ML20248C292

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Calculation 52091-C-015, Evaluation of Anchorage for Motor Control Centers 43A,43B
ML20248C292
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/09/1995
From:
EQE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS (FORMERLY EQE ENGINEERING
To:
Shared Package
ML20248C136 List:
References
52091-C-015, 52091-C-015-R00, 52091-C-15, 52091-C-15-R, NUDOCS 9806020109
Download: ML20248C292 (24)
v • d • e


Text

--

l Pc, po. 1 Olll3 CALCULATION COVER SHEET l

,e

\\

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS ya.? m

< ; ve: ' ^

1 un s

,:n 79 l

l Calculation No:

6MT/ " 0' bb Project:

//eS S

@WMdC OM IT I IPE88-Calculation

Title:

EVALOAT/CA/ OF A-N CHoA2 AGE FOR Mo7 OR.

j couraou uurmes us4; ess

{

References:

6EE /A/s/DE Attachments: ATTACH MEur A '

2 estes i

i l

Total Number of Pages (Including Cover Sheet): b EM'** hW#

~

I

(

Revision Approval Number Date Description of Revision Originator Checker Approver o

t+w oem

  • E STF st nv ha ggs ww

,y n

y g

us,.

w 12att oticever.ht (71st) 980o020109 990529 PDR ADOCK 05000263 P

PDR

l 1

EQE WTERNATIONAL l

""'~ 5 b

SHEET NO.

JOB NO. 5709/

JOB #40u T/cg4LO Oy/ 7~ I TPEEE-F 12.//9/9j BY DATE CALC. NO.t-06 SUBJECT MM NSA; b CHK'D GL DATE 8Z/0/42 REFEREFJCES 4

1.

E. Q. E calc.

5209/ -C -c/O R2V o 2

BLUMG CAL c.,

bI55 - C - 6)O QEY o 3.

BLVHG CAL.c.

bl Gs - c - o(es esy 2.

i 8.

EQE. calc.

52091-C- 005~

6EWS FM. EQV(PMENT 90s.

43 A &

4 *a (5 Rcv o 5

MbG MhtatinG of STEEL. C.ON9r2Va70N9 W Eb nu l

(,

SEl sM I C, VER)):/ CAT /oAl oF NUctsAR PLArJT EQ L/I P MEN T 1 l9) tJ P 5 22-8 C

NJCliORA6E VOL I, REV. l l

O I

l 1

, EQE NTERNATONAL SHEET NO.

k DATE I E' N ~'.

JOB NO. 82 M/

JOB MOMIID

/E #"

BY l

CALC. NO.DO 6 SUBJECT Mcc 43 A, 6 Csgo sL DATE LZd7/13 PUR Po6f:

Tt45 PUR. Pose OF THis cAccvLAT/m3 15 TO CNEcX THE ACFGVAol oF Tt+E N>cHo@6E FDL TH5.

MC1 OR. cG>/ Ao/

CENTER.6 43 4

+

4%,

l APf520AcH THE P R.I V A q C twt.A TMis CAL.c.uthr10 P l^)vssncAr2.5 IS.

BENDIA>G IA) 7'i+5 BASE hfJCHORAC.5 bLh?.

reaviot's ANALysss dsse M4=s. 2 L5)

To LATEthL to40s.

O navs tussursa res f&wis uses, rus tActen.-

LoAc6 Af4E. DERIVEb USINb k 57o DAMMED BE6PcW.sE.

6PEcr2A-wITH A*

P Ghc &RonO Ac wLae417cA/

[AJRRE6 CAoca5)

l l

EG.E EQE INTERNATIONAL SHEET NO.

O JOB no. 6209/

sob NSP MOW /cstLo

/PBE2 BY MY DATE /2lJ4'l%

i' CALC. NO. 'OD SUBJECT ME 93k 8 CHKD SL DATE (2/sV43 j

l I

Mcc.-

4 5A

  • lb awsr. no era t evo W OF vpIT

= 5(o4 % 't- \\ %3 = 753 I

  • EF-2.

