ML20294A056

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility Hf Spiking Station 1 Assessment Report
ML20294A056
Person / Time
Site: Westinghouse
Issue date: 07/30/2020
From: Joyner D
Westinghouse
To: Kuhn K
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, State of SC, Dept of Health & Environmental Control
References
LTR-RAC-20-65
Download: ML20294A056 (154)


Text

Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Fuel Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility 5801 Bluff Road Hopkins, South Carolina 29061 USA

© 2020 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved SCDHEC, BLWM Kim Kuhn 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 Direct tel: 803.647.1920 Direct fax: 803.695.3964 e-mail: joynerdp@westinghouse.com Your ref:

Our ref: LTR-RAC-20-65 July 30, 2020

Subject:

HF Spiking Station #1 Soil Sampling Assessment Report Mrs. Kuhn:

Attached for your review and approval are the Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility (CFFF or Site) assessment report (Assessment) for the Hydrofluoric Acid Spiking Station (HFSS) #1 as well as the Technical Basis Document (TBD). The Assessment and TBD were prepared by AECOM Technical Services (AECOM) and Leidos, respectively, and document the investigation activities, results and conclusions from completion of the Work Plan which was approved by South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Controls (SCDHEC or Department) on March 30, 2020. Based on these submittals, CFFF concludes that HFSS #1 is protective of employee health and safety and poses no threat to the public.

=

Background===

CFFF uses two independent spiking stations referred to as Hydrofluoric Acid Spiking Stations 1 or 2 (HFSS

  1. 1 or HFSS #2). The stations are adjacent to each other and mix hydrofluoric acid with uranyl nitrate (UN) for the conversion process. Previous assessment of HFSS #2 after the discovery in 2018 of a release from this station indicated the presence of uranium (U) within sub-slab soils beneath HFSS #2. Subject to DHECs review and approval, the station was subsequently remediated and returned to normal operation.

Following the HFSS #2 assessment, CFFF completed the following actions to mitigate future issues at the spiking stations in the plant.

Developed an improved design for both spiking stations and diked areas that prevents spills of process solution from impacting the concrete, protects the concrete with a floor coating that is impervious to acidic materials and guards against undetected deterioration of the concrete floor.

o The improved design for HFSS #2 was implemented and also included a new preventive maintenance strategy.

Page 2 of 4 Our ref: LTR-RAC-20-65 July 30, 2020 To comprehensively assess potential environmental impacts at the CFFF from current and historical operations, the Site also:

Entered into Consent Agreement (CA) 19-02-HW with SCDHEC in February of 2019 to address environmental impacts originating from facility operations. This included the establishment of eight operational units (OUs) and the installation of sentinel wells. One OU (Chemical Area) includes the portions of the manufacturing building where liquid uranium processing and handling operations occur. A network of sentinel wells was installed around the Chemical Area OU to detect a potential leak or contaminant migration from this area.

Completed the first phase of a comprehensive Remedial Investigation (RI) performed under the CA, with a final summary report submitted to SCDHEC on July 15, 2020. The results of this assessment show there is no off-site impact from CFFF operations, and the extent of the existing impact is limited, generally well-defined and poses no significant threat to plant workers, the general public or the environment.

Developed procedure RA-433, Environmental Remediation, using industry best practices to standardize a risk-based, decision-making process for analysis of environmental data and facility response to a release with potential environmental impact. This procedure uses best practices from an industry groundwater protection initiative to prevent migration of material off-site and to minimize decommissioning impacts.

Developed and implemented a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) to assist CFFF with the assessment of environmental data. The CSM was enhanced using the data from the first phase of the RI, making it a more effective decision-making tool. The CSM coupled with improved environmental monitoring and the remediation procedure provide a robust environmental protection program.

HFSS #1 Investigation Due to the conditions found in HFSS #2 CFFF investigated the conditions of HFSS #1. CFFF submitted for SCDHECs approval a Work Plan for the subsurface investigation of the HFSS #1 area in a letter (LTR-RAC-20-31) dated March 20, 2020. The Department subsequently approved the plan on March 30, 2020.

In accordance with the aforementioned plan and as part of implementation of the improved HFSS #1 design, the concrete floor was removed to construct the new containment dike. Soil samples were collected from May 4-6 of 2020 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The results of the sampling are included within the Assessment Report prepared by AECOM (Attachment 1).

Page 3 of 4 Our ref: LTR-RAC-20-65 July 30, 2020 Calculations of Dose and Risk Following the Sites Environmental Remediation procedure, RA-433 and AECOMs recommendations, CFFF contracted Leidos to evaluate risk and dose to the industrial worker at HFSS #1 resulting from residual uranium beneath the concrete floor. The Technical Basis Document prepared by Leidos and dated July 28, 2020 is attached to this cover letter (Attachment 2).

Conclusions and Further Environmental Evaluation Based on the data provided in the AECOM HFSS #1 Assessment Report and the Leidos TBD, the following conclusion were made:

Neither fluoride nor nitrate exceeded the CFFF action levels delineated in the Sites Remediation Procedure.

Tc-99 results were non-detect and further evaluation of Tc-99 was not warranted.

Uranium results showed exceedances of the remedial action levels, triggering an evaluation of the residual contamination.

Based on the operating configuration of the HF Spiking Station, the concrete floor slab provides an adequate barrier between the residual U and an industrial worker under current conditions.

Over the course of the 100-year timeframe that was modeled, the highest dose was calculated at 0.324 mRem/year and the highest Total Excess Cancer Risk (TR) was calculated at 6.47E-6.

Based on the TBD results, it is acceptable to leave the material in place beneath a 6-in concrete cover at present time and for the next 100 years.

The current decommissioning cost estimate includes funding for the removal of material beneath the process-building slab in the Chemical Area OU, including the area where the Spiking Stations are located.

Leaving the residual contamination in-place, with the existing controls and monitoring program poses no risk for off-site impacts.

Based on the Final Interim RI Data Summary Report, the potential for U to migrate with groundwater has been shown to be limited at the Site.

Closing We look forward to continuing work with SCDHEC to finalize this assessment. CFFF is committed to protecting the safety of its employees, the community, and the environment, and we believe the transparency and ongoing activities being performed under the Consent Agreement demonstrate this commitment. If you have any questions or comments, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me or Nancy Parr at (803) 647-3338 or parrnb@westinghouse.com.

Page 4 of 4 Our ref: LTR-RAC-20-65 July 30, 2020 Respectfully, Diana P. Joyner Principal Environmental Engineer Westinghouse Electric Company, CFFF 803.497.7062 (m) joynerdp@westinghouse.com cc:

M. Annacone, VP Columbia Fuel J. Ferguson, EH&S Manager V. Kelmeckis, Corporate Environmental Manager N. Parr, Environmental Protection Manager J. Grant, AECOM Project Manager K. Harris, Leidos ENOVIA Records Attachments:

1. HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report dated July 22, 2020 prepared by AECOM
2. Technical Basis Document dated July 28, 2020 prepared by Leidos

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility 5801 Bluff Road Hopkins, South Carolina Prepared for:

Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility 5801 Bluff Road Hopkins, South Carolina 29061-9121 Prepared by:

AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

101 Research Drive Columbia, SC 29203 AECOM Project No. 60633543 July 22, 2020

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility 5801 Bluff Road Hopkins, South Carolina Prepared By Jeremy Grant, Senior Project Manager Reviewed By Scott Ross, P.G., Senior Project Manager

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx i July 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................................ i LIST OF APPENDICES................................................................................................................................. i LIST OF ACRONYMS.................................................................................................................................. ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION

.............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Site Background..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Site Description................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Site History.......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Site Investigation Objective.................................................................................................... 1-2 2.0 SITE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Field Investigation Activities................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Soil Assessment.................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Soil Analytical Results......................................................................................... 2-2

3.0 CONCLUSION

S............................................................................................................................... 3-1

4.0 REFERENCES

................................................................................................................................. 4-1 TABLES Table 1 Soil Analytical Results FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Map Figure 3 HF Spiking Station #1 Soil CoC Map LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Boring Logs Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Data

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx ii July 2020 LIST OF ACRONYMS AECOM AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

bss Below Soil Surface CSM Conceptual Site Model CA Consent Agreement CFFF Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility GEL GEL Laboratories, LLC HF Hydrofluoric Acid HFSS HF Spiking Station OU Operable Unit RAL Remedial Action Level RI Remedial Investigation SCDHEC South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Tc-99 Technetium 99 U

Uranium

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx1-1-1 July 2020

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility (CFFF) uses two spiking stations, located directly adjacent to each other, where hydrofluoric acid (HF) is mixed with uranyl nitrate for the conversion process. Previous assessment of HF Spiking Station (HFSS) #2 in 2018 after the discovery of a potential release from this station indicated the presence of uranium (U) within subslab soils beneath HFSS #2.

Approximately 76 metric tons of soil from beneath HFSS #2 were excavated and disposed prior to HFSS

  1. 2 being rebuilt. As part of CFFFs extent of condition review, the facility is also upgrading the HFSS #1 to the new design which includes investigation of subslab soil quality beneath HFSS #1 under the Consent Agreement (CA) with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC).

The CA, Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and a risk-based site remediation procedure were not in place when the HFSS #2 issue was discovered. This report documents assessment activities related to HFSS

  1. 1.

1.1 Site Background 1.1.1 Site Description The CFFF (the Site") is located at 5801 Bluff Road (SC Hwy 48) near Hopkins, South Carolina (Figure 1). The Site includes approximately 1,151 acres, the majority of which is undeveloped. The developed portion of the property including the plant building, an employee parking area, several smaller support buildings, outdoor supply staging areas, and wastewater lagoons encompasses approximately 75 acres.

The developed area is located approximately 2,700 feet southwest of Bluff Road within the north-central portion of the property. The position of the developed area within the Site creates a substantial buffer from downgradient, adjoining properties. HFSS #1 is located in the south central portion of the plant building.

A manmade dike approximately 1,850 feet south of HFSS #1 backs up water in Mill Creek, creating Lower Sunset Lake. A second manmade dike cuts across Mill Creek creating Upper Sunset Lake. Upper and Lower Sunset Lake are located approximately 1,250 feet southwest of the HFSS #1 (Figure 2) within a natural oxbow of Mill Creek. A small, man-made pond known as the Gator Pond is also located approximately 900 feet southwest of HFSS #1. Surface water drainage on the developed portion of the property is managed by several ditches which empty into Upper Sunset Lake.

The southern portion of the property, including the Gator Pond, and both portions of Sunset Lake (part of Mill Creek) are located within the floodplain of the Congaree River. The plant and the floodplain are separated by a bluff, approximately 20 feet high, located immediately south of the east-west trending dirt road on the plant property.

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx1-1-2 July 2020 1.1.2 Site History The CFFF plant was constructed in 1969 to manufacture fuel assemblies and components for the commercial nuclear power industry. Prior to construction the Site consisted of farmland, woodlands, and floodplain.

As a result of historical operations and the need to further assess environmental impacts, the Site entered into a CA with SCDHEC on February 26, 2019. As discussed in the Final Remedial Investigation Work Plan (AECOM, 2019), CFFF records indicate historic releases in the Chemical Area of the manufacturing building. This area was established as the Chemical Area Operable Unit (OU). The soil underneath this portion of the manufacturing building is known to be radiologically impacted with residual quantities of U.

Because of this, a Chemical Area OU groundwater monitoring well network was established in 2018-2019. Collectively, the monitoring wells and the CSM provide a robust early detection program to monitor the OU for migration of potential impacts from past or future manufacturing operations for the life of the plant.

The HFSS #1 system and containment dike were last replaced in March 2002 following an above ground piping leak in October 2001. The previous containment dike, with interior dimensions of 112 inches by 84 inches, used the exterior manufacturing building wall as one of its four sides. The replacement project included moving the south wall of the dike approximately 12 inches from the exterior building wall.

Seventeen 55-gallon drums of concrete floor and subsurface soils were removed to install the new containment dike. The event was documented in the Sites decommissioning records in 2001 and was incorporated into the initial CSM included with the Final Remedial Investigation (RI) Work Plan approved in June 2019 (AECOM, 2019).

1.2 Site Investigation Objective As part of the CA, CFFF is performing an RI to understand the source, nature and extent of impacts, resulting from current and historical operations at the Site. The first phase of the investigation has been completed and supported the conclusion that there are no known offsite impacts from plant operations.

CFFF is currently developing the scope of work to be proposed to SCDHEC for the second phase of the RI.

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx2-2-1 July 2020 2.0 SITE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES This section discusses the rationale and methods used during the soil investigation. AECOM Technical Services, Inc (AECOM) performed the soil assessment in HFSS #1 from May 4, 2020 to May 6, 2020.

The investigative efforts were performed to determine if subsurface soils and plant building footers have been impacted by potential releases from HFSS #1.

2.1 Field Investigation Activities Field investigation activities included the following:

Installation of 5 vertical hand auger borings (HF1-B1 through HF1-B5) to collect soil samples from beneath HFSS #1 footprint; and Installation of 2 angled hand auger borings (HF1-B6 and HF1-B7) to collect soil samples within and adjacent to the HFSS #1 footprint that were also in close proximity to the building footer for structural engineering evaluation.

2.1.1 Soil Assessment To protect CFFF workers outside of the HFSS #1 study area from potential exposure to dust generated during concrete removal and soil disturbance, a tented structure was set up around the work station. A temporary berm was also installed on the floor to keep potential spills from outside of the study area from reaching the exposed subslab soil.

Seven (7) borings (HF1-B1 through HF-B7) were advanced using dedicated stainless steel hand augers within the HFSS #1 study area (Figure 3). These borings were advanced to hand auger refusal or a depth of 10 feet below soil surface (bss), whichever was less. The depth to the water table below HFSS

  1. 1 is approximately 12 feet bss. Boreholes HF1-B4, HF1-B6, and HF1-B7 encountered hand auger refusal at depths ranging from 5.08 feet to 5.37 feet bss.

Composite soil samples were collected from the following intervals: 1-2 feet bss, 3-4 feet bss, 5-6 feet bss, 7-8 feet bss, and 8-10 feet bss, with the exception of borings where hand auger refusal was encountered at shallower depths. The top foot of soil generated at each boring was discarded because the surface of the soil beneath the concrete was likely cross contaminated with Uranium (U) during the cutting and removal of the concrete floor. The concrete floor in this area is known to contain elevated U concentrations.

When pulling the hand auger bucket out of the borehole and pushing the hand auger bucket back into the borehole, soil from the sidewalls of the borehole could have collapsed into the bottom of the borehole. To ensure that representative samples were collected from the desired depths, AECOM personnel used a tape measure before and after each advancement of the hand auger bucket within the sample interval to document how much soil within each retrieved hand auger bucket was native soil at a given depth. Soil from the top of the hand auger bucket was emptied into 3-gallon plastic bags until only the measured increase in the total borehole depth remained within the hand auger bucket.

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx2-2-2 July 2020 One grab sample (HF1-B7 REFUSAL) was collected at the refusal depth of borehole HF1-B7 to assess pH at the depth that is believed to be the top of the plant buildings footer.

Soil from the composite sample intervals was emptied from the hand auger bucket onto a 3 foot by 3 foot 4-mil polyethylene plastic mixing square, dedicated to the specified sampling interval, and homogenized.

Homogenized soil samples were placed in pre-cleaned, laboratory-provided sample bottles.

After the soil samples were collected from HF1-B6 and HF1-B7, CFFF and AECOM personnel used the hand auger extension rods and a plumb bob to obtain measurements that would allow for the assessment of the angle at which boreholes B-6 and B-7 extended into the subsurface, the depth below soil surface of the sampling intervals, and how far from the borehole opening each borehole extended towards the plant buildings footer.

Subsurface lithology from each borehole was logged by an AECOM geologist. Boring logs are included in Appendix A.

2.1.2 Soil Sample Analysis and Results Soil samples were submitted to GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) for analysis of percent moisture using ASTM D 2216 (Modified), fluoride and nitrate using EPA Method 9056A, isotopic U using EPA DOE EML HASL-300 (U-02-RC Modified), technetium 99 (Tc-99) using DOE EML HASL-300 (Tc-02-RC Modified) and pH using EPA Method 9045D. Soil analytical results and the depth bss of the samples are summarized in Table 1 and displayed on Figure 3. Laboratory analytical results are contained in Appendix B.

Soil from borings HF1-B1, HF1-B3, HF1-B5, and HF1-B7 contained uranium above the Site-specific remediation action level (RAL), as documented in the facilitys Procedure RA-433 Environmental Remediation Revision 1 (CFFF, 2020), with the greatest impact encountered in soil samples from boreholes HF1-B1 and HF1-B3 at depths ranging from two feet bss to eight feet bss. The Site-specific RAL incorporates established regulatory screening levels that are protective of human health and the environment for decision making purposes. Impact in soil within boreholes HF1-B1 and HF1-B3 increased from the surface to the greatest impact in the 4-6 feet sampling interval and decreased thereafter.

Surficial soils from the two angled borings (HF1-B6 0-2 foot and HF1-B7 0-2 foot) were intended to be analyzed for pH only due to potential cross contamination with U impacted concrete from the floor.

