ML23304A450

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LLC Response to NRCs Request for Docketing of Resolved Audit Responses, Chapter 3, Response to Sdaa Audit Question A-5.2.1.1-5, Re Information Related to Compliance with 10 CFR 50.55a
ML23304A450
Person / Time
Site: 05200050
Issue date: 10/31/2023
From:
NuScale
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML23306A049 List: ... further results
References
LO-152560
Download: ML23304A450 (1)


Text

NuScale Nonproprietary Response to SDAA Audit Question Question Number: A-5.2.1.1-5 Receipt Date: 06/30/2023 Question:

Section 5.2.1.1 states that The ASME BPVC of record for the US460 standard design for the NPM is the ASME BPVC, 2017 Edition. However, Section 3.5.1.1.1 states that Missiles from piping or valves designed in accordance with American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Section III, (Reference 3.5-1) and maintained in accordance with an ASME Section XI (Reference 3.5-2) inspection program. Section 3.5.1.2 states that The control rod drive mechanism housing is a Class 1 appurtenance per Reference 3.5-1.The staff notes that References 3.5-1 and 3.5-2 refer to 2013 Code edition. Please clarify the inconsistency of the Code Edition.

Response

Reference 3.5-1 and Reference 3.5-2 refer to incorrect American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) editions for Section III and Section XI.

The ASME BPVC 2017 edition is applicable to the entire standard design approval application.

The attached markup corrects Reference 3.5-1 and Reference 3.5-2 to the 2017 edition of the ASME BPVC for Section III and Section XI, respectively.

Markups of the affected changes, as described in the response, are provided below:

NuScale Nonproprietary

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Missile Protection In determining an appropriate equivalent static load, elasto-plastic behavior can be assumed with permissible ductility ratios as long as deflections do not result in loss of function of safety-related systems.

Section 3.8 provides additional information on loading combinations and analysis methods for the RXB and CRB.

3.5.4 References Audit Question A-5.2.1.1-5 3.5-1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 20173 edition with no Addenda (subject to the conditions specified in paragraph (b)(1) of section 50.55a),Section III, "Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components," New York, NY.

Audit Question A-5.2.1.1-5 3.5-2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 20173 edition with no Addenda (subject to the conditions specified in paragraph (b)(2) of section 50.55a),Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," New York, NY.

3.5-3 Kennedy, R.P., "A Review of Procedures for the Analysis and Design of Concrete Structures to Resist Missile Impact Effects," Nuclear Engineering and Designs, (1976) 37(2), 183-203.

3.5-4 American Concrete Institute, "Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures and Commentary," ACI 349-06, Farmington Hills, MI.

3.5-5 Bechtel Power Corporation, "Design of Structures for Missile Impact,"

BC-TOP-9A, Revision 2, San Francisco, CA, September 1974.

3.5-6 Nuclear Engineering and Design, Full-Scale Tornado-Missile Impact Tests, Volume 45, Issue 1, March 1978, Pages 123-143.

3.5-7 Design of composite SC walls to prevent perforation from missile impact, Bruhl, J. C., et al., International Journal of Impact Engineering, 75 (2015) 75-87.

3.5-8 U.S. Reactor Containment Technology, Chapter 6, Volume 1, W.B. Cottrell and A.W. Savolainen, ORNL-NSIC-5, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1965.

3.5-9 American Institute of Steel Construction, Specification for the Design, Fabrication and Erection of Steel Safety-Related Structures for Nuclear Facilities, ANSI/AISC N690, 2018.

3.5-10 Williamson, R.A., and R.R. Alvy, Impact Effect of Fragments Striking Structural Elements, Holmes and Narver, Inc., Orange, CA, 1973.

NuScale US460 SDAA 3.5-16 Draft Revision 2