ELEt/ =

931' TURSI DE st b.

e m-exe. szo,i-c.-oio (esr= b Sn -

159y 6% DAsere PG A =. 3 CRECK 1801.7 /S EAID W h Ar 846G l

csuTER OF GRAv/rV J.s l G 9

9 AT' nwswur oF vu t T-(SEE REF 2, S) swanon avnrioa l

u.

,x a

TOP foetK6 /Al X D/2ECT"~/DN DnMoonL BRACE 7% KG.S %L.F of s k rA R. foncA.

O

' s' 6532 595 7 #

2 k to AucHOR BOLT 5 hT ftASE E.122 =

5 98Qog ree ? s 2.

V=

to n

1 EOE EQE FUERNAMONAL

.9

- ~ ~ - -

SHEET No.

JOB No. $20*ll JOB }JSP Mol)nCE/jA JPEW BY $3V IEl5l1 DATE CALC. NO.

bN SUBJECT MN 9,M) b CHK'D SL DATE (2/17 6

/

Fotc26

/Al Y DIREcY/DA)

SR AC4NG Thw&S HhlF DP 6H531g. @m

ieesr nrraeo F 28-1

~~~ --.*

...-,...,c A

i Fi

(

F, F

Fr y

cer*SL en socr PHrrsa =

o + 190 + 16o Hs o + 22o - /v/ mou F, qb/

s-6927(30) = fiOYo) +.191566) +.29/id/o) t.5 766o)

E =

3%or w to4o ou 4 sou =

398. ar =

+ 4 7,o2. Y @ t r 2

l

\\/=

S c19, 7 + t w.o 2. =- Io48 #

t Y

to Y(ve,0'+ciors'

=

i2o0, N.eocY 3,*3c1 W ooLT

%dA (o. 7%

f6'2 WG

= 6 75 =-

F.S.

27 A = 3 =oed O.

F. S =-

3.59

=

2.45 '7 /. O o i< "

_l.zl

EGE toe werwaonn.

%3 b

" " ~ ' "

n SHEET NO.

k3')

/2// O U

JOB NO. 52.o4/

Os AJ S P M ON Ts c.Ett_ o IPEEE sy DATE CALC. NO.b'bb SUBJECT IA% 4'3 A 3 CHK'D SL DATE (Z/87M73 j

i cma: ur MA>cwn l

u\\Y2 I

's Y ?

. (PJ5.F 2-)

i.

r,'

p s

G 1

3 bf 1

i M $ =[206)/f=

905 #'"

2 7

.I = TI CY=

TT-62.O:

.003DA M_._ - =

(905h[2.s)

M M

G=

c 0

I

,003 os

/(gaf T=

74 Ms;C.

5'

\\) s.4 =-

/.7. [.(g0)[56) =

31.F.5E<:sr 2.

~74 ess O 6, J

(CR.lTEdh FOR, STEEt\\,

FROM REA t THIS ITEM c.Ah/A>0T ss Sc.RF1Asb our 7,5,= Nl = W4

=- o. 5

< t. o O

EQE INTERNAllONAL

( TOTA L 7 [%6g4 )

SHEET NO. ! OF 2-I U JOB NO. 5'l 09/

JOB NCA/D C#' / O BY DATE CALC. NO. C -Ot 6 SUBJECT AT7'ACA'NF^/7' A FeoM REF. 2.-

CHK'D DATE s.

OISO ~010 050 '

ITER KAHE E NTbt M 0MS hMW~Ml ITEH NO.

d 8 MI2 U S, 0 0 4' W XANUTACTURER'SNAMEdt'dMA Mofd fMHUFACTURER'S LOCA710N SERIAL, TYPE, MODEL, ETC.,H05.

I' NM M bN 70/

AREA IUE O/ ^'I FLOOR LOCAT!ON:

23U I L D I NC DOE S PO S I T ! v'E ANCHOP.AG E EX I ST :

%YES G No l

~

. Rg" * " '-)---S M, i as s

csu4< f D3 A MM4 7sC M M.2.)

A O.0M ~79//,7 g/j/

~7M

?Gosu V fd6 f4 cm cwEL.

@h.

7bh 9 75ca +3 77 7. y A.

. ' ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - - -

j r1cc d s h' W R b f 6 4Ctf A/C) fOH*' W i

i

.);",l"' _,

.oj>rt a/>i/pg

~l 12 Te' G'

i egg tO

~~

OVT. Kart-MME-95+Ch'f DF UN I T j,.

f) g 7owng (simple Ske t c.h) g ~76 m cc g jg.,

' M HOTO NO.

J g_,, v x

)

u

.._a_s 4

2 s

h

~

2 Q % Rea a lcour

\\ ' ya g

-g sfog 'g',

p Ove?

I 4. A,.i 9

pce

,cl W* y..,eg,.sy,,,, -

PLAN VMW -

t J

.. qff a-m' p..c..cc.c ' #,

f r.

v-C,l df ',

5.

s U

yk

/!-g

g.

.,s

=

its hY 7

& 'N

(

e Jk '

A c

3 4-M

(

O o,,

9w 5

L 0

0 FLOM y

9 4W p

dE_i At ff

/

!! l l l -l

' h

'[

l l \\

5' M

Q;/

t e, e, t.

