyzed in 1990.

Were were 4 quarterly TLDs and 3 annual TLDs missing. These missing TLDs were most likely the result of vandalism.

We average quarterly exposure for the year for all TLDs and the equivalent annual dose per year are as follows:-

Average Quarterly Equivalent Annual l

Exposure Exposure I=

1990 14.94 4.56 mR/Std. Otr.

59.76 mIVYr.

1989 14.70 4.50 mIVStd. Otr.

56.80 m!VYr.

1 Preop. 18.90 6.80 m!vStd. Qtr.

75.60 mIVYr.

here appears to be good agreement between the results for 1990 and 1989.

We preoperational'TLD results are higher than the 1989 and 1990 TLD rqsults due to a change in vendors. A cceprehensive explanation of the differences in TLDs between previous vendor (s) and current vendor is provided in the 1989 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit No. 1, Annual Environmental Operating Report, Jarraary 1,1989-December 31, 1989. This explanation is an account of why our preoperational data-is higher than our current data.

The quarterly exposure rates for 1990 ranged from 11.0 mfVStd.0tr. to 23.4 mR/Std.0tr. % e location with the highest quarterly average for the year was Location No. 18, 5.0 miles S. of the plant.' Location 18 historically has always been the highest TLD location. %e highest average quarterly dose for the year was 22.4 mIVStd.Qtr.

.q)

O V

he annual average quarterly exposure for indicator locations and control locations in 1990 vere as follows:

INDICA'IOR LOCATICNS CCNTROL LOCATICNS 14.99 4.60 mR/Std.Qtr.

14.1013.61 ns/Std.Qtr.

h ere appears to be no statistical difference in exposure levels between the indicator and control locations, h e sum of the quarterly TLDs to the annual TLDs compared quite well. W ese values appear in Table 5. The sum of the quarterly TLD results were compared to he annual TLD result for each location.

he average of the annual TLDs and the average of quarterly sum TLDs are summarized belcw:

Annual Sum of all Quarters TLD Average TLD Average 62.18 17.19 mR 59.83 15.58 mR W ese results appear to be in good agreement with each other

(]

and the aforementioned equivalent annual dote.

LJ Comparison To Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports A dose comparison is compiled between actual release results from the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports (SRERR) for the first and second halves of 1990, and the equivalent results from the 1990 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. For this comparison, the air gamma exposure from plant gaseous effluents going to the predominant land based sector at the site boundary, (as reported in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports (SRERR) for 1990), is compared to the actual readings from the TLD in the ccrresponding Ircation.

According to the SRERR for the first and second half of 1990, the land based sector predicted to receive the highest exposure for each quarter of 1990 and the corresporxling TLD located there, are as follows:

OG -

O(d Sector at Site Corresponding Boundary from SRERR TLD Location Quarter 1 ENE Sector 1

Quarter 2 E Sector 2

Quarter 3 SW Sector 5

Quarter 4 NE Sector 7

he predicted exposure according to the SRERRs is in mrem while the TLD exposure is listed in mR. For the purpose of this comparison, these units can be considered as equivalent to each other using the gama quality factor of 1. In comparing the expected exposures from the release data shown in the SRERRs to the four quarters of TLD results at the corresponding locations gives the following:

1st Otr.

2nd Otr. 3rd Otr.,4th Otr.

Expected Exposure i

from the SRERRs 3.77E-3 1.25E-2 1.81E-2 1.85E-4 mrenVQtr.

f]

Actual TLD

()

Results 15.1 1.2 12.4 0.4 13.9 1.0 16.6 1.1 mR/Std. Qtr.

herefore, the expected exposure from plant effluents is far too arall to be positively identified above the normal fluctuation of the natural background levels of radiation in the environment arxl the error associated with the TLD measurements. W e expected exposures frce the plant effluents for each quarter in 1990 was less than the lower limit of detection of 1 mrem for CaSO4 (Dy) environmental TLDs.

2. AIR A total of 371 samples were collected in 1990 for each air i

particulate and air iodine medium. Air particulate filters l

were analyzed for gross beta weekly and were composited by location and analyzed quarterly by ganna spectrometry. Air lodine cartridges were analyzed by gama spectremetry weekly.

I

%e 1990 annual average gross beta activity for all locations for air with respect to its previous year and preoperational value is as follows:

l

() l

I';

YEAR ACTIVITY (pCl/Cu.M) 2 Sigma a

1990_

19.30E-03 13.08E-03 1989 22.13E-03 18.88E-03 Preop.

17.44E-03 13.74E-03 he gross beta concentrations ranged from 6E-03 pC1/Cu.M to 48E-03 pCi/Cu.M for all locations. The location with the highest annual average concentration was L > cation No. 5 approximately 0.6 r'Ms SW from the plant, This location had an annual concentit. an of 20.72E-03 pCi/Cu.M.

h e 1990 annual average gross beta concentration for air for indicator locations and the control location is as follows:

RADIONUCLIDE INDICA'IOR LOCATICNS CONTROL IOCATICN Gross Beta 19.19E-03 13.10E-03 19.98E-03 13.00E-03 pCi cu. M pCi/Cu.M here appears to b/ no statistical difference in gross beta concentrations between the indicator locations and t:ie control loc.stion.

The rauonuclide Be-7, which is naturally-occurring, was G(d detected in all quarterly emposited air samples he 1990 annual average concentration for Be-7 in air for all locations with respect to its previous year and preoperational value is as follows:

YEAR ACTIVITY (pCi/Cu.M) 2 Sigma 1990 49.29E-03 19.18E-03 1989 60.70E-03 29.30E-03 Preop.

70.90E-03 41.40E-03 he Be-7 cencentration this year was lower than the previous year and the average preoperational period. Historically, Be-7 has ranged from 30 E-03 pCi/Cu.M to 140 E-03 pCi/Cu.M.

In 1990, the Be-7 concentrations ranged from 40 E-03 pCi/Cu.M to 80 E-03 pCi/Cu.M for all locations. %e location with the highest annual average concentration was Location No. 5, approximately 0.6 miles SW of the plant. he highest annual average concentration was 52.5 E-03 pCi/Cu.M.

h e 1990 annual average concentration for Be-7 in air is as follows:

RADIONUCLIDE INDICA'IOR LOCATIONS CCNITtOL LOCATICN

. f3

(")

BE-7 48.75E-03 20.28E-03 52.5E-03 9.8E-03 pCi/Cu.M pci/Cu.M (9

t.

L/

There appears to be no statistical difference between the annual average concentrations for the indicator locations and the control location.

We radionuclides Co-58, co-60, Cs-134, Cs-137 and I-131 were reported as the lower limit of detection.

3. NATER A total of 54 water samples were collected and analyzed for gross beta activi'y and by ganna spectrometry. From these 54 water samples, a total of 20 water samplos were composited and analyzed for tritium. A total of 22 senples were analyzed for Sr-89 and Sr-90 on a quarterly basis.

h e 1990 annual average gross beta activity for all locations in water with respect to its previous year and preoperational value is as follows:

YEAR ACTIVITY (pC1/L) 2 Sigma 1990 2.46 1.13 i

1989 2.90 1.30 Preop.

5.26 6.78 j'~h C) he 1989 and 1990 gross beta concentrations are in good agreement when compared together. But, when compared to the preoperational value, they are much lower. %e reason for this difference was due to the change in vendor laboratories in 1987/1988. W e previous vendor laboratory had consistently higher gross beta activities in water. An investigation into this matter did not provide any evidence for this higher concentration of gross beta.

h e gross beta activity ranged from 1.5 pCi/L to 4.4 pC1/L for all locations and Location 60 was identified as the location with the highest annual average gross beta activity.

This activity was reported as 2.84 1.51 pCi/L.

h e 1990 annual average gross beta activity in water for indicator and control locations are as follows:

RADIO UCLIDE INDICATOR IOCATIO1S CCtRROL LOCATICNS Gross Beta 2.49 1.22 pC1/L 2.35 0.63 pC1/L h ere appears to be no significant deviation between the indicator locations and the control locations.

l O

l l N-) l

(]

We radionuclide Sr-90 was detected in 3 out of 22 samples U

analyzed for Sr-89 and Sr-90 he 1990 annuar avera.ge Sr-90 concentration for all locations in water was 0.73 0.11 pC1/L.

W e Sr-90 conceptration ranged from 0.70 pCi/L to 0.80 pC1/L.

Preoperational Sr-90 concentrations ranged frcxn 0.55 pC1/L to 1.9 pCi/L. his indicates that St-90 was present prior to the operation of the plant and most likely a result of the atmospheric fallout from nuclear weapon tests performed several decades ago. No positive St-89 activity was detected in any samples.

We control locations showed no positive activity above the lower limit of detection for either Sr-89 or Sr-90.

A gamma isotopic analysis was done on water for Cs-134, C=-137, Fe-59, La-140, Mn-54, Nb-95, In-65 and Zr-95. No positive activity was detected above the lower limit of detection for any of these radionuclides. Minimum detectable levels were achieved in the 100 to 200 pC1/L. range.

Tritium was detected in 17 out of 20 composited samples in 1990. The laboratory veMor used, between 1984 and 1997, had a lower limit of detection that was equivalent to the IRC LLD value of 2000 pCi/L. Since 1988, the new vendor laboratory l

has been able to achieve detection levels well below the contractual detection limit of 1500 pCi/L.

h e 1990 annual average concentration for H-3 for all locations in water with respect to its previous years and preoperational value is as follows:

YEAR ACTIVITY (pCi/L) 2 Sigma 1990 180.5 108.1 1989 248.7 117.0 1988 284,8 351.0 1

Preop.

333.6 341.0*

• tis value was computed from data obtained from a vendor laboratory used by PNPP from 1982 to 1984.

l The tritium values ranged from 100 pCi/L to 275 pC1/L. W e location with the highest annual mean value was Location No.

28, a control location, 22 miles ENE of the plant. Only one value was reported for this location. It was 264 pCi/L.

The 1990 annual average concentration for H-3 in water for indicator locations and control locations are as follows:

PADIONUCLIDE INDICA'IOR LOCATICNS CCNTROL IDCATICNS

(

-s H-3 166.5 98.2 pCi/L 226.0 99.7 pCi/L l !

IJ 2e control locations are slightly higher in concentration than the indicator locations. his is probably due to the randomness of the statistics, since both the indicator and the control locations display 2 sigma values that would overlap each other when added or subtracted from the reported value.

In 1990, the water sampling program experienced two abnormal events. W e first event was the loss of water samples in shipnent in April. Water samples were collected for the month of April, but according to the vendor laboratory, the package did not arrive at the laboratory. A follow up with the shipping agent indicated that the samples were accidentally destroyed during shipping.

he second event was the invalidation of two water samples collected from the control location (#68) during the acnths of November and December. It was decided that the samples collected for November ard December were invalid when it was discovered that the tygon tubing from the raw water line was disconnected. his event was recognized in January during a routine monthly sample collection when maintenance was performed in the sump area. An investigation of the event showed that the tygon tubing had become disconnected from the

,r 3 saddle valve off the raw water line sometime prior to or

(/

during the sampling period for the month of September.

During collection of water samples during the month of September, the environmental technician duly noted in the PNPP Sample Collection Field Form that the sample used for analysis was a grab sample. The grab sample was collected due to the technician observing that the normal collection container was only half full and a crimp was in the tygon tubing. %e technician had easily removed the tygon tubing from the sampling area witn no resistance end removed the crimp from the tubing. % e technician then lowered the tygon tubing back into the pit.

i During the October water collection period, the environmental technician observed again that the sample collection container was only half full. We environmental technician inspected the tygon tubing closer and noted that the tubing was clogged with debris. h e technician changed out the tubing, lowered the tubing back into the pit, and took a grab sample according to PNPP instnictions. he grab samples for both September and Octnber were taken from an ohic>-American sample line which draws from the raw water supply line and were therefore valid.

3(v lO

' Water. samples collected during the nonths of November and U

December were invalid. We normal collection system was used but the tubing was sampling from the pit and was not properly connected to the saddle valve. Discussions with the technician indicated that the technician was not aware that i

the tubing was supposed to be connected to a saddle valve as originally designed. It was assumed by the technician that the pit in which the tygon tubing was taking a suction was an intake point for raw water. It was learned from the Ohio-American Water personnel that the samples were collected from a sump and not an intake structure. A 36 inch carbon steel pipe with a sampling line runs through the sump. A saddle valve had been attached to a rubber sample line used by the facility to collect daily water samples for chemistry.

The probable cause of this event was an improper connection f

of a saddle valve to a rubber hose, saddle valves are i

normally attached to a hard-line pipe under pressure. Copper piping, not tygon tubing, is normally used to channel the water from the saddle valve to a collection container.

l he corrective action was to remove the sample collection 4

point from.the Ohio-American Water Company facility in Ashtabula to the CEI Ashtabula Generating Station, located approximately 2.5 miles further east of the drinking water facility. Grab samples will be taken at the Ohio-American Water Company facility for the immediate future.

i ne decision to move the contrel location was predicated on several factors: 1) Due to the proximity of the rav water line at the Ohio-American Water facility with respect to the sample landing on top of the pit, PNPP cannot visually ensure that the sample line remains connected, particularly if the line becomes submersed in water. The CEI facility does not require the use of a saddle valve and the sampling line is deposited directly into the intake bay which is located only several feet from tha sample container, and 2) CEI does not

.have jurisdiction over: Ohio-American Water and any maintenanca or inspection done in this area. %ere is no way for PNPP to ensure that the raw water line remains connected and a continuous supply of raw lake water is collected.

4. MILK

'During 1990, a total of 108 milk samples were collected and arnalyzed for radioiodine by chemical separation and by gamma spectroinetry. A total of 18 samples from the 108 samples were analyzed for strontium.

The most predominate r3diohuclide detected by gama c

spectrometry was K-49. This radionuclide is naturally 1

occurring and is not associated with the production of auclear power. K-40 was detected in all milk samples..

.m

-n

... * ~

- he 1990 annual average concentration for E 40 for all locations in milk with respect to the.revicus years and preoperational value is es follows:

YEAR ACTIVITY (pCi/L) 2 ' sigma 1990 1522 508 1989 1508 495 1988 15d'd78 Preop.

1537 546 1

he concentration for K-40 in milk ranged from 680 pC1/L to

.2060 FCi/L. his wide range can be attributed to the differences in K-40 concentrations in goats and dairy cows.

As an example, the preoperational K-40 concentration in goat and dairy cows were 1655 468 pCi/L and 1320 pCi/L, respectively.

Nevertheless, the 1990 average value is in good agreement with the previous year' average values and the preoperational concentration.

h e location with the highest annual mean concentration for K-40 was 17881259 pCi/L located 7.4 miles SE of the plant.

]

he 1990 annual _ average concentration for K-40 in milk for indicator and control locations are as follows:

RADIONUCLIDE.

INDICA'IOR IOCATIONS CONI'ROL IOCATIONS K-43 1643 455 pC1/L

.1298 455 pCi/L Coincidentally, the dairy cows are located at the control locations and the milking goats are located at the indicator locations. his accounts for the difference in the K-40 concentrations.' Goat's milk naturally contains higher.

concentrations of K-40' than cow's milk.

he radionuclides Ba-140, La-140, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were all reported as the lower limit of detection for the year.

The 1990 annual average concentration for Sr-90 in milk with respect to the previous years and preoperational value are as fe,1 lows:

YEAR ACTIVITY (pci/L) 2 Siga

~

1990 2.28 1.14 l

-1989 2.78 1.78 1988 3.24 1.94 1

Preop.

1.80 2.12 l - l

f~y V

hese values appear to be in relatively good agreement with each other and show a decreasing trend over a three year period. his reduction is tempered by high two sigma values.

We Sr-90 concentrations have ranged from 1.10 pCi/L to 3.2 pCi/L with preoperational data ranging from 0.47 pCi/L to 3.5 pC1/L. We location with the highest annual mean was Location No. 31,'l.4 miles ESE of the plant. he value reported for this location was 2.90 0.83 pC1/L.

We annut.1. average concentracion for Sr-90 in milk for indicator and control locations area as follows:

RADIONUCLIDE.

INDICNIOR LOCATIONS CONTROL IOCATIWS Sr-90' 2.28 0.92 pC1/L 2.29 1.44 pCi/L here appears to be no statistical differences between the indicator and control locations.

Historically strontium-90 has been detected every year since l

1983 when the program first started to sample for it. In 1987 and 1988, the program had observed Sr-90 activities in milk that ranged from 1.0 pC1/L to 7.60 pC1/L, and 1.20 p"d/L to (3

4.70 pC1/L, respectively, hese activities during this period

()

were higher than other Sr-90 concentrations reported in other years. A review of meteorological and gaseous effluent data did not lend any_ evidence to direct plant releases. Since i

that period, the program has monitored this area closely and the data tends to suggest that the Sr-90 concentrations are returning to a normal range as identified in the preoperational period..

1 4

Low level trace: amounts of Sr 00 are found pretty much eW1y throughout the area and ' appear to cora from a universal source such as fallout. Reference materials have indicated that the presence of Sr-90 is related to the type of pasture fertilization employed, the particular kind of feed grain used and soil characteristics.

It is interesting to note that the program observed elevated

~Sr-90 concentrations in soil in 1990 and this information is discussed in more detail in the Soil Section of this report.

Milk samples analyzed for I-131 and Sr-89 were reported as the limit of detection.

5. rISH A total of 31 samples of fish were collected and analyzed by gamna spectroscopy. This collection was comprised of 12 species of fish. The radionuclide Cs-137 was detected in only one sample, a freshwater drum, at sample station No. 42, 15.8 miles WSW. A list of species collected and analyzri are as follows: Rock Bass, Freshwater Drum, Catfish. Smallmouth Bass, Carp, White Sucker, White Perch, Yellos Perch, Walleye, White Bass, Red Horse, and Rainbow Trou*.. We major E

recreational and commercial species ere Perch, Walleye, and White Bass.

he 1990 annual average K-40 concentration fo.

d-locations for fish with respect to the previous year and p.

sperational value is as follows:

YEAR ACTIVITY [pCi/Kg(wet))

2 Sigma 1990 2940 868 1989 3213rl184 Preop.

3722 2465 h e 1990 value is in good agreement with the 1989 value.

However, when compared to the preoperv ional value, it is 9

difficult to draw any ccaparison due to *he large uncertainty associated with the preoperational ve'.ue.

h e concentration for naturally occurring K-40 ranged from 2010 pCi/Kg to 3794 pC1/Kg. @e location with the highest annual average concentration was the control locatim No. 32.

which is located 15.8 miles WSW from the plant, he concentration was reported as 3032 pC1/Kg. his location also had the highest annual average concentration in 1989.

The 1990 annual average K-40 concentration for fish for the indicator and control location is as follows:

RADICNUCLIDE INDICA'IOR II)CATICN CONIROL LOCATICH K-40 2873 948 3032 740 hese values are in good agreement with each other.

he radionuclide Cs-137 has been seen periodically in fish sample. since preoperational fish sampling began in 1981. In 1989, Cs-137 was reported in 5 out of 28 fish samples, whereas, in 1990 Cs-137 was reported in 1 out of 31 fish samples.

O l

l The 1990 annual average Cs-137 ::encentration for all

\\

locations with respect to the previous year and preoperational value is as follows:

YEAR ACTIVITY (pCi/Kg(wet 2 Sigma 1990 42,0 0.0 1989 37.0 11.6 Preop. 38.9 46.6 h e single fish sample with Cs-137 activity was found in location No. 32, 15.8 miles WSW. This is a control location. It is suspected that the Cs-137 activity found in 1990 can be attributed to fallout. his radionuclide has been detected in preoperational fish samples aM continues to be detected periodically with no substantial increases in activity during the operational period. All other radionuclides (which include C& 58, co-60, Cs-134, Fe-59, Mn-54, and "un-65) were analyzed by gamma spectrometry and reported as the lower limit of detection (LLD).

6. SEDIMarr here were 14 sediment samples collected in 1990. We most p'Q predominant radionuclide was K-40, which is naturally occurring. his radionuclide has been detected in all samples since sampling began in 1981.

The 1990 annual average K-40 concentration for all locations for sediment with respect to the previous year and preoperational value is as follows: YEAR ACTIVITY (pCi/Kg (dry)lg2 Sigma 1990 11685 7720 1989 9981 5586 Preop. 13317 7914 he K-40 concentration ranged from 5870 pCi/Kg to 16875 pCi/Kg. he 1990 annual average K-40 conecntration for sediment for indicator locations and the control locations are as follow: BADIONOCLIDE INDICATOR II) CATIONS CCNDOL LOCATIW K-40 11123 7684 pCi/Kg 15055 7684 pCi/Kg In 1989, the PNPP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program introduced three new sediment sample, locations. W ese -

O locations were added as a result of a recommendation from v American Nuclear Insurers to monitor sediment Nom on-site streams. It was observed that the K-40 indicator locations have shown a small reduction in annual average concentrations since 1989. 21s is attributed to the low K-40 concentrations found in sediment samples taken from the on-site streams. Other radionuclides that have been detected in sediment samples were Cs-137 and Sr-90. nese radionuclides are fission products. We radionuclides Cs-137 and Sr-90 have been detected in most sediment samples since 1981, five years prior to the operation of the Perry Unit 1. In 1990, Cs-137 was detected in 8 out of the 14 sediment samplec: We annual average concentration for Cs-137 for all i locations in sediment with respect to the previous years and preoperational value is as follows: YEAR ACTIVITY (pCi/Kg (dry)) 2 Sigma 1990 357 347 1989 1491222 l 1988 308 353 p Preop. 243 310 Q i h e Cs-137 concentrations ranged from 173 pCi/Kg to 723 pCi/Kg. We location with the highest annual mean concentration was Location No. 27, 7.9 miles WSW with a concentratior. of 510 pCi/Kg. The 1990 annual average Cs-137 concentration for sediment for the indicators and control location were as follows: RADICNUCLIDE INDICATOR LOCATICNS CCNTROL IDCATICN CS-137 362 359 pCi/Kg 343 471 pC1/Kg he indicators and control locations are in good agreement with each other showing the Cs-137 to be more universal in the environment. We radionuclide, Cs-137 was detected in all lake sediment samples, but it was not detected in any on-site stream Lediment samples. On-site stream sediment samples did not l contain any Cs-137 activity above the lower limit of detection in 1990. It is speculated that the on-cite stream soil composition may differ from the lake sediment thereby lacking the ability to retain the Cs-137 radionuclides as r readily as the lake sediment samples. (

( O' %e radionuclide Sr-90 was detected in 5 out of 14 samples. he 1990 annual average concentration for Sr-90 for all locations, when compared to 1988 and 1989, were as follows: YFAR ACTIVITY [pCi/Kg(dry)) 2 Sigma 1990 15.58i9.67 1989 12.3012.40 1988 26.40t22.0 he concentrations in 1990 ranged from 9.70 pC1/Kg to 22.0 pCi/Kg with the highest annual mean concentration at Location No. 27, 7.9 miles WSid of the plant. This concentration was 17.15 ;C1/Kg. he control location reported no activity above the lowr limit of detection. Were is no preoperational data for Sr-90. j j %e concentrations for the radionuclides cs-137 and Sr-90 appear to be relatively constant with respect to previous years. It is su pected that these radionuclides in the environment are the product of nuclear weapon testing. he radionuclides co-58, co-60, Sr-89, and Cs-134 were reported as the lower lir.it of detection.

7. SOIL A total of 32 soil samples were collected and analyzed for strontium and t=j gamma spectrometry in 1990. S o naturally occurring radionuclides, K-40 and Ra-226, were detected in these samples. Were were also two fission product radionuclides, Cs-137 and Sr-90, that were detected in these

> samples.. he 1990 annual average concentration of the naturally-occurring radionuclides K-40 and Ra-226 for all locations in 1 soil with respecs to the previous year and praoperational data are as follows: F YFAR ACTIVITY [pC1/Kg(dry)) 2 S1 ma 3 ~K-40 1990 10490t6962 1989 12061 6197 Preop. 12391 6174 1 Ra-226 1990 1886 1509 1989-2086t1225 Preop. 758t 596 - -. a

~ 'the 6ctivities for K-40 and Ra-226 ranged from a low of 5756 pCi/Kg and 632 pCi/Kg to a high of 22110 pCi/Kg and 3451 pCi/Kg, respectively. comparison of the activities for K-40 and Ra-226 between 1989 and 1990 appear to be in relatively good agreement with each other. However, comparison of the activities for Ra-226 in 1989 and 1990 with respect to the preoperational values, appear auch higher. Further investigation into the differences between 1989/1990-Ra-226 concentrations and preoperational Ra-226 concentration for soll'shows a significant increase in Ra-226 activities around the time period 5/88 through 8/88 for several locations. l Discussions with the vendor laboratory, indicates that these increased concentrations in Ra-226 coincide very closely with the moving period from the old vendor lab facility to their new facility. 2he new facility is located several miles it:nn i the old facility. 'the vendor laboratory had changed methocs for determining Ra-226 concentrations in soil. A review of 1988 and 1989 meteorological parameters such as ./^ nonthly average temperature, monthly total precipitation, ( annual average barometric pressure and stability class as a function of direction and stability class (A-G) indicates no significant changes in meteorological conditions to warrant a change in Ra-226 concentrations in soil, 2he annual average concentration of the naturally occurring radionuclides K-40 and Ra-226 in 1990 for indicator locations and the control location were as follows: RADICNUCLIDE INDICA'!DR 14CATICNS. ColfrROL LOCATION K-40 10766t7135 pC1/Kg 856314586 pCi/Kg Ra-226 178911452 pCi/Kg 256711357 pC1/Kg Historically, the Ra-226 concientration in soil has been consistently higher at the control location than the .indicatorL locations. 'the control location is approximately 11.0 miles SSW of the plant. The K-40 concentration periodically shows higher concentrations at the control location than the indicator locations. -2he progras has seen potassium (K-40) fluctuations vary widely at the une location over time. It is suspected that. this is due to soil . composition and geochemical reactions in the soil. LO --.

N O A total of 30 out of 32 sanples detected positive Cs-137 activity in soil. We annual average conceritration for Cs-137 for all locations in soil with respect to the previous two 1 years and preoperational value is as follows: i YEAR ACTIVITY [pCi/Kg(dry)) 2 Sigma 1990 392.4 737.5 1989 380.01544.0 l 1988 396.0 671.0 Preop. 867.0 1855 %e Cs-137 activity ranged from 56 pCi/Kg to 1598 pCiAg in 1990. mis variation in activity can be attributed to the wide range of Cs-137 concentrations found in soil at various locations around a five mile radius of the plant. his large variation was also observed in preoperational data which ranged from 109 pC1/Kg to 3940 pCi/Kg. It appears that the current vendor laboratory results are more consistent when compared to the previous vendor laboratory. It is also suspected that soil chemistry can be influencing the concentration of radionuclides from location to location and from sampling period to sanpling period. Bis is evident when comparing the indicator locations and control location as noted below: RADIONUCLIDE INDICA'IOR IOCATIONS CONTROL IOCATIONS Cs-137 399.9 777.5 pCi/Kg 287.0 80.4 pCi/Kg 2e location with the highest annual mean concentration for Cs-137 was Location No. 2 located 0.7 miles E with an activity of 850.7511326.6 pCi/Kg. Nevertheless, the overall reduction of Cs-137 concentrations in soil for all locations from the preoperational period to present tend to suggest that the plant is not inpacting the environment. Se high indicator concentrations reflectt. the high Cs-137 concentrations at Location No.2 and Location No.12 with respect to other indicator locations in 1990. High Cs-137 concentrations have been observed in the these locations in other years including the preoperational period. Se radionuclide Sr-90 was detected in 25 out of 32 samples. Se annual average concentration for Sr-90 for all locations in soil with respect to the previous years are as follows:,

~ I YEAR ntNITY [pCIAg(dry)) 2 Sigma 1990 70.24 218.26 1989 41.6 58.1 1988 63.2 2 21.5 1 he St-90 activities ranged from 4.80 pCiag to 540.2 pCiag. Since 1988, the lower limit of detection has improved with the change in current vendor laboratory. The previous lower limit of detection for Sr-90 in soil was 500 pCiAg. Werefore, no usable preoperational data exist. We 1990 annual average concentration for Sr-90 for indicator locations and the control location are as follows: RADIONU7,IDE INDICA'IOR IDCATIONS CONTROL LOCATION Sr-90 73.6 226.62 pCIAg 31.1 25.6 pCIAg he location with the highest annual mean concentration for Sr-90 was Location No. 2 at 227.98 461.99 pCIA g. his location is 0.7 dies E of the plant. It was observed that the Sr-90 concentration at Location No.2 during the first and second quarter had higher concentrations /Q than what had normally been reported for this area. he l V concentrations from a sample collected at Location No. 2 l during the first and second quarter were 540.2 29.5 pCI A g and 280.30 41.0 pCi Ag, respectively. he previous two and last two quarterly soil samples at this location averaged 44.6 5.6 pCiAg. A review of PNPP gaseous effluents for the first Quarter of 1990 for Sr-89 and Sr-90 indicates a total curie release of 1.63E-4 Ci for Sr-89 and 1.17E-6 Ci for St-90. Although plant effluant records show Sr-89 activities greater than Sr-90, no Sr-89 concentrations above the lower limit of detection were reported by the vendor laboratory. We lower limit of detection a posteriori for Sr-89 ranged from less than 4.4 pC1Ag to less than 32.5 pCiAg. Wis tends to suggest that Sr-90 concentrations found in the soil at Location No. 2 is most probably not from the plant. %e program will continue to monitor this area closely. %e results from co-58, co-60, cs-134, and Sr-89 analyses were reported as the lower limit of detection. _

t

8. PRECIPITATION A total of 72 precipitation samples were collected and analyzed for gross beta, gamma spectrometry, and tritium in 1990. Precipitation monitoring was added in 1985 as a means to enhance the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

Precipitation monitoring is not required under the NRC 'Iwchnical specifications. Se annual average gross beta activity for all locations for precipitation with respect to previous years are as follows: YEAR VALUE (pCi/L) 2 Sigma 1990 6.68 11.44 1989 9.50 23.20 1988 9.51tl6.94 1987 7.361 5.74 1986 8.741 5.52 1985 10.01114.42 Precipitation samples analyzed for gross beta activity tend to have a wide variation of results. 21s accounts for the large 2 sigma values. O Se gross beta activity ranged from 1.10 pCi/L to 35.40 pCi/L for all locations and the location with the highest annual i mean gross beta activity was identified as Location No. 3. B is location is approximately 1.0 miles SE of the plant. Se activity was reported as 11.05118.95 pCi/L. h e 1990 annual average concentration for gross beta in precipitation for indicator locations and the control location is as follows: RADIGIUCLIDE INDICNIOR IDCATIONS CONTROL IDCATION Gross Beta 6.98112.10 pel/L 5.1916.99 pCi/L h e indicator locations tend to show a.slightly higher gross beta activity than the control location although with the high 2 sityna uncertainty, it is hard to give this any meaning. It is not certain if this' difference is due to plant effluent releases or the effectiveness of the waahing capabilities of precipitation on the atmosphere. Berefore during months of high precipitation the gross beta activity is high. his phenomena was observed during the Chernobyl incident in 1986. Weekly air samples analyzed for gross beta exhibit high i i. 1 concentrations when precipitation was low. When the.

1 i precipitation was high, the gross beta concentration was low. \\ It was determined that the precipitation had a strong washing influence on the atmosphere. It is suspected that the high gross beta concentrations are not due to plant effluents. During the nonth of November, the gross beta concentration at Location No. 3, which is 1.0 mile SE of the plant, was 15.3 0.5 pCi/L. nis value was considerably higher than the other concentrations reported for the other locations in the program. It is interesting to note that the plant was in a shutdown mode since September due to the refueling outage. %erefore, high gross beta activities in precipitation are nest likely not the result of plant effluents. Nevertheless, PNFP will continue to nonitor this pathway and investigate any abnormalities that are observed in precipitation results. A review ot gama isotopic activities on these precipitation samples show no positive activity levels above the 1cuer limit of detection. We results from samples analyzed for gama isotopics were reported as the lower limit of detection for Ba-140, co-58, f co-60, Cs-134, Cs-137, re-59, La-140., Mn-54, In-65, and Zr-95. %e results for samples analyzed for tritium showed a total of 28 out of 72 samples giving values above the lower limit of detection. From 1985 to 1987 the lower limit of detection (LLD) for tritium was 2000 pCi/1. %en with the change of vendors to the current vendor, the lower liteit of detection greatly improved. Decause of the very high LLD for samples taken from 1985 to 1987 it is not included below for comparison purposes. We 1990 annual annual average concentration for tritium for all locations in precipitation with respect to its previous years are as follows: YEAR ACTIVITY (pci/L) 2 Sigma 1990 175.8! 99.4 1989 163.9 82.3 1988 202.3 129.2 %e tritium results ranged from 106 pCi/L to 314 pC1/L. h e 1990 annual average concentration for tritium in 3 precipitation for indicator locations and the control location is as follows: l '

O _RADIONUCLIE INDICA h LOCATIONS CCNTROL LOCATION H-3 173.7 86.8 pC1/L 188.2f174.1 pC1/L hese values appear to be in relatively good agreement with each other. We location with the highest annual tritium activity was sample location No.3, located 1.0 mile SE. he concentration was reported as 193 56.5 pCi/L.

9. FOOD PRODUCTS Food products were collected in 1990 but these samples wre not analyzed by the vendor laboratory due to the sagles getting lost. A tracer was placed with the shipping company and records showed that the vendor laboratory had received the packages. We vendor laboratory indicated that the sa gles could not be found and it is believed that the i

sagles were inadvertently thrown out. j i he type and total weight of samples collected from 4 sa g ling sites in 1990 were cabbage (8.25 Kg), peaches (8.0 Kg), and zucchini (9.0 Kg). PNPP uses redundant media sampling for food products to cover multiple food chain pathways. We loss of food produce (tomatoes, zucchini, cabbage, squash, ect.) did not jeopardize our sampling program. his particular pathway is well covered by the milk, grass, and leaves sagling programs.

10. FEED /sIIAGE Hay samples were collected from each sampling location. A feed sample was collected from one location in 1990. Each sample was analyzed by gamma spectrometry. We major radionuclide detected in the hay and feed sagles was K-40.

Wis radionuclide is a naturally occurring radionuclide. We radionuclides Be-7 and Cs-137 were detected separately in hay sa gles. %ese radionuclides were detected in only two samples. %e naturally occurring radionuclide K-40 was detected in all sagles. he 1990 annual average concentration for K-40 for all locations with respect to the previous years and the preoperational value are as fonows: O -

YTAR ACTIVITY [pCi/Kg(wet)} 2 Sigm 1990 8451 6821 1989 .8003 7111 t 1988 9558 9569 Preop. 7715 8590 We concentre' ions for K-40 ranged from 3356 pCi/Kg to 14900 pCiAg. he 1990 average annual concentration for all indicator locations and the control location are as followc: j RADIONUCLIDE INDICA'IOR IDCATIONS CONTROL LOCATION K-40 7376 4308 pC1/Kg 14900 0 pCi/Kg t he control location appears to have a higher concentration of K-40 than the indicator locations. W is large difference in concentration bete en the control location and the indicator locations was not observed in previous years. his difference my be attributed to the variation of K-40 l concentration in soil / fertilizer and the ability of the plants to absorb this radionuclide. me radionuclide Be-7, which is also a naturally occurring radionuclide was detected in the hay sample from Locatinn No. r

47. me value was_ reported as 758 152 pCi/Kg. h is valts is

s slightly lower than the annual average values for Be-7 reported in previous years, but consistent with other reported results. We radienuclide Cs-137 was detected in a hay sample from Location No. 61. Its reading was 26 pCi/Kg. his radionuclide has never been detected in feed / silage samples since the inception of collection in 1983. Berefore, it is considered an abnormality. We radionuclides Cs-134, Cs-137, Co-60, Co-58 and I-131 were reported as the lower limit of detection.

11. VEGETATION Vegetation samples included grass and leaves. Wese samples were collected in conjunction with the food product (produce) samples and supplement the collection of milk samples. A total of 65 samples were collected and analyzed by gamma spectrometry in 1990.

S e two naturally occurring radionuclides that were detected in vegetation samples were Be-7 and K-40. Only one sample, a grass sample from Location No. 7 located 0.6 miles ENE of the plant, was detected with Cs-137. Wis value was 13 6 pCi/Kg. O -

O V %e 1990 annual average Be-7 and K-40 concentrations for all locations for grass and leaves with respect to the previous years and the preoperational value are as follows: YEAR ACTIVITY [pCi/Kg(wet)) 2 Sigma Be-7 1990 2940 6206 i 1989 1937t4946 1988 2337 4?32 Preop. 2306t1688 K-40 1990 5176 2278 1989 5262 2797 1988 5932 ?.660 Preop. 4273I3949 h e values for Be-7 and K-40 ranged from 437 pCi/Kg to 16390 pCi/Kg and 2400 pCi/Kg to 7749 pCi/Kg, respectively. he locations with the highest annual mean for Be-7 and K-40 were Location No. 6, a control location, approximately 11 miles SSW and Location No. 48, 1.1 mile ENE. It is interesting to note that the locations with the highest annual mean concentrations for Be-7 and K-40 were found in (~~ two different locations and tends to suggest the random ( variability of the presence of naturally ocer tring radionuclides. The 1990 annual average concentration for Be>7 and K-40 for indicator locations and the control location are as follows: RADIONUCLIDE INDICA'IOR IDCATIONS COtRROL IDCATION BE-7 2716 5726 pCi/Kg 3836 7869 pCi/Kg K-40 5266 2096 pCi/Kg 481812890 pCi/Kg A comparison of grass and leave samples for the radionuclide Be-7 concentration shows that grass samples had a higher concentration and greater variation in results than leaves. he concentration for Be-7 in grass for all locations was 3889 3701 pC1/Kg, wherees, the B-7 concentration in leaves for all locations was 1507 670 pCi/Kg. his accounts for the high two sigma value for Be-7. here was no statistical difference in K-40 concentrations between grass and leaves. Were was no positive activity above the detection limit for the nuclides Cs-134, I-131, co-58, and co-60. All results were reported as the lower limit of detection. O.

