ML20248G031
| ML20248G031 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1989 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248G018 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8910100027 | |
| Download: ML20248G031 (89) | |
Text
.
FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
- AUGUST, 1989 N
N
$bl%
~
E I III
~
(. N
,7
/
/
r Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division Special Services
$885[: $$S$ffg5 e
.....f.,.,
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT I
FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PREPARED BY:
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SPECIAL SERVICES s
l.'
AUGUST, 1989
.,i I
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Distribution....................
iv Preface......................
1 Purpose......................
2 Scope.......................
3 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs.......
4 Performance Indicator Graphs............
8 Escalated Enforcement History........... 64 Significant Items of Interest........... 67 Definitions....................
68 Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goals................. 78 Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates.... 80 Production and Operation Records.......... 81 Data Source.................... 82 References..................... 85
DISTRIBUTION V. W. Anderson R. L. Andrews W. R. Bateman K. L. Belek A. D. Bilau C..N. Bloyd J. P. Bobba C. J. Brunnert M. W.' Butt R. H. Cagle C. A. Carlson G. S. Cary
'J.
W. Chase ~
G. R. Chatfield A. G. Christensen R. P. Clemens R. G. Conner J. L. Connolley M. R. Core G. M. Cook P. J. Cotton S. R. Crites D. W. Dale R. C. DeMeulmeester W. D. Dermyer R. D. DeYoung D. C. Dietz D. E. Dirrim J. A. Drahota M. O. Elzway R. G. Eurich H. J. Faulhaber M. A. Ferdig K. S. Fielding J. J. Fluehr J. J. Foley F. F. Franco M. T. Frans J. F. W. Friedrichsen R. M. Fussell S. K. Gambhir l
J. K. Gasper W. G. Gates M. O. Gautier J. T. Gleason L. V. Goldberg R. E. Gray iv
PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS A new paragraph has been added to each indicator for the month of August.
These paragraphs (Adverse Trends) explain the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. This addition to the I
Performance Indicators Report was a request made at the Nuclear Managers Meeting held on August 9, 1989.
One indicator has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report in August. This new indicator is shown in the Chemistry and. Radiological Protection Section.
The new Chemistry and Radiological Protection indicator is the Hazardous Waste Produced Indicator found on page 39. This indicator shows the amount of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.
9 One indicator has been changed for the month of August. This indicator is shown in the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section.
The indicator that has been changed in the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section is the In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Indicator found on page 38. This indicator now shows a Fort Calhoun goal of less than 3 in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service.
Fcur indicators in the Maintenance Section are in the process of being changed. These revisions include changing the current data sources and are expected to be completed for the September, 1989, Performance Indicators Report. The four indicators that are in the process of being changed include the Ace of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Indicator found on page 23, the Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Indicator found on page 24, the Corrective Maintenance Backloo >3 Months Old Indicator found on page 25, and the Ratio of Hichest Priority MWO's to Total MWO's Completed Indicator found on page 26.
i 1
PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.
O e
G S
i 4
L_________--_______ _ ___ _ _________--_ ___________________
SCOPE In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program:
Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.
Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.
Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.
Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter.
This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS Forced Outage Rete........................ 8 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical......... 9 Unplanned Safety System Actuations...............
10 Gross Heat Rate.........................
11 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
12 Fuel Reliability Indicator...................
13 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
14 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
15 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate.................
16 G
i 5
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS' INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
OPERATIONS Forced Outage Rate........................ 8 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical......... 9 Unplanned Safety System Actuations...............
10 Gross Heat Rate.........................
11 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
12 Fuel Reliability Indicator...................
13 Daily Thermal Output......................
17 Equipment Forced Outager per 1000 Critical Hours........
18 Operations and Maintenance Budget................
19 Document Review.........................
20 MAINTENANCE Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands)...........
21 Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands)............
22 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders...........
23 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown................
24, Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old..........
25 Ratio of Highest Priority MW0's to Total MWO's Completed....
26 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............
27 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue..............
28 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments........
29 Craft Work Activity.......................
30 n i
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) d MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED)
Maintenance Overtime......................
31 I
Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........
32 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage).....
33 NumberofNuclearPlantReliabilityDataSystem(NPRDS)
Reportable Failures.......................
34 j
CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)..........
14 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
15 Secondary System Chemistry...................
35 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit....
36 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits....
37 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service..........
38 Hazardous Waste Produced....................
39 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure..............
40 '
Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.............
41 1
Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................
42 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..
43 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..
44 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts..............
45 i
Spare Parts Inventory Value...................
46 Spare Parts I ssued.......................
47 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS-(CONTINUED)
DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications....................
48 Temporary Modifications.....................
49 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Disabling Injury Frequency Rate.................
16 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate.............
50 Minor Injury Cases per Month..................
51 HUMAN RESOURCES Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs...........
52 Personnel Turnover Rate.....................
53 Staffing Level.........................
54
~
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION SRO License Examination Pass Ratio...............
55 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio................
56 R0 Hot License Exams......................
57 Hotlines............................
58 Classroom (Instructor) Hours..................
59 Total Hours of Student Training.................
60 OUALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours.........
61 Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old.........
62 DR/QR's Issued versus Significant DR/QR's Issued versus.....
63 NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported --__
- Forced Outage Rate 6
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 5-GOOD 4-4 R
a t
3-e 2-O---- O --- +---O -- G----O --- O O----G --- + ---G --- O 1
O O
O 8-- E O
O i ddj
- l 0
0
\\
0
'86
'87
'88 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 FORCED OUTAGE RATE No forced outage hours were logged for the Fort Calhoun Station during August, 1989. The present 12 month average forced outage rate is 0.0%.
The last forced outage at Fort Calhoun occurred three years ago in August of 1986.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.0%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
The 1989 goal for forced outage rate is 2.1%
and is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1989 performance goals can be found on page 78.
Adverse Trend: None 4' Reactor Scram 5-
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal e Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-S 3-GOOD c
r 4
a m
2-1
?
1-O- --
O = - G----G----G----G----G----G----O ----e----e ----e l
' j 0
0 0
O C
3
,86,87,88 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in August. It has been 1,156 days since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurr.ed on July 2, 1986.
The 1989 goal for unplanned automatic reactor.
scrams while critical has been set at 1.
The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
Adverse Trend: None I
4-SW Safety System Actuations
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal
- & Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3-A c
t GOOD a
2-
+
o n
s 1-0 0
0 0
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
'86 '37 '88 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS There were no unplanned safety system actuations in August, 1989.
The 1989 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. This goal is based on past performance at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upaer ten percentile of nuclear plants for t11s indicator.
Adverse Trend: None l
l Monthly Gross Heat Rate
- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal C Industry Upper 10 Percentile 10750-GOOD
+-
O--- kG--- O Z YI B 10500-C O---O---C
-O U
-10284 10270 K I10014IHI 1000 3
W 10250-f C
1
-g c
a c
c c
c a
a 9750
'86
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 GROSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station during August, 1989 was 10,703 BTU /KWH.