gt' s

U SIDE 'C SIDE 'YL' 1

AAE TH E RE HOM-CATECORY EQUIPMENT IN THE VICINITY OF CAT. I EQUlPMENT, VHICH IF DISLODGED ST A SEISMIC EVENT, COULD IMPACT CAT. I EQUIPMENT 7 YES O No 4

If YES, L I ST I T Ds N u."2 E R S Ter "r t EL D SHE ET - NON-CAT. I EQUIPMENT)

- c

-u rn iri,ris nit

EQE INTERNATIONAL O'

SHEET NO E # 2 (j JOB NO. f2.o 9/

og p/oAj 77e_s/_t o CALC NO.0 "OD SUBJECT NTMYMSU 7~ A FCOM REE 1 CHK.D DATE g,ffWO&Wh&,

-_ g & E_

1-p$..< - --

y' e

1 2 0 *- O "

i l l.> /.

_7{s. l

_K-

-u j

~

q

[.

V

,r

-l hy,'

  • .4~.

,;gtj s

d %,,, sorTou virw c

<r 4 w i

9 i g',

/r g,g 4 A g!. sotico. cod. -

p utt n.s io Atg.rTCM Nt$,,,,,-

g 3

o 4% p #(

(/

"{

=

w L,3 l

}

4 nL & >, /, /k ~

b 4

_, _ / r~

. _A_.y.c.1MO

~

r s d c-c-gp 3

1,

}

I Y

h g,

~

p

~

,g

-6%g eth4 f.

/

aw

O RHR PUMPS AND CORE SPRAY PUMPS RHR Pump SEWS and Photos Core Spray Pump SEWS and Photos a

Calculation 52091-C-025

'i]

l 1

O 1

520cli-c- %. - _ _ _ _ _

Qq Status y

n y

l Sheet 1 of

!~

SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

Plant Name: Monticello Unit:

1 l

PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. P-202A/ C Equip. Class Vertical oumo g a. As ? 'Lo c.C j

' Equipment Description RHR oumos (2 total) l Equipment Location: Bldg. BS Floor El. S_QS' Room, Row / Col 52 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. P-p f4 i c L u C V'DS

/0VItJv/dk Seismic input Elevation DW PART B. PUMP EVALUATION 69me 6 i' 1.

Is pump of good seismic design?

@N U N/A Base flexibility /

4' 4Y

  • b ** "

i C i gs 7 -201 C M cA44E'- M C*'* % s D" Y ""

i

. ~

Differential structural motion /

Nozzles loadings - CNAh-htk6 %G Unsupported componentsr J

2.

No other pump concerns?

hN U N/A is pump itself screened out?

hN U

PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION isi cf A., E

@fdd 3 e 6 %

hlg.

1.

Is strength assessment based on:

E" edge ds'%be.

gg

. Judgement (supportr'd by generic analysis)?

J Specific analysis? b C=tc. 00, St oSt -C -02.6 CA Other?

Other

2. ~ls strength adequate?

YhU N/A 3.

is stiffness adequate?

Y N U N/A l GV 2HD299nbNP-sows

6209 \\-C -006 M

Sheet 2 of i

SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

O Equip. ID No. P-202A/ C Equip. Class Vertical oumo 4.

No other anchorage concerns?

hN U N/A is anchorage adequate?

YhU PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.

Is pump free from influence by adjacent hU N/A elements?

Pump contains soft targets bd Ov & Y M 6 WE'd Purnp contains essential relays N Ger b EA0 v C.%k, 34 g Flexibility of connected lines 05-uNc+

A/c, U s :t \\/ -kC-5 00-w V -AC-9 os e c h, eel ce wet /st :tt%e' Collapse of nearby equipments or structures t

Masonry block walls (Jo jgit c+st, eo.'l un't( u e g.Cp m

' T ON $0 rww,

OY 2.

No potential sources could flood or N U N/A spill onto pump hN 3.