[ VI. EFFLUENT RELFASES Plant effluents for gaseous and liquid releases in 1990 were compar6d to 1989 gaseous and liquid releases %e release by nuclide are depicted in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively. ne gaseous effluents were divided into particulate /lodines and noble gases. % e liquid effluents.show only particulates. he sum of the activities for each category is presented with each table. Particulate / Iodine activities for gaseoas and particulate activities for liquid show a slight increase in total curies. his is to be expected as the plant ages and the nuclides reach equilibrium with respect to their production and decay. Se noble gases show a reduction in activities from 1989. 21s reduction is'more significant when compared to the total noble gas releases for 1988. Were are several factors that i contributed to this reduction: 1) system improvements in the operation of mechanical vacuum pumps, 2) improvements in off-gas treatment, and 3) the replacement of a bad fuel bundle during the 1989 refuel outage. A summary of the radionuclides and the activities reported in i the radiological ~ environmental monitoring program from 1986 O to 1990, that are identified with light-water reactors, are displayed in Table 8. A review of Table 8 shows no appreciable increase in activity for the sample matrices identified with light-water reactors in spite of the increases in activities reported from effluent release reports. A twiew of preoperational: data shows that the range of radianuelide activities prior to plant operation is statistically consistent with the range of activities reported between 1986 and 1990, which are the first five years of operation since criticality. VII. IDNER LIMIT OF DETECTION here was one environmental sample that exceeded the NRC Lower Limit of Detection requirement. We sample media, -analyses, date, location, report value and NRC limit are reported as follows: REPORTED NRC MEDIA ANALYSIS' ta'IT IDCATION LLD VALUE LLD VALUE Air-Gross Beta 3/14/90 6 0.075 0.01 O L.

h e elevated LLD for this one sample was due to a low air \\ volume sample. We air pump for station 6 was out of service for most of the week. VIII. LAND USC CENSUS ne 1990 Land Use Survey was conducted from July 26th to August 8, 1990. he survey was conducted in accordance with 10 CrR 50 Appendix I and the PNPP Technical Specifications, Section 12. Were are sixteen meteorological sectors which have their origin at the centerline of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 reactor buildings. We neatest residence, milk animal and garden were identified in each of these sectors. This information is used in the assessment of potential radiological doses to the public. In addition, all produce growers, recreational areas, and public drinking water facilities within a five mile radius around the plant vere identified. We survey was conducted by visual inspection while traveling over all major roads within a five mile radius of PNPP, referring to previous years' reports, and talking with local residents. O he garden identified with the highest D/O (Deposition rate) V as a function of distance with respect to other sectors continues to be 3121 Center Road, Perry. This resident was also identified as having the potential to produce the highest dose (most restrictive) XM value (Dispersion rate) as a function of distance with respect to other sectors. h is garden and resident was identified in 1988 and 1989. W e other gardens and residences identified in the survey by sector and distance are snown in Table 9 and Table 10, respectively. he survey found only two milk animals within the five mile radius in 1990, as opposed to four locations in 1989. W e nearest milk animal in the highest D M area was located at 2908 Antioch Rd. Perry, located approximately 1.3 miles ESE from the plant. W e other milk-producing animals identified in the survey by sector and distance are shown in Table 11. h e produce growers are depicted in Table 12. %ey are listed by name, address, and sector / distance. h e survey found 11 new producers in 1990. Some of these locations, including the new locations, are nurseries which also sell produce and/or fruit. O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

_. ~.._ _._ _ 1 Recreational area and public drinkin9 water facilities are j listed in Table 13. Wey are listed by name, address, and sector / distance. he survey identifies 3 new facilities in 1990. hey include Tuttle Park, 3.7 miles ENE, Lake County YMCA Outdoor Center, 4.6 miles S., and the rairway Pines Golf course 4.8 miles SW. Fairway Pines is a new golf course in the area. All locations identified in this land use section of this report and in Table 9 through 13 are shown and listed on the map identified as rigure 4. In summary, the Land Use census shows no significant changes. We census shows that the viainity within the 8 Km radius of the plant is considered to be rural sparsely populated area with agricultural nurs6 ries occupying a large fraction of the area. IX. QUALITY ASSURANCE We Quality Assurance program includes the results of the EPA crosscheck Intercomparison Program and the Environmental TLD Quality Control Spiking Program depicted in Table 14 and Table 15, respectively. D he vendor laboratory analyzed 80 EPA samples in 1990. We l ( results of these analyses are depicted in Table 14 with EPA known results. A total of 3 EPA sample results fell outside the EPA control limit. his represents 3.75% of-the total EPA samples his is slightly lower than the 5.5% performance in 1989. We three samples that were out of the control limits were as follows: SAMPLE LRTE TIML RESULTS EPA CCWrROL TYPE COLLECTED ANALYSIS 2 SIGMA LIMITS j MTER JANUARY SR-90 17.3tl.2 pCi/L 17.4-22.6 MILK APRIL K 1300.0 69.2 mg/kg 1414.7-1685.3 MTER MAY GROSS ALPHA 11.0 2.0 pC1/L 11.6-32.4 A review of the spiked environmental TLD's in 1990 shows that the sum of the average performance value and the standard deviation for each spiking period did not exceed the maximum acceptance criteria of 0.3. Based on this acceptance criteria, the environmental TLDs used in the field are performing satisfactorily. l l Table 15 gives a conparison of the spiked TLD results for 1990. Spiked TLDs were sent out during the second and third quarters., m i

V Cenparison of the delivered dose to the repcrted dose, shows good agreement between each other. During the 3rd quarter, two TLDs were inadvertently exposed slightly longer than the allotted time. We results were declared invalid. TLD performance level from the 2nd quarter exhibited a good balance of reported results that were shghtly higher and lower than the actual dose, whereas, thr: TLD results during the 3rd quarter showed a slight negative bias. X. CONCLUSION l @e program did not detect any changt:s in concentrations or exposure levels from environmental samples when ceapared to 1989. In some medias, results were r;ompared to previous years and the trend appeared to be decliring or steady. Annual and quarterly TLD results t.ppear to be relatively consistent with respect to 1989. Wis pattern was also observed with air samples. W e water media experienced two incidents in 1990: 1) the loss of April water samples in transport to the vendor laboratory, and 2) the invalidation of November and December (~) water samples from the contro) location due to the V disconnection of tygon tubing frcxn a saddle valve. A control location was established at t.he CEI Ashtabula Generating Station in January 1991. Only grab samples will be collected at the Ohio-American Water Company facility. Gross beta and tritium results for water and precipitation did not show any changes when compared to 1989. Gama isotopic results were reported as the lower limit of detection. Several environmental sr.mples, such as milk, water, soil, and sediment, showed trace amounts of activity above the minimum detection levels for St-90. One indicator station showed significant levels of Sr-90 during the first and second quarter of 1990. Plant effluents show Sr-89 activities higher than Sr-90 activities, but the results from soil samples from this area showed no rietection of Sr-89 above the lower limit of detection. This tends to suggest that Sr-90 concentrations found in soil are mast probably not from the plant. PNPP will continue to monitor this area closely for any potential deposit!.on from the plant. he remaining St 90 activities found in other sample medias 3 were consistent with concentrations found during the period G f)/ of preoperations. his activity is suspected to be from L nuclear weapons testing perfomed several decades ago. We radionuclide, Cs-137, was detected in several environmental samples, such as soil, sediment, fish, hay and grass, only one fish, hay, and grass sagle were detected with Cs-137. Soil and sediment samples, with the exception of sediment samples taken from on-site streams, showed consistent concentrations of Cs-137. Howver, the concentration for Cs-137 did not vary between preoperational and operational data. Again, Cs-137 has been widely reported in many professional journals as a by-product of nuclcar weapon testing and this is evident in Northeast Ohio. Finally, all environmental samples, of one type of sagle media or another, have detected naturally occurring radionuclides such as '8e-7, K-40 and Ra-226. We activities reported in 1900 appears to be in agreement with activities reported for 1989. We consistency among naturally occurring radiornaclides over the years tend to indicate that the vendor laboratory has performed satisfactorily. Werefore, it can be concluded that the operation of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant did not have any measurable adverse impact on the environment during 1990. oV.

V Tv 1 v SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND MEDIA FOR THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Locati9n Distance I1} Number Direction (Miles) Diration Media 1 Redbird (Haines Road, north of vest Chspel Road) TLD 3.4 ENE

1. PT, AI, TLD, located on pole 3303609, closest pole to the air sampler 50 pole.

2 Site boundary tree line, on tree approximately 1,000 0.7 E TLD, 50 feet North-northwest of second transmission tower from road 3 Meteorological tover, on fence surrounding the equipment 1.0 SE SPT, AI, TLD shelter PR 4 Pole V79/SPG5-30, inside auxiliary road gate on Parmly 0.7 S Al'P, AI TLD Road 50, PR S Qunicy Substation, on fence, east side of substation 0.6 SV APT, AI, flB [ 6 Concord Service Center (Control), Auburn Road, south of 11.0 SSV APT, AI, TIP, Route 90, inside rear fence next to gate PR, 50, VL 7 Site boundary, Lockwood Road bus turnaround, to the 0.6 NE TLD, VL, PR right, 100 feet past turnaround on tree APT, AI 8 Site boundary tree line, behind nursery off Antioch Road, 0.8 E TLD following road to end of nursery, on tree near creek with thite dot 9 Site boundary transmission line tover, north of third tower 0.7 ESE TLD from Antioch Road toward the plant on small tree about 15 feet off access road ---

o O O i Locativa Distance l Number Direction -(Miles) Direction Media ( } i 10 Inside auxiliary road gate cf f Paraly Road, south of the 0.8 SSE TLD . creek, going SE to_the first electrical pole:.which is inside the fence. i 11 Transmission line tower at southwest corner of Center and 0.6 SSV TLD Paraly Roads l 12 Site boundary transmission line tower, access road from 0.6 VSV TID, PR, 50 north side of Parmly just vest of location 5 l 13 Madison-on-the-Lake at the end of Whitevood Drive, north 4.7 ENE TLD [ L 1 of Chapel Road, northwest side'of turnaround. pole 835803 14 Hubbard Road (sr<th of North Ridge Road), pole 28974 on 4.9 E TLD, SO [ vest side of road, south side of McMackin creek t i 15 Madison Substation (Eagle Street), on fence, south side 5.1 ESE TLD { of rebstu* ion L 16 Dayton Road (north of Interstate 90), pole 572203 on vest 5.0 SE TLD side, by sharp curve on Dayton 1 h l 17 Chadwick Road (dead end south of Interstate 90), pole 5.2 SSE TLD [ 276222/118Z011, last pole on left i l 10 Blair Road, pole on left side just after road makes 5.0 S TLD, So i c 90-degree lef t curve down hill heading towards river h 19 Lane Road near intersection with South Ridge Road, on 5.3 S5V TLD pole PC5648, 100 feet north of intersection 20 Nursery Road at Route 2 overpass, pole 828976, across 5.3 SV TLD, 50 from entrance to Route 2 21 Hardy Road at Painesville Township Park, pole 378345, 5.1 VSV TLD east of park entrance' ,6 l 4 t k ? P :

q o. O Locatbs Distanco Number Direction (Miles) Direction Nedia 22 Painesville, south side of Main Street across from 6.9 SV-TLD Evergreen Cemetery. Stand.at cemetery sign, cross the street and proceed approx. 25 paces up the hill. TLD in woods on rt. 23 Fairport Harbor (High Street and New Street), pole near-7.9 USV TLD substation facing street 24 St. M air Avenue Substation (Control) in Mentor, on 15.1 SV TLD rrrr nice corner near railroad track 25 PNPP Discharge 0.6 NNV SED, FSH 26 Offshore at Redbird, vicinity of Ohio Water Service 4.2 ENE SED Company intake 27 Offshore, vicinity of Fairport Harbor Fater Supply 7.9 VSV SED i System intake 28 Deleted [Ashtabula (Control) CEI Generating Station intakel 22.0 N VTR 1 29 Milk Farm, J. Valtes, Antioch Road 1.3 ESE MLK, FS 30 Deleted (Milk Farm, E. Manley, North Ridge Road) 2.3 SSV MIJt, FS f 31 Milk Farm, P. Hofer, Antioch Road t 1.4 ESE MIJC, FS [ 32 Mentor-on-the-Lake (Control) 15.8 VSV SED, FSH r 33 releted [Brookglen Farm (Control), Greig residence, 10.2 S MLK, FS ] Callow Road, Leroy] i 34 PNPP Intake l 0.7 NV VTR 35 Site boundary, north of transmission line next to 0.6 E AFT, A7 TLD, transformer, follow tree line VL, F i + l i, a'

O O O 1 Location'- Dintcnce

Number Direction.

(Miles) Direction Media (1) t I

i

.36. Lake County Water Plant, 3rd pole from the corner,'in 3.9 USW UTR, TIE l ~ front.of the plant. 37 Deleted (Ohio' Vater Service Company puso station, Green 4.1' ENE VTR Road, Madison) \\ -38 Deleted (Seith Farm, 2861 Antioch Road. 0.5 miles from North 1.1 E PD Ridge' Road); 39 Goldings Farm Stand, 3515 Ne th Ridge Road' 1.8 SSV PD 40 Deleted (2767 Antioch Road) 1.1 E PD [ 41 Clark Road, one-half mile from Center Road, pole 1.1 SV: TLD 561%9, south side of road i t 42 Parmly Road, one-half M le from center Road, pole 0.8 S TLD 582923, near southwest corner of plant fence 43 Paraly Road, approximately 0.6 miles from Center 1.0 SSE TLD j Road next to stream, tree with white dot 50 feet i from road, left of stream ~ L r 44 Parmly Road 1.0 SSE VL ( 45 Clark Road, approximately 0.2 miles from Center Road, 0.9' SSV TLD pole 561960, south side of road c k 46 Deleted (milk farm,-Brill, North Ridge Road) 1.5 SE MtJt, FS .[ N 47 Milk farm, J. Zoldak, Middle Ridge Road 6.5 E MLK, FS i 48 Antioch Road 1.1 ENE VL i L 49 Deleted (Garden, 4385 Lockwood Road) 0.8 NE PD i j-50 Deleted (Garden,.13271 Radcliffe Road) 10.9 S PD l Y ! i i- - ~, 5

7 j \\ j 'v/ Locet on Dictanco Number Direction (Miles) Direction MediaI} 51 Rettger Farm (Control), Rettger residence, Painesville-9.6 S MLK, FS Varren Road, Leroy 52 Deleted (Milk farm, Pollack residence, Vood Roa1) 4.5 SE MLK, FS 53 Neff Perkins Company, on utility pole. Approximately 50 0.5 USV TLD feet east of the drivevay and 200 feet south of the fence. 54 Hale Road School, pole 395910, second from corner on Lee 4.6 SV TLD 55 Off Center Road, along football field fence to pole north 2.5 S TLD of bus parking lot. 56 Madison High School, first clump of pine trees from 4.0 ESE TLD library 57 Milk farm, Butler residence, North Ridge Road, Geneva 8.5 E MLK, FS 58 On tree in northwest corner of nursery approximately 100 0.8 ENE TLD yards north of Location 8. The nursery is behind 2660 Antioch Road, may enter in drivevay at this location. 59 Lake shoreline at the north end of Green Road 4.0 ENE VTR 60 Lake shoreline at the retired boat launch area in Perry 1.0 VSV VTR Park, vest of PNPP 61 Milk farm, M. Keller, 5888 Dewey Road 7.4 SE MLK, FS 62 Shreve Farm, 2431 Antioch Road, Commercial produce farm 1.2 ENE PD 63 Minor stream outlet at Lake Erie. 0.08 NNE SED 64 Northwest Drain outlet at Lake Erie. ~ 0.09 NV SED 65 Major Stream outlet at Lake Erie. 0.18 V SED 66 Deleted (Sevage Lift Station). 0.07 V VTR. - - - -

e o O O i [ Location. Distance I) j- ' Number ' Direction (Miles) ' Direction Media i i t 67' Sabo Farm; 5674 N. Ridge Road, Madison 2.9 E PD i 68' Ohio-American Vater' Company (Control), Ashtabula Plant, 19.5 ENE-VTR Valaut Beach Park i , 69 John Rhoades Farm. 11640 Sperry Road..Chester Township. 18.7 SSV MLK, FS l i (Control)l ~ ) 70 H&H Farm Stand Rt.6 Chardon approximately 1/4 mile V of 16.2 SSV PD Auburn Rd. (Control) -t (1) AI - Air Iodine f APT = Air Particulate y FS = Feed / Silage i FSH = Fish 4 t MIX = Milk l PD = Produce PR = Precipitation (Snow) SED = Sediment. l 50 = Soil.: TLD = Thermoluminescent Dosimeters .t VL = Vegetation VTR = Vater r l } VV = Vastewater 't l i 1 t i-i i i ~-

O O O NNW N NNE LEGEND: l NW i_ NE STATION NO. MEDIA DIRECTION 2 TLD,SO E / 3 APT, Al,TLD, PR SE 4 A PT, AI,TLD.SO,PR S 5 APT AI TLD SW i WNW ENE 7 APT, AI,TtD,VL,PR NE 257 Lockwood \\R 8 TLD E 847 A, 9 TLD ESE 3 PERR NUCLEAR

1. .458 \\*

ts2 e to TLD SSE t POW R PLAN f.,sf-ff 7 11 TLD SSW l W 2 MILES 1 MILE 65 E 12 TLD,PR,SO WSW $, r12 2g 25 SED,FSH NNW

• j 35h rs 29 MILK, FEED / SILAGE ESE 31

,4 g 31 MILK, FEED / SILAGE ESE si Nqrth[ Perry E i 20 34 WTR NW A i g, v-- fiag WSW f 41 "y 4g5 W ESE 35 A PT, AI,TLD,VL,PR E c---- / x 3 39 PD SSW d gg661 41 TLD SW g e 38 \\ 42 TLD S E 43 TLD SSE f { v 44 VL SSE as 20 e 45 TLD SSW SW 0 - A SE 48 VL ENE SSW S SSE 53 TLD WSW 1 0 1 2 MRES 58 TLD ENE N 60 WTR WSW 62 PD ENE 63 SE NNE 64 SE NW RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 65 SE W SAMPLING LOCATIONS AM*ROXIM ATELY 2 MILES FROM SITE PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMfMATING COMPANY FIGURE 1 43_ I

N NNW N NNE NE LEGEND : 8 "' 8 STATION NO. MEDIA Dif'!ECTION I 1 APT, AS, TLD. SO EME 13 TLD ENE e 14 TLD,SO E 5 15 TLD ESE 16 TLD SE WNW ENE 4 17 TLD SSE 1a TLD.SO S 2f,59 3 19 TLD SSw 1 1 I 20 TLD,SO Sw g p g p '! 21 TLD wSw 13 4 6g JkW 3!. 57.... 2 TLD sw i i C e g 23 TLD WSW g cp

g. 7 j

'p \\ p%

r. -

E 26 SEDIMENT ENE g i e' [. 7 47 27 SEDIMENT wSw g 6 N% r.h 3D MILK, FEED / SILAGE SSw "g -d N/15 as WATER TLD wSw J 2 /5 d 47 MILK FEED / SILAGE E 2 8 g ~, s 52 MILK, FEED / SILACE SE m y ( ,x_ 3, 3 54 TLD Sw S ']bg,.. L / is j 'I WSW e* ESE 56 TD SE / 57 MILK, FEED / SILAGE E ei i 1[ \\- 59 WTR ENE ~ ~. < - ;,. 4" - ggi m,4 A

u....

i 61 MILK FEED / SILAGE SE / l 7 -_x e 67 PD E \\ e v_ g SW SSW S SSE SE N RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLMG LOCATKMS APP 90XIMATELv 2 TO 8 Mt.ES FROM SITE PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY 44-FIGUftE 2 . D

O O O NW NNW N NNE NE WNW conne, ENE LAKE ERIE \\ tabuTEP \\ g M8 ' $tt I n, (!s) n,w,, en het 6 3,g,,oT " f u,caen de S b*! Q) Ge ev 3. W 20 p L E Miles m lun+on v. / ' '" ~ h G j g Mector Ob/. aines / $2' C+'"* }_ n,T A h u t,,,, tholak pyd[e ,tg < oent fs 95 t% Rock

• pt t /N kg w/

ree6 [. at Tirnt>ertake,f , 1"*L*' wt Wittowick % . g: yo 8 Y, l i,- M.' ESE Euclid,f,' - wooindy' ' /g g i WSW 7G. g r j g w, I' g Ng V i u+b -

• Chard n q

J ,b 'meytiete O6 9 '*""

• F*"' \\cm tw

-,d.wt g G $ d ^ .Ct is h@ Hgg f~ ~ ~ ~~ chl?' a-Hg&sadg jy c.I t 1 Je. a l_ [ WM._ _._ 9 "**'s ts'l 3 (A s SW SSW S SSE SE s o 5 10 15 20 MILES LEGEND. STATION NO. MEDIA DIRECT!ON 1/8'= 1 MILE 6 APT, Al. TLD, PR. SO, VL SSW 24 D SW RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 28 WATER ENE CONTROL SAMPLtNG LOCATIONS 32 FISH - SEDIMENT WSW GREATER THAN 10 MILES FROM SITE 50 PD S PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT MILK. FEED / SILAGE THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC tiLUMINATING COMPANY FIGURE 3 69 MILK, FEED /StLAGE SSW 70 FP SSW i TABLE 2 HISSING SAMPl#, COLLECTIONS i MEDIA LOCATION NO. COLLECTION DATE REASONS Food Products 39,62,67,70 1990 Barvest Samples lost in shipment -I (vegetables) Lake Vater 34,36,59,60,68 April Samples lost in shipment Lake Vater 68 11/30/90 Suetion hose not working i Lake Water 68 12/28/90 Suction hose not working Milk 29,31,47,57,61 1/22/90 Drying period Milk 29,31,47,57,61 2/20/90 Drying period Milk 29,31,47,57,61 3/19/90 Drying period Milk 52 3/19/90 Sold cow, dropped out of progras 4 Milk 29,31,57 4/9/90 Drying period l 1 Milk 57 4/23/90 Drying period Milk. 57 5/7/90 Drying period Milk 31,47 11/6/90 Drying period - Milk 29,31,47,57,61 12/10/90 Drying period TLD 0-15,0-42,0-55 7/18/90 TLDs lost in field I 2nd Otr. TLD 0-21,A-15,A-21 1/3/91 TLDs lost in field j A-22 l l l O l (

m ds..umm .mm _6,%.Jl.___m,Ad.e,e2a-_4s+h,__a4-C..A4 4aM AA a.Lw.4 _4#a2.-a.*_m A_ A.aL4Aa-,4AA,a m 2 .___m 4 ._m.a4._c.-*_a A m u .,2,an 4,,.%4g 9 4 1 TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF FISULTS 4 k l i l 1 47-

i!' ? I J F24071 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOBITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

FAGE: 681 i ( 'Name of Facility: FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. 50-440/50-441 Locatica'of Facility 2 Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 1990 TLD i + +- + + ~+ -+ I I 1 i I i I I I I I l l 1 I { l l l { l Location with Righest j "l { 1. IType and:l l All I l Annual Mean l l i l Medium ITot. (n) 1 Leser' l Locatione I All + + -+ All i I and IAnalysis I Limit I (Indicator s Control)-l Indicator Locatione IDist. l Mean (13 l Control Locations I i i Measurement IFerformedt (LLD).1 Mean (1) (Rangel I Mean (1) (Range) (Direct I (Rangel' i Mean (1) (Range) l I + + + - - - - + + - - - + + +- + 'l TLD' I DIRECT I i 14.94 l 14.99 l 18 l' 22.40 [ . 14.1 (, l IM2/STD.QTR I 136 I I (0135/01368 l (0128/01281 1 05.01 (0004/00043 I (000s/000s3 l l I I I I .11.00-23.40 1 11.40-23.40 15 1 21.10-23.40 1 11.00-16.80 l I I i-I l I l' I i 1 I I I I i 1. 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 i i i 1 i l I l i I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I i i l I 1 l l I-1 I I I I I I I-iI I I I I I I I I l 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I i 1 I I I I i 4 1 1 1 I I I I I I i 1 l I I I I l i I I- $I I I I I I I I I I i i i i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I l l l 1 I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I i i i l i I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t i I I i i l I I i i i I i i i i i i i ~ l I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I + + + + + + + r 3 1 - The ratio of penitiwe results to the number of samples analyse'; for the parameter of interent. } -LLD - Lower Limit of Detecties. 1-48.-- 4 4' i ~

' F24ool ~ RAD 10LOQ1 CAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING FROGRAM

SUMMARY

FAGE: oot i Name of Facility: FERRY WUCLEAR FOwtR PLANT . Docket so. : so-44o/so-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohic ReForting period : 1sso e ' AIR i + + + + + + + + i i i i l I i i I I I I I I I I I I l t i 1 I Location with Nighest i I j 1 ITyre and l l All I l Annual Mesa l l l Medium ITot. (a) i Lower i Locations l All + -+ All .I l and l Analysis i Limit l (Indicator & Control) l Indicator Locatione IDist. l Mean (1) l Control Locations I 6 i l Msasurement IPerformedi (LLD) l Mesa (1) (Range) i Mean (1) (Range) l Direct I (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) l + + + + + + -+ 1 AZ l 1-131 l l l t I i .1 IFCI/CU.M. I 37o i I LLD l ] l I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I i i I i i i l AFTs I o-esTA l i 19.3e I 19.is I s l 2o.72 1 15.se l Ir-os FCr/cu.nl .371 1 l tosss/o371) 1 (c313/o31a) I co.si .toess oss I (cos2/coss) i l i I i s.co-4a.ori l s.on-4s.co I sw I s.oe .co I a.co-3s.co I i 1 I i i l i l l i I AFra 1 et-7 I I (s.2s l 48.7s I s i 1 i I 52.so l Ir-os FCr/CU.Ml 2a i i too2sfoo2s) I too24/oo'4) I co.sl ( s o o.. ie t ) I (coo 4/coes) l I I I I to.co-se.co I ao.co-se.co I sw I 40.00 e.co I so.co-so.co I i f I I I I I I i l Co-se I i i i l l l l l 2a i I LLD 1 I I 1 l i i l I i I i i I I I I I I I I I I I I CO-So 1 I I I I l I I I 2a i I LLD 1 1 l l I 1 I I I I I I i 1 t 1 I I I l l 1 I I 1 i Cs-134 1.cos I l i l l 1 1 I as l I LLD I I I I 3 I I I i 1 I I I I ^ i I I I I I I I l t l I Cs-137 I.cos. l l 1 I I l I 1 as 1 I LLD l I i l g I i I i l 1 1 I I i 3 I I I I i 1. I I l + ---+ ---+ + + + + 'l - The ratio of positive'results to the number of samples analysed for the parameter of interent. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. J j k 4 7 49-

I -w ..y-I I t l P24ool RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROr. RAM sOMMART PAGE: ool same of racility PERRY WUCLEAR power-PLANT Docket no. : 50-44e/50-441 Location of racility i Lake County'obio' Reporting period 1993 WATER t + +- +-- + + + -+ + 1 1 I I I I I I l' l 'l I I i I I i I l l l l l Location with Righest l I I l Type and l l All l I Annual Mean l l l Medium ITot. (al i Lower i Locations l All +-- -+ + All g l and. lAnalysis l Limit l (Indicator & Control)-.I Indicator Locations lnitt. l Mean (1) l control. Locations l ) Measurement lPorformedl,(LLD) 1 Mesa (13 (Range) -l Mean'(1)-(Range) l1drect l (Range) l Mean (1) (R6nge) l + _ _ + - + ---+--s - + . - + + + I "TRB l o-sETA 1 1 2.44 I 2.4s i so l 2.s4 1 -2.3s I IPC1/L 1 54 l l (oosefo:st) I .too44/co44) l on.og too11/co11) 1 toolo/colo) { I I i 1 1.50-4.40 1 1.50-4 40 I wsw I 1.70-4.3o 1 1.so-2.ss 1 I I i i l i I .I I e i I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I i 't i 1 1 I I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I-I I I I I I I I I [ t i I I i i I i i r I I i i I i I I I I I i i i I I I l 't 1 I I i l I I I I I I I i i i I l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -l i I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I i i I 1 1 i i i l i i i i i i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I i i i 1 1 I I i 1 1 I I l-1 I I I I I I I I i l I i i i t i -1 I I I I I I I I I -1 I I I I 't i e + + + + +- + + - + 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of sesples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. I -

t' [; , ;i:

r i:

o t = 'l 1 + iiIi1i!+l'lIIl1III1III1IiIIIII1III1i i+ 9 9 sl ne E og G ie A te F aR c( o lL) l 1 Al(orn t a ne oM C ~ ~ + IliI+ + IIIi{1IIIIi1I1III1I1IIIIIIii + 1i t 1 s 4 e 4 h ) t g 1) s 8 i ( e e 5 N g r / n nn e 8 ha aa t 4 te eR n 4 i M-M( i 6 w Y 8 9 l 7 f R 5 9 na - o A 1 ou-M i n-r M : : tn+l{+ IIIiI1IiI1l1I1III1I1IIIIIIli + e f aA t t S . d c t e e o o . c m M m i L te a A r sr ~ r R t e ii y a G e p DD-p O k + Ii1I+II+ !1IiI1III1IiIIIII1I1I1II11ii + R c g e P e n s' h D i nl t G t oe N r ig r I o tn o R p aa f O T e cR T N R o( d 1 A L e N L l ) z O P l r1 y M Ao( l R t a 1 L E an n 5 A W ca a T O o i e N P i dM s E h n e M R O I l N A p O E y + IIiIIiI+ I18 tIIIIi1IIIIIIII11III11IiI+ m m R L t a C n l s T U u l N N o ol f E C re o Y tg L R e nn r A R k oa e C E a sCR b 1 P L n ( m G o& D D D D D D D u O li ) L .L L L t L L n L y lt r1 L L L L L L L 0 t y Aao( e 1 i t ct h D l i oan t A i l .Lca R c i i e o a c dM t F a a F 1 s f ( t o f l o + iII1i1i+ iliIIIIIIIIII1II1111iII11III+ u. e s m m rt) en a s eiD ro N i wmL i t oil o s 5 5 s e 5 et a LL( s-i 1 1 1 3 1 vc c ie o + IIIiIIl+ I1IIiIII1I1I31IIl11iI1IiiIii+ tt L d i e d) se sD .nnim e4 4 4 44 74 o e4 o a( sr 45 e5 05 35 15 9s 45 pf yo 1 S 8 1 1 5 1 o e .lf f ptar A O O s 1 e A ot yone e C C e c r L i TTAP om + 1Ii{III+ IIIIiiIIi11IIIIIIt

IIIIIIii. ii tL t

a n rr e e m m ew u e ho R idr o TL E dnu R eas TL 1 TA M a c/ 0 e 1 1D 0 W M C L 4 2 P L P +1lII1I{+IIIIiIIIIi1IIIII1l1IIIIiIiII+ l 4' i;i f

92% P24801 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMESTAL MOWITORING PROGRAM StfMMARY FAGE: 992 Wane of Facility: FERRY NUCLEAR FOWER FLANT Docket ao. : 58-440/56-441 Location of Facility : Lake county-chio-Reporting period : 1998 i WATER + + + -+ + -+- + + 1 1 I I I I I i i l I l-1 I l l I I l l .. l l l l Location with Hig%est l l Type and I. l All I l-Annual Mean' I l l Medium l Tot. (n) i Lower l ' Locations j All + + + _ All I I and l Analysis I., Limit.l (Indicator a control) i Indicator Locations IDist. l Mean (1)- I control Locations-l l Measurement IPerformedi (LLD) i Mean (1) (Range)' j. heen (1)'(Rangel' IDirect l (Range) l 'Mean (1) (Rangel I + + + + - - ~+ + + + +- .I WTRG I MN-34 .I 15. l l [ t l 1 IPCI/L .I 54. 1 -l LLD. l I l I 1 I I I I I I I I I I i -1 I I I I I I I I us-95 8 15 I l l l l l l 1 54 .I .I LLD l' 1 I-1 l-F - l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 - 1 1 2N-65 I 30 I 1 I 1 I 1 I l 1 I I I I 54 I i LLD ' I I I I 'l i i I f l I I i 'l I l-1 i i i 2R-95 1 30 I I I I I I I 1 54 I I LLD I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I I I I I l ~ l i I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 1 1 1 I I I-I 1 1 1 I l-1 I I I I I I I I I I I l 1 1 I I I I I I I I 'l i I I I i l i I i I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l-1 I I I I 1 I I I-1 .1 I I l + --+ + + + + + +-- + 1 - The ratio.of positive resulte to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of int o t es t'. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. t ~. _ -

s P24eo1 RADIOLOGICAL R"YRONMENTAL MOSITORING FROGRAM

SUMMARY

FAGE: Bo1 Wase'of Facility PERRY WUCLEAR POWER PLANT Decket no. : So-44e/So-441 Location ** Facility : Lake County Ohio ' Reporting period r 199o LI WATER + . _ + +- +-- + + + + I I I I I I I I I l-l 1 1 I I i 1 l l 1 1 I Location with Nighest I- { I { Type and i I All l' I-Annual Mean i l i Medium ITot. (el i Lower i Locations l All + + + Als 1 I I and IAnalysis l Limit I (Indicator & Control) l Indi ator Locations IDist. I Mean (1) I Control Locations I { l Measurement IFerformedt (LLD) l Mean.(1) (Range) l Mean -(1) (Range) IDirect I (Rangel i Mean (1) (Range) l + +-- +- + + +- + + + t I sTRG I sR-se i I I I l { l IFCz/L l 22 I I LLD I I I I 1 I I I I I i-I I i I i i I i l I i i l I sR-ee I i .o.73 I o.73 1 .34 1 o.so I o.co I I I 22 1 1 (coo 3/co22: 1 (o003/o019) I 00.71 toco1/ocoel I tocoo/ coast. I l 1 1 I I o.70-o.so I a.7o-o.so 1 nw I o.so-o,so I o.co-o.co 'l 1 I I I I I { l I. I I I I I I I I I l l 1 1 I I I I I I t i I I I I I ( l 1 i I I I i i i i i 1-t l l l 1 I I i 1 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I l I i I l i 1 I I I I I l I I I I l i I I i 1 l l l 1 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I i i i l I i I i l I i 1 1 1 I I I I I I i i i i l I i i i i i l i I 1 I I i I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I { { I 1 I i i I I i i I + + + + + + + + + 1 - The retio of positive results to the number of samples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. i I i !

,i - *i' L 1 + IIlllll+ llllIilIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIlIiII + 0 0 s) ne R og O O i n 0 A t a ) 0 P aR 4 c( 000 o 006 lL) 02 l 1 6/- Al( 240 o 200 ra 0 t s 00 ne (6 oM 1 C + IIll+ ll+ llliIIIIiIIIIIiIIIiIIIIiilIi+ 0 t ) 0 1 s 1 4 e 004 4 h ) 006 t g 1) 02 s 0 i ( e 4 / - e 5 m g 610 r / n en 200 e 0 ha na 0 t 4 te eR - 04 n 4 iM M( (6 i 0 w 2 Y 0 9 l f R 5 9 ne o A 1 ou R i m r R t a+ll + llliIIIIiIIIIiIiiiiiIiIIIlII+ e U aA 0 t S . d c t e o o o . c 02 m M s i L te 22t a A r er a r R t e ii r a G e p DD p O k + IIll + ll+ lliIIIIIi1IIIIliIiliIII1IiIl+ R c g e P o n e h D i n )' t G t oe N r ig 0 r I o i n 10 o R p aa 6 f O T e cR 415 T N R o(

5. 0 2 d

07 O I A L e 4 W L 1 ) 6/- z 5 O P 1 r1 630 y N Ao( 110 l R t 0 a L E aa 00 n A W cs (0 a T O o i e 1 N P i dM s E h n e N R c I l W A p O E y + IIlllll+ ll1IIIIII11IIIIiIiiIIiiIiiIi + m R L t a I C n ) V U u l ~ s N N o o) f E C re o Y tg L' R e nn 0 r A R k oa .) 0 e C E a sCR 0 b I P L n ( 325 m G o& 5.02 07 u O li ) n L y ltr1 0/- O t y Aao( 870 e I i t ct 110 h D l i oan 0 t A i l Lca 00 R c i i e (0 o a c dM 1 t P a n P I s f ( t o f l o + IIlllIl+ lllIIIIIIi1IIIIiIIIIIiiIiIII+ u. e s s m rt) en a o eiD ro W t wmL i t oil nt a LL( oc c ie o + I1lllll + lllII!IiIIiIIIIiIlliIiIiiIII + tt L d i e d) se sD naim 0 o a( sr 2 Pf yo o e.lf 3 f ptar N ot yone i TTAP om 4T+11!lIIl+ lllIliItIIiIiiIiIiiiIi111IIl + ii O L tL I t a T n rr I e e R m m ew u e ho T idr TL dnu M R-eas TL 1 0 E-M a T/ 0 T-e 1 1D 4 A-2 W- . M C L P L P +11lllll+lll1i11lI1IIiIIiIIiiIll11I1i+ i

j' l

} i s tF!' e t I { I l + I1lIIII+ I1iIiIIIi1IIiilII1IIIiIiI1II+ oo sl ne-E og o G .i n c. A ta ) P aR e0 c( 2s2 o o5 lL) 4.o 1 l 1 sf-Al( 9so o 2 s c. rn 1o t a co ne (s oM o C l + Iili + Il+ I1lIiIIII1IIi1III11iIIIIIiII + o c. t ) 1 s so 4 e ots 4 h )

c. o 2 o9 t

g 1) s 0 i ( e sf-e 5 n g sso r / n nn 7 l c. e o ha aa 1o t 4 t e eR oo n 4 i M M( (s i' 0 w 5 Y 0 9 l 1 f R 5 9 na o A 1 ou M i n r M tn+II+ I1iIiIIII1IIl1iiI1ilIIIlIiII + e U aA 4 t s d c t e o o o . c i7 m M n i L t e so a A r sr .e r' R t e ii s a G e p DD p O k + IIIi+II + 1IIIi1IIiIIIiIIiI1IIIIIi1i1I+ R c g e P o n s h D i n) t G t oe N r i g o r I o tn ) c. o R p . aa o f O T e cR 97o T N R o(

2. c 0 os d

o.. M Ao( 67o l I A L e N L l ) - 3/2 z 5 O P l r1 40 - y 5 R t 1 o c. a L E an o n A W ca (o a T O c ie e N P i dM E h n . s s e M R O I l N A p O E y + IIIIiII + i1iIiIIIiI!IlIIiI1IIIIIi1i1I+ m R L t a 7 C n ) s Y U u l. N N o o) f E C re o Y tg L R e nn o' r A R k oa ) c. e C E a . sCR s b I P L n ( 4oo m G o& D D D ls D u O li ) L L L

9. o 0 L

n L y ltr1 L L L 1f2 L O t y Aao( 2s - e I i t ct soo h D l i oan t A i l Lca i l c. c R c i ie (o o F a dM a t a c n s P I s f ( t o f l o +IIIIiIi+ 1iiIIII1iI1iIIIi!IIIIIIIiIiI + u e s'. n n rt) - en a o eiD-ro W i wmL-i t oil o s a s et a .LL( - s 1 l i vc c ie o + IIIIlIi+ IIII1iIiIiiiIiIIIiIIII1IIiII + tt L d ie ..d) se sD nnim os 4s 7s s os o a( sr 4o 3o 3o oo oo pf yo 1l 1l 1l 4l ll o e .lf f ptar A s s a A ot yone e C C L i TTAF om + + IIlIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIII* iIiII + i i 1IIIIII tL t a t n rr e e m m ew u e ho i dr o TL dnu u K eas LL I o M a M/ I e I 1D c M M C L 4 2 P L P + 1IIIIIl +IIiiIiI1I1IIIIIIIIIIII1IiiII + j * ,i

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 P24001 Name of Pacility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Location of Pacility - Lake County Chio Reporting period : 1990 1 MILK -+- + +- -+ =+ +- '-+ + l 1 I I I I l i I I I I I I i 1 l l l l l l Location with Nighest l l l l Type and [ [ All l l Annual Mean l l l Medium ITot. (n) l Lower l Locations l All +- ---+ + All l l and IAnalysis I Limit l (Indicator s Control) I Indicator Locations lDist. I Mean (1) l Control Locations l l Measurement l Performed l (LLD) l Mean (1) (Range) l Mean (1) (Ranget l Direct [ (Renge) l Mean (1) (Range) l +-- + + -+- + +. + + + 1 MLxI I I-131 11 1 1 1 1 I I IPCI/L i 108 I l LLD [ l 1 1 l l l l l I I I 1 I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I i i i i l i I I I i I i i i I i l I i l 1 i I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l l I I I I I I I i i i i i i I l l l 1 I I I I I I I I i 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I i I 1 i i I i i i I I i i I i i I I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l t i I I I I I I I I I I l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I + + + + + + + + + 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of semples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. i P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name of Facility:: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER - PLANT : Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Location of Pacility : Lake County Ohio . Report ing period : 1990 -MILK + +- + + + + +

+

1 I 'l I 1. I 1. 1 I I-1 I 'l I l' I i 1. 1 1 1 1 Lo. - u n with Nishest I l l IType and~l l All .l l Medium l Tot.. (n) l Lower l' Locations. l A11. l haual Mean l .l + + + A11 l l and l Analysis I. Limit l-(Indicator & Control) l Indicator Locations lDist. -l Mean (1) l Control Locations,j' l Measurement l Performed l (LLD) l Mean'(1) (Range) l Mean (1)'(Range) l Direct l (Range) l Mean (1) (Range)- l + + + + - - + + + - - + + l STRG l SR-89 l .l l l I. l l lPCI/L l .18 l l LLD l l l l l: 1 1 1 i I 1 i i l- 'l l l 1-I 'l i I I l.. l l SR-90 l I .2.28 1 2.28 I 31 1 2.90 l 2.29 l. [ l l 18 l l (0018/0018) l (0010/0010) l 01.41 (0002/0002) I (0008/0008) l l l 1 1 1.10-3.20 .i 1.50-3.20 l ESE I 2.60-3.20 1 1.10-3.20 .l-s I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I i I ) i I I I l-1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I i 1 I l-I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I i 1. I I I I 't I I i 1 I I I I l I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I l-l l l 1 l I I I I I i 1 1 1 I I I I I i 1 't I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I i 1 1 't I I I I I I I i .I I I I I l l I i l i l i i 1 i I i i l i I I + + + + - - + - ~ ~ - - + + + 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analysed for the parameter of : interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detectica. m r.