The gross heat rate values for this cycle of operation will be increased due to the removal of the first stage of the high pressure turbine.
The 1989 year to date gro.es heat rate value is 10,577 BTU /KWH. The 1989 goal is 10,500 BTU /KWH. This goal value of 10,500 BTU /KWH is the theoretical best heat rate that the Fort Calhoun St& tion can obtain in its present configuration.
The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,989 BTU /KWH.
Adverse Trends: The monthly gross heat rate and the year to date heat rate have been increasing since June. These increases in the gross heat rate values are due to high river water temperatures which are affected by summer weather conditions.
l _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ______N
l l Monthly EAF
^
- 12 Month Average EAF
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD C Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-bbb l
80 C
-e 71 66 P
60-l c
e y 40-20-
'86 '87
'88-Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) was reported as 95.3% for the month of August.
The 1989 EAF goal is 84.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 51.9%.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%.
Adverse Trends:
The decline in the 12 month average EAF is due to the unavailability of the Fort Calhoun Station during the 1988 Refueling Outage and the maintenance outage that occurred in April and May of 1989. The 12 month average EAF is cyclic and will respond to refueling and maintenance outages.
L 5-Fuel' Reliability Indicator n
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal o
O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-
.n a-n.
C 3-16' r
u GOOD ri
+
e 2-r a
m-1-. e-0 ---G--- C O
O-e--- e----e----e---e-
-e -
3~
..... _0-0
~
n
'86' '87 '88 Sep Oct ' Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun fu'l Aug 1988 1989 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 1.85 nanocuries/ gram for the month of August. Even though the FRI value for August is: above the Fort Calhoun Goal, this FRI value indicates that there have been no fuel. failures since startup in January, -
1989.
The higher than normal FRI figures resulted from a change in the way that the FRI is calculated. The FRI was previously calculated using a constant letdown flow rate for the
~~
entire month, but the actual letdown flow rate h now used.
The 1989 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram, The fuel reliability indicator industry / gram.
upper ten percentile value is 0.07 nanocuries Adverse Trend: None
1 Personnel Radiation Exposure 388 400
-e-Fort.Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile ]
i-300 GOOD 272 4
O O
O R-N E 200-
\\-
M
'g a
3 3
g 3
g 3
3'
-129
___.e-
-O 100-
,,,.e -O#'~
p - & ~ O,,,.g.
-G '
p
'86
'87
'88-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul, Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
During August, 1989, 10.8 man-rem was recorded by pencil dosimeters worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The monthly cumulative exposure goal for July
.was 95.0 man-rem while the actual recorded-exposure through July was 71.0 man-rem.
The personnel radiation exposure ' industry upper ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year.
Adverse Trend: None
~
l _ - - - _ -
3 4
S Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500-
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper'10 Percentile C
b c 7500-
+
F e
O--- e ----&--- G----&-- G O
O
-&--- O O----O e
24096 C
C D
f N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2500-E E
0
'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep -Oct Nov Dec 1989 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial.
Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet):
Amount Shipped in August 0.0 Amount in Temporary Storage 729.0 1989 Cumulative Amount Shipped 4624.0 1989 Goal 6000.0 There are two reasons for the very high amount of low-level solid radioactive waste that was shipped in January, 1989. One reason is that the 1988 refueling outage produced a large volume of radioactive waste. Also, shipping of low-level solid radioactive waste stopped in October, 1988, due to samples being sent off-site for isotope analysis that could not be completed at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988.
Adverst Trend: None _-___ _ _ _____--_-_ _
1-
-H-Disabling Injury Frequency Rate
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 3
O Industry Upper 10 Percentile j.
2-GOOD R
t,
4 a
e
'1.1 1-
.4 B'
G--O
--G---G----G
- O---O O ---& --- O O
-O O'
O
86'
'87
'88 Jan -Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l
Rates for;1986, 1989 1987, and 1988 are shown for the month of August, DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE
.(LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
There were zero disabling injuries reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in August. The total number of disabling injuries in 1989 is two.
The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was based on one disabling injury occurring in 1989.
The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury-frequency rate is 0%.
Adverse Trend: None ___ ______-__-_____________ - __ _ __ ___
\\
-+- Thermal Output
- Technical Specification Limit
-G Fort Calhoun Goal 1500 14954 y
j M
.d-1 e
a w 1490-a t
t s
1485-1480 1
7 14 21 28 August 1989 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross I
hatched area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant operation.
The percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station was approximately 100% for the month of August.
Adverse Trend: None _-. ___
w r'/-
c :-
r o
s
.6-u.
Equipment' Forced Outage Rate
.5 l
'4'
.12' R
GOOD a
.3-
+
t.
e
.2-
.1 -
0 0
'86
'87-
'88 Sep : Oct' Nov - Dec Jan. Feb Mar A'p'r May Jun Jul A'ug 1988 1989 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were zero forced outage hours reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during the month of-August, 1989. The current value for the number' of equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours for,.
1989 is zero.
The last equipment forced outage occurred in 1986 and was due to a failed electrical inverter.
g Adverse Trend: None
N x,
@F>g
- Actual-Operations Expenditures g,
-X-Operations Budget o:
, ' M f 60-p
.j ;
i d-(40-Jo 1:
- n a.
. s r 20-e s
4 0
a Jan - Feb Mar Apr May-Jun Jul Aug Sep' ~Oct Nov Dec 1989-7 -
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures
. g [12-l ' Maintenance Budget
-j.
ild.g.
1 o' 11 o 1 6-
'" 3 n a-
.s r_.3-s
_0 EJan Feb Mar
.Apr. 'May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct LNov Dec
-1989 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET Th'e Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well.as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station. This ' indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the-time for collecting and processing.the data.
The budget year to date for operations was 39.2 million dollars for July
~
while the actual cumulative expenditures for July totaled 45.4 million
-dollars.
The budget.. year to date for maintenance was 7.0 million dollars for July while. the actual cumulative expenditures for July totaled 7.8 million dollars.
i Adverse' Trends:
Since March the actual expenditures for operations have been 'above budget. This is due to the fact that several items were not budgeted for in the 1989 budget. These items include; extension of the 1988 Refueling. Outage, contract security support, radiation protection support, and Design Basis support. y
]
i I
500-
. - Documents Scheduled for Review j
--X-Documents Reviewed l Overdue Documents 400-ND 300-I bu oa 1
re
~
" 200-X ot s
fs
\\
//
\\
100-p
\\
r e-XN
/ p'..A s
\\'X o,
/
,/
'o--- R-x -
N.__.____ x '
y' g
0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of documents reviewed for the reporting month, scheduled for review, and the document reviews that are overdue. These document reviews are performed in house and -
include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual. The documents included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the Technical Data Book, the Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures, Operating Procedures, Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, 0)erating Instructions, the Radiological Protection Manual, the
)
Caemistry Manual, the Fuel Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and
~
Calibration Procedures.