However, the chain of custody for the surficial composite soil sample from HFSS1-B7 0-2 foot was errantly marked to also analyze soil from this interval for fluoride, nitrate, Tc-99 and U. Analytical results from the 0-2 foot interval in samples HFSS-1 B6 and HFSS-1 B-7 are similar to the analytical for the surface soil samples from the 1-2 foot interval for HFSS-1 B1 through HF1-B5.

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx 3-1 July 2020

3.0 CONCLUSION

S Based upon the results of this assessment, AECOM concludes the following:

Some of the soil below the concrete floor within the HFSS #1 area is impacted with fluoride, nitrate, and uranium, and has areas of low pH (<5 standard units). This data is representative of other soils below the Chemical Area OU.

In general, surficial soils (0-2 feet bss) had minimal impact from the operations of HFSS #1. This is likely due to the dike replacement early 2002. Based on the minimal impact in the shallow surficial soil beneath the concrete slab, operations of HFSS #1 do not appear to have impacted these soils since this replacement.

Soil from borings HFSS1-B1, HFSS1-B3, HFSS1-B5, and HFSS1-B7 exceed the Site-specific remedial action levels. Based upon the facilitys Procedure RA-433 Environmental Remediation Revision 1, the following evaluations should be undertaken:

1. Complete dose/risk assessment under current circumstances (industrial worker scenario).
2. Determine the potential for off-site impacts if the impacted soil is left in place.
3. Complete an assessment of Site conditions and future use of the area.

The results of these evaluations are documented in the Technical Basis Document prepared by Leidos (Leidos, 2020).

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina 2020-07-22_final_hfss 1 assessment report_aecom.docx 4-1 July 2020

4.0 REFERENCES

AECOM, 2013. Final Remedial Investigation Work Plan, Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility, June 2019.

Leidos, 2020. Technical Basis Document - Evaluation of Dose and Risk from Uranium in Soil at HF Spiking Station #1 at the Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility (CFFF), July 2020.

RA-433, Rev 1 - CFFF Environmental Remediation Procedure, dated January 16, 2020.

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina hfss 1 assessment report_july 2020.docx July 2020 TABLES

Table1 WestinghouseColumbiaFuelFabricationFacility HFSpikingStation#1 SoilAnalyticalResults pH Fluoride Nitrate Technetium99 Uranium233/234 Uranium235/236 Uranium238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g SampleID Sample Depth DepthBSS SampleDate HF1B1(12) 12ft 12ft 5/4/2020 4.81 28.3 180 0.447U 13.2 0.828 3.22 HF1B1(24) 24ft 24ft 5/4/2020 4.02 706 707 0.88U 8,310 465 1,620 HF1B1(46) 46ft 46ft 5/4/2020 3.88 1500 1240 0.0772U 10,100 436 1,680 HF1B1(68) 68ft 68ft 5/4/2020 4.03 936 971 0.871U 4,500 252 802 HF1B1(810) 810ft 810ft 5/4/2020 4.26 96.4 303 0.656U 1,440 79.4 263 HF1B2(12) 12ft 12ft 5/5/2020 6.38 1.28 76.5 0

4.65 0.455 1.39 HF1B2(24) 24ft 24ft 5/5/2020 5.16 0.623J 90.8 0

0.847 0.107U 0.785 HF1B2(46) 46ft 46ft 5/5/2020 6.05 1.09 94 0

1.5 0.0943U 0.955 HF1B2(68) 68ft 68ft 5/5/2020 5.98 1.1 45.9 0.00658U 0.926 0.0131U 0.218 HF1B2(810) 810ft 810ft 5/5/2020 6.17 0.8J 23.4 0

1.52 0.0407U 0.421 HF1B3(12) 12ft 12ft 5/5/2020 4.82 6.24 285 0

3.52 0.0795U 1.13 HF1B3(24) 24ft 24ft 5/5/2020 4.08 683 589 0

3,510 159 582 HF1B3(46) 46ft 46ft 5/5/2020 3.96 1020 1290 0

5,600 264 948 HF1B3(68) 68ft 68ft 5/5/2020 4.11 546 700 0

2,790 171 632 HF1B3(810) 810ft 810ft 5/5/2020 4.25 343 398 0

2,600 139 636 HF1B4(12) 12ft 12ft 5/6/2020 5.46 65.8 69.3 0

563 29 110 HF1B4(24) 24ft 24ft 5/6/2020 3.97 335 70.4 0.171U 511 22.1 105 HF1B4(45.33) 45.33ft 45.33ft 5/6/2020 3.29 359 82.5 2.6U 700 31.9 139 HF1B5(12) 12ft 12ft 5/6/2020 5.07 1.55 232 0

9.36 0.396 2.56 HF1B5(24) 24ft 24ft 5/6/2020 4.39 135 288 0

1,520 82.8 246 HF1B5(46) 46ft 46ft 5/6/2020 4.28 21.7 440 0

1,250 50.9 224 HF1B5(68) 68ft 68ft 5/6/2020 5.67 1.11 150 0

9.67 0.587 1.61 HF1B5(810) 810ft 810ft 5/6/2020 4.35 0.879J 54.3 0

2.65 0.294 1.02 HF1B6(02) 02ft 01.90ft 5/6/2020 8.09 NA NA NA NA NA NA HF1B6(24) 24ft 1.903.79ft 5/6/2020 6.35 5.67 14.5 0

403 19.3 78.5 HF1B6(45.67) 45.67ft 3.795.37ft 5/6/2020 6.22 43.8 38 0

226 9.66 41.6 HF1B7(02) 02ft 01.88ft 5/6/2020 4.72 40.4 127 0

2,140 93.5 313 HF1B7(24) 24ft 1.883.75ft 5/6/2020 4.41 158 178 3.15U 2,020 92 355 HF1B7(45.42) 45.42ft 3.755.08ft 5/6/2020 5.21 121 83 0.627U 799 46.5 158 HF1B7REFUSAL 5.425.42ft 5.08ft 5/6/2020 4.58 NA NA NA NA NA NA 3,100 130,000 89,400 3,310 39 179 Notes:

SUstandardunits ftfeet mg/kgmilligramperkilogram Unotdetectedabovetheminimumdetectibleconcentration pCi/gpicocuriespergram Shadedcellsexceedtheremedialactionscreeninglevel BSSbelowsoilsurface Analyte Unit IndustrialUseRemedialActionLevel

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina hfss 1 assessment report_july 2020.docx July 2020 FIGURES

Dominion Energy Substation CFFF 101 Research Drive Columbia, SC 29203 T: (803) 254-4400 F: (803) 771-6676 PROJECT NO.

PREPARED BY:

DATE:

60633543 CCS July 2020 FIGURE 1 q

0 4,000 2,000 Feet 1:48,000 Map Projection: NAD 1983, South Carolina State Plane, FIPS 3900, Feet Datum: North American 1983 Data Source: Esri/USGS WESTINGHOUSE COLUMBIA FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY HOPKINS, SOUTH CAROLINA Site Location Map Path: M:\\EnvDataViz\\Westinghouse\\mxd\\2020_Interim_RI_Data_Summary_Rpt\\fig_1_sitelocationmap.mxd

^_

Legend Locations Property Line Topographic Quadrangle Boundary 1

2 3

4 5

6 Southwest Columbia Gaston Fort Jackson South Saylors Lake Congaree Gadsden ID Topographic Quadrangle Name 1

2 4

3 5

6

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A@

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

")

")

")

")

Plant Building WL2 WL1 SAN NL EL SL Gator Pond Culvert Eastern Ditch Dominion Energy Substation Western Ditch Middle Ditch Former Oil House W-11 W-27 W-32 W-3A W-4 W-42 W-47 W-49 W-64 W-61 W-60 W-69 W-70 W-71 W-85 W-86 W-90 W-92 W-91 RW-2R W-10 W-13R W-14 W-15 W-16 W-19B W-20 W-23R W-24 W-26 W-33 W-36 W-39 W-41R W-43 W-44 W-46 W-48 W-7A W-62 W-63 W-67 W-68 W-88 W-89 W-97 W-96 W-95 W-94 W-25 Creek Upper Gator Lower 101 Research Drive Columbia, SC 29203 T: (803) 254-4400 F: (803) 771-6676 PROJECT NO.

PREPARED BY:

DATE:

60633543 CCS July 2020 FIGURE 2 q

0 600 300 Feet 1:7,200 Map Projection: NAD 1983, South Carolina State Plane, FIPS 3900, Feet Datum: North American 1983 WESTINGHOUSE COLUMBIA FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY HOPKINS, SOUTH CAROLINA Site Map Path: M:\\EnvDataViz\\Westinghouse\\mxd\\2020_Interim_RI_Data_Summary_Rpt\\fig_2_SiteMap.mxd Legend East Lagoon North Lagoon South Lagoon Sanitary Lagoon West Lagoon I West Lagoon II EL NL SL SAN WL1 WL2 Groundwater Monitoring Wells Upper Surficial Aquifer Lower Surficial Aquifer Black Mingo Aquifer A

A A

?

Ditch Culvert Upper Sunset Lake Lower Sunset Lake Mill Creek Upper Floodplain Well A

SCRDI Bluff Road (Superfund Site)

Mill Creek Flow Direction Mill Creek Property Line Dike Location

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

A A

Plant Building WL2 WL1 SAN NL EL SL Approximate location of HF Spiking Station #1 W-75 W-78 W-77 W-66 W-65 W-59 W-58 W-57 W-56 W-55 W-54 W-53 W-52 W-51 W-7A W-6 W-50 W-45 W-43 W-40 W-39 W-38 W-37 W-36 W-35 W-33 W-30 W-29 W-28 W 10 RW-1 W-22 W-18R W-17 W-72 W-73 W-74 W-93 W-79 W-80 W-81 W-82 W-83 W-84 W-87 W-86 W-76 Staff Gauge Location

")

Lower Floodplain Well A

Top of Bluff Inferred Top of Bluff Bottom of Bluff Inferred Bottom of Bluff Secondary Bluff Area Lower Sunset Dike Upper Sunset Dike

PLAN VIEW - HF SPIKING STATION HF1-B1 HF1-B2 HF1-B6 HF1-B3 HF1-B4 HF1-B5 HFSS #1 HF1-B7 HFSS #2 a

b c

d e

f SYMBOL DESCRIPTION CONCRETE REMOVAL FOR REPLACEMENT SPIKING STATION REMOVED DIKE OUTLINE, HF SPIKING STATION 1 LEGEND - SOIL SAMPLING SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR SCDHEC WORK PLAN SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, (SAMPLES COLLECTED @ AN ANGLE)

BSS FT.

SU mg/kg pCi/g U

N/S

- BELOW SOIL SURFACE

- FEET

- STANDARD UNITS

- MILLIGRAM PER KILOGRAM

- PICOCURIES PER GRAM

- NOT DETECTED ABOVE THE METHOD DETECTION CONCENTRATION

- NOT SAMPLED

- SHADED CELLS EXCEED THE REMEDIAL ACTION SCREENING LEVEL

- GEL LABORATORY WORK ORDERS : 510581, 510757, 510807 NOTES:

HF1 - B1 Sample Data Depth BSS Corrosivity Fluoride Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g HF1 - B2 Sample Data Corrosivity Fluoride Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g HF1 - B3 Sample Data Corrosivity Fluoride Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g HF1 - B4 Sample Data Corrosivity Fluoride Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g HF1 - B5 Sample Data Corrosivity Fluoride Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Corrosivity Fluoride Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Corrosivity Fluoride Nitrate Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 SU mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Sample Data Collection Results 05-04-2020 05-05-2020 05-05-2020 05-06-2020 05-06-2020 05-06-2020 05-06-2020 ft.

ft.

ft.

ft.

ft.

ft.

ft.

Depth BSS Depth BSS Depth BSS Depth BSS Depth BSS Depth BSS Fluoride Nitrate Technetium-99 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 mg/kg mg/kg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g REMEDIAL ACTION SCREENING LEVEL Nitrate Nitrate Nitrate Nitrate Nitrate Nitrate HF1 - B7 Sample Data (Sample collected @ angle - a,b,c)

HF1 - B7 Sample Data (Sample collected @ angle - d,e,f) 60533543 101 Research Drive Columbia, South Carolina 29203 Telephone (803) 254-4400 : Fax (803) 771-6676 www.AECOM.com Figure 3 HF Spiking Station #1 Soil CoC Map WESTINGHOUSE COLUMBIA FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY HOPKINS, SOUTH CAROLINA PROJECT NO.

PREPARED BY: CAV SHEET:

APPROVED BY: JG 1

OF 1

DATE: JULY 15, 2020 CHECKED BY: JG DATE: JULY 15, 2020

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina hfss 1 assessment report_july 2020.docx July 2020 APPENDIX A BORING LOGS

PAGE PROJECT:

HF Spiking Station #1 PROJECT NO:

CLIENT:

Westinghouse LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR:

AECOM ELEVATION:

EQUIPMENT:

Stainless Steel Hand Auger NORTHING:

GROUNDWATER EASTING:

DATE START:

DATE FINISH:

DRILLER:

OVERSIGHT:

Light tan to brown fine to medium grained sand. Slightly moist.

Brown fine to medium grained sand. Some silt. Slightly moist..

Tan fine grained sand. Few silt. Dry.

Tan fine grained sandy silt. Slightly moist.

Light yellow clayey silt. Some fine sand. Slightly moist.

Tan fine to medium grained silty sand. Slightly moist.

Light tan fine grained sand. Some silt. Slightly moist.

Light tan fine grained silty sand. Moist.

NO RECOVERY 50+

VERY DENSE 16-30 VERY STIFF TRACE

<5%

31+

HARD 31-50 DENSE 9-15 STIFF MC MACRO-CORE FEW 5-10%

NR NOT ENCOUNTERED 11-30 MEDIUM DENSE 5-8 MEDIUM STIFF G

GRAB SAMPLE LITTLE 15-25%

UR NOT READ 5-10 LOOSE 3-4 SOFT ST SHELBY TUBE SOME 30-45%

NE SAMPLER ID.

DESCRIPTIONS NOTES 0-4 VERY LOOSE 0-2 VERY SOFT SS SPLIT SPOON MOSTLY 50-100%

WD WHILE DRILLING BLOWS/FT.

DENSITY BLOWS/FT.

CONSISTENCY 5

4 3

2 SAMPLING HAMMER WT HAMMER FALL 1

SCREENING PER NUMBER DEPTH CASING DEPTH GROUT TYPE Not Applicable SOIL CLASSIFICATION:

USCS (PPM) 6 INCHES Jeremy Grant DEPTH IN FEET ORGANIC SAMPLER SAMPLE DEPTH RANGE VAPOR BLOWS SAMPLE TEMP / PERM 5/4/2020 HOLE DIA.

CASING DIA.

CASING TYPE DATE HRS WATER METHOD CASING 5/4/2020 60633543 Hopkins, SC DRILLING INFORMATION BORING NO.

HF1-B1 1

OF 1

Soil Boring Report 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

PAGE PROJECT:

HF Spiking Station #1 PROJECT NO:

CLIENT:

Westinghouse LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR:

AECOM ELEVATION:

EQUIPMENT:

Stainless Steel Hand Auger NORTHING:

GROUNDWATER EASTING:

DATE START:

DATE FINISH:

DRILLER:

OVERSIGHT:

Light tan fine to medium grained sand.Dry.

Dark brown fine to medium grained silty sand. Slightly moist.

Reddish brown silty clay. Some fine sand. Slightly moist.

Light brown fine to medium grained sand. Few silt. Slightly moist.

Tan fine grained sand. Few silt. Dry.

Light brown fine grained sandy silt. Few clay. Slightly moist.

Light brown fine grained sandy silt. Few clay. Slightly moist.

Tan fine grained sand. Few silt. Slightly moist.

Grey and tan fine to medium grained silty sand. Moist.

60633543 Hopkins, SC DRILLING INFORMATION BORING NO.

HF1-B2 1

OF 1

TEMP / PERM 5/5/2020 HOLE DIA.

CASING DIA.

CASING TYPE DATE HRS WATER METHOD CASING 5/5/2020 DEPTH CASING DEPTH GROUT TYPE Not Applicable SOIL CLASSIFICATION:

USCS (PPM) 6 INCHES Jeremy Grant DEPTH IN FEET ORGANIC SAMPLER SAMPLE DEPTH RANGE VAPOR BLOWS SAMPLE SAMPLING HAMMER WT HAMMER FALL 1

SCREENING PER NUMBER 3

2 5

4 BLOWS/FT.

DENSITY BLOWS/FT.

CONSISTENCY SAMPLER ID.

