ML22146A137
| ML22146A137 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry |
| Issue date: | 06/27/2017 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17142A152 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22146A137 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Perry Date of Examination: July2017 Item Initials Task Description b*
c#
a
- 1.
JJ/A 11)1,4-,;t,o\\..
w
- b. Assess v.tlether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R
I Section 0.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and v.tlether all l</A categories are appropriately sampled.
T C. Assess v.tlether the ouUine over-emphasizes any-systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
T E
- d. Assess v.tlether the justifications for deselected or rejected l</A statements are appropriate.
N
\\
- 2.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and NI-~
s major transients.
I
- b. Assess v.tlether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M
u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam Integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A
least one new or significanUy modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit tesl(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
I 0
To the extent possible, assess v.tlether the ouUlne(s) conform(s) with the qualitative
'~
- c.
tJ!.
R and quanlitaUve criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
,v
... \\ /
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through ouUine meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
w (1) the ouUine(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed fl among the safety functions as specified on the form I
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form
?~
T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants* audit test(s)
Jff' (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
>k (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form
~ ~
(2) al least one task is new or slgnlficanUy modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of
~rl 4 rr~
applicants and ensure that no Items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4.
-11r l e~
appropriate exam sections.
G
- b. Assess v.tlether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
I~
Ji t ~
E N
C. Ensure that l</A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.. 5.
.,4Jiv, - ~
E
.,(fV ~ 1 ~
R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
I Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
N ~ - -~
C
- e.
-1JV Ix! -~~
P:mme/Slgnature Date
- a.
Author Rav Torres ln>'I.~
~
- 11~~ ~
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
Steve Kaooslasv
- c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#) v'...~ ~~,-J~V~,~'1 O(l ~
- d.
NRC Supervisor
- fvy,(.9..., 1' o aL, \\l.,~ ')'i..\\ I NJl2u_
'7 ~)./10{/
I f
Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column* *c*: chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28