ML20248C295
| ML20248C295 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/1995 |
| From: | EQE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS (FORMERLY EQE ENGINEERING |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248C136 | List: |
| References | |
| 52091-C-025, 52091-C-025-R00, 52091-C-25, 52091-C-25-R, NUDOCS 9806020111 | |
| Download: ML20248C295 (37) | |
Text
- ---- ---- --------------------- ---------- ------------ - ------ - - - - - - -
pC CALCULATION COVER SHEET ENGINEERING I
CONSULTA NTS
> xo'i
- pa g
s-, p;,;
4 l
5 Z 0 4 f." C.~ ON Calculation No:
Project:
NSP MONTf C ELLo IPEEE Calculation
Title:
A M CHORAGE GVA L UATroM OF THE RHR PUMPS
( P-202 A B C.t D) AMD THE CORE SPRAY r
PUM PS
( P-208 A CB)
References:
SEE INSIDE Attachments: ATTA C HM G MT A (SEW JHEETS}
e Total Number of Pages (including Cover Sheet): 17 /Nh l'P443 MN, Revision Approval Number Date Description;of Revision Orlginator Checker-Approver i
0 5.% 16 ORidlHA L ISSUE SL HUl~
h9 s
/
avspywp n% w : a miy ~%
, ungg:na ga 9806020111 980529 FM.E I b
PDR ADOCK 05000263 L_______
P PDR
FOF EQE ENGINEERING SHEET NO. 2
{
JOB NO. 520Al-JOB HSP MONTICE L LO IPEEE By SL DATE 12//W93 CALC NO. C-ODSUBJECT P-2o2 A/8/c/JD ' ( P-206 A /B CHKD M DATE / 2//7/93 REFERGMCES D
EPR1 MP-604l-SL, "A METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSMGHT OF MdCLEAR POWER PLANT GGISMIC MA RG lH, "
R E V. I
RE V. I
- 5) GQE CA LCULATIOM
- S2091 - C - 010 o 'M ON TIC 6L t..
UMIT l>
ELECTRICA L EQUIPMCHT AMCHORAGG SC.REElJING SASED Obl DCSIGN BASI 6 6VA L UATIOM > "
REL/. O.
(O
\\
)
- 4) DRAWINGS a N F - 36 103 i REV. S I4x 1905 -20, R/ro Alg-785*b-10, R/4 NY 1405-34, R/4 NX-7833 - II, R/3 MX-7405 -35,
R/l NY-7835-41, R/2 NX - 7405 -73 >
R/B NX-1905 -34, R/S VCMDCR DwG. 2BI A Z.*A 7, R/2 PUR POCG.
l THfS CALCULAm0M IS TO EVALUA-TED THE GEISMIC ADEQUACY Oc* THE ANCHORAGEC FOR THE RHR. PUMPS ( P-202 A/6/C/D) A@ CCRE SPRAY PUHRs C 9-208 A/B).
!v r
l
FQF LQE ENGINEERING SHEET NO. -
b ID JOB NO. 52001.
JOB Nsp Mou ri cEt_ L o IPEEE By
.S L DATE '2/'d/93 CALC. NO. c4 SUBJECT P-2o2 A/B/C/D # 'P-2os A /B CHK'D //8I DATE /2//7/93 LOCATIONS THE SU63ECT PutdPS ARE LOCATED IN THE REACTOR. SulLDIMG @ EL.696' (RSR [43),
MA56 6 STIMATE S
( REF. C43 )
P-202 A/C/.D P-202B P-20b A /B MOTOR 4500*
GICO$
65004 PUMP 353od 3530" 3550' 4
9630*
10030"
> LisE W=/O.I kips TOTAL WT.
6030 (D
l Cl l
SGISMIC DEMA MD5 1
THE hon t %0MTA L PEA K 5% DAMPCD SPECTRAL ACCELERATrous AEG TAKGkt FROM RGF. C 5 3,
=
THG VEstTiCAL IHPUT 15 TAEEN A5 #/3 0F THE HoRIEo4TAl.
i- (sAH)
-I C osg., z.s ) = o.ssg sAv
=
l NO2ELG LcADS
.[
NOT INCLUDED HERE 174 ud
EQE ENGINEERING SHEET NO. 4[ h
(~\\ JOB NO. S20QI.
