ML20247H002
| ML20247H002 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1989 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20247G999 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8909190190 | |
| Download: ML20247H002 (89) | |
Text
__ _ _ _
I FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
- JULY, 1989 IllII'
~. %
,e
./
f,!
/
Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division Special Services
$$0"$0$$0 $$E!$E!!w R
FDC
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PREPARED BY:
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SPECIAL SERVICES JULY, 1989 b
il i,
L i
I i
Pursuit of ex c elle n c e is a n attitude...
O it in volves w is d o m and sound judgment...
it is e lif e t im e, c a re e r-lo n g commitment...
'it is a wsy of lif e... i t is doing the job right the fist tim e, every tim e.
It is in n e r-dire c t e d, not the result of-external yressure, it is our o w n s e lf ^ w o r t h - w h o we are and the p rid e and s a tisf a ctio n that com es from being the right kin d of person, nat just in deing the right things.
James J.
O'Connor J
TABLE OF CONTENTS
? Mal Distribution....................
iv Preface.......................
1 Purpose......................
2 Scope.......................
3 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs.......
4 Performance Indicator Graphs............
8 Escalated Enforcement History...........
63 Significant Items of Interest........... 66 Definitions....................
67 Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goals.................
78 Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates.... 80 Production and Operation Records.......... 81 Data Source.................... 82 References..................... 84 I
DISTRIBUTION I
V. W. Anderson J. T. Gleason J. T. O'Connor R. L. Andrews L. V. Goldberg W. W. Orr W. R. Bateman M. J. Guinn E. C. Pape K. L. Belek R. H. Guy T. L. Patterson A. D. Bilau M. C. Hendrickson F. M. Petersen C. N. Bloyd K. R. Henry G. R. Peterson J. P. Bobba K. C. Holthaus S. M. Peterson C. J. Brunnert L. G. Huliska D. R. Pettit M. W. Butt R. L. Jaworski R. L. Phelps R. H. Cagle R. A. Johansen T. J. Pirruccello C. A. Carlson J. W. Johnson W. R. Plowman G. S. Cary D. W. Jones S. C. Presler G. R. Chatfield W. C. Jones T. M. Reisdorff A. G. Christensen J. D. Kecy A. W. Richard R. P. Clemens R. C. Kellogg G. M. Riva R. G. Conner J. D. Keppler T. J. Sandene J. L. Connolley D. D. Kloock F. C. Scofield G. M. Cook G. J. Krause L. G. Sealock P. J. Cotton G. A. Krieser H. J. Sefick S. R. Crites L. J. Kripal R. W. Short D. W. Dale J. B. Kuhr E. L. Skaggs R. C. DeMeulmeester L. T. Kusek F. K. Smith W. D. Dermyer R. C. Learch R. L. Sorenson R. D. DeYoung R. E. Lewis li. T. Spetman D. E. Dirrim R. C. Liebentritt D. E. Spires J. A. Drahota B. R. Livingston K. E. Steele M. O. Elzway J. H. MacKinnon W.
Steele R. G. Eurich G. D. Mamoran C. J. Sterba H. J. Faulhaber J. W. Marcil H. F. Sterba K. S. Fielding N. L. Marfice R. K. Stuitz J. J. Fisicaro D. J. Matthews G. A. Teeple J. J. Fluehr J. M. Mattice M. A. Tesar J. J. Foley T. J. McIvor J. W. Tills F. F. Franco M. L. Meador D. R. Trausch M. T. Frans R. F. Mehaffey C. F. Vanecek J. F. W. Friedrichsen K. A. Miller L. P. Walling R. M. Fussell R. A. Miser J. M. Waszak S. K. Gambhir K. J. Morris W. O. Weber J. K. Gasper D. C. Mueller G. R. Williams W. G. Gates R. J. Mueller S. J. Willrett M. O. Gautier M. W. Nichols D. D. Wittke C. W. Norris iv
PREFAC'E PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS Two indicators have been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report in July. One of the new indicators is shown in the Maintenance Section and the other is shown in the Chemistry and Radiological Protection Section.
The new Maintenance indicator is the Maintenance Work Order Backloo (corrective non-outace maintenance) Indicator found on page 33. This indicator shows the number of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that exist at the end of the reporting period. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to address a maintenance concer.n identified in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 36.
The new Chemistry and Radiological Protection indicator is the In-line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-service Indicator found on page 38. This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting period. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
Two indicators have been changed for the month of July. One of the indicators that has been changed is shown in the Maintenance Section and the other is shown in the Quality Assurance Section.
The indicator that has been changed in the Maintenance Section is the Craft Work Activity Indicator found on page 30. This indicator now shows the percentage of a type of work performed by each craft during the reporting month involving plant personnel only. The percentage of time that each craft works on maintenance work requests (MWR's) is also shown.
The indicator that has been changed in the Quality Assurance Section is the DR/0R's Issued Versus Significant DR/0R's issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Versus LER's Reported Indicator found on page 62. This indicator now shows the monthly and year-to-date totals of Significant DR/QR's as well as DR/QR's, NRC violations, and LER's.
i 1
i
)
1. - ___- _- __ _ _ -
PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The
'information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing
-and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.
0 2-
SCOPE In order for the Performance Indicator Program.to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program:
Select the data which most ' effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.
Present the data in a straight forward. graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.
Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.
Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter.
This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with. industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report..
PERFORMANCE. INDICATORS IF9EX TO GRAPHS INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS i
Forced Outage Rate........................ 8 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical......... 9 Unplanned Safety System Actuations...............
10 Gross Heat Rate.........................
11 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
12 Fuel. Reliability Indicator...................
13 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
14 Volune of Low-level Solid Radioactive' Waste...........
15 Disabling' Injury Frequency Rate.................
16
PERFORMANCE INDI.CATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
OPERATIONS O
Forced Outage Rate........................ 8 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical.........
9 Unplanned Safety System Actuations...............
10 Gross Heat Rate.........................
11 Equivalent Availability Factor.................
12 Fuel Reliability Indicator...................
13 Daily Thermal Output......................
17 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours........
18 Operations and Maintenance Budget................
19 Document Review.........................
20 MAINTENANCE Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands)...........
21 Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands)............
22 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders...........
23 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown................
24 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old..........
25 Ratio of Highest Priority MWO's to Total MWO's Completed....
26 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............
27 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue..............
28 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments........
29 Craft Work Activity.......................
30 l _ _ _ _ _ -
___a
r.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED)
Maintenance Overtime......................
31 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)........
32 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage).....
33 Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS)
Reportable Failures........................
34 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)............