DESCRIPTIONS NOTES 0-4 VERY LOOSE 0-2 VERY SOFT SS SPLIT SPOON MOSTLY 50-100%

WD WHILE DRILLING 5-10 LOOSE 3-4 SOFT ST SHELBY TUBE SOME 30-45%

NE NOT ENCOUNTERED 11-30 MEDIUM DENSE 5-8 MEDIUM STIFF G

GRAB SAMPLE LITTLE 15-25%

UR NOT READ 31-50 DENSE 9-15 STIFF MC MACRO-CORE FEW 5-10%

NR NO RECOVERY 50+

VERY DENSE 16-30 VERY STIFF TRACE

<5%

31+

HARD Soil Boring Report 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

PAGE PROJECT:

HF Spiking Station #1 PROJECT NO:

CLIENT:

Westinghouse LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR:

AECOM ELEVATION:

EQUIPMENT:

Stainless Steel Hand Auger NORTHING:

GROUNDWATER EASTING:

DATE START:

DATE FINISH:

DRILLER:

OVERSIGHT:

Light tan fine grained sand. Dry.

Brown fine to medium grained sand. Some silt. Slightly moist.

Orangish brown clayey sit. Few fine grained sand. Slightly moist.

Tan fine grained sand. Few silt. Slightly moist.

Tan fine grained silty sand. Slightly moist.

Tan fine grained sandy silt. Slightly moist.

Tan fine to medium grained silty sand. Slightly moist.

Light brown and grey fine to medium grained sand. Some silt.Slightly moist.

Light tan medium to coarse grained sand. Some silt. Moist.

60633543 Hopkins, SC DRILLING INFORMATION BORING NO.

HF1-B3 1

OF 1

TEMP / PERM 5/5/2020 HOLE DIA.

CASING DIA.

CASING TYPE DATE HRS WATER METHOD CASING 5/5/2020 DEPTH CASING DEPTH GROUT TYPE Not Applicable SOIL CLASSIFICATION:

USCS (PPM) 6 INCHES Jeremy Grant DEPTH IN FEET ORGANIC SAMPLER SAMPLE DEPTH RANGE VAPOR BLOWS SAMPLE SAMPLING HAMMER WT HAMMER FALL 1

SCREENING PER NUMBER 3

2 5

4 BLOWS/FT.

DENSITY BLOWS/FT.

CONSISTENCY SAMPLER ID.

DESCRIPTIONS NOTES 0-4 VERY LOOSE 0-2 VERY SOFT SS SPLIT SPOON MOSTLY 50-100%

WD WHILE DRILLING 5-10 LOOSE 3-4 SOFT ST SHELBY TUBE SOME 30-45%

NE NOT ENCOUNTERED 11-30 MEDIUM DENSE 5-8 MEDIUM STIFF G

GRAB SAMPLE LITTLE 15-25%

UR NOT READ 31-50 DENSE 9-15 STIFF MC MACRO-CORE FEW 5-10%

NR NO RECOVERY 50+

VERY DENSE 16-30 VERY STIFF TRACE

<5%

31+

HARD Soil Boring Report 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

PAGE PROJECT:

HF Spiking Station #1 PROJECT NO:

CLIENT:

Westinghouse LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR:

AECOM ELEVATION:

EQUIPMENT:

Stainless Steel Hand Auger NORTHING:

GROUNDWATER EASTING:

DATE START:

DATE FINISH:

DRILLER:

OVERSIGHT:

Light tan to brown fine to medium grained sand. Slightly moist.

Hand auger refusal at 5.33 feet.

1 2

31+

HARD 3

NO RECOVERY 50+

VERY DENSE 16-30 VERY STIFF TRACE

<5%

31-50 DENSE 9-15 STIFF MC MACRO-CORE FEW 5-10%

NR NOT ENCOUNTERED 11-30 MEDIUM DENSE 5-8 MEDIUM STIFF G

GRAB SAMPLE LITTLE 15-25%

UR NOT READ 5-10 LOOSE 3-4 SOFT ST SHELBY TUBE SOME 30-45%

NE NOTES 0-4 VERY LOOSE 0-2 VERY SOFT SS SPLIT SPOON MOSTLY 50-100%

WD BLOWS/FT.

DENSITY BLOWS/FT.

CONSISTENCY SAMPLER ID.

DESCRIPTIONS WHILE DRILLING SOIL CLASSIFICATION:

USCS (PPM) 6 INCHES Jeremy Grant HAMMER WT HAMMER FALL DEPTH IN FEET ORGANIC SAMPLER SAMPLE DEPTH RANGE VAPOR BLOWS SAMPLE SAMPLING SCREENING PER NUMBER DATE HRS WATER METHOD CASING 5/6/2020 DEPTH CASING DEPTH GROUT TYPE Not Applicable 60633543 Hopkins, SC DRILLING INFORMATION BORING NO.

HF1-B4 1

OF 1

TEMP / PERM 5/6/2020 HOLE DIA.

CASING DIA.

CASING TYPE Soil Boring Report 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

PAGE PROJECT:

HF Spiking Station #1 PROJECT NO:

CLIENT:

Westinghouse LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR:

AECOM ELEVATION:

EQUIPMENT:

Stainless Steel Hand Auger NORTHING:

GROUNDWATER EASTING:

DATE START:

DATE FINISH:

DRILLER:

OVERSIGHT:

Light tan to brown fine to medium grained sand. Dry.

Brown fine to medium grained silty sand. Slightly moist.

Brown fine to medium grained sand. Few silt. Slightly moist.

Reddish brown silty clay. Some fine grained sand. Slightly moist.

Brown fine to medium grained sand. Some silt. Slightly moist.

Tan fine grained sandy silt. Some clay. Slightly moist.

Light brown fine grained sandy silt. Few clay. Slightly moist.

Tan clayey silt. Few fine grained sand. Slightly moist.

Tan fine grained silty sand. Slightly moist.

Light tan fine grained sand. Some silt. Slightly moist.

Grey and tan fine to coarse grained silty sand. Moist.

60633543 Hopkins, SC DRILLING INFORMATION BORING NO.

HF1-B5 1

OF 1

TEMP / PERM 5/6/2020 HOLE DIA.

CASING DIA.

CASING TYPE DATE HRS WATER METHOD CASING 5/6/2020 DEPTH CASING DEPTH GROUT TYPE Not Applicable SOIL CLASSIFICATION:

USCS (PPM) 6 INCHES Jeremy Grant DEPTH IN FEET ORGANIC SAMPLER SAMPLE DEPTH RANGE VAPOR BLOWS SAMPLE SAMPLING HAMMER WT HAMMER FALL 1

SCREENING PER NUMBER 3

2 5

4 BLOWS/FT.

DENSITY BLOWS/FT.

CONSISTENCY SAMPLER ID.

DESCRIPTIONS NOTES 0-4 VERY LOOSE 0-2 VERY SOFT SS SPLIT SPOON MOSTLY 50-100%

WD WHILE DRILLING 5-10 LOOSE 3-4 SOFT ST SHELBY TUBE SOME 30-45%

NE NOT ENCOUNTERED 11-30 MEDIUM DENSE 5-8 MEDIUM STIFF G

GRAB SAMPLE LITTLE 15-25%

UR NOT READ 31-50 DENSE 9-15 STIFF MC MACRO-CORE FEW 5-10%

NR NO RECOVERY 50+

VERY DENSE 16-30 VERY STIFF TRACE

<5%

31+

HARD Soil Boring Report 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

PAGE PROJECT:

HF Spiking Station #1 PROJECT NO:

CLIENT:

Westinghouse LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR:

AECOM ELEVATION:

EQUIPMENT:

Stainless Steel Hand Auger NORTHING:

GROUNDWATER EASTING:

DATE START:

DATE FINISH:

DRILLER:

OVERSIGHT:

Light tan to brown fine to medium grained sand. Slightly moist.

Hand auger refusal at 5.67 feet.

60633543 Hopkins, SC DRILLING INFORMATION BORING NO.

HF1-B6 1

OF 1

TEMP / PERM 5/6/2020 HOLE DIA.

CASING DIA.

CASING TYPE DATE HRS WATER METHOD CASING 5/6/2020 DEPTH CASING DEPTH GROUT TYPE Not Applicable SOIL CLASSIFICATION:

USCS (PPM) 6 INCHES Jeremy Grant DEPTH IN FEET ORGANIC SAMPLER SAMPLE DEPTH RANGE VAPOR BLOWS SAMPLE SAMPLING HAMMER WT HAMMER FALL SCREENING PER NUMBER 1

3 2

BLOWS/FT.

DENSITY BLOWS/FT.

CONSISTENCY SAMPLER ID.

DESCRIPTIONS NOTES 0-4 VERY LOOSE 0-2 VERY SOFT SS SPLIT SPOON MOSTLY 50-100%

WD WHILE DRILLING 5-10 LOOSE 3-4 SOFT ST SHELBY TUBE SOME 30-45%

NE NOT ENCOUNTERED 11-30 MEDIUM DENSE 5-8 MEDIUM STIFF G

GRAB SAMPLE LITTLE 15-25%

UR NOT READ 31-50 DENSE 9-15 STIFF MC MACRO-CORE FEW 5-10%

NR NO RECOVERY 50+

VERY DENSE 16-30 VERY STIFF TRACE

<5%

31+

HARD Soil Boring Report 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

PAGE PROJECT:

HF Spiking Station #1 PROJECT NO:

CLIENT:

Westinghouse LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR:

AECOM ELEVATION:

EQUIPMENT:

Stainless Steel Hand Auger NORTHING:

GROUNDWATER EASTING:

DATE START:

DATE FINISH:

DRILLER:

OVERSIGHT:

Light tan to brown fine to medium grained sand. Slightly moist.

Hand auger refusal at 5.42 feet. Grab sample also collected at refusal depth.

60633543 Hopkins, SC DRILLING INFORMATION BORING NO.

HF1-B7 1

OF 1

TEMP / PERM 5/6/2020 HOLE DIA.

CASING DIA.

CASING TYPE DATE HRS WATER METHOD CASING 5/6/2020 DEPTH CASING DEPTH GROUT TYPE Not Applicable SOIL CLASSIFICATION:

USCS (PPM) 6 INCHES Jeremy Grant DEPTH IN FEET ORGANIC SAMPLER SAMPLE DEPTH RANGE VAPOR BLOWS SAMPLE SAMPLING HAMMER WT HAMMER FALL 1

SCREENING PER NUMBER 3

2 BLOWS/FT.

DENSITY BLOWS/FT.

CONSISTENCY SAMPLER ID.

DESCRIPTIONS NOTES 0-4 VERY LOOSE 0-2 VERY SOFT SS SPLIT SPOON MOSTLY 50-100%

WD WHILE DRILLING 5-10 LOOSE 3-4 SOFT ST SHELBY TUBE SOME 30-45%

NE NOT ENCOUNTERED 11-30 MEDIUM DENSE 5-8 MEDIUM STIFF G

GRAB SAMPLE LITTLE 15-25%

UR NOT READ 31-50 DENSE 9-15 STIFF MC MACRO-CORE FEW 5-10%

NR NO RECOVERY 50+

VERY DENSE 16-30 VERY STIFF TRACE

<5%

31+

HARD Soil Boring Report 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS

HF Spiking Station #1 Assessment Report Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility AECOM Project No. 60633543 Hopkins, South Carolina hfss 1 assessment report_july 2020.docx July 2020 APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS

May 28, 2020 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Re: Soil and Vegetation Analysis Work Order: 510581

Dear Ms. Logsdon:

GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the sample(s) we received on May 05, 2020. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GELs standard operating procedures.

Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards, with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.

Copies of GELs accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www.gel.com.

Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4707.

Sincerely, PM_SIGN_HERE Katelyn Gray Project Manager Purchase Order: 4500799254 Enclosures Page 1 of 26 SDG: 510581

Reviewed by USER_SIGN_HERE GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 (843) 5568171 www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report WNUC008 Westinghouse Electric Co, LLC (4500775170)

Client SDG: 510581 GEL Work Order: 510581 Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.

The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above the limit as defined in the U qualifier above.

This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Katelyn Gray.

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
    • Analyte is a Tracer compound
    • Analyte is a surrogate compound H Analytical holding time was exceeded U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

for Page 2 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1994861 1994861 1994735 1932 0110 1446 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/05/20 05/06/20 05/07/20 JLD1 JLD1 RXB5 1.08 5.38 0.100 1

5 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581001 Soil 04-MAY-20 13:13 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

7.46%

0.366 1.77 0.0100 1

2 3

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 28.3 180 4.81 9.95 9.95 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/05/20 1994849 1814 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 3 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1994861 1994735 0243 1448 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/06/20 05/07/20 JLD1 RXB5 21.7 21.7 0.100 20 20 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581002 Soil 04-MAY-20 13:43 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

7.57%

7.38 7.16 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 706 707 4.02 10.0 10.0 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/05/20 1994849 1814 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 4 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1994861 1994735 0314 1449 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/06/20 05/07/20 JLD1 RXB5 56.1 56.1 0.100 50 50 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581003 Soil 04-MAY-20 14:58 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

11.8%

19.1 18.5 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 1500 1240 3.88 9.90 9.90 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/05/20 1994849 1814 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 5 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1994861 1994735 0345 1450 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/06/20 05/07/20 JLD1 RXB5 27.8 27.8 0.100 25 25 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581004 Soil 04-MAY-20 16:10 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

11.6%

9.45 9.17 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 936 971 4.03 9.83 9.83 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/05/20 1994849 1814 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 6 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1994861 1994735 0415 1451 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/06/20 05/07/20 JLD1 RXB5 11.5 11.5 0.100 10 10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581005 Soil 04-MAY-20 17:02 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

12.8%

3.90 3.79 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 96.4 303 4.26 10.0 10.0 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/05/20 1994849 1814 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 7 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1994680 1994733 1307 0542 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/09/20 05/10/20 HAKB JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581001 Soil 04-MAY-20 13:13 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.986

+/-0.286

+/-0.486

+/-1.94 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 7.46%

0.221 0.186 0.111 3.34 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 13.2 0.828 3.22 0.447 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 81.9 97.3 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/05/20 1994664 1018 CXC1 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 8 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995912 1994733 1159 0603 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/10/20 HAKB JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581002 Soil 04-MAY-20 13:43 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-213

+/-56.2

+/-94.3

+/-2.19 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 7.57%

11.4 5.28 8.12 3.75 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 8310 465 1620 0.880 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 62 94.5 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/05/20 1994664 1018 CXC1 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 9 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995912 1994733 1159 0625 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/10/20 HAKB JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581003 Soil 04-MAY-20 14:58 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-239

+/-55.3

+/-97.6

+/-2.09 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 11.8%

9.20 7.65 8.76 3.63 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 10100 436 1680 0.0772 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 67.1 95.8 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/05/20 1994664 1018 CXC1 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 10 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1994680 1994733 2115 0647 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/07/20 05/10/20 HAKB JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581004 Soil 04-MAY-20 16:10 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-119

+/-31.3

+/-50.2

+/-2.06 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 11.6%

4.20 4.22 3.97 3.53 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 4500 252 802 0.871 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 15 96.1 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/05/20 1994664 1018 CXC1 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 11 of 26 SDG: 510581

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

May 28, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1994680 1994733 2115 0708 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/07/20 05/10/20 HAKB JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510581005 Soil 04-MAY-20 17:02 05-MAY-20 HF1-B1-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-43.8

+/-11.5

+/-18.7

+/-2.13 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 12.8%

1.98 1.79 1.69 3.65 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 1440 79.4 263 0.656 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 31.5 92.7 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/05/20 1994664 1018 CXC1 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 12 of 26 SDG: 510581

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1994861 1994735 Batch Batch Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity Corrosivity Parmname Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina May 28, 2020 Report Date:

Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg SU SU Anlst Date Time JLD1 RXB5 05/05/20 23:07 05/06/20 01:41 05/05/20 22:36 05/05/20 22:05 05/05/20 23:38 05/06/20 02:12 05/07/20 14:47 05/07/20 14:42 QC 37.9 238 24.1 24.8 ND ND 40.8 221 5.15 7.00 NOM Sample 28.3 180 28.3 180 4.81 Range (0%-109%)

(0%-104%)

(90%-110%)

(90%-110%)

(75%-125%)

(75%-125%)

(0%-10%)

(95%-105%)

Qual U

U H

QC1204556272 510581001 QC1204556271 QC1204556270 QC1204556273 510581001 QC1204556044 510581001 QC1204556042 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

29.1 28 6.83 REC%

95.6 98.2 46.8 N/A 100 25.3 25.3 26.9 26.9 7.00 DUP LCS MB MS DUP LCS 510581 Workorder:

Result is less than value reported H

RPD%

Notes:

Page 1 of 2 Page 13 of 26 SDG: 510581

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Parmname Page 2 of 2 Units Anlst Date Time QC NOM Sample Range Qual REC%

510581 Workorder:

B E

H J

J N/A N1 ND NJ Q

R R

U X

Z

^

d e

h Result is greater than value reported The target analyte was detected in the associated blank.

General Chemistry--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range Analytical holding time was exceeded See case narrative for an explanation Value is estimated RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.

See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.

Per section 9.3.4.1 of Method 1664 Revision B, due to matrix spike recovery issues, this result may not be reported or used for regulatory compliance purposes.

Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Paint Filter Test--Particulates passed through the filter, however no free liquids were observed.

RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.

5-day BOD--The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample 5-day BOD--Test replicates show more than 30% difference between high and low values. The data is qualified per the method and can be used for reporting purposes Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.