JOB HSP MOMTICELLO fPEEE BY SL DATE 1214/93 CALC. NO. C W SUBJECT P-202 A /8 /C /D L P-208 A /6 CHK'D RHT pggg i2/IT/93 SEISMIC FORCES IH THE ANCHOR BOLTS 6FCAtLSE OF SIMILActTY Ibl THE CONFIGURATtotJS AND AIJcnoRAGC$ of THG SUBJEC T pdm PS, ONE BotJHD/AIG CALC.23 PERFOL% ED HER$lhi.
+
+
c.u.
[
G s
y a
~
'd bgu, e.7;r
+
+
h =~ {6500
- hhs2") + 3550*(20").] ~ 65,,
is, L is,
=
i
/O,050*
q rx i
)
'% J H-s onRECTIOM SHEA R
= (W $A u )/4
= 0.27 W. GAn Tt.ustoM
= { W SA a 6s ")/2 (1"+ls") = l.6zF K/.5A-u E('
E-W DIRELTIou SHEAR
+
2( = 0.329 W4SAq
[cousrev4riw}
=(WSAu'65")/2ag" Teuston 1.250 W SA n
=
VEs2TecAL Tsusion
= (W'%)/4. +
20" = 0 5tr W %
/4-(N'0kazo N
Dean WEl&HT Cyy n
=
0.175 y
=
5 = /(o.25 W 54wf+ (0.3zr W 5Aaf' = a41 W 54 = 3.4 901.T GREAR. Fostcs
/
BOLT Teustot4 FotcG T=l(i'zc W 5Aa)'+ C.aro W sof + (o.sarg/s4vf - Cru 87.2 6 Veotr - I.76 6 kboLT
=
(SEISMIC )
(p. WBidHT.)
,g r
1
' Q,/
EQE ENGINEERING SHEET NO. 5[%
,es i,
) JOB NO. 520 Al. '
JOB NSP MONTICELLO TPEEE BY SL DATE I2A4Ms NOr DATE 12/17/9.3 CALC. NO. C-CE SUBJECT P-Zo Z A /8/C /D t P-208 A/B CHK'D AdCt+0R. G,0LT CAPAClTIES
'PG K KEF.E4 3, TIIE AHCHOR. SOLT.s ARG DRILL & grout IN PLACE I"p *3to"LG wirH 4&' PROJECTION.
THE ALLOV/ABLE CAPACITIES ARC Prot / IDEO t u R E F. C 2 3 FOR BOLTS tu GIJCRACKE.D CONCRETE WITH fl=35o0 P.**.
'no acDuctiod is TAxev svR Su
- 13.35 f60tT l
EMBEDMEN T = 38.5 " > MiH. EMS.cto" Tu =
2.69 k /60LT EDGE DIST.
> H IN. E. D. = o h."
~
zo "
> M s4 SP. = 12 Ms" l
SPN4NG
=
EQUlPMEMT STREAGTH TACTOR.
(Ps)
V re N, = 2 +%.w - o.zt.
< o.s GVALUATE Pl.ILL OUT ONLY fIv 6 I.0 87 26 F*s - I.968 2.67 Fs = 0 257 l
OL) l h
l CA LC. M 52091.06 -C-h REV. O Status Y
N U
Sheet 1 of ATTACHMEMT A (TOTAL (2 PAGEs) m l PA6E I [p'
(/
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS) s I
Plant Name: Monticello Unit:
1 PART A. DESCRIPTION l
Equip. ID No. P-202A/ C Equip. Class Vertical oumo g, a %<,
? to'7.C Equipment Description RHR oumos (2 total)
I Equipment Location: Bldg. BB Floor El. 396' Room, Row / Col 52 l
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Ek o.
R iel u C v'DS
/4 v 14 v n/k s
Seismic input Elevation 0 W D-PART B. PUMP EVALUATION 6&me.
W=-
1.
Is pump of good seismic design?
Y N U N/A Base flexibility /
4 ' M#d M M 4 t, w.e., 20 WA l FN Shaft restraints /
l U Casings /
?- ZOTC M cAMe>-M CWbb d E*"
N M
- Differential structural motion /
i Nozzles loadings - CN.Ah-heke go Unsupported components (
2.
No other pump concerns?
Y N U N/A is pump itself screened out?
Y N U j
PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION t 't c/ A 3.
M @c6 m C hJg 2 " edge ds'%be_
1.
Is strength assessment based on:
l gg l
Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?
J Specific analysis?
A Other?
Other 6%
/
2.
Is strength adequate?
Y N [U l N/A
/.
3.
Is stiffness adequate?
