ML23291A400

1 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 1, Section 1.4, Identification of Agents and Contractors

ML23291A400
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	10/12/2023
From:	Susquehanna
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML23291A105	List: ML23291A113 ML23291A342 ML23291A343 ML23291A344 ML23291A369 ML23291A370 ML23291A371 ML23291A372 ML23291A373 ML23291A374 ML23291A375 ML23291A376 ML23291A377 ML23291A378 ML23291A379 ML23291A380 ML23291A381 ML23291A382 ML23291A383 ML23291A384 ML23291A385 ML23291A386 ML23291A387 ML23291A388 ML23291A389 ML23291A390 ML23291A391 ML23291A392 ML23291A393 ML23291A394 ML23291A395 ML23291A396 ML23291A397 ML23291A398 ML23291A399 ML23291A400 ML23291A401 ML23291A402 ML23291A403 ML23291A404 ML23291A405 ML23291A406 ML23291A407 ML23291A408 ML23291A409 ML23291A410 ML23291A411 ML23291A412 ML23291A413 ML23291A414 ... further results
References
PLA-8081
Download: ML23291A400 (7)

Text

SSES-FSAR

• HISTORICAL INFORMATION 1.4 IDENTIFICATION OF AGENTS AND CONTRACTORS 1.4.1 Pennsylvania Power & Light Company (APPLICANT)

The Applicant has engaged the contractors noted below to perform engineering, procurement and construction services for the plant.

However, irrespective of the contractual responsibilities discussed below, Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. is responsible for the design, construction and operation of the plant. A summary of previous experience in the field of power generation shows that the Applicant is technically qualified to engage in the proposed activities.

. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. has been involved in various nuclear projects for over 17 years. They include the following:

a.

A scoping design study of a pressurized water reactor plant (1954-1955)

b.

A scoping study of a homogeneous reactor power plant (1955)

• c.

Participation in the Pennsylvania Advanced Reactor (PAR) project, including research and development of a 135 MWt homogeneous slurry reactor. This was a

$9 million project, shared equally by Pennsylvania Power *& Light Co. and Westinghouse.

Twenty-four Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. engineers and operators participated (1955-1959)

d.

Participation in the construction and pre-operational testing of the Homogeneous Reactor Experiment #2 at Oak Ridge (1955-1957)

e.

Participation with High Temperature Reactor Development Associates in construction and pre-operational testing of the 40 MWt Peach Bottom Gas Cooled Reactor ( 196 3-1966)

f.

Participation in the HTGR Fuel and Fuel Cycle Development Program with other utilities and Gulf General Atomics (1964-1967).

In addition to the above activities various Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. personnel have

• attended Oak Ridge School of Reactor Technology and have been taking courses in Health Physics, Radiation Chemistry, Reactor Safety, Reactor Core Analysis, Water Cooled Reactor Technology, and Fuel Management.

In-house capability has included nuclear power plant bid evaluation and fuel management program development.

HISTORICAL INFORMATION Rev. 53, 04/99 1.4-1

SSES-FSAR HISTORICAL INFORMATION Since 1970, PP&L has maintained Engineering, Project Management, Construction and Quality Assurance groups who are assigned full time to the design development and construction of the Susquehanna_Stea_m Electric Station.

1.4.2 ARCHITECT ENGINEER The Bechtel Power Corporation, San Francisco Power Division, has been awarded contracts for engineering, procurement and construction. Bechtel will perform engineering work related to the Balance of Plant (BOP) including the integration of NSSS systems and components.

This work includes the preparation of mechanical, electrical, and civil/structural designs, plans and specifications.

• Bechtel has been engaged in construction and engineering activities since 1898. Since the close of World War 11, Bechtel has emphasized on electrical power generation projects.

During this period, Bechtel has been responsible for the design and/or construction of over 237 thermal generating units, representing more than 118,000,000 kW of new generating capacity. Of this number, a nuclear capacity of more than 69,000,000 kW has been or is being engineered.

The ratings of thermal generating plants designed by Bechtel range up to 1,470,000 kW per unit and include most types of station* designs and arrangements. such as reheat and non-reheat, indoor and outdoor stations, single and multiple units, and wide ranges of steam conditions up to 3500 psig, covered design, construction, startup, site surveys, license applications, feasibility studies, and equipment procurement.

