PLA-5890, 2004 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non - Radiological)
| ML051300377 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 04/28/2005 |
| From: | Mckinney B Susquehanna |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| PLA-5890 | |
| Download: ML051300377 (23) | |
Text
%I I I
's
'"'. ~a aa ' -
BrEtt T. McKlnney PPL Susquehanna, LLC
, *% a 0* #0 P I a,.
Vice President-Nuclear Site Operations 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603 Tel. 570.542.3149, Fax 570.542.1504 4 btmckinney pplweb.com
- I
%TM APR 2 8 2005 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station OPI-17 Washington, DC 20555 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) Docket Nos. 50-387 PLA-5890 and 50-388 The Susquehanna SES Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-radiological) is hereby submitted for the calendar year 2004 in accordance with the Environmental Protection Plan.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Rocco R. Sgarro at (610) 774-7552.
Sincerely, B. T. McKinney Attachments Copy: NRC Region I
- Mr. A.J. -Blamxey, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. R. V. Guzman, NRC Project Manager Mr. R. Janati, DEP/BRP X" )SS
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units I & 2 2004 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NONRADIOLOGICAL)
PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA April 2005
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NONRADIOLOGICAL) 2004 Prepared by: 1.1"k. -7.AA Curis H. Saxton /
Date: Y//Y/05 i a Supervisor - Services & Programs Reviewed by. Date: V///a/
Brice E. Rhoads Manager - Plant Chemistry Approved by -GM 17ate: z//ls7le-r Robert A. Saco~@
VP - Nuclear Operations
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 & 2 2004 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NONRADIOL OGICAL)
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-14 & NPF-22 Docket Nos. 50-387 & 50-388 Prepared by Plant Chemistry PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA April 2005
FOREWORD The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (Susquehanna SES) consists of two boiling water reactors with design electrical ratings of 1220 megawatts electrical (MWE) net for Units 1 and 2, respectively. The site consists of approximately 1,700 acres located in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, approximately five miles northeast of Berwick, Pennsylvania. An additional 670 acres of PPL recreational land are located on the East Side of the Susquehanna River in Conyngham and Hollenback Townships.
Under terms of an agreement finalized in January 1978, 90% of the Susquehanna SES is owned by PPL Susquehanna, LLC (Licensee) and 10% by the Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
This report discusses environmental commitments and impacts from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. In summary it documents that environmental commitments were met and there was no significant adverse environmental impact from station operation.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION . PAGE NO.
Foreword : ' < ; -
Table of Contents ii 1.0 OBJECTIVE 1-1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ;2-1 .
2.1 Aquatic Issues 2-1 2.2 Terrestrial Issues :i 2-3 2.2.1 Studies Previously Comipleted 2-3 2.2.2 Sound Level Survey - 2-3 2.2.3 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors 2-3 2.3 Cultural Resources Issues 2-4 3.0 CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS 3-1 3.1 Plant Design and Operation 3-1 3.2 Reporting Related to NPDES Permits and State Certifications 3-2 3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with other Environmental 3-3 Regulations 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 4-1 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events 4-1 4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4-1 4.2.1 General Monitoring 4-1 4.2.2 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors 4-1 i;,I
tL-SECTION PAGE NO.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 5-1 5.1 Review and Audit 5-1 5.2 Records Retention 5-1 5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan 5-2 5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 5-2 5.4.1 Routine Reports 5-2 5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports 5-2 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6-1 Table 2.1-1 2004 Shad Impingement Monitoring Program Figure 5.1-1 Auditing Organization Chart (2004) iii
1.0 OBJECTIVE The Licensee has developed procedures and guidelines to ensure that operation of Susquehanna SES does not adversely affect the environment in the vicinity of the station. Also, these procedures allocate responsibilities and define interfaces necessary to monitor environmental impacts. They include coordination of U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements with other federal, state, and local requirements for environmental protection.
The objective of this 2004 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) is to provide a summary of both environmental programs and procedures. This report is required by the Final Environmental Statement (FES) for the operation of the Susquehanna SES, Unit I and 2, NUREG-0564, June 1981, and Appendix B - Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) to Operating Licenses, No. NPF-14 and No. NPF-22. The 2004 report is the 23rd Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) submitted to meet EPP requirements.