During August there were 34 document reviews completed while 50 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of August, there were 169 document reviews overdue.
Adverse Trend:
The number of overdue document reviews has been increasing since June. The number of overdue document reviews is expected to decrease due to an increased effort to review the overdue i
j documents.,
G l
I D
' 100-
- Diesel Generator No.-1 j
b
-X-- Diesel Generator No. 2 98-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 96-O-
- G-----G-----O O-
- O--- ;O O-O O
- -O 94-l l
l X
X X
X
> ( 'X m
y X
X X
>f X
'[
P e.. 90-7 C'
e 88-n
^
t 86-GOOD 84-
.82-80 Sep Oct Nov Dec-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 DG RELIABILITY LAST 100 DEMANDS Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid -
demands.
Diesel generator D-2 has a 93 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability is 95%. Presently D-1 meets this goal.
Adverse Trend:
Diesel generator D-2 had a f ailure during the month of July which decreased its reliability over the last 100 demands. This was due to the present ventilation scheme for the diesels and missing insulation from the diesel exhaust i
systems. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
y '
1 v
p l -Diesel Generator No.11' i
-X-Diesel Generator No. 2
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 1002 t
h' 95-0- -- -s
-s-----e-----e-----g.-
e ----g-----g
=
e
-e
' ~
P
/'.
}-
e.'
f -
s
):e
.r
/
\\
- ,l90-X X
X X
X' M
x n
t.
o 85-
^
GOOD 80 Sep
'Oct Nov Dec-Jan Feb Mar-Apr May Jun Jul Aug y
'1988-1989 DG RELIABILITY LAST 20 DEMANDSL
~ Diesel generator D-1 has not h'ad a failure in the last.20 -demands on the unit. The present reliability factor for D-1 is 100% over the last 1
20 demands.
l Diesel generator D-2 has had 2 failures in the I
last 20 demands. D-2 has a 90% reliability factor over the last 20 demands.
.The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel - ger.erator reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 presently meets this goal.
m Adverse Trend:
Diesel generator D-2 had a fai' ure during the month of. July which decreased its reliability over the last 20 demands. This was due to the present ventilation scheme for the
' diesels and missing insulation from the diesel exhaust systems. --
- 600, June 1989 E"""3 July 1989
~
l l August 1989 0
u
=
l t
=
400-Niih==
g M
Fort Calhoun Goal a
n jgsg (zero MWO's > 12 months old) j
~
sess n
9 0
m
[
200-liiM M
w==
M
[siilillii 7
M e
r 3.e l
==
':===
.!g;;; gig l
= ass liiiiiiiii liliiili M
M
==
- =
liiiiiii
==
0-0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12
>12 Age in Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (NON-00TAGE)
The above bar chart breaks down the maintenance work orders by their age in months and trends each category over the previous three months.
l The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero outstanding maintenance work orders greater than'12 months old.
This indicator is in the process of being modified. This modification will include a change in the data source for this indicator. The information for the month of
- August, 1989, will be shown in the September, 1989 Performance Indicators Report.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable until after the performance indicator revision is completed. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i i
'1500-l l1 E June 1989
~
S July 1989
'l 1200-1 IAugust 1989
= l Fort Calhoun Goal i
900-
? -
I
!!!!g y
!l!
h 600-
=
=! -
w?
i
- ==a:=
300-
!!!E E
Ili
=
t M
M ssa:
- ssa
=
5.,
E E
! ~= ~'"5s
=
Total Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Safety High MW0s
> 3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related MW0s MW0s l
MW0s
> 3 n nths Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (NON-0UTAGE)
This indicator shows the total number of open non-outage maintenance work orders at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories..
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero MW0's older than the average age of MW0's that are greater than three months old. The July goal was to have less than 584 open MWO's that are greater than three months old.
This indicator is in the process of being modified. This modification will include a change i
in the data source for this indicator. The information for the month of August, 1989, will be shown in the September, 1989 Performance Indicators Report.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable until after the performance indicator revision is completed. _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
e
-# " ":T:
..L r
- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 0+
O Industry Upper Quartile
- b.,,;
80-'
r K' T P
O ~
O O
O O
O O
O O
O Q
40-f n
t.
GOOD
'20-4.
0 Sep. _Oct Nov' Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 t
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-0UTAGE)
This indicator shows the percentage of open non-outage corrective maintenance work orders ' that are greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.
The industry upper cuartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months.old is 44.1%.
This indicator is in the process of being modified. This modification will: include a change in the data source for this indicator. The information for the month of
- August, 1989, will be shown in the September, 1989 Performance -Indicators Report.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable until after the j
performance indicator revision is completed.
I J - Ratio of' Highest Priority M0s to Total M0s Completed 30-p
' e r
- c 20-GOOD t
- t 10-
'O Sep Oct~
Nov' Dec.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 BATip 0F HIGHEST PRIORlTY MWO'S TO-TOTAL MWO'S COMPLETED (NON-0UTAGE).
The purpose of this indicator is to monitor the ability to effectively prioritize, plan,-and.
schedule corrective maintenance. A higher ratio indicates that a comparatively greater number of j
emergency type maintenance activities have been.
required to_ support plant operation.
1 The' industry upper quartile for the ratio of I
highest priority MWO's to total MWO's completed is no longer available. This indicator was discontinued for 1989 by INPO.
This indicator is in the process of being
'l modified. This modification will include a change in the data source for this indicator.
The information for the month of August, 1989,
-will be shown in the September,1989 Performance Indicators Report.
Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable until after the performance indicator revision is completed.,
__._m___
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance O Industry Upper Quartile l-90-
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 80-70-p.
60-0-----e-----e -----e ---- -
---e-----e ---
--p.----9_
p--
g v
v v
V
.-C O'/
e n-50-0 0
0 0
0 0
t 0
40
~
GOOD 30-20 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul.
Aug 1988 1989
~
RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-0UTAGE)
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance.
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station increased to 69.1% in August.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.
The industry up)er quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.4%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper quartile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
Adverse Trend:
None _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
~
g-1 1
i-
- Preventive Maintenance Items' Overdue
~
U20-0 Industry Upper Quartile.
t,
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal I
L j
15-u 1
p.
e.
GOOD
,r-r c
.10-4
.e-
. n.
t g-5-
O O
O Og,-4 O
O-O O
O
- Oj-0 c
m v
v Sep.
Oct
.Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
'Apr.
May Jun Jul Aug
~1988, 1989 p
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE
~
The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution l
of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station connitment to the l
preventive maintenance program and an ability.
to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require.
'The preventive maintenance items overdue value increased to 0.99% for the month of August. There were a total of 991 preventive maintenance items completed during the month with 10 preventive maintenance items not E
completed within the' allowable grace period.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue.
The = industry upper quartile for preventive-maintenance items overdue is 1.5%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in _ the upper quartile for this indicator.