No other interaction concerns?

U N/A is pump free from interaction effects?

Y U

DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets,if necessary) hews 4 ows-hogk c6%L

%xe., %k :M e. ~ 6/n* c$

C e,+

h t'"*- V

-- --.;- _y 4

., f'CLe wg "*

1 f

_.g i

-w

.t l

I

~

l i

[ 4 '-

{" ~

) e.

c I}

I i

,J.-a,.______

/

f g

[%

b--

g 4\\

~ {-(V l* %

./

j, Q

3

\\6 LDI j

s iMos l

2Ho299nbNP-sews l

SZocil-C -006 95 SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

O Equip. ID No. P-202A/ C Equip. Class Vertical oumo O

~

l.

l L

IS PUMP FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION / ANALYSIS?

Doct, euW ne_

YES NO Evaluated by:

N Date:

I45 M

  1. 'M'%

Evaluated by:

IMil Date:

2HD299nbNP-sewe.

C.___________..__________________.__._._...

52Onl-C -oDS B261 Status Y

N U

Sheet 1 of SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

Plant Name: Monticello Unit:

1 PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. P-202B/ D Equip. Class Vertical oumo Equipment Description RHR oumos (2 totah 11 0

  • Equipment Location: Bldg. EB Floor El. SRD' Room, Row / Col El C

ge*

Gt 5 t.(o *#t l MC+4r Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Rm g A. '#

O/p3

/yyu/x/dA Seismic input Elevation P lo '

PART B. PUMP EVALUATION 1.

Is pump of good seismic design?

hN U N/A

^lT ko\\ e-d o g Base flexibility es 4 yg 4 %r, g

/]

Shaft restraints

(.)

Casings ot-Differential structural motion et pu Nozzles loadings Pcsyt,, geHt.r Sw cwag. pJ/ rehte to%

Unsupported components ou 2.

No other pump concerns?

N U N/A is pump itself screened out?

hN U,

PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1.

Is strength assessment based on:

b#{$fA "D

W n ti4t. res.it e No l

Judgement (supported by generic analysis;7 Specific analysis? ht Con.UD StoRI-C'Oh' A

Other?

Other 2.

Is strength adequate?

YhU N/A 3.

Is stiffness adequate?

hN U N/A 1

-( j 2HD299nbNP-sews l

Sheet 2 of

/

SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

O Equip. ID No. P-202B/ D Equip. Class Vertical oumo 4.

No other anchorage concerns?

hN U N/A is anchorage adequate?

Y U

PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.

Is pump free from influence by adjacent YhU N/A elements?

Pump contains soft targets J

Pump contains essential relays VO Flexibility of connected lines ou Collapse of nearby equipments or structures

\\1 - AC - 4 A/C unM 4t.a.beA6%

Masonry block walls 2.

No potential sources could flood or hN U N/A spill onto pump hN

{g 3.

No other interaction concerns?

U N/A is pump free from interaction effects?

YhU DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets,if necessary) gjc y tw sf - A C tt Ame r : cca Nr W Wer V^* tJo-V '7150 ' AC.-E A 3,

I L - 0 8%

p w% t l

Lt -o ct i

N' ~ -

17,*.09 i - pasA

(.see.stv+pe g l

+

~

't.