^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

  • Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

RPD%

Page 14 of 26 SDG: 510581

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec 1994680 1995912 Batch Batch Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Parmname Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina May 28, 2020 Report Date:

Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time HAKB HAKB 05/07/20 20:55 05/07/20 20:55 05/09/20 13:07 05/11/20 11:59 QC 12.1 0.575 2.27 12.2 0.933 12.0 0.428 0.0679 0.0889 8000 379 1420 NOM Sample 13.2 0.828 3.22 8310 465 1620 Range (0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(75%-125%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

Qual U

QC1204555898 510581001 QC1204555899 QC1204555897 QC1204558442 510581002 9.25 36.1 34.6 3.74 20.5 13.5 REC%

93.5 12.9 DUP LCS MB DUP 510581 Workorder:

+/-0.986

+/-0.286

+/-0.486

+/-213

+/-56.2

+/-94.3

+/-1.02

+/-0.253

+/-0.450

+/-0.829

+/-0.257

+/-0.821

+/-0.164

+/-0.0763

+/-0.0914

+/-253

+/-61.4

+/-107 RPD%

Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Page 1 of 3 Page 15 of 26 SDG: 510581

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec Rad Liquid Scintillation 1995912 1994733 Batch Batch Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time HAKB JJ3 05/11/20 11:59 05/11/20 11:59 05/10/20 07:52 05/10/20 08:14 05/10/20 07:30 QC 162 17.4 168

-1.59

-0.163 0.176 0.433 49.8 2.16 NOM Sample 0.447 Range (75%-125%)

N/A (75%-125%)

Qual U

U U

U U

QC1204558443 QC1204558441 QC1204556036 510581001 QC1204556037 QC1204556035 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

N/A REC%

105 87.1 160 57.1 LCS MB DUP LCS MB 510581 Workorder:

BD FA H

J Analyte is a Tracer compound Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low Failed analysis.

Analytical holding time was exceeded See case narrative for an explanation U

+/-1.94

+/-27.6

+/-10.6

+/-28.1

+/-2.31

+/-2.70

+/-3.14

+/-2.00

+/-3.28

+/-2.07 RPD%

Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Page 2 of 3 Page 16 of 26 SDG: 510581

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Parmname Page 3 of 3 Units Anlst Date Time QC NOM Sample Range Qual REC%

510581 Workorder:

J K

L M

M N/A N1 ND NJ Q

R U

UI UJ UL X

Y

^

h Value is estimated Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.

Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.

M if above MDC and less than LLD REMP Result > MDC/CL and < RDL RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.

See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.

Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.

Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Other specific qualifiers were required to properly define the results. Consult case narrative.

RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.

Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.

^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

  • Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

RPD%

Page 17 of 26 SDG: 510581

Technical Case Narrative Westinghouse Electric Co, LLC SDG #: 510581 General Chemistry Product: Ion Chromatography Analytical Method: SW846 9056A Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-086 REV# 27 Analytical Batches: 1994861 and 1994849 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510581001 HF1-B1-(1-2) 510581002 HF1-B1-(2-4) 510581003 HF1-B1-(4-6) 510581004 HF1-B1-(6-8) 510581005 HF1-B1-(8-10) 1204556270 Method Blank (MB) 1204556271 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1204556272 510581001(HF1-B1-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204556273 510581001(HF1-B1-(1-2)) Matrix Spike (MS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Matrix Spike (MS)/Post Spike (PS) Recovery Statement The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the spike analyses are evaluated when the sample concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. The matrix spike recovered outside of the established acceptance limits due to matrix interference and/or non-homogeneity.

Analyte Sample Value Fluoride 1204556273 (HF1-B1-(1-2)MS) 46.8* (75%-125%)

Technical Information Sample Dilutions The following samples 1204556272 (HF1-B1-(1-2)DUP), 1204556273 (HF1-B1-(1-2)MS), 510581001 (HF1-B1-(1-2)), 510581002 (HF1-B1-(2-4)), 510581003 (HF1-B1-(4-6)), 510581004 (HF1-B1-(6-8)) and 510581005 (HF1-B1-(8-10)) were diluted because target analyte concentrations exceeded the calibration range.

Dilutions may be required for many reasons, including to minimize matrix interferences or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range.

Page 18 of 26 SDG: 510581

Analyte 510581 001 002 003 004 005 Fluoride 1X 20X 50X 25X 10X Nitrate 5X 20X 50X 25X 10X Product: pH Analytical Method: SW846 9045D Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-008 REV# 24 Analytical Batch: 1994735 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510581001 HF1-B1-(1-2) 510581002 HF1-B1-(2-4) 510581003 HF1-B1-(4-6) 510581004 HF1-B1-(6-8) 510581005 HF1-B1-(8-10) 1204556042 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1204556044 510581001(HF1-B1-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Technical Information Holding Times Samples (See Below) were received by the laboratory outside of the method specified holding time. The data is qualified.

Sample Analyte Value 1204556044 (HF1-B1-(1-2)DUP)

Received 05-MAY-20, out of holding 04-MAY-20 510581001 (HF1-B1-(1-2))

Received 05-MAY-20, out of holding 04-MAY-20 510581002 (HF1-B1-(2-4))

Received 05-MAY-20, out of holding 04-MAY-20 510581003 (HF1-B1-(4-6))

Received 05-MAY-20, out of holding 04-MAY-20 510581004 (HF1-B1-(6-8))

Received 05-MAY-20, out of holding 04-MAY-20 510581005 (HF1-B1-(8-10))

Received 05-MAY-20, out of holding 04-MAY-20 Radiochemistry Page 19 of 26 SDG: 510581

Product: Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 27 Analytical Batch: 1994680 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1994664 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510581001 HF1-B1-(1-2) 510581004 HF1-B1-(6-8) 510581005 HF1-B1-(8-10) 1204555897 Method Blank (MB) 1204555898 510581001(HF1-B1-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204555899 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Method Blank Criteria The blank result (See Below) is greater than the MDC but less than the required detection limit.

Sample Analyte Value 1204555897 (MB) Uranium-233/234 Result: 0.428 pCi/g > MDA: 0.138 pCi/g <= RDL: 0.500 pCi/g Uranium-235/236 Result: 0.0679 pCi/g > MDA: 0.0509 pCi/g <= RDL: 0.500 pCi/g Duplication Criteria between QC Sample and Duplicate Sample The Sample and the Duplicate, (See Below), did not meet the relative percent difference requirement; however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with the value listed below.

Sample Analyte Value 1204555898 (HF1-B1-(1-2)DUP) Uranium-235/236 RPD 36.1* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.24 (0-3)

Uranium-238 RPD 34.6* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 2.31 (0-3)

Technical Information Recounts Samples 1204555897 (MB) and 510581001 (HF1-B1-(1-2)) were recounted due to high MDCs. The recounts are reported.

Page 20 of 26 SDG: 510581

Product: Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 27 Analytical Batch: 1995912 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1994664 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510581002 HF1-B1-(2-4) 510581003 HF1-B1-(4-6) 1204558441 Method Blank (MB) 1204558442 510581002(HF1-B1-(2-4)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204558443 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Duplication Criteria between QC Sample and Duplicate Sample The Sample and the Duplicate, (See Below), did not meet the relative percent difference requirement; however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with the value listed below.

Sample Analyte Value 1204558442 (HF1-B1-(2-4)DUP) Uranium-235/236 RPD 20.5* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.05 (0-3)

RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the other sample aliquots.

Sample Analyte Value 1204558441 (MB) Uranium-233/234 Result -1.59 < MDA 7.84 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Uranium-235/236 Result -0.163 < MDA 5.72 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Uranium-238 Result 0.176 < MDA 6.81 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Technical Information Page 21 of 26 SDG: 510581

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were reprepped due to low carrier/tracer yield. The re-analysis is being reported.

Product: Dry Weight Preparation Method: ASTM D 2216 (Modified)

Preparation Procedure: GL-OA-E-020 REV# 13 Preparation Batch: 1994664 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1994664 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510581001 HF1-B1-(1-2) 510581002 HF1-B1-(2-4) 510581003 HF1-B1-(4-6) 510581004 HF1-B1-(6-8) 510581005 HF1-B1-(8-10) 1204555869 510581001(HF1-B1-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-059 REV# 5 Analytical Batch: 1994733 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510581001 HF1-B1-(1-2) 510581002 HF1-B1-(2-4) 510581003 HF1-B1-(4-6) 510581004 HF1-B1-(6-8) 510581005 HF1-B1-(8-10) 1204556035 Method Blank (MB)

Page 22 of 26 SDG: 510581

1204556036 510581001(HF1-B1-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204556037 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Page 23 of 26 SDG: 510581

Page 24 of 26 SDG: 510581

Page 25 of 26 SDG: 510581

State Certification Alaska Alaska Drinking Water Arkansas CLIA California Colorado Connecticut DoD ELAP/ ISO17025 A2LA Florida NELAP Foreign Soils Permit Georgia Georgia SDWA Hawaii Idaho Illinois NELAP Indiana Kansas NELAP Kentucky SDWA Kentucky Wastewater Louisiana Drinking Water Louisiana NELAP Maine Maryland Massachusetts Massachusetts PFAS Approv Michigan Mississippi Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire NELAP New Jersey NELAP New Mexico New York NELAP North Carolina North Carolina SDWA North Dakota Oklahoma Pennsylvania NELAP Puerto Rico S. Carolina Radiochem Sanitation Districts of L South Carolina Chemistry Tennessee Texas NELAP Utah NELAP Vermont Virginia NELAP Washington 17018 SC00012 880651 42D0904046 2940 SC00012 PH0169 2567.01 E87156 P3301500283, P3301500253 SC00012 967 SC00012 SC00012 200029 CSC01 E10332 90129 90129 LA024 03046 (AI33904) 2019020 270 MSC012 Letter 9976 SC00012 NEOS2613 SC0001220201 2054 SC002 SC00012 11501 233 45709 R158 2019165 6800485 SC00012 10120002 9255651 10120001 TN 02934 T1047042352017 SC00012202032 VT87156 460202 C780 List of current GEL Certifications as of 28 May 2020 Page 26 of 26 SDG: 510581

June 01, 2020 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Re: Soil and Vegetation Analysis Work Order: 510757

Dear Ms. Logsdon:

GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the sample(s) we received on May 06, 2020. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GELs standard operating procedures.

Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards, with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.

Copies of GELs accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www.gel.com.

Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4707.

Sincerely, PM_SIGN_HERE Katelyn Gray Project Manager Purchase Order: 4500799254 Enclosures Page 1 of 39 SDG: 510757

Reviewed by USER_SIGN_HERE GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 (843) 5568171 www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report WNUC008 Westinghouse Electric Co, LLC (4500775170)

Client SDG: 510757 GEL Work Order: 510757 Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.

The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above the limit as defined in the U qualifier above.

This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Katelyn Gray.

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
    • Analyte is a Tracer compound
    • Analyte is a surrogate compound H Analytical holding time was exceeded J See case narrative for an explanation J Value is estimated U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

for Page 2 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995237 1995237 1994735 0024 1557 1453 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/07/20 05/07/20 05/07/20 LXA2 LXA2 RXB5 1.11 2.21 0.100 1

2 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757001 Soil 05-MAY-20 09:12 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

8.89%

0.376 0.730 0.0100 1

2 3

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 1.28 76.5 6.38 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/06/20 1995236 1859 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 3 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995237 1995237 1994735 0157 1730 1456 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/07/20 05/07/20 05/07/20 LXA2 LXA2 RXB5 1.07 5.37 0.100 1

5 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757002 Soil 05-MAY-20 09:40 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

7.14%

0.365 1.77 0.0100 1

2 3

J H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 0.623 90.8 5.16 9.98 9.98 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/06/20 1995236 1859 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 4 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995237 1995237 1994735 0227 1800 1457 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/07/20 05/07/20 05/07/20 LXA2 LXA2 RXB5 1.09 5.47 0.100 1

5 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757003 Soil 05-MAY-20 10:43 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

8.79%

0.372 1.80 0.0100 1

2 3

U H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" ND 94.0 6.05 9.98 9.98 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/06/20 1995236 1859 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 5 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995237 1994735 0400 1459 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/07/20 05/07/20 LXA2 RXB5 1.10 1.10 0.100 1

1 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757004 Soil 05-MAY-20 11:30 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

9.81%

0.375 0.364 0.0100 1

2 U

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" ND 45.9 5.98 9.95 9.95 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/06/20 1995236 1859 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 6 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995237 1994735 0431 1500 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/07/20 05/07/20 LXA2 RXB5 1.14 1.14 0.100 1

1 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757005 Soil 05-MAY-20 12:30 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

13.1%

0.388 0.377 0.0100 1

2 J

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 0.800 23.4 6.17 9.93 9.93 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/06/20 1995236 1859 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 7 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1996294 1996294 1994735 2320 2347 1502 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/14/20 05/14/20 05/07/20 LXA2 LXA2 RXB5 1.09 10.9 0.100 1

10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757006 Soil 05-MAY-20 14:13 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

7.09%

0.370 3.59 0.0100 1

2 3

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 6.24 285 4.82 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/14/20 1996293 2018 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 8 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1996294 1994735 0229 1501 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/15/20 05/07/20 LXA2 RXB5 55.0 55.0 0.100 50 50 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757007 Soil 05-MAY-20 14:44 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

8.9%

18.7 18.2 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 683 589 4.08 10.0 10.0 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/14/20 1996293 2018 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 9 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1996294 1994735 0417 1502 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/15/20 05/07/20 LXA2 RXB5 58.7 58.7 0.100 50 50 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757008 Soil 05-MAY-20 15:35 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

13.9%

19.9 19.4 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 1020 1290 3.96 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/14/20 1996293 2018 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 10 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1996294 1994735 0511 1504 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/15/20 05/07/20 LXA2 RXB5 28.8 28.8 0.100 25 25 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757009 Soil 05-MAY-20 16:20 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

12.3%

9.79 9.50 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 546 700 4.11 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/14/20 1996293 2018 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 11 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1996294 1994735 0605 1505 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/15/20 05/07/20 LXA2 RXB5 11.5 11.5 0.100 10 10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757010 Soil 05-MAY-20 17:22 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

12.6%

3.91 3.80 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 343 398 4.25 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/14/20 1996293 2018 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 12 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995261 1995247 0839 0610 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/09/20 05/12/20 BXA4 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757001 Soil 05-MAY-20 09:12 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.740

+/-0.268

+/-0.409

+/-1.95 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 8.89%

0.316 0.201 0.228 3.51 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 4.65 0.455 1.39

-1.41 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 99.6 99.5 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995223 1726 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 13 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995261 1995247 0839 0626 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/09/20 05/12/20 BXA4 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757002 Soil 05-MAY-20 09:40 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.345

+/-0.154

+/-0.321

+/-2.14 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 7.14%

0.285 0.186 0.206 3.79 1

2 U

U Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 0.847 0.107 0.785

-0.842 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 87 97.6 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995223 1726 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 14 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995261 1995247 0839 0643 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/09/20 05/12/20 BXA4 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757003 Soil 05-MAY-20 10:43 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.493

+/-0.162

+/-0.391

+/-1.99 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 8.79%

0.341 0.141 0.251 3.66 1

2 U

U Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 1.50 0.0943 0.955

-2.60 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 90.6 97.2 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995223 1726 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 15 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995261 1995247 0839 0659 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/09/20 05/12/20 BXA4 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757004 Soil 05-MAY-20 11:30 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.396

+/-0.137

+/-0.198

+/-2.05 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 9.81%

0.327 0.286 0.182 3.57 1

2 U

U Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 0.926 0.0131 0.218 0.00658 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 86 97.2 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995223 1726 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 16 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995261 1995247 0839 0716 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/09/20 05/12/20 BXA4 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757005 Soil 05-MAY-20 12:30 06-MAY-20 HF1-B2-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.453

+/-0.114

+/-0.253

+/-2.18 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 13.1%

0.248 0.122 0.231 3.97 1

2 U

U Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 1.52 0.0407 0.421

-2.27 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 87.2 94.7 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995223 1726 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 17 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995261 1995247 0839 0732 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/09/20 05/12/20 BXA4 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757006 Soil 05-MAY-20 14:13 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.714

+/-0.156

+/-0.414

+/-2.03 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 7.09%

0.281 0.217 0.256 3.59 1

2 U

U Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 3.52 0.0795 1.13

-0.758 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 74.2 101 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995223 1726 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 18 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1997576 1995246 1147 0429 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/19/20 05/12/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757007 Soil 05-MAY-20 14:44 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-99.5

+/-23.6

+/-40.5

+/-2.39 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 8.9%

5.06 2.72 3.73 4.21 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 3510 159 582

-0.638 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 66.5 93.3 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995224 1723 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 19 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1997576 1995246 1147 0445 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/19/20 05/12/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757008 Soil 05-MAY-20 15:35 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-137

+/-33.1

+/-56.3

+/-2.23 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 13.9%

6.49 5.06 3.66 3.89 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 5600 264 948

-0.0340 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 61.5 93 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995224 1723 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 20 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1997576 1995246 1147 0502 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/19/20 05/12/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757009 Soil 05-MAY-20 16:20 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-98.0

+/-27.1

+/-46.6

+/-2.20 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 12.3%

5.36 3.32 4.21 3.92 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 2790 171 632

-1.07 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 50.9 94.8 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995224 1723 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 21 of 39 SDG: 510757

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 1, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1997576 1995246 1147 0518 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/19/20 05/12/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 5.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510757010 Soil 05-MAY-20 17:22 06-MAY-20 HF1-B3-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-83.9

+/-21.6

+/-41.5

+/-2.15 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 12.6%

5.25 3.66 4.19 3.92 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 2600 139 636

-2.17 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 64.6 96.1 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/06/20 1995224 1723 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 22 of 39 SDG: 510757

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Ion Chromatography 1995237 1996294 Batch Batch Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Parmname Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina June 1, 2020 Report Date:

Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Anlst Date Time LXA2 LXA2 05/07/20 00:55 05/07/20 16:28 05/06/20 22:20 05/06/20 21:49 05/07/20 01:26 05/07/20 16:59 05/15/20 00:14 05/15/20 00:41 05/14/20 22:51 QC 0.471 103 27.1 26.6 ND ND 10.7 108 5.79 278 24.8 25.0 NOM Sample 1.28 76.5 1.28 76.5 6.24 285 Range

(+/-1.10)

(0%-104%)

(90%-110%)

(90%-110%)

(75%-125%)

(75%-125%)

(0%-109%)

(0%-104%)

(90%-110%)

(90%-110%)

Qual J

U U

QC1204557123 510757001 QC1204557122 QC1204557121 QC1204557125 510757001 QC1204559298 510757006 QC1204559297 92.1 29.9 7.5 2.37 REC%

108 106 34.2 116 100 101 25.1 25.1 27.4 27.4 24.7 24.7 DUP LCS MB MS DUP LCS 510757 Workorder:

^

RPD%

Page 1 of 3 Page 23 of 39 SDG: 510757

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1996294 1994735 Batch Batch Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity Corrosivity Parmname Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg SU SU Anlst Date Time LXA2 RXB5 05/14/20 21:55 05/15/20 01:08 05/15/20 01:35 05/07/20 14:47 05/07/20 14:42 QC ND ND 12.7 302 5.15 7.00 NOM Sample 6.24 285 4.81 Range (75%-125%)

(75%-125%)

(0%-10%)

(95%-105%)

Qual U

U H

QC1204559296 QC1204559300 510757006 QC1204556044 510581001 QC1204556042 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

6.83 REC%

24.1 N/A 100 26.8 26.8 7.00 MB MS DUP LCS 510757 Workorder:

B E

H J

J N/A N1 ND NJ Q

R R

Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported The target analyte was detected in the associated blank.