Y N U N/A O
v 2HD299nbNP-sews f
l
Sheet 2 of D2 UlbC- @
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS) gjgg gzgg7,
/
Equip. ID No. P-202A/ C Equip. Class Vertical oumo 4.
No other anchorage concerns?
hN U N/A T
ls anchorage adequate?
Y N PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS i
1.
Is pump free from influence by adjacent Y N U N/A elements?
Pump contains soft targets Do c.
ON Y W 6 W W Pump contains essential relays N Ser b eat v C.% @ %
Flexibility of connected lines Ow wN6+
A/c U a V-AC-5 0c-w V-Ac-$
Collapse of nearby equipments or structures os ow r%c,. d c6 we L/ st N c%g GNbene.ai usit uegg,~ - {
Masonry block walls Uo Oh p jeg 2.
No potential sources could flood or N U N/A spill onto pump 3.
No other interaction concerns?
hN U N/A C7 is pump free from interaction effects?
Y N U DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets,if necessary) hedd\\e Wd.I. 7 h%
...,...._... %-~l k 4- =./
W M'r
(
-- _~.
?
2a 1
p; y
l l
?
I
,c
'l 4 --
l
.e.
h 4 ~.~ l e
1 l
..., A. -
\\
i g_
A\\
~[-h#
Y'S 3
\\6 L DI s istos 2HD299nbNP-sews
(
Sheet 3 of D2C4 t-c: OzS c
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS) g4ggf)gg O
Equip. ID No. P-202A/ C Equip. Class Vertical oumo l
t l
l
!O l
l:
i' IS PUMP FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION / ANALYSIS?
i l
YES.
NO Evaluated by:
6H Date:
5-5 95 Evaluated by:
Date:
[.
2HD299nbNP-sews i
________.__._._m._
Status Y
N U
5 2 0 U-C.-e p Sheet 1 of FAGEA4gtI b
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
I i
Plant Name: Monticello
' Unit:
1 PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. P-202B/ D Equip. Class Vertice.1 oumo Equipment Description RHR oumos (2 total) d ** 0
- Equipment Location: Bldg. RE Floor El. fLQS' Room ~, Row / Col 5.2 e-Go 5 t.O M l VC%
C Manufacturer, Mode!, Etc. _ Dy. p A.
L_.
CVp3
,/2x/dx /d(
Seismic Input Elevation PART B. PUMP EVALUATION.
1.
Is pump of good seismic design?
Y N @ N/A
~lY ke\\ e-d o v~
l Base flexibility a gY 4 y g 4 m e., cg D'
Shaft restra,nts i
\\
Casings ow Differential structural motion oE S-cAoue.vJ/ eiMeLo %
Nozzles loadings Pcgge., E.eM t.r s
Unsupported components ou hN 2.
No other pump concerns?
U N/A N.h is pump itself screened out?
Y PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION So A {ed S Wic e N N'.g%t P*%,
1.
ls strength assessment based on:
gg g ygg g
Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?
J Specific analysis?
A Other?
Other
)
N h N/A l
2.
Is strength adequate?
Y 3.
Is stiffness adequate?
hN U N/A i
i g
^
%)
(
2HD299nbNP-sows I
Y l ~ C.~ (
Sheet 2 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
%2 V(~%
Equip. ID No. P-202B/ D Equip. Class Vertical oumo 4.
No other anchorage concerns?
hN U N/A is anchorage adequate?
Y N PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Is pump free from influence by adjacent YhU N/A elements?
Pump contains soft targets Pump contains essential relays Vu Flexibility of connected lines ou Collapse of nearby equipments or structures
\\1 - A C - 4 A/C O*M.St.e. LOA A Masonry block walls 2.
No potential sources could flood or hN U N/A spill onto pump 3.
No other interaction concerns?
hN U N/A is pump free from interaction effects?
YhU DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTO3Y (Use additional sheets, if necessary) g f g y 2,+
Nf - A. C, - q A me r : cca N r EWV V A-+ Id 0 - V'7150 ~AC.'BA 3,
it oS p w4 (
l
(
tt. -o q
')
tv.06 7'
e D.> tar ~ ( %c e. Ntv& p eg p
w s u ca sse ce~
SN
^
, ~~~' I
~
w g a t(
l 7
\\q"e t.r tro N l
j
- [~~ ['
-&' y -
k j ~
i O
)
q f
- T' g,Mi T
"'w I
4 o.,.
f
. 4,,, Ml_. 1.