14 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste...........
15 Secondary System Chemistry...................
35 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit....
36 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits....
37 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service..........
38 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure..............
39 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations.............
40 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building................
41 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..
42 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..
43 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts..............
44 Spare Parts Inventory Value...................
45 Spare Parts Issued.......................
46 _ _ -__ --___-_ ____ -___- - _ _ _
-_7____-_________
5 L
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS ~
(CONTINUED)
DESIGN' ENGINEERING' Ou'tstanding Modifications....................
47.
l Temporary Modifications......................
48 I
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
' Disabling Injury Frequency Rate..................-16
-l Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate.............
49 I
Minor Injury Cases per Month..................
50 HUMAN RESOURCES Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs...........
51 J
Personnel Turnover Rate.....................
52
. Staffing Level.........................
53 I
TRAINING AND OVALIFICATION SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio...............
54 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio................
55 R0 Hot License Exams.....................-.
56 Hotlines............................
57 Classroom (Instructor) Hours..................
58 Total Hours of Student Training.................
59 OUALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours.........
60 Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old.........
61 DR/QR's Issued versus Significant DR/QR's Issued versus.....
62 NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported._ _ ____-_ - ___-_ _ _ -
- Forced Outage Rate 6
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 5-GOOD 4-4 R
a t
3-e 2
O----O -
-O
- e--C -
-O O
O
-O-O O---O 1-G C
B C
C 0
0 Q
E0
\\
0
\\
0
'86
'87
'88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 FORCED OUTAGE RATE No Forced outage hours were logged for the Fort Calhoun Station during July, 1989. The present 12 month average forced outage rate is 0.0%.
The June, 1989, Performance Indicators Reports stated that 174.6 forced outage hours were-logged for the month of May, 1989. After engineering and plant review it was determined that the actual value should be zero forced outage hours. This change in the number of forced outage hours also changed the forced outage rate from 3.1% reported in the June, 1989, Performance Indicators Report to an actual value of 0.0%
The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.0%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
The 1989 goal for forced outage rate is 2.1% and is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1989 performance goals can be found on page 78. _ - - _ _ _ - _ - -
5 E Reactor Scram
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-S 3-GOOD r
4 a
m 2-I 1-e-----e----e.---e
-e
- e e-
-e 9----g
- c - -.e 0
0 O
3 3
m m
m m
m m
86 87 88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in July. It has been 1,125 days since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurred on July 2, 1986.
The 1989 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at 1.
The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
-g.
L__--__-----.----_--_-------------
Safety System Actuations
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3
A c
t a
GOOD t
1-2-
+
o
.n
!~
s 1-0 0
0 0
m m
m
,86,87 '88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun, Jul 1988 1989 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS There were no unplanned safety system actuations in July, 1989.
The 1989 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. This goal is based on past performance at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten percentile value for 4
the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of r.uclear plants for this indicator.
l l Monthly Gross Heat Rate
- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 10750-GOOD
+
B 10500-0-- - \\e---9--A
[G-0 0 ---G---G----O u
10284 10270 K I10014.
W 10250-H 10000- G-G-B g
g_e_e_
e o
o o
o e
il-9750 I
'86
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 GROSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station during July, 1989 was 10,742 BTU /KWH. The high gross heat rate value for the month of July was due to high river water temperatures.
The gross heat rate values for this cycle of operation will be increased due to the removal of the first stage of the high pressure turbine.
The 1989 year to date gross heat rate value is 10,552 BTU /KWH. The 1989 goal is 10,500 BTU /KWH. This goal value of 10,500 BTU /KWH is the theoretical best heat rate that the Fort Calhoun Station can obtain in its present configuration.
The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,989 BTU /KWH. - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
l l Monthly'EAF
^
- 12 Month Average EAF
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD 0 Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-85 Q ---G-Q -$
0-Q
-O g- --g--- -g-u m
m m
m m
m u
66 P
60-s e
Q 40-20-0
'86 '87
'88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) was reported as 91.9% for the month of July.
The 1989 EAF goal is 84.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 50.6%.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
5-Fuel' Reliability. Indicator m
l
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal
-& Industry Upper 10 Percentile l
4-n a
n O
C 3-16 u
GOOD i
+
e 2-r a
m 1-G- -- e-
&___e
. s___e c
. c = _g___g___.g 3
0 C
6 C
G C
4xp 9
p
'86 '87 '88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju'l 1988 1989 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as.005 nanocuries/ gram for the month of July. This indicates that there have been no fuel failures since startup in January, 1989.
The high FRI figures resulted from a change in the way that the FRI is calculated. The FRI was previously calculated using a constant letdown flow rate for the entire month, but the actual letdown flow rate is now used.
The 1989 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram.
The fuel reliability indicator industry / gram.
upper ten percentile value is 0.07 nanocuries The Fort Calhoun is currently perfonning in-the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator. ___ _____--_-
Personnel Radiation Exposure 388 400
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 300 GOOD 272 4
C O
Q R
\\,
E 200-x M
'd O
O O
O O
O O
O 129
~
l 100-O
- ~~~~9. - & '- *,,,g.
. -& -9...-&
-O 00
'86
'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 9
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
During July, 1989, 7.8 man-rea was recorded by pencil dosimeters worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The monthly cumulative exposure goal for June was 87.5 man-rem while the actual recorded exposure through June was 63.7 man-rem.
The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year.
1 - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500-
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 10000-C u
bi GOOD c 7500-
+
F e
O----e -
O e
0---e O
O G--- e----e----e t 5000-4454 4096
\\
C C
C C
C C
C C
C 2500-E E
0
'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE The above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount cf waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial.
Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet):
Amount Shipped in July 0.0 Amount in Temporary Storage 594.0 1989 Cumulative Amount Shipped 4624.0 1989 Goal 6000.0 There are two reasons for the very high amount of low-level solid radioactive waste that was shipped in January,1989. One reason is that the 1988 refueling outage produced a large volume of radioactive waste. Also, shipping of low-level solid radioactive waste stopped in October,1988, due to samples being sent off-site for isotope analysis that could not be completed at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten' percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(:
l
-H-Disabling Injury Frequency Rate
-G-Fort'Calhoun Goal
+
3 O Industry Upper 10. Percentile e
2-GOOD R
a t.
4
'1.3-Bl, 1-
.4 O----O --O -
3--
O O---e~
' O --O--s---C
-O O
O T,87
,88-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec.
m m
m m
m m
m m
w 86 Rates for 1986, 1989 1987, and 1988-are shown for the month of July DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE (LOST. TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
There were zero disabling injuries reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in July. The total number of disabling injuries in 1989 is two.
