ML22179A337
| ML22179A337 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 05/27/2018 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Nuclear Management Co |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17165A321 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22179A337 (2) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: fA.il.LltU: l~L/Wt) JJllCLl<'flf? ~~Tll\\t.-MtJrtb_,,,-,s111""' l Date ofExamination:'$i;~il:~~ 1¢-J.11 Jf#t~
Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c**
- 1.
f<.
NIA (f}
w
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematlcaHy and randomly prepared in accordance with NIA (JJ R
Section D.1 of ES-401 orES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
f<
I T
Assess whether the outline overemohasizes anv svstems evolutions or aeneric tooics.
f<.
NIA © T
C.
E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
f<.
NIA (j)
N
- 2.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major fc. flit ~
s transients.
I M
- b. Assess whether there are enough soenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule fi\\i ~
L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at ft.
A least one new or significantly modified scenario. that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
aoolicants' audl testrs\\ and that scenarios will not be reoeated on subseauent davs.
0
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and Y.\\'J--
R
~
quantitative criteria specified on Fonn ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in tC Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Sinulator Operating Test,'" of ES-301 (including overtao).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
Mt (1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2)
Task repe1ilion from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
~
L (3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audittest(s).
re K
(4) The number of new or modified tasksmeels or exceeds the minimums specified on the l'orm.
T (5) The number of ahemate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on thefo1171.
R
\\\\\\.i 0
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
fL
~
G (2) At least one.task is new or significantly modified.
H 131 No more than one task is rerv>ated from the last two NRC licensinaexaminations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of
(-c.
Yi\\t rw aoolicants and ensure that no items are duolicated on subseouenl davs.
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual (i
NIA ~
plant examination insights} are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G NIA w E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 55.43 and 55.45 samolina is aoorooriate.
f<
N Ensure that KIA unoortance ratinas,.,.,,r.,.,,t tor olant-soecific orioritiesl are at least 2.5.
f<
l1t.1 ?~
E C.
R
- d. Check for duolication and overlao amona exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
f,.
l~ ~
A tvd.. ~
L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coveraae.
f,
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the aoorooriate iob level £RO or SROI.
f'
>>ff' ~
Printed Name/Sign~ d Date
- a. Author
~ 11::i>a,n.- r.,,u,,,,1 1
~"/ _ "
-D
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
/11-"r-\\'
1... " '>{)IT;,,kl - r 7 lf/1.:-,,
J.,,,_.,
C.
NRC's Chief Examiner(#)
.e ~br'I\\. DED.a.> ~1.t.ihe I Y"""" 0 0 \\")___ 1)1)
J4P~
- d. NRC Supervisor
~--\\...i.A* cs. ()r\\:'\\t..\\) -..,\\..., r I /f/4A 'll1r.L '
I
- Not applicable fOr NRC-prepared examination ou1Unes.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in COiumn *c*; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
v,ffE (='~1..,"ry wlS' *vtov S-201, Page 30 of 32
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent to the Facility ONLY Facility: Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: Se12tember 10 - 21, 2018 Item Task Description Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
~
NIA ~
w
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with tY(J,
~
R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
N/A I
T C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
~
N/A ~
T E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
Mc/
N/A J.?~
N I~
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of V
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s "'
/
I vv M
b~e, theffi a,e eaoogh,~aario sets (,od spa,es) to test the pcojecied oombe, aed u
m1 f applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
witho compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested usi~
A least one ew or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' di! test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the e~eot :~
whethe, the ootlioe(s) roofo~s with the,~
R C.
quantitative criteria s cified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D in Section D.5, "Specific In ructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-1 (including overlap).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthro outline meets the criteria speci don Form ES-301-2:
(1)
The outline(s) contains the req
- ed number of control roo nd in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as sp
- fied on the form.
A (2)
Task repetition from the last two NRC aminations is
- hin the limits specified on the form.
L (3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applica 's audi st(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets o eds the minimums specified on the form.
T (5)
The number of alternate-path, low-power, e ency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0
- b. Ve,;fy that the adm;oSt,atNe ~he cMte,;a .~
ES-301-1 u
(1) The tasks are distributed amon he topics as specified on e form.
G (2) At least one task is new ors* nificantly modified.
H (3) No more than one task is pealed from the last two NRC licens1 examinations.
C.
Determine whether I~
enough different outlines to test the project~er and mix of applicants and ensur at no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4.
- a. Assess whe~~t-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment an~dual plant examin 10n insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G Assess/4ether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sa;,,pling is appropriate.
E
- b.
N E~ that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
"~
E
- c.
check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
R y
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
"I"-."
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
Printed FF~
Date
- a.
Author 1J.fu@ti t7 M ichael E. Bielby
/
~
- b.
Facility Reviewer (*)
NA N/A
- c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
Randal D. Baker 1-P () 0 Cu.._ -,~_..Q_
=
- d.
NRC Supervisor Robert J. Orlikowski I '41/A 111 I
- N ot applica ble for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.