I
.Q yy. &U
~
g 4,,Q \\
p l t. 4v t__...
~-
y.-
}
2HD299nbNP-sews
b201 l-C-oz6 Sheet 3 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
PAGE86/t O
Equip. ID No. P-202B/ D Equip. Class Vertical oumo Doth I
,I 4
i i
i
.\\
s x
'N N
N N
\\
h
\\
i i
3 5/e," 9 3 4-l
-- ~._ ~
a.
}t
-_)_..
l ' E' ' "h
'\\
k',-
gN, y
s.
s giu ~y i~-
7 N8 M t.o-
- L (c' 6
- r. 4 '
+
p-
~
a l
lS PUMP FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION /AIJALYSIS?
j YES NO X
Evaluated by:
748 Date:
4-5 -%
Evaluated by:
Date:
2HD299nbNP-sews
YN-0 Status Y
N U
S Sheet 1 of PMEA7/lz.
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
Plant Name: Monticello Unit:
1 PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. P-208U k Equip. Class Vertical oumo Equipment Description CSoumo-Equipment Location: Bldg. BB Floor El. 333' Room, Row / Col El B
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Os - n GJgkm C V DS loy7,7v/ k Seismic Input Elevation PART B. PUMP EVALUATION Tcta cN Y" EOS 1.
Is pump of good seismic design?
Y N U N/A Base flexibility Shaft restraints (Ohp Casings N SM ea \\ '" O' #- N okCN N Differential structural motion 4 e m'. p. s ver 6 A. CM do. ~ tg 4 [4 d g, b'y Nozzles loadings e
Unsupported components 2.
No other pump concerns?
Y N U N/A is pump itself screened out?
Y N U l
PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1.
Is strength assessment based on:
Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?
J Specific analysis?
A p
Other?
Other 2.
Is strength adequate?
Y N U N/A 3.
Is stiffness adequate?
Y N U N/A 2Ho299nbNP-sews E-. -. _ _ _ _ _ - - - -
Sheet 2 of 9Ml4-N5 SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
PAGE qB 2 O
Equip. ID No. P-2084 A Equip. Class Vertical oumo l
4.
No other archorage concerns?
Y N U N/A is anchorage adequate?
Y N U PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Is pump free from influence by adjacent Y N U N/A elements?
Pump contains.. soft targets D v c A c v e.- 7 e, w t,e M g q Pump contains essential relays Vo sem oc+= S't4x 4-Ow'2.-To m V '7.0 7 4/C.
L Flexibility of connected lines at Collapse of nearby equipments or structures Masonry block walls tJud 2.
No potential sources could flood or hN U N/A spill onto pump 3.
No other interaction concerns?
hN U N/A is pump free from interaction effects?
Y N U DESCRIBE PO.TENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets, if necessary)
L i
I l
2HD299nbNP sews l
Sheet 3 of 8zoq(-c-orl5 SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS) pad 6 49 ft2.
O l
Equip. ID No. P-20S& A Equip. Class Vertical oumo I
f O
l l
9 IS PUMP FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION / ANALYSIS?
YES NO Evaluated by:
DR Date:
S S S Evaluated by:
Date:-
I l
2HD299nbNP-sews
Status Y
N U
l Sheet 1 of F60m l
J
/~'s VME fto&2.
'q)
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
Plant Name: Monticello Unit-1 l
l PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. P-20846 Equip. Class Vertical oumo 3
h'N Equipment Description CSoumn Equipment Location: Bldg. BB Floor El. 896' Room, Row / Col.E2 yr.o r c e GE 34 %*oV Mp 800 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. 9, _ n F;; g e-- @o -s p cVD S /vv/dx/k k
Seismic input Elevation l
PART B. PUMP EVALUATION l
1.
Is pump of good seismic design?
hN/A Base flexibility ot l
' Shaft restraints vs. & J - t*ve e_~
ow
,r 3 (j
Casings
/
Differential structural motion o b 4, gee,7ey s j
Nozzles loadings te+ r y % wyp o w c. ec\\d u e44-i
- W
- t - h t" NW Unsupported components ow 2.
No other pump concerns?
N U N/A hNh l
is pump itself screened out?
PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1..
Is strength assessment based on:
Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?
J Specific analysis?
A Other?
Other N h N/A 2.
Is strength adequate?
Y j
3.
Is stiffness adequate?
hN U N/A i
k' I k I:>.
BON TCdh % d k 7 ig " M k b
v
' ' ~ ~
i
-1 F
li' Z%
ret 9h [
s.