The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was based on one disabling injury occurring in 1989.
The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 04. -
a
-+- Thermal Output
- Technical Specification Limit
-s Fort Calhoun Goal 1500 14950-O-G-O-O-O O-CH}O-O-O
?
v M
e 9
a w 1490-a t
t s
1485-1480 1
7 14 21 28 July DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross hatched area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant operation.
The percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station was approximately 100% for the month of July..
l t
n O
.6-Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1
.5-
'4~
.12 R
GOOD a
.3 -
4 e
.2-i
.1 -
O O
'86
'87
'88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan F'e'b Mar Apr May Jun Ju'l 1988 1989 EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There. were zero forced outage hours reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during the month of July,1989. The current value for the number of equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours for 1989 is zero.
The last equipment forced outage occurred in 1986 and was due to a failed electrical inverter.
The June, 1989, Performance Indicators Report stated that there was one equipment forced outage during the month of May, 1989. The actual number of equipment forced outages during May was zero. This change in the number of equipment forced outages also changed the equipment forced outage rate i
l from 0.29 reported in the June, 1989, Performance Indicators Report to an actual value of zero. _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- Actual Operations Expenditures
-M-Operations 5udget o
M f 60-
/
1d l$40-o1 na s r 20-s 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 15-
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures 12-l Maintenance Budget M
i 1d 9 lo ilol 6 na s r 3-s 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time for collecting and processing the data.
The budget year to date for operations was 33.6 million dollars for June while the actual cumulative expenditures for June totaled 39.0 million dollars.
The budget year to date for maintenance was 5.9 million dollars for June while the actual cumulative expenditures for June totaled 7.0 million dollars.
- l. _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
[
500-
--+- Documents Scheduled for Review
-M-Documents Reviewed
- Overdue Documents 400-ND 300-c bu em
+
re
" 200-ot f s-N
\\
100-e
\\
\\
f N
j
../
/
- - - :- x g /,,,-
~. X-X Y
'O Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of documents reviewed for the reporting month, _ scheduled for review, and the document reviews that are overdue. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the ~ Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual. The documents included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the Technical Data Book, the Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures, Operating Procedures, Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, Operating Instructions, the Radiological Protection Manual, the Chemistry Manual, the Fuel Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures.
During July there were 93 document reviews completed while 82 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of July, there were 158 document reviews overdue. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
I-100-l Diesel Generator No. 1 98[
-x-Diesel Generator No. 2
-e-Fort Calhoun. Goal 96-G-
e
-- s -
O----C
--e O f ----s--
3---- c e
94-x x
x x
m X
X
.X X
X N
92-p e
90-r c
e 88-n A-86-G D 84-82-i-
80 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 DG RELIABILITY LAST 100 DEMANDS Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
Diesel generator D-2 had a failure during the month of July and now has a 93 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability is 95%.
+=
l Diesel Generator No. 1
-X-Diesel Generator No. 2
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 100-l' i
l l
l l
95-
. O-
-O-O O ----e-----G-----e----e-----e----e-----g-----e P
/'
\\
e
/
\\
c
/-
\\
r
/
s
[90-X X-X X
X
,M X
n t ^
GOOD 80 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr.
May Jun Jul 1988 1989 DG RELIABILITY LAST 20 DEMANDS Diesel generator D-1 has not had a failure in the last 20 demands on the unit. The present reliability factor for D-1.is 100%
over the last 20 demands.
Diesel generator D-2 has had 2 failures in the last 20 demands.
D-2 has a 90%
reliability factor over the last 20 demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 presently meets this goal.
800-
, May 1989 June 1989 I
IJuly 1989
)
0 600-t Fort Calhoun Goal (zero MWO's > 12 months old) r 400-n 9
i 0
s d
I$
e mi r
200-
=
]
s Hi!
=
id 52 5
"==
0-0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12
>12 Age in Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (NON-0UTAGE)
As of July 31, 1989, there were a total of 1,466 outstanding non-outage maintenance work orders. The above bar chart breaks down the maintenance work orders by their age in months and trends each category over the previous three months.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero outstanding maintenance work orders greater than 12 months old. As of July 31, the Fort Calhoun Station had 221 maintenance work orders greater than 12 months old. __
1500-tiay 1989 June 1989 j
1200-1 IJuly 1989
~
Fort Calhoun Goal 900-
~llG i
y l
600-
' m i{d.
im 300-E
~
E iiii 0-C Total Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Safety High MW0s
> 3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related MW0s MW0s MW0s
> 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (NON-0UTAGE)
A new goal was established for the Maintenance Work Order Breakdown indicator in March. The goal is to have zero MWO's older than the average age of MWO's that are greater than three months old. There is presently 1,466 total MW0's with 942 open MWO's greater than three months old. The July goal is to have less than 584 open MWO's that are greater than three months old.
The total number of open non-outage maintenance work orders as of July 31, 1989, is shown, along with a breakdown by several key categories..
- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old
+ Industry Upper Quartile 80-60-P e
0 O
O O
O O
O O
O c 40-f n
GOOD 20-4 O
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-0UTAGE)
The Fort Calhoun Station corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old increased in July to 64.3%. The total number of outstanding maintenance work orders increased from 1,454 in June to 1,466 in July. The number of outstanding maintenance work orders greater than 3 months increased from 857 in June to 942 in July.
The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 44.1%. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
I 40-
- Ratio of Highest Priority M0s to Total M0s Completed I
30-p e
r c 20-GOOD e
n
+
t 10-O Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 RATIO OF HIGHEST PRIORITY MWO'S TO TOTAL MWO'S COMPLETED (NON-0UTAGE)
The purpose of this indicator is to monitor the ability to effectively prioritize, plan, and schedule corrective maintenance. A higher ratio indicates that a comparatively greater number of emergency type maintenance activities have been required to support plant operation.
In July, the ratio of highest priority MWO's to total MW0's completed decreased to 5.6%. The reason for this decrease was that there were a total of 214 MWO's completed during the month with only 12 of these being of highest priority.
The industry upper quartile for the ratio of highest priority MWO's to total MW0's completed is no longer available. This indicator was discontinued for 1989 by INPO. __
)
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 4-Industry Upper Quartile 90-
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 80-70-b 60-O--
O O
O =----C
---O-O Q
Q-g 50-O O
O O
O O
O O
t
^
40-
~
GOOD 30-20 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-0UTAGE)
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance -to total completed non-outage maintenance.
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station increased to 67.2% in July.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.
The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.4%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper quartile of nuclear plant performance in this area.