General Chemistry--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range Analytical holding time was exceeded See case narrative for an explanation Value is estimated RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.

See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.

Per section 9.3.4.1 of Method 1664 Revision B, due to matrix spike recovery issues, this result may not be reported or used for regulatory compliance purposes.

Sample results are rejected H

RPD%

Notes:

Page 2 of 3 Page 24 of 39 SDG: 510757

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Parmname Page 3 of 3 Units Anlst Date Time QC NOM Sample Range Qual REC%

510757 Workorder:

U X

Z

^

d e

h Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Paint Filter Test--Particulates passed through the filter, however no free liquids were observed.

RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.

5-day BOD--The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample 5-day BOD--Test replicates show more than 30% difference between high and low values. The data is qualified per the method and can be used for reporting purposes Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.

^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

  • Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

RPD%

Page 25 of 39 SDG: 510757

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec 1995261 1997576 Batch Batch Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Parmname Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina June 1, 2020 Report Date:

Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time BXA4 MP2 05/09/20 08:39 05/09/20 08:39 05/09/20 08:39 05/19/20 11:47 QC 1.31 0.0496 1.06 11.9 0.344 13.2

-0.0435

-0.0501 0.0146 2820 128 417 NOM Sample 1.56 0.0219 1.60 3510 159 582 Range (0% - 100%)

N/A (0%-20%)

(75%-125%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

Qual U

U U

U QC1204557184 510752001 QC1204557186 QC1204557183 QC1204562383 510757007 17.7 N/A 40.4 21.9 21.6 33 REC%

106 12.5 DUP LCS MB DUP 510757 Workorder:

U

+/-0.476

+/-0.122

+/-0.470

+/-99.5

+/-23.6

+/-40.5

+/-0.436

+/-0.136

+/-0.376

+/-1.09

+/-0.228

+/-1.15

+/-0.0855

+/-0.0808

+/-0.0813

+/-85.0

+/-20.2

+/-32.7 RPD%

Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Page 1 of 3 Page 26 of 39 SDG: 510757

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec Rad Liquid Scintillation 1997576 1995246 1995247 Batch Batch Batch Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time MP2 JJ3 JJ3 05/19/20 11:47 05/19/20 11:47 05/12/20 05:51 05/12/20 06:08 05/12/20 05:35 05/12/20 08:22 05/12/20 08:38 05/12/20 07:49 QC 71.6 4.52 97.1 0.523 0.147

-0.153

-1.41 52.9

-1.73

-0.0762 57.2

-1.52 NOM Sample

-0.638

-1.41 Range (75%-125%)

N/A (75%-125%)

N/A (75%-125%)

Qual U

U U

U U

U U

QC1204562384 QC1204562382 QC1204557146 510757007 QC1204557147 QC1204557145 QC1204557150 510757001 QC1204557151 QC1204557148 N/A N/A REC%

99.8 88.3 100 97.3 59.9 57.2 LCS MB DUP LCS MB DUP LCS MB 510757 Workorder:

U U

+/-2.39

+/-1.95

+/-16.2

+/-5.03

+/-18.7

+/-1.70

+/-1.49

+/-0.856

+/-2.24

+/-3.84

+/-2.25

+/-2.19

+/-3.64

+/-1.89 RPD%

Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Page 2 of 3 Page 27 of 39 SDG: 510757

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Parmname Page 3 of 3 Units Anlst Date Time QC NOM Sample Range Qual The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

REC%

510757 Workorder:

BD FA H

J J

K L

M M

N/A N1 ND NJ Q

R U

UI UJ UL X

Y

^

h Analyte is a Tracer compound Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low Failed analysis.

Analytical holding time was exceeded See case narrative for an explanation Value is estimated Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.

Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.

M if above MDC and less than LLD REMP Result > MDC/CL and < RDL RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.

See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.

Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.

Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Other specific qualifiers were required to properly define the results. Consult case narrative.

RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.

Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.

^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

  • Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

RPD%

Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Page 28 of 39 SDG: 510757

Technical Case Narrative Westinghouse Electric Co, LLC SDG #: 510757 General Chemistry Product: Ion Chromatography Analytical Method: SW846 9056A Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-086 REV# 27 Analytical Batches: 1995237 and 1995236 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757001 HF1-B2-(1-2) 510757002 HF1-B2-(2-4) 510757003 HF1-B2-(4-6) 510757004 HF1-B2-(6-8) 510757005 HF1-B2-(8-10) 1204557121 Method Blank (MB) 1204557122 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1204557123 510757001(HF1-B2-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557125 510757001(HF1-B2-(1-2)) Matrix Spike (MS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Matrix Spike (MS)/Post Spike (PS) Recovery Statement The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the spike analyses are evaluated when the sample concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. The matrix spike recovered outside of the established acceptance limits due to matrix interference and/or non-homogeneity.

Analyte Sample Value Fluoride 1204557125 (HF1-B2-(1-2)MS) 34.2* (75%-125%)

Technical Information Sample Dilutions The following samples 1204557123 (HF1-B2-(1-2)DUP), 1204557125 (HF1-B2-(1-2)MS), 510757001 (HF1-B2-(1-2)), 510757002 (HF1-B2-(2-4)) and 510757003 (HF1-B2-(4-6)) were diluted because target analyte concentrations exceeded the calibration range. Dilutions may be required for many reasons, including to minimize matrix interferences or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range.

Page 29 of 39 SDG: 510757

Analyte 510757 001 002 003 Nitrate 2X 5X 5X Product: Ion Chromatography Analytical Method: SW846 9056A Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-086 REV# 27 Analytical Batches: 1996294 and 1996293 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757006 HF1-B3-(1-2) 510757007 HF1-B3-(2-4) 510757008 HF1-B3-(4-6) 510757009 HF1-B3-(6-8) 510757010 HF1-B3-(8-10) 1204559296 Method Blank (MB) 1204559297 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1204559298 510757006(HF1-B3-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204559300 510757006(HF1-B3-(1-2)) Matrix Spike (MS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Matrix Spike (MS)/Post Spike (PS) Recovery Statement The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the spike analyses are evaluated when the sample concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. The matrix spike recovered outside of the established acceptance limits due to matrix interference and/or non-homogeneity.

Analyte Sample Value Fluoride 1204559300 (HF1-B3-(1-2)MS) 24.1* (75%-125%)

Technical Information Sample Dilutions The following samples 1204559298 (HF1-B3-(1-2)DUP), 1204559300 (HF1-B3-(1-2)MS), 510757006 (HF1-B3-(1-2)), 510757007 (HF1-B3-(2-4)), 510757008 (HF1-B3-(4-6)), 510757009 (HF1-B3-(6-8)) and 510757010 (HF1-B3-(8-10)) were diluted because target analyte concentrations exceeded the calibration range.

Dilutions may be required for many reasons, including to minimize matrix interferences or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range.

Page 30 of 39 SDG: 510757

Analyte 510757 006 007 008 009 010 Fluoride 1X 50X 50X 25X 10X Nitrate 10X 50X 50X 25X 10X Product: pH Analytical Method: SW846 9045D Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-008 REV# 24 Analytical Batch: 1994735 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757001 HF1-B2-(1-2) 510757002 HF1-B2-(2-4) 510757003 HF1-B2-(4-6) 510757004 HF1-B2-(6-8) 510757005 HF1-B2-(8-10) 510757006 HF1-B3-(1-2) 510757007 HF1-B3-(2-4) 510757008 HF1-B3-(4-6) 510757009 HF1-B3-(6-8) 510757010 HF1-B3-(8-10) 1204556042 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1204556044 510581001(HF1-B1-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Technical Information Holding Times Samples (See Below) were received by the laboratory outside of the method specified holding time. The data is qualified.

Sample Analyte Value 1204556044 (HF1-B1-(1-2)DUP)

Received 05-MAY-20, out of holding 04-MAY-20 510757001 (HF1-B2-(1-2))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757002 (HF1-B2-(2-4))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757003 (HF1-B2-(4-6))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757004 (HF1-B2-(6-8))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757005 (HF1-B2-(8-10))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757006 (HF1-B3-(1-2))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 Page 31 of 39 SDG: 510757

510757007 (HF1-B3-(2-4))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757008 (HF1-B3-(4-6))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757009 (HF1-B3-(6-8))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 510757010 (HF1-B3-(8-10))

Received 06-MAY-20, out of holding 05-MAY-20 Radiochemistry Product: Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 27 Analytical Batch: 1995261 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1995223 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757001 HF1-B2-(1-2) 510757002 HF1-B2-(2-4) 510757003 HF1-B2-(4-6) 510757004 HF1-B2-(6-8) 510757005 HF1-B2-(8-10) 510757006 HF1-B3-(1-2) 1204557183 Method Blank (MB) 1204557184 510752001(NonSDG) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557186 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Duplication Criteria between QC Sample and Duplicate Sample The Sample and the Duplicate, (See Below), did not meet the relative percent difference requirement; however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with the value listed below.

Sample Analyte Value 1204557184 (Non SDG 510752001DUP) Uranium-238 RPD 40.4* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.6 (0-3)

Page 32 of 39 SDG: 510757

Miscellaneous Information Manual Integration Manual integration of alpha spectroscopy spectra 510757003 (HF1-B2-(4-6)) was performed to fully separate counts in Regions of Interest which would have been biased.

Additional Comments The tracer peak centroid for sample 510757003 (HF1-B2-(4-6)) is greater than 50 keV from the expected library energy value for the tracer; however, the tracer yield requirement was met and the tracer peak is within the tracer region of interest.

Product: Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 27 Analytical Batch: 1997576 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1995224 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757007 HF1-B3-(2-4) 510757008 HF1-B3-(4-6) 510757009 HF1-B3-(6-8) 510757010 HF1-B3-(8-10) 1204562382 Method Blank (MB) 1204562383 510757007(HF1-B3-(2-4)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204562384 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Duplication Criteria between QC Sample and Duplicate Sample The Sample and the Duplicate, (See Below), did not meet the relative percent difference requirement; however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with the value listed below.

Sample Analyte Value 1204562383 (HF1-B3-(2-4)DUP) Uranium-233/234 RPD 21.9* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.48 (0-3)

Page 33 of 39 SDG: 510757

Uranium-235/236 RPD 21.6* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.18 (0-3)

Uranium-238 RPD 33* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 2.09 (0-3)

RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the other sample aliquots.

Sample Analyte Value 1204562382 (MB) Uranium-233/234 Result 0.523 < MDA 3.21 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Uranium-235/236 Result 0.147 < MDA 3.13 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Uranium-238 Result -0.153 < MDA 2.16 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Product: Dry Weight Preparation Method: ASTM D 2216 (Modified)

Preparation Procedure: GL-OA-E-020 REV# 13 Preparation Batch: 1995223 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1995223 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757001 HF1-B2-(1-2) 510757002 HF1-B2-(2-4) 510757003 HF1-B2-(4-6) 510757004 HF1-B2-(6-8) 510757005 HF1-B2-(8-10) 510757006 HF1-B3-(1-2) 1204557002 510752001(NonSDG) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Page 34 of 39 SDG: 510757

Product: Dry Weight Preparation Method: ASTM D 2216 (Modified)

Preparation Procedure: GL-OA-E-020 REV# 13 Preparation Batch: 1995224 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1995224 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757007 HF1-B3-(2-4) 510757008 HF1-B3-(4-6) 510757009 HF1-B3-(6-8) 510757010 HF1-B3-(8-10) 1204557003 510757007(HF1-B3-(2-4)) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-059 REV# 5 Analytical Batch: 1995246 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757007 HF1-B3-(2-4) 510757008 HF1-B3-(4-6) 510757009 HF1-B3-(6-8) 510757010 HF1-B3-(8-10) 1204557145 Method Blank (MB) 1204557146 510757007(HF1-B3-(2-4)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557147 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Page 35 of 39 SDG: 510757

Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-059 REV# 5 Analytical Batch: 1995247 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510757001 HF1-B2-(1-2) 510757002 HF1-B2-(2-4) 510757003 HF1-B2-(4-6) 510757004 HF1-B2-(6-8) 510757005 HF1-B2-(8-10) 510757006 HF1-B3-(1-2) 1204557148 Method Blank (MB) 1204557150 510757001(HF1-B2-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557151 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Page 36 of 39 SDG: 510757

Page 37 of 39 SDG: 510757

Page 38 of 39 SDG: 510757

State Certification Alaska Alaska Drinking Water Arkansas CLIA California Colorado Connecticut DoD ELAP/ ISO17025 A2LA Florida NELAP Foreign Soils Permit Georgia Georgia SDWA Hawaii Idaho Illinois NELAP Indiana Kansas NELAP Kentucky SDWA Kentucky Wastewater Louisiana Drinking Water Louisiana NELAP Maine Maryland Massachusetts Massachusetts PFAS Approv Michigan Mississippi Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire NELAP New Jersey NELAP New Mexico New York NELAP North Carolina North Carolina SDWA North Dakota Oklahoma Pennsylvania NELAP Puerto Rico S. Carolina Radiochem Sanitation Districts of L South Carolina Chemistry Tennessee Texas NELAP Utah NELAP Vermont Virginia NELAP Washington 17018 SC00012 880651 42D0904046 2940 SC00012 PH0169 2567.01 E87156 P3301500283, P3301500253 SC00012 967 SC00012 SC00012 200029 CSC01 E10332 90129 90129 LA024 03046 (AI33904) 2019020 270 MSC012 Letter 9976 SC00012 NEOS2613 SC0001220201 2054 SC002 SC00012 11501 233 45709 R158 2019165 6800485 SC00012 10120002 9255651 10120001 TN 02934 T1047042352017 SC00012202032 VT87156 460202 C780 List of current GEL Certifications as of 01 June 2020 Page 39 of 39 SDG: 510757

June 04, 2020 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Re: Soil and Vegetation Analysis Work Order: 510807

Dear Ms. Logsdon:

GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the sample(s) we received on May 07, 2020. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GELs standard operating procedures.

Test results for NELAP or ISO 17025 accredited tests are verified to meet the requirements of those standards, with any exceptions noted. The results reported relate only to the items tested and to the sample as received by the laboratory. These results may not be reproduced except as full reports without approval by the laboratory.

Copies of GELs accreditations and certifications can be found on our website at www.gel.com.

Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4707.

Sincerely, PM_SIGN_HERE Katelyn Gray Project Manager Purchase Order: 4500799254 Enclosures Page 1 of 47 SDG: 510807 Samuel Hogan for

Reviewed by USER_SIGN_HERE GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 (843) 5568171 www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report WNUC008 Westinghouse Electric Co, LLC (4500775170)

Client SDG: 510807 GEL Work Order: 510807 Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.

The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above the limit as defined in the U qualifier above.

This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Katelyn Gray.