~p
,_w..
2Ho299nbNP-sews
_______a
Sheet 2 of M N/-(_- M 5 SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
O PAdE4tifz Equip. ID No. P-208 A 6 Equip. Class Vertical oumo 4.
No other anchorage concerns?
hN U N/A is anchorage adequate?
Y N PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Is pump free from influence by adjacent N U N/A elements?
Pump contains soft targets NO Pump contains essential relays tJ o Flexibility of connected lines at Collapse of nearby equipments or structures Uo Masonry block walls f4%
2.
No potential sour'ces could flood or hN U N/A spill onto pump hN 3.
No other interaction concerns?
U N/A is pump free from interaction effects?
hN U
DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets,if necessary)
I O
2HD299nbNP-eews
Sheet 3 of DE M ({-02 SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
M 4IE 12.
Equip. ID No. P-2084 6 Equip. Class Vertical oumo i
l l..
l.
4 l
i i
IS PUMP FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION / ANALYSIS?
CWL e @ rag YES NO 1
Evaluated by:
DN Date:
Evaluated by:
Date:
j 2HD299nbNP-sews i
____..____.__________.___.___..________._.__________._.________..____._._____._______..____________.__._.____.____.__.______J
O BATTERY CHARGERS D52,D53,D54,D70,D80,D90 Battery Charger D52, D53, D54 SEWS and Photos Battery Charger D70 SEWS and Photos Calculation 52091-C-028 O
O
16 0 } ' ('T Ob Status Y
N U
b Sheet 1 of l
V SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
Plant Name: Monticello Unit:
1 PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. D52 Equip. Class Batterv charaer Equipment Description Batterv charaers Equipment Location: Bldg. ADM Floor El. 928' Room, Row / Col Manufacturer, Model, Etc. f. 8
/ CI'# On // Y 'M F
/ S E y e.s.
' Seismic input Elevation PART B. CABINET EVALUATION 1.
Is cabinet of good seismic design?
N U N/A Solid state charger and invertor 3
Transformer mountings
- (j
\\
Load paths GDP Base assembly Door attachment 2.
No other cabinet concerns?
hN U N/A hN is cabinet itself screened out?
U PART C. RELAY WALKDOWN $qu(c Wlu-Appjzcss 1.
Does spot check of essential relays indicate Y N U N/A relays are present and properly mounted?
2.
Are essential relays screened out?
Y N U N/A If no, attach list of relays with locations in cabinet and general dimensions, thicknesses and details of mounting plates that support relays.
3.
No other relay concerns?
Y N U N/A OU l
2HD299nb/BCl-sews i
62,%l-(,-C06 Sheet 2 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
Equip. ID No. D52 Equip. Clas.s Battery charger Are requirements for relays satisfied?
Y N U 9/p PART D. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1.
Is strength assessment based on:
y}CG{L Phu S. W C-D Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?
J n ejgg g'
Specific analysis? %.c.w. de. Sto% -c-Dis Other?
ther W'E @ ES PE EMG fl To %S 2.
Is strength adequate?'
YhU N/A 3.
Is stiffness adequate?
YhU N/A 4.
No other anchorage concerns?
hN U N/A is anchorage adequate?
Y@U PART E. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Is cabinet free from influence YhU N/A by adjacent elements?
PpWeL (5. V P /-PIN M,, Gu T N cT Cabinet contains sott targets MOUNED TO A f>LO@ WAU.
)
Cabinet contains essential re!"
l Flexibility of connecting lines Collapse of nearby equipments or j
structures Masonry block walls 124 2.
No potential sources could flood
@N U N/A or spill onto cabinet?
L 3.
No other interaction concerns?
yN U N/A Is equipment free from interaction effects?
YhU l
EucF wpu-GtitiMD PtAML:
l O
2HD299nb/BCl-sews j
@ y () [ - C 'O O b Sheet 3 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS) p Equip. ID No. D52 Equip. Class Battery charger DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets,if necessary) l Cbt4
$ m W W/Lt, nHEF-WlSE PMa
- gf.gC i WF G LAME / 9C HGLS
'J EEf P[ EMGE.OME NT 6)MCc THE C4 oui PA D ogot}L ?J-5E 4
WICd
- Y/I O
i IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION, EXCLUDING RELAY CHATTER?
YES NO IS EQUlFMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER RELAY CHATTER INVESTIGATION?