N Q

%.) i-P24ool. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONFENTAL MONITORING PsOGRAM

SUMMARY

FAGE: ool Name of Facility: PERRY' NUCLEAR FOwER PLANT Docket no. : so-440/so-441 Location of Facility : Lake county Ohio Reporting' period : 199o FISH + + + -+ +-

---

+

+ + 1 I I i i i I I i l i I i 1-1 I I I 1 1 I I Location with-Wighest i I I IType and I I All 1 I Annual Mean i .I 1 Madium ITot. (n) I Lower i Locations 1 . 'All + -+ + All I 'I and IAnalysis 1 Limit I (Indicator a control) l Indicator Locations IDist. I _Mean (1) I control Locations I i Measurement IPerformedi (LLD) l 'Mean (1) (Range). I Mean (1) (Rangel IDirect I (Range) i Mean (1) (Range) I +- + + + - - + + -+ -+ e---+ 1 rsa 1 cO-ss 1 iso i I 1 1 I I tecI/xG(wzT) 1 31 l l LLD I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I i 1 -l i I I I i l I I CO-so 1 130 t I i I i I I I 31 I I LLD 1 I ) 1 1 I I l i I I I I I I I I I l i I I I I i es-134 1 13e I I I i 1 i i I 32 I I LLD i 1 1 1 1 I I I i i I I I I I I I I I cs-137 1 150. I I i i 1 1 1 42.co I o.co I 32 1 42.00 1 42.co I i I 31 1 I (oool/costi I (oooo/cois) I 15.st toool/co133 I (oool/co13) i I I I I 42.00-42.00 1 o.00-o.00 t wsw I 42.co-42.co i 42.co-42.no 1 i i i I i 1 1 I I I I re-59 1 2so I i i i I I i I 31 1 I LLD 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 't i 1 1 1 I i l i 1 1 I i 1 1 I I x-4o 1 1 294o.13 1 2:13.5o I 32 1 3132.3s 1 3o32.3s I I l 31 1 I. -(oo31/co31) 1 (cois/cols) I is.si (oo13/co133 I toolsfools) I I I I I

2o1o.00-3794.00 1

2010.00-3794.0c I wsw I 24so.oo-3 sos.co i 24so.co-3 sos.co 1 i i i i i I i i i 1 Ms-54 I t3o I I I I I I I I 31 I I LLD I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I i I l I I I I I I I i 1 I i + +-- +- + + + =+ + + t 1 - The ratio-of positive results to the number of samples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. I i j '

m g f (:' : ..%-~' i. P24001 . RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 902' Name of Facility! ' PERRY NUCLEAR Powt1 PLANT Docket no. 50-440/50-441 Location of racility : Lake County.Chio Reporting' period r.1990 FISH i + + -. + + --+ + +- + i 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Nighest l l I-I l l [. l l l Location with 1 IType and I l All l l Annual Mean l l. l } l Medium l Tot.-(n) l Lower l

Locations l'

All +-- -+ +' All' l l and l Analysis l Limit l (Indicator a Control) l Indicator Locations IDist. _l Mean (1) I Control Locations l Msesurement l Performed l (LLD) l Mean =- (1) - (Range ) l Mean (1).(Range). l Direct I (Range) l Mean (1)-(Range) l + + + + + + + +-- + i l FSN' l EM-65. I 260 l l -l l l l lPCI/KG(wt?) l 31 I l LLD l l 1 l l I I I l-1 I i 1 l-1 I 'I I I I I I l' I I I I I I I I I i i i I i I i I I I 1 i I I i i I i i i i l I i I i i f I I I I I-1 I I I I I i I I I 1 i i j i l I I i I 1 I i 1 1 -l i I I i 1 I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i I I .I I I I 3 t i i I i i I I i l-i I I I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I l-I I I I I I I l l l 1 1 I i 1 1 I I I i 1 I i 1 i i l I i l i i i i I I I i I I I I 1 -1 I I i I i I I I I I l i I I I I i l i i i i l I I i l i i l i i i i I i I i 1 1 I l-1 I I I [ + + - - + + + + + + + 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number'of samples analysed.for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. l l b -.

O -OL D ll l !~ I F24051 RADIOLOGICAL EN71RONMENTAL MONITORING FROGRAM sUMMART-FAGE: 001 l Wame of Facility: FERRY NUCLEAR FowtR PLANT Docket no. So-440/so-441, Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 1990 f SEDIMEtTT + + -+ + + + + + t 1 1 I I I I I I I I l I i i l i 1 I l i I Location with mighest I-I I IType and i I A11 1 I Annual Mesa i I i Madium ITot, tal i Lower i Locations I _ All + + (1) [ control Locations i .--+. All 1-I and IAnalysis I Limit I (tadicator a control).I Indicator Locatioas IDist. I Mean I Msasurement IFerformedt (LLD) l Mean (1) (Range) I Mean (1) (Rangel IDirect I (Rangel i Mean (1) (Range) I t + + + + + + + + + 1 sto I co-se i I I i 1 I I lFcI/rotDRT) I 14 I I LtD I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I i i i I I i i i I I 1-1 I co-so i I I i l i I I i 14 1 i LLD I 1 I I 1 i i i I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 I l cs-134 1 15o 1 I I I I I a I i 14 I I LLD I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 cs-137 I too i 357.13 1 3st.s3 1 27 I sto.co i 343.co i I i 14 I I (ooos/co14) I tooos/co12) I o7.91 toco2/ coo 2) I toco2/ coo 2) 1 I I I i 173.co-723.co i 251.00-723.00 I wsw 1 297.co-723.co I 113.0o-513.00 1 1 I i i i I I I I I I t-to I i 11sa4.71 I 11123.co i 25 1 15s37.so I isess.co 1 I i 14 I I (co14/co14) I 10012/0012) I co.si (o002/0002) I toco7/ coo 2) l I I I I ss7o.co-16s75.co I sa7o.co-16s75.co I new I 144eo.co-1ss75.co i 1331o.co-1ssoc.co I t i I I I I I I I I i l I I i 1 1 1 -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l t i I I I I + + + + + + + + 1 - The ratio of positive results to'the number of samples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. i t P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL 3081T0R15G FROGRAM

SUMMARY

FAGE: 001 Rame of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER FLANT Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 1990 SEDIMD1T + +__ - - - + _ + + _ _ _ _.. .+ + + 1 1 I i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Location with Righest i 1 1 IType and i I All i I Annual Mean i I I Medium ITot. (n) 1 Lower i Locations l All e + e All i I and IAnalysis I Limit I (Indicator & Control) 1 Indicator Locations IDist. I Mean (1) I control Locations l I Measurement IFerformedt (LLD) i Mean (1) (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) IDirect I (Range) i Mean (1) (Range) I + + + +--- + -+ + -+ 1 STRo I sR-es l l l I I I I IFc1/tG(DRT) I 14 1 I LLD I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l i I I I I sR-so I i 15.sa I 15 se i 27 I 17.15 I o.co i I i 14 I I (cons / col 4) I tocos/co12) I e7.91 (coo 2/cooz) I tocoo/ coo 2) I 1 I I I s.7o-22.oo 1 9.70-22.00 I wsw I 15.90-18.40 I o.co-o.co I I I I I i i i I I I I I I i l I I i i l i I i l i i I i i i i 1 I I I i i i i I i I i i I i i I I I i i I I I I i i I I i i i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l I i i I I I I I I I I i 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I I l l 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I i l I I I I I I I i 1 1 I l I i i i i i i i i l I i I I I I 1 i I e I i i I i l I i + + _ -. + +- + + + + 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. l [ j" {; i !!!' .i 9i? ,i" i 6 I. + l + I I lillI.+ [IIIlllIlII1lIIlIIIIIllIIIII oo s) ne E og o o S i n o 0 c. A ta ) c. ) ) F aR 4 40 41 ct oos oo4 so5 o1 o1' o4 o'

c. c 3

s. o 1

7. c 1 '

lL) l 1 7/- 3f1 s/- Al( s2o 64 - s4o o 5o0 rn - 2 o c. 5 o c. c ac0 2c ta es . t6 ts o os ne s5 oM 2 5 7 C 7 1 _5 + IIII+ll+ ll1IIIIIlli I1I1lIIilll1IIIiI+ o c. o o c. t ) c. )o ) 1 s 4 041 4s 4 e 5os

7. c 5

.0. o 2 o1 oo9 4 h ) o9

s. c 3 o3 t

g 1) 0c2 s 0 i ( e o/1 5/- 3/ - e 5 H g-S4 - 54o s4o r' / n nn soo 7 o c. s o c. e 0 ha aa n c. 1c 2c t 4 t e eR o o0 o5 n 4 i M M( t9 t2 _t9 i 0 w 3 3 9 Y o 9 l 2 3 1 f R 5 9 na 1 o A 1 ou M i n r M t n+Il+ l1IlIII1IliIIlili1i1IlliI1lI+ e U aA 7 0 o. t s d c t e o o o . c 2o s5 ss m M n i L te c 1c io a A r sr r R t e i i e s s a G e p DD p O k + IIll +ll+ IIIlIl R c g IiI1iIlIII1IIIIIiII1iI+ e P o n s' h D i n) t G t oe 0 N r i g o o r o. o I o tn ) c. c. t 9s0 s f R p aa - s 21 92s 2 O T e cR 32s

7. o 1 o9 d

6 T N R o( 9.c 5

s. c 3 '

e o9 I A L sc2 N L l -) 9/1 s /2 s/3 z O P l r1 . 9s-7s - se - y M Ao( 32o o20 7mo l 4 R t lo0 a o c. 1 o c. L E an o o n o A W ca ts t1 t2 a T O o ie s 3 3 E h - dM 6 s N P i n 5 e M R O I l N A p O E y + I1ltjllellt11IiIIlIIlIIIIl1I1IiII11I+ m R L t a I C n ) s V U u l N N o o) f E C . re o Y 0 L R e . tg - 0 o r nn o c. ) e A R k oa c. .) ) 020 2 b C E a sCR 2 I F L n ( - 03s 531' 3s1 m

4. o 9 '

G .o& D D D 01 o5 u c5 002 - 1. c 4 n li i L L L O 2/1' 9/2 s/3 L y ltrl L .L L 42 - s2 e O t y Aaog I i t .ct 33c - o30 s3o h" t 1 o c. D l i oan o o. ' - 100 A i l Lca o 6 o R c i ie ts (s t2' o a c dM s 5 3 t F a n 7 s F I 5 s t f ( o f lu. Ii1llll+ IIii1lIII1I1llI11IIiil1II1iI+ o + s e m n rt) en a o eiD ro N i wmL i t oil et a LL( vc c i e o + l' iiIll1II1IllI1l1lIIIIiI1ii1+ tt + IlllIt L d-i e d) se 7 s sD nnim 2 2 42 32 2 22 o aI sr e3 o3 33 13 03 23 pf yo s s 1 4 o e. lf s A f ptar o o s c K R ot yone c c c i TTAP om IIl{lII+ lliiIiiII[IIllllIIIItlIIlIil + ii + tL t arr n ) e Y e m m R ew u e D ho idr Lt TL L dnu IG I eas ox 1 0 O M' a s/ o S e 1D 4 M c L 2 e L P +1Ililll+It1iItl11l11llIIIiIIIIIIlIil+ i i' i! i 1 j k

^ i' [ l + I1jlllI + lII1IIIIIIiliIIIIIII11iiIII + o S s) ne E og G i n A ta )o s. P aR 44 c( o o so0 . lL)

1. c 4 l

1 / - Al( 120 o 3o9 rn c t a o1 ne t2 oM C' + IIIl+jl + IlII1I1IIIiIiI1iIiI1IiiiiliI+ t 0 1 s' t2 4 . e so oo' 4 h l

9. c 4 t

g ,i ) s 0 i .( e . 7/5 e 5 N g 24 - r / n nn 2o0 e o ha aa o0 t 4 4 - t e eR o n' i M M( (4 i 0 w 4 Y 0 9 l~ f R 5 9 na o A 1 ou M ~ i n r M t n+II + I1II11IlIIi1IiIiIiI1IIIIiiiI + e U aA 7 t S d c t - 2o' m e o o. o c M n i. L t e c a A r sr r R t e ii E' a G e p DD p O k + 1Ill+Il+ IlIl1I1IIIi1IIliIiIiIIiIIiIi+ R c g e P o n s h D i n) t G t oe N r ig r I o t n )0' o R p. aa s2 f O T e cR 2 T N R o( 3o0 d I A L

6. c 4 e

N L l ) /5 z 3 O P l r1 33 - y' 6 M Ao( 72o l R t o s. a L E an o n A W ca (4 ' a T O o - i e N P i dh s E h n e M R O .I l N A O E y p R L t. + 1IlIIil+ IlII1 11II i1iIiiIiII1Iiiilii + m a' I C n ) s V U u l N N o o) f E C. re-o Y tg L R e. nn r A R k oa )0 e C E a sCR 22 b' I P L n ( 3 m D 4oo u G o& ' .L O n li )

2. c 4 L

y ltr1 L /5 O t y Aao( 05 - e I i t ct 72o h D l i oan o a. t A i l Lca c R c i i e .(4 o a c dM t F a n F I s f ( t o f l + IIIIIIIiIII1iIIiIIII1II1IiiI+ u. o + iIt1lIl e s rt) en m n. a o eiD ro N i wmL i t oil et a LL( vc i e c lIlllI)+ 1lIIlIIIIIiiill1Ii1IiIIiIIII+ tt o + L d i e d) se sD nnim 2 o2 o a( sr s3 s3 pf yo a o e. lf R f pt ar R s ot yone s i - TTAP om 1IIiIlI+IlIIIiIIIIiIIiiiIi1iIIIiII1I + ii + tL t a n ) rr e T e m m R ew u e D ho i dr ( TL L dnu RG l eas TE I o M a s/ O 1D e I c 4 S M C L 2 P L , 1IIIIIIIIIIIiilili1iI1II1iiI + P + 1IIlllI 4 ',1I s

m m e t ?I +P P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM'

SUMMARY

PAGE t ' O O1-l

{

m Name.of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket-no.' 440/Se-461 q 'I Location.of'racility :-Lake County Ohio- _ Reporting. period.: 1990 -PRECIPITATION 1 +-- _+. .+ __+ . + - - - - - - _ _ -+- + _+ I I I I I I l

l I

I I I Li -1 1 -1 i 3 l_ i l l 1 ] l Location with Highest. j' .[. + l IType and I l All. -l l- . Annual Mean-1 l j-Medium ITot. (n) I Lower l Locations , ') All +=- =+ - --+ .All . l l and l Analysis l Limit'l (Indicator & Control) l Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean (1) l Control Loca t ion s !.-l - 1 l I Measurement l Performed l (LLD) i Mean (1) (Range)' l Mean (1) (Range)-- l Direct l (Range) .) Mean (1)L(Range) .{ ~ ( + - -

---

+--

_+ .+- _ - - - _ _ + _ - - --+-------+- _- - - + - + I prs i G-sETA I i 6.6s- 'l (0060/0060) l 01.0l (0012/0012) I (0012/0012). l [ I s.9s 3 1 11.05 I- _ 5.19' IPCI/L l 72 l l '(0072/0072) { l I I i 1 10-35.40 1 1.10-35.40 i sE I 2.00-35.40 I 1.10-11.00 l I I I i 1 l 1-I .l: 1 I i l 1 -I I I l I I I I l 1 l I. I i i i I l-1 I I I i I I I I I I I i - 1 1 1 1 1 l I 'l 1 -l. I i 1 I 1 1 1 I I i I I I i I I I 1 1 1 1 -l l I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I .i i I .I -l 'I I I I - 1 i i i I I I i 1 I [ I I I I I I I I l-I I I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I i 1 l-J l i I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I i i l I i I i I i i I i 1 - t 4 d i I i i 1-1 I I I l i I I I I I I I 2 I I I I I I I I i 't _+ _+__-- +

---

+_

+--- +__ + t i 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. 0 l [ ..,. ~, _ _

o r LO P24001 ' RADIOLOGICAL ~ ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 001 Name.of Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket ao. : 50-440/50-441 i Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period : 1990 l PRECIPITATION l . + __+-- + + + -. + ---+ +. I i l I l I i l' I I i I i I with mighest I I I I i l I 1 I i . Location I IType and i I All 1 I Annual Mean i I 1 Medium ITot. (n) I Lower i Locationa 1 .A11 + + + All. I I and IAnalysis I Limit 1 (Indicator & Control) 1 Indicator Locations IDist. I Mean (1) I Control Locations' l. l l Measurement IPerformedi (LLD) l Mean (1) (Range) i Mean (1) (Rangel IDirect I (Rangel 1 Mean (1) (Range) I + + + + + + + + l PRO 1 BA-140 I 'l I I l l l l lPCI/L 1 72 I i LLD 1 I 1 1 5: i 1 1 'l i I I I 1 1 I I. 1 I I I I l l l I I CO-5s 1 I I I I I I I I 12 1 i LLD I I 1 I I I i .1 I E I I I I i i 1 1 I i i i I I I I CO-60 I I I I I l -1 i i I 72 I l-LLD I I 1 I 1 1 1 I .I I I I l' I t i I I I I I I i 1. I l Cs-134 I I I I I I I I I 72 1 i wLD I I I 1 I i 1 I I I I l-1 1. I I I I I I I l-I I l Cs-137 I I I I I I-I I I 72 l 1 LLD I -1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I .I I .I I i i l' I I FE-59 l l l 1 1 I I I i 72 I .I LLD. 1-I 1 I I I I I I-1 I I I 'l I I I l-l I I I I I i LA-140 1 I I I I I i i 1 72 I I LLD I I 1 1 1 I I I I i 1 1 I I I I I i l i I i 1 + + -+-------+ -+ + + + + i 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of Interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. 2 -

2 J P P24001-RADIOLOGICAL ENT!RONMENTAL MONITCRIRG PROGR8W. $UMMARY - PAGE: 902 Base of Facility: PERRY-NUCLEAR power PLANT-Docket no. : 50-440/50-141 t Location of Pacility : Lake Coonty chie Reporting period : 1990 PRECIPITATION' + -+ + + - - + + - - - - + -4 I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I l l l l l l Location witti sighest l -l-i l l Type and l l All l l Annual Meme l' All-l l l Medius l Tot. (n) l Lower l Locations- ) All + + + l -and l Analysis l Limit l (Indicator E Control) l Indicator Locations lDist.' [ Mean (1) l Control Locations: j' l Masaurement l Performed l (LLD) l Mean (1) (Range)- l Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Rangel i Mean (1) (F3 age) l + + + + + + + + + l PRG l Ms-54 l l \\ 'l l l 1 lPCI/L l 72 l l LLD l l l l l l 1 1 I I I I I .I' I i i i I I I l' 'l l l NS-95 I l l l l l l I l 72 l l LLD l l l l l I 1 I I I I I i .I i 1 i I I i I I i i i l l ts-65 1 l l 1 l l l l 72 l l LLD l l l l l l 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'l I I zR-95 l l l l l l l i l 72 l l LLD l l l l l 1 1 I I I I I i -I I i 1 I I I I I I I i l I l-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I .s i I I 1 1 I I I I t i I I I l i I I i I I I I I I I I I ) I i 1 I I 1 1 I i l l t 1 'l I l' I I I: i l i I I I I I l I ~ i i i 1 -I I I i i i 1 l l I I 1 I I I l I I I I i i l i I I I I I I I I i i + + -+- + + + + + + 1 - The ratio of positive resulta to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. t ? ? i i p, e.-

~.. I ' ' ',,i. ' 3 a. 4 e P 2 4 0' 01 '. R ADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL. MONITORING PROGRAM.SUMMART PAGE: 001'-., j Name.cf Facility: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER' PLANT' ' Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Location of Facility : Lake county-- Oh'io ' Reporting perihd :-1990 PRECIPITATION-TRITItH. . +.. += _+ _ _ _ + - +- -+ --+- .+ 1 I I I l-I l' l i' I I l-1 I I ' l l l l I i Location with' Highest-1 1. 7 l l -l l Type and;l j .All 1 I Annual Mean I I j 1 Medium -ITot. (n) 1 Lower j Locations 'l' All += + + _ All-l j and IAnalysis I Limit I (Indicator E Control) l' Indicator Locations IDist. I Mean (1) l Control Locations 1 -- 1 Measurement IPerformedi (LLD) 1 Mean (1) (Range)' l Mean (1) (Range) IDirect I (Range) 1 Mean (11'(Range) l + .+ +-- + + -+ + ---+ +- l TTM i M3-1. .I 175.s2 1 173.75-l 3 1 193.co I 1se.25 I IPCr/L 1 72 1 1 too2s/co72)- 1 (o024/o060) I ol' ol (coo 4/co12) 1 (oo04/o012) .I l 1 1 I 'I los.co-314.co .I .111.co-271;oo _I sE I 1s2.00-229.00 1 10s.00-314.0o I I I I I I I I l-l l l 1 I i l i I' I I I i 1 'l I- ~l I i 'l I I I I i l I i I 4 I i i i i i I .I l i i I I I i i i 1-f I I i 1 1 I I I I i l i i i l' I I I I 1 1 I i 1 1 I I I + I I I l i I I I .I I I I I I I I I l 1 I l 'l i I I I I I i I i i i I 'l I a l I I I I I I-1 I I i i i 1 1 1 I I I I I I I l i 'l 1 I I I I I I .I i 1 1 I I I I I I I i I I i 'l i I I i 1 I I I i i i I l 1 1 I i 'l i I I l 'l 1 1 1 I i i I I i 4 I I -I i 1. 1 I I i 1 I I I 'I-1 I i 1 + 1 I I i i i I I I +-- - -+ .+ __+ _+ -+--- +- - - + - ---+ 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. 1 i k 4 , I

O. t i V 1 F24o01 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

FAGE: ool . Wane of Facility: FERRY WUCLEAR FOWER PLANT Docket no. : So-44e/So-441 Location of Facility : Lake County Ohio Reporting period t'1990 FEED / SILAGE and HAY + +- + + + + + + 1 I I I i-I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I I ' Location with nighest l l l l Type and l l All l l Annual Mean l j l Madium l Tot. (a) l Lower l Locations l All + + + All l l and l Analysis l Limit l (Indicator & Control) l Indicator Locations lDist. l Mean.(1) l Control Locations l l M3asurement l Performed l (LLD) l Mean (1) (Range) l Mean (1) (Range) l Direct l (Range) l Aeon (1) (Rangel i + + + + + + + -+ + l FF l BE-7 l 'l 75s.co i 158.00 l 47 l 758.co I-o.oo l lPCI/FG l 7 l l (oool/ cool) { (oool/ coos) l os.5l (coot / coo 2) l (oooo/ cool) l 1 1 I i 75s.co-15s.co i 153.co-75s.oo Ie l 75s.co-75s.co l o.co-o.co l t I i I I I i i I I l CO-Se l l l 1 l 1 1 I I 7 I I LLD I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I i i I I 1 I I I l-1 I CO-so I 1 I I I I i i i 1 1 I LLD I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I l 1 1 I I I I I I I I I Cs-134 I so l l l l l l 1 l 7 I l LLD j 1 l l l l l 1 1 I I I I I I I I i 1 1 I t I l l Cs-137 l so i 26.00 l 26.00 1 61 l 25.00 l c.oo l l t 7 I I (o001/0o07) I toco1/coes) I o7.41 (ooot/ coot) (oooo/ coot) 1 1 I I I 2s.co-26.co l 2s.00-28.00 l St l 26.co-26.co I o.co-o.co I i i i I i l I i I I I I-131 l so I t l l l l l l 7 l l LLD l l l l l t i I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I l 3 a-so 1 l s451.14 l 737s.33 I s9 l 14900.00 l 14,00.o0 l t 1 7 I I (8007/00071 1 10005/00061 1 1s.7l . (coot /coolt l (ooc 1/cos1) l l l l l 335s.co-149eo.co 1 335s.co-too3o.oo l ssw l 14900.0o-14900.03 3 149eo.03-1490s.oo l l 1 1 I I i i I i + + + + + -+ -+ + + 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of samples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection. -

p r~5 x ) P24001 RADIOLOGICAL ENTIRORMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

PAGE: 941 Name of Pacilityt PERRY BUCLEAR POWER PLANT Decket me. So-44e/So-441 Location of Facility.t Lake County Ohio Reporting period : VEGETATION-GRASS and LEAVES + + + + + +- + + 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l 1 i Location with Nighest i I l l Type and l I All i 1 Annual Mesa l I I Medium ITot. (n) I Lower l Locations l A11 + + + All .I l and IAnalysis l Limit l (Indicator & Control) l Indicator Locations IDist. I Meam (1) l Control Locations i I Msamurement Iterformedl (LLe) l Mean (1) (Range) 1 Mesa (1) (Range) Ipirect I (mange) l Mesa (1) (Range) I + + + + + + + + +. I FP I st-7 I I 2,39.es i 2715.e5 I s l 3e35.92 1 3e35.92 I iPCI/EG I s5 I I toes 5/oes5) l (ooS2/eoS2) i 11.0l (oo13/se13) I tott3/oe13) l l l l 1 437.oo-assso.co I 437.oo-is3se.oo I ssW-l 1e95.oo-155ee.oo I tos5.ee-155eo.co i I I I I I I I I I I I Co-se i I I I I I I I I s5 1 1 LLD I I 1 I 1 I I I i 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I l' I I Co-so i i 1 1 I I I l l 85 I I LLD I 1 I 1 I I i I I I 1 i I i i I I I i l I I I i i Cs-134 I so i I I I I l I I s5 1 1 LLD I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i l I l l Cs-137 l es 13.co i 13.co I 7 3 13.oo i se35.92 I l l s5 ! (oost/cos5) I (oeot/coS2) I oo.sl (ooet/oo14) l (oooo/ cots) l I I I i 13.oo-13.co 1 13.o0-13.00 1 mz i 13.oo-13.co I o.co-o.co l I I I I I I I I i i i r-131 I se i I i 1 1 I I I s5 I I LLD I 1 I 1 1 i i I I I I i l i i l I i l i i l i I i x-4o i 1 517s.22 I $2ss.s5 1 4e 1 See4.55 I este.4s I I s5 I I (oos5/ses5) I tooS2/ce52) I et.11 (oo11/oe11) I (oe13/oe13) I I I I I 24es.so-774s.co 1 2sSo.se-774s.co I sur I tote.se-7749.ee l 24ee.co-717e.ee I i l l 1 I I I I 1 + + + + + + + + -+ 1 - The ratio of positive results to the number of saeples analysed for the parameter of interest. LLD - Lower Limit of Detection...

~ <-~g (v$ \\ \\ [ P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CD. - PNPP. PAGE:001 REMP TRACE 1NG SYSTEM DATE:19-MAR-91 Table 4 DIRECT RADIATION - THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS OF QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL FIELD CYCLZS 199D STAT 70N FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER. THIRD QUARTER FOURTE QUARTER MR/STD QTR 01 15.10+/-1.20 .12.60+/ .2 12.90+/a.9 14.10+/.2 13.68+/-1.992 02 13.00+/ .2 12.40+/ .4 15.10+/-1.40 14.20+/ .5 13.68+/-2.095 03 14.40+/ .1 13.50+/ .5 12.90+/ .8 15.80+/-1.00 14.15+/-2.184 04 16.50+/ .1 14.00+/-1.00 15.40+/-1.50 16.00+/ .9 15.48+/-1.873 05 15.10+/~.7 13.50+/ .9 13.90+/-1.00 16.60+/~.7 14.78+/-2.414 12.90+/ .3 13.33+/-3.433 06 15.80+/ .9 . 11.00+/ .3 13.60+/-1.30 . 1G.60+/-1.10 15.70+/-1.934 07 16.70+/~.5 15.00+/-1.20 14.50+/-1.00 08 13.60+/ .3 11.40+/ .6 12.10+/~.9 12.90+/ .6 12.50+/-1.65% 09 14.20+/ .3 11.50+/ .1 12.40+/ .8 12.90+/ .6 12.75+/-1.952 10 18.50+/~.7 13.80+/ .7 16.20+/ .9 17.50+/ .9 16.50+/-3.519 11 16.80+/-1.40 13.60+/ .7 13.10+/-1.00 14.30+/ .2 14.45+/-2.844 12 14.60+/ .2 12.70+/ .4 12.50+/ .8 18.40+/ .9 14.55+/-4.738 13 13.30+/ .2 12.80+/ .4 11.50+/ .8 14.20+/ .4 12.95+/-1.952 14 14.70+/-1.30 12.70+/ .6 12.20+/ .8 14.40+/~1.20 13.50+/-2.140 15 16.90+/ .6 15.30+/-1.00 15,40+/ .9 15.87+/-1.464 16 19.80+/ .7 17.10+/ .9 16.80+/~1.00 15.70+/-1.00 18.10+/-2.437 17 18.70+/ .5 '15.40+/ .6 14.70+/-1.20 16.30+/-1.20 16.27+/-3.021 18 23.40+/ .6 22.30+/-1.60 21.10+/ .9-22.80+/ .8 22.40+/-1.691 19 15.60+/ .2 14.80+/-1.00 14.40+/ .8 17.10+/ .9 15.48+/-2.066 20 17.30+/~.7 15.60+/-1.10 14.30+/-1.10 17.20+/ .9 16.10+/-2.478 21 18.90+/ .5 16.60+/- 3 17.80+/-1.40 17.77+/-1.879 22 17.50+/ .6 15.10+/ .6 15.80+/-1.00 17.60+/ .6 16.50+/-2.159 23 18.10+/-1.20 16.40+/ .7 16.80+/-1.50 19.10+/~.7 17.60+/-2.140 24 15.40+/ .8 13.90+/-1.10 13.40+/-1.10 16.80+/ .7 14.88+/-2.866 35 12.90+/-.2 12.50+/ .2 11.70+/~.9 15.10+/ .7 13.0$+/-2.520 36 16.60+/ .5 17.10+/-1.30 15.10+/-1.20 17.20+/ .4 16.50+/-1.679 41 16.30+/ .2 .12.50+/ .6 13.20+/ .8 16.40+/-1.50 14,.60+/-3.536 42 . 15.20+/ .2 13.40+/ .8 13.60+/ .7 14.07+/-1.611 43 14.70+/-1.00 11.70+/ .6 12.60+/-1.10 13.3c+/ .4 13.0S+/-2.193 45 14.40+/ .7 12.00+/ .7 12.10+/ .8 13.20+/ .8 12.93+/-1.946 53 14.60+/ .9 13.10+/ .3 12.10+/-1. 2 0

• 13.90+/

.4 11.43+/-1.862 54 13.80+/ .4 13.20+/ .4 12.50+/-1.40 15.10+/ .2 13.65+/-1.910 13.40+/ .8 14.so+/-1.a0 15.13+/-3.138 55 17.20+/ .3 13.90+/-1.10 14.00+/-1.00 13.95+/-2.335 56 15.60+/ .3 12.30+/ .2 58 15.80+/ .7 12.70+/ .4 13.70+/~.1 14.70+/ .6 14.23+/-2.304 avg +/- 2s 16.03+/-4.259 13.90+/-4.466 14.07+/-3.933 15.68+/-4.267 i L _

O TABLE 5 &J Comparison of TLD Direct Radiation Results comparing Quarterly sums and Annual Results 1990 (mR/YTAR) IOCATION MNAL DOSE (1) ANNUAL DOSE (2) 1 54.7 63 I 2 54.7 54.7 3 56.6 59.8 4. 61.9 62.0 5 59.1 58.6 6 53.3 53.9-7 62.8 39.2 (3) 8 50.0 52.3 9-51.0 50.6 10-66.0 75.0 11 57.8 58.3 -12 58.2 56.6 13 51.8 57.6 14 54.0 55.4 15 63.5 (4) ND (5) 16 72.4 79.9

(

17 65.1 69.4 I. 18 89.6 90.4 19 61.9 61.3 20 64.4 59.4 71.1 ND (5) 22 66.0 -ND (5)- 23 70.4 63.5 24 59.5 59.5-135 52;2 56.8 36 66.0 79.8 41' 58.4 61.1-42. 56.3 (4) 61.9 43 52.3 60.1 45 51.7 57.0 L. .53 53.7-59.4 54 54.6 63.6 55 60.5 (4) 69.4 56 55.8 61.2 '58 56.9 55.9

1. Annual dose is'the sum of each quarterly TLD badge,

2. TLD badge remains in the field for the full annual cycle.

3. ' Itis TLD was received wet by the vendor laboratory L

4. 'Ihe average of the sum of the remaining TLDs for the l

location was substituted for the missing data and sununed l to achieve the annual dose, i -5. ND=No Data; Missing TLDs

l. 1 i

l

O TABLE 6 -() ' Plant Gaseous Effluents Taken from the 1990 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report .I Gaseous Effluent'(Ci) PARTICUIA'11!:S/ IODINES l 1 RADICHUCLIDE 1989 1990 I-131 8.38E-03 9.70E-03 I-132' 5.76E-04 9.68E-05 1 I-133 9.26E-03 1.32E-02 ) Sr-89 1.03E-04 1.36E-03 1 Sr-90 1.21E 6.75E-06 i Cs-134 No DATA 1.76E-11 Cs-137 No DATA 2.81E-11 '!OTAL 1.83E-02 2.4dE-02' NOBLE GASES RADICNUCLIDE 1989 1990 ( ' Kr-85m 1.88E+01 6.27E-01 g;( Kr-85 1.31E+00 NO DATA Kr-87 1.30E+00 6.16E-01 l Kr-88 5.92E+00 .5.35E-01 L Xe-131m 1.13E+01 NO DATA Xe-133m 7.06E-01 2.84r n1 .i Xe-133 1.04E+02 2.97E+u.- Xe-135m 8.17E+00 1.08E+01 xe-135' 3.90E+01 3.86E+01 Xe-137 NODMA 2.78E-01 Xe-138 1.35E+00 2.27E+00 ' IDEAL 191.9 83.71 i - l-

1 TABLE 7 Plant Liquid Effluents Taken from the 1990 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Re, cort Liquid Effluents (C1) (Excludes Noble Gases) RADICNUCLIDE 1989 1990 H-3 5.80E+00 8.79E+00 Cr-51 3.01E-01 2.39E-01 Mn-54 1.60E-01 4.20E-02 re-55 1.02E-01 2.26E-02 Fe-59 2.13E-'02 4.51E-03 Co-58 3.11E-02 1.22E-02 Co-60 3.13E-01 1.46E-01 Zn-65 4.67E-03 7.87E-02 St-89 3.55E-04 1.52E-03 Sr-90 NO DATA 2.45E-05 St-92 5.27E-04 to DATA Zr-95 3.30E-05 1.38E-04 Zr-97 NO DATA 8.67E-05 tb-95 1.86E-04 3.19E-04 O i Tc-99m 7.70E-05 9.75E-05 Ag-110m 1.56E-02 3.16E-02 I-131 9.13E-04 7.47E-04 I-133 1.89E-04 NO DATA Cs-134 3.91E-03 1.23E-02 Cs-137 9.97E-03 1.55E-02 St>-122 2.56E-05 NO DATA Sb-124 3.11E-04 9.22E-05 Sb-125 7.78E-04 to DATA La-140 2.74E-03 1.44E-03 Np-239 1.09E-03 No DATA As-76 5.34E-04 No DATA Sc-46 2.59E-05 to DATA TOTAL 6.78 9.40 0 l

)( (.. 'mBLE~0 ~ Summary of Radionuclides Associated with Light-Water Reactors and the Activity Reported from the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program MPUER 1986 1987 1988-1989 1990 UNITS Sr-90 LT 1.0 - 1.85 0.96 0.80 0.73 pCi/L SOIL Sr-90 .LT 500 LT 500 63.23 41.64 70.24 pC1/Kg Cs-137 568.83 463.00 396.28 380.00 392.40 SEDIMENT Sr-90 LT 500 LT 500 '26.45: 12.33 15.58 pci/Eg j Cs-137 321.50 '354.57 308.25 148.50 357.00 Co -60 84.25 73.0 59.0 LT 40 LT 50 -MILK t Sr-90 1.20 3.19 3.24 2.78 2.28 pC1/L LT indicates. lower limit of detection 4 L). - - 3

. ~ _. . ~ ?/7 TABLE 9 i-NJ NEAREST GARDEN BY SECTOR AND DEPOSITION (D/Q) VALUE EM3teorological Address of Distance D/O Value Map ESector -(1-) Location from PNPP per m Locator iiE 4398-Lockwood Rd. 0.8 miles 1.09E-8 3 ENE-4650 Lockwood Rd. 1.1 miles 4.77E-9 5 -E 2674 Antioch Rd. 1.2 miles 4.56E-9 16 ESE 2774 Antioch Rd. 1.2 miles 3.41E-9 23 SE-4613'N. Ridge Rd.* 1.2 miles 2.90E-9 29 SSE 3119 Parmly Rd. 0.9 miles 1.23E-8 31 S 3121 Center Rd. 0.9-miles 1.31E-8 35 LSSW- .3515 N. Ridge Rd. 1.7 miles 1.192-9 41 SW-3440 Clark Rd. 1.2 miles 2.24E-9 45 WSW1 '3424 Parmly Rd.* 1.1-miles 2.68E-9 52 .(1) W, WNW, NW, NNW, N, and NNE sectors extend over Lake Erie. -*5 Indicates a new location for 1990. 75-1 5T'1 'aW44 g p ,s .,um, .,,y-

.~~ .-~ l )) J(% f TABLE 10 NEAREST RESIDENT BY SECTOR 1 AND DISPERSION (X/Q) VALUE

Msteorological

Address of Distance Chi /O-value Map Sector (1)

Location from PNPP (Sec/m ) -Locator 1 i NE 4384 Lockwood Rd. 0.8 miles 2.17E-6 '2 ENd 4602 Lockwood Rd. 1.0 miles 1.13E-6 4 E' 2684 Antioch Rd. 1.1 miles 6.67E-7 15 ESE- '2774-Antioch;Rd. 1.2 miles 4.44E-7 23 LSE 4495'N. Ridge Rd. 1.2 miles 3.89E-7' 28 7 'SSE 3119-Parmly Rd. 0.9 miles 1.89E-6 31 S 31'21 Center Rd. 0.9 miles 2.25E-6 35

SSW-3850 Clark Rd.