The Licensee submitted an Environmental Report-Operating License Stage for Susquehanna SES to the NRC in May 1978. This report reviewed the results of the preoperational environmental programs and described the preoperational and proposed operational environmental monitoring programs. The NRC and other agencies reviewed this report and made recommendations for operational environmental monitoring programs which were listed in the FES.
1-1
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 2.1 .; Aquatic Issues The aquatic'monitoring program for operation of the Susquehanna SES is divided into'two parts. Part l'iricludes effluent monitoring required by a Natiorial Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Pennsylvania Dpartnient'of Erivironmental P'otectioi (PaDEP).
Monthly discharge nmonitodring' reports are submitted to the PaDEP as part of the permitting requirements. The station's operational NPDES permit No. PA-0047325 was reissued o'n July 7, 2000, and'expireson July 6, 2005. Part 2 of the'aquatic monitoring program dealt'with
'programs listed in the FES 'or *recommended by the PaDEP or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ' '.
The PaDEP is responsible for regulating the water quality permit for the Susquehanna SES.' The NPDES'permit deals with' discharge parameters for the Susquehanna SES Sewage Treatment Plant, Cooling Tower blowdown, and 'miscellaneous low volume waste;discharges. The Cooling Tower blowdown also includes in-plant process strearmis which discharge to the Susquehanna River. Various low volume waste'surmps discharge to thestorm sewers which flow into Lake Took6a-whil,'and'6ventually into the Susquehanna River.' NPDES permit liriits were included in the 2000 Annual Report. ',. ' ,'-
,;'- I .. ;
American Shad The Susqdehanna'Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee continued to administer programs to restore American shad (Alosa sapadissima) to the Susquehanna River in 2004. The restoration program'is a continuing commitment to return' shad aind other migratoryjfishes'to historic spawning and nursery waters above major dams in'athe Susquehanna'River.
Throughout the spring of 2004 above average precipitation resulted in higher than normal river flows and rapidly warming water temperatures (Ref.2.1-1). Riverflows at Holtwood fluctuated between 44,000 cfs and 82,000 cfs from mid-April through May. River temperatures ranged from the upper 50s to mid-60s (F) during the first half of this period, and then rose into the mid-70s for the remainder of May. Typically, fewer migrating shad use fish passage facilities during springs with high river flows because they cannot'find the relatively small attraction flows from these facilities.
2-1 ' '
I dU-At Conowingo Dam, the East lift began operations on 12 April intermittently until 21 April and then daily through 31 May. During this period, 109,360 shad were transferred over the dam and into the -
Conowingo reservoir. An additional 3,426 shad were captured at the Conowingo West lift from 13 to 28 May. Of these, 1,055 were tank spawned on-site and none were transported upriver. The shad population index for the Conowingo tailrace was calculated at approximately 1,000,000 American shad, although this was likely an over estimate.
High river flows and rapidly rising water temperatures noticeably hampered shad passage at each of the three successive upriver fish transfer facilities. The lift at Holtwood passed 3,428 shad (only 3% of those from Conowingo reservoir) for the lowest annual shad passage since lift startup in 1997. At Safe Harbor, 2,109 shad passed through this lift representing 62% of the shad transferred at Holtwood. The fish ladder at York Haven passed 219 shad or 10% of the total at Safe Harbor.
The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission's (PFBC) shad culture facility at the Van Dyke Research Station, Thompsontown, Pennsylvania, processed 17.3 million shad eggs with a viability of 54% in 2004.
Although most shad fry from the hatchery were stocked in the lower Susquehanna and Juniata Rivers, there were stockirigs upriver from the Susquehanna SES: 480,000 fry about 50 miles upriver at Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania and 828,000 fry 150 miles upriver in New York waters of the Susquehanna and Chemung Rivers.
The Susquehanna SES intake screens were monitored daily for impinged juvenile American shad from 9 August through 30 September 2004. No American shad were, found, but 21 other fish of at least 6 species (gizzard shad, smallmouth bass, channel catfish, bluegill, rock bass, and minnow spp.) and 43 crayfish were captured (Table 2.1-1).