Adverse Trend: None ___ - __ _ _ __ __ _ _ -
- Total Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service P=5 Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month l
lOut-of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month 35-Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments
^
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments l
l 30-
)
GOOD j
25-4 1
If i
20-j i
l 10-b 3
t l
$ __ _. ' _ _ _j
-- ([
k___'
~~~_
l 5-i 9
h O
~
~
=
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 l
l NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE
.[QNTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS The Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Indicator was changed for the uonth of May, 1989. In addition to the previously shown total number of control room instruments out-of-service, This indicator shows the number of out-of-service control room instruments that were corrected during the reporting month and the number of control room instruments that were added to the out-of-service control room instruments list during the reporting month.
There was a total of 17 out-of-service control room instruments at the
-i end of August. During the month of August, one out-of-service instrument was corrected and 3 instruments were added to the out-of-service instruments list.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments.
The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 9..
Adverse Trend:
None _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
EM GM MM
, e::K s ::: S
)9::
9li!l EEEEE llE m
5 i
r J
l l
s
,iii s
j_
's
\\
ijEEEE::F J'
y h,/
s NEEEE l
N, RiE PE I&C Modifications (MOD) gg
. //
f I
lMaint. Work Orders (MWO)
. /
l[1]Unestimated(UNE)
~~~
~~
E Preventive Maintenance (PM)
L i
- s Training (TRA)
\\
'CalibrationProcedures(CP)
's m Surveillance Tests (ST)
M 'Maint. Work Requests (MWR)
CRAFT WORi ACTIVITY The Craft Work Activity Indicator shows the percer.tage of a type of work each craft (plant personnel only) performed during the month. The crafts that are represented in this indicator are Electrical Maintenance (EM),
General Maintenance (GM), Mechanical Maintenance (MM), Pressure Equipment (PE),andInstrumentationandControl(I&C).
WORK ACTIVITY (IN PERCENT)
CRAFT MOD
'MWO UNE PM TRA CP ST MWR EM 4.93 38.39 16.83 19.17 11.55 0.00 9.13 0.00 GM 6.12 23.62 14.98 2.34 9.56 0.00 0.00 43.38 MM 2.39 36.13 33.04 7.56 9.23 0.00 4.09 7.56 1
PE 6.61 45.00 10.48 20.91 14.29 0.00 0.00 2.71 I&C 12.33 29.69 7.56 8.98 14.09 18.38 8.83 0.14 Adverse Trend:
None _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
~
' 80-l' 60-GOOD Pl 4
e r.
c 40-e n
-t j>.
20-0 Oct Nov' Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates..
insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.
The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was 19.9% during the month of August, 1989.
Adverse Trend: None -___-__-__-_ _ _ __
100-1 IIdentified' Incidents E Incident Reports Opened Incident Reports Closed N. 80-m b
e r
60-o f'
L I
40-i' 1
l -.
d l
n t_
20-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec' 1989 l
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) l This indicator shows the number of incidents identified (not yet written as an IR) each l
month involving maintenance, the number of l
incident reports opened each month involving l
maintenance, and the number of incident reports closed each month involving maintenance.
Total Description June July Auoust Year to date Incidents Identified 3
1 11 137 Incident Reports Opened 4
6 12 142 Incident Reports Closed 6
0 14 71 Adverse Trend:
The number of incidents identified and the number of incidents that were opened during the month of August increased due to the closeout of old M0's.
I __- ____-_ __- _ _ _ __ _ _ _ -
900-
- Open MWO's
~
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 800-I o
30-Nf 4
mM bW 600-G-----O =
0 O-----G
-O
-O-----O O-O---
O
-O e 0, 7
500-400-300 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989' 1990 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE)
The Maintenance Work Order Backlog Indicator was added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of July, 1989.
This indicator shows the number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are open at the end of the reporting month.
The goal for this indicator is to have less than 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. At the end of August, 1989, there were 619 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.
This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNo.36.
Adverse Trend: None 1
ISuspected NPRDS Failures 100-
- Confirmed NPRDS Failures
- Average CE Plant Confirmed NPRDS Failures 80-60-F a
i 1
40-u r
e s
20-E M
J E---------
0-Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)
REPORTABLE FAllyRES The suspected NPRDS reportable failures are identified by possible equipment failures on the applicable Maintenance Work Order (MWO). Only after the MWO has been completed can the determination be made whether the equipment has failed or not. The entire 12 month graph is updated on a monthly basis to reflect completed MWO's.
In August, 1989 there were 0 confirmed NPRDS reportable failures and 87 suspected NPRDS failures.
The average value for confirmed reportable equipment failures at similar Combustien Engineering (CE) designed plants is 8.4 failures per unit. The Fort Calhoun Station has a 12 month average value of 7.7 confirmed NPRDS failures.
Adverse Trend:
None
- Secondary System CPI
-+- Se ndary System CPI Limit 1.5-Industry Upper Quartile 1-
+ - - - - + -
l
+
l
-+-
--+
- + ----+
g GOOD
.36 I
'5-I0
.. A -
C 0
0 0
0
'87
'88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 800
- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 600-GOOD l 400
+
u r
s 200-0 0
'87
'88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistrv Performance Index (CPI),
is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The monthly CPI is plotted relative to the EPRI chemistry limit for CPI. The CPI was reported as 0.42 for the month of July. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is 0.20.
The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelines, tracks the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. In July, 1989, there were 120 hours0.00139 days <br />0.0333 hours <br />1.984127e-4 weeks <br />4.566e-5 months <br /> outside owners group guidelines. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is no longer available.
The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the l
reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.
Adverse Trends: None. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
8'
- Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit 6-P e
r c
4 3.0 l2-GOOD Y
I
~
L 0
'87
'88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT 0F HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.
The Primary System Chemistry Percent of -
Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0.5% for the month of July.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month.
Adverse Trend: None.... _
-++- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit
+ Industry Upper Quartile 40-GOOD
+
30-
~
H o
u 20-r s
C O
O O
O O
O 0,
\\
10-
\\
\\
h O
O O
0 0
0
'87
'88 A'u'g S'e'p 0'c't N'ov D'e'c la'n F'e'b M'a'r A'pr M'a'y du'n du'l 1988 1989 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.
The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits for the month of July,1989 was reported as zero.
The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this area.
Adverse Trend: None E Number of Out-of-Service Instruments 25
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 20-
=
N
- r
=.
u s m 215-br e u.
Im e 10-
-1 0n f t s
5-
. y O-O----- C
--G --
9-O-
-G O=
0
-O 0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE A Fort Calhoun Station goal has been added to the In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Indicator for the month of August, 1989. This goal is to have less than 3 in-line chemistry instruments out-of-service.
This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemist-ry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month.
The chemistry systems involv.ed in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident SamplingSystem(PASS).
At the end of August there were a total of 18 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Thirteen of these instruments were from the Secondary System and five were from PASS.
Adverse Trend: None
.'1500-E Waste Oil M Non-Halogenated Hazardous Waste s@ Halogenated Hazardous Waste
- 1200-IOther Hazardous Waste 0
)
f 900-
.j "W
9 a
8 600-e IlaIlIail s
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCfD.