0.9 miles 1.11E-6 40-su SW 3440 Clark Rd. 1.2 miles 4.98E-7 45 WSW 2815 Perry Park 1.0 miles-1.72E-6 -50 l(1). Sectors which extend over Lake Frie include: W, WNW, NW, NNW,fi, and NNE. ' *1 Indicates the location is new for 1990.

LO;.

r- -~w + -m

1 i 1. l TABLE 11 NEAREST MILK ANIMAL BY SECTOR ANDEDEPOSITION (D/0) VALUE Mateorological . Address of Distance. D/Q Value Map ,Sactor'(1,2) Location from PNPP. per m Locator { ESE-2908 Antioch Rd. 1.3 miles 2.97E-9 24 'SSE 5485 River Road

• 4.6 miles 1.94E-10' 34 (1) W,-WNW,1NW, NNW, N, and NNE sectors extend over Lake Erie.

);(2)TheNE, ' f

ENE, E,

SE, S, SSW, SW, and WSW sectors have-no milk-producing animals within 5 miles. Indicates new location for 1990 i 1 ' O - ,w--. -_----,-g

b) \\_/ TABLE 12 PRODUCE GROWERS l WITHIN THE VICINITY OF PNPP 1 Name of Address of Sector / Map racility Location Distance Locator Shreve Farm 2431 Antioch Rd. ENE 1.2 miles 6 Gerlica rarm 4860 Lockwood Rd. ENE/1.5 miles 7 Rainbow rarms Townline Road ENE/1.9 miles 8 Twins Creek Farm 2299 Haines Road ENE/3.2 miles 12 orosz rarm* 2674 Antioch Road E/1.2 miles 16 Sabo Farm 5674 North Ridge Rd. E/2.9 miles 17 Resident 5014 North Ridge Rd. E/3.3 miles 18 () Woodworth rarm Middle Ridge Road E/4.6 miles 19 Wayman Farm Produce

• Across from 2605 E/4.8 miles 20 Hubbard Road Plant Pride Center
• Intersection of Hubbard E/4.9 miles 22

& Middle Ridge Road Resident

• 5009 North Ridge Rd.

ESE/1.8 miles 25 Secor Nursery North Ridge Road ESE/1.8 miles 26 Resident

• 6030 Middle Ridge Rd.

ESE/3.9 miles 27 Resident (ruller)* 5352' South Ridge Rd. SE/3.7 miles 30 Leekala Farm 4830 Davis Road SSE/3.0 miles 33 Resident

• 3271 Call Road SSE/1.6 miles Brookside Fruit rarm Middle Ridge Road S/1.7 miles 36 Resident (Honnessey)*

4063 South Ridge Rd. S/3.7 miles 37 84 Garden Spot South Ridge Road S/3.8 miles 38 O Garden Center Corner Narrows Rd. SW/3.6 miles 40 & North Ridge Rd. ' Champion Nursery North Ridge Road SSW/1.8 miles 41 -.Golding Farm North Ridge Road SSW/1.7 miles 42 Perry Park Road SW/1.5 miles Resident

• 3570 Narrows Road NNW/ 2.8 miles 43 Resident (Erason)*-

2671 Hale 'SSW/3.7 miles 44 Resident (Sasu)* 3191 North Ridge Rd. SW/2.4 miles 46 West Orchard Fruit North Ridge _Rd. SW/2.7 miles 47 i Market Perry Pa'rk/ Clark-Rds. SW/1.6 miles i

• Indicates a new location for 1990.

O O.. ~.

TABLE 13 RECREATIONAL AREAS & PUBLIC DRINKING WATER FACILITIES Name of Address of Sector / Map racility Location Distance Locator North Perry Park Lockwood Road NE/0.7 miles 1 North Townline Park Townline Road ENE/2.3 miles 9 Lake Metro Park Lockwood Road ENE/1.7 miles 10 Camp Isaac Jogues Chapel Road ENE/3.2 miles 11 Madison Country Club Chape'l/. Green Roads ENE/4.0 miles 14 Tuttle Park Tutle Park Road ENE/3.7 miles 13 Madison Village 2934 Hubbard Road E/4.8 miles 21 O Water Plant Lake County YMCA 4540 River Road S/4.6 miles 39

outdoor center Fairway Pines.

Corner of Blase / SW/4.8 miles 49 -Golf Course Nemeth and Bacon Rds. Perry Township Park Perry Park Road WSW/1.1 miles 51 Camp Roosevelt Perry Park Road WSW/1.4 miles 53 Lake County Water Bacon Rood-WSW/3.9-miles 54 Treatment-Plant I O t e.

o6 4 .n

u. s -

--.a n1w s.s.-- i-s ~~...nu-3 1..a a nnoc-a w e-n na--- - - -. + --.-w-. --an.xsm-1 --i.e s-- a. m a u-ama-m- n. ( c.c - ' r2 ea-(. I, i f.I'

• t,i,,

r 4. ' P'e. '1:,."' 6 al g 4 4 i . a. ,,, m ', s t .- l ':.) f;'.y4, ,e..;l w d' o. 1 '..'....,g. ~- ..... $g(.@'...'@ ...p. p. ... -f 1 y l r g.o-.. - ,a/ . i f;r u_ -s., t g* i 3 ', *, ( s g

1. "d

!'[;- ].

• {

'.)), {,.,. t { p v. 4. '..N@...........,h',g e g i::~ '.. - ~ - t 1 _l. I e i y. U,,,y? - f...g..........,.,',, s sp',*. ?4),, ,g, .g, s. g g i. 0-i N. W \\ i i 1 -.<---.--.---------'--A....e T, ' .l = i, a 5, t---- } i - e 1 0, I L... 4> ,....-....--........'g g l g; t znn ~,.. aE d,., .,. n.... i i a g I g.' e E , f ,.[) y 'g ' l 'g .s

g...'*a, g

• s - -

s-.e, !; e i. I.. 8 3 s. .u - r.. 1 s ./(, J e e ,/ 'g I i / p I, y $ t* $,i...... !......g. *,gg y,,g' p, .n .,4{ t I-n t g. f g,. 4. ~ s. .,f.%l %b },'... ,h Y*a* e ' mee . 5 g_ {' ')m is, fJ' $u( Q y1 = , s .... y.j 3 m g ~} \\ bl 't. s'- e, .k s I,) % ) I .f k/ N.", %,, 7,,\\, z 'l f. k l, n, l \\ ./.. y~ 1.,,,,' ... s n &', ..} r. e, s, \\4

• • .we esa g.

\\x  % . l' ~ ( l.7 'f,, 3., \\', 't. s, i f f. ^ x y s t w e w ',-..J ; \\} . y j, 'g,. -),3.. e ,'.; -.. - e,.. m...., G, . z-,', E ,O 8 t '.,..a N 34... d w.g.,,g J ~4 ad',. u ;g\\,i (V}.-r,'.p-y, 4Hw c,p.. g -a r m.4, l cil v g ej - 7 (, s, \\ ' \\. g, ~ ./ ~ \\.:d*,,' % m w E e'l 3 .a 1. s c k h [ #[. i. - 1 -. 3;rt.x. ' '1 N.[ +'-, e 4e e. ,,e, g, 6 '8- ,( }f . af a-1 _) ( \\ i to .~ C

• , e 11',0(t ? \\

,\\l 4 1 ',(\\n'h 4.- 4 o \\l% ;

• ke?

) ; '. ;-,] s, g,. e 3 a $5 L j j, - :5 g ,J t - to C , *..wr, r-l"s.,. b ll*****-*QW", Q - p,, s. y i 3 s* I ~ p t, [ Q \\, sk, n* s F -@*f-TV P e bt'*'W w -Frg a

• W.'-'W e

wL'?'=mm: o-+ w m-e4 -wPe*Nw-w -a+e +9 "P M

O O O TABLE 14 EPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1990 TINL RESULTS EPA RESULTS DATE SAMPLE TTPE OF ANALYSIS MEAN VALUE i TVO SIGNA MEAN VALUE ONE SIGNA 1. January Vater Sr-89 (Strontium) 22.715.0 pCi/L 25.0 5.0 pC1/L 1 1 2. January Water Sr-90 (Strontium) 17.311.2 pC1/L' 20.011.5 pC1/L 3. January Water Alpha (Gross Alpha) 10.3 3.0 pC1/L 12.0 5.0 pC1/L 2 4. January Water Beta (Gross Beta) 12.3tl.2 pC1/L 12.015.0 pC1/L 5. January Water Co-60 (Gamma Spec) 14.7 2.3 pci/L 15.015.0 pCi/L 2 6. January Vater Zn-65 (Gamma spec) 135.016.9 pC1/L 139.0214.0 pCi/L 7. January Vater Ru-106 (Gamma Spec) 133.3113.4 pC1/L 139.0114.0 pCi/L 8. January Water Cs-134 (Gamma Spec) 17.311.2 pci/L 18.025.0 pcl/L 9. January Water Cs-137 (Gamma Spec) 19.311.2 pC1/L 18.015.0 pCi/L 10. January Vater Ba-133 (Camma spec) 78.0 0.0 pC1/L 74.0 7.0 pC1/L 1 1 11. February Water B-3 (Liq. Scint.) 4827i83 pC1/L 49761498 pC1/L 12. March Vater Ra-226 (Chem. Sep.) 5.0 0.2 pC1/L 4.910.7 pC1/L 1 13. March Vater Ra-228 (Chem. Sep.) 13.510.7 pC1/L 5 12.7 1.9 pC1/L 2 14. March Vater Uranium 4.0 0.0 pC1/L 4.0 6.0 pC1/L 1

15. March Air Filter Alpha (Gross Alpha) 7.3 1.2 pCi/ Filter 5.015.0 pC1/ Filter 1

16. March Air Filter Beta (Gross Beta) 34.010.0 pC1/ Filter 31.015.0 pC1/ Filter 17. March Air Filter Sr-90 (Strontium) 10.010.0 pCi/ Filter 10.011.5 pC1/ Filter 18. March Air Filter CS-137 (Gamma Spec) 9.311.2 pC1/ Filter 10.015.0 pC1/ Filter Vater (Blind) 19. April Sample A Alpha (Gross Alpha) 81.013.5 pC1/L 90.0123.0 pCi/L f 20. April Sample A Ra-'226 (Chem. Sep.) 4.910.4 pC1/L 5.010.8 pCi/L 21. April Sample A Ra-228 (Chem. Sep.) 10.610.3 pC1/L 10.2 1.5 pC1/L 2

22. April Sample A Uranium 18.713.0 pC1/L 20.016.0 pCi/L I

23. April Sample B Beta (Gross Beta) 51.0110.1 pC1/L 52.015.0 pC1/L 24.

April Sample B Sr-89 (Strontium) 9.321.2 pC1/L 10.015.0 pC1/L i 25. April Sample B Sr-90 (Stror, tium) 10.3 3.1 pC1/L 10.0 1.5 pC1/L l 2

26. April Sanple B Cs-134 (cme =a Spec) 16.010.0 pC1/L 15.0 5.0 pCi/L j

1

27. April Sample B Cs-137 (Gamma Spec) 19.012.0 pCi/L 15.015.0 pC1/L

28. April Milk St-89 (Strontium) 21.723.1 pCi/L 23.015.0 pC1/L

29. April Milk Sr-90 (Strontium) 7 21.01 0 pC1/L 23.015.0 pCi/L

30. April Milk I-131 (Iodine) 98.711.2 pCi/L 99.0 10.0 pC1/L

31. April Milk Cs-137 (Gamma Spec) 26.0 6.0 pCi/L 24.0 5.0 pCi/L 1

1

32. April Milk Potassium 1300169.2 mg/kg 15001 8 ag/kg 7

33. May Water Sr-89 (Strontium) 6.022.0 pcl/L 7.015.0 pC1/L

d ( p n U TABLE 14 EPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1990 TIML RESULTS EPA RESULTS DATE SAMPLE TYPE OF ANALYSIS MEAN VALUE i TVG SIGMA MEAN VALUE ON8 SIGMA 34. May Water Sr-90 (Strontium) 6.7 1.2 pCi/L 7.015.0 pci/L 2 35. May Water Alpha (Gross Alpha) 11.01 0 pCi/L 22.016.0 pC1/L 2 36. May Water Beta (Gross Beta) 12.31 2 pC1/L 15.015.0 pC1/L 1

37. June Vater Co-60 (Gamma Spec) 25.3i2.3 pCi/L 24.0 5.0 pC1/L

38. June Water Zn-65 (Gamma Spec) 155.0110.6 pC1/L 148.0115.0 pC1/L

39. June Water Ru-106 (ca=== Spec) 202.7117.2 pC1/L 210.0121.0 pCi/L 40.

June Water Cs-134 (Gamma Spec) 23.7 1.2 pCi/L 24.0 5.0 pC1/L 2 1 41. June Water Cs-137 (Gamma Spec) 27.7 3.1 pC1/L 25.0 5.0 pC1/L 2 i 42. June Vater Ba-133 (Gamma spec) 100.7 8.1 pC1/L 99.0t10.0 pC1/L 1 43. June Vater H-3 (Liq. Scint.) 2927 306 pC1/L 29331358 pC1/L 44. July Vater Ra-226 (Chem. Sep.) 11.810.9 pCi/L 12.111.8 pCi/L 45. July Water Ra-228 (Chem. Sep.) 4.1 1.4 pC1/L 5.121.3 pC1/L 1 46. July Water Uranium 20.311.7 pCi/L 20.8 3.0 pC1/L 2 47. August Vater I-131 (Iodine) 43.0 1.2 pCi/L 39.016.0 pCi/L 1 48. August Vater Pu-239 (Chem. Sep.) 10.011.7 pC1/L 9.1 0.9 pC1/L 1 49. August Air Filter Alpha (Grcss Alpha) 14.010.0 pCi/ Filter 10.015.0 pC1/ Filter 50. August Air Filter Beta (Gross Beta) 65.311.2 pC1/ Filter 62.015.0 pCl/ Filter 51. August Air Filter Sr-90 (Si.atium 19.0 6.9 pC1/ Filter 20.015.0 pC1/ Filter 1

52. August Air Filter Cs-137 (G.ama Spec) 19.0 2.0 pC1/ Filter 20.0 5.0 pCi/ Filter 2

53. September Vater Sr-89 (Stontium) 9.0 2. 0 pC1/L 10.015.0 pC1/L 1 54. September Vater Sr-90 (Stontium) 9.0 2.0 pCi/L 9.025.0 pC1/L 55. September Vater Alpha (Gross Alpha) 8.311.2 pC1/L 10.0 5.0 pC1/L 56. September Vater Beta (Gross Beta) 10.31 2 pC1/L 10.015.0 pC1/L 1 57. September Milk Sr-89 (Strontium) 11.713.1 pC1/L 16.015.0 pci/L i 58. September Milk Sr-90 (Strontium) 15.010.0 pCi/L 20.015.0 pC1/L 59. September Milk I-131 (Iodine) 63.0 6.0 pC1/L 58.0 6.0 pC1/L 60. September Milk Cs-137 (c==== Spec) 20.012.0 pCi/L 20.025.0 pC1/L 61. September Milk Potassium 1673.31 0.2 ag/kg 7 1700.0 85.0 mg/kg 2 62. October Vater Co-60 (Camma Spec) 20.313.1 pC1/L 20.0 5.0 pC1/L

63. October Vater Zn-65 (t'a=== Spec) 115.3112.2 pC1/L 115.0112.0 pC1/L 64.

October Vater Ru-106 (Gamma Spec) 152.0 8.0 pC1/L 151.0115.0 pC1/L

65. October Vater Cs-134 (Gamma Spec) 11.0 00.0 pCi/L 12.0 5.0 pC1/L 1

1 66. Getober Vater Cs-137 (c=== Spec) 14.012.0 pCi/L 12.0 5.0 pC1/L e 1 67. October Vater Ba-133 (c==== Spec) 116.7 9.9 pC1/L 110.0 11.0 pC1/L 1.

1 TABLE 14 EPA INTBtCOMPARISON FROGRAN I .1990 ~ TINL RESULTS EPA RESULTS DATE SANFi2 TYPE OF ANALYSIS MEAN VALUE i TWO SIGNA MEAN VALUE'i UNE SIGNA i

68. October ~

Water-E-3 (Liq.-Scint.) 7167 330 pC1/L 7203t720 pC1/L 1 1 Vater (Blind)

69.. October Sample A Alpha (Gross Alpha) 68.717.2 pC1/L 62.0 16.0 pC1/L f

i L 70. October ' Sample A Ra-226 (Chem. Sep.) 12.910.3 pC1/L-13.6 2.0 pCI/L 1

71. October.

Sample A Ra-228 (Chem._Sep.) 4.21 6 pCi/L 5.0 1.3 pCi/L 0 72. October Sample A Uranium-10.& 0.6 pC1/L 10.2 3.0 pCi/L 73. October Sample B Beta (Gross Beta) 55.0 3.'7 pC1/L 53.0 5.0 pC1/L 3 l

74. October Sample B Sr-89 (Strontium) 15.7 2.9 pC1/L 20.025.0 pC1/L.

3

73. October Sample B Sr-90 (Strontium).

12.01".0 pC1/L 15.0 5.0 pcl/L i

76. October Sample B-Cs-134 (c==== Spec) 9.01 7 pC1/L 7.015.0 pC1/L 1

77. October Sample B Cs-137 (Gamma Spec) 7.7 1.2 pCi/L 5.Or5.0 pC1/L 1 78. November Water Ra-226 (Chem. Sep.) 6.8 1.0 pC1/L 7.4 1.1 pC1/L f 79. November Water Ra-228 (Chem. Sep.) 5.3 1.7 pC1/L 7.7 1.9 pCi/L { 1

80. November Water Uranium 35.0 0.4 pC1/L 35.5 3.6 pC1/L

't i i- -l 4 t i I 4 1 6 4 2 f j 2 i 4 1 i [ i ) kI 4 i

TABIE 15 E2NIROt@tDTTAL TLD RESULTS QC SPIKItKi PROGRAM 1990 2nd Otr. 3rd Qtr. ACWAL REPORTED PERFORMANCE ACWAL PIPORTED PERFORMANCE

1. 19.0 mR 17.9 mR

-0.06 1. 16.3 mR 15.0 mR -0.08

2. 19.0 mR 20.2 mR 0.06 2.

16.3 mR 15.6 mR -0.04

3. 19.0 mR 21.8 mR 0.15 3.

17.4 mn 20.2 mn (1)

4. 19.0 mR 21.8 mR 0.15 4.

17.4 mR 19.9 mR (1)

5. 19.0 mR 22.9 mR 0.21 5.

16.3 mR 15.5 mR -0.05

6. 19.0 mR 19.0 mR 0.00 6.

16.3 mR 15.5 mR -0.05

7. 19.0 mR 17.3 mR

-0.09 7. 16.3 mR 16.1 mR -0.01

8. 19.0 mR 18.4 mR

-0.03 8. 16.3 mR 15.7 mR -0.04

9. 19.0 mR 19.2 mR 0.01 9.

16.3 mR 15.5 mR -0.05

10. 19.0 mR 19.4 mR 0.02 10.

16.3 mR 15.8 mR -0.03

11. 19.0 mR 20.1 mR 0.06

12. 19.0 mR 18.6 mR

-0.02 13, 19.0 mR 10.1 ma -0.05 0

14. 19.0 mR 17.8 mR

-0.06

15. 19.0 mR 17.6 mR

-0.07 (1) Wese values were rejected due to the inconsistent actual delivered dose. We reconmended ne recomended delivered dose 19 mR delivered dose 15 mR Average Performance Average Performance Value (P) 0.019 Value (P) -0.043 Standard Standard Deviation (S) 0.091 Deviation (S) 0.02 lPl+S 0.11 lPl+S 0.063 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SHOULD NCrt EXCEED 0.3 O 1 _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - -

1 APPENDIX A 3 i j l I i i i t l l t. l - A l l-l---

O 4 TLD THERM? LUMINESCENT DOSIMETER O O -A _____ _________ - - -_ _ _ _

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGEs 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATEt 8-FEB-91 DIRECT REPORT SAMPJ TREQUENCY IS : QUARTERLY l (~'J) RESI TS IN MR/QTR +/- 2 SIGMA L STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 01 TLD 900111/900404 15.10+/-1.20 01 TLD 900404/900718 12.60+/.20 01 TLD 900718/901000 12.90+/.90 01 TLD 901009/910103 14.10+/.20 02 TLD 900111/900404 13.00+/.20 02 TLD 900404/900718 12.40+/.40 02 TLD 900718/901009 15.10+/-1.40 02 TLD 901009/910103 14.20+/.50 03 TLD 900111/900404 14.40+/.10 03 TLD 900404/900718 13.50+/.50 03 TLD 900718/901009 12.90+/.80 03 TLD 901009/910103 15.80+/-1.00 ( ) 04 TLD 900111/900404 16.50+/.10 04 TLD 900404/900718 14.00+/-1.00 04 TLD 900718/901009 15.40+/-1.50 04 TLD 901009/910103 16.00+/.90 05 TLD 900111/900404 15.10+/.70 05 TLD 900404/900718 13.50+/.90 05 TLD 900718/901009 13.90+,-1.00 05 TLD 901009/910103 16.60+/.70 06 TLD 900111/900404 15.80+/.90 06 TLD 900404/900718 11.00+/ 30 06 TLD 900718/901009 13.60+/-1.30 06 TLD 901009/910103 12.90+/ 30 07 TLD 900111/900404 16.70+/.50 07 TLD 900404/900718 15.00+/-1.20 07 TLD 900718/901009 14.50+/-1.00 -A.

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP.

PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 8-FEB-91 DIRECT REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : OUARTERLY RESULTS IN MR/QTR +/- 2 SIGMA STATION. SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECO LOCATION TYPE DATE 07 TLD 901009/910103 16.60+/-1.10 08-TLD 900111/900404 13.60+/.30 08 TLD 900404/900718 11.40+/.60 08-TLD 900718/901009 12.10+/.90 '03 TLD 901009/910103 12.90+/.60 09 TLD. 900111/900404 14.20+/.30 09 TLD 900404/900718 11.50+/.10 09 TLD 900718/901009 12.40+/.80 09 TLD 901009/910103 12.90+/.60 10 TLD 900111/900404 18.50+/.70 10 TLD 900404/900718 13.80+/.70 10 TLD 900718/901009 16.20+/.90 10 TLD 901009/910103 17.50+/ 90 11 TLD 900111/900404 16.80+/-1.40 11 TLD -900404/900718 13.60+/.70 3 11 TLD 900718/901009 13.10+/-1.00 11 TLD_ 901009/910103 14.30+/.20 12 TLD 900111/900404 14.60+/.20 12 TLD 900404/900718- -12.70+/.40-12 TLD 900718/901009 12.50+/,80 12 TLD 901009/910103-18.40+/.90-13 TLD-900111/900404 13.30+/.20 13 TLD 900404/900718 12.80+/.40 13 TLD-900718/901009 11.50+/.80 13 .TLD 901009/910103 14.20+/-.40 LO .A -? m

--._._..__.m_ P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 8-FEB-91 l DIRECT REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : QUARTERLY RESULTS IN MR/QTR +/- 2 SIGMA . STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION-DIRECT tLOCATION TYPE DATE i 14 TLD 900111/900404 14.70+/-1,30 14 TLD 900404/900718 12.70+/.60- -14 TLD 900718/901009 12.20+/.80 14. TLD 901009/910103 14.40+/-1.20 15 TLD 900111/900404 16.90+/.60 15 TLD 900718/901009 15.30+/-1.00 15 TLD 901009/910103 15.40+/.90 16 TLD 900111/900404 19.80+/.70 1-6 TLD 900404/900718 17.10+/.90 16 TLD 90071G/901009 16.80+/-1.00 16 TLD 901009/910103 18.70+/-1.00 17 TLD 900111/900404 18.70+/.50 17 TLD 900404/900718 15.40+/.60 ,/ 17 TLD 900718/901009 14.70+/-1.20 17 TLD 901009/910103 16.30+/-1.20 18 TLD. 900111/900404 23.40+/.60~ 18 TLD 900404/900718-22.30+/-1.60-18 TLD 900718/901009 21.10+/.90 18-TLD' 901009/910103 22.80+/.80 19 .TLD-900111/900404 15.;0+/.'20 19 TLD - 900404/900718 14.80+/-1.00 19 TLD 900718/901009 14.40+/.80 19 TLD 901009/910103 - 17.10+/.90 20. .TLD 900111/900404 17.30+/.70 20 .TLD 900404/900718 15.60+/-1.10 20 TLD 900718/901009 14.30+/-1.10 '20 TLD 901009/910103 17.20+/.90 LO -A }

. ~ P24001-CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 8-REB-91 DIRECT REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : QUARTERLY q RESULTS IN MR/QTR +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPE DATE 21 TLD 900111/900404 18.90+/.50 21 .TLD 900404/900718 16.60+/ 30 21 TLD 900718/901009 17.80+/-1.40 22 TLD 900111/900404 17.50+/.60 22 TLD 900404/900718 15.10+/.60 22~ TLD 900718/901009 15.80+/-1.00 22 TLD. 901009/910103 17.60+/.60 23 TLD 900111/900404 18.10+/-1.20 -23 TLD 900404/900718 16.40+/.70 23 TLD 900718/901009 16.80+/-1.50 23 TLD 901009/910103 19.10+/.-70 24 TLD 900111/900404 15.40+/-.80 024 + TLD 900404/900718 13.90+/-1.10 24. TLD 900718/901009 13.40+/-1.10 24. TLD 901009/910103 16.80+/.70 35 TLD 900111/900404 12.90+/.20 35' TLD-900404/900718 12.50+/.20 -35 TLD 900718/901009 11.70+/.90 35-TLD 901009/910103 15.10+/.70-36 TLD 900111/900404 16.60+/.50 136 TLD 900404/900718 17.10+/-1.30 36 TLD-900718/901009 15.10+/-1.20 136 TLD 901009/910103-17.20+/.40 41- -TLD 900111/900404-16.30+/.20 41 -TLD. 900404/900718 12.50+/.60 41- -TLD -900718/901009 13.20+/.80 41 LTLD 901009/910103 16.40+/-1.50 -A-6--

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - FNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 8-FEB-91 DIRECT REPORT l SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : QUARTERLY RESULTS IN MR/QTR +/- 2 SIGMA [) STATION SAMPI'; COLLECTION DIRECT LOCATION TYPi DATE 42 TLD 900111/900404 15.20+/.20 42 TLD 900718/901009 13.40+/ 80 42 TLD 901009/910103 13.60+/.70 43 TLD 900111/900404 14.70+/-1.00 43 TLD 900404/900718 11.70+/.60 43 TLD 900718/901009 12.60+/-1.10 43 TLD 901009/910103 13.304/.40 45 TLD 900111/900404 14.40+/.70 45 TLD 900404/900718 12.00+/~ 70 45 TLD 900718/901009 12,10+/.80 45 TLD 901009/910103 13.20+/.80 53 TLD 900111/900404 14.60+/.90 TLD 900404/900718 13.10+/.30 053 53 TLD 900718/901009 12.10+/-1.20 53 TLD 901009/910103 13.90+/.40 54 TLD 900111/900404 13.80+/.40 54 TLD 900404/900718 13.20+/.40 54 TLD 900718/901009 12.50+/-1.40 54 TLD 901009/910103 15.10+/.20 55 TLD 900111/900404 17.20+/.30 55 TLD 900718/901009 13.40+/~.80 55 TLD 901009/910103 14.80+/-1.00 56-TLD 900111/900404 15.60+/.30 56 TLD 900404/900718 12.30+/.20 56 TLD 900718/901009 13.90+/-1.10 56 TLD 901009/910103 14.00+/-1.00 9 -A l

---

~~m

- P24001: CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 8-FEB-91 DIRECT REPORT SAMPLE FREQUEN0Y IS : QUARTEZLY RESULTS IN MR/QTR +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION DIRECT ) LOCATION TYPE DATE I i 58 TLD 900111/900404 15.80+/.70 1 58 TLD 900404/900718 12.70+/.40 158 TLD 900718/901009 13.70+/.10 58 TLD 901009/910103 14.70+/.60 h if f 9 J -r . W -A 1 .a 2.-.--

l l t I l AIR RESULTS Gross Beta Iodine i Gamma Spectronetry 1 ' O { l \\ i t . A-9

l l M f\\ { t% M i om o NN OH 44 hu cooco occo o Oo ocoo ocobo occo coco op 00000

c. o. c. o.

o.

o. p 0000

c. o. c. c. o. o. c. c. o

c. o. c. o.

c. o.

mewww womw w me vece wwemw wmvv mwww em t i l l i l l i t i i l I l l t l i l l i l i l l l i f f 1 8 \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\ N\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\ + + +++ + +++ +o++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++ ococo como o o. o o como conco ocoo oeoo no

o. c. o. c. o.

o. c. o. o.

c. c c. o.

o c o. o.

c. o. c. c. o. o. c. o. o.

c. o. c. o.

a. o.

Mewsw NNeo shoo owww mmmeo mewm wmMo me NmNMM MNMe N NN MMM N NNMoM MMMM MMMN MM w ococo ocoo OHoo 0000 cooco oneo como on O J ococo coco oooo cooo cooco ocoo occo oo o c. o. c. o. o. c. o. o.

o. c. o. o.

c. o. c. o

c. o. o. c. o. a c. c o.

c o. c. o.

o. c e

e e e e whome emwm whwe memb meeww wwmv wwww we b 4 g g g g g g g g g g g g g g i i g g g g g l g g g g g l g g g h NNNNN NNNN NNNN NNNN NNNNN NNNN NNNN NN H ++ +++ + +++ + +++ ++++ +++++ + + ++ + + ++ ++ b 00000 0000 0000 0000 cocco occo coco oc t

e. c. o. o. p

o. c. c. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. c. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. c. c o.

c. o. m. o. o. c.

M m weveM mwNM oNew ewem emNoe Meow omme om E E mwNMN MNNN mMNN OMMm NNMMM MMMM MMMM NM O O O e cocco ocoo ocoo ocoo oocco como cooo o0 U M M o Hm H O d 4 W WN U ME W O ococo coco ocoo 000 00000 0000 0000 00 HW W 6 A 4H kN

o. o. o. o. n. o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o.

c. o. o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o o.

o. c. o. o.

a. o.

Un H + E we,ww

wwe, mwmw mwm vmwem mmww meww em MH M

a* O l i f el 8 9 1 1 t i l l l l t l i l l i t i l l 1 8 4 1 I t Em O M NNNNN NNNN NNNN NNN NNNNN NNNN NNNN NN h e t. H +++++ ++++ ++++ + ++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++ 6 MM 4 cooco oooo ocoo coco ooooo ocoo coco oc o N D H

o. c. o. c. o. c. o. c. o

o. c. o. o.

o. o. w. o. c. o. o. c. o. o. c. o. o. c. o. c. o.

o. c.

M Hu m w E MON eMMMw eMee NeMW Wwww owoop OMNw NMwh mo g UU MEM NNNMM MNMM NMMM MMN NMMoo MMMM MMMM MN q M4 4WU e cocon nooo como Hooo ooooo coco ocoo Do I GM Db o 4 kk 40 U HWm Wb WNo ME ob I WH l W G OW cooco occo coco como ococo ocoo occo oo O 42

c. o. c. c. o. o. c. c. o.

c. o. c. o.

o o. c. o. c o. c. c. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. c ti mM j

+ mbwmw wemw meww wwwe wwwew emme ewwe wm M $ 5 0 0 0 l l l l t i l l t i l l l i l l i I l l l 9 0 0 0 l l d MH \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ NN\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\ m 4 +++++ ++++ + +++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++ 4 D cocco como como ocoo oocoo ocoo ocoo no J m

c. o. c. c. o.

o. c. o. o. c. o. t. o.

o. c. o. o

c. o. c. c. o. c o c o.

o. c. c. o.

o. o.

J We WhwhM wmMM Nwee ewwM Nwwoe emme Nhww me NwNMN MNNN NMMN eMMm NNMMO OMMM MMMN HM M cooco coon ocoo occo cocco coco coop oc o cooco coco coco occo coo o como coco oc

o. o. o. o. o. o. c. o. o. o o. o. o.

o.0 0 0 000 o.

o. c. o. o.

c. o. m. o. n. o.

mewmw wemw meww wwmw www w wmvv mwww wm t i l l i t i l l I l l ) t i l l 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 t i l l i l \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ + ++++ + +++ ++ occoo oooo coco ocoo cocoo coOO ocoo ao

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

o o. o. o. D. o. o. o. o. D. o. o. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. o.

eeNSM meNM MNM. Mmoh Neone Mwom weMw eM NmMMN MMNN NMNM eMNN NNM o MMM M MMMM NN M oooco oooo oooo oooo oooko ocou oooo ao o J mohwM MwMe hwMe wMem Newmo WMob mHem Me oHMNm oMNN eMNN OM MN ooMNm oMNN oMMN 0c MMMMM NNNN MMMm

• www memem wwwe Whhh me E

ouoco ocoo ocoo ocoo oocco cooo ooon op O oooco ouoo ocoo ooco ococo oooo oooo ao MO meece emme empe emee eeeme emme epee me O HO UM 00000 0000 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00 i WM HHHHH HHHH HHHH HHHH HHHHH HHHH HHHH HH \\ 4W am

hmoh, MhwM ehwM ewHe cNewn owmo emHe mW O

NOMMN moMN NoMN NOMM NooMN moMN NOMM No Q NMMMM MNNN Nmme avvw wemme meww whMM he Moooo occo como occo cocco ocoo ocoo oc t moooo ocoo oooo cooo ococo ocoo oooo oc emmee emme P ome emme ememe meme e F. e e me E o N N N R O O e 4 W 4 h 4 D D D b E 4 E 4

1 M W/ N 8 om o MM-NH h @(I 4 000 0000 occoo occo coco o

c. o. o.

o. c. o. o

c. o. c. c. o. o. c. o. o. o. c. o. o. o.

e m e,.

• ww enwee cwee ecce e i I e aI I I ea t I t t t t t t t t 1 i

\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\ +++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ + oco ocoo cooco ocoo ocoo o

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. c. o. o. o. o. o. o.,o.

o. SNw Neew womNo NMNN wwe w MNm MNam muoNn mNmm NNwN N w coo oooo ooooo oooo oooo e o coo ocoo cocco ocoo ocoo o o.00

o. o. o. o. c. o. c. c. o. o. c. o. o.

o. c. o. o. o.

• ww wwwe wewcw ecce ecce e b

I l t I 6 i t t I t I e e i t 1 4 # # 1 t h il NNN \\\\\\N \\NN\\\\ NNNN \\\\\\\\ \\ +++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ + h coo como cocco ocoo ocoo o

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. c. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. c. o. o. o.