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
    • Analyte is a Tracer compound
    • Analyte is a surrogate compound H Analytical holding time was exceeded J See case narrative for an explanation J Value is estimated U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

for Page 2 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 1033 1438 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 5.05 5.05 0.100 5

5 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807001 Soil 06-MAY-20 08:23 07-MAY-20 HF1-B4-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

1.89%

1.72 1.67 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 65.8 69.3 5.46 9.90 9.90 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 3 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995671 1995459 0218 1038 1443 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/14/20 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 JLD1 RXB5 5.10 10.2 0.100 5

10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807002 Soil 06-MAY-20 08:35 07-MAY-20 HF1-B4-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

1.71%

1.68 3.47 0.0100 1

2 3

H Nitrate-N Fluoride Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 70.4 335 3.97 10.0 10.0 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 4 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 0350 1446 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 10.5 10.5 0.100 10 10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807003 Soil 06-MAY-20 08:55 07-MAY-20 HF1-B4-(4-5.33)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

4.19%

3.56 3.45 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 359 82.5 3.29 10.0 10.0 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 5 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995671 1995459 0423 0421 1447 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 JLD1 RXB5 1.09 10.9 0.100 1

10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807004 Soil 06-MAY-20 09:47 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

8.03%

0.372 3.61 0.0100 1

2 3

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 1.55 232 5.07 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 6 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 0452 1448 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 11.0 11.0 0.100 10 10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807005 Soil 06-MAY-20 10:15 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

7.57%

3.72 3.62 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 135 288 4.39 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 7 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995671 1995459 0525 1312 1448 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 JLD1 RXB5 1.16 29.1 0.100 1

25 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807006 Soil 06-MAY-20 10:45 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

14.3%

0.396 9.60 0.0100 1

2 3

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 21.7 440 4.28 9.98 9.98 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 8 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995671 1995459 0556 0656 1449 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 JLD1 RXB5 1.11 5.55 0.100 1

5 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807007 Soil 06-MAY-20 11:51 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

11.4%

0.377 1.83 0.0100 1

2 3

U H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" ND 150 5.67 9.83 9.83 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 9 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 0626 1450 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 1.16 1.16 0.100 1

1 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807008 Soil 06-MAY-20 13:40 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

12.6%

0.393 0.381 0.0100 1

2 J

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 0.879 54.3 4.35 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 10 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Titration and Ion Analysis 1995459 1450 SU 05/28/20 RXB5 0.100 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807009 Soil 06-MAY-20 14:20 07-MAY-20 HF1-B6-(0-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

0.0100 1

H Corrosivity SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 8.09 The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 Method Description SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 11 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 0657 1452 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 1.02 1.02 0.100 1

1 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807010 Soil 06-MAY-20 14:40 07-MAY-20 HF1-B6-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

3.15%

0.348 0.337 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 5.67 14.5 6.35 9.90 9.90 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 12 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 0728 1454 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 1.03 1.03 0.100 1

1 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807011 Soil 06-MAY-20 15:25 07-MAY-20 HF1-B6-(4-5.67)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

4.47%

0.350 0.339 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 43.8 38.0 6.22 9.83 9.83 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 13 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995671 1995459 0759 0726 1455 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/13/20 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 JLD1 RXB5 1.03 5.14 0.100 1

5 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807012 Soil 06-MAY-20 15:53 07-MAY-20 HF1-B7-(0-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

3.63%

0.349 1.70 0.0100 1

2 3

H Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 40.4 127 4.72 9.90 9.90 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

3 Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 14 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 0757 1456 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 10.3 10.3 0.100 10 10 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807013 Soil 06-MAY-20 16:13 07-MAY-20 HF1-B7-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

3.49%

3.51 3.41 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 158 178 4.41 9.98 9.98 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 15 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Ion Chromatography Titration and Ion Analysis 1995671 1995459 0828 1457 mg/kg mg/kg SU 05/14/20 05/28/20 JLD1 RXB5 5.19 5.19 0.100 5

5 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807014 Soil 06-MAY-20 16:31 07-MAY-20 HF1-B7-(4-5.42)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Moisture:

2.69%

1.76 1.71 0.0100 1

2 H

Fluoride Nitrate-N Corrosivity SW846 9056A Fluoride and Nitrate "Dry Weight Corrected" SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 121 83.0 5.21 10.1 10.1 The following Prep Methods were performed:

SW846 9056A SW846 9056A Total Anions in Soil 05/12/20 1995670 2001 CJ2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description SW846 9056A SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 16 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL DL PF Titration and Ion Analysis 1995459 1458 SU 05/28/20 RXB5 0.100 1

Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807015 Soil 06-MAY-20 16:31 07-MAY-20 HF1-B7-Refusal WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

0.0100 1

H Corrosivity SW9045D Corrosivity (pH<2or>14) "As Received" 4.58 The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 Method Description SW846 9045D Analyst Comments Notes:

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 17 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1421 0509 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807001 Soil 06-MAY-20 08:23 07-MAY-20 HF1-B4-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-16.4

+/-4.16

+/-7.26

+/-2.26 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 1.89%

0.997 0.937 0.595 4.01 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 563 29.0 110

-0.924 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 25.9 95.1 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 18 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1421 0525 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807002 Soil 06-MAY-20 08:35 07-MAY-20 HF1-B4-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-14.7

+/-3.41

+/-6.66

+/-2.45 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 1.71%

0.721 0.408 0.771 4.26 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 511 22.1 105 0.171 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 24.1 89.2 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 19 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1421 0542 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807003 Soil 06-MAY-20 08:55 07-MAY-20 HF1-B4-(4-5.33)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-17.4

+/-4.14

+/-7.78

+/-2.27 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 4.19%

0.789 0.668 0.790 3.78 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 700 31.9 139 2.60 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 25.4 91.7 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 20 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1421 0559 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807004 Soil 06-MAY-20 09:47 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(1-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.963

+/-0.242

+/-0.505

+/-2.33 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 8.03%

0.221 0.233 0.141 4.21 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 9.36 0.396 2.56

-2.14 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 109 92.4 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 21 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1421 0615 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807005 Soil 06-MAY-20 10:15 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-51.1

+/-13.3

+/-20.6

+/-2.17 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 7.57%

2.49 2.81 2.55 3.91 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 1520 82.8 246

-1.79 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 17.9 94.9 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 22 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1421 0632 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807006 Soil 06-MAY-20 10:45 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(4-6)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-36.4

+/-8.19

+/-15.4

+/-2.27 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 14.3%

1.81 1.84 1.70 4.05 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 1250 50.9 224

-1.41 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 25.9 92.8 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 23 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1410 0648 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807007 Soil 06-MAY-20 11:51 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(6-8)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-1.23

+/-0.346

+/-0.510

+/-2.21 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 11.4%

0.417 0.147 0.277 4.02 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 9.67 0.587 1.61

-2.28 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 89.5 95.2 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 24 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1410 0705 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807008 Soil 06-MAY-20 13:40 07-MAY-20 HF1-B5-(8-10)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-0.665

+/-0.267

+/-0.424

+/-2.17 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 12.6%

0.327 0.245 0.306 3.98 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 2.65 0.294 1.02

-2.91 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 81.8 94.7 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 25 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1410 0721 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807010 Soil 06-MAY-20 14:40 07-MAY-20 HF1-B6-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-12.7

+/-3.11

+/-5.62

+/-2.31 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 3.15%

0.905 0.618 0.808 4.14 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 403 19.3 78.5

-1.66 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 32.9 94.7 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 26 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1410 0738 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807011 Soil 06-MAY-20 15:25 07-MAY-20 HF1-B6-(4-5.67)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-9.28

+/-2.16

+/-3.99

+/-2.26 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 4.47%

0.962 0.805 0.858 4.01 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 226 9.66 41.6

-1.09 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 34.1 97.1 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 27 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1998535 1995744 1152 0754 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/21/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807012 Soil 06-MAY-20 15:53 07-MAY-20 HF1-B7-(0-2)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-68.1

+/-15.9

+/-26.1

+/-2.17 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 3.63%

4.07 2.09 2.92 3.91 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 2140 93.5 313

-1.90 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 90.4 97 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 28 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1998535 1995744 1152 0811 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/21/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807013 Soil 06-MAY-20 16:13 07-MAY-20 HF1-B7-(2-4)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-59.9

+/-14.3

+/-25.1

+/-2.40 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 3.49%

3.64 2.73 1.97 3.97 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 2020 92.0 355 3.15 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 94.8 97.3 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 29 of 47 SDG: 510807

Certificate of Analysis GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Report Date:

June 4, 2020 Parameter Result Units Qualifier Analyst Date Time DF Batch Method RL MDC PF Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis 1995498 1995744 1410 0827 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 05/11/20 05/17/20 MP2 JJ3 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Company :

PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Address :

Soil and Vegetation Analysis Project:

510807014 Soil 06-MAY-20 16:31 07-MAY-20 HF1-B7-(4-5.42)

WNUC00821 Project:

WNUC008 Client ID:

Client

+/-26.9

+/-7.24

+/-12.0

+/-2.37 Sample ID:

Receive Date:

Client Sample ID:

Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Matrix:

Collect Date:

Collector:

Recovery%

Moisture:

Test Acceptable Limits 2.69%

1.88 1.37 1.40 4.09 1

2 U

Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 799 46.5 158 0.627 Uranium-232 Tracer Technetium-99m Tracer Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg "Dry Weight Corrected" Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil "As Received" 29.4 94.1 (15%-125%)

(15%-125%)

The following Prep Methods were performed:

Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 05/07/20 1995477 1252 CXB7 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch The following Analytical Methods were performed:

1 2

Method Description DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analyst Comments Uncertainty Nominal Result Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Lc/LC: Critical Level PF: Prep Factor RL: Reporting Limit SQL: Sample Quantitation Limit Column headers are defined as follows:

DF: Dilution Factor DL: Detection Limit MDA: Minimum Detectable Activity MDC: Minimum Detectable Concentration Page 30 of 47 SDG: 510807

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Ion Chromatography 1995671 Batch Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Fluoride Nitrate-N Parmname Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina June 4, 2020 Report Date:

Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Anlst Date Time JLD1 05/13/20 11:04 05/14/20 11:08 05/14/20 02:49 05/12/20 22:44 05/12/20 22:13 05/13/20 11:35 05/14/20 12:41 05/14/20 03:20 QC 65.1 68.5 340 70.3 25.0 24.4 ND ND 94.2 95.2 353 95.9 NOM Sample 65.8 69.3 335 70.4 65.8 69.3 335 70.4 Range (0%-109%)

(0%-104%)

(0%-109%)

(0%-104%)

(90%-110%)

(90%-110%)

(75%-125%)

(75%-125%)

(75%-125%)

(75%-125%)

Qual U

U QC1204557905 510807001 QC1204557906 510807002 QC1204557904 QC1204557903 QC1204557907 510807001 QC1204557908 510807002 1.06 1.27 1.66 0.148 REC%

99.4 97.2 113 103 N/A 99.6 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.7 25.7 DUP DUP LCS MB MS MS 510807 Workorder:

RPD%

Page 1 of 3 Page 31 of 47 SDG: 510807

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Titration and Ion Analysis 1995459 Batch Corrosivity Corrosivity Corrosivity Parmname Units SU SU SU Anlst Date Time RXB5 05/28/20 14:40 05/28/20 14:44 05/28/20 14:38 QC 6.08 3.98 7.00 NOM Sample 5.46 3.97 Range (0%-10%)

(0%-10%)

(95%-105%)

Qual H

H QC1204557582 510807001 QC1204557583 510807002 QC1204557581 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

10.7 0.252 REC%

100 7.00 DUP DUP LCS 510807 Workorder:

B E

H J

J N/A N1 ND NJ Q

R R

U X

Z

^

d e

h Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported The target analyte was detected in the associated blank.

General Chemistry--Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range Analytical holding time was exceeded See case narrative for an explanation Value is estimated RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.

See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.

Per section 9.3.4.1 of Method 1664 Revision B, due to matrix spike recovery issues, this result may not be reported or used for regulatory compliance purposes.

Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Paint Filter Test--Particulates passed through the filter, however no free liquids were observed.

RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.

5-day BOD--The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample 5-day BOD--Test replicates show more than 30% difference between high and low values. The data is qualified per the method and can be used for reporting purposes Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded H

H RPD%

Notes:

Page 2 of 3 Page 32 of 47 SDG: 510807

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Parmname Page 3 of 3 Units Anlst Date Time QC NOM Sample Range Qual REC%

510807 Workorder:

N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.

^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

  • Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

RPD%

Page 33 of 47 SDG: 510807

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec 1995498 1998535 Batch Batch Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Parmname Ms. Cynthia Logsdon

Contact:

Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC PO Drawer R Columbia, South Carolina June 4, 2020 Report Date:

Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time MP2 MP2 05/11/20 14:10 05/11/20 14:10 05/11/20 14:10 05/21/20 11:52 QC 534 22.9 98.1 11.6 0.461 12.1 0.0886 0.151 0.211 1770 81.2 276 NOM Sample 563 29.0 110 2140 93.5 313 Range (0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(75%-125%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

(0%-20%)

Qual U

U U

QC1204557617 510807001 QC1204557618 QC1204557616 QC1204564487 510807012 5.32 23.7 11.7 19 14.1 12.6 REC%

98.8 12.3 DUP LCS MB DUP 510807 Workorder:

+/-16.4

+/-4.16

+/-7.26

+/-68.1

+/-15.9

+/-26.1

+/-18.5

+/-4.29

+/-7.94

+/-1.29

+/-0.321

+/-1.31

+/-0.216

+/-0.191

+/-0.209

+/-56.9

+/-13.6

+/-22.5 RPD%

Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Page 1 of 3 Page 34 of 47 SDG: 510807

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec Rad Liquid Scintillation 1998535 1995744 Batch Batch Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time MP2 JJ3 05/21/20 09:49 05/21/20 11:52 05/17/20 09:01 05/17/20 09:17 05/17/20 08:44 QC 104 4.86 101

-0.479 0.500

-0.104

-0.568 49.6

-1.71 NOM Sample

-0.924 Range (75%-125%)

N/A (75%-125%)

Qual U

U U

U U

QC1204564488 QC1204564486 QC1204558065 510807001 QC1204558066 QC1204558064 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

N/A REC%

92.4 90.2 109 55.0 LCS MB DUP LCS MB 510807 Workorder:

BD FA H

J Analyte is a Tracer compound Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low Failed analysis.

Analytical holding time was exceeded See case narrative for an explanation U

+/-2.26

+/-11.8

+/-3.01

+/-11.6

+/-0.824

+/-1.39

+/-0.812

+/-2.24

+/-3.46

+/-1.93 RPD%

Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty Notes:

Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96-sigma).

Page 2 of 3 Page 35 of 47 SDG: 510807

QC Summary GEL LABORATORIES LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Parmname Page 3 of 3 Units Anlst Date Time QC NOM Sample Range Qual REC%

510807 Workorder:

J K

L M

M N/A N1 ND NJ Q

R U

UI UJ UL X

Y

^

h Value is estimated Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.

Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.

M if above MDC and less than LLD REMP Result > MDC/CL and < RDL RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.

See case narrative Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.

Sample results are rejected Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, MDC or LOD.

Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.

Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Other specific qualifiers were required to properly define the results. Consult case narrative.

RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.

Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.

^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

  • Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

RPD%

Page 36 of 47 SDG: 510807

Technical Case Narrative Westinghouse Electric Co, LLC SDG #: 510807 General Chemistry Product: Ion Chromatography Analytical Method: SW846 9056A Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-086 REV# 27 Analytical Batches: 1995671 and 1995670 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510807001 HF1-B4-(1-2) 510807002 HF1-B4-(2-4) 510807003 HF1-B4-(4-5.33) 510807004 HF1-B5-(1-2) 510807005 HF1-B5-(2-4) 510807006 HF1-B5-(4-6) 510807007 HF1-B5-(6-8) 510807008 HF1-B5-(8-10) 510807010 HF1-B6-(2-4) 510807011 HF1-B6-(4-5.67) 510807012 HF1-B7-(0-2) 510807013 HF1-B7-(2-4) 510807014 HF1-B7-(4-5.42) 1204557903 Method Blank (MB) 1204557904 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1204557905 510807001(HF1-B4-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557906 510807002(HF1-B4-(2-4)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557907 510807001(HF1-B4-(1-2)) Matrix Spike (MS) 1204557908 510807002(HF1-B4-(2-4)) Matrix Spike (MS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Technical Information Sample Dilutions The following samples 1204557905 (HF1-B4-(1-2)DUP), 1204557906 (HF1-B4-(2-4)DUP), 1204557907 (HF1-B4-(1-2)MS), 1204557908 (HF1-B4-(2-4)MS), 510807001 (HF1-B4-(1-2)), 510807002 (HF1-B4-(2-4)),

510807003 (HF1-B4-(4-5.33)), 510807004 (HF1-B5-(1-2)), 510807005 (HF1-B5-(2-4)), 510807006 (HF1-B5-(4-6)), 510807007 (HF1-B5-(6-8)), 510807012 (HF1-B7-(0-2)), 510807013 (HF1-B7-(2-4)) and 510807014 (HF1-B7-(4-5.42)) were diluted because target analyte concentrations exceeded the calibration range.