T\\ ts Co n ne c%'*V e

,c a

\\l "* U W t

/$'-

V, L L q.;; 3.. 5 q p

i

~

q n--

,(./

hd

}

g '."c \\

l 7 i.

l i- (, v f

e.-

(

2HD299nbNP-sewe

92B91-C.-06 Sheet 3 of b

a SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

Equip. ID No. P-202B/ D Equip. Class Vertical oumo Doth I

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

\\

N.

\\'N

'N N

N

\\

l 1

u 3,.5/g 9 L

'p N..

..w.

l

, D s.v,

n"

  • g a.;

.z 3

{y 1

s s

j

's

  • dd 3- _ 9 3 9 ~ y. r v Q.

N

(

t Pr(t * *

(956 I

y4L

\\

l l

IS PUMP FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION / ANALYSIS?

- b c.k=n.34 YES NO X

- h/L ve"i Evaluated by:

ISH Date:

l- % -SI Evaluated by:

D'r'-H Date:

6'M'%

l 2HD299nbNP-sews I-

O 1

l l

t l

l x.

l 3

' fld 2

h ()[-

kff

'i

"' E '

,E4

}[. 7 C e

Q gyC

-y i

h

,jf,

!{if

,{

3.t_..,. 7, iIT2 "I.

~

n

'k y

.[.);;,

y:14

?

RHR Pump P-2028 i

I O

P:\\5228308\\ PHOTO. DOC /nb l

O py

\\

f

.,[

1%

I RHR Pump P-202C r

ses

52bn I +o6 l

Status Y

N U MSC l

4 1

Sheet 1 of l

.Q Q

- SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

I Plant Name: Monticello Unit:

1 l

l l

PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. P-208i!r k Equip. Class Vertical oumo Equipment Description CS oumo l

Equipment Location: Bldg. BB Floor El. 898' Room, Row / Col El L

i.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. Os m n, G J. e6%

C V DS

/o y,a vi k l

t u

Seismic Input Elevation Ts%Y PART B. PUMP EVALUATION G4 c% Y" IC~d $

1.

Is pump of good seismic design?

@N U N/A l

Base flexibility.

l i

l._/"~'

Shaft restraints (obg i

l,(

Casings Ne AW\\ v.9.E 0 0~ okcA \\S Differential structural motion 4M m '. 5. ':: V W 6 A, C h l

Nozzles loadings d % M g 4 5 1 g, ll %

l Unsupported components 2.

No other pump concerns?

hN U N/A is pump itself screened out?

N U f

PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1.

Is strength assessment based on:

l Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?

Specific analysis? Scv Cuc,. ve. 51o% - C -OL5 A

Other?

Other 2.

Is strength adequate?

YhU N/A 3.

Is stiffness adequate?

N U N/A oV 2HD299nbNP sows L______________.___

7..

92oc11 - c-oos

$26h Sheet 2 of

(

SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS 1 l

l-Equip. ID No. P-2088k Equip. Class Vertical oumo s

4.

No other anchorage concerns?

hU N/A ls anchorage adequate?

YhU i

l PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.

Is pump free from influence by adjacent Y

U, /A elements?

Pump contains soft targets bv6 cu t-pc, vat e-Ce b\\ %

Pump contains essential relays 'Jo h 68.-= s' car &<

tteEVo w ? 2.02.4/c.

Flexibility of connected lines ot Collapse of nearby equipments or structures Masonry block walls Wsu 2.

No potential sources could flood or hN U N/A

{

spill onto pump hN 3.

No other interaction concerns?