\\ 4 m awm

ace, wewow emwo woew w

i 8 E E MNM WNMw wWHNN NNNm NmwN N 0 o O e coo cooo cocco cooo ocoo o O M M o km i O d 4 l LA MN U HE u o ooo oooo conco oooo ooo e U te M 8 A (b 3N

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o o.

up h + 2 www wcww wmwew ewee wee e l Mk N ** O I # 1 I i t I t t eie I s a i t I t e g En o w NNN NNNN NNNNN NNNN NNN N N I W' h m E. H +++ ++++ +++++ ++ ++ +++ + 8 i e t1 M 4 000 oooo cocco cooo ocoo o 4 i CJ D H

c. o. m. o. c. o. o. o. c. o. c. o. o. c. o. o. o. o. o o.

o. 6 m, HU m b muN abw owhN womme eNeo wmew m uU wnH mum mNum mNmMM NNNm NNm N w4 (uu e oco ocoo cocco ocoo cook o M tt Dh o Hb 40 J V Hum Wh WMo AE Mb I WW l M u GM coo ocoo om oc cooo coco o n an

o. o. o.

o. o o. o.

a. o.

a. o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

o. 74 kw 4 E wwe ewwe ww me emme ecce 4 4 4m I i l e t I t 1 I i t aeI e i eit i 4 mN N\\\\ \\\\\\\\- \\\\ \\\\ \\\\NN \\\\\\\\ \\ d +++ ++++ ++ ++ +++ + ++++ + d D 000 coco cocco ocoo occo e 4 m

o. o. o.

c. o. c. o. o. c. o. c. o. o. c. o. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. s u N woo

• www WNN.:w oNeo odew m

WNN NNMM AN NM MNNM NNWN N m ooo ocoo ochoo oooo oooo o o A coo occo cocco ocoo ocoo o

o. o. o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o. o.

eww ecew wwwmw meme emme e i I I I I t 6 4 e i t t I t t i 1 4 I i i \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\ +++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ + 000 oooo ooooo eooo onoo o

o. o. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

Now awwe webem ewem emew w NNM MNWM MMoMM NNNN MNdN N H ooo oooo ooooo ocoo cooo o o eNo eNew MobwM MwMe eNew N MNN oMNN cddNm OHNN eMWN O mee aema voooo MMMM NNNN M m coo omoo wwwww wwMM Mwww o O coo 0000 0000o ocon ocoo

• MO mee same ammme meme meme e NO UM 000 0000 00000 0000 0000 O

WM bbH HHHH bHHHP HHNH HHHH N au Ah men meNe emoMw WMwd ecNo e o onN NoMM NeMMN monN NoMM N U ese meme mooco owww wNNN N coo oooo onMMM MMMM MwMM M i coo ocoo cooco coFo ocoo o mem meme memme meme emem m b U E u u O W 4 m o E Q M ~

. -.. -., -..... - ~ - ~.. _. -. ~ - - - -. - - - - ~ - e \\ N l . =e e Oe -o y ., es et i Nk-4 48 aM i l g . l 6 LS i he. 1 t' 4 m .1 g' s 1 0 .O O U M w Mm H d 4 . 20 W ce U-MK W H ti - Nl .O 4 i at H 3N 'u m (* + m -g m.. O MW. o-w

a. m E.

H ww 4 m D NU m NU\\ OU MrM 4 - M4 4 6e u N ft (1. Oh

• "I

$4 Se 40 4

U Num (l

en 6 wao - e .4 E e a. I WW e W M' .OM ooooo oooo oooo ocoo. ooo o oooo oooo ao h .J K

a. w

o. o. o. c. o. o. o. o. o.

o. o. c. o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

o.

o. o. o. o.

o. c. o. o.. o. c.

E wwwwm ewww w en en w w en w en w en w m mwww wmww in an 4m I I t i I e : 0 t I eei e e4 e e ae I I t e 1 I eI t i 'M c' N NNN\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ N \\N\\N \\\\\\\\ 'N\\ .3 +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ + ++++ ++++ ++ 4.J 9-D. ococo oceo como occo ococo ocoo occo oo m

o. o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o. - o. o.

U u-as weeaw m N es o emaw eoew w en w e e Noon o en e. o we N m w.4 * .eNwN we es W W o oc we e. N e4 W e me w w me w we a M et ce m ooooo oooo oooo oooo cooke oeoo oooo ao m .J ooooo ooon oooo oooo ocoeo oooo oooo oc

c. o. c. o. o. o. e. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. c. o. o. o. c. o. n. o. o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o. o. n.

wwwww w an an w en w en w wwww wwwew weww aw,w-en en 1 4 9 0 0 t i 3 $ I l iI I i$ 1 4 4 8 8 9 0 0 t l-l l 0 l 4 N\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ - \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\N \\\\N\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\ +++++ ++++ + + + + - ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++ ooooo oooo ocoo cono~ cocoo oooo eooo ao

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o.

o. o. o. o.

a. o.

N w an N e mMec =e e e e e m e an =e M e es w w m es a m en un e ww N 9 et N w e4 N w N N me me w o et we N N N e4 ** O .4 ee me e se ce w w w me ococo oooo oooo oooo ooooo oooo oooo no e' m o t.=e ce m.e ce e e.4 es m w ew*e > w.4 e wwee mo emoe meee .e e ow o,e N N o me ce N o.4.e N oo o 4 N et o w w es eo ,e w we e.e NNNN MMmM wwww en en en en 4R wwww hMeb ee E ococo oooo ocoo cooo cocoo oooo D000 oo o ooooo cooo oooo ooon ooooo oooo coco on wo ememe meme emme emme -epeep meem esem em HC Uw 00000 0000 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00 WW HHHkk HbHH HHHH kkkh NbHHH HbHH bHHH HH .J et .J h 6moPw me 6 w w e N w *e a w me e en ce a e m owmo 6 m es e an es O et o me =8 N m o ** Pe No*N et o -e.* N O O =4 M M o ** es N o ** we No U N we ce ce at me et N ed cemmm mWww w en en an en an W w w whMM Pe ee o o o o ocoo oooo oooo ococo oooo oooo ao - =4 mooon vooo oooo oooo cooco ocoo oooo oo o. memmee meem meem emeem epeem meee emme me o-R o M N b. m .3 O N 4 W a( 8. 4 D D D

a. ~

es t. K 4 E es M 4 ..,_.m._ _,_,_.__.-,_,_._s.___-.._ m

l l es om o W4 0 t* 44 aO e e. 5. E 6. 1 4 m E m o o O V M M Nm 0 4 4 E WN U HX H O Mu en I 4H > \\ 35 m te + t 8 M N at.. O M 3: M O. m K es M tt 9 to 4 Ww. 4 <tl N D >U M 'a MUN UU HEM M d 4 W U. N. M DD tN 4O u Hum W e. W si o pJ 3l m h. e MN 4 M M 0M oco o00o occoo ocon cooo o O aJ R

o. o. c.

o. o. o. e. 00,000 0000 0000 o.

a s., w j 3* www weww enin w w w w w wan wwww in m I l l i l 1 0 0 1 4 4 1 l i 1 1 0 1 1 4 i M Mb \\\\\\ NN\\\\ \\\\\\\\N \\\\\\\\ NNNN N J +++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ + W D 000 coon occoo oeon ocop o J m o o. m.

o. c. o. o.

o. c. o. o. c.

e. o o. c.

o. c. o. o.

o. U W en oaw w w en m N es o es e teNwe e e se o m N es se e4 N ee es m N me N e4 NNNm me N .4 N N en Doo cooo boooo coco ovou o m ooo ooon cooco coDo oooo e

o. o. o.

o. n. e. n.

o. o. o o. o.

e. s. c. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. vww w en w w w in w en e en w en en enininin en i 1 0 I 1 l I 4 I I $ 1 4 6 4 5 4 4 I 1 I \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\N N +++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ + ooo uooo oooco oooo oooo o o o. o.

o. o. o. o

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o en. o. o. o. o.

o. e e es e in woeee e N to e e en b N o o en e4 =e ee N ee Nn m N o on ee NNNN we N ee N N N ooo oooo cocoo oooo oooo o o en N e en N e o m o e w es e e se e in N O w N es N N o ed s=4 N o e4 a=e N m o we N N o e4 w N o eee eeee ooooo w w me me NNNN ee E ooo oooo e4 es w ee se w 4 m os e44m* o O c o c-ocoo cocco occo coco ee HO eSe eeee eeeee eeee eeee e UO UM 000 0O00 0000O 0000 0000 O MW HHb bHNN H ta H H ta H H H te H t* H H H AM el # e un N e en N O wmo6w se P' w es e en N e w 0 oeN N o e4 ee N o se e4 ee m o es N N u es ee ce U e e ca eeee eoooo o me se se ma N ee N es ooo oooo o se e4 ee ** e4 ** e4 as e4 es we me see se ooo oooo ooooo eooo oooo o o eee eeee eeeee eeee eeee e o w 0. $4 b U E N M U O M 4 8. m O E O

• 1

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-FEB-91 2-131 REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA ( STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 l LOCATION TYPE DATE 01 AIR 891227/900103 LT.02 01 AIR 900103/900110 LT.02 01 AIR 900110/900117 LT.03 1 01 AIR 900117/900124 LT.03 01 AIR 900124/900131 LT.02 01 AIR 900131/900207 LT.03 01 AIR 900207/900214 LT.03 01 AIR 900214/900221 LT.03 01 AIR 900221/900228 LT.02 01 AIR 900228/900307 LT.04 01 AIR 900307/900314 LT.03 01 AIR 900314/900321 LT.03 i 01 AIR 900321/900328 LT.05 01 AIR 900328/900404 LT.03 01 AIR 900404/900411 LT.03 01 AIR 900411/900418 LT.03 01 AIR 900418/900425 LT.04 01 AIR 900425/900502 LT.02 01 AIR 900502/900509 LT.02 N 01 AIR 900509/900516 LT.02 ,01 AIR 900516/900523 LT.02 01 AIR '900523/900530 LT.04 01 AIR 900530/900606 LT.05 01 AIR 900606/900613 LT.02 01 AIR 900613/900620 LT.02 01 AIR 900620/900627 LT.02 01 ' AIR 900627/900703 LT.03 01 AIR 900703/900711 LT.02 01 AIR 900711/900718 LT.02 i 01 AIR 900718/900725 LT.02 HD1 AIR 900725/900801 LT.03 01 AIR 900801/900808 LT.02 01 AIR 900808/900815 LT.02 01 AIR 900815/900822 LT.02 01 AIR 900822/900829 LT.03 01 AIR 900829/900905 LT.03 01 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02 01 AIR 900912/900919 LT.02 01 AIR 900919/900926 LT.02 O -A..

-.. ~ - - - P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 ~ REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-FEB-91 l I-131 REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 01 AIR 900926/901003 LT.02 01 AIR 901003/901010 LT.02 01 AIR 901010/901017 LT.02 01 AIR 901017/901024 LT.02 01 AIR 901024/901031 LT.02 01 AIR 901031/901107 LT.02 01 AIR 901107/901114 LT.02 01 AIR 901114/901121 LT.03 1 01 AIR 901121/901128 LT.03 01 ~ AIR 901128/901205 LT.02 01 AIR 901205/901212 LT.03 01 AIR 901212/901219 LT.02 01 AIR 901219/901226 LT.02 01 AIR 901226/910102 LT.02 03 AIR 891227/900103 LT.02 03 AIR 900103/900110 LT.02 O03 AIR 900110/900117 LT.03 03 AIR 900117/900124 LT.0? 03 AIR 900124/900131 LT.C) 03 AIR 900131/900207 LT.05 1 03 AIR 900207/900214 LT-.03 03 AIR 900214/900221 LT.03 03 AIR 900221/900228 LT.02 '03 ' AIR 900228/900307 LT.04 03 AIR 900307/900314 LT.03 03 AIR 900314/900321 LT.03 03 -AIR 900321/900328 LT.05 03 AIR 900328/900404 LT.03 03 AIR 900404/900411 LT.03 03 AIR 900411/900418 LT.03 03 AIR 900418/900425-LT.04 03 AIR 900425/900502 LT.03 03 AIR 900502/900509 LT.02 03 AIR 900509/900516 LT.02 03 AIR 900516/900523 LT.02 03 AIR 900523/900530 LT.04 03. AIR 900530/900606 LT.05 -A -

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PHPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-TEB-91 I-131 REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY (~ RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA v STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 03 AIR 900606/900613 LT.02 03 AIR 900613/900620 LT.02 03 AIR 900620/900627 LT.02 03 AIR 900627/900703 LT.03 03 AIR 900703/900711 LT.02 03 AIR 900711/900718 LT.03 03 AIR 900718/900725 LT.02 03 AIR 900725/900801 LT.03 03 AIR 900801/900808 LT.02 03 AIR 900808/900815 LT.02 03 AIR 900815/900822 LT.02 03 AIR 900822/900829 LT.03 03 AIR 900829/900905 LT.03 03 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02-03 AIR 900912/900919 LT.02 03 AIR 900919/900926 LT.02 03 AIR 900926/901003 LT.03 ,s)03 AIR 901003/901010 LT.02 l 03 AIR 901010/901017 LT.02 N/ 03 AIR 901017/901024 LT.02 03 AIR 901024/901031 LT.02 03 AIR 901031/901107 LT.02 03 AIR 901107/901114 LT.02 03 AIR 901114/901121 LT.03 03 AIR 901121/901128 LT.03-03 AIR 901128/901205 LT.02 03 AIR 901205/901212 LT.03 03 AIR 901212/901219 LT.02 03 AIR 901219/901226 LT.02 03 AIR 901226/910102 LT.03 04 AIR 891227/900103 LT.02 04 AIR 900103/900110 LT.02 04 AIR 900110/900117 LT.03 04 AIR 900117/900124 LT.03 04 AIR 900124/900131 LT.02 04' AIR 900131/900207 LT.03 04 AIR 900207/900214 LT.03 -A P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-FEB-91 \\ I-131 REPORT l SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY ~' RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 04 AIR 900214/900221 LT.03 04 AIR 900221/900228 LT.02 04 AIR 900128/900307 LT.03 04 AIR 900307/900314 LT.02 04 AIR 900314/900321 LT.03 04 AIR 900321/900328 LT.05 04 AIR 900328/900404 LT.03 04 AIR 900404/900411 LT.02 04 AIR 900411/900418 LT.02 04 AIR 900418/900425 LT.04 04 AIR 900425/900502 LT.02 04 AIR 900502/900509 LT.02 04 AIR 900509/700516 LT.02 04 AIR 900516/900523 LT.02 04 AIR 900523/900530 LT.04 04 AIR 900530/900606 LT.04 04 AIR 900606/900613 LT.02 ,~04 AIR 900613/900620 LT.02 \\~) 04 ( AIR 900620/900627 LT.02 04 AIR 900627/900703 LT.03 04 AIR 900703/900711 LT.02 04 AIR 900711/900718 LT.02 04 AIR 900718/900725 LT.02 04 AIR 900725/900801 LT.02 04 AIR 900801/900808 LT.02 04 AIR 900808/900815 LT.02 04 AIR 900815/900822 LT.02 04 AIR 900822/900829 LT.02 04 AIR 900829/900905 LT.02 04 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02 04 AIR 900912/900919 LT.02 04 AIR 900919/900926 LT.02 04 AIR 4fC920/901003 LT.02 04 AIR 901003/901010 LT.02 04 AIR 901010/901017 LT.02 04 AIR 901017/901024 LT.02 04 AIR 901024/901031 LT.02 04 AIR 901031/901107 LT.02 04 AIR 901107/901114 LT.02 O -A _

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGEs 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-FEB-91 I-131 REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY /~') RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA (_/ STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 04 AIR 901114/901121 LT.03 04 -AIR _ 901121/901128 LT.02 04 AIR 901128/901205 LT. 02-04 AIR 901205/901212 LT.02-04 AIR 901212/901219 LT.02 04 AIR 901219/901226 LT.02 04 AIR cY ~26/910102 LT.03 05 AIR 1227/900103 LT.03 05 AIR 103/900110 LT.02 05 AIR 900110/900117 LT.03 05 AIR 900117/900124 LT.03 05 AIR 900124/900131 LT.02 .05 AIR-900131/900207 LT.03 05 AIR 900207/900214 LT.03 05 AIR 900214/900221 LT.03 05 AIR C. 900221/900228 LT.03 g']05 1 AIR 900228/900307 LT.04 05 AIR 900307/900314 LT.03 05 AIR 900314/900321 LT.03 05 AIR 900321/900328 LT.04 05 AIR 900328/900404 LT.03 05 AIR-900404/900411 LT.03 t 05 AIR 900411/900418 LT.03 05 AIR 900418/900425 LT. 0 5 05 AIR-900425/900502 LT.03 l-05 AIR 900502/900509 LT.03 05 AIR 900509/900516. LT.03 05-AIR 900516/900523 LT.03 05 ' AIR 900523/900530 LT.05 05 AIR-900530/900606 LT.05 05 ' AIR 900606/900613 LT.03 05 AIR 900613/900620 LT.02 e l-05 AIR 900620/900627 LT.02 1 05 AIR 900627/900703 LT.02 05 AIR-900703/900711 LT.02 05 AIR 900711/900718 LT.02 1 05 AIR 900718/900725 LT.02 O -A.

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-FEB-91 1-131 RUPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS WEEKLY '~' / RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA 's STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 05 AIR 900725/900801 LT.03 05 AIR 900801/900808 LT.02 05 AIR 900808/900815 LT.02 05 AIR 900815/900822 LT.02 05 AIR 900822/900829 LT.03 05 AIR 900829/900905 LT.03 05 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02 05 AIR 900912/900919 LT.02 05 AIR 900919/900926 LT.04 05 AIR 900926/901003 LT.02 05 AIR 901003/901010 LT.02 05 AIR 901010/901017 LT.02 05 AIR 901017/901024 LT.02 05 AIR 901024/901031 LT.02 05 AIR 901031/901107 LT.02 05 AIR 901107/901114 LT.02 05 AIR 901114/901121 LT.03 05 AIR 901121/901128 LT.02 ,3 ) 05 AIR 901128/901205 LT.02 x 05 AIR 901205/901212 LT.02 05 AIR 901212/901219 LT.02 05 AIR 901219/901226 LT.02 05 AIR 901226/910102 LT.02 06 AIR 891227/900103 LT.02 06 AIR 900103/900110 LT.02 06 AIR 900110/900117 LT.03 06 AIR 900117/900124 LT.03 06 AIR 900124/900131 LT.02 06 AIR 900131/900207 LT.03 06 AIR 900207/900214 LT.03 06 AIR 900214/900221 LT.03 06 AIR 900221/900228 LT.02 06 AIR 900228/900307 LT.04 06 AIR 900307/900314 LT.19 06 AIR 900314/900321 LT.03 06 AIR 900321/900328 LT.05 06 AIR 900328/900404 LT.0? ^ / 's G -A P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. PnPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-PEB-91 1-131 REPORT SAMPLE PREQUENCY IS WEEKLY i RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATR 05 AIR 900725/900801 LT'.03 05 AIR 900801/900808 LT.02 ) 05 AIR 900808/900815 LT.02 05 AIR 900815/900822 LT.02 05 AIR 900822/900829 LT.03 1 05-AIR 900829/900905 LT.03-l 05 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02 05 AIR 900912/900919 LT.02-05 AIR 900919/900926 LT.04 05 AIR 900926/901003 LT.02 05 AIR 901003/901010 LT.02 05 AIR 901010/901017 LT.02 05 AIR 901017/901024 LT.02 -05 AIR 901024/901031 LT.02 05 AIR 901031/901107 LT.02 05 AIR 901107/901114 LT.02 05 AIR 901114/901121 LT.03 05 AIR 901121/901128 LT.02 05 AIR 901128/901205 LT.02 \\- DOS AIR 901205/901212 LT.02 05-AIR 901212/901219 LT.02 05 AIR 901219/901226 LT.02 -05 AIR 901226/910102 LT 02 06 . AIK 891227/900103 LT.02 06 AIR-900103/900110 LT.02 06. AIR 900110/900117 LT. 03 06 AIR 900117/900124 LT 03 06 AIR: 900124/900131 LT.02 06 AIR .900131/900207 LT.03 06 AIR 900207/900214 LT.03 06 AIR 900214/900221 LT.03 06 AIR' 900221/900228 LT.02 06 AIR 900228/900307 LT.04 06 AIR 900307/900314 LT.19 06~ -AIR 900314/900321 LT.03 06-AIR 900321/900328 LT.05 06 AIR 900323/900404 LT.03 fO l -A. _,,x_.,-__...__

- ~~ -~'~~~~ ^~ ^! t 1

P240011 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC.-ILLUMINATING 1CO.

~ PAGE: _002 , -{1 REMP; TRACKING. SYSTEM: ~ -.PNPP. O DATE: :7-FEB-91 / 4 I 1:1 I-131tREPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY, RESULTS IN.PCI/CU.M. +/ 2~ SIGMA a l /- RSTATION. SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 (.fLOCATION: TYPE DATE-t 06' AIR '900404/900411. 1Mr. 02 I 06 AIR 900411/900418 T.03 06 ' AIR. 900418/900425: tr.04' D6 . AIR' 900425/900502 J06 - AIR: 900502/900509 - ur.02 i LT.02-e- t 06; . AIR. '900509/900516 LT.02

06-AIR 900516/900523 LT.02

,06 lifR 900523/900530 LT.04 06 . AIR. 900530/900606 LT.04 1 =06 A2 R. 900606/900613 LT.02 06-AIM 900613/900620 LT 02 14 '06- -AIK 900620/900627 LT.02 06c AIR .900627 000703 LT.03 .s 06

AIR 4

=900703/s0071' LT.02 e^ '06: ' AIR' S00711/90071-LT.02 ~03 ' AIR: 900718/9001 LT.02 01 AIR 900725/900t.. ~,T.02 ()06 AIR. '900801/9008*.t T.02 06 AIR; 900808/90081 .T.02 06 , AIRL 900d15/900822 LT.02 06 ' AIR 900822/900829 LT.02 i m 06: AIR' 900829/900905 LT.02 J l06 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02 061 AIR ~900912/900919' LT.02 106. AIR 900919/900926 .LT~.02 106-- AIRT -900926/901003 LT.02 10 6 -- LAIR: 901003/901010 LT.02 e 06 AIa -901010/901017' LT.02 061 AIR; 901017/901024 .LT.02-LO6j LAIRE 901024/901031 LT -.02-06' "AI L 901031/901107 LT.02 206I AIR-901107/901114 -LT.02 s 06: LAIR 901114/901121 LT.03 + 06 AIR' 901121/901128 LT.02 06 . AIR-901128/901205 LT.02 o E 06'

AIR' 901205/901212 LT. 0 2.

06 AIR. 901212/901219 LT.02

06.

' AIR; 901219/901226 LT.02 .06 ' ' AIR. 901226/910102 LT.02 4 -A-20-' n

- - ~ - - -

?24001$

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. ~ PNPP. PAGE: 002 ~ REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: FEB-91 j I-131 REPORT SAMPLE' FREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY

/ %[

RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA' V STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION T 131 i LOCATION TYPE DATE 07-AIR 891227/900103 LT.02 07 -AIR 900103/900110 LT.02 07 AIR ~ 900110/900117 LT.03 07' AIR 900117/900124 LT.03 07 AIR 900124/900131 LT.02 07. AIR 900131/900207 LT.03 07 AIR 900207/900214 LT.03 07 AIR 900214/900221 LT.03 07 AIR 900221/900228 LT.02 07 AIR-900228/900307 LT.04 07 AIR 900307/900314 LT.03 07 AIR 900314/900321 LT.03 .07 AIR 900321/900328 LT.05 07 AIR 900328/900404 LT.03 07-AIR 900404/900411 LT.02 07 AIR 900411/900418 LT.02 07 AIR. 900418/900425 LT.04 07 -AIR. 900425/900502 LT.02 .~ 07 AIR 900502/900509 LT.02 - 07 AIR 900509/900516 LT.02 07; AIR 900516/900523 LT.02 07 ~ AIR-900523/900530 LT.04 07-AIR 900530/900606 LT.04 07 AIR 900606/900613 Lt.r2 07 AIR 900613/900620 LT.02 07 AIR 900620/900627 LT.02 07 ' AIR 900627/900703 LT.03 07: AIR 900703/900711 LT.02 07 AIR 900711/900718 LT 02 07L AIR 900718/900725 LTL.02 07 AIR .900725/900801-LT.02 07: AIR 900801/900808 LT.02 07 -AIR 900808/900815 LT-.02 07' AIR 900815/900822 LT.02 07 AIR 900822/900829 LT.02 ~ '07 ~ AIR 900829/900905 LT.02 07 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02 07 A'lR 900912/900919 LT.02 07l AIR 900919/900926 LT.02 -A -

?P24001L CLEVELAND ELECTRIC-ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP.. PAGE: 002 . j REMP TRACKING SYSTEM .DATE: 7-FEB-91 v I-131 REPORT-i SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS-: WEEKLY-("j RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGMA h /: ' STATION' ' SAMPLE. COLLECTION. I-131

• LOCATION TYPE DATE 07 AIR 900926/901003 LT.02 07-AIR 901003/901010 LT.02 07-

. AIR 901010/901017 LT.02 '07 AIR 901017/901024 LT.02-07-AIR. 901024/901031 LT.02 07 AIR 901031/901107 LT.02

07 AIR ~

901107/901114 LT.02 07 AIR. -901114/901121 LT.03 07. AIR 901121/901128 LT. 02- .07 AIR 901128/901205 LT.02 07 . AIR 901205/901212 LT.02 07 _ AIR 901212/901219 LT.02 e 07 ' AIR. 901219/901226 LT.02 4 071 AIR' 901226/910102 LT.02 .35 AIR. '891227/900103 LT.02 - :35 AIR 900103/900110 LT.02 35 AIR 900110/900117 LT.02

^

35 AIR 900117/900124 LT.02 r35

AIR 900124/900131 LT.02 35' AIR 900131/900207 LT.02 35 AIR 900207/900214 Iar. 0 3 35l

. AIR-900214/900221 LT.02 .35 AIR' 900221/900228 LT.02 13 5 AIR-900228/900307 LT.03 35 AIR ~ $00307/900314 LT.02 35 AIR 900314/900321 LT'.03 '35 AIR 900321/900328 LT.05 35 AIR 900328/900404 LT.02 35 AIR 900404/900411 LT.02 + 35 ' AIR 900411/900418 LT:.02 35 AIa 900418/900425 LT.04 35 . AIR 900425/900502 LT.02 35 AIR. 900502/900509 LT.02 . '3 5 AIR '900509/900516 LT. 02 35 AIR 900516/900523 LT.02 35 AIR 900523/900530 LT. 04 13 5 AIR 900530/900606 LT.04 7 LO -A... .. ~..

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 7-TEB-91 I-131 REPORT SAMPLE PREQUENCY IS : WEEKLY RESULTS IN PCI/CU.M. +/- 2 SIGKA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 35 AIR 900606/900613 LT.02 35 AIR 900613/900620 LT.02 a5 AIR 900620/900627 LT.02 35 AIR 900627/900703 LT.02 35 AIR 900703/900711 LT.02 35 AIR 900711/900718 LT.02 35 AIR 900718/900725 LT.02 35 AIR 900725/900801 LT.02 35 AIR 900801/900808 LT.02 35 . AIR 900808/900815 LT.02 35 AIR 900815/900822 LT.02 35 AIR 900822/900829 LT.02 35 AIR 900829/900905 LT.02 35 AIR 900905/900912 LT.02 35 AIR 900912/900919 LT.02 35 AIR 900919/900926 LT.02 35 AIR 900926/901003 LT.02 35 AIR 901003/901010 LT.02 35 AIR 901010/901017 LT.02 O'/35 AIR 901017/901024 LT.02 35 AIR 901024/901031 LT.02 35 AIR 901031/901107 LT.02 35 AIR 901107/901114 LT.02 35 AIR 901114/901121 LT.03 35 AIR 901121/901128 LT.02 35 AIR 901128/901205 LT.02 35 AIR 901205/901212 LT.02 35 AIR 901212/901219 LT.02 35 AIR 901219/901226 LT.02 35 AIR 901226/910102 LT.02 0 -A _.

m. m.,. ,,,.m , m ..~ h 4[i' t 5,* cwl_- 0000' ocou 0000 0000 occo coco ocoo S' e6_1 o.

c. o c. o.

c. o. c. o. o. c. o. o..

wNww Nwwm 0000 0000

o. o. c, o.

c. o. c. o.

e' wenw wwww 'nwww n N.4 N wNww' m ' t$ M - I >* p p p - e e p 6* 64 e $* p p to e e epep - p $4 eN e e p $4 ap p - 0 JJud WW44 4444 JJud 4444 444d 4444-4d-U 'te 0 - Ii coco ocoo ocoo occo cooo coco poco

c. o. c. o. o. c. o. o..c. o. m. o. c. o. c. o.

o. c. o. o.

o. c. o. r.,

c. o. t. o t-l o

• www wwww wwww NNww Mwww wwwu wwww t

w I $. $4 $e $e $4 $. $4 $s $e $4 $8 $. Se $4 $. $4 $e $e $4 $. $4 $s $4 $- $4 $. $e $4 0 4444 4444 -4 4 4 4 Judd 44d4 9444 44d4 V i Ii

• a I

h ! f-8 8 :. h-ocoo coco ocoo ocoo coco ocoo coco

c. o. c. o. o.000, o. c. c. o.

c. o. c. o.

{ 0.o.00. 0000 0000 .l.4 e n l i m wwww wwww wwww wwwN-awww wwww wwww w i 'O c' s 9999-k e e p-pppe pepp. Hppp. pppe p p te. I U~ pM -m 4AAA daAd adAA adua-Aada Jaaa aad 4M V -, N ' cHN . ME te p - 64 m.

e. N 6 44%

't ' is a > n D+ l M>' 60. E '04 - * = sg - p 'M D coon ocoo 0000. coco occo occo coco i N 0000 000,0 0000 m N m -w w w w wwww

c. o. c o,

o. c. o. o. c. o. c. o. c. o. c. o.

' oMU. w . 00-wwww wwww wwww -wwww wmwe e ':-M41 - wpH -w ' NOU e ep-keep pepp p999 p $. p keep 8999 q I - -4M' -OW U th-m- d 44 4444 4444 ddad

44. 4 4444 44J4 m

b 94 6* U . - MDn .us . moo- =J K ' MM i. 8 HM' NM M O . jj.? ed ' - [.e 1. m. h. m. m. 0-e -e O 9 O e e o W w P* w I 4 I - l l l b'f l -, N ' N. N N N N N N N + + + + + + + + + 0M-e e e o ~ e e O O o e N w P= N. e. M. e eft e o e e e' e ' ee .e - .N N N N .g n ,,g m n ~MM e o e e. Sa O O e o Mb. /w 4 . a. e e e e e o e O O O O

m.. W e

er -w Pm m e m er er e a e e e e e e e N N. O I 1 4 I I l l l i 1 -N N N N N N N N N + + + + + + + + + + + e. o e e o e e - e e. O O 1 e r-m r- , e m m m m-e i e e o e e e e e e e e M N w end - M i and N N A m M-e O .O. e D 9 O O O o O O w I 8 O e e o O O o o O O ,e h e6 w W m m O W m m b e .e e e e e e e e e 8'. 4 'l i 1 1 I I I i i N N. N N N N N N N N N + + + + + + + + + + + O O e e e o e- 0 O O O -l-W P. O. M. - N M W e. O. es e e e e 'O. W . e o e o e o e e o o o o N 'N N N N N N N M N N O u M e ...N 4 Ig og W0 V .O ' ' e e e e e O O e-O e - O ME M NM 4 t* te I -NO 19 M NEN N w en e e r= m' m w P-w w M D* ' O O EM..

a. ** - 1 M

i l i I I i 1 4 1 i 'P*w M N e N N' N N N N N N N N N 1 / at le + at - +- + + + +. o e O e O O + + + + + + 1 lt M k o e o . O.e e M .3 to w N w e. M. en. N M m e w e W M N-e e e e e -e i U - ' De U M N N w N. e4 N N M N. N M g - (3. 3 M se. m -g M at M U e o e e e e o e O O O O g D 4 O' k M a. pMM

• J K M 98 48 if -.

e 6. M C4 4 O M.te 3 =J D - O e e-e e O.O e c O O en M

gM

m.. w h

w en m e en. m. w w e e e e e e W - 4 as i I I I 'l I l 4 8 1-I M N N N -N N N N N N N N M + + + + + + + + + + + .I ' o e e o o-- M. m. O. ' re. O. o o e o e o U w w-

• e en.

w e e N N N ee. ee N N N m M N w e o -o o e-o o o o O O M s 4 oe e iN*e em.. ce e e M e r= - r= e e o e M ee o e N N re n N m N O N m N M re e m w e e o o M N a o e o O o o O O n e o e o o o o O O O Mc e e e e e e e e e *

• O M

O O. O O O O O O O O O M ss (* te & F to N N N 95 t' ol u .3 a. e e P* O m W D M M O Q re M N m o N m O N O m y N-M N er w W P' O O M

• e

.e o e e o O o a w =e ..e e O O O O O O O O O O O Ow-3 e 86 De M m3 0 se ti U n et u of et D D D M U O M . gg,. - *) e. E E M M et M C E D .... ~.. - _., -.. -. e.----.