Dilutions may be required for many reasons, including to minimize matrix interferences or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range.

Page 37 of 47 SDG: 510807

Analyte 510807 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 012 013 014 Fluoride 5X 10X 10X 1X 10X 1X 1X 1X 10X 5X Nitrate 5X 5X 10X 10X 10X 25X 5X 5X 10X 5X Sample Re-analysis Sample510807006 (HF1-B5-(4-6)) was re-analyzed to verify the result.

Product: pH Analytical Method: SW846 9045D Analytical Procedure: GL-GC-E-008 REV# 24 Analytical Batch: 1995459 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510807001 HF1-B4-(1-2) 510807002 HF1-B4-(2-4) 510807003 HF1-B4-(4-5.33) 510807004 HF1-B5-(1-2) 510807005 HF1-B5-(2-4) 510807006 HF1-B5-(4-6) 510807007 HF1-B5-(6-8) 510807008 HF1-B5-(8-10) 510807009 HF1-B6-(0-2) 510807010 HF1-B6-(2-4) 510807011 HF1-B6-(4-5.67) 510807012 HF1-B7-(0-2) 510807013 HF1-B7-(2-4) 510807014 HF1-B7-(4-5.42) 510807015 HF1-B7-Refusal 1204557581 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 1204557582 510807001(HF1-B4-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557583 510807002(HF1-B4-(2-4)) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) between the sample and duplicate falls outside of the established acceptance limits because of the heterogeneous matrix of the sample:

Analyte Sample Value Page 38 of 47 SDG: 510807

Corrosivity 1204557582 (HF1-B4-(1-2)DUP) 10.7* (0%-10%)

Technical Information Holding Times Samples (See Below) were received by the laboratory outside of the method specified holding time. The data is qualified.

Sample Analyte Value 1204557582 (HF1-B4-(1-2)DUP)

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 1204557583 (HF1-B4-(2-4)DUP)

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807001 (HF1-B4-(1-2))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807002 (HF1-B4-(2-4))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807003 (HF1-B4-(4-5.33))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807004 (HF1-B5-(1-2))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807005 (HF1-B5-(2-4))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807006 (HF1-B5-(4-6))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807007 (HF1-B5-(6-8))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807008 (HF1-B5-(8-10))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807009 (HF1-B6-(0-2))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807010 (HF1-B6-(2-4))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807011 (HF1-B6-(4-5.67))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807012 (HF1-B7-(0-2))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807013 (HF1-B7-(2-4))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807014 (HF1-B7-(4-5.42))

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 510807015 (HF1-B7-Refusal)

Received 07-MAY-20, out of holding 06-MAY-20 Radiochemistry Product: Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 27 Analytical Batch: 1995498 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1995477 Page 39 of 47 SDG: 510807

The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510807001 HF1-B4-(1-2) 510807002 HF1-B4-(2-4) 510807003 HF1-B4-(4-5.33) 510807004 HF1-B5-(1-2) 510807005 HF1-B5-(2-4) 510807006 HF1-B5-(4-6) 510807007 HF1-B5-(6-8) 510807008 HF1-B5-(8-10) 510807010 HF1-B6-(2-4) 510807011 HF1-B6-(4-5.67) 510807014 HF1-B7-(4-5.42) 1204557616 Method Blank (MB) 1204557617 510807001(HF1-B4-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204557618 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information Duplication Criteria between QC Sample and Duplicate Sample The Sample and the Duplicate, (See Below), did not meet the relative percent difference requirement; however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with the value listed below.

Sample Analyte Value 1204557617 (HF1-B4-(1-2)DUP) Uranium-235/236 RPD 23.7* (0.00%-20.00%) RER 1.08 (0-3)

Miscellaneous Information Manual Integration Manual integration of alpha spectroscopy spectra 510807014 (HF1-B7-(4-5.42)) was performed to fully separate counts in Regions of Interest which would have been biased.

Additional Comments The tracer peak centroid for sample 510807014 (HF1-B7-(4-5.42)) is greater than 50 keV from the expected library energy value for the tracer; however, the tracer yield requirement was met and the tracer peak is within the tracer region of interest.

Product: Alphaspec U, Soil/Veg Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, U-02-RC Modified Page 40 of 47 SDG: 510807

Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 27 Analytical Batch: 1998535 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1995477 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510807012 HF1-B7-(0-2) 510807013 HF1-B7-(2-4) 1204564486 Method Blank (MB) 1204564487 510807012(HF1-B7-(0-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204564488 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on a "dry weight" basis.

Data Summary:

All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable, with the following exceptions.

Quality Control (QC) Information RDL Met The blank (See Below) did not meet the detection limit due to keeping the blank volume consistent with the other sample aliquots.

Sample Analyte Value 1204564486 (MB) Uranium-233/234 Result -0.479 < MDA 2.7 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Uranium-235/236 Result 0.5 < MDA 1.5 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Uranium-238 Result -0.104 < MDA 1.93 > RDL 0.5 pCi/g Product: Dry Weight Preparation Method: ASTM D 2216 (Modified)

Preparation Procedure: GL-OA-E-020 REV# 13 Preparation Batch: 1995477 Preparation Method: Dry Soil Prep Preparation Procedure: GL-RAD-A-021 REV# 23 Preparation Batch: 1995477 Page 41 of 47 SDG: 510807

The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510807001 HF1-B4-(1-2) 510807002 HF1-B4-(2-4) 510807003 HF1-B4-(4-5.33) 510807004 HF1-B5-(1-2) 510807005 HF1-B5-(2-4) 510807006 HF1-B5-(4-6) 510807007 HF1-B5-(6-8) 510807008 HF1-B5-(8-10) 510807010 HF1-B6-(2-4) 510807011 HF1-B6-(4-5.67) 510807012 HF1-B7-(0-2) 510807013 HF1-B7-(2-4) 510807014 HF1-B7-(4-5.42) 1204557593 510807001(HF1-B4-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP)

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Soil Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Procedure: GL-RAD-A-059 REV# 5 Analytical Batch: 1995744 The following samples were analyzed using the above methods and analytical procedure(s).

GEL Sample ID# Client Sample Identification 510807001 HF1-B4-(1-2) 510807002 HF1-B4-(2-4) 510807003 HF1-B4-(4-5.33) 510807004 HF1-B5-(1-2) 510807005 HF1-B5-(2-4) 510807006 HF1-B5-(4-6) 510807007 HF1-B5-(6-8) 510807008 HF1-B5-(8-10) 510807010 HF1-B6-(2-4) 510807011 HF1-B6-(4-5.67) 510807012 HF1-B7-(0-2) 510807013 HF1-B7-(2-4) 510807014 HF1-B7-(4-5.42) 1204558064 Method Blank (MB) 1204558065 510807001(HF1-B4-(1-2)) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1204558066 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

Page 42 of 47 SDG: 510807

The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.

Data Summary:

There are no exceptions, anomalies or deviations from the specified methods. All sample data provided in this report met the acceptance criteria specified in the analytical methods and procedures for initial calibration, continuing calibration, instrument controls and process controls where applicable.

Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Page 43 of 47 SDG: 510807

Page 44 of 47 SDG: 510807

Page 45 of 47 SDG: 510807

Page 46 of 47 SDG: 510807

State Certification Alaska Alaska Drinking Water Arkansas CLIA California Colorado Connecticut DoD ELAP/ ISO17025 A2LA Florida NELAP Foreign Soils Permit Georgia Georgia SDWA Hawaii Idaho Illinois NELAP Indiana Kansas NELAP Kentucky SDWA Kentucky Wastewater Louisiana Drinking Water Louisiana NELAP Maine Maryland Massachusetts Massachusetts PFAS Approv Michigan Mississippi Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire NELAP New Jersey NELAP New Mexico New York NELAP North Carolina North Carolina SDWA North Dakota Oklahoma Pennsylvania NELAP Puerto Rico S. Carolina Radiochem Sanitation Districts of L South Carolina Chemistry Tennessee Texas NELAP Utah NELAP Vermont Virginia NELAP Washington 17018 SC00012 880651 42D0904046 2940 SC00012 PH0169 2567.01 E87156 P3301500283, P3301500253 SC00012 967 SC00012 SC00012 200029 CSC01 E10332 90129 90129 LA024 03046 (AI33904) 2019020 270 MSC012 Letter 9976 SC00012 NEOS2613 SC0001220201 2054 SC002 SC00012 11501 233 45709 R158 2019165 6800485 SC00012 10120002 9255651 10120001 TN 02934 T1047042352017 SC00012202032 VT87156 460202 C780 List of current GEL Certifications as of 04 June 2020 Page 47 of 47 SDG: 510807

2 PURPOSE The purpose of this Technical Basis Document (TBD) is to evaluate the risk and dose to the industrial worker at Spiking Station #1 resulting from residual uranium beneath the concrete floor.

Since the WCFFF is an operating manufacturing plant, the levels do not need to be reflective of an unrestricted use area (10 CFR 20.1402), as would be required for decommissioning, but rather, should be established to protect the workers, be as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), and be protective of the environment to prevent leaching of residual uranium into groundwater.

HF Spiking Station #1:

In May of 2020, as part of the floor replacement beneath Spiking Station #1, soil samples were collected to evaluate the subsurface conditions. Samples were taken from 2-foot intervals from 7 locations beneath the concrete floor of Spiking Station #1. Soil was collected to a depth of 10 feet, except in cases where the sampling device encountered refusal (HF1-B4, -B6, and B7). Two of the sample locations were set at an angle to intercept the known footing (HF1-B6 and -B7). Soil samples were submitted to GEL Laboratories for isotopic Uranium (U) and Technetium -99 (Tc-99) analysis along with corrosivity, fluoride, nitrate, and moisture content. This report focuses on the radiological contaminants U and Tc-99; however, it was noted that neither fluoride nor nitrate exceeded the CFFF action levels (Procedure RA-433) shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1. CFFF Action Levels from Procedure RA-433 Contaminant Action Level Basis of Action Level Uranium - 234 3,310 pCi/g NUREG 1757, Appendix H1 Uranium - 235 39 pCi/g NUREG 1757, Appendix H1 Uranium - 238 179 pCi/g NUREG 1757, Appendix H1 Technetium - 99 89,400 pCi/g NUREG 1757, Appendix H1 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 100 mg/kg EPA Regional Screening Levels2 Fluoride 3,100 mg/kg EPA Regional Screening Levels3 Nitrate 130,000 mg/kg EPA Regional Screening Levels3 1 NUREG Vol. 1, Rev. 2, Consolidated Decommissioning Guide, Appendix H: Memorandum of Understanding between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Final Report, September 2006. The individual isotope limits are based on carcinogenic risk.

2 USEPA Regional Screening Level, Summary Table, Industrial Soil Standard (TR=1E-06, HQ=1), November 2018.

3 USEPA Regional Screening Level, Summary Table, Residential Soil Standard (TR=1E-06, HQ=1), November 2018.

Tc-99 results were non-detect and further evaluation of Tc-99 was not warranted. Uranium results showed exceedances of the CFFF action levels triggering an evaluation of the residual contamination.

Because multiple isotopes of uranium were detected in the soil samples, a sum of fractions or SOF approach was used to determined compliance. The Sum of Fractions screening was initially compared to the SSLs presented in Table 2 of Procedure RA-433. Six of the seven sample locations contained sample intervals with SOF calculations exceeding 1.0. Therefore, the laboratory results for each samples were then compared to the action levels provided in Table 1 above [from Table 4 of procedure RA-433 (Section 5.2.4

3 E)]. The SOF for each soil sample was calculated using the concentration for each isotope and the Action Level for each isotope. The calculation for each unique sample used the following equation:

=. 234 3,310

+. 235 39

+. 238 179 A SOF result exceeding 1.0 indicates that the action levels have not been met. SOF calculations for each sample interval are shown in Table 2, with SOF calculations exceeding 1.0 in bold. All sample locations, with the exception of HF1-B2, had at least one sample interval where the SOF exceeded 1.0. Since both individual isotopes exceeded action levels and sample locations exceeded an SOF of 1.0, further evaluation of the effects of leaving residual uranium beneath the spiking station was warranted.

Per RA-433, further evaluation included:

Calculation of dose and risk under the current circumstances (industrial worker scenario);

Evaluation of the potential for off-site impacts if the contamination is left in place; and Assessment of the site conditions and future use of the area.

CALCULATION OF DOSE AND RISK RESRAD-ONSITE Version 7.2 was used to calculate potential dose and risk to the evaluated receptor.

RESRAD-ONSITE (formerly RESRAD) is a computer model developed by the Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). RESRAD-ONSITE calculates site-specific risk and dose to various future hypothetical on-site receptors at sites with residual radioactive materials.

The use of the RESRAD family of codes for modeling risk and dose has become an acceptable regulatory standard. RESRAD-ONSITE Version 7.2 incorporates recently (2014) updated dose conversion and morbidity slope factors calculated by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). These updated factors are presented in the ORNL document entitled Calculation of Slope Factors and Dose Coefficients (ORNL 2014) and are included in the DCFPAK 3.02 library of the RESRAD-ONSITE Version 7.2 model. The derivations of these factors are based on updated decay chain and nuclide energy data presented in International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication (ICRP)-107, Nuclear Decay Data for Dosimetric Calculations (ICRP 2008).

Uranium was detected in all the samples collected from the soil under Spiking Station #1. Three of the seven sample locations (HF1-B2, HF1-B4, and HF1-B6) did not have samples that exceeded the Action Level. The remaining four locations (HF1-B1, HF1-B3, HF1-B5, and HF1-B7) had at least one sample interval where the levels of uranium exceeded the action level for at least one isotope. Figure 1 below shows the sample locations within the HSFF#1 footprint. Table 2 below contains the isotopic uranium results for the samples collected. Exceedances of the action levels are shown in bold typeface.

4 Figure 1. Location of Samples for Spiking Station #1

5 Table 2. Uranium Results from Soil beneath Spiking Station #1 Analyte Uranium-233/234 Uranium-235/236 Uranium-238 Calculated Unit pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g SOF Location Depth BSS Action Level = 3310 Action Level = 39 Action Level = 179 HF1-B1 1 - 2 ft 13.2 0.828 3.22 0.04 2 - 4 ft 8310 465 1620 23.48 4 - 6 ft 10100 436 1680 23.62 6 - 8 ft 4500 252 802 12.30 8 - 10 ft 1440 79.4 263 3.94 HF1-B2 1 - 2 ft 4.65 0.455 1.39 0.02 2 - 4 ft 0.847 0.107 U 0.785 0.01 4 - 6 ft 1.5 0.0943 U 0.955 0.01 6 - 8 ft 0.926 0.0131 U 0.218 0.00 8 - 10 ft 1.52 0.0407 U 0.421 0.00 HF1-B3 1 - 2 ft 3.52 0.0795 U 1.13 0.01 2 - 4 ft 3510 159 582 8.39 4 - 6 ft 5600 264 948 13.76 6 - 8 ft 2790 171 632 8.76 8 - 10 ft 2600 139 636 7.90 HF1-B4 1 - 2 ft 563 29 110 1.53 2 - 4 ft 511 22.1 105 1.31 4 - 5.33 ft 700 31.9 139 1.81 HF1-B5 1 - 2 ft 9.36 0.396 2.56 0.03 2 - 4 ft 1520 82.8 246 3.96 4 - 6 ft 1250 50.9 224 2.93 6 - 8 ft 9.67 0.587 1.61 0.03 8 - 10 ft 2.65 0.294 1.02 0.01 HF1-B6 b 1.90-3.79 ft 403 19.3 78.5 0.00 c 3.79-5.37 ft 226 9.66 41.6 1.06 HF1-B7 d 0 - 1.88 ft 2140 93.5 313 0.55 e 1.88-3.75 ft 2020 92 355 4.79 f 3.75-5.08 ft 799 46.5 158 4.95 Contaminated Zone:

In order to calculate the dose and risk using RESRAD-ONSITE, an estimate of the residual contamination needed to be calculated. Because the contamination is not homogeneous either vertically or horizontally, it was determined that the model would be based on 2 foot thick layers of impacted soil. The residual U in each layer was conservatively estimated by calculating the 95% Upper Confidence Level (UCL) for each 2-foot interval. The 95% UCL provides a reasonable confidence that the true concentration average will not be underestimated. This is important given the heterogeneity of the material and the variability of the sampling results. The RESRAD-ONSITE model was then executed for each 2-foot layer and the dose and risk contribution from each layer was summed to account for a total dose and risk. The 95% UCL concentrations of U-isotopes used for each 2-foot layer are shown in Table 3.

6 Table 3. 95% UCL Calculation for Each Soil Layer Layer U -234 (pCi/g) 95% UCL U -235 (pCi/g) 95% UCL U -238 (pCi/g) 95% UCL 0 - 2 feet 1352.42 60.0 203.87 2 - 4 feet 5004.15 269.56 946.10 4 - 6 feet 6175.21 273.27 1036.23 6 - 8 feet 5348.61 306.94 1026.03 8 - 10 feet 3012.18 162.07 703.33 Protective Cover At HF Spiking Station #1, the residual concentrations of U are beneath a minimum 6-inch layer of concrete, which forms the floor beneath the spiking station. As each layer was modeled, the protective cover included the 6-inch concrete layer and the depth of overlying soil. For example, the 0 to 2-foot interval was modeled with only the concrete floor as a cover, while the 2-4 foot layer was modeled with the concrete floor plus 2 feet of soil. This process was continued until the final layer (8-10 feet) was modeled with the concrete and 8 feet of soil.