2-2
Biofouling Mollusk Monitoring The biofouling mollusk-monitoring program continued at the Susquehanna SES in 2004. Currently,' thi6program involves biweekly artificial substrate inspections, both'in the river'and the Susquehanna SES River Intake Building, from May through November. Additionally, mbnthly'inspections
-are'made of both artificial substrates and the cement shoreline of the Emergency Service Water'Spray Pond, as well as an annual scuba inspection of the pond. Finally, natural river'substrates are normally examined as part of the program both near Susquehanna SES and at many sites ranging 40 miles 'above and below the plant; However, high water from summ'er through' fall this year prevented the inspection of river
-substrates.
To date, no biofoulers have been found in the river near the Susquehanna SES. Zebra mussel young were observed during years past in the Johnson City, New York area, about 150 miles upriver. Asiatic clams adults have been observed in the river near Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, approximately 18 miles downriver from Susquehanna SES. In 2001, a single Asiatic clam was collected from within the plant, as have a few relic shells since.
2.2 Terrestrial Issues 2.2.1 Studies Previously Completed Terrestrial environmental studies completed prior to 1989 included Cooling Tower bird impaction and sound level surveys.
2.2.2 Sound Level Survey An increase in station power generation of 5% was completed during spring 1995. A power uprate sound level survey was conducted in June 1995.
2.2.3 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors Transmission line corridor vegetation maintenance and inspection records are maintained by the Asset Management Group of PPL Electric Utilities and are available upon request. There were no adverse environmental impacts to transmission corridors reported in 2004. Records will be maintained for five years.
2-3 :
2.3 Cultural Resources Issues Environmental Protection Plan actions required to satisfy Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations Part 800, relating to archeological sites, were completed in 1987. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), in accordance with 36 CFR 800.6 (a)(1), approved the NRC's determination of "no adverse effect" for archeological sites SES-3, SES-6, SES-8, and SES-1 1 located on the Licensee's property (NRC letter dated October 28, 1987, to ACHP).
As part of the determination of effect process, the Licensee committed to and is taking appropriate measures to mitigate impacts from plant maintenance and operation to sites SES-3, SES-6, SES-8 and SES-l1.
There was no impact to these sites from plant maintenance and operation in 2004.
2-4
REFERENCES 2.1-1 Restoration of American Shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report-2004, Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee, February 2005.
2-5
3.0 CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Plant Desiqn and Or ration' In accordance with the E miviroiimental Protection Plan (EPP), the Licensee shall prepare and record an'environmrntal evaluation of proposed changes in plant design, operation,'or performance of any test or experiment which may significantly affect the'environment. Before initiating'such activities, the Lic'ensee shall provide a written evaluation and obtain prior approval from the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Criteria for the need to perform an' environmental evaluation
,include: (1)'a'significant increase in any adverse'environmental impact previously evaluated by the NRC br'Atoriic Safety'and Licensing Board, (2) a significant change in effluent or power level, or (3) a matter not previously evaluated which 'may have a'significant adverse environmental impact. '
The EPP requires that if an activity meets a'ny of th6 criteria to perform an environmental evaluation,'the NRC will be notified. If the change, test, or experiment does not meet any of these criteria, the Licensee-will document the evaluation and allow the activity to occur.
During operation of the Siusquehanna SES'in 2004, there were five proposed activities'that the Licensee reviewed as part of the unreviewed envir6nmerital question program. None of these activities were determined to involve' an unreviewed environmental question or require prior NRC'notification. These activities were:
- 1. Upgrade to Security Firing -Range to incorporate mandatory firing distances and improv6 the' physical range features. Determined not to involve an unreviewed environmental question since involves relatively minor earth disturbance, tree trirnming,' and drainage adjustments.
- 2. Installation'of Onsite Se'curity Upgrades including towers, delay fencing and relocation'of existing security fence arid patrol road.
-Determined not to involvean unreviewed'environmental question since impacts weretoopreviously disturbed areas and resulted in no significant changes to'aesthetic ;cnditions'r land use.
3-'1
- 3. Installation of security upgrade vehicle barrier system. Included review of earth disturbance during construction activity and installation of permanent vehicle barrier system. Determined not to involve an unreviewed environmental question due to use of controls during installation and resulted in no significant impacts to previously disturbed areas.
