NRC Generic Letter 1991-15

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Generic Letter 1991-015: Operating Experience Feedback Report, Solenoid-Operated Valve Problems at U.S. Reactors
ML031140529
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Washington Public Power Supply System, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Clinch River, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/23/1991
From: Partlow J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
GL-91-015, NUDOCS 9109180200
Download: ML031140529 (3)


IT

'Io UNITED STATES

0 ?NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 September 23, 1991

ADDRESSEES

ALL POWER REACTOR LICENSEES AND APPLICANTS

SUBJECT: OPERATING EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK REPORT, SOLENOID-OPERATED

VALVE PROBLEMS AT U.S. REACTORS

(GENERIC LETTER 91-15)

of operating This generic letter informs addressees of a case study report by the Office experience problems with solenoid-operated valves (SOVs) prepared published as for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) and NUREG-1275, Volume 6, "Operating Experience Feedback Report--Solenoid-Operated integrates what Valve Problems," February 1991 (copy enclosed). The case study extensive assessment has been learned over the past several years and provides an in design and of SOV operating experience. The study describes deficiencies feedback of application, manufacture, maintenance, surveillance testing and attention failure data, and concluded that problems with SOVs need additional are not intended by the industry. While the recommendations in the case study in the to establish regulatory requirements, many of the problems described and quality report already are addressed by current environmental qualification assurance rules.

affected In the study, several events are described in which SOV failuresor multiple redundant safety components, multiple trains of safety systems isolated occurrences safety systems. Three of the most significant events were valves (MSIVs) in involving the failure to close of both main steam isolation diesel generators, the same line, the inability to start two redundant emergency insert. The examples and simultaneous failure of several BWR control rods to to common mode failure illustrate the vulnerability of safety-related equipment of SOVs reliability or degradation of SOYs. The NRC is concerned about theregulator activities, used in safety applications. As part of NRC's ongoing include the inspections such as Safety System Functional Inspections (SSFIs) safety related reliability of SOVs as well as other components required by advice to the Electric Power applications. The NRC also is providing technical Center (NMAC) to Research Institute's (EPRI) Nuclear Maintenance Application The first draft of the SOV

assist in preparing an SOY maintenance guide. end of 1991.

maintenance guide is anticipated to be available towards the use in each It has been estimated that many hundreds of SOVs are in wide-spread indirectly as nuclear power facility. They are used in safety-related systems system fluid (such as pneumatic or hydrau- pilot operators working with control (such as lically operated isolation valves) and directly in fluid systems system for to vent the reactor vessel head or to supply air to the starting nonsafety-related emergency diesel generators). Many SOYs are also used in as plant instrument systems that can significantly affect safety systems (such systems and compo- air drier systems). Over the years, many failures of plant SOV failures, nents have been attributed to SOV problems. To address specific information notices the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued numerous

9109180200 P DRC osooOcO 3 P

a lo

Generic Letter 91-15 -2- September 23, 1991 and bulletins that provide the immediately attributed root cause for the failure. Because these communications frequently were focused on a specific failure, licensees may have made assessments and taken corrective actions that were focused on the specific failures and not on broader issues.

In the case study, the staff reviewed many SOV failures and degradations and discussed those having a similar failure mechanism, thereby showing how only slight differences frequently are all that separate operation from failure.

Correcting only one obvious and specific deficiency at a time without awareness of other mechanisms for degradation may permit another problem in a short time to lead to unnecessary recurrent SOV failures. In addition, correcting problems only in SOVs used in the specific application in which the problem was found can allow similar SOY degradation to develop in other applications.

No specific action or written response is required by this generic letter.

However, it is expected that recipients will review the information presented in the case study for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. Since this generic letter and enclosure do not contain new or revised regulatory requirements, the Backfit Rule, 10 CFR 50.109, does not apply. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate NRR project manager.

Sincerel Ja s G. Partlow As ociate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:

NUREG-1275, Volume 6 Technical Contacts: H. Ornstein, AEOD

(301) 492-4439 J. Carter, NRR

(301) 492-1153

LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS

Generic Date of Letter No. Subqect Issuance

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Issued To

91-14 EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICA- 09/23/91 ALL HOLDERS OF OP

TIONS LICENSES OR CONST.

PERMITS

91-13 REQUEST FOR INFO RELATED 09/19/91 LICENSEES AND APPLI-

TO RESOLUTION OF G1130, CANTS Braidwood, Byron

"ESSENTIAL SERVICE WATER Catawba, Comanche Peak SYS FAILURES AT MUTLI-UNIT Cook, Diablo, McGuire SITES," PURSUANT TO 10CFR50.54(f)

91-12 OPERATOR LICENSING NAT. 08/27/91 ALL PWR REACTOR

EXAMINATION SCHEDULE AND APPLICANTS FOR

AN OPERATING LICENSE

91-11 RESOLUTION OF GENERIC 07/18/91 ALL HOLDERS OF

ISSUES 48, "LCOs FOR CLASS OPERATING LICENSES

1E VITAL INSTRUMENT BUSES,"

and 49, "INTERLOCKS AND LCOs FOR CLASS 1E TIE BREAKERS"

PURSUANT TO 10CFR50.54(f)

91-10 EXPLOSIVES SEARCHES AT 07/08/91 TO ALL FUEL CYCLE

PROTECTED AREA PORTALS FACILITY LICENSEES

WHO POSSESS, USE,

IMPORT OR EXPORT

FORMULA QUANTITIES

OF STRATEGIC SPECIAL

NUCLEAR MATERIAL

88-20 INDIVIDUAL PLANT EXAMINATION 06/28/91 ALL HOLDERS OF

SUPP. 4 OF EXTERNAL EVENTS (IPEEE) OLs AND CPs FOR

FOR SEVERE ACCIDENT VULNERA- NUCLEAR POWER

BILITIES - 10 CFR 50.54 (f) REACTORS

91-09 MODIFICATION OF SURVEILLANCE 06/27/91 ALL HOLDERS OF

INTERVAL FOR THE ELECTRICAL OLs FOR BWRs PROTECTIVE ASSEMBLIES IN

POWER SUPPLIES FOR THE

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM

91-08 REMOVAL OF COMPONENT LISTS 05/06/91 ALL HOLDERS OF OLs FROM TECHNICAL SPECIFICA- OR CPs FOR NUCLEAR

TIONS POWER REACTORS

91-07 GI-23 "REACTOR COOLANT 05/02/91 ALL POWER REACTOR

PUMP SEAL FAILURES" AND LICENSEES AND

ITS POTENTIAL IMPACT ON HOLDERS OF CPs STATION BLACKOUT

Template:GL-Nav