1.4.3 NUCLEAR STEAM SUPPLY SYSTEM The General Electric Company (GE) was has been awarded the contracts to design, fabricate, and deliver the direct cycle boiling water nuclear steam supply system, to fabricate the first core of nuclear fuel, and to provide technical direction of installation, and startup of this equipment. GE has engaged in the development, design, construction and operation of boiling water reactors since 1955. Tabfe 1.4-1 lists over 90 GE reactors completed, under construction, or on order.

Thus, GE has substantial experience, knowledge, and capability to design, manufacture, and furnish technical assistance for the installation ~nd startup of reactors.

1.4.4 TURBINE-GENERATOR VENDOR General Electric Company designed, fabricated, and delivered the turbine-generator for the plant. GE also provides technical assistance for the installation and startup for this equipment.

HISTORICAL JNFORMA TION Rev. 53, 0~/99 1.4-2

SSES-FSAR HISTO~ICAL INFORMATION General Electric Company has a long history in the application of turbine-generators in nuclear power stations, *dating back to the inception of nuclear facilities for the production of electrical power.

GE also has extensive design, developmentl and installation experience on similar turbine-generator-units used in non-nuclear power plants.

1.4.5 OTHER CONSULTANTS Dames & Moore (D&M) Consultants have been responsible for the review and utilization of on-site meteorological data to perform short and long-term diffuser analysis which determine relative concentrations to the expected from normal plant operations.

D&M

_have also perfor~ed geology and hydrology surveys of the Susquehanna SES site and vicinity for PP&L. O&M has performed similar services for other nuclear facilities.

Radiation Management Corporation (RMC) is a service organization which has performed the Appendix I dose calculations, performed the investigational phase of the radiological monitoring program, and will provide medical consulting services defined in the signed agreement letter contained in the Emergency Plan RMC has performed similar services for other nuclear facilities.

HISTORICAL JNFORMA TION *

- I Rev. 531 04/99 1.4-3

SSES-FSAR HISTORICAL INFORMATION TABLE 1.4.. 1 I

COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR REACTORS COMPLETED, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, OR IN DESIGN BY GENERAL ELECTRIC Station Utility Rating Year of Order Year of I (MWe)

Startup lresden 1 Commonwealth Edison 200 1955 1960 I

Humboldt Bay PacfficG&E 69 1958 1963

' j Kahl Germany 15 1958 1961 Garigliano Italy 150 1959 1964

'.Big Rock Point Consumers Power 70 1959 1963

.JPDR Japan 11 i

1960 1963 I

KRB Germany 237 1962 1967 Tarapur 1 India 190 1962 1969 jTarapur 2 I

India 190 1962 1969 I

I I

!QKN Holland 52 1963 1968 J

1Oyster Creek

µcP&L I

640 1963 1969 i

Nine Mile Point 1 Niagara Mohawk 625 1963 1970 I I I

Dresden 2 Commonwealth Edison 809 1965 1970

!Pilgrim Boston Edison 664 1965 1972 I

jMillstone 1 NUSCO 652 1965 1971 I [Tsuruga Japan 340 1965 1970 1Nuclenor Spain 440 1965 1971 I

(Fukushima 1 Japan 439 1966 1971 jsKW KKM Switzerland 306 1,966 1972 loresden 3 Commonwealth Edison 809 1966 1971

!Monticello Northern States 545 1966 1971 I

Quad Cities 1 Commonwealth Edison 800 1966 1972 i

I jBrowns Ferry 1 TVA 1098 1966 1973 I

Browns Ferry 2 n'VA 1098 1966 1974

!auad Cities 2 Commonwealth Edison 800 1966 1972 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Rev. 53, 04/99 Page 1 of 4

I I

ii ii ii a

I I I

• Station Vermont Yankee Peach Bottom 2 1Peach Bonam 3 I

Fitzpatrick Bailly Shoreham Cooper

Browns Ferry 3 I

Limerick 1 iHatch 1 I

!Fukushima 2

snmswick 1

Brunswick 2

Arnold Fermi2 Limerick 2

Hope Creek 1 1Hope Creek 2 I

1Zimmer, I

Chinshan Caorso 1 Hatch 2 La Salle 1 Rev. 53, 04/99 SSES-FSAR

• _ HISTORICAL INFORMATION TABLE 1.4-1 I

COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR REACTORS COMPLETED, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, OR IN DESIGN BY GENERAL ELECTRIC Utility Rating Year of Order Year of (MWe)

Startup Vennont Yankee 514 1966 1972 Philadelphia Electric 1005 1966 1974 Philadelphia Electric 1065 1966 1974 PASNY 821 1966 1975 NIPSCO 660 1967 1977 ULCO 819 1967 1978 I