The Hazardous Waste Produced Indicator has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of August, 1989.
This indicator shows the amount of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste.
produced by Fort Calhoun each month.
During the month of August, 207.0 kilograms of waste oil was produced, 0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced, 358.9 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.
Adverse Trend: None
r 5000 I
I IMonth Quarter OPPD E Year Limit i
4000-3000-m-
R E
-M 2000-1000-0 July 1989 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure graph is one month behind the reporting period due to the lag time involved with collecting and calculating the radiation exposure for the station.
During July,1989 an individual accumulated 357 mrem which was the highest individual exposure.
at the Fort Calhoun Station for the month.
The maximum individual exposure so far for the third quarter of 1989 was 357 mrem.
The maximum individual exposure for the year so far was 907 mrem.
The maximum accumulated 1988 individual exposure was 2,371 mrem, received by a visiting contractor during the refueling outage.
The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.
Adverse Trend: None' R) Monthly Contaminations 500-
- Cumulative Contaminations
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal
+ Industry Upper Quartile 400-357 P
e r
s 300-o GOOD
+
n e
200-161 1
I 100 yC O
O O
O O
O O
Q O
O,9
-&,,_g
-m v
v
_n-O--g,4-%~
0
'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS
~
There was a tri: 1 of 3 skin and clothing contamination', reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during August, 1989. These contaminations consisted of two clothing contaminations and one combination skin and clothing contamination.
There have been a total of 110 skin and clothing contaminations so far in 1989. The 1989 goal for skin and clothing is 110 contam1 nations.
The industry upper quartife value for total l
skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.
Adverse Trend: None i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
[c
-s
- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building 100-80-60
.e.
n t
40-
^
20-O Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean)basedonthe'totalsquarefootage.
As of August 31, 1989, 77.0% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was ~
decontaminated.
Adverse Trend: None
t..
u u et e w
- u,
, u t;
I lMonthly Radioactive Gas Discharged r
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged
-G-Cumulative Goal _
!785' 800-Q 3
GOOD-E 4
9<
CL 600-l u
.r.
l
'432 :-
. e.___e.. -e-___e__ e o ___e __.e.---O O
O
-- O 400-
-s 1
i
}.
.200-0 P
- '87-
.'88-Jan Feb. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT Th'e gaseous ~ radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is :shown for.-
-1989.. A. total of 51.3 curies. have ' been released to the environment from January.
_~
through June of 1989. The Fort. Calhoun Station goal is 450 curies: for this indicator.
The gaseous radioactive - waste. being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
Adverse Trend: None I
h.
n 9
4 l
6 %
I IMonthly. Radioactive Liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged
{
-e-Cumulative Goal 1
228 231 250-O---C C
e---O---O O-O-S---C
- e---O Ille C
200-
]
u r
150-GOOD i
1 100;
+
s 50-0 Jan Feb ' Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
'86
'87
- 88 i
1989 192 200-B o Il f
i f IfE
~
132 ilf a1f 100-nol 8""
50-o n t
o i
11 11 il I
'86
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment totaled 78.8 curies and 83.7 billions of gallons of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water). from January through June 1989.
The high amount of waste that was discharged during the month of May was due to the dilution of coolant for the maintenance outage that occurred in May. Th5 Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is 225 curies.
The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
Adverse Trend: None _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ -
1 l
t
'r 10-
- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting' Parts I
1
.j 1
8-
.)
GOOD P
6-
+
e r
C
.e i.
n
~
t 4-2-
O Sep 0ct Nov Dec.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-0UTAGE)
This. procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage,- maintenance items - that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a percentage.
' The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts increased to 3.2% in August.
As of August 31, 1989, there were a total of 1,358 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 43 of these items on hold awaiting parts.
Adverse Trend: None _ _ _ _ _
m, g
8-'
.l - Spare Parts Inventory Value h
M.:.
'i o-7-
ns-f D
6-
.a r
s 5
Sep Oct Nov Dec
- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
'Aug 1988 1989 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts. inventory value at the Fort Calhoun' Station at the end of August, 1989 was reported as $7,296,726.
Adverse Trend: None l
4 400-
'f-
- Spare Parts Issued o:
u-s 300-j
'a.
n d
s 200-
. o
.f D
o.
1 100-1 a.
.r s-0 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during August, 1989, was not available.
i Adverse Trend:
An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that the data for this indicator was not available for the month of August.
700-
- Total Modification Packages Open 640 600-j 500-425
~
384 400- [
'86 '87 '88 Sep Oct. Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications increased by one during the month of August.
CATEGORY JUN 89 JUL '89 AUG 8'9 Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 103 93 89 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 173 1.70 169 Design Engr. Backlog 0
'O O
Design Engr. In Progress 70 72 73 Construction Backlog /In Progress 43 44 44.
Desion Enor. Update Backloo/In Prooress 44 45 E
l Total 433 424 425 Adverse Trend: None l
Tcmporary Eltetrical Modifications j
M 60
-th-Temporary Mechanical Modifications c.
Nd ui~
o f 40-bi g_. -----A-----g
],,. 8 t 20-oi f o.
0 s
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 I
June 1989 N
25 E July 1989 Nd I
IAugust 1989 ui 20 af b i 15-i n
0-3 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12
> 12 Age in Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)
The top graph, _ Number of Temporary Modifications, displays a monthly trend of installed electrical and mechanical temporary modifications.
There was a total of 31 electrical jumpers and 34 temporary mechanical jumpers existing in the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of August, 1989.
The bottom graph, Ace of Temocrary Modifications, displ,ays the age of all electrical and mechanical temporary modifications by months installed in the plant.
Adverse Trend:
Even though the number of temporary mechanical modifications has been increasing since June, the total number of-tem)orary modifications is expected to decrease. The decrease in the num>er of temporary modifications is expected due to greater awareness and control of the number and types of temporary modifications currently in the plant. New procedures, such as GEI-60, are also being established to decrease the number of temporary modifications. _ _ _ _ _
g q;q m.
n
- g.
l
' :sl
,'Y..
f12
. Recordable ~.InjuryCasesFrequencpRate 4
- 10-p
- p r.
. e-8-
.q.
-u-
!i, t
e' n.
6-l GOOD-Win
.R-t a.
4-
- t e- -,
, 2.2. 2.2
. e:
1.8S g ~
0
? '86 l, '87. : > '88 LJan lFeb' Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct' Nov Dec 1
- Ratss-for 1986,=
~1989 11987,fand 1988' o
Eare shown for-Ethe month of August j
1 RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE
. AL recordable. injury case is reported if Nuclear Production' Division personnel are injured on the 'jobiand 1
frequireE corrective medical treatment.~ The' recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a: year-to-date basis.
u h
iThere were.'4 recordable injury cases reported for..;the i
month of. August. There have been a total of'8 recordable'
?-
. injury -cases so far in 1989. The '4 recordable injury
' cases reported during August raised the Recordable Injury Frequency Rate from 1.4 in July to 2.5 in August.