P24001. CLEVELAOD ELECT 21C / 7 ~MICATED3 CO. - FHFF. FAT 3: 051 [ 01 ILSMF T2ACC S YST!!M - '$173: .V. I,V. .-t . GAMMA SPEC"REFORT OF WTRO'. ' [ SAMPLE FREQORWCT If': MONTELY RESULTS IN FC2/L +/- 2. SIGMA t 5 STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION S A-?. 4 0 co-58 Co-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION-TYPE DATE' FE-59 .LA-140 MN-54 es-95 Es-65 ER-95 28 WATER 891218/900129 LT 16.90 LT 3.50 3.20 LT 3.20-LT 4.20 LT 10.00 LT 3.80 LT 3.20 LT 4.00. LT 5. Ts 0 LT 5.70 34 WATER 891218/900129 LT 22.80 LT 4.90 LT 4.40 LT 3.70 LT 4.40 LT 10.50 LT 5.90 LT 5.40 LT 6.30 LT 12.30 LT 3.20 34 WATER 900129/900227. LT 24.20 LT 5.10 LT 3.80 LT 3.90 LT 3.40 LT 9.90 LT 5.20 LT 3.10 LT 3.80 LT 5.80 LT 7.00 34 WATER 900227/900327-LT 24.50 LT 4.20 LT 3.90 LT 3.10 LT 4.20 LT 3.60 LT 7.40 LT 3.90 LT 5.10 LT 7.50 l iT 7.40 34 WATER 900430/900529 LT 32.60 LT 4.80 LT 3.60' LT 4.10 LT 4.40 [ LT 9.50 LT 5.80 LT 4.20 LT 4.80 LT 8 60 LT 8.90 34 WATER 900529/900626 LT 27.40 LT 3.80 LT 3.40 LT 3.80 LT 3.90 LT 8.8G LT 30.10 LT 3.50 LT 4.40 LT 7.70 LT ?.00 34 WATER 900626,900730 'LT 23.90 LT 4.20 LT 4.40 LT 3.40 LT 4.70 LT 11.10 LT 7.50 LT 3.60 LT 4.70 LT 8.50 .LT 7.50 34 WATER 960730/900829 LT 29.40 LT 4.50 LT 4.00 LT 4.50 LT 4.30 LT 10.70 LT 9.00 LT 4.00 LT 5.70 LT 9.20 LT 8.29 34 WATER 901001/901001. LT 25.00 LT 4.70 LT 4.00 LT 3.80 LT 4.20 i LT 9,70 LT 9.70 LT 4.10 LT 4.60 LT 10.70 LT 7.70 34 WATER 901026/901026 'LT 12 80 LT 1.00 LT.80 LT.70 LT.80 l LT 2.80 LT 3.20 LT.80 LT 1.40 LT 1.70 LT 2.00 54 WATER 901030/901130 LT 27.20 LT 3.50 LT 3.80 LT 4.70 LT 4.00 t LT 9.70 LT 5.70 lLT 4.60 LT 4.60 LT 9.80 I LT 7.80 34 WATER 901130/901222 LT 34.90 LT 5.20 ' LT 5.40 LT 4.80 LT 5.50 i LT 11.70 LT 8.70 LT 5.40 LT 6.30 LT 10.80 LT 10.20 -A : s t

---

__.___-_a,--..-__-__--2__----_-.--.-.3.

P24001 ' ~ _ CLEVELJCD ELECT 22 C f^~ MINATIL*S C3. , PCPP ; PA23: 902[T.. CCftP TOAC. TCTEM ~ EAT 3: 74 21. GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF WTRG SAMPLE FREQUENCT IS. : MORTMLY RESULTS 15.FC1/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION f: AMPLE. COLLECTION BA-140 ~ CO-58 Co-se' CS-134. CS-137 LOCATION TTPE DATE PR-59 LA-140 MW-54 RB-95 ss-65 ER-95 l 36 WATER 491218/900129 LT 20.20 LT 4.40 LT 3.80 LT 3.30 LT 4.20 LT 5.69 LT 4.40 LT 5.30 LT 5.90 LT 4.30 i LT 8.40-36 WATER 900129/900227 LT 22.50 LT 4.20 LT 4.80-LT 4.49 LT 4.29 - ' LT 10.19-LT 9.80 LT 4.99 LT 4.98 LT 19.19 iLT 8.20 36 WATER 908227/900327.LT 25.70 LT 3.50 LT 3.89 LT 3.80 ~ LT 4.20 LT 9.60' LT 5.60 LT 3.90 LT 5.40 LT 8.30 t LT 8.20 36 WATER 900430/900529 LT 20.20 LT 2.80 ' LT 2.40 LT 2.30 LT 3.10 'LT 7.08 LT 5.20 ' LT 2.70 LT 3.50 LT 5.30 - LT 5.00 36 WATER 900529/900626 LT 42.20 LT 5.50-LT 4.20 LT 3.70 LT 4.90 LT 8.90 LT 8.90 LT 4.40 LT 6.70 LT 8.30 LT 4.70 36 WATER 900626/900730 - LT 20.10 LT'3.40 LT 3.50 LT 3.30 LT 3.80 LT 3.10 LT 5.80 LT 3.40 LT 3.80 LT 7.60 LT 6.80 36 WATER 900730/900829' LT 35.80 LT 4.50 LT 4.20 -LT 4.10 LT 3.80 i j LT 10.20 LT 6.50 LT 4.10 LT 5.00 LT 8.10 [ LT 8.20 i 36 WATER 900829/900927 LT 30.40 LT 4.50 LT 4.10 Lt 3.30 LT 4.90 - LT 10.70 LT 5.00 LT 4.10 LT 6.00 LT 9.60 LT 8.00-36 WATER 900927/901026 LT 26.90 LT 4.40 LT 4;50 LT 4.80 LT 4.50 f LT 10.40 LT 3.90 LT 4.00 LT 5.80 LT 9.80 t LT 8.50 36 WATER .901026/901130 LT 29.70 LT 4.30 LT 4.70 LT 4.30 LT 4.20 LT 11.80 LT 9.00 LT 4.70 LT 5.10 LT 9.40 LT 8.10' t 36 WATER 901130/901228 LT 25.50 'LT 3.30 LT 2.60 LT 3.00 LT 3.80 r LT 7.00 LT 4.00 LT 3.10 LT 4.0c LT 7.20 i LT 5.90 59 WATER 900103/900i29 LT 22.60 .LT 3.30 LT 3.70 LT 3.7C LT 4.88 LT 9.40 LT 3.90 LT 3.70 LT 4.80 LT 7.70 LT 7.30 t -A i

P24001- - CLEVELA"D ELECT 2IC 7"MMICATING C@. - P0FF. FA43: 003 [ \\ EEMF TT.ACIV @' YSTim 72 ~./ Ef.?32-21 . GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF-w?RG SAMFLE FREQtrENCY IS MOWTELY 'RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SISMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 co-se C3-134 C3-127 LCCATION T2*E DATE. FE-59 LA-140 -t-54 33-95 ss-65 ' 3R-95 59 WATER 900205/900226 LT 31.30 LT 7.10 LT 5.80 LT 5.90 LT 6.80 l LT 12.90 LT 7.80 LT 6.10 LT 5.90 LT 13.50 t LT 12.10 59 WATER 900302/900328 LT 21.90 LT 3.70 LT 3.90 LT 3.50 LT 3.40 LT 7.60-LT 5.90 LT 3.10 ' LT 4.70 LT 8.00 LT 7.50 59 WATER 900504/905601 LT 32.30 LT 5.00 Lt 4.10 LT 4.10 LT 4.60 LT 11.10 LT 9.30 LT 4.20 LT 5.30 LT 10.10 LT 9.00 59 WATER 900608/900629 LT 39.10 LT 4.40 LT 3.30 LT 4.10 LT 4.80 LT 13.00 LT S.40 LT 4.00 LT 5.80 LT 8.20 LT 9.00 59 WATER 900706/900727 LT 16.00 LT 3.00 LT 2.30 LT 2.50 LT 3.10 LT 6.20 LT 5.80 LT 2.70 LT 3.40 LT 5.90 LT 5.50 l 59 WATER 900803/900831 LT 28.20 LT 3.90 LT 4.00 LT 3.50 LT 4.10 ~ LT 8.50 LT 6.10 LT 3.70 LT 4.70 LT 6.20 { LT 6.70 59 WATER 900907/900928 LT 31.10 LT 4.60 LT 3.90 LT 4.50 LT 4.50 LT 11.60 LT 9.80 LT 4.30 LT 3.80 LT 11.10 [ LT 8.60 3 59 WATER 901005/901026 LT 39.40 LT 4.80 LT 4.00 LT 4.40 LT 5.00 LT 10.30 LT 9.90 LT 5.30 LT 4.60 LT 7.10 LT S.30 59 WATER s$1101/901130 LT 23.40 LT 4.30 LT 4.80 LT 4.10 LT 4.50 L LT 9.80 LT 6.30 LT 4.30 LT 4.60 LT 9.40 LT 7.20 59 MATER 901206/901226 LT 15.70 LT 1.90 LT 1.60 LT 1.90 LT 1.80 LT 4.10 LT 4.90 LT 1.80 LT 2.30 LT 4.50 LT 3.50 60 NATER 900103/900129 LT 21.30 LT 3.10 LT 4.40 LT 3.10 LT 4.70 LT 9.60 LT 4.80 LT 4.30 LT 3.80 LT 7.90 LT 6.40 60 WATER 900205/900226 LT 39.30 LT 8.30 LT 6.10 LT 5.80 LT 7.60 LT 14.60 LT 10.00 LT 7.40 LT 8.10 LT 13.20 LT 13.40 2 3 4 i e -A '

eatuult CLEVELA;D ELECT 2f C f *"jMICATIDS. C3. -[FCFF. ~ FA13:.034/ CCMF T*ACR GYSTC3

CAT 3-: 17 4 J1:

%, /. ~ GAMMA SPEC REPORT'OF WTRS SAMPLE FREQUEBCY 15,: MONTRLT RESULTS IN FCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SLMFLE COLLECT 10W BA-140 CO-50 CO CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION-TYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 MW-54 ms-95 EN-65 2R-95 60 WATER 900302/900328 _LT 28.80 LT 5.90 LT 4.90 LT 5.50 LT 5.50 LT 12.40 LT 9.60 LT 5.40 LT 6.50 LT 10.40 LT 10.00 - 60 WATER 900504/900601 LT 26.50 LT 4.00 LT 2.20 LT 3.30 LT 5.10 LT 10.20 LT 8.50 LT 4.40 LT 5.10 LT 5.40 . LT 10.40 60 WATER 900608/900629 LT 27.90-LT 5.00 LT 2.70 LT 4.20 LT 5.10 LT 10.50 LT 10.60 LT 3.40 LT 5.80 LT 10.40 LT-9.80 40 WATER 900706/900727 LT 28.60 LT 4.90 LT 3.80 LT 4.50 LT 5.00 LT 9.90 LT 5.90 LT 4.80 LT 5.10 LT 9.70 LT 9.40 60 WATER 900803/900831 LT 25.40 LT 4.20 LT 3.50 LT 4.00 LT 3.70 LT 8.10 LT 8.40 LT 3.70 LT 4.h6 LT 8.90 LT 8.10 60 WATER 900907/900928 LT 30.30 LT 5.50 LT 4.20 LT 5.00 LT 4.70 LT 10.00 LT 9.50 LT 3.70 LT 5.10 LT 10.70 LT 8.00 60 WATER 901005/901026 LT 23.60 LT 4.50 LT 4.50 LT 4.90 LT 4.40 L 4 LT 9.20 LT 9.10 LT 4.00 LT 5.00 .LT 10.10 i LT 7.80 60 WATER 901101/901130 LT 26.50 LT 4 70 LT 4.00 LT 4.60 LT 4.50 i LT 10.40 LT 8.00 LT 4.00 LT 5.00 LT 8.90 LT 8.00 60 WATER 901206/901226 LT 25.10 LT 3.50 LT 3.20 LT 2.80 LT 3.20 LT 10.40 LT 7.10 LT 2.90 LT 4.80 LT 7.50 LT 5.90 69 WATER P91218/900129 .LT 25.20 LT 6.50 LT 7.70 LT 4.30 LT 5.50 LT 11.50 LT 6.70 LT 5.20 LY 6.90 LT 12.20 LT 10.90 68 WATER 900129/930227 LT 15.40 LT 3.00 LT 3.40 LT 2.60 LT 3.60 LT 7.90' LT 3.00 LT 3.50 LT 4.30 LT 6.10 LT-6.00 3 68 WATER 900227/900327 LT 22.10 LT 3.80 LT 4.20 LT 3.80 LT 4.10 LT 3.50 LT 8.70 LT 4.20 LT 4.10 LT 3.10 LT 6.40 1 i -A ! + ' ~ - ... m -.n... e

P24001 g- 'CLEVELA23 EL3CTOIC " iMICATIC3 CO. - PCPP. PAG 25 CSS f ISTETE3 EATE: { CCMP TEAC1~ d ' 7 91 GAMMA SPEC' REPORT OF WTRG ' SAMPLE FREQUENCY'IS : MONTMLT RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION '5A-140 Co-58 Co-60 CS-134' CS-137' LOCATION TYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 Ms-54 ms-95 E5-65 ER-9 5. 68 WATER 910430/900529 LT 20.40 LT 3.00 LT 2.50 LT'2.40 LT 3.00 LT 6.00 LT 5.30 ' LT 3.6e LT 4.19 LT 5.3e LT 6.80 64 WATER 906529/900626 LT 19.70 LT 2.50 LT 2.00 LT 1.90 LT 2.30 LT 4.99 LT 5.70 LT 2.80 LT 2.89 LT 4.49 ' LT 4.49 (8 WATER 900626/900730 LT 16.00 LT 2.60 LT 2.60 LT 2.49 LT 2.90 LT 5.70 LT 3.00 LT 2.40 LT 3.30 LT 5.30 LT 5.00 68 WATER 900730/900829 LT 31.00 LT 4.00 LT 3.00 LT 4.60 LT 3.80 LT 8.50 LT 9.70 LT 3.90 LT 5.10 - LT 10.00 LT'7.99' i 68 WATER 901001/901091 LT 22.50. LT 4.20 LT 4.50 LT 3.70 LT 4.00 LT 9.50 LT 3.40 LT 3.50 LT 4.50 LT 3.90 LT 7.80 68 WATER 901026/901026 LT 36.10 LT 3.30 LT 2.30 LT 2.40 LT 2.80 LT 7.00 LT 8.80 LT 2.70 LT 4.f* LT 5.40 LT 5.70 i 5 ? h -A

• 4 f

r- ' ~ ~ - ,_.__._.._,-__.__-____u.__ .=s.~~ ~~

P24001": CLEVELAND ELECTRIC-ILLUMINATIHG CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE' 7-MAR-91 TRITIUM REPORT SAMPLE rREQUENCY IS : MONTHLY ~ j'l ~} RESULTS IN PCI/.L +/- 2 SIGMA x STATION SAMPLE . COLLECTION H3 . LOCATION TYPE DATE 28 WATER 891218/900129 264.00+/-103.00 I 34 WATER 891218/900327 215.00+/-99.00 34 WATER 900529/900626 176.00+/-99.00 34 WATER 900626/900927 LT 175.00 34 MATER 900927/901228 133.00+/-95.00 36-WATER 891218/900327 215.00+/-99.00 36 ' WATER-900529/900626 190.00+/-100.00 36 WATER-900626/900927 192.00+/~94.00 R '36-WATER 900927/901228 126.00+/-94.00 59' WATER 900103/900328 LT 182.00 3 59. MATER 900608/900629 100.00+/-96.00 59 WATER. 900626/900927 275.00+/-97.00 (_)~59 WATER 900927/901228 119.00+/-94.00 60. -WATER 900103/900328 LT 182.00 60 WATER 900608/900629 129.00+/-97.00 60 WATER 900626/900927 167.00+/-93.00 60 WATER 900927/901228-128.00+/-94.00-iS 8 WATER 891218/900327 268.00+/-72,00 68. WATER-900529/900626 212.00+/-71.00 68 WATER 900626/900927 160.00+/-93.00 L l M -A l L

~ P24001 .CLEVE!M D ELECTRIC {MICATIGO CO. - PEPP.: 'PATE: 031 g %)3YST M REMP T2ACL EAT 3:. 7-LV1 2 ' GAMMA-SPEC REPORT OF STRO SAMPLE PREQUENCY_IS : QUARTERLY RESULTS IN PCI/L +/. 2 SIGMA 3 STATION SAMPLE COLLECTIOW. '3R-09 SR-90 LOCATION TYPE DATE 34 NATER 900227/900327 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 34 WATER 900529/900626 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 34 NATER 900626/900730 LT 5.G .80+/.40 34 WATER 901130/901228 LT 5.9 LT 1.0 36 WATER 900227/90032'7 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 36 WATER 900529/900626 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 36 NATER 900626/9c0730 LT 5.0 .70+/.40 36 WATER 900829/900927 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 36 WATER 901130/90122% LT 5.0 LT 1.0 59 WATER 900102/900328 LT 5.0 LT-1.0 59 WATER 900608/900629 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 59 WATER 900106/900727 LT 5.0 .70+/~.40 59 WATER 900907/900928 LT 5* LT 1.0 59 WATER 901206/901226 LT 5.6 LT 1.0 60 WATER 900302/900328 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 60 WATER 900608/900629 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 60 WATER 900706/900727 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 60 WATER 900907/900928 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 60 WATER 901206/901226 .LT 5.0 LT.1.0 68 WATER 900227/900321 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 68 WATER 900529/900626 LT 5.0 LT 1.0 68 WATER 900626/900730 'LT 5.0 LT 1.0 -A _.. ..-a

O MILK REStiLTS Gamma Spectrometry Iodine Strontiun O O .,g.34

P24001. /""g. CL37.ILA."".3 EL3CTDIC /7MI2ATIO3 C3.' -. P2PP. PAGE: 032 1 12MP. Tr.AC' /ST3 TEM : . EAT 32.26-Aq )1' GAMSA SPEC REPot? OF MLES SAMPL2 FREQUEWCT IS' s SI-MONTELT RESULTS IN PC1/L +/- 2 210MA ' STATION SAMPLE COLFECTION .BA-140 CS-134 CS-137 K-40 LA-140 LOCATION TYPE iTK 47 MILE 999907/900910 LT 29 LT 6 LT $ 173e+/-170 LT 9 47 MILE 900921/900924 LT 20 LT 5 LT 5 1570+/-120 LT 6 g 47 MILK 901095/901000 LT 19 LT 5 LT 7 1730+/-110 LT 4-47 MILE 901019/901022 LT 27 LT 5 LT 6 159e+/-16e LT 6 51 MILE 998119/905122 LT 24~ LT 4 LT 6 1170+/-80 LT 5 51 MILK 900217/*00220 LT 23 LT 5 LT 5 1156+/-160 LT 6 51 MILK 900316/900319 LT 20 IT 4 LT 5 1200+/-140 LT 5 51 MILK 900406/990409 LT 34 LT 5 LT 1 152e+/-13e LT 5 51 MILK 9 0 0 4 2 0,<90 0 4 2 3 LT 38 LT 7 LT 9 1320+/-120 LT 9~ 51 MILE 900504/900507 LT 42 LT 9 LT to 1320+/-140 LT 9 51 MILE 308518/900521 LT 19 LT 4 LT 5 1030+/-70 LT 5 51 MILE 90?648/900611 LT 36 LT 5 LT 5 122e+/-120 LT S 51 MILK 900622/900625 LT 28 LT 5 LT 5 1150+/-100 LT 9. k 51 MILE -900706/990709 LT 24 LT 5 LT 5 1350+/-11e LT 4 51 MILE 300720/900723 LT 30 LT 5 LT 6 1400+/-170 LT 5 51 MILE 90e810/900813 LT 17 LT 5 LT 7 1510+/-220 LT 10 51 MILK 900824/900027 LT 34 LT 6 LT 6 1300+/-180 LT 9 51 MILE 900907/900910 LT 21 LT 5 LT 5 1230+/-100 LT 3 51 MILK 900921/900924 LT 29 LT 5 LT 5 1340+/-140 LT 7 51 MILK 941005/901008 LT 31 LT 7 LT S 1220+/-160 LT e 51 MILE 981019/901022 LT 32 LT 6 LT 7 1500+/-130 LT 6 51 MILE 9011e3/901106 LT 35 LT 4 LT 5 13404/-40 LT T 51 MILE 9012e7/901210 LT 33 LT 6 LT 7 1490+/-140 LT E 52 MILE 998119/999122 LT 36 LT 6 LT 7 000+/-130 LT 7 52 MILE 900217/999220 LT 20 LT 4 LT 5 68e+/-Se LT 4 57 MILE 999518/905521 LT 20 LT 5 LT 5 144e+/-11e LT 5 57 MILE 900608/900611 LT 34 LT 5 f.T 5 163e+/-120 LT S 57 MILE 999422/900625 LT 34 LT 6 LT 1 154e+/-14e LT to 57 MILE $e8706/904709 LT 31 LT 5 L? 7 1639+/-168 LT S 57 MILK 900729/900723 LT 16 LT 3 LT 4 1600+/-tes LT 4 57 MILE 990018/900813 LT 26 LT 5 LT 4 1580+/-90 LT e 57 MILE 909824/990827 LT 25 LT 5 LT 4 1499+/ 40 LT 5 57 MILE $89947/986910 LT 29 LT 7 LT 7 1500+/-17e LT 4 57 MILE 999921/98e924 LT 23 LT 4 LT 6 1480+/-100 LT 3 i 57 MILE 901045/9e19e8 LT 25 LT 6 LT 7 130e+/-150 LT 5 57 MILE 501919/961822 LT 27 LT 5 LT 5 1460+/-15e LT 6 -A.

~ r ;_ _, , F 2 4 0 01.' i-' 'S 2Q. CLEVELAID ELECTRIC f ] MICAT133 C3. - F2FF. FAGE: '003 [ 1 + COMF TRAci J272?OM-1 Q/ WAT2: : 26 N/J1 i GAMMA SPEC REFORT OF MLKG ' SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : MONTELY RESULTS IN FCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA- -i 4 STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 'CS-134 CS-137 K-40 LA-140 LOCATION TYPE DATE 4 57 ' MILE 901103/901106 LT 43' LT 6 LT 6 1390+/-150 LT 7 61 MILE 900406/900409 LT 28 LT 4 LT 6 1690+/-110 LT 6 + 61 MILK 900420/90042p LT 24- .LT 5 LT 7 1780+/-170 LT 7 61 MILK 900504/9005C7. LT 30 - LT - 7 LT 8 18406/-120 LT S El MILK 900518/900521 LT 24 LT 4 LT a 1850+/-180 LT 6 61 MILE 900608/900611.. LT 40 LT 6 LT 9 1990+/-170 LT 9 El MILE 900622/900625 : LT 40 LT 8 LT 8 1590+/-130 LT 7 ^ 61 MILK 900706/900709 LT 26 LT 4 LT 7 2060+/-180 LT 8 l 61 MILE 900720/900723 LT 27 LT 6 LT 6 1810+/-140 LT S 61 MILE 900810/900813 LT 41 LT 10 LT'9 1730+/-160 LT 8 di MILE 900824/900827 LT 21 LT 4 LT 6 1800+/-130 LT 7 61 MILE 9"<0907/900910 LT 39 LT 8 LT 10 1650+/-150 LT 9 El MILK $80921/900924 ' LT 39 LT 8 LT 9 1790+/-140 LT S 61 MILK 901005/901008 LT 32 LT 7 LT 8 1880+/-190 LT 10 41 MILE 901019/901022 LT 31' LT 6 LT 7 1580+/-160 LT 9 '61 MILE 901103/901106 LT 39 LT 4 LT 6 1780+/-170 LT 8 69 MILK 900119/900122 LT 37 LT 6 LT 7 1280+/-100 LT 6 i 69 ILK .900217/900220 LT 24 LT 6 LT 6 1480+/-120 LT S 69 MILK 900316/900319 LT 24 LT 7 LT 7 1360+/-130 LT 7 69 MILE 900406/900409 LT.26 LT 4 LT 6 1170+/-110 LT 5 69 MILE 900421/900424 LT 25 LT 6 LT 5 1370+/-120 LT 6 69 MILE 900504/900507 LT 19-LT 4 LT 5 1380+/-150 LT 5 69 MILK ' .900518/900521 LT 21 LT 5 LT 5 1300+/-110 LT 5 69 MILK '900608/900611 LT 37 LT 6 LT 6 1420+/-120 LT 11 4 -69 MILK 900622/900625 LT 24-LT 4 LT 5 1300+/-90 LT 5 69 MILK 900706/900709 LT 32 LT 5 LT 7 116 0 +/--13 0 LT 8 69 MILE 980720/900723 LT'19 LT 4 LT 5 1160+/-60 LT 6 69 MILK '900010/900813 LT 23 LT 4 LT 5 1340+/-160 LT 5 69 MILK 900824/900627 LT-32 LT 5 LT 6 1140+/-130 LT 8 69 MILK 988987/900910 LT 39 LT 10 LT 10 1280+/-140 LT s 69 MILE 940921/900924 LT 33 LT 4 LT 7 1270+/-150 LT 10 69 MILE 981005/901908 LT'30 LT 7 - LT 7 1170+/~150 LT 8 69 MILE 901019/901022 LT 25 LT 4 LT 5 1400+/-140 LT 4. 69 MILK 901103/901106.LT 39 LT 5 LT 7 1280+/-150 LT 10 65 MILE 501207/901210 LT 22 LT 6 LT 5 1320+/-90 LT 7 -t t -A :

~ 7 P24001 ]' CLEVELAUD ELFCTMIC /"']MITATIGS CO. - P:PP. PAT 3:,_601/'~Y _ REMP TEACL SYSTEM EAT 32 23-1 -' , GAMMA SPEC 2EPORT OF MLEG SAMPLE FREQUENCT IS SI-MONTELT RESULTS IN PCZ/L +/- 2 SIGMA s STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-14P CS-134 CS-137 E-40 LA-140 LOCATION TYPE DATE 29 MILE 900420/900423 LT 31 LT 6 LT 7. 1740+/-180 LT 7 29 MILM 900504/900507 LT 43 LT.9 LT 10 1630+/-160 LT 7 29 MILE 900518/900521 LT 21 LT 4 LT 4 1390+/-150 LT 5 29-MILE 909609/900611 LT 35 LT 5 LT 7 1690+/-150 LT S- -29 MILE 900622/900625 LT 24 LT 4 LT 6 1400+/-130 LT 6 29 MILE 906706/900709 LT 27 LT 5 LT 6 38104/-110 LT 6 29 MILE 900720/900723 LT 16 LT.3 LT 4 1720+/-80 LT 3 29 MILE 900810/900813 LT 24 LT 4 LT 6 1800+/-140 LT S 29 MILE 900824/900827 LT 25 LT 4 LT 1 1780+/-260 LT 5 29 MILK 900907/900910 LT 27 LT 6 LT 9 1830+/-230 LT 7 29 MILK 900921/900924 LT 23 LT 4 LT 7 1900+/-150 LT 6 29 MILE '901005/901004 LT 21 LT 4 LT 6 1920+/-150 LT 4 29 MILE 901019/901022 LT 30 LT'6 LT 7 1840+/-180 LT 9 29 MILK 901103/901105 LT 30 LT 4 LT 5 1830+/-130 LT 10 31 MILE 900420/900423 LT 30 LT 6 LT 6 1840+/-140 LT 9 31 MILE 900504/900507 LT 23 LT 5 LT 7 1770+/-180 LT 6 31 MILE 900518/900521 LT 24 LT 6 LT 6 1630+,'-170 LT 3 31 MILE 900608/900611 LT 31 LT 5 LT 6 16 2 0 +/ -110 LT 5 31 MILK 900622/900625 LT 30 LT 4 LT & 1660+/~120 LT 5 31 MILK 500706/900709 LT 28 LT 4 LT 6 1520+/-150 LT 7 31 MILE 900720/900723 LT 27 LT 4 LT 7 1800+/-140 LT 8 31 MILE 900810/900813 LT 26 LT 5 LT 6 1680+/-160 LT 6 31 MILE 900824/900827 LT 27 LT 5 LT 6 1730+/-120 LT 6 i 31 MILE 900907/900910 LT 32 LT 7 LT 8 1750+/-190 LT 7 31 MILE 900921/900924 LT 28 LT 6 LT 7 1990+/-140 LT 8 31 MILE 901005/901002 LT 33 LT 7 LT S 1650+/-140 LT 7 31 MILE 901019/901022 LT 32 LT 7 LT 7 1800+/-150 LT 10 47 MILE 900406/909409 LT 21-LT 4 LT 5 1510+/-140 LT 5 47 MILE 900420/900423 LT 23 LT 4 LT 6 1460+/-110 'LT 5 t i 47 MILK 900504/900507 LT 20 LT 5 LT 6 1578+/-120 LT 5 47 MILK 900518/900521 LT 32 LT 8 LT S 1110+/-12e LT 7 47 MILE 949608/900611 LT 44 LT 4 LT 6 1430+/-140 LT 4 47 MILE 900622/900625 LT 26 LT 4 LT 6 161e+/-140 LT 5 47 MILac 94e706/900709 LT 17 LT 5 LT 7 1568+/~160 LT 5 47 MILE 900720/900723 LT 24 LT 4 LT 7 1800+/-15e LT 4 47 MILE 900810/900813 LT 32 LT 6 LT 7 1748+/-180 LT 9 47 MILE 998824/900827 LT 25 LT 6 LT 7 156e+/-14e LT 8 h -A,

A 'P24001 ..(p, CL2VNLA03EL2CTSIC[~']MI2ATICSCD. - P2 P P.' PAG 2 C C 1 [ ') ' 3%P TOAC S12 TIM KAT32 2 d17-j GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF MLKI SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS's.51-MONTELY. -RESULTS.IN PCZ/L +/- 2. SIGMA-STATION SAMPLE ddLLECTION 1-131 LOCATION TYPK DATK 1 29 MILE 900420/900423 LT.44 29 MILK 900504/900507 LT.36 29 MILK 904518/960521 LT.38 29 MILE ' 900608/900611 LT.35 29 MILK 904422/900625 LT.25 29 MILK 900706/900709 LT.39 29 MILE 900720/900723 LT.23 29 MILK 904810/900813 LT.28 29 MILK . 900824/900827 LT.22 29 MILK 900907/900910 LT.42 29 MILK 908921/900924 ~LT.42 29 MILE 901005/901003 LT.40 29 MILK 901019/901022 LT.27 29 MILE 901103/901106 LT.46 31 MILK 900420/900423 LT.45 31 MILE 900504/900507 LT.36 31 MILE ' 900518/900521 LT.28 31 MILK 900608/900611 LT.44 31 MILK 900622/900625 - LT.23 31 MILE 908706/900709 LT.38 31 MILK 900720/900723 LT.22 31 MILE 900810/900813. LT.29 31 MILK 900824/900827 LT.28 31 MILE 900907/900916 LT.47 31 MILE 900921/900924 LT.37 31 MILE -901485/901008-LT.34 31 MILE 901019/901022 LT .33-47 MILE 900406/900409 LT.35 47 MILE 900429/900423 LT.33 47 MILK 900544/950507 LT.40 47 MILK - 900518/900521 LT.50 47 MILE 900648/900611 LT.30 47 MILE - 904622/900625 LT.24 47 MILK 900706/980709 LT.31 47 MIk - 909720/900723 LT.23 47 ' MILK 990818/900813 LT.39 47 MILK $09824/900827 LT.41 -A,

F24001 ' CLEVELAMD EL3CT'JIC MICAT103 C3. - P!PF. FASE: 952/' %- GENF Y2AC ZYSTCM-DATE: 26-( f)1-GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF MLKI- . SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : BI-MORTRLT RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATIoM SAMPLE COLLECTION I-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 47 MILE 900907/900910 LT.42 47 MILE 900921/900924 LT.41 47 MILE '901985/901008 LT.48 47 MILK 901019/901022 LT.20 31 MILE 900119/900122 LT. 24 51 MILE 900217/900220 LT.33 51 MILE 900316/900319 LT.31 51 MILE 900406/900409 LT.35 51 MILK 900428/900423 LT.29 51 MILE 900504/900507 LT.30 51 MILE 900511/900521 LT-.31 51 MILE -90060s/900611 LT.32 51 MILE 900622/90e625 LT.23 51 MILK 9807?t/900709 LT.30 51 MILE 900726<900723 LT.22 51 MILK 900810/900813-LT.26 51 MILK 900824/900827 LT.23 51 MILF 900987/900910 LT.43 51 MILK 900921/900924 LT.32 51 MILK 901005/9010Cs LT.30 51 MILK 901019/901022 LT .27-51 MILE .901103/901106 LT. *9 51 MILK 901207/901210 LT.26 52 MILE 900119/900122 LT.21 52 MILE 900217/900220 LT.33 57 MILK 940510/900521 LT.31 57 MILE 900608/900611 LT.32 57 MILE 988622/900625 LT.36 57 MILE ?t0786/900709 Lt.30 57 MILE 908720/900723 LT.20 57 MILE 900010/900813 LT.32 57 MILE 906024/900827 LT.30 57 MILE 900987/999910 LT.45 57 MILE 999921/90e924 LT.31 57 MILE 901405/941088 LT.43 57 MILK 9e1019/901922 LT.24 -A.

003['"5g' FAGE: CLEVELA D ELECT 2IC 7]MICATIN3 Co. - P:PP. DATE: 2 6-- J1 P24001 REMP TRACC SYSTEM GAMMA SPEC REFJt? 0F MLKI SAMPLE FREQUERCT IS : MCRTELY RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION 1-131 LOCATION TYPE DATE 57 MILE 901103/901106 LT.48 61 MILE 900406/900409 LT.42 61 MILE 900420/900423 LT.31 61 MILE 900504/900507 LT.40 61 MILE 900518/900521 LT.35 di MILE 90060s/900611 LT.26 61 MILE 900622/900625 LT.31 61 MILE 900706/900709 LT.30 61 MILE 900720/900723 LT.19 61 MILE 900010/900813 LT.21 61 MILE 900824/900827 LT.21 61 MILE 900907/900910 LT.44 61 MILE 900921/900924 LT.31 61 MILK 901005/901008 LT.37 61 MILK 901019/901022 LT.21 61 MILE 901103/901106 LT.43 69 MILE 900119/900122 LT.24 69 MILE 900217/900220 LT.29 69 MILK 900316/900319 LT.32 69 MILE 900806/900409 LT.28 69 MILE 900421/900424 LT.29 69 MILK 900504/900507 LT.35 69 MILK 900518/900521 LT.33 69 MILE 900608/900611 LT.27 69 MILK 900622/900625 LT.39 69 MILE 900706/900709 LT.27 69 MILK 900720/900723 LT.29 69 MILE 900810/900813 LT.22 69 MILK 900824/900827 LT.24 69 MILE 900907/900910 LT.49 69 MILK 900921/900924 LT.32 69 MILE 901005/901000 LT.36 69 MILK 901019/901022 LT.20 69 MILE 901103/901t06 LT.45 69 MILE 901207/901210 LT.29 -A,

~ - 1 9 1 - 00 C2 E3 M1 7 PC PP - ZP 3 Y' C LEA O TM D' GNG IM ROI T* TMS AT S - CC E2 IT FB 00 00 00 0000 00 00 0000 MS O 74 65 54 5854 74 75 4654

• /

T + RS // // // //// // // //// OIL + + ++ ++ ++++ ++ ++ ++++ 1 P / 0 00 00 00 0009 00 00 0000 4 CC Ef1 9 19 26 50 1254 41 46 4142 !. :A RCC r. NP R 21 32 12 3322 22 22 1122 A T 'T CE S C EUN 3P PQI LM SE EO RS C APT 3 M L C MEU J ALS L GPE 3 MR Y A 3 S' L 76 66 66 5764 76 67 6765 C 9 8 ~ TT TT TT TTTT TT TT TTTT R LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LLLL S 14 14 14 9140 14 16 9140 12 12 12 1121 12 12 1121 69 69 69 3692 69 69 3692 N 00 00 00 0001 00 00 0001 O 00 00 06 0000 00 00 0000 I' 99 99 99 9999 99 99 9999 TE // // // //// // // //// CT 81 81 81 6s17 81 41 6817 EA 02 02 02 1020 02 02 1020 LD 69 69 69 3692 69 69 3692 L 60 00 00 8001 00 00 0001 O 00 80 00 4008 00 00 8000 C 99 99 99 9999 99 99 9999 E LE PP MY AT S EE EE KE KEEE EK KE EKEE LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LLLL II II II IIII II II IIII N. MM MM MM MMMM MM MM MMMM NO OI 1 IT 99 11 77 1111 77 11 9999 9 TA 22 33 44 5555 55 66 6666 0 AC 4 TO 2 SL P

^

j i lt l, I ll

O FISH RESULTS Gamma Spectrometry O O -A _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - -

i. .A P24001 ( ' CLEVELAC3 ELECTOIC - f*"7MICATILG ~ CO. 5 -. F;FF. ' FAtt s' 0 91[] - j .CEMP.T2ACC, SYSTEM . CAT 32 10-e d1. ' GAMMA sprd RtroRT'or FSR ~ SAMPLE FREQUEJCT IS.r SEM-ANRUAL - RESULTS 1N FCI/KG(WET) +/- 2 SIGMA 4 STAT!oN SAMPLE COLLECTION-Co-58 Co-60 CS-134 CS-137 FE-59 . LOCATION TTPE DATE E-40 MN-54 EN-65 25 ROCK BASS 900525/900525 LT - 2 5.. LT'26 'LT 22' LT 27 LT ' 6 0 ' 2159+/-544 LT 25 LT 53; 25 FRESRWATER DRUM' 900525/900525 LT 15 LT.14 LT 13 LT 13 LT 33 2700+/-266 LT'11 LT 32 a 25 CATFISM '900525/900525 LT 17 LT 15 LT'16 LT 17 LT 38 2010+/-249 LT'16 LT 40' l 25 SMALLMOUTH SASS 900525/900525 LT 19 '. LT'19 LT 18 LT 22 LT 51 2752+/-447 LT 21 LT 45 25 CARP 900525/900:25 LT'18 LT'18 LT 15 LT 18 LT 37 3195+/-402' 'LT 18 LT 36 25 ww1TE SUCKER 600525/90c525 LT 17 LT : 13 : LT 11 LT 14 LT 34 2951+/-365 LT 13 LT 31 25 WHITE PERCH 900525/900525 LT 27-LT 22 LT 22-LT 25 LT 50 2600+/-243 LT 27 LT 55 s 25 YELLOW PERCH 900525/900525-LT 18 LT 18 LT 15 LT 23' LT 51 3144+/-420 LT 17 LT 43 25 WALLETE 900525/900525 .LT 18 LT 14 LT 12 LT 13 LT 50 3794+/-293 'LT 14 LT 42 25 MALLETE 901017/901017 LT 21 LT 23 LT 19 LT 18-LT 56 3310+/-409 LT 18 LT d5 25 WHITE SUCKER 901017/901017 ' LT 14.. LT 12 LT 9 LT 17 LT 32 3003+/-355 'LT'15 LT 30 25 FRESRwATER DRUM 901017/901017 LT 18 LT.21 LT 16 LT 18 LT 40 2110+/-266 LT 18 LT 46 25 WHITE PERCH 901017/901017 LT'36 LT 33 LT 30 LT 34 LT 72 3240+/~388 LT:33 LT 72 25 waITE BASS '901017/901017 LT 24 LT 25 LT 23 LT 29 LT 67 2171+/-502 LT 23 LT 58 25 RED HORSE 901017/901017 LT 21 LT 19 LT 20 LT 20 LT 39 3470+/-370 LT'19 LT 49 l 25 TELLow PERCH 901017/901017 LT 16 LT 13 LT 12 LT 17 LT 39 2544+/-303 LT 17 LT 33 25 RAINBOW TROUT 901017/901017 LT'18 LT 24 LT 16 LT 19 LT 55 3220+/-279 LT 21' LT 56 25 SMALLMoUTH BASS 901017/901017 LT 9-LT 10 LT 7 LT 9 LT 22 i 2650+/-383 LT.10 LT 23 32 wsITE SUCKER 900525/900525 LT 14 LT 12 LT 12 LT 16 LT 34 3241+/-286 LT 13 LT 35 e + -A-43-- 1 ~. j[-

Co. - PDPP. PATEt 002[ CLEVELA2D ELECTRIC f,MINATICG P24001 REMP TRACE ,3YSTEM DATE: 19-1 J1 GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF FSH SAMPLE FREQPENCY IS : SEM-ANNUAL RESULTS IN pct /EG(WtT) +/- 2 SIOMA STATION SAMPLE CO LLE C'7 E ON Co-58 Co-60 CS-134 CS-137 FE-59 LOCATION TYPE DATE E-40 MN-54 ts-65 ) i 32 wsITE PERCH 900525/900525 LT 14 LT 15 LT 13 LT 13 LT 30 2820+/-278 LT 14 Lf 35 32 CARP 900525/900525 LT 13 LT 13 LT 12 LT 12 LT 29 2600+/-255 LT 13 LT 33 32 FRESMWATER DRUM 900525/900525 LT 14 LT 16 LT 10 42+/-13 LT 38 2701+/-312 LT 12 LT 38 32 TELLOW PERCH 900525/900525 LT 24 LT 20 LT 18 LT 21 LT 52 2980+/-316 LT 23 LT Ss 32 WALLEYE 900525/900525 LT 11 LT 10 LT 9 LT 17 LT 28 3222+/-204 LT 13 LT T1 32 NEITE SUCEER 501017/901017 LT 14 LT 22 LT 11 LT 16 LT 60 3507+/-429 LT 17 LT 45 32 RED HORSE 901017/901017 LT 22 LT 21 LT IS LT 19 LT $0 3608+/-398 LT 18 LT 50 32 WHI** PERPR 901017/901011 LT 19 LT 22 LT 19 LT 21 LT 21 3110+/-420 LT 19 LT 50 32 901017/901017 LT 40 LT 40 LT 38 LT 39 LT 79 2450+/-513 LT 38 LT 91 32 901017/901017 LT 23 LT 20 LT 19 LT 22 LT 50 3335+/-246 LT 20 LT $2 32 F oRUM 901017/901017 LT 31 LT 29 LT 26 LT 33 LT 70 2610+/-616 LT 30 LT 69 32 CATFISH 901017/901017 LT 21 LT 24 LT 18 LT 28 LT 67 3177+/-452 LT 21 LT 49 I l l -A _ u .m

(D 'w) l l i ) i SEDIMENT RESULTS Gamma Spectrometry Strontium f>= I (s -A t m 9

001['% CLEVELAND ELECTRIC IEAUMIRATING CO. - FNPP. PAGE: 23- ( -.'1 REMP TRACE / ISYSTEM DATE: CAMMA SPEC SEPORT OF SED SAMPLE FREQUENCT IS : SEM-ANNUAL RESULTS IN PCI/KG(DRY) +/- 2 SIOMA STATION SAMPLE COLLTCTION CO-58 Co-60 CS-134 CS-137 E-40 LOCATION TYPE DATE 25 SEDIMENT 900524/900524 LT 37 LT 38 LT 43 264+/-24 14400+/-543 25 SEDIMENT 901016/901016 LT 35 LT 40 LT 27 304+/-39 16875+/-630 26 SEDIMENT 900524/900524 LT 31 LT 40 LT 25 332+/-35 14750+/~664 26 SEDIMENT 901016/901016 LT 28 LT 38 LT 26 251+/-30 12150+/-622 j l 27 SEDIMENT 900524/900524 LT 31 LT 31 LT 27 297+/-14 12550+/-303 27 SEDIMENT 901016/?O1016 LT 27 LT 39 LT 24 723+/-45 16370+/-652 l 32 SEDIMENT 90052' 900524 LT 31 LT 35 LT 26 173+/-41 133104/-520 32 SECIMEN? 901016/901016 LT 27 LT 36 LT 37 513+/-29 16500+/-664 63 SEDIMENT

• 00530/900530 LT 22 LT 27 LT 17 LT 19 7070+/-525 63 SEDIMENT 901516/901016 LT 24 LT 23 LT 22 LT 19 5870+/-282 64 SEDIMENT 900530/900530 LT 25 LT 33 LT 21 LT 26 10570+/-621 64 SEDIMENT 901018/901018 LT 23 LT 32 LT 24 LT 27 7998+/-616 65 SEDIMENT 900530/900530 LT 25 LT 37 LT 25 LT 31 7123+/-584 65 SEDIMENT 901018/901018 LT 33 LT 36 LT 39 LT 29 7750+/-534 I

t -A F24001.