YES NO Evaluated by:
PPN Date:
1 < l 'b 9 S l
Evaluated 'by:
MB Date:
) -G -6 l
2HD299nb/BCl sews i
L.____________..___..____.____.________.____._____._
%0 i \\ - (, ' O ( ?
0 Status Y
N U
Sheet 1 of U
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
Plant Name: Monticello Unit:
1 l
PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. p53 Equip. Class Batterv charaer Equipment Description Batterv charaers Equipment Location: Bldg. ADM Floor El. 928' Room, Row / Col Manufacturer, Model, Etc.
CO A/RF? muk WF NL7 5#c-j l
t Seismic input Elevation g g peg j
PART B. CABINET EVALUATION 1.
Is cabinet of good seismic design?
Y N U N/A Solid state charger and invertor l (']
Transformer mountings L/
Load paths Base assembly Door attachment 2.
No other cabinet concerns?
Y N U N/A Is cabinet itself screened out?
Y N U PART C. RELAY WALKDOWN 1.
Does spot check of essential relays indicate Y N U N/A relays are present and properly mounted?
2.
Are essential relays screened out?
Y N U N/A If no, attach list of relays with locations in cabinet and general dimensions, thicknesses and details of mounting plates that support relays.
3.
No other relay concerns?
Y N U N/A
' h))
l 2HD299nb/BCl-sows
b b O 9 l < 'Ob Sheet 2 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
[
Equip. ID No. D53 Equip. Class Battery charger l
l l
Are requirements for relays satisfied?
Y N U PART D. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1.
Is strength assessment based on:
Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?
J Specific analysis?
A l
Other?
Other I
2.
Is strength adequate?
Y N U N/A 3.
Is stiffness adequate?
Y N U N/A l
4.
No other anchorage concerns?
Y N U N/A is anchorage adequate?
Y N U PART E. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS t
I /^%
V 1.
Is cabinet free from influence Y N U N/A by adjacent elements?
Cabinet contains soft targets Cabinet contains essential relays Flexibility of connecting lines l
Collepse of nearby equipments or structures Masonry block walls 2.
No potential sources could flood Y N U N/A or spill onto cabinet?
I 3.
No other interaction concerns?
Y N U N/A is equipment free from interaction effects?
Y N U l
t v
J I
I 2HD299nb/BCl-sews
h 3 9 [ " C ~~6 6 6 Sheet 3 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
O Equip. ID No. D53 Equip. Class Battery charger DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use l
additional sheets, if necessary) i l
l O
f l
l l
i IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION, EXCLUDING RELAY CHATTER 7 YES NO IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER RELAY CHATTER INVESTIGATION?
YES NO Evaluated by:
$M Date:
I ' I B
'1 h Evaluated by:
%h Date:
HT-%
l 2HD299nb/BCl-sews l_1
O/-
.,. 5,
)
' Status Y
N U
Sheet 1 of (3U SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS 1 Plant Name: Monticello Unit:
1 PART A. DESCRIPTION "yN~m s' q c T) L N
Equip. ID No. D54 Equip. Class Batterv charaer FH 12 13 16 # 2l Equipment Description Batterv charoers 13 l @,2 L /--u 4oi2 AGE.
Equipment Location: Bldg. ADM 71oor El. Q23' Room, Row / Col Manufacturer, Mode!, Etc.
(#h liMI' 130 Mf' /A o C
% rc
/8f[~
Seismic input Elevation PART B. CABINET EVALUATION b
M
/
1.
Is cabinet of good seismic design?
hN U N/A Solid state charger and invertor
]
Transformer mountings (V
Load paths Base 5ssembly Door attachment
[N 2.
No other cabinet concerns?
U N/A hN is cabinet itself screened out?
U PART C. RELAY WALKDOWN e g g jppgcs5 1.
Does spot chet.k of essential relays indicate Y N U N/A relays are present and properly mounted?
2.
Are essential relays screened out?
Y N U N/A i
If no, attach list of relays with locations in cabinet and genera! dimensions, thicknesses and details of mounting plates that support relays.
i 3.
No other relay conr ms?
Y N U N/A 2HD299nb/DCl-sews
m Sheet 2 of
]
~
~
C SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
O Equip. ID No. D54 Equip. Class Battery charger Are requirements for relays satisfied?
Y N U PART D. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1.
Is strength assessment based on:
Jdgement (supported by generic analysis)?
J Specific analysis? h cec. 9 o.6 tom - C-O'lY O Other?
Other 2.
Is strength adequate?