Nebraska PPD na 1967 1974 TVA 1098 1967 1975 Philadelphia Electric 1098 1967 1981 Georgia 786 1967 1975

!Japan 762 1967 1974 I

Caronna P&L 821 1968 1976 I

Carolina P&L 821 1968 1975 i

Iowa ELP 569 1968 1974 I

Detroit Edison 1123 1968 1979 i

Philadelphia Electric 1065 1969 1982 PSE&G 1067 1969 1981 PSE&G 1067 1969 1983 I I I

CCDPP 810 1969 1978 I

~aiwan 610 1~69 1977 i

Italy 827 1969 1975 Georgia 795 1970 1978 I

Commonwealth Edison 1078 1970 1978 HISr_ORICAL INFORMATION

. j Page 2 of 4

I 3

Station La Salle 2

!susquehanna 1

Susquehanna 2 lchinshan 2

~PSS2

!Nine Mile Point 2 I

.Grand Gulf 1 Grand Gulf 2 jKaiseraugst Fukushima 6 Tokai2 Riverbend 1

!Rivertend 2 *

,Perry 1 Perry 2 Barton 1 1sarton 2 I

!Douglas Point 1 Douglas Point 2

!somerset 1 I ;somerset 2 Hartsville 1

,Hartsville 2 SSES-FSAR

. J

• : HISTORICAL.INFORMATION COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR REACTORS COMPLETED, UNDER CONSTRUCTIONt OR IN DESIGN BY GENERAL ELECTRIC Utllfty Rating Year of Order (MWe) commonweatth Edison 1078 1970 Pennsylvania P&L 1970 1052

~ennsylvania P&L 1052*

1970 Taiwan 610 1970 WPPSS 1103

. 1971 Niagara Mohawk 1080 1971 Midsouth 1290 1971 Midsouth 1290 1971 Switzer1and 915 1971 Japan 1135 1971 Japan 1135 1971 Gulf States 934 1972 Gulf States 934 1972 creveland Electric

~

1205 1972 Cleveland Eledric 1205 1972 Alabama 1100 1972 Alabama 1100 1972 PEPCO 1178 1972 PEPCO 1178 1972 New York State E8G 1220 1972 New York State E&G 1200 1972 rrvA 1226 1972 rTVA 1228 1972 Uprated to 1100 MWe (NET) in 1994.

HISTORICAL INFORMATION Rev. 53, 04/99 Year of I

Startup 1979 I

1980 1982 I

1978 i

1977 I

1979 I

I 1979 I

1981 1978 i

I

'1976 I

1976 1980 I

1981 I

1979 1980 1983 l

1984 I

1985 1987 1982 1984 1980 1981 Page 3 of 4

I Station l

Hartsville 3 Hartsville 4 I '.Laguna Verde 1 Leibstadt i jKuosheng 1 Kuosheng 2 Clinton 1 Clinton 2

!Montague 1 *

~!lens Creek 1

!Allens Creek 2 lSkagit 1 Skagit 2 Barton 3 Barton 4 iBlackfox 1 js1ackfo:x 2 lzimmer2 Confrentes Laguna Verde 2 1Enel6 jEnel8 Rev. 53, 04/99 SSES-FSAR

'. HISTORICAL INFORMATION TABLE 1.4-1 COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR REACTORS COMPLETED, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, OR IN DESIGN BY GENERAL ELECTRIC Utility Rating Year of Order (MWe)

n/A 1228 1972 lfVA 1228 1972 Mexico 660 1972 Switzerland 940 1972 Taiwan 992 1972 Taiwan 992 1972 IOinois Power 955 1973 Illinois Power 955 1973 NUSCO 1220 1973 Houston L&P 1150 1973 Houston L&P 1150 1973 Pu~et SD 1290 1973 Puget SD 1290 1973 Alabama 1220 1973 Alabama 1220 1973 Oklahoma 950 1973 Oklahoma 950 1973 COPP 1220 1973 Spain 975 1973 Mexico 660 1973 Italy 982 1974 Italy 982 1974 H~TORICALINFORMAnON I

Year of Startup 1981 1982 1977 I

1978 1978 I

1979 I

1981 I

1984 1982 1980 1982 1981 j

1983 I

I 1985 I

1986 I

1983 I

1985 1984 1977 1978 l

1980 I

1980 Page 4 of 4