- Preventive Maintenance Items'0verdue 4-
-&- Industry Opper Quartile
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 3-P e
GOOD r
C 2-e n
t
!j.
o o
o C
O O
O O
--C O
O O
--C e-----O 1-l l
l l
l 0
0 0
0 O
d I
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require.
The preventive maintenance items overdue value rematt:d :t 0.0% for the month of July.
There were a total of 856 preventive maintenance items completed during the month with zero preventive maintenance items not completed within the allowable grace period.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue.
The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.5%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper quartile for this indicator. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
E Total Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service M a Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month l
IOut-of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month 35 Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments
^
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments 3~
pl GOOD y 25-g$
4
\\
20-j-
ll j
15-
?
l U j
Ill l
es g
I' 1
j 10-r g
g
[ j q
y yg i
l-h j ___ $ D 1 f_d H 2
?
N
[
kid t
23 (
1h y
m 1
3 __.
n i
g
[
q s
i Aug Sep Oct idov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul i
1988 1989 NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS The Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Indicator was changed for the month of May, 1989. In addition to the previously shown total number of control room instruments out-of-service, this indicator now shows the number of out-of-service control room instruments that were corrected during the reporting month and the number of control room instruments that were added to the out-of-service control room instruments list during the reporting month. This change is due to the Control Room Instruments Project established on April 18, 1989 to prioritize and expedite the resolutica of out-of-service control room instruments.
i There was a total 15 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of July. During the month of July, 6 out-of-service instruments were corrected and 3 instruments were added to the out-of-service instruments list.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments.
The industry upper quartile value for %e number of out-of-service control room instruments is 9. {
t i
EM GM,
l+t EE A:
N.
A*:
g z;:
e 1
8
~.
w=w p
PE I&C Modifications (M03) l lMaint. Work Orders (MWO)
\\
j llll Unestimated (UNE)
N sf$ Preventive Maintenance (PM)
't Training (TRA) j
~CalibrationProcedures(CP) fIlSurveillanceTests(ST)
/
E Maint. Work Requests (MWR)
CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY This indicator has been changed for the montii of July. The percentage of work shown is for plant personnel only. Also, Maintenance Work Requests (MWR) are now represented.
The Craft Work Activity Indicator shows the percentage of a type of work each craft (plant personnel only) performed during the month. The crafts that are represented in this indicator are Electrical Maintenance (EM),
General Maintenance (GM), Mechanical Maintenance (MM), Pressure Equipment (PE), and Instrumentation and Control (I&C).
WORK ACTIVITY (IN PERCENT)
CRAFT MOD MWO UNE PM TRA CP ST MWR EM 0.00 39.69 6.19 23.11 15.06 0.79 8.68 6.48 GM 1.91 31.30 19.00 4.06 15.71 0.00 0.00 28.03 MM 0.00 31.10 28.90 10.56 16.06 0.00 2.82 10.56 PE 10.89 53.13 5.79 17.75 12.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 I&C 0.00 31.80 14.13 7.86 14.38 20.87 10.96 0.00 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _
- Maintenance Overtime 60-GOOD P
4 e
r c 40 e
n t
20-0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.
The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was 25.1% during the month of July, 1989.
l 100-1 IIdentified Incidents 0:n Incident Reports Opened E In ident Reports Closed N
80-u m
b e
r 60-o f
I 40-i d
n e
n t
20-s
[
j 0
F F
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 PROCEDURAL, NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of incidents identified (not yet written as an IR) each month involving maintenance, the number of incident reports opened each month involving maintenance, and the number of incident reports closed each month involving maintenance.
Total Description May June Julv Year to date Incidersts Identified 2
2 1
125 Incident Reports Opened 10 4
6 130 Incident Reports Closed 6
6 0
57 900
-K-Open MWO's
~
-G-Fort Calhoun Goal 800-L o.700-Nf X
u-l 0M b W 600-O-
O-O
'O O.
'G---- O O
O----O O
---O e0
- r. '
500-400-300 Jul..Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-Jan.
Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 MAINTENANC'E WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE)
The Maintenance Work Order Backlog Indicator has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of July, 1989.
This indicator shows the number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are open at the end of the reporting month.
The goal for this indicator is to have less than 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.
This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend Safety Enhancement
. Program (SEP)ItemNo.36. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
100-1 ISuspected NPRDS Failures Confirmed NPRDS Failures
- Average CE Plant Confirmed NPRDS Failures 80-60-F a
i 1
40-u I
e u
5 20 y
$4 i
i l
[,1s
=
5 i -
l f
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)
REPORTABLE FAILURES The suspected NPRDS reportable failures are identified by possible equipment failures on the applicable Maintenance Work Order (MWO). Only after the MWO has been completed can the determination be made whether the equipment has failed or not. The entire 12 month graph is updated on a monthly basis to reflect completed MW0's.
In July, 1989 there were O confirmed NPRDS re rtable failures and 33 suspected NPRDS fa lures.
The average value for confirmed reportable equipment failures at similar Combustion Engineering (CE) designed plants is 8.8 failures per unit. The Fort Calhoun Station has a 12 month average value of 9.9 confirmed NPRDS failures.
I --_--- _ -- _ -- ----- _ _ _ _ _ _ a
- Secondary System CPI 1.5-
-O-Industry Upper Quartile 1-l
+
l--+
l l -
l
-+
g GOOD
.36 I
- 5-E0 A
C O
O O
'87
'88 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1988 1989 300'
- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 200-H GOOD 0
+
{ 100-31 ggg 0
0
'87
'88 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1958 1989 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI),
i is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The monthly CPI is plotted relative to the EPRI chemistry limit for CPI. The l
CPI was reported as 0.41 for the month of June. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is 0.20.
The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidelines, tracks the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. In June, 1989, there were 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> outside owners group guidelines. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is no longer available. This increase is due to the startup that occurred in May.
The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
s 0'
- Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit l
6-P e
r c
4 3.0 E
I 2-.
GOOD
+
0
'87
'88 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun.
1988 1989 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.
The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0.6% for the month of June.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. ____-_______-a
-++- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit O Industry Upper Quartile 40-GOOD
+
30-H
~
o u
20-r s
~
C O
O O
O O
O O
O
\\
10-
\\
\\
\\
0 0
O O
'87
'88 u'l A'ug Sep Oct Nov D'ec Jan F'e'b Mar Apr May Jun 1988 1989 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.
The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits for the month of June,1989 was reported as zero.
The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this area. __ -
e i a Number of Out-of-Service Instruments 30-I
" 20-mt b
=
y e u r m e
o n ZZ 10-f t
=
s
=
0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE The In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Indicator has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of July, 1989.