- 4. North Storm Drain Environmental Remediation and Erosion Control Restoration. Determined not to involve an unreviewed environmental question based on controls to be utilized during remediation activities and intent of efforts to restore original soil erosion controls and sedimentation capacity. As part of this activity oil impacted soil was removed from the drainage basin. The soil had been contaminated by accumulated oil from the main turbine lube oil mist eliminator discharge. Additional controls and equipment have been put in place to eliminate this oil accumulation in the future. The Pa Dept. of Environmental Protection was contacted prior to this activity and informed of completion of this project.
- 5. Use of SF6 (Sodium Hexafluoride) in control structure boundary envelope testing. Determined not to involve an unreviewed environmental question based on the very limited amount of tracer gas to be used, 0.062 lbs. There were no regulatory emission restrictions associated with the limited use of this tracer gas for control room boundary envelope testing.
3.2 Reporting Related to NPDES Permits and State Certifications There were no NPDES permit noncompliances in 2004.
The 2002 Annual Report provided a description of an environmental evaluation completed for oil accumulation around the turbine lube oil system roof vents. The PaDEP was provided with information on this additional source of oil to stormwater outfall 075. In December 2003 corrective action was taken to install cyclone separators on the Unit 1 and Unit 2 roofs to eliminate the small amount of entrained oil from the discharge. Environmental remediation activities in the North Storm Drain, outfall 075, were completed in 2004. Refer to Unreviewed Environmental Question #4 in Section 3.1 of this report .
The Susquehanna SES has an NPDES permit; therefore, state certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act is not required.
3-2
3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations A water resources registration for utilization of Susquehanna River water and site well system was completed in March 2004 in compliance with Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Water Resources Planning Act 220.
An EPA Risk Management Plan renewal approval was received in June 2004 for the Hydrogen and Oxygen storage tanks associated with Hydrogen Water Chemistry Treatment.
A revision of the Susquehanna Pollution Prevention and Contingency (PPC) Plan (which incorporates the Spill Prevention Control & Counter-measure (SPCC) Plan) was completed in November 2004 in anticipation of submittal with the NPDES permit renewal in January 2005.
3-3
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events During 2004, there were no operating occurrences requiring review as part of the significant environmental event evaluation program. There were no significant or adverse environmental effects related to station operation. There were no EPP noncompliances.
4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4.2.1 General Monitoring With the exception of aquatic monitoring discussed in Section 2.1 of this report, all monitoring of station operational impacts on aquatic and terrestrial biota listed in the FES and Appendix B of the operating license have been completed.
4.2.2 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors In 2004, the Asset Management group of PPL Electric Utilities maintained transmission line vegetation maintenance and inspection records.
4-1
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Review and Audit The Licensee has established procedures for an independent group to review and audit compliance with the EPP. Audits of EPP compliance are conducted by Quality Assurance. The Manrager-Quality Assurance is responsible for verifying compliance with the EPP. The Vice President-Nuclear Operations is responsible for environmental monitoring and for providing any related support concerning licensing. The Manager- Plant Chemistry is responsible for day-to-day offsite monitoring. The Auditing Organization Chart (Fig. 5.1-1) lists the groups utilized in reviewing and auditing of the Susquehanna SES environmental monitoring programs as well as those responsible for managing these programs. The Director-Environmental Management Department is'available to provide auditing support, as needed. ,
There are periodic audits of the EPP program.'Ari audit of the EPP was initiated in 2004 as part of a Chemistry Program Audit. There were no findings reported as a result of this audit. A recommendation was made to update the EPP to capture fulfillment of previously completed environmental monitoring commitments. This recommendation is being reviewed for applicability and implementation as determined appropriate.
5.2 Records Retention Records and logs relative to environmental aspects of plant operation and audit activities are retained in the Nuclear Records System. This system provides for a convenient review and inspection of environmental documents, which are available to the NRC upon request.
All records concerning modifications of plant structures, systems and components which are determined to potentially affect the continued protection of the environment, are retained for the life of the plant. All other records, data, and logs relating to the environmental programs and monitoring are retained for at least five years or, where applicable, in accordance with the requirements of other agencies. Transmission line corridor vegetation maintenance records' are maintained by PPL Electrical Utilities per section 2.2.3 of this report.