T There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1988,
.i eight reported in 1987, and four reported in 1986.
1 Adverse Trend:
The recordeble injury frequency rate for
-the. Fort Calhoun ' Station was reported as 2.5 for the month of August. The increasing frequency rate is due to j
8 ' recordable injury cases that have been reported in 1
1989.' One ~ recordable injury occurred in March, one 1
recordable injury; occurred in May, two recordable
' injuries occurred in June, and four recordable injuries occurred in August.
r 1 1
3
l v
i I
1
- Min r Injury Reports Filed Per Month i
30-
'25-g g
i
.i' n ' 20-o.
r i
15-I y
n-l J
u 10-r-
.j
[
5-O Sep Oct Nov' Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 MINOR' INJURY CASES PER MONTH The Minor Injury Cases per Month indicator shows the~ number-of minor injury cases each month involving OPPD employees.
During ' the month of August,1989 there were a total of 14 minor injury cases reported.
There have been a total of 68 minor injury cases reported in 1989.
Adverse Trend:
The number of minor injuries have increased from 4 reported in June to 8 reported in July and 14 reported in August.
l !
._____________________-_U
H j
l v
)
9 Licensee Event Reports l
IPersonnel' Errors Reported in LERs
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 50-46-39 40 30-L-
26 20-10-5 0
'86
' 8 7--
'88 EJan Feb Mar. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecJ 1989 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The Licensee Event Reports (LERs) are reported for the month that they are submitted to the NRC.
In August, 1989 there was one LER submitted.
This LER was attributable to personnel error.
There have been 23 LERs reported so far in 1989 with only 8 attributable to personnel errors.
Adverse Trend: None._________-___- _ _______ -
1 1
INuclear Divisions Turnover Rate
- OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate
.5
.T 1 4-u r
-n o,
3-y.
n e
r-2-
R.
L a-t 0
1-Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality-Division Division and Environmental Affairs PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE-The turnover rate for three Nuclear Divisions is shown for the last twelve months.
The personnel turnover rate is plotted
- against -the OPPD corporate turnover rate of 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last three years.
Adverse Trend: None
- r 4 _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
600-E Actual Staffing I
IAuthorized Staffing 537.
L 470' p 400'-
e r
.s l
o n
l' n
$200-199 l
l-45 45-0-
Nuclear Operations-Production Engineering Quality
' Division
. Division and Environmental Affairs l.
i i
STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.
Adverse Trend: None
- \\
n
'q 1
- a I
ISRO Initial Exam-SRO Requalification Exara y
p
)
- - 100-80-
-i l
P.
E -:-
a 60-s -.
R
~
a 1'.
[40 o-20-y, Initial Exams Taken-0--
1987-1988 1989
'(
.SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO There were zero Senior Reactor. Operator (SRO) exa'ns taken in August.
OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Initial Exam Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam j
DATE
% PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO 100 100 March 87 100 June 87 80
-February 88 100 100 67 March 88 April 88 100 100 July 88 67 April 89 100 May 89
-Adverse Trend: None I,
f
. Gi, A
1 IR0 Inftial Exam E R0 Requalification Exam
}
!100-
[-)
80-P.
~
a si'60-s R
a.
- t 1
40-o P
I 20-No l
Requal Exims-
-Taken.
0--
-1987 1988 1989 R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO There were zero Reactor Operator (RO) exams taken in August.
OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Initial Exam Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE
% PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO 100 June 87 February 88 100 March 88 100 100 100 July 88 100 April 89 100 100 May 89 100 Adverse Trend: None '
o'
f r
.j; A.
+
- 4 -
E R0 Hot License Exams Administered l
IR0 Hot License Exams Passed
. N.
- u -
- n
- b' o
r c' 2-
- l 3
0-Jan' Feb-Mar Apr.
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
^
1989 R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS The R0 Hot License Exams indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed each month.
During the month of August, 1989, zero exams were administered.
Adverse Trend: None i
Hotlines Initiated
.50-Hotlines Closed 45-Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks N 40-u
.a b 35-e 30-o f 25-20-l o
t 1 ^15-i j
n 10-E E
i i
e gi g
s E
i E
E 5
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct-Nov Dec 1989 HOTLINES This indicator was,indicatorchanged for the month of June, 1989. This now shows the number of Hotlines initiated, the number of Hotlines closed, the number of Hotlines that remain open and are less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than fo.ur weeks old.
During the month of August, 19B9, there were 4 Hotlines. initiated, 2 Hotlines closed, 3 Hotlines that remained open and were less than four weeks old, and 7 Hotlines that remained open and were older than four weeks old.
Adverse Trend:
The increase of open Hotlines was due to the reopening of previously closed Hotlines. ___-
4-E Planned Classroom Hours I
l Actual Classroom Hours
-T h
3
'e u
s a
n d
s 2-e f
H u
l-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
The planned classroom hours for January and February are low because Maintenance and General Employee Training were not figured into the schedule for these months.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time to collect and process the needed information.
Adverse Trend:
None.
.______-__-__________-A
L I
IOperations 25-E Maintenance Chemistry and Radiation Protection 4
Technical Support E General Employee Training T 20-E Other h
.o u
,s
.a 15-n u
,=,
[
5-
~
t 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistr and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Train ng, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.
Total Hours TRAINING JUNE 1989 JULY 1989 Operations 3,530 2,184 Maintenance 2,130 2,753 Chemistry and 2,167 1,820 Radiation Protection Technical Support 4,003 1,543 General Employee Training 3,200 3,094 pther 675 122 Total 15,705 11,516 Adverse Trend: None l U
- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal I
14 15-l GOOD 10.6
+
9' O-O O
O -- O/' ----e O-O
-O x
6-
)
i 3-0
'86
'87
'88
-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
{
VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was' calculated using the number of violations and the number of inspection hours from the months of December, 1988, through August, 1989.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 8.7 for the month of August, 1989.
There were three violations cited in one inspection report for the month of August.
There have been a total of 21 violations cited with 2,184 inspection hours in 1989.
The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.6.
Adverse Trend:
The violations per 1000 ins )ection hours has increased due to 3 violations found in 30 inspection hours for the month of August.
1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __- _ --
- Total Outstanding DR/QR's E Outstanding DR/QR's > Si). Months Old
.L.'. Outstanding DR/QR's That Are Modification Related 200-150-D
- R l
Q R 100-f.-
-['y1..
r 00
,/;-
f
-i'-
J.
-a
.:a
~
0-Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 OUTSTANDING DEFICIENCY AND OVALITY REPORTS
=
The Outstanding Deficiency and Quality Reports Indicator was changed for the month of May, 1989. This indicator now shows outstanding Deficiency and Quality reports that are associated with modifications.
As of the end of August, 1989 there were 190 outstanding DR/QR's reports, 67 DR/QR's that are greater than six months old, and 9 DR/QR's that are modification related.