Additionally, the concrete floor within the spiking station diked area will have a chemical resistant non-permeable coating covering the floor and the dike once restored. This coating will be a Milimar Coatings 6200 FS, which is a highly chemical resistant, multi-layered Novolac Vinyl Ester laminate flooring system, built up to approximately 1/4 inch (250 mils) thick. The monolithic surface is resistant to concentrated chemicals, thermal shock and abrasion. This coating creates not only a barrier for chemical migration downward into the concrete, but also prevents upward radon migration through the concrete floor and into the indoor air. However, for conservativeness, no credit was taken for this coating during the dose and risk calculations for the spiking station.

The radon pathway was set as active for the dose and risk modeling. It is understood that there are relative uncertainties of the model predictions for radon; however, the predictions are still valuable in estimating the protectiveness. RESRAD-ONSITE does contain parameters that can be adjusted to specific building design characteristics, but actual radon migration does not necessarily adhere to the parameters and transport mechanisms within the model. Indoor radon concentrations are driven by meteorological conditions, indoor heating and air conditioning practices, local geological characteristics, structural air spaces and airflow conduits, seasonal variances, and other factors. For this TBD, the default RESRAD parameters for radon were used with the exception of the air changes per hour, and wind speed. Spiking Station #1 is located in an area of the facility that is kept under negative air pressure. The actual air changes with the area are maintained at a minimum of 6 per hour, versus the default of 0.5 air changes per hour in the RESRAD model. Also, the wind speed parameter, found on the Cover and Contaminated Zone Hydrological Data window within the program model, is used for radon dose calculation. The default for wind speed is 2 meters per second and is based on outdoor conditions. Since the spiking station is indoors, the wind speed was reduced from 2 meters per second to 0.15 meters per second. This deviation from the default wind speed was a more conservative approach because overall airflow is created by designed ventilation systems.

7 Although not accounted for in the model, the chemical resistant coating will provide additional means of preventing radon migration from the soil through the floor slab. Accounting for the coating would reduce the overall cover permeability and the emanation coefficient for radon, thereby lowering the calculated risk.

As these parameters could not be definitively assessed, the default numbers were used in the model, leading to another layer of conservativeness.

The spiking station itself is contained within a building structure, which prevents any precipitation from providing a migration driver for the residual contamination to the underlying groundwater. Additionally, the floor of the spiking station is raised approximately 4 feet above the natural ground surface, providing approximately 12 feet of unsaturated material between the base of the spiking station and the groundwater.

With no mode of force driving the residual U vertically, the building and concrete floor provide an impervious engineered barrier. The concrete floor covering also provides a protective barrier between the industrial worker and the residual U, lowering any potential risk. If conditions change, such that sub-slab excavation and work becomes necessary, the utility worker scenario will require evaluation.

Tables 4 and 5 present the dose and risk calculations from the RESAD model for each 2-foot layer and modeled duration. The individual 2-foot layer results are then added to determine the total dose (Table 4) and risk (Table 5) for each modeled year. Based on the results of the RESRAD model, shown in Tables 4 and 5 above, the residual U does not currently pose a threat to human health and the environment, nor will it pose a threat over the next 100 years. Over the course of the 100-year timeframe that was modeled, the highest dose was calculated at 0.324 mRem/year and the highest Total Excess Cancer Risk (TR) was calculated at 6.470E-6. Both of these maximums occur at year 100. Based on these model results, it is acceptable to leave the material in place beneath a 6-in concrete cover at present time and at least for the next 100 years. Currently, the life span of the facility is not known, but can be reasonably assumed to be less than 100 years. At the time of facility decommissioning, the soil beneath the process building, including soil at this location, will be removed and disposed of off-site as outlined in the Westinghouse CFFF Decommissioning Funding Plan (WDD-PD-00591-CFFF).

Table 4. Dose Calculations (mRem/yr) - RESRAD Model Modeled Year 0-2 Feet 2-4 feet 4-6 feet 6-8 feet 8+feet TOTAL Current 0.2063 3.14E-04 1.75E-07 2.21E-08 6.64E-09 0.206614 1

0.2074 3.15E-04 4.78E-07 1.54E-07 4.65E-08 0.207715 10 0.2172 3.36E-04 1.68E-05 7.27E-06 2.19E-06 0.217562 20 0.2283 3.97E-04 6.37E-05 2.77E-05 8.34E-06 0.228797 40 0.2505 6.36E-04 2.47E-04 1.08E-04 3.25E-05 0.251523 60 0.2732 1.03E-03 5.50E-04 2.40E-04 7.22E-05 0.27509 80 0.2962 1.57E-03 9.71E-04 4.23E-04 1.28E-04 0.299294 100 0.3193 2.27E-03 1.51E-03 6.57E-04 1.98E-04 0.323933 Dose Threshold = 25mRem/year;

8 Table 5. Risk Calculations (max. annual) - RESRAD Model Modeled Year 0-2 feet 2-4 feet 4-6 feet 6-8 feet 8+feet TOTAL Current 4.08E-06 7.76E-09 1.56E-09 6.77E-10 2.04E-10 4.09E-06 1

4.10E-06 8.01E-09 1.75E-09 7.62E-10 2.30E-10 4.11E-06 10 4.28E-06 1.11E-08 4.16E-09 1.81E-09 5.47E-10 4.30E-06 20 4.49E-06 1.64E-08 8.25E-09 3.59E-09 1.08E-09 4.52E-06 40 4.91E-06 3.26E-08 2.09E-08 9.08E-09 2.74E-09 4.97E-06 60 5.33E-06 5.64E-08 3.93E-08 1.71E-08 5.16E-09 5.45E-06 80 5.76E-06 8.76E-08 6.35E-08 2.77E-08 8.34E-09 5.95E-06 100 6.20E-06 1.26E-07 9.35E-08 4.07E-08 1.23E-08 6.47E-06 Total Excess Cancer Risk Threshold = 1.0E-05; POTENTIAL FOR MIGRATION AND OFF-SITE IMPACTS If the contamination is left in-place, there is no potential for off-site impacts. In its current configuration, there is not a mode of force to cause migration of the uranium vertically into the groundwater. Additionally, the potential for uranium to migrate with groundwater has been shown to be limited at the CFFF site. If monitoring, as described below, indicates that migration or uranium from beneath the process building is occurring, it will be corrected/remediated before it reaches the facility boundary.

The primary mechanism for contaminant transport is migration with water. Contaminants generally move as a solution in water, based on solubility, and their rates of migration are controlled by both water migration rates and by sorption and desorption reactions involving the surrounding soils. Some contaminants are strongly sorbed on soils, thus migration is significantly retarded. The equilibrium distribution coefficient (Kd [cm3/g]) is defined as the amount of contaminant absorbed into soil divided by the amount remaining in solution. Contaminants with a low Kd are more readily transported through the soil than those with a high Kd.

Site-specific Kd values for contaminants at CFFF have not been established. It may be prudent to conduct site-specific studies prior to the final decommissioning, when unrestricted release criteria will be met, but in the interim, literature values, combined with knowledge of site geology will be sufficient as they are generally lower (more conservative) than the site-specific values and therefore predict greater mobility than would actually occur.

Soil type has a significant impact on the published values of Kd. NUREG/CR-6697 separates Kd values by soil type based on Sheppard and Thibault (1990). The Sheppard and Thibault ranges grouped by soil type for uranium are: Sand - 0.03 to 2,200 cm3/g (mean 35); Loam - 0.22 to 4,500 cm3/g (mean 15); Clay 395,100 cm3/g (mean 1,600); and Organic - 33 to 7,350 cm3/g (mean 410).

Further literature review provided the following distribution coefficients (Kd) for Uranium across all soil types. (Source Table 3-13, EPA 402-R-96-011A).

EPA Best Case - 15 cm3/g RESRAD Version 7.2 Default - 50 cm3/g NUREG/CR-5512 Default - 15 cm3/g Proposed EPA Median Value - 220 cm3/g

9 Based on the Remedial Investigation Report (AECOM 2013), the uppermost geologic formation is composed of a stratified, but poorly sorted, mixture of alluvial clay, silt, sand, and gravel. These layers can generally be differentiated into an upper firm clay/silty sand and a lower loose sand/silty sand unit.

Potentiometric surface maps indicate that the unsaturated zone is the firm clay/silty sand with the saturated zone being primarily the loose sand/silty sand layers. Based on this interpretation, the residual impact at CFFF is within the clay/silty sand and would need to migrate downward into the saturated zone to have a detrimental impact on the groundwater within the loose sand/silty sand layer. Due to the spiking station being beneath a building roof and concrete floor, there is not infiltration from precipitation creating a mode of force. Using the RESRAD default Kd for uranium is appropriate until the site enters into decommissioning, at which time a site-specific study may be performed.

The oxidizing and pH conditions also affect the mobility of contamination with the subsurface. Under oxidizing conditions, anticipated to be similar to the surface soils at CFFF, dissolved U is predicted to exist as a cation up to a pH of approximately 6; as a neutral hydroxide species from a pH of 6 to 8, and as an anionic carbonate above a pH of 8 (PNL 1995). This suggests that U would sorb, via cation exchange, under conditions observed at CFFF, resulting in a higher Kd, indicating that the migration of U is significantly retarded. Comingling of contamination, such as nitrate, can have an effect on the transport of U; however, the nitrate contamination at CFFF is not collocated with U. If a nitrate plume or other conditions, such as pH extremes, are identified in the future, a re-evaluation may be required.

Verification that there are no off-site impacts will be confirmed through monitoring and inspection.

Monitoring of the groundwater downgradient from HF Spiking Station #1 will be conducted on a regular basis as part of the site-wide groundwater-monitoring program. The results will be reviewed and compared to historic levels to detect any increases in U that could be attributed to the residual U beneath Spiking Station #1. Monitoring wells have been installed around the east, south, and west sides of the process building to monitor potential contaminant migration from beneath the process building, including contamination beneath the spiking station. These wells serve as an early detection system of groundwater impacts from the residual U beneath HF Spiking Station #1 as well as any potential future releases.

An inspection program is in place to evaluate the status of engineered controls at HF Spiking Station #1.

The program is designed to ensure that the concrete floor which provides a protective cover, remains in place and is functional. In addition, the chemical resistant coating on the concrete in the diked area will also be inspected on an annual basis.

RESIDUAL URANIUM AND ENGINEERING CONTROL REGISTRY The results of the current soil sampling event will be kept in the site registry until the time of site decommissioning. This registry will be included in the WCFFF site procedure (RA-137 Decommissioning Recordkeeping) and will conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 20.1501. The registry should include a description of the location and nature of the residual U, the concentrations remaining, an estimate of the mass remaining, the controls necessary to retain protectiveness, and a list of the downgradient wells used to monitor for potential migration.

10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the operating configuration of the HF Spiking Station, the concrete floor slab provides an adequate barrier between the residual U and an industrial worker under current conditions. Over the course of the 100 year timeframe that was modeled, the highest dose was calculated at 0.324 mRem/year and the highest Total Excess Cancer Risk (TR) was calculated at 6.47E-6. Both of these occur at year 100. Based on these model results, it is acceptable to leave the material in place beneath a 6-in concrete cover at present time and for the next 100 years. Since the facility will likely be decommissioned prior to this timeframe, there is no need to remove the contaminated soil at this time. The current decommissioning cost estimate includes funding for the removal of material beneath the process-building slab, including the area of each HF Spiking Station.

11 RESRAD-ONSITE Non-Default Input Parameters Category Parameter Industrial Worker Value Basis for Value Physical Parameters Area of Contaminated Zone (m2) 9.51 Based on sketch of Spiking Station 10.5 ft by 9.5 ft.

Thickness of Contaminated Zone (m) 1.22 Average depth of contamination was between 2-6 feet below the floor slab based on sampling.

Length Parallel to Aquifer Flow (m) 3.2 Based on side of Area of Contaminated Zone.

Cover Depth (m) 0.15 - concrete floor; 0.60 for each 2-foot soil layer The floor slab provides 6 inches of concrete cover for each layer. A 2-foot soil layer is added for each layer in depth.

Density of Cover Material (g/cm3) 2.4/1.51 Building foundation material density in Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil and Building Structures (ANL 2015). Concrete density of 2.4 and soil density of 1.51. A calculated average density was used for each subsequent layer.

Cover Erosion Rate (m/yr) 0 Building foundation provides cover Density of Contaminated Zone (g/cm3) 1.51 ANL 2015 identifies NUREG-6697 this value for silty clay loam, which is the site soil type.

Hydrological Data Evapotranspiration Coefficient 0

Building foundation provides cover.

Wind Speed (m/second) 0.15 The default value was reduced from the default of 2 m/s as the air movement indoors is solely from ventilation.

However, the areas is under negative pressure and the building has 6 air exchanges per hour; therefore, the wind speed (air movement) may be greater.

Precipitation (m/year)e 0.001 Conservatively assumes some source of moisture even though the building foundation provides cover.

Irrigation (m/year) 0 Building foundation provides cover.

Runoff Coefficient 0

Building foundation provides cover.

Contaminated Zone Erosion Rate (m/year)g 0

Building foundation provides cover.

12 RESRAD-ONSITE Non-Default Input Parameters Category Parameter Industrial Worker Value Basis for Value Unsaturated Zone Thickness (m) 2.7 Based on location-specific depth of 9 ft to saturated soil at high water table.

Exposure Parameters Inhalation Rate (m3/year) 10,550 The inhalation rate of 1.2 m3 per hour is from Table 6.23 of Volume 1 of NUREG/CR-5512 (NRC 1992). The annual inhalation rate = 1.2 m3/hour x 8,760 hour0.0088 days <br />0.211 hours <br />0.00126 weeks <br />2.8918e-4 months <br />s/year = 10,550 m3/year.

Mass Loading for Inhalation (g/m3) 0.0002 Section 35.2 of the Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts Of Radioactive Material in Soil (ANL 1993).

Exposure Duration (year) 25 EPA OSWER Directive 9285.6-03 established an exposure duration of 25 years for the industrial receptor.

Indoor Time Fraction 0.2112 Assumed to annually spend 1,600 hours0.00694 days <br />0.167 hours <br />9.920635e-4 weeks <br />2.283e-4 months <br /> indoors and 400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br /> outdoors, plus 250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />s/day x 250 days) indoors to account for eating lunch on site, early daily arrival, and late daily departure. The fraction of time indoors per year for the industrial worker =

(1,850 hour0.00984 days <br />0.236 hours <br />0.00141 weeks <br />3.23425e-4 months <br />s/year) / (24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />s/day x 365 days/year) = 0.2112.

Outdoor Time Fraction 0.04566 Assume 400 hrs time outdoors per year for the industrial worker = (400 hour0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br />s/year) / (24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />s/day x 365 days/year) = 0.04566.

Soil Ingestion (g/year) 18.25 ANL 2015 identifies EPA documentation for 50 mg/d for adults (50 mg/d x 365 d/yr x 0.001 g/mg = 18.25 g/yr).

Conservatively ignores concrete slab over the contaminated soil.

13 References ANL 1993. Argonne National Laboratory, Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division.

Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts Of Radioactive Material in Soil. April 1993.

ANL 2015. Argonne National Laboratory, Environmental Assessment Science Division. Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil and Building Structures.

ANL/EVS/TM-14/4. September 2015.

EPA 1989. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual, (Part A), Interim Final, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C., EPA/540/1-89/002.

EPA 1991. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance, Standard Default Exposure Factors. OSWER Directive 9285.6-03. Interim Final. March 25, 1991.

EPRI 2011. Electric Power Research Institute. Groundwater and Soil Remediation Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plants, 2011 Technical Report, 2011.

ICRP 2008. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Nuclear Decay Data for Dosimetric Calculations. ICRP Publication 107. 2008.

NRC 1992. Residual Radioactive Contamination from Decommissioning: Technical Basis for Translating Contamination Levels to Annual Total Effective Dose Equivalent, Volume 1. NUREG/CR-5512. PNL-7994. October 1992.

ORNL 2014. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Calculation of Slope Factors and Dose Coefficients. ORNL/TM-2013/00. September 2014.

PNL 1995. Pacific Northwest Laboratory. Richland, Washington. Geochemical Factors Affecting Radionuclide Transport Through Near and Far Fields as a Low-Level Waste Disposal Site. March 1995.

USACE 2002. Buffalo District Office. Buffalo, New York. White Paper: Using RESRAD in a CERCLA Radiological Risk Assessment. October 2002.

Westinghouse 2020. RA-433, Rev 1 - WCFFF Environmental Remediation Procedure, dated. January 16, 2020.

Westinghouse 2019. Westinghouse CFFF Decommissioning Funding Plan (WDD-PD-00591-CFFF).

July 2019.