U N/A l

ls pump free from interaction effects?

Y U

1 DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use additional sheets,if necessary) l l

l l

i O

2HD299nbNP-sews

520cil-C oos 4

SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

O Equip. ID No.- P-208& A Equip. Class Vertical oumo l

l l

I l

LO i

l IS PUMP FREE OF NEED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION / ANALYSIS?

J YES NO Evaluated by:

DM Date:

i-16' Evaluated by:

DM4 Date:

I'M'D l

2HD299nbNP-sews 1___________________________.__________

________________J

N Status Y

N U

b Sheet 1 of O

SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS)

Plant Name: Monticello Unit:

1 PART A. DESCRIPTION Equip. ID No. P-208495 Equip. Class Vertical oumo Equipment Description CSoumo 3

b ' ti Equipment Location: Bldg. HB Floor El. B_95' Room, Row / Col 52 9

.. y., x e, <

G E 3 4 %co 1 Mp 200 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

O.. n G; de- - (Pay r VD S /oy/dy/k Seismic input Elevation PART B. PUMP EVALUATION 1.

Is pump of good seismic design?

hN U N/A Base flexibility ow Shaft restraints vs. e d -t w ee.,-

ow A

Casings

/

Differential structural motion o b Nozzles loadings Cev r 9:, e. 5,4p o

  • s. ec\\d d N

i h'~

"# * ?

b%t. t.t.h t " Wn Unsupported components ow 2.

No other pump concerns?

hN U N/A is pump itself screened out?

hU PART C. ANCHORAGE EVALUATION 1.

Is strength assessment based on:

Judgement (supported by generic analysis)?

J Specific analysis? he Cou.tJo, SWu-C-ots l

Other?

Other 2.

Is strength adequate?

Y U N/A 3.

Is stiffness adequate?

hN U N/A k' l b.I).

b"CM 4CdS"

  • bYD Eh "kE j

?# hrm F

(11 Z%

g.1)t1

.g 2HD299nbNP-sews

Sheet 2 of j

o SCREENING AND EVALUATION SHEET (SEWS) i.

Equip. ID No. P-208A 6 Equip. Class Vertical oumo 4.

No other anchorage concerns?

hN U N/A

{

Is anchorage adequate?

Y U

PART D. SYSTEMS INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.

Is' pump free from influence by adjacent Y h u N/A l

elements?

Pump contains soft targets NO Pump conta:ns essential relays tJ o Flexibility of connected lines ob i

Collapse of nearby equipments or structures Mc, v~W - Sa b toll /D.

Masonry block walls Nea 2.

No potential sour'ces could flood or hN U N/A spill onto pump hN

' 3.

No other interaction concerns?

U N/A la pump free from interaction effects?

U l

DESCRIBE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS INDICATED BY NO OR UNSATISFACTORY (Use l

additional sheets, if necessary) l

[.

i I

)

l 0

I I

2HD299nbNP-eews

O j' _ ~

.g?,

t C:

.t, m

g, SY i

4

=

f, p..

'i~)

g I

N.M-~hi Y[*'

h2

- h,.!f O

4 J.

7 a

fg:

r, Ni m

1 e

g, - l s

w 9

~

n

,4

.,(,

'T y *1 3

.Se e

Core Spray Pump O

P:\\5228308iPHOTO. DOC /nb

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20248C292&oldid=3889624"