5-1
5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan No changes were made to the EPP during 2004.
5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 5.4.1 Routine Reports This Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) was prepared to meet routine reporting requirements of the EPP for 2004. It provides summaries and analyses of environmental protection activities required in Subsection 4.2 of the EPP for the reporting period.
5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports There were no unusual or Important Environmental Events as identified in the Environmental Protection Plan that required reporting in 2004.
5-2
6.0 ATTACHMENTS Table 2.1-1 2004 Shad Impingement Monitoring Program Figure 5.1-1 Auditing Organization Chart (2004) 6-1
TABLE 2.1-1 ; I I.... .
2004 SHAD IMPINGEMENT PROGRAM 2004 Shad I Fish 5 I "' ' ' , Other .'
9 Aug 1330 Nets set to begin sampling. e_:___;_;_'__
10 Aug - 1430 0 1 channel catfish, 3 minnow spp. :_-_-_;
11 Aug 1420 0 1 channel catfish 1 crayfish 12 Aug 1400' °0 c I: h 123 Aug 1400 '0 , channelcatfish, 1 minnow sp. 1 crayfish 14 Aug Nets not checked '
15 Aug 1515 0 1 bluegill 2 crayfish 16 Aug 1505 0 0 4 crayfish 17 Aug 1430 0 1 rock bass 2 crayfish 18 Aug 1430 0 1 channel catfish 4 crayfish 19 Aug 1420 0 0 3 crayfish 20 Aug 1400 0 0 21 Aug 1310 0 0 22Aug 1530 0 , 0 , - - 1crayfish 23 Aug 1330 0 1 minnow sp. 2 crayfish 24 Aug 1430 0 0 - -1 crayfish 25 Aug 1415 0 0 a 2 crayfish 26 Aug 1400 0 0 ,
27 Aug 1405 0 12 smallmouth bass 1 crayfish 28 Aug - Nets not checked. . _ , _ ; _ _
29Aug 1345 0 0 1 crayfish 30 Aug 1430 0 0 ; *- 1crayfish 31 Aug 1425 1 smallmouth bass" 3 crayfish 1 Sep 2030 0 0 ; _- 5 crayfish 2 Sep 0900 1 crayfish 3 Sep. 1045. 0 ,_ ,0. ' -___'_._' .
4 Sep Nets not checked.
5Sep 1000 10 l0 6 Sep Nets not checked.
7 Sep 1100 I_3 crayfish 8 Sep 1105 10 I0 9 Sep Nets not checked.
10 Sep 0845 0 0 1 crayfish 11 Sep 1300 0 0 _
12 Sep 1330 0 0
Table 2.1.1 (cont.)
M-I-I.. S _ . l l-I_
2004 Shad Fish Other 13 Sep 1430 lo0 0 l _l 14 Sep 1415 0 0 15 Sep 1345 0 1 channel catfish 1 crayfish 16 Sep 1030 0 1 channel catfish 17 Sep Nets not checked.
18 Sep 1000 River level on the rise from rains due to Hurricane Ivan. Nets were 19 Sep full of leaves and debris. Nets were placed in a non-fishing condition 20 Sep until more favorable conditions occur.
21 Sep 22 Sep 23 Sep 24 Sep 25 Sep 26 Sep 27 Sep 1400 Nets reset.
28 Sep 1500 0 l1 channel catfish, 1 bluegill l1 crayfish 29 Sep 1205 01 gizzard shad 2 crayfish.
30 Sep 1145 01 gizzard shad, 1 bluegill ; -
TOTAL 0 21 fish - 6 species 43 crayfish 2 gizzard shad 7 channel catfish 3 smallmouth bass 3 bluegill 1 rock bass 5 minnow spp.
--- 1--l- --- F---7 F--77 F7---' I-' i7' 1- [I FT) r-I' V I--- --- I - F---- -
.FIGURE 5.1-1 AUDITING ORGANIZATION CHART (2004)
President - PPL Generation &
Chief Nuclear Officer Lt I;.---.R
- ?>*^
r l I I
Vice President- General Manager-Nuclear Site Nuclear Assurance Operations Vice President - Manager-Quality Assurance Nuclear Operations I
Director - Env. Mgmt Manager - Plant Chemistry (Auditing Support as needed)
_