Yh U N/A 3.
Is stiffness adequate?
YhU N/A 4.
No other anchorage concerns?
hN U N/A is anchorage adequate?
Y U
PART E. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Is cabinet free from influence Y@U N/A by adjacent elements?
~
f4.AcF WkW Cabinet contains soft targets Cabinet contains essential relays Flexibility of connecting lines Collapse of nearby equiprnents or structures Masonry block walls 2.
No potential sources could flood Y N U N/A or spill onto cabinet?
3.
No other interaction concerns?
Y N U N/A Is equipment free from interaction effects?
Y N U
)
O 2HD299nb/BCl-sews bn___________________
\\
S.,,,
-r
. 'D Sheet 3 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
Equip. ID No. D54 Equip. Class Battery charger DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets,if necessary)
)
g6 qt. WC! p To fu s C. f pg L AMcSI-Go'T5 /f 6 Hl 5 AI N 6 OH o H E. S h"C s/.c FMcu c.ccrow5t ovuo cc m To uruFT pg> To E.v/ L U AT-5 f(PiCAL. 9A klE.L /-h(4ts-WELD PATTCP-4 l
u cp 1/g" fltLQ WE.L9 TW f;
3 i.
L i
M" l
o 6,
h
,--h-;f' gpgT 4.A N @ lL M LT
('LbH IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION, EXCLUDING RELAY CHATTER?
YES NO IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER RELAY CHATTER INVESTIGATION?
YES NO Evaluated by: OM Date:
I
- l8 ' 6 S f\\
l ~ l 2 - D<
V Evaluated by:
TSM Date:
2HD299nb/BCl-sews I'
L___---___._________.______________________________________________._____
8N
,%. EQEINTERNATONAL hh
- C.. ~~ j j ks
%S
,,,..... ~
SHEET NO.
JOB NO. M&l I JOB
}doNh06 LO By DNi DATElVY43 CALC. NO. C
- CC6 SUBJECT WALK-Do WN CHK'D DATE fMTE M - CAttcr GETL 064 eb"
~
. /_.
l fMO Sj lO S $la tl
'hh-Vi Tmc att scut camsa. zo touc,
--1
_.e
~
O'p
\\
c~~t7ig 4-gV (.
4, 1, _.,..
. __ _..li
+
f qu.
z_ y,\\ --
uw %T r
o azg s O
- - - _ _ - _. - _ - - - - - _. _ _.-_---._,_--- _ - __. _ - _-_______ - _------_..-, - __-_.- --__~__ - _ _.- -.__ - ___ ---__ _ - - - _- - - -
O i
{kl[=kinL"ifU
'Y ~
f i
.m.
jr u
uma ams rk.. I "n 8W BM
'O', U.
L. W T
. % U'. ~.. '
.r u
w n
6 l
{
.]
l t
t
, Ih a
U. hi p
I
~,..
r* (a t
((
a 7
~p..
O ik <_.
l Battery Chargers D52, D53, D54 O
gg e,2 _ _ _
i f
l
" e..::
"s
.g.
j
,i,
~
e s-ig: W@j l
,s
'Nh!):
- ktp,
2if
+
m.
- << 9
- w: s@Xs ' +
l et.
5
.. er.ef"it.l:
.p.
.i g p; 2
- e ;v g,. ~
- jl
- ' #'jpe'J M
,, j.+
f 2
f' b
v:.
i i
q<;.
O c.
j, s'
455:!:"
a g 5555:2 "
- c.e
+
R e:5EEEEL*"
- V
?e :~::T*
Battery Charger D54 Anchorage i
I l
l l
P:\\5228308\\ PHOTO. DOC /nb b J Eo2 1
1 J
I-b hZgffl-C_.-(Jc.rf Status Y
N U
Sheet 1 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWjl s
Plant Name: Monticello Unit:
1 PART A. DESCRIPTION l
Equip. ID No. D70 Equip. Class Batterv charoer l
Equipment Description Batterv charoers l
Equipment Location: Bldg. EEI Floor El. 932'-10" Room, Row / Col HQ3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. C # h 951 r>< -. G.',
ARR PoNheC
..n 8/ f o
Seismic input Elevation PART B. CABINET EVALUATION 1.
Is cabinet of good seismic design?
ON U N/A l
Solid state charger and invertor Q
Transformer mountings V
Load paths Base assembly Door attachment O
2.
No other cabinet concerns?
Q' N U N/A l
I is cabinet itself screened odt?