LEVELanD ELECTRIC k % ?JAT238'CO. -'FOPP. ~

F A'42 : 001 ~

1. fBTEM:

EAT 3:

• 1 7REMP TOACK; V 23-( / -

N -GAMMA SPEC. REPORT OF STRG SAMPLE'FREQUENCT IS.: SEM-ANNOAL RESULTS IN PCI/L +/--2 SIGMA ~ 1 a' 3TATION - SAMPLE-COLLECTION. SR-09 'SR-90 LOCATION- ' TYPE. DATE L ^W 25 SEDIMENT .'900524/900524 LT 15.8 11.90+/-7.40 25 -SEDIMENT L901016/901016 LT 20.7 22.00+/-6.60 26 SEDIMENT 906524/900524 LT 20.8 9.10+/-7.20-26 SEDIMENT 901016/901016 LT 19.7 LT 10.3 27 SEDIMENT 900524/90052'4-LT 24.7 18.40+/-6.66 27 SEDIMENT 901016/901016 LT 19.2 15.90+/-6.60 32 SEDIMENT. 900524/900524' LT 22.3 LT 14.7 32 SEDIMENT 901016/901016 LT 24.7 LT 11.7 63 SEDIMENT 900530/900530 LT 21.0 LT 12.7 63 SEDIMENT '901016/901016 LT 35.0 LT 18.4 64 SEDIMENT 900530/900530 LT 25.9 LT 17.6 64 SEDIMENT 901018/901018 LT 12.8 LT 6.0 65 SEDIMENT 900530/900530 LT'21.5 LT 14.2 65 SEDIMENT 901018/901013 LT 25.6 LT 13.4 i i f Y 7 I .I i ~ i i s -A i e g 4 ,"'--""a 6 ^'-

A w -W e-A 2-,A1 a 1 l SOIL RESULTS Camma Spectrometry strontium i r l O r -A -

1 9 1 - 03 02 3 0 4 7 5 o 2 4 3 0 1 9 2 3 9 3 8 2 3 3 1 2 t 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 5 3O T T T T T T t T T T T T T T T T 3T o L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L AA C FC 5 2 6 4 0 2 8 7 3 7 2 1 0 0 2 8 8 2 9 8 4 4 3 8 6 7 2 4 7 8 5 1 2 6 3 2 5 9 4 2 2 6 7 7 4 3 4 ~ ~ / - / / - / / / / - / / / / / / 6

• / + +

/ + + * + / + * + + + + 2 1 + 4 5 + 5 9 0 3 + 4 0 0 6 0 1 2 7 2 6 7 2 2 6 9 7 5 5 1 6 8 7 5 4 0 0 4 3 2 3 0 7 6 7 0 6 7 3 4 A 2 9 2 1 6 1 1 1 1 7 1 2 2 1 2 3 R 3 9 0 2 F 0 8 8 2 7 2 9 6 8 2 8 3 5 4 6 3 P 0 6 5 1 4 5 9 2 7 8 6 4 1 7 2 7 L 5 5 4 3 3 6 4 6 5 4 5 6 F / - / / - / / / / / / / / / + / + + / / / * + + + + + + + + 0 + 0 0

• + +

0 2 6 7 5 7 4 7 1 0 1 0 0 6 8 4 A 0 5 2 6 5 2 2 9 6 6 8 9 1 5 4 1 3 M 4 2 0 6 1 6 9 5 8 3 t 3 1 7 7 6 1 C YG 9 8 8 9 6 8 8 8 1 S 1 1 7 5 5 1 LI E G RS N LE IM I T2 TO oR AT SA - ?! S U/ IT FQ+ 1 MQ O 3 9 ~ /"

• )

8 6 2 4 3 5 9 2 6 7 0 8 5 T T 4 3 5 2 2 3 4 2 7 2 3 3 F %RSR / / - 2 OI D 7 / / / / + + / / / / - / 2 1 / / [\\ P ( 3 + + + + 8 8 + + + + / + 2 3 + + t 9 Cc ETG 1 9 0 9 0 4 9 9 8 0 6 + 1 0 6 I A. RCE 9 2 9 9 2 5 3 1 2 3 6 0 T T 5 1 4 R'. P/ S 4 4 6 6 1 1 2 3 1 1 5 1 L L 2 3 TT CEI C A C EUC E) PQF LM SE E~ RN D" AFI M I MES K ALT L CPL E MU V AS C SE L R 4 40217941 28588853 73944 970 56616668 C 30 23232322 22231233 22232334 32232323 16 TTTTTTTT TTTTTTTT TTTTTTTT TTTTTTTT So LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL LLELLLLL CC 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 5 8 2 3 5 8 2 3 5 t 2 3 5 8 2 N 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 TE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / CT 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 EA 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 LD 3 5 8 2 3 5 8 2 3 5 8 2 3 5 9 2 L 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 O 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 E LE PP MY AT S ))'. L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L I I I I I T I I I I I I I I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ( S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S N Mo o! 1 IT 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 0 TA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AC 4 TO 2 SL F

m_ .-._mm. ..m. ..-m-.-. i w . 9 p i + \\6,- - O t. oN e ce w e e e N m , e e ce en a w o e N M M N m m M N , m N m M M m m m es w l N H H .H b H H $4 H .H >3 b N ok O d 4 na .N k 4 ma na .a 4 4 4 J I a 3 .s 4 U -h e ce e m .e .e e e N w w e e en a w N m o e m m N m m .o e e m N en m o m w w en e e en e e e e. en e w N w I l i N-N N N N -N N N N N N. N N N N w + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + es o m w e m e e o e en w e e in .e en N e N en e N m.e o e e e m o m o w en Ig( ' w e w w .e en a m .a e m .e e o e .e e4 .e r1 N as ese w m e N M m N N .e N ee w = m en w e N w e en O .e h m o e e m e e e .o w m e e w w e h en e o e-e = w o e a m o e .e , o El l en w w e w I en 1 0 t 0 0 h N I I I l N I N N N N N N N N + -N N N N N + N

• + + +

+ + + + l e + + + + + o + o e o o o .N. .o. e o m w e e m ei o .e o N e ce en et o-w a w w w w o = e. e e M e e o m N O E w .e - w e e .e e o N N m M w .N .o e o u' We I es e e es e e w ei N w w .e e e w w e2 M M Q Rm .Li .3 M eR M De N kM O4 4e, m4 1 -(A #4 pN M $8 b Cp + E9 O ' N w N O en N w e m o N en W e -A- - ~ H e w m en w w m w w am m m m en N Pe M 'MMU I w M 1 l l l l (- O M O. e N N N N N N N 1 I N N N N N N N g h m + + + '+ + + + N N + + + + + + + U D, u>e .e m .e m C .e es N p + + m a w es .e e e MM-WuW I r. en m w .e o e en m en e N A e o .e .a ($ (3 mN m a se m-e w .e e w w n .e N N .e w .4 - 0 HH UwN U 4 O upu 8 M to eOh e4 E mMMM-M $4 bM. 2 'O (J '. um 4 e4 $4 W.- O en eJ - 4D 4m W mW .4 M' w .e N N e o en M e mmooeoaw e w e o N e en m MMemNeMe U e.se e e m ce N es m N m mmNseNwmm mMNmNNNm m M N m N m es M . ee $4 $4 Ie $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $* $8 $4 $8 $4 $4 $4 $4.I8 $8 $4 $9 k8 $4 $4 $8 $4 $4 $4 el eJ 3 I J eJ eJ I .4 el.3 3.k8 8 eJ.b $4 mO .a ea J.aeJ.4 eJ d d eJ.4.3 4 4 3 el 8 $ UU N - o m e ww e en e N e m o N e m o N m N N N re

• N N

N M N N es m N N m m o es m en e N m en e N ti en e N M e.o o. ese o e' o

• e o o e

.4 o o o sie O O o e o o o e e o o o e o o e o M e e e m e m 2 en m en m m e .m e $4 M ' N O se e N N N N -.N N N N N N N N N N N N UM e o m o N o m o es o m o W 4.- N. m e4 N N m N N N m N-N N M - N N .30 m en e es e en e N m en e N m en e N.e .3 e o e me o e o

• e o o o me o o o O

e e o e o o o o e o o o o o e o U m e e m m e e m m m m m m D m m MeJ H

0. Se

$ Se 4k m eJ e4 .3 .3 .2 .3 .3 el .4 el .J e4 .3 e4 .3 .3 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m a m m m M m N

1. 0 O ne

=e M Se N N N M w w w-w e e e B 4 o e o 3 Se 4 .e .4 .e e4 .4

• ..e

.e .e w ee .e N N N N 4u

e bO

.v' m3 4 ......, _. _. -. _.. _........ _ - _ - ~ - -, - - -. _.. -. _., _. -.

i ~ t F24001 'CLET3LA23 EL2CT2IC MICAT103 Co. - FCFF. FA43 09;((23-y\\ ( 'EBRF T2AC SYSTEM DOT 3: J1_ 5-GkMRA SPEC REFORT OF STRG' SARFLE FREgetWCY IS : QUARTERLY RESULTS IN FCI/EG(DRY) +/-'2 SIGRA I i STATION SARFLE' ' COLLECTION SR-89 SR-90 I LOCATION TYPE DATE i l-01 SOIL-900322/900322 LT'20.6 _34.30+/-13.00 el SOIL 900530/900530 LT 22.6 93.20+/-19.90 i 01 SOIL 900823/900973 LT 14.4 37.30+/-8.50 el SOIL 901220/901/20 LT 8.2 78.60+/-8.50 i l l 02-SOIL 900322/9003T2 LT 27.5 540.20+/-29.50 t l 02 SOIL - 900 5 3 0/9 005'J 0 'LT 32.5 280.30+/-41.00 } 02 SOIL 900823/900823 LT 21.2 47.40+/-12.80 i 02 SOIL 901220/901220 LT 3.6 44.00+/-8.30 1 l 04 SOIL 900322/900322 LT 22.2 20.00+/-11 ce } 04 SOIL 900530/900530 LT 12.5 '18.40+/-6.20 2 04 SOIL 900823/900823 LT 32.0 LT 20.0 04 SOIL 901220/901220 LT 8.5 13.10+/-5.70 ) 06 SOIL 900322/900322 LT 23.9 LT 14.0 06 SOIL 900530/900530 06 SOIL 900823/900823. LT 17.9 LT 9.8 t I '06 SOIL 901220/901220. LT 10.9 21.90+/-5.70 LT 14.8 40.40+/-12.20 1 12 SOIL 900322/900322 LT 11.9 37.20+/-9.40 12 SOIL 900530/900530 LT 20.5 38.10+/-11.60 12 SOIL 900823/900823 LT 25.8 79.90+/-17.40 12 SOIL 901220/901220 LT 10.8 56.004/-11.20 l 14 SOIL 900322/900322 LT 14.2 LT 9.5 t 14 SOIL 900530/900533 LT 18.0 LT 10.8 14 SOIL 900823/900023 LT 24.2 LT 14.8 14 SOIL 901220/901220 LT 4.4 4.80+/-2.70 18 SOIL 900322/900322 LT 20.9 LT 17.9 18 SOIL 500530/900530 LT 16.1 50.00+/-11.30 18 SOIL 900823/900823. LT 12.2 48.00+/-9.10 g_ 18 SOIL 901220/901220 LT 12.1-63.40+/-12.90 t 20 SOIL 900322/900322 - LT 14.7. 13.80+/-7.30 [ 20 SOIL. 900530/900530 LT 18.0. 20.50+/-6.00 i 20. SOIL 900823/900823 LT 17.9 62.80+/-12.70 20 SOIL 901220/901220 LT 0.0 12.30+/-5.30 l' t t j i -A ! I r i .w 9-a, ,,,3 y= .-c.m-_. 4,

. -.. ~. - - -.... - - -. - - _ - = - -. - - -.. - -. -. -. J. 1 1-4 PRECIPITATION RESULTS Gross Beta Gamma Spectrometry Tritius E t 4 l l l l l l l l l i -A __

a 1 e4 ) o o o o o o o o o o o o / .I '\\ P. N. e. N. w m W N N W w w e e e (%_t/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I i 1 6 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ N \\ \\ N N N N wI + + + + + + + + + + + + ow e o o o o o o o o o o o o N. m. m. M. M. N. P. N. P. N. M. b .e M N b in m N m P* M W WW en O O w e o o o o o o o o $d H m e4 aC De u 1 I O o o o o o o o o o o o 1 e. e. N. m. 6 N. N. N. m. w w w i 1 0 1 1 l I l 1 1 6 s s, s N N N N N \\ N N + + + + + + + + + + + + o o o o o o o e o o e o e w a. m. N. N. M. N. M. o. e. we e e w w w o m .m j N m a N o n r.4 e w o .e a o e o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o w N m s N. m. e. e. N. N. v .s ev h e e Le i 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 8 1 f Il N \\ \\ \\ N N \\ \\ N N N N b' + + + + + + + + + + + + o o o e o o o o e o o o 1 me e. o. e. e. e.

c.. w.

N. w w w M e e E ce N e w m en N N e e M -e O O o o o o o o o o o o o o U M o N4 k O dK 4 11 mO Y H 2l HH O H ?J EM d 4H O o e o o o o o o o o o o 14 m HEN 2 m m M N. g es N e en es v w w MN N O e e e = e -[*17) h 0 ** l M 1 8 1 1 1 0 i t 1 i gg j \\ H N N N N N N N N N N N N p ( WM+ 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + 8 s sE M H e o o o o e o e o o o 4 o. e4 M o A. MMN N. m. m. e. o. e. W o. 8 w w -e OO HUM o N e w me .4 en o N ee M N H e% mU w n o n o o o o m o o o o f 5 $4 4Wh o $* H HD U W cu m Wh abw 63 K 1 M WW ObM If De h W mJ !~ 63 D 'S o o e o o o o o o o o &M Ws m h W w N xW en. P. m. N. m. m. e e e W 4M 1 f 1 6 6 I I I I 0 M N N. N N N N N N N N N N W + + + + + + + + + + + + .4 o o e o o o o o o o o o U m, o. e. a. e. en. e. m.e e. .e .e e e e e n w e e en e N N N 6 me w we o me we o o o o o o o o o S o o o w o o o o o o o o e. e. en. v. N. F. en. m = w m w e m I i 1 l I i i 1 i l 4 i \\ \\ \\ \\ N \\ N N N N N + + + + + + + + + + + + o o e o o o o o o o o o m. e.s en. m. e. e. o. w w w m m m m o en en e N m w an e.n N m ,e o es m o o w o o o 4 o o e o N N ee N

• • en m

P en W N o o o o e o o o o N me N w In e M e e o me N N R o e o o e o o o -e me .e .e o o o o o o o o o o o o o HC e e e e e e e e e e e e HO ( UM O O O O O O O O O O O O WM H N H H H H H b H H H H .g m3 W 3h N e N N N me N we en M b in O =e ce o o o o o o o o o o U N e4 m w en e m em o 4 N et o o o o o o o o .e -4

• e et D

o e o o o o o e o o o o e m p p e e ow M m M el be E .1 0 k > U me

• (

W sel h e4 D D D W V fe W h-M b K 4 E M M 4 M O A O

l _F24001 CLEYkLASS' ELECT 22C MICATING Coi c-F FF. - PASC: 001[ CEMF TRAC YSTEM' EATE: 4-1 f l ..5AMFLE FREQUENCY IS : MONTELY. IGAMMA SPEC REPORT OF FR6-i e l REStTLTS ' IN FCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMFLE COLLECTION BA-140 co-S e '- Co-se Cs-134 Cs-137 i LOCATION' TYPE-DATE FE-59 LA-140 MM-54' 59-15 33-65 [ 32-95 j t. 03 FR 491212/900118 LT 44.60 LT 7:30 LT 6.50' LT 5.90 LT 7.40 i i LT 19.10 LT 8.20 LT 7.20 LT 4.90 LT 13.40 4 'LT 13.30 I j 03 FR 906118/900220 LT 33.90. LT 5.30 LT'5.30 LT'5.20 LT 7.10 ~ LT 11.60 LT 6.50 LT 5.10 LT 6.70 LT 12.00 LT 11.10 93 FR 900302/903402_ LT 19.10 LT 4.10 LT 4.4e LT 3.80 LT 4.30 t LT 10.80 LT 6.20 LT 3.00 LT 4.30 LT 8.70 I LT 7.10 03 FR 900402/900$02 LT 32.60 LT 5.20 LT_4.70 LT 4.20 LT 5.10 t LT 12.00 LT 6.80 LT 5.00 LT 4.1'J LT 9.10 LT 9.70 03 FR. 900502/900601 LT 34.10 LT 3.80 LT 3.20 LT 3.10 LT 3.20 LT 7.60 LT 10.30 LT 3'.20 LT 4.40 LT 6.40 f j LT 6.50 L l 03 FR 900601/900702 LT 17.70 LT 3.20 LT 2.60 LT 2.90 LT 2.80 l 1-LT 4.10 LT 5.30 LT 2.60 LT 3.30 LT 5.40 I' LT 5.40 t t 03 FR 900702/900801 LT 32.30 LT 5.20 LT 3.30 LT 4.60 LT 3.30 t LT 15.60 LT 9.40-LT 4.80 LT 5.60 LT 10.40 LT 10.00 03 FR 900801/900905 LT 8.10 LT 1.60 LT 1.70 LT 1.40 LT 1.60 LT 3.60 LT 2.00 LT 1.60 LT 1.90 LT 2.90 LT 2.90 ~ 03 FR 900905/901003 LT 29.30 LT 4.70 LT 5.20 LT 4.60 LT 5.9C 4 LT 11.50 LT 9.10 LT 5.30 LT 5.30-LT 11.10 LT 9.70 63 FR 901003/901107 LT'38.60 LT 2.00 LT 1.30 LT 1.60 LT 1.40 j LT'4.90 LT 10.60 LT 1.40 LT 2.90 LT 3.70 UT 3.70 03 FR 901107/901705 L7 25.20 LT 5.10 LT 4.60 LT 5.00 LT 4.90 LT 10.00 LT 7.00-4T 4.00 LT 5.40 LT 10.20 'LT 9.30 63 FR 901205/901227 LT'25.10-LT 3.60 LT 4.20 LT 3.10 LT 3.30 LT 3.20 LT 10.00 LT 3.20 LT 4.40 LT 7.90 LT 6.70 l t i -A 1 ~

1 i' i' fi 5 i l h 1 (LgO 0 0 0 2 - 06 01 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 @4 17 55 89 23 27 21 20 35 10

0. 2

2. 2

7. 2 t

7 35 61 51 47 48 36 35 51 36 48 13 48 3E 16 32 TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT 2Y sM LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 3A CE PD 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 s0 o0 00 80 37 51 63 30 68 28 54 33 71

i. 5

c. C.

4 35 57 56 34 35 35 23 54 23 34 i2 45 24 19 TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT se LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL

• . L sL LL LL CN P

TLP 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 35 72 90 22 64 09 94 38 10 33 90 52 04 38 45 34 44 33 32 45 32 44 11 34 33 63 O TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT C oN LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL TA CM G LM O^ GEO IR ETT TE PSS AT O Es FM2 I7 O J 5 ) T / 0 5 RS+ 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 t 0 00 00 00 - { . P L 0 OI 39 49 98 49 18 44 28 92 88 04 28 A

3. 0 K

ET/ 84 78 58 34 48 41 33 68 34 37 19 57 36 CC RCZ 51 IA NC TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT R2 CEF OA LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL TT EC CL C Pq3 EP SE1 LM R EC APS C M T 3 MEL O ALU A GPS L ME E AR 0000000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 00 0 V S 0 5 7 9 0 8 8. 5 1000.850 0 0. 7 5005006020.62001.040 0 9. 3 20004.2 0300 E 48.7214 43 L 0 3004007. 8.. 5. 1 1.. 1. .10 2 C 495 321211197298397275311186297343314246 159 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT7TTTTTTTTT AER LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL BPE 8 0 2 2 1 2 1 5 3 7 5 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 2 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 TE / / / / / / / / / / / / CT 2 8 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 3 7 5 EA 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LD 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 7 L 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 O 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ELE PP MY AT S g(w R R R R R R R R R R R R P V P P P P P P P P P P N NO OI 1 IT 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 TA 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 AC 4 TO 2 SL P

P24931 CLEVJLA'23 GLECT21C MICATING Co. - PCPP. P A D"J : CO3/'% ,-m \\ / CEMP TRf_C SYLTER LATC: 4-I 31 L./ CAMMA SPEC REPORT OF PRG SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : MONTRLY RESULTS IN PC1/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION BA-140 CO-58 CO-60 CS-134 CS-137 LOCATION TYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 Ms-54 as-95 EN-65 ER-95 06 PR 891212/90G118 LT 32.20 LT 4.50 LT 4.40 LT 3.70 LT 4.60 LT 16.60 LT 8.80 LT 5.50 LT 6.20 LT 11.10 LT 8.00 06 PR 900118/900220 LT 21.40 LT 4.70 LT 5.90 LT 4.40 LT 4.40 LT 9.30 LT 10.20 LT 3.90 LT 4.50 LT 9.60 LT 8.00 06 PR 900302/900402 LT 16.40 LT 3.60 LT 4.10 LT 3.70 LT 3.90 LT 8.40 LT 5.60 LT 3.90 LT 4.10 LT 9.10 LT 6.70 06 PR 900402/900502 LT 39.10 LT 7.00 LT 6.40 LT 6.40 LT 7.50 LT 12.70 LT 7.90 LT 6.40 LT 6.40 LT 12.90 LT 13.20 86 PR 900502/900601 LT 36.10 LT 3.80 LT 3.40 LT 3.30 LT 3.40 LT 9.20 LT 10.60 LT 3.30 LT 4.50 LT 7.60 LT 6.80 06 PR 900601/900702 LT 16.40 LT. 60 LT 7.40 LT 2.30 LT 2.50 LT 5.30 LT 5.00 LT 2.20 LT 2.80 LT 5.00 LT 4.60 06 PR 900702/900801 LT 24.70 LT 3.80 LT 3.20 LT 3.10 LT 3.70 LT 8.10 LT 4.20 LT 3.60 LT 4.50 LT 6.70 LT 6.40 06 PR 900001/900905 LT 15.40 LT 3.90 LT 4.40 LT 3.90 LT 4.50 LT 9.40 LT 4.50 LT 4.40 LT 4.10 LT 8.20 LT 7.60 06 PR 900905/901003 LT 23.50 LT 4.20 LT 4.60 LT 4.40 LT 4.50 LT 10.40 LT 5.00 LT 3.80 LT 4.60 LT 7.20 LT 7.30 06 PR 901003/901107 LT 42.60 LT 1,90 LT 1.40 LT 1.49 LT 1.50 LT 5.40 LT 8.60 LT 1.50 LT 3.00 LT 2.90 LT 3.70 G6 PR 901107/901205 LT 16.50 LT 2.40 LT 1.90 LT 2.30 LT 2.00 LT 4.80 LT 4.60 LT 2.00 LT 2.70 LT 4.50 LT 4.20 06 PR 901205/901227 LT 34.70 LT 5.10 LT 4.50 LT 4.00 LT 4.80 LT 13.40 LT 10.60 LT 4.60 LT 6.30 LT 10.50 LT 9.50 -A 1 ~ 0 4 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 23 34 09 0.1 43 11 11 51 45 10 33 01 0 7 35 53 49 5S 51 43 37 48 37 47 13 34 37 u 16 3E TT TT TT TT. TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT GT 5F LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL AA CE FR 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 80 12 85 34 73 77 40 50 16 03 10 4 35 45 35 45 43 46 24 34 33 35 12 33 33 19 TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT SS LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL CN F F3F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 63 74 69 56 45 30 10 52 09 33 67 79 04 54 44 44 54. 34 33 44 33 43 11 12 22 u 65 O TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT C OW LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL TA CM ~ LM SC GNG IM RTI TO FNS AT O CS FM2 1T O. - 7 3*4gF ~ T / w 5 0 0 0 RS+ 00 00 00 00 ' 01 00 01 00 00 08 00 00 OI 30 86 03 48 A T

4. 0

2. 0

6. 0 61 43 05 69 15

$7 L 0 3_ ET/ e4 45 39 54 53 ,51 37 41 34 43 11 24 36 ? CC. RC1 51 1A NC TT T T. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 'm TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT 1 2R. CEF OA LL L TT EU CL C PQN EP SEI LM. R EE AFS C M T 3 MEL 3' ALU M A GPS L' ME . 3 AR 0 00 0 00 00 00 00 0 00 0 0 0 Y S~

1. 9017.94008.990022.6080.2061.00 5 9. 708.000 0 2 6.50 0.4 1005.720 0 3. 4 1 00 EL 0

0 03. 1. 11. 30 00 80 .8 .. 80 3. 0. 2.. C ~ 495 3312S7298319419214217176217353345266 159 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT AER LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLI LLLLLL GF2 8 0 2 2 1 2 1 5 3 7 5 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 4 5 - 6 7 8 9 . 0 1 2 2 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 TE / / / / / / / / / / / / CT 2 5 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 3 7 5 ~ EA 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LD 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 4 9 0 1 2 L 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 M O 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C' 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ELE PP MY AT S s w R R R R R R R R R R R R P P P F P P F F P P F P N' NO OI 1 IT 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 - 7 7 7 7 '8 TA" 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AC 4~ TO 2' SL F d ,(

l

{ .j:1!l! {i!!' ,ll .t i} ;1! i ; r E q4 4

. j' liI ,f [iI [i1h* ,I [s[i

• Elt(*[tfj :tIIfi((8! tiJ r[f;h![,.

F k; i:! 1 (> S '/ } 0 0 5 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 52 09 79 44 05 94 26 65 21 50

8. 4

8. 0 0

7 35 30 61 23 59 24 51 37 25 49 12 25 26 t 2 16 E3 TT TT T T' TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT IT S5 LL LL LL LL LL LL EL LL LL LL LL LL AA C2 FD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 09 00 00 79 44 76 19 02 84 53 79 02 69 97 62 4 35 34 67 12 55 23 45 35 22 44 12 12 23 19 TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT S0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL C5 x F' F E . 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 F 00 00 49 66 21 70 02 06 10 59 84 25 40 38 04 33 57 22 46 22 65 44 22 33 11 22 32 .~ 65 O TT TT TT TT TT TT T1 TT TT TT TT TT C OW LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL YA CR G LR C OMG IM RT1 y TE Ps$ AT 6 CS FR2 IT O 8 T / 0 5 RS+ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 22 72 31 95 08 81 68 09 21 05 A OI 43

0. 0 P

L 0 ET/ 84 35 01 22 54 25 53 47 23 8 7 25 27 33 C' C RCI 51 n IA NC TT TT TT TT TT TT TT TT

• T TT TT TT n

RR CEF oA LL LL LL LL' LL LL LL LL tL LL LL LL TT EU CL C PQN E7 SEI LR R EE AFS D M T 9 REL ~ 2 ALU A GPS L ME ~ 4 E AR 00 000 0000 00000 0 0 0 0 0 V S 55.20331.0790004900.520082635.60 0.2 4003.61006.07000.11505.76 00 E L 0 61. 645. . 8114.. 05061 .6 .. 9. 3. 4 . 9.. C 495 217311943211254311217155177453154164 159 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT AER LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL SF1 8 0 2 2 1 2 1 5 3 7 5 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 1 2 4 5 6 7 9 9 0 1 2 2 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 9 9 . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 TE / / / / / / / / / / / / CT 2 8 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 3 7 5 EA" 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LD 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 5 9 9 1 2 L 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 O 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 C 8 9 9 9 9 9 9' 9 9 9 9 9 E LE FP RY AT S e r R R R R R R R R R R R R F F f P F F F F F F F F / N NO OI 0 - IT 2 2 2 2 2' 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 TA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 AC 4 TO' 2 SL F I !.{ij ii[ i ljif i s *

!hill ;y

P24001 J CLEY'LA!D ELECTOIC J "" "'[M I'.' AT I NG Co. - POPP. PLT.E CC6

1. .-m LEMP TOACE pYLTZM LCTJ:

4-1 V GAMMA SPEC REPORT OF PRO SAMPLE FREQUENCT IS : MONTELY RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION SA-140 co-58 Co-60 CS-13C CS-137 LOCf. TION TYPE DATE FE-59 LA-140 MM-54 Ne-95 EM-45 1R-95 35 PR $91212/900118 LT 34.00 LT 5.00 LT 6.40 LT 4.50 LT 6.10 LT 17.30 LT 10.10 LT 6.20 LT 4.80 LT 11.20 LT 12.30 35 PR 900118/900220 LT 22.90 LT 4.70 LT 4.60 LT 4.50 LT 4.40 LT 9.40 LT 10.00 LT 4.00 LT 4.40 LT 10.70 LT 7.50 35 PR 900302/900402 LT 24.10 LT 5.20 LT 5.70 LT 3.10 LT 5.20 LT 11.90 LT 6.10 LT 5.00 LT 5.20 LT 12.20 LT 9.30 35 PR 900402/900502 LT 32.90 LT 6.60 LT 4.40 LT 5.90 LT 6.10 LT 14.30 LT 9.90 LT 5.. S LT 5.20 LT 13.90 LT 11.00 35 PR 900502/900501 LT 16.50 LT 1.83 LT 1.80 LT 1.60 LT 1.70 LT 5.30 LT 4.50 LT 1.70 LT 2.60 LT 3.40 LT 3.60 35 PR 900601/900702 LT 26.20 LT 4.60 LT 4.60 LT 4.50 LT 5.00 LT 12.90 LT 8.40 LT 4.70 LT 5.60 LT 12.20 LT 8.70 35 PR 900702/900801 LT 20.00 LT 2.90 LT 2.30 LT 2.70 LT 2.90 LT 5.60 LT 4.70 LT 2.80 LT 3.40 LT 5.50 LT 5.50 35 PR 900801/900905 LT 9.90 LT 2.00 LT 1.90 LT 2.00 LT 2.00 LT 4.10 LT 3.00 LT 1.80 LT 2.20 LT 4.20 LT 3.60 35 PR 900905/901003 LT 21.90 LT 3.90 LT 3.20 LT 3.00 LT 3.80 LT 3.60 LT 3.60 LT 3.50 LT 4.30 LT 6.80 LT 7.70 35 PR 901003/901107 LT 44.80 LT 2.20 LT 1.50 LT 1.60 LT 1.60 LT 5.10 LT 1c.90 LT 1.70 LT 3.40 LT 3.70 LT 4.00 35 PR 901107/901205 LT 25.30 LT 1.30 LT 2.30 LT 2.90 LT 3.00 LT 7.20 LT 4.20 LT 3.00 LT 3.20 LT 3.60 LT 4.70 35 PR 901205/901227 LT 30.60 LT 4.30 LT 4.10 LT 3.60 LT 3.50 LT 10.60 LT 10.50 LT 3.80 LT 4.70 LT 8.40 LT 7.20 -A -

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - PNPP. PAGE: 001 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 26-FEB-91 l TRITIUM REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : MONTHLY RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGHA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION H3 LOCATION TYPE DATE 03 PR 891212/900118 LT 179.00 03 PR 900118/900220 LT 182.00 03 PR 900302/900402 LT 186.00 03 PR 900402/900502 LT 185.00 03 PR 900502/900601 LT 175.00 03 PR 900601/900702 201.00+/-108.00 03 PR 900702/900801 229.00+/-97.00 03 PR 900801/900905 180.00+/-99.00 03 PR 900905/901003 162.00+/-94.00 03 PR 901003/901107 LT 179.00 03 PR 901107/901205 LT 188.00 03 PR 901205/901227 LT 181.00 04 PR 891212/900118 LT 179.00 04 PR 900118/900220 LT 184.00 04 PR 900302/900402 LT 186.00 04 PR 900402/900502 LT 185.00 C. 04 PR 900502/900601 LT 175.00 04 PR 900601/900702 136.00+/-74.00 04 PR 900702/900801 230.00+/-69.00 04 PR 900801/900905 171.00+/-98.00 04 PR 900905/901003 LT 176.00 04 PR 901003/901107 LT 179.00 04 PR 901107/901205 LT 178.00 04 PR 901205/901227 LT 181.00 06 PR 891212/900118 106.00+/-93.00 06 PR 900118/900210 LT 184.00 06 PR 900302/900402 LT 186.00 06 PR 900402/900502 LT 185.00 06 PR 900502/900601 LT 175.00 06 PR 900601/900702 LT 201.00 06 PR 900702/900801 314.00+/-100.00 06 PR 900801/900905 LT 185.00 06 PR 900905/901003 175.00+/-94.00 06 PR 901003/901107 158.00+/-95.00 06' PR 901107/901205 LT 188.00 -A - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_

P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CD. - FNPP. PAGE: 002 REMP TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 26-FEB-91 TRITIUM REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : MONTHLY l RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION H3 LOCATION TYPE DATE 06 PR 901205/901227 LT 181.00 07 -PR 891212/900118 134.00+/-94.00 07 PR 900118/900220 LT 182.00 07 PR 900302/900402 250.00+/-102.00 07 PR 900402/900502 155.00+/-98.00 4 07 PR 900502/900601 111.00+/-99.00 07 PR 900601/900702 LT 201.00 07 PR 900702/900801 271.00+/-99.00 07 PR 900801/900905 129.00+/-68.00 07 PR 900905/901003 166.00+/-96.00 07 PR 901003/901107 LT 179.00 07 PR 901107/901205 LT 178.00 07 PR 901205/901227 LT 181.00 I 12 PR 891212/900118 LT l';9.00. i 12 PR 900118/900220 LT 164.00 12-PR 900302/900402 LT 186.00 12' PR 900402/900502 134.00+/-97.00 12-PR 900502/900601 LT 191.00 12 PR 900601/900702 197.00+/-108.00 12 PR 900702/900801 181.00+/-95.00 12 PR 900801/900905 147.00+/-98.00 12 PR' 900905/901003 188.00+/-95.00 12 ~PR 901003/901107 116.00+/-93.00 12 PR 901107/901205 LT 178.00 12 PR 901205/901227 LT 181.00 -35 PR 891212/900118 LT 179.00 35 PR 900118/900220 LT 184.00 35 PR 900302/900402 LT 186.00 35 .PR 900402/900502 112.00+/-96.00 .35 PR-900502/900601 LT 191.00 35 PR 900601/900702 161.00+/-106.00 .3 5 - PR 900702/900801 227.00+/-97.00 35 PR 900801/900905 182.00+/-99.00 -A -,_

...._._.__.m._.=._...-- 1 P24001 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. - FNFP. PAGE: 002 .REMP. TRACKING SYSTEM DATE: 26-rG-91 TRITIUM REPORT SAMPLE FREQUENCY IS : MONTHLY .O RESULTS IN PCI/L +/- 2 SIGMA a ' STATION-SAMPLE COLLECTION H3 LOCATION TYPE DATE i I 35-PR 900905/901003 .LT 176.00 35- -PR 901003/901107 LT 179.00 35 PR 901107/901205 LT 178.00 35 PR 901205/901227 LT 181.00 ~' 4 0 I' s s 9 -A - - ..... - ~,.-.