Adverse Trend: None _ _ _ _ _ _ -
E 2
L D
E e yd s 8 d en C
T hten8e rg Rs R
S
)
)
O tiuo9u ai N'
l si1 s s
R N
3 3
P sast s
e Q
O
(
(
E h
I R
wuia ni d
3
/
c CT oQ l
i R
i S
h so
)
,D RA 7
1 1
0 5
6 1
0 1
s he i
NL 2
e 'R v n s wh d
O R
h et I
E wt Q o 'R t
i u n L
o
/f sa mV t E s
n Ro aL afc sc yD i
t(
eo ii
)
)
S b
r r
l f
IT 2
2 U
x S
te s
a b
i N
(
(
S i
A R
rd nb t
eu sn amn r dp g
CR E
t e cu u ei Ri I0 0
1 2
0 0
2 0
0 5
V au o
F/
ms in o tse QS p
IR D
sf h
ath
/
e c ut R
ND E
ei iel R nha io Ds G
U v
gt C d
f I
)
)
)
)
)
S t
n o
tR o)i S
3 8
2 8
1 S
n is bsSst e
nQ
(
(
2
(
4 I
a 'R f s o E u r n e a/
v or cR
(
(
R S
h DO 2
2 8
8 3
5 9
0 7
N eQorF ctia iD h(
f P/
PR 2
9 1
5 5
5 O
e e
i i
f T
rve h
if l
I 2
OD T
se hs w de no e
nw A
.tbntn o
g L
9rm o e
scd in O
8ouirc So c
n I
9pn s oi i
a t
i V
1 e ifL t ),
2u
,R e v s
h b
S C
hi is t f
1 1
6 1
1 3
3 0
6 R
y yt D )C o r (e
,i s
l R
1 1
1 4
N l
dr t
ui s R
e a
e E
sNr t c et e
s s L
S J
u r( e c n u
l h
sie U
a si a
b a
h sd S
r a r
e i
fuoQefnm t
S R
l i
N E
vf ou a
h yn p
in h
t e
O V
A m
l I
h dn s
c shr o r a
S t
_C T se c
t n o yi h
'R n p e
RA 8
5 3
0 0
2 0
0 8 '
n ai r
rn g
NL 1
1 3
R o
s oo Qo O
0 m
omt
)i t n
/m n na R
i I
/
v os D e'n s
aCi s
d V
R e
i D
h 'R Du ndn h
l 9T T
D gye oa e w
t 1T o s e rl ie 1
(
tr d 4
.h N
N r
rRob l
s
-A A
o i
ta ip d
CR C
fs a at ds u ee d
ne o r u re
_I 0 I
t f l
-F/
1 0
2 0
0 1
0 0
4 F
rf n od w es u s ci ws d
a a
IR I
oA gi ND N
ep wt g
eh i
a s
G G
eyeRtr e
h e
n r R 'R
_I I
Rr cn a
r
,t
_S S
a o
r ne ad eE E hc yt a ai y e s h L L r
S ca R
U u e sin t
s d h fo ed nl l
-D0 S
s
'R i eu c
c i
n n
-P/
8 3
8 1
9 0
0 0
9 R
awi gsceAuda Qtt 9
e
,oa
-PR 3
5 5
1 4
3 1
4 E
N e
/ni 8d OD 1
3 V
i R u
Red rf y
n Ddn 9ns l
tec 1
D o ed o
io an Dnihn E
t i
c o
s U
a al t
t
,i tI l
S c
a a
n yd tst o
S if e uy.t al n s na r
/
I do cQb9s cda u ol A
t t
n n
8 i e gi o E
s n
n S
ira ed9e ft,
uti R
n o
e erh e1 h ias Aav A
o C
m R
sbut u t
nei l
s 0
i ms sd gps oC i
L t
l
/e s
/
s n
/
husysny iea niR A
a a
ec s
g e
o R
TnAbiab Srb I vN N
r c
cn e
n s
i D
O e
i na yn il s
t l
I p
g al cd y
ra A
a a
T O
o nl ne t
ect yc t
C l
ei er i
eir yti o
N t
o t e ga r
nno tif r
T U
n i
nv rp u
ihp eli e
F a
d ir ee c
gcp f ar h
l a
au mr e
nau aue t
P P
R MS EP S
El S SQV O
LA S
A B
C D
E F
G H
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY Escalated enforcement includes level III, II, and I violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for deficiencies discovered at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also includes civil penalties which are usually assessed with level III and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for the Fort Calhoun Station.
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
- 1. F.ebruary 1985 Site Se'curity Multiple Level IV and V Violations that were escalated to a Level III.
A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed.
- 2. April 1986 Qualification of Electrical Penetrations - Level III Violation.
No civil penalty was assessed.
- 3. May 1986
- Radiological Protection Level III Violation.
No civil penalty was assessed.
- 4. December 1986 Physical Security - Level IV Violation.
A civil penalty of $15,000 was assessed.
- 5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation.
A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.
- 6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and Lack of Health Physics Coverage to Very High Radiation Areas Level III Violation.
A civil penalty of $75,000 was assessed.
- 7. February 1988 Design Evaluation, Design Implementation and Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action of Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 Level III Violations.
A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed.
- 8. May 1988 Unlocked Very High Radiation Door and deficiencies identified in the Radiological Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations.
A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessed.
1 _____________ _ ____ _____
\\
ESCALATEDENFORCEMENTHISTORY(CONTINUEl/)
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
- 9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, SIRWT check valve test failures, and Safety Analysis for Operability - Level III violation.
A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.
- 10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted in a response.
No civil penalty was assessed.
e e
4 l
O ~
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and management meetings held with the NRC.
RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
- 1. August 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in August. One meeting was held to discuss the security program while another meeting was held on the OPPD independent appraisal results.
- 2. October 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in October. One meeting was held concerning the security program while another meeting was held to discuss the training program and the radiation protection program.
~
- 3. November 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in November. One meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program while another was held to discuss Decay Heat Removal.
- 4. January 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January. This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security Plan.
- 5. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in' February. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning the Radiological Protection Program.
- 6. February 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in February. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 7. April 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in April. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 8. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in May.
This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 9. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in July. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-10 controller operability.
- 10. August 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in a
August. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems...
m_____---__----
___m-
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST This section is intended to provide information on events which are significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a " heads-up" look at what is scheduled in the coming months.
The Fort Calhoun Station went critical on January 29, 1989 at 9:27 a.m.
The Fort Calhoun Station went on-line on January 31, 1989 at 4:46 p.m.
eiie 1990 refueling outage is scheduled for February, 15, 1990.
The 1990 INPO Plant Assessment is scheduled to start on June 18, 1990.
e 4
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS
'O' AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months.
AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders.
AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first samale exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to ae back within limits.
CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported.
CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY The percentage of a type of work performed by each craft during the reported month involving plant personnel.
DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts.
DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel supply system, lubricating oil system, starting air system, autostart controls, manual controls, and diesel generator breaker.
Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual DG unit.
FORTCAL90VNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (CONTINUED)
A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of this unit.to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time period of 60 minutes.
A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergency or a valid test.
The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of the failures and the successful runs.
This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1".
This is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station.
a DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel.
DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document ' Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue.
EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000. critical hours is the inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period.
E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuc,usly at maximum capacity.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical. generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e.,
the unit is available but not in service.
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a connon purification rate.
Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.
Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days.
GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station.
4 GROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal. energy in British Thermal Units (BTV) produced by the reactor to the total gross electricalenergyproducedbythegeneratorinkilowatt-hours (KWH).
HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month.
HOTLINES The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review. The Hutline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline.
, i
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation.
Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power.
The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.
IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-0F-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays both the total volume of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) and the associated Curies discharged from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River.
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)
Item No. 36.
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicator is a breakdown of all open maintenance work orders by several categories.
MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.
MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamma and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.
MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH The number of minor injury cases (short-form cases) involving OPPD employees.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED The data plotted is the number of suspected and confirmed NPRDS component failures. The suspected NPRDS failures are designated as such on the applicable equipment Maintenance Work Order.
NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO and implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station.
NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of the out-of-service condition is not considered.
Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments.
NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error on the original LER submittal.
NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC inspection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance.
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of authorized Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between the issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the drawing update.
Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has r.ot been approved.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
OUTSTATIDING MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
Modification Requests Being Reviewed Nuclear Planning is reviewing these Modification Requests and will assign a year for construction to be completed or will submit an approval for cancellation.
Design Engineering Backlog Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed but PED has not started design work.
Design Engineering In Progress PED has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress.
Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System AcceptanceCommittee(SAC).
Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated.
PERCENT OF DR/0R'S GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS OLD This indicator displays the percentage of Deficiency Reports (DR's) and Quality Reports (QR's) that are greater than six months old.
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors) o during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-rem.
PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, death, termination, transfers within the company, and part-time employees are not considered in turnover.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE This indicator is defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the scheduled interval.
PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The percent of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month.
The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used.
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
The number of identified incidents, the number of opened incidents, and the number of closed incidents each month involving maintenance.
RATIO OF HIGHEST PRIORITY MWO'S TO TOTAL MWO'S COMPLETED This indicator is defined as the ratio of the number of highest p)riority, non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders (priority 4 or 5 to the total number of non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders completed, expressed as a percentage.
RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance Jincluding surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours.
RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREOUENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE)
The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked.
R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed for the month they were taken.
R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Reactor Operator (RO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
JECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are - the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power.
The following equation is how the CPI is calculated:
CPI = ((Ka/1.2) + (Na/20) + (C1/20) + (50 /20) + (0 /10)) / 5 4
2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of; Ka = Steam Generator Blowdown Cation Conductivity Na = Steam Generator Blowdown Sodium Concentration C1 = Steam Generator Blowdown Chloride Concentration Steam Generator Blowdown Sulfate Concentration 50 4 = Condensate Pump Discharge Dissolved Oxygen Concentration 02
=
SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period.
SPARE PARTS ISSUED The dollar value of the s)are parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc..
SRO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Secior Reactor Operator (SRO) license examination to the total number,of candidates taking examinations.
TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems.
Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&ID, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or 0)erating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless tie jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifications. Scaffolding is not considered a temporary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block i
is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings.
TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared.
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actuations) that occur while the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows:
Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution.
UNPLANNED REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL (CONTINUED)
Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious.
Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room.
Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations:
the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated.
Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolution.
The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste produced, in final form ready for burial, during a given period. It is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for dis)osal, plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. The volume of radioactive waste that is not yet in final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and
~
evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing. _ _ _ - _
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING A989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1989 performance goals.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1989 to 1992. The following table is a areakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next five years.
STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR YEAR (HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(%)
1%1 1989(**)
7783 168 172 737 8760 84.4 2.1 1990(*)
7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1991(*)
7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 240 0
0 8760 92.9 2.7 1992 8520
(**)The1988RefuelingOutagecontinuedintoJanuary,1989
(*) Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1989 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past three years of operation.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1989 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last five years.
s GROSS HEAT RATE The 1989 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,500 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on the 1988 goal of 10,075 BTU /KWH less 20.6 MW(e) stated in memo TS-FC-83-233H, written on July 17, 1983. This states that operation without the governing (e)tage of s
the turbine results in a gross electrical output loss of 20.6 MW
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR G0ALS (CONTINUED)
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1989 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for approximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completed without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
The 1989 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 130 man-rem.
This goal was based on 50 man-rem of cumulative exposure for tie month of January,1989, and approximately 7.5 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the months of February, 1989, through December, 1989.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE The 1989 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 6,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division.
DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE
~
The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1989 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1989.
. am
-mems i
mes
FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE T0 (MWH)
(MWH)
EVENT FROM Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639
.First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034-Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8' 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/1.2/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/15/90*
Twelfth Refueling 02/15/90*- 05/11/90*
Cycle 13 05/11/90*- 09/01/91*
- - Planned Dates i
-FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS The following seven items. are.the current production and operation
\\
" records"'for the Fort Calhoun Station.
j l
- 1. First-Sustained Reaction............. August 5,1973(5:47p.m.)
2..First Electricity Supplied to the System..... August 25, 1973 3.' Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973 1
- 4. Achieved Full Power (100%),............May 4,1974
- 5. Longest Run (477 days)............... June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27,1988 q
6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober1987 7.MostProductiveFuelCycle'(4,936,859 MWH).... June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27, 1988 (Cycle 11)
I L
. l i
.I
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders CHAMPS Amount of Work.On Hold Awaiting Parts CHAMPS Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Stultz Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Kobanski Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old CHAMPS Craft Work Activity Peterson/Shrum Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Christensen Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log Disabling Injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay DR/QRs Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Krieser Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray Hazardous Waste Produced Schmidt/Sayre Hotlines Gasper /Kobunski In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Schmidt/Renaud Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage CHAMPS Maintenance Work Order Breakdown CHAMPS Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Shrum
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)
. Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Minor Injury Cases per Month Peterson/McFadden Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Fisicaro/Riva Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments CHAMPS Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs LER File Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Krieser Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Krieser Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)
Peterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/Cagle Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Jaworski/Stultz ProceduralNoncomplianceIncidents(Maintenance)
CHAMPS
, Ratio of Highest Priority MW0s to Total MW0s Completed CHAMPS Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterton/Shrum Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 Hot License Exams Gasper /Kobunski R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Fleuhr Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Stultz Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Vake Steele/Huliska SRO License Exam 4ation Pass Ratio Gasper /Fleuhr Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)
Temporary Modifications Jumper Log Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Christensen Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scraras While Critical Holthaus/ Gray Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Bilau e
e 4
1...
REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" IEEE Standard 762, "IEEE Trial Use Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" U.S. Nuclear Replatory Comission " Regulatory Guide 1.108
\\
.___