This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month.
The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident SamplingSystem(PASS).
At the end of July there were a total of 23 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Eighteen of these instruments were from the Secondary System and five were from PASS.
' t
5000-1 IMonth E Quarter OPPD E Year Limit 4000-3000-m R
E M
2000-1000-0 June 1989 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure graph is one month behind the reporting period due to the lag time involved with collecting and calculating the radiation exposure for the station.
During June,1989 an individual accumulated 211 mrem which was the highest individual exposure at the Fort Calhoun Station for the month.
The maximum individual exposure so far for the second quarter of 1989 was 211 mrem.
The maximuas individual exposure for the year so far was 894 mrem.
The maximum accumulated 1988 individual exposure was 2,371 mrem, received by a visiting j
contractor during the refueling outage.
The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual i
radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.
Monthly Contaminations 500-i
- Cumulative Contaminations H
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal
- 400, 4-Industry Upper Quartile
~357 P
e r
s 300-o GOOD
+
n e
200-161 I
--l 100-
/-C C
C C
C C
C C
O O
0 g...e
-O v
O
-O
n. -O
-O __,4..-&
0
'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS There was a total of 6 skin and clothing contaminations reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during July, 1989. These contaminations were all clothing contaminations.
There have been a total of 101 skin and clothing contaminations so far in 1989. The 1989 goal for skin and clothing is 110 contaminations.
The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually..
- Decontaminated' Auxiliary Building 100-80-P 60-c e
n t
40-A GOOD 20-O Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
'00 1989 DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage.
As of July 31, 1989, 75.0% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated.
I l
l Monthly R'adioactive Gas Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged
-G-Cumulative Goal 800-GOOD 576 C
600-u r
432 C
O C
O
-G O
O O
O- -C
-O-O Ie 400-s 200-0
'86
'87 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1988. A total of 785.0 curies have been released to the environment from January through December of 1988. The Fort Calhoun Station goal was 450 curies for this indicator.
The high amount of gaseous radioactive waste released to the environment in October was caused by the purging of containment in preparation for the 1988 refueling outage.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
I IMonthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged
-e-Cumulative Goal 228 250-180 168 C
200-
- I u-r 150-G000 i
e 100-
+
s 50-
'I I'
I I
85
'86
'87 0
i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 988 1
192
'144 i f 132 1G 150-i Io laE ilf olf 100-nol snu 50-se n
'l il l'
'l il II H
I-0
'85
'86
'87 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for 1988. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment totaled 231 curies and 147.6 billions of gallons of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) from January through December 1988. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1988 was 225 curies.
The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months..
0-
- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 8-GOOD P
6-4 e
r C
e n
t 4-2-
O Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-00TAGE)
This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a percentage.
The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts decreased to 2.9* in July.
4 As of July 31, 1989, there were a total of 1,466 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 42 of these items on hold awaiting parts.
, u___-____-__
4 8-
- Spare Parts Inventory Value
. M
' i
'1' o
7-n s
0 y
D n
. ]
6-a r.
- S 5
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of July, 1989 was reported as $7,063,400. _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ -
400-
{
- Spare Parts Issued o
u s
300-a n
d
~
s 200-o f
D o
1 100-1 a
r s
0 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during July, 1989 totaled $64,458. i
J 700-
- Total Modification PacLages Open 640 600-500-425 II300-
~j 400-200
'86 '87 '88 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications decreased by nine during the month of July.
CATEGORY MAY 89 JUN 89 JUL 89 Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 106 103 93 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 185 173 170 Design Engr. Backlog 0
0 0
Design Engr. In Progress 55 70 72 Construction Backlog /In Progress 45 43 44 Desion Encr. Update Backloc/In Procress 42 44 45 Total 433 433 424
, i
- - ------- ------_--- _ --_ _ a
Temporary Electrical Modifications M 60- Temporary Mecha'nical Modifications Nd ui e f 40-bi g_,,,,,g,,,_-A______g______g ra 20-
' N, - d '~
oi g
'f o 0
s Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 May 1989 M
25 E June 1989 o
Nd l
IJuly 1989 ui 20-mf b i ' 15-ec r a 10 o
[. E!_
d_
i s
0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12
> 12 Age in Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)
The top graph, Number of Temporary Modifications, displays a monthly trend of installed electrical and mechanical temporary modifications. There was a total of 29 electrical jumpers and 32 temporary mechanical jumpers existing in the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of July, 1989.
The bottom graph, Aae of Temporary Modifications, displays the age of all electrical and mechanical temporary modifications by months installed in the plant.. _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ - - - -
t 12'
- Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate 10-6-
7 r
e 8-q u
e i-y GOOD R
4 a
4-t.
2.5 e
1.6 1.7 2-0
'86
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Rates for 1986, 1987, and 1988 1939 are shown for the month of July RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE A recordable injury case is reported if Nuclear Production Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis.
There were zero recordable injury cases reported for the month of July. There have been a total of four recordable injury cases so far in 1989.
There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1988, eight reported in 1987, and four reported in 1986. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- Mi r Injury Reports Filed Per Month 30-25-M i
n 20-o r
~
15-g n
j u
10-r i
5-
-0 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH The Minor Injury Cases per Month indicator shows the number of minor injury cases each month involving OPPD employees.
During the month of July, 1989 there were a total of 8 minor injury cases reported.
There have been a total of 54 minor injury cases reported in 1989.
Wk' Y
l Licensee Event Reports l
l l Personnel Errors Reported in LERs
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 50-
.46 39 40 30-26 20-
'10-5 0
'86
'87_-
'88 Jan 'Feb Mar Apr May 'Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-1989 g
NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The Licensee Event Reports (LERs) are reported for the month that they are submitted to the NRC.
In July, 1989 there were 4 LERs submitted with 2 attributable to personnel error.
There have been 22 LERs reported so far in 1989 with only 7 attributable to personnel errors. ______-_-____-_-_
l 1 -l Nuclear Divisions Turnover Rate
- OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate,
. T-4-
-u r
n o
3-v.
e r
2-R a
.t-e 1
O Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality Division Division and Environmental Affairs PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rate for three Nuclear Divisions is shown for the last ten months.