___ww-,-__ O FEEb SIIAGE RESULTS GAMMA SPECTROMETRY O O -A _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

F24601 CL2 TELA 23 ELECT 21C ICATING CO..- F0FF. FA03: C01 CEMF YOf.C YST'4M. DAT3: '7 i 1 GAMMA SPEC REFORT OF FF SAMPLE FREQtFEBCY IS 2 AWWWAL RESULTS IN FC1/ES +/- 2 SIGRA i I t l STATION SAMPLE COLLECTION CS-134 CS-137-1-131 E-49 SE-1 j-LOCAT1ow. TYPE DATE CO-50 Co-69 4 29 NAY 999924/999924 LT 12.40 LT 29.89 LT 24.79 74596/-599.9 LT 129.39 LT 21.29 LT 19.79 i 31 NAY 999924/999924 LT 6.99 LT 8.09 LT 12.29 3356+/-119.9 LT 64.99 I LT 9.39 LT 9.99 3. 47 NAY 999924/909924 LT-14.79 LT 18.99 LT 36.99 .19930+/-429.9 758+/-152 LT 16.69 LT 16.99 I 47 FEED 999924/999924 LT 19.89 LT 29.20 LT 33.29 7396+/-642.0 LT 133.99 LT 24.79 LT 28.39 5 57 RAY 900924/900924 LT 16.70 LT 15.19 LT 29.70 7990+/-491.0 LT 105.90 { LT 15.10 LT 16.49 [ 61 RAY 900924/900924 LT 7.60 26+/-18.0 LT 13.00 8126+/-349.0 LT 83.80 LT 10.60 LT 9.20 I 69 MAY 900924/900924 LT 23.50 LT 25.00 LT 39.60 14900+/-761.9 LT 189.00 t LT 25.20 LT 25.69 L e l t i P I l-F -A ~I t

i VEGETATION Gamma Spectrometry r I i -A.

l ll ,) 1 ]1 /( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 04 6 0 0 7 01 7 5 5 7 1 1 7 3 8 9 6 6 2 1 4 8 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 9 1 2 2 1 1 1 7 s 1 1 1 5 3E T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T GT o L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L AA C PD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 8 2 5 1 0 7 3 7 7 3 2 0 0 4 0 7 8 6 7 1 6 1 0 4 9 6 3 9 2 4 8 2 1 9 2 5 6 4 2 3 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 5 6 3 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 5 0 3 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 9 5 0 0 e 6 2 9 0 9 8 8 1 7 0 6 1 5 5 3 5 4 5 9 t 0 3 2 4 6 0 0 2 1 4 1 5 2 6 3 9 0 4 4 3 5 4 2 5 4 7 5 7 4 6 4 3 2 5 4 6 4 5 E F F C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 9 4 2 7 9 6 9 5 3 3 4 9 5 8 3 5 3 4 8 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 2 2 3 1 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T C L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 6 L 7A I G LM N EG I2 FTI T2 FNs 0 0 A7 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e. 0 C0 FM2 6 0 0 0 0 8 I7 O 4 2 1 7 4 8 4 6 4 6 8 6 5 0 6 ]2 3 2 - 3 6 8 3 3 0 5 1 2 1 2 6 5 3 2 5 8 1 6 T / 0 - 02 902090101 10102030101 0 - 01 9010802 Rs+

0. / 0. / 8 /0. /9. /0. /3. / 0 /7. /0. /3. /0. /0. /

0. / - 0

- 0 - 0 + 6 / 4. /8.,-4. /0. / A O! + %'E P G 7 804+ .+4 +5+0 +0+ .+5+7+5+9 +5+ 90 - + +1 1+5+ EYE 3 10107510152020911020261010 19/700101010 CC RC/ 17 5 6 9 1 7 4 3 9 3 2 9 5 7 3 +3 7 5 3 6 12 N2 T5T3T9T7T6T1T1T3T2T4T7T4T9 T636T2T2T9T1 1 O CEC sE L1L6L1L7L1L2L2L2L2L1L2L1L2 L114L1L1L1L5 "T Y EUF CS C PQ 0F SE5 1M R2 EZ AF R M s 3 MET 0' ALL A GPU L Ms E AE 0000 00000000 0000000000 00 00000 Y SR 0 8 0 0. 4 0 0000600047002200510000 000000000400 3L 4 0765. 42579888 00.4525228734 0 0 4 6 0. 0 0 1 4 3 55 C 30 21115511111111791122231111 116673911111 16 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTT sO LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLL CC 8 3 1 1 6 6 6 6 0 0 7 7 1 8 3 1 1 6 6 2 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 0 3 3 2 2 3 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 0 8 9 9 0 3 5 5 5 6 6 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 TE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / CT 8 3 1 1 6 6 6 6 0 0 7 7 1 5 3 1 1 6 6 EA 2 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 0 3 3 2 2 LD 3 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 0 9 9 0 3 5 5 5 6 6 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ELE PP MY AT S S s S S s s s / s s E s E s E s E s E s s s s E s E s s s T s V s V s T s T s s s s T s V s A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A R R E R E R E R E R E R R R R E R E R G G L G L G L G L G L G G G G L G L G N 8O 0I 1 2T 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 TA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 AC 4 TO 2 SL F lI il .l illflli ,ll l,f l

,lilll 1 7 [ 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 9 0 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 1 0 0 9 5 8 4 O4 4 C1 1 8 5 9 s 2 1 2 4 9 2 1 8 3 1 1 8 1 8 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 2 2 1 s : 5 3E T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T CT o L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L AA C FD 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 1 5 3 3 4 6 9 4 9 2 6 7 4 7 7 2 2 3 4 7 5 7 5 4 6 4 3 4 0 3 1 9 0 7 9 8 2 7 2 2 3 5 2 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 6 6 2 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 2 4 0 2 8 3 9 8 9 8 8 0 9 0 0 7 9 0 9 6 8 0 3 8 8 3 4 4 9 5 6 2 7 0 8 9 2 7 4 2 5 0 7 1 7 4 9 2 1 9 7 3 6 0 6 6 2 9 4 6 6 5 4 5 5 3 3 6 4 5 5 4 6 6 5 5 4 E F 7O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 P 5 0 8 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 1 7 2 6 8 5 8 3 9 5 0 6 1 8 7 1 9 4 0 7 1 1 2 3 4 1 3 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 4 1 3 O 1 T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T C L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 2A 1 G LR N EG IM FTI T FNS AT O CS FM2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 0 9 1T O 7 1 4 3 8 9 5 7 ~ / 0 0 0 9 5 1 3 3 0 4 5 0 3 6 8 1 6 4 1 4 7 4 7 ~ T / 9901829341038191 9201e1926196 081838289 6 RS+ 980./5. /9. /5. /0. /9. /9. /

9. /0 1 4 1 0 8 0. /

17970./3. /9. /3. / OI [ P G 7 2/0+7+6+0+2+2+2+ 4+8/2/1/7+2/9. /1 +f+0+2+ A Z ETE 3 1 +14112015201310 101 + 1 +1+191 +4+19233018 CC RC/ 17 9 2 1 5 4 2 2 7 4 7 1 1 9 8 3 7 6 2 4 1 f. E2 T1T3T1T3T5T5T8T1 T5T4T1 T7T4T1T7T3T0T8T3 2O CEC sE L9L2L2L4L2L4L2L4 L7L9L9L7L1L9L9L2L2L2L1 TT EUF CS C FQ CP sE5 LM R1 EO AF C M S 3 MET 0 ALL A GPU L MS E AE 00 00000 000 00 00000000090s 00908000 Y SR 0809 0000429052 O 48.0008290.70100.00 000065008055.67 L 4 11 03498 033. 32 5666e2015491. 11098581 C 34 1191112271229911 1111111111124511222211 16 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SO LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL CC 6 6 4 9 7 8 1 9 8 3 1 1 6 6 6 6 0 8 7 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 1 3 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 TE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / CT 6 6 0 0 7 8 1 9 8 3 1 1 6 6 6 6 0 9 7 LA 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 LD 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 1 3 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 L 0 0 0 9 9 9 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 9 9 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 4 C 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 E LE FP RY AT S s S S^ s S s S s E s E s E s s s s s E s s E E s E s t V s T s T s s s s r V s s V V s T s v A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A E R E R E R R R R t E R R E E R E R E L G L G L O G G O e L G O L L G L G L N NO OI 1 IT 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 TA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 AC 4 TO 2 SL F il l!Il 1

m~.. _ _,..... m.__.__am_.m m._,. ._..am i.___.* ._am-__.a l l e e o e e e e e e e e o e e e mi e e o e e o e e o e = w =, e o e m . Q9 e e e e e a w e e e e e e e e e e S QM w e w w w e O N e w e N e w w w w e m W N N w N N M M M W N w e M w g M . es se e NW l N b N b b b N N N N N N N N b b b b WM O J d d d 4 J d 4 4 4 4 4 4 d d d a d r 44 Y he e e o e e e e e. e. e o e e e e e. e. e. e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e m m w e e e e e N N b. N N e w N N m e e e a e e e e e a w m e e 1 N w e m w N w N M N w w w N m N N m i l i 0 1 1 8 l 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 % \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + m e o e e e w w w e N w e w m N e e e n e w e N e w N e n e m m m m > N e w w N e e e m e 6 m e w N w a m e w n 1 m w w w w w w m w m m e w w e N m e W I t ' e b 9 e n e o e e e e e e o e e e o e e e b e o e e e e o e.

m. o e m e e o e e o e

e e a e e e e e e e e e e e e I w w e e N m m e a w w e o e e w m e N N m n N n e w m m n m N e a m N n e 0 k > k k k N N h b b b b N N H k > b U d 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 d d d 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 d o e MM h H .kN h M e 4 e f e e e e e e e o a - NM. b N e e e o e e o e e o e e e e e 1 O m M w e e e a w e o e N e o a w w e m V' a l a w e e e M e M N N O m e e e W > \\ omen eleNem o me-ememowevee newea owaw I WM+ elal e\\ewonetemelnwebeNeNeNoN \\eN leOmlelelei elNm 4 0m eNeN e+ e i e 9e\\wI e\\=$ e 9 eNe i h W e m+e+ wen \\w\\e+ *\\e+M\\eNN+e+w+ g 4 +M49+ n+w\\ M w w m wome Nem+wenom+me=+w+meneweeNwwwe wow + UU N \\ wh n e w n m e N w n o e w w e e o > M NN 1 0 kNkm km>N>wkwkeheNMhwHwbeNMbwbeNN bebm M UWU Mu dede dadwdedwdedadededmdmdNd.edNde 4mde Mb Mai dR' sH e - A M h. Mb a' de 4 WhD d EM Cl . au eeee seeees e seeees se

• • ee MM mees eesemmee,wweoe eeeeemoseownewesemee e e. m. e at -

e e e e e e e e e ee eoe e e e e e eoe e o e e. - e e d .e enew emeNmme e e e e e em e owMeoww sow wwww U' me MMMN NNMMMMMewhMbmMmeMmwMMMebMMSS MwMW we I l NNNN Nbb>NNbHbbbbb>NbbMbbbhbbb>MN MbbN MO dddd ddddddddddddddddddeJddddddddd dddd YU e w-a m w w w w w w (. e e e w a m w N m M e m m M N N N m m N N m N e m S e m m m M w w M e o e S e M e e S e M e e o e e e e e e o e e M w e o O e o e o e e e e e e e o e e e e e e H m O O e O 9 m 9 O NM \\ \\. N \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ Uk e w - a m a w w w w w e e e e a e m w M4 e m MO ' N m N e m M N N N N m -M N N m M ' O M S e m e e m w w M M e e e S e w a m o e e e o e o e' e o e o ee w e o O e e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e e e U m e e e a e m m e-m a m e e a e MdM hh EH 4H M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W M M M M M 4 ) m M M M M M M M M M M M 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 V a W m a w a m a w W W W M m a W a u 9 9 9 9 4 0 4 9 4 O O d d O O O 9 d 50 OM

• e ;

MN e m e w w w w w w w w.* w w w w e e O' $4 .M M w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w O. 4U 'w-po N Md ,h' ...._,..__4 .~ v......

n., m F 2 4001' CLETELAND CLECTRIC [ 7 JBATING C3. - PSP 2. CASSt $94 KJIP TRACE, MTE"2 SATE tw 'l. -eAnnA SrEC mErOaT Or re SAMPLE FRE99EWCT IS : NORTELY BESULTS IN FCI/ES +/- 2 Stena r L CTATION SARFLE COLLECT 30s CS-134 CS-137-I-131 44 CO-50 LOCATION TYPE DATE CO-69 GE-1 i 3 48 GRASS 999531/999531 LT 19.99 LT 12.99 LT 24.99 6152+/-282.0 LT-11.99 LT 12.99 954+/-197.9 48 LEATES 999626/999626 LT 9.99 LT 19.39 LT 17.99 6999+/-396.0 LT 10.59 i LT 19.99 746+/-73 48 ORASS 999626/999426. LT 8.99 LT 11.99 LT 16.99 5429+/-289.9 LT 11.99 t LT 19.99 2993+/-140.9 i 48 LEATES 999726/999726 LT 12.69 LT 14.39 LT 24.39 7749+/-397.9 LT 14.49 3 LT 15.69 551+/-136.9 48-GRASS 999726/999726 LT 19.99 LT 14.99 LT 28.99 5929+/-271.9 LT 12.st LT 11.99 3211+/-173.5~ [ ]_ i _ 48 LEATES 999819/999839 LT 13.39 LT 16.49 LT 28.09 6597+/-499.9 .LT 17.49 LT 17.99 1999+/-188.9 48 GRASS 999830/999939 LT 29.99 LT 10.00 LT 29.99-6300+/-457.9 LT 22.99 LT 22.99 2139+/-198.9 43 LEATES 999927/999927 LT 18.59 LT 23.1e-LT 39.29 4918+/-4S4.0 LT 22.89 LT 21.89 1229+/-255.9 48 GRASS 999927/999927 LT 17.99 LT 19.99 LT 20.99 4749+/-431.9 LT 29.99 LT 16.99 3449+/-254.0 i 4 1 i 4 1 i i I ? 6 t I a l L i -A 3 i v,, +

O. I O O

4,. 4 l 1 i. 1990 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT' (NORADI0lMICAL) MM -PERRY NUCLEAR POWER FIAff. j 1 t ? l i i N l k P ..,,-n.nnnwee--+m-+---s.---w,-s-w--wo-mn------- - ' ' " " * ' ' * ' * ' ' ' ' * * " " * ' ' ' ' * ' * ' " ' * * * ' " * ~ ' ' ' ' ' " ^ ~ ' " * * * * " ' ' ' * ~ ~ ' ' " " ' ' ' * " ^ ' ' ' * ' " ' " " * * ' " "

O INTRODUCTION The 1990 Annual Environmental Operating Report (nonradiological) describes the programs necessary to meet the requirements of the operating License NPF-58, Appendix B, Environmental Protection Plan (EPP). The Licensee has developed procedures for environmental responsibilities i as well as the departmental interfaces necessary to assure that the operation of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) does not adversely affect the environment. This includes implementation of Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements and compliance with'other federal, state and local requirements for environmental protection. i i I P LO I 4 LI O

l O I comTRTS ?*E* I. Aerial Remote Sensing............................. 1 II. Corbicula Monitoring Program...................... 11 III. Berbicide Usage.................................... 19 IV. Noncompliances........,............................ 20 V. Unrevievsd Environmental Questions................. 21 VI. Nonroutine R6 ports................................. 22 LIST OF FIGURES

1. Predicted Annual Deposition of Disuolved Solids from Cooling Tover Drift...........................

6

2. Flight Line Map of the 1990 Photomission...........

8

3. Distribution of Ground-truthed Locations...........

9

4. PNPP In-plant Sampling Locations...................

16

5. Eas d ake Plant Sampling Loca tions..................

17 LIST OF TABLES t

1. Summary of the 1990 color Infrared Photomission...

7

2. 1990 Sampling Dates and Locations..................

13

3. Bivalves Collected During the 1990 Corbicula Monitoring Program...............................

14

4. 1990 Herb.tcide Usage...............................

19 . wma. aemi maa mmmesi-

(m\\ J I. Lerial Remote Sensing Index l fs fage s. I. Introduction............ 2 II. Methods......................................... 3 III. Results........................................ 4 IV. Conclusions.................................... 5 References............................... 10 i l 1 i 'l \\% e

f 'y. l.*i; sr L y ?L.l',$1 j y. (..:s g,- \\,. p; u M(ll.. 1

• ; s'II[ggy).

~ X s,ic,t t; ( t R3 i p. fl ' : 3,. .'I h!$ hl 't k 4 t': d.' f$ ., e ~Cq e6,y?fh,! T ~ l (? 5"g

\\ ~ c

2

u. 4

,w_. _,7 s n,. N._.-. ~~., k.-. :gyJy,3$.l.g' 4 m ..~.III: 'd h . r'M

• f Q.M h g-T.C DIlpr?iinf j

.E ,'7)_. A. u.rh;h y..

., a""88j -

i. 2 1 r- ,. 7,,. ' d{

., u.%c, mit... r

11 v,.,,,.

'b !if ,,e {

h. $ w' a. y,0,.

ta l ' l,'-- - l,. h),,h,), i,t H5 c: 4 c )xs,_,_- w,;,,.:.,

v i j' 't.. ' 'i'

] e;y [ .J g u.,.mmg,.. w,- n .J~ .b 4'*

lO I. Introduction V The basis for this program can be found in the PHPP Environmental Protection Plan, Section 4.2.2.1. Healthy green leaf tissue is a strong absorber of visible light, although the absorptivity is somewhat reduced in the green vavelengths. The slightly higher reflectance of green light from plant surfaces, as compared to the low reflectance for blue and red, accounts for the green appearance of most vegetation. The reflectance of near infrared radiation from healthy green leaves is even higher than f.or the green light, although it does not iniiuence color perception because it is outside of the vis.lble range. Infrared film emulsions react with the near infrared wavelengths to produce images which are then coded with visible colors. Red or magenta colors are coded to correspond to the reflected near infrared radiation, (INTERA). Consequently, this " false color" infrared photography (FCIR) is used for the purpose of monitoring vegetation and vegetation stress. Recognition of stress symptoms during interpretation of the FCIR imagery is based on several stress signatures (- and recognition clues which include the following: 1) a shift in the spectral reflectivity of plant surfaces (color changes): 2) a change in the texture of reflecting plant surfaces (size and form changes); and 3) larger scale pattern recognition (shape and location of the stressed area). For example, if all the trees in a forest are of the same species, it is easier to identify anomalous conditions in the photographs which are : elated to stressed trees than if the forest is made up of 10 different tree species, each having different natural reflectivity for near infrared radiation. Tre FCIR photography does not detect differences in the amount of heat being emitted from substances. Vegetative stress is any disturbance of the normal growth cycle of vegetation brought about by any living entity or environmental factor, which interfores with the mam.facture, translocation or utilitation of food, mineral nutrients, and water in such a way that the affected vegetation changes appearance (Agrios,1969). In natural and urban environments, many varied, complex and inter-related factors may cause f% (a) vegetation stress. These factors include (but are not limited to) insect pests, disease agents, drought, air pollution, temperature extremes, soil l

compaction, salt deposition, mechanical damage, old age deterioration and changing environments. 1 In the environment around Perry, salt deposition vould be the most likely j non-natural cause of vegetation stress, this being attributable to drift from the cooling tower at PHPP. Irojected deposition of drif t is depicted in Figure 1. An evaluation of recent changes in the chemical addition to the circulating water system was conducted to ensure that it vould have no impact on total dissolved solids levels. Salt stress on vegetation may result either indirectly from excess accumulations of salts in soils, or directly from deposition of salts on the foliage. Mechanisms by which salt stress in plants may occur include (1) increased osmotic potential of the soil solution affecting the availability of soil moisture to plant; (2) altering of mineral nutrition balance in the salt tissues; and/or (3) toxic effects due to specific lon concentrations in the plants (Bernstein, 1975; H m s, et. al.,1970; Allison, 1964; Levitt, 1980). Tolerances and susceptibility to salt deposition are highly variable, depending both upon the plant species and other conditions in the environment.- Some plants are able to tolerate high salt concentrations vithout shoving signs of stress; whereas some other species are very susceptible to damage from elevated levels of salt _in the environment. Studies-for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission indicated that thresholds for development of visible salt stress symptoms on the most sensitive species were approximately 0.6 kg/ha-day (0.5 lb./ acre-day) of Nacl salt '(INTERA,lo80). The threshold for detectability of salt stress using remote sersing techniques was found to be between 0.9 and 1.9 kg/ha-day (0.8 and 'l./ lb./ acre day) of Nacl salts, depending on a variety of environmental and plant factors. II. Methods i Aerial Infrared Photography a. t .A summary of the pertinent information regart ng the color infrared (CIR) photographic mission is presented in Table 1. The mission was flovn according to the specifications licted in Table 1 on August 29, 1990 by Kucera and Associates of Mentor, Ohio. The lines of flight and corresponding photo numbers along those lines are shown on the flight line map (Figure 2). Photo Interpretation The photographs were scanned to (1) check for quality o color, resolution and cloud cover, (2) detect any obvious differences in color tone or pattern, and (3) identify those areas where differences in tone, pattern or textural characteristics suggested the need for specific ground truthing. Areas of potential vegetative stesss were compared to the areas thich are predicted to have maximum d ift from cooling towers. Areas to be ground truthed vere located on maps for reference during field inspections (Figure 3). 1990 photos vere also compar,d to baseline ln and photos frot tue previous survey to determine whether there vere any 3 p significant changes. l Gtound Inspection Following the initial interpretation of infrared photography, sevaral trips vere conducted to gather. ground truth data. In addition, the environmental monitoring program evaluates site areas for stress on a routine basis. III. Results This year 15 locations exhibiting potential indications of stress on the FCIR imagery were ground truthed. None of these locations occurred within the areas of maximum projected deposition. Four of the locations were vithin the PNPP site boundary. 1990 photos were compared to photos from the previous survey for all the locations identified as exhibiting potential signs of stress. In no instances was any significant difference noted. -

i 1 Areas exhibiting variations in spectral signatures on and in the-vicinity of the PNPP site in 1990 were generally attributable to the following . factors: Stress due to vind and root exposure in trees along the lakeshore. ' Variations in species compsition in the arboreal ~ canopy-for example, silver maple (Acer saccharinum), black'villow (Salix nigra) and American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) reflect electromagnetic energy differently and thus provide _ variations in CIR tonal contrast; ornamentals also exhibit this phenomenon. Variations in soil moisture and elevation-some areas typically support more mesic flora such'as red maple (Acer rubrum), veeping villov (Salix babylonica), Eastern Cottonvood (Populus deltoides)' and American Beech (Pagus grandifolia); these species also provide varietions in CIR tonal signatures. . Arboreal mortality due to natural causes such as over-maturity. Stress due to root exposure or mortelity due to siltation as a result of nearby construction activities. IV. @ nclusions Tae vegetative stress that has been observed on and in the vicinity of the PHPP site during this survey and since the.beginning of color infrared photomissions has been insignfficant and attributable to natural factors. For these reasons,'the' operation of the cooling tower from August.1988 through August 1990 does not appear to have resulted in. adverse environmental impact. [ A/ I.' G ' l

' f~%\\ h v I (@ s 4 y = I s g e ], s' s ' C!'s '- /' n ',\\l, ? j g' i f ~N r i, s a I s n 2 / s( w a s s l  ; / I, f s s ~ fiI:l '< b 'l,i \\ i, s i I, ? > (' A f ,d./k- .iN s ' /,r ~. -l J e rf ,i c g /s r y, z D Q = s / ? J s s,- /d i / h'. s f il l 'f/s / .2 I is j x ,f a / / o s s (s ~ / s, [- N j / -,j ,s / I l ) lls e .s w N.i /- /.' / = m g' f f 4 s ~~_l' f ( ~ td C s a \\ 's f-c A- \\ n ' r' / s,'@f I! a ll c x f-e i 3 / j \\\\ w V['N

O Kucera and Associates, Inc. Subcontractor: 7000 Reynolds Road Mentor, Ohio 44060 (215) 255-4700 29 August 1990 Date: Veather: Clear Start Times 14:01 hrs Eastern Daylight Savir.gs Time 14:32 hrs Eastern Daylight Savings Time Stop Time: 914 m (3000 ft) Above Ground Level Altitude Eastman Kodak 2443 Color Infrared Latch 336, Film Type: Lott 13 Camera Serial Number: 247136 Camera / Lens modelt Zeiss Jena Magazine Serial Number: 246436 Lens Serial Number: 7370200 Camera Focal Lent,th: 151.76mm Filters Mir.us Blue 493198 Shutter Speed: 1/300 second f 4.5 Aperture.: Icm=600m (1 in = 500 ft.) Scale: Table 1 - Summary of the 1990 Color Infrared Photomission 0 - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,m.,. y s k%4j %'g J jE k Mi'7,/ e;,,ps;,.,x,;n%s.:. 8

1. g 1

i n m c l.L i 4 uw.s sj q; j. g g "y" 3,, j;. x%,. 7 :,1 ::h 1 Q<- g

• ,p wt l':

. m.b y, G 1 %p .'y ', ' 3I$4 . g 4 c d'y~, j d[5 p s., g 'E, j 4 , /, M%-h f igyg C e ., %g y.i y 47,3 }3}[y']U,I ..,[/'s M - s' W f.M~ mFf,%. /j. 3 C s rp A g .l " u' 'N 1 ~ , - ((... L 4,- x, -.;)- 4 _.9 J f - f: /> .s, . s [ .' C 4 I' s "6, fa ,-..m .' h t: .c ?. ~~,. p . m<. a. . f. ~ :. e r >r m r ,/ - }\\ .e g. J.O-J t~ A3 . w' -- o u.a., ./,

• s

'L

1. ,, w..

s - n Q '<7 p, < - 'e,

1. p'%t, R p *%[p ){i.

W it f a .w. ~ g Y 4a k. 'm .o a rf - J' ,) y 4 l Vy %ys ,/ d' ' q* J 'f q N y ! . & x :."s' ~.,- ) p.i. l .c5 'l B a M~,4 ','3il, 3 t, - ( 3 y' mi,, s m 4 C 4 . c;,, o I r .4 [ ?4 r N s w u I*- y - , - _- N,. g;,.> Q,N 'y.N J;i,., _ _ t. n e t 7 h ,, u,, gm e.e y JE, .c.3 ,t ~ .,. b.. ; ,;e W,, " - - ( "N,( 7, a s '. ',, tty e .g " g..- 4 fQN-I ,G' f, N g, '. g, >! w y$j 4 '** ( 4s ,,.x s. f j -[ c ' N [r, '% ' l <W Y, i , k# s f @b \\~- p yi

R

( f.;g -T N., o. 'y k :',

), d} z y

4. yN J'

l k ', X< ~ l,? (s c6 F /, pi. e g 1 ww y h,. h;

• ['

y. y{[ '., ~ h m, n: yv ) a q u,; q: ; ~.,,,, p r-f. an;- pA

i. /

2* cq - 's f %" ., Aq g y s 3 s ~#,,~ 1 bl + w (t-5

, * * >J )d G.j; i

j a, ',., ,e e* .. o {' .q 4 f,. w

s..

a l' 4 4

• mp 1

~ j .g e- @g I - 1 %' t, / h,g g% P E s 2 4 _, ; - 4 y i - k (*,. ] j[: s, 3 y s ) Q f ( f f. 'M ' b Y ,,p ~ ys y.

• k x

3 {! .0 v. 9 . 4.M.- 'y 3-, y[.w% f' 1 ao 'f s w N. t l ')i., Q

.f Qll '

f l y pQ?m, ,y ,. g A 14 c (. 3]ivd( )1 3 ')' y f. v. 1 V W \\, .,:i f. ~

1. ,[

.,. em, +.*. 2 n' 4 ,,n m* l I s, t j ) 14 g l' i o 4 nf s e e + ?...- g, 's s ./ 2* An.}. 4; y,, f i ' ~b, u a.x} ), h \\.5.1,,, *., );y l s L m. 'u{.' ' Y ' v,y I( e* v.. s.h[' .] J ' ' '{ N,- \\ h;,',,, s 'N l N* .1-

u. e

/**N U [."],, { I \\'., '$.h

f s

[ si ? ~ \\ m.,,,. 1,,o;g, f' ' llr.,~ \\ 4, n1 c}M1pp1 o i <m,,,, x,. \\ p s.; ,e 2 s p N..o - ~ e. e c i k'j 8,.. b f ' O t',' ~,. t a d 8 ,6 ~w

, _. ~ ~. 4 li. l s fi' l ~ I, il e / / q ft 3 3 ,~s \\,, I Il b e' / / I gI / j 5 i it; ,Ym, l ll o j b "W j / t ll /, 's l ,i o-t s 'Q Il / / g s/ n g,.--. e ' s., I / R, ' s 11 Dg 35 k f [t 2% 4' gll kg% i / a yi i ~ l / )/ 3, i g N 't / %s i Q 's / 7 I s k ( ,Y ', { ,s ,n l W$w%g l/ 's,,y/ / 'l / 's, s 'k g,N 7s, 'g /; lIl s, l s.4 Ill ,I "m.. f g) = 1 g ~ s I I t .g ,g -.-c %, j j 's., l 7 / y / l .]3 ~ k l lllje'~o".~-j,j l7 ~ So=pY~cn\\l 'v l

• % l

\\ u 8 j 'Q' \\ 9me I F 't t ,/ g l's ',j ' -s 4 9 5 e '[ k' '. g' y / / s$ yJ I l [' / " #' ' * *l s' O Yi

• f t

( TON _ A, w s ll' N/ ,,4 9: u I / I 0 y ,4 1 LO-<o ca j l l %'~l a "%Q j l ,g -l l P l l ,o ; a g' ,t l l l' 1 a II .l g b 1 , p 11 t y I o Sl I / - / M,, / to o d' e g 7, l ,f \\,# N, a i 1 y l l s r, s I i ,/ 8' i g-p,:.

,' v,

's, ,, w '~ s \\ qvi ~ l [ p -tDN %, 4m(/ .d 0 b t' n O \\ s,f',w 'N ,y. s. 's i a 1 l "g 4 [ .c !'\\'

f%C REFERENCES Agrios, G.N. 1969. Plant Pathology, Academic Press, Ner York, New York. 1 Allison, L.E. 1964. " Salinity.in Relation to Irrigation," Advances in Agronomy,Vol. 16, pp. 139-180. Bernstein,'L. 1975. " Effects of Salinity and Sodicity n Plant Growth," Annual Rev Phytopathology, Vol. 13, pp. 295-312. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. Perry Nuclear Power Plant . Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B, to the Operating License. Cleveland. Electric Illuminating Company Perry Nuclear Power Plant Environmental Report, Figure 5.1-16. j Hanes, R.E.,'L.V. Zelany, and R.E. Blaser. 1970, Effects of Deicing Salts on Vater Quality and Biota,. National Cooperative. Highway Research Board,. National Acadeau of Sciences, Vashington, D.C. =INTERA Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1980. Remote' Sensing for-the Detection and Monitoring of Salt Stress on Vegetation: Evalv- ' 4 on_s, and Guidelines. NUREG/CR-1231, Nuclear Regulatory Commision Washington, D.C. b Levitt, J. 1980. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses, Academic l' Press, New York, New York. l-f .(.L l-l! g

l l l l l II. Corbicula Monitoring Program Index Page I. Introduction................................... 12 II. 1990 Corbicula Monitoring Program............... 12 III. Results........................................ 14 IV. Conclusions.................................... 14 References..................................... 18 _

'~'T I. Introduction j Sampling for benthic macroinvertebrates has been conducted in Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (INPP) sivee 1971, and specifically for Corbicula since 1981. Monitoring efforts have also i included Dreissena polymorpha (zebra mussel) since it was first collected at PNPP in 1988. The initial monitoring program specifically for Corbicula was developed by NUS Corporation for the PNPP in response to IE Bulletin 81-03 and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board The current monitoring program was developed in conjunction with Aquatic Systems Corporation and incorporated into the Environmental Protection Plan (Operating License Appendix B) Section 4.2.1 in July, 1988 by License Amendment 15. The program consists of periodic sampling of areas at both the PNPP and Eastlake Power Plants. Its purpose was to detect Corbicula, should it appear in the study area. This report describes the 1990 program and O results. G t II. 1990 Corbicula Monitoring Program History In response to IE Bulletin 81-03, a benthic macroinvertebrate reconnaissance survey was conducted in May, 1981. The purpose of the survey var to determine the population status of Corbicula in the local environment. Although no Corbicula were found, an ongoing monitoring program was initiated in June, 1982, that called for semi-annual sampling. The survey locations included the intake and discharge areas at both PNPP and the Eastlake Pover Plant. From program initiation through fall 1986, no Corbicula vere found in any samples collected. Two Corbicula vere found in a sample collected from the Eastlake plant in June, 1987 (PY-CEI/NRR-0691L, dated 8-10-87). No [v; Corbicula have been found in any other sample collected since that time. A more detailed program history can be found in the PNPP Annual y l Environmental Operating Reaorts, 1986 and 1987. In hly, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved a new monitoring program (License Amendment No. 15), which modified sampling locations at both plants. Samples vere still collected from Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Plant, and samples were collected from -in-plant locations at PNPP. Dreissena polymorpha, the zebra mussel, was first ecllected at PNPP and Eastlake :in the fall of 1988. The population significantly increased in 1989, but remained relatively stable in 1990, due primarily to poor veather conditions during the-spawning season. The population is expected to continue to increase for the next several years. _w . Sampling Locations & Frequency s: Samples vere collected quarterly from in-plant locations at PNPP as shown .; A in Figure 4, and semi-annually from the vicinity of the Eastlake Power Plant as shown in Figure 5. Dates of sample collections are listed belov .in Table 2. Date Sample Location -1/16-Service water (SV) and Emergency Service Vater m J (ESV) forebays and trash baskets j 4/18 SV and ESV.forebays and trash baskets -6/12 Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Plant L 7/19 'SV and ESV forebays and trash baskets l-9/10 Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Plant 10/ 8 Cooling tower basin 10/30 SV and ESV forebays and trash baskets Weekly Inspections of PNPP property shoreline, veather f permitting (t l- [O Table 2 - 1990 Sampling Dates and Locations 1 L.

t l-- [] Hethods and Equipment v All samples vere collected by Ponar hand dredge, hand scoop, or scraper. In the consultant's laboratory, the samples were examined for bivalve shells and fragments, which vere then identified to the lovest possible taxon. In addition.to sample collections, active communications were maintained with other agencies involved with benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring on Lake Erie. Representatives of other power plants were contacted as well as universities and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. III. Results No Corbicula vere found in any sample collected during the 1990 monitoring program. All bivalves collected are listed belov in Table 3. O PNPP EASTLAKE '%J Dreissenapgymorpha X X Musculium transversum X Pisidium caeseratiry X Pisidium compressum X X Sphaerium striatinum X X Sphaerium transversum X Unionidae X Table 3 - divalves Collected During the 1990 Corbicula Monitoring Program IV. Conclusions The collection in June, 1987 vas the first indication that Corbicula are slowly spreading into the Central Basin of Lake Erie. Bovever, it has not been demonstrated that the presence of these eless is creating any operational problems at the Eastlake Power Plant or at PNPP. '

l l Q)-. Dreissena has spread rapidly and has an unusually high ability to cause flow reduction or blockage in systems that use rav vater. For these reasons, a program was developed in 1990 that irrludes monitoring, chemical treatment, and research. No operational problems have occurred as a result of this species. No live mussels have been found in plant systems past the service water and emergency service water basins. The program was implemented proactively in order to maintain the plant in a mussel free condition, and vill be continued in 1991. f 4 O O l !

= a o O A j LAKE. ERIE i ~ s m- .7 K / / 1 ~ ./ x. / X / X f x / x / M_ / / / x / i l FOREBAY l ACCESS PORTS I a s ESW-41 1 ESW-- M p g TRASH BASKET s w-s s

1. _

SW-1 ai ag sw-2 TRASH FOREBAY PORTS ~ _ TRAVELING BASKET I sw-3, SCREENS T p sw-4 EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER 1 PUMP HOUSE i SERVICE WATER PUMP HOUSE o - Sample Location 1 Figure & PNPP In plant sampling locations. i i b ,--g.

o O O X LAKE ERIE E-6 O 10 E-3 E0 0 E-13 ~7 E. E-6 E-4 E-19 ~ E-2 g 12 ~g 0 E-9 E E-15 r g 7 wr, l E-21 EASTLAKE POWER PLANT l SAMPLING LOCATIONS O - Bottom Sediments SCALE 5 - Canal Wall Scrapings 0 800 FT. n n Figure 5. Eastlake Plant sampling locations.

REPERENCES Cleveland Electric. Illuminating Company, November 13,;1986, Appendix B to Operating License No.-NPF-58, Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Environmental Protection Plan. Cleveland Elect'ric Illuminating Company, 1987. Annual Environmental Operating Report for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 10, 1981. Inspection and Enforcement Bulletin.81-031 Flow Blockage of Cooling Vater to Safety System Components by Corbicula sp.-(asiatic clam) and Mytilus sp. (mussel). PY-CEI/NRR-0691 L August 10, 1987. Notification to the NRC of the collection-of Corbicula.

Amendment No. 15 to License no. NPF-58.

.] h III. Berbicide Usage The following is a compilation of herbicide usage at the PNPP for 1990.

i All usage was in compliance with Ohio Environmental Protection Agency regulations. 'No adverse environmental impacts as a result of this usage o

-were noted during weekly site environmental inspections. Surflan AS and Round Up were used in equal portions to make up the. total T2antity.- Spike was also used as.noted. ~ i Total .Date' Applied Location Acres Gallons ~ 5/22 Unit 1 graveled ereas 5.3 -20.0

5/23-6/5-E-field.and outer perimeter 3.9 15.0

6/5-8/2-Parmly Rd. pipe laydown area 12.8 40.0 6/28-?/6 Transmission yard.

-10.0 ~15.4* ~7/16! Mise.: yard areas .3-40.0* 8/3 _cabl9 reel storage yard .3.3 10.0 8/.8-8/10 Fire training ground and laydown area 6.9 25.0 Table 4_-- Herbicide Usage + /" . :Thesefapplications included _Round-Up, Surflan, and Spike, mixed in the ratio 1:2.5:4.

r;

3

OL IV. Noncompliances A. NPDES Noncompliances There vere no NPDES noncompliances in 1990.

B. EPP noncompliances There were no EPP noncompliances in 1990. O O

r i W .q

• i w.

V. Unreviewed Environmental Questions All proposed changes in station design or operation, tests or experiments during 1990 vere reviewed for potential environmental impact in accordance with the EPP and administrative quality assurance procedures The reviews ensured that no changes were performed which could cause an adverse environmental impact. Therefore, there vere no potentially significant unreviewed environmental questions in 1990., i .p

s.,r i

a 3 O h

L] VI. Nonroutine Reports one nonroutine report was submitted in 1990: On November 2, 1990, the Environmental Monitoring Element was notified of the presence of dead birds in the Unit 1 cooling tower basin. Fifty-four (54) birds vere found during an inspection conducted that afternoon. Spele Number Kingle: 45 White civvned sparrov 3 Varbler sp. 2 Black capped chickadee 2 Vireo 1 Sparrow sp. 1 Total 54 n) The Perry Nuclear Power Plant was in cold shutdown for a refueling outage i a prior to and during this event. The cooling tower basin was drained and had been cleaned on 10/29/90. No lights were on inside the tower, and no birds vere found around the outside of the tover. Veather conditions during the time of the event included a high pressure system moving in, accompanied by northerly vinds and air temperature in the 40's. Additional inspections of the Unit I cooling tover basin vere conducted on 11/5/90, 11/6/90, and 11/0/90. The following dead birds were indentified as a result of these inspections. No endangered species were identified during any of the inspections. Species 11/5 21/6 11/8 Kinglet 4 Black capped chickadee 1 1 Sparrov sp. 1 {) Heurning dove 1 Total 5 2 1 i l

The Unit 2 cooling tower basin was cleaned on 11/6/90 and inspected on l 11/8/90 to provide comparative information. No dead birds were found during this inspection. The unit 2 cooling tower is not in operation and no internal verticle supports or baffle plates are installed to serve as obstacles to birds flying into the tover. The cause is believed to have been impaction of the birds with the internal components and structures o.' the Unit 1 cooling tover. This unique occurrence is probably associated with the fall migration of the birds and the existing plant and weather conditions. A detailed study l undertaken at the Davis-Besse Nuclear lover Station documents similar l impactions during fall migrations, and :orrelates them vith the occurrence of high pressure systems. In addition, teortherly air flows vere noted to increase migration of insectivorous birds such as kinglets, which follow different migration paths each year. (

Reference:

Cooling Towers as Obstacles in Bird Migrations, H. Tomme and V. Jackson, Bowling Green State University, 1979.) Although this is an unusual occurrence at the Perry Plant, it is not unusual in industries that utilize tall stacks or towers. No corrective actions are presently planned. Initial notification of this event was provided to the USNRC Region III office on 11/2/90, and a written report submitted on 11/30/90 (PY-CF.I/NRR-1269 L). Due to the nature of this occurrence, no other agencies vere notified. }}