Y N U
. PART C. RELAY WALKDOWN.SRuG To Appg.%
l 1.
Does spot check of essential relays indicate Y N U N/A relays are present and properly mounted?
2.
Are essential relays screened out?
Y N U N/A i
if no, attach list of relays with locations in cabinet and general dimensions, thicknesses and details of mounting plates that support relays.
\\
t l
3.
No other relay concerns?
Y N U N/A a
2HD299nb/BCl-sows
()0l^C'D00 Sheet 2 of I
i SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS) lO Equip. ID No. D70 Equip. Class Battery charger l
Are requirements for relays satisfied?
Y N U PART D. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 4_
ij.,e 37dhdb6Q 1.
Is strength assessment based on:
'/ " * e c
-[u /F US acKm -
m l
Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?
T 2.uT Specific analysis?
A Other?
Other (Am( fo W: ls 2.
Is strength adequate?
Y U N/A sec.rd4cs 3.
Is stiffness adequate?
YhU N/A 4.
No other anchorage concerns?
Y N U N/A is anchorage adequate?
Y[U PART E. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS l
OV 1.
is cabinet free from influence hN U N/A by adjacent elements?
Cabinet contains soft targets Cabinet contains essential relays Flexibility of connecting lines Collapse of nearby equipments or structures Masonry block walls IN 2.
No potential sources could flood hN U N/A or spill onto cabinet?
3.
No other interaction concerns?
@N U N/A is equipment free from interaction effects?
Y N U l
o i
2HD299nb/BCl-sows l
[3 f
hj[\\/'b' Ob Sheet 3 of l
SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)
LC~)
Equip. ID No. D70 Equip. Class Battery charger DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets, if necessary{
f
.4, j f*
l T
\\
}
g
__%;==nu:m..._ '"
dr
/
- F
(
. : C ~- \\
14ELP 15 DPPS6T Pfad EDCG- @ f# N r
l l
l i.
IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION, EXCLUDING RELAY CHATTER?
YES NO IS EQUIPMENT FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER RELAY CHATTER INVESTIGATION?
YES NO Evaluated by:
YM Date:
7 ' ID 1L Evaluated by:
MR Date:
1' ID 9L r
/
2HD299nb/BCl sows Y_-_--___--________
E 4-EQE INTERNATIONAL 2l$
l L
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.@0 $ I -
JOB 1.A04TICE R O BY DM DATE /2/7//H
. CALC. NO. C 'O# 3 SUBJECT h/NDOW N CHKD DATE 6tTTEltf CRmLEEVs b 90, o eo, paa l
g'l t
t i
l i
659 /f22130Ek (90F-
?
+.
%n ow' l
II bb l-1 O
g - c. ~)
jr
- / Tv w su y
l
\\'is Y*
~
Sg
}/[ - s'h" Leac,.
i H
/y &
y\\ l, 9#
l opiT
'Zb I
l L...E \\
.n ;
d-
- ~
- ~
()
b l'//
I C__________.__..____
O
':je3 b..
p-
{'l' ?
~ If
!.w 3
. 10 m-
!a q;
1%93-r
'55 Ei ;;'
y,
- 4 g
l
~" S y I._..
s.
f f,' q' Battery Charger D90 0
es
__e___
1 l
l l
l
.G.5.6. c.u.....a. : :...... n... c;. cc.......... s u......... ' ::::':
s
.....n.
.u.tt.:::::.... **::l.. n*.
\\
u.n.......
.u..
\\
- c. y
- u.. u.....; ;....... u
..,;..............':.'..'...........l.l..
+
f '?lm;;.u;u................ :........... '
l
'::.;000;
.u.
O'.
ni'?::!????lIlu........... u u."".".///.
.....................;;..................u."".
i E:::':! u............u.. a ".*"."..*
lll$$$$$$$$$$2ll...........
lll':::::: 'll.................
,.n
'.'??..........
fT. e,
\\
,tm*; L.
)
.???!!."............
e, s
"?'..
?
c.
? 'N 'd
,*??..??.
- k r
t
\\
.y i
\\
wum~
I o ~, ~ :~
dm
.th.%D.x;%_%..
\\
c,-..
I M
gc.df(
y..<
- e gc< <,, ;. x '
%.A',..
1
,, n,,,.
~.
a
%.?% ~
- w ;Qwf.a%v> >
>t Battery Charger D90 Anchorage I
h
' P:\\5228308\\ PHOTO. DOC /nb 1