The personnel turnover rate is plotted against the OPPD corporate turnover rate of 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last three years.
l l- - __- _ ___- _ _ _ _
l 600-llfdActualStaffing i
l Authorized Staffing 537 458 P 400-e r
s 0
n n
I e
l 216 1 200-197 l
43 45 0
3 Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality Division Division and Environmental Affairs STAFFING _ LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.
l
}
l I
l lSRO Initial Exam A SRO Requalif! cation Exam 100-e~s p 3 ea s ey,3 (R@yp l
$pj$;mt;{[bl1f nn) hMfl 7
g$y!!))lgl 80-p
~!'
y* d2 U1 F MW l
Q%
q;lTj'elr:qg 21 i
r syvhy P
1
[ glj
[.y!
p ggyg)
{f[((]j lf a
j 60-s n;
l.
b k n;. :
R
'^
f MYk'j H
a s
mu n
pdl4 3j t 40 U
8 1
fvc ?Qlk:
1 rwt o
6Q kNJ n;.
vw 20' 9'$t
- l No
$$ sf!
Initial gygg s
W Exams
- wg dk l
Taken
- ra 0
1987 1988 1989 SR0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO There were zero Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) exams taken in July.
OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Initial Exam Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE
% PASS RATIO, % PASS RATIO 100 100 March 87 100 June 87 80 February 83 100 100 67 March 88 April 88 300 100 July 88 67 April 89 100 May 89 I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
j r..
I
~
l IRO Initial Exas a.
E R0 Requalification Exam 100-i 80-t P
1 a
5-60-5
- R' a
t~i 40-o
~20 No Requal Exams-Taken 0--
1987 1988 1989 R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO There were zero Reactor Operator (RO) exams taken in July.
OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Initial Exam' Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE
% PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO 100 June 87 100 February 88 100 100 100 March 88 100 July 88 100 100 April 89 100 May 89
,w.
e i
4-E R0 Hot License Exams Administered I
lR0 Hot License Exams Passed N.
u 3-m b
e r
o 2-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS The R0 Hot License Exams indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed each month.
During the month of June, 1989, zero exams were administered.
This indicator is one month behind due to the time needed to collect and process the data.
l
'liotlines Initiated 507 Hotlines Closed M Hotlines Open Under 4 Weeks 45-E Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks
" 40-G b 35-e 3
r 30-o f 25-H 20-t EE 1 15-EE i
EE n 10- !
E e
E 2
t EE y
5-h 5
E w
E E
E O
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 HOTLINES This indicator was changed for the month of June, 1989. This indicator now shows the number of Hotlines initiated, the number of Hotlines closed, the number of Hotlines that remain open and are less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old.
During the month of July, 1989, there were 13 Hotlines initiated, 9 Hotlines closed, 8 Hotlines that remained open and were less than four weeks old, and 2 Hotlines that remained open and were older than four weeks old. -________-_____w
4-Planned C'lassroom Hours I
IActual Classroom Hours T-s h-3-
o u
s a
n d
s 2-o H
o u
l-r s
O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The Classroom (Instructor) Hours indicator was added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of March, 1989.
This indicator displays the number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
The planned classroom hours for January and February are low because Maintenance and General Employee Training were not figured into the schedule for these months.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting
~
month due to the time to collect and process the needed information.
-T-
l l
l Operations
~
25-Im Maintenance l
Chemistry and Radiation Protection Technical Support M General Employee Training T 20-E Other h
o u
s a
15-n d
Nh 10- l E
u r
5-s O
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 RTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.
Total Hours TRAINING MAY 1989 JUNE 1989 Operations 3,320 3,530 Maintenance 2,164 2,130 Chemistry and 1,644 2,167 Radiation Protection Technical Support 3,005 4,003 General Employee Training 1,928 3,200 Other 1.186 675 Total 13,255 15,705 _
i 1
- Violatiohs per 1000 Inspection Hours
-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 4
14 15-GOOD I
- I 10.6
+
9' o-=
ge o
e----c e--
o -
o o
o x
6-3-
0
'86
'87
'88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was calculated using the number of violations and the number of inspection hours from the months of December, 1988, through July, 1989.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 7.1 for the month of July, 1989.
There were two violations cited in three inspection reports for the month of July.
There have been a total of eighteen vi',1ations cited with 2,154 inspection hours in 1989.
The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.6. _.___.___ _-_ _ _________ -
i
- Total Outstanding DR/QR's Outstanding CR/QR's > Six Months Old E Outstanding DR/QR's That Are Modification Related 200-150-D R
/
Q R 100-g( N 51% hl'"%W&: rwa 50-mm
,:,g g
' W.;:m;;,yv._[
- qfygy..y;9;;py.
q{
gl : y f.;'((}[':g {'Qk'f:yxy:'y
- 5 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1988 1989 OUTSTANDING DEFICIENCY AND OUALITY REPORTS The Outstanding Deficiency and Quality Reports Indicator was changed for the month of May, 1989. This indicator now shows i
outstanding Deficiency and Quality reports that are associated with modifications.
