ML23067A246

NRC Comments on Proposed Operating Test

ML23067A246
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	03/08/2023
From:	Brian Fuller NRC/RGN-I/DORS/OB
To:	Dougherty M Constellation Energy Generation
References
EPID L-2023-OLL-0002
Download: ML23067A246 (1)

Text

Facility:

Exam Date:

1 JPM # or title 2

Type (S/P/A) 3 ALT (Y/N) 4 LOD (1-5) 5 JPM Errors 6

U/E/S 7

Explanation LOD REF IC TSK CUE CS TL RO COO1 A

N 3

E S Added initial condition that the plant computer is not available Added not concerning 3rd bullet in section 6.4.7 Updated ranges on answer key RO COO2 A

N 3

E S Revised provided temperature data RO-SRO EC A

N 3

E S Revised times on 3DM handouts Added info to JPM step 5 standard Added detail to task standard RO-SRO RC A

N 3

X U S Added SRO Only worksheet and added critical steps SRO COO1 A

N 3

E S Updated task standard Added note regarding timing of handouts Fixed issue with high and low range rad monitors Deleted question on Extra Worksheet SRO COO2 A

N 3

S SRO EP A

N 3

X U S Fixed JPM step 4 Fixed EAL number on key Made task standard more specific JPM A S

Y 3

E S Updated times on 3D Monicore case Added two additional ICs Added evaluator notes and cues JPM B S

Y 3

E S Added examiner note Fixed simulator event trigger to cover potential different order of operator actions JPM C S

Y 3

E S Added note to include procedure Att 7 in the handout JPM D S

Y 3

E S Added two additional steps added examiner note

Form 2.3 -3 Operating Test Review Worksheet (JPMs)

Facility:

Exam Date:

1 JPM # or title 2

Type (S/P/A) 3 ALT (Y/N) 4 LOD (1-5) 5 JPM Errors 6

U/E/S 7

Explanation LOD REF IC TSK CUE CS TL JPM E S

N 3

E S Changed some critical steps to non-critical Revised IC to eliminate an alarm Added evaluator cue JPM F S

Y 3

E S Added examiner note and cue JPM G S

N 3

E S Added examiner note and cue JPM H S

N 3

E S Added examiner note and cue JPM I P

N 3

E S Added examiner cue JPM J P

N 3

S JPM K P

N 3

S

Form 2.3-3 Instructions for Completing the JPM Table

1. Enter the JPM number and/or title.

2. Enter the type of JPM(S)imulator, (P)lant, or (A)dministrative.

3. Enter (Y)es or (N)o for an Alternate Path JPM.

4. Rate the level of difficulty (LOD) of each JPM using a scale of 1-5 (easy-difficult). A JPM containing less than two critical steps, a JPM that tests solely for recall or memorization, or a JPM that involves directly looking up a single correct answer is likely LOD = 1 (too easy). Conversely, a JPM with over 30 steps or a JPM that takes more than 45 minutes to complete is likely LOD = 5 (too difficult).

5. Check the appropriate block for each JPM error type, using the following criteria:

LOD = 1 or 5 is unsatisfactory (U).

REF: The JPM lacks required references, tools, or procedures (U).

IC: The JPM initial conditions are missing or the JPM lacks an adequate initial cue (U).

CUE: The JPM lacks adequate evaluator cues to allow the applicant to complete the task, or the evaluator cues are subjective or leading (U).

TSK: The JPM lacks a task standard or lacks completion criteria for a task standard (U).

CS: The JPM contains errors in designating critical steps, or the JPM lacks an adequate performance standard for a critical step (U).

TL: The JPM validation times are unreasonable, or a time-critical JPM lacks a completion time (U).

6. Mark the JPM as unsatisfactory (U), satisfactory (S), or needs enhancements (E). A JPM is (U) if it has one or more (U) errors as determined in step 5. Examples of enhancements include formatting, spelling, or other minor changes.

7. Briefly describe any JPM determined to be unsatisfactory (U) or needing enhancement (E). Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound JPM is marked by a satisfactory (S) resolution on this form.

Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Scenario:

Exam Date:

1 Scenario Event ID/Name:

2 Scenario event errors 3

U/E/S 4

Explanation Realism/

Credibility Performance Standards Verifiable Actions Critical Task TS Scenario 1 1 Swap Service Water Pumps S

2 Perform a Control Rod Pattern Adjustment S

3 Control Rod Drive Pump Trip S

4 EPR Oscillation S

5 Main Turbine Vibrations S

6 RPS and ARI Fail to Insert Control Rods S

7 First Liquid Poison Pump Trips After Start S

8 Main Turbine Inadvertently Trips S

Scenario 2 1 Swap Turbine Building Ventilation Exhaust Fans S

2 Raise Reactor Power with Recirculation Flow S

3 Feedwater Booster Pump Trip with Failure of Standby Pump to Auto-Start S

4 Powerboard 102 Electrical Fault S

5 RPS MG Set 131 Trips S

6 Loss of All RBCLC Pumps S

7 Loss of 115 KV Offsite Power S

8 Emergency Diesel Generator 103 Fails to Automatically Start S

9 Steam Leak in Drywell S

Scenario 3 1 Swap Powerboard 101 Supply S

2 Lower Reactor Power with Recirculation Flow S

3 Core Spray Pump 111 Suction Leak S

4 Reactor Recirculation Pump 13 Trip S

5 Seismic Event and Steam Leak in Drywell S

6 RPS Pushbuttons Fail, RPS Fails to Process Automatic Scram S

7 Torus Leak S

8 Bypass Opening Jack Fails S

Scenario 4 1 Return IRM to Service S

Form 2.3-3 Operating Test Review Worksheet (Scenarios) 2 Raise Reactor Power with Control Rods S

3 Control Rod Drift Out S

4 Loss of Line 1 S

5 Emergency Condenser Tube Leak S

6 Intake Structure Clogging S

7 Loss of Coolant Accident S

8 HPCI Fails to Automatically Initiate, Core Spray Pumps Fail to Automatically Start S

Form 2.3-3 Instructions for Completing the Scenario Table

1. For each scenario, enter the scenario event names and descriptions.

2. Review the individual events contained in each scenario, and identify and mark event errors:

The scenario guide event description is not realistic/credibleunsatisfactory (U).

The scenario guide event description lacks adequate crew/operator performance standardsneeds enhancement (E).

The scenario guide event description lacks verifiable actions for a credited normal event, reactivity event instrument/component malfunction, or technical specification (TS) event (or a combination of these) (U).

The scenario guide event description incorrectly designates an event as a critical task (i.e., a noncritical task labeled as critical or a critical task labeled as noncritical). This includes critical tasks that do not meet the critical task criteria (i.e., the critical task does not have a measurable performance standard) (U).

The scenario guide event description incorrectly designates entry into TS actions when not required or does not designate entry into TS actions when required (U).

3. Based on the outcome in step 2, mark the scenario event as unsatisfactory (U), satisfactory (S), or needs enhancements (E). An event is (U) if it has one or more (U) errors as determined in step 2. Examples of enhancements include formatting, spelling, or other minor changes.

4. Briefly describe any scenario event determined to be unsatisfactory (U) or needing enhancement (E). Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound scenario event is marked by a satisfactory (S) resolution on this form.