As of the end of July,1989 there were 184 outstanding DR/0P's reports, 65 DR/QR's that are greater tnan six months old, and 9 DR/QR's that are modification related..- _-____-__ _ -__ __-_-___
4l
,!;jjll
)
)
)
)
1 2
1 4
(
(
(
(
S
'R 0
1 9
0 6
5 0
1 2
E 2
L DE s yd s 8 d en C
T wten8e rg Rs S
)
)
)
R oiuo9u ai N'
N 1
1 2
O hl si1 s s
R O
(
(
(
P
.I sast s
e Q'
E h
2 uia ni d
/
CT R
c w Q's o i
R RA 7
1 1
0 2
6 1
0 8
l i
)
,D ML 1
S o
i he d
n e 'R v n s O
h wh et
'R I
o' t
un 9
V E
xtQ iR 8
/f t E s
sa L
ir yR o aL afc sc
. 9
)
1 T
0 S
tbD t(
eoi ii N~
(
U a
r S r
l f
A S
md te s
a b
i s
CR R
enb t
eu n
I0 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 3
E e uamn r dp
'R g F/
V v scu u ei i
o IR o sinop tse Q S ND D
bif h
ath
/
e c ut R
E a
iel R G
~
)
)
)
)
U
)
D nha io s
I
)
)
)
s gt C d
f S'
1 2
4 2
6 1
6 S
e t
n o
t 'R
(
(
2
(
(
1 4
S i
h 'R Sst e ne a/
n is nQ
(
(
(
I T
R Q
u r v or cR D0 2
9 0
8 3
3 1
0 6
S
.(fsoE h
i a iD P/
1 9
1 3
5 1
N 9
orF ctf f
PR 2
O s
e e
il if i
8 trve e h
OD I
T re hs wde no 9
1 nw g
A obntn o
in~
L pmo e
scd So O
,euirc yR n a c
n i
I l
r oi i
a ot V
fL t ),
ru
-S uyev s
h 1
1 6
1 1
3 3
0 6
C J
eb thi)f s t
'R i
1 1
1 4
R i tD zi E
N fl Co r(e r s l
R' e
a
,t e L
oas s
tc e s s S
uu r (N r U
hQsi e
c nh die a
b a
ed h S
S t
r a rie u
t N
R ndefnm alh O
E on vfou h pt syn I
V ma A
m sl e i n hr CT n
s c
i o r a
RA 8
5 3
0 0
2 0
0 8
S e) o yi h c e snp se
.t NL 1
1 3
rng O
'R hs ir mt oo n
'o s
t 'R o m n a n
Rm I
0 i
8 V
/
rDv tos i
Q aCi s
d 8
R o(i
/ e n
'. 1 T f
Du ndn Rhw l
9 D
N T
s gye oa e DTo i
s e rl e
trd
.h A
N dt CR A
er rRob i pl 6
s d
go ta i
ds u 4
I0 C
npa d at ne o e e F/
1 0
2 0
0 1
0 0
4 I
u r f
l IR F
ae n
odw es a ND I
hR a us ci rs fA gi wt eis G
N c
eh a
I G
y yeRtr e
h w
S en o n a
r
,t s 'R S
I nc r c rne ad e'L E
eeta ai y e s rR R
S bia r E
D0 U
cl u e sin e
P/
8 3
8 1
9 0
0 0
9 S
siu s dh fo h Ld l
PR 3
5 5
1 4
3 1
4 R
afgs e c
'R i c
i t
n OD 1
3 E
he eAuda Qt t 4a Nu e ni V
D R
/ed
,d R
r y
l n
Ddn 9ns tec D
ofd o
i o 8an s
E to nihn i
c 9
o l
U a
altI t t
1,i o
S cr a
a n yd st r
/
S iee uy.t al n
,na A
t t
I dbcQb9s cda yol E
s n
n nmn 8
i e io R
n o
e S
l A
o C
m iuaed 9e ft ti u
n rh e1 h i as Jav i
s R
s utu t
nei l
L t
l
/ e s
/
s n
0 ies sd gps oC A
a a
ec s
g e
o
/
hhsysny i ea niR N. e i
na yn il s
t D
r c
cn e
n s
i R
TtAbiab Srb I vN 0
. p g
al cd y
ra A
a a
l T
O o
nl ne t
ect yc t
C l
ei er i
ei r yti o
N t
o te ga r
nno tif r
T U
n i
nv rp u
ihp eli e
F a
d i r ee c
gcp far h
l a
au mr e
neu aue t
P P
R MS EP S
ETS SQV O
LA S
A B
C D
E F
G H
,p jllI li ll
l'
]
j ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY Escalated enforcement includes level III, II, and I violations
)
issued-by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for deficiencies I
discovered at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also
{
includes civil penalties which are usually assessed with level III and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for the Fort Calhoun Station.
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
- 1. February 1985 Site Security Multiple Level IV and V Violations that were escalated to a Level III.
A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed.
- 2. April 1986 Qualification of_ Electrical Penetrations - Level III Violation.
No civil penalty was assessed.
- 3. May 1986 Radiological Protection Level III Violation.
No civil penalty was assessed.
- 4. December 1986 Physical Security - Level IV Violation.
A civil penalty of $15,000 was assessed.
- 5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation.
A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.
- 6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and Lack of Health Physics Coverage to Very High Radiation Areas Level III Violation.
A civil penalty of $75,000 was assessed.
- 7. February 1988 Design Evaluation, Design Implementation and Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action of Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 Level III Violations.
A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed.
- 8. May 1988 Unlocked very High Radiation Door and deficiencies identified in the Radiological Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations.
A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessed. _ _ _ _ -
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY (CONTINUED)
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
- 9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, SIRWT check valve test failures, and Safety Analysis for Operability - Level III violation.
A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.
- 10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted in a response.
No civil penalty was assessed.
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and management meetings held with the NRC.
RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
- 1. August 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in August. One meeting was held to discuss the security program while another meeting was held on the OPPD independent appraisal results.
- 2. October 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in October. One meeting was held concerning the security program while another meeting was held to discuss the training program and the radiation protection program.
- 3. November 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in November. One meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program while another was held to discuss Decay Heat Removal.
- 4. January 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January. This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security Plan.
- 5. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in February. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning the Radiological Protection Program.
- 6. February 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in February. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 7. April 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in April. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 8. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in May.
This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
l
- 9. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in July. This Enforcemer,t Conference was held concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-10 controller operability.. _ _ _ -
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS'0F INTEREST This section is intended to provide information on events which are significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a " heads-up" look at what is scheduled in the coming months.
The Fort Calhoun Station went critical on January 29, 1989 at 9:27 a.m.
The Fort Calhoun Station went on-line on January 31, 1989 at 4:46 p.m.
The 1990 refueling outage is scheduled for February, 15, 1990.
A Safety Enhancement Program meeting is scheduled in August to discern the status of procedures and their validation and verification approval.
The next Safety Audit and Review Committee (SARC)
Meetings are scheduled for September 12, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. and September 13, 1989, at 8:00 a.m.
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS AGEOFOUTSTANDINGMAINTENANCEWORKORbERS This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months.
AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders.
AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first sam)1e exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to 1:e back within limits.
CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS l
The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported.
CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY The percentage of a type of work performed by each craft during the reported month involving plant personnel.
DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts.
1 i i l
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
~
DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel supply system, lubricating oil system, starting air system, autostart controls, manual controls, and diesel generator breaker.
Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for
'the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual DG unit.
A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of this unit to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time period of 60 minutes.
A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergency or a valid test.
The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of the failures and the successful runs.
This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1". This is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station.
DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel.
DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue.
E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period.
1.______-_a
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuously at maximum capacity.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the'end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e.,
the unit is available but not in service.
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate.
Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.
Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days.
GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station.
3ROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in British Thermal Units (BTU) produced by the reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH).
HOTLINES The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - _
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation.
Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power.
The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.
IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays both the total volume of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) and the associated Curies discharged from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River.
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)
Item No. 36.
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicator ir, a breakdown of all open maintenance work orders by several categories.
MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.
MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamma and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.
i MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH The number of minor injury cases (short-form cases) involving 0 PPD employees. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - -
1 FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED The data plotted is the number of suspected and confirmed NPRDS component failures. The suspected NPRDS failures are designated as such on the applicable equipment Maintenance Work Order.
NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INP0 and implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station.
NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS 1
A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MW0) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of the out-of-service condition is not considered.
Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments.
NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error on the original LER submittal.
NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC inspection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspectwn was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for-operations and maintenance.
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS l
The number of Engineering Evaluation and Assistance Requests (EEAR'S) and authorized Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between Division Manager approval of an EEAR and the completion of the drawing update.
Form 'B' Backlog /In Progress The Form ' A' has been approved but the Form 'B' has not been signed off.
l l
I i
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
Minor Modification Backlog /In Progress Minor modifications that GSE has approved but the plant has not issued a Construction Package.
Modification Requests Being Reviewed The plant is revicwing these Modification Requests and will assign a year for construction to be completed or will submit an approval for cancellation.
GSE, Design Backlog The plant has assigned a year in which construction will be completed but GSE has not started design work.
GSE Design In Progress The plant has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and GSE design work is in progress. This also includes minor modifications for which the Form
'B' has been issued and GSE has not returned the Form 'D' to the plant.
Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Committee (SAC).
GSE Update Backlog /In Progress GSE has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated.
i
_P_ERCENT OF DR/0R'S GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS OLD This indicator displays the percentage of Deficiency Reports (DR's) and Quality Reports (QR's) that are greater than six months old.
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-rem.
i _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
~
PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, death, termination, transfers within the company, and part-time employees are not considered in turnover.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE This indicator is defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the scheduled interval.
PRIMARY ' SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The, percent of hours out of' limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month.
The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used.
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
The number of identified incidents, the number of opened incidents, and the number of closed incidents each month involving maintenance.
RATIO 0F HIGHEST PRIORITY MWO'S TO TGJAL MWO'S COMPLETED This indicator is defined as the ratio of the number of highest p)riority, non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders (priority 4 or 5 to the total number of non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders completed, expressed as a percentage.
RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours.
RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE)
The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked.
R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed for the month they were taken. -_ _-____
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIQ The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Reactor Operator (RO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations.
SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power.
The following equation is how the CPI is calculated:
CPI = ((Ka/I.2) + (Na/20) + (C1/20) + (50 /20) + (0 /10)) / 5 4
2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of; Ka = Steam Generator Blowdown Cation Conductivity Na = Steam Generator Blowdown Sodium Concentration Cl = Steam Generator Blowdown Chloride Concentration 50 Steam Generator Blowdown Sulfate Concentration 4 = Condensate Pump Discharge Dissolved Oxygen Concentration 02
=
SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period.
SPARE PARTS ISSVED The dollar value of the spare parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting period.
SR0 OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations. _ - - _ _
\\
3 FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems.
Temporary. configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical l
i blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&ID, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.
Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or 0)erating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless t1e jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is J
complete. Jumpers and blocks-installed in test or leb instruments are not considered as temporary modifications. Scaffolding is not considered a.
temporary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings.
TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Empl,oyee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels j
greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared.
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actuations) that occur while the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows:
Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution.
i l
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
UNPLANNED REACiUR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL (CONTINUED)
Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have re::ulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious.
Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control ~ room.
Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff) was equal to one.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations:
the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety (system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated.
Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolution.
The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks.
i l
l I
l ---
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste produced, in final form ready for burial, during a given period. It is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for dSposal, plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. The volume of radioactive waste that is not yet in final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing.
l.______-___ ____ _
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1989 performance goals.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1989 to 1992. The following table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next five years.
STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED
ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR YEAR (HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(HOURS)
(%)
(%)
1989(**)
7783 168 172 737 8760 84.4 2.1 1990(*)
7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1991(*)
7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0
0 8760 92.9 2.7
(**) The 1988 Refueling Outage continued into January, 1989
(*) Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITTCAL The 1989 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past three years of operation.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1989 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last five years.
GROSS HEAT RATE The 1989 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,500 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on the 1988 goal of 10,075 BTV/KWH less 20.6 MW(e) stated in memo TS-FC-83-233H, written on July 17, 1983. This states that operation without the governing (e)tage of s
the turbine results in a gross electrical output loss of 20.6 MW I L 1
J l
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR G0ALS (CONTINI)ED)
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1989 fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for approximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completed without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
The 1989 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 130 man-rem.
This goal was based on 50 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the month of January, 1989, and approximately 7.5 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the months of February, 1989, through December, 1989.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE The 1989 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 6,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager ~ of the Nuclear Production Division.
i DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1989 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1989.
l l
l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ -
FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE EVENT FROM T0 (MWH)
(MWH)
Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 Cycle 4 ~
12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 l
Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/15/90*
Twelfth Refueling 02/15/90*- 05/11/90*
Cycle 13 05/11/90*- 09/01/91*
- - Planned Dates - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
4 f:
FORT CALHOUN STATION
. PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS The _ following seven ' items are the current production and L operation
" records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.-
i
- 1. First Sustained Reaction............. August 5, 1973 (5:47 p.m.)
- 2. First Electricity Supplied to the. System..... August 25, 1973
- 3. Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973
- 4. Achieved Full Power (100%)............May.4,1974
- 5. Longest Run (477 days)
....-.......... June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27,1988 6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober.1987
- 7. Most Prdductive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH).... June 8,.1987 - Sept. 27, 1988 (Cycle.11):
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work. Orders.
CHAMPS I
Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts-CHAMPS i
Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Stultz Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Kobunski Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old CHAMPS Craft' Work Activity Peterson/Shrum Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Christensen Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log DisablingInjuryFrequencyRate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay DR/QRs Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Krieser Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray.
Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray Hotlines Gasper /Kobunski In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Peterson/Renaud Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz MaintenanceWorkOrderBacklog(CorrectiveNon-Outage CHAMPS Maintenance Work Order Breakdown CHAMPS Maintenance Overtime Feterson/Shrum Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Minor Injury Cases per Month Peterson/McFadden Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Fisicaro/Riva.
t.
PERFORMANCE-INDICATOR DATA' SOURCE-(CONTINUED) l
.I 1
Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments CHAMPS 1
Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs LER File Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Krieser l
Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding Modifications.
Jaworski/ Turner Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months'0ld Orr/Krieser PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumulative)
Peterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/Cagle Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Jaworski/Stultz Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance)
CHAMPS-Ratio of Highest Priority MW0s to Total MW0s Completed CHAMPS Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Shrum Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 Hot License Exams Gasper /Kobunski R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Fleuhr Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Stultz Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Fleuhr Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager Temporary Modifications Jumper Log Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Christensen Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Bilau - _ - _ -
u-REFERENCES-INPO Good. Practices OA-102,
" Performance ' Monitoring Management
.Information"
'IEEE. Standard '762, "IEEE 1 rial Use Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting. Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity"-